Comparative Study of RCC T-Beam Bridge by IRC: 112-2011 & IRC: 21-2000
Comparative Study of RCC T-Beam Bridge by IRC: 112-2011 & IRC: 21-2000
FOR
THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF
MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
BY
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the dissertation work entitled COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RCC
T-BEAM BRIDGE BY IRC: 112-2011 & IRC:21-2000 being submitted by Mr. A V
PRANAY KUMAR REDDY, Regd.No.12011D2002 in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY in
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING to the JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, HYDERABAD is a record of bonafide work carried
out by him under my guidance and supervision.
Project Guide
Mrs.P. Srilakshmi
Assoc.Professor in Civil Engineering Dept.,
Dept. of Civil Engineering,
JNTUH College of Engineering,
Engineering,JNTUH
Hyderabad-500085
DECLARATION
PLACE : Hyderabad
DATE :
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
Grillage analysis is probably the most popular computer aided method for
analyzing bridge decks. This is because it is easy to comprehend and use, relatively
inexpensive, and has been proved to be reliably accurate for a wide variety of bridge types.
This method, pioneered for computer use by Lightfoot and Sawko represents the deck by an
equivalent grillage of beams. The dispersed bending and torsional stiffness in every region of
the slab are assumed for purpose of analysis to be concentrated in the nearest equivalent
grillage beam. The slab's longitudinal stiffnesses are concentrated in the longitudinal beams
while the transverse stiffnesses are concentrated in the transverse beams.
The present work deals with grillage analogy method for the comparative study of
RCC T Beam bridge by IRC:21-2000 & IRC:112:2011.
CONTENTS
Certificate
Declaration
Acknowledgement
Abstract
Contents
Tables
figures
notations
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
General
1.1 Definition
1.2 Components of bridge
1.3 Structural forms of bridge decks
1.3.1
Forms of construction
(a) Solid slab deck
(b) Voided slab deck
(c) Pseudo slab deck
1.3.2
1.3.3
1.4
1.5
Support configurations
1.6
Objectives of study
CHAPTER-6 CONCLUSSIONS
REFERENCES
APPENDIX