The International Journal Of Engineering And Science (IJES)

|| Volume || 3 || Issue || 5 || Pages || 46-50 || 2014 ||

ISSN (e): 2319 1813 ISSN (p): 2319 1805
www.theijes.com The IJES Page 46
Quality and Utilization of Timber Species for Building
Construction in Minna, Nigeria
Adebara S. A
1
, Hassan Haruna
2
, Shittu M.B
3
, Anifowose M.A
4

1
Department of Civil Engineering, Federal Polytechnic, P.M.B 231, Ede. Osun State
2
Department of Building Technology Federal Polytechnic, P.M.B 231, Ede. Osun State
3
Department of Building Technology Federal Polytechnic, P.M.B 420, Offa. Kwara State
4
Department of Civil Engineering, Federal Polytechnic, P.M.B 420, Offa. Kwara State



---------------------------------------------------------ABSTRACT-------------------------------------------------
Lack of quality timber utilization for building construction in Minna formed the basis for this study. The specific
objectives were to identify the timber species utilized in Minna; to determine the most quality timber species
used in Minna metropolis and factors that influence the choice of a particular quality timber species.
Information was obtained through interviewing of traders and observing timber yards and construction sites.
Quality control measures in place were also investigated and ranking wise method was used to obtain the
nineteen (19) most quality timber species utilized in Minna metropolis.
It was observed that there are over 18 timber species on market without quality control measures;
where timber grading methods in Minna are mainly subjective with visual grading technique as the predominant
method of assessing timber quality. Timber intended for purpose should be based on subjective prescriptive
approaches. It was concluded that, the absent of quality timber standards has impended efficient utilization of
timber and has affected the market value and building construction industry. This is due to the poverty and
rapid population growth resulting to indecent cutting of trees in use for firewood and other domestic purposes,
deforestation, over cultivation, poor irrigation practices, resulting to the loss of biological and economic
productivity of the land.
KEYWORDS: Timber, Construction, Standard, Species, Deforestation, Irrigation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------
Date of Submission: 22 April 2014 Date of Publication: 10 May 2014
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
I. INTRODUCTION
Timber is the most useful and important material for construction in building without which entire
process is incomplete. Selecting timber is not an easy task as it seems to be, because timber has different type
and selecting the right material is an important key. Timber is again an expensive material to be incorporated in
a building for different purpose for which it should be necessarily be strong and tough. There are many useful
needs of timber during the construction of building such as in doors, windows, cupboards, cabinet and railings
which contribute a lot in the beautification and overall look of interiors. Timber has many other uses but which
type of timber should be used for right purpose is important to know because if timber used in construction
comes out to be of low quality then one may need replacement again and again. Timber while selecting should
be considered for its quality aspect which must be free from any decay like rotten, warp, knot, fungi and mold or
termite so that it would not give problem afterward. Before purchasing timber material for the construction, one
must be well informed regarding timber types and forms to select as a single knot can bring down the show of
whole wood work.
With wood utilization one should therefore, recognize the fact that properties of wood vary with
species age, site and environmental conditions. (Bowyer et al. 2003; Ishengoma et al. 2004) reported that Minna
and its surroundings are endowed with a variety of tree species in her natural forest and in recent there has been
an increase in the importation of tree species from southern part of the country and exotic trees species such as
Gmelina (Gmelina arborea), Neem tree (Azadiarata indica), Teak (Tectona grandis) etc. With a boom in the
construction sector resulting in over-exploitation and scarcity of well-known trees such as khaya senegalensis,
khaya grandifaliola etc. there is a shift to a diversity of species comprising unpopular species (Zzwa et. al.
2006b). In Minna, systematic approaches for predicting timber strength have not yet been employed. Yet these
Quality and Utilization of Timber Species for Building Construction in Minna, Nigeria
www.theijes.com The IJES Page 47
would assist timber dealers and consumer to have rough idea of timber quality at the outlet with proven track
record, a practice which unfortunately exerts pressure on well-known timber species leading to their scarcity and
abnormal prices. The dynamic nature of the building environment couple with population growth dwindling
wood resources globally that necessitate research into optimal use of multiple tree species with quality control
procedures (Leicester, 2002; Mackenzre et al.2005).
Ozden, (2008) revealed that, the relatively low priority given to environmental protection often leads to poor land
management decisions, which may result from specific economic conditions or inappropriate land laws or customs. In many
cases unregulated access to land resources may lead some individuals to maximize their own gain by over exploiting the land
at the expense of the community as whole. Human factors such as over-cultivation, overgrazing and over fuel wood
consumption are some of the causes of desertification that lead to the unavailability of quality timber species in Minna and
its surrounding. Odokonyero, (2005) attributed inaccurate dimension of sawn timber to poor condition of saws and poor
workmanship. Bill et al. (2004) and Zziwa et al. (2006c) stressed the economic importance of sorting timber according to its
strength quality at the time of merchandising and construction. Ishengoma et al. (1994) argue that in order to efficiently and
economically utilize various timber species detailed knowledge of their properties was necessary. This is in agreement with
Winandy (2002) who noted that users will increase their demand with more reliable and durable building materials available.
II. METHODOLOGY
Minna, the state capital of Niger State was chosen as a result of high concentration of construction
activities targeting various categories of people including low, medium and high income earners with
differences preferences and hence high likelihood of obtaining representative information on quality and
utilization of timber species for building construction. Interview of stake holders namely site engineers, saw
miller, timber dealer, and on site observation of timber yard and building sites were carried out. Three timber
yards were selected for studied; namely Shango, Maikunkele and Sayeko respectively. Emphasis was on
identification of quality timber species, most utilized timber and reason for preference of particular timber
species. Quality control measures in place were also investigated and Ranking wise method was used to obtain
the nineteen (19) most quality timber species utilized in Minna metropolis.
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The data collected was analyzed using pier wise ranking, deviation and Spearman statistical tool. Table 1 and 2
shows different timber species available and most commonly utilized quality timber species for building construction in
Minna metropolis. While basis for choice of timber species for building construction is presented in Figure 1 respectively.
1
6
1
2

N N
D
r
s
(1)
Where,
Summation

s
r Spearman
D Deviation
N Number of occurrence

It was observed that various timber species are utilized in the construction industry as shown in Table 2 but the
general trend was application of similar nominal dimension of different timber species for different structural applications.
Timber species such as Khaya Senegalensis (Africa mahogany Madachi), Berlina Grandiflora, (Berlina, Dokar Rafi), Afzelia
Africana (West Africa Albizza, Kawo) were being utilized as roofing timber, ceiling material, lintel, columns, and beams.
Market survey revealed that timber on market were characterize by variable dimension, non-uniformity in
thickness, width, length; non parallel edges and merchandise on the basis of appearance. An interview with engineer in one
of the construction site in Minna showed that timber for construction is classed as soft wood and hard woods or structural
timbers. Timber design is based on adopted or adapted foreign standards such as BS 5268:1999 on structural use of timber.
Building contractors had limited knowledge on timber as a unique construction material and customers were not keen on
quality assurances, few indicated awareness of its impact on structural integrity. At commercial outlets timber grading was
mainly subjective, base on negotiations between buyer and seller and also depending on the general quality supplied, which
varied with the sources and duration of stork. An interview with timber traders shows that there are no standard procedures
governing quality control measures in Minna; no strict rules and regulation regarding timber classification, grading and
pricing. It is further noted that in some cases timber design was based on experience rather than superiority in term of
strength base.
Quality and Utilization of Timber Species for Building Construction in Minna, Nigeria
www.theijes.com The IJES Page 48
Selection of timber species for structural application was generally based on availability, cost, customers
preference, strength and appearance, a procedure which were adequately used to assess the potential quality of timber
species. Majority (29%) of respondents revealed that choice of timber species was mainly influenced by availability and cost
(Figure 1). Customers preference perceived by majority timber dealers as a strength indicator was one of the considerations
in selection of timber species for construction purposes. More so, utilization of diverse species for building construction was
inappropriate since various species are not necessarily of the same strength.
The declining demand for quality timber has led to a shift to lesser known species (Table 1 and 2), not knowing
that strength properties might differ from those well-known species given the biological and anisotropic nature of wood. This
in agreement with Winandy (2002) who observed that forest resources issues would increasingly affect the building
materials used worldwide to an extent that usage will shift toward new species and composite rather than solid-sawn lumber.
However, this poses a threat to structural stability, especially when there is no strength of the newly introduced materials at
the design and construction stages. The lack of quality assurance mechanism in Minnas timber utilization sector is partly
responsible for material wastage, unsafe construction and low market value of some timbers.
Table 1 Different Timber species available in Minnas market
S/N BOTANICAL NAME HAUSA NAME NUPE NAME GWARI NKWA
NAME
STANDARD
NAME
1 Berlina Grandiflora Dokar Ra Fi Wuchi/ shichi Berlina
2 Piptadniastrum Dorowan Kurmi Lonchi Kari Dawadawa
3 Aubrevillea Kerstingi Dorowan Mahalba Lonchi
4 Antiaris Africana Farin Loko Lokoyi
5 Mitragyna Stipulosa Gayan Goro Fininbi
6 Triplochiton Seleroxylon Hannun Biyar Egwa gutsu
7 Afzelia Africana Kawo Pasan kori West Africa Albizza
8 Sterculia Oblonga Kunkun Rafi Yellow sterculia
9 Chlorophora Excele Loko Kochi Iroko
10 Khaya Senegalensis Madaci Pkache Guyi Africa Mahogani
11 Ptegota Macrocarpa Marken Kurmi Danchi boggi Darin
12 Khaya Grandifaliola Male Guyi
13 Tectona Grandis Tik (Poles)
14 Nauchlea Diderrichir Tafashiyar Kurmi Epuko Kutingbare
15 Terminalia Superba Baushen Kurmi Pkache batta Afra limba
16 Blighia Sapida Allele
17 Pterocarpus All Spp Madobiya Zanchi Modobia
18 Canarium Schweinfurthii Atile Stedia/ neem
19 Dalbergia Sisso Dalbijiya Goriba
20 Borassus Arethiopum Giginya Bagoyi
21 Vitex Doniana Daniya
22 Irvingia Gabonensis Hakokari
23 Diospyros Mespilformis Kanya Africa ebony
24 Albizia Zygia Tsintsiyar Kurmi Sokun
25 Daniellia Ogoa Maje Kurmi Danchi/ Sanchi Ogea
26 Danielilia Oliveri Maje Danchi Ogea
27 Sysygium Guineense Malmo Gori
28 Allanblackia All Sp Mangoro Kurmi Mungoro
29 Prosopis Africana Kirya Pkache
30 Vetellaria Paradoxum Kade Ekochi Koli Sheer butter
31 Acacia Abida Gawo Pakuri
32 Anona Senegatensis Gwandan Daji Nungberechi Jauri
33 Bomax Costatum Rimi Kochi
34 Anogeissus Leieo Marke (Iron Wood) Marke
35 Gmelina Arborea Malahina
36 Azadirata indica Dogon yaro Neemu Neem tree
37 Crocodylusn Cataphractus Kada Nakaraba








Quality and Utilization of Timber Species for Building Construction in Minna, Nigeria
www.theijes.com The IJES Page 49
Table 2: Most commonly utilized quality timber species for building construction in Minna metropolis.
S/N BOTANICAL
NAME
STANDAR
D NAME
HAUSA
NAME
NUPE
NAME
GWARI
NKWA
NAME
SOURCE OF
SUPPLY
1 Berlina Grandiflora Berlinia Dokar Rafi Wuchi/
shichi
Indigenous
2 Piptadniastrum Dorowan
Kurmi
Lonchi Kari Indigenous
3 Mitragyna Stipulosa Gayan Goro Fininbi Indigenous
4 Afzelia Africana West Africa
Albizza
Kawo Pasan
kori
Indigenous
5 Chlorophora Excele Iroko Loko Wuchi Indigenous
6 Khaya Senegalensis Africa
mahogany
Madaci Pkache Guyi Indigenous
7 Ptegota Macrocarpa Marken
Kurmi
Danchi
boggi
Darin Indigenous
8 Tectona Grandis Tik (Poles) Exotic (India,
Burma,
Thailaand, Java)
9 Blighia Sapida Allele Indigenous
10 Pterocarpus All Spp Madobia Madobiya Zanchi Indigenous
11 Diospyros
Mespilformis
Africa ebony Kanya Indigenous
12 Daniellia Ogoa Ogea Maje Kurmi Danchi/
Sanchi
Indigenous
13 Danielilia Oliveri Ogea Maje Danchi Indigenous
14 Allanblackia All Sp Mangoro
Kurmi
Mungoro Indigenous
15 Prosopis Africana Kirya Pkache Indigenous
16 Vetellaria Paradoxum Sheer butter Kade Ekochi Koli Indigenous
17 Acacia Abida Gawo Pakuri Indigenous
18 Bomax Costatum Rimi Kochi Indigenous
19 Anogeissus Leieo Marke (Iron
Wood)
Marke Indigenous
20 Gmelina Arborea Malahina Exotic (India)

Figure 1: Basis for choice of timber species for building construction


Quality and Utilization of Timber Species for Building Construction in Minna, Nigeria
www.theijes.com The IJES Page 50
IV. CONCLUSION
The chances of timber engineering and the use of timber as load-bearing material depend on the quality
criteria. The most important factor is the economical use of timber in order to increase its utilization in
construction and make it competitive in comparison to other constructional materials. Timber as a material for
supporting systems is an indicative orientation for the use of wood in further constructions. Therefore, all kinds
of wood and timber, from round wood to squared timber through composite sections made of boards and
squared timber, as well as glue-laminated timber, plywood, etc., especially when combined with other materials,
must be developed and employed. In order to take advantage of better qualities, one needs only to build in the
best pieces of timber in the most solicited construction elements. This requires the admission of non-destructive
testing equipments which can, like the Sylva test ultrasound method, determine single resistances much more
precisely; this goes for the elasticity modulus as well as for the modulus of rupture.
The study shows that there are limited numbers of quality timber species in Minna. Timber grading
methods in Minna are mainly subjective with visual grading technique as the predominant method of assessing
timber quality. Timber intended for purpose is based on subjective prescriptive approaches. The study also
revealed that due to the poverty and rapid population growth it lead to extension of farmland, overgrazing, bush
burning, cutting of trees to use for firewood and other domestic purposes, deforestation, over cultivation, poor
irrigation practices, inappropriate land use by the rural dwellers and these result to loss of biological and
economic productivity of the land. Therefore, there is need for Federal government to strengthen the capacity of
state government institutions and involvement of local people in collective decision making for effective
management of grazing land and trees as common pool resources. An initiative of poverty reduction strategies
with aim of diversification among the rural dwellers to reduce pressures on the dry land should be encouraged.
Equally, more effort to fuse agencies like National policy on the Environment 1999 under the supervision of
Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA), National Environmental Standard and Regulations
Enforcement Agencies (NESREA) to combat desertification should be carried out.
REFERENCES
[1] Bowyer, J. L., Shmulsky, R. And Haygreen J. G. (2003). An Introduction. Forest Products and Wood Science. Fourth Edition.
Iowa State Press.
[2] Erfurth, T. (1976) Product Development And The Choice And Effective Application Of Promotional Measures To Advance
The Wider Use Of Products From The Tropical Moist Forest. Fao, Rome.
[3] Erfurth, T. And Rusche H. (1976) The Marketing Of Tropical Wood. Fao. Rome.
[4] Ishengoma R. C., Gillah, P. R., Amartey S. A. And Kitojo D. H. (2004). Physical, Mechanical and Natural Decay
Resistance Properties Of Lesser Known And Lesser Utilized Diospyros Mespiliformis, Tyrachylobium Verrucosum And
Newtonia Paucijuga Timber Species From Tanzania. Holz Als Roh- Und Werkstoff Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. Issue:
Volume 62, Number 5; 387389.
[5] Ishengoma, R.C., Gillah, P.R. And Kimu, M. M. (1994). Properties Of Juvenile And Mature Wood Of Cupressus
Lusitanica Grown In Kawetire Forest Plantation, Mbeya- Tanzania. East African Agriculture And Forestry Journal. (1994) 59(4),
287292. Kityo, P.W.
[6] Leicester, R.H. (2001). Engineered Durability For Timber Construction. Progress In Structural Engineering & Materials. Vol. 3
(3):216227.
[7] Leicester, R.H. (2002). Future Directions Of Timber Engineering Research. CSIRO Division Of Building, Construction
And Engineering. NZ Timber Design Journal. Issue 4
[8] Mackenzie R. K. T., Smith R,.S. And Fairfield, C.A. (2005). New Directions For NDT In Forestry.British Institute Of Non-
Destructive Testing.
[9] Natterer, J., Herzog, Th., Volz, M., (1991): Holzbauatlas Zwei. Hrsg.Arbeitsgemeinschaft Holze.V. und Inst. f. int.
Architektur-Dokumentation. D-Mnchen. OE Nov 21, 1996
[10] Odokonyero, G. G. 0. (2005). Forest harvesting case study; pit sawn timber production in natural forests of Uganda.FAO
Publication.
[11] Towler, R.W. (1975). The Possibilities Of Increased Consumption Of The Lesser Known Tropical Hardwood Species.
Commonwealth Forestry Review. Vol. 54(3) And (4), Nos.161 And 162.
[12] Winandy J. E. (2002). Emerging Materials: What Will Durable Materials Look Like in 2020?
[13] Zziwa, A. Kizito, S. Banana, A. Y., Kaboggoza, J. R. S., Kambugu, R. K. and Sseremba O. E. (2006a). Production of
composite bricks from sawdust using Portland cement as a binder. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12(1): 3844 ISSN
1026-0919.
[14] Zziwa, A., Bukenya, M., Sseremba, O. E. and Kyeyune, R.K. (2006b). Non-traditional tree species used in the furniture
industry in Masaka District, central Uganda.Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences,12(1): 2937 ISSN 1026-0919.
[15] Zziwa, A., Kaboggoza, J.R.S., Mwakali, J.A. Banana A.Y., and Kyeyune, R.K. (2006c). Physical and mechanical properties
of some less utilised tropical timber tree species growing in Uganda.Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12(1): 5766 ISSN
1026-0919.