Postmodernist Fabulation

International Journal of English and Education
ISSN: 2278-4012, Volume:2, Issue:2, APRIL 2013

478

Copyrig! I"!er"#!io"#l $our"#l o% &"glis #"' &'u(#!io" ) ***+i,ee+org

Jeanette Wintersons Fiction: A Postmodernist Fabulation
Isha Malhotra
Assistant Professor
Central University of Jammu

Abstract: The present paper examines Jeanette Wintersons works in relation to
postmodern theories of narrative and history and, critically analyses the
indeterminate identity of the subjective narrator. It explores how Winterson in her
oeuvre has self-consciously explored the ambiguous status of objective reality and has
also questioned the suppositions about narratorial identity. Her use of deconstructive
strategies to interrogate the assumptions about sex and gender and her deconstruction
of binary oppositions like fiction/history, art/lies and male/female also form a purview
of this study. A detailed postmodernist analysis of her novels Sexing the Cherry and
Written on the Body is made to exemplify postmodern aesthetics and the high degrees
of self-reflexivity, pastiche and intertexuality in her works. In addition to it, the
postmodern themes of constructed and performative nature of identity, gender and
sexuality is also looked at in these works.
Key texts: Sexing the Cherry, Written on the Body
Key Words: postmodernism, deconstruction, historiographic metafiction, binary
oppositions
Jeanette Winterson is a prominent contemporary British writer who self-consciously
explores the ambiguous status of objective reality in her works. Her postmodern credentials have
never been in doubt and since her debut novel Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit (1984), she has
been widely described in academe as a part of British postmodern stylists which includes Angela
Carter, Martin Amis and Salman Rushdie. The metafictional assumptions about narratorial
identity and fictional artifice are continuously questioned in her fiction. She produces fictional
narratives that deconstruct deep-rooted cultural binaries and hierarchical discourses, presenting a
crisis of legitimation. Postmodern fiction reveals how the past is always ideologically and
discursively constructed, what Linda Hutcheon describes as historiographic metafiction, that
narratives foreground the recognition and narrative is not objective and that any representation
of history is always an ideologically laden discourse. (Grice and Woods 27). It is a fiction that
is directed both inward and outward, concerned with its status as fiction, narrative or language,
and also grounded in some historical reality. Postmodernism tends to use and abuse, install but
also subvert conventions through the use of either irony or parody. (Woods 56) The stories and
narratives of postmodernist writers push at and play with the limits of fictionality and become
complex forms of complicity between author, text and reader. Such fiction shows a plurality of
forms, skepticism towards generic types and categories, ironic inversions with a strong
47-


inclination towards pastiche and parody, and a metafictional insistence on the unpredictability of
the texts power to signify.
Winterson in her fiction constantly foregrounds narrativity, whether it is in the pattern of
narrative or in the fictional representation of history. In an interview she once said: People have
an enormous need to separate history, which is fact, from storytelling, which is not factand
the whole push of my work has been to say, you cannot know which is which. (Harthill 1990).
Her refrain throughout her novel The Passion says, Im telling you stories. Trust me points
directly to her assertion that the world is both fictive and historical. Similarly, Wintersons
fictional works such as The Passion, Sexing the Cherry and Written on the Body combines the
self-referentiality characteristic of metafiction and the pleasure in epistemological hesitation
characteristic of the fantastic with a seemingly contradictory realism-enhancing interest in
history and the traditional aspect of storytelling. Her novels not only seek to change the world,
but to make one from language. Fiction, therefore, is no longer mimetic in her works but
constructive and representation is no longer to be seen as a form of mirror-like reflection, but
more a form of construction, of creating something new. So, postmodern fiction seeks to insert
the crevices of history, censored, forgotten, marginalized or otherwise eccentric aspects, and
makes its narratives by supplementing history, by filling it out. (Grice and Woods 31).In The
PowerBook section of her website she cautions that:
We cant go on writing traditional nineteenth century fiction, we have to recognise that
modernism and postmodernism have changed the map, and any writer worth their weight
in floppy discs will want to go on changing that map. I dont want to be a curator in the
museum of Literature, I want to be part of what happens next.
The literary evolution the part of what happens next necessarily involves postmodernism,
and Wintersons relationship to postmodernism remains complex, a contested category. On the
one hand, postmodernism conflicts with the more materialist, lesbian-feminist matrix of
Wintersons work and on the other, her novels exemplify postmodern aesthetics, revealing high
degrees of self-reflexivity, pastiche and intertexuality in addition to frequent mimetic and
temporal dispersions. Her dominant themes and tropes which include existential contingency and
spectacle, the performative nature of gender and identity, and the ontological burdens of love are
also quintessentially postmodern.
In numerous essays Winterson has attacked the tenets of classical realism, and over the
course of ten novels she has evolved a signature blend of postmodern prose, a mlange of Linda
Hutcheons historiographic metafiction, Diane Elams postmodern romance and Amy J.
Eliass metahistorical romance. (Keulks 147). In Art Objects, which is a theoretical
manifeastation of her works, Winterson claims that she does not write novels and that the
novel form is finished. (191) By novel she means a wholly realistic genre, born alongside the
development of patriarchal humanism in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, achieving its
480


height in the Victorian period and its point of exhaustion with the advent of modernism. What
Winterson seems to dislike, then, is the banality of the Victorian attitude to art, which she
describes as the absurd attempt of Victorian writers to transform art into a version of everyday
reality. (31). Her suspicion of realism is so visible that she is ready to forego one of her most
valuable and distinctive gift, that of storytelling. Thus, she self-consciously justifies the inclusion
of stories within stories in her fiction as a trap for the readers attention, insisting that she is
not particularly interested in folk tales and that she is a writer who does not use plot as an
engine or foundation. (189).
Although, Wintersons themes range widely, conforming the richness of her
imagination, yet, the quest for the self or identity is one of the central themes of her fiction, for it
is through them that Winterson attempts the metaphorical mapping of the self that resides at the
base of her fiction as well as postmodernism itself. Moreover, there is always one theme to
which she invariably returns: the power of stories to shape desire, to defend against the weight of
inevitable loss and to move towards love. Love is a grand-narrative that occupies a
predominant position in Wintersons trope and re-occurs quite frequently in Wintersons ouevre.
Winterson told her former partner, the Australian critic Margaret Reynolds in an interview that,
in her work, the same themes do occur and return, disappear, come back amplified or modified,
changed in some way, because its been my journey, its the journey of my imagination, its the
journey of my soul in those books. (Andermahr 7)
Wintersons work has always pushed at the boundaries of storytelling in order to stretch
language, to show what language can do. Her concern with the transgressive clearly includes
crossing and re-crossing the conventional limits of narrative. And as she highlights the
fictionality of her work so she also foregrounds the practices of reading. Winterson is archly
aware of the fact that her books only take on existence when read; that is, that reading re/creates
the text: When I talk about writing I have to always come back to reading (2006). In Art
Objects (1996) Winterson convincingly argues that reading is itself an art, one that is difficult to
acquire and has to be practiced and refined. The non-linear narratives and temporal eclecticism
in her novels insist that the reader is conscious of the practice being enacted; indeed, Winterson
deliberately makes her readers aware of the fact that one is reading, Im telling you stories. In
addition to the ways in which her novels make the reader work, Wintersons characters
themselves are often readers and their reading skills, or lack of them, become central to the
unfolding of story/ies. Thus reading is highlighted in two different ways one, the texts demand
attention and interaction from the reader and simultaneously the texts explicitly represent readers
and reading. Another very pertinent aspect that has to be kept in mind is Wintersons own
reading and her representation of canonical works. Her writing abounds with intertextuality and
literary allusion as she reworks both traditional stories and traditions of storytelling. These
aspects work together to blur the conventional distinctions between author, reader and text. The
481


author is also the re/reader; the reader writes the work; the text is a site that shifts its
significance, that is continuously in flux. (Carpenter 70).
It seems unnecessary to state that in Wintersons works, writing and reading are
inextricably linked. The connection is not, however, always explicitly made. Wintersons novels
demand that the reader is active and engaged. In Barthesian terms her work broadly conforms to
the characteristics of the writerly text in that reader is not a passive recipient of the story but
rather participates in the creation of meaning. The readers relationship with the text fluctuates
and thus interpretation remains open-ended, this will become clear by a postmodernist reading of
her works Sexing the Cherry and Written on the Body.
Sexing the Cherry
Wintersons fiction constantly rewrites history and myths. Sexing the Cherry describes
how the narrator constantly feels her subjectivity escapes her, the narratorial I in the novel
shifts, from the Dog Woman to her son Jordan. In Sexing the Cherry, the narrators Dog Woman
and Jordan are autodiegetic, that is, they are both narrators as well as protagonists, reporting their
life stories in retrospect in a manner characteristic of Buildungsroman. Thus, the novel
simultaneously moves in two opposite directions. On the one hand, the physical journey of
narrator progresses from past to present along a chronological time. On the other hand, their
minds move backwards as they try to recover the lost memories and repressed desires of a past
that seems fragmentary and incomprehensible to them. As early as 1994, Paulina Palmer situated
Jeanette Winterson with Margaret Atwood and Angela Carter in a postmodernist trend
characterized by the delination of subjectivity as fractured and decentred. (Palmer 181) In
Sexing the Cherry, explorations into the nature of subjectivity lead to theories of the self as able
to transcend time and space in the construction of a new concept of time and space as flexible
and at the command of the self: Time has no meaning, space and place have no meaning, on this
journey. All times can be inhabited, all places visited. In a single day the mind can make a
millpond of the oceans. (80) The novel concerns spaces that remain as yet undiscovered despite
the explorations taken by humans on earth. This in turn affects the conception of time in the
novel, as it repeatedly dislocates our conventional understanding of time, questioning the
metaphysical conceptions of time erected by language. Within this dislocation of space-time, the
novel asks one of the central postmodern questions about the relativity and certainty of
epistemology: Maps are being re-made as knowledge appears to increase. But is knowledge
increasing or is detail accumulating?(81) Wintersons world is not simply one of facts, but one
of stories and narratives, which are folded within each other; hence, the realms of the aesthetic
and the imagination assume a new importance. The novel extols the realm of the aesthetic, set
against the pure empirical world, realizing the realm of the imagination to form other important
and acceptable places that need exploring. Sexing the Cherry is about the insertion of fantasy into
what is taken to be reality, or history, and the supposed fixed oppositions of these two categories.
482


What appears to be a history of the English Civil War, and the early seventeenth century, turns
out to hide the myths of the Dog Woman and the twelve dancing princesses.
The magic is a way of decentring the realism, or suggesting an alternative way of life.
Winterson is always interested in those aspects that are covered up by narratives. At the
beginning of her novel Sexing the Cherry, the protagonist states:
Every journey conceals another journey within its lines: the path not taken and the
forgotten angle. These are journeys I wish to record I wish to record. Not the ones I
made, but the ones I might have made, or perhaps did make in some other place or time.
(2)
The defining characterstic of postmodernist art is its paradoxical nature, its deliberate
refusal to resolve contradictions and to raise questions about or render problematic the
commonsensical and the natural. Indeed Sexing the Cherry may be set to belong to Hutcheons
category of historiographic metafiction, a paradoxical type of postmodernist novel that
combines self reflexivity with history. Thus, its main story line is situated in the 17
th
century,
at a time of extraordinary upheaval in English history, but the historical events that take place in
Sexing the Cherry are not focused from the generalist and totalitarian prospective required by
world history but rather from the subjective prospective of two marginal narrator characters, a
huge dog breeder who lives by the bank of the Thames, nicknamed the Dog Woman, and her
foundling son, Jordan.
The fact that Jordan can cross the boundary separating the world of common day reality
from the world of fantasy suggests the complementarity and reversibility of real and the unreal,
of the imagined and the actually lived. Moreover, the merging of events and characters widely
separated in time in what appears to be an atemporal present successfully challenges the
chronological notions of past, present and future in favour of the cyclical temporality of myth.
Further, the weird coexistence of real and fantastic worlds is reflected in the paradoxical
characterisation of the Dog Woman and Jordan. While the young man has a perfectly normal
physical appearance, his narration is wholly concerned with his travels to unreal cities and his
relationship with fantastic characters. By contrast, the Dog Woman in Sexing the Cherry is
described as a flexible materialist and has never travelled beyond London and is a fantastically
huge giantess, who, like the awe-inspiring ogres in fairytales, has murdered or maimed
thousands of men, including her own father. (107) She herself constantly alludes to her
grotesque Swiftean parentage. For instance, she refers to her body as the mountain of my flesh,
and when a frustrated lover complains that she is too big for sex, she resorts that all her bodily
parts are all in proportion to each other (107). Her huge body and her ugly face with a flat
nose, a few broken black teeth and skin covered with pock marks as big as caves where fleas live
(24) provoke in male onlookers a misogynist nausea. The Dog Woman shows a most benign and
483


protective side towards her numerous female friends, including nuns, prostitutes and the wives of
the Puritan men she loathes.
Wintersons powerful depiction of communities of women and her presenting an
alternative female symbolic realm beyond heteropatriarchy shows how while existing in the
realm of fictional myth, these are politically powerful images for women. The postmodern critics
and queer theorists foregrounding the deconstructive potential of sexual identities and gender
blurring in her works. Drawing on Butlers theories of gender as performance and queer models
of transgendered body, Dog Womans grotesque body can be described as a queer body which
challenge sexual stereotypes and deconstructs the concepts of natural body, and thus presents a
new sexual politics based on difference, diversity and plurality, all tenets of postmodernism.
Indeed, it is only with men, especially Puritans with a double standard of morality, that
she displays the all-devouring and deadly facet of her Mother-earth personality. To this type of
man, the Dog Woman appears to be, literally, a monster. Thus, her parson has forbidden her to
enter the church on the contention that gargoyles must remain on the outside (SC 14). And, on
seeing her for the first time, the half-wit who kept the gate of the royal gardens tells Tradescant
in utter discomfiture that the garden had been invaded by an evil spirit and her Hounds of Hell
(29), thus comparing her, as Patricia Waugh acutely notes, to Miltons Sin with her brood of
hungry dogs.
Sandra M. Gilbert and Susan Gubar have pointed out how the monstrosity of mythical
female hybrids such as sirens, harpies and sphinxes is invariably located in the lower half of their
bodies, thus symbolising mens fear of female sexuality and power. Similarly, the Dog Womans
monstrosity is located in her lower half and is associated with her sexual power. The day she lifts
her skirts over her head to show the public that she is not hiding any weights, before competing
with an elephant in a fair attraction, she provokes a great swooning amongst the crowd since
she is wearing no underclothes in respect of the heat ( 25). From Lacans perspective, the Dog
Womans colossal inability to understand the metaphors of patriarchy further augments her
position in the unsymbolised realm of the imaginary and confirms the epigraphs assertion that
language is the decisive battle ground for the transformation of the symbolic order. Added to her
grotesque monstrosity, the Dog Womans literalmindedness situates her in a strategic position to
reshape patriarchys false picture of the world, since it is only by transforming the metaphors of
patriarchy that she can aspire to create a new symbolic order capable of responding to her own,
more feminine and authentic picture of the world.
Jordan also Compares his secret book to the invisible letters written by the ancient
Greeks, remarking that they were written in milk (10). This remark adds crucial insight into
the type of individuation process he is initiating, since it points to Jordans invisible book as an
example of ecriture feminine, the type of writing written with langue lait, the white ink of
mothers milk that Helene Cixous proposes as an alternative to the phallogocentric writing of
484


patriarchy, carried out as she asserts, with a pen/penis. As becomes clear at the end of the novel,
Jordans individuation process involves his understanding of the constructedness of binary
oppositions like father/mother; man/woman; culture/nature; head/hearth and the eventual
revelation of his bisexuality. Dog Womans only fear is not that Jordan might be bodily injured
in the course of his journeys, but that he might lose his heart. His heart (41), knowing as she
does that he has not my common sense and will no doubt follow his dreams to the end of the
world and then fall straight off(40). If Jordan has to find his own identity, then, he will have to
overcome his feeling of incompleteness, symbolised by his obsessive search of Fortunata, and
acquire his mothers androgynous completeness.
Thus, one can examine the intersection of lesbianism and postmodernism in Sexing the
Cherry. Winterson fully uses both lesbian-feminism and postmodernism to deconstruct the
sexual identities of her characters and displays how the template of sex and gender can be
opened up and the identities can become unstable and fluid. Further, the alternation of narrative
voices in the novel complicates its basic pattern, as does the undercutting of the narrative flow by
the interpolation of additional texts. In these metanarratives, that is, a narrative within a
narrative, fictional discourses such as fairytales, fragments of romance, poems and religious and
mythical texts are juxtaposed with the objective discourses of history, medicine, psychology,
critical theory, Greek philosophy, Newtonian science, the New physics and so on. The
trespassing of narrative and ontological boundaries and the juxtaposition of realistic, fictional,
mythical and biblical variations on the same events is a postmodernist narrative technique
consciously employed by Winterson to subvert and question the earlier texts and histories.
Written on the Body
Written on the Body, Wintersons fifth novel, presents a narrator which questions gender
identity through a complete absence of gender identification. There is no physical description of
the narrators body throughout the novel it remains invisible. The lovers body in Written on
the Body is invisible to any objectifying gaze. It can be seen as female, male, hermaphroditic,
transgendered, differently abled, from any culture in the world, with any sexual preferences or
any combination of the above. With this non-specific narrator, Winterson is evading the
consequences of gendering that Monique Wittig, in her article The Mark of Gender, expresses
clearly: Language casts sheaves of reality upon the social body, stamping it and violently
shaping it. (78) Winterson evades the enforcement of a gender-bound heterosexual concept of
love by giving the lover an invisible body, which is fabulous because it cannot be classified nor it
can be put into neat compartments, moreover it is enigmatic and full of endless possibilities.
Jeanette Wintersons language opens up imaginative possibilities rather than delimiting
them, perhaps because as Winterson writes, the important things are often left unsaid; rather,
they are inferred, between the lines, or written on the body. ( ) In part, this is because Winterson
most often avoids the conventions of realism as for her they point to a terror of the inner life, of
48.


the sublime, of the poetic, of the non-material, of the contemplative.( ) Winterson uses the
poetic, the fantastic, the imaginary and the magical in her fiction and evinces a commitment to
revivify and transform language.
In the novel, the body is positioned as a text that can be both written and read. Or,
conversely, the text is represented as a body and, as such, as an animate object that is constantly
changing and that can exert not only intellectual but also physical pleasure, and, conversely, pain
upon the reader. The relationship between reader and text is located as more than a cerebral
activity; it is intimate, embodied and has the potential of changing lives. The idea that the body
can be read and re-read, written and rewritten is the central motif of Written on the Body. The
novel tells of a love affair between a married woman Louise and the unnamed narrator. The
gender and physical aspect of the autodiegetic narrator are never made explicit and the identity
of the narrator is problematised, thus suggesting that s/he enjoys the type of bisexuality Jordan
achieved in Sexing the Cherry at the end of his quest for individuation. The programmatic nature
of the narrators bisexuality in Written on the Body has not always been interpreted differently by
different critics. Thus, Rachel Wingfield considers the narrators androgyny as an example of
formal experimentation, the result of the authors postmodernist pre occupation with writing
about writing.
It seems that Derridas insight is clearly shared by Winterson, as one of her most
characteristic narrative strategies is to place language in quotation marks, as if it were, and in so
doing to reframe meaning. She writes:
My work is full of cover versions. I like to take stories we think we know and record
them differently. In the re-telling comes a new emphasis or bias, and the new
arrangement of the key elements demand that fresh material be injected into the existing
text. ( )
Importantly, then, while meaning is contextually bound, contexts are boundless. As Winterson
insists, there is no limit to new territory.Reality is continuous, multiple, simultaneous,
complex, abundant and partly invisible
Winterson has remarked that art has the capacity to allow us to apprehend more than the
visible world. In her work, she explores desire, the valuable, fabulous thing that remains
difficult to articulate. Winterson is trying to establish the same thesis as put forth by Judith
Butler in Gender Trouble that identity is not something one is born with, but a fluid, ever-
changing and complex ideological process, determined by the individuals relationship with
other individuals. We cannot refer to the narrator as a she, meaning hereby that narrator cant
be referred to as a woman/lesbian because that will ignore the texts insistence that we use the
slashed forms s/he and her/his even if having to use the slashes is irritating, precisely
48/


because it is this irritation that will challenge and set into question the objectivity of patriarchal
assumptions about identity.
As the title suggests, Written on the Body is a self-conscious experiment in ecriture
feminine, carried out by an autodiegetic author-narrator, whose aim, as Ute Kauer has succinctly
put it, is no longer self-discovery, but rather self-construction. (6) In this sense, it is important
to realise that, like earlier Winterson autodiegetic narrators at the beginning of their narration, the
nameless narrator of Written on the Body is a purblind hero/ine engaged in a quest for self-
individuation. The novel begins with the narrator presenting her/himself as a reckless Lothario
(20) involved in numberless love affairs with partners of both sexes that only last for a brief span
of time, either because of the partners various oddities; because of sheer incompatibility or,
more often, because the narrators sexual partner is a married woman who tries to lessen the
unhappiness and monotony of her married life by indulging in a secret and passionate sexual
affair, without ever, however, contemplating the possibility of setting her marriage at risk. This is
a source of endless suffering for the narrator, who hopes for a more stable and affective
relationship and invariably ends up heartbroken, feeling misused, objectified and forced to find
refuge in her/his own private island (27). The narrator's rakish behaviour unexpectedly comes
to an end when s/he meets Louise Fox, a beautiful Australian woman who has splendid red hair.
Unlike the narrators earlier partners, Louise falls in love with her/him, sees no reason to hide
their relationship and is ready to divorce her husband, Elgin Rosenthal, a well-to-do cancer
specialist, whose orthodox Jewish background is made to symbolise his uncompromising
patriarchal ideology. After several months of shared bliss, the narrator learns that Louise is
suffering from leukaemia and makes the unilateral decision to leave her in the hands of her
husband so that she can undergo specialist treatment in his private Swiss clinic.
After telling this story, the narrator raises the question of her/his own reliability,
addressing the reader in a self-conscious frame-break: I can tell by now that you are wondering
whether I can be trusted as a narrator. (24). The narrator repeatedly addresses the reader with
this type of questions, so that, as Kauer has noted, s/he ironises his/her own role constantly as
well as the role of the reader [and] plays with the moral objections the implied reader might raise
by anticipating them. Near the end of the novel, the narrator, who is now living alone in a
remote cottage in the Yorkshire countryside and is feeling quite sick with yearning for Louise,
overtly acknowledges the fictionality of her/his account, when s/he admits that s/he is making
up my own memories of good times (161). This remark confers a circular structure on the novel
and situates the author-narrator in the position of earlier Winterson protagonists like Jordan and
Henri, who also wrote the stories of their lives in retrospect and warned their addressees that they
were telling stories or reporting imaginary voyages, not facts.
Once the fictionality of the memoirs is taken into account, it is easy to see that the one-
dimensionality of the narrators lovers is that of well-worn literary types. Inge, for example, is a
butch in the invert tradition of the butch/femme couple of early lesbian fiction. By contrast,
487


Jacqueline, the narrators latest partner, is a clear example of lesbian femme She is described as
a sort of household pet (25), and we learn that she installed herself in the narrators house and
assumed the role of housewife without asking first. Other lovers mentioned by the narrator are
equally one-dimensional and parodic. The novel Written on the Body opens with the question:
Why is the measure of love loss? (9). This question reflects the narrators state of mind at the
time of writing, which is of utter despair and misery after having lost Louise. This is the question
the narrator tries to answer by writing her/his fictional memories and the sentence that,
according to Jeanette Winterson, concentrates the single image around which the whole novel
develops (Art Objects 169-70). Once posed, the question triggers off what can be described as
the narrators remembrances of things past. Structured chronologically in the form of diary
entries, the evolution of the narrator and Louises relationship follows the natural rhythm of the
seasons through the year, thus suggesting that it has the wholeness of a cosmogonic cycle: it
begins with the happy memory of a certain September when Louise declared her love; reaches
a climax of passion in an August ; is interrupted when the narrator decides to leave Louise to
save her as she is suffering from leukaemia on Christmas Eve ; and concludes in October with
the lovers reunion .
In the first entry we find the narrator struggling for the right words to write about love.
As s/he reflects in Written on the Body that, love demands expression but it is difficult to
express love adequately, since I love you is always a quotation (9) and there are too many
clichs surrounding the question of love:
Love makes the world go round. Love is blind. All you need is love. Nobody ever died of
a broken heart. You'll get over it. It'll be different when we're married. Think of the
children. Time's a great healer. Still waiting for Mr Right? Miss Right? And maybe all
the little Rights?
It's the clichs that cause the trouble. (10)
Susana Onega in her full-length study, Jeanette Winterson: a Contemporary Critical
Guide, has said that the narrators words bring to mind Umberto Ecos definition of post-
modernist irony by reference to love in the Postscript to The Name of the Rose:
I think of the postmodern attitude as that of a man who loves a very cultivated woman
and knows he cannot say to her I love you madly because he knows that she knows
(and that she knows that he knows) that these words have already been written by
Barbara Cartland. Still, there is a solution. He can say, As Barbara Cartland would put it,
I love you madly. At this point having avoided false innocence, having said clearly that
it is no longer possible to speak innocently, he will nevertheless have said what he
wanted to say to the woman: that he loves her, but he loves her in an age of lost
innocence.(67)
488


According to Eco, then, the only way in which we can still use the well-worn words of love with
the purity and intensity of their pure meaning is by having recourse to irony. From this
perspective, the jokes made by the narrator of Written on the Body in the recounting of her/his
absurd sexual feats and her/his acknowledgement of the fictional nature of the events narrated
acquire the double irony, for, although s/he makes constant use of literary clichs to describe
her/his sexual feats, the narrator seems to be frankly unaware that s/he is behaving according to
these clichs. The lack of self-directed irony in the narrators report surely is what produces a
distancing effect in the readers, revealing the narrators moral bluntness. This is made evident,
for example, when, surprised by the realisation that Louise is not reacting like her/his previous
married partners, the narrator says that she is not following the set directions: This is the wrong
script. This is the moment where Im supposed to be self-righteous and angry. (18). In her/his
relationships with numberless married women, the narrator invariably assumed the role of
pleasure-giver and victim. When the narrator realises that Louise is not behaving like other
married women, that she is in fact offering her/him a relationship built on terms of equality and
love, s/he is panic-stricken about living an experience that does not respond to the habitual
scheme: Yes you do frighten me. You act as though we will be together forever. You act as
though there is infinite pleasure and time without end. How can I know that? My experience is
that time always ends (18).If s/he is to grow morally and spiritually, then, s/he will have to
become aware of the seriousness of Louises proposal and of the artificiality and wrongness of
her/his sexual behaviour.
Before falling in love with Louise the narrator was bisexual in the sense that s/he had
sexual intercourse both with women and men, but the relations with her/his partners followed
traditional patriarchal patterns of binary opposition and inequality. Her/his bisexuality simply
meant that s/he could switch sexual roles: s/he could be the victimiser and the victim, the butch
and the femme, the rakish Don Juan/Lothario/Casanova and the masochistic sexual toy of
middleaged married women. It is this fear of infinite pleasure, then, that the narrator must
overcome ifs/he is to acquire the wholeness and maturity of Cixouss other bisexuality which
Jordan achieved at the end of Sexing the Cherry. Thus, Winterson subverts the traditional gender
roles and binary oppositions in her postmodernist text to show that gender and identity are social
constructions by her introduction of a narrator whose name, sex, gender and age are intentionally
kept hidden so that heteropatriarchy and binary oppositions can be questioned and hence
deconstructed.
Thus, the novels Sexing the Cherry and Written on the Body provide a politically useful
postmodern unsettling of fixed boundaries and gendered identities. Winterson by employing
postmodern techniques construct her narratives in such a way that it questions the social
constructs of sex, gender and sexuality. She fruitfully exploits the techniques as well as the
ideology of postmodern historiographic metafiction to challenge and subvert patriarchal and
heterosexist discourses and ultimately provides an oppositional but positively forceful critique.
48-


References
Andermahr, Sonya , ed. Jeanette Winterson: a Contemporary Critical Guide. Great
Britain: Cromwell Press ltd, 2007. Print.
---. Reinventing the Romance. Andermahr 82-99.
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and Subversion of Identity. London:
Routledge, 1990. Print.
Carpenter, Ginette. Reading and the Reader. Andermahr 69-81.
Eco, Umberto . Postscript to The Name of the Rose. New York: HBJ, 1994. Print.
Grice, Helena and Tim Woods, eds. Im telling you stories: Jeanette Winterson and the
Politics of Reading. (Postmodern Studies 25). Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi,
1998. Print.
---. Wintersons Dislocated Discourses. Andermahr 27-40.
Hutcheon, Linda. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. New York and London:
Routledge, 1998. Print.
Keulks, Gavin. Wintersons Recent Work: Navigating Realism and
Postmodernism. Andermahr 146-162
Onaga, Susana. Jeanette Winterson. Manchester and New York: Manchester UP, 2006.Print.
Palmer, Paulina. Postmodern Trends in Contemporary Fiction: Margaret Atwood,
Angela Carter, Jeanette Winterson Postmodern Subjects/ Postmodern Texts. Eds, Jane
Dowson and Steven Earnshaw. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, 1994. Print.
Winterson, Jeanette. Art Objects: Essays on Ecstasy and Effrontery. New York:Alfred A. Knopf,
1995. Print.
---.Sexing the Cherry. London: Bloomsbury, 1989.Print.
---. Written on the Body. New York: Vintage Books, 1992. Print.
Woods, Tim. Beginning Postmodernism. UK: Manchester University Press, 1999. Print.

Postmodernist Fabulation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Postmodernist Fabulation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Postmodernist Fabulation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Journal of English and Education

ISSN: 2278-4012, Volume:2, Issue:2, APRIL 2013

You might also like