Thermal Bowing

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that simulation was used to analyze the cool down of a cryogenic transfer system to avoid issues like excessive thermal stresses and pipe bowing during the cool down process. Simulation also helped establish suitable mass flow rates and cool down sequences.

Simulation helped address two main problems - avoiding excessive thermal stresses in thick-walled components during cool down, and preventing the bowing of pipes with stratified liquid and gas cryogen. It also helped optimize flow rates and find improvement opportunities.

Thermal stresses were modeled using a radial discretization approach for cylindrical geometries like pipes and valves. Heat transfer was modeled using the Fourier equation with central differencing. A combination of 1D two-phase flow and heat conduction models were used to capture thermal stresses.

Simulation of Peak Stresses and Bowing Phenomena

during the Cool Down of a Cryogenic Transfer System


Hubertus Tummescheit

, Kristian Tuszynski

, Philipp Arnold

Modelon AB
,
Ideon cience Park, !"##$%& 'und, (eden
'inde Kryotechik A)

, *H"+,## P-un.en, (itzerland


Hubertus/Tummescheit0modelon/se, Kristian/Tuszynski0modelon/se
Abstract
An e1tension -or cryo.enic systems to the Air*ondi"
tionin. 'ibrary by Modelon (as used to analyze the
cool do(n o- a cryo.enic trans-er system (here
'inde Kryotechnolo.ie in P-un.en, (itzerland (as
the main contractor/ imulation (as used early in the
desi.n process to make sure that the system (as (ell
desi.ned -or a number o- cool"do(n scenarios/ !arly
detection o- problematic parts o- the system -or some
cool"do(n se2uences lead to chan.es in the pipin.
desi.n/ imulation (as also used to assess the ma1i"
mum thermal stresses durin. cool do(n and deter"
mine suitable mass -lo( rates/ Proper cool"do(n se"
2uences (ere established iterati3ely (ith the help o-
a combined simulation o- the cryo.enic t(o"phase
-lo(, the heat conduction in solid structures and the
resultin. thermal stresses/ The t(o main problems to
a3oid durin. cool do(n are 456 e1cessi3e thermal
stresses in thick"(alled components, and 4#6 bo(in.
o- pipes (ith li2uid cryo.en in the lo(er part o- a
lon., horizontal pipe (ith .aseous cryo.en abo3e/
T(o similar systems (here considered, one -or li2"
uid hydro.en, the other -or li2uid o1y.en/ 7ymola
and Modelica (ere choosen -or the pro8ect due to the
.ood multi"domain and multi"physics capabilities,
and the a3ailability o- model libraries that co3ered a
lar.e part o- the problem/
Keywords: Cryogenics, two-phase flow, transient
thermal stress simulation
1 Introduction
The Indian pace 9esearch :r.anization, I9:, is
buildin. and commissionin. a ne( cryo.enic en.ine
test ri. in their 'i2uid Propulsion Test *entre in Ma"
hendra.iri, Tamil ;adu/ The system under in3esti.a"
tion is the cryo.enic trans-er system -or the cryo"
.enic -luids hydro.en and o1y.en, used to trans-er
cryo.en -rom tankers into the run"tanks and -rom
both tankers and run tanks to the test ob8ects/ The
system is desi.ned -or a (ide ran.e o- pressures and
-lo( rates (hich leads to a rather comple1 o3erall
structure o- pipes, 3al3es and measurement e2uip"
ment/ imulations o- the system cool do(n (as used
early in the desi.n process to 3alidate the desi.n <
here the main issue is to a3oid bo(in. o- dead"end
pipes < and to -ind impro3ement potential -rom an
operational point o- 3ie(/ imulation (as also used
later on to establish suitable cool"do(n -lo( rates
and 3al3e se2uences that -ul-ill the t(o main re2uire"
ments= use as little cryo.en as possible -or cool do(n
(hile not e1ceedin. the ma1imum allo(ed thermal
stresses/
:btainin. the desired mass -lo( rates in a transient
t(o"phase -lo( system throu.hout the system is 3ery
di--icult because o- the enormous chan.e in densities
bet(een .aseous and li2uid cryo.en= the density ra"
tio can be up to 5=5&&&/ 7urin. the -illin. o- the sys"
tem (ith li2uid, de3iations bet(een local mass -lo(
rates and controlled rates at a 3al3e (ith one"phase
inlet conditions can be lar.e/ In the situations (hen
the control 3al3e is inside the t(o"phase re.ion, ac"
tual mass -lo( rates can not be controlled at all/
2 odeling of thermal stress in
cylindrical bodies
The model -or thermal stress is based on a radial dis"
cretization o- cylindrical .eometries both -or pipes
and 3al3es/ >or the bo(in. phenomenon, also a tan"
.ential discretization and, i- necessary an a1ial one
are added/ The ener.y balance o- a cylindrical slice
o- the pipe is based on the >ourier e2uation (ith a
central di--erence appro1imation o- the temperature
.radient and takes the temperature dependence o- the
heat capacity and thermal conducti3ity into account/
tresses are computed separately -or the stress intro"
duced throu.h temperature .radients and the me"
chanical stress due to the pressure inside the pipe/
The stress 3ectors are summed to compute a total
e2ui3alent stress/ The e2ui3alent stress reaches its
Simulation of Peak Stresses and Bowing Phenomena during the Cool Down of a Cryogenic Transfer System
The Modelica Association 693 Modelica 2008, March 3
rd
4
th
, 2008
ma1imum 3alue either on the inside o- the cylinder
or on the outside o- the cylinder/ The ratio o- the
ma1imum e2ui3alent stress and the yield stress is the
stress ratio/
The >ourier e2uation is .i3en by ?%@,
j
i
\
i
(
T
i
t
Cp
i
+
Cp
i
t
T
i
)
= A
i
T
i5
+B
i
T
i
+C
i
T
i+5
456
Ahere i = 2, 3 !r-" and !r is the discretization
number o- the material in radial direction/ The t(o
remainin. elements are .i3en by the boundary condi"
tions/
The calculation o- the >ourier coe--icients, A, B and
C -or a radial discretization is sho(n in e2uation #2$/
A
i
=
r
i
+r
i5
r
i
( r
i
r
i 5
)(r
i +5
r
i 5
)
B
i
=
r
i +5
+r
i
r
i
( r
i+5
r
i
)(r
i +5
r
i 5
)
C
i
=A
i
B
i
4#6
The a1ial heat conduction in the material is assumed
to be ne.li.ible/
To obtain the thermal stress distribution, three stress
components in tan.ential 4B6, radial 4r6 and a1ial 4z6
directions are calculated/ The .eneral stress e2ua"
tions are .i3en by

c
0
=
%o
(5+)r
#

|
r
#
+r
i
#
r
o
#
+r
i
#

r
i
r
o
T (r) r dr+

r
i
r
T (r) r drT ( r)r
#

c
r
=
%o
(5+) r
#

|
r
#
r
i
#
r
o
#
+r
i
#

r
i
r
o
T (r) r dr

r
i
r
T (r) r dr

c
&
=
%o
(5+)

|
#
r
o
#
+r
i
#

r
i
r
o
T (r) r drT (r )

4$6
(here % is the Coun. modulus, ' the linear e1pan"
sion coe--icient and ( the Poisson ratio/
By only calculatin. the thermal stress at the inner
and outer points o- the (all 4the ma1imum stress o- a
pipe is al(ays at one o- these points6 the e2uations
can be simpli-ied as=
c
0
i
=
%
5
o
5
(5+
5
)

|
TmT ( r
i
)

c
0
o
=
%
! r
o
! r
(5+
!r
)

|
TmT (r
o
)

c
&
i
=
%
5
o
5
(5+
5
)

|
TmT ( r
i
)

c
&
o
=
%
! r
o
! r
(5+
! r
)

|
TmT (r
o
)

c
r
i
=&, c
r
o
=&
4,6
Ahere Tm is the mean temperature o- the material
and 5 and ;r re-er to the innermost and outermost ra"
dial discretizations respecti3ely/
The e--ecti3e stress accordin. to Don"Mises theory
results in 4-rom ?%@6=
c
eff
=
.
c
0
#
+c
&
#
+c
r
#
(c
0
c
r
+c
0
c
&
+c
r
c
&
)
4E6
The stress"ratio is de-ined as the ratio o- e--ecti3e
stress to yield stress o- the material=
c
ratio
=
c
eff
c
)
4F6
The t(o di--erent problems analyzed later in the pa"
per need di--erent discretizations/
5/ The thermal stress analysis -rom cool"do(n
re2uires a t(o"dimensional model (ith radi"
al and a1ial discretizations to capture the lo"
cal thermal stresses alon. the pipe/
#/ The bo(in. problem re2uires a1ial and tan"
.ential discretizations to capture the di--er"
ent de-ormations on the top and bottom o- a
pipe (here the bottom is -illed (ith boilin.
li2uid and the top is -illed (ith saturated .as/
Both cases (ere captured (ith a sin.le model (ith
all $ discretizations, (here the ones that (ere not
needed (ere set to one element/
H. Tummescheit, K. Tuszynski, P. Arnold
The Modelica Association 694 Modelica 2008, March 3
rd
4
th
, 2008
! "low modeling
>or the t(o"phase -lo( in the pipes, a standard -inite
3olume method assumin. homo.eneous e2uilibrium
-lo( (as used as described in ?#@ and ?$@/ 7ue to the
partially 3iolent transients, a dynamic momentum
balance has been used -or some o- the simulations/
Heat trans-er needs to take into account the Gsub"
cooled boilin.H re.ime, (hich is important to(ards
the end o- the cool do(n and is present durin. a
lar.e -raction o- the o3erall cooldo(n time/ Pressure
drop models are -rom the standard literature like ?,@/
Properties -or o1y.en (ere implemented accordin.
to ?5@, hydro.en properties accordin. to ?+@, and the
results (ere compared to 9e-Prop by ;IT (hich
contains the same property models/
The main trade"o-- that has to be taken into account
is bet(een minimal cryo.en consumption -or cool"
do(n and a minimal cool do(n time/ The mass -lo(
is restricted by an upper limit, usually determined by
the ma1imum allo(able thermal stress, and a lo(er
limit/ The lo(er limit is de-ined by the Gnon"strati"
-ied -lo(H condition/ A stable phase separation (ith
li2uid -lo( on the bottom o- the pipe and .aseous
-lo( abo3e it results in di--erences in the heat trans"
-er rate o- about one order o- ma.nitude/ They may
lead to -aster cooldo(n on the bottom o- the pipe,
(hich may lead to bo(in./ The limit -or strati-ied
-lo( conditions -or cryo.ens has been in3esti.ated in
?I@/
It could be ar.ued that a homo.eneous e2uilibrium
model does not capture the physics o- the cool do(n
-lo( su--iciently accurate/ >or the main -ocus o- the
study, the thermal stress in the thick"(alled compo"
nents, it is not necessary to predict the -lo( and the
-lo("re.ime e1actly 4appart -rom a3oidin. strati-ied
-lo( conditions6, and there-ore (e do not belie3e
that a non"homo.eneous -lo( (ould impro3e the
2uality o- the results in a (ay that (ould 8usti-y the
much hi.her model comple1ity/
# $ow tem%erature %ro%erties
Both the thermal conducti3ity and the heat capacity
o- metal pipes .o to & at & de.rees Kel3in/ This has a
number o- surprisin. e--ects (hen the temperatures
are approachin. the lo(er limits 4ca/ #& K -or li2uid
hydro.en and ca/ +& K -or li2uid o1y.en6= the cold
parts o- metal pipes and 3al3es almost insulate the
remainin. (armer parts -rom the cryo.en, e--ecti3e"
ly slo(in. do(n the last part o- the cool do(n/
>ortunately detailed data -or metals used in cryo"
.enic trans-er systems is publicly a3ailable -rom
;IT 4;ational Institute -or tandards and Technol"
o.y6 3ia their (eb"based database, see ?+@/
*igure ": *low rate which predicts non-strati-
fied flow conditions for pipeline fluid +ualities
,elow-./ #li+uid and gas phase assumed saturated
at ,oiling point$, from 0-1
*igure 2: Thermal conducti2ity for steel 3"34
as a function of temperature
Simulation of Peak Stresses and Bowing Phenomena during the Cool Down of a Cryogenic Transfer System
The Modelica Association 695 Modelica 2008, March 3
rd
4
th
, 2008
& Thermal stress results
>or the e3aluation o- thermal stresses, a 5& m lon.
pipe (ith ca 5E& mm diameter 47; 5E&6 and ca +
mm (all thickness, material stainless steel $5F -or
o1y.en and $&, -or hydro.en, directly do(nstream
o- an open"close 3al3e that opens completely in #
seconds is in3esti.ated/ The results -or pipes .i3e a
.ood understandin. -or the situation o- the complete
system as they demonstrate (ell the di--erences
caused by the di--erent cryo.en properties The up"
stream properties are=
5/ 'i2uid o1y.en o- &/E MPa at I5 K/
#/ 'i2uid hydro.en o- &/E MPa at #5 K/
In both cases, the hi.hest stress is not directly do(n
$/ stream o- the 3al3e but a short distance into the pipe,
at a location (here the combination o- hi.h heat
trans-er coe--icient and lar.e T results in the com"
bination (ith the hi.hest heat -lo(/ The lon.itudinal
discretization is #& se.ments, the radial discretiza"
tion 5& se.ments -or pipes/
7i--erent phases o- cool do(n can be clearly dis"
tin.uished -rom the temperature tra8ectories/ The di-"
-erence bet(een hydro.en and o1y.en cool do(n is
also strikin., but becomes understandable once the
in-luences o- the di--erent thermophysical properties
o- the -luids and the metals are taken into considera"
tion/ ome o- the results are not entirely intuiti3e,
e/./ that the -irst part o- the pipe has initially lo(er
temperature than the do(nstream parts, but is the last
part to be cooled do(n entirely/
This is e1plainable -rom the chan.e o- the heat trans"
-er coe--icients o3er timeJtemperature= ob3iously the
-irst part o- the pipe is cooled do(n -aster at the be"
.innin., but the combination o- a cold (all 4metal
conducti3ity decreases (ith temperature6 and a lo(
heat trans-er coe--icient 4the be.innin. o- the pipe is
e1posed to sin.le phase li2uid -lo( at 3ery lo(
9eynolds numbers6/ This -act, combined (ith -urther
results omitted here, leads to the result that the cool
do(n time is independent o- the pipe len.th -or pipe
len.ths less than E& m/ The di--erences bet(een o1y"
.en and hydro.en cool do(n become clear (hen
lookin. in more detail at the re2uired ener.y -or the
metal cool do(n and the a3ailable speci-ic enthalpy
di--erences -or coolin. in di--erent phases, tabulated
in Table 5/ It is ob3ious that a much lar.er part o- the
cooldo(n is bet(een .as phase and metal -or hydro"
.en, both due to the lar.er ener.y content and the
lar.er temperature di--erence/ The .as phase cool
do(n has a lo(er heat trans-er coe--icient (hich
*igure 3: 5pecific heat capacity for steel 3"34
as a function of temperature
*igure .: Temperature o2er time with different
phases for a "6m low-pressure pipe during cool
down with a hydrogen mass flow of 62. 7g8s at
control 2al2e
*igure 9: Temperature o2er time with different
phases for a "6m high-pressure pipe during
cool down with an o:ygen mass flow of "; 7g8s
at control 2al2e
H. Tummescheit, K. Tuszynski, P. Arnold
The Modelica Association 696 Modelica 2008, March 3
rd
4
th
, 2008
leads to lo(er stress peaks in the material/ econdly,
the rapid cool"do(n (ith t(o"phase -lo( mostly
happens a-ter e--icient pre"coolin. (ith cold .as/
:3erall and a.ainst -irst intuition, coolin. do(n (ith
o1y.en poses hi.her risks in spite o- the lo(er tem"
perature di--erence/ ;ote also the temperature
Gbounce"backH o- the metal layer in contact (ith the
hydro.en a-ter the hydro.en in the pipe chan.es
-rom t(o"phase to li2uid/ This e--ect is caused by the
drastic drop in heat trans-er coe--icent in the pres"
ence o- much (armer outer layers in the pipe metal/
aterial '
%hase
(nergy content for com%lete
cooldown )from !1* + to *, + for
-
2
. 2,+ for /
2
0
teel $&, 101.5 kJ/kg
teel $5F 94.6 kJ/kg
Total h H
#
4158 kJ/kg
Total h :
#
391.2 kJ/kg
h H
# e3ap
$%$ kKJk.
h H
# .as
3785 kKJk.
h :
# e3ap
5I5/# kKJk.
h :
# .as
#&& kKJk.
Ta,le ": <ntegrated energy content comparison
The lar.est source o- uncertainty in the e3aluation o-
the stress ratio is the occurrence o- the Gboilin. cri"
sisH in t(o"phase heat trans-er at 3ery hi.h heat -lo(
rates/ Lnder such conditions, a thin layer o- .as at
the metal (all separates the boilin. li2uid -rom the
metal by an insulatin. layer, thus drastically reduc"
in. the heat -lo( and the resultin. thermal stresses/
*orrelations -or the occurrence o- the boilin. crisis
-or cryo.enic -luids are not 3ery reliable, data only
e1ists -or non"cryo.enic -luids/ In addition, the boil"
in. crisis condition -or cryo.enic coolin. occurs at
4almost6 constant temperature o- the hot side, (hich
is di--erent -orm the usual e1periments (ith rapid
heatin. and risin. temperature on the hot side/
Ahile this means that the e1act heat trans-er in
the 3icinity o- the boilin. crisis is di--icult, the
e1istin. correlations can nonetheless be used to
estimate the hi.hest reasonable heat trans-er co"
e--icient and thus the (orst case scenario -or the
thermal stresses in the metal (all/ The results in
>i.ure F -or a hi.h pressure pipe sho( that the
combination o- (orst case assumptions 4-irst
se.ments o- pipe that is sub8ect to t(o"phase
heat trans-er -rom the start and hi.h coe--icinent
o- heat trans-er6 lead to stress ratios close to the
permissible limit/ The stress ratio plot in >i.ure
F also sho(s that locations -urther do(nstream
are sub8ect to lo(er stress due to pre"coolin.
(ith cold .as/ The stress peaks (iden and the
le3el decreases as the t(o"phase zone (idens
-urther do(nstream/ A sensiti3ity study (as
conducted (ith repect to the most important pa"
rameters -or the stress calculation, amon. others,
the heat trans-er coe--icient, and the result (as
that the ma1imum heat trans-er coe--icient had a
ne.li.ible e--ect on the stress ratio/ >or 3al3es,
due to the much thicker metal (alls, the stress
ratio e1ceeds 5/& locally and -or brie- times/
*ryo.enic 3al3es sur3i3e these conditions, but
the hi.h thermal stress leads to local de-orma"
tions and Gcold hardenin.H, but is -ar -rom 3al"
ues that (ould cause complete material -ailure/
Ahile it is not possible to a3oid these conditions
e3ery(here in the system, the operation o- the
plant can be adapted to minimize the number o-
times and locations that are sub8ect to the e1"
treme conditions/ It (as, ho(e3er, possible to
a3oid the se3ere thermal stress conditions -or
3al3es in the hi.h pressure part o- the system/
*igure 3: 5tress ration along o:ygen pipe di-
rectly after 2al2e without any pre-cooling
Simulation of Peak Stresses and Bowing Phenomena during the Cool Down of a Cryogenic Transfer System
The Modelica Association 697 Modelica 2008, March 3
rd
4
th
, 2008
1 Pi%e Bowing
The calculation o- the pipe bendin. due to the tem"
perature di--erence at the top and bottom o- the pipe,
(hen -illin. (ith cold li2uid, is done (ith the -ol"
lo(in. assumptions=
Pipes are considered strai.ht,
The pipes are -i1ed at the lo(er end points
(ith a .lidin. support at one end to compen"
sate -or lon.itudinal len.th chan.e,
Both radial and circum-erential heat trans-er
is taken into consideration in the (all, a1ial
heat trans-er is ne.lected due to a1ial sym"
metry/
The li2uid cross section area in the pipe is calculated
accordin. to #"$=
A
li+
=acos(5
4
li+
r
pipe
)r
pipe
#
+( 4
li+
r
pipe
)

.
#r
pipe
4
li+
4
li+
#
456
The li2uid 3olume is computed -rom the mass -lo(
into the horizontal pipe, assumed to end at a closed
3al3e/ The mass -lo( into the pipe is taken -rom a
prior cooldo(n simulation, at the position o- the hor"
izontally connected pipe/
imulations use t(o heat trans-er coe--icients, one
-or the part o- the (all that is in contact (ith li2uid
and the other -or the part that is in contact (ith the
.as/ The .as temperature has 3ery little in-luence on
the o3erall result because o- the lo( heat trans-er co"
e--icient bet(een .as and pipe (all/ 7ue to the boil"
in. li2uid underneath it (ill (ithin short time a-ter
li2uid cryo.en is at the bottom reach the saturation
temperature/
To calculate the heat trans-er to the (all the actual
li2uid le3el is used to -ind the len.th o- a discretiza"
tion that is co3ered by li2uid 4i- any6 and the heat
trans-er is proportional to this 3alue=

==7
li+
(T
wall
T
li+
)A
>T

4
li+
4
?,ottom
4
?top
4
?,ottom
+7
gas
(T
wall
T
gas
)A
>T
(5
4
li+
4
?,ottom
4
?top
4
?,ottom
)
(here A
>T
is the heat trans-er area, 4
?,ottom
is the
len.th -rom the bottom o- the pipe to the lo(er
boundary o- a discretization, 4
?top
is the len.th -rom
the bottom o- the pipe to the top boundary o- a dis"
cretization, 7
li+
is the heat trans-er coe--icient (hen in
contact (ith li2uid and 7
gas
is the heat trans-er coe--i"
cient (hen in contact (ith the .as/ ;ote that the
(ei.hted heat trans-er area is a linearization o- the
inner pipe area -raction around the middle o- a cir"
cum-erential section and should thus only be used -or
relati3ely hi.h discretization 45F (ere considered
su--icient6/
Ahen calculatin. the pipe bendin. only the len.th
chan.e at the top 4element , and E in >i.ure E6 and
bottom 45 and + in >i.ure E6 o- the pipe is taken into
consideration/ The len.th chan.e is calculated
throu.h=
A4=4o(T
wall
)
4,6
(here o is the linear e1pansion coe--icient o- the
material/
4ift =rh 4E6
r=
4/ #
sin(o)
and sin(o)=
&
d
4F6
*igure .: Circumferential discreti&ation of the wall
#defined ,y user$
%
5
#
$
, E
F
+
*igure 9: @ipe ,ending
d
z
M
M
r
'
'i-t
h
H. Tummescheit, K. Tuszynski, P. Arnold
The Modelica Association 698 Modelica 2008, March 3
rd
4
th
, 2008
h=
4/ #
tan (o)
4%6
#.$, #3$ and #;$ yields,
4ift =
4
#
(
d
&

5
tan( o)
)
4+6
I- the li-t (ould reach hi.h 3alues o- se3eral cen"
timeters, the in-luence o- the li-t on the local le3el
and heat trans-er (ould ha3e to be taken into ac"
count, but such 3alues are outside o- the permissible
ran.e any(ays/
The (orst case encountered in the -inal modi-ied
3ersion o- the plant dia.ram (as -or a dead end o-
sli.hly less than , m len.th and a -illin. time -orm
empty to -ull o- about 55 minutes/ The (orst li-t (as
#/+ cm, a tolerable amount, and the (orst case stress
ratio usin. an e2ui3alent stress -rom the -ull three"di"
mensional stress tensor (as around &/,E/ The len.th
o- the pipe has the (orst e--ect on bo(in. as it e-"
-ects both the .eometry and the e1posure time, and
dead end pipes lon.er than , m (ould 2uickly cause
inacceptable bo(in./
2 Com%utational effort
>or cooldo(n scenarios o- the lar.er plant se.ments,
the computational e--ort (as 3ery hi.h= -or the most
comple1 se.ments o- the plant cooldo(n, *PL"times
o- $", days (ere necessary -or each simulation case,
and most o- the (ork is spent durin. the -irst -e(
seconds o- simulation time/ 7ymolaNs 3ersion o- the
dassl sol3er only mana.ed to sur3i3e the initial time
(ithout error (hen the option Ge2uidistant output
.ridH (as s(itched o--/ This in turn lead to result
-iles o- around 5)B that could not be handled by
7ymola and made postprocessin. 3ery tedious/
:3erall, -or system simulations o- the le3el o- com"
ple1ity encountered durin. the cool do(n simula"
tions, Ae see the -ollo(in. tool re2uirements -or
lar.e scale system simulations (ith short periods o-
3ery sharp .radients=
5/ A -ine .rained control o3er ho( many 3ari"
ables are stored and ho( o-ten they are
stored that does not in-luence the step"size
control al.orithm/ 7ymolaNs 7assl is a bad
e1ample o- a sol3er that takes the stora.e in"
ter3al into account in a (ay that lets simula"
tions -ail -or a small step size to stora.e in"
ter3al ratio/
#/ Means to in-luence step size control durin.
e1treme .radients under short time, or set a
minimum step size and .et (arnin.s in the
lo. (hen the re2uested accuracy (as not
achie3ed/
$/ Impro3ed numerical debu..in. -acilities/
7ymolaNs current debu..in. -acilities -or nu"
merical problems in lar.e models are insu--i"
cient/
* Conclusions
Modelica is not primarily kno(n -or its stren.th -or
modelin. partial di--erential e2uations, but due to its
suitability -or system le3el simulations, there are sit"
uations in (hich Modelica and 7ymola are an e1cel"
lent tool e3en -or models that re2uire a -ull $"dimen"
sional P7! discretization, under the contraint that
this only (orks -or simple .eometries/ In particular
the heat conduction e2uation (ith its simple struc"
ture can be combined (ith 5"dimensional t(o phase
-lo( -or thermal stress calculations/ The key ad3an"
ta.e is that it is possible to capture the most critical
thermal stress situation (ithin a comple1 plant (ith"
out the need to resort to co"simulation, or di--icult to
assess assumptions/
This simulation study re.ardin. cool do(n o- a cryo"
.enic trans-er system (as able to achie3e a number
o- .oals, in part because simulation (as used already
early in the desi.n process=
5/ It (as possible to establish desi.n .uidelines
re.ardin. dead pipe ends at closed branches
o- the net(ork to a3oid pipe bo(in./ The
.uidelines (ere incorporated in later re3i"
sions o- the desi.n/
#/ >lo( rates (ere optimized (ith respect to
the contradictory .oals o- minimum cryo.en
consumption and a3oidance o- strati-ied
-lo( conditions/
$/ imulation results allo(ed to de3ise cool
do(n se2uences that substantially decreased
the thermal stress -or all parts in the plant
e1cept the parts closest to the tanker used -or
-illin./
There are situations in (hich there is no possibility
to 3alidate simulations a.ainst measurements/ In
spite o- that shortcomin., simulation .i3es important
insi.ht into system beha3iour and e3en allo(s to im"
pro3e both system desi.n and system operation/
!3en 2uantitati3e analysis is possible to a certain de"
.ree (hen important parameters are (ell understood
and a care-ul sensiti3ity analysis is conducted (ith
respect to such parameters/
*ryo.enic plant simulations, e3en under the 3iolent
transients that occur durin. cool do(n o- trans-er
Simulation of Peak Stresses and Bowing Phenomena during the Cool Down of a Cryogenic Transfer System
The Modelica Association 699 Modelica 2008, March 3
rd
4
th
, 2008
lines, can be modeled easily (ith the cryo.enic op"
tion o- the Air*onditionin. 'ibrary/
3eferences
?5@ S%an. 34. Multiparameter !2uations o-
tate/ An Accurate ource o- Thermodynamic
Property 7ata, prin.er, Berlin, #&&&/
?#@ Tummescheit. /45 ?esign and <mplementa-
tion of A,Bect-Ariented Codel 4i,raries using
Codelica, 7issertation, T>9T"5&F$"!, 7epart"
ment o- Automatic *ontrol, 'und Inst/ o- Tech"
nolo.y, 'und, ch(eden, #&&#/
?$@ Tummescheit. /4. (born. 64 und Pr7l8. +45
Air*onditionin. < a Modelica 'ibrary -or 7yna"
mic imulation o- A* ystems, in Proceedings
of the 9th <nternational Codelica Conference,
Hambur., pp/ 5+E < 5I#, #&&E/
?,@ 9DI:;esellschaft 9erfahrenstechnik und
Chemiewesen 4!ditor6, D7I"AOrmeatlas, I
th
!di"
tion, prin.er, Berlin, #&&#
?E@ 9ersteeg. /4 +4 and alalasekera. </, An In"
troduction to *omputational >luid 7ynamics < The
>inite Dolume Method, Prentice Hall, 5IIE/
?F@ $emmon. (4, The 9e-Prop Lser manual, 3ersion
%/5, Personal communication ee also in-ormation
on 3ersion %/& at http=JJ(((/nist/.o3JsrdJnist#$/htm
4accessed #&&E"55"5E6/
?%@ "au%le 64/4, "isher "4(4, !n.ineerin. 7e"
si.n"A ynthesis o- tress Analysis and Material
!n.ineerin., Ailey, ;e( Cork, 5I+5/
?+@ http=JJ*ryo.enics/nist/.o3/ Accessed :ctober
#&&E/
?+@ =ounglo>e. B4A4, Thermophysical Properties
o- >luids/ I/ Ar.on, !thylene, Parahydro.en, ;i"
tro.en, ;itro.en Tri-luoride, and :1y.en, K/
Phys/ *hem/ 9e-/ 7ata, Dol/ 55, uppl/ 5, pp/
5"55, 5I+#/
?I@ D4/4 $iebenberg. 64+4 ?o>ak. "464 (des:
kuty= *ooldo(n o- *ryo.enic Trans-er ystems,
AIAA Paper ;o/ F%",%E/
H. Tummescheit, K. Tuszynski, P. Arnold
The Modelica Association 700 Modelica 2008, March 3
rd
4
th
, 2008

You might also like