Simulation and Static Analysis of An Off-Road Vehicle Roll Cage
Simulation and Static Analysis of An Off-Road Vehicle Roll Cage
Simulation and Static Analysis of An Off-Road Vehicle Roll Cage
OPEN
Journal
ACCESS
Abstract: The SAE-BAJA competition is arranged every year with a purpose to have teams of
engineering students design, build and race a prototype of a four-wheel, one passenger, off-road
vehicle. The most important aspect of the vehicle design is the frame. The frame contains the operator,
engine, brake system, fuel system and steering mechanism, it must be of adequate strength to protect
the operator in the event of a rollover or impact. The roll cage must be constructed of steel tubing, with
minimum dimensional and strength requirements dictated by Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE).
Increased concern about the roll cage has created the importance of simulation and analysis thereby
predicting failure modes of the frame. In the present paper, we have used ANSYS to investigate the
response of the frame under various impacts. We considered a direct frontal impact and side impact
that results in a 4g horizontal loading, a rollover impact of 3g deceleration value, bump impact and
front torsional impact analysis with 3g deceleration value. The impact loading is simulated by
restricting displacements at certain locations, and applying discrete forces at various points on the
frame where the weight is concentrated. Throughout the analysis of roll cage more emphasis was given
on obtaining a allowable factor of safety and designed according to it.
Keywords: roll cage; frontal impact; side impact; rollover impact; ANSYS.
I. Introduction
A frame of a vehicle plays the most important role in safety of the passenger. The frame contains the
operator, engine, brake system, fuel system, and steering mechanism, and must be of adequate strength to
protect the operator in the event of a rollover or impact. The passenger cabin must have the capacity to resist all
the forces exerted upon it. This can be achieved either by using high strength material or better cross sections
against the applied load. But the most feasible way to balance the dry mass of roll-cage with the optimum
number of members is done by triangulation method. The roll cage must be constructed of steel tubing, with
minimum dimensional and strength requirements dictated by SAE. The SAE BAJA vehicle development
manual also restricts us about the vehicle weight, shape and size, and dimensions [1-3].
Circular cross-section is employed for the roll cage development as it helps to overcome difficulties
like increment in dimension, rise in the overall weight and decrease in fuel efficiency. Its always a perfect one
to resist the twisting and the rolling effects, therefore is preferred for torsional rigidity.
a) Design objective of roll cage are:
1) Provide full safety to the driver, by obtaining required strength and torsional rigidity, while reducing weight
through diligent tubing selection.
2) Design for manufacturability, as well as cost reduction, to ensure both material and manufacturing costs are
competitive with other SAE vehicles.
3) Improve driver comfort by providing more lateral space and leg room in the driver compartment.
4) Maintain ease of serviceability by ensuring that roll cage members do not interfere with other subsystems
[4-6].
This roll cage is developed in ANSYS Multiphysics Menu by plotting the keypoints, lines and arcs.
The element type selected for it is PIPE 16, a uniaxial element with tension, torsion and bending capabilities.
The element has six degrees of freedom at two nodes: translations in the nodal x, y and z directions and rotations
about the nodal x, y and z axes. The real constants involved in the pre-processing of PIPE 16 element are its
outer diameter and thickness value. The material used for the roll cage is AISI 1018 with Youngs Modulus 210
GPa; yield strength is 365.5 MPa and Poissons ratio 0.29. The density of material is 8000 kg/m 3 with hardness
(Brinell) of 126 HB [7].
www.ijmer.com
II.
www.ijmer.com
III.
It is the impact wherein there is a possibility of vehicle crashing into another vehicle head on during the
race (Sharma and Purohit, 2012).The deceleration value for frontal impact is 4g. This is equivalent to a loading
force of 16000 N. The load is applied on two nodes at front as depicted by red arrows in (Fig. 4). Thus, the force
gets divided into two parts i.e. 8000 N on each node. The value recorded for the deformed shape is 0.73 mm
(Fig. 6) which abides by the safety regulations and standards of SAE BAJA competition. (Fig. 7) shows the Von
Mises stress plot, where the maximum stress is observed at the front members (68.673 MPa) where the load is
applied. The driver cabin members are shown in yellow and green colors which clearly depicts the safety of
driver cabin even when loaded with such high force.
The side impact analysis is carried out as there is a possibility of collision with another vehicle from
either direction. Thus, the stresses acting on the side members of the roll cage are analyzed. The deceleration
value for side impact is 4g. This is equivalent to a loading force of 16000 N. The load is applied on two nodes as
shown in (Fig. 8). Thus, the force on each node is 8000N. The nodal solution shows a deformation of 4.246 mm
in colored contour same as the deformation plot as depicted in (Fig. 10). The Von Mises stresses came out to be
99.453 MPa which is inside the permissible range of the material (Fig. 11). The driver cabin members are shown
with green colours which reflect the safety of driver cabin even when such a high load is introduced.
www.ijmer.com
The rollover impact analysis is carried out by considering the stresses induced on the members of the roll cage
when the vehicle topples down from a slope with an angle of 45. In this impact, the upper and rear members of
the vehicle will bear the force. The deceleration value for rollover impact is 3g. This is equivalent to a loading
force of 12000 N. The number of nodes on which the load is applied is 4 (Fig. 12). Thus 3000 N was applied on
each node. The maximum deformation is 8.342 mm in the members of the vehicle as shown in (Fig. 14). The
Von Mises stress induced on the members is shown in (Fig. 15). The maximum stress i.e. 139.69 MPa was
observed at the upper members of the vehicle which is well below the permissible range.
www.ijmer.com
During the SAE-BAJA competition, the vehicle has to travel on uneven tracks. There are times when the vehicle
moving along an upward slope travels about a curved projectile in air before landing on its wheels. The lower
frontal part of the vehicle is the initial member which faces this impact. Once the front tyres touch the surface,
the suspension system absorbs the initial forces exerted on it. A time comes when the suspension system are
compressed to its maximum extent and act like solid member of the vehicle. The rest of the load is transferred to
the roll cage members of the vehicle [9]. In order to ensure the safety of the driver, we determine this impact
force using ANSYS.
The deceleration value for bump analysis was taken as 3g i.e. 12000N.The force was applied on the
frontal four suspension pick up points (Fig. 16). The load applied on each node was 3000 N. The deformation
value is 9.128 mm which abides by the safety regulations and standards of SAE BAJA competition (Fig. 18).
The Von Mises stress is plotted in (Fig. 19) showing the individual stresses in the members. The maximum
stress as observed was found out to be 190.79 MPa which is within the permissible limit of the materials yield
strength.
This impact is analyzed taking into consideration the torsional forces acting on the frontal elements of
the vehicle. This type of force is exerted on the vehicle when it traverses on an uneven road. The two tyres on
the front axle experience a moment. The torque is applied to one tyre and reacted by the other one (Fig. 20).
These forces are equal and opposite. The deceleration value for this impact is 3g i.e. 12000 N. But as these act in
opposite direction, the number of nodes for application of force is 2. The amount of force per node is 6000 N.
The deformed value after analysis is 9.476 mm as shown in (Fig. 22). The maximum Von Mises stress
in this analysis came out to be 90.117 MPa which lies within the permissible range of the material (Fig. 23).
IV.
Stress plots and deformations of critical elements undergoing different loads during the impact tests
were analyzed using ANSYS. This project helps us to understand the vital components of designing. As
mentioned above the yield strength of the material which we are using is 365.5 MPa. The maximum stress
values of various impact tests have been determined and we can easily find the factor of safety of the vehicle.
Safety is of utmost concern in every respect; for the driver, crew & environment. Considerable factor of safety
| IJMER | ISSN: 22496645 |
www.ijmer.com
Von Mises
stress (MPa)
5.322
3.675
2.616
1.915
4.157
68.673
99.453
139.69
190.79
90.117
Maximum
Deformation
(mm)
0.73
4.246
8.342
9.128
9.476
V.
Number of
Nodes
Loading
force (N)
2
2
4
4
2
16,000
16,000
12,000
12,000
12,000
Type of
impact test
Front
Side
Roll-over
Bump
Torsional
Conclusion
The use of finite element analysis was invaluable to the design and analysis of the frame for SAEBAJA off-road vehicle. The analysis was helpful in finding out the maximum deformation, Von Mises stress
and the factor of safety for five different impact tests namely frontal impact, side impact, rollover impact, bump
impact and torsional impact. The findings from the finite element analysis and the actual failure will allow
future designers to integrate a solution to this problem into their design from the beginning.
REFERENCES
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
[7].
[8].
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].
[13].
[14].
[15].
[16].
[17].
[18].
www.ijmer.com