Design of Foundation
Design of Foundation
Design of Foundation
157
Chapter six
Design of Foundation
6.1 General
The primary function of all structural elements is to transfer the applied dead and imposed
loading from whichever source to the foundation and subsequently to the ground. The type
of foundation required in any particular circumstance is dependent on number of factors
such as:
1- The magnitude and type of applied loading,
2- The pressure which the ground can safely support,
3- The acceptable levels of settlement,
4- The location and proximity of adjacent structures, and
5- The soil properties and conditions.
5. Piles footing
The different types of footing used in our project are mentioned below:
1. Isolated footing for individual columns.
2. Combined footing for two adjacent columns.
The choice is usually made from experience but comparative designs are often necessary to
determine the most economical type to be used.
However, for a soil with safe bearing capacity of 230 kN/m2, and normal soil properties
for this project, it may said that isolated footing and combined
-The final pressure transferred by the footing area into the soil should not exceed
than the safe bearing capacity of the soil .
-The size of footing has been determined from working loads including self weight of
footing .
-Thickness of footing must be sufficient to resist the shear forces and punching shears.
Type of foundation currently used is explained as follows:
158
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
a) Rectangular combined
footing.
b) Trapezoidal combined
footing
c) Combined rectangular
footing
The dimension of a combined footing can be determine such that the resultant load from the
columns passes through the centroid of the base area. In this case the resulting pressure on
the soil will be uniform.
A rectangular base does not always provide the most economic arrangement due to the
difficulty of making the resultant load pass through the centroid of the base area. The
trapezoidal base has the disadvantage of the detailing and cutting the transverse
reinforcement. It is most suitable when there is a large variation in the column loads and
there are limitations on the dimension of the foundation. The combined rectangular solution
can be used in most cases.
159
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
shown in fig. (6.3). The area of reinforcement required is calculated in the same manner as
for beam using clause (3.4.4.4) of BS8110-1. The minimum and maximum area of steel
reinforcement is determined by using Table (3.25) and clause (3.12.6) of BS8110-1
respectively
The direct shear stress should be checked at distance of 1.0d from the column face, and if it
is less than from table 3.8 of code no shear reinforcement is required. If the direct shear
is more than
the depth of the footing should be increased. It is normal practice to make
the base sufficiently deep so that shear reinforcement is not required. The depth of the base
is controlled by the design for shear.
160
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
distance of 1.5d from the column face see fig. (6.4), and if it is less than from table 3.8 of
code no shear reinforcement is required. If the Punching shear is more than
the depth of
the footing should be increased.
Fig. (6.4) Show the critical section for direct shear and punching.
6.3.5 Cracking:
See the rules for slabs in clause 3.12.11.2.7 of the code. The bar spacing is not to exceed 3d
or 750 mm, but much lesser spacing is possible depending on the amount of flexural steel
supplied.
161
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
6.3.9 Specification:
In our project, the design of all different type of footing using the following specification:
Characteristic strength of concrete
=
Characteristic strength of steel
=
Soil bearing capacity
=
Nominal cover for mild condition of exposure = 50 mm (BS8110-1, Clause 3.3.1.4
162
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
Loading:
From etabs analysis for frame (C-C) and (21-21) we get:
(KN.m)
N (kN)
(KN.m)
Ultimate Load
3047
35
-Working Load 2123.35
24.4
---
Note:
Column dimension 850 mm*400 mm
Area of footing:
Determination area of footing:
Where:
: Working load which transferred from building.
Assume self-weight of footing = 8% of
:. Area required including weight of footing:
)
(
Area is satisfactory
163
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
(
)
(
)
stress is ok.
. /
Shear force:
The critical shear will be at distance "d" from the column face
(
)
(
)
164
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
About (Y-Y) axis:
The critical section of moment at face support about (Y-Y)
see fig. (6.9)
.
Shear force:
The critical shear will be at distance "d" from the column face
The critical value of shear about (y-y)axis:
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)) (
Lcy< (
(
)) (the distribution of bars is equally)
Total steel reinforcement is distributed along the width
(
)
(
165
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
(
)) (
(
)
(
)) (the distribution of bars is equally)
Lcx< (
Total steel reinforcement is distributed along the width
(
) (
( ) (
,(
)-
166
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
*
+
Punching shear force =
*(
)(
)++-
} .
/ .
))
(
(
(
)
)
( ) (
167
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
R.C.C Area of
Footing
Bottom Reinforcement
Short Direction
(B1)
3
3
1.6
3.4
2.9
3.5
2.6
2.5
3.4
2.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
T 16-200mmc/c
T 16-225mmc/c
T 16-225mmc/c
T 16-175mmc/c
T 16-225mmc/c
Long Direction
(B2)
T 16-200mmc/c
T 16-225mmc/c
T 16-225mmc/c
T 16-175mmc/c
T 16-225mmc/c
The other footing are designed using Excel sheets. See Drawing & Tables in an Appendix 5
168
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
Loading:
From Etabs analysis for frames (8-8 ),(9-9) and (G-G) we get:
Column A
(8-G)
Column B
(9-G)
Column
dimension
Dead
load
Live
load
Working
load
Ultimate
Load
250*600
978
373
1351
1966
250*600
849
233
1082
1562
2433
3528
TOTAL
Note: moments resulting from column are very small; so it can be neglected.
Area of footing:
169
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
Where:
:. Provide L = 5 m, B = 2.5 m.
Rectangular Footing (
170
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
Check for maximum soil pressure:
- Case (1) all max (CA+CB) :
):
171
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
- Case (3) max on (CB)and min on (CA):
):
By taking moment about center line of column A we get: Fig. (6.17) Case (1) all max(
172
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
Ultimate soil stress below base:
. /
173
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
. /
):
174
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
- Case (2) max on ( )and min on (
):
)and min on ( ):
175
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
Diagrams of envelope moment and shear for longitudinal direction:
The envelope bending moment and shear force diagram shown in Fig. (6.23)
Bending moment
176
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
(
)
)
))
))
))
(
.
(
)
)) (The distribution of bars is equally).
))
))
177
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
))
))
Provide 5 16mm@225mmc/c
Provide 4 116mm@250mmc/c
178
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
Check for Crack:
Max. Spacing = 3*d = 3*542 = 1626 mm or 750 mm.
Actual spacing = 250 mm < max. Spacing.
crack is satisfactory
Max. Stress =
) (
179
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
,(
)-
*(
( )
) (
)+
+)
180
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
(
))
+ (
) ((
)
(
))
181
Design of Foundation
Chapter six
Name
of
footing
b (m)
L (m)
h (m)
F11
2.5
0.60
Bottom Reinforcement
Long
Direction
(B1)
Short
Direction
(B2)
Top Reinforcement
Long
Direction
(T1)
Short
Direction
(T2)
The other footing are designed using Excel sheets. See Tables in an Appendix 5
182