Psychology transitioned to being viewed as a scientific discipline focused on the study of mind and behavior. Early schools of thought included structuralism, which aimed to understand the mind by analyzing its elements, and functionalism, which focused on psychological processes rather than structures and asked what people do and why. Later, behaviorism emerged, emphasizing objective study of behavior over internal mental processes, with radical behaviorists like Watson arguing that any behavior could be shaped through control.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
208 views
Associationism: Early Ideas About Learning
Psychology transitioned to being viewed as a scientific discipline focused on the study of mind and behavior. Early schools of thought included structuralism, which aimed to understand the mind by analyzing its elements, and functionalism, which focused on psychological processes rather than structures and asked what people do and why. Later, behaviorism emerged, emphasizing objective study of behavior over internal mental processes, with radical behaviorists like Watson arguing that any behavior could be shaped through control.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
Psychology was increasingly seen as a distinct, unified, scientific
discipline that focuses on the study of mind and behavior.
Structuralism: Taking Inventory of the Mind o In structuralism, the first major school of thought in psychology, the goal was to understand the mind by analyzing its elements, such as particular sensations or thoughts. o Although structuralism is no longer a dynamic force, it is important for having taken the first steps toward making psychology a systematic, empirical science. o A forerunner to structuralism was the perspective of German psychologist Wilhelm Wundt, who some considered the founder of modern psychology. o Wundt believed that psychology should focus on immediate and direct (for ex., seeing narrow, vertical, spiky, green protrusions of varying lengths and widths, amassed closely together on a 2D surface), as opposed to mediated or interpreted, conscious experience (the inferred concepts of lawn and grass). o For Wundt, the optimal method by which a person could be trained to analyze such sensory experiences was a form of self-observation called introspection. o This method involves looking inward at pieces of information passing through consciousnessa form of self-observation. o Wundts student Edward Titchener, like Wundt believed that all consciousness could be reduced to elementary states. o After using strict structuralist principles in his teaching, research, and writing, Titchener changed his mind toward the end of his life. Like others, he recognized the problem that structuralism proposed too many elementary sensations. The number of such sensations could increase without end. Structuralism also provided no means for understanding processes of thought. Furthermore, it was probably too rigidly tied to a single methodology: introspection.
Functionalism: Why Do We Do What We Do The roots of structuralism are in Germany, but its countermovement, functionalism, originated in the United Statesthe first U.S.-born movement in psychology. Functionalism focuses on active psychological processes rather than on passive psychological structures or elements. The key difference between structuralists and functionalists was in the fundamentally different questions that they asked. Whereas structuralists asked, What are the elementary contents, the structures, of the human mind?, functionalists asked, What do people do, and why do they do it? Another way of viewing the difference between structuralism and functionalism is that structuralists considered humans and other organisms as largely passive in analyzing incoming sensations. Functionalists, in contrast, viewed humans and others as more actively engaged in processing their sensations and formulating their actions. Functionalists openness to diverse methodologies broadened the scope of psychological methods. Among the various approaches used by the functionalists was experimentation on animals. A leader in the functionalist movement was William James, whose chief contribution to the field of psychology was a single book, his landmark Principles of Psychology. James is particularly well known for his pragmatic theorizing about consciousness. He was leader in guiding functionalism toward pragmatism, a view of science and psychology that asserts that knowledge is validated by its usefulness. Functionalism, like structuralism, did not survive as an organized school of thought. The term function lacked clear definition as applied to psychology. The result was that the school did not hold together.
Associationism: Early Ideas About Learning o Associationism, like functionalism, was a less rigid school of psychology than an influential way of thinking. o In general, associationists are mainly interested in the middle- to higher-level mental processes, such as those of learning (this is opposite of Wundts insistence on studying elementary sensations). o Associationism examines how events or ideas can become associated in the mind, thereby resulting in a form of learning. o An influential associationist, the German experimenter Herman Ebbinghaus was the first experimenter to apply associationist principles systematically. o He used self-observation to study and quantify the relationship between rehearsalconscious repetition and recollection of material. o He found that frequent repetition mixes mental associations more firmly in memory, by extension, that repetition aids in learning. o Ebbinghauss ideas were elaborated by Edwin Guthrie, who proposed that two observed events (a stimulus and a response) become associated through their close temporal contiguitytheir occurring very close together in time. o In contrast, Edward Lee Thorndike, held that satisfaction, rather than Guthries temporal contiguity, is the key to forming assosciations. o Thorndike called this principle the law of effect: Over time the actions (the effect) for which an organism is rewarded (the satisfaction) are strengthened and are therefore are more likely to occur again in the future. o Associationism in its strictest form has not survived. The school of thought was overly simplistic and did not explain cognition, emotion, or many other psychological processes. o Nevertheless, associationism made a contribution to contemporary thinking in psychology and has been linked to many other theoretical viewpoints.
Psychology in the 20 th Century
An important 20 th century contribution was the idea that the primarysubject matter of psychology ought to be the self. In her self-psychology, Mary Whiton Calkins, argued both that the self should be the focus of psychological investigation and that the self must be studied in its social context.
Behaviorism: A Search for Rigor and Reduction Behaviorism is a theoretical outlook that emphasizes the idea that psychology should be scrupulously objective. John Watson and Radical Behaviorism
The individual usually acknowledged as the founder of radical behaviorism is American psychologist John Watson. John Watson had no use for internal mental contents or mechanisms. His radical conception of behaviorism stated that any behavior can be shaped or controlled. This view is dramatized in his famous challenge: Give me a dozen infants.and Ill guarantee to take any one at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might selectdoctor, lawyer, artist, merchant-chief and yes, even beggar and thiefregardless of his talents Behaviorism differed from earlier movements in psychology in its emphasis on nonhuman animal rather than human research participants. Watson himself preferred animal subjects. From his point of view, the simpler the organisms emotional and physiological makeup, the less the researcher needs to worry about any of the interference that can plague psychological research with humans as participants. An American behavioral psychologist who tried to connect the involuntary learning studied by Pavlov with the voluntary learning studied by Watson and Thorndike was Clark Hull. Hulls work was ignored for a decade before its importance was recognized. Hull was particularly influential for his belief that the laws of behavior could be quantifiedexpressed in terms of numerical quantitieslike the laws of other scientific disciplines.