Expecting Better

Expecting Better:
A State-by-State Analysis of Laws That Help New Parents

SECOND EDITION
|
MAY 2012
About the National Partnership for Women & Families
At the National Partnership for Women & Families, we believe that actions speak louder than words, and for four
decades we have fought for every major policy advance that has helped women and families.
Today, we promote fairness in the workplace, reproductive health and rights, access to quality, affordable health
care, and policies that help women and men meet the dual demands of work and family. Our goal is to create a
society that is free, fair and just, where nobody has to experience discrimination, all workplaces are family friendly,
and no family is without quality, affordable health care and real economic security.
Founded in 1971 as the Womens Legal Defense Fund, the National Partnership for Women & Families is a
nonproft, nonpartisan 501(c)3 organization located in Washington, D.C.
Acknowledgments
Funding from the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation for the National Partnership for Women &
Families Work and Family Program provided critical resources for this report. The National Partnership thanks the
law frm of Hogan Lovells US LLP for pro bono research assistance that made this report possible.
The fndings and conclusions presented here are those of the authors alone.
Contents
1 Foreword to the Second Edition of Expecting Better
2 Grade by State (Map)
4 Executive Summary
7 Glossary of Terms
8 Introduction
16 Methodology
21 2012 State-by-State Report Card
22 Summary of State Laws
47 Conclusion
48 State-by-State Comparison of Select Policies
50 Endnotes
54 A Special Section of the Second Edition of Expecting Better
60 Endnotes to Special Section
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES | REPORT | EXPECTING BETTER 1
Foreword to the Second Edition of
Expecting Better
Seven years ago, in 2005, the National Partnership for Women & Families published the frst edition of Expecting
Better, a comprehensive review of federal and state laws that help new and expecting parents take leave when a
child arrives. Today, in this second edition of that report, there are signs of progress.
Across the political spectrum, more of our nations leaders acknowledge that 21st century families face signifcant
challenges in meeting their responsibilities at home and on the job. High-profle leaders including President Barack
Obama and frst lady Michelle Obama have spoken passionately about the needs of working families. The presidents
proposed budget for three years running has included funding to speed the development of paid family leave
programs in the states so that new parents can take leave from work to care for their children. And the president, the
frst lady and Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis are all strong supporters of legislation that would guarantee most workers
paid sick time to care for themselves and their families when illness strikes or medical needs arise.
Since the frst edition of Expecting Better, workers in some states have gained new rights that address the work and
family challenges faced by new parents. For example:
j In 2011, Connecticut became the frst state to pass a paid sick days law, joining the District of Columbia, in
providing many workers the right to earn paid sick time that can be used to care for an ill child or family
member or to seek medical care. Two cities San Francisco and Seattle also provide this right;
j In 2008, New Jersey joined California in establishing a paid family leave insurance program that provides new
parents (and other family caregivers) with partial wage replacement during up to six weeks of family leave.
j In 2007, the state of Washington took a signifcant step toward establishing a paid parental leave program.
j In 2007, Maine expanded workers ability to take unpaid, job-protected family leave by recognizing that
domestic or civil union partners often need to care for each other and each others children.
j And, from 2006 through 2009, nine states granted new rights to nursing mothers in the workplace.
At the federal level, workers have also gained new family friendly rights. Many nursing mothers are now guaranteed
reasonable break time and a private place to express breast milk while at work, thanks to a provision in the 2010
health care reform law that amended the Fair Labor Standards Act. Expansions of the Family and Medical Leave Act
(FMLA) in 2008 and 2009 provided new leave rights to military families. And a new 2010 interpretation of the FMLA
extends unpaid, job-protected leave to a broader range of adults caring for new or ill children.
These are important victories, but more signifcant progress toward securing a family friendly nation remains
elusive. The nations political debates too often continue to refect a false dichotomy about work and family,
promoting a narrative that suggests families have all adults in the labor force by choice rather than by economic
necessity. And too few public offcials recognize that public policies must refect the new realities of a workforce
made up of workers women and men with signifcant child and elder care responsibilities. It is imperative that
our nations leaders and our public policies acknowledge that workers economic security and their ability to
provide for their families often hinges on their ability to take time away from work when a new child arrives or
health challenges arise. Working parents need to be able to address the needs of their children and families without
jeopardizing their jobs.
This second edition of Expecting Better documents workers rights under current state laws and the progress
that states have made in promoting the economic security of new parents. In addition, a special section provides
a snapshot of state policies that more broadly assist family caregivers both parents and workers overall in
addressing the needs of their children and other family members. This report documents how far the United States
has come, and how far we still have to go.
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN&FAMILIES | REPORT | EXPECTING BETTER 3
Grade by State
FOR COMPLETE REPORT CARD, SEE PAGE 21.
A
B
C
D
F
2 NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN&FAMILIES | REPORT | EXPECTING BETTER
Executive Summary
The arrival of a child should be cause for celebration. A time of pure joy. Parents may be
sleep deprived during this important time but sleep loss should not be made worse by
concerns about job security or fnancial well-being.
Yet, for millions of parents throughout the country, a childs birth or adoption means stretched fnances
and unsettling concerns about whether caring for their new baby will cost them their jobs. Our nations
failure to provide key supports to new parents including job-protected paid family and medical leave
to care for a new child or recover from childbirth adds signifcant pressure and harms millions of
families during what should be one of the happiest times in their lives.
Working parents without paid leave or even job-protected unpaid leave face a range of diffcult
choices, none of which are acceptable. New parents are frequently forced to return to work before they,
Expecting Better:
A State-by-State Analysis of Laws That Help New Parents
SECOND EDITION | MAY 2012
4 NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES | REPORT | EXPECTING BETTER
their spouses or partners, or their children are ready. Many must take unpaid leave that stretches
their families fnancial resources and puts their jobs at risk. Others must resign from work altogether.
None of these options serves working families or the nation well. They hurt the national economy,
erode the nations competitiveness and cause signifcant hardship for families and communities.
Just three national laws, addressing pregnancy discrimination, family and medical leave, and
nursing mothers rights at work, help some new and expecting parents upon the birth of a child.
But the United States lacks a national policy that provides paid family and medical leave and other
support to new parents. And gaps in our nations chief work and family law, the Family and Medical
Leave Act (FMLA), leave millions of working parents without even unpaid job-protected leave when
a new child arrives. Some states do better offering more support to working parents and providing
good models for changes at the national level. Still, too many parents are left on their own.
The United States distinguishes itself from much of the rest of the world by failing to provide
adequate supports and protections for parents and children. The absence of paid leave protections for
new parents is in striking contrast to the 178 nations that guarantee paid leave for new mothers and
the 54 nations that guarantee paid leave for new fathers.
1
The United States guarantees neither.
As a result, when workers need family or medical leave, they generally have to rely on individual
employers policies. Only 38 percent of workers have access to employer-provided short-term disability
insurance,
2
which would provide some income
during a womans pregnancy-related disability
leave. And only about one-tenth of the workforce
has access to employer-provided paid family leave
to care for a new child.
3
Workers in low-paying
jobs those with the greatest need for both job
protection and wage replacement during leave
from work are far less likely to have access to
either of these employer-provided benefts.
4
After
returning to work, some nursing mothers have legal protections that help them continue to provide breast
milk to their children, but others must rely on their employers goodwill to be able to pump at work.
As the frst edition of Expecting Better asserted seven years ago, the United States can and must do better.
The need for change is only becoming more urgent. Dramatic shifts in the U.S. economy, labor
markets and workplaces have resulted in working families growing need for public policies that
address the demands they face. Seventy-one percent of children live in families where all parents
work, so it is unlikely that new mothers will stay home full time to care for a new child while a father
returns to work.
5
Women are primary or co-breadwinners in nearly two-thirds of families,
6
meaning
that a womans income loss during pregnancy or parental leave has signifcant consequences for her
family. The number of single-parent families has also grown;
7
parents (usually mothers) in these
families often bear sole responsibility for the familys economic security.
Policymakers across the political spectrum have begun to embrace the need for change, yet
consensus in support of family friendly policy solutions is still elusive. Where public policies do
exist, research has demonstrated that work and family policies offer enormous benefts for families
economic security and health, as well as for businesses and their bottom lines. Yet, despite this
positive and compelling evidence, there have been too few advances in federal and state employment
laws to bring public policies in line with the needs of the 21st century workforce. New and expecting
parents need more and expect better.
[T]here have been too few advances in
federal and state employment laws to bring
public policies in line with the needs of the
21st century workforce. New and expecting
parents need more and expect better.
This second edition of Expecting Better: A State-by-State Analysis of Laws That Help New Parents
surveys the landscape of protections available to workers by cataloguing state laws that improve upon
federal rights and protections. It is the most comprehensive state-by-state analysis of laws that relate
to workplace rights and protections for new parents. In a special section, this report also includes
a snapshot of laws that help parents and other family caregivers meet the needs of both older and
younger members of their families.
As this report highlights, some states have surpassed the federal government by expanding access
to leave and providing other workplace supports to new parents. Those states provide models worth
replicating in other states and at the national level.
For example, California and New Jersey have led the way by providing paid leave to new parents.
States from Maine to Oregon have expanded access to unpaid job-protected leave so that people
who are ineligible for federal FMLA leave can care for a new child or for a spouse or partner with a
pregnancy-related disability, or take a longer leave than federal law allows. Many states provide all
nursing mothers the right to express breast milk at work.
Despite these bright spots, the report concludes that all states show room for improvement. No state
provides all new parents both guaranteed job protection and paid family and medical leave upon the
birth or adoption of a new child. For this reason, not a single state earned a grade of A.
California and Connecticut received grades of A- for their panoply of laws that help new parents,
including Californias frst-in-the-nation paid family leave law and Connecticuts frst statewide paid
sick days law; the District of Columbia and New Jersey received grades of B+ in recognition of their
advances in providing workers access to paid sick days and paid family leave, respectively; and Hawaii,
Oregon and Washington received grades of B for the steps they have taken to protect working
parents with FMLA expansions and other family friendly policies. Eighteen states received grades
of F for failing to provide a single beneft or program to help support families before and after the
birth, adoption or foster placement of a child. Most states fall somewhere in between; they are doing
something but not enough for working parents.
There is much more progress to be made progress that must be made if working families are to
prosper, communities are to become stronger, and the nation is to sustain and build its competitiveness
worldwide. That is why people in the United States want and need stronger family friendly policies,
and particularly job-protected paid family and medical leave. Americas families simply cannot afford
to wait any longer.
Family Leave
Leave taken to provide care for a family member who is
seriously ill (including a spouse or partner disabled by
pregnancy or childbirth), or to provide care for a new
baby or newly placed adopted or foster child.
Flexible Use of Sick Leave
Sick leave that may be used to care for a family member
who is recovering from an illness, to accompany a family
member to a medical appointment or, in some cases, to
care for a new child.
Job-Protected Leave
Protection provided by law, regulation, contract or
agreement that prohibits employers from fring,
demoting or otherwise penalizing workers for taking
leave, and entitles workers to return to the same or an
equivalent position after their leave is over.
Maternity Leave
A broad term that encompasses both pregnancy
disability leave (medical leave) and parental leave to care
for a new baby (family leave). It applies only to pregnant
women or birth or adoptive mothers (not to fathers).
Medical Leave
Leave taken to recover from ones own serious
health condition.
Nursing Mothers Workplace Rights
Rights provided by law, regulation, contract or agreement
that guarantee nursing mothers reasonable break times
and a private place to express breast milk at work.
Paid Family Leave
A state-administered program or employer-provided
beneft that fully or partially replaces the wages of
workers who take leave to care for a seriously ill family
member or new child.
Paid Medical Leave
A state-administered program or employer-provided
beneft that fully or partially replaces the wages
of workers on leave for medical reasons, including
pregnancy disability. Paid medical leave may be
provided through a state-administered system, called a
State Disability Insurance (SDI) or Temporary Disability
Insurance (TDI) program. Paid medical leave may also
be available through privately purchased or employer-
provided short-term disability insurance, or through
employer-provided paid sick days or paid time off.
Paid Sick Leave
Employer-provided beneft that provides full wage
replacement to workers who take sick leave for their
own illness or medical appointment or for those of a
family member.
Parental Leave
A type of family leave taken by mothers or fathers to
provide care for a new baby or newly placed adopted or
foster child.
Pregnancy Disability Leave
A type of medical leave taken by new or expecting
birth mothers who are temporarily disabled by their
pregnancy, childbirth or a related medical condition. It
may be taken prior to and/or following childbirth for the
period during which a woman is actually disabled.
Private Place
A place other than a bathroom or toilet stall where a
woman can express breast milk without intrusion from
co-workers and the public.
Reasonable Break Times
Intermittent breaks from work that are long and
frequent enough to meet a nursing mothers
physiological need to express milk. These breaks may
be paid or unpaid.
Sick Leave
Short-term leave taken to recover from a brief illness or,
in some cases, to obtain preventive or routine care.
Small Necessities Leave
Short-term leave taken for occasional family-related
activities, most frequently involving a childs schooling
(such as a parent-teacher conference) or a family
members medical appointment.

Glossary of Terms
Introduction
Virtually all of the nations leaders talk about valuing children and families, yet public policies
fail to refect a fundamental reality: In 21st century America, women are more likely than ever
to be in the workforce as key breadwinners, most children live in families in which all parents
work, and families are struggling more than ever to make ends meet. Working families
urgently need public policies that help them meet the dual demands of work and family.
Right now, the United States is failing to meet the basic needs of working families. For new parents in
particular, the failure to provide adequate workplace policies means that the birth or adoption of a child
which ought to be a glorious event can too often mark the beginning of a familys fnancial struggles.
The absence of family friendly public policies in the United States leaves many new parents without
pay and in danger of losing their jobs when they need or want time away from work to care for a
newborn or newly adopted child. Too many parents must manage conficts between needing to care
for a child and fnancial realities that require them to return to work before they or their children are
ready. Back at work, many new mothers fnd it diffcult to continue nursing, face discrimination and
worse. As their children grow, parents often face signifcant challenges in meeting their own needs, the
needs of their families and the needs of their employers. And they often face these challenges without
modernized labor standards that help ease the conficting pressures on working families.
Workers want more and expect better. In addition to paid, job-protected family and medical
leave, parents need a comprehensive set of policies that recognize their family responsibilities as
their children grow, including job-protected paid sick days to care for a sick child or a child needing
preventive medical care, fexible work arrangements, affordable child and after-school care, and job-
protected time away from work to attend school meetings.
The focus of this report, however, is the federal and state workplace policies that parents need just before
and after the arrival of a child. These policies include paid and unpaid family and medical leave laws that
allow parents more than a few days away from work when a new child arrives, pregnancy disability laws
that give women time to recover from childbirth, sick days laws that let workers earn paid sick time to
care for a recovering spouse or partner and to attend pre- and post-natal medical appointments, and laws
that help nursing mothers continue to provide breast milk to their babies after returning to work. This
report focuses on these policies because the economic security, health and well-being of workers and their
families is closely linked to being able to tend to family needs around the time of a childs arrival.
New Realities, Old Ways
Americas workforce has changed, but the nations public policies have not kept pace. Women and mothers
are a permanent fxture in the workforce and odds are slim that after a childs birth its mother will stay
home full time while its father works as the familys sole breadwinner. Seventy-two percent of women
work at some point before giving birth to a frst child; among women who worked during pregnancy,
73 percent return to work within six months of giving birth.
8
Seventy-seven percent of mothers with
children under the age of six and 78 percent of mothers with elementary- to high-school-age children work
outside the home.
9
In fact, 71 percent of children live in households where all parents work.
10

Whats more, womens wages are critical both to the national economy and the economic security
of their families. The wages that a woman brings home can increasingly make or break her familys
economic security. Women are now the primary or co-breadwinners in more than six out of 10
households, and nearly 40 percent are the main or sole breadwinner. In lower-income households,
womens earnings are even more important to the familys economic survival.
11

These demographic and economic changes make the imperative to update the nations public policies
more urgent than ever. There needs to be a national commitment to promoting families economic
security while giving parents the time to care for themselves and their children after birth or
adoption. Without a public policy standard that gives new parents the time and fnancial support they
need, they are forced to cobble together individual solutions in order to manage work responsibilities,
childrens needs and fnancial obligations.
Strong Public Support for New Workplace Standards
Given the nearly universal challenges faced by working families, it is no surprise that Americans are
hungry for change. They overwhelmingly agree that business and government need to adapt to the
needs of modern families and support new parents.
Seventy-six percent of adults in the United States believe that businesses should be required to provide
paid family and medical leave.
12
Nearly eight in 10 (78 percent) say that family and maternity leave is
a very important labor standard for workers.
13
Paid leave policies are also popular among voters when evaluating their support for candidates. In
a poll conducted before the 2010 elections, 76 percent of registered voters said they would support a
candidate who proposes laws to provide paid leave for family care and childbirth, including 41 percent
who said they would strongly support a pro-paid-leave candidate.
14
As Figure 1 shows, solid majorities
of voters across political and demographic groups support pro-paid-leave candidates.
FIGURE 1. SUPPORT FOR CANDIDATES WHO PROPOSE LAWS TO PROVIDE PAID LEAVE FOR FAMILY
CARE AND CHILDBIRTH
Voters overall 76%
Women 81%
White 72%
Latino 86%
African-American 92%
Republican 68%
Independent 70%
Democrat 88%
Men 71%
Source: Institute for Womens Policy Research. (2010, October 29). Majority of Voters Support Workplace Flexibility, Job Quality, and Family Support Policies. Based on a survey of
2,080 registered voters nationwide, conducted September - October 2010.
Despite broad public support for paid leave and other key work and family policies, working families
are still waiting.
Existing U.S. Policies Dont Apply to All New Parents and
Dont Address All of Their Needs
Throughout our countrys history, lawmakers at the federal level have enacted just three laws that provide
modest protections to new working parents. Millions of new and expecting parents have benefted from
the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 (PDA) and the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA).
These laws have enabled countless new parents to hold on to their jobs while taking leave to care for
a new child or a spouse disabled by pregnancy. Millions of women are benefting from a provision of
the 2010 health care reform law that protects new mothers who want to continue breastfeeding after
returning to work. Each of these laws set important minimum standards, but they are only a start.
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act
The PDA was the frst law to explicitly protect pregnant women. Before its passage, women were routinely
fred as soon as their pregnancies were discovered. The PDA prohibits employers from using pregnancy as
a barrier to job opportunity. According to the law, workers cannot be fred, denied a promotion, demoted
or forced to stop working because they are or might become pregnant, and employers cannot refuse to
hire someone because they are or may become pregnant.
15
The law also requires employers to treat a
pregnant woman the same as any other employee who becomes sick or temporarily disabled.
Although the PDA has helped combat discrimination against millions of pregnant women, it has three primary
shortcomings: It does not require employers to provide any period of leave; it does not guarantee that a
pregnant woman who takes leave will be able to return to the same or a similar job, unless the employer also
provides those protections to other returning workers; and it applies only to employers with 15 or more workers.
As the analysis of state laws in this report shows, some states do better. They offer job-protected
pregnancy disability leave to pregnant workers and women recovering from childbirth; they have
expanded protections to include smaller workplaces; and they guarantee a woman the same or an
equivalent job when she returns to work.
The Family and Medical Leave Act
The FMLA has allowed millions of new parents to take time away from work after the birth, adoption or foster
placement of a new child. The FMLA also provides men with family leave to care for a spouse disabled by
pregnancy or childbirth.
16
Since its 1993 enactment, the FMLA has been used by workers more than 100 million
times,
17
and more than one in four of these FMLA users have been new parents.
18
By providing job-protected
leave, the law has made an enormous difference in the lives of working parents striving to care for their families.
However, only about half of the workforce benefts from FMLA protections.
19
The FMLA applies only to
employees in workplaces with 50 or more workers within a 75-mile radius. Even in covered workplaces, workers
must meet eligibility requirements to qualify for leave they have to have worked for their employer for at
least a year and worked at least 1,250 hours during the previous year. And, even though a recent interpretation
of the FMLA permits the domestic partner of a birth or adoptive parent to take leave to care for a new child,
20

the FMLAs defnition of family does not permit domestic partners to take time to care for each other.
Even among the 50 percent or so of workers who are eligible for FMLA leave, many simply cannot afford to
take time away from work without pay. According to a Department of Labor study, 78 percent of workers
who needed FMLA leave but did not take it said they could not afford to take unpaid leave.
21
And nearly one
in 10 workers who did take unpaid FMLA leave sought public assistance to make ends meet.
22

CONTINUED NEXT PAGE
The analysis of state laws in this report shows that many states have done better by providing access
to leave to workers in smaller businesses, by requiring employers to provide longer leave periods, by
extending leave rights to workers who have had less time on the job, and by permitting domestic partners
to take leave to care for a pregnant partner.
The 2010 health care reform law amended the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to provide nursing mothers
with a new right to pump at their worksite.
23
As a result, many nursing mothers who return to work now
have the right to take reasonable break times and use a private place to express breast milk while at work
for one year after giving birth. The nursing mothers protected by the law are those who are paid hourly or
eligible for overtime (non-exempt employees under the FLSA) a population that is least likely to have
control over breaks and schedules or, previously, to have a private place to express milk at work. The law
generally applies to employers of all sizes, with only a limited exemption in cases of undue hardship.
24
The right-to-pump provision was an important national breakthrough for the women and children who will
beneft from it. However, it excludes many workers, including salaried managerial and professional women.
As the analysis of state laws in this report shows, some states do better by providing the right to pump to all
women, both salaried and hourly, and by extending a mothers right to pump into her childs toddler years.
The United States Trails the Rest of the World in Providing Paid Leave
The workplace protections available to U.S. workers pale in comparison to those enjoyed by workers
in the rest of the world. The United States does not even provide unpaid leave to all new parents. In
contrast, 178 countries guarantee paid leave to women in connection with childbirth, and 54 guarantee
paid paternity or parental leave.
25
The United States is the only highly competitive country that fails to
provide paid leave to new parents.
26
The United States failure to guarantee access to paid parental leave means that many new mothers and
fathers can only take time away from work when their employers voluntarily offer some form of paid time
off for parental leave. Some employers have stepped up, but many have not. In fact, employers have cut
back paid maternity leave benefts in recent years, with just nine percent offering fully paid maternity leave
in 2012, down from 16 percent in 2008 and 27 percent in 1998.
27
And, according to government data, just 11
percent of private sector workers have access to paid family leave that can be used by fathers or non-birth
mothers to care for a new child.
28

At some companies, workers may be able to use accrued paid vacation and sick time, but only if their
employers provide paid sick or vacation time and allow it to be used when a new child arrives. Notably,
however, a signifcant portion of workers in the United States do not have access to any vacation or sick
time 23 percent of private sector workers do not earn paid vacation time, and 37 percent of private
sector workers do not earn paid sick time.
29
Women who need time to recover from childbirth are less
likely than men to hold jobs that offer paid sick time or paid vacation time.
30
Even many industry leaders companies that are regarded as the most family friendly by offering paid
leave and other benefts that help workers manage the dual demands of work and family have room for
improvement. Among Working Mother magazines top 100 companies in 2011, all provided fully paid leave
to new birth mothers and more than three-quarters provided fully paid leave to new fathers and adoptive
parents.
31
On average, however, these companies provided 7.2 weeks of fully paid maternity leave, three
weeks of fully paid paternity leave and 5.3 weeks of fully paid leave to adoptive parents far less than
parents need to care adequately for their new children.
32

Low-Wage Parents Are Hit the Hardest
Low-wage workers face particular challenges upon the arrival of a new child. They are
disproportionately unable to access unpaid leave under the FMLA because they tend to work for
smaller employers, have shorter tenures and work multiple part-time jobs.
33
They are also far more
likely to not have access to employer-provided short-term disability insurance, paid sick days, paid
vacation days and employer-provided paid family leave (See Table 1). These challenges compound
the daily hardships that low-wage workers already face, including low pay, little access to health
insurance or other workplace benefts, and little control over hours or schedules.
TABLE 1. PERCENTAGE OF PRIVATE SECTOR WORKERS WITH ACCESS TO PAID TIME OFF
ALL WORKERS
WORKERS IN THE
LOWEST WAGE QUARTILE
(EARNING $10.69 PER
HOUR OR LESS)
WORKERS IN THE
HIGHEST WAGE QUARTILE
(EARNING $24.81 PER
HOUR OR MORE)
Paid family leave 11% 5% 19%
Short-term disability insurance 38% 17% 58%
Sick leave 63% 32% 85%
Vacation leave 77% 51% 89%
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2011 National Compensation Survey of Employers.
Cumulatively, this puts low-wage workers in a particularly precarious fnancial position when a new
child arrives, and it makes the choice so many new parents face staying home to care for a new child
at a crucial time or going back to work to meet family fnancial needs even more stark.
States Are Leading the Way Toward a Better Future for Families
Fortunately, some states are taking the lead in addressing the challenges facing working families by
making signifcant policy changes.
In a few states, workers can take longer, unpaid, job-protected leave than the FMLA provides.
Many workers in Connecticut and the District of Columbia are entitled to paid sick time to use for
prenatal, postnatal and childrens medical appointments. And in two states, California and New
Jersey, new parents can use statewide paid family leave insurance to receive up to six weeks of
income support while on leave after the arrival of a new child. New parents in Washington state are
awaiting the implementation of their own statewide paid parental leave program.
Experience shows that state innovation can pave the way for national change. For example, 23 states
had passed FMLA laws prior to the 1993 enactment of the federal FMLA.
34
And more than a dozen
states had created rights for nursing mothers at work prior to the 2010 adoption of a federal standard.
This report, by surveying the states and charting their progress, provides a glimpse of what the
future may hold for parents and workers across the country.
Paid family leave is the next frontier. The paid family leave insurance programs in California and
New Jersey demonstrate that it is possible to provide benefts to new parents at minimal cost, and
with great benefts. President Obama has recognized the importance of state paid leave programs by
proposing a special fund to spur state innovation.
Paid Leave Strengthens Families
PAID LEAVE PROVIDES HEALTH BENEFITS FOR MOTHERS AND CHILDREN
All of the available research from studies of Californias paid leave insurance program, to data that
reflect the experiences of new parents fortunate enough to work for employers who offer some form of
paid leave, to analyses of the experiences of parents in other countries demonstrate the clear health
benefits of paid leave.
Paid leave gives new parents time to establish and build a strong bond with a new child during the
frst months of life, which results in long-term health benefts for both children and parents. Parental
leave can decrease maternal depression and infant mortality.
38
And children whose mothers take
leave longer after giving birth and before returning to work full time are more likely to be taken to
pediatricians for regular checkups,
39
with clear health benefts and likely cost savings down the road.
In an international study of paid family leave, a 10-week extension in paid leave was predicted to
decrease infant mortality by as much as four percent.
40
California and New Jersey Prove That Paid Leave Works
In 2002, California became the frst state to enact a paid family leave insurance program to help new parents
and other family caregivers make ends meet when a new baby arrives or a family member becomes ill. The
law took effect in July 2004. New parents in California can receive 55 percent of their income, up to a weekly
capped amount, for up to six weeks.
New Jersey enacted a similar program in 2008 and started paying benefts in 2009. Under the program, new
parents may be eligible for up to two-thirds of their income, up to a weekly capped amount, for up to six
weeks of family leave.
These two programs demonstrate the benefts of paid family leave:
k Between July 2004 and June 2011, Californias paid family leave program saw more than 1.1 million
claims fled by parents caring for new children.
35
k Between July 2009 and March 2012, New Jerseys paid family leave program was used more than 60,000
times by parents caring for new children.
36
k In California:
j Parents who used the state paid family leave program were much more likely than those who
didnt to report that leave had a positive effect on their ability to care for their new children and
to arrange child care;
j Fathers who used the state paid family leave program stayed home to care for their children twice as
long as fathers who did not use the program;
j Mothers who used the state paid family leave program breastfed for twice as long as mothers who
did not use the program; and
j Sixty percent of businesses reported coordinating their own benefts with the state program, likely
leading to cost savings for these employers.
37
It is also clear that there is more to do:
k Neither California nor New Jersey offer job protection to workers who take paid family leave under the
states programs, leaving workers who do not have job protection through state family and medical
leave laws or the federal FMLA at risk of job loss when they take leave.
k Many of the workers who need paid family leave the most are not aware that the programs exist,
suggesting the need for strategic public education and outreach efforts to increase program uptake.
Paid leave also provides more time for mothers to establish breastfeeding. Research demonstrates
that breastfeeding lowers the risk of childhood health concerns such as infections, diarrhea, SIDS,
obesity, diabetes, asthma and leukemia and it lowers the mothers risk of breast and ovarian
cancers.
41
Among women in California who reported taking leave under the states paid family leave
insurance program, the link between paid family leave and breastfeeding was clear. Women who
took leave for 15 weeks or longer breastfed for a median of 13 weeks.
42
Women in lower-quality
jobs (jobs in which workers were paid less than $20 per hour and did not receive health insurance
benefts) benefted in particular these new mothers who took paid leave were more likely to initiate
breastfeeding and breastfed for nearly twice as long as their peers who did not take leave.
43
FATHERS AND CHILDREN BENEFIT FROM PAID LEAVE
When fathers take leave after a childs birth, they are more likely to be involved over the long term in
the direct care of their children. One longitudinal study of U.S. families shows that fathers who took
two or more weeks off after the birth of their children were involved in the direct care of their children
nine months longer than fathers who took no leave.
44

Access to paid family leave encourages fathers to take leave. In California, as the states family leave
insurance program has become better established, fathers have become more likely to take paid family
leave.
45
Among fathers in lower-quality jobs in California, access to paid family leave has greatly
impacted the average length of leave, nearly tripling the amount of time fathers reported taking off
work after the birth of a child, from an average of three weeks to an average of eight weeks.
46
PAID LEAVE LEADS TO BETTER CHILD CARE PLACEMENTS
Many working parents need to arrange child care in order to return to work after the arrival of a new
child. Working parents seeking institutional day care face signifcant obstacles in waiting lists and
restrictive rules about minimum enrollment age and being forced to go back to work soon after
a childs arrival only increases the pressure and odds of a child being placed in a poor or unstable
child care situation. Parents who must settle for unreliable or poor child care often fnd themselves
struggling to fll unexpected gaps in care while also trying to keep their jobs. For some, discipline and
serial unemployment are all too common occurrences.
Access to paid leave gives parents time to fnd child care. The impact is particularly dramatic for
workers in lower-quality jobs. Among Californians in lower-quality jobs who reported having taken
leave to care for a new child, nearly three-quarters of those who took leave through the state paid
leave program (72 percent) reported that the leave had a positive effect on their ability to arrange child
care; and only half (49 percent) of those who took leave and did not participate in the state paid leave
program reported that the leave had a positive effect on their ability to arrange child care.
47
Businesses Beneft from Paid Family Leave
Paid leave makes sense for businesses. Worker turnover declines and loyalty increases when workers are
able to use paid leave to care for a new child. First-time mothers with access to paid maternity leave
are more likely to return to work and to return to work for the same employer within a year after
giving birth.
48
Worker retention saves employers money because replacing workers can be expensive
turnover costs are estimated to be between 25 and 200 percent of an employees annual salary.
49

In California, 83 percent of workers reported returning to their employers after taking family leave.
Access to paid family leave insurance had a particularly signifcant impact on businesses ability to
retain workers in low-quality jobs.
50
What's more, the California case study demonstrates how benefcial a state paid family leave program
can be for businesses that already provide some form of paid leave. Sixty percent of California
employers reported coordinating their own benefts with the states paid family leave insurance system,
which likely resulted in cost savings for those who previously permitted employees to use vacation, sick
leave, family leave or personal time during maternity or parental leave, and shouldered the entire cost
of providing that time off.
51
Paid Leave Provides Economic Benefts for Families and Governments
When new parents have access to paid leave, they are more likely to remain in the workforce,
contributing to the tax base and boosting their own economic security. First-time mothers who use paid
leave after the birth of a child are more likely to work into the last month of pregnancy.
52
In addition, a
recent analysis of paid leave use among new parents shows that women who take paid leave after the
birth of a child are more likely to be working nine to 12 months after the childs birth than those who
take no leave (paid or unpaid) at all.
53
New mothers who have taken paid leave are also more likely to
report higher wages in the year following a childs birth, controlling for other factors that might affect
wage rates.
54

In addition, families rely less often on public assistance when new parents have access to paid leave,
even when controlling for other socioeconomic factors that might affect reliance on public assistance.
New mothers who return to work after taking paid leave are about 40 percent less likely to report
receiving public assistance and food stamps in the year after a childs birth when compared to those
who return to work without taking paid or unpaid family leave.
55
New fathers who take paid leave are
also signifcantly less likely to report receiving public assistance or food stamps in the year following a
childs birth than those who return to work and take no leave at all.
56
In short, paid leave makes economic sense for families, for businesses and for taxpayers.
Research and experience demonstrate what some state policymakers, forward-thinking businesses, and
tens of millions of working families already know: Support for new parents, particularly paid family
leave, should be available to every working family in the United States.
The states that provide greater legal rights and protections to their residents than federal law prove
that progress is possible. These states showcase new models that can and should be replicated to help
millions more working families across the country. The nation cannot afford to wait.
Methodology
This report provides the most comprehensive assessment to date of state policies that support new
parents just before and soon after the arrival of a new child. It discusses:
k State laws that exceed the FMLA in guaranteeing job protection or pay to women and men who
take a leave of absence from their job to care for a new child (parental leave) or a spouse or
partner disabled by pregnancy (family leave)
k State laws that provide birth mothers a period of disability leave to prepare for and recover from
pregnancy and childbirth (medical leave or maternity leave)
k State laws that require employer-provided sick, vacation or personal leave to be available for
workers to care for a new child or an ill spouse or partner (fexible use of sick leave)
k State laws that exceed federal standards in enabling new mothers to continue to provide breast
milk to a new baby after returning to work (workplace rights for nursing mothers)
The National Partnership used legal search engines, reviewed materials created by the National
Conference on State Legislatures and searched state websites, statutes, regulations and case law
to identify state laws that guarantee access to leave to new and expecting parents and support for
breastfeeding mothers.
57
States may have other laws in place that help new parents, including laws
affecting state employees ability to work a fexible or reduced schedule, or to pool unused vacation or
sick time to help co-workers when a new child arrives. These laws are unquestionably valuable but
are not within the scope of this analysis.
This analysis differentiates between laws affecting private sector workers and public sector state workers.
Scoring Criteria
PRIVATE SECTOR WORKERS
To evaluate leave and breastfeeding support laws that apply to private sector workers, the following
questions were answered:
Paid Family and Medical Leave
k Does the state guarantee wage replacement to workers while they take leave from work to care for
a new child or a spouse disabled by pregnancy?
k Does the state guarantee wage replacement to female workers when they take leave due to
pregnancy or childbirth-related medical issues?
k Does the state require employers to provide paid sick leave that can be used by pregnant women
and their partners to seek prenatal and postnatal care or to take a new baby to the doctor?
Job-Protected Family Leave
k Does the state guarantee workers greater access to job-protected family leave than the federal
FMLA by requiring smaller employers to provide leave?
k Does the state guarantee workers greater access to job-protected family leave than the federal
FMLA by expanding eligibility to include workers with less time on the job?
k Does the state guarantee workers access to job-protected family leave for a longer period of time
away from work than the federal FMLA?
k Does the state guarantee more workers access to job-protected family leave than the FMLA by
providing them leave to care for a pregnant domestic partner or the new child of a domestic partner?
Job-Protected Medical Leave for Pregnancy, Childbirth or Related Medical Conditions
k Does the state guarantee female workers greater access to job-protected medical or disability leave
than federal law by requiring smaller employers to provide leave?
k Does the state guarantee female workers greater access to job-protected medical or disability leave
than the federal FMLA by providing access to workers with less time on the job?
k Does the state provide workers with a longer period of job-protected time off for medical or
disability leave than the federal FMLA?
Paid Sick Leave
k Does the state guarantee workers the ability to earn paid sick leave that can be used for the
workers own illnesses, to care for an ill family member or for personal or family medical visits?
Other Policies Affecting New Parents
k Does the state have a fexible sick-leave requirement that permits workers to use accrued earned
paid sick time for leave to care for a new child or a spouse or partner with medical needs?
k Does the state guarantee nursing mothers greater rights to express breast milk at work than
federal law does?
STATE WORKERS
k Does the state provide its workers with paid family leave or paid medical leave?
k Does the state provide its workers with a longer period of job-protected time off for family or
medical leave than the federal FMLA?
k Does the state provide its workers with a lower threshold for the hours they are required to work
in order to qualify for job-protected time off for family or medical leave?
k Does the state have a fexible sick leave requirement that allows its workers to use accrued earned
paid sick time for leave to care for a new child or an ill spouse or partner?
k Does the state provide all nursing mothers who return to work for the state with reasonable break
time and a private place to express breast milk?
Each state was awarded points based on the protections provided to private and state employees.
Because most employees work in the private sector, the point system favors laws that provide
protection and benefts to private sector employees.
Scoring Results
Paid Family Leave Benefts
Thirty points were awarded to California and New Jersey for their programs providing paid family
leave to new parents who are caring for newborns, newly adopted children or newly placed foster
children, or for a spouse disabled by pregnancy. Washington state passed a paid parental leave
program in 2007 but, due to budget constraints, it has not yet been implemented. Washington was
awarded 10 points for taking a step toward providing paid leave.
Paid Medical/Pregnancy Disability Leave Benefts
Twenty-fve points were awarded to each state with a program that provides paid medical leave to
birth mothers who need leave for pregnancy-related disabilities and for recovery after childbirth.
Five states (California, Hawaii, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island) and Puerto Rico have
short-term disability insurance programs that provide paid leave to women who are temporarily
disabled due to pregnancy and childbirth.
Paid Sick Leave
Fifteen points were awarded to the District of Columbia and Connecticut for their paid sick leave
laws, under which employers are required to provide workers with a limited number of days each
year that can be used to address a workers own illness, to seek medical care or to accompany a
family member to a medical appointment. Access to paid sick leave may help new and expecting
parents attend prenatal, postnatal and well-baby/sick-baby medical appointments and take a few
paid days off in connection with childbirth.
Expanded Job-Protected Family Leave for Workers in Smaller Businesses
Ten points were awarded to states that provide job-protected unpaid family leave to workers in
businesses with fewer than 50 employees. Laws in fve states (Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey,
Oregon and Vermont) plus the District of Columbia provide this expanded leave.
Expanded Job-Protected Family Leave for Workers with Less Time on the Job
Ten points were awarded to states that provide job-protected unpaid family leave to workers with
less than one year of job tenure or fewer than 1,250 hours worked in the previous year. Laws in
seven states (Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon and Wisconsin) plus the
District of Columbia provide this expanded leave.
Extended Length of Job-Protected Family Leave
Ten points were awarded to states that give workers a longer period of job-protected leave to care
for new babies or to recover from maternity disability than the 12 weeks provided by the federal
FMLA. Laws in three states (Connecticut, Rhode Island and Tennessee) and the District of Columbia
provide a longer period of family leave.
Expanded Defnition of Family for Purposes of Job-Protected Family Leave
Ten points were awarded to states that allow workers to take family leave to care for a pregnant
domestic partner or same-sex spouse or to care for the child of a domestic partner or same-sex
spouse. Laws in nine states (California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, New Jersey, Oregon, Vermont,
Washington and Wisconsin) and the District of Columbia provide an expanded defnition of covered
family members.
Expanded Job-Protected Medical or Pregnancy Leave for Workers in Smaller Businesses
58
Ten points were awarded to states that provide job protection for pregnancy and childbirth-related
disabilities to women who work for businesses with fewer than 50 employees. Laws in nine states
(California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire and
Washington) protect women in smaller businesses.
59

Expanded Job-Protected Medical or Pregnancy Leave for Workers with Less Time on the Job
60
Ten points were awarded to states that provide job-protected pregnancy or childbirth- related
disability leave to workers with less than one year of job tenure or fewer than 1,250 hours worked
in the previous year. Laws in nine states (California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, Louisiana,
Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire and Washington) provide job-protected leave to mothers
with reduced or no tenure requirement.
Extended Length of Job-Protected Medical or Pregnancy Disability Leave
61
Ten points were awarded to states that provide a longer period of job-protected pregnancy- or
childbirth-related disability leave than the 12 weeks provided by the federal FMLA. Laws in four
states (California, Louisiana, Oregon and Washington) and the District of Columbia provide a longer
period of leave.
62
Among these jurisdictions, California, Oregon, Washington and the District of
Columbia allow birth mothers two buckets of leave one to recover from pregnancy and another
to care for their new children.
Fifteen points were awarded to states that allow workers to use earned paid sick leave to care for a
new child and/or a spouse or partner with a pregnancy-related disability. Eight states (California,
Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Oregon, Washington and Wisconsin) and the District of
Columbia allow some workers to use their leave to care for either a new child or an ill family member
(such as a spouse or partner disabled by pregnancy), and some of these jurisdictions permit both.
Minnesota has a similar law but only requires that employers allow accrued sick leave to be used for
an ill child (not a new baby or an ill spouse). The Minnesota law is acknowledged, but no points were
awarded for it.
Workplace Protection for Nursing Mothers
Ten points were awarded to states that improve upon the federal law by providing all nursing
mothers with reasonable break times and/or a place other than a bathroom to express breast milk
at work. Fourteen states (Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Maine,
Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee and Vermont) and the District
of Columbia received points for their laws supporting nursing mothers at work.
STATE EMPLOYEES
Paid Family and Medical Leave Benefts
Twenty points were awarded to states that do not provide paid leave to private sector workers but do
provide at least some of their own workers with paid family leave to care for a new child or ill spouse,
or paid medical leave for birth mothers pregnancy or childbirth-related disability. Three states
(Illinois, Ohio and Virginia) received points for providing paid leave.
Expanded Job-Protected Family and/or Medical Leave for Workers with Less Time on the Job
Ten points were awarded to states that provide their own workers (but not private sector workers)
with family and/or pregnancy disability leave even before a worker has been on the job for one year
and has worked 1,250 hours in the prior year. Twelve states (Alaska, Arizona, Connecticut, Florida,
Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Montana, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas and Washington)
received points for relaxed job tenure requirements.
Extended Length of Family and/or Medical Leave
Ten points were awarded to states that provide their own workers (but not private sector workers)
with more than 12 weeks of job-protected family or medical leave by statute or administrative rule.
Thirteen states (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts,
New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin) received points for providing longer
leave.
The report provides information on states whose statutes or administrative rules permit state workers
to use accrued sick leave to care for a new child or ill family member. Points were not awarded for
these policies.
Workplace Protection for Nursing Mothers
The report provides information on states whose statutes or administrative rules provide all nursing
mothers returning to work for the state with reasonable break time and a private place to express
breast milk. Points were not awarded for these policies.
A- POINTS AWARDED
California ...................................................................... 125
Connecticut ................................................................ 120
B+
District of Columbia ...................................................95
New Jersey .....................................................................85
B
Hawaii ..............................................................................80
Washington ...................................................................75
Oregon ............................................................................70
B-
Maine ...............................................................................60
New York.........................................................................60
Illinois ...............................................................................55
C+
Rhode Island .................................................................50
Vermont ..........................................................................45
Wisconsin .......................................................................45
Massachusetts ..............................................................40
C
Minnesota ......................................................................35
C-
Louisiana .........................................................................30
Montana .........................................................................30
D+
Colorado .........................................................................25
Tennessee .......................................................................25
D
Alaska ...............................................................................20
Arizona ............................................................................20
Florida ..............................................................................20
Iowa...................................................................................20
Kentucky .........................................................................20
New Hampshire ...........................................................20
Ohio ..................................................................................20
Pennsylvania ..................................................................20
Virginia .............................................................................20
D-
Arkansas ..........................................................................15
Indiana .............................................................................15
Maryland ........................................................................15
New Mexico ..................................................................15
Texas .................................................................................10
F
Alabama ............................................................................ 0
Delaware ........................................................................... 0
Georgia .............................................................................. 0
Idaho .................................................................................. 0
Kansas ................................................................................ 0
Michigan ........................................................................... 0
Mississippi ........................................................................ 0
Missouri ............................................................................. 0
Nebraska ........................................................................... 0
Nevada .............................................................................. 0
North Carolina ............................................................... 0
North Dakota .................................................................. 0
Oklahoma ......................................................................... 0
South Carolina................................................................ 0
South Dakota .................................................................. 0
Utah .................................................................................... 0
West Virginia ................................................................... 0
Wyoming .......................................................................... 0
*This second edition of Expecting Better examines a wider variety of laws,
including nursing mothers rights at work laws and paid sick days laws,
and scores family and medical leave laws on more specifc dimensions
than in our frst edition; as a result, this second edition employs a different
scoring system than the frst edition. Therefore, this report does not
provide a direct comparison of individual states 2005 and 2012 grades.
In broad strokes, however, this 2012 analysis reveals very similar results to
those of seven years ago a handful of states score relatively high grades
of A-, B+ or B, but the majority garners failing or near-failing grades.
2012 State-by-State Report Card
*

The following grades refect the degree to which each state improves upon federal law.
Summary of State Laws
The state-by-state descriptions that follow provide a snapshot of how state-based rights and protections
compare to the 12 weeks of leave for new and expecting parents provided by the federal Family and
Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the protections provided by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA),
and the right to express breast milk at work provided to some nursing mothers under the Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA).
63
ALABAMA F
Alabama law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
work in the private sector.
STATE WORKERS
Alabama law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
work for the state.
ALASKA D
Alaska law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who work
in the private sector.
STATE WORKERS
Job-Protected Family and Medical Leave
State workers have greater access to family and pregnancy disability leave under state law than under
the federal FMLA. Alaskas public sector leave law applies to employees who have worked 910 hours
over six months and grants workers 18 weeks of leave.
64
ARIZONA D
Arizona law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
STATE WORKERS
Arizona state workers may take up to 12 weeks away from work to care for a new child, care for a
spouse disabled by pregnancy or childbirth, or for their own pregnancy or childbirth-related disability
without meeting FMLA tenure or hours worked eligibility requirements.
Birth mothers with serious complications arising from pregnancy may take up to 180 days of leave
for a seriously incapacitating and extended illness or injury.
65
A worker who takes medical leave is
entitled to return to the same position or a position in the same class as the position held prior to the
extended medical leave if a position is available and funded.
66
ARKANSAS D-
Arkansas has no laws beyond the federal FMLA that guarantee job protection or leave for new or
expecting parents who work in the private sector.
All nursing mothers are entitled to reasonable break time and a place other than a toilet stall to
express breast milk at work, for an unspecifed time after childbirth.
67
STATE WORKERS
Arkansas has no laws beyond the federal FMLA that guarantee job protection or leave for new or
expecting parents who work for the state.
Like private sector workers, women who work for the state of Arkansas are entitled to reasonable
break time and a place other than a toilet stall to express breast milk at work, for an unspecifed
time after childbirth.
68

CALIFORNIA A-
Private sector workers who qualify for the states disability insurance system are entitled to up
to six weeks of paid family leave that can be used by either parent.
69
The states paid family leave
program is an expansion of Californias State Disability Insurance (SDI) program that provides
partial wage replacement for new parents and for workers caring for a seriously ill family member,
including a spouse disabled by pregnancy. The program is funded
through employee payroll contributions. The paid family leave law
provides wage replacement only; it does not provide job protection
for workers while they are on family leave.
In addition, Californias SDI program provides partial wage
replacement to workers with a non-work-related illness, injury
or a medically disabling condition, including disability resulting
from pregnancy or childbirth. In essence, SDI functions as paid
pregnancy disability leave for women preparing for or recovering
from childbirth. The SDI program is funded through employee
payroll contributions.
70
Women who take SDI leave for a pregnancy-
related disability are also eligible to take paid family leave; SDI
leave and family leave must be taken sequentially rather than
concurrently. Although SDI covers a disabled worker for up to 52
weeks, typical coverage for a pregnancy-related disability is four
weeks prior to the womans due date and six weeks after delivery.
71
More private sector workers have parental and family caregiving
leave rights under California law than under the federal FMLA.
California and Louisiana include
unique provisions in their anti-
discrimination laws that make
it unlawful for an employer to
refuse a pregnant employees
request to transfer to a less
strenuous or less hazardous
job for the duration of her
pregnancy. The employer
cannot refuse the request if
the request can be reasonably
accommodated.
72
The
California statute also makes
it unlawful for an employer to
refuse a pregnant employees
request for a reasonable
accommodation for conditions
related to pregnancy, childbirth
or related medical conditions.
73
The California leave law extends parental and family leave rights to workers caring for a domestic
partner or the child of a domestic partner.
74
Job-Protected Medical Leave for Pregnancy Disability
Workers disabled by pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions also have protections
under California anti-discrimination law. Pregnant women are eligible for up to four months of job-
protected leave to address a pregnancy-related health condition. The law applies to women working for
employers with fve or more employees, regardless of the workers tenure or the number of hours she
has worked.
75
Once a pregnancy-related disability ends, a woman eligible for leave under the California
Family Rights Act can request up to 12 additional weeks of leave to care for her new baby.
Private sector workers who earn sick leave are entitled to use up to half of their allotted leave each year for
the care of a sick child or other family member, including a spouse or domestic partner with a pregnancy-
related disability.
76
Unlike similar laws in some other states, the California law does not require that
employer-provided sick time be available to care for a healthy newborn or newly adopted child.
All nursing mothers are entitled to reasonable break time and a private place other than a toilet stall
to express breast milk at work while their children are infants.
77
STATE WORKERS
State workers are eligible for State Disability Insurance (SDI) and paid family leave only if their
bargaining unit has opted in to the system.
78
If an employee contributes to the SDI system, that
employee is also eligible for paid family leave. The time allotted for SDI and paid family leave and the
wage replacement level is the same for covered state workers as it is for private sector workers.
Like private sector workers, more state workers have parental and family caregiving leave rights
under California law than under the federal FMLA because the California leave law extends parental
and family leave rights to workers caring for a domestic partner or the child of a domestic partner.
79
Like private sector workers, state workers disabled by pregnancy, childbirth or related medical
conditions enjoy protections under California anti-discrimination law. They are eligible for up to four
months of job-protected leave to address a pregnancy-related health condition regardless of their
tenure on the job or the number of hours worked in the prior year.
80
Once a pregnancy-related disability
ends, a state worker eligible for leave under the California Family Rights Act may take up to 12
additional weeks of leave to care for her new baby.
Like private sector workers, state workers who earn sick leave are entitled to use up to half of their
allotted time each year for the care of a sick child or other family member, including a spouse or
domestic partner with a pregnancy-related disability.
81

As in private sector workplaces, nursing mothers working for the state of California are entitled to
reasonable break time and a private place other than a toilet stall to express breast milk at work while
their children are infants.
82
COLORADO D+
Colorado has no laws beyond the federal FMLA that guarantee job protection or leave for new or
express breast milk at work for up to two years after giving birth.
83
STATE WORKERS
Employees of the state who work full time and meet federal FMLA eligibility requirements are
entitled to up to 520 hours (the equivalent of 13 weeks) of family leave or leave for a pregnancy-related
disability each fscal year. The number of hours available to part-time employees is prorated.
84
State workers who earn sick leave are entitled to use it to seek medical diagnosis or treatment or to
care for a sick child or family member, including a spouse disabled by pregnancy.
85
As in private sector workplaces, women who work for the state of Colorado are entitled to reasonable
break time and a place other than a toilet stall to express breast milk at work for up to two years
after giving birth.
86
CONNECTICUT A-
Private sector workers who work for employers with 75 or more employees have greater family leave
and pregnancy disability leave rights than the federal FMLA provides.
87
Connecticuts family and
medical leave law applies to private sector workers who have worked 1,000 hours during the previous
year.
88
The Connecticut law also provides workers with up to 16 weeks of leave in a 24-month period
(rather than 12 weeks in a 12-month period under federal law).
89

In addition, because same-sex marriage is now legal in Connecticut, the state law defnes family
more broadly than the federal FMLA to include same-sex spouses caring for a new child or a spouse
disabled by pregnancy.
90
Workers disabled by pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions also have protections under
Connecticut anti-discrimination law. Pregnant women are eligible for a reasonable period of leave
to address a pregnancy-related health condition.
91
The law applies to workers in businesses with
three or more employees.
92

Job-Protected Paid Sick Leave
As of January 2012, many workers in service industries and in other occupations requiring public contact,
who work in businesses with 50 or more employees, will be able to earn paid sick time that can be used to
care for a child or spouse who is ill or needs to seek medical care.
93
Workers may earn up to 40 hours per
year. The law entitles pregnant women to use paid sick leave to seek prenatal or postnatal care.
Under the state family and medical leave law, private sector workers in frms with 75 or more
employees who earn sick leave are entitled to use up to two weeks for the birth or adoption of a child or
to care for an ill child, spouse or parent.
94
Employers of any size must provide all female workers a place other than a toilet stall to express
breast milk at work, for an unspecifed period of time after giving birth.
95

STATE WORKERS
State workers have greater family and pregnancy leave rights than under the federal FMLA. Public
sector workers also enjoy greater leave rights than Connecticuts private sector workers. Connecticuts
public sector family leave law protects employees after six months of employment, regardless of the
number of hours worked,
96
and grants workers up to 24 weeks of leave in a two-year period.
97
Like many private sector workers in Connecticut, state workers disabled by pregnancy, childbirth
or related medical conditions have protections under Connecticut anti-discrimination law. Pregnant
women are eligible for a reasonable period of leave to address a pregnancy-related health condition.
98

As in private sector workplaces, women who work for the state of Connecticut are entitled to a place other
than a toilet stall to express breast milk at work, for an unspecifed period of time after childbirth.
99
DELAWARE F
Delaware law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
STATE WORKERS
Delaware has no laws beyond the federal FMLA that guarantee job protection or leave for new or
State workers who earn sick leave are entitled to use it upon the birth of a child or upon the adoption of
a pre-kindergarten-age child.
100
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA B+
Private sector workers have greater access to family and pregnancy disability leave under District law
than under the federal FMLA. The D.C. family and medical leave law applies to employers with 20 or
more employees.
101
Employees who have worked at least 1,000 hours over the preceding year are eligible
for leave. Workers are entitled to up to 16 weeks of leave over two years to care for a new child or a family
member with a serious health condition.
102
Women with a pregnancy-related disability are eligible for up to
16 weeks of medical leave;
103
this leave is in addition to any period of leave taken to care for a new child.
104
In addition, District law provides a broader defnition of family member than the federal FMLA so
that a worker in a committed relationship may take leave to care for a partner with a serious health
condition, including a pregnancy-related disability.
105
Most private sector workers in the District are entitled to earn paid sick leave that may be used
for their own medical care or the medical care of a child or other family member.
106
The law entitles
pregnant women to use paid sick leave to seek prenatal or postnatal care and enables a spouse,
domestic partner or other family member to take time away from work for a relatives pregnancy-
related disability or medical care. The number of days a full-time worker earns ranges from three to
seven days, depending on the size of his or her employer.
107

All nursing mothers are entitled to reasonable break time and a place other than a bathroom to
express breast milk at work for an unspecifed period of time after childbirth.
108
DISTRICT WORKERS
Like private sector workers, District workers have greater access to family and pregnancy disability leave
under District law than under the federal FMLA. Employees who have worked for the D.C. government
for at least 1,000 hours in the previous year are entitled to up to 16 weeks of leave to care for a new child
or family member with a serious health condition,
109
and female workers may take up to 16 weeks of
pregnancy disability leave
110
which is in addition to any period of leave taken to care for a new child.
111

In addition, the expanded family defnition that includes taking leave to care for an ill or disabled
partner in a committed relationship applies to District workers as it does to private sector workers.
112
Like most private sector workers, District workers earn paid sick leave that may be used for their own
medical care and the medical care of a child or other family member.
113

Like private sector workers, women employed by the District are entitled to reasonable break time
and a place other than a bathroom to express breast milk at work for an unspecifed period of time
after childbirth.
114
FLORIDA D
Florida law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who work
STATE WORKERS
State workers have greater family and pregnancy disability leave rights than under the federal FMLA.
Floridas public sector family leave law provides career service employees with up to six months of
leave to care for a new child or deal with personal or spousal medical issues arising from pregnancy or
childbirth.
115
Workers do not have to satisfy any tenure requirements to be eligible for leave.
GEORGIA F
Georgia law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
STATE WORKERS
Georgia law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
work for the state.
HAWAII B
Paid Medical Leave
Under Hawaiis Temporary Disability Insurance (TDI) law, most private sector workers disabled
by pregnancy or the termination of a pregnancy are entitled to up to 26 weeks of partial wage
replacement each year. To be eligible, a worker must have worked at least 14 weeks and earned
at least $400 in the previous 52 weeks.
116
Under Hawaiis law, employers of all sizes are required
to provide TDI for their employees.
117
Employers may ask their workers to contribute up to half of
the premium cost, as long as that amount does not exceed half of one percent of the employees
weekly wages.
118
Private sector workers in frms with 100 or more employees have greater family leave and caregiving rights
than under the federal FMLA. The Hawaii family leave law protects employees with six months tenure,
regardless of the number of hours worked,
119
and defnes family more broadly than the federal FMLA to
include caregiving for a designated reciprocal benefciary, which may include a same-sex partner.
120
Women in the private sector have greater access to pregnancy disability leave under state law than
under federal law. The law applies to employers of all sizes and protects employees regardless of tenure
and number of hours worked. Pregnant workers must be granted leave for a reasonable period of time.
121
Under the state family leave law, private sector workers in frms with 100 or more employees who earn
sick leave or other forms of paid leave are entitled to use up to 10 days for the care of a new child or to
assist an ill family member.
122
STATE WORKERS
Paid Medical Leave
Like private sector workers, state workers disabled by pregnancy or childbirth are eligible for partial
wage replacement under Hawaiis TDI law.
123

Like private sector workers, state workers have greater access to parental and caregiving leave
under Hawaii law than under the federal FMLA. Hawaiis family leave law protects workers with
six months tenure, regardless of the number of hours worked,
124
and defnes family more broadly
than the federal FMLA.
125
Like private sector workers, state workers employed by Hawaii have greater access to pregnancy
disability leave under state law than under federal law. Hawaiis leave law provides pregnant
workers with leave for a reasonable period of time and protects workers regardless of tenure and
number of hours worked.
126
Like private sector workers, state workers who earn sick leave or other forms of paid leave are
entitled to use up to 10 days for the care of a new child or to assist a family member, pursuant to
Hawaiis family leave law.
127
IDAHO F
Idaho law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who work
STATE WORKERS
Idaho law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
work for the state.
ILLINOIS B-
Illinois has no laws beyond the federal FMLA that guarantee job protection or leave for new or
Nursing mothers employed by private employers with more than fve employees are entitled to
reasonable break time and a private place other than a toilet stall to express breast milk at work while
128
STATE WORKERS
Paid Family Leave
State workers are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the birth or adoption of a child
that can be used by either parent. If both parents are state workers, only the family is entitled to
just one leave per pregnancy or adoption.
129

State workers have greater access to family leave under state law than under the federal FMLA.
Illinoiss public sector family responsibility leave law applies to full-time employees, regardless of
tenure. Workers may take up to one year of leave to care for a new child or a disabled family member.
The law defnes family more broadly than the federal FMLA to include household members who share
a custodial or mutually dependent relationship.
130
Like private sector workers, women who work for the state of Illinois are entitled to reasonable
break time and a private place other than a toilet stall to express breast milk at work while their
children are infants.
131
INDIANA D-
Indiana has no laws beyond the federal FMLA that guarantee job protection or leave for new or
All nursing mothers who work for larger employers in Indiana (25 or more employees) must be
provided a private place other than a toilet stall to express breast milk. Unlike most other states,
Indianas law does not require that workers also be provided reasonable break time to express
breast milk.
132

STATE WORKERS
Indiana has no laws beyond the federal FMLA that guarantee job protection or leave for new or
Women employed by the state of Indiana are entitled to reasonable break time and a place other than a
bathroom to express breast milk at work, while their children are infants.
133
IOWA D
Women in the private sector have greater access to pregnancy disability leave under state anti-
discrimination law than under federal law. Iowa law prohibits employers with four or more employees
from denying a womans request for up to eight weeks of leave to address pregnancy, childbirth and
related medical disabilities. Leave must be granted regardless of a womans tenure on the job or the
number of hours she has worked.
134
The law is silent as to whether a woman is entitled to return to the
same or a similar position after returning from leave.
STATE WORKERS
As in the private sector, state workers have greater access to pregnancy disability leave under state
law than under federal law. The state may not deny a womans request for up to eight weeks of leave to
address pregnancy, childbirth and related medical disabilities. Leave must be granted regardless of a
womans tenure or the number of hours she has worked.
135
KANSAS F
Kansas law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
STATE WORKERS
Kansas law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
work for the state.
KENTUCKY D
Kentucky law does not expand upon federal rights or protections
for new and expecting birth parents who work in the private sector.
STATE WORKERS
Women who work for the state have greater access to pregnancy
disability leave under Kentucky law than under the federal
FMLA. Kentuckys public sector sick leave law applies to
employees regardless of tenure and number of hours worked and
provides up to one year of leave to sick or disabled employees,
including workers disabled by pregnancy or childbirth.
137
LOUISIANA C-
Women in the private sector have greater access to pregnancy disability leave under state anti-
discrimination law than federal law. Louisianas pregnancy disability law applies to employers with
more than 25 employees.
138
Women are protected by the law regardless of tenure or the number of
hours they have worked. The law forbids an employer to refuse to allow a worker to take up to four
months of leave for her own disability related to pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions.
139

The law does state, however, that no employer is required to provide more than six weeks of leave for a
normal pregnancy, childbirth or related medical condition.
140
The law is silent as to whether a woman is
entitled to return to the same or a similar position after returning from leave.
STATE WORKERS
Like private sector workers, state workers with pregnancy-related disabilities have greater access to
leave under state law than under federal law. Women may receive up to four months of leave related
to pregnancy disability, childbirth or related medical conditions.
141
The law applies to all workers,
without eligibility requirements related to tenure or hours worked. The law does state, however, that
no employer is required to provide more than six weeks of leave for a normal pregnancy, childbirth or
related medical conditions.
142
MAINE B-
Private sector workers have greater access to family and pregnancy disability leave under Maine law than
under the federal FMLA. The Maine family leave law applies to employers with 15 or more employees,
and eligible workers are those with 12 months tenure, regardless of the number of hours worked.
143
The
Maine law also defnes family more broadly than the federal FMLA to include domestic partners, the
children of domestic partners and cohabiting siblings.
144
The duration of family and medical leave under
Maine law is less than under the federal FMLA, however (10 weeks in a two-year period).
145
Adoptive parents in Kentucky
have a novel right to leave.
Under Kentucky law, private
sector employers must grant
new adoptive parents a period
of reasonable personal leave of
up to six weeks. Workers are not
required to have met any tenure
or hours worked requirements
to qualify, and the law applies to
employers of all sizes.
136
Private sector workers who earn paid leave and are employed by a frm with 25 or more employees are
entitled to use at least 40 hours of paid leave per year for the care of an ill child, spouse or parent.
146

Unlike similar laws in some other states, the law does not require that leave be available to care for a
healthy newborn or newly adopted child.
All nursing mothers are entitled to adequate break time and a place other than a bathroom to express
breast milk at work, for up to three years after childbirth.
147
STATE WORKERS
Like private sector workers, state workers have greater access to family and pregnancy disability
leave under Maine law than under the federal FMLA. Workers with at least 12 months tenure are
eligible for leave regardless of the number of hours they have worked.
148
The Maine law also defnes
family more broadly than the federal FMLA to include domestic partners, the children of domestic
partners and cohabiting siblings.
149
As it is for private sector workers, the duration of family and
medical leave under Maine law is less than under the federal FMLA.
150
Like private sector workers, state workers who earn paid leave are entitled to use at least 40 hours per
year for the care of an ill child, spouse or parent.
151

Like private sector workers, women employed by the state of Maine are entitled to adequate break time and
a place other than a bathroom to express breast milk at work, for up to three years after childbirth.
152
MARYLAND D-
Maryland has no laws beyond the federal FMLA that guarantee job protection or leave for new or
expecting parents.
Private sector workers who earn sick leave are entitled to use it for the care of an ill child, spouse
or parent.
153
Unlike similar laws in some other states, the law does not require that leave time be
available to care for a healthy newborn or newly adopted child.
STATE WORKERS
Maryland state workers do not have parental or pregnancy disability leave rights or protections beyond
those provided by the federal FMLA.
State workers who earn sick leave are entitled to use it for the care of a child, spouse or parent,
including upon the birth or adoption of a child.
154
MASSACHUSETTS C+
Job-Protected Medical or Maternity Leave
Women in the private sector have greater access to maternity leave rights (defned as leave for giving
birth or leave to care for an adopted child) under commonwealth law than under the federal FMLA.
The Massachusetts leave law applies to employers with six or more workers and provides up to eight
weeks of job-protected leave;
155
workers with three months tenure are eligible.
156

COMMONWEALTH WORKERS
Like private sector workers, women employed by the commonwealth have greater access to maternity
leave rights under commonwealth law than under the federal FMLA. The Massachusetts leave law
provides up to eight weeks of job-protected leave;
157
employees with three months tenure are eligible.
158
In addition, executive branch employees have greater access to parental and pregnancy disability leave
than under the federal FMLA. Massachusettss public sector family and medical leave regulations
grant workers up to 26 weeks of leave and apply to employees with three months tenure, regardless of
the number of hours worked.
159
MICHIGAN F
Michigan law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
STATE WORKERS
Michigan law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
work for the state.
MINNESOTA C
Workers have greater access to parental leave upon the birth or
adoption of a child under Minnesota law than under the federal
FMLA. Minnesotas parental leave law applies to employers with
21 or more workers;
160
employees who have worked at least part
time in the previous 12 months are entitled to up to six weeks of
leave to care for a newborn or newly adopted child.
161
All nursing mothers are entitled to reasonable break time and a
place other than a toilet stall to express breast milk at work while
162
In Minnesota, public sector and
private sector workers at frms
with 21 or more employees
who earn sick leave are entitled
to use it for the care of an ill
child.
163
Unlike in many other
states, however, Minnesotas
fexible sick leave law does
not require employer-provided
sick leave to be available to care
for an ill spouse or partner or to
care for a healthy newborn or
newly adopted child.
STATE WORKERS
Like private sector workers, state workers have greater access to family leave upon the birth or adoption
of a child under Minnesota law than under the federal FMLA. Minnesotas law provides up to six weeks
of parental leave to employees who have worked at least part time in the previous 12 months.
164
Like private sector workers, women employed by the state of Minnesota are entitled to reasonable break
time and a place other than a toilet stall to express breast milk at work while their children are infants.
165
MISSISSIPPI F
Mississippi law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
STATE WORKERS
Mississippi law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
work for the state.
MISSOURI F
Missouri law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
STATE WORKERS
Missouri state workers do not have parental or pregnancy disability leave rights or protections beyond
State workers who earn sick leave are entitled to use it for the care of a spouse, child, stepchild or other
relative or household member, or upon the adoption of a child.
166
MONTANA C-
Job-Protected Medical or Maternity Leave
Women in the private sector have greater access to maternity leave rights under state law than
under federal law. Montana law applies to employers of any size and protects employees regardless
of tenure and number of hours worked.
167
Workers are entitled to a reasonable leave of absence for
the pregnancy with job protection and cannot be required to take a mandatory maternity leave for
an unreasonable length of time.
168
STATE WORKERS
Like private sector workers, women who work for the state have greater access to maternity
leave rights under state law than under federal law. Montana law protects employees regardless of
tenure and number of hours worked.
169
Workers are entitled to a reasonable leave of absence for the
pregnancy with job protection and cannot be required to take a mandatory maternity leave for an
unreasonable length of time.
170
The state government has adopted rules providing that six weeks is
reasonable leave after the birth of a child.
171
In addition, birth fathers and adoptive parents employed by the state are entitled to a reasonable
leave of absence of up to 15 days immediately following the birth or adoption of a child without having
to meet tenure or hours worked requirements.
172

Women employed by the state are entitled to reasonable break time and a place other than a toilet
stall to express breast milk at work for an unspecifed period of time after giving birth.
173
All public
employers must have a written policy supporting women who want to continue breastfeeding after
returning from maternity leave.
174
NEBRASKA F
Nebraska law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
STATE WORKERS
work for the state.
NEVADA F
Nevada law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
STATE WORKERS
work for the state.
NEW HAMPSHIRE D
Women in the private sector have greater access to pregnancy disability leave under state anti-discrimination
law than under federal law. The New Hampshire law applies to employers with six or more employees and
covers all workers regardless of tenure and number of hours worked.
175
The law provides workers the right to
a leave of absence of an unspecifed length due to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions.
176
STATE WORKERS
Like private sector workers, state workers have greater access to pregnancy disability leave under
state anti-discrimination law than under the federal law. The New Hampshire law applies to workers
regardless of tenure and number of hours worked.
177
The law provides workers with a leave of absence
of an unspecifed length due to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions.
178
NEW JERSEY B+
Private sector workers are entitled to up to six weeks of paid family leave that can be used by either
parent to care for a new child, including the child of a domestic partner.
179
The states paid family
leave law is an expansion of New Jerseys Temporary Disability Insurance (TDI) program. The paid
family leave program provides partial wage replacement for new parents and for family caregivers of a
seriously ill family member. The program is funded through employee payroll contributions. The paid
family leave law provides wage replacement only; it does not provide job protection for workers while
they are on family leave.
In addition, New Jerseys TDI program provides partial wage replacement to workers with a non-
work-related illness, injury or a medically disabling condition resulting from pregnancy or childbirth.
In essence, TDI functions as paid pregnancy disability leave for women preparing for or recovering
from childbirth.
180
The TDI program is funded jointly through employer and employee payroll
contributions.
181
Women who take TDI leave for a pregnancy-related disability are also eligible to take
paid family leave; TDI leave and family leave must be taken sequentially rather than concurrently.
182

Although workers are eligible for up to 26 weeks of TDI leave, the typical duration of benefts for
pregnancy disability leave is four weeks prior to a womans expected due date and six weeks after
delivery.
183
Private sector workers have greater access to family leave under state law than under the federal
FMLA. The New Jersey family leave law applies to employers with 50 or more employees nationwide;
184
employees who have worked 1,000 hours over the preceding year are eligible for up to 12 weeks of leave
in a 24-month period.
185
The New Jersey law also defnes family more broadly than the federal FMLA to
include civil union partners.
186

However, unlike most other state laws and the federal FMLA, the New Jersey Family Leave Act does
not include leave for a workers own illness; therefore, a birth mother does not have job-protected leave
to recover from pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions.
187
STATE WORKERS
Like private sector workers, state workers are entitled to six weeks of paid family leave that can be
used by either parent.
188

However, female state workers are not necessarily entitled to paid pregnancy disability leave through
New Jerseys TDI program; state workers are only covered by TDI if the government entity they work
for has elected to be a covered employer and the worker has exhausted all accumulated sick leave.
189
Like private sector workers, state workers have greater access to family leave under state law than
under the federal FMLA because New Jerseys family leave law applies to employees who have worked
at least 1,000 hours over the preceding year.
190
State workers who earn sick leave are entitled to use it for the care of a seriously ill child or family
member, including a family member disabled by pregnancy.
191
NEW MEXICO D-
New Mexico has no laws beyond the federal FMLA that guarantee job protection or leave for new or
expecting parents.
All nursing mothers who work for employers with four or more workers are entitled to fexible break
times and a place other than a bathroom to express breast milk at work for an unspecifed period of
time after childbirth.
192
STATE WORKERS
New Mexico state workers do not have parental or pregnancy disability leave rights or protections
beyond those provided by the federal FMLA.
Like private sector workers, women employed by the state are entitled to fexible break times and a place
other than a bathroom to express breast milk at work for an unspecifed period of time after childbirth.
193
NEW YORK B-
New York has no laws beyond the federal FMLA that guarantee job-protected family leave for new or
expecting parents.
Paid Medical Leave for Pregnancy Disability
New Yorks Temporary Disability Insurance (TDI) program provides up to $170 per week to eligible
workers who are temporarily disabled, including women with pregnancy or childbirth-related
disabilities. The TDI program is funded by contributions from employers and workers.
194
Although
workers are eligible for up to 26 weeks of TDI, the typical period of pregnancy-related disability is four
to six weeks prior to a womans due date and four to six weeks after delivery.
195
All nursing mothers are entitled to reasonable break time and a room or other location close to their
work area to express breast milk at work for up to three years after childbirth.
196
STATE WORKERS
State workers are not covered by New York's TDI system.
State workers have greater access to parental leave under state law than under the federal FMLA.
New Yorks public sector family leave regulations apply to all workers regardless of tenure and number
of hours worked and grant workers up to seven months of leave after a child is born.
197

Female state workers have greater access to pregnancy disability leave under state law than under
the federal FMLA. New Yorks public sector pregnancy disability regulations apply to all workers
regardless of tenure and number of hours worked. The typical period of pregnancy disability is four
weeks prior to a womans due date and six weeks after her delivery date.
198
Like private sector workers, women employed by the state are entitled to reasonable break time and
a room or other location close to their work areas to express breast milk at work for up to three years
after childbirth.
199
NORTH CAROLINA F
North Carolina law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents
who work in the private sector.
STATE WORKERS
North Carolina law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents
who work for the state.
NORTH DAKOTA F
North Dakota law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents
STATE WORKERS
North Dakota law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents
North Dakota state workers are entitled to use up to 40 hours of paid leave provided by an employer to
care for spouse with a serious health condition, including a pregnancy-related disability.
200
OHIO D
Ohio law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who work in
the private sector.
STATE WORKERS
Job-Protected Paid Family Leave
State workers who work at least 30 hours per week, regardless of tenure, are entitled to up to six
weeks of parental leave after the birth or adoption of a child. Leave can be used by either parent. New
parents receive four weeks of leave at 70 percent of their current salary after satisfying a two-week
waiting period. Workers can use accrued paid sick or vacation time during the two-week waiting
period and to top off the paid leave beneft, so that they can earn 100 percent of their usual pay during
parental leave. Paid parental leave must be taken concurrently with federal FMLA leave.
201
Job-Protected Paid Medical Leave for Pregnancy Disability
Full-time state employees who have worked continuously for the state for at least one year and are
disabled for more than 14 consecutive days are entitled to up to 12 months of paid disability leave over
the course of their employment, including for a pregnancy-related disability.
202
Workers are paid 67
percent of their usual salary while on disability leave.
203

State workers who earn sick leave are entitled to use it for the care of an ill immediate family member
(spouse or signifcant other), including a sick child or a family member disabled by a serious health
condition such as pregnancy.
204
OKLAHOMA F
Oklahoma law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
STATE WORKERS
Oklahoma law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
work for the state.
OREGON B
Private sector workers have greater access to family and pregnancy disability leave under state law
than under the federal FMLA. The Oregon family leave law applies to employers with 25 or more
employees.
205
Workers who have worked 25 or more hours per week for 180 days are eligible for up
to 12 weeks of leave.
206
The law defnes family more broadly than the federal FMLA to include
domestic partners.
207

In addition, birth mothers are eligible for 12 weeks of pregnancy disability leave and an additional 12
weeks of family leave to care for a new child.
208

Under the Oregon family leave law, private sector workers at frms with 25 or more employees who
earn paid leave are entitled to use it for the care of a new child or a family member with a serious
health condition (including pregnancy disability).
209
All nursing mothers who work for employers with 25 or more workers are entitled to reasonable
break time and a place other than a bathroom to express breast milk at work for up to 18 months
after childbirth.
210
STATE WORKERS
Like private sector workers, state workers have greater access to family and pregnancy disability
leave under state law than under the federal FMLA. Workers who have worked 25 or more hours per
week for 180 days are eligible for up to 12 weeks of leave.
211
The law defnes family more broadly than
the federal FMLA to include domestic partners.
212

In addition, as in the private sector, female state workers who are eligible for family and medical leave
may take up to 12 weeks of pregnancy-related leave and up to an additional 12 weeks of family leave to
care for a new child.
213

As in the private sector, state workers who earn paid leave are entitled to use it for the care of a new
child or a family member with a serious health condition (including pregnancy disability).
214
As in the private sector, women employed by the state are entitled to reasonable break time and a
place other than a bathroom to express breast milk at work for up to 18 months after childbirth.
215
PENNSYLVANIA D
Pennsylvania law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents
STATE WORKERS
Commonwealth workers have access to longer parental and pregnancy disability leave under public
sector regulations than under the federal FMLA. Permanent management workers, non-represented
workers and some workers covered by collective bargaining agreements are entitled to six months of
either parental leave or pregnancy disability leave, provided they meet the federal FMLA eligibility
requirements.
216
All other permanent workers are entitled to six months of parental leave and
another six months of pregnancy disability leave, regardless of tenure or hours worked.
217
In addition to the parental and pregnancy disability leave discussed above, commonwealth
workers also have greater access to family caregiving leave under public sector regulations than
under the federal FMLA, and some have access to a longer leave for family caregiving. Permanent
management workers, non-represented workers and some workers covered by collective bargaining
agreements are eligible for up to six months of leave to care for a family member with a serious health
condition, including a pregnancy-related disability, provided they meet the federal FMLA eligibility
requirements.
218
All other permanent workers need only have been employed for one year or more to
qualify for up to 12 weeks of such leave.
219
RHODE ISLAND C+
Rhode Islands Temporary Disability Insurance (TDI) program provides partial wage replacement
to eligible workers who are temporarily disabled, including to women with pregnancy or childbirth-
related disabilities, or other related medical conditions.
220
The TDI program is funded through
workers payroll contributions.
221
Workers are eligible for up to 30 weeks of TDI payments up to a
maximum payment cap.
222

Private sector workers have access to a slightly longer family and pregnancy disability leave under
state law than under the federal FMLA. Under the Rhode Island family and medical leave law,
workers with one year of tenure who work an average of 30 hours or more per week are eligible for up
to 13 weeks of leave in a two-year period for parental or family care.
223
All nursing mothers are entitled to a place other than a bathroom to express breast milk at work while
224
Unlike most other state laws, the Rhode Island law permits, but does not
require, employers to provide reasonable break time.
STATE WORKERS
Rhode Islands TDI program covers only some state workers. Governmental entities can elect to
participate in the program, or state workers may choose to become subject to it through the collective
bargaining process.
225
The law covers participating state workers in the same way it covers private
sector workers.
As in the private sector, state workers have access to a slightly longer family and pregnancy disability
leave under state law than under the federal FMLA. Under the Rhode Island family leave law,
workers with one year of tenure who work an average of 30 hours or more per week are eligible for
up to 13 weeks of leave.
226
As applied to state workers, the defnition of family member includes
domestic partners, a defnition that is broader than under the federal FMLA.
227
As in the private sector, women who work for the state of Rhode Island are entitled to a place other
than a bathroom to express breast milk at work while their children are infants.
228

State workers may use up to 10 paid sick days each year for the illness of an immediate family member.
229
SOUTH CAROLINA F
South Carolina law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents
STATE WORKERS
South Carolina law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents
State workers who earn sick leave are entitled to use up to 10 days to care for an ill family member.
230
SOUTH DAKOTA F
South Dakota law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents
STATE WORKERS
South Dakota law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents
TENNESSEE D+
Full-time workers in frms with more than 100 employees and who have at least one year of tenure are
entitled to up to four months of leave for adoption, pregnancy, childbirth and nursing an infant.
231

express breast milk at work while their children are infants.
232
STATE WORKERS
Like private sector workers in larger frms, state employees have greater family leave rights under
state law than under the federal FMLA. Tennessees law provides full-time workers with up to four
months of leave for adoption, pregnancy, childbirth and nursing an infant.
233
State workers who earn sick leave are entitled to use it to care for an ill immediate family member,
including a spouse disabled by pregnancy.
234
Like private sector workers, women employed by the state are entitled to reasonable break time and a
place other than a toilet stall to express breast milk at work while their children are infants.
235
TEXAS D-
Texas law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who work
STATE WORKERS
State workers have greater access to parental leave rights under state law than under the federal
FMLA. Texas law provides state workers with up to 12 weeks of leave to care for a new child,
regardless of the workers tenure and hours worked.
236
The statute and the regulations are silent as to
whether the leave is job-protected.
State workers who earn sick leave are entitled to use it to care for and assist an immediate
family member.
237
UTAH F
Utah law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who work
STATE WORKERS
Utah state workers do not have parental or pregnancy disability leave rights or protections beyond
State workers who earn sick leave may use it to care for a new child or a seriously ill family member,
including a spouse recovering from pregnancy and childbirth.
238
VERMONT C+
Private sector workers have greater access to family and pregnancy disability leave under state
law than under the federal FMLA. The Vermont leave law applies to employers with 10 or more
employees.
239
Eligible workers (those who have worked an average of 30 hours per week for one year)
are entitled to up to 12 weeks of parental leave during pregnancy and following the birth or adoption
of a child.
240

Under a separate family leave provision, eligible workers in businesses with 15 or more employees
are entitled to up to 12 weeks of leave to care for a spouse with a serious health condition, including
pregnancy-related health issues.
241
Under Vermonts civil union law, a civil union partner has the
same rights as a married spouse to take family leave.
242
All nursing mothers are entitled to reasonable break time and a place other than a bathroom stall to
express breast milk at work for up to three years after childbirth.
243
STATE WORKERS
Job-Protected Parental and Medical Leave
State workers have greater parental and pregnancy disability leave rights under state law than
under the federal FMLA. Vermonts public sector family leave policy provides workers up to four
months of unpaid leave following the birth of a child; birth mothers are able to use accrued sick leave
for any period of disability prior to childbirth and for up to six weeks after childbirth.
244

State workers are entitled to up to 12 weeks of family leave to care for a family member with a
serious health condition, including a pregnancy-related disability.
245
As in the private sector, women employed by the state of Vermont are entitled to reasonable break
time and a place other than a bathroom stall to express breast milk at work for up to three years
after childbirth.
246
VIRGINIA D
Virginia law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
STATE WORKERS
Certain female state workers, including those who participate in the states retirement system, are
eligible for up to 125 days of full or partial wage replacement for pregnancy disability/maternity
leave through Virginias short-term disability insurance system.
247
In addition, certain state workers, including those who participate in the states retirement system,
are entitled to a few days per year of paid family or personal leave to address a family members
illness, death or any other need. Workers with up to one year of tenure receive 32 hours per year;
workers with longer tenure receive 40 hours per year.
248
WASHINGTON B
In 2007, Washington state enacted a paid parental leave program that has not yet gone into effect.
Once implemented, the program will provide eligible workers both mothers and fathers up to
fve weeks per year of paid leave to care for a newborn or newly adopted child.
249
The beneft amount
will be $250 per week for full-time workers, and part-time workers will receive a prorated beneft.
250

Leave taken under the family leave insurance program will run concurrently with any leave taken
under the federal FMLA or the state family and medical leave act.
Employers with more than 25 workers will be required to provide job protection to any worker who
takes leave under the paid parental leave program if the worker has been with the employer for one
year and has worked at least 1,250 hours during the previous year.
251
Washingtons family leave law defnes family more broadly than the federal FMLA to permit workers
to take leave to care for a registered domestic partner.
252
Like the federal FMLA, workers who meet
state family leave eligibility requirements are entitled to up to 12 weeks of leave to care for a new
child or a seriously ill spouse or partner.
Women in the private sector have greater access to pregnancy disability leave under state law
than under the federal FMLA. Washington anti-discrimination law applies to employers with
eight or more employees
253
and covers pregnant workers regardless of tenure and the number of
hours worked.
254
Women may take job-protected leave for the entire period of a pregnancy-related
disability,
255
and this period of leave does not count against a workers parental leave rights under the
state family and medical leave law.
256
This means that a woman with a normal pregnancy who meets
FMLA eligibility requirements and works for an employer covered by the FMLA may generally take
up to 18 weeks of leave, six weeks of pregnancy-related disability leave and 12 weeks of family leave
to care for her child.
257
Private sector workers who earn paid time off are entitled to use it for the care of an ill child, spouse,
parent, parent-in-law or grandparent. Unlike similar laws in some other states, the law does not
require that paid time off be available to care for a healthy newborn or newly adopted child.
258
STATE WORKERS
Like private sector workers, state workers will be eligible to participate in Washingtons family leave
insurance program once the program is implemented. State workers will be eligible for up to fve
weeks of paid leave upon the birth or adoption of a child.
259
Leave for state workers who meet the
minimum tenure and hours-worked requirements will be job-protected.
260
State workers have greater parental leave rights than under the federal FMLA. Washingtons public
sector family leave regulations grant workers who meet FMLA eligibility requirements up to six
months of leave to care for a newborn or newly adopted child.
261

Like private sector workers, many women employed by the state (those classifed as permanent
state employees) who have given birth may take disability leave for the entire period of pregnancy- or
childbirth-related disability, regardless of tenure or hours worked.
262
The broader defnition of family
member under the state family leave law permits state workers to take family leave to care for a domestic
partner with a serious health condition, which includes pregnancy-related periods of incapacity.
263
Like private sector workers, state workers who earn paid time off are entitled to use it for the care of
an ill child or other family member.
264
WEST VIRGINIA F
West Virginia law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents
STATE WORKERS
West Virginia law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents
WISCONSIN C+
Private sector workers have greater access to family and medical leave under state law than under
the federal FMLA. The Wisconsin law applies to workers who have worked at least 1,000 hours over
the preceding year
265
and defnes family more broadly than the federal FMLA to include domestic
partners.
266
However, state law provides less generous amounts of time off than the federal FMLA.
Workers are entitled to a maximum of six weeks of leave to care for a new child, up to two weeks of
leave to care for a spouse or domestic partner with a serious health condition, and up to two weeks of
pregnancy-related leave in any 12-month period.
267
Under the state family and medical leave law, private sector workers at frms with 50 or more
employees who earn paid leave are entitled to use it for the birth or adoption of a child or to care for
an ill child, spouse, domestic partner or parent.
268
STATE WORKERS
By regulation, permanent classifed employees of the state are entitled to up to six months of unpaid
maternity, paternity, adoption and pre-adoptive foster-care leave.
269
Other state employees are entitled to the same leave rights as private sector workers.
270
Workers with at
least 1,000 hours of service in the preceding year may take job-protected unpaid leave to care for a new
child (up to six weeks) or a family member with a serious health condition (up to two weeks),
271
including
a spouse or domestic partner.
272
Female state workers with at least 1,000 hours of service in the
preceding year may take up to two weeks of job-protected leave for pregnancy-related medical leave.
273
State workers who earn sick leave are entitled to use it for family medical or dental appointments or for the
emergency care of an ill or injured child or other family member (for up to fve days per illness or injury).
274
WYOMING F
Wyoming law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
STATE WORKERS
Wyoming law does not expand upon federal rights or protections for new and expecting parents who
work for the state.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Federal workers do not have parental or pregnancy disability
leave rights or protections beyond those provided by the
federal FMLA.
All women employed by the executive branch are entitled to
reasonable break time and a private place other than a bathroom
to express breast milk.
275
Federal workers earn paid sick leave that may be used to
accompany a family member to medical appointments or to care
for an ill child or other family member.
276
Regulations issued by the U.S.
Offce of Personnel Management
authorize federal agencies to
issue advanced sick leave (sick
leave not yet earned) to federal
government workers under
certain circumstances. Agencies
may advance up to 30 days
of sick leave to a worker for a
disability related to pregnancy
or childbirth, a serious health
condition of a family member or
the adoption of a child.

Agencies
may advance up to 13 days of
sick leave to a worker for the
care of a family member or to
accompany a family member to
medical appointments.
277
Conclusion
The United States cannot wait any longer for public policies that honor new parents and their
children. Paid leave policies, more substantial access to unpaid family and medical leave, paid sick
days and other family friendly policies will allow working families to prosper, businesses to grow,
communities to thrive, and the nation to become more internationally competitive.
Despite the imperative for change, progress is painfully slow. To be sure, between our frst report
in 2005 and this report in 2012, one state New Jersey enacted and implemented paid family
leave, joining California as a national leader. Another Washington took a frst step toward paid
parental leave. A smattering of other policy advances expanded workers access to unpaid family
and medical leave in Maine, Oregon and Washington, to fexible sick leave in Maine and Maryland,
and to paid sick days in Connecticut and the District of Columbia. A number of states, including
Arkansas, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Vermont and the
District of Columbia, enacted laws to protect the rights of nursing mothers in the workplace.
But, in aggregate, more remains the same than has changed. In the frst edition of Expecting Better,
just six states received grades of A-, B+ or B, and the same is true in this second edition.
Similarly, in 2005, 19 states received a grade of F; today, 18 states received a grade of F. The
unfortunate reality is this: A lack of progress in most states means that too many working families
continue to struggle at the very time that they should be focused on celebrating the birth or adoption
of a child and giving that child the best possible start.
Looking ahead, we hope and expect better. If policymakers are responsive to the needs of working
families, if they take note of the policy research that demonstrates enormous benefts for families,
communities, businesses and the public, and if they understand the breadth and depth of public support
for policies that support new parents and working families, a report like this will look very different
six or seven years from now or sooner. We can only hope that our next report will paint an entirely
different picture of a nation that is truly family friendly. Americas families cant afford to wait.
State-by-State
Comparison
of Select Policies
* Washington passed a programbut it has not
been implemented.
** Minnesota's law can only be used for a sick
child, not for a newborn, adopted child or a
sick spouse.
*** Access to policies through same laws as private
sector workers or through laws or regulations
specifc to public sector state employees.
**** TDI/PFL policies cover only some state workers.
PRIVATE SECTOR WORKERS STATE WORKERS***
State Paid Family Leave
Medical Leave
Through State TDI Paid Sick Leave
UnpaidLeave with
Expanded Access
for Workers
in Smaller
Businesses
Unpaid Leave
Longer than
Federal FMLA
Unpaid Leave
with Expanded
Access for
Workers with
Less Time on
the Job
Unpaid Leave
with an Expanded
Defnition of
Family
Flexible Use of
Sick Leave
Right to Pump
that Exceeds
Federal Law
Paid Family and/or
Medical Leave
Unpaid Leave
Longer than
Federal FMLA
Unpaid Leave with
Expanded Access
for Workers with
Less Time on
the Job
Alabama
Alaska YES YES
Arizona P only YES
Arkansas YES
California YES YES P only P only P only YES YES YES YES**** P only YES
Colorado YES YES
Connecticut YES P only YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
Delaware
District of Columbia YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
Florida YES YES
Georgia
Hawaii YES P only YES YES YES P only YES
Idaho
Illinois YES YES YES YES
Indiana YES
Iowa P only P only P only
Kansas
Kentucky P only P only
Louisiana P only P only P only P only P only
Maine YES YES YES YES YES YES
Maryland YES
Massachusetts P only P only P only P only
Michigan
Minnesota YES YES ** YES YES
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana P only P only P only YES
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire P only P only P only
New Jersey YES YES YES YES YES YES**** YES
New Mexico YES
New York YES YES YES YES
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio YES
Oklahoma
Oregon YES P only YES YES YES YES P only YES
Pennsylvania YES YES
Rhode Island YES YES YES P only**** YES
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee YES YES YES
Texas YES
Utah
Vermont YES YES YES YES
Virginia YES
Washington * P only P only P only YES YES * YES YES
West Virginia
Wisconsin YES YES YES YES YES
Wyoming
Total 2 5 2 15 8 15 10 9 15 7 20 23
48 NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN&FAMILIES | REPORT | EXPECTING BETTER
1
Heymann, J., & Earle, A. (2009). Raising the
Global Floor: Dismantling the Myth That We
Cant Afford Good Working Conditions for
Everyone. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press;
and Human Rights Watch. (2011, February 23).
Failing Its Families: Lack of Paid Leave and Work-
Family Supports in the US (p. 33). Human Rights
Watch Publication. Retrieved 26 April 2012, from
http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2011/02/23/
failing-its-families-0
2
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011, March).
Employee Benefts Survey Table 17. Insurance
benefts: Access, participation, and take-up rates,
private industry workers, National Compensation
Survey. Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://
www.bls.gov/ncs/ebs/benefts/2011/ownership/
private/table12a.pdf
3
Employee Benefts Survey Table 33. Leave
benefts: Access, private industry workers,
National Compensation Survey. Retrieved 26
April 2012, from http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ebs/
benefts/2011/ownership/private/table21a.pdf
4
See notes 2 and 3.
5
Glynn, S.J. (2012, April 16). The New
Breadwinners: 2010 Update. Center for American
Progress Publication. Retrieved 26 April 2012,
from http://www.americanprogress.org/
issues/2012/04/epd_breadwinners.html
6
Ibid.
7
Boushey, H. (2009). The New Breadwinners.
In H. Boushey and A. OLeary (Eds.), The Shriver
Report: A Womans Nation Changes Everything
(p. 35). Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://
www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/10/pdf/
awn/a_womans_nation.pdf
8
Laughlin, L. (2011, October). Maternity Leave
and Employment: Patterns of First-Time Mothers
1961-2008. U.S. Census Bureau Publication.
Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://www.census.
gov/prod/2011pubs/p70-128.pdf
9
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). Women
in the Labor Force: A Databook (2010 Edition).
Employment status of women by presence and
age of youngest child, March 1975-2010 (Table 7).
Retrieved 7 May 2012, from http://www.bls.gov/
cps/wlf-table7-2011.pdf
10
See note 5.
11
Ibid.
12
Halpin, J., & Teixeira, R. (2009). Battle of the
Sexes Give Way to Negotiations. In H. Boushey
and A. OLeary (Eds.), The Shriver Report: A
Womans Nation Changes Everything (p. 412).
Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://www.
americanprogress.org/issues/2009/10/pdf/
awn/a_womans_nation.pdf
13
Smith, T., & Kim, J. (2010, June). Paid Sick
Days: Attitudes and Experiences (p. 9). National
Opinion Research Center at the University of
Chicago Publication. Retrieved 26 April 2012,
from http://www.publicwelfare.org/resources/
DocFiles/psd2010fnal.pdf
14
Institute for Womens Policy Research.
(2010, October 29). Majority of Voters Support
Workplace Flexibility, Job Quality, and Family
Support Policies. Reporting fndings from a
survey of 2,080 registered voters nationwide,
conducted September through October 2010.
15
Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 42
U.S.C. 2000e(k).
16
Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 29
U.S.C. 2612(a).
17
Ness, D. (2008, February 13). Testimony
before the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor and Pensions Subcommittee on Children
and Families. Washington, D.C. Retrieved 26 April
2012, from http://help.senate.gov/imo/media/
doc/Ness.pdf; and U.S. Department of Labor.
(2007, June). The Family and Medical Leave Act
Regulations: A Report on the Department of
Labors Request for Information 2007 Update (p.
129). Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://www.
dol.gov/whd/Fmla2007Report.htm
18
Cantor, D., Waldfogel, J., Kerwin, J., et al.
(2000). Balancing the Needs of Families and
Employers: Family and Medical Leave Surveys
(p. 2-5). Westat and U.S. Department of Labor
Publication. Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://
www.dol.gov/whd/fmla/toc.pdf
19
Waldfogel, J. (2001, September). Family
and medical leave: evidence from the 2000
surveys, Monthly Labor Review, 18. Retrieved
26 April 2012, from http://www.bls.gov/opub/
mlr/2001/09/art2full.pdf
20
In 2010, the Department of Labor issued an
Administrators Interpretation of in loco parentis
that makes clear the right of same-sex partners
to take leave to care for their partners child; U.S.
Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division.
(2010, June 22). Administrators Interpretation
No. 2010-3. Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://
www.dol.gov/whd/opinion/adminIntrprtn/
FMLA/2010/FMLAAI2010_3.pdf
21
See note 18, p. 2-16.
22
Ibid, p. 4-9.
23
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 29 U.S.C.
207(r).
24
Smaller employers can apply for a hardship
exemption, but U.S. Department of Labor
guidance has interpreted that exemption strictly
so that an employer would have to show actual
hardship each time a woman requests the right
to pump.
25
See note 1.
26
Ray, R., Gornick, J., & Schmitt, J. (2009, June).
Parental Leave Policies in 21 Countries: Assessing
Generosity and Gender Equality (p. 7). Center
for Economic and Policy Research Publication.
Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://www.cepr.net/
documents/publications/parental_2008_09.pdf;
Australia instituted a paid parental leave program
in 2010. See Paid Parental Leave Act 2010 (Cth).
27
Matos, K., & Galinsky, E. (2012). 2012
National Study of Employers (p. 21). Families
and Work Institute Publication. Retrieved 2 May
2012 from, http://familiesandwork.org/site/
research/reports/NSE_2012.pdf; and Galinsky,
E., Bond, J., Sakai, K., et al. (2008). National
Study of Employers (p. 6). Families and Work
Institute Publication. Retrieved 26 April 2012,
from http://familiesandwork.org/site/research/
reports/2008nse.pdf
28
See note 3.
29
Ibid.
30
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012, April).
Current Population Survey: Employed persons by
occupation, sex, and age. Table A-19. Retrieved
26 April 2012, from http://www.bls.gov/web/
empsit/cpseea19.htm; See also note 3. Women
are overrepresented in industries such as sales
and offce employment, and are more likely to
have part-time employment. Workers in these
industries and in part-time jobs are less likely to
have paid sick time or paid vacation time.
31
Working Mother. (2011, October). 100 Best
Companies. Working Mother, 52-62.
32
Ibid. Data analysis by the National
Partnership for Women & Families.
33
See note 18. Workers paid less than $20,000
made up 16 percent of the workforce in 2000 but
only 10 percent of those eligible for FMLA leave.
34
Waldfogel, J. (1999, October). Family Leave
Coverage: Family leave coverage in the 1990s.
Monthly Labor Review, 13. Retrieved 26 April
2012, from http://www.bls.gov/mlr/1999/10/
art2full.pdf.
35
State of California Employment Development
Department. (2011). State Disability (SDI)
Statistical Information: Paid Family Leave (PFL)
Program Statistics. Retrieved 20 April 2012, from
http://www.edd.ca.gov/Disability/pdf/qspf_PFL_
Program_Statistics.pdf (Unpublished calculation)
36
State of New Jersey Department of Labor and
Workforce Development. (2009-2012). Family
Leave Monthly Report. Retrieved 20 April 2012,
from http://lwd.dol.state.nj.us/labor/fi/content/
fi_program_stats.html (Unpublished calculation)
37
Appelbaum, E., & Milkman, R. (2011). Leaves
That Pay: Employer and Worker Experiences
with Paid Family Leave in California (p. 4). Center
for Economic and Public Research Publication.
cepr.net/documents/publications/paid-family-
leave-1-2011.pdf
38
Gomby, D., & Pei, D. (2009). Newborn
Family Leave: Effects on Children, Parents, and
Business. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Publication. Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://
www.packard.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/
NFLA_fullreport_fnal.pdf
39
Berger, L., Hill, J., & Waldfogel, J. (2005).
Maternity Leave, Early Maternal Employment and
Child Health and Development in the U.S. The
Economic Journal, 115(501), 44.
40
Zero to Three. (2009). Building a Secure and
Healthy Start: Family Leave in the Early Years.
zerotothree.org/public-policy/policy-toolkit/
familyleavesingmar5.pdf (Citing Kamerman, S.
B. (2006). Parental leave policies: The impact on
child well-being. International Review of Leave
Policies and Related Research, 57, 1621.)
41
United States Breastfeeding Committee.
(2011). Breastfeeding Saves Billions: Fund
Breastfeeding Support. United States
Breastfeeding Committee Publication. Retrieved
26 April 2012, from http://www.usbreastfeeding.
org/LinkClick.aspx?link=Publications%2fHealth-
Endnotes for Expecting Better
Care-Reform-One-Page-USBC-update.
pdf&tabid=70&mid=388
42
See note 37, p. 26.
43
Ibid, p. 26.
44
Nepomnyaschy, L., & Waldfogel, J. (2007).
Paternity Leave and Fathers Involvement with
Their Young Children. Community, Work, and
Family, 10(4), 427-453.
45
See note 37, p. 29.
46
Ibid, p. 23.
47
Ibid, p. 26.
48
Laughlin, L. (2011, December 7). Presentation
to the National Partnership for Women &
Families Work-Life Lunch Group, Washington,
D.C. Calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau
Survey of Income and Program Participation,
2008 Panel, Wave 2. Data on fle with the
National Partnership for Women & Families.
49
Sasha Corporation. (2007). Compilation of
Turnover Cost Studies. Retrieved 26 April 2012,
from http://www.sashacorp.com/turnframe.html
50
See note 37, p. 5.
51
Ibid, p. 8.
52
See note 8, p. 11.
53
Houser, L., & Varatanian, T. (2012, January).
Pay Matters: The Positive Economic Impacts of
Paid Family Leave for Families, Businesses and
the Public (p. 6). Rutgers Center for Women and
Work Publication. Retrieved 26 April 2012, from
http://smlr.rutgers.edu/paymatters-cwwreport-
january2012
54
Ibid, p. 7.
55
Ibid, p. 8.
56
Ibid. p. 8.
57
Some state laws allow workers job-protected
family and medical leave for family care and
personal medical issues of all kinds; these laws
apply to new and expecting parents as well as
to other workers who need leave to care for
seriously ill family members and/or their own
serious medical conditions. Other state laws
specifcally provide for pregnancy disability
leave. States are given points when their laws
exceed federal standards, whether they address
family and pregnancy leave in the same statute
or in different statutes.
58
States that provide both family and medical
leave to workers in smaller businesses are given
points under the family leave category to avoid
double counting.
59
Massachusetts and Montana call this type of
leave maternity leave and permit mothers time
to care for their new child (rather than simply just
to address their own medical issues) during their
leave. Those states are counted in this category
because their laws only apply to women.
60
States that provide both family and medical
leave to workers with less time on the job are
given points under the family leave category
to avoid double counting, except where birth
mothers are provided two buckets of leave
that allow them to take a longer leave than a
biological father or an adoptive parent.
61
States that provide a longer period of both
family and medical leave are given points under the
family leave category to avoid double counting.
62
In the frst edition of Expecting Better,
states were awarded points if they provided
job-protected pregnancy disability leave for
a reasonable or unspecifed length of time.
A review of relevant case law reveals that the
reasonable length of leave permitted is typically
less than the 12 weeks permitted by the federal
FMLA. Therefore, points were not awarded to
these states in this second edition.
63
As discussed elsewhere in this report, the
FMLA and the FLSAs protections for nursing
mothers each protect only particular segments
of the workforce. The FMLA applies only
to places of employment with 50 or more
employees within a 75-mile radius and, within
those workplaces, only to workers who have
been on the job for at least 12 months and
have worked 1,250 hours within the prior 12
months. The FLSA right-to-pump provision
applies to non-exempt workers (those who
are paid hourly or are subject to overtime pay
protections), but not to salaried workers.
64
Alaska Stat. 39.20.500(b).
65
Ariz. Admin. Code R2-5-413.
66
Ariz. Admin. Code R2-5-414(D).
67
Ark. Code. Ann. 11-5-116.
68
Ibid.
69
Calif. Unemp. Ins. Code 3300-3306.
70
Calif. Unemp. Ins. Code 2625-2630.
71
Department. FAQ Pregnancy. Retrieved 26
April 2012, from http://edd.ca.gov/Disability/
FAQ_DI_Pregnancy.htm
72
Calif. Govt Code 12945(b)(3).; La. Rev. Stat.
23:342(4). (Applies to employers with more than
25 employees.)
73
Calif. Govt Code 12945 (b)(1).
74
Calif. Fam. Code 297.5; Cal. Govt Code
12945.2.
75
Calif. Govt Code 12926, 12945.
76
Calif. Lab. Code 233.
77
Calif. Lab. Code 1030-1031.
78
Department. (2011, September). State Disability
Insurance Program. Retrieved 26 April 2012, from
http://www.edd.ca.gov/pdf_pub_ctr/de8714c.pdf
79
Calif. Fam. Code 297.5; Cal. Govt Code
12945.2.
80
Calif. Govt Code 12926, 12945.
81
Calif. Lab. Code 233.
82
Calif. Lab. Code 1030-1031.
83
Colo. Rev. Stat. 8-13.5-103(1), 8-13.5-104.
84
4 Colo. Code. Regs. 801(5-25).
85
4 Colo. Code. Regs. 801(5-5).
86
Colo. Rev. Stat. 8-13.5-103(1), 8-13.5-104.
87
Connecticut employees who work for
employers with between 50 and 74 employees
would only receive federal FMLA protection.
88
Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-51kk(1).
89
Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-51ll.
90
Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-51kk, 46b-38rr.
91
Conn. Gen. Stat. 46a-60(a)(7).
92
Conn. Gen. Stat. 46a-51.
93
2011 Conn. Acts 11-52 (Reg. Sess.)
94
Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-51pp(c)(1).
95
Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-40w.
96
Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. 5-196(20). Some
employees do not have any tenure requirement.
97
Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. 5-248a(a).
98
Conn. Gen. Stat. 46a-60(a)(7).
99
Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. 31-40w.
100
Del. Code. Ann. tit. 14, 1333; tit. 29,
5116(b), 5120.
101
D.C. Code 32-516
.
102
D.C. Code 32-501(1), 32-502(a).
103
D.C. Code 32-503(a).
104
Government of the District of Columbia Offce
of Personnel. (2001, December 10). Procedures
on Family and Medical Leave under the D.C.
Family and Medical Leave Act. Retrieved 26 April
2012, from http://dc.gov/downloads/ABOUT%20
DCPS/Human%20Resources/Downloadables/
DCPS-HR-REQUEST-FOR-FAMILY-MEDICAL-
LEAVE.pdf
105
D.C. Code 32-501(4); In addition, D.C. law
recognizes same-sex marriages, so same-sex
couples are also covered by the D.C. law. See D.C.
Code 46-401.
106
D.C. Code 32-131.02(b).
107
D.C. Code 32-131.02(a).
108
D.C. Code 2-1401.02(10), 2-1402.82(d).
109
D.C. Code 32-501(1), 32-502(a).
110
D.C. Code 32-503(a).
111
D.C. Code 32-516.
112
D.C. Code 32-501(4).
113
D.C. Code 32-131.01(3)(B), 32-131.02(b).
114
D.C. Code 2-1401.02(10), 2-1402.82(d).
115
Fla. Stat. 110.221.
116
Haw. Rev. Stat. 392-3, 392-21, 392-23.
117
Haw. Rev. Stat. 392-41.
118
119
Haw. Rev. Stat. 398-1, 398-3.
120
121
Haw. Code. R. 12-46-108.
122
Haw. Rev. Stat. 398-2, 398-4(c).
123
Haw. Rev. Stat. 392-3, 392-21, 392-23.
124
Haw. Rev. Stat.. 398-1, 398-3.
125
Haw. Rev. Stat. 398-1, 398-3.
126
Haw. Code. R. 12-46-108.
127
Haw. Rev. Stat. 398-4(c).
128
820 Ill. Comp. Stat. 260/5, 260/10, 260-15.
129
Ill. Admin. Code tit. 80 303.130.
130
Ill. Admin. Code tit. 80 303.148.
131
820 Ill. Comp. Stat. 260/5, 260/10, 260-15.
132
Ind. Code 22-2-14-1, 22-2-14-2(a).
133
Ind. Code 5-10-6-2(a).
134
Iowa Code 216.6(2)(e), (6)(a).
135
Iowa Code 216.6(2)(e), (6)(a).
136
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. 337.015.
137
101 Ky. Admin. Regs. 2:102 2(3), 3:015 2(3).
138
La. Rev. Stat. Ann. 23:341(A).
139
La. Rev. Stat. Ann. 23:342(2)(b).
140
La. Rev. Stat. Ann. 23:341(B)(1).
141
La. Rev. Stat. Ann. 23:342(2)(b).
142
La. Rev. Stat. Ann. 23:341(B)(1).
143
Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 26 844(1).
144
Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 26 843(4), (8).
145
146
Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 26 636.
147
Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 26 603(1)(A), 604.
148
149
Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 26 843(4), (8).
150
151
Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 26 636.
152
Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 26 603(1)(A), 604.
153
Md. Code. Ann., Lab. & Empl. 3-802.
154
Md. Code. Ann., State. Pers. & Pens. 9-501,
9-505.
155
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, 105D; ch. 151B,
1(5).
156
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, 105D.
157
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, 105D; ch. 151B,
1(5).
158
159
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Human Resources Division. (2009, January).
Enhanced Family and Medical Leave Guide (pp.
5, 8).
160
Minn. Stat. 181.940 (Subd. 3).
161
Minn. Stat. 181.940 (Subd. 2), 181.941.
162
Minn. Stat. 181.939.
163
Minn. Stat. 181.9413.
164
Minn. Stat. 181.940 (Subd. 2), 181.941.
165
Minn. Stat. 181.939.
166
Mo. Rev. Stat. 105.271.; Mo. Code. Regs.
Ann. tit. 1 20-5.020(2)(K).
167
Mont. Code. Ann. 49-2-101(10)-(11), 49-2-
310, 49-2-311.
168
Mont. Code. Ann. 49-2-310(2), (4); 49-2-
311.
169
Mont. Code. Ann. 49-2-101(10)-(11), 49-2-
310, 49-2-311.
170
Mont. Code. Ann. 49-2-310(2), 49-2-311.
171
State of Montana. (n.d.). Salary and Benefts
Information Overview. Retrieved 26 April
2012, from http://mt.gov/statejobs/salary.
mcpx#Maternity
172
Mont. Code. Ann. 2-18-606; See also note 148.
173
Mont. Code. Ann. 39-2-216.
174
Mont. Code. Ann. 39-2-215.
175
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. 354-A:2(VI)-(VII),
354-A:7(VI)(b).
176
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. 354-A:7(VI)(b).
177
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. 354-A:2(VI)-(VII),
354-A:7(VI)(b).
178
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. 354-A:7(VI)(b).
179
N.J. Stat. Ann. 43:21-27(k),(o), 43:21-38.
180
N.J. Stat. Ann. 43:21-25-43:21-31; State of
New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce
Development. (n.d.). Pregnancy Temporary
Disability Benefts for Pregnancy Related Disabilities.
Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://lwd.dol.state.
nj.us/labor/tdi/worker/state/sp_pregnancy.html
181
State of New Jersey Department of Labor and
Workforce Development. (n.d.). Cost to Worker
State Plan. Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://lwd.
dol.state.nj.us/labor/tdi/worker/state/sp_cost.html
182
State of New Jersey Department of Labor
and Workforce Development. (n.d.). Family Leave
Insurance Frequently Asked Questions (#41).
Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://lwd.dol.
state.nj.us/labor/fi/content/fi_faq.html#41
183
State of New Jersey Department of Labor
and Workforce Development. (n.d.). Pregnancy
Temporary Disability Benefts for Pregnancy
Related Disabilities. Retrieved 26 April 2012, from
http://lwd.dol.state.nj.us/labor/tdi/worker/state/
sp_pregnancy.html
184
N.J. Stat. Ann. 34:11B-3(f); New Jersey Offce
of the Attorney General. (2011, April). Civil Rights
Fact Sheet: The New Jersey Family Leave Act.
Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://www.state.
nj.us/lps/dcr/downloads/fafactsheet.pdf
185
N.J. Stat. Ann. 34:11B-3(e).
186
N.J. Stat. Ann. 34:11B-3(h), ( j), 37:1-31.
187
New Jersey Offce of the Attorney General.
(2011, April). Civil Rights Fact Sheet: The New
Jersey Family Leave Act. Retrieved 26 April 2012,
from http://www.state.nj.us/lps/dcr/downloads/
fafactsheet.pdf
188
N.J. Stat. Ann. 43:21-27(a)(1),(k)(o), 43:21-
38.
189
N.J. Stat. Ann. 43:21-27(a). Governmental
entity may elect to become a covered employer
for TDI purposes but is automatically a covered
employer for paid family leave insurance
purposes, 43:21-27 (b).
190
N.J. Stat. Ann. 34:11B-3(e).
191
N.J. Admin. Code 4A:6-1.3(g)(3).
192
N.M. Stat. 28-1-2, 28-20-2.
193
N.M. Stat. 28-20-2.
194
N.Y. Workers Comp. Law 201-205; New
York State Workers Compensation Board. (n.d.).
Disability Benefts (Off-the-Job Injury or Illness)
Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved 26 April
2012, from http://www.wcb.ny.gov/content/
main/offthejob/CommonQuestions_DB.jsp
195
New York State Workers Compensation
Board. (n.d.). Disability Benefts (Off-the-Job
Injury or Illness) Frequently Asked Questions.
wcb.ny.gov/content/main/offthejob/
CommonQuestions_DB.jsp
196
N.Y. Lab. Law 206-c.
197
New York State Department of Civil Service.
(1991, January). Attendance and Leave Manual,
Leaves Without Pay (Part 22), Section 22.1
Leave of Absence; Duration. Retrieved 30
September 2011, from http://www.cs.ny.gov/
attend_leave_manual/022LeavesWithoutPay/22_
1/22_1Rulespages-LeaveofAbsenceDuration.htm
198
Ibid.
199
N.Y. Lab. Law 206-c.
200
N.D. Cent. Code 54-52.4-03.
201
Ohio Rev. Code. Ann. 124.136.
202
Ohio Admin. Code 123:1-33-01, 123:1-33-
05, 123:1-33-06.
203
Ohio Admin. Code 123:1-33-05(B).
204
Ohio Admin. Code 123:1-32-05(A)(5),
123:1-47(A)(39).
205
Ore. Rev. Stat. 659A.153(1).
206
Ore. Rev. Stat. 659A.156, 659A.162(1).
207
Ore. Rev. Stat. 106.340, 659A.150(4).
208
Ore. Rev. Stat. 659A.162(2)(a).
209
Ore. Rev. Stat. 659A.159(1)(d), 659A.174(2).
210
Ore. Rev. Stat. 653.077.
211
Ore. Rev. Stat. 659A.156, 659A.162(1).
212
Ore. Rev. Stat. 106.340, 659A.150(4).
213
Ore. Rev. Stat. 659A.162(2)(a).
214
Ore. Rev. Stat. 659A.159(1)(d), 659A.174(2).
215
216
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Governors
Offce. (2007). Management Directive 530.30(4)
(f), (m).
217
Offce. (2008). Management Directive 530.2(3)(d).
218
Offce. (2007). Management Directive 530.30(4)
(f), (m).
219
Offce. (2008). Management Directive 530.2(3)(e).
220
R.I. Gen. Laws 28-41-8.
221
R.I. Gen. Laws 28-40-1, 28-40-3.
222
Rhode Island Department of Labor and
Training. (n.d.). Temporary Disability Insurance
Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved 26 April
2012, from http://www.dlt.ri.gov/tdi/tdifaqs.htm
223
R.I. Gen. Laws 28-48-1(2), 28-48-2(a).
Workers are entitled to a maximum of 13 weeks
in any two calendar years, compared to 12 weeks
in a 12-month period under the federal FMLA.
224
R.I. Gen. Laws 23-13.2-1.
225
R.I. Gen. Laws 28-39-3.
226
R.I. Gen. Laws 28-41-1(2), 28-48-2(a).
227
R.I. Gen. Laws 28-48-1(5).
228
R.I. Gen. Laws 23-13.2-1.
229
State of Rhode Island. (2010, September
22). Employee Handbook: Sick Leave with Pay
(Exception Code S). Retrieved 26 April 2012, from
http://www.hr.ri.gov/documents/Handbook/
leave/1200_Sick%20Leave%20with%20Pay_9-22-
2010.pdf
230
S.C. Code. Ann. 8-11-40(C), 8-11-155.
231
Tenn. Code. Ann. 4-21-408(a), (d)(2).
232
Tenn. Code. Ann. 50-1-305.
233
Tenn. Code. Ann. 4-21-102(5), 4-21-408.
234
235
236
Texas Govt Code Ann. 661.913.
237
Texas Govt Code Ann. 661.202(d)-(e).
238
Utah Admin. Code R477-7-4(2).
239
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21 471(1).
240
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21 471(4), 472(a)(1).
241
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21 471(1), (3), 472(a)(2).
242
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15 1204(e)(12); tit. 21
471(3)(B), 472(a).
243
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21 302(1), 305.
244
Vermont Department of Human Resources.
(2008, August 4). Personnel Policy & Procedure
Manual (pp. 281-282). Retrieved 26 April 2012,
from http://humanresources.vermont.gov/sites/
dhr/fles/pdf/policies_procedures/DHR-Policy_
Manual.pdf
245
Ibid.
246
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21 302(1), 305.
247
Va. Code. Ann. 51.1-1110.
248
Va. Code. Ann. 51.1-1107, 51.1-1108.
249
Wash. Rev. Code 49.86.010, 49.86.030,
49.86.050.
250
Wash. Rev. Code 49.86.060.
251
252
Wash. Rev. Code 49.78.020 (7), (17).
253
Wash. Rev. Code 49.60.040(11); Wash.
Admin. Code 162-04-010.
254
Wash. Rev. Code 49.60.040(10); Wash.
Admin. Code 162-30-020(4).
255
Wash. Admin. Code 162-30-020(4)(a), (c).
256
Wash. Rev. Code 49.78.390; Wash. Admin.
Code 162-04-020(4)(d).
257
Washington State Department of Labor
& Industries. (2010, March). Washington
State Family Leave Act Q&A (#6). Retrieved
26 April 2012, from http://www.lni.wa.gov/
WorkplaceRights/fles/FamilyLeaveFAQs.pdf
258
259
Wash. Rev. Code 49.86.010, 49.86.030,
49.86.050.
260
261
Wash. Admin. Code 357-31-460, 357-31-
465, 357-31-475.
262
Wash. Admin. Code 357-31-500.
263
Wash. Rev. Code 49.78.020 (7), (16), (17).
264
265
Wis. Stat. 103.10(2)(c).
266
Wis. Stat. 103.10(1)(ar).
267
Wis. Stat. 103.10(3), (4).
268
Wis. Stat. 103.10(5)(b).
269
Wis. Adm. Code E.R. 18.14(2)(d), (e).
270
Wis. Stat. 103.10(1)(c).
721
Wis. Stat. 103.10(3).
272
Wis. Stat. 103.10(1)(ar).
273
Wis. Stat. 103.10(4).
274
Wis. Adm. Code E.R. 18.01(4), 18.03(4).
275
United States Offce of Personnel
Management. (2010, December 22). Nursing
Mothers in Federal Employment. Memorandum
for Heads of Executive Departments and
Agencies. Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://
www.chcoc.gov/Transmittals/TransmittalDetails.
aspx?TransmittalID=3281
276
5 C.F.R. 630.401.
277
United States Offce of Personnel
Management. (2010, December 3). Final
Regulations on Sick Leave. Memorandum for
Human Resources Directors. Retrieved 26 April
2012, from http://www.chcoc.gov/Transmittals/
TransmittalDetails.aspx?TransmittalId=3237
Expecting Better for
All Working Families
A Special Section of the Second Edition
of Expecting Better
Introduction
Workers caregiving responsibilities extend well beyond caring for new babies, adopted or
foster children, or a spouse or partner disabled by pregnancy. Frequently, women and men
must also balance their work responsibilities with caring for a special-needs or chronically ill
child; an ill parent, spouse or domestic partner; or even an ill sibling, grandparent, grandchild
or in-law. Workers also have routine caregiving needs, such as attending parent-teacher
conferences during work hours or accompanying a parent to a medical appointment.
The primary focus of Expecting Better is workplace supports for new and expecting parents, but it is
also important to recognize working families critical need for public policies that go beyond the federal
Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) policies that help workers meet a more diverse range of
caregiving responsibilities and care for a broader defnition of family members. Many of the same state
laws discussed in Expecting Better also appear below, but the focus of this special section is on the
rights and protections that these laws offer to help workers meet broader family caregiving needs.
Expecting Better for All Working Families summarizes state policies that improve on the FMLA by:
k providing private sector workers with paid leave for family caregiving;
k providing workers with unpaid leave to care for family members other than the family members
covered by the FMLA;
k providing workers with extended leave for uses beyond those included in the FMLA; and
k providing workers with leave for small necessities, such as attending their childrens school
activities or accompanying family members to medical appointments.
This section also summarizes improvements that more than 20 states have made to their
unemployment insurance laws to recognize that family caregiving responsibilities often compel
workers to leave their jobs. These states provide unemployment insurance benefts to workers who
are caring for ill or disabled family members.
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES | SPECIAL SECTION | EXPECTING BETTER 54 54 NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES | SPECIAL SECTION | EXPECTING BETTER
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES | SPECIAL SECTION | EXPECTING BETTER 55
Millions of Working Americans Provide Unpaid Family Care and the
Demand is Growing
There is a growing need for laws and policies that recognize the needs of working family caregivers.
Sixty-six million people in the United States nearly one in three adults are unpaid family
caregivers.
1
The majority of family caregivers work outside the home, and seven in 10 have been
employed at some point while providing care.
2

Most family caregivers assist parents or older
relatives,
3
but one in seven provides assistance
to a child with special needs.
4
One-third of family
caregivers cares for more than one person,
frequently an adult and a child.
5
Improving policies to support caregivers is a 21st
century imperative. The population is aging:
By 2030, there will be 71 million older adults in
the United States double the number there
are now.
6
This means that even more workers will need time off to care for aging family members.

Already, approximately one-third of caregivers providing eldercare ends up leaving the workforce or
reducing the number of hours they work taking a fnancial toll on their current economic stability
and impacting their long-term retirement security.
7
Updating workplace policies to support these
workers will be vital to their economic security and the well-being of their families.
Workers Need Public Policies to Manage the Dual Demands of Work
and Caregiving
Working families need public policies that recognize their family responsibilities because employers policies
often fail to match working caregivers needs. For example, one in fve family caregivers reports having had
to take a leave of absence from work at some point while caregiving.
8
Yet, according to government data, the
overwhelming majority of workers do not have paid family leave that can be used for such purposes.
9

Beyond access to paid leave, caregivers urgently need fexibility in scheduling: Two-thirds of caregivers
report that they have had to go to work late, leave early or take time off during the day to handle
caregiving responsibilities.
10
Unfortunately, day-to-day fexibility in scheduling is not the norm for most
workers. Even though many businesses allow some workers control over their schedules, only 10 percent
of employers allow all workers to change their start or end times on short notice.
11

The mismatch between working caregivers needs and workplace policies puts families economic security
at risk. Too often, caregivers jeopardize their fnancial and job security to care for a loved one, or they
report for work worried that a child, parent, spouse, sibling or grandparent is going without needed care.
State Family and Medical Leave Innovations
Just as many states have improved upon federal FMLA rights for new and expecting parents, some
states have recognized a broader range of family care responsibilities than those covered by the FMLA.
As shown below, paid family leave insurance programs in California and New Jersey each provide working
family caregivers with a portion of their wages for up to six weeks per year to care for an ill child, spouse,
parent or same-sex partner. One state and the District of Columbia require many employers to provide
paid sick leave to care for ill family members or family members in need of medical care.
The average worker over 50 years of age
who leaves the workforce to take care of
a parent will lose more than $300,000 in
earnings and retirement income.
MetLife Mature Market Institute. (2011, June). The MetLife Study
of Caregiving Costs to Working Caregivers: Double Jeopardy for
Baby Boomers Caring for Their Parents.
Family and Medical Leave Policies
Federal law provides some protections for working caregivers, and laws in more than a dozen states expand on
those protections. But much more is needed to bring public policies in line with the needs of the workforce.
Workers need paid, job-protected leave to attend medical appointments and to provide more intensive health-
related and personal care to their loved ones. They also need time to care for their children and deepen their
involvement in their childrens school activities.
And, although the focus of this section is on laws that provide workers with leave from work, working caregivers
also need public policies that will provide them more control over their schedules, more fexibility in work hours
and shift start and end times, and the ability to refuse
overtime so that workers can meet child care, eldercare
and other family responsibilities.
The Federal Family and Medical Leave Act
The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) addresses
some of the key challenges working caregivers face
when they have to take time away from work. The
FMLA provides eligible workers with up to 12 weeks
of unpaid, job-protected leave to care for a spouse,
parent or child when that family member has a serious
health condition.
12
A worker is eligible for leave to care
for a family member when the family member is unable
to care for his or her own basic medical, hygienic or
nutritional needs; needs assistance with transportation to
medical appointments; or is in inpatient or home care and would beneft from psychological comfort or reassurance.
Workers may also take leave to substitute for regular caregivers when the family members regular caregivers are
unavailable, or to make arrangements for ongoing care. Leave may be taken intermittently to accommodate the
nature of a family members serious health condition or to share caregiving responsibilities with another caregiver.
13
Special Provisions for Military Family Members
In 2008 and 2009, the FMLA was amended to cover the special needs of military family members. Under these
amendments, the spouse, child, parent or next of kin of a seriously injured military member is entitled to 26 weeks
of unpaid job-protected leave. Furthermore, family members of a deployed service member may use FMLA leave
to respond to qualifying exigencies arising out of deployment.
14

Where the FMLA Falls Short
As discussed in Expecting Better, only about half of workers in the United States are covered by the FMLA.
15

Workers employed by frms with fewer than 50 employees, those who have not worked at least 1,250 hours
for their current employer in the past year, and those who havent been with the same employer for at least
a year, are not eligible for leave under the law.
In addition, workers have many urgent caregiving needs that are not covered by the FMLA. More than one-third
of family caregivers provide care for a family member that falls outside the FMLAs protection, including parents-
in-law (8 percent), grandparents (8 percent), siblings (5 percent) and other relatives (11 percent).
16
And, although
the law covers caregiving for spouses, it does not cover care for domestic partners or same-sex spouses.
Finally, although the FMLA gives workers leave to care for family members with serious health conditions, it
does not help them fulfll more run-of-the-mill caregiving responsibilities, such as attending parent-teacher
conferences or taking relatives to medical appointments.
A KEY STEP TOWARD RECOGNIZING A
BroaDEr ConCEPt oF FaMiLy
In 2010, the Department of Labor issued an
administrators interpretation of the FMLAs defnition
of parent, making clear that family members may
qualify for FMLA leave to care for a child if they stand
in loco parentis (in the place of a parent) to that child,
regardless of whether they are the childs biological
or adoptive parent. This clarifcation helps to ensure
that same-sex partners, grandparents and others who
provide daily care or fnancial support to a child will
be able to use FMLA leave to care for that child.
56 NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES | SPECIAL SECTION | EXPECTING BETTER
Ten states and the District of Columbia have FMLA laws that cover more family caregiving
relationships than the FMLA, and two of these states provide leave for more caregiving purposes
than the FMLA.
Eight states and the District of Columbia offer leave for employees to participate in their childrens
school activities. Two of those states also permit leave to be used to attend to the routine health needs
of family members.
PAID FAMILY LEAVE AND SICK LEAVE
STATE PAID LEAVE POLICY
California Provides up to six weeks of caregiving leave at 55 percent wage replacement, up to a maximum cap,
to workers caring for a child, parent, spouse or domestic partner with a serious health condition
17
New Jersey Provides up to six weeks of caregiving leave at 67 percent wage replacement, up to a maximum cap,
to workers caring for a child, parent, spouse, domestic partner or civil-union partner with a serious
health condition
18
District of
Columbia
Requires employers to provide most workers with a limited number of paid sick days each year
that can be used, among other things, to care for an ill spouse, domestic partner, parent, parent-in-
law, child, grandchild, sibling, sibling-in-law or a person with whom the worker is in a committed
relationship; to take these family members to a medical appointment; or to assist a family member
who is a victim of stalking, domestic violence or sexual abuse
19
Connecticut Requires most employers with 50 or more employees to provide certain categories of workers with up
to 40 hours of earned paid sick leave per year to care for a spouse, domestic partner, minor child or
adult child incapable of self-care because of mental or physical disability, or to address the impacts of
domestic violence or sexual assault.
20
STATE FAMILY LEAVE LAWS THAT INCLUDE ADDITIONAL FAMILY MEMBERS
STATE DEFINITION OF FAMILY (BEYOND CHILD, SPOUSE AND PARENT)
California Registered, formerly registered and surviving registered domestic partners and children of such
partners;
21
stepparent
22
Connecticut Civil-union partner;
23
parent-in-law
24
; stepparent
25
Hawaii Non-dependent adult child;
26
grandparent;
27
parent-in-law;
28
grandparent-in-law;
29
stepparent;
30

reciprocal benefciary
31
Maine Domestic partner and child of domestic partner;
32
non-dependent adult child;
33
sibling who lives with
employee
34
New Jersey Civil-union partner and child of civil-union partner;
35
parent-in-law;
36
stepparent
37
Oregon Domestic partner and child of domestic partner;
38
39
grandparent;
40

grandchild;
41
parent-in-law
42
Rhode Island Non-dependent adult child;
43
parent-in-law
44
Vermont Civil-union partner and child of civil-union partner;
45
46
parent-in-law
47
Washington Registered domestic partner and child of domestic partner
48
Wisconsin Registered or unregistered domestic partner;
49
parent-in-law
50
District of
Columbia
Person related by blood, legal custody or marriage;
51
child who lives with employee and for whom
employee permanently assumes and discharges parental responsibility;
52
person with whom
employee lives and maintains a committed relationship
53
STATES FAMILY LEAVE LAWS THAT PERMIT ADDITIONAL USES FOR LEAVE
STATE ADDITIONAL USES
Maine Death of employees family member if that family member is a servicemember killed while on active duty
54
Oregon Care of a child with an illness, injury or condition that is not serious but requires home care
55
SMaLL nECESSitiES LawS
STATE
EMPLOYERS COVERED,
BY SIZE AVAILABLE LEAVE PERMISSIBLE USES
California 25 or more employees
56
40 hours per year
57
To participate in a childs school activities
58
Colorado 50 or more employees
59
18 hours per year
60
To attend an academic activity for or with a child
61
Massachusetts 50 or more employees
62
24 hours per year
63
To participate in a childs school activities, or to
accompany a child or elderly relative to medical or
dental appointments
64
Minnesota Any size
65
16 hours per year
66
To attend a childs school conferences or school-
related activities
67
Nevada 50 or more employees
68
4 hours per year,
per child
69
To attend parent-teacher conferences, school-related
activities or school-sponsored events, or to volunteer
at a childs school
70
North Carolina Any size
71
4 hours per year
72
To attend or otherwise be involved at a childs school
73
Rhode Island 50 or more employees
74
10 hours per year
75
To attend a childs school conferences or other
school-related activities
76
Vermont 15 or more employees
77
24 hours per year
78
To participate in a childs school activities, to accompany
a family member to medical or dental appointments, or
to respond to a family members medical emergency
79
District of
Columbia
Any size
80
24 hours per year
81
To attend or participate in a childs school-related
events
82
Modernizing Unemployment Insurance Programs to Protect Caregivers
FEDERAL UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FUNDS AND THE RECOVERY ACT
Too often, workers lose or need to leave their jobs when serious family caregiving needs arise. Until
recently, these workers could not access unemployment insurance benefts when they were ready to
return to work after a period of caregiving because state unemployment insurance programs generally
deny benefts to workers who voluntarily leave their jobs. Leaving work for caregiving purposes did not
meet the defnition of good cause needed to qualify for unemployment insurance.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) offered states incentive payments
in the form of federal unemployment insurance funds to modernize their unemployment insurance
systems. One qualifying type of modernization was to defne good cause for leaving employment
to include certain compelling family reasons. The incentives increased the number of states
offering unemployment benefts to workers who lose their jobs due to a family members illness or
disability, bringing the number of states that offer such benefts to 21 plus the District of Columbia.
Unemployment insurance funds are not a substitute for paid family leave, but they do provide
additional economic security for workers who face caregiving challenges.
STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAMS THAT COVER JOB LOSS DUE TO AN ILLNESS
OR DISABILITY IN THE FAMILY
STATE PErMitS GooD CauSE For SEParatinG FroM work to inCLuDE CarinG For iLL FaMiLy MEMBEr
Alaska
Caring for an immediate family member (parent, child, spouse, sibling, grandparent or grandchild) with
a disability or illness
83
Arizona
The illness of an immediate family member (spouse, parent, child, sibling or any other person with a
similar relationship to the worker) or providing care for a family member
84
Arkansas
The illness, injury, pregnancy or disability of an immediate family member (spouse, child, parent, sibling,
grandchild or grandparent)
85
California Caring for an elderly family member or a family member with a serious physical or mental illness
86
Colorado An immediate family member (spouse, parent or minor child) is suffering from an illness or disability
87
Connecticut Caring for a spouse, child or parent with an illness or disability
88
Delaware Caring for a spouse, minor child or parent with an illness or disability
89
Hawaii The illness or disability of an immediate family member
90
Illinois
Caring for a spouse, child or parent who is in poor physical or mental health or is mentally or
physically disabled
91

Maine The illness or disability of an immediate family member
92
Minnesota
Providing necessary care because of the illness, injury or disability of an immediate family member
(spouse, parent, stepparent, child, stepchild or grandchild)
93
Nevada
Providing care for an immediate family member (spouse, parent, domestic partner, grandparent, sibling
or child) who is ill or has a disability
94
New Hampshire The illness or disability of an immediate family member
95
New York The illness or disability of an immediate family member
96
North Carolina
The disability or health condition of a minor child, a parent who has a disability or is aged, or a member
of the individuals immediate family (spouse, parent, sibling, child, grandparent or grandchild, whether
the relationship is biological, step, half or in-law) who has a disability
97
Oklahoma The illness or disability of an immediate family member (spouse, parent or minor child)
98
Oregon The illness or disability of an immediate family member (spouse, domestic partner, parent or minor child)
99
Rhode Island
Caring for an immediate family member (spouse, parent, parent-in-law or minor child) due to illness or
disability
100
South Carolina The illness or disability of an immediate family member (spouse, parent or minor child)
101
Texas The illness of a minor child or terminal illness of a spouse where reasonable alternative care is not available
102
Washington The illness or disability of an immediate family member
103
Wisconsin
The illness or disability of an immediate family member (parent, spouse, child or any other person for
whom the employee is and has been the source of care)
104
District of
Columbia
Caring for a family member (spouse, domestic partner, dependent child or any other individual related
by blood to the individual, spouse, domestic partner or child) who is ill or has a disability
105
Whats Next?
The state laws profled here not only help workers in these states, they can also serve as models for
other states and for national leaders. Working caregivers and their families have too much at stake to
wait much longer. The time for action is now.
106
1
National Alliance for Caregiving. (2009,
November). Caregiving in the U.S. 2009
(p.4). National Alliance for Caregiving, AARP
Publication. Retrieved 11 October 2011, from
http://www.caregiving.org/data/Caregiving_in_
the_US_2009_full_report.pdf
2
Ibid, pp. 52-53.
3
Ibid, p. 18.
4
Ibid, p. 15.
5
Ibid, p. 14.
6
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
& the Merck Company Foundation. (2007). The
State of Aging and Health in America 2007 (p.
iii). The Merck Company Foundation Publication.
Retrieved 11 October 2011, from http://www.cdc.
gov/aging/pdf/saha_2007.pdf
7
MetLife Mature Market Institute. (2011,
June). The MetLife Study of Caregiving Costs
to Working Caregivers (p. 10). MetLife Mature
Market Institute Publication. Retrieved 11
October 2011, from http://www.caregiving.org/
wp-content/uploads/2011/06/mmi-caregiving-
costs-working-caregivers.pdf
8
See note 1, p. 54.
9
Employee Benefts Survey Table 33. Leave
benefts: Access, private industry workers,
National Compensation Survey. Retrieved 24
October 2011, from http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ebs/
benefts/2011/ownership/private/table21a.pdf
10
See note 1, p. 54.
11
Galinsky, E., Sakai, K., & Wigton, T. (2008).
National Study of the Changing Workforce:
Workplace Flexibility Among Small Employers
(p. 5). Families and Work Institute Publication.
Retrieved 11 October 2011, from http://www.
familiesandwork.org/site/research/reports/
nscw08_workfex_DOL_101018.pdf
12
A serious health condition is defned at 29
C.F.R. 825.113. The FMLA only covers caregiving
leaves for children under certain circumstances.
FMLA leave is available to parents to care for
minor children and for adult children with
disabilities. An employer is not required to provide
FMLA leave to workers to care for a previously
healthy but now seriously ill adult child unless that
adult child has a disability. 29 C.F.R., 825.122.
13
Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29
C.F.R. 825.124.
14
For more information on both of these
provisions, see U.S. Department of Labor. (2010,
February). Fact Sheet #28A: The Family and Medical
Leave Act Military Family Leave Entitlements.
Retrieved 11 October 2011, from http://www.dol.
gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs28a.htm
15
Waldfogel, J. (2001, September). Family and
Medical Leave: Evidence from the 2000 Surveys.
Monthly Labor Review, (p.19). Retrieved 3
October 2011, from http://www.bls.gov/opub/
mlr/2001/09/art2full.pdf
16
See note 1, p. 18.
17
Cal. Unemp. Ins. Code 3301(a)(1).
18
N.J. Stat. Ann. 43:21 et seq.
19
D.C. Code 32-131.01(4), 32-131.02(b).
20
2011 Conn. Acts 11-52 (Reg. Sess.). Effective
January 1, 2012.
21
Calif. Fam. Code 297.5.
22
Calif. Govt Code 12945.2(c)(7).
23
Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-51kk. Effective October
1, 2010, all couples who entered into civil unions
in Connecticut were deemed to be married.
Conn. Gen. Stat. 46b-38rr. An employee is
thus permitted under the plain meaning of
Connecticuts family and medical leave statute to
take leave to care for a same-sex spouse or the
child of a same-sex spouse.
24
Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-51kk(7).
25
Ibid.
26
Haw. Rev. Stat. Ann. 398-1.
27
Ibid.
28
Ibid.
29
Ibid.
30
Ibid.
31
Haw. Rev. Stat. Ann., 398-3.
32
Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, 843(4).
33
Ibid.
34
Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, 843(4), (8).
35
N.J. Stat. Ann. 34:11B-3(a), 37:1-31.
36
N.J. Stat. Ann. 34:11B-3(h).
37
Ibid.
38
39
Ore. Rev. Stat. 659A.150(4).
40
Ibid.
41
Ibid.
42
Ibid.
43
R.I. Gen. Laws 28-48-1(5).
44
Ibid. Rhode Island also allows state
employees to take family leave to care for
seriously ill domestic partners.
45
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15 1204(e)(12).
46
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21 471(3)(B).
47
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21 472(a).
48
Wash. Rev. Code 49.78.020(1), (7), (17);
49.78.904.
49
Wis. Stat. 103.10(1).
50
Ibid.
51
D.C. Code 32-501(4)(A).
52
D.C. Code 32-501(4)(B).
53
D.C. Code 32-501(4)(C).
54
Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 26 843(4)(F).
55
Ore. Rev. Stat. 659A.159(1)(d).
56
Calif. Lab. Code 230.8.
57
Ibid. Certain state executive branch
employees may get an additional 20 hours of
leave per year. Calif. Code. Regs. tit. 2 599.912.
58
Calif. Lab. Code 230.8.
59
Colo. Rev. Stat. 8-13.3-102(4).
60
Colo. Rev. Stat. 8-13.3-103.
61
Ibid.
62
63
Ibid.
64
Ibid.
65
Minn. Stat. 181.940 (Subd. 3).
66
Minn. Stat. 181.9412.
67
Ibid.
68
Nev. Rev. Stat. 392.457, 394.179.
69
Ibid.
70
Ibid.
71
N. C. Gen. Stat. 95-28.3.
72
Ibid.
73
Ibid.
74
R. I. Gen. Laws 28-48-1(3)(i).
75
R. I. Gen. Laws 28-48-12.
76
Ibid.
77
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21 471(1).
78
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 472a.
79
Ibid.
80
D. C. Code 32-1201(1).
81
D. C. Code 32-1202.
82
Ibid.
83
Alaska Admin. Code tit. 8 85.095.
84
Ariz. Admin. Code R6-3-50155(F).
85
Ark. Code. Ann. 11-10-513(b)(2).
86
Calif. Code. Regs. tit. 22 1256-10.
87
Colo. Rev. Stat. 8-73-108(4)(v).
88
Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-236(a)(2).
89
Del. Code. Ann. tit. 19 3314(1).
90
Haw. Rev. Stat. 383-7.6.
91
820 Ill. Comp. Stat. 405/601(B)(1).
92
Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 26 1193(1)(A)(1).
93
Minn. Stat. 268.035, 268.095(7).
94
Letter from Cynthia Jones, Deputy Director,
Nevada Department of Employment, Training
and Rehabilitation, to Cheryl Atkinson,
Administrator, U.S. Department of Labor. (2009,
May). Retrieved 11 October 2011, from http://
www.doleta.gov/recovery/pdf/NV2-3.pdf
95
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. 282-A:32(I)(a)(6).
96
N.Y. Lab. Law 593(1)(b)(ii).
97
N.C. Gen. Stat. 96-8(27), 96-14(1).
98
Okla. Stat. tit. 40 2-210.
99
Ore. Admin. R. 471-030-0038(1).
100
R. I. Gen. Laws 28-44-17(a)(3).
101
S. C. Code. Ann. 41-35-125(B).
102
Tex. Lab. Code Ann. 207.046(a)(3),
207.045(d)(1), 207.045(e),
103
Wash. Rev. Code 50.20.050(1)(b)(ii).
104
Wis. Stat. 108.04(7)(c); State of Wisconsin
Department of Workforce Development. (2011,
August). Wisconsins Unemployment Insurance
Handbook for Employers (UCB-201). Retrieved
14 October 2011, from http://dwd.wisconsin.
gov/ui201/b7201.htm
105
D.C. Code 2-1401.02(11B), 51-110(d)(5).
Endnotes to Special Section
1875 Connecticut Avenue, NW | Suite 650 | Washington, DC 20009
202.986.2600 | www.NationalPartnership.org

Expecting Better

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Expecting Better

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Expecting Better

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Expecting Better:

A State-by-State Analysis of Laws That Help New Parents

You might also like