This document provides an overview of the Indian electronics industry. It discusses how the industry has grown from being primarily government-owned in the 1960s to experiencing rapid growth after economic liberalization in the 1990s. Private and foreign investment was encouraged, leading to growth across various sectors like commercial electronics, software, telecommunications, and defense. While strides have been made, infrastructure like power, transportation, and telecommunications need further improvements to sustain high economic growth. The document aims to cover different segments of the industry for potential investors, examining the roles of government, major companies, research organizations, and educational institutions in building the industry.
This document provides an overview of the Indian electronics industry. It discusses how the industry has grown from being primarily government-owned in the 1960s to experiencing rapid growth after economic liberalization in the 1990s. Private and foreign investment was encouraged, leading to growth across various sectors like commercial electronics, software, telecommunications, and defense. While strides have been made, infrastructure like power, transportation, and telecommunications need further improvements to sustain high economic growth. The document aims to cover different segments of the industry for potential investors, examining the roles of government, major companies, research organizations, and educational institutions in building the industry.
This document provides an overview of the Indian electronics industry. It discusses how the industry has grown from being primarily government-owned in the 1960s to experiencing rapid growth after economic liberalization in the 1990s. Private and foreign investment was encouraged, leading to growth across various sectors like commercial electronics, software, telecommunications, and defense. While strides have been made, infrastructure like power, transportation, and telecommunications need further improvements to sustain high economic growth. The document aims to cover different segments of the industry for potential investors, examining the roles of government, major companies, research organizations, and educational institutions in building the industry.
This document provides an overview of the Indian electronics industry. It discusses how the industry has grown from being primarily government-owned in the 1960s to experiencing rapid growth after economic liberalization in the 1990s. Private and foreign investment was encouraged, leading to growth across various sectors like commercial electronics, software, telecommunications, and defense. While strides have been made, infrastructure like power, transportation, and telecommunications need further improvements to sustain high economic growth. The document aims to cover different segments of the industry for potential investors, examining the roles of government, major companies, research organizations, and educational institutions in building the industry.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 149
A
Summer Training Report
On Employee welfare
Submitted to Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra In the partial fulfillment of the Degree of Bachelors of Business Administration (Session 2011-14) BBA 5 th Semester
Under the Guidance of: Submitted By: Dr Vikas Daryal Anmol Sharma Director & Professor S/O Sh. Rajeev sharma TIMT Univ. Regd. 11-Try-11 Univ. Roll No
Tilak Raj Chadha Institutute of Management & Technology (Affiliated to Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra & Approved By AICTE) M.L.N. College Educational Complex, Yamuna Nagar- 135001 (Haryana) Ph. 01732-220103, 234010, 234110. Fax: +91-1732-234110 E-mail: [email protected], Web Site: www.timt.ac.in
DECLARATION I, Anmol Sharma, Roll No. 2101/11, BBA (Semester-5 th ) of the Tilak Raj Chadha Institute of Management and Technology, Yamuna Nagar hereby declare that the Summer Training Report entitled Employee welfare has been an original work and the same has not been submitted to any other Institute for the award of any other degree.
(Anmol Sharma)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This project involves many helping hands. First of all the researcher would like to thank all those, who have helped her in completion of the project and bringing out the timely submission of the report. He is also grateful to the management of Godrej & Boyace for allowing him to undergo a project in their company providing all sorts of facilities and above all a learning experience. He owes his sincere thanks to Mr. Jasbir Taya for allowing his to work as a trainee in Godrej & Boyace. He will remain indebted to his for the guidance and whole hearted cooperation. This summer training has added to his practical knowledge and built his confidence. He would like to convey thanks to Dr. Vikas Daryal, Director, Mrs. Vandana Madaan, Head, Department of Management for their ready assistance, keen interest and valuable suggestions. Last, but not the least, he is extremely thankful to his parents, respondents and friends for their unconditional support and ready assistance.
TABLE OF CONTENT: 1. Introduction a. Industry Profile b. Company Profile c. Introduction to Topic 2. Literature Review 3. Theoretical Framework a. Construct b. Independent and Dependent Variables 4. Research Objectives 5. Research Methodology a. Research Design i. Type of Research Design ii. Time Horizon iii. Study Setting iv. Measurement and scaling b. Flowchart for selection of statistical tools c. Hypothesis Development and Testing d. Sample and Sampling Design e. Data Collection f. Analytical Tools i. Reliability Test ii. Descriptive Test iii. Regression Analysis v. Factor Analysis vi. Probit
g. Limitations of the Study 6. Data Analysis 7. Results and Findings 8. Policy Implications 9. Recommendations 10. Bibliography 11. Annexures a) Annexure i Questionnaire b) Annexure ii- Factor Analysis c) Annexure iii- Descriptive d) Annexure iv- Probit Analysis e) Annexure v- Regression f) Annexure vi- Snapshots
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Research is intended to the topic The employee welfare
The research has been carried out using primary data along with the support of secondary data. Questionnaires were used in order to unveil the perception of employees regarding the company performance. The Analysis is done with the help of statistical tools like t-test, factor analysis, correlation and reliability, descriptive after checking the responses filled by the 250 respondents. The Research has been exploratory in nature as it has been a first time study. The type of investigation is causal as the effects of variables have been studied. It is a cross sectional study as data has been collected at one particular time. The data has been collected by researcher from, mohali through questionnaire comprising 20 questions. He has drawn a sample of 250 respondents using non sampling probability technique. Factor Analysis has been used to find out the most significant factors out of all factors which are developed through extensive literature survey which are used in employee referral program. Reliability tool has been applied to find out the credibility of data regarding the responses filled by the respondents. The researcher has made various recommendations to the organization . Some limitations have been there in the study like time constraint, unwillingness of respondents and limited scope of study. At last it has been conclude that there is a significant impact of employee referral program on hospital performance.
INDUSTRY PROFILE
The Indian Electronics Industry Preface India is the fifth largest economy in the world and has the second largest GDP among emerging economies. Owing to its large population, the potential consumer demand is almost unlimited and consequently under appropriate conditions, strong growth performance can be expected. In fact, the liberalization of the economy in 1991 has led to rapid growth. The electronics industry, in particular, is emerging as one of the most important industry in the Indian market. The electronics industry in India dates back to the early 1960s. Electronics was initially restricted to the development and maintenance of fundamental communication systems including radio-broadcasting, telephonic and telegraphic communication, and augmentation of defense capabilities. Until 1984, the electronics sector was primarily government owned. The late 1980s witnessed a rapid growth of the electronics industry due to sweeping economic changes, resulting in the liberalization and globalization of the economy. The economic transformation was motivated by two compelling factors - the determination to boost economic growth, and to accelerate the development of export- oriented industries, like the electronics industry. The electronics industry has recorded very high growth in subsequent years. By 1991, private investments - both foreign and domestic - were encouraged. The easing of foreign investment norms, allowance of 100 percent foreign equity, reduction in custom tariffs, and delicensing of several consumer electronic products attracted remarkable amount of foreign collaboration and investment. The domestic industry also responded favorably to the politic policies of the government. The opening of the electronics field to private sector enabled entrepreneurs to establish industries to meet hitherto suppressed demand. Improvements in the electronics industry have not been limited to a particular segment, but encompass all its sectors. Strides have been made in the areas of commercial electronics, software, telecommunications, instrumentation, positioning and networking systems, and defense. The result has been a significant trade growth that began in the late 1990s. Despite commendable achievements in the sphere of electronics, considerable infrastructural improvements remain a priority. Water, power, telecommunications, and transportation sectors must still be augmented so that high economic growth can be sustained. The Indian Electronics Industry is a text for investors who are considering India as a potential investment opportunity. The book is designed to cover various segments of India's electronics industry, which include telecommunications, consumer electronics, computer hardware and software, and medical electronic systems. The authors have examined the roles of government, major companies in electronics including the multinationals, research organizations, and educational institutions in establishing the infrastructure. This book features detailed coverage of the important aspects of the Indian electronics industry and: discusses the historical background of the electronic development in India outlines tax structure, market strategies, economic policies (domestic and foreign), and traditional areas of economic development tracks the growth of various segments of the electronics industry including telecommunications, consumer electronics, computer hardware and software, and medical electronic systems addresses the problems faced by the industries pertaining to power, transportation, communication networks, and other environmental considerations presents directions and strategies for radical industrial growth in the future, and hints at promising development in the coming years
Market capitalization The Indian electronics market was at US$11.5 billion in 2004, then the market wgrew worldwide over the next several years. Indian Electronics Industry is expected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 23% by 2010 to reach US$40 billion. Though its total output will be far behind China electronics market, worth US$271.97 billion in 2004, India promises a better market with the bears watching. Low manufacturing costs in skilled labor and raw materials, availability of engineering skills, and opportunity to meet demand in the populous Indian market, are driving its electronics market. Size of the industry In the year 2005 India's electronic consumption was around 1.8 %. It is likely to touch 5.5 % in 2010. According to a study conducted by ISA and Frost Sullivan, India's semi-conductor market would grow by 2.5 times. The end-user products of semi-conductor would include mobile handsets, desktop and notebooks, PCs, etc. Total contribution to the economy/ sales Indian electronics industry today stands at US $ 25 billion and is ranked 26th in the world in terms of sales and 29th in the world in terms of production. It is growing at over 25% CAGR and is expected to be worth US $ 158 billion by 2015. Electronic industry is one of the fastest growing industries in the country and is driven by growth in key sectors such as IT, Consumer Electronics and Telecom.
The demand for electronics is expected to be fuelled by the growth of Telecommunications (250 million subscribers by the next few years) PCs and Notebooks (5 million every year) Broad-Band connectivity reaching rural areas Top leading Companies Video Projectors: Phil Systems, Keltron Projectors, Birla 3M, Samrat Video Vision Color Television: LG Electronics, Philips, Sony; Sansui, Samsung, BPL, Videocon, Onida, Aiwa, Akai, Thompson, Panasonic. Cameras/Camcorders: Sony, Canon, Olympus, Fuji film, Nikon Employment opportunities According to a recent report presented by Ernst & Young, the Indian domestic demand for electronics products is expected to reach $125 billion by 2014 from the current level of $45 billion annually. The primary demand drivers for the Indian Electronic Industry are sectors like telecom, defence, IT and e-governance, automotive, consumer electronics, and energy. At these demand levels, until India creates its own electronics product industry, the imports of these products will create the single largest trade deficit item, which would even be larger than petroleum products. On the other hand, if this particular unique opportunity is utilized, it can create a large industry catering to domestic consumption, which will help achieve self reliance in strategic sectors like telecom and defence, while leading to large exports. Latest developments The Indian Electronic industry constitutes less than 1% of the global market. However, demand for these products are growing rapidly and investments are flowing in to augment manufacturing capacity. Today India remains a major importer of electronic materials, components and finished equipment amounting worth of $20 billion (Rs84, 000 crore ) in 2007. The country imports electronic goods mainly from China In past four years, production of computers has grown at a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 31%, which is highest among the various electronic products in India. And then the production is followed by communication and broadcast equipment (25%), strategic electronics (20%) and industrial electronics (17%). The consumer electronics segment has grown at a CAGR of 10% in the last five years includes a wide range of products such as DVD, VCD/MP3 players, television sets and microwave ovens. The growth in demand for telecom products has been high, with India adding two million mobile phone users every month, which serves as one of the main reasons for the growth in production of electronic goods. This growth is expected to continue over the next decade, too. To attract foreign investment the government has adopted Chinese style Special Economic Zones with the aim to provide islands of excellence where the infrastructure is world standard. Fifteen-year tax breaks given to foreign investors and SEZs are treated as foreign territories for the purpose of trade operations, duties and tariffs. India has been a great success story in the IT services industry and the next great opportunity is to create our own electronics product industry, which will help to move up the value chain and create global technology brands. Today the market is at the threshold of a decisive phase in our growth where, if the government and entrepreneurs take concrete steps it can create a $100 billion electronics product industry from India in the next 10 years. Multi national corporations provide growing electronics market to India at lower costs by manufacturing semiconductors in India. India has the potential to come up as the next electronics and hardware destination in the world. The chip design and other complex components electronic device can be acquired from the Indian companies at low cost. India is growing up to be one of the biggest markets for electronic instrumentations. The consumption value of electronic equipment in India in 2005 is estimated as US$ 28.2 billion. The main factor pertaining to the success of the Indian Electronics and Hardware Industry is the growth in the market demand. The growth in the manufacturing of semiconductor serves as the key driver in the emergence of India as one of the leaders. The advantages pertaining to the taxes and duties, the access to technical and engineering expertise, proper manufacturing facilities, lucrative investment offers, etc.
COMPANY PROFILE
Introduction of the organization The Godrej Group
Inception Established in 1897, the Godrej group has grown in India from the days of the charkha to nights at the call centers. Our founder, Ardeshir Godrej, lawyer-turned-locksmith, was a persistent inventor and a strong visionary who could see the spark in the future. His inventions, manufactured by his brother Pirojsha Godrej, were the foundation of todays Godrej Empire. One of Indias most trusted brand, Godrej enjoys the patronage and trust of around 500 million Indians every single day. Our customers mean the world to us. We are happy only when we see a delighted customer smile.
With 7 major companies with interests in real estate, FMCG, industrial engineering, appliances, furniture, security and agri care to name a few our turnover crosses 3.3 billion dollars*. You think of Godrej as such an integral part of India like the bhangara or the kurta that you may be surprised to know that 26% of our business is done overseas. Our presence in more than 60 countries ensures that our customers are at home with Godrej no matter where they go. With brands you can believe in, service excellence you can count on and the promise of brighter living for every customer, Godrej knows what makes India tick today.
Today, we are at a point in Godrejs history when our amazing past is meeting up with its spectacular future head on. Godrej is learning and relishing being young again.
PRODUCTS Appliances Offerings in the refrigerator, washing machine,air conditioner and microwave oven ranges.
FMCG
Cinthol, Good Knight mosquito repellent, Hair Colour and Hair Dye.
Agri
Animal feed, oil palm plantations, agrochemicals and poultry.
Batteries Godrej and GP Batteries offer a range of zinc chloride, alkaline & rechargeable batteries and a range of chargers.
Construction Variety of construction services like real estate development, ready mix concrete, horticulture and enviro-tech.
IT & Software Solutions
Solutions for engineering and service industry.
Material Handling Counter balance trucks, forklift trucks, tyre handlers, all terrain trucks, attachments and accessories.
Precision Engineering Critical custom-built precision engineering equipments for multiple applications.
Process Equipment High pressure vessels, heat exchangers, columns, heavy walled reactors and other custom.
Storage Solutions Warehousing solutions, automation and consulting.
Vending High quality table top beverage vending machines, services and beverages.
Tooling Die casting dies, press tools, special purpose machines and engineering services.
PARTICULARS OF THE MOHALI PLANT PLOT SIZE : 75 ACRES CAPABILITY : 5 LACS PRODUCTIVITY : REFRIGERATORS INVESTMENT : Rs 120 CRORES MANPOWER : 336 INAUGRATED BY : S. HARCHARAN SINGH BRAR INAUGRATION ON : 28 TH FEBRUARY,1996.
INTRODUCTION
Introduction to Employee welfare Employee welfare is a term including various services, benefits and facilities offered to employees by the employers. The welfare measures need not be monetary but in any kind/forms. This includes items such as allowances, housing, transportation, medical insurance and food. Employee welfare also includes monitoring of working conditions, creation of industrial harmony through infrastructure for health, industrial relations and insurance against disease, accident and unemployment for the workers and their families. Through such generous benefits the employer makes life worth living for employees. Importance of Employee Welfare As a business, you have to provide various benefits to ensure your employees' welfare. While this may increase your business expense and negatively affect your bottom line, looking after your employees will benefit you in other ways. Compliance: As an owner, you are required by law to provide certain benefits for the welfare of your employees. You may have to match the Social Security taxes your employees pay and obtain a worker's compensation insurance policy. If you terminate an employee, you may have to funds to extend his health insurance. Hiring and Retention: The benefits an employee receives from his employer for his welfare are often a significant reason why he decides to accept a job offer. As such, providing employee benefits allow you to compete with other businesses to recruit and retain qualify employees. If other employers offer better benefits, good employees may choose to go there. Employees Motivation: By providing a plan that's good for employees' welfare, you show them that you value them. This can help make them feel welcome and happy in your company, motivating them to work harder. If your health plan has wellness coverage and preventative care, employees are more likely to stay. Employees' Well-Being: For companies that have a large base of employees working under stressful conditions or living away from family, it is important to look at fostering personal happiness and professional growth. Investing in employees pays dividends in terms of higher productivity and greater loyalty. Company Image: Providing a good employee welfare plan reflects well on your business, building a good company image. It may even earn you some press coverage, giving you free publicity to improve awareness among potential customers. This may boost your sales and increase your profits. Features of Employee Welfare Employee welfare is a comprehensive term including various services, facilities and amenities provided to employees for their betterment. Welfare measures are in addition to regular wages and other economic benefits available to employees under legal provisions and collective bargaining. The basic purpose of employee welfare is to improve the lot of the working class and thereby make a worker a good employee and a happy citizen. Employee welfare is an essential part of social welfare. It involves adjustment of an employee's work life and family life to the community or social life. Welfare measures may be both voluntary and statutory. How to Develop an Effective Employee Welfare Program Conduct employee surveys to understand their needs and expectations Indentify key areas of building skills and engagement and facilitating trainings for the same Propose solutions for personal upkeep, family uplifting and future security Create opportunities for greater synergies between the management and employees Conduct impact assessments and feedback surveys Employee Welfare Schemes
Organizations provide welfare facilities to their employees to keep their motivation levels high. The employee welfare schemes can be classified into two categories viz. statutory and non-statutory welfare schemes. The statutory schemes are those schemes that are compulsory to provide by an organization as compliance to the laws governing employee health and safety. These include provisions provided in industrial acts like Factories Act 1948, Dock Workers Act (safety, health and welfare) 1986, Mines Act 1962. The non statutory schemes differ from organization to organization and from industry to industry.
STATUTORY WELFARE SCHEMES The statutory welfare schemes include the following provisions: 1. Drinking Water: At all the working places safe hygienic drinking water should be provided. 2. Facilities for sitting: In every organization, especially factories, suitable seating arrangements are to be provided. 3. First aid appliances: First aid appliances are to be provided and should be readily assessable so that in case of any minor accident initial medication can be provided to the needed employee. 4. Latrines and Urinals: A sufficient number of latrines and urinals are to be provided in the office and factory premises and are also to be maintained in a neat and clean condition. 5. Canteen facilities: Cafeteria or canteens are to be provided by the employer so as to provide hygienic and nutritious food to the employees.
6. Spittoons: In every work place, such as ware houses, store places, in the dock area and office premises spittoons are to be provided in convenient places and same are to be maintained in a hygienic condition. 7. Lighting: Proper and sufficient lights are to be provided for employees so that they can work safely during the night shifts. 8. Washing places: Adequate washing places such as bathrooms, wash basins with tap and tap on the stand pipe are provided in the port area in the vicinity of the work places. 9. Changing rooms: Adequate changing rooms are to be provided for workers to change their cloth in the factory area and office premises. Adequate lockers are also provided to the workers to keep their clothes and belongings. 10. Rest rooms: Adequate numbers of restrooms are provided to the workers with provisions of water supply, wash basins, toilets, bathrooms, etc. NON STATUTORY SCHEMES
Many non statutory welfare schemes may include the following schemes: 1. Personal Health Care (Regular medical check-ups): Some of the companies provide the facility for extensive health check-up. 2. Flexi-time: The main objective of the flextime policy is to provide opportunity to employees to work with flexible working schedules. Flexible work schedules are initiated by employees and approved by management to meet business commitments while supporting employee personal life needs. 3. Employee Assistance Programs: Various assistant programs are arranged like external counseling service so that employees or members of their immediate family can get counseling on various matters. 4. Harassment Policy: To protect an employee from harassments of any kind, guidelines are provided for proper action and also for protecting the aggrieved employee. 5. Maternity & Adoption Leave Employees can avail maternity or adoption leaves. Paternity leave policies have also been introduced by various companies. 6. Medi-claim Insurance Scheme: This insurance scheme provides adequate insurance coverage of employees for expenses related to hospitalization due to illness, disease or injury or pregnancy. 7. Employee Referral Scheme: In several companies employee referral scheme is implemented to encourage employees to refer friends and relatives for employment in the organization.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK CONSTRUCT: Analyzing employee satisfaction with respect to working conditions VARIABLES:- Dependent variable: Employee satisfaction Independent variable: Hours of work Accident prevention measures Safety culture Safety training & participation
LITERATURE REVIEW
BOOKS: Mamoria C.B 1 ,(Edition 2009) Dynamics of Industrial Relations:- Introduction and Features of welfare. It is extremely important for every enterprise to take great care in removing grievances among workers and to create a friendly atmosphere through the distribution and maintenance of proper labor welfare facilities. Sen Ratan 2 ,(Edition 2008) Industrial Relations in India Concept of welfare. The concept of welfare is dynamic, since it varies from enterprise to enterprise, or region to region or even within the same industry in one region. Ashwathappa K. 3 , (Edition 2009) Human Resource Development:- Types of welfare. A comprehensive list of welfare activities is given by Moorthy in his monumental work on labour welfare. He divides welfare measures into two broad groups. Monappa Arun 4 , (Edition 2005) Industrial Relations in India:- Intra mural and Extra mural facilities in welfare. It is useful to consider welfare benefits under two basic categories, viz. Intra-mural and extra-mural. Kapoor N.D 5 , (Edition 2008) Elements of Mercantile Law:- Factorys act 1948 for welfare. :- Statutory and non statutory schemes i.e. schemes of welfare. The statutory welfare schemes include the following provisions according to factories act 1948 Dwedi R.S, 6 Managing Human Resource and Personnel Management in Indian Enterprises:- Labour laws on trade unions. Many voluntary social-service agencies have been doing useful labour-welfare work. Mention may be made of the Bombay Social Service League, the Seva Society, the Maternity Rao V.S.P, 7 (Edition 2008)
Human Resource Management :- Statutory and non statutory schemes i.e. schemes of welfare. The statutory welfare schemes include the following provisions according to factories act 1948: Drinking Water: At all the working places safe hygienic drinking water should be provided. Facilities for sitting: In every organization, especially factories, suitable seating arrangements are to be provided. Decenzo David A 8 , (Edition 2008) Fundamentals of Human Resource Management:- Concept of welfare. This declaration stated, among others, that labor was not a commodity, that freedom of expression and of association were essential to sustained progress and that poverty anywhere constituted a danger to prosperity everywhere and so on. Desseler G 9 , (Edition 2006) Human Resource management,:- Basic needs defined for the employee welfare in any organization. The need for the employee welfare arises from the very nature of the industrial system, which is characterized by two basic factors; one, the conditions under which work is carried on are not congenial for health. Rao Suba 10 P. (Edition 2004) Essentials of Human Resource Management & Industrial Relations Importance of employee satisfaction & pointed out the important attribute that are necessary to build up healthy working environment) Kothari C.R 11 ., (Edition 2008Quantitative Techniques,:- Objectives of research methodology. The procedure adopted for conducting the research requires a lot of attention as it has direct bearing on accuracy, reliability and adequacy of results obtained.
Wilkinson 12 Business Research Methodology:- Regression is the determination of a statistical relationship between two or more variables. In simple regression, researcher have only two variables, independent variable is the cause of the behavior of dependent variable.
Beri G.C. 13 Business Statistics:- Sampling Distribution. Pg. no. 300-325:- Testing of Hypothesis. Sampling method is that method in which data is collected from the sample of items selected from the population and conclusions are drawn from them.
Luck David 14 Marketing Research:- Design of Research. A research designs is the arrangement of conditions for collection and analysis data in a manner that aims to combine relevance to the research purpose with economy in procedure.
Jain T.R 15 , Statistics for MBA:-t-test is small sample test. It was developed by William Gosset in 1908. For applying t test the value of T is calculated then the calculated value of t is compared with the table value of t for given degrees of freedom at certain specified level of significance.
Gupta S.P, 16 Business Statistics:- when the relationship is of a quantitative nature, the appropriate statistical tool for discovering and measuring the relationship and expressing it in a brief formula is known as correlation
Hair, Bush 17 Marketing Research:-. Sampling method is that method in which data is collected from the sample of items selected from the population and conclusions are drawn from them.
JOURNALS: Mukhopadhyay Asish 18 , trends in diffusion and effects of employee welfare Indian Journal of Labor Economics (ILO has drawn our attention to the steadily Deteriorating Health and Safety of labor force and its inherent social cost,) vol44 pp675 Diwan Ritu 19 ,implementation of labour welfare measures Indian Journal of Labor Economics,:(-policy must cover health security and occupational safety. The welfare doesnt mean The amenities but the right atmosphere where the worker can work in safe environment,) vol,76 pp234 Kannan K.P 20 Provisions of welfare measures Indian Journal of Labor Economics,(The welfare model of social security in India. Mutually beneficial collective care arrangements by workers to take care of risk and uncertainties and are not known in labor history) vol.23 Fossum John A, 21 welfare reforms and employments Indian Journal of Industrial Relations vol26 ( The Tata Steel Works at Jamshedpur, for example spends Rs. 10 crore each year on social welfare. Brooke Bond has set up a free animal welfare clinic at Gevrai, Aurangabad, under the direct charge of a qualified veterinary doctor.) Madhumati M and Desai R.G 22 , health care of employee Indian Journal of Industrial Relationsvol44 pp345 (Analysis of Pre and Post Reform social security labor welfare. Labour welfare plays a vital role in any industrial society. Provisions of welfare measures to the workers and other employees has received much importance to maintain good industrial relations) Sonawane Pragya, 23 -The Eighth Plan (1992-1997) . welfare activity The Indian Journal of Labor Economics,vol .37:(-remarked stated that "workers in the organized sector, who constitute 90 per cent of the total working force, by and large, do not have access to those benefits normally enjoyed by workers of urban areas.) Kumari Virmala, 24 safety and security of employee The Indian Journal of Labor Economics,vol,45(The Indian Trade Unions have not gained success to provide welfare to its own community. In fact, it is futile to think that they would undertake any welfare activity for the benefit of its members when they themselves are trapped in a host of tricky problems.), P Purna Chandra Rao 25 , welfare scheme The Journal of Industrial Relations rest rooms,batrooms (Workmens Welfare Under Free Enterprise Era: An Empirical Study) M.S. Ramanujam & K.L. Rawal 26 corporate unionisum and employee welfare The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Unorganized Workers Welfare: Imperatives & Initiatives Michael White 27 ,facility regarding welfare Industrial Relations Journal (Cooperative unionism and employee welfare) Gary T. Burtless 29 Implementation of labour welfare measuresTHE FUTURE OF CHILDREN SPRING 1997(Long-term welfare recipients sufferextreme disadvantages in the job market.)
WEBSITES: 1. (Online available) http://www.hrmanager.com/HRManager/welcome.html 30 It reveals that we should use principles & laws of labour welfare in the organization in order to satisfy our employees. (Online available) http://hrlink.in/topics/what-is-employee-welfare 31 It shows that what kind of statutory and non statutory schemes are to be included in labor welfare programmes. (Online available) http://hrlink.in/topics/what-is-employee-welfare 32
It shows the HR welfare program in India and various provisions regarding this. (Online available) http://www.managebuddy.com/notes/human-resource-management/meaning-of- employee-welfare/ 33 It shows the various acts related to labour welfare which are needed to the organization. (Online available) http://www.slideshare.net/chandanrajbiotech/employee-welfare-10464598 34 It gives important information regarding history of employee welfare in india. (Online available) http://www.citehr.com/172743-employee-welfare-measures- questionnaire.html 35 Employee satisfaction survey helps employers and understanding their employees attitude, opinions, motivation and satisfaction. After getting the results and the employer is able to know if people working there are happy or not,what they like most about the organization ,area of improvement to control attrition & retain employee. ( online available) http://www.scribd.com/doc/23385667/Labour-Welfare 36 Statutory welfare facilities: - These are those welfare activities which are compulsory for an organization to provide to its employees. Voluntary welfare facilities:- These are those activities which are not mandatory by laws rather the organization provide benefits themselves to their employee.
Intra-mural activities cover the services and facilities provided outside the factory such as housing accommodation, indoor and outdoor recreational facilities, amusement and sports, educational facilities for adults.
(Onlineavailable) http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-employee-satisfaction.htm:- 38 HRM activities have been probably performed since ancient times. As a formal discipline, however, its roots are traceable to the period immediately following the Industrial Revolution.The pioneering work of Peter Drucker and Douglas Mc Gregor in the 1950 laid its formal foundation .HR management is management by integration and self control, partly as a form of management by objectives, but more importantly, a strategy for managing people which effect the whole business.
(Online available) http://www.humanresources.hrvinet.com/importance-of-employee-satisfaction 39 Employee satisfaction survey helps employers and understanding their employees attitude, opinions, motivation and satisfaction. After getting the results and the employer is able to know if people working there are happy or not, what they like most about the organization, area of improvement to control attrition & retain employee. (Online available) http://www.citehr.com/-employee-welfare-measures-questionnaire.html 40
employee satisfaction survey helps employers and understanding their employees attitude, opinions, motivation and satisfaction. After getting the results and the employer is able to know if people working there are happy or not,what they like most about the organization ,area of improvement to control attrition & retain employee.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To analyze, understand and draw inferences on the need for reforming employee on working conditions.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: To study and review various legal provisions relating to working conditions in factories.
To examine the current trends in labour jurisprudence in India
Assessing the impact of LPG onlegl perspectives of business organizations in enhancing competitive.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY To carry out the research, the researcher has used the following research methodology. RESEARCH DESIGN
Decisions regarding what, where, when, how much, by what means concerning an enquiry or a research study constitute a research design. Research Design is advance planning of research. A good research design should be flexible, appropriate and efficient and so on. A good design ensures that the required data is gathered accurately, timely and economically. In study the researcher has used the following framework of research design.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
Exploratory cum Descriptive
TYPE OF INVESTIGATION
Causal
STUDY SETTING
Non contrived
TIME HORIZON
Cross-Sectional MEASUREMENT AND SCALING Likert Scale (Interval Scaling)
Type of Research Design The present study has been Exploratory cum descriptive in nature, as it seeks to discover ideas and insight to bring out new relationship based on previous findings in other organizations. Type of Investigation:- The present study has been Causal relationship because the researcher has attempted to find out the cause & effect relationship between competitor and cipla of the brand. Time Horizon:- The study has been found to be Cross-sectional as data has been collected at particular time duration. Study Setting:- The study setting is Non Contrived as the study has been carried out in natural environment and no researcher interference has been there in data collection. Measurement & Scaling:- Five point Likert (interval) scaling has been used for conducting the survey to analyze the impact of emotional intelligence and employee performance which has been given as follows:
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of Working hours on employee welfare Alternate Hypothesis (H1):There is a significant impact of Working Hours on employee welfare
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean workinghours 250 2.79 .959 .061 employeesatisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t Df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
INTERPRETATION: Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between working hours and employee satisfaction since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted. and it has been found that there is significant relationship between working hours & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of forty eight hours on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is significant impact of forty eight hours on employee satisfaction. One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Forty eight hours 250 2.74 .928 .059 Employees atisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t Df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between forty eight hours and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between forty eight hours & employee satisfaction.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of week days on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is significant impact of week days on employee satisfaction One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Week days 250 2.95 .964 .061 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
INTERPRETATION: Through t-test it has been found that there is significant relationship between weekdays and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between week days & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of secure foothold on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is significant impact of secure foothold on employee satisfaction. One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Secure foot hold 250 3.01 1.026 .065 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between secure foothold and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted. and it has been found that there is significant relationship between secure foothold & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of medical practioner on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is significant impact of medical practioner on employee satisfaction. One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Medical practionier 250 2.72 .998 .063 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between medical practionier and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between medical practioner & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of practical measures on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1):There is significant impact of practical measures on employee satisfaction
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Practical measures 250 2.79 1.123 .071 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between practical measures and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between practical measures & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of proper overhauling on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1):There is significant impact of proper overhauling on employee satisfaction
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Proper overhauling 250 3.10 1.044 .066 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between proper overhauling and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between proper overhauling & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of adequate training on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1):There is significant impact of adequate training on employee satisfaction One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Adequate training 250 3.35 .991 .063 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
INTERPRETATION: Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between adequate training and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between adequate training & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of safe culture on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is significant impact of safe culture on employee satisfaction. One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Safe culture 250 3.06 1.148 .073 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t Df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between safe culture and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between safe culture & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of first aid measures on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is significant impact of first aid measures on employee satisfaction. One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean First-aid measures 250 2.79 1.002 .063 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between first aid measures and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between first aid measures & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of training and seminar on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is significant impact of training and seminar on employee satisfaction. One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Training seminar 250 2.95 .964 .061 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between training and seminars and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between training and seminar & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of proper guidelines on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is significant impact of proper guidelines on employee satisfaction. One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Proper guidelines 250 2.78 .894 .057 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between proper guidelines and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted. So it has been found that there is significant relationship between proper guidelines & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of machine handling on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is significant impact of machine handling on employee satisfaction. One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Machine handling 250 2.76 1.052 .067 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between machine handling and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between machine handling & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of medical check-up on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is significant impact of medical check-up on employee satisfaction.
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Medical checkup 250 3.18 1.242 .079 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between medical check- up and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between medical check-up & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of cleanliness on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is significant impact of cleanliness on employee satisfaction.
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean cleanliness 250 2.85 .945 .060 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t Df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between cleanliness and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between cleanliness & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of effective awareness on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is significant impact of effective awareness on employee satisfaction. One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Effective awareness 250 2.70 1.042 .066 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
INTERPRETATION: Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between effective awareness and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .003 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between effective awareness & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of recreational facility on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is significant impact of recreational facility on employee satisfaction.
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Recreational facility 250 2.86 1.412 .089 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between recreational facility and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between recreational facility & employee welfare.
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant impact of subsidized meal on Employee satisfaction. Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is significant impact of subsidized meal on employee satisfaction. One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Subisized meal 250 3.06 1.148 .073 Employee satisfaction 250 2.79 1.002 .063
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Through t-test it has been found that the significant relationship between subsidized meal and employee satisfaction. Since significant level is .000 which is less than .005. So, null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted and it has been found that there is significant relationship between subsidized meal & employee welfare.
SAMPLE AND SAMPLING DESIGN
TARGET POPULATION Workers and Employees of Godrej & Boyce
SAMPLING UNIT Employees of Mohali
SAMPLE SIZE 250 employees
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
Non Probability Sampling SAMPLING AREA Mohali
DATA COLLECTION After the research problem has been identified and selected, the next step is to gather the requisite data. While deciding about the method of data collection to be used for, the researcher should keep in mind two types of data: primary and secondary. In the present study researcher has made use of the primary data which has been collected through Questionnaire, Observation, Personal Interview along with the secondary data which has been collected from companys website and from their records Books, magazines, newspapers and journals.
Personal Interview Questionnaire PRIMARY DATA Magazines Internet Books SECONDA RY DATA
STATISTICAL TOOLS
Statistical tools helped the researcher to correctly analyze the data .The researcher is likely to use the SPSS 16.0 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software for analysis of the data. The following tools are likely to be used by the researcher:- Reliability Statistics Correlation Descriptive Probit Regression
RELIABILITY STATISTICS
Researcher has used reliability statistical tool in the study because this tool signifies to what extent data collected is reliable and truly represents the whole population. Case Processing Summary
N % Cases Valid 250 83.3 Excluded a 50 16.7 Total 300 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .719 20
Interpretation: By applying reliability statistics on variables of emotional intelligence, the value of Cronbachs Alpha has been found to be .719 which is greater than .5. It means that data under study is reliable and is truly representative of the population. It also shows that the data collected is 71% reliable.
Interpretation: By applying descriptive the mean value is above 2.88 in following variables Week days Secure foothold Proper overhauling Adequate training Safe culture Training & Seminar Medical check-up Subsidized meal Thus from above variables it can be interpreted that organization performance is good in these field. Mean value is below 2.88 in following variables Working hours Forty eight hours Safety measures Medical practionier Practical measures First aid measures Proper guidelines Machine handling Cleanliness Effective arrangement Recreational facility
Thus from the above variables it can be interpreted that organization performance is not satisfactory in these field.
PROBIT ANALYSIS
Convergence Information
Number of Iterations Optimal Solution Found PROBIT 20 Yes
Covariances and Correlations of Parameter Estimates
Working hours Safe culture PROBIT Working hours .013 -.240 Safe culture -.003 .010 Covariances (below) and Correlations (above).
Chi-Square Tests
Chi-Square df a Sig. PROBIT Pearson Goodness-of-Fit Test 36.066 247 1.000 a. Statistics based on individual cases differ from statistics based b. on aggregated cases. Interpretation: From probit analysis it is interpreted that working hours is more important than safe culture.
REGRESSION ANALYSIS Regression analysis tool is used to quantify the impact of independent variable on dependent variable. Researcher has applied this tool to measure the impact of independent variables on dependent variables.
Predictors are: working conditions Dependent variable: Employee satisfaction Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .191 a .037 .033 .985 a. Predictors: (Constant), working conditions
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 9.140 1 9.140 9.420 .002 a
Residual 240.624 248 .970 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), working conditions
b. Dependent Variable: employee satisfaction
Interpretation: Regression analysis signifies that R square is .033 or there is 33% impact of the above predictors on working conditions which shows that there is insignificant impact of these predictors on employee satisfaction.
Predictors are: Welfare facility
Dependent variable :Employee satisfaction
Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .056 a .003 .000 1.002 a. Predictors: (Constant), welfarefacility
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression .772 1 .772 .769 .382 a
Residual 248.992 248 1.004 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), welfare facility
b. Dependent Variable: employee satisfaction
Interpretation: Regression analysis signifies that R square is .000 or there is 0% impact of the above predictors on welfare facility which shows that there is insignificant impact of these predictors on employee satisfaction.
Predictors are: Safety machine handling
Dependent variable : Employee satisfaction Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .149 a .022 .018 .992 a. Predictors: (Constant), safety machine handling
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 5.576 1 5.576 5.664 .018 a
Residual 244.188 248 .985 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), safety machine handling
b. Dependent Variable: employee satisfaction
Interpretation: Regression analysis signifies that R square is .018 or there is 18% impact of the above predictors on safety machine handling which shows that there is insignificant impact of these predictors on employee satisfaction.
Predictors are : Corporate culture
Dependent variable :Employee satisfaction
Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .265 a .070 .067 .968 a. Predictors: (Constant), corporateculture
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 17.581 1 17.581 18.779 .000 a
Residual 232.183 248 .936 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), corporateculture
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Interpretation: Regression analysis signifies that R square is .067 or there is 67% impact of the above predictors on corporate culture which shows that there is insignificant impact of these predictors on employee satisfaction.
Predictors are: Cleanliness measures
Dependent variable :Employee satisfaction
Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .071 a .005 .001 1.001 a. Predictors: (Constant), cleanliness measures
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 1.257 1 1.257 1.255 .264 a
Residual 248.507 248 1.002 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), cleanliness measures
b. Dependent Variable: employee satisfaction
I nterpretation: Regression analysis signifies that R square is .001 or there is 1% impact of the above predictors on cleanliness measures which shows that there is insignificant impact of these predictors on employee satisfaction.
Predictors are : Provisions regarding accident prevention
Dependent variable: Employee satisfaction
Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .059 a .003 .000 1.002 a. Predictors: (Constant), provisions regarding accident prevention
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression .867 1 .867 .864 .354 a
Residual 248.897 248 1.004 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), provisions regarding accident prevention
b. Dependent Variable: employee satisfaction
Interpretation: Regression analysis signifies that R square is .000 or there is 0% impact of the above predictors on provision regarding accident prevention which shows that there is insignificant impact of these predictors on employee satisfaction.
Predictors are: Availability of medical check-up Dependent variable: Employee satisfaction Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .158 a .025 .021 .991 a. Predictors: (Constant), availability of medical checkups
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 6.231 1 6.231 6.345 .012 a
Residual 243.533 248 .982 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), availability of medical checkups
b. Dependent Variable: employee satisfaction
Interpretation: Regression analysis signifies that R square is .021 or there is 21% impact of the above predictors on availability of medical check-up which shows that there is insignificant impact of these predictors on employee satisfaction.
Predictors are: Safety measures Dependent variable: Employee satisfaction Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .600 a .360 .357 .803 a. Predictors: (Constant), safety measures
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 89.898 1 89.898 139.458 .000 a
Residual 159.866 248 .645 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), safety measures
b. Dependent Variable: employee satisfaction
Interpretation: Regression analysis signifies that R square is .357 or there is 35% impact of the above predictors on safety measures which shows that there is insignificant impact of these predictors on employee satisfaction.
Factor analysis Factor analysis is a statistical method used to describe variability among observed variables in terms of fewer unobserved variables called factors. The observed variables are modeled as linear combinations of the factors, plus "error" terms. The information gained about the interdependencies can be used later to reduce the set of variables in a dataset. The researcher has used factor analysis to find out the most significant factors in the study out of many variables Communalities
I nterpretation: After applying factor analysis it has been observed that 8 factors are extracted namely Working conditions Welfare facility Safety machine handling Corporate culture Cleanliness measures Provisions regarding accident prevention Availability of medical check-up Safety measures
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY However the researcher has tried his best in collecting the relevant information for research report, yet there have been some problems faced by the researcher. The prime difficulties which researcher has faced in collection of information are discussed below: Time Constraint: The time period for carrying out the research has been limited as a result of which many facts have been left unexplored. So if more time had been provided, the sample size would have been increased. The respondent would have been given more time to fill the questionnaire. Limited sample size: The sample size was only 250 which can't be regarded as true representative of all employees in the organization. Unwillingness of respondents: While collection of the data many employees were unwilling to fill the questionnaire. Respondents were having a feeling of wastage of time. Limited area for research: The area for study has been only selected of godrej to represent the employees in the organization. Respondents bias: Due to the biasness on the part of respondents, data collected may have been affected which further reduces the credibility of the findings. Researchers bias: While analyzing the data, some biasness on the part of researcher may have crept into the duty. Despite of these difficulties, best efforts have been put to do the full justice with the subject matter and in the completion of report.
Data analysis
1. Working hours from 7am to 5pm includes lunch break of half n hour and tea brake of 15 minutes is comfortable with the employees? Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 27 27 Agree 60 60 Neutral 111 111 Disagree 44 44 Strongly disagree 8 8 Total 250 250
11% of the employees strongly agree that the Working hours from 7am to 5pm includes lunch break of half n hour and tea brake of 15 minutes is comfortable with the employees, while 24% agree 44% are neutral, 18% disagree and 3% strongly agree with the statement.
2. Workers in the organization are not allowed to work for more than forty eight hours in a week? Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 31 31 Agree 56 56 Neutral 114 114 Disagree 47 47 Strongly disagree 2 2 Total 250 250
12% strongly agree that workers in the organisation are not allowed to work for more than forty eight hours in a week,while 22% agree.46% are neutral,19% disagree and 1% strongly disagree with the statement.
3. Employees are not allowed to work on the first day of the week? Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 18 18 Agree 56 56 Neutral 113 113 Disagree 48 48 Strongly disagree 15 15 Total 250 250
Interpretation: strongly agree 7% agree 23% neutral 45% disagree 19% strongly disagree 6% 7% strongly agree that employees are not allowed to work on the first day of the week,while 23% agree,45% are neutral,19% disagree and 6% strongly disagree with the statement.
4. Safety measures such as fencing of machinery should be there?
Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 51 51 Agree 83 83 Neutral 82 82 Disagree 29 29 Strongly disagree 5 5 Total 250 250
Interpretation: 20% strongly agree that safety measures such as fencing of machinery should be there while 33% agree, 33% are neutral,12% disagree and 2% strongly disagree with the statement.
5. Secure foothold, handhold is provided to the operator?
Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 21 21 Agree 54 54 Neutral 93 93 Disagree 67 67 Strongly disagree 15 15 Total 250 250
8% employees strongly agree that secure foothold, handhold is provided to the operator while 22% agree,37% are neutral,27% disagree and 6% strongly disagree with the statement.
6.Availability of full time medical practioner to ensure timely availabilty of first aid? Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 18 18 Agree 100 100 Neutral 82 82 Disagree 34 34 Strongly disagree 16 16 Total 250 250
Interpretation: strongly agree 7% agree 40% neutral 33% disagree 14% strongly disagree 6% medical practioni er
7% employees strongly agree that there is availability of full time medical practioner to ensure timely availabilty of first aid while 40% agree,33% are neutral,14% disagree and 6% strongly disagree with the statement.
8. Practical measures are there to prevent outbreak of fire?
Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 36 36 Agree 66 66 Neutral 81 81 Disagree 50 50 Strongly disagree 70 70 Total 250 250
Interpretation: 12% employees strongly agree that practical measures are there to prevent outbreak of fire while 22% agree,27% are neutral,16% disagree and 23% strongly disagree wuth the statement.
8. Proper overhauling of machines is done from time to time in order to prevent accident ?
Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 15 15 Agree 54 54 Neutral 99 99 Disagree 55 55 Strongly disagree 27 27 Total 250 250
Interpretation: 6% employees strongly agree that proper overhauling of machines is done from time to time in order to prevent accident, while 21% agree,40 are neutral,22% disagree and 11% strongly disagree wih the statement.
9. Adequate training for handling the machines is avaliable ?
Responses Responses in num Responses in % strongly agree 6% agree 21% neutral 40% disagree 22% strongly disagree 11% accident prevention
Interpretation: 3% employees strongly agree that adequate training for handling the machines is avaliable,while 18% agree,33% are neutral,35% disagree and 11% strongly disagree with the statement.
Interpretation: 11% employees strongly agree that the culture of organisation is safe for women to work,while 17% agree,37% are neutral,23% disagree and 12% strongly disagree with the statement.
11. Safety measures such as ambulance, safety gloves are readily avalaible?
Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 30 30 Agree 60 60 Neutral 103 103 Disagree 48 48 Strongly disagree 9 9 Total 250 250
Interpretation: 12% employees strongly agree that safety measures such as ambulance, safety gloves are readily available while 24% agree.41% are neutral,19% disagree and 4% strongly disagree with the statement.
12. Time to time training and seminars are there for guiding the employees?
Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 18 18 Agree 56 56 Neutral 113 113 Disagree 48 48 Strongly disagree 15 15 Total 250 250
Interpretation: 7% employees strongly agree that time to time training and seminars are there for guiding the employees while 23% agree,45% are neutral,19% disagree and 6% strongly disagree with the statement.
9% employees strongly agree that proper guidelines are provided to the employees for active participation towards the work while 26% agree,45% are neutral,19% disagree and 1% strongly disagree with the statement.
14. Proper training is provided to the employees for handling of machines?
Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 33 33 Agree 67 67 Neutral 89 89 Disagree 50 50 Strongly disagree 11 11 Total 250 250
Interpretation: 13% employees strongly agree that proper training is provided to the employees for handling of machines while 27% agree,36% are neutral,20% disagree and 4% strongly disagree with the statement.
15. Avalaibility of medical chek-up, health insurance are provided?
Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 24 24 Agree 67 67 Neutral 68 68 Disagree 54 54 Strongly disagree 47 47 Total 250 250
Interpretation: 9% employees strongly agree that avalaibility of medical chek-up, health insurance are provided while 23% agree, 27% are neutral, 22% disagree, and 19% strongly disagree with the statement. 16. Proper cleanliness such as avoiding of dirt, dust and drain is properly done?
Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 23 23 Agree 59 59 Neutral 109 109 Disagree 52 52 Strongly disagree 7 7 Total 250 250
Interpretation: 9% employees strongly agree that proper cleanliness such as avaoidng of dirt, dust and drain is properly done while 23% agree,44% are neutral,21% disagree and 3% strongly disagree with the statement.
17. Effective arrangements are there for disposal of wastes and effulents?
Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 31 31 Agree 81 81 Neutral 83 83 Disagree 43 43 Strongly disagree 12 12 Total 250 250
Interpretation: 13% employees strongly agree that effective arrangements are there for disposal of wastes and effluents while 32% agree,33% are neutral,17% disagree and 5% strongly disagree with the statement.
18. Does the overall culture of organization include recreational facilities? Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 37 37 Agree 43 43 Neutral 65 65 Disagree 76 76 Strongly disagree 29 29 Total 250 250
Interpretation: 15% employees strongly agree that the overall culture of organization includes recreational facilities while 17% agree, 26% are neutral,30% disagree and 12% strongly disagree with the statement.
19. Subsidized meal and medical facilities add upto the satisfaction of employees?
Responses Responses in num Responses in % Strongly agree 29 29 Agree 43 43 Neutral 92 92 Disagree 57 57 Strongly disagree 29 29 Total 250 250
Interpretation: 11% employees strongly agree that subsidized meal and medical facilities add up to the satisfaction of employees while17% agree, 37% are neutral,23% disagree and 12% strongly disagree with the statement.
20. Does the godrej & boyce provides environment that satisfies the employees?
Interpretation: 12% employees strongly agree that godrej&boyce provides environment that satisfies the employees while 24% agree, 41% are neutral19% disagree and 4% strongly disagree with the statement.
RESULTS AND FINDINGS The following are the major findings of the study: Reliability test for employee referral shows that Cronbach Alphas value is .719 which depicts that data is reliable and it truly depicts the whole population. The descriptive statistics show that all the variables are important and truly depict the whole population. After applying factor analysis 8 factors have been extracted namely strongly agree 12% agree 24% neutral 41% disagree 19% strongly disagree 4% employee satisfaction
T- test shows that the significance value is .000 which shows that working conditions, welfare facilities, safety machine handling, corporate culture, cleanliness measures, provisions regarding accident prevention, availability of medical check-up, safety measures have significant impact on employee satisfaction. Most of the employees agreed that only skilled members are appointed. Most of the employees agreed that the Godrej & Boyace is reputed organization. In the area of Mohali people prefers to go to Godrej & Boyace.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Policy implications are the probable outcomes resulting from the implementation of various recommendations given by the researcher. Further suggestions are implicated by the top management, high level authority are--- Company implement the regular vacancies for the new members for enrolling their skiils and helping the organization in gaining the more reputation. The organization also implement that they provide good behavior for all the employees working in order to explore the reputation of the company. Proper medical facilities are provided to the staff so that they can enhance the better environment and thus providing better services to the people. In the organization proper working hours, canteen facility for staff members and for outsiders are provided adequately.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Employee welfare measures help employees to achieve a better co-operation with the company and a greater loyalty to it.The management is benefitted in the sense that higher standards of quality is achieved as satisfactory organisation structure is build up,thus following are the recommendations for the organisations improvement.
Proper facility for emergency care and injuries sustain in the course of work and for the conduct of pre employment and post employment medical checkups should be provided to the employee.
A properly defined welfare policy regarding statutory measure and non statutory measures should be designed so as to ensure effective implementation of welfare measure provided by the organisation.
Proper first aid treatment for occupational injuries and disease should be provided. Advice on an supervision of the provisions and maintained of satisfactory sanitary conditions in the factory premises should be made available to the employees.
The maintaince of adequate and confidential medical reports.
Adequate provision for truly assessment of effectiveness of welfare measure should be under taken so as to ensure of satisfaction of employees.
Proper reasonable first aid treatment of employees for non occupational aliments for eg. For cold, skin disorder, headache etc.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS:- Sen Ratan, (Edition 2008) Industrial Relations in India, Macmillan Business Books, New Delhi, page no.(459-470) Ashwathappa K.,(Edition 5) Human Resource Development, Tata MC-Graw Hill Publishing company limited, New Delhi, page no.(456-470) Dwedi R.S.,(edition 2004),Managing Human Resource and Personnel Management in Indian Enterprise, Galgotia publishing company, New Delhi, page no.(170-189). Rao V.S.P, (edition 2005), Human Resource Management, Macmillan Business Books ,New Delhi, page no.(170-189). Kothari C.R.,(4th edition),Quantitative Techniques, Vikas publishing house Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, 2005, p.no.(10-20). Kothari, C.R, (2nd edition) Research Methodology Methods & Techniques, New age international ltd. Publishers, New Delhi, 2005, P.no(27-42). Wilkinson & Bhandarkar, (4th edition), Business Research Methodology, Tata McGraw Hill Publications, Delhi, 2005, P.no. (237-243) Beri G.C.,(3rd edition),Marketing Research,Tata Mc graw Hill Publications, New Delhi, 2005, P.no.( 95-98),(233)
JOURNALS: Mukhopadhyay Asish, trends in diffusion and effects of employee welfare Indian Journal of Labor Economics (26) pp 1-2 Diwan Ritu , Individual welfare measures Indian Journal of Labor Economics, vol,3 pp40 Kannan K.P
welfare imperatives and initiatives Indian Journal of Labor Economics, pp 115-135 Fossum John A, states and its parts of welfare Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, pp 60-64 Madhumati M and Desai R.G , cooperative unionism and employee welfare Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, vol,6 pp32-36 Sonawane Pragya,-The Eighth Plan (1992-1997). Joint effects on customer satisfaction The Indian Journal of Labor Economics vol,55 pp25-29 Kumari Virmala, implementation of labour welfare measures The Indian Journal of Labor Economics vol, 13 pp54
P Purna Chandra Rao, worker welfare performance and productivity Workmens Welfare Under Free Enterprise Era: An Empirical Study, pp 44-56
M.S. Ramanujam & K.L. Rawal, effects on satisfaction and commitment The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Unorganized Workers Welfare: Imperatives & Initiativesvol,8 pp67
Michael White ,Cooperative unionism and employee welfare Industrial Relations Journal vol,56 pp67-73
Bulent Aydin and Adnan Ceylan role of employee welfare The International Journal of Human Resource Management vol.34 pp 56-89
Gary T. Burtless group welfare services . the future of children spring 1997 vol,77
Ghosh K.B., welfare reforms employment and stress at work place, HRM review vol,54 pp545-589
Kumari virmala satisfaction level of employee The Indian journals of labour economics, vol.44, page no.(645-664)
23 Popla T.S, job skiils and employment perspectivesThe Indian Journal of Labour Economics
24 sonswane Pragya ( oct 2008) scope of employee welareThe Indian journal of Labour Economics. vol.44,page no.(256-269)
25. John p. Hauskneecht, Nathan, j.Hiller, Robert j Vance, health care of employeeThe Indian journals of labour economics vol.44 no.6,1223-1245,pg no.(01-24)
WEBSITES: 26 .Online available http://www.hrmanager.com/HRManager/welcome.html 27 Online available http:// http://hrlink.in/topics/what-is-employee-welfare 28 Online available http://hrlink.in/topics/what-is-employee-welfare 29 Online available http://www.managebuddy.com/notes/human-resource-management/meaning-of- employee-welfare/ 30 Online available http://www.slideshare.net/chandanrajbiotech/employee-welfare- 10464598 31 Online available http://www.citehr.com/172743-employee-welfare-measures-questionnaire.html 32 . online available http://www.scribd.com/doc/23385667/Labour-Welfare 33 Online available http://blogs.siliconindia.com/Jyotionnet/Employee_Welfare-bid- F941ap7D79656261.htm 34 Online availablehttp://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-employee-satisfaction.htm:-
35 Online available http://www.humanresources.hrvinet.com/importance-of-employee-satisfaction 36. Online available http://www.citehr.com/-employee-welfare-measures-questionnaire.html 37. Online available http:/ www.humanresources.about.com/od/emloyeewelfare 38. Online available http:/ www.articlebase.com/human-resources-articles/employee-welfare 39. online available www.en.wikipedia.org/principle of evolution of welfare 40. Online available http://hrlink.in/topics/what-is-employee-welfare
Annexure- 1 Questionnaire
Sr. # Items Strongly Agree Agree Neutral
Disagree Strongly Disagree 1 Working hours from 7am to 5pm includes lunch break of half n hour and tea brake of 15 minutes is comfortable with the employees
2 Workers in the organization are not allowed to do work for more than forty-eight hours in week.
3 Employees are not allowed to work in organization on the first day of the week.
4 Safety measures such as fencing of machinery should be there.
5 Secure foothold, handhold is provided to the operator.
6 Availability of full time medical practionier to ensure timely availability of first aid
7 Practical measures are there to prevent outbreak of fire.
8 Proper oyerhauling of machines is done from time to time in order to prevent accident
9 Adequate training for handling the machines is available
10 Is the culture of organization safe for women to work
11 The safety measures such as first aid, ambulance, safety gloves are readily available.
12 Time to time training and seminars are there for guiding the employees
13 Proper guidelines are provided to the employees for active participation towards work.
14 Proper training is provided to the employees for the handling of machines
15 Availability of medical check-up, health insurance are provided.
16 Proper cleanliness such as avoiding of dirt, Dust and drain is properly done
17 Effective arrangements are there for disposal of wastes and effluents
18 Does the overall culture of the organization includes recreational facility
19 Subsidized meal and medical facilities add up to the satisfaction of the employees
20 Does Godrej &boyce provides the environment that satisfies the employees
ANNEXURE-II
FACTOR ANALYSIS
KMO and Bartlett's Test Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .915 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 1.393E3 Df 105 Sig. .000
Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 workingcondition s a
. Enter a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .191 a .037 .033 .985 a. Predictors: (Constant), workingconditions
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 9.140 1 9.140 9.420 .002 a
Residual 240.624 248 .970 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), workingconditions
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Variables Entered/Removed b
Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 welfarefacility a . Enter a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .056 a .003 .000 1.002 a. Predictors: (Constant), welfarefacility
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression .772 1 .772 .769 .382 a
Residual 248.992 248 1.004 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), welfarefacility
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Variables Entered/Removed b
Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 safetymachineha ndling a
. Enter a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .149 a .022 .018 .992 a. Predictors: (Constant), safetymachinehandling
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 5.576 1 5.576 5.664 .018 a
Residual 244.188 248 .985 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), safetymachinehandling
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Variables Entered/Removed b
Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 corporateculture a . Enter a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .265 a .070 .067 .968 a. Predictors: (Constant), corporateculture
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 17.581 1 17.581 18.779 .000 a
Residual 232.183 248 .936 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), corporateculture
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Variables Entered/Removed b
Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 cleanlinessmeas ures a
. Enter a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .071 a .005 .001 1.001 a. Predictors: (Constant), cleanlinessmeasures
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 1.257 1 1.257 1.255 .264 a
Residual 248.507 248 1.002 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), cleanlinessmeasures
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Variables Entered/Removed b
Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 provisionsregardi ngaccidentpreve ntion a
. Enter a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .059 a .003 .000 1.002 a. Predictors: (Constant), provisionsregardingaccidentprevention
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression .867 1 .867 .864 .354 a
Residual 248.897 248 1.004 Total 249.764 249 ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression .867 1 .867 .864 .354 a
Residual 248.897 248 1.004 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), provisionsregardingaccidentprevention
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Variables Entered/Removed b
Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 avalabilityofmedi calchekup a
. Enter a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .158 a .025 .021 .991 a. Predictors: (Constant), avalabilityofmedicalchekup
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 6.231 1 6.231 6.345 .012 a
Residual 243.533 248 .982 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), avalabilityofmedicalchekup
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Variables Entered/Removed b
Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 safetymeasures a . Enter a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: employeesatisfaction
Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .600 a .360 .357 .803 a. Predictors: (Constant), safetymeasures
ANOVA b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 89.898 1 89.898 139.458 .000 a
Residual 159.866 248 .645 Total 249.764 249 a. Predictors: (Constant), safetymeasures