Experience With Torsional Vibration at Reciprocating Compressors
Experience With Torsional Vibration at Reciprocating Compressors
RECIPROCATING COMPRESSORS
Dr.-Ing. Johann Lenz*, Dr.-Ing. Fikre Boru
KTTER Consulting Engineers GmbH & Co. KG
Bonifatiusstrae 400, 48432 Rheine, Germany
[email protected]
Abstract
Reciprocating compressors are unavoidable classical solutions in the field of
natural and process gas compression with the ability to function over a wide
range of operating conditions. The dynamic design of the reciprocating
compressor is complicated due to the large number of conditions that have to
be satisfied. Since high torsional dynamic stress is often not recognised until
damages appear, it is advisable to conduct a detailed torsional vibration
analysis when planning a new drive train or modifying an existing one. In this
paper, the different measures to influence the torsional behaviour of
reciprocating compressors are presented with the help of four case studies.
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
s(t)
Piston rod
Kolben
Piston
FFp K
ppeA
ppi i
uerer
External
volume
Zylinderraum
Figure 1:
innerer
Internal
volume
Zylinderraum
Simplified cylinder
F p (t ) = m p a p (t ) + p i (t ) Ai p e (t ) Ae
(1)
where
m p = piston and piston rod mass
ap
= piston acceleration
pi e
Ai e
From the piston rod force and the dynamic force of the crosshead and the
reciprocating mass of the connecting rod, one can calculate the radial (Fr) and
tangential (Ft) forces (as a function of the crank shaft angle) acting on the
crosshead pin. The tangential force component is responsible for the torque
loading of the crank shaft.
Figure 2 depicts the piston rod force and the resultant moment load of a
single crank shaft of a typical slowly rotating natural gas reciprocating
compressor for one complete crank shaft revolution.
150
20
100
50
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
Figure 2:
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
15
10
-5
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Piston rod force and crank shaft moment, variation of a typical natural
gas piston compressor as a function of crank angle
Moment [kNm]
Harmonics [-]
Figure 3:
2
2.1
CASE STUDIES
Throw 1 to 4
Crank shaft
Motor shaft
Coupling
Figure 4:
2nd ef @ 183.75 Hz
1st ef @ 98.15 Hz
Figure 5:
Campbell diagram as well as 1st and 2nd torsional eigenform at the drive
train
The suction valve unloaders influence the excitation torque spectrum of the
drive train. Figure 6 shows the torque spectra for different settings of the
unloaders. The dynamic response of the drive train was analysed for the
unloader settings. In figure 7 the torque amplitude in the coupling element is
given for an operation between 400 rpm and 1,100 rpm.
Torque [kNm]
Discharge
volume
Harmonics [-]
Figure 6:
Coupling
Discharge
volume
Figure 7:
Figure 7 shows that the dynamic torque of the coupling was considerably
higher for the 75 % setting than for 100 % (i. e. deactivated unloader). This
was due to the change in the 8th harmonic of the excitation, which interfered
with the 1st torsional eigenfrequency.
This example shows that - depending on the system damping and the
selected rotational speed - large dynamic torque may result from the
activation of the unloaders. Hence, it is always advisable to conduct a
torsional vibration analysis before retrofitting an existing reciprocating
compressor with an active suction valve unloader.
2.2
Figure 8:
For the preliminary investigation of the possible source of the problem, the
calculated torsional eigenfrequencies of the drive train were presented in the
Campbell diagram in figure 9.
nd
2 ef @ 116.6 Hz
st
1 ef @ 19.5 Hz
Figure 9:
It can be seen that in the neighbourhood of the operation speed of 600 rpm
there was an interference between the 1st torsional eigenfrequency (19.5 Hz)
and the 2nd excitation harmonic. The torsional vibration at the connecting
shaft was measured as shown in figure 10. Figure 11 shows the amplitude
spectrum of the measured torque.
Power supply
Telemetry unit
Reciprocating
compressor
Motor
Strain gauge
Shaft
Receiver
Figure 10:
Figure 11:
Figure 12:
From the vector presentation it can be seen that the main torsional
deformation occurred in the connecting shaft. As an easy corrective measure
the diameter of the connecting shaft was increased. This moved the
calculated 1st torsional eigenfrequency up to 26 Hz. Since this corrective
measure was implemented at all compressors, there have not been coupling
failures due to torsional vibration anymore.
2.3
Influence of damping
Below, a principle investigation of the coupling effect is presented for a sixcylinder natural gas (reciprocating) compressor with an elastic coupling and
flywheel. A torsional finite element model was developed for the drive train.
Then, an appropriate metal disc coupling was selected. Figures 13 and 14
show calculated eigenfrequencies and eigenforms of the drive train with the
elastic (figure 13) and the metal disc (figure 14) coupling.
1st ef @ 5.48 Hz
2nd ef @ 34.1 Hz
Motor
3rd ef @ 58.33 Hz
Elastic
coupling
Crank shaft
4th ef @ 73.56 Hz
Figure 13:
1st ef @ 52.54 Hz
2nd ef @ 110.48 Hz
3rd ef @ 145.31 Hz
Motor
Metal disc
coupling
Throw 1/2
Crank shaft
Throw 3/4
Throw 5/6
4th ef @ 206.96 Hz
Figure 14:
One can see that the elastic coupling gives three natural frequencies below
the 1st crank shaft natural frequency. These natural frequencies are torsional
vibrations within the coupling and hence do not exist in the system with metal
disc coupling. Using an elastic coupling the excitation of the eigenmodes with
large twisting within the coupling leads to a large power dissipation which may
lead to an overheating of the coupling elements resulting in coupling failure.
Hence, an additional control of the power dissipation is unavoidable for
systems with elastic coupling. The 1st crank shaft eigenfrequency of the drive
train with metal disc coupling is 52.5 Hz, whereas that of the drive train with
elastic coupling is 73.6 Hz. Figure 15 shows the Campbell diagram of both
assemblies to determine the possible resonance operation speeds between
450 rpm and 1,150 rpm.
Elastic coupling ( x )
9xn
st
6xn
1 eigenfrequency 5.5 Hz
2nd eigenfrequency 34.1 Hz
3rd eigenfrequency 58.3 Hz
3xn
1 eigenfrequency 52.5 Hz
2nd eigenfrequency 110.5 Hz
Rotational speed n [rpm]
Figure 15:
Campbell diagram of the drive train with elastic and metal disc coupling
9% Damping ratio
4.5% Damping ratio
1% Damping ratio
9% Damping ratio
4.5% Damping ratio
1% Damping ratio
Figure 16:
Comparison of the torsional loading of the motor shaft stud (top) and
crank shaft stud (bottom) for different damping ratio
The calculation results show that damping ratio has a crucial influence in
attenuating the torque amplitude level in the motor shaft stud. Unlike the
motor shaft stud, the torque level in the crank shaft stud is irresponsive to
variation of the coupling damping ratio. At the resonance speed of around
750 rpm in the crank shaft stud the 4th eigenfrequency is excited by the 6th
harmonics. Since the coupling elements are almost static (nodes) for the 4th
eigenform, the variation of coupling damping ratio plays an insignificant role
for this resonance.
2.4
There are different ways to reduce the dynamic torque at the resonance
speed of 750 rpm. One possible method is the installation of either an
undamped or damped torsional dynamic absorber directly on the crank shaft.
An undamped torsional dynamic absorber removes the 4th eigenfrequency but
results in two new eigenfrequencies, one above and one below the previous
value. As shown in figure 17, the dynamic torque level at the two new
resonance speeds (resulting from the new eigenvalues) is significantly lower
than the previous level. Including damping to the absorbers will further reduce
the torque level as illustrated in figure 18.
Crank shaft without dynamic absorber
Figure 17:
Torque level at the crank shaft stud with and without torsional dynamic
absorber
Crank shaft with dynamic absorber 1% damping ratio
Figure 18:
CONCLUSION