EURACOAL Coal Industry Across Europe 2013

COAL
INDUSTRY
ACROSS EUROPE
5 th edition 2013
Contents
1
Foreword by Philip Lowe,

Director-General for Energy, European Commission
Introduction by Pawe Smole,

President of EURACOAL
Global energy trends and the international coal market
20
The socio - economic value of a sustainable European coal industry
Country profiles
24
26
29
34
36
38
42
44
46
48
50
52
55
58
Bulgaria
Czech Republic
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Poland
Romania
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom
60
Other EU Member States and Energy Community stakeholders
72
EU statistics
74
EURACOAL
75
Glossary
75
Data sources and references
76
Coal classification
Coal industry across Europe 2013
Foreword by Philip Lowe, Director-General for Energy, European Commission
Foreword
The challenges facing the energy world and the coal
industry in particular are getting more complex. Global
energy markets have become increasingly competitive and
Europe finds itself in a race for resources and investments.
Energy policies and political commitments have had to
adapt in the wake of the economic crisis. US shale gas has
brought cheaper coal from the US to Europe, shifting the
balance in Europe between gas and coal. At the same time,
global energy-related CO2 emissions in 2012 reached a new
historic high, whilst scientific consensus on the direct link
between our use of energy and climate change, described
in the latest IPCC report, has never been stronger.
To deal with these challenges, EU policy makers, together
with Member States, are working to find the right balance
between sustainability, competitiveness and security
of supply concerns, not just in our current strategy and
programmes, but also for the forthcoming EU 2030 energy
and climate policy framework.
These challenges also have an impact on the European
coal industry. The economic arguments for coal have
changed recently in its favour. Coal provides much-needed
security of supply in our electricity network. After years
of decline, demand for coal in the EU has started rising
again, with coal imports up 7% in 2012. On the other
hand, many coal plants will be faced with closure due to
new air pollution limits coming into force in 2016. EU coal
production will be affected by the phase out of state aid
by 2018. In addition, policies to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions have a particularly profound impact on the coal
industry and coal-fired power generation.
Philip Lowe, Director-General for Energy, European Commission
Coal plays an important role in the European economy.

Over one quarter of our electricity comes from coal. Coal
and related industries employ well over 200000 people.
Balancing the benefits of coal with its environmental
impact is a challenge both for the coal industry and for
European policy makers.
The facts are undeniable: 87% of the EUs CO2 emissions
come from energy production or use, with energy
industries remaining the dominant source. The only way
to reconcile the use of coal with a low-carbon and efficient
energy system is with greater flexibility, more efficiency
and the widespread uptake of carbon dioxide capture
and storage CCS. It is essential for the coal and power
industries to develop more low-carbon options for coalfired electricity generation. Investing today will give us a
more diversified energy mix in the future.
Making progress on CCS development is not just a
technical and financial challenge, but also a political issue.
The Commissions March 2013 communication on CCS
re-launched the debate on how to give CCS the kick-start
that it needs. Ideally, the Commission would like to see
a commercial-scale demonstration project running this
side of 2020. However, we are also aware of the many
obstacles which need to be overcome. We want to work
with the coal industry, coal generators and coal investors
to find innovative solutions for the future of coal and to
ensure that coal continues to be a useful resource in a
low-carbon energy system.
Introduction by Pawe Smole, President of EURACOAL
Introduction
This is the fifth edition of Coal industry across Europe
and comes at a time when coal is making a resurgence
in Europe. Since the first edition was published in
2003, the coal industry in Europe has undergone a
transformation. Underground coal mining has become
more automated and more productive in order to
compete against imported coal. Surface lignite mining
has become a much more important component of
energy supply as enlargement of the European Union
has brought in countries with rich deposits of this
valuable resource. Unfortunately, Europe is in the fifth
year of an economic crisis and austerity measures.
The means to wealth creation are under scrutiny.
Whatever the conclusions, we can be sure that basic
industries, like coal mining, will play a decisive role in
pulling Europe out of this crisis and back to prosperity.
The European Union is the worlds third largest coal-using
region, after China and North America. Each year, we
mine around 130 million tonnes of hard coal and import a
further 210 million tonnes making us the worlds largest
importer behind China. At 430 million tonnes, our lignite
production far exceeds that from any other region. Russia,
Australia, the USA and Turkey each mine around 70 million
tonnes, far behind Germany which produced 185 million
tonnes in 2012. Most Europeans never see a lump of coal,
but they use it in their homes in the form of electricity:
27% of EU electricity production comes from burning coal
and lignite in power stations.
Pawe Smole, President of EURACOAL
Despite these remarkable statistics, coal and lignite

are not always viewed positively. They are abundant,
affordable and accessible so add to the security and
competitiveness of energy supply in the EU. 88% of EU
fossil energy reserves are in the form of coal and lignite.
However, burning fossil fuels of any type coal, oil or
gas releases carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere
that is thought to cause global warming and climate
change. It is right that the coal industry is taking steps to
reduce emissions. EURACOAL itself calls for a three-step
strategy encompassing power plant modernisation to
improve efficiency using technologies that are commercial
today, research and development into even more efficient
technologies for tomorrow and finally deploying CO2
capture and storage the day after tomorrow.
In too many countries, there is a reluctance to take even
the first of these practical steps as policy shifts against
coal. This needs to be reversed so that the EU is not left
behind in a world that is embracing coal like never before.
We need to demonstrate how to use coal cleanly and
efficiently. There are good examples that we can be proud
of and use to promote European technology. In Denmark,
one can find the worlds most efficient coal-fired power
plants. In Germany, lignite-fired power plants that have
opened in the last couple of years are the worlds most
flexible perfect for balancing the increasing share of
electricity from renewable energy sources under the
German Energiewende. In the Netherlands, new coal-fired
power plants will open shortly and ensure that the country
Introduction by Pawe Smole, President of EURACOAL
does not become dependent on imported gas as its

own North Sea gas reserves deplete. These are all good
examples, but when we look to Eastern and South East
Europe a different picture emerges.
Newer member states have not been so lucky because
the investment climate has not favoured renewal of their
ageing and often inefficient coal-fired assets. The basics
must be in place to support economic growth. For most
countries, this means a reliable and affordable electricity
supply that does not pollute the countryside. Whilst many
in Western Europe can be satisfied with the progress
that has been made in that direction, the same is not true
across all parts of the Union.
A startling fact emerges from the chapter that reviews
global energy trends. In 2012, Chinas coal production
grew by 130 million tonnes the same as total EU hard
coal production. In truth, the EU is now responsible for
a rather small and declining share of global greenhouse
gas emissions just 11% although EU consumers enjoy
the benefits of products from China. This trend towards
globalisation extends the EUs carbon footprint in ways
that are not properly appreciated.
EU climate and energy policy aims to shift energy
consumers in Europe away from coal towards gas.
This is one reason why gas is so expensive in Europe
a market is being created not through competitive
forces, but through policy, legislation and regulation.
If this continues, we will wake up one day to find that
competitive energy markets have all but disappeared.

Today, it is only competition between coal and gas that
protects consumers from high electricity prices.
This report summarises coal industry developments not
only across the EU-28 but also the Energy Community
which includes countries where there are enormous
investment opportunities in the energy sector. Countries
that were ravaged by war not so many years ago are
vigorously rebuilding their economies. Many of these
countries sit on coal and lignite reserves that they want
to exploit to provide electricity for their fast-growing
economies. If European banks do not lend money to these
countries, then it will be Chinese banks with Chinese
technology. European power plant suppliers would miss
out on new projects right on their doorstep. The EU
needs a strong industrial policy to match its strong climate
policy so that member states and neighbouring countries
become wealthier.
I am pleased that EURACOALs thirty four members have
worked together to produce a report that offers so much
information within its pages. Like the European project,
it brings the quarter of a million men and women who
work in the coal industry closer together, makes us all
more aware of the challenges that we face and hints at
ways forward to a more prosperous future. With greater
prosperity, Europe can look forward to a cleaner and
brighter future. For many countries, the foundation of
prosperity comes from the exploitation of their natural
resources, beginning with coal and lignite.
GERMANY
RECULTIVATION
OF COLLIERY SPOIL TIPS
Over the long history of coal mining in the Ruhr basin,
hard coal extraction from underground mines inevitably
produced unwanted waste material now a feature of
the surface landscape in coalfield areas. Some of these
spoil heaps have undergone changes on their own, others
have provided a site for artistic works. Totem is a piece
of contemporary art by the Basque painter and sculptor
Agustn Ibarrola. Created from more than one hundred
railway sleepers, it is intended to portray the apparent
contradictions between industrial landscapes and nature.
UNITED KINGDOM
NORTHUMBERLANDIA
THE LADY OF COAL
At Shotton in Northumberland, the Banks Group decided to create
the worlds largest human landform Northumberlandia, using
1.5 million tonnes of carefully selected stone, clay and soil
extracted from the adjacent Shotton surface mine. The Lady was
designed in line with a restoration first approach, where extra
land not needed for coal mining was provided by the landowner
Blagdon Estate to deliver a lasting and positive legacy for both the
local community and the wider region.
Since being officially opened by Her Royal Highness The Princess
Royal in September 2012, Northumberlandia has proved
extremely popular with local residents and tourists alike. Many
thousands of people visit the 47-acre public park in which she
resides every week.
GERMANY
WATER BUFFALOES
AT LAKOMA
Since the natural paradise of Spreeaue was opened to

visitors in 2007, thousands of tourists, cyclists, hikers, kids
and teenagers have come to visit this fascinating area of
530 hectares between Cottbus and Spreewald in Germany.
The area became the new home to more than 146 000
amphibians, while oxen, wild horses and water
buffaloes graze on the meadows. Many fish are bred
in the ponds. Fire-bellied toads and tree frogs have
found a new habitat in the biotopes which draw
locals and tourists from all across Germany. The new
landscape offers new perspectives and new views
on local sustainable development.
Global energy trends and

the international coal market
There are many sources of energy data and reconciling
these is a task for professionals. Government bodies,
such as the European Commission, Eurostat, International
Energy Agency (IEA) and the US Energy Information
Administration, alongside private companies, investment
banks and market research consultancies, aim to provide
consistent data to policy makers and other users.
Many also forecast future energy supply and demand.
EURACOAL itself collects historic data from its members
and national governments to build a picture of coal
industry developments in Europe for publication in its

regular coal market reports. In this chapter, data is drawn
from various sources to present a concise overview of
global energy trends, notably coal market data from VDKi
the German coal importers association. Coal is seen to be
well on the way to becoming the worlds most important
energy source, helped by a well-functioning international
coal market. In contrast, Europes importance is shown
to be declining as energy demand in the emerging
economies overtakes that of Western consumers.
Global energy reserves and resources

We are not about to run out of energy: the world has
sufficient energy reserves of all types for the next
80 years and resources to last over one thousand years.
Well over one half of our reserves are in the form of coal
and lignite which together account for an even larger share
of resources (Figure 1). Natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels
make up the remainder of total non-renewable energy

reserves and resources. Renewable energy is abundant
and in the case of wind, solar and geothermal practically
inexhaustible, although much harder to quantify as a
resource since converting it into useful energy can be
inefficient and expensive.
Figure 1
Global production, reserves and resources of non-renewable fuels
billion tonnes of coal equivalent (Gtce data for the end of 2011)
reserves:
resources:
total energy production:
1 346 billion tonnes
18 156 billion tonnes
16.9 billion tonnes
0.4% 18.3%
5.1%
47.4%
79.8%
17.8%
8.3%
2.7%
3.4%
2.2%
2.4%
1.2%
0.5%
1.2%
9.3%
Hard coal
Lignite
Uranium
Thorium
Oil
Unconv. oil
Natural gas
Unconv. gas
Source: BGR, 2013
Coal and lignite reserves are sufficient for the next

137 years at current rates of production. Unlike oil and gas,
coal is widely distributed around the world with particularly
large reserves in the USA, Russia and China (Figure 2).
For this reason, coal offers a much higher level of supply
security: most coal produced is used in the country of
extraction. Where there is an indigenous source of coal,
supply security is self-evident. Where coal is imported,
supply is supported by a competitive market and a
well-developed infrastructure.
At around 3%, the European Unions share of global energy
reserves and resources is rather small (Table 1). As at the
global level, it is the reserves and resources of coal and

lignite that are most significant: together they account for
94% of the EUs remaining potential. Some coal deposits
lie near consumers and can be exploited under very
favourable conditions. For example, surface-mined lignite
in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Hungary,
Poland and Romania is used mainly for power generation,
often transported to power plants over short distances by
conveyor belt to produce some of the lowest-cost electricity
in Europe. Hard coal, both indigenously produced and
imported, is much less expensive than imported oil or gas
and the majority of EU member states enjoy the benefits
of competitive coal-fired electricity generation.
5
Figure 2
Global hard coal and lignite reserves
billion tonnes of coal equivalent (Gtce data for the end of 2011)
Hard coal: 638 Gtce
North America
CIS
Lignite:
111 Gtce
Total:
749 Gtce
13
46
Europe
China
3
104
198
22 18
India
1
Latin America
1
8
Other Asia
148
6
17
Africa
63
Australia & NZ
29
17
52
Source: BGR, 2013

Table 1
Non-renewable energy reserves and resources in the European Union
Gtce
reserves
Hard coal
16.6
43.0%
Lignite
17.4
45.0%
Oil
1.7
4.4%
Natural gas *
2.8
7.3%
Uranium/Thorium
0.1
0.3%
Total
38.7
100.0%
resources
428.6
93.1
3.6
20.5
4.8
550.7
77.8%
16.9%
0.7%
3.7%
0.9%
100.0%
Source: BGR, 2013

* Natural gas includes conventional natural gas, tight gas, shale gas, coalbed methane, aquifer gas and gas hydrates.
Coal in global energy consumption

Global consumption of commercial energy, excluding
non-commercial firewood, dung and other waste, totalled
19 billion tonnes of coal equivalent (Gtce) in 2012. Coal, with
a 29% share, ranked second after oil as one of the major
sources of primary energy (Figure 3). Coal production has
more than doubled since 1980 and, according to the IEA,
coal could replace oil to become the most important source
of energy within the next five years (IEA, 2013a).
Each of the primary energy sources has a different end-use

profile. For oil, the transport sector dominates; for natural
gas, the heating market is important as well as power
generation. Coal is mainly used for electricity generation
and steelmaking, while nuclear energy is used commercially
for power generation alone. Renewable sources are used
both in the heating market and for power generation, while
bio-fuels are gaining ground as transport fuels.
For power generation, coal plays a major role in both

developed and emerging economies. In 2012, 41% of
global power generation was based on coal: 38% hard
coal and 3% lignite (Figures 3 and 4).
World coal production reached 7.8 billion tonnes in 2012:

6.9 billion tonnes of hard coal and 0.9 billion tonnes of lignite.
In turn, the production of hard coal comprised 5.9 billion tonnes
of steam coal and 1.0 billon tonnes of coking coal. Around one
Figure 3
Global primary energy mix and global power generation by primary energy source, 2012
Total primary energy supply
Gross power generation
19.1 Gtce
22 500 TWh
10%
2%
5%
1%
5%
16%
29%
Coal
11%
Oil
41%
21%
Natural gas
Nuclear energy
22%
Hydro
32%
Traditional biomass
5%
New renewables
Sources: IEA databases, BP (2013a) and own estimates

Figure 4
Share of coal-fired power generation in selected countries, 2012 *
South Africa *
94%
Poland
51%
33%
Kazakhstan *
80%
China *
2%
79%
Serbia *
76%
Israel
70%
Australia
48%
22%
India *
65%
Greece
3%
56%
Bulgaria *
9%
Czech Republic
9 %
46%
45%
Taiwan *
Germany
51%
21%
26%
44%
Indonesia *
42%
South Korea
UK
USA
Denmark
World *
40%
36%
2%
Lignite
35%
38%
Coal
3%
* 2011 for non-OECD countries
Source: IEA databases and own calculations

Figure 5
Major coal producing and importing countries, 2012
China
USA
India
Indonesia
Australia
Russia
South Africa
Germany
Poland
Kazakhstan
Colombia
Ukraine
Turkey
Canada
Greece
Czech Republic
Production
UK
Imports
Taiwan
South Korea
Japan
1000
2000
3000
4000
Mt
Source: IEA, 2013b
hundred countries use coal in commercial quantities: some are

major producers; others rely on imported coal; but all value the
contribution that coal makes to energy supply (Figure 5). There
are some very large consumers of coal which tend to dominate
the global picture. On an energy basis, the European Union
is the worlds fourth largest consumer of coal after China, the
United States and India. It is noteworthy that in 2012, Chinas
annual coal production grew by an estimated 130 million
tonnes, this being almost identical to the EUs total hard
coal production. Nevertheless, at 433 million tonnes, the EU
remains the worlds largest lignite producer by a wide margin.
Two thirds of all coal produced worldwide is delivered
to power plants, or 90% in the case of lignite. Other
major customers for hard coal are in the iron and steel
sector, chemical fertiliser manufacture and the process
heating market, including cement works, paper mills, food
processors and other industries. Coal today plays a lesser
role in the heating of buildings, except in several eastern
European countries, Turkey, China and North Korea. That said,
8
coal-fired district heating and cooling as well as combined

heat and power are important in Scandinavian countries.
In many cases, countries with indigenous coal deposits
have above-average shares of coal-fired power generation,
while countries with insignificant or no reserves have
below-average shares. Exceptions include Taiwan and Israel
who import all of their hard coal needs (Figure 4). In Japan,
coal is a major economic input, not only to the iron and steel
industry, but also to the power industry. Over one quarter
of electricity supply in Japan relies on imported hard coal.
On an electricity production cost basis, lignite-fired power
plants are very competitive. Similarly, hard coal contributes to
energy supply security at an affordable cost. While the actual
cost varies from region to region and depends on many
factors, the economic contribution of low-cost electricity
from coal and lignite is of great value to economies across
the EU. In addition, coal and lignite mines sit at the centre
of long value chains creating wealth in other sectors, from
mining equipment suppliers to operators of power plants.
HUNGARY
A BUCKET-WHEEL EXCAVATOR
STANDING TALL AT 24 m
In order to further improve productivity at the Bkkbrny

opencast mine of Mtrai Erm in Hungary, a new
compact excavator was designed and built.Taking three
years to build, the excavators capacity of 6 700 m3/h
is 20% higher than the known capacity of any other
excavator in the world. In terms of weight and power, the
excavator also sets new standards and since it has been
in operation it has significantly contributed to the mines
productivity. The compact design, the two-crawlers and
the large belt wagon allow flexible operations, while the
integrated control and monitoring system guarantees
easy handling. In 2012, the excavator moved some
13.2 million cubic metres, accounting for some 50% of the
total overburden removed at the Bkkbrny mine.
CZECH REPUBLIC
MOST HIPPODROME A FAVOURITE
RECLAMATION PROJECT
The Hippodrome racecourse, located in the 790-hectare Velebudice
reclamation park in Most is a unique and highly acclaimed project
of the Czech reclamation school.The idea was to give new breath
and social importance to this former surface mine. The result is
a unique racecourse, skirted by a 3 370 m in-line skating track, a
show jumping field, training fields, a golf course and a picnic park
for the public. The brown coal companies Vransk uheln and
Severn energetick are proud of the outcome: 100 000 visit the
Hippodrome every year, proving the success and originality of the
project.
CZECH REPUBLIC
THE DRAGON OF BEZNO
At Bezno village, the retired bucket-wheel excavator

KU 800 has become an industrial monument, standing for
the glorious history of modern surface mining in the North
Bohemian brown coal basin. The veteran KU 800, with
a respectable 32 years of service and winner of eleven
overburden extraction records, attracts tens of thousands
of visitors every year to witness the technical and design
skills of Czech brains and hands. This dragon symbolises
the technological success of modern and efficient surface
mining. Children from Bezno village might also relate the
fantastic fairy tale of the Good Dragon and the Brave Knight,
who saved the village many centuries ago.
Coal consumption trends
In the EU, hard coal production has declined from Europes

mature production centres whilst volumes of imported coal
have grown significantly. Major coal-consuming countries
in the region are Germany, Poland, the UK, the Czech
Republic, Italy, France, Greece, Spain, the Netherlands,
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
Co
al
re O
ne t
w he
ab r
le
s
H
yd
ro
0.0
N
uc
le
ar
Trends in coal use differ by region. In OECD countries, coal

consumption declined slightly since 2000; in the EU, there
was a 14% drop. In contrast, coal demand in developing
countries has increased dramatically. Growth in non-OECD
countries from 2000 to 2012 amounted to 2.3 Gtce, a
126% increase. The main driver was China, where coal
consumption increased from 1.0 Gtce in 2000 to 2.8 Gtce
in 2012. Thus, China has accounted for 83% of the growth
in world coal consumption; India accounted for 12%.
Gtce
N
at
ur
al
ga
s
New renewables, such as wind, solar and geothermal,

have also grown quickly. However, in absolute terms, their
contribution remains rather limited, amounting to just 1.3%
of worldwide primary energy consumption in 2012.
Figure 6
Growth in total primary energy supply, 2000 to 2012
O
il
Since the turn of the new millennium, from 2000 to 2012,

coal use has grown more strongly than any other primary
energy source, in absolute terms, helping to meet a 4.5 Gtce
or 34% growth in overall energy demand (Figure 6).
Source: BP, 2013a
Bulgaria and Romania. In 2012, Germany was the largest coal

importer in the EU, followed by the UK, Italy, Spain, France,
the Netherlands and Poland (see map inside back cover).
International coal trade

In 2012, international coal trade grew by 11% to 1258 million
tonnes or 18.2% of world hard coal production which
reached 6926 million tonnes there is little international
trade in lignite (Figure 7). Of this, 1 082 million tonnes were
transported across the oceans, being the seaborne coal
trade (Figure 8). This data shows that coal is mainly used in
the vicinity of deposits. However, coal from mines with low
production costs and good transport links to sea ports can
be delivered competitively to overseas consumers. Since the
oil crises of the 1970s, the growth in global coal trade has
allowed the world to shift away from an overreliance on oil to
the extent that oil is now rarely used for power generation.
Figure 7
Global coal and lignite production and
international coal trade, 1980 to 2012
Mt
Lignite
Coking coal
8 000
Steam coal
7 000
6 000
5 000
4 000
3 000
Total coal trade
2 000
1 000
0
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
Seaborne trade can be further divided into coking coal

trade and steam coal trade (Figure 9). In 2012, seaborne
steam coal trade grew to 826 million tonnes, with a further
256 million tonnes of coking coal. Overland cross-border
deliveries added an estimated 120 million tonnes to
international coal trade.
Source: IEA, 2013b
The market for steam coal can be subdivided into Pacific

and Atlantic markets, each with different supply patterns
10
Figure 8
Seaborne trade flows on the international hard coal market, 2012
61
28
to Far East
Canada
34
65
Poland
3
USA
107
31
Russia
117
54
57
China
9
25
293
seaborne steam coal trade:
826 Mt
seaborne coking coal trade:
256 Mt
Colombia/
Venezuela
79
total seaborne hard coal trade: 1 082 Mt

20
Indonesia
304
South Africa
76
294
49
Australia
316
13
Source: VDKi, 2013
(Figure 10). By contrast, the coking coal market is a

more uniform world market, reflecting the small number
of supply countries: principally Australia, the USA and
Canada, but with strong growth potential in the new
entrants Mongolia and Mozambique.
Figure 9
International coal trade, 1980 to 2012
Mt
1 400
Seaborne coking coal
1 200
Seaborne steam coal
Important exporting countries for hard coal are Indonesia,

Australia, Russia, the United States, Colombia and South
Africa, who together accounted for around 87% of all
coal exports in 2012 (Figure 11). Resource nationalism
normally associated with oil and gas exploitation is
creeping into the coal industry. Indonesia will ban the
export of low quality coal from 2014. In South Africa,
the ruling ANC party has made proposals ranging from
nationalisation of the coal mining industry to greater black
economic empowerment and from a rent tax to export
tariffs. South Africa, like Indonesia, wants to secure coal
for domestic power generation and avoid the premature
depletion of its reserves by coal-hungry China.
Source: IEA, 2013b
The top coal importing countries are China, Japan, India,

South Korea, Taiwan, Germany, the UK, Russia, Turkey,
Italy and Spain, together accounting for 80% of coal
trade. Indias coal imports are growing quickly, helped by
a government decision in 2012 to temporarily remove coal
import duties. India will likely overtake Japan to become
the worlds second largest coal importing country.
Imported hard coal makes a significant contribution to the

EUs security of energy supply and offers a competitive
fuel which can be easily and safely transported and
stocked. In 2012, 17% of all coal exports were destined
for EU member states. Leading exporters to the EU are
Russia, Colombia, the United States, Australia, South
Africa and Indonesia (Figure 12).
1 000
800
Total hard coal and lignite
600
400
200
0
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
11
FRANCE
ADVANCED AMINE POST-COMBUSTION
CO2 CAPTURE AT LE HAVRE
The reduction of CO2 emissions from fossil fuels is one of
the challenges that EDF intends to meet over the coming
years. The carbon capture demonstration plant located
at the coal-fired power plant of EDF in Le Havre aims to
demonstrate Alstoms proprietary Advanced Amine Process
(AAP) Technology.
The first tonne of CO2 was captured on 11th July 2013 and
approximately 25 tonnes of CO2 will be captured every day.
The primary test objectives are the validation of key process
performance parameters such as CO2 capture efficiency,
thermal degradation and related environmental emissions as
well as material selection for key components. Additionally,
the robustness and behavior of the AAP technology under
transient operating modes such as load variations and cold
and hot start-ups and shut-downs will be examined as
well as of course the economic viability of the process.
BULGARIA
FROM COAL TO GYPSUM
Over one half of Bulgarias electricity is generated from coal, mainly
mined by Mini Maritsa Iztok. At the Maritsa Iztok complex, gypsum
is collected as a by-product of the flue-gas desulphurisation
process at two power plants. Gypsum is found in nature, but Knauf
Bulgaria and Technogips can now produce gypsum plasterboard
sheets and gypsum products out of a raw material which is in
fact a waste product from power plant operation rather than from
gypsum mines. This successful symbiosis between lignite mining,
power generation and product manufacturing is a unique solution
that ensures the efficient utilisation of indigenous resources,
protects ambient air and respects the requirements of EU
environmental regulations.
CZECH REPUBLIC
LESS EMISSIONS AND
MORE ELECTRICITY
Czech domestic coal reserves will continue to play a
key role in the national energy mix to make the country
less dependent on fossil fuel imports. EZ committed
to refurbish coal-fired power plants and construct new
high-efficiency ones to provide economically attractive
and lower-carbon solutions to meet the countrys power
demand. Prunov power plant (3x250 MW) will increase
its efficiency from 32.8% to 40%, Tuimice power plant
(4x200 MW) from 33% to 39% and the first supercritical
brown coal-fired unit in the country (660 MW) with a net
efficiency of 42.5% is under construction at Ledvice. All
three power plants have a long future ahead providing
affordable, reliable and lower-carbon electricity.
12
Figure 10
Major steam coal flows within and between the Atlantic and Pacific markets, 2012
Atlantic Market: 226 Mt
Pacific Market: 600 Mt

16 Mt
Supply: 279 Mt
USA
Russia
Colombia
210 Mt
South Africa
Venezuela
Poland etc.
Demand: 226 Mt
EU27
Eastern Europe
Mediterranean
North, Central &
South America
etc.
Demand: 600 Mt
China
Japan
India
South Korea
Taiwan
etc.
531 Mt
Supply: 547 Mt
Australia
Indonesia
Russia
South Africa
Vietnam
China etc.
69 Mt
Source: VDKi, 2013

Figure 11
Top coal exporting countries, 2012
Indonesia
Australia
Russia
USA
Colombia
South Africa
Canada
Kazakhstan
Mongolia
Vietnam
North Korea
China
Poland
Steam coal
Ukraine
Coking coal
Czech Republic
Mozambique
New Zealand
100
200
300
400
Mt
Source: IEA, 2013b

13
Figure 12
Coal imports into the EU by source country, 2011
Norway 0.6 %
Ukraine 2.2 %
Venezuela 0.5 %
Kazakhstan 0.3 %
China 0.1 %
Others 0.1 %
Canada 2.2 %
Indonesia 5.2 %
Russia 26.1 %
South Africa 8.0 %
200 Mt
Australia 8.9 %
Colombia 23.9 %
USA 18.1 %
Source: DG Energy, 2013
Note: the source country of 4.0% of coal imports is not specified in customs data.
Recent coal market developments

Despite the strong growth in coal demand, the global
economy remains fragile and many predict a slowdown
in Asia as government stimulus spending is reduced.
Demand for commodities such as iron ore, coking coal
and steam coal may stagnate as infrastructure projects are
delayed or cancelled and economic growth slows. Already
in 2013, coal markets have become oversupplied, putting
downward pressure on prices. There are various reasons for
this oversupply, including an increase in US coal available
for export during the summer months due to a fall in US
natural gas prices and a devaluation of the Indian rupee
against the US dollar. The latter has put coal exporters to
India under mounting pressure to reduce prices, pressure
felt most acutely by Indonesian producers who supplied
an estimated 78% of Indias steam coal imports in 2012.
Significant upward swings in coal demand have been seen
in Europe where high prices have made natural gas very
uncompetitive and the German nuclear phase out created
an unexpected demand for alternatives such as coal and
lignite. The German Energiewende progressed with sharp
rises in power generation from solar PV and wind up
37% in 2011 and 8% in 2012 leaving new gas-fired power
plants lying idle. In Japan, following the ongoing accident
at Fukushima nuclear power plant and temporary closure
of nearly all Japans other nuclear plants, there has been no
growth in coal demand. Demand-side measures mean that
14
electricity demand fell 7% between 2010 and 2012.

In the absence of sufficient coal-fired generation capacity
some was damaged by the tsunami in 2011 this reduced
demand has been met with the greater use of oil and
gas for power generation at great cost to the Japanese
economy and contributing to the high gas prices seen
around the world.
More than ever before, the coal market now depends on
events in the Far East. China imported 289 million tonnes
in 2012, overtaking Japan to become the worlds biggest
coal importer and absorbing 23% of internationally traded
coal into a country which now consumes just over half
of all the coal mined around the world. Some forecasts
show Chinas coal imports rising to an unimaginable one
billion tonnes by 2030, coming mostly from Australia and
Indonesia.
Surprisingly, US and Colombian coal now finds buyers in
Asia, despite the long transport distances and sometimes
difficult logistics. South African exporters also now ship
to Asia in preference to Europe, although have failed to
deploy the full capacity of the countrys export terminals.
These new coal trade flows have emerged because sea
shipping rates remain at historic lows. The Baltic Dry Index
a measure of shipping rates has been below 2 500
since November 2010, compared with a peak of 11 793
at the height of the economic boom in May 2008 when

the rate for shipping coal from South Africa to north-west
Europe rose to above 60 US$/tonne. During much of
2012, the same rate was below 10 US$/tonne. With new
vessels still being delivered into an already oversupplied
market, shipping rates are likely to remain low. Moreover,
new or expanded trade routes are opening up with the
expansion of the Panama Canal and thawing of the
Northwest Passage and Northern Sea Route. How these
affect international coal trade remains to be seen, but we
can be sure that trade will continue to grow, matching
coal producers and consumers in perhaps the worlds
most dynamic and competitive market.
The shale gas revolution in the United States has had a
significant impact on coal demand in that country. Cheap
natural gas averaging one quarter of EU prices in 2012
has displaced coal for power generation leading to coal
mine closures, corporate bankruptcies and greater efforts
to export coal. Since 2010, US coal consumption has fallen
by 128 million tonnes or 13% to 822 million tonnes
a 20-year low whilst exports grew 54% to 114 million
tonnes over the same two-year period. Europe in particular
has benefitted from competitive supplies of US coal: in
2012, the US became the second largest coal exporter to
the EU after Russia. There are various reasons to question
the long-term durability of this development:
US natural gas prices are unlikely to remain so much

lower than elsewhere in the world once LNG export
terminals open and link the now isolated US market
with international gas trade.
Continued low international coal prices would see US
producers exit the international market: their production
costs are at the upper end of the cost curve for
internationally traded coal.
The production profile of shale gas formations depends
on a programme of continuous drilling and fracturing
(fracking). Decline rates for individual wells are very
steep 65% to 85% in the first year refracking helps,
but more and more wells are needed to maintain
production.
More generally, there is much uncertainty on the potential
of shale gas. Resource estimates are often based on
patchy data because, outside of North America, shale
gas exploration is still in its infancy. Even when data is
available, the different methodologies and assumptions
used to interpret that data have led to wildly varying
resource estimates: varying by a factor of 100 in the case
of Poland. Hence, any estimates must be treated with
caution, at least until they are confirmed by commercial
production.
Coal pricing
Price formation on the world coal market was for a long
time dominated by non-transparent long-term contracts.
One reason for this is the non-homogenous nature of hard
coal with quality defined by a number of parameters (e.g.
calorific value, ash, moisture, volatile matter, sulphur and
chloride). Delivery location also determines price since
freight costs can be significant. Typical source and delivery
locations for pricing purposes are Richards Bay in South
Africa, Newcastle in Australia, Qinhuangdao in China
and the ARA ports in north-west Europe (Amsterdam,
Rotterdam and Antwerp).
Over the years, greater tolerance to coal quality has
become possible due to ongoing developments in
power plant technology and greater use of flue gas
desulphurisation. Today, coal price indices, such as
those published by Argus, McCloskey and Platts, refer
to standard locations and specifications, and contracts
include price adjustments for coals which vary from the
norm. In this way, the prices of individual coal trades
can be fed into the calculation of benchmark or reference
price indices.
Today, the world market for hard coal is characterised

by strong competition between many suppliers, large
and small. The leading twenty coal companies represent
about one third of global coal production and about half of
international coal trade. The four largest coal exporters
BHP BILLITON, GLENCOREXSTRATA, ANGLO AMERICAN
and RIO TINTO account for about one quarter of
international trade.
Establishing a price no longer depends exclusively on
bilateral negotiations and contracts, although these are
still important. The availability of reference spot prices for
different types of coal and different countries or regions
not only increases transparency, but also makes trade in
futures and derivatives possible. In the steam coal market,
as in other commodity markets, it is now possible to
manage risk flexibly and affordably, thanks to derivatives.
In practice, this can take place on commodity exchanges
such as Nymex and EEX, via exchange-traded funds,
on electronic trading platforms such as globalCOAL, as
well as on the over-the-counter market. This trend has
encouraged the entry of new market participants, thus
deepening market liquidity. In the coking coal market,
15
Figure 13
Australian steam coal real price index, 1901 to 2012
(1901 = 100)
400
6-Day War
200
end WWI
China joins WTO
end WWII
100
19
00
19
10
19
20
19
30
19
40
19
50
19
60
19
70
19
80
19
90
20
00
20
10
50
Sources: Reserve Bank of Australia, 2007;

IEA, 2013b; own estimates using US CPI
annual contract negotiations typically led by Australian

producers and Japanese steel mills have moved
to a broader participation in the setting of quarterly
benchmarks coupled with monthly contracts and
a growing spot market.
Over the last one hundred years or more, a number of
economic cycles can be seen reflected in the real price
of steam coal on the international market (Figure 13).
The global economic crisis interrupted what was described
by some as a super cycle with booming demand for
products from emerging economies around the world
as well as from their new middle classes. Coal prices
today still reflect a period of tight supply and it is difficult
to predict future prices. However, in its outlooks, the
IEA assumes real coal prices will rise steadily over the
next twenty years to reach 10% to 20% above the 2012
average.
Imported hard coal is a very affordable source of energy.
Over the last 25 years, coal has been consistently cheaper
than both oil and natural gas on an energy basis (Figure

14). The strong demand for energy commodities since
around 2000, driven by China, has seen a quadrupling of
oil and gas prices. Over the same period, coal prices have,
on average, remained at below half the level of oil and gas
prices.
Unlike for hard coal, there is no free-market price
formation for lignite used in power generation and very
little international trade just 3 million tonnes in 2012.
This is because its low energy density makes transport
uneconomic over longer distances. For this reason, it is
common to build lignite-fired power plants adjacent to
lignite mines such that producer and consumer co-exist
in a captive market and form a single economic entity.
Lignite is then most economically transported by
dedicated infrastructure typically a conveyor belt
delivered directly to nearby power plants under, for
example, 50-year contracts. Lignite mining and use is
a stable, long-term business.
Figure 14
EU import prices for coal, oil and natural gas, 1990 to 2012
/tonne of coal equivalent
400
350
300
low sulphur fuel oil

(Rotterdam)
EU pipeline gas imports
EU steam coal imports
250
200
150
100
50
0
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
Sources: McCloskey, 2013; IEA, 2013b; BAFA, 2013
Global outlook for coal

The future of coal looks assured with rising demand all
around the world: the IEA forecasts that demand will
grow by 17% between 2012 and 2017 (IEA, 2013a).
On current trends and with no major technological
changes, coal demand is likely to increase by 50% over
the next 25 years. However, many forecasters try to marry
16
the competing challenges of securing global energy supply

and reducing global greenhouse gas emissions. This leads
to scenarios in which coals role is significantly curtailed.
For example, the IEA World Energy Outlook 2012 presents
three future energy scenarios:
POLAND
SKIING ON OVERBURDEN THE
HIGHEST PEAK IN CENTRAL POLAND
Kamiesk mountain is the highest peak in Central Poland.

It is man-made built of overburden from the lignite mine
Bechatw. Todays forested mountain is the result of a
comprehensive rehabilitation plan which transformed this
industrial location into an attractive summer and winter
tourist resort. The main attraction is a 760-metre long
ski slope with one chairlift and two ski lifts, as well as an
ultra-modern toboggan run and several bike trails.
NORWAY
ENABLING SCIENCE IN THE ARCTIC CIRCLE
Store Norske mines coal 1 250 km from the North Pole in some
of the most challenging conditions: coal can only be shipped once
sea ice melts in late summer. This unique location attracts many
scientists and engineers. Only here is there a single ground station
that can stay in contact with the polar-orbiting satellites that map
the world and measure global temperature changes. The Svalbard
Global Seed Vault provides a safety net against losing crop
diversity. The NASA rover that is now exploring Mars was tested
in the arctic desert of Svalbard. All of this is made possible only
because of the mine, its infrastructure and the local community.
SLOVENIA
ALEK VALLEY WHERE COAL
MINING STANDS FOR WELFARE
AND PROSPERITY
The mining company Premogovnik Velenje in Slovenia
provides lignite to the nearby otanj power plant,
producing electricity for the entire region and covering 31%
of the countrys electricity needs. Thanks to lignite mining,
the small town became the fifth largest city in Slovenia in
less than fifty years. Premogovnik Velenje takes seriously
its commitments in the field of social responsibility and
the rehabilitation of mining sites in order to marry industrial
activity and high living standards.
17
Global energy
The macro-economic
trends and the international
value of coal
coal
in Europe
market
POLAND
PROTECTING THE UPPER REACHES
OF VISTULA RIVER
Since 2002, Kompania Wglowa has worked on the

protection of the Vistula river in Poland against salt water
from coal mines. The protection scheme is based on a
temporary reservoir of salty mining water followed by
regulated inflow of this water to the river in order not to
exceed the acceptable limits for chloride and sulphide
concentrations. During periods of low water levels, the
most salty mine water is stored in the Wola reservoir until
periods of high level water, when it can be safely released.
The "Maa Wisa" scheme
participants in the protection scheme
control point for water quality
mine water storage reservoir
ZGE
Sobieski
Jaworzno
Wisla
Zbiornik
WOLA
Sola
KWK
Brzeszcze
a
nk
zcy
Ps
PG Silesia
Sk
aw
a
KWK
Piast
ZGE
Janina
Pr
ze
m
sz
a
KWK
Ziemowit
P
G ot.
o
aw
iw
ck
i
nia
sty
Go
Mleczna
KWK
Wesoa
Bi
al
a
Commissioned:
2008
Total investment: c. 10 million
Ecological benefits: balancing salt concentration in the Vistula River and

avoiding the discharge of 998 000 tonnes of salt

stored in former mining excavation
Vistula River
POLAND
INTERACTIVE TRAINING WITH
VIRTUAL SIMULATION
AND ON-LINE DOCUMENTS
Mining is not only about hard and hazardous work. Nowadays,
advanced ICTs are vital to underground operations and also in the
field of training. Interactive training material, including accident
scenarios as well as advanced applications that aid with manual
activities, are successfully used at underground mines in Poland.
Ground level = +244 m asl
+50 m asl
operational part of mine water
reservoir ~ 1.9 million m3
-150 m asl
4 deep-well pumps
irretrievable mine water
storage ~ 17 million m3
SLOVENIA
THE WORLDS BEST MINING
OF THICK COAL SEAMS
18
Velenje coal mine in Slovenia with more than 135 years

of mining tradition uses highly developed technologies.
Exploiting one of the thickest lignite seams in the world,
the company has developed a unique and patent-protected
method for extracting thick coal seams. The basic approach
at Velenje coal mine is to extend coal extraction above the
protected area at the face. Natural forces break and crush
the seam. Thanks to modern mining equipment, especially
hydraulic supports and advanced chain conveyors, the
company uses a lower number of wider longwall faces.
The method is producing enviable results, placing the coal
mine at the global forefront
of underground
coalEurope
mining.2013
Coal
industry across
Figure 15
Future global coal demand to 2030 and 2035
Mtce
8 000
7 000
6 000
Most forecasts and outlooks mirror the IEAs Current

Policies Scenario. For example, BP expects global coal
supply to grow by an average of 1.4% each year from
2010 to 2030 to 6.7 Gtce by 2030, a 33% increase, with
strong growth in India and other non-OECD countries
offsetting declines in the OECD. Growing imports drive
further expansion and integration of global coal markets.
In the EU, production and consumption of energy
remains flat.
5 000
4 000
3 000
IEA range of scenarios
2 000
BP Energy Outlook 2030
1 000
1990
IEA New Policies Scenario

2000
2010
2020
2030
Sources: BP, 2013b; IEA, 2012
A Current Policies Scenario or status quo scenario in

which energy and climate policy frameworks remain
unchanged.
A New Policies Scenario which assumes political
promises and announced plans to limit greenhouse gas
emissions are met.
A 450 Scenario in which the atmospheric concentration
of greenhouse gases is limited to 450 parts per million
of CO2 equivalent to meet the objective of limiting global
temperature rise to 2C compared with the pre-industrial
level.
The Current Policies Scenario is the most realistic in that
it has been, over recent years, the scenario which closest
matches actual outcomes. The 450 Scenario reflects the
stated commitment of G8 leaders to address the climate
challenge. However, it is a virtually impossible goal, unless
draconian action is taken to stop the use of fossil fuels.
The New Policies Scenario is closest to the assumptions
made by the EU institutions that other countries will follow
the EUs progressive energy and environment policies.
Worldwide primary energy consumption increases by 35%
to 24.6 billion tonnes of coal equivalent in 2035 (an annual
average increase of 1.2% from 2010). 93% of this increase
occurs in non-OECD countries while energy demand in
OECD countries increases only slightly. Coal demand rises
by 21% over the outlook period, but this global figure
masks a 53% decline of coal use in the EU.
Coal demand declines in the OECD (by 0.8% p.a.

2011-2030), but continues growing in the non-OECD
(1.9% p.a.). China remains the largest coal consumer
with over half of global consumption (52%), while India
(12%) overtakes the US to become the second largest in
2024. Together, China and India account for 92% of global
coal growth to 2030. As the focus of Chinas economic
development shifts from rapid industrialisation and
infrastructure development to growth based on services
and light manufacturing, its coal demand growth slows
rapidly from 9% p.a. in 2000-2010 to 3.5% p.a. this
decade and 0.4% p.a. in 2020-2030. Indias coal demand
growth slows more gradually, from 6.5% p.a. in 2000-2010
to 3.6% p.a. in 2011-2030, as energy efficiency gains
partially offset rising energy demand for industrial and
infrastructure expansion.
The growth of global coal consumption in power
generation slows from 3.6% p.a. in 2000-2010 to 2.4%
p.a. in 2011-2020 and 0.4% p.a. after 2020. In the
OECD coal use in power is already in decline (-0.2%
p.a. 2000-2010); this decline accelerates to -1.2% p.a. in
2020-2030. In non-OECD countries, the growth of coal
use in power generation slows, from 7.7% p.a. 2000-2010
to 1.0% p.a. after 2020. As a result, coals share in fuels
used for power generation declines from 44% in 2020 to
39% in 2030 just a little lower than today.
Overall, there is a clear disjoint between what politicians
espouse and the actual outcome that results from the
individual decisions of billions of energy consumers.
If there is a strong political will to tackle climate change,
then perhaps the IEAs optimistic New Policies Scenario
will materialise. BPs outlook looks more likely since
it is based on an economic assessment of the known
alternatives and does not depend on political promises
being delivered in a tight timeframe during times of
austerity in many countries. It is likely that the energy
consumer will have the final say which means that our
energy future must be not only clean and secure, but also
affordable.
19
The socio- e conomic value of

a sustainable European coal industry
The key advantages of coal are security of supply and
favourable prices compared with competing energy
sources. When indigenous supplies can be exploited,
the use of coal adds value along the entire supply
chain: from coal mine to electricity consumer. This
underpins economic development and employment.
Policy makers must balance these socio-e conomic

benefits with environmental protection and climate
objectives. Here, technological progress allows coal to
take its rightful place alongside other energy sources
each of which has its own particular set of advantages
and disadvantages.
Employment in the European coal industry

In 2012, across the EU, 130 million tonnes of hard coal
and over 430 million tonnes of lignite were mined. Mining
this coal employed more than 240 000 people, some at
integrated mine and power plants. In the greater Europe,
including Turkey and Ukraine, this number rises to almost
600 000 people (Table 1). Adding the indirect jobs supported
by coal mining leads to a total of well over one million people
whose livelihoods depends on the coal industry.
Table 1
Manpower in the European coal industry 2010 and 2012
2010
Hard Coal
Lignite
Bosnia and Herzegovina
13 000
Bulgaria
4 600
8 200
Czech Republic
13 700
10 200
Germany
24 200
16 700
Greece
8 400
Hungary
2 400
Poland
114 100
16 300
Romania
8 800
13 500
Serbia
12 500
Slovakia
3 900
Slovenia
1 800
Spain
5 400
Turkey
18 500
37 000
Ukraine
271 000
United Kingdom
6 000
Total
466 300
143 900
These jobs are frequently in economically less advantaged

regions where coal extraction and utilisation is the only
wealth-creating activity. In total, with its capital investments,
operating expenditures and payment of salaries and
taxes, the coal industry makes an important contribution
to the prosperity of Europes mining regions and national
economies.
Total
13 000
12 800
23 900
40 900
8 400
2 400
130 400
22 300
12 500
3 900
1 800
5 400
55 500
271 000
6 000
610 200
Hard Coal
3 500
12 900
17 600
113 000
6 000
3 900
3 400
18 500
273 800
5 800
458 400
2012
Lignite
11 500
7 800
9 100
16 600
7 500
2 100
15 000
15 000
12 300
3 700
1 600
37 000
139 200
Total
11 500
11 300
22 000
34 200
7 500
2 100
128 000
21 000
16 200
3 700
1 600
3 400
55 500
273 800
5 800
597 600
Source: EURACOAL
20
The socio-economic value of a sustainable European coal industry
Added value from coal mining in the EU

supply chain, creating economic wealth and prosperity
in the EU. In this context, the impact of coal and
lignite mining to alleviate the already high balance of
payments deficit of various EU member states cannot be
understated. Beyond Europe, the technologies developed
by the European mining and power plant equipment
suppliers also contribute to improving the efficiency of
coal production, preparation and use in other regions of
the world.
Access to energy is the very basis of economic and social

progress leading to prosperity and social harmony.
Indeed, the founding fathers of the European Union sought
peace and prosperity when they signed the Treaty of Paris
to establish the European Coal and Steel Community in
1952. This treaty promised energy consumers a common
market for coal so that this valuable resource would be
distributed as rationally as possible. In contrast, energy
poverty causes real hardship in many regions of the world.
Supplying EU industry and households with an affordable
source of energy that has stable and predictable prices
in the long-term is therefore one of the most important
reasons to justify coal and lignite mining in the EU. This is
of major significance, especially to those countries that are
well endowed with these energy resources and should not
be overlooked by those that are not.
The annual value of EU-wide coal and lignite production,

based on its calorific value and on international hard coal
prices at the beginning of 2013, totals more than 25
billion.1 If the quantity of coal mined in the EU were to be
replaced by natural gas, then the annual cost would be
almost 60 billion.2 The EU has insufficient indigenous
natural gas production to meet its existing gas needs and is
67% dependent on imports, so this entire sum would leave
the EU and weaken the regions economy (Figure 1).
The coal industry, from extraction to power generation,

represents a completely secure value-added industrial
Figure 1
EU energy import dependence, 2005 and 2011 with projections for 2020 and 2030
100 %
80 %
60 %
40 %
20 %
0%
2005
2011
2020
Oil
2030
2005
2011
2020
Natural gas
2030
2005
2011
2020
2030
Coal
Source: European Commission, 2013
1 Indigenous production of 239 Mtce or 279 Mt (6 000 kcal/kg) at a price of 90 US$/tonne.

2 In 2012, the cost of importing natural gas into Germany was 11.03 US$/mmBtu (BAFA, 2013) which is equivalent to 239 /tce.
The annual cost of replacing indigenous coal production with imported natural gas would therefore be around 57 billion.
21
The socio-economic value of a sustainable European coal industry
Economic competitiveness from electricity

Figure 2
Evolution of end-user electricity price index for industry
(taxes excluded, 2005 = 100)
150
OECD Europe
Japan
United States
140
130
120
110
100
An important indirect benefit of coal is its contribution to

competitive electricity tariffs. Tariffs are a key factor for
the location of industry, especially for energy-intensive
industries looking to make investments at existing or new
sites. Any tax or duty on coal and lignite therefore not
only costs direct jobs in the coal industry, but indirectly
threatens many others across those industries burdened
by higher energy costs. Recent data shows that electricity
prices in Europe have become less competitive (Figure 2).
This is a worrying trend that can be reversed by ensuring
that there is true inter-fuel competition between fuel
sources for electricity generation: that means between
coal, natural gas, nuclear, hydro and new renewables.
90
80
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
2011
2012
Source: IEA detabases, 2013
Security of supply from indigenous coal and reliable coal imports

Households and especially industry depend on secure
energy supplies without interruption. The contribution
of lignite and hard coal mining to the security of energy
supply in Europe is very significant. EU import dependence
for solid fuels was 41% in 2011, less than half that for oil
and gas (Figure 1). Much of the energy imported into EU
member states comes from a relatively small number of
producing countries, with Russia, Norway, Saudi Arabia,
Algeria and Colombia being the most significant. However,
those countries supplying hard coal present an overall

lower risk than those countries supplying oil and gas.
A base supply of indigenous energy raw materials in the
EU clearly reduces any potential weaknesses in security
of supply. Coal and lignite mined in the EU in 2012 covered
about 10% of EU primary energy demand. Indigenous coal
and lignite remain the most important indigenous energy
supplies in the EU, exceeding natural gas production in
terms of energy supplied by 20%.
Sustainable coal use in the long term

Environmental impacts associated with coal are well
understood. Inevitably, coal mining interferes with the
environment, in common with the mining or production
of any other mineral; however, ecological impacts are
increasingly well addressed during mine planning,
operation and landscape restoration. The maritime
transport of coal is safe and it can be easily stocked
in large quantities. Emissions from coal use, such as
sulphur dioxide, NOX and dust, can be almost eliminated
by commercially available pollution control equipment.
In the EU, most coal-fired power plants are now
equipped with highly efficient flue-gas desulphurisation.
22
For some years, the environmental debate has focused

on global climate protection. The strategy to reduce CO2
emissions from coal use begins with more efficient
state-of-the-art power plants, assumes the further
development of power plant technology to reach higher
efficiencies, and leads ultimately to power plants fitted
with CO2 capture and storage. Installations with CO2
capture should be commercially available by 2020,
reducing CO2 emissions from coal-fired plants by around
90%. Central to the wide use of this technology is an
investment-friendly legal framework and public support
for a CO2 transport and storage infrastructure.
GERMANY
WHERE ELECTRICITY IS GENERATED FROM MINE GAS
The German Saarland region operates the worlds largest mine
gas combined heat and power plant at Vlklingen-Fenne with
a capacity of 42 MW. The Saarland has a 110 km mine gas grid
connecting local gas extraction stations with mine gas-fired
combined heat and power plants. Mine gas from active hard coal
mines is extracted during production and pumped to the surface

through a series of pipes. It is then compressed before being
delivered to combustion plants. Even after a mine closure, mine
gas can still be captured and pumped to the surface, avoiding the
uncontrolled relase of gas.
GAV
Hangard
GAV
Kohlenwald
GAV
Allenfeld
FVS Lebach
STEAG
KW Weiher
GAV
Itzenplitz
GAV Nordschacht
STEAG Quierschied
STEAG KW Fenne
GAV
GAV
Alsbach Camphausen
STEAG
Camphausen
GMA Fenne
GAV Frstenhausen
Neuwaldstrae
AVA Velsen
STEAG Velsen
GMA Velsen
gasometer
GMA
Weiher
Saarstahl
Neunkirchen
GAV Ludwigstollen
Gipswerk Knauf
GAV
Delbrck
Luisenthal pilot
fuel cell plant
GAV
Kallenberg
GAV
GAV
Erkershhe Reden
DSK Hirschbach
gas plants
gas consumers
gas engines
GAV:
gas sucon pump / gas compressor plant
GMA: mine gas engine plant

BRGM
Wellesweiler
gas turbine
STEAG
Wellesweiler
GMA
Camphausen
Saarstahl
Burbach
STEAG
KW Bexbach
BRGM: Bureau de Recherches Gologiques et Minires

(French Geological Survey)
Ownership of mine gas pipelines

STEAG New Energies GmbH
enovos
connecon to pilot fuel cell plant
EUROPEAN UNION
LIGPOWER COST-SAVING
CLEANING IN POWER PLANTS
Lignite is a competitive energy source in the power generation of
many European countries. However, the specific properties of lignite
lead to relatively low softening and melting temperatures, resulting
in deposits forming in the boiler during combustion. LIGPOWER
was a three year Research Fund for Coal and Steel (RFCS) project
aimed at improving the cleaning equipment and finding new
easier-to-clean heating surfaces with the goal of enhancing the
availability and competitiveness of lignite as an energy source.
EUROPEAN UNION
NEMAEQ A PROJECT THAT MAKES
EUROPEAN HARD COAL MORE
COMPETITIVE
Coal mining in Europe occurs at depths of up to 1400 metres

where both the rock temperature and pressure are
significantly greater than in the shallow deposits in Australia
and America. To compete, European coal producers need
to be highly productive which is only possible through
improved mechanisation of all processes and optimal
automation of the mining equipment. NEMAEQ was a
project funded by the Research Fund for Coal and Steel
(RFCS) aimed at developing a fully automatic shearer loader
system which cuts and loads the coal without major manual
interaction; including also load dependent regulation,
coal/rock distinction, collision avoidance and appropriate
control and data processing technologies.
23
Bulgaria
Bulgaria
be
nu
Da
Dobr
Dobrudzha
ob udzzh
ha Ba
B
Basin
as
Vidin
ar
Varna
Pleven
Isk
The mining industry is of outstanding importance to

Bulgaria and it has become one of the best developing
industries over the last few years. The mining sector
has almost reached the average EU labour productivity,
considerably surpassing average productivity in other
sectors. The mining industry is an important branch and
one of the main driving forces of the country`s economy.
Balkanbas
Sofia Basin
sin
Over the last few years the Bulgarian mining industry has
attracted considerable foreign and Bulgarian investors and
several companies are investing in world best practices in
the fields of exploration, extraction and processing.
S
Svoge
Bobov Dol
Bobo
ol
Cherno
o More
M
Stara Zagora
Blagoevgrad
Elhovo Basin
Maritsa
ma
Maritsa
lignite field
t
es
M
a
The major tasks of the Bulgarian mining industry are

the sustainable development of the mining regions,
environmental protection and restoration, improvement
of safety standards and the improvement of vocational
training.
Tundzha
Pernik
Pern
nik
u
Str
Bulgaria has great resource potential and provides jobs to

highly qualified and experienced specialists contributing to
the social and economic development and welfare of the
mining municipalities. Nevertheless, the long permitting
procedure from the initial investment assessment to
exploration and a lack of clear regulations on extraction and
planning are slowing down the industrys projects. There
are good prospects for the introduction of leading world
and European technologies in order to further enhance
efficiency in the field of extraction and processing.
Yantra
Sofia
Pirin Basin
n
Lignite
Hard coal
Lignite
Hard coal
Brown coal
Anthracite
Hard coal and

Anthracite
Brown coal
Anthracite
Hard coal and

Anthracite
General data
Population
GDP
Unit
million
billion
2012
7.3
39.7
Lignite
Opencast lignite mining is mainly carried out in the mines
of MINI MARITSA IZTOK EAD, whose production accounts
for 95.7% of the total inland output. The entire mines area
accounts for some 240 square kilometres and besides
being the largest mining site in South East Europe, MINI
MARITSA IZTOK EAD is also the biggest employer in
Bulgaria. The company supplies four thermo-electric power
plants with its own lignite: the state-owned Maritsa East 2
EAD thermal power plant (TPP) (1 600 MW) and the
privately-owned CONTOURGLOBAL Maritsa East 3 TPP
(908 MW), AES Galabovo TPP (670 MW) and BRIKEL EAD
(200 MW). MINI MARITSA IZTOK EAD also supplies lignite
to Maritsa 3 TPP in Dimitrovgrad, which has an installed

capacity of 120 MW.
The company plays an important role in securing national
energy security, and guaranteeing energy independence
for Bulgaria. 40% of the generated electric power is
provided by lignite from MINI MARITSA IZTOK EAD.
The company is part of the BULGARIAN ENERGY
HOLDING EAD.
Other lignite mining companies are Beli Bryag mine (1.7%),
Stanyantsi mine (1.6%) and Chukurovo mine (1.0%).
Brown coal
Bulgarias brown coal deposits are mainly located in the
western part of the country (Bobov Dol, Pernik and Pirin
coalfields and the Katrishte deposit) and near the Black
24
Sea (Cherno More coalfield). In 2012, the total production

of brown coal, extracted from both underground and
opencast mines, amounted to 2.1 million tonnes.
Bulgaria
VAGLEDOBIV BOBOV DOL EOOD mines the Bobov Dol

coalfield, which is the largest deposit of brown coal in the
country. There are significant coal reserves and resources
here, amounting to some 100 million tonnes. Coal mining
is carried out at one opencast and two underground mines.
In 2012, a total of 1.1 million tonnes of brown coal was
produced by the three mines owned by VAGLEDOBIV
BOBOV DOL. The produced coal is mainly supplied to the
nearby 210 MW Bobov Dol EAD power plant which was
retrofitted with flue gas desulphurisation in 2012 to comply
with EU legislation. About 10% to 12% of coal mined by
VAGLEDOBIV BOBOV DOL is used by households.
OTKRIT VAGLEDOBIV MINES EAD, another private
company, owns two opencast mines in the Pernik coalfield
where it extracted 1.1 million tonnes of brown coal in 2012.
BALKAN MK carries out underground coal mining in the
Oranovo coalfield with some 30 million tonnes of brown
coal reserves and a production output of 0.7 million tonnes
per year. The brown coal is supplied mainly to the Bobov
Dol power station.
Other small privately owned mines are the Vitren mine
located in the Katrishte deposit, with an annual output of
some 0.1 million tonnes, and Cherno More mine in the
Black Sea coalfield, with an annual output of 0.25-0.3 million
tonnes.
Hard coal output is insignificant (14.1 thousand tonnes) and
its extraction is carried out by BALKAN 2000 MINES EAD.
Energy Policy
The liberalisation of the electric power market in Bulgaria
is being carried out in line with the requirements of EU
legislation. In practice, this is a step-by-step process
with the aim of creating the necessary conditions for
competition among electric power generators, as well as
to give consumers the opportunity to choose their supplier.
The Bulgarian energy sector is relatively small on a global
scale, but it is of great significance to the country`s
industrial capacity. It mainly encompasses electricity
generation and oil and gas transport to Western markets.
The sector is traditionally considered to be of strategic
importance to the economic development of the
country and to national energy security, which to some
extent explains the large investments in new capacity,
rehabilitation of old power plants and expansion of the
power supply grid made over the last 7-8 years.
Coal resources and reserves

Resources hard
(black and brown) coal
Resources lignite
Reserves hard
(black and brown) coal
Reserves lignite
Primary energy production
Total primary energy production
Hard ( black and brown) coal
(saleable output)
Lignite (saleable output)
Saleable coal quality
Hard coal calorific value
Lignite calorific value
Hard coal ash content
(black and brown)
Lignite ash content
Hard coal moisture content
(black and brown)
Lignite moisture content
Hard coal sulphur content
(black and brown)
Lignite sulphur content
Coal imports/exports
Hard coal imports
Primary energy consumption
Total primary energy consumption
Hard coal consumption
(black and brown)
Lignite consumption
Power supply
Total net power generation
Power imports/(exports)
Total power consumption
Power generation from lignite
Capacity of lignite- and
brown coal-fired generation
Employment
Direct in lignite and
brown coal mining
Other lignite- and
brown coal-related *
Unit
2012
Mt
Mt
598.4
3 386.8
Mt
Mt
254.7
1 600.2
Mtce (2011)
17.7
Mt
Mt
2.1
30.4
kJ/kg
kJ/kg
12 140-13 400
6 720
% a.r.
% a.r.
<26
15.97
% a.r.
% a.r.
<16
52.9
% a.r.
% a.r.
<2.7
2.28
Mt
2.3
Mtce
25.8
Mt
Mt
4.4
30.4
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
42.9
2.4/(10.6)
34.6
19.9
MW
5 917
thousand
11 300
thousand
67 100
* e.g. in power generation, equipment supply, services and R&D
25
Czech Republic
Czech Republic
Primary energy consumption, which amounted to

60.8 Mtce in 2012, was supplied as follows: 40.6% coal
(total 24.7 Mtce, of which hard coal 5.9 Mtce and brown
coal 18.8 Mtce), 15.8% natural gas (9.6 Mtce) and 20.4%
oil (12.4 Mtce). This primary energy mix is supplemented
by nuclear energy with an 18.6% share (11.3 Mtce), as
well as by renewables and hydroelectric power, which
together account for some 6.5% (4.0 Mtce), and 0.5%
(0.3 Mtce) other fuels and -2.4% (-1.5 Mtce) as net exports
of electricity.
The Czech Republics dependence on energy imports has
been quite modest to date; 28.5% of energy demand
is met by imports. However, imports are structurally
unbalanced. The countrys dependence on oil is about
95%, and similarly for natural gas. A number of direct and
indirect measures must be adopted to prevent any further
increase in energy imports, including: increased energy
efficiency, the promotion of renewable energy sources
in areas where their use is effective and helps to reach a
13% share in final energy consumption in 2020 and the
efficient use of indigenous solid fuel resources, mainly
brown coal.
In 2012, approximately 52.4% of total gross electricity
production (87.6 TWh) was generated from coal, 34.6%
from nuclear energy and 9.3% from renewable sources.
Conventional coal-fired power stations have a total
capacity of approximately 10.8 GW. The Czech electricity
market has been fully liberalised since 2006 and the gas
market since 2007.
26
Northern Bohemian
Basin
Kladno
Karlovy Vary
Sokolov Basin
Labe
Ostrava-Karvin
Basin
Prague
Odra
Vl
a
rav
Mo
Coal is the only significant indigenous energy resource

in the Czech Republic. The countrys economically
recoverable coal reserves have been estimated at some
2.33 billion tonnes. Brown coal, which accounts for
more than 73% of these resources, is mainly produced
in north-western Bohemia, whilst hard coal is mined in
northern Moravia. Significant quantities of hard coal are
exported to Austria, Slovakia and Poland.
ta
va
Ostrava
Brno
Hodonin
Lignite
General data
Population
Brown coal
GDP
Hard coal
Anthracite
Unit
Hard coal and
million
Anthracite
billion
2012
10.5
152.3
There are five coal mining companies in the Czech

Republic: OSTRAVSKO-KARVINSK DOLY, the only
hard coal producer, and four brown coal companies,
SEVEROESK DOLY, owned by EZ and the biggest
producer of brown coal, VRANSK UHELN, with coal
reserves to last until 2055, SEVERN ENERGETICK
(Sev.en formerly LITVNOVSK UHELN) with the
largest brown coal reserves in the Czech Republic,
and SOKOLOVSK UHELN, the smallest brown coal
company. All of these coal mining companies have been
privatised. EZ is the largest coal consumer in the Czech
Republic and the most important Czech supplier of
electricity. In 2012, EZ generated 64 TWh, i.e. 73%
of the countrys electricity generation. The EZ Group
is listed on the Prague and Warsaw stock exchanges,
although remains majority state-owned.
Czech Republic
Hard coal
The Czech Republic has 181 million tonnes of economically
recoverable hard coal reserves. The largest hard coal
deposits are located in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin.
With an area of 6 500 square kilometres, this coal basin
ranks among the largest in Europe. A major part is
located in Poland, while about one sixth (1 200 square
kilometres) lies in the Czech Republic where it is called
the Ostrava-Karvin Basin (after the city of Ostrava and
the town of Karvin). Here, OSTRAVSKO-KARVINSK
DOLY (OKD) extracts hard coal from deep mines. In 2012,
saleable output was 11.4 million tonnes, with a workforce
of 12 866 own employees and 16 432 contractors. Coal
is currently extracted at four deep mines: Karvin, SM,

Darkov and Paskov. The worked seams in Ostrava at the
Paskov colliery range in thickness from 0.8 to 1.6 metres.
The thickness of the Karvin seams ranges from 1.5 to
6.5 metres. Longwall working with shearer loaders
(90.2%) and ploughs (9.8%) is employed, combined
with controlled caving. Mechanical supports (95.1%) and
individual hydraulic props (4.9%) are used to support the
coalfaces. At each of the collieries, the extracted coal
is processed in preparation plants where it is graded as
coking coal or steam coal, based on its quality parameters.
Brown coal and lignite

The Czech Republic has 873 million tonnes of economically
recoverable brown coal and lignite reserves. In addition
to a coal basin in northern Bohemia and another near the
town of Sokolov, there are also coalfields in the south of
the country, although they are not economically viable.
Elsewhere, production of brown coal totalled 43.5 million
tonnes in 2012, providing an important contribution to
the countrys energy supply. Brown coal production in
the Czech Republic has been quite stable in recent years,
ranging from around 44 to 49 million tonnes.
The main brown coal deposit and the largest mining
area, covering 1 400 square kilometres, is the Northern
Bohemian Brown Coal Basin, which is located in the
foothills of the Krun hory mountains, along the border
with Germany (Saxony), in the vicinity of the towns of
Kada, Chomutov, Most, Teplice and st nad Labem.
The seams in this area extend to depths up to 400 metres
and are between 15 and 30 metres thick.
Brown coal is extracted in the central part of the Northern
Bohemian Brown Coal Basin by two mining companies,
VRANSK UHELN (VUAS) and SEVERN ENERGETICK
(Sev.en formerly LITVNOVSK UHELN or LUAS).
In 2012, VUAS extracted 8.9 million tonnes of brown coal
at the Vrany site. LUAS extracted 4.6 million tonnes
of brown coal at the SA site. SA boasts the largest
brown coal reserves in the Czech Republic sufficient
to support coal mining to 2100 and beyond. However,
extraction is curtailed by mining limits imposed in 1991.
Within the current mining limits, extraction will last until
2022. However, beyond the mining limits lie an estimated
750 million tonnes of high-quality brown coal. In 2012,
VUAS had a total workforce of 850 and LUAS had 590
employees.
The only deep brown coal mine in the Czech Republic,

Centrum, is also located in the central part of the Northern
Bohemian Brown Coal Basin. In 2012, some 300 employees
extracted about 0.4 million tonnes of brown coal there.
After extraction, the brown coal is processed at the
Komoany preparation plant, which supplies a broad range
of coal products. Graded, pulverised and single-purpose
products are delivered to power stations, the heat supply
industry and households. Fuels blended for the energy
sector are supplied to power stations (Poerady, Chvaletice,
Mlnk, Po, Opatovice and Hodonn), CHP plants and
energy complexes.
The brown coal company SEVEROESK DOLY (SD) based
at Chomutov operates in the north-western part of the
Northern Bohemian Brown Coal Basin, to the east of the
town of Most. SD extracts brown coal at two sites, namely
Doly Nstup Tuimice and Doly Blina. A total of 22.8 million
tonnes was produced in 2012, increasing SDs share in
national brown coal production to almost 50%.
The Doly Nstup Tuimice brown coal mining area is located
between the towns of Chomutov and Kada and consists
of one large surface mine with an average annual output of
13 million tonnes. After preparation at the Tuimice crushing
plant, most of the product is supplied to power stations
operated by EZ.
The Blina brown coal mining area has one surface mine.
Doly Blina is located between the towns of Blina and
Duchcov. More than 9.5 million tonnes of brown coal
are produced each year and transported to the Ledvice
preparation plant before being delivered to power stations,
industries and households.
27
Czech Republic
In 2012, the SD group had a total workforce of 5 145.

Located in western Bohemia, in the western part of the
coalfield below the Krun hory mountains, the brown
coal basin around the town of Sokolov is mined by
SOKOLOVSK UHELN (SU). The company operates
two surface mines, the Druba and Ji mines. In 2012,
its output was 6.7 million tonnes.
SUs key products include electricity and heat, graded
coal, steam coal and chemical products produced during
coal gasification. Brown coal from the Sokolov area is
mainly used for power and heat generation. SU generates
electricity in two of its own power plants: the Vesov
IGCC plant (2 x 200 MWe) and a CHP plant (5 x 270 MWt),
which have a combined annual output of 3.5 TWh. Most
of the heat produced is consumed by the company itself,
although some is supplied to the towns of Karlovy Vary,
Nejdek, Chodov and Nov Role. The company also pursues
environmental activities, notably the reclamation of land
affected by surface mining, and waste processing and
disposal. SUs operations employed a total workforce of
4 070 in 2012.
A smaller deposit of some 200 million tonnes of workable
lignite is located in southern Moravia near the town of
Hodonn. Approximately 0.5 million tonnes of lignite per
year from underground mines were produced there.
Lignite production stopped in 2010.
The Czech brown coal industry has always played an
important role in the national economy. According to
the current National Energy Concept, coal is expected
to remain an important energy resource in the Czech
Republic, playing a significant role in the Czech energy
mix. The Czech Republic devotes great attention to the
clean use of brown coal. A very good example is the
comprehensive programme to renovate and develop
coal-fired power stations in northern Bohemia. The
800 MW Tuimice power station has been renovated;
its CO2 emissions have been significantly reduced and its
life has been extended to 2035. September 2012 saw the
launch of the renovation of the Prunov power station,
with the objective of reducing emissions by 40% and
extending its life by 25 years. The Ledvice power station
is under construction and is expected to be commissioned
in 2014 with a planned life of 40 years.
28

Resources hard coal
Resources lignite
Reserves hard coal
Reserves lignite
Unit
Mt
Mt
Mt
Mt

Hard coal (saleable output)
Mtce
Mt/Mtce
Mt/Mtce
2012
617
1 711
181
873
45.3
11.4/10.5
43.5/19.2

Hard coal net calorific value
Lignite net calorific value
kJ/kg
kJ/kg
25 490-32 070
11 600-20 560

Lignite ash content
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
4.3-18.9
5.97-37.8
3.5-9.9

% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
26.46-38.3
0.42-0.43
0.78-1.44
Hard coal imports
Hard coal exports
Mt
Mt
2.0
5.6

Lignite consumption
Mtce
Mtce
Mtce
60.8
5.9
18.8
Power supply
Net power imports/(exports)
Power generation from hard coal
Capacity of coal-fired generation
Capacity of lignite-fired generation
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
MW
MW
81.1
(17.1)
58.8
4.5
35.2
1 200
9 600
thousand
thousand
12.866
9.093
Employment
Direct in hard coal mining
Direct in lignite mining
Germany
Germany
Germany has considerable reserves of hard coal
(2 500 million tonnes that are technically accessible of
82 961 million tonnes of known resources) and lignite
(40 400 million tonnes), making these the countrys most
important indigenous source of energy. However, in the
case of hard coal there remain only 37 million tonnes to be
extracted following the political decision to end subsidised
German hard coal production in 2018.
The power generation structure is characterised by a

widely diversified energy mix. In 2012, gross power
generation of 628.7 TWh output was produced as follows:
44.2% from coal (of which 25.7% was from lignite and
18.5% from hard coal), 15.8% from nuclear, 12.0% from
natural gas, 22.6% from renewable energy sources and
5.7% from other sources. This means that hard coal and
lignite, as well as nuclear energy, are the mainstays of the
German power industry.
The federal government adopted its Energiekonzept
or energy concept in October 2010. It combines a life
extension of German nuclear power plants (on average
by 12 years, with the last shutdown around 2040) with
green energy policy objectives. The focus to date
has been on ambitious climate protection policies: a
CO2 emission reduction of at least 80% by 2050 with
Oder
Ruhr
Elbe
Lusatian
n
Area
Leipzig
Essen
Kln
Rhineland
Area
Berlin
Helmstedt Area
re
er
es
W
Germanys primary energy consumption amounted to

469.4 Mtce in 2012. Oil accounted for the largest share
(32.9%), followed by coal (24.8%), natural gas (21.5%)
and nuclear energy (7.9%). Renewable energy grew to
11.6%. Within the figure for coal, hard coal accounted
for 12.8% and lignite for 12.0% of total primary energy
consumption. Germany is dependent on energy imports
to a large extent, except in the case of lignite. About 87%
of hard coal was imported, in comparison with 98% of oil
and 87% of gas.
Ibbenbueren
Ibbenbuere
en
en
ein
Rh
In 2012, primary energy production totalled 148.4 million

tonnes of coal equivalent (Mtce), excluding nuclear. With
an output of 68.3 Mtce, coal and lignite had a share of
46%. The mix of indigenous primary energy production
can be broken down as follows: 57.2 Mtce of lignite
(38.5%), 11.1 Mtce of hard coal (7.5%), 13.3 Mtce of
natural gas (9.0%), 3.8 Mtce of oil (2.5%), 54.3 Mtce
of renewable energy (36.6%) and 8.7 Mtce from other
sources (5.9%).
Hamburg
Central
al German
Area
Frankfurt
Dresden
Main
Saar
S
na
Do
Isar
Mnchen
Lignite
General data
Population
Brown coal
GDP
Hard coal
Anthracite
Unit
Hard coal and
million
Anthracite
billion
2012
80.5
2 666.4
step-by-step objectives for each decade, including a 40%

reduction by 2020, a massive increase in energy efficiency
to yield total energy savings of 20% by 2020 and 50% by
2050, and the steady development of renewable energies
to a 60% share of final energy consumption and 80% of
power generation by 2050. The Energiekonzept should also
be understood as a "Roadmap into the age of renewable
energies" and the extended use of nuclear energy as the
bridge to get there, although 2011 saw the collapse of
this bridge.
To implement the new Energiekonzept, an immediate
10-point programme was introduced for offshore wind
and measures in connection with extending the life of
29
Germany
nuclear power plants, including the introduction of a new

tax on nuclear energy. Coal played only a secondary role
in the Energiekonzept, without any specific objectives
or long-term perspective. Coal-fired power plants
shall, in the future, have the role of swing and reserve
supplier to balance the ever-increasing power generation
from renewables. Scenario calculations underlying the
Energiekonzept foresee a drastic decrease of overall coal
use in Germany. The market for hard coal halves by 2020
and then halves again by 2050.
Subsidised hard coal production is to be phased out
by 2018, in agreement with national and European
regulations. Lignite use, according to the scenarios,
remains stable until 2020, but practically disappears
as an energy source by 2050.
fast as practicable. A return to the situation prior to the

granting of lifetime extensions to nuclear power plants
is seen as a minimal objective, together with improved
efficiency and an accelerated development of networks
and infrastructure across the entire energy sector. Now,
there is an agreement among all political parties not to
restart the eight nuclear power plants that were shut
down during the moratorium, to phase out the remaining
nine nuclear power plants in Germany by 2022 at the latest
and to speed up the move to a green energy economy.
For this purpose, the German government has outlined
a package of several new or amended energy laws and
further political measures to foster change in the energy
sector.
From a technical point of view, the Energiekonzept is

based on a number of doubtful premises: a strong global
agreement on climate policy, a perfectly organised
European energy market, future technical innovations
and efficiency leaps in the energy sector, solutions to
all problems concerning public acceptance, and smooth
changes to the structure of the energy economy given
the assumed economic growth to 2050. Successful
implementation of the concept therefore seems to be
questionable.
In total, it is expected that German electricity consumers

will pay more than 20 billion of EEG levies in 2013 to
promote renewable energy. This is because a dramatic
increase in the Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz (EEG
German Renewable Energy Act) levy was announced
in October 2012. The 5.3 c/kWh levy has triggered
a controversial debate since the public is concerned
about how EEG costs are shared. In response, the
federal government proposed an EEG price brake
(Strompreisbremse). However, the proposal was not
adopted and it does not address other issues, such as
the impact on competition in the electricity market.
In the meantime, the nuclear incident at Fukushima

in Japan in March 2011 re-ignited the debate about
extending the lifespan of nuclear power plants in Germany.
The federal government initially announced a nuclear
moratorium and wanted to redraft its Energiekonzept
during the summer of 2011. All political parties have now
set themselves the objective of phasing out nuclear as
The way to an age of renewable energies has to be

smoothed in Germany and elsewhere. Modern coal- and
gas-fired power plants represent the technological bridge
along this path. To this extent, the prospects for coal in
general, and especially for coal-fired power plants under
construction or in the planning stage, have become
somewhat brighter.
30
Germany
Hard coal
In 2012, the German hard coal market amounted to
57.0 Mtce, of which 40.1 Mtce were used for power
and heat generation, whilst 15.4 Mtce went to the
steel industry. The remaining 1.5 Mtce were sold to
the residential heating market.
during 2012 by 15.8% from 20 925 on 31 December

2011 to 17 613 on 31 December 2012. Productivity levels,
measured in terms of saleable output per man-shift
underground, increased after a crisis-driven decline in the
previous years from 6 623 kg in 2011 to 6 876 kg in 2012.
Germany was the EUs largest hard coal importer in 2012,

as well as one of the worlds largest coke importers.
Some 45 million tonnes of hard coal (steam coal and
coking coal) or 79% of national consumption were
imported in 2012. The biggest suppliers of hard coal to
Germany were Russia, with a market share of more than
24%, and the USA with 25%, followed by Colombia with
21%. Exports from Australia accounted for 11% and from
Poland 8% which was also an important coke supplier.
In 2007 and 2008, the formal separation of RAGs

so-called white business, the former RAG Shareholding
Limited Company, was completed and the new EVONIK
INDUSTRIES AG was created. EVONIK, with its
commercial activities in the fields of chemicals, energy
and property, is now striving to list on the stock exchange
as an independent company.
In the regions of the Ruhr, the Saar and in Ibbenbren, coal

is extracted by RAG DEUTSCHE STEINKOHLE. In 2012,
RAG produced 10.8 million tonnes of saleable hard coal
(11.6 Mtce).
The core business of RAG became hard coal mining, as

was the case for the former RUHRKOHLE AG, although
it has retained certain related activities, especially in
the fields of real estate in mining areas (RAG MONTAN
IMMOBILIEN) and in mining consultancy and equipment
sales (RAG MINING SOLUTIONS).
Restructuring of the hard coal industry continues in

Germany which in 2012 still had five operating deep mines,
namely the collieries West (which closed at the end of
2012), Prosper-Haniel and Auguste Victoria located in
the Ruhr area, the Saar mine in the Saar coalfield (which
closed at the end of June 2012) and another deep mine
near Ibbenbren. Production in 2012 from these three
coalfields can be broken down as follows: 78% from
the Ruhr area, 4% from the Saar and 18% from the
Ibbenbren coalfield.
The private RAG Foundation, created in July 2007, is the

owner of both RAG and EVONIK. Its remit is to bring
its assets in EVONIK to the capital market, retaining
only a minority stake. Long-term liabilities after the final
phase-out of hard coal mining will be financed by the
proceeds. The German government has taken the decision
to phase out in a socially acceptable manner managed
by the RAG Foundation all state aid for coal production
by 2018. Using its assets, the Foundation will promote
training, science and culture in the mining regions.
Employment figures continued to fall steadily. The number

of employees in the hard coal mining sector decreased
31
Germany
Lignite
Lignite supply in 2012 totalled 56.1 Mtce, with domestic
output accounting for 57.2 Mtce and imports approximately
43 000 tce. Lignite exports amounted to 1.1 Mtce of
pulverised lignite and briquettes.
Lignite production, which totalled 185.4 million tonnes in
2012, was centered in four mining regions, namely the
Rhineland around Cologne, Aachen and Mnchengladbach,
the Lusatian mining area in south-eastern Brandenburg
and north-eastern Saxony, the Central German mining
area in the south-east of Saxony-Anhalt and in north-west
Saxony as well as the Helmstedt mining area in Lower
Saxony. In these four mining areas, lignite is exclusively
extracted in opencast mines.
Lignite is an indispensable energy source for Germany
because it is abundantly available for long-term use
and competitive. Furthermore, the lignite industry is an
important employer and investor, adding major economic
value to the mining regions.
More than 90% of lignite production is used for power
generation (169.4 million tonnes in 2012), accounting
for nearly 26% of total power generation in Germany.
In the Rhineland, RWE POWER AG produced a total
of 101.7 million tonnes of lignite in 2012 from its three
opencast mines: Hambach, Garzweiler and Inden. Almost
90% of the lignite was consumed by the companys own
power stations, whilst some 12.0 million tonnes were
used for processed products and for private consumption.
At the end of 2012, the lignite division of RWE POWER
had a total workforce of 11 241.
RWEs BoAplus project is on track following a decision
of the Cologne regional council on 5July 2013 to
amend its regional plan. This Aufstellungsbeschluss is
an important milestone in the overall approval process
which is expected to be completed by the end of 2014.
The selection of bidders for the main components (boiler,
steam turbine, cooling tower, electrostatic precipitator and
flue gas desulphurisation) is proceeding so that documents
32
required by the BlmSchG (the Federal pollution control act)

can be prepared the final stage in the process.
The generation capacity of RWE POWER consists of
five lignite-fired power plants with a total capacity of
10 848 MW. At Neurath, a new lignite-fired power
plant with optimised plant technology (BoA 2/3) was
commissioned in August 2012, boasting a gross capacity of
2 200 MW and replacing old plants. The lignite-fired power
output in the Rhenish lignite mining area amounted to
some 74 TWh in 2012.
In the Lusatian mining region, where VATTENFALL
EUROPE MINING AG (VE-M) is the only producer, total
lignite output amounted to some 62.4 million tonnes.
The lignite is extracted in Jnschwalde, Cottbus Nord and
Welzow Sd in Brandenburg, as well as in Nochten and
Reichwalde in Saxony.
Lignite sales to public power plants amounted to
58.6 million tonnes. VATTENFALL EUROPE GENERATION AG
(VE-G) is the main operator of lignite-fired power plants in
the Lusatian area with a gross rated capacity of 7 581 MW.
In 2012, with the opening of the new 675 MW
Boxberg power plant, the gross power output from the
Lusatian lignite-fired power plants totalled 53 TWh. At the
end of 2012, VE-M and VE-G had a total workforce of 7 758.
The Central German mining area around Leipzig yielded
a total lignite output of 19.2 million tonnes in 2012. The
most important company in this area is MITTELDEUTSCHE
BRAUNKOHLENGESELLSCHAFT (MIBRAG), owner of two
opencast mines at Profen (Saxony Anhalt) and Schleenhain
(Saxony).
In 2012, MIBRAG produced 18.7 million tonnes of lignite,
serving the three company-owned combined heat and
power plants at Deuben, Mumsdorf and Whlitz with a total
capacity of 208 MWe. At the end of 2012, MIBRAG had a
total workforce of 1 991.
Germany
Another opencast mine operated by ROMONTA is located

in Amsdorf (Saxony-Anhalt), in the Central German
mining area. In 2012, 0.5 million tonnes of lignite were
mined there and processed to extract raw lignite wax.
The wax-free fuel is employed for power generation at
Amsdorf. At the end of 2012, ROMONTA had a total
workforce of 311.
In the Helmstedt mining area, E.ON KRAFTWERKE
produced 2.0 million tonnes of lignite. The heat and power
generation sector is the only customer for lignite in the
Helmstedt mining area. Extraction from the Schningen
opencast mine and operation of the Buschhaus (390 MW)
power plant will continue until 2017. The lignite-fired
power plant generated a total output of 2.3 TWh in 2012.
On 31 December 2012, E.ON had a total workforce of 495.
It is clear that the coal industry, with its capital
investments, operating expenditures and payment of
salaries, makes a very substantial contribution to the
economy. One of the major criteria for sustainability is to
maintain and create employment. The shrinkage of the
coal industry and coal use has had a considerable impact
on employment in the EU. A study by the EEFA research
institute analysed the employment created by the German
lignite industry. According to this study, approximately
25 000 direct jobs and a further 63 000 indirect jobs at
suppliers can be attributed to the lignite industry. So for
each direct job in the lignite industry, another 2.5 jobs
are created at companies who supply equipment and
services.
Extraction of lignite from opencast mines changes the
natural landscape, so land reclamation is an integral part
of any mining project. Mining activities are only complete
following the transformation of a former industrial
opencast mine into a vibrant landscape. There is a long
tradition of reclamation in ecologically ambitious ways.
For more than one hundred years, nature has inspired
landscape restoration projects, including indigenous flora
and fauna. Reclamation involves a learning process, in
which there is always room for further improvement.
Projects that return land to productive use, often with
a high recreational and agricultural value, are typical.

Resources hard coal
Resources lignite
Reserves hard coal
Reserves lignite
Unit
Mt
Mt
Mt
Mt

Mtce
Mt/Mtce
Mt/Mtce
2012
82 961
36 500
2 500
40 400
148.4
10.8/11.6
185.4/57.2

Lignite ash content
kJ/kg
kJ/kg
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
21 000-32 000
7 800-11 500
3.3-21.0
2.0-20.0
2.5-13.0

% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
40.0-60.0
0.45-1.8
0.15-3.5
Hard coal imports
Hard coal exports
Mt
Mt
44.9
0.2

Lignite consumption
Mtce
Mtce
Mtce
469.4
60.4
56.1
Power supply
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
MW
MW
593.7
(23.1)
534.1
106.7
148.2
24 061
21 507
thousand
thousand
thousand
thousand
17.613
16.622
22.897
5.802
Employment
Other hard coal-related *
Other lignite-related *
33
Greece
Greece
Drama
St
ri
m
on
Ax
as
Western
io
s
Macedonian Field
Al
i
km
on
Thessaloniki
he
loo
Elassona
Athens
Ak
Accounting in 2012 for over 30% of the countrys total

primary energy supply of 37.1 Mtce, lignite is Greeces
most important indigenous energy resource, although
the country does have modest oil and gas reserves.
Oil accounted for approximately 45% of the countrys
primary energy supply and Greece has a large refining
industry which exports oil products. Consumption of
imported natural gas increased significantly until the global
economic crisis hit in 2008; gas had a 15% share in 2012.
At 0.4 Mtce, hard coal imports accounted for 1.2% of total
primary energy supply in 2012. Security of supply, low
extraction costs and stable prices are important reasons
why lignite will maintain a strong position in the energy
market.
Patra
Megalopolis
Lignite
Greece boasts lignite resources of 4.7 billion tonnes and
3.0 billion tonnes of economically workable reserves. The
most important deposits are located in the north of the
country at Ptolemais-Amynteon and Florina (1.5 billion
tonnes) which contribute around 80% of production. Other
deposits lie at Drama (900 million tonnes) and at Elassona
(170 million tonnes), as well as in the south at Megalopolis
(225 million tonnes). There is also a large peat deposit of
about 4 billion cubic metres at Philippi in the northern part
of Greece (Eastern Macedonia). Only 30% of the total
lignite reserves have been extracted to date and remaining
reserves are good for over 40 years at current production
rates.
Lignite deposits in Greece lie at an average depth of
150 to 200 metres and typically comprise layers of
lignite alternating with layers of mineral. In 2012, 257.2
million cubic metres of overburden and interburden were
excavated at the principal mines.
The quality of Greek lignite can be characterised as
follows: the lowest calorific values are in the areas of
Megalopolis and Drama (3 770 to 5 020 kJ/kg) and
Ptolemais-Amynteon (5 230 to 6 280 kJ/kg). In Florina
and Elassona the calorific value lies between 7 540
and 9 630 kJ/kg. The ash content ranges from 15.1%
(Ptolemais) to 19.0% (Elassona), and the water content
from 41.0% (Elassona) to 57.9% (Megalopolis). The sulphur
content is generally low.
34
Lignite
General data
Population
Brown coal
GDP
Hard coal
Anthracite
Unit
million
Hard coal and
billion
Anthracite
2012
11.3
193.7
Lignite is mined by the PUBLIC POWER CORPORATION

(PPC) exclusively in opencast mines. This majority
state-owned company is the largest lignite producer
in Greece. It operates mines in Western Macedonia at
Main Field, South Field, Kardia Field, Amynteon Field and
Florina. PPC also has an opencast site in the Peloponnese
region of southern Greece, in the Megalopolis Field.
Bucket-wheel excavators, spreaders, tripper cars and
conveyor belts are used to mine and transport lignite at
these sites. PPC currently operates 48 bucket-wheel
excavators and 22 spreaders, together with more than
300 km of belt conveyor lines. Heavy trucks are used to
remove the hard overburden formations found at some
mines.
In 2012, lignite production amounted to 62.2 million
tonnes, mostly mined by PPC, with 52.1 million tonnes
extracted by the company at the West Macedonia Lignite
Centre (WMLC) and 9.6 million tonnes at the Megalopolis
Greece
Lignite Centre (MLC). The few privately operated mines in

the West Macedonia area produced a total of 1.1 million
tonnes of lignite.

Resources lignite
Reserves lignite
Unit
Mt
Mt
In 2012, WMLC operations removed a total of 236.2 million

cubic metres of overburden and interburden, corresponding
to an overburden-interburden-to-lignite ratio of 4.53 cubic
metres per tonne. At MLC, overburden plus interburden
removal was 21.1 million cubic metres, corresponding to an
overburden-interburden-to-lignite ratio of 2.2:1. Although
the overburden-interburden-to-lignite ratio has significantly
increased in recent years, it is expected to remain stable in
the future. The two mining areas, WMLC and MLC, and the
head office in Athens, currently employ a total permanent
workforce of about 3 720.

Mtce
Mt/Mtce
Environmental protection is one of the major

parameters defining PPCs overall strategy and its daily
mining activities. In the lignite mining areas around
Ptolemais-Amynteon and Megalopolis, PPC has carried
out site restoration projects to create farmland, tree
plantations, woodland, sanctuaries for small animals and
crop testing areas.
At the end of 2012, PPCs power generation plants
accounted for approximately 68% of the countrys total
installed capacity of 16.5 GW and include lignite- and
gas-fired plants, oil-fired plants on interconnected and
autonomous islands, hydro plants, wind farms and solar PV
plants. There are also six private power plants with a total
capacity of 2 564 MW. PPC owns eight lignite-fired power
plants comprising 21 units with a total installed capacity of
5 180 MW. In 2012, lignite-fired generation accounted for
52% of a total interconnected system output of 53.1 TWh
which excludes the autonomous islands. The share of gas
was 27%, oil 0.2%, hydro 8.6% and renewables 9.4%.
Lignites future role in Greece will depend on changes
taking place in the European energy sector, including
the cost of CO2 emission allowances. Nevertheless,
low-cost domestic lignite is still competitive compared to
imported energy sources such as natural gas. PPC faces
important changes relating to the regulatory framework
governing energy market liberalisation. Strategic priorities
now include the replacement of old and inefficient plants
and the promotion of renewable investments. However,
the current recession has a negative impact on any new
2012
4 728
2 978
14.5
62.2/11.4

Lignite ash content
kJ/kg
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
Hard coal imports
Mt
0.24

Lignite consumption
Mtce
Mtce
Mtce
37.1
0.4
11.3
Power supply *
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
MW
51.3
1.8
53.1
27.6
5 180
thousand
thousand
4.795
2.726
Employment
Other lignite-related **
3 770-9 630
15.1-19.0
41.0-57.9
0.4-1.0
* excluding small islands with independent diesel generators

** e.g. in power generation, equipment supply, services and R&D
investment and the governments green policy means

that while renewables are displacing generation from
lignite and natural gas, the cost of producing electricity
has increased: in 2013, consumers will be asked to pay
29/MWh in renewables subsidies, up from 9/MWh
in 2012. This increase comes at a time when electricity
production has fallen 8.5% below its 2008 peak and
unpaid electricity bills total 1.3 billion dramatic
indications of the impact that high energy prices have
on an economy.
35
Hungary
Hungary
Hungarys most important indigenous energy reserves
comprise approximately 2.4 billion tonnes of natural gas
(including unconventional reserves), 48.2 million tonnes
of oil (including unconventional reserves) and 8.5 billion
tonnes of coal. Lignite and brown coal account for about
80% of the countrys total coal reserves, making these
the most important indigenous sources of energy.
Borsod
Borso
Du
na
Torony
National electricity generation in 2012 amounted to

31.9 TWh, with an installed capacity totaling some 10 GW
of which 8.3 GW are constantly available. A net 8 TWh of
electricity was imported. Nuclear energy from Hungarys
sole state-owned nuclear power plant at Paks accounted
for about 46% of domestic electricity production. The Paks
power plant has four reactors with a total gross capacity
of 2 000 MW. A permission procedure has recently been
launched to extend the lifetimes of these units. In addition,
there are plans to add new units to the existing nuclear
plant.
36
Tatabnya
tabny
ya
Budapest
Bu
ud
u
dapest
Mtra
Oroszlny
Orosz
Ajka
Ajk
ka
Mecsek
Mecse
ek
e
nu b
Da
Hungarys primary energy consumption in 2012 amounted

to 33.6 Mtce. Natural gas had the biggest share in this
total (34.5%), followed by oil (24.3%), nuclear energy
(17.3%) and coal (12.3%). Hence, energy consumption
is characterised by a high demand for natural gas and
Hungary is highly dependent on gas imports. Against this
background, one focus is on improving access to natural
gas by extending the pipeline systems to increase security
of supply. To this end, several projects are currently under
way in Hungary.
Tis
za
Ngrd
Szeged
Pcs
P
Lignite
General data
Population
Brown coal
GDP
Hard coal
Anthracite
Unit
Hard coal and
million
Anthracite
billion
2012
10.0
97.7
Gas-fired generation also makes a major contribution

to the national electricity supply: it had a share of about
27% in 2012. Electricity produced from coal and lignite
had a share of 18% in domestic electricity production in
2012. Most of the coal-based electricity was generated
by MTRAI ERM ZRT. Renewable energy had a
share of about 8%: biomass and wind being the main
pillars followed by hydro and biogas. Solar plays only a
subordinate role. Hungary aims to increase the renewable
energy share of generation to 15% by 2020.
Hungary
Lignite
Hungarys lignite and brown coal resources are
concentrated in the regions of Transdanubia and in
northern and north-eastern Hungary. In 2012, Hungarys
total lignite output was about 9 million tonnes. About
95% of this was used for heat and power generation.
The remaining lignite went to municipalities, households
and other consumers.
Currently, there are three main coal extraction sites in
Hungary. Some 10% of the total production come from
the Mrkushegy underground mine belonging to VRTESI
ERM ZRT in western Hungary. The mine supplies coal
to the associated Oroszlny power plant. As the power
plant is supposed to be decommissioned, the mining
operations will have to close as well. However, political
considerations may override this economic decision.
The remaining 90% of Hungary's coal production is
lignite from the opencast mines Visonta and Bkkbrny,
belonging to MTRAI ERM ZRT. The company is located
90 km north-east of Budapest. In 2012, MTRAI produced
approximately 8.4 million tonnes of lignite and removed
some 75 million cubic metres of overburden. The lignite is
used in the company-owned power plant in Visonta which
comprises five lignite-fired units and two topping gas
turbines. The power plant has a total capacity of 936 MW
(2 x 100 MW units, 1 x 212 MW, 2 x 232 MW and two gas
turbines of 2 x 30 MW). Besides lignite and gas, biomass
is co-fired to a fuel input level of around 10%. To supply
the power plant with lignite, the company operates an
opencast mine in Visonta which is located right next to the
power station and an opencast mine in Bkkbrny, some
50 kilometres away. From there, the coal is transported by
rail to the power plant. The approved mining fields of the
two MTRAI opencast mines have about 0.5 billion tonnes
of lignite. The company is exploring further lignite deposits
which could be developed at a later date.

Resources hard coal
Resources lignite and brown coal
Reserves hard coal
Reserves lignite and brown coal
Unit
Mt
Mt
Mt
Mt
Mtce
Mt/Mtce
2012
1 625
8 939
1 915
6 580
15.6
9.3/2.3

Lignite ash content
kJ/kg
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
Hard coal imports
Mt
1.5
Mtce
Mtce
Mtce
33.6
1.6
2.6
TWh
TWh
TWh
31.9
8.0
39.9
TWh
5.7
MW
1 430
thousand
thousand
2 087
1 575

Lignite consumption
Power supply
Power generation from
lignite and brown coal
Capacity of lignite-and
brown coal-fired generation
Employment
6 880
21.0
46.6
1.3
37
Poland
Poland
More than half of Polish power stations are over 25 years

old, whilst about one quarter has been in operation for
more than 30 years. The lignite-fired power plants are
amongst the newest ones and they are being refurbished
to meet EU environmental standards. Poland has no
nuclear power stations, but has plans to construct a new
nuclear power plant by 2020.
Szczecin
Warta
Gubin
Od
er
According to the Energy Policy of Poland to 2030, coal is

expected to remain the main fuel for electricity generation,
but a general reduction of energy consumption by industry
and a 19% share of renewables by 2020 are targeted.
Nevertheless, electricity consumption in 2030 is expected
to increase by 30%, gas consumption by 42% and
petroleum products consumption by 7%.
38
Warszawa
Lublin Basin
B
Ko
onin-Adamov
damov
d
Konin-Adamov
Bogatynia
Boga
gatyn
ga
nia
Belch
Belchatw
Legnica
gn
nica
Upper Sil
Silesian
illesian
an
Basin
Lignite
Several European energy companies, including

VATTENFALL, RWE, EDF and GDF SUEZ are currently
active in the Polish energy sector, having a certain
impact on energy production and distribution as well as
on the governments privatisation policy. Polish national
energy policy is focused on security of energy supply,
with competitive cost structures, minimal environmental
impacts and increased energy efficiency.
Vistula
Pozna
Wrocca
aw
Wrocaw
st
ul
a
Poland has hard coal reserves totalling 19.1 billion tonnes,

mainly located in Upper Silesia and in the Lublin basin.
Mineable lignite reserves amount to almost 1.6 billion
tonnes.
Gdask
Vi
Coal and lignite are strategic fuels for power generation

in Poland, where indigenous supplies of these fuels have
underpinned growth in electricity supply. The contribution
of coal and lignite to total power generation is dominant
today and is expected to be maintained in the medium
term.
General data
Population
Brown coal
GDP
Kato
Katowice
Krakw
Hard coal
Anthracite
Unit
million
Hard coal and
billion
Anthracite
2012
38.5
381.2
Poland does not have significant reserves of oil and only

modest natural gas reserves, although it may have great
potential to exploit unconventional gas. The government
has issued over 90 licenses for shale gas exploration and
reliable assessments are expected to be presented in due
time. However, initial analysis shows that Poland has huge
shale gas deposits, stretching from the northern Baltic Sea
coast to the eastern borders with Ukraine and Belarus,
totalling over 5 000 billion cubic metres. Experts estimate
that this amount could cover domestic needs for over 100
to 200 years. If these estimates were confirmed, it would
change the fuel mix of the country and reduce energy
dependence on Russia.
Poland
Hard coal
Poland is Europes biggest hard coal producer and was
once one of the worlds leading suppliers. In the 1970s,
Poland became Europes biggest coal producer, with an
annual output of around 150 million tonnes. In the late
1970s, it was the second largest coal exporter in the
world, after the USA, exporting around 40 million tonnes
each year. Although the role of Poland, as an exporting
country, was already declining in the 1980s, the output
was maintained at a significantly high level (193 million
tonnes in 1988) compared with other European countries.
It was not until the political turnaround in the Eastern Bloc
countries and the ensuing transition to a market economy
system, that Poland began to experience a contraction of
hard coal mining during the early 1990s that had begun in
Western Europe two decades earlier. Nevertheless, coal
continues to play a major role, making a 52% contribution
to the countrys primary energy supply. In recent years, the
output of hard coal was about 75 million tonnes reaching
79.2 million tonnes in 2012. In 2012, the Polish hard coal
industry employed a workforce of some 113 000.
Commercially workable hard coal reserves are located in
the Upper Silesian basin and the Lublin basin in the east
of Poland, with the Upper Silesian coalfield accounting for
93% of the total. The coal reserves in this region contain
some 400 coal seams with thicknesses of 0.8 metres to
3.0 metres. About half of these seams are economically
workable. Some 56% of the workable coal reserves
consist of steam coal, while the remaining 44% are
coking coal.
All hard coal is deep mined at an average working depth
of approximately 600 metres. Mining is fully mechanised,
with over 90% of coal produced by longwall systems. The
run-of-mine coal from underground operations contains
discard and requires preparation. In the past, only coking
coal was cleaned to meet international quality standards.
The expansion of existing coal preparation plants, and the
commissioning of new coal upgrading facilities in recent
years, has resulted in a significant improvement in the
quality of Polish steam coal, which meets world market
requirements.
Most of the countrys natural resources, including coal, are
in public hands and coal mining is still mostly a state-run
activity. However, in recent years, the state has made
decisions on ownership changes in the Polish hard coal
industry. In 2009, LUBELSKI WGIEL BOGDANKA, a
steam coal producer operating in the Lublin basin, was
privatised and listed on the Warsaw stock exchange.
Its debut on the stock exchange was seen as a success.
Bogdanka mine is executing a development strategy
that will see a doubling of production. It intends to expand

the mining area to new mining fields. Taking advantage
of its geographic location, Bogdanka has, for the time
being, no problems with selling all of its production. In
December 2010, the Czech group EPH took over Silesia
hard coal mine from KOMPANIA WGLOWA. The newly
created company, PG SILESIA, started coal production
in 2012. In 2011 JASTRZBSKA SPKA WGLOWA
(JSW), the largest Polish coking coal producer, listed on
the Warsaw stock exchange. After having reached an
agreement with trade unions, the government gave a
green light to the initial public offering of a minority
share in JSW. JSW is regarded as one of the top mining
companies in Poland with reserves of good quality
coking coal and a well-established customer base of
steel producers. JSW is also the largest coke producer in
the EU, possessing substantial coking facilities of about
3-4 million tonnes annual capacity.
The government has presented a policy which aims to
fully privatise all coal mining companies in the coming
years. WGLOKOKS SA, the biggest Polish coal exporter,
is scheduled to be listed on the Warsaw stock exchange in
2013.
Two other coal producing companies remain under state
ownership: KOMPANIA WGLOWA SA (KW), the EUs
largest coal mining group with a production capacity of
nearly 40 million tonnes of coal, and KATOWICKI HOLDING
WGLOWY SA (KHW) with a production capacity of
12 million tonnes of thermal coal. The government plans
to list both of these entities on the stock exchange in the
next two or three years, but such ambitions will be largely
dictated by the economic outlook and general market
conditions.
The main objectives of the coal industry over the coming
years are to overcome legal barriers that restrict access
to new coal deposits and to apply efficient and modern
mining technologies alongside low-emission technologies
in the power generation sector.
Coal exporters and recently also coal importers have an
efficient infrastructure at their disposal, with cross-border
rail links to neighbouring countries and to Baltic Sea
ports for exports and imports. These comprise Gdask,
winoujcie, Szczecin and Gdynia ports. Among these
terminals, Gdask and winoujcie are able to load
capesize vessels. Hard coal exports from Poland totalled
6.4 million tonnes in 2012, and about half of these were
transported by land to neighbouring countries, while the
remaining volumes were trans-shipped via the Baltic ports.
39
Poland
Polish ports such as Szczecin-winoujcie and Gdask

have built permanent piers for the import of coal and,
over time, both the ports and railways may offer better
transport conditions for importers with large contracts.
European Union which oblige member states to generate

more and more electricity from low-carbon sources, whilst
the coking coal industry is at the mercy of the performance
of the European steel industry.
Indeed, Poland has become a net importer of coal. In 2010,

imports of coal were 13.4 million tonnes, in 2011 they
reached 15 million tonnes, before dropping to 10.2 million
tonnes in 2012, mainly due to the economic slow-down.
Imports were dominated by deliveries from Russia. Much
smaller quantities come from other countries, including
the Czech Republic, Colombia, Kazakhstan and the USA.
In order to increase the use of hard coal, not only for its
combustion but also for non-conventional use, it was
decided to open a Centre of Clean Coal Technologies
co-financed by EU funds and co-managed by the Central
Mining Institute (GIG) and the Institute of Chemical Coal
Processing. This is an important opportunity to give Polish
coal the chance to become an environmentally friendly and
socially acceptable fuel in future.
Polish coal mines still have a geographic advantage, but

this is beginning to shrink with the expansion of ports
and logistic hubs near Polands eastern border, both of
which facilitate coal imports from abroad. Indigenous
coal is becoming less attractive for power generators
than cheaper imported coal. This is a big challenge for
Polish coal producers, because electricity generators
are no longer guided by loyalty, but mostly by economic
calculations.
The thermal hard coal market also faces increasing
pressure from environmental targets being dictated by the
Beside its hard coal mining industry, Poland also has a

well-developed and technically advanced mining machinery
and equipment industry. Together with the research
institutes and technology centres KOMAG, EMAG and GIG,
the machinery and equipment sector assists the Polish
hard coal industry to continuously develop and modernise
its activities.
Despite the current economic slow-down, coal companies
and other investors, including those from abroad, are
interested in making investments in new Polish coal mines.
Lignite
Polands lignite deposits are exclusively mined in opencast
mines. Two of these operations are located in central
Poland and a third one lies in the south-west of the
country. In 2012, total lignite production reached
64.3 million tonnes (18.2 Mtce), 98.4% of which was
used by mine-mouth power plants. Lignite-fired power
stations generated 55.6 TWh of electricity, representing
one third of the total gross power generated in Poland.
The Bechatw basin, situated in the central part of Poland,
incorporates two lignite fields: Bechatw and Szczercw.
In 2012, the Bechatw mine produced 40.1 million tonnes
(10.8 Mtce) of lignite, this being 62.5% of Polands total
lignite production. Mining this lignite required the removal
of some 106.9 million cubic metres of overburden, which
equates to an overburden-to-lignite ratio of 2.6 cubic
metres per tonne. The depth of the mining operation in
the Bechatw field is about 300 metres and the average
calorific value of the fuel is 7 960 kJ/kg. Bechatw mine
is expected to remain in operation until 2038. The lignite
output is supplied entirely to a mine-mouth power plant,
with a capacity of 5 298 MW. The power plant generates
27-28 TWh per year, covering about 20% of domestic
power requirements. Built between 1981 and 1988,
40
it generates the cheapest electricity in Poland. A new

858 MW power unit was put into service on 27 September
2011 in the PGE GiEK SA Bechatw power plant.
In the Turoszw lignite basin, located in the south-west of
Poland, the Turw mine has a production capacity of
15 million tonnes per year (4.1 Mtce). Reserves are
estimated at 340 million tonnes (91.6 Mtce). In 2012,
the mine produced over 10.3 million tonnes of lignite
(2.8 Mtce), representing 16.1% of Polands total lignite
production, with a calorific value of 9 564 kJ/kg.
Up to 96% of the lignite is supplied to the PGE GiEK SA
Turw mine-mouth power station. This plant has been
modernised and upgraded to a capacity of 2 100 MW.
On 31 December 2012, unit No. 9 at the power plant was
decommissioned. Currently, the Turw power plant has
a capacity of 1 698 MW and is one of the most modern
in Poland. In 2012, some 45.6 million cubic metres of
overburden were removed, giving a stripping ratio of
4.4 cubic metres per tonne. Turw mine is expected
to be in operation until 2045.
The Bechatw and Turw lignite mines, as well as
Bechatw and Turw power plants, belong to the group
Poland
of companies included in the PGE Grnictwo i Energetyka

Konwencjonalna (PGE GiEK SA) having its office in
Bechatw. The company is one of the six key companies
belonging to the majority state-owned Polish utility
POLSKA GRUPA ENERGETYCZNA SA (PGE).
Coal resources and reserves *

Resources hard coal
Resources lignite
Reserves hard coal
Reserves lignite
The Konin-Adamw basin, located in central Poland

between Warsaw and Pozna, has been producing lignite
for over 50 years. There are two active mines: Konin and
Adamw, which belong to the PAK Group and are named
PAK KWB Konin SA and PAK KWB Adamw SA.

PAK KWB Konin SA has a production capacity of 15 million

tonnes per year (4.1 Mtce). Lignite is produced at three
opencast sites: Jwin IIB, Drzewce and Tomisawice.
Total lignite production reached 10.1 million tonnes
(2.7 Mtce) in 2012. It required the removal of 70.7 million
cubic metres of overburden, a stripping ratio of 6.9 cubic
metres per tonne. The working depth at these pits varies
between 25 metres and 80 metres. The extracted fuel
has an average calorific value of 9 220 kJ/kg. The planned
lignite production from PAK KWB Konin SA is estimated to
be about 195 million tonnes (52.5 Mtce). The Konin mine
supplies lignite to three mine-mouth power plants: Ptnw I
with an installed capacity of 1 200 MW, Konin (583 MW)
and Ptnw II (464 MW).
PAK KWB Adamw SA operates three opencast pits,
named Adamw, Wadysaww and Komin. Adamw
mines overall production capacity is 5 million tonnes per
year (1.3 Mtce). The depth of mining operations is between
44 metres and 70 metres. The deposits currently being
exploited have workable reserves of 44 million tonnes
(11.8 Mtce). In 2012, lignite production reached 3.6 million
tonnes (0.9 Mtce), all of which was supplied to the
600 MW Adamw mine-mouth power station. Some
31.7 million cubic metres of overburden was removed,
which gives a stripping ratio of 8.7 cubic metres per tonne.
The entire Ptnw-Adamw-Konin (PAK) lignite basin
generates approximately 8.5% of Polands electricity
requirements. The mines belong to ZESP ELEKTROWNI
PTNW-ADAMW-KONIN SA which listed on the
Warsaw stock exchange in October 2012. PAK KWB
Adamw SA is expected to remain in operation until
2023 and PAK KWB Konin SA until 2040.
Unit
Mt
Mt
Mt
Mt
Mtce
Mt/Mtce
Mt/Mtce
2012
48 225
22 584
19 131
1 591
101.1
79.2/64.4
64.3/18.2

Lignite ash content
kJ/kg
kJ/kg
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
21 000-28 000
7 400-10 300
8.0-30.0
6.0-12.0
6.5-11.0

% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
50.0-60.0
0.4-1.2
0.2-1.1
Hard coal imports
Hard coal exports
Mt
Mt
10.2
6.4

Lignite consumption
Mtce
Mtce
Mtce
140.4
60.4
18.1
Power supply
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
MW
MW
147.6
(2.8)
144.8
84.5
55.6
20 152
9 635
thousand
thousand
113.000
15.000
Employment
* Source: Pastwowy Instytut Geologiczny (Polish Geological

Institute) as at 31 December 2012
The average productivity at Polands lignite mines was

4 236 tonnes per man-year in 2012 and employment
totalled 15 156. Polands lignite mining areas can maintain
their annual production output at current levels of around
60 million tonnes and lignite is expected to play an
important role in Polands energy supply until at least 2030.
41
Romania
Romania
Pr
ut
Iai
et
Sir
Romania has significant energy resources, including

natural gas, oil and coal, and has a long coal mining
tradition, stretching back 150 years. Almost 80% of the
countrys primary energy demand is met by indigenous
energy resources. Current oil reserves are estimated at
82 million tonnes with an annual production of around
4 million tonnes. Natural gas reserves are estimated at
109 billion cubic metres with an annual production of
around 11 billion cubic metres. In October 2012, a new
860 MW gas-fired power plant was inaugurated at Brazi.
New offshore gas could enable Romania to become a net
gas exporter by 2025.
Cluj Napoca
Mure
Timioara
Jiu Valley
Braov
Ploiesti Basin
Romanias entire hard coal and lignite output is used for

heat and power generation. At the end of 2011, the total
capacity of installed generation was 20 498 MW; coal-fired
power plants had a share of 28.9% or 5 918 MW, other
fossil fuel power plants 5 374 MW (26.2%), hydro power
plants 6 483 MW (31.6%) and the Cernavod nuclear
power plant 1 411 MW (6.9%). The National Renewable
Energy Action Plan shows that there is a large potential
for wind power generation; turbines with a capacity
of 1 905 MW had been installed by the end of 2012.
ENERGONUCLEAR proposes to build two new CANDU
reactors (1 440 MW) at the Cernavod nuclear power
plant.
The main consumers of hard coal are the thermal power
plants at Paroeni (3 x 50 MW) and Mintia (6 x 210 MW).
Hard coal has the advantage of ensuring a long-term
supply for these power plants. Nevertheless, hard coal
42
Olt
Hard coal reserves and resources are estimated at

2 446 million tonnes, of which 252.5 million tonnes are
commercially exploitable within the currently leased
perimeters, although as little as 11 million tonnes might be
economically recoverable. Proven reserves of lignite total
280 million tonnes, with a further 9 640 million tonnes
of resources. 95% of lignite deposits are situated in the
Oltenia mining basin and more than 80% of these can be
mined in opencast mines. The remaining lignite deposits
have low economic potential, explaining why extraction in
most other areas has stopped.
Oltenia Basin
Ar
Bucureti
ge
nu
Da
Lignite
General data
Population
Brown coal
GDP
Constana
be
Hard coal
Anthracite
Unit
million
Hard coal and
billion
Anthracite
2012
21.4
131.7
mining in Romania faces complex geological conditions,

making mining difficult. Some mines will be obliged to
stop their activities due to the enormous land acquisition
costs and very high operational costs. More generally,
some mining companies urgently need to modernise their
equipment to improve performance and productivity.
Lignite mining in Romania offers some competitive
advantages with the use of modern technologies and
skilled labour. Reserves are concentrated in a relatively
small area of about 250 square kilometres where lignite
is currently mined in 19 opencast pits. These reserves
provide a long-term secure supply for power plants. In
order to avoid impacts on neighbouring agricultural land,
overburden is placed back in the excavated voids, which
also helps reduce costs. The main consumers are nearby
Romania
power plants, including Turceni (2 640 MW), Rovinari

(1 720 MW) and Mintia-Deva (1 260 MW). Further to
the south lies the 300 MW Craiova power plant, also
lignite-fired.
Romania has established an energy policy framework
which is in line with EU law, regulating the production of
gas, coal, lignite, oil and nuclear energy, as well as power
plant modernisation. The National Energy Regulatory
Authority (ANRE) is the responsible independent authority,
reporting to the prime minister.
The recently transposed EU laws on environmental
protection oblige the coal industry to meet several
European standards which necessitates large investments.
The 2001/80/EC Directive on Large Combustion Plants
was adopted and is being implemented. 174 large
combustion plants have been identified, of which 78 need
to comply with stricter environmental requirements by 2017.
Current coal-burning technologies will be replaced by clean
coal technologies to reduce SO2 and NOX emissions along
with particulate emissions from coal-fired thermal power
plants. In order to maintain the important role of fossil fuels
in power generation, Romania intends to implement CO2
capture and storage at all new power plants.
During 2012, the coal industry underwent major
restructuring. The lignite mines and power plants were
combined into the vertically integrated OLTENIA ENERGY
COMPLEX to create what the Romanian government
hopes will be a national champion. Restructuring of
the hard coal sector was more problematic and was
finalised only at the end of 2012 with the creation of
two separate operating units under the NATIONAL
HARD COAL COMPANY (CNH SA Petroani). One will
oversee the closure by 2018 of three coal mines in the Jiu
Valley that are not viable (Uricani, Paroeni and Petrila),
following Council Decision 2010/787/EU on state aid to
the coal industry. The other unit will continue to operate
the remaining four coal mines without state aid (Lonea,
Livezeni, Vulcan and Lupeni), with an annual production
capacity of 1.5 million tonnes. Job losses will total 2 400,
leaving 5 200 employees.

Resources hard coal
Resources lignite
Reserves hard coal
Reserves lignite
Unit
Mt
Mt
Mt
Mt

Mtce (2011)
Mt/Mtce
Mt/Mtce

Lignite ash content
Hard coal imports
kJ/kg
kJ/kg
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
2012
2 435
9 640
11
280
39.4
1.9/0.9
32.1/9.4
14 200-15 900
7 200-8 200
37-44
30-36
5.0-7.4
40-43
0.5-1.8
1.0-1.5
Mt
1.4

Lignite consumption
Mtce
Mtce
Mtce
48.7
2.0
9.4
Power supply
TWh (2011)
TWh (2011)
TWh (2011)
TWh (2011)
TWh (2011)
MW
MW
56.5
(1.9)
54.6
0.8
24.0
1 400
4 500
thousand
thousand
6 000
15 000
Employment
43
Serbia
Serbia
Tisa
The activities of the state-owned ELEKTROPRIVREDA

SRBIJE (EPS or Electric Power Industry of Serbia) cover
electricity generation, distribution and supply, lignite
production, processing and transport, as well as hydro
power generation. EPS is also active in the development,
design, engineering, construction and maintenance of
mining equipment and other energy industry assets.
Novi Sad
Danube
Save
Lignite is a strategic and dominant energy source for

Serbia and the opencast mines of EPS clearly contribute
to the countrys stable and secure energy supply. Lignite,
therefore, remains one of the main fuels for power
generation within the long-term development plans of
EPS. In 2012, total power generation in Serbia reached
34.5 TWh of which 24.3 TWh were based on lignite. Since
1999, EPS no longer has activities in Kosovo and Metohija.
Beograd
ograd
grad
Danube
Kostolac
K
Ko
ostolac
Kolubara
aM
zn
Ju
av
or
Coal from underground mines has an insignificant share

of 0.7% in the total electricity generation of EPS.
Be
li D
rim
Lignite
Metohija
Pritina
Kosovo
In 2012, EPS produced a total of 37.5 million tonnes of

lignite in opencast mines located in the Kolubara and
Kostolac basins. The lignite extracted by the corporate
enterprise MINING BASIN KOLUBARA generated 50% of
the total electricity production of EPS and lignite mined
by TPPs-OCMs KOSTOLAC at Kostolac fuelled 15% of
EPS power generation. The average calorific value of
the supplied lignite to the thermal power plants of MB
KOLUBARA and TPPs-OCMs KOSTOLAC subsidiaries is
about 7 520 kJ/kg and 8 150 kJ/kg, respectively. The ratio
of excavated overburden to lignite was 2.31 cubic metres
per tonne in the Kolubara mining basin and 4.30 cubic
metres per tonne in Kostolac.
Lignite mining in the Kolubara mining basin is carried out
in relatively densely populated areas, with much farmland,
many roads and water features. These facts heavily impact
on the speed and the cost of land acquisition. The Kostolac
basin is an agricultural region of the country which
includes the well-known archaeological site of Viminacium
44
Lignite
General data
Population
Brown coal
GDP
Hard coal
Anthracite
Unit
million
Hard coal and
Anthracite
billion
2012
7.2
29.9
Since 1999, EPS does not operate its facilities in the territory of Kosovo
where MB KOLUBARA operates four opencast mines,

namely Field B, Field D, Veliki Crljeni and Tamnava West
Field. The extracted lignite generates heat and power at
the Kolubara thermal power plant (TPP), TPP Nikola Tesla A
and B, and TPP Morava. TPPs-OCMs KOSTOLAC operates
Drmno mine, supplying lignite to TPP Kostolac A and B.
Lignite output in both the Kolubara and Kostolac basins
is expected to increase, since the Serbian energy
development strategy includes the construction of new
Serbia
thermal power plants. Investments are therefore needed

at existing lignite mines and also for the development of
new lignite deposits.
Priority is given to joint projects with strategic partners
of EPS, including projects to construct two new 350 MW
lignite-based units near the Kolubara mine at TPP
Kolubara B and a new unit, Nikola Tesla B3 with a capacity
of 700 MW. At the same time, the existing opencast
lignite mines will be extended and new deposits will
be accessed.
EPS is still in the process of upgrading and modernising
its thermal power plants in order to reach the standards
required by national law on environmental protection by
2015. These activities include the replacement of ash
transportation and disposal systems in several thermal
power plants, as well as the refurbishment of electrostatic
precipitators.
In October 2012, EPS and the German KfW Development
Bank signed a loan agreement for a 65 million
project: Energy Efficiency through Efficient Coal
Quality Management in MB KOLUBARA part of the
international RIO+20 initiative. Implementation of this
project will lead to total annual savings of 26 million,
as well as to less lignite use, saving about one million
tonnes per year as the efficiency of the power plant will
be improved.
A further significant investment is being carried out
by TPPs-OCMs KOSTOLAC to increase annual lignite
production to 12 million tonnes. This expansion is a
precondition for the construction of an additional 350 MW
unit at Kostolac while securing future lignite supplies for
the existing A and B units.
As a member of the Energy Community, Serbia has
accepted to implement certain rules in the field of energy
related to competition, environmental protection, renewable
energies and EU regulations. In 2012, EPS continued its
efforts to implement EU regulations with a view towards
Serbias integration and accession into the EU.

Resources hard coal
Resources lignite
Reserves hard coal
Reserves lignite
Unit
Mt
Mt
Mt
Mt

Mtce
Mt/Mtce
Mt/Mtce

Lignite ash content
Hard coal imports
kJ/kg
kJ/kg
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
2012
184
5 363
176
3 660
14.3
0.6/0.3
37.5/10.5
12 000-18 000
7 500-8 200
12.0-35.0
14.0-18.0
45.0-54.0
48.0-52.0
0.9-3.8
0.4-0.9
Mt
1.3

Lignite consumption
Mtce
Mtce
Mtce
22.2
0.3
11.0
Power supply
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
MW
33.6
24.3
3 976
thousand
thousand
thousand
3 900
12 300
14 350
Employment
34.5
(1.0)
45
Slovakia
Slovakia
The Slovak Republic does not have any significant
exploitable indigenous fossil energy reserves. Resources
are relatively large, but the majority are not recoverable
at the present time. Slovakias dependency on imported
energy sources is therefore higher than 90%.
In 2008, Slovakia became a net importer of electricity,

following the closure of two 440 MW blocks at the
Bohunice nuclear power plant EBO. In 2011, a new CCGT
power plant at the village of Malenice near the town of
Trnava went into operation with an installed capacity of
436 MW. In general, the energy mix under the national
energy policy is well balanced, supporting indigenous
lignite and renewables.
Trencn
Vh
V
Whilst exploitable crude oil and natural gas reserves and

their extraction accounts for a relatively small share of
overall energy supply, there is quite a large potential for
gas storage. During recent years a public discussion on
the exploitation of a new uranium deposit at Kurikov was
launched.
ilina
Hornonitrianske
Bane Prievidza
Prievidza
Hornd
Bansk Bystrica
Preov
Koice
on
Hr
Bana Dolina
Bana Cry
Bratislava
a
Da
Nitra
nu
be
Lignite
General data
Population
GDP
Unit
million
billion
2012
5.4
Brown coal
71.5
Lignite
Lignite resources are estimated at more than 400 million
tonnes and a further 500 million tonnes should be available
in the future. Exploitable lignite reserves, including
brown coal, are calculated at 100 million tonnes. There
is an insignificant hard coal deposit in the eastern part of
Slovakia, which is not exploitable.
Lignite is extracted by three companies at five
underground mines located in the central, southern and
western parts of Slovakia. In 2012, 2.3 million tonnes of
lignite were produced. Lignite-based power generation
46
reached nearly 2 TWh, representing approx. 7% of total

electricity generation (27.9 TWh).
HORNONITRIANSKE BANE PRIEVIDZA (HBP) is a coal
mining company with a history of over 100 years. HBP is
seated in the town of Prievidza and extracts lignite at the
Handlov and Novky deposits located in the Horn Nitra
region. In the past, there were three independent collieries
in operation here Cigel, Handlov and Novky, which are
nowadays integrated into HBP. The depth of the worked
coal seams ranges from 150 metres to 450 metres.
Hard coal
Anthracite
Slovakia
The lignite seams have a thickness of up to 20 metres

and are mostly extracted by using a long-wall sub-level
caving method. HBP also operates a mine rescue station,
which serves all mining districts in Slovakia. Lignite output
in 2012 was 2.04 million tonnes and all the lignite was
supplied to the nearby 522 MW Novky power plant
(Elektrre Novky ENO) belonging to the SLOVENSK
ELEKTRRNE COMPANY which is majority owned by
ENEL of Italy. Nearly one third of the lignite supplied came
from the new mine in the Novky deposit.
BAA DOLINA COMPANY, located near the town of Velk
Krti, extracts lignite from the Modr Kame deposit in
southern Slovakia at a depth of 150 metres. In 2012, this
mine produced only 130 thousand tonnes of lignite due
to closure plans which now extend to the end of 2015.
Lignite is supplied to the ENO power station. The BAA
ZHORIE COMPANY near the town of Hol has been in
operation since 1990 and extracted 170 thousand tonnes
of lignite in 2012 from a working depth of 180 metres.
The mine plans to expand its annual production in future
to 350 thousand tonnes.
More than 90% of the total lignite produced was used for
electricity generation and district heating.
Bansk Mechanizcia and Elektrifikcia Novky (BME) is
a modern mining equipment plant owned by HBP that
supplies hydraulic powered supports and other equipment.
HBP is a private mining company developing some
activities together with SLOVENSK ELEKTRRNE
ENEL, mainly in relation to modernising the ENO power
plant. HBP also has an interest in research projects and
is working together with the University of Koice on
underground coal gasification technologies.

Resources hard coal
Resources lignite
Reserves hard coal
Reserves lignite
Unit
Mt
Mt
Mt
Mt

Mtce
Mt/Mtce
9.2
2.3/0.9

Lignite ash content
kJ/kg
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
10 450
<25
<36
<2.5
Coal Imports/Exports
Hard coal imports
Mt
3.4

Lignite consumption
Mtce
Mtce
24.8
1.2
Power supply
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
MW
MW
27.9
13.4/(13.1)
28.3
1.2
2.0
660
524
Employment
thousand
thousand
2012
8
1 000
0
95
3 700
630
47
Slovenia
Slovenia
Resources of lignite and brown coal in Slovenia are
estimated at 1 170 million tonnes, with mineable reserves
accounting for 140 million tonnes. Since its creation
in 1991, the Republic of Slovenia has enjoyed steady
economic growth and, between 2000 and 2012, the
countrys primary energy consumption increased by
11% to reach 10.2 Mtce, even though there was a slight
economic downturn in 2009 due to the global economic
crisis. Approximately 50% of the countrys primary energy
requirements are met by imports.
The key elements of Slovenian energy policy are closely
aligned with the priorities of the European Union, such
as a national plan for renewables and a plan to improve
energy efficiency. In the long term, coal and lignite are
expected to be partially replaced by renewable energies
and coal imports reduced. PREMOGOVNIK VELENJE will
continue its lignite production until 2054, since lignite
is needed in the currently well-balanced energy mix for
security of supply reasons.
Lignite
There is one underground lignite deposit in Slovenia
which is mined at Velenje in the north of the country.
The Trbovlje-Hrastnik underground coal mine, operated
by RUDNIK TRBOVLJE-HRASTNIK in central Slovenia,
stopped coal production in the first quarter of 2013 and is
now being decommissioned. In 2012, these two mines
produced 4.3 million tonnes of lignite and brown coal.
Velenje coal mine is the biggest lignite mine in Slovenia
and the major part of its output is used in the nearby
otanj power plant. Operated by PREMOGOVNIK
VELENJE, the mine is one of the largest and most modern
underground mines in Europe. It is located in the aleka
dolina Valley, boasting one of the thickest known lignite
layers in the world (more than 170 metres) where a unique
mining method is used. The companys long-term strategy
is to operate the mine until 2054, as it is likely to remain
Slovenias only exploitable energy resource for the next
50 years. The majority of Velenje coal mine belongs to the
48
Goricko
Mura
Premogovnik
Velenje
So
ca
Sa
vin
Vipara
Dra
Velenje
ja
Rudnik Trbovlje
Hrastnik
H
Sava
Maribor
Trbovlje
Ljubljana
Lignite
General data
Population
GDP
Unit
million
billion
2012
2.1
Brown coal
35.3
state-owned HOLDING SLOVENSKE ELEKTRARNE (HSE)

who also owns two power plants (TE and TET) as well
as hydro power plants. Imported coal is mainly used at
the Termoelektrarna Toplarna Ljubljana (TE-TOL) heat and
power plant in Ljubljana, covering over 90% of the capitals
heat demand and 3% of its power demand.
Taking into consideration the increasing demand for
electricity, the risks of energy import dependence and
the abundant coal reserves at Velenje, HSE is building
a new 600 MW Unit 6 at otanj thermal power plant.
Unit 6 uses best available techniques (BAT) to achieve an
efficiency of more than 43% and deliver a CO2 emissions
reduction of 35% as older units are replaced. The new
Unit 6 will go into operation in 2016 and it is expected
to have a noticeable impact on the local economy by
supplying electricity at lower prices.
Hard coal
Anthracite
Slovenia
PREMOGOVNIK VELENJE is a technologically developed

and strongly integrated company with a 140-year tradition
in lignite mining. In 2007, the company received a special
award from the Slovenian Chamber of Engineers for its
innovative approach to mining engineering. The priority
now is to modernise coal production, which will contribute
to better working conditions and better public acceptance.
The Velenje mining method is performed by caving hanging
seams. The very first long-wall faces appeared in 1947,
followed by the extensive introduction of long-wall faces in
1952. The basic approach is to extend the lignite extraction
area above the protected area at the face. The Velenje
mining method is patent protected and has been proven
to be the most effective method for extracting thick coal
seams. PREMOGOVNIK VELENJE continues to develop
this method in order to gain even more improvements. The
largest development project includes the construction of a
new shaft NOP II which would reduce the mines footprint.
The knowledge and products of PREMOGOVNIK VELENJE
offer good opportunities for co-operation with other
countries, particularly where there is a need to introduce
new technologies (e.g. in Turkey, Slovakia, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Serbia, Macedonia and Montenegro).
Further away, some activities are being developed in the
Asia-Pacific region. PREMOGOVNIK VELENJE is also a
partner in many projects funded by the EU Research Fund
for Coal and Steel, such as the CoGasOUT project which
aims to develop new technologies to predict gas outbursts
and emissions from thick coal seams. PREMOGOVNIK
VELENJE also has a long history in underground coal
gasification.
PREMOGOVNIK VELENJE makes serious commitments
in the field of social responsibility and the rehabilitation of
mining sites. The company has always aimed to prevent
and eliminate any negative environmental effects and has
played an active role in a land, air and water protection
programme in the aleka Valley. The company regularly
monitors its environmental impacts, but the clearest
testament to sustainable development is the tourist
and sports resort that has been developed around the
man-made lakes above the mine.

Resources lignite
Reserves lignite
Unit
Mt
Mt

Lignite and brown coal
(saleable output)
Mtce
Mt/Mtce
5.4
4.3/1.6

Lignite ash content
kJ/kg
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
11 300
14
36
1.4
Hard coal imports
Lignite imports
Mt
Mt
0.09
0.55

Lignite consumption
Mtce
Mtce
10.2
2.1
Power supply
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
MW
16.1
7.5/(8.4)
12.7
5.1
975
Employment
thousand
thousand
2012
1 170
140
1 617
2 773
49
Spain
Spain
The hard coal deposits in Asturias are located in the Naln

valley and are of a low calorific value. Nevertheless, in the
past they were Spains biggest source of coal. Today, high
extraction costs have led to the gradual closure of mines.
The deposits at Len-Palencia are also of a low calorific
value, although some anthracite seams are present. Coal
in the Astur-Leonesa basin north of La Robla in Len,
where anthracite is mined by HULLERA VASCO-LEONESA
and CARBONAR, has a high calorific value (5 500 kcal/kg)
and low volatile matter, making its extraction more
economic. The hard coal basin at Puertollano has enough
reserves to keep the current opencast mine owned by
ENDESA in operation for several decades. Teruel boasts
the largest Spanish sub-bituminous hard coal reserves,
of which some 200 million tonnes can be extracted by
opencast mining. The high sulphur content of this coal
(4% to 6%) made it less attractive for use at power
plants in the past, before they were fitted with flue gas
desulphurisation.
Spain has one of the most dynamic electricity markets in
Europe. There is fierce competition between coal-fired
and natural gas-fired power generation for the market that
remains after nuclear, hydro and must-run renewables
have supplied. Hydro output can vary significantly from
one year to the next and, with a system capacity margin
La Corua
As Pontes
o
Min
Spains primary energy consumption was 178.1 Mtce in

2012, 13.3% less than its peak in 2007. The economic
crisis has been particularly harsh in Spain and the
government has been forced to introduce many austerity
measures which have had a direct impact on the
coal industry. At the same time, the country is highly
dependent on imported oil and natural gas. It has an overall
import dependence of 76.4%, well above the EU average
of 53.8%. This places a burden on the Spanish economy
by increasing its trade deficit and foreign indebtedness.
The only significant indigenous energy resource that Spain
possesses is coal, totalling 4 500 million tonnes, including
accessible reserves of 1 156 million tonnes. In 2012, coal
met 12.2% of the countrys energy demand.
Meirama
Naln
Len-Palencia
Eb
Duero
ro
Tajo
Barcelona
Madrid
ian
ad
Gu
gr
Se
Teruel
Jcar
Puertollano
Guadalquivir
Alicante
Granada
Cdiz
Lignite
General data
Population
Brown coal
GDP
Hard coal
Anthracite
Unit
million
Hard coal and
billion
Anthracite
2012
46.2
1 029.0
of 136%, there is plenty of room for switching between

energy sources. During 2012, the Spanish government
introduced many new measures, including taxes, into the
power generation sector which will significantly reduce
earnings. The aim is to reduce the growing deficit resulting
from generous renewable tariffs which amounted to 8
billion in 2012. In fact, the government put a halt on any
subsidises for new renewable projects in January 2012.
In addition, a new electricity sector law moved through the
Spanish parliament during 2013 and will mean deep cuts to
the subsidies paid to renewable projects that are already
installed in order to reduce the deficit.
Hard coal
Hard coal mines are located in the region of Castilla y
Len, especially in the Len and Palencia provinces,
producing 1.6 million tonnes in 2012. Also in northern
Spain, 1.8 million tonnes were produced in Asturias.
Mining is very important at Puertollano in the Ciudad
Real province south of Madrid with an output of 0.5
million tonnes. Finally, in the eastern part of the country
in the Teruel province of Aragon, 2.2 million tonnes of
sub-bituminous coal were produced in 2012. In all, there
50
are fourteen active coal mining companies. Over 60%

of the hard coal is mined in opencast mines, making
indigenous hard coal competitive compared with imported
coal. CARBUNIN, the Spanish confederation of coal
producers, is seeking to maintain such competitive
indigenous coal production, even after the expiry of state
aid in 2018 as required by Council Decision 2010/787/EU,
and, in this respect, is supported by the Spanish
government. Nevertheless, in 2012, the government
Spain
dramatically reduced subsidies paid to coal mining

companies, by 63%. Over the course of two years, state
aid to the coal mining sector will have been reduced by
over 80%, from 300 million in 2011 to 55 million in
2013. There are now coal mines operating without state
aid and these represent the first element of a competitive
mining industry in Spain. In September 2013, the Spanish
government reiterated in parliament that it is seeking from
the European Commission a review of Council Decision
2010/787/EU on state aid to facilitate the closure of
uncompetitive coal mines. Specifically, the government
wants this review to allow mines that have achieved
competitiveness to continue to produce coal after 2018
and not to have to repay past state aid.
Coal demand in 2012 was very strong and was met by a
combination of 6.1 million tonnes of domestic production
and 21.4 million tonnes of imports. Royal Decrees
134/2010 and 1221/2010 took effect in 2011 and helped to
maintain demand for indigenous hard coal via an off-take
obligation on utility companies of up to 23.4 TWh per year
from the ten coal units still burning local coal. Coal-fired
generation increased 24.4% to 55.9 TWh in 2012 from
11.2 GW of installed capacity, covering 19% of overall
electricity production. Renewables, including hydro, took
a 30% share, natural gas 25%, nuclear 21% and oil 5%.
Spanish coal-fired power plant operators have two major
objectives to meet their environmental obligations. On
the one hand, the reduction of sulphur dioxide, oxides of
nitrogen and particulate emissions are being addressed
through the progressive introduction of technical
measures. Almost all plants are now fully compliant with
the Large Combustion Plants Directive. On the other
hand, the reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions
presents another challenge. In Spain, coal combustion
currently generates 18.5% of CO2 emissions, while
the transport sector emits more than one third of CO2
emissions.
Several projects are well underway to address clean coal
combustion and dramatically reduce CO2 emissions. The
Fundacin Ciudad de la Energa (CIUDEN), in co-operation
with the central government, is managing one of these
projects, having benefitted from EU funding under the

Resources hard coal
Resources lignite
Reserves hard coal
Reserves lignite
Unit
Mt
Mt
Mt
Mt

Mtce
Mt/Mtce
178.1
6.1/3.5
kJ/kg
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
18 231
34.6
13.2
2.5

Hard coal imports
2012
4 308
210
946
210
Mt
21.4

Mtce
Mtce
178.1
21.4
Power supply
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
MW
262.9
(11.2)
251.7
55.9
11 200
thousand
3 407
Employment
European Energy Programme for Recovery. The project is

a very large scale pilot plant that is already demonstrating
oxy-fuel combustion in two types of boiler. In addition, it
aims to demonstrate the storage of the captured CO2 by
injecting it 800 metres underground into a deep saline
aquifer. It is foreseen that all Spanish power plants will
be CO2 capture-ready by 2020 and that transport and
storage options will be in place by the same date. These
very challenging goals should allow the continued use of
indigenous coal at reasonable prices at least until 2050,
and so contribute to Spains energy supply security.
Lignite
At the end of 2007, Spains last lignite mines located in
Galicia on the north-west of the Iberian Peninsula were
closed. Lignite reserves of 210 million tonnes remain.
51
Turkey
Turkey
Zonguldak
Karliova
Mengen
Trakya
ehri
at N
Mur
Kangal
Orta Basin
Alpu
Beypazari
Elazi
Afsin-Elbistan
TuncbilekSeyitmer
Soma
Izmir
BeyehirSeydiehir
Karapinar
MilasYatagan
Tigris
Eup
hra
te
an
Ankara
Ki
Orhaneli-Keles
zil
irm
ak
Istanbul
Tufanbeyli
Adana
Antalya
Lignite
Although per-capita energy use in Turkey is still

comparatively low, energy demand is expected to
grow rapidly due to the demographics of a very young
population and a rapidly growing economy. Total primary
energy supply was 165 Mtce in 2012 and is expected to
double within a decade, according to the governments
most probable scenarios.
The Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources is
responsible for the preparation and implementation of
energy policies, plans and programmes in co-ordination
with its affiliated institutions and other public and private
entities. It has statutory duties covering coal mines, power
stations and the electricity grid.
The Electricity Market Law came into effect in 2001 and
was revised in 2013 giving further impetus towards the
liberalisation of the electricity market. The law established
the Energy Market Regulatory Authority as an independent
regulatory authority.
52
General data
Population
GDP
Hard coal
Unit
million
Brown coal billion Anthracite
2012
74.7
Hard coal and
612.0
Anthracite
As Turkeys indigenous energy resources consist almost

exclusively of lignite and small amounts of hard coal, the
country is heavily dependent on imports of oil, gas and
hard coal. The countrys net energy imports account for
approximately 76% of the total primary energy needs.
Turkey has around 1.3 billion tonnes of hard coal and
13.9 billion tonnes of lignite reserves and resources,
of which 0.5 billion tonnes and 13.4 billion tonnes
respectively are proven reserves. Turkeys primary energy
production totalled 44.5 Mtce in 2012, of which indigenous
coal provided 52.7%, oil and natural gas together 9.1%,
hydropower 16.0% and renewable sources, including
traditional biomass (firewood) 22.1%. However, natural
gas had the biggest consumption share with 32.2%,
while the share of coal was 30.3%.
Turkey
The Turkish coal sector produces both hard coal (2.3 million
tonnes in 2012) and lignite (70.0 million tonnes), mainly
used for power generation. At present only a small power
station (300 MW) is fed with domestic hard coal from the
Zonguldak basin, whilst the larger skenderun power plant
(1 200 MW) and Zonguldak Eren Enerji atalaz power
plant (1 360 MW) use imported hard coal. Other power
plants use lignite. In total, Turkish coal-fired plants have
a capacity of approximately 12.2 GW.
Turkeys energy consumption has been growing much
faster than its production, increasing the countrys reliance
on energy imports. Energy demand has doubled over the
last two decades, and this trend is set to continue in the
future, with a forecast average increase of 4% per year.
29% of Turkeys gross electricity production of 239.5 TWh
in 2012 was generated from hard coal (13.9%) and lignite

(14.5%). Of the remainder, 43.6% was provided by natural
gas, 24.2% by hydropower, 0.7% by oil and the remaining
3.1% by wind and other renewable energies. Turkey
aims to increase its domestic electricity production by
constructing new power plants.
Turkey mainly produces lignite: hard coal accounts for only
5% of production on a tonnage basis. Over 90% of the
entire coal production in 2012 was extracted from three
state-owned enterprises: TURKISH COAL ENTERPRISES
(TK), ELECTRICITY GENERATION COMPANY (EA) and
TURKISH HARD COAL ENTERPRISES (TTK). The private
sectors share was only around 6.9%. However, about one
third of coal production reported by the state enterprises is
mined by private companies under subcontracts.
Hard coal
Turkeys main hard coal deposits are located in the
Zonguldak basin, between Ereli and Amasra on the Black
Sea coast in north-western Turkey. Hard coal resources in
the basin are estimated at some 1 314 million tonnes of
which 512 million tonnes are in the proven category. The
calorific value of hard coal reserves varies between 6 200
and 7 200 kcal/kg.
This coal basin is the only region in Turkey where hard
coal is extracted and it has a very complex geological
structure which makes mechanised coal production almost
impossible and requires labour-intensive conventional coal
production methods.
The state-owned TTK has a de facto monopoly in the
production, processing and distribution of hard coal,
although there are no legal restrictions on private sector
involvements. The company operates five deep mines in
the Zonguldak coal basin that produced approximately

2.5 million tonnes of saleable coal in 2011. Long-standing
restructuring and privatisation efforts to increase coal
production in the basin have not succeeded so far; coal
production today is not very different from that of ten
years ago.
In 2012, Turkey also imported 29.7 million tonnes of hard
coal for thermal power plants, steel production, industry
and domestic heating purposes. Coal imports to Turkey
are expected to increase over the coming years. Although
gas-fired power stations dominate the newly installed
power capacity of Turkey, a number of coal-fired power
plants have also been commissioned in recent years.
Coal-fired power plants using imported coal have a total
capacity of 3 900 MW. An example is the 1 200 MW
skenderun power plant in southern Turkey that was
completed by STEAG of Germany in 2004.
53
Turkey
Lignite
Lignite is Turkeys most important indigenous energy
resource. Deposits are spread across the country, with
proven reserves of 13 442 million tonnes.
The most important lignite deposits are located at the
Afsin-Elbistan lignite basin of south-eastern Anatolia, near
the city of Mara where the geological and economically
mineable reserves are estimated at around 4 381 million
tonnes of low quality lignite. The Soma basin is the second
largest lignite area in Turkey. Other important deposits are
located in the Tunbilek, Seyitmer, Bursa, an, Mula,
Beypazar, Sivas and Konya Karapnar basins. The quality
of Turkish lignites is generally very poor and only around
6% of the reserves have a heat content of more than
3 000 kcal/kg.
A project to develop existing mineral and geothermal
reserves and to explore new deposits was initiated in
2005. This has explored new lignite deposits in the country
with extensive research and prospecting studies carried
out and more than 200 000 metres of drilling completed
across approximately 30 000 square kilometres from
2005 to 2011. The project is still ongoing and has added
approximately 4 billion tonnes to the total lignite reserves
of Turkey.
In 2012, lignite output totalled 70.0 million tonnes. Almost
90% of Turkeys total lignite production is from opencast
mines. However, there are some underground mining
activities, mainly in the Soma, Tunbilek and Beypazar
basins.
Thirty opencast and nine deep mines are operated by TK,
producing 33.4 million tonnes of saleable lignite in 2011.
EA produced 31.6 million tonnes of saleable lignite for
three power plants. The private sectors lignite production
in 2011 was 6.9 million tonnes and is expected to increase
in the future.

Resources hard coal
Resources lignite
Reserves hard coal
Reserves lignite
Unit
Mt
Mt
Mt
Mt

Mtce
Mt/Mtce
Mt/Mtce

Lignite ash content
kJ/kg
kJ/kg
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
Hard coal imports
2012
1 314
13 900
512
13 442
44.5
2.3/1.7
70.0/22.2
26 000-30 000
8 665
10.0-15.0
11.0-46.0
4.0-14.0
6.0-55.0
0.8-1.0
0.2-5.0
Mt
29.7

Lignite consumption
Mtce
Mtce
Mtce
165.0
29.0
22.3
Power supply
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
MW
MW
239.5
4.4/(1.5)
230.1
32.5
34.7
3 900
8 278
Employment
thousand
thousand
18 500
37 000
The scale of the surface operations allows lignite to be

produced at a relatively low cost, making it competitive
with imported energy resources. Its main market is
lignite-fired power plants which had a total capacity
of 8 278 MW in 2012.
54
Ukraine
Ukraine
Ukraine is well-endowed with energy resources,
especially its 31 800 million tonnes of proven coal
reserves as at the end of 2012, ranking the country
No. 7 in the world. Major coal deposits are located in the
Donetsk, Lviv-Volyn and Dnipro coal basins, as well as
in the Dnipro-Donets and Zakarpattya coal depressions.
The deposits are located in thin seams (0.8-1.0 metres) at
an average depth of around 700 metres. Some mines are
deeper than 1 000 metres.
Donetsk Basin
Kyiv
Lvov Basin
Donetsk
Lviv
Piv
de
nn
yi-
Although coal production declined significantly from

1990 to 1996, it has stabilised since 2000. While Ukraine
is totally self-sufficient in coal, it remains heavily reliant
on natural gas and oil imports. Coal-fired power plants
produced 38.2% of Ukraines total electricity supply in
2011. Ukraines Energy Strategy to 2030, updated in 2013,
envisages increasing the installed capacity of coal-fired
power plants by upgrading existing units and constructing
new ones.
sn
De
Bu
Odessa
Lignite
Hard coal
General data
Unit
2012
As of December 2012, more than 350 legal entities

Population
million
45.6
Hard coal and
Anthracite
Brown coal
operated in the coal, lignite and peat production,
GDP
billion
136.3
Anthracite
processing and agglomeration sectors in Ukraine, of which
approximately 250 produced and processed hard coal.
the government plans to further liberalise the coal market,
There are more than 143 mines in Ukraine. The Ministry of
accelerate restructuring of the coal sector, close unviable
Energy supervises 22 coal production enterprises which
mines and privatise the remaining, more attractive coal
operate 94 mines, including 43 private mines. The eight
mining companies. From 2015 to 2030, the coal industry
largest companies account for approximately 63% of
is expected to invest, steadily grow and reach an output of
domestic coal production.
115 million tonnes.
Coal is sold either under bilateral contract on the free
In 2012, an agreement was signed for a $3.7 billion loan
market or, in the case of some sales from state-owned
from the State Bank of China for projects in Ukraine to
mines, via the wholesale market operator, Ugol Ukrainy.
substitute natural gas with domestic coal and for the
Coal trading will become even more market-based in 2013
construction of coal gasification plants.
as it moves on to the Ukrainian Energy Exchange. By 2016,
55
Ukraine
Hard coal
In 2012, total coal production increased by 4.0% to
65.6 million tonnes. Steam coal production accounted
for 71.1% of total production. Coal consumption also
increased to 74.3 million tonnes, of which 55.5% was
used in power plants.
The increase in coal production in 2012 was achieved after
several years of capital investments in order to modernise
the sector. State financing for the technical modernisation
of mines amounted to UAH 13.2 billion, with state mines
spending UAH 9.9 billion on capital expenditures in 2012,
72% more than in 2011.
State enterprises produced 24.8 million tonnes in 2012,
including 17.7 million tonnes of steam coal and 7.2 million
tonnes of coking coal. The share of state enterprises in
total domestic coal production has been decreasing due
to structural changes in the industry resulting from the
Ukrainian energy privatisation programme and increased
investments by the private sector.
DTEK, the largest private energy company in Ukraine,
produced 39.7 million tonnes of run-of-mine coal, which
accounted for approximately 46.1% of Ukraines total coal
production. DTEK owns, leases or has concession rights
to operate 31 coal mines and 13 coal enrichment plants,
including three mines and one coal enrichment plant in
Russia.
Based on Ukrainian government estimates of coal
reserves, DTEK has production licenses, after reserve
56
reclassifications, new coal discoveries and acquisitions,

covering an estimated 1 699.7 million tonnes of reserves.
DTEKs operating subsidiary DTEK Pavlogradugol is the
largest coal-producing company with an annual output of
approximately 17.0 million tonnes. DTEK Pavlogradugol
operates ten mines and an integrated mining complex,
including transportation and production infrastructure,
located in the Dnipropetrovsk region of Ukraine, with
estimated coal reserves of 652.9 million tonnes and a
production life of 52 years, assuming current production
rates.
DTEKs subsidiary DTEK Mine Komsomolets Donbassa
operates one mine and coal enrichment plant located
in the Donetsk region with estimated coal reserves of
110.9 million tonnes and a production life of 43 years.
In 2011, DTEK entered into two 49-year concession
agreements with the Ministry of Energy and one
49-year lease agreement with the State Property Fund,
pursuant to which the companys subsidiaries, DTEK
Rovenkyanthracite, DTEK Sverdlovanthracite and DTEK
Dobropolyeugol, operate six mines and an integrated
mining complex, including three coal enrichment plants,
located in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions, five mines
and an integrated mining complex, including three coal
enrichment plants, located in the Dolzhano-Rovenetskyi
region and five mines and an integrated mining complex
located in the Donbass region. As at 31 December 2012,
DTEK Rovenkyanthracite, DTEK Sverdlovanthracite and
Ukraine
DTEK Dobropolyeugol have coal reserves of 162.9 million

tonnes, 208.0 million tonnes and 367.8 million tonnes with
average production lives of 33 years, 40 years and 94 years
respectively, assuming current production rates.
In February 2012, DTEK acquired a 95.4% stake in its
subsidiary Bilozerska Mine, which operates one mine in
the Dobropolsky region with estimated coal reserves of
71.6 million tonnes and a production life of 90 years.
Also in 2012, the company acquired three mines located
in the Rostov region of Russia with aggregate reserves
of 125.6 million tonnes and an average production life of
73 years. The three Russian mines are operating through
DTEKs subsidiaries, Obukhovskaya, Don-Anthracite and
Sulinanthracite.
In 2012, DTEK exported 2.8 million tonnes of coal through
its subsidiary, DTEK Trading LLC, primarily to Turkey, India,
Egypt, Russia, the USA and EU member states. The
country as a whole exported 6.1 million tonnes.
Lignite
Ukraine produces only small volumes of lignite less than
200 thousand tonnes each year from the Olexandria and
Mokra Kalyhirka deposits in the Kirovohrad and Cherkasy
regions, near the Dnipro River. However, with estimated
reserves of 2 336 million tonnes, there is great potential
and in 2012 Ukraine and China began a joint project to
exploit lignite for electricity generation in the Kirovohrad
region.

Resources hard coal
Resources lignite
Reserves hard coal
Reserves lignite
Unit
Mt
Mt
Mt
Mt

Mtce (2011)
Mt/Mtce
121.7
65.6/53.5
kJ/kg
% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
20 000
5.0-35.0
5.0-14.0
0.8-4.0

Hard coal imports
Hard coal exports
2012
48 800
5 380
31 800
2 340
Mt
Mt
14.8
6.1

Mtce
Mtce
178.9
63.6
Power supply
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
MW
180.5
9.7
150.7
78.9
27 408
thousand
273.820
Employment
57
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
The United Kingdom is by far the largest oil producer in the
EU, and is also a significant producer of natural gas. It is
one of the largest energy consumers in Europe, third only
to Germany and France.
ss
The country has significant, potentially economic, hard

coal resources estimated at around 3 200 million tonnes.
About 500 million tonnes of reserves are available in
existing deep mines or in shallow deposits capable of
being extracted by surface mining. In addition, currently
inaccessible resources have the potential to provide many
years of future production at present levels. There are also
about 500 million tonnes of lignite resources, mainly in
Northern Ireland, although no lignite is mined at present.
c
Lo
For
th
Glasgow
Tw
eed
Cumberland
coalfield
Norththumberland
coalfield
East Pennine
coalfield
ve
Se
North Staffordshire
coalfield
Oxfordshire
coalfield
Cardiff
Bristol and Somerset
coalfield
General data
Population
Brown coal
GDP
Tre
rn
South Wales
coalfield
Lignite
nt
South Lancashire
coalfield
The UKs primary energy consumption in 2012 was up

2.5% to 294.7 Mtce, with natural gas accounting for the
largest share (36.0%), followed by oil (32.3%), hard coal
(22.5%), nuclear energy (7.7%) and renewables (1.5%).
Power generation in the UK reflects a diverse energy

mix. In 2012, net electricity supplied was 353.5 TWh,
dominated by coal (38.4%), gas (27.7%) and nuclear power
(18.1%). Hydropower and renewables contributed 11.4%,
oil 1.0% and net imports provided 3.4% of electricity
supplied.
coalfield
Fife ccoalfie
Fi
oal
Edinburgh
Cly
de
Ayrsh
Ayrshire
yr h
hir
ire
coalfield
coalfi
field
field
In 2012, the UKs primary energy production fell by 10.5%

to 175.7 Mtce. The largest share of production came from
oil (39.7%), followed by natural gas (33.3%). Hard coal
production represented 12.2%, with nuclear supplying
13.0% and renewables 1.8%.
After spending most of the previous 25 years as a net

exporter of energy, the UK became a net importer in 2004.
The gap between imports and exports has increased since
2004 and in 2011 imports of energy outstripped indigenous
production for the first time. This trend looks set to
continue as North Sea oil and gas reserves deplete.
Ne
Thames
London
Hard coal
Anthracite
Unit
million
Hard coal and
billion
Anthracite
2012
63.3
1 929.6
In March 2013, 5 GW of coal capacity closed to meet

the requirements of the LCPD, having utilised their
20 000 hours allowed under the opt-out derogation. Many
UK generators are actively pursuing biomass conversions
of their coal fleet, encouraged both by green tariffs and
the carbon price support mechanism which placed an
additional levy on coal generation from April 2013.
Hard coal
UK hard coal consumption rose by almost 25% in 2012
due to a combination of low international coal prices, high
natural gas prices and falling CO2 emission allowance
prices.
Coal consumption in 2012 was 64.1 million tonnes,
of which 54.9 million tonnes were used for electricity
generation. Coal consumption by the electricity sector was
58
the highest since 1995. Hard coal consumption in the steel

industry was 5.9 million tonnes.
In 2012, hard coal supply totalled 61.6 million tonnes, with
16.8 million tonnes covered by indigenous production and
44.8 million tonnes by imports. There was a significant
stock reduction of 3.0 million tonnes. Imports supplied
virtually the whole of the coking coal market, as the UK
United Kingdom
no longer produces significant quantities of coal suitable

for use in coke oven. Nevertheless, steel makers in the
UK are using more UK-produced coals by increasing the
PCI capability of their blast furnaces. The UK also exported
0.5 million tonnes of hard coal. Indigenous production was
split between deep mines with 6.1 million tonnes, surface
mines with 10.2 million tonnes and 0.5 million tonnes from
other sources, such as tip washing.

Resources hard coal
Resources lignite
Reserves hard coal
Unit
Mt
Mt
Mt

Mtce
Mt/Mtce
The UKs coal imports rose dramatically in 2012 as

increased demand could only be met from overseas.
Russia, Colombia and the USA are the main sources,
accounting for around 95% of all imports. Supplies from
South Africa dropped to relatively low levels, with no coal
from Indonesia reaching the UK. As the size of the UK
coal market fluctuates markedly, depending on the relative
pricing of international coal and natural gas, along with
carbon allowance prices, imports are expected to remain
the swing component of supply.

kJ/kg

% a.r.
% a.r.
% a.r.
The UKs coal mines are mainly located in central and

northern England, south Wales and central and southern
Scotland where there is the highest concentration of
surface mines. There are three large deep mines remaining
in operation. Two of these are owned by UK COAL MINE
HOLDINGS LIMITED (Kellingley and Thoresby) with
HARGREAVES SERVICES PLC operating Hatfield colliery.
The UK lost two major deep mines in the early part of
2013. Daw Mill mine, the UKs largest, closed as a result of
a massive underground fire. Maltby mine was mothballed
following difficult geological conditions which forced the
abandonment of the production face.
The low international coal price and rising domestic
production costs and a government energy policy which
encourages fuel switching from coal to natural gas has put
pressure on many UK coal producers. Several companies
have been forced either to financially restructure or go
into administration and the final outcome of these events
is still awaited. Meanwhile, all UK producers are reluctant
to invest in long-term production capacity under current
policies.
UK COAL was Britains biggest producer of coal,
accounting for 6.4 million tonnes in 2012. The closure of
Daw Mill colliery, leaving both contractual and restoration
liabilities, resulted in the company entering administration
and its output will reduce in 2013. The second largest UK
producer was SCOTTISH COAL, with an output of around
3 million tonnes annually from six to eight surface mines.
However, the company went into voluntary liquidation in
Hard coal imports
Hard coal exports
Power supply
Employment
Mt
Mt
Mtce
Mt/Mtce
2012
3 200
500
500
175.7
16.8/13.9
22 000-27 000
7.0-18.0
7.0-17.0
0.6-2.8
44.8
0.5
294.7
64.1/55.2
TWh
TWh
TWh
TWh
353.5
12.0
353.5
135.6
MW
27 900
thousand
5 827
April 2013 and whilst HARGREAVES SERVICES has

a contract to continue some mining operations having
already acquired other surface mines in Scotland
the long-term future of the former SCOTTISH COAL
surface mines depends on how restoration liabilities
are assigned. Other important surface mine coal
producers include CELTIC ENERGY, H J BANKS, KIER
MINING,MILLER-ARGENT and HALL CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES. The industrys trade association is the
Confederation of UK Coal Producers, whose member
companies produce over 95% of the UKs coal output.
Total direct employment in the coal mining sector at the
end of 2012 was 5 827 (3 441 at deep mines and 2 386
at surface mines).
59
Other EU Member States and

Energy Community stakeholders
Figure 1
EU-28 Member States and Energy Community stakeholders
Energy Community members
Contracting parties
Finland
Candidate
Norway
Observers
European Union **
Estonia
Sweden
Latvia
Denmark
Lithuania
Ireland
United
Kingdom
Netherlands
Belgium
Poland
Germany
Czech
Republic
Luxembourg
Ukraine
Slovakia
Austria
France
Italy
Moldova
Hungary
Slovenia
Croatia
Romania
Bosnia and Serbia

Herzegovina
Montenegro
Kosovo
Bulgaria
Georgia
FYR of
Macedonia
Portugal
Armenia
Albania
Greece
Turkey
Spain
Malta
Cyprus
Source: Energy Community

** the 16 EU member states shown in bold on the map hold participant status
Earlier chapters have reported on the key coal-producing

countries of the EU and its neighbours. This chapter
examines the other EU member states that all use coal to
a greater or lesser extent. Also included, because of their
alignment towards EU energy policy, are the contracting
parties and observers to the Energy Community.
MAURITANIA
The 2005 treaty establishing the Energy Community
NIGER
MALI
requires contracting parties
to implement important parts
SENEGAL
of the EU acquis on energy markets and the environment.
GAMBIAIt provides for the creation of a single energy market and
BURKINA
a mechanism for the operation
of networks in
the South
NIGERIA
INEA BISSAU GUINEA
BENIN
Austria
SIERRA LEONE
IVORY
COAST
East European region which disintegrated following the

conflicts of the 1990s. In 2011, the contracting parties
agreed to implement the EUs third internal energy package
by January 2015, although parties are not obliged to join the
EU emissions trading scheme.
SAUDI ARABIA
The Energy Community offers opportunities to owners of
coal-fired power plants in South East Europe who will gain
access to what should soon become
the worlds largest YEMEN
ERITREA
CHAD
electricity market. At the same time, plant owners will be
required to make SUDAN
very substantial investments in pollution
DJIBOUTI
control equipment to meet stringent EU emissions
legislation.
GHANA
TOGO
CAMEROON
SOMALIA
CENTRAL AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Austria LIBERIA
has limited primary energy resources and is dependent
EQUATORIAL GUINEA
on energy imports for over
two
thirds
of its primary energy
SAO
TOME
& PRINCIPE
60
GABON
CONGO
ETHIOPIA
supply. Although no longer

exploited, lignite resources total
UGANDA
333 million tonnes, lying mainly in
western Styria near Graz.
KENYA
ZAIRE
RWANDA
BURUNDI
TANZANIA
OM
During the Monarchy, Austrian energy demand was

largely met by coal from Moravia and Silesia, although
coal mining in Austria began during the second half of the
18th century. After each World War, hard coal and lignite
mining in Austria was expanded to replace production lost
elsewhere; lignite output peaked at over 6 million tonnes
in 1963 when hard coal output was 100 thousand tonnes.
However, with the re-opening of borders and resumption
of trade, as well as the general trend towards greater
oil and natural gas use and the development of hydro
power, Austrias underground hard coal mines became
less competitive and were closed during the 1960s.
By 1991, lignite production had fallen to 2 million tonnes,
this being a rather small component of energy supply.
After more than two centuries of mining activity, Austrian
coal production definitively ended in 2006 with the
recultivation of Oberdorf lignite mine.
Today, the steel industry and the power industry each

consume around 2 million tonnes per year of mainly
Czech, Polish, US and Russian coal. The integrated steel
works operated by VOESTALPINE AG at Linz has an
annual crude steel production capacity of 6 million tonnes.
At the 757 MW Drnrohr power plant in Lower Austria,
one unit is owned by VERBUND and the other by EVN.
Small quantities of hard coal are consumed by the cement
and paper industries.
In 2011, EVN and AE&E installed a CO2 capture pilot plant
at Drnrohr. The clean CO2 is sold to the industrial gas
industry and is also used in innovative CO2 conversion
processes that are at the experimental stage.
Baltic States
The neighbouring states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania
lie between the Baltic Sea and Russia. In 2004, these
former Soviet states joined the EU and, in 2011, Estonia
joined the euro area. To their south, the Russian enclave
of Kaliningrad Oblast borders Lithuania and Poland.
Whilst no coal is produced in the Baltic States, all three
countries consume modest volumes of imported coal,
mainly from Russia. More significantly, Estonia, Latvia and
Lithuania offer alternative transit routes for Russian coal
exporters, since ice can hinder exports from Russias Baltic
ports at Vyborg, St. Petersburg and Ust-Luga.
Some Russian coal is shipped through Tallinn port in
Estonia. Latvias major ports Riga, Ventspils and Liepja
are likely to grow in importance with a planned high-speed
upgrade to the 922-km rail link between Moscow and Riga.
Lithuanian ports, notably Klaipda, can also ship Russian
coal, although none was handled in 2012. However, Klaipda
State Seaport is strategically important, because it is the
northernmost ice-free port on the eastern coast of the Baltic
Sea and has good infrastructure links to Russia.
The Kaliningrad enclave is dependent on imported fuel and
power from Russia, although power is also locally produced
from hydro, gas and wind. In February 2012, construction
work began at a new 2 400 MW nuclear power plant
(NPP), but was stopped in June 2013 because of financing,
offtake and political problems. When operational, the Baltic
NPP would be able to export electricity to the EU. However,
the intention is to desynchronise the Baltic States from the
Russian IPS/UPS network, leaving Kaliningrad isolated unless
DC links are built or the enclave joins the ENTSO system.
The closure of Ignalina NPP in Lithuania at the end of

2009 left a power vacuum in the Baltic region. This could
have been filled by the proposed Visaginas NPP, but a
consultative referendum in October 2012 saw Lithuanians
vote against this project. Meanwhile, the first unit at the
2 400 MW Astravyets NPP is also under construction in
Belarus. If all NPP projects move to completion, the region
will become a significant exporter of electricity.
For its energy supply, Estonia is uniquely dependent on
indigenous oil shale. Large quantities are used to generate
competitively priced electricity at thermal power plants
where it is used in much the same way as coal either
as a pulverised fuel in older boilers or in new circulating
fluidised beds (CFBs).
Oil shale is a sedimentary rock containing up to 50%
organic matter Estonian oil shale extracted from the
Baltic kukersite basin has a heating value of 8-11 MJ/kg
and 1.5-1.8% sulphur content. Once extracted from the
ground, the rock can be either used directly as a fuel
in power plants or processed into petroleum products.
EESTI ENERGIA and privately owned VKG and KIVILI
KEEMIATSTUS process oil shale into mainly heavy
fractions such as bunker fuel. EESTI ENERGIAs new
Enerfit280 plant produced its first oil in December 2012
and the private companies also have new projects;
when fully operational, these will increase Estonias oil
production capacity from the current 20 000 bbl/day.
Looking ahead, Estonia is exploring whether to build a
refinery to produce lighter transport fuels from shale oil.
61
Although oil shale deposits are found in fourteen EU

member states, only Estonia has any exploitation
experience. Its oil shale industry is the most developed
in the world, and accounts for 4% of Estonian GDP and
about 1% of national employment (over 7 700 people).
In 2012, 18.8 million tonnes of oil shale were mined from
reserves that total 1-2 billion tonnes. The VKG Ojamaa oil
shale mine was opened in February 2013, the first new
mine in 40 years, whilst EESTI ENERGIA plans to open a
new underground mine at Uus-Kivili, having closed the
exhausted Viru mine in June 2013, and is developing large
integrated projects in Jordan and Utah, USA.
Russian seaborne Baltic coal trade (including coke), 2012

Port (north to south)
million tonnes
Vyborg (Vysotsk), Russia
3.30
St. Petersburg, Russia
0.00
Ust-Luga, Russia
15.72
Tallinn (Muuga), Estonia
0.04
Riga, Latvia
14.90
Ventspils, Latvia
7.87
Liepja, Latvia
0.28
Klaipda, Lithuania
0.00
Kaliningrad, Russia
0.14
Source: Klaipda State Seaport Authority
In 2012, Estonia generated 85% of its electricity supply

from oil shale, a share that is expected to decrease in the
future in line with government policy. Almost 80% of oil
shale production is used for electricity generation, notably
at the EESTI ENERGIA Narva energy complex, comprising
the 1 615 MW Eesti power plant and the 765 MW Balti
power plant which also supplies heat to the town of Narva.
In January 2011, a contract to add two 300 MW units was
signed with ALSTOM; completion of the first unit of the
Figure 2
Room and pillar oil shale mine in north-east Estonia
EESTI ENERGIA operates one underground and one opencast

mine as well as a rail transport division
Auvere power plant is scheduled for 2015. State-owned

EESTI ENERGIA has enough generation capacity to cover
all of Estonias electricity needs, helping to ensure the
countrys energy security.
The Estonian electricity market became fully liberalised in
January 2013. Electricity is traded with other Baltic States
and with the Nordic power market via the 350 MW HVDC
Estlink 1 undersea cable to Finland. The 650 MW Estlink 2
is being laid and will open in 2014. By 2016, the NordBalt
project linking Lithuania and Sweden will further strengthen
the Baltic Ring that connects the electricity grids and
markets of the Baltic and Nordic States, bringing greater
competition and opportunities for the most efficient power
producers.
The environmental issues associated with oil shale
exploitation are complex. With 45% incombustibles, ash
can occupy 25% more volume than the original shale which
does not collapse when burnt. Under the accession treaty
agreed when Estonia joined the EU in 2004, oil shale has
certain temporary derogations. To meet EU directives on
emissions to air, all old pulverised-fuel boilers must be
closed or upgraded by the end of 2015. Balti 11 and Eesti 8
have already been repowered with CFB boilers and a further
four units have been fitted with ALSTOMs novel integrated
desulphurisation, supplemented with lime injection.
Belgium
In the 19th century, the Walloon coal mines of southern
Belgium made a major contribution to the industrial
expansion of the country. Coal mining started in the
north-east of the country in 1917, around Limburg
where the geological conditions were favourable.
Between 1952 and 1953, national coal production
peaked at 30 million tonnes and was maintained at this
level until the late 1950s, after which output gradually
declined as the Walloon mines closed. Closure of
62
the Limburg mines followed twenty years later, with

Belgiums last colliery at Heusden-Zolder ceasing
production in 1992. Although not currently economic
to exploit, remaining hard coal resources are estimated
to be 4 100 million tonnes.
Imported coal remains an important energy source
for the steel industry and for power generation.
Consumption of imported coal in 2012 totalled
3.5 million tonnes, coming mainly from the USA, Australia

and Russia (more coal is imported into Antwerp for
onward delivery to customers in other EU countries).
Coal provides 5% of Belgiums primary energy supply.
Power generation in 2012 totalled 77.3 TWh: 52%
from nuclear power stations, 27% from gas-fired
power plants and 7.1% from coal-fired plants E.ON
Langerlo (556 MW) and ELECTRABEL Ruien (290 MW)
which finally closed at the end of August 2013. Other
coal-fired plants consumed biomass. Renewables grew
to 12%. Belgiums largest power utility, ELECTRABEL
a subsidiary of GDF SUEZ, has further investments

in coal-fired power plants in the Netherlands.
Coal imports are expected to decline with the
closure of DUFERCOs Carsid blast furnace in 2013
ARCELORMITTAL announced the permanent closure of
its last blast furnaces at Lige back in 2011. Whilst the
Belgian steel industry will continue to consume smaller
volumes of coal, a highly political situation developed
in 2013 with the fall in global steel demand and
competition from Chinese steel exports leading to the
potential for further job losses at ARCELORMITTAL.
Cyprus
Cyprus imported 13 thousand tonnes of hard coal in
2012 for use mainly in the cement industry. With the
memorandum of understanding signed by Cyprus,
Greece and Israel in August 2013 and its new offshore gas
exploration, Cyprus is set to become a link between Europe
and Asia for electricity transmission and gas supply.
Denmark
With the rise in oil and gas production from the North Sea,
Denmark became energy self-sufficient in 1999 and is today
the only EU member state producing more energy than it
consumes. The country is the third largest oil producer in
Western Europe, after Norway and the UK. However, oil and
gas production are in decline. Gas production in 2012 was
5.6 billion cubic metres less than half of its 2005 peak
placing Denmark in fourth place behind the largest North
Sea producers: Norway (115 bcm), the Netherlands
(64 bcm) and the UK (41 bcm).
Danish energy production has changed significantly as a
result of political efforts to promote the use of renewable
energy, combined heat and power (CHP) and energy
efficiency. The Energy Strategy 2050, published in 2011,
aims at 100% renewable sources in the energy and
transport sectors by 2050. It was given a boost in March
2012 when broad political support was reached on a new
Energy Agreement which outlines how renewables will be
subsidised to 2020. In 2012, renewable energy (excluding
renewable electricity imports) accounted for 27% of total
energy consumption, mainly from biofuels and waste, but
also from a steadily growing wind capacity which provided
34% of electricity generation.
The relatively high use of wind for electricity generation
enhances supply security, but also poses balancing
challenges. As a part of the integrated Nordic electricity
market, Denmarks coal-fired generation plays an important
role in balancing not only wind power, but also hydro
power from Norway and Sweden which depends on annual
precipitation. High reservoir levels at the beginning of 2012

were the result of record inflows in 2011 and Denmark
electricity imports soared such that its domestic electricity
generation fell by 23% between 2010 and 2012.
In 2012, 35% of Danish electricity generation came from
coal-fired power plants at Amager (319 MW), Asns
(1 057 MW), Avedre (810 MW), Ensted (626 MW), Esbjerg
(378 MW), Fyn (409 MW), Nordjylland (660 MW), Randers
(52 MW), Stigsns (409 MW) and Studstrup (700 MW),
having a total capacity of 5.4 GW. With the exception of
Randers, the plants are owned by DONG ENERGY and
VATTENFALL, both majority state-owned. Some co-fire coal
with biomass and many are CHP plants with connections
to district heating systems, including Nordjyllandsvrket 3
which is one of the worlds most efficient coal-fired power
plants. Its supercritical boilers and steam turbines result
in a very high electrical generation efficiency of 47% and,
with the supply of heat, the overall efficiency can exceed
95%. Under the Energy Agreement, some of the larger
coal-fired CHP plants will be converted to fire 100%
biomass, mainly wood pellets.
Denmark has no indigenous coal resources. In 2012, the
country imported 3.9 million tonnes of coal, mainly from
Colombia, Russia and South Africa. Over 95% of this
coal is used for electricity and heat generation, including
district heating. Having peaked in 1984 at 96%, the share
of electricity produced from coal has fallen and the Danish
government expects this decrease to continue: to 27% in
2020 and 15% in 2030.
63
Finland
Finland is very dependent on foreign energy supplies, as
the country lacks its own oil, natural gas or coal reserves.
Around half of the energy consumed in Finland is imported.
This fact has dictated and will continue to dictate Finlands
energy policy: the energy mix must be as diversified as
possible. One third of electricity production is from nuclear
plants and Finlands fifth nuclear reactor, a 1 600 MW EPR,
is under construction at Olkiluoto, with more reactors
planned. Around 4 million tonnes of locally produced peat
are consumed each year for its energy value. Peat is used
at dedicated district heating plants and at combined heat
and power (CHP) plants, the latter accounting for 6% of
total electricity supply in 2012.
Finland is one of the worlds leaders in renewable energy,
especially bio-energy. Renewable energy meets over one
quarter of Finlands total energy consumption and accounted
for 40% of its power generation in 2012. Nevertheless,
coal and natural gas are the main fuels for CHP plants in
Finland. For conventional thermal power generation, coal
is the leading source of energy. In 2012, the share of coal
in electricity production was 11% (70 TWh total) and 25%
in district heating (58 TWh total). The efficiency of heat and
power production in Finland is very high compared with
most other countries. Approximately one third of electricity
is produced at CHP plants which operate with overall
efficiencies of 80% to 90%. These plants are used widely
by industry and for district heating and cooling.
Annual coal consumption in Finland is fairly stable at about

6 million tonnes: 5 million tonnes of steam coal for energy
production and 1 million tonnes of coking coal for the steel
industry. Smaller quantities of coal are used by the cement
industry. All coal is imported, steam coal mainly from
Russia and coking coal from North America and Australia.
The EUs role in domestic energy policy has increased in
recent years. The core framework for Finnish energy policy
comes from the Unions energy and climate policy, notably
the 20-20-20 targets. Finland must implement integrated
energy and climate policy measures, in particular energy
efficiency and energy savings measures, and increase the
share of renewable energy to 38% by 2020, which is fairly
challenging.
In the future, energy sources for electricity production
should continue to be diversified and versatile, thanks to
the flexibility and variety of CHP plants. As well as the
increased share of renewable energy, the objectives of
the national energy and climate strategy are to maintain
the position of peat as an indigenous energy resource,
but to diminish the share of fossil fuels, in particular coal.
Therefore, the construction of new coal-fired capacity is
very unlikely, except where coal is co-fired with biomass
or used in multi-fuel boilers.
France
Hard coal mining in France ended in April 2004 with the
closure of the last operational mine, La Houve in the Lorraine
region. The state-owned coal company Charbonnages de
France ceased its activities at the end of 2007. Today, all coal
is imported, with the exception of small quantities recovered
from spoil tips in Northern France and slurry ponds in
Lorraine an estimated 100 thousand tonnes in 2012.
The Service de lobservation et des statistiques reports

that gross power generation in France was 561 TWh in
2012, with 75.8% of this total generated at nuclear power
plants. Thermal electricity production contributed 9.6%,
hydro 11.2%, wind 2.7% and solar PV 0.7%. Coal-fired
generation accounted for 3.3% of the total, while the
share of renewables reached 14.6%.
Coal resources in France are estimated by the French

geological survey (BRGM) to be 425 million tonnes of
hard coal plus an additional 300 million tonnes of lignite.
Despite various proposals, there has been, to date, no
successful project to revive coal mining in France.
Coal consumption amounted to 15.9 million tonnes in 2012

of which 7.1 million tonnes was consumed at power plants.
The largest plants are located at Le Havre (1 450 MW) and
Cordemais (1 200 MW), both owned by EDF adjacent to
ports, and Emile-Huchet (1 045 MW) owned by E.ON in
Lorraine. In compliance with the Large Combustion Plants
Directive (LCPD), two of Le Havres three units will close
by 2014. The remaining unit 4 is expected to operate until
2035 and, with a view to the future, EDF commissioned
a pilot-scale CO2 capture plant at Le Havre in 2012. The
company owns four smaller coal-fired plants: Blnod
(500 MW), Bouchain (250 MW) and La Maxe (500 MW)
In 2012, coal imports amounted to 17.0 million tonnes,

including one million tonnes of coking coal. The main coal
suppliers were the USA (24%), Australia (20%), Colombia
(19%), Russia (15%) and South Africa (11%). Coal is
delivered through the ports of Dunkerque, Le Havre, Rouen,
Montoir and Fos-sur-Mer, as well as via the ARA ports.
64
which it plans to close by 2015. Similarly, E.ON plans to

close the four oldest units at its French coal-fired power
plants (235 MW Hornaing 3, 245 MW Lucy 3 and Emile
Huchet 4 and 5) between 2013 and 2015, as required by
the LCPD, while the 230 MW Provence 4 will be converted
to biomass, leaving the 595 MW unit 5 on coal.
coking and steam coal in 2012. ARCELORMITTAL

plants at Dunkerque, Florange and Fos-sur-M er are
the biggest coal consumers in this sector. However,
the company created a political controversy in 2013
when it announced the closure of Florange because of
sluggish demand in the major steel consuming sectors
(construction and automotive).
The French steel industry consumes important but

declining volumes of coal 5.6 million tonnes of
Georgia
Lying in the Caucasus region between Europe and Asia,
Georgia has proven hard coal reserves of 201 million
tonnes plus resources of 700 million tonnes in the
Tkibuli-Shaori and Tkvarcheli deposits. The Akhaltsikhe
lignite deposit near Vale has reserves of 76 million tonnes.
These deposits supported a major coal industry during
the 1950s to 1970s supplying power stations at Rustavi,
Kutaisi, Tkvarcheli and Gardabani, the metallurgical industry
(Rustavi iron and steel works and Zestafoni ferroalloys
works) and residential customers. Production peaked at
3 million tonnes in 1958. By 2000, coal production had
collapsed to almost zero. Today, following the Rose
Revolution of 2003 and conflict with Russia in 2008,
the coal industry is being revitalised.
In 2011, 77% of Georgias electricity production of
10.2 TWh came from hydro plants. The balance was
produced at gas-fired plants, using imported gas from
Russia. Greater political stability has seen new investment
in hydro plants and electricity transmission, including the

commissioning of a 700 MW DC link with Turkey in 2013
part of the bigger power bridge project with Azerbaijan
which will facilitate electricity exports to the EU.
Today, the Dzidziguri and Mindeli underground coal mines
(up to 1 200 m deep) are operated by SAQNAKHSHIRI
(GIG Group) LLC in the Tkibuli-Shaori coalfield, supplying
cement works at Kaspi and Rustavi and the ferroalloy
industry. The company produced 258 thousand tonnes
of coal in 2012 and employed 1 600 workers. In the
breakaway republic of Abkhazia, TAMSASH produces
coking coal from an opencast mine in the Tkvarcheli
coalfield. Although no coal is used for electricity
production, there is some political support for a
new 300 MW coal-fired power plant at Tkibuli and a
160 MW lignite-fired plant at Gardabani, both promoted
by GEORGIAN INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CORP.
Ireland
The Republic of Ireland has no indigenous coal production,
although 1.5 million tonnes of peat were extracted in 2012
for energy use. Coal imports totalled 2.2 million tonnes in
2012, mainly from Colombia, but with small volumes from
Poland and the USA. Coal and peat have taken a declining
share of the Irish industrial and residential markets, but
together still accounted for 20% of primary energy supply
in 2012 used mainly for power generation.
to security of supply through the use of indigenous fuels.

However, this support will expire over the coming years:
2015 in the case of Edenderry power plant and 2019 in
the case of West Offaly and Lough Ree. In addition, the
government has set biomass dilution targets for peat
used as a fuel. Taken together, these developments will
further reduce the demand for peat. In 2012, 10% of Irish
electricity was generated at peat-fired power plants.
BORD NA MNA is the leading peat producer and

distributes solid fuel products within the residential
heating market in Ireland. The companys peat briquettes
are popular due to their low sulphur emissions and
competitive price.
The main user of coal is the 915 MW coal-fired power

plant at Moneypoint. Commissioned in 1987, it is owned
and operated by the ELECTRICITY SUPPLY BOARD (ESB)
which recently invested 368 million in pollution control
equipment to meet EU regulations on NOX and SOX.
In 2012, the plant met 20% of the countrys electricity
demand and consumed an estimated 1.9 million tonnes
of coal.
Since 2001, peat-fired electricity plants have been

supported by a public service obligation as they contribute
65
In 2012, Ireland imported 92% of its natural gas needs.

Given that 50% of the countrys electricity generation is
gas-fired, this points to a high security of supply risk since
all imports must flow through a single transit point at
Moffat in Scotland. According to a government White Paper
Delivering a Sustainable Energy Future for Ireland which

outlines an energy policy framework for 2007-2020, the
increased market penetration of renewable energy sources
in the electricity, heat and transport sectors will displace
fossil fuels and improve energy security.
Italy
The only coal reserves and resources in Italy are located
in the Sulcis Iglesiente basin, in south-west Sardinia,
estimated to be 610 million tonnes. Mining activities were
stopped there in 1972, but restarted in 1997 with many
environmental improvements. Currently, CARBOSULCIS,
owned by the Autonomous Government of Sardinia, is
struggling to survive and production fell in 2012 to an
estimated 80 thousand tonnes.
Imported coal plays a small but growing role in the Italian
energy sector. In 2012, 9.8% of Italys primary energy
supply was provided by coal, 90% of which was consumed
for power generation. It is expected that the share of coal
in electricity production will continue to grow from the 16%
share in 2012. Following a heavily subsidised investment
boom in wind and solar PV, new renewables accounted for
a 16% share in 2012. Hydro produced 14%.
With a share of 46%, Italy is one of the most dependant
countries in the EU on natural gas for electricity production.
Moreover, it has an overall energy import dependence of
over 80% far exceeding the EU average of 54%. This
situation, which makes Italy heavily dependent on Algerian
and Russian gas imports, will continue in the years to
come and will have a significant impact on Italys security
of energy supply and electricity costs. It is therefore
perhaps not surprising that in 2012 Italys energy bill hit
a new record of 65 billion or 4.2% of GDP, compared
to an average figure of 1.5% during the 1990s. High
electricity costs are having a negative impact on industrial
competitiveness: in 2012, Italian industry paid 23.29
c/kWh compared with an EU average of 14.66 c/kWh.
Only Denmark with its expensive wind energy and Cyprus
with its dependence on fuel oil for power generation have
higher electricity rates than Italy.
In a decisive June 2011 referendum, Italian voters rejected
government proposals to restart a nuclear programme that
was abandoned following an earlier referendum held after
the 1986 Chernobyl disaster. The government responded
with the National Energy Strategy. Approved in March 2013,
the strategy places great emphasis on renewable energy
sources and the greater use of natural gas for power
generation both of which would further increase the
cost of electricity in Italy.
66
In 2012, Italy imported 19.8 million tonnes of steam coal

and 4.6 million tonnes of coking coal. Since the year
2000, steam coal imports have grown by over 4% per
annum. The main supply countries are the USA, Indonesia,
South Africa, Colombia and Australia. ENEL has a 10%
shareholding in PT BAYAN RESOURCES of Indonesia
which produced 16.3 million tonnes of coal in 2012. Italy
has thirteen coal-fired power plants with a total capacity
of 11.2 GW. Of these, nine are built with the very latest
technologies, reaching an average 39% efficiency 46%
in the case of ENELs Torrevaldaliga Nord which went
into full operation in 2011 following its conversion from
oil-firing. With more conversions planned, steam coal
imports should reach 25-26 million tonnes over the coming
years.
A key new project is ENELs 1 980 MW oil-to-coal
conversion at the Porto Tolle power plant on the Adriatic
coast. It will have an efficiency of 45% halving CO2
emissions and use new clean coal technologies to
reduce sulphur dioxide, NOX and dust emissions by 70%
to 80%. The company has well-developed plans to capture
and store the CO2 from one of the plants three units in
an offshore saline aquifer. Porto Tolles authorisation has
suffered legal delays, but the conversion can go ahead
as soon as permission is granted. In addition, TIRRENO
POWER has been granted authorisation to build a new
460 MW coal-fired unit at the Vado Ligure power plant
in the province of Savona. This unit will also have a very
high efficiency of 47%. Other coal-fired projects that have
been submitted for permitting include Saline Joniche,
a 1 320 MW coal/biomass-fired plant proposed by SEI in
the province of Calabria.
Recent years have seen significant developments in
CCS technologies in Italy at various scales, from pilot
to demonstration. At the 2 640 MW Federico II power
plant near Brindisi, a 50 MW pilot plant was inaugurated
in March 2011 and other R&D projects, such as an
oxy-combustion experimental plant at Gioia del Colle, are
adding to the knowledge base. Separately, coal gasification
at the proposed Sulcis power plant could offer another
route for CO2 capture.
Luxembourg
In 1952, when its prosperity was based on steelmaking,
the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was chosen as the site of
the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), marking
the start of the institutional development that led to the
European Union.
Luxembourg is almost entirely dependent on imports for its
energy needs. At 97%, it has an energy import dependence
second only to Malta among the EU member states. Hence,
the government aims to develop the national potential
for energy production and conversion. For example, the
gas-fired Twinerg CCGT power plant at Esch-sur-Alzette has
increased the countrys electricity production since it opened

in 2002, but at the expense of a sharp rise in CO2 emissions.
The country has the highest CO2 emissions per capita of all
the OECD countries (20 tCO2/capita).
The steel industrys conversion to electric-arc furnaces
(ARCELORMITTAL steel works at Belval, Differdange and
Schifflange) has practically eliminated Luxembourgs coal
use. Coal is used today mainly for the production of cement
at the CIMALUX Rumelange plant. All coal is imported
82 thousand tonnes in 2012 and makes only a small
contribution to the countrys primary energy supply.
Malta
Malta has no indigenous energy production and reports no
coal consumption. Until 1995, coal was imported for power
generation. Today, the Delimara and Marsa power stations,
with a combined capacity of 571 MW, burn imported fuel
oil in steam boilers/turbines and diesel engines, as well as
distillate fuel in gas turbines. In 2013, the utility company
ENEMALTA announced a competitive bidding process to
build a LNG terminal to import fuel for a new 200 MW
gas-fired CCGT, as well as refuelling some existing plants.
An alternative proposal for Delimara comes from SARGAS

AS: a new 360 MW power plant with a fluidised-bed boiler
burning bio-paste (coal and biomass). Around 95% of the
plants CO2 emissions 0.7 million tonnes per annum
would be captured using a post-combustion process. CO2
could be transported by ship for enhanced oil recovery or
urea production.
Moldova
The Republic of Moldova does not produce coal or
lignite. It imports small quantities of hard coal for use
by industry and in heating plants 155 thousand tonnes
was consumed in 2012. The 2 520 MW Kuchurgan power
station, in the breakaway region of Transnistria on the
Ukrainian border, can be fuelled by coal (8 units) and
natural gas or fuel oil (2 units). In 1990, over 4 million
tonnes of coal were consumed there, but since the late
1990s the station has used virtually no coal. Although

the Moldovan electricity grid is synchronised with
Russias (IPS/UPS), some units at Kuchurgan could be
synchronised with Continental Europe to allow exports of
electricity via Romania. Owned by CJSC MOLDAVSKAYA
GRES, a subsidiary of INTER RAO UES, the plant is in
need of refurbishment.
The Netherlands
Hard coal mining dominated the South Limburg area of the
Netherlands from the early 1900s to the mid-1970s. The
coalfield, located in the south of the country close to the
German and Belgian borders, was mainly exploited from
underground mines.
Since around 1915, lignite was extracted at opencast
mines near the towns of Eygelshoven and Hoensbroek.
These deposits were located on the north-west fringe of
the large German lignite basin to the west of Cologne.
Lignite mining ceased in 1968 with the closure of the

Carisborg site.
The Netherlands is home to the main trans-loading ports
for coal imports into Europe. Rotterdam and Amsterdam
ports, along with Antwerp in Belgium, constitute the ARA
trading area the most important for imported coking coal
and steam coal in north-west Europe.
Just over 10% of the Netherlands primary energy demand
is met by coal. In 2012, the country imported 12.4 million
67
tonnes, comprising 9 million tonnes of steam coal,

2.5 million tonnes of coking coal and 1 million tonnes
of PCI coal. The main supplier countries were Colombia,
the USA and Russia.
Most imported coal is used for coal-fired power
generation. Coal had a 27% share of the Dutch power
generation market, which totalled 102 TWh in 2012,
and a smaller share of the heat supply market. Large
coal-fired plants are located at Geertruidenberg (Amer
1 245 MW), Borssele (426 MW), Nijmegen (Gelderland
635 MW), Amsterdam (Hemweg 630 MW) and Rotterdam
(Maasvlakte 1 040 MW). All these plants co-fire coal
with biomass, to a greater or lesser extent. Ownership
is very diverse, with ESSENT (a subsidiary of RWE),
ELECTRABEL (a subsidiary of GDF-SUEZ), E.ON, EPZ
and NUON (a subsidiary of VATTENFALL) being the major
players in coal-fired generation. The 253 MW Buggenum
plant one of the worlds few integrated coal gasification
combined cycle (IGCC) plants was closed in 2013 by its
owner NUON.
TATA STEEL owns the IJmuiden integrated steel works
which has a steel production capacity of 7.6 million
tonnes and consumes most of the coking and PCI coal
imported by the Netherlands. A pilot project at IJmuiden
to demonstrate a new iron-making process, called

Hisarna, aims to reduce CO2 emissions from steelmaking.
In the power sector, the Netherlands has a progressive
policy on coal and the government has supported
CCS demonstration projects. As a result, three large
ultra-supercritical coal-fired power plants are now
being built. In the north, at Eemsmond near Groningen,
RWE/ESSENTs 1 600 MW coal- and biomass-fired
Eemshaven power plant is under construction with
commissioning scheduled for 2014. A planned CCS
project at Eemshaven was submitted, through the Dutch
authorities, for EU funding from the New Entrants Reserve
300 under the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. However, like
many other CCS projects in the EU, progress has stalled.
In the Rotterdam area, two new coal-fired power plants
are under construction and will be commissioned in
2013/2014: ELECTRABELs Maasvlakte plant (800 MW)
and E.ONs MPP3 (1 100 MW). Both include preparatory
work for CCS. Trials of CO2 storage in North Sea oil and
gas fields will be undertaken as part of the ROAD project
(Rotterdam Opslag en Afvang Demonstratieproject) whilst
the CINTRA consortium has proposed a CO2 hub with ship
transport of CO2 to offshore operations for enhanced oil
recovery.
Norway
Norway, Europes northernmost country, opted to stay
out of the EU by referendum in 1994, but is a significant
supplier to the EU of coal, oil and natural gas. In 2011,
27% of EU gas imports came from Norway, the worlds
second largest gas exporter after Russia. In April 2010,
Norway and Russia signed an historic agreement dividing
the Barents Sea and defining maritime boundaries that
clear the way for future oil and gas exploitation.
In 2012, Norway consumed 796 thousand tonnes of mainly
imported coal and imported 0.4 million tonnes of coke for
use in the metallurgical industry, chemicals production and
cement manufacture.
Coal mining on Spitsbergen, the largest and only
permanently populated island of the Svalbard archipelago,
serves multiple government goals, not all related to
energy. Without continued peaceful economic activity
on Spitsbergen, Norwegian sovereignty might be
weakened by foreign economic activity since the Svalbard
Treaty of 1920 grants rights to all 39 signatories. To this
end, the state-owned STORE NORSKE SPITSBERGEN
KULKOMPANI (SNSK) operates the most northerly coal
68
mines in the world with 300 employees: the Svea Nord

longwall mine and the Gruve 7 room-and-pillar operation.
Annual production over the last decade has averaged
2.4 million tonnes, but reserves are close to exhaustion at
Svea Nord and production fell to 1.2 million tonnes in 2012.
Coal is sold on the international market with Germany
being the largest customer; however, SNSK cannot
provide a year-round supply of coal because the sea port
at Sveagruva is frozen for much of the year. Spitsbergens
10 MW coal-fired combined heat and power plant takes
coal from Gruve 7.
At the end of 2011, SNSK gained approvals from the
Norwegian government to open a new longwall mine
at Lunckefjell. The mine boasts probable reserves of
bituminous coal totalling 8.4 million tonnes, 60% of which
is expected to be suitable for metallurgical purposes
(PCI). Construction began in March 2012 and first output
is scheduled for 2015 by which time production from
Svea Nord will have ceased, although its coal transport
infrastructure will serve Lunckefjell mine until production
ends there in 2019.
SNSK and its subsidiaries have located coal and mineral

deposits in large parts of Svalbard. Its concessions not
in operation are held in reserve for future operations.
Under the companys long-term plan to 2028, annual
coal production will be between 1.5 and 2 million tonnes.
Political guidance for SNSKs operations is laid down
in a government White Paper (No. 22 to the Storting,
2008-2009), establishing that SNSK and its coal
mining operations are and will remain important for
maintaining a Norwegian community in Longyearbyen
on Spitsbergen.
Despite generating 97% of its electricity needs from

hydro sources in 2012, Norways per capita CO2 emissions
at 8 tCO2/capita are no lower than the EU average. The
government is also conscious that end-use emissions from
the countrys exports of oil and gas are very substantial. In
response, Norway has been a pioneer in the field of carbon
capture and storage: at the Sleipner natural gas field and
at the Snhvit LNG project. The CO2 Technology Centre
Mongstad was inaugurated in May 2012 to develop CO2
capture technologies for both gas- and coal-fired power
plants. Since 2007 at Longyearbyen, the UNIS CO2 Lab has
drilled a series of test wells and injected water to prove the
CO2 storage potential of Svalbards deep saline aquifers.
Portugal
Portugal has limited indigenous energy resources, leading
to 78% energy import dependence in 2012. Its last coal
mine, Germunde in the Castelo de Paiva region, was
closed in 1994, leaving behind reserves of 3 million
tonnes. The country also has some lignite deposits:
reserves and resources total 66 million tonnes.
In 2012, 42% of Portugals electricity production came
from renewable energy sources: wind, hydro, solar PV,
geothermal and wave. Nevertheless, coal-fired electricity
generation remains crucial to cover those periods when
wind and solar are not available and to balance the annual
variation in hydro electricity production on the Iberian
Peninsula. Imported coal accounted for 13% of total
primary energy supply in 2012 with 5.2 million tonnes
coming mainly from Colombia and the USA, but also from
South Africa. This is almost entirely consumed at Portugals
two coal-fired power plants located at Sines (1 180 MW)
and Pego (628 MW) which together produced 29% of the
countrys electricity in 2012. Both are fitted with flue gas
desulphurisation (FGD) and selective catalytic reduction
(SCR) for SOX and NOX control.
Sines power plant, adjacent to a coal import terminal on

the Atlantic coast, was built in the late 1980s and is owned
by ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL (EDP). The inland Pego
power plant which was fully commissioned in 1995 is
owned by INTERNATIONAL POWER PLC, a subsidiary of
GDF-SUEZ, and ENDESA GENERACIN SA, a subsidiary
of ENEL. The National Laboratory on Energy and Geology
(LNEG) has completed a project (KTEJO) to examine the
feasibility of retrofitting CCS at Pego power plant. Although
there are currently no plans for new coal-fired power
plants in Portugal, both coal and gas have been proposed
as fuels for a possible new 800 MW plant at Sines.
By 2020, Portugal intends to be generating 60% of its
electricity from renewable resources, in order to satisfy
31% of its final energy consumption. Although Portugal
has this aggressive target, it is also facing severe austerity
measures which mean that the government has had to
scale back the support offered for renewable energy and
revise capacity payments.
South East Europe

The countries of South East Europe not covered in earlier
chapters include Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia,
Kosovo, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and
Montenegro.
Albania produces very small volumes of lignite and

imports further volumes to meet demand totalling
an estimated 300 thousand tonnes at industrial and
residential customers, who use the fuel for heating
purposes, and at the Antea cement works which opened
in 2010. The country produces all of its electricity at hydro
plants. With reserves of 522 million tonnes and a further

205 million tonnes of resources, the country has the
potential to support a much larger lignite mining industry.
During the 1980s, annual production of around 2.4 million
tonnes came from mines in central Albania near Valias,
Manz and Krrab; at Mborje and Drenov in the Kor
district; in northern Tepelen at Memaliaj and in Alarup
to the south of Lake Ohrid.
69
In Bosnia and Herzegovina, brown coal and

lignite make a large contribution to primary energy
supply (67% in 2011), consumed mainly at power plants
near to mines. In 2012, the country produced a total of
6.3 million tonnes of lignite and a further 6.3 million tonnes
of sub-bituminous brown coal. Of this total, roughly two
thirds were from underground mines and one third from
opencast mines some being subsidiaries of the major
electricity utilities. The country also imported 1.2 million
tonnes of hard coal in 2012. At 1 272 million tonnes,
Bosnias reserves of lignite are substantial and further
resources of 1 801 million tonnes are reported. Brown
coal reserves total 827 million tonnes.
The largest coal deposits are located in the north-east of
the country around Tuzla in the Kreka-Banovii coal basin.
These are worked by KREKA at the Sikulje and Dubrave
opencast lignite mines, and at the Mramor and Bukinje
underground mines.
Other deposits in central Bosnia are worked by KAKANJ
(Vrtlite opencast mine, the Haljinii undergound mine
and the new BegiiBitrani underground mine opened
in July 2013), BREZA (underground mines at Sretno and
Kamenice), ZENICA (underground mines at Stara Jama,
Raspotoje and Stranjani) and ABID LOLI. BILA operates
the Grahovii opencast mine, and GRAANICA operates
the Dimnjae opencast mine. UREVIK operates
opencast brown coal mines at Via II and Potoari, and an
underground mine at urevik. RMU BANOVII operates
large opencast mines at Grivice and ubri, employing
shovel dredgers and 170-tonne trucks to mine a 17-metre
seam, and has developed a third opencast mine at Turija.
The company also operates one partly mechanised
underground mine at Omazii.
The Gacko deposits in the south-east are worked by RiTE
GACKO to supply the 300 MW Gacko supercritical power
plant owned by the public enterprise ELEKTROPRIVREDA
REPUBLIKE SRPSKE. Other production sites in Bosnia
and Herzegovina include Livno and Ugljevik, the mines of
Tunica, which supply the Ugljevik power plant, and the
Stanari mine at Doboj.
The total production capacity of the countrys power
plants is 3 824 MW. 54% of this is hydro-electric based,
while the remaining 46% is provided by thermo-electric
installations. The Tuzla power plant has three operating
blocks, with an installed capacity of 715 MW. The plant
also supplies heat for Tuzla and Lukavac, process steam
for nearby industries and fly ash for the cement factory
70
at Lukavac. After the Bosnian war of 1992-95, major

overhauls were completed at the plant, including boiler
upgrades and the installation of new precipitators.
The Kakanj power plant has three operating blocks, with
a total capacity of 450 MW and, like Tuzla, is owned
by the public enterprise ELEKTROPRIVREDA BOSNE I
HERCEGOVINE. The Ugljevik and Gacko power plants,
each 300 MW, are operated by state-owned enterprise
ELEKTROPRIVREDA REPUBLIKE SRPSKE.
In general, coal mining in Bosnia and Herzegovina faces
many challenges. For years, poor geological conditions and
a lack of funding for maintenance and investment have
hindered mining. The government plans to restructure the
industry by merging coal mines and power plants to attract
new investment. To that end, many new projects are on
the horizon.
RMU BANOVII proposes a new 300 MW power plant
with a circulating fluidised bed combustor and supplied
with brown coal from its existing mines from 2017.
ELEKTROPRIVREDA HRVATSKE ZAJEDNICE HERCEG
BOSNE, a state-owned enterprise, has proposed
the construction of a new 2 x 275 MW lignite-fired
mine-mouth plant near Tomislavgrad. The plant would
be supplied with lignite from a new mine in the Kongora
deposit. There are many other potential mine and power
plant projects in Bosnia and Herzegovina: the new Kotezi
mine would supply a new 350 MW power plant near the
town of Bugojno; a new 300 MW plant adjacent to the
existing Stanari mine; a 600 MW expansion of the Ugljevik
power plant; the potential Miljevina brown coal mine;
a 300 MW expansion of the Kakanj power plant; a new
450 MW block at Tuzla; and a possible 430 MW two-unit
plant at Kamengrad mine. Bosnia and Herzegovina is
already a net electricity exporter to neighbouring countries
and exports could grow in the future as these projects are
materialised.
Croatia became the newest member state of the EU-28

on 1 July 2013. The county does not produce coal, but
imported 1.3 million tonnes in 2012. Over three quarters of
this are used for power generation at the 335 MW Plomin
power plant, owned by HRVATSKA ELEKTROPRIVREDA
(jointly with RWE in the case of unit B), while the balance
is used for cement production and food processing.
HRVATSKA ELEKTROPRIVREDA has invited bids to
construct a third coal-fired unit at Plomin which is seen
as a priority by the government. The new 500 MW unit C
would replace unit A and thus increase the plants overall
capacity to 710 MW.
Kosovo is governed by the United Nations Interim

Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), following
the violent conflict of 1996-99. It has very large lignite
resources, totalling 10.8 billion tonnes and fourth only
to Poland, Germany and Serbia in Europe. Reserves are
located in the Kosova, Dukagjini, Drenica and Skenderaj
basins, although mining has been limited to the Kosova
basin to date. Lignite production in 2012 was 8.9 million
tonnes.
For electricity, Kosovo is almost entirely dependent on
lignite, with just over 2% coming from hydro plants
and imports in 2011. The state-owned KORPORATA
ENERGJETIKE E KOSOVS (KEK) has a monopoly position
in lignite mining and electricity generation. Kosova A (5
units totalling 800 MW) and Kosova B (2 x 339 MW) power
plants near Pristina are supplied with lignite from the
adjacent Mirasha and Bardh opencast mines, in production
since 1958 and 1969 respectively, and from the smaller
Sitnica mine. These mines are nearing exhaustion and the
new Sibovc Southwest mine near Obiliq was opened in
2010 to secure future lignite supplies for Kosova power
plants until 2024. The plants operate at a reduced capacity
of 910 MW and the plan is to retire A units by 2017 and B
units by 2024. A new 600 MW Kosova C or Kosova e Re
power plant is proposed as a replacement and this would
improve the reliability of electricity supply in Kosovo and,
at the same time, significantly reduce emissions.
The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

is a significant lignite producer: 7.5 million tonnes in
2012 from the state-owned Suvodol-Brod Gneotino
and Oslomej-Zapad surface mines, and from a number
of smaller privately owned surface mines. It has
lignite reserves of 332 million tonnes in the Pelagonija
and Kicevo deposits with further potential in the
Mariovo and Tikves deposits new mines at Mariovo,
Zhivojno, Negotino, Popovjani, Lavci, Zvegor-Stamer
and Star-Istevnik/Pancarevo could add to supply. The
country also imports sub-bituminous coal (168 thousand
tonnes in 2012). Most coal and lignite is used for power
generation, around 90% on an energy basis. The balance
is used almost entirely by the steel industry, including
DUFERCO MAKSTILs integrated steel works at Skopje
and ARCELORMITTALs steel mill, also at Skopje. The
state-owned ELEM Bitola (675 MW) and ELEM Oslomej
(125 MW) lignite-fired power plants generated 77% of
Macedonias electricity in 2011. With hydro, total production
was 6.9 TWh. The government plans to build a new 300 MW
lignite-fired power plant at Mariovo conditional upon the
part privatisation of ELEM.
Montenegro produced and consumed an estimated

2 million tonnes of lignite in 2012. It is used mainly for power
generation over half of the countrys electricity comes from
coal. Although not currently exploited, Montenegro boasts
hard coal reserves of 142 million tonnes.
Sweden
There are very limited hard coal deposits in Sweden:
reserves and resources are reported at just 5 million
tonnes. In the past, small-scale coal mining took place in
southern Sweden. In 2012, 630 thousand tonnes of peat
were extracted.
In the 1930s, coal met more than half of Swedish energy
demand, with imports of around 7 million tonnes per year.
Today, at just over 4%, coal has just a minor share of the
countrys total primary energy supply.
Since the mid 1990s, demand for coal imports had been
stable at close to 3 million tonnes per year, but declined
in 2012 to 2.2 million tonnes as coal is replaced with
biofuels. Steam coal is now only used at a few combined
heat and power (CHP) plants, including at Fortums
efficient and clean Vrtan plant in Stockholm site of
the worlds first commercial pressurised fluidised bed
combustor. The majority of coal demand comes from
Swedens speciality steel industry which uses mainly
high-quality coking coal. Some coal is used by the cement

industry, but the sector is increasing its use of alternative
fuels. The pulp and paper industry uses mainly biofuels
with small quantities of coal.
In a typical year, almost half of Swedens electricity
demand is met by hydropower and almost half by
nuclear power. The balance is met by CHP plants, firing
either solid waste, biofuels or fossil fuels. Wind power
production is increasing with a share of 4% in 2012. In
2010, the Swedish parliament agreed that new nuclear
power plants could replace old ones at existing locations.
Government support schemes exist for the construction
of biofuelled CHP and wind farms. The national energy
mix for power generation is well balanced and Sweden
has good interconnections with its neighbours. More
interconnectors are under construction to enable a future
increase of cross-border power trade. For the coming
years, Sweden is expected to be a net exporter of
electricity.
71
EU Statistics
General data and coal- related data for EU member states that use imported coal, 2012
(see country chapters for data on coal- producing member states)
Primary
Primary
Primary energy
Gross
Population
GDP
energy
energy
consumption
power
production
consumption coal and peat
generation
(million)
( billion)
(Mtce)
(Mtce)
(Mtce)
(TWh)
Austria
8.4
307.0
18.1
47.0
4.6
64.5
Belgium
11.1
376.2
23.5
81.8
3.9
77.3
Croatia*
4.4
43.9
5.4
12.1
1.0
10.7
Denmark
5.6
245.0
28.5
24.3
3.5
30.4
Finland
5.4
192.5
24.5
47.8
6.7
70.4
France
65.3
2 032.3
190.2
359.6
16.4
561.2
Ireland
4.6
163.9
2.0
19.1
3.8
27.5
Italy
60.8
1 565.9
46.7
226.6
22.2
294.4
Netherlands
16.7
599.3
92.5
111.7
11.7
102.2
Portugal
10.5
165.2
6.9
31.4
4.2
45.5
Sweden
9.5
407.7
49.9
69.8
3.2
165.4
Power
generation
from coal
(TWh)
6.2
5.5
2.6
10.6
7.4
22.7
5.5
47.1
27.3
13.1
1.6
Capacity
of coal-fired
generation
(GW)
2.2
0.8
0.3
5.9
7.8
6.3
0.9
11.2
4.2
2.3
1.1
* Energy data for 2011

Sources: EURACOAL members, Eurostat, IEA
Coal production and imports in 2012 for the EU- 28 (million tonnes)
Hard coal production
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
2.1
Croatia
Czech Republic
11.4
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
10.8
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
0.1
Netherlands
Poland
79.2
Portugal
Romania
1.9
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
6.1
Sweden
United Kingdom
16.8
others
EU-28
128.4
Lignite production
30.4
43.5
185.4
62.2
9.3
64.3
32.1
2.3
4.3
433.8
Hard coal imports

3.2
3.5
2.3
1.3
2.0
3.9
4.0
17.0
44.9
0.2
1.5
2.2
24.3
12.4
10.2
5.2
1.3
3.4
0.6
21.4
2.2
44.8
0.8
212.6
Source: EURACOAL members
72
EU Statistics
Power generation structure in EU- 28 in 2011

Total gross
coal & coal
power generation
products
EU-28
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia*
Finland**
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland**
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
TWh
3 290.4
65.7
90.2
50.8
10.8
4.9
87.5
35.2
12.9
73.5
562.0
608.9
59.4
36.0
27.5
302.6
6.1
4.8
3.7
2.2
113.0
163.5
52.5
62.2
28.7
16.1
291.8
150.4
367.8
EU-share (%)
100.0
2.0
2.7
1.5
0.3
0.1
2.7
1.1
0.4
2.2
17.1
18.5
1.8
1.1
0.8
9.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
3.4
5.0
1.6
1.9
0.9
0.5
8.9
4.6
11.2
%
27
11
6
54
24
0
57
40
89
21
3
45
52
18
25
17
<1
0
0
0
22
86
19
40
14
33
15
1
30
oil
%
2
2
<1
<1
7
96
<1
1
<1
<1
<1
1
10
<1
<1
7
<1
4
<1
100
1
1
5
1
2
<1
5
<1
1
natural gas
nuclear
energy
hydro
renewables,
waste & other
%
21
19
28
4
24
0
1
17
2
13
5
14
23
30
54
48
49
55
63
0
61
4
28
13
11
3
29
1
40
%
28
0
53
32
0
0
32
0
0
32
79
18
0
44
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
19
54
39
20
40
19
%
10
57
2
7
43
0
3
<1
<1
17
9
4
7
<1
3
16
47
22
30
0
<1
2
23
24
14
23
11
44
2
%
12
11
10
2
2
4
6
42
9
17
4
19
7
7
17
13
3
18
7
0
13
7
25
3
5
2
19
13
8
* coal figure includes oil shale

** coal figure includes peat
Source: Eurostat
73
EURACOAL
The European Association for Coal and Lignite is the
umbrella organisation of the European coal industry.
Associations and companies from twenty countries work
together in EURACOAL to ensure that the interests of coal
producers, importers, traders and consumers are properly
served. Its thirty-four members come from across the
EU-28 and Energy Community. As the voice of coal in
Brussels, EURACOAL evolved from CECSO (European Solid
Fuels Association) after the expiry of the treaty establishing
the European Coal and Steel Community in 2002.
Country
Belgium
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Czech Republic
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Italy
Poland
Romania
Serbia
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom
74
EURACOALs mission is to highlight the importance of

the European coal industry to energy supply security,
energy price stability, economic added value and
environmental protection. EURACOAL seeks to be
an active communicator, with the aim of creating an
appropriate framework within which the coal industry
and coal consumers can operate.
EURACOAL Members
as at October 2013
ISSeP Institut Scientifique de Service Public (Scientific Institute of Public Service)
RMU Banovici dd
MMI Mini Maritsa Iztok EAD
Vagledobiv Bobov dol EOOD
ZSDNP Zamstnavatelsk svaz dlnho a naftovho prmyslu
(Employers Association of Mining and Oil Industries)
Finnish Coal Info
BRGM Bureau de Recherches Gologiques et Minires
(The French Geological Survey)
DEBRIV Deutscher Braunkohlen-Industrie-Verein eV
(German Association of Lignite Producers)
GVSt Gesamtverband Steinkohle eV (German Coal Association)
VDKi Verein der Kohlenimporteure eV (Hard Coal Importers Association)
PPC Public Power Corporation SA
CERTH Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
Mtrai Erm ZRt
ENEL SpA
PPWB Porozumienie Producentw Wgla Brunatnego
(Confederation of Polish Lignite Producers)
ZPGWK Zwizek Pracodawcw Grnictwa Wgla Kamiennego
(Polish Hard Coal Employers Association)
GIG Gwny Instytut Grnictwa (Central Mining Institute)
EMAG Institute of Innovative Technologies
KOMAG Institute of Mining Technology
APFCR Asociatia Producatorilor si Furnizorilor de Carbune din Romania
(Coal Producers and Suppliers Association of Romania)
EPS Elektroprivreda Srbije (Electric Power Industry of Serbia)
HBP Hornonitrianske bane Prievidza as
Premogovnik Velenje dd
CARBUNIN Federacin Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbn
(National Coal Mining Employers Association)
Geocontrol SA
Svenska Kolinstitutet (Swedish Coal Institute)
TK Turkish Coal Enterprises
DTEK
Ukrvuglerobotodavtsy (All-Ukrainian Coal Industry Employers Association)
CoalImp Association of UK Coal Importers
CoalPro Confederation of UK Coal Producers
Coaltrans Conferences Ltd
Golder Associates (UK) Ltd
University of Nottingham
Glossary/Data sources
Glossary
Coal reserves
The portion of known coal resources that can be profitably
mined and marketed with todays mining techniques.
Mtce
Million tonnes of coal equivalent
(1 tce = 0.7 toe or 29.307 gigajoules or 7 million kcal)
Coal resources
Coal deposits that are either proven, but at present are not
economically recoverable, or not proven, but expected to
be present based on geological knowledge.
Total primary energy supply

TPES refers to the direct use of primary energy (e.g.
coal) prior to any conversion or transformation processes.
It is equivalent to total primary energy demand or
consumption.
Coal mining terminology varies around the world. For a comprehensive and current glossary of English terms,
see IHS Energy Publishings coalportal website: www.coalportal.com.
For a glossary of terms used in energy statistics, see Eurostats Statistics Explained website:
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Category:Energy_glossary
Data sources and references

Data and information has been provided by EURACOAL
members and national government agencies. Eurostat
databases and IEA databases have also been valuable
sources. Other data and information has come from the
following publications.
BGR (Bundesanstalt fr Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources)
(2013), DERA Rohstoffinformationen 15 (2012): Energy
Study 2012 Reserves, Resources and Availability of
Energy Resources, BGR on behalf of the German Mineral
Resources Agency (DERA), Hannover, 28 March.
DG Energy (2013), EU Energy in Figures statistical

pocketbook 2013, European Commission, Luxembourg.
European Commission (2013), Energy challenges and
policy, Commission contribution to the European Council
of 22 May 2013.
IEA (International Energy Agency) (2012),
World Energy Outlook 2012, OECD/IEA, Paris.
IEA (2013a), Medium-Term Coal Market Review,
OECD/IEA, Paris.
IEA (2013b), Coal Information 2013, OECD/IEA, Paris.
BAFA (Bundesamt fr Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle

German Federal Office of Economics and Export Control
(2013), Aufkommen und Export von Erdgas Entwicklung
der Grenzbergangspreise ab 1991, BMWi, Eschborn.
McCloskey (2013), IHS McCloskey Coal Information

Service.
BP (2013a), BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2013,

BP plc, London, June.
Reserve Bank of Australia (2007), The Recent Rise in

Commodity Prices: a long-run perspective, Bulletin, April.
BP (2013b), BP Energy Outlook 2030, BP plc,

London, January.
VDKi (2013), Annual Report 2013 facts and trends

2012/2013, Verein der Kohlenimporteure e.V.
(German Coal Importers Association), Hamburg.
Photo credits
EURACOAL members, Tommy Dahl Markussen (page 17, top left),
To-Foto AS / Tommy Simonsen (page 17, middle left) and Eesti Energia (page 62).
75
Coal classification
Coal classification
Coal Types and Peat
UNECE
USA (ASTM)
Germany (DIN)
Peat
Peat
Torf
Ortho-Lignite
Lignite
Energy
Content
a.f.*
(kJ/kg)
Volatiles
d.a.f.**
(%)
Vitrinite
Reflection
in oil
(%)
75
6,700
35
16,500
0.3
25
19,000
0.45
10
25,000
Weichbraunkohle
Mattbraunkohle
Meta-Lignite
Sub-bituminous
Coal
Total Water
Content
(%)
Sub-bituminous
Coal
Glanzbraunkohle
45
0.65
40
0.75
35
1.0
28
1.2
19
1.6
14
1.9
10
2.2
Gasflammkohle
Gaskohle
Medium Volatile
Bituminous Coal
Fettkohle
Low Volatile
Bituminous Coal
Ekohle
Semi-Anthracite
Magerkohle
Anthracite
Anthrazit
Anthracite
Hartkohle
High Volatile
Bituminous Coal
Steinkohle
Bituminous Coal
Flammkohle
36,000
Hard Coking Coal
36,000
* a.f. = ash-free
** d.a.f. = dry, ash-free
UNECE:

USA:
Ortho-Lignite up to 15,000 kJ/kg

Meta-Lignite up to 20,000 kJ/kg
Sub-bituminous Coal up to 24,000 kJ/kg
Bituminous Coal up to 2% average Vitrinite Reflection
Lignite up to 19,300 kJ/kg
Source: BGR
76
EU-28
21.4
Spain
6.1
2.2
12.4
0.2
10.8
0.8
44.9
Italy
< 0.1
4.3
0.6
1.2
8.9
Serbia
37.5
1.3
Albania
< 0.1
0.2
Greece
62.2
1.9
1.3
2.1
2.3
Bulgaria
30.4
0.2
Moldova
0.2
Belarus
0.1
Romania
32.1
FYROM
Kosovo 7.5
0.6
Montenegro
2.0
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
12.6
1.5
Hungary
9.3
Slovenia
Croatia
24.3
3.4
Slovakia
Austria
1.3
10.2
Poland
0.3
Latvia
0.3
Estonia
0.1
Finland
4.0
Lithuania
3.2
2.0
64.3
2.3
11.4
Sweden
2.2
79.2
Czech Republic
43.5
Denmark
3.9
Norway
1.2
Germany
185.4
Switzerland
Belgium
3.5
Netherlands
France
17.0
United
Kingdom
16.8
Note:
bars
show
million
tonnes
of coal
Note: bars show
million
tonnes
of coal
equivalent
(Mtce)
while equivalent (Mtce) while
figures
at top
of barstonnes
show(Mt)
millions of physical tonnes (Mt)
figures at top of bars show
millions
of physical
Source:
EURACOAL members
Source: EURACOAL
members
Portugal
5.2
Imports 213
Ireland
million tonnes
Lignite production
434 Mt 434
Lignite production
Hard coal production 128 Mt
Hard coal213
production
130
Imports
Mt
EU - 28
44.8
lignite production
, hard coal production & imports
Coalin Europe 2012
Lignite production, hard coal production and imports in 2012, million tonnes
Coal in Europe 2012
70.0
2.3
10
20
30
40
50
60
29.7
Turkey
Ukraine
14.8
65.6 Mt
Mtce
Published by
EURACOAL
European Association for Coal and Lignite AISBL
Avenue de Tervueren 168 bote 11
1150 Brussels, Belgium
tel +32 2 771 31 70
[email protected]
www.euracoal.org
Authors and advisers
EURACOAL members and secretariat
Uwe Maaen, DEBRIV
Hans-Wilhelm Schiffer, RWE
Project managed by
Gitta Hulik, EURACOAL
Edited by
Brian Ricketts, EURACOAL
Designed by
agreement werbeagentur gmbh
Grevesmhlener Strae 28
13059 Berlin, Germany
www.agreement-berlin.de
Printed by
vierC print+mediafabrik GmbH & Co. KG
November 2013
ISSN 2034-5682

EURACOAL Coal Industry Across Europe 2013

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

EURACOAL Coal Industry Across Europe 2013

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

EURACOAL Coal Industry Across Europe 2013

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

COAL

Foreword by Philip Lowe,

Introduction by Pawe Smole,

Global energy trends and the international coal market

The socio - economic value of a sustainable European coal industry

Other EU Member States and Energy Community stakeholders

Data sources and references

Coal industry across Europe 2013

Foreword by Philip Lowe, Director-General for Energy, European Commission

Coal industry across Europe 2013

Philip Lowe, Director-General for Energy, European Commission

Coal plays an important role in the European economy.

Introduction by Pawe Smole, President of EURACOAL

Pawe Smole, President of EURACOAL

Despite these remarkable statistics, coal and lignite

Coal industry across Europe 2013

Introduction by Pawe Smole, President of EURACOAL

does not become dependent on imported gas as its

Coal industry across Europe 2013

competitive energy markets have all but disappeared.

Since the natural paradise of Spreeaue was opened to

Global energy trends and

industry developments in Europe for publication in its

Global energy reserves and resources

make up the remainder of total non-renewable energy

total energy production:

1 346 billion tonnes

18 156 billion tonnes

16.9 billion tonnes

Source: BGR, 2013

Coal and lignite reserves are sufficient for the next

global level, it is the reserves and resources of coal and

Global energy trends and the international coal market

Hard coal: 638 Gtce

Source: BGR, 2013

Source: BGR, 2013

Coal in global energy consumption

Each of the primary energy sources has a different end-use

For power generation, coal plays a major role in both

World coal production reached 7.8 billion tonnes in 2012:

Coal industry across Europe 2013

Global energy trends and the international coal market

Gross power generation

Sources: IEA databases, BP (2013a) and own estimates

* 2011 for non-OECD countries

Source: IEA databases and own calculations

Global energy trends and the international coal market

Source: IEA, 2013b

hundred countries use coal in commercial quantities: some are

coal-fired district heating and cooling as well as combined

Global energy trends and the international coal market

In order to further improve productivity at the Bkkbrny

Coal industry across Europe 2013

At Bezno village, the retired bucket-wheel excavator

Global energy trends and the international coal market

Coal consumption trends

In the EU, hard coal production has declined from Europes

Trends in coal use differ by region. In OECD countries, coal

New renewables, such as wind, solar and geothermal,

Since the turn of the new millennium, from 2000 to 2012,