Hebrew Roots/Messianic Christian Zionism Warning -Part 1

To Embrace Hebrew Roots: Part I

There is a growing movement within Christianity, which contends that Christians need "to return to their
Hebrew Roots." The leaders of this movement purport to be teaching believers the "Hebrew Roots of
Christianity" through the study of the Jewish foundational teachings. Having been enjoined to study
"Hebrew Roots", it is only reasonable that one must take a close look at the teachings of the Messianic
and Hebrew Roots movements, as well as the Hebrew faith itself.

We are reminded in Colossians 2:6-9:

"As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk ye in Him: Rooted and built
up in Him, and stablished in the faith, as ye have been taught, abounding therein with
thanksgiving. Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after
the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. For in Him
dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily."

Is the Hebrew Roots, as some might suggest, merely the study of the Old Testament, which Christians
already study in light of the New Testament?

What do the Hebrew foundational teachings expound with regard to the New Testament, the Messiah, the
divinity of Jesus Christ, the Persons or Manifestations of God, the Bible and the character of God?

I could never accept the concept of being spoon-fed answers to my questions from those promoting the
movement or belief that is questionable. To embrace the Hebrew Roots theology without a full review and
understanding of its teachings, would be blindness on our part and lead to ignoring the many warnings we
find in the Word of God.

2 Timothy 3:13-17:
"But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived. But
continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom
thou hast learned them: And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able
to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction,
for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be throughly furnished unto all good
works."

We know that many of the Hebrew Roots ministries are connected with each other and with various other
types of ministries. This obligates us to investigate them even more thoroughly. By examining the HR
teachings, those of the Jewish faith and it's mystical exponent, Kabbalism--which is indeed the
concerning root of the Hebrew Roots movement--we will then see if what is taught upholds the Word of
God.

Anti-Semitism?

Those who have challenged the Hebrew Roots teachings in the past have been dealt with swiftly and with
the utmost hostility. For example, a response was forwarded to me that came from one of the Hebrew
Roots leadership. This retort was in response to information sent out by another person on various
Hebrew Roots issues. This well-known leader, who incidentally, never addressed any of the issues,
attacked with the words:

" You have to be one of the most arrogant/ignorant *** on this earth!!!! You are a total danger to
society and to God Himself. Your day will not be what you think it will be!! I would not wish to be
in your shoes. You are a deceiver and liar!!!!! You pervert the facts and you totally distort the
truth. May God one day forgive you of your stupidity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

This is hardly what one would expect from a "man of God," who claims to belong to Jesus Christ.

Paul admonished Timothy in 2 Timothy 2:24, that:

"And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient."

In James 3: 17,18 we are reminded:

" But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated,
full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality and without hypocrisy. And the fruit of
righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace."

In James 3: 8-10 we see:

"But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison. Therewith bless we
God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God.
Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so
to be."

Scripture tells us in Matthew 12:37:

" For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned."

Those who question this movement have often been accused of anti-semitism. Does the presentation of
various Jewish doctrines obtained from Jewish sources constitute anti-Semitism? It seems unreasonable
to conclude that the facts, presented objectively, are inherently anti-Semitic. Moreover, this writer has no
bias against the Jews, but looks forward to the salvation of any through Jesus Christ.

This is a search for truth. The information that will be used is from the very beliefs and teachings that we
are being asked to embrace.

John 3:20-21

"…For everyone that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should
be reproved. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest,
that they are wrought in God."

Promoters of Hebrew Roots

This search for truth must test all those involved against such passages as:

James 3:13-16:
 "Who is a wise man and endued with knowledge among you? Let him show out of a good
conversation his works with meekness and wisdom. But if ye have bitter envying and
strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the truth. This wisdom descendeth not
from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish. For where envying and strife is, there is
confusion and every evil work."

It seems fitting, then, that we examine the teachings of prominent leaders such as Peter Michas of
Messengers of Messiah, Avi ben Mordechai of Torah Talk & the B'ne Torah Movement; Jacob Prasch of
Moriel, Larry Rowland of Messengers of Truth and James Trimm of the Society for the Advancement of
Nazarene Judaism. We must consider these and the many groups linked to them which are advocating
the Hebrew Roots cause. Not all of the individuals and groups mentioned are claiming connections to the
Messianic or Hebrew Roots movement, and these distinctions will be noted.

For example, Avi ben Mordechai, a "Nazarene (messianic) halacha" teacher, as stated on his website,
(www.millenium7000.com/halacha.htm) in the article Halacha, is very influential within the Hebrew Roots
and Messianic leadership. Mr. Mordechai made this pronouncement in an email to Mr. Ed Tarkowski,
dated May 8, 1998:

"…I am not a proponent of the "Jewish Roots" or "Hebraic Roots" movement as you or
they define the terms. I am a proponent of Torah observance for both Jews and non-
Jews which takes "Jewish Roots" information and engages it to become a lifestyle. In
other words, it's not Jewish information that I'm teaching in and of itself; It's Jewish
information with an associated lifestyle that I uphold…"

"I am an Orthodox Sephardic Jew. I believe fully in the written and oral Torah of Moshe
and of Y'shua, hence the term, the "Mesorah of Y'shua HaMashiach." Furthermore, I am
not connected to the Messianic movement which generally (and I say GENERALLY) only
accepts the written Torah and usually rejects the oral Torah and then makes the written
Torah optional equipment for the faith which is fully counter to Y'shua's and Sha'ul's
teachings."

" Nor am I connected to the Christian church which outright rejects both the written and
oral Torot as being replaced with new Mesorah (traditions) that also violate the very heart
of Y'shua HaMashiach's teachings. Rather, I am connected to the B'ne Torah movement
which is a fast-growing sect of Judaism that happens to believe that Y'shua is
HaMashiach, Ben Elohim and our Mesorah perfectly lines up with Moshe, Y'shua, and
Sha'ul in their teachings of the Torot, oral and written."

For More on Avi ben Mordechai see: Avi ben Mordechai & Millennium 7000

In promoting their cause, Hebrew Roots leaders give us many reasons why we must or should become
involved. For example, Larry Rowland of Messengers of Truth believes that the Bible is a book about the
Jewish people, and should be studied as such:

"…In order to correctly understand the Newer Testament, it is beneficial to have a working
knowledge of the world from which it was birthed. Most of the Bible, from Genesis to Revelation
was written by Jews, for Jews, about Jews, or with Jews in mind. Even the Gospel of Luke and
part of the Book of Acts, while probably written by Gentiles, nonetheless addressed Jewish issues
and concerns on behalf of an early Jewish Church."

" Today, a travesty is occurring within the body of Christian believers. The Church, as well as
Christians themselves, have a lack of knowledge concerning their Jewish heritage. Without that
 knowledge, Christians are burning their bridges at an alarming rate. They have forgotten the
foundation on which their faith was originally founded."

"Only the knowledge of our Hebraic Roots, will allow us, as Christians, to span the bridge of time
linking yesterday to today; allowing us to understand the full richness of Scripture. Remember,
what you miss, don't see or comprehend in Scripture you can't have and Yeshua's desire was
that we, as believers in Him . . . have it all!"1.

We have always understood that the Bible was a revelation of God himself. It encompasses His unending
love, mercy, justice, patience and most of all, His plan for humanity and our salvation through Jesus
Christ.

An organization in Colorado Springs for the propagation of a new kind of church is The Open Church
Ministries. It promotes a "prophecy" written by Dean Cozzens regarding the Hebrew Roots movement.
This "prophecy" discloses that the Hebrew Roots movement as the last of a series of movements
designed to change the direction of the church, the previous movements being the Pentecostal,
Charismatic and Word of Faith. Part of this prophecy declares this:

"… The critical turn in thinking [which Christians must make] is a shift away from the Greek
corruptions of the past and back toward the center line God-ordained Hebrew runway, down
which Jesus Himself came and landed perfectly. Jesus Himself was the airship, and the terminal
where He had been loading since His first coming has been the world into which He has come. . .
The runway then is all the Old Testament, i.e. all of the Old Testament Hebrew truth and
revelation, and much of the Hebrew culture and custom that came with it…"

"We'll leave on the same runway Jesus landed on-Old Testament Hebrew revelations and
prophecies, and Hebrew ways of thinking and living. That's who God revealed Himself to be, and
Who Jesus also showed Himself to be when He lived here on this planet in the flesh."

"Many errors were incorporated into the early church in order to please and accommodate the
Greek culture, and to escape anti-Hebrew persecutions from the Romans. These early
corruptions are what we mean by the Hebrew-to-Greek shift. The correction of this past mistake
is the turning of that great airliner in what is called the Greek-to-Hebrew shift, or the Hebrew
Movement. It is what God now expects from us before He more fully empowers us, and thrusts us
into His glory. It's what we need to do to make Him more comfortable about openly identifying
Himself with us in His full approval of glory and power…" 2.

Do we indeed have to become Jewish in thought and custom in order to fully understand the Word of God
and be pleasing before Him? Are we to accept that we have been lacking and even deliberately misled as
some will say, by the New Testament and many orthodox teachings? The implications could indeed be
overwhelming if this were a possibility. What of the needed reconciliation between Jews and Gentiles they
say will take place if we embrace our Hebrew Roots? Is there any truth to the charges of anti-Semitism
towards Jews on the part of Christians in general, and from the New Testament?

Does this teaching of Jew and Gentile reconciliation change the meaning of the Scripture found in:

Galatians 3:26-29 ?
 "For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been
baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor
free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ's, then
are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. "

What of the divine inspiration of the Bible? Is Scripture sufficient in itself and considered the inerrant Word
of God? Are Peter Michas and others correct when they state that we must go back to the Hebrew or
Aramaic writings and look to the Oral traditions for the interpretation of Scripture?

Another issue Hebrew Roots teachers bring forward is the need to rewrite the English versions of the
Word of God with Jewish names as done in the book, "Holy to Yahveh,"

"…. which is bringing revelation, illuminating the importance of the Hebrew name of the Father
and the Son; magnification of the holy Hebrew roots of Scripture and Christianity; scriptural truths
that reveal many faulty religious doctrines and traditions; Anti-semitism exposed and shattered;
and "the reconciliation of Jews and Gentiles to a holy God and one another…"

"Holy to Yahveh" author, Terrye Goldblum Seedman and her husband, desire all to be "searching into the
Scriptural pure holy Hebrew roots of Christianity".

Their brochure: "Messianic Revelation, Spiritual Revival" further states:

"The Mighty One, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, is wooing a remnant, both Jews and
Gentiles, to be reconciled to Him and one another." 3.

Jacob Prasch maintains that we need the knowledge of the Midrash, the rabbinical commentary on
scripture, to rightly understand the Bible. Many advocates of the Hebrew Roots doctrine would have us
believe that the Talmud, a compendium of oral traditions, is divinely inspired and of benefit to those
involved in Judaism, the Hebrew Roots movement and Christianity.

What evidence is there of the alleged connections between the Talmud, the Kabbalah [Jewish mysticism]
and Freemasonry? While many deny any connections and state that the Kabbalah is not used, connected
nor promoted, there are facts which indicate otherwise.

Many Hebrew Roots and Sacred Name advocates are decrying that the name, 'Jesus Christ', is invalid,
mistranslated or unacceptable for whatever reason. One has to ask which Name do these people wish us
to use if not the name of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ? Which of the numerous "only Sacred Name,"
are we to use?

We must also ask, what is the acceptable Name of the Father? Many of the groups are promoting the
changing or rejecting of the English translation of Jehovah and even Lord, stating that His name is also
translated inaccurately. Is their translation the Name which Theosophists and Kabbalists call the Ineffable
Name or Tetragrammaton and should we embrace it?

Would changing the name of our Savior and embracing another name become the rejection of Jesus
Christ and His salvation?

It is imperative that we understand the significance of the Sacred Name issue, for

Scripture tells us in John 14:6,

"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by
me."
Acts 4:12:

"Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among
men, whereby we must be saved."

Also promoted is the occult symbol, the Star of David, which we must consider as part of the fulfillment of
Bible prophecy.

Besides removing or changing the Name of Jesus Christ, many would eliminate the term Christianity. Uri
Marcus, of Nehemiah Trustees Covenant Fund, in an email regarding "A Vote For "Jesus"?, insists that
converted Jews must retain their Jewish identity and refuse the Christian name so as not to offend their
fellow Jews:

" ...a Jew cannot reasonably hope to identify with this metamorphasized name and expect that
other Jews are going to want to run in and find out how they too can believe. Our only hope is re-
establish our Jewish Identity in light of our Beliefs in the Jewish Messiah. In other words, we must
restore the Jewishness to the Gospel…"

" I did not say that I would not want to be considered "Christian" amongst others in the Body of
Messiah. I only said that with regard to our own people, the Jews, we cannot afford this
association…"4.

Do other Jewish people view Christianity in the same manner? If we embrace the Hebrew roots and
traditions, will the Jewish people, people who do not accept Jesus Christ or the New Testament, then
accept us?

Will reconciliation take place between Jews and Christians, and is this objective of the Hebrew Roots
movement desirable? Do the various Jewish groups view the Messianic or Hebrew Roots movement in a
favorable way? If we embrace all the rituals, ceremonies, feasts and beliefs, do we fall under the Law, or
become proselytes of Judaism? Where do the Noahide laws fit into the Hebrew Roots doctrine? These
laws, which are acceptable to Jews and Muslims alike, are intended to govern those who are not born
"into the faith".

We must ask, are these Messianic and Jewish leaders able to now provide, Truth, which has been
hidden, from Gentiles and Christians all this time? Do they hold the knowledge that the rest of us lack, as
suggested by so many?

Is it possible, as Peter Michas has stated, that even the conception and birth of Christ are different than
what we have been taught?

Is Jesus' length of ministry on earth recorded incorrectly in the New Testament? Or is this part of the
Antichrist's plan to changing times and dates that we understand as truth?

Have these spiritual leaders been given unique and new insight that they alone are able to dispense, to
those who embrace the "Hebrew Roots of Christianity"? Is this movement of God, or does it come from
something else?

These, then, are some of the questions that need to be addressed. The next articles will reveal many
answers, which will lead to an understanding of the nature of the Hebrew Roots movement. My
conclusions about this movement are based on my belief in the inerrancy of the Word of God alone, and
that there is salvation in only One Name--the Lord Jesus Christ.
1 Corinthians 3:18:

"Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him
become a fool, that he may be wise."

As we evaluate the teachings of the Hebrew Roots or messianic movements, we must understand these
teachings in their historical context. Clearly there are many people who love the Lord Jesus Christ, whose
hearts' desire is to follow Him, serve Him, and share Him. However, we would be naïve to think that all
who say they belong to Him, are true believers. Seeking the truth about the "Hebrew Roots of Christianity"
means carefully weighing all pertinent information according to the Word of God.

Ephesians 5:17:

"Wherefore be ye not unwise, but understanding what the will of the Lord is."

http://www.seekgod.ca/embraceintro.htm

To Embrace Hebrew Roots: Part II

The Bible & The Talmud

Please note: Research into the Hebrew Roots & Messianic movements constitutes research into
Judaism as well as the occult. We fully respect each persons right to believe or utilize what resources
they choose. We however, see a clear distinction in believing the Messiah has come versus utilizing
resources which still await His coming. That is how and why we must evaluate all to Christ and the New
Testament as well as the Tenach. We do not wish to edit or criticize Judaism, but recognize it as distinct
from our Christian beliefs, just as many in Judaism also see a distinction and separateness from our
beliefs, and we jointly have mutual respect for our differences and each other.

A Personal Note: Although the research on Hebrew Roots issue has encompassed material that I have
found disturbing, it in no way has changed my feelings about those involved, especially the Jewish
people. I hold no anger, resentment or animosity toward any. However, I have felt a deep sense of grief
because of many things. What I feel very strongly is that all the issues addressed were dealt with at the
cross. Truly, His grace is sufficient. What I do have, is a strong sense or desire to see deceptions--
regardless of who propagates them--exposed. This issue is very large and complex. Not all that is said
about one group's views can necessarily be applied to all. However, an overview must be established and
various thoughts and attitudes tested to Scripture. I do not necessarily agree with the theological positions
of some sources I quote from. In fact, some I strongly disagree with. However, I have tried to establish all
pertinent facts with at least one or more other sources, each saying the same or similar things and then
have chosen which stated the issue with the most clarity.

Overview:

This article explores the teaching of the Talmud in relation to the Bible. It evaluates the push for other
transcripts other than the Received Greek Texts, and evaluates the teachings of , for example, Peter
Michas and Jacob Prasch, and other advocates of Hebrew translations who postulate that the Greek
manuscripts hold error.
It evaluates the need for Midrash, Mishnah, Haggadah, Halakah, and the use of the "Ancient Wisdom"
versus the teaching of the New Testament and the sufficiency of Scripture with the teaching of the Holy
Spirit. It shows who the scribes and Pharisees were, the Biblical view of oral traditions and the difference
between New Testament beliefs versus Global Halacha and acceptance of the oral traditions.

2 Peter 1: 20-21:

"Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy
came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy
Ghost."

What of the Bible? Is Scripture sufficient in itself and considered by the Hebrew Roots ministries to be the
inerrant Word of God? Are the Old and New Testament the complete revelation of God's will for the
salvation of man? Do they constitute the divine and only rule of Christian faith and practice? Or is it true
as stated by Peter Michas that we must return to the Hebrew or Aramaic writings and the Oral traditions
of Judaism for New Testament doctrine?

"Is The New Testament Hebrew/Aramaic or Greek? by Peter Michas"

"…since existing New Testament manuscripts are Greek, written to express Hebraic concepts, why be
limited to the Greek or English translations when we have Hebrew,… The New Testament is in the
pattern of the Jewish traditional work of Torah, Mishnah, Haggadah, Halakah, Talmud and Midrash, but
inspired by God Himself for the common people."

"These Hebraic works as well as the Inspired Scriptures were quoted from by Jesus and all the writers of
the New Testament… to have full comprehension, we must read the scriptures in the proper Hebraic
context… the New Testament is Hebrew/Aramaic and not Greek or English in origin or thought… Most all
of the Judaic writings have been preserved for us and now translated into proper English directly from the
Hebrew, as well as explained in true Hebraic manner…" 1.

In an email dated1/19/99, James Trimm of the "Society for the Advancement of Nazarene Judaism"
responded to questions regarding the sources of manuscripts for the Semitic New Testament Project
(SNTP), on which he is working.

"…It is such a delight to spend so much time buried in the text in its original language... The SNTP is
based on Hebrew and Aramaic rather than Greek manuscripts…the Aramaic text makes much more
sense than the Greek text…This is just one example from this project which I believe will revolutionize
New Testament understanding…"

2 Peter 3:16:

" As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be
understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto
their own destruction."

Orthodox scholars agree that the New Testament was originally written in Greek.

"The New Testament writings were composed in Greek." 2.

Unger's Bible Dictionary states:

"Despite the critical claim that Matthew wrote the gospel in Aramaic, this contention has never been
proved. If there was an Aramaic original it disappeared at a very early age. The Greek gospel, which is
now the Church's heritage, was almost beyond doubt written in Matthew's lifetime." 3.

"By whom the gospel of Matthew was given in our present Greek form is unknown, but probably by
himself. The consensus of critical scholars is that it is not a mere translation but an original composition."
4.

John 17:17:

"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."

Hyam Maccoby, grandson to the famous Rabbi Haim Zundel Maccoby, the Polish Kamenitzer Maggid,
[spirit guide], propounds the view of Peter Michas and other Hebrew Roots advocates that the Gospels
were written in an era of extreme prejudice and hatred towards the Jews and that this anti-Semitism was
reflected in the New Testament. Hyam Maccoby impugns the accounts of Mark and Luke:

"… the Gospel of Mark, … the Gospel in which the lines of policy were laid down by the Gentile-Christian
Church; a policy of condemnations of the Jews as an accursed people."

"…What had been the history of the Christian Church since the death of Jesus? The bulk of the New
Testament which purports to give this history is The Acts of the Apostles; but this is a Gentile-Christian
composition written about 100 A.D. by Luke, giving a Gentile-Christian slant to the events of those years.
By reading between the lines of Acts, by following using a supplementary sources such as Josephus, the
Talmud and early Christian historians, we can reconstruct the true history of the early church." 5.

Scripture tells us many times that God's Word is pure.

Psalm 12:6,7:

"The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou
shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever."

Error in the Bible

Other HR and related groups make the excuse that there is error in the Bible, which must be eliminated.
Promoting their NEW Translation called "The Book of Yahweh," the House of Yahweh stated this
regarding the Scriptures,

"… Many phrases have been deliberately mistranslated in order to hide their true meaning, so that
Scripture would not bring to light the deceitful teaching of the established, and popular, religious
organizations. The alteration of Yahweh’s Scriptures, either by untranslating or mistranslating, has
caused the True Work, which His Prophets spoke of, to be hidden in most translations of the Scriptures,
and has been damaging to those who are searching the Scriptures for the way to Eternal Life."

"However, the most damaging error in all the Scriptures, was the error of removing YAHWEH’S NAME
from the very scriptures He inspired to be written, and writing in its place the pagan titles of GODS, and
SATAN HIMSELF! Because of this grave error, those who are calling upon the names of gods and Satan,
even though ignorantly, are actually worshiping the gods and Satan—for they are not calling upon, and
with, The NAME of YAHWEH!" 6.
Psalm 119:104,105

"Through thy precepts I get understanding: therefore I hate every false way. Thy word is a lamp unto my
feet, and a light unto my path."

In his article, Explaining the Midrash, Jacob Prasch stated that we need the knowledge of the Midrash
and Jewish thought to rightly understand the Bible.

"…But Matthew appears to take the passage out of all reasonable context and twist it into talking about
Jesus. We have to ask, is Matthew wrong? or is there something wrong with our Protestant way of
interpreting the Bible? There is nothing wrong with Matthew, and there is nothing wrong with the New
Testament. But there is something wrong with our Protestant mentality…They were reading a Jewish
book as if it were a Greek book… The first step is going back to reading the Bible as a Jewish book,
instead of as a Greek one." 7.

Referring to the Midrash, Mr. Prasch said:

" It takes the wisdom of the ancients to really understand these things." 8.

"Wisdom of the Ancients" bears an uneasy resemblance to Ancient Wisdom, which is the esoteric term
used by occultists for Gnosis or Mysticism. William Kingsland wrote of this wisdom in his book, " THE
GNOSIS OR ANCIENT WISDOM IN THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES: OR THE WISDOM IN A
MYSTERY":

"...when I speak of the Gnosis, I do not refer specifically to the Greek or Coptic variety, but to that 'Ancient
Wisdom' which can be discovered as a thread of gold running through allegories and myths and fables
from the very earliest times of which we have any literary records, and which has more recently been
somewhat more fully expounded to us by some of the existing Masters of that Wisdom." 9.

Are Christians unable to understand the Bibles teachings without this Ancient Wisdom?

Psalm 19: 7-11:

"The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the
simple. The statutes of the Lord are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the Lord is pure,
enlightening the eyes. The fear of the Lord is clean, enduring forever: the judgments of the Lord are true
and righteous altogether. More to be desired are they than gold, yea, than much fine gold: sweeter also
than honey and the honeycomb. Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping them there is
great reward."

What about other sources of Jewish thought regarding the Messiah, the kingdom of God, sin and
salvation? How do teachings expounded from the "Ancient Wisdom" compare with the New Testament
teachings? What differences may be found between the inspired Old and New Testament and the
"Mishnah, Haggadah, Halakah, Talmud and Midrash?" Has the Holy Spirit equally inspired these
sources?

Perhaps Peter Michas is correct in saying that we need to understand the original concepts from history
and as they are taught now —particularly from these books and the Jewish people themselves.
Obviously, they would hold the keys to the Hebrew Roots of Christianity as taught by the Jewish sages.

Avi ben Mordechai, an Orthodox Sephardic Jew, concurs with Hebrew Roots teachers that the ancient
Jewish teachers of the Law hold the answers:
"…Since Sha’ul followed Messiah Y’shua, who also taught the Oral and Written Torah, I submit (at this
time in my life) that we should be following in the footsteps of Judaism’s great teachers of G-d’s Law,… I
believe that Judaism’s ancient scholars and sages were far more knowledgeable on the Oral Traditions
than we could ever hope to be." 10.

For More on Avi ben Mordechai see: Avi ben Mordechai & Millennium 7000

In other words, the rabbinical scholars are saying much the same thing as the leaders of the Hebrew
Roots/Messianic movements. According to these eminent scholars, the Bible is in error and insufficient in
itself, and therefore not easily or correctly understood without the aid of select knowledge and insight from
the written and oral traditions of the Hebrew rabbis and scribes of old. Among the ancient Jewish writings
which we are urged to study, the Talmud is regarded by the Jewish people as equal to the Scriptures and
by some even more important than the Scriptures.

Many are teaching that one must also utilize "PaRDes as a tool for Torah study," with the qualifier, "that
this would be within normative rabbinic Judaism (and should be in ours), not necessarily just Kaballah,
that is why the rule for being 40 years of age and extensively schooled in Torah was the original
prerequisite for understanding Sod." and in order to understand the meaning of the Scriptures. However,
kabbalah will be discussed and it needs to be understood that Pardes is an acronym for the
understanding of Scriptures via kabbalistic means.

It's noteworthy that an article published in the final print edition of the Jerusalem Perspective, written by
David Bivin of the Jerusalem School of Synoptic Research (JSSR) and who is so popular within the
Hebrew Roots movement, is not accepted by many within the Hebrew Roots or Messianic movements or
Christians embracing these teachings, because of their not understanding or denying the source of
kabbalah or Pardes:
“... students of the Kabbalah speak of Pardes ...which is an acronym derived from the initial letter of each
of the four terms (p-r-d-s)....According to the late Professor Gershom Scholem, pioneer researcher in the
field of Kabbalah, Moses ben Shem Tov of Leon was the first known writer to mention the acronym
Pardes. He did so about 1290 in a composition called Sefer Pardes. Moses ben Shem Tov also wrote
The Zohar, which became the most influential work of the Spanish Kabbalists...The Kabbalists were
mystics par excellence, and they pursued vigorously Scripture's concealed meanings. They aspired to an
elevated spiritual awareness by gaining access to concealed knowledge through scrutinizing each letter
of the biblical text and through ecstatic ascents into heaven...Their longing for esoteric knowledge may be
traced back in part to earlier Gnostic speculations. Such speculations left their imprints on the
Kabbalah...The acronym Pardes belongs exclusively to the domain of the Kabbalah.”

Quoted from an article titled:

“Medieval Jargon on First-century Lips”

Author: David Bivin
Jerusalem Perspective
Page 33
July-September 1999 #56

A book published in 1984 by David Bivin (Director of the JSSR) and Roy Blizzard has formed the basis
of much Hebrew Roots' doctrine. The following excerpts from Understanding The Difficult Words Of Jesus
represent the JSSR viewpoint on the lack of originality of the Greek New Testament:

"...Our reasons for writing this book are not only to show that the original gospel was communicated in the
Hebrew language; but to show that the entire New Testament can only be understood from a Hebrew
perspective. 2.
"It cannot be overemphasised, that the key to an understanding of the New Testament is a fluent
knowledge of Hebrew and an intimate acquaintance with Jewish history, culture, and Rabbinic Literature."

Jesus Christ is identified by the JSSR as being "like other Jewish sages of that time". Please see Jacob
Prasch & The Jerusalem School of Synoptic Research for more on the JSSR

We are reminded in 1 Corinthians 2:5:

"That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God."

James 1:5:

"If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it
shall be given him."

Primacy of the Talmud

Author, Nesta Webster quotes Talmud translator, Michael Rodkinson's view of the importance of the
Talmud in Jewish life:

" The modern Jew is the product of the Talmud."¹ 11a.

She goes on to mention the lesser importance of Scripture given by the Talmud:

" The Talmud itself accords to the Bible only a secondary place. Thus the Talmudic treatise Soferim says:
'The Bible is like water, the Mischna is like wine, and the Gemarah is like spiced wine.'" 11.

One can verify these statements in the Talmudic treatise Soferim, in the tract Sopherim XV, 7, fol.13b.
This teaching regarding the inferior status of the Bible is echoed in the tract Babha Metsia, fol. 33a:

"Those who devote themselves to reading the Bible exercise a certain virtue, but not very much; those
who study the Mischnah exercise virtue for which they will receive a reward; those, however, who take
upon themselves to study the Gemarah exercise the highest virtue. " 12.

The author, Rev. I.B. Pranaitis, reiterates the high esteem with which the Talmud and its writers are held,
either placing it on a level with Scripture or surpassing it:

"In the tract Erubhin, f.13b, where it is related that there was a difference of opinion between the two
schools of Hillel and Schamai, it is concluded that:

"The words of both are the words of the living God."

In the book Mizbeach, cap. V, we find the following opinion:

"There is nothing superior to the Holy Talmud." "Contemporary defenders of the Talmud speak of it
almost in the same way." 13.

"…The following is a well-known and highly praised opinion in the writings of the Rabbis:

"My son, give heed to the words of the scribes rather than to the words of the law."
The reason for this is found in the tract Sanhedrin X, 3, f.88b:

"He who transgresses the words of the scribes sins more gravely than the transgressors of the words of
the law." 14.

From the Babylonian Talmud we read that rabbis can debate God---and win:

Baba Mezia 59b. A rabbi debates God and defeats Him. God admits the rabbi
won the debate. 15.

Maimonides defines the various ways one would be considered a denier of the Law, meaning not the
Bible, but the oral law as set down by the sages:

Rabbi Maimonides, in Hilkhoth Teschubhah (III, 8) gives the list of those who are considered as denying
the Law: "There are three classes of people who deny the Law of the Torah: (1) Those who say that the
Torah was not given by God, at least one verse or one word of it, and who say that it was all the work of
Moses; (2) Those who reject the explanation of the Torah, namely, the Oral Law of the Mischnah, and do
not recognize the authority of the Doctors of the Law, like the followers of Tsadok (Sadducees) and
Baithos; (3) Those who say that God changed the Law for another New Law, and that the Torah no
longer has any value, although they do not deny that it was given by God, as the Christians and the Turks
believe. All of these deny the Law of the Torah." 16.

Scribes and Pharisees

Who are the scribes whose words or oral law must be listened to and obeyed above all the written law?
Quoting again from Hyam Maccoby’s, Revolution in Judaea, is the following explanation of the terms
Pharisee, Sadducee, scribes and rabbis, at the time of Christ.

"These [the Pharisees] were the members of the body of ‘Comrades’ (Haverim) as they called
themselves. Their leaders were called ‘Wise Men’ (Hahamin), and they were later given the title ‘Master"
(Rabbi) before their names. These leaders were also sometimes known as the ‘Scribes’ after the title of
Ezra and his followers in late Biblical times. Pharisees, in fact, regarded Ezra as the founder of their
movement, and they regarded themselves as the heirs of the Prophetic tradition." 17.

The term Pharisee was used at the time of Jesus, and eventually became replaced completely with rabbi,
who was often a lay teacher. Rabbi Maccoby explains the differences between the Pharisees and
Sadducees at the time of Christ.

"The central religious distinction between the Pharisees and the Sadducees was on the question of the
‘Oral Law’. The Pharisees held that in addition to the revealed word of God in Scripture ( i.e. the Old
Testament, as Christians later called, and especially the five books of Moses known as the Torah or
‘Teaching’) there was an oral tradition consisting of interpretations and enactments supplementing and
developing the Written Law." 18.

"…The Sadducees, on the other hand, held that the whole of Judaism lay in the Written Law which was a
closed and final revelation with no need of interpretation or development. The Sadducees, ...wanted to
keep Judaism simple. They wanted it to be centered around three great institutions, the Scripture, the
Priesthood, and the Temple…" 19.

Mr. Maccoby goes on to develop the Pharisaical view of the Torah as a dynamic document, subject to
new interpretations by themselves, according to the Oral Law:
"… To the Pharisees, however, this policy was, in their own graphic phrase, ‘to put Torah into a corner’.
[B.Kiddushin, 66a.(Talmud)] The Torah was to them, a living thing which must continually encounter and
grapple with new circumstances, thus, giving rise to new decisions which became part of the developing
Oral Law. This does not mean the Pharisees regarded the Bible as imperfect. It was the Word of God,
revealed to Moses and the Prophets. But new circumstances were continually drawing out of it new
depths of meaning; its content was inexhaustible. This growing knowledge of the possibilities of the
Torah, revealed through time in the processes of history, was the Oral Law. In other words, the place of
the Torah was ‘not in heaven, but in the hands of men’; [B.B.Metz, 59b. (Talmud)] and the Oral Law was
thus the working, human reality of the divine revelation." 20.

"The Pharisees, however, always claimed that the Oral Law, of which they were supporters and
champions, went back to the origins of Judaism and that the Sadducees, in denying the Oral Law, were
heretics who were attempting to abolish a fundamental religious principle. " 21.

In the volume, Josephus, the historian, also contrasts the views of the Pharisees and Sadducees
regarding the Oral Law:

"…the Pharisees have delivered to the people a great many observances by succession from their
fathers, which are not written in the law of Moses; and it is for this reason that the Sadducees reject them,
and say that we are to esteem those observances to be obligatory which are in the written word, and not
to observe what are derived from the tradition of our forefathers. " 22.

In defense and support of the Pharisees, Hyam Maccoby adds this tribute to their preservation and
multiplying of religious rituals and traditions:

"The Pharisees added new Festivals (Chanukah and Purim) to the Jewish religious year; they added to
the canon of Scripture…they added new doctrine to Judaism…they added new rites to the Temple
worship…as well as being continual creators of new prayers and ceremonies in the synagogue." 23.

Indeed, the authority and respect attributed to rabbis is so great, that it is taught within the Babylonian
Talmud, section Hagigah 27a., that no rabbi will go to hell.

The Pharisees and Sadducees were both believers in the word given by God to man, but the Pharisees
added extra-Biblical oral teachings as authority over the written Word of God. They called the Sadducees
heretics for not doing so. Those in the Hebrew Roots movement parallel the Pharisees in that they look to
these extra-Biblical works for their guidance---and wish all to follow suit.

Jesus refuted the teachings of the Sadducees:

Mark 12:24:

"And Jesus answering said unto them, Do ye not therefore err, because ye know not the scriptures,
neither the power of God?"

Exclusiveness of the Talmud

Why would the leaders of the Hebrew Roots, Nazarene movements want us to study the Talmud, and so
on, when the Talmud itself teaches that it's precepts are only for the Jews??

P.L.B. Drach states in his " De l' Harmonie entre l'Eglise et la Synagogue,"
"… the Talmud is not a law of righteousness for all mankind, but a meticulous code applying to the Jew
alone ....In the Talmud and ... as Drach points out, "the precepts of justice, of equity, of charity towards
one’s neighbor, are not only not applicable with regard to the Christian, but constitute a crime in anyone
who would act differently ... The Talmud expressly forbids one to save a non-Jew from death, ...to restore
lost goods, etc., to him, to have pity on him." 24.

The exclusiveness of the Talmud is commonly understood among the Jews. In the footnote regarding
these quotes it is noted that Drach was:

"Quoting the treatise Aboda-Zara, folio 13 verso, and folio 20 recto; also treatise Baba Kamna, folio 29
verso. Drach adds: "We could multiply these quotations to infinity"

It should be noted that Mr. Drachs knowledge comes firsthand. Accordingly,

"…The Jewish Encyclopædia has an article on Drach in which it says he was brought up in a Talmudic
school…" 25.

Furthermore the Talmudic view of the Gospels and those who own them are as follows:

" In the Talmud those who possess books called the Gospels are heretics [Minim]. Thus in Schabbath
(116a) it says: "Rabbi Meir calls the books of the Minim Aven Gilaion [iniquitous volumes] because they
call them Gospels." 26.

What Scripture supports the idea that we must hold to Hebrew thought that the Gospels are iniquitous
and those who believe them are heretics? Is this what Larry Rowland means by "understanding in order
to grasp all that scripture has to offer"? Is this oral tradition committed to the writings of the Talmud, to be
embraced as truth and supporting what Christ himself taught?

Or did Jesus say in Matthew 15:6:

"Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition."

James 2:9:

"But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as trangressors."

Considering the great importance of the Talmud in Hebrew thought and Hebrew Roots teachings, we
need to understand exactly what the Talmud is and what it contains.

The Talmud

Many involved in Judaism and the Hebrew Roots movement embrace the idea that the Talmud is divinely
inspired and of benefit to Christianity. In the past, not surprisingly, some Jews have viewed the Talmud as
an obstacle, preventing reconciliation between the groups.

We know that many people, Jewish and non-Jewish, do not consider the New Testament to be of God.

However, Avi ben Mordechai redefines the gospel as the Oral Torah:
"…When Paul says, "I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of
Christ unto another gospel" you need to see the definition of Gospel in light of the Mishnah of Mark 1:1ff.
It's a direct connection to the Torah of Moshe- Oral and Written…" 27.

It has been established that the oral traditions of the Pharisees, which were committed to the Talmud,
take authority and precedence over the Old Testament, as Judaism's holiest book. The Talmud contains
material accumulated over several centuries. A complete collection consists of 63 books in 524 chapters.
The main elements of the Talmud are the Mishna, the Gemara (Babylonian and Palestinian) and the
Midrashim or Midrash. The Mishna and Gemara compose the Jerusalem Talmud, which was revised in
the third to fifth century and later named the Babylonian Talmud, the one commonly used today. Credit is
given to Rabbi Judah the Prince for the compilation of the Mishna around 200 A.D.

The Talmud itself confirms, again, the authority of the Talmud teachings in Erubin 21b (Soncino edition):

"My son, be more careful in the observance of the words of the Scribes than in the words of the Torah
(Old Testament)." 28.

In Judaism on Trial, Hyam Maccoby quoted Rabbi Yehiel ben Joseph, who insists that it is indispensable
to understanding Scripture:

"Further, without the Talmud, we would not be able to understand passages in the Bible...God has
handed this authority to the sages and tradition is a necessity as well as scripture. The Sages also made
enactments of their own... anyone who does not study the Talmud cannot understand Scripture." 29.

From Fabre d' Olivet, author of La Langue He'braique, we learn not only the true source of the Hebrew
Oral Tradition, which is Egypt, but its future transmission into the great body of Jewish mysticism called
the Kabbalah:

"…According to Fabre d'Olivet, Moses, who was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, "drew from
the Egyptian Mysteries a part of the oral tradition which was handed down through 'the leaders of the
Isrealites."¹. That such an oral tradition, distinct from the written word embodied in the Pentateuch, did
descend from Moses and that it was later committed in writing in the Talmud and the Cabala is the
opinion of many Jewish writers." ². 30.

From the "Kabbalah in English", we may glean factual information about the Hebrew Sacred books,
whose Gnostic (hidden) meanings were later developed into the Kabbalah:

"…But the Scripture alone can not show the meanings within. Rabbinic hermeneutics could find a wealth
of meaning in the subtlest details of the text, a characteristic that Kabbalistic writing took over… The
Talmud is actually two works in one… The core work is the Mishnah, a codification of Jewish Law from
the second century CE, together with transcriptions of debates, discussions, and teachings of various
sages in the next two to three centuries, organized around the Mishnah, called the Gemara. The Talmud
thus shares the same structure of the Mishnah--a tractate by tractate enunciation of Jewish law; but,
being in form the record of oral teaching, the Gemara wanders far and wide. There are two versions of
the Gemara, based on the work of the Academies of Babylonia (Babylonian Talmud/Talmud Bavli) and
Palestine (called the Palestinian Talmud or Talmud of the Land of Israel; in Hebrew the title is Talmud
Yerushalmi, or Jerusalem Talmud). Not every tractate of the Mishnah accumulated a Gemara, and some
tractates have Gemara in one recension but not the other… the standard complete translation of the Bavli
is that of Soncino Press, originally done in the 1930s… The Hebrew contains various commentaries
normally printed with the Talmud, but these are not translated…"31.

Regarding the Midrash, The Kabbalah in English, notes the legendary character of its content, and further
explains the more important authors and their commentaries.
"…The Midrash, stemming from the same period as the Talmud, but more concerned with supplying
context and elaboration of the Biblical text. Much legendary material is archived here. Midrashim exist on
the Torah, the books of Ruth, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes, Esther, Song of Songs (together referred to as
the five Megillot), and Psalms. Usually all but the last are grouped together as Midrash Rabbah, and an
multivolume translation from the Soncino Press is available…"32.

"Ancillary to this is Rashi and Rambam. Rashi is Rabbi Shlomo ben Yitzchak, author of the most
important, because most widespread, commentary on the Bible and the Talmud; even the most
uneducated of Jews in premodern times knew what Rashi said about a passage in the Bible, and his
glosses are to be found on almost every page of the Talmud… His commentary generally distills the
Talmudic teaching, and draws on the Midrash heavily; and in turn lies at the foundation of many later
commentators… Rambam is Rabbi Moses ben Maimon (another acronym), usually called in English by
his Greek name, Maimonides. He wrote the first definitive compilation of Jewish law since Talmudic times,
the Mishneh Torah, but for the student of Kabbalah it is the Guide for the Perplexed, Moreh Nebuchim…"
33.

Peter Michas, Jacob Prasch and others in the Hebrew Roots, also favour the Midrash. Hyam Maccoby
notes that The Haggada of the Midrash is composed of Jewish fables:

"The Haggada (found mainly in the Midrash) is the poetical side of Pharisaism, and comprises folktales,
parables, quaint fancies and metaphysical speculations." 34.

God issues this warning in the Scriptures found in Titus 1:14:

" Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth."

Jewish Education and "Halacha"

Project Genesis, found at www.torah.org/info/genesis.html, is connected to such Hebrew Roots sites as

Larry Rowlands, Messengers of Truth. Part of its purpose includes education about Jewish roots:

"Project Genesis promotes further Jewish education about our Jewish roots, as represented in Jewish
sources…"

According to their Facts,

"Our teachers are Orthodox, so they approach the tradition from a traditional perspective (which is logical,
after all). But our program so carefully avoids labels and politics that Conservative and Reform Rabbis
have actively expressed their support of the program to their congregants and colleagues." 35.

One of their online Torah projects is the Hypertext Halacha, which is a translation of selections of the
Mishna. The Hypertext Halacha:

"is a translation of the Shulchan Aruch and Mishna Berurah as distributed by Project Genesis " 36.
http://www.torah.org/

The term Halacha is used frequently when discussing the Midrash, Mishnah and Talmudic teachings, and
needs to be defined. According to one authority,

"Halacha means "Way" or "Path". Halacha is the application of the Law (Torah) to everyday living. The
traditional viewpoint is that Halacha should be decided by those who are most knowledgable in all
aspects of Jewish law. Since the Halacha of each generation is decided by its greatest Torah scholars,
and the Torah doesn't change, there is usually little change in the Halacha from one generation to the
next. The development of Halacha is most evident when new situations arise for which rulings must be
made, such as the destruction of the Temple, the development of electricity, and the increasing
complexity of modern food processing technology. Since the non-traditional viewpoint is that the Torah
itself was written by people, both the interpretation of the Law and its application are re-evaluated in each
generation, using the interpretations of the past to serve primarily as non-binding guidance in how to
continue this process. Both viewpoints encourages all Jews to study halacha, and apply it to their daily
lives in order that they be brought closer to G-d." 37.

The Halacha List Home page cites that the teachings of the Mishna Berurah (like Project Genesis) are
provided with the intended aim, " to familiarize the general public with various Halachic situations
which are relevant to our everyday life." 38.

With that in mind we see from the Hypertext Halacha, distributed by Project Genesis , a list of topics from
these Sacred Jewish books, relevant to everyday life. Just a small portion of these includes the following
examples.

"Siman 11. The Laws of Tzitzis The Laws of the Tzitzis String, 12. Things that Invalidate Tzitzis [Fringes]
… Siman 20. Laws of Tzitzis in a Cemetary… Siman 26. The Law for Someone Who Has Only One
"Tifila"… Siman 28. The Laws of taking off the Tefillin… Siman 35. The Law Concerning the Number of
Lines (in the Torah Passages of Tefilin)… Siman 39. Which People are fit to write Tefilin and …" Siman
43 The laws of tefilin when entering a bathroom(cont.)… Siman 45 The Laws of Tefillin in a graveyard
and bathhouse… Siman 73 How one who sleeps with his wife and children should act… Siman 75 One
should be careful about [a woman's] uncovered hair and a woman's [singing] voice when reading the
Shema, and also not to read it in the presence of nakedness… Siman 76 To Be Careful of Excrement
While Saying the Shema … Siman 79 One who comes across excrement when reading the Shema
(continued)…Siman 89 The Laws of Prayer and Their Proper Time… Siman 100 One must concentrate
upon all of the blessings, and one can pray in any language [Shmoneh Esrei]… Siman 103 Someone who
needs to flatulate in the middle of praying…. Siman 114 The law of mentioning wind, rain and dew." 39.

The Jewish writer, Solomon Maimon, wrote in 1792, to expose what he called "absurd questions" which
are discussed with utmost seriousness and explicit detail in the Talmud.

". . .the oddest rabbinical conceits are elaborated through many volumes with the finest dialectic, and
absurd questions are discussed with the highest efforts of intellectual power: for example, how many
white hairs may a red cow have, and yet remain a red cow; what sort of scabs require this or that
purification; whether a louse or a flea may be killed on the Sabbath-the first being allowed, while the
second is a deadly sin; whether the slaughter of an animal ought to be executed at the neck or the tail;
whether the high priest put on his shirt or his hose first; whether the Jabam, that is, the brother of a man
who died childless, being required by law to marry the widow, is relieved from his obligation if he falls off a
roof and sticks in the mire." 40.

Global Unity and the Halacha

Avi ben Mordechai, an Orthodox Sephardic Jew, indicates that we need to incorporate the Jewish
"halacha" teachings in order for "believers" to be unified globally. His intention is that Jewish teachers and
eventually a Jewish high court should be in place in order to teach us the truth.

"…As I see it today… Nazerean (Messianic) halacha should be in place to help us as a global
community of believers in Y’shua HaMashiach properly interpret the written code of Sinai for the
community at-large. Not only is this good government (i.e., "the kingdom of G-d on earth") but this is
also the commandment of Y’shua.…"

"The council in Acts Chapter 15 led by it Nasi (Prince) Ya’acov HaTzadeq (James) and his Av Bet Din
(Father of the House of Judgment) Kefa (Peter), was built on Y’shua’s Mishnah and Gemara and on the
principle that biblical Jewish government must include the halachic jurisdiction of a Bet Din or
high court ( Mattityahu 18). Consequently, I believe we have the responsibility and privilege to
establish another authority like the one recorded in Acts 15, and ideally, it should be seated in
Y’rushalayim! "

"… first century halacha is not what it used to be. Furthermore, since there is no official high court to
represent the halachic interests of believers in Y’shua, what are we to do with our own disputes,
judgments, and need for legal rulings? Do we turn to the established traditions of the Sephardim?
[Kabbalists] The Ashenazim? [Mystics] The Conservatives or some other body of Judaism?…I believe
that Judaism’s ancient scholars and sages were far more knowledgeable on the Oral Traditions
than we could ever hope to be. So, what do we do? Where do we stand today since we do not have
our own high court and have not had one for nearly two millennia?" 41.

Both the Sephardim and the Ashkenazim are gnostic sects of Judaism. The Sephardim are credited with
the dissemination of the Cabala throughout Europe after the Jews were expelled from Spain.

Since the Talmud is considered to be above the Bible, it behooves us to know what things it teaches
about the very foundations of our Christian beliefs. Since we are admonished we are not able to
understand the Word of God without it and we need to be taught by Jewish sages, that is to whom we will
turn, to see what is believed and taught.

Psalm 119: 16:

"I will delight myself in thy statutes: I will not forget thy word."

I Corinthians 1:19:

"For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the
prudent."

All Scripture quotes from the Authorized King James Bible

Next Section:

To Embrace Hebrew Roots: III-- The Talmud & Jesus Christ

Previous Section: To Embrace Hebrew Roots Introduction

Footnotes

1. Peter Michas, http://www.ez/com/~peterm/HB.GK.RF.HTML

2. Fitzmyer, "Responses to 101 Questions on the Dead Sea Scrolls; p.104 ; as Cited in Andrew
Goulds SOME DISTURBING ASPECTS OF THE SO-CALLED "HEBREW ROOTS' MOVEMENT,
AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS"
3. Unger's Bible Dictionary p. 706, Ibid.
4. Ibid p.422 Ibid.
5. Hyam Maccoby; "Revolution in Judaea: Jesus and the Jewish Resistance"; p. 230, ii. Ocean
Books; 1973
6. House of Yahweh, www.yahweh.com
7. Jacob Prasch; Explaining the Midrash; www.cw.co.za/moriel/midrash.html]
8. Ibid.
9. Kingsland, William. THE GNOSIS OR ANCIENT WISDOM IN THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES:
OR THE WISDOM IN A MYSTERY; London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1954 (1937), Kingsland,
p.83
10. Avi ben Mordechai; www.millenium7000.com/halacha.htm
11. Michael Rodkinson (i.e. Rodkinssohn), in Preface to the translation of the Talmud, Vol. I. p. x. ; as
Cited in: Nesta H. Webster, p. 370-371., "Secret Societies and Subversive Movements" Omni
Publications, Eighth edition, 1964
12. Rev. I.B. Pranaitis; The Talmud Unmasked: The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning
Christians; The Talmud; holywar.org/txt/talmud_unmasked.html
13. Ibid.
14. Ibid.,
15. Michael A. Hoffman II & Alan R. Critchley, The Campaign for Radical Truth in History;
http://www.hoffman-info.com
16. Pranaitis, op.cit.
17. Maccoby, op.cit., p.77-78
18. Ibid., p. 74
19. Ibid., p.74-75
20. Ibid., p.75
21. Ibid., p..76
22. Ibid., p.77
23. Ibid., p.281
24. P.L.B. Drach, De l’Harmonie entre l’Elise et la Synagogue, I. 167. Cited in: Nesta H. Webster, op.
cit. p.371 Note: probable typo in Book. Should be De l’Harmonie entre l’Eglise et la Synagogue,
as cited on other pages in the book
25. Webster, Ibid., p.11-12
26. Rev. Pranaitis; holywar.org/txt/talmud_unmasked.html
27. Avi ben Mordechai, email to Ed Tarkowski, May 1998
28. Michael A. Hoffman II & Alan R. Critchley, op. cit.
29. Ibid.
30. 1. Fabre d' Olivet, La Langue He'braique, p.28 (1815); 2. According to the Jewish view God had
given Moses on Mt. Sinai alike the oral and the written Law, that is, the Law with all it’s
interpretations and applications."-Alfred Edersheim, The Life and Times of Jesus the
Messiah,I.99 (1883)quoting other Jewish authorities; as Cited in Nesta H. Webster; Ibid., p.6
31. Kabbalah in English, http://remus.rutgers.edu/~woj/arcana/index.html
32. Ibid.
33. Ibid
34. Maccoby, op.cit., p. 281
35. Project Genesis, http://www.torah.org/info/genesis.html
36. Hypertext Halacha; http://www.torah.org/learning/halacha/
37. Torah and Halachic Authority (3/12) - What is "Halacha?" How is it determined?;
http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/text/faq/usenet-faqs/html/judaism/FAQ/03-Torah-Halacha/faq-doc-
45.html
38. http://www.virtualjerusalem.com/city_services/lists/halacha/index.htm
39. Hypertext Halacha; http://www.torah.org/learning/halacha/
40. Solomon Maimon: an Autobiography, translated from the German by J. Clark Murray, p. 28
(1888). The original appeared in 1792. As Cited in: Webster ; op.cit. p. 7
 41. Avi ben Mordechai, Halacha; www.millenium7000.com/halacha.htm

http://www.seekgod.ca/embracebible.htm

To Embrace Hebrew Roots: Part III

The Talmud & Jesus Christ

Please note: Research into the Hebrew Roots & Messianic movements constitutes research into
Judaism as well as the occult. We fully respect each persons right to believe or utilize what resources
they choose. We however, see a clear distinction in believing the Messiah has come versus utilizing
resources which still await His coming. That is how and why we must evaluate all to Christ and the New
Testament as well as the Tenach. We do not wish to edit or criticize Judaism, but recognize it as distinct
from our Christian beliefs, just as many in Judaism also see a distinction and separateness from our
beliefs, and we jointly have mutual respect for our differences and each other.

Since we are asked to embrace the teachings of the Talmud and various other writings and teachings of
the Jewish people, we should start by inquiring as to what these teach about our Lord and Savior, Jesus
Christ.

I John 5: 10- 13

"He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself; he that believeth not God hath made
him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son. And this is the record, that God
hath given us eternal life; and this life is in his Son. He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the
Son hath not life. These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye
may know that ye have eternal life; and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God."

From a Jewish article about Jesus we learn that the Talmud slanders our Savior, Jesus Christ.

"... the Jewish Encyclopœdia admits that Jewish legends concerning Jesus are found in the Talmud and
Midrash and in " the life of Jesus ( Toledot Yeshu) that originated in the Middle Ages. It is the tendency of
all these sources to belittle the person of Jesus by ascribing to Him illegitimate birth, magic, and a
shameful death. " 1.

Upon scrutiny one also finds that Jesus is maligned as a false teacher:

"… He [Jesus] is referred to in the Talmud as Otho Isch- "That man," i.e. the one who is known to all. In
the tract Abhodah Zarah, 6a, we read: "He is called a Christian who follows the false teachings of
that man, who taught them to celebrate the feast on the first day of the Sabbath, that is, to worship on the
first day after Sabbath…Talui, -"The one who was hanged"…" 2.

Many people believe that the name for Jesus in Hebrew is Jeschua or Yeshua. However, the complete,

"…name in Hebrew would be Jeschua Hanotsri--Jesus the Nazarene. He is called Notsri from the city of
Nazareth… In the Talmud Christians are also called Notsrim. (Amongst other things). 'Since the word
Jeschua means 'Savior,' the name Jesus rarely occurs in the Jewish books. It is almost always
abbreviated to Jeschu…"3.

In the Talmud, the name "Jeschu [Ieschu]" can apparently be translated:

"…as if it were composed of the initial letters of the three words Immach SCHemo Vezikro-- (meaning)- -
'May his name be blotted out.'" 4.

That translation could only be accomplished by the use of Gematria a tool of Kabbalists. Hebrew Roots
proponents might say that these teachings are in the past. However, a review of various sources reveals
the same or similar teachings.

The Talmud and Cabala teachings of the Toledot Yeshu-- (or Tolodoth Ieschu or Sepher Toldoth
Jehoshua) represent various teachings regarding Christ, which may be shocking to many. A brief
overview of these teachings refers to writings that quote the Talmud, (treatise Sabbath, folio 104, treatise
Sanhedrim, folio 107, and Sota, folio 47) which presents this falsified account of Jesus:

"...the Toledot Yeshu relates with the most indecent details that Miriam, a hairdresser of Bethlehem,4.
affianced to a young man named Jochanan, was seduced by a libertine, Joseph Panther or Pandira, and
gave birth to a son whom she named Johosuah or Jeschu. According to the Talmudic authors of the Sota
and the Sanhedrim, Jeschu was taken during his boyhood to Egypt, where he was initiated into the
secrets doctrines of the priests, and on his return to Palestine gave himself up to the practice of
magic. 5. The Toledot Yeshu, however, goes on to say that on reaching manhood, Jeschu learnt the
secret of his illegitimacy, on account of which he was driven out of the Synagogue and took refuge for a
time in Galilee."

"Now, there was in the Temple a stone on which was engraved the Tetragrammaton [YHWH] or Schem
Hamphorasch, that is to say, the Ineffable Name of God; this stone had been found by King David when
the foundations of the Temple were being prepared and was deposited by him in the Holy of Holies.
Jeschu, knowing this, came from Galilee and, penetrating into the Holy of Holies, read the Ineffable
name, which he transcribed on to a piece of whom parchment and concealed in an incision under his
skin. By this means he was able to work miracles and to persuade the people that he was the son
of God foretold by Isaiah. With the aid of Judas, the Sages of the Synagogue, succeeding in capturing
Jeschu, who was then lead before the Great and Little Sanhedrim, by whom he was condemned to be
stoned to death and finally hanged." Such is the story of Christ according to the Jewish Kabbalists ..." 5.

This false witness to the person of Jesus in the Talmud is also confirmed by Rev. I. B. Pranaitis in his
online report, The Talmud Unmasked: The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians, and other
sources" 6.

More importantly Daniel Lapin, an Orthodox Jewish Rabbi, stated in "Protesting Gibson's Passion Lacks
Moral Legitimacy":

"...Do we really want to open up the Pandora's Box of suggesting that any faith may demand the removal
of material that it finds offensive from the doctrines of any other faith? Do we really want to return to those
dark times when Catholic authorities attempted to strip from the Talmud those passages that they found
offensive? Some of my Jewish readers may feel squeamish about my alluding to the existence of
Talmudic passages uncomplimentary toward Jesus as well as descriptive of Jewish involvement in his
crucifixion. However the truth is that anyone with Internet access can easily locate those passages in
about ten seconds. I think it far better that in the name of genuine Jewish-Christian friendship in America,
we allow all faiths their own beliefs even if we find those beliefs troubling or at odds with our own beliefs.
This way we can all prosper safely under the constitutional protection of the United States of America..."
[September 22, 2003; Rabbi Daniel Lapin, "Protesting Gibson's Passion Lacks Moral Legitimacy";
President, Toward Tradition; www.towardtradition.org/article_Mel_Gibson.htm]
Another Jesus?

In his email circulated article, "Some Disturbing Aspects of the So-called 'Hebrew Roots' Movement and
Their Implications" Andrew Gould presents the Hebrew Roots doubtful view concerning the validity of the
Gospel account of Jesus.

"…It has been widely accepted in "Hebrew Roots" circles that Jesus spoke Hebrew and that the Gospels
were originally written in Hebrew. Most "Hebrew Roots" ministries have been influenced in this notion by
the output of a body called the Jerusalem School Of Synoptic Research, [JSSR] and most especially due
to the widespread influence of the book "Understanding The Difficult Words Of Jesus" published by David
Bivin (Director of the JSSR) and his partner Roy Blizzard. in 1984 and reprinted in 1994 and 1995…" 7.

According to the JSSR, there is a more authentic Life of Jesus than the gospel accounts:

"… There was an original Hebrew 'Life of Jesus', from parts of which our canonical Greek Gospel Texts
are mere compilations and translations. The individual words of the Greek texts that we have are
standard Greek equivalents used to translate Hebrew documents into Greek, therefore we can retranslate
back into Hebrew to discover what Jesus really said. Failure to appreciate the Hebraic origins of the
Gospels has led to mistranslation, misinterpretation, spiritually damaging error and doctrinal
confusion." 8.

Toledot Yeshu, with its various components, is one of the Hebrew or Jewish views of Jesus for those who
rejected him as God come in the flesh. It has been established that the original manuscripts for the New
Testament were composed in Greek. If one accepts Jewish thought regarding who Jesus was according
to Judaic writings and teachings, then Jesus was not divine. It is also conveyed that He was not viewed
as divine by his disciples, but was viewed as the human Messiah. This subject will be pursued in the next
section on Jewish Thought.

Sir James Frazer, author of The Golden Bough, mentions that to cast doubts on the historical reality of
Jesus, would be hardly less absurd than it would be to doubt Mohammed and so on. Other historians
reiterate that the existence of Christ is an historic fact. However, Rene' Guenon,"who writes with inside
knowledge" of Theosophy in Le Theosophisme (1921), cites a reference to the occultic Le Lotus of 1887
which states that Jesus Christ of the New Testament never existed, but the Jesus of the Talmud did exist:

"... Madam Blavatsky's writings, on the person of Christ, ... 'For me, Jesus Christ, that is to say the Man-
God of the Christians, copy of the Avatars of all countries, of the Hindu Chrishna as of the Egyptian
Horus, was never a historical personage.' Hence the story of His life was merely an allegory founded on
the existence of the 'a personage named Jehoshua born at Lud.' But elsewhere she asserted that Jesus
may have lived during the Christian era or a century earlier 'as the Sepher Toldoth Jehoshua indicates.'

"And Madame Blavatsky went on to say of the savants who deny the historical value of this legend, that
they- 'either lie or talk nonsense. It is our Masters who affirm it. If the history of Jehoshua or Jesus Ben
Pandera is false, then the whole of the Talmud, the whole of the Jewish canon law, is false. It was
the disciple of Jehoshua ben Parachai, the fifth President of the Sanhedrin since Ezra, who re-wrote the
Bible .... This story is much truer than that of the New Testament, of which history does not say a word."
9.

Is it possible that Jehoshua Ben Pandera of the Talmud, who was initiated into the secrets doctrines and
gave himself up to the practice of magic, is Jehoshua or Yeshua or Jeschu whom the Hebrew Roots
ministries worship?
Please note, the question was asked in regard to the Talmudic descriptions. Yeshua [short form] for
Joshua or Yehoshua [long form], translates into Greek as Iesous. Jesus is a transliteration of Iesous
[Greek] and it came about from the Hebrew/Aramaic. We have no problem with the Name Yeshua, as it
means Salvation in Hebrew.

What we have a problem with, is those who try to deny the Name of Jesus, a Name that billions have
attained salvation using, and try to tell other believers that YAHshua, or numerous other variations, a
name that is not even found in the Old Testament, is the only name of the Messiah. For more on the
sacred name movement please see the series Taking the Name, the Mark and the Number.

For an in-depth discussion from a reader about the various Names, please see: Yahshua, Yehoshua,
Y'shua, Yeshua, Iesous, Iesus, or Jesus The Sacred Name or True Name

The following is a portion of an e-mail exchange dated 1/28/99 between the writer and Uri Marcus of
Nehemiah Trustee Covenant Fund:

Vicky Dillen: The name Jesus Christ is known world wide and synonymous with Christianity. That is a
historical fact.

Uri Marcus: Today, yes. 200+ years ago it was synonymous with nothing. How naive you are of history...

Vicky Dillen: The Jewish people reject that Jesus Christ was divine and believe that He was not God
come in the flesh. I believe on the other hand that He is all of that. Where do you stand Uri? In the Jewish
belief or in what Christ himself said and what is taught in the New Testament?

Uri Marcus: I believe in the Jewish belief. But your definition is somewhat lacking. Doesn't look like you
would understand it, since its already been explained, and it just goes right over your head.

th
From the La Science des Esprits, by the 19 century occultist, Eliphas Levi, we learn that the Cabalistic
Toledot Yeshu and similar Talmudic teachings were purposely hidden from Christians.

"…the Toledot Yeshu, or the Sepher Toldos Jeschu, described here as originating in the Middle
Ages…belongs in a much earlier period. Eliphas Levi asserts that 'the Sepher Toldos, to which the
Jews attribute a great antiquity and which they hid from the Christians with such precautions that
this book was for a long while unfindable, is quoted for the first time by Raymond Martin of the Order
of the Preaching Brothers… This book was evidently written by a Rabbi initiated into the mysteries of the
Cabala 1.'" 10.

History reveals that The Talmud itself was put on trial and ordered to be burned, by King Louis IX in June
of 1242, because of the various slanders against Christ, and Christianity. It was stated that The Talmud
contained such things as it being acceptable to deceive a Christian without any scruple; that it was
permitted to break a promise, and so on.

The stories contained in Toledot Yeshu and similar teachings were known in Jewish circles, but did not
come into the hands of 'Gentiles' or 'Christians' until Raymond Martin translated the Toledot Yeshu into
Latin. Later, Martin Luther summarized it in German under the name Schem Hamphorasch and his
expose can be found in French in Gustave Brunet's, Evangiles Apocryphes. 11.

According to Geschichte der Juden, by Jewish historian Heinrich Graetz, the image of Jesus Christ is
simply as an offshoot of Essenism and Jesus was just performing what any adept in the mysteries could
do.
"…Thus the Jewish historian Graetz declares that Jesus simply appropriated to himself the essential
features of Essenism, and that primitive Christianity was "nothing but an offshoot of Essenism"2" 12a.

Nesta Webster summarizes the Christ of the Talmud:

". . . So after representing Christ as a magician in the Toledot Yeshu and the Talmud, Jewish tradition
seeks to explain His miraculous works as those of a mere healer-an idea that we shall find
descending right through the secret societies to this day… if the miracles of Christ were simply due to a
knowledge of natural laws and His doctrines were the outcome of a sect, the whole theory of His divine
power and mission falls to the ground…" 12.

Many sources state that when the teachings regarding Jesus Christ in the Toledot Yeshu and other
Jewish books were discovered in the early 1600's, there were serious repercussions. A Jewish synod in
Poland in 1631, ordered the offending passages to be expunged, to be replaced by circles which the
Rabbis were to fill in orally when giving instructions to young Jews. This is documented by P.L.B Drach:

"Drach, op.cit. I.168, 169. The text of this encyclical is given in Hebrew and also in translation, thus: " This
is why we enjoin you, under the pain of excommunication major, to print nothing in future editions,
whether of Mischna or of the Gemara, which relates whether for good or evil to the acts of Jesus the
Nazarene, and to substitute instead a circle like this O, which will warn the Rabbis and schoolmasters
to teach the young these passages only viva voce. By means of this precaution the savants amongst the
Nazarenes will have no further pretext to attack us on this subject. Cf, Abbe'Chiarini, Le Talmud de
Babylone, p. 45 (1831)." 13.

These passages are said to have been reinserted since then, although such offensive passages would
not necessarily be in any English translations or newer editions. 14.

These then, are some of the Hebrew Roots - a significant part of which are the teachings and thought
within the Talmud regarding our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.

Some might say, that the views presented from the past regarding Jesus Christ do not apply today, or
have no effect on our studying Jewish tradition, teachings or thought within the Hebrew Roots movement.
That perhaps, the above information is no longer taught. We must ask ourselves, then, what was and is
today, Jewish thought regarding the Messiah, salvation, sin, the Son of God, and the divinity of Christ?
Do these Jewish terms mean the same as what we think?

John 14:6

"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me."

Acts 4:12

"Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men,
whereby we must be saved."

In his volume, The Talmud, Joseph Barclay confirmed the writings of Drach, a talmudist turned Catholic
whose writings were never refuted by Jews, that Jesus was a sorcerer:

" … Abominable calumnies on Christ and Christianity occur not only in the Cabala but in the earlier
editions of the Talmud. In these, says Barclay - "Our Lord and savior is "that one", "such an one", "a fool",
"the leper", "the deceiver of Israel", etc. Efforts are made to prove that He is the son of Joseph Pandira
before His marriage with Mary. His miracles are attributed to sorcery the secret of which He brought in
a slit in His flesh out of Egypt. He is said had been first stoned and then hanged on the eve of the
Passover. His disciples are called heretics and opprobious names. They are accused of immoral
practices, and the New Testament is called a sinful book. The references to these subjects manifest
the most bitter aversion and hatred." 15.

Jewish & Christian Terms

Knowing that there is much diversity of thought inside Judaism with four [some say three, under different
terms] basic groups: Orthodoxy, Conservative, Reform, and Reconstructionist Judaism, it is difficult to
present their respective ideas as being in agreement with one another. However, there are some
underlying beliefs that appear to remain constant and accepted by most Jews regarding Christ, the
Messiah, salvation, sin, and so on.

Jesus and Messiah

Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein, considered a Conservative Jew, explains some of today's thinking pertaining to
"The Differences between Judaism and Christianity":

In "THE JEWISH VIEW OF JESUS", Dr. Epstein gives Jesus credit for being a good teacher, but not God:

"To Christians, the central tenet of their religion is the belief that Jesus is the Son of God, part of the
trinity, the savior of souls who is the messiah. He is God's revelation through flesh. Jesus was, in
Christian terms, God incarnate, God in the flesh who came to Earth to absorb the sins of humans and
therefore free from sin those who accepted his divinity. To Jews, whatever wonderful teacher and
storyteller Jesus may have been, he was just a human, not the son of God (except in the metaphorical
sense in which all humans are children of God). In the Jewish view, Jesus cannot save souls; only
God can. Jesus did not, in the Jewish view, rise from the dead." 16.

The "Jews for Judaism" web site explains Jesus as a false prophet predicted in the Old Testament.

"…Jesus the Nazarene, who imagined that he would be messiah and was killed, is alluded to in the book
of Daniel, as it is said, `And the sons of the transgressors among thy people will rise, in order to establish
a vision, and will stumble' (Dan. 11:14). Can there be a greater stumbling then this? All the prophets said
that messiah will be a redeemer and a savior to the Israelites, will bring together their outcasts, and will
strengthen their obedience to the Divine precepts, but he (Jesus) caused destruction by the sword to
Israel, the dispersion of those left, and their humiliation. He changed the law, and misled many
people to worship a being beside G-D…." 17.

Rabbi Hyam Maccoby, in Revolution in Judaea, written in 1973 and still proclaimed accurate today,
defines the Jewish view of Messiah as an anointed one, and angel or king, but not divine:

"The title "Messiah' (Greek-Christos) was not a divine title among the Jews. It simply means '
anointed'. It was given to two Jewish officials, King and the High Priest… every Jewish king of the house
of David was known as Messiah, or Christ…" 18.

"The 'Son of Man', was not a Messiah. He was an angel identified with the Guardian Angel of Israel,
with Metatron, with the angel who guided the Children of Israel in the wilderness…" 19.
"…There is hardly any reference in the Prophetic writings of the Old Testament to the Messiah as a
person. There is no splendid shining figure judging mankind, sitting at the right-hand of God and coming
very near to eclipsing God Himself by His glory." 20.

"Messiah…in Jewish eyes, belonged to royalty, not divinity. Even the title 'Son of God" was to Jews
(but not to the Gnostics) a human title applied at various times in the Hebrew Scriptures to Kings such as
King David…"Son of Man" also was not a divine title…far better known as a mode of address to a
prophet…to mean simply 'human being'." 21.

The Jews for Judaism web site explains the historical "Jewish Belief in Messiah," from the Mishna (Torah)
by Maimonides:

"... In his monumental work Mishneh Torah, Maimonides (1135-1204) spelled out the fundamental Jewish
concept of the messiah as it was handed down to us, generation after generation, from the time of the
prophets…"

"…from the Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim XI - XII. The King Messiah will in some future time come,
restore the kingdom of David to its former power, build the Temple, bring together the scattered of Israel,
and all the ancient laws will again be in force. Sacrifices will be offered, and years of release and Jubilees
will be kept as prescribed in the Torah. Whoever does not believe in him, or does not hope for his coming,
shows a lack of faith not only in the prophets, but also in the Torah…" 22.

Many Jews have believed there would be many Messiahs. At the time of Christ, Hyam Maccoby states:

"… Any leader who succeeded in driving out the Romans and setting up an independent Jewish state
would have little difficulty in being recognized as the Messiah. His very success would prove his claim.
Thus Bar Kochba was recognized as the Messiah by Rabbi Akiva even though there was no evidence
of his descent from David." 23.

From the Jewish Guardian of 1924, we read that the great messianic prophecy, Isaiah 53, refers to the
sufferings of Israel, rather than Christ:

"… an article in the Jewish Press,… according to the teaching of the "Liberal Jewish Synagogue," the
beautiful passages in the fifty-third chapter of Isaiah concerning " the Man of Sorrows acquainted with
grief, "usually supposed by Christians to relate to the promised Messiah, are interpreted to modern
Jewish youth as relating to Israel and signifying that Israel's " sufferings were caused by the sins of other
nations," who thus "escaped the suffering they deserved." Consequently, "Israel was offered for the sake
of the whole world.2. " 24.

Messiah and Peace

According to Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein, current Jewish teaching excludes Jesus because it is unanimously
believed that the Messiah will bring peace:

"Jesus is not seen as the messiah. In the Jewish view, the messiah is a human being who will usher
in an era of peace. We can tell the messiah by looking at the world and seeing if it is at peace. From the
Jewish view, this clearly did not happen when Jesus was on Earth or anytime after his death." 25.

Hyam Maccoby considers Jesus to be a rebel, but misrepresented by the gospel accounts out of fear of
reprisals by Rome:
"…Jesus was executed as a rebel, against Rome, not as a blasphemer against the Jewish religion, and
that the Gospel's misrepresentations on this point are politically motivated--I regard as strongly
established…" 26.

Hyam Maccoby, author, is considered a classical scholar and Rabbi of Reform Judaism, and has in
recent years been director of the library at the Leo Baeck College of Judaistics in London. His books
appear to present accepted ideas regarding Christ, Christianity and the New Testament and the Jewish
thought. Clarifying the various Jewish thought and Christian misconceptions redefines Jesus' mission:

"…The phrase 'the kingdom of God'…meant the reign of God (not His heavenly territory) and referred to
a projected return to a Jewish system of theocracy…" 27.

"….He [Jesus] had campaigned among 'the lost sheep of Israel', calling them to repentance, because he
felt that the coming of God's Kingdom was being held back by Israel's sin's. Pharisee writings often stress
that God's promises to Israel are not automatically fulfilled; they depend on Israel's worthiness and
co-operation ... " 28.

"…Jesus' mission as a prophet was exclusively directed towards the Jews, not towards the
Gentiles. The idea that Jesus rejected the Jews and transferred the Old Testament 'promises' to the
Gentiles was a later invention of the Gentile-Christian Church…" 29.

"… Some believed that the Messiah would inaugurate a new era for the whole world; that the nations of
the world would acknowledge the One God and his Temple in Jerusalem; that the Jews would be revered
as the chosen priests of the One God; and that an era of world peace would begin when, in the words of
Isaiah's wonderful internationalist vision, the swords would be beaten into plowshares and the wolf
would lie down with lamb. Some, however, did not believe that the coming of the Messiah would
necessarily bring about an era of international peace. There might be many Messiahs - many more
sorrows and comfortings, defeats and victories - for the Jewish people before that happened. After all,
there had been Messiahs before and none had brought everlasting peace. The vision of Isaiah was
acknowledged by every Pharisee, as the word of God but it was not necessarily attached to the
expectation of the coming Messiah who would defeat the Romans." 30.

In The Traditions of the Jews, from the Talmud (treatises Baba Bathra folio 74b, Pesachim folio 32,
Bekhoroth folio 57 and Massektoth Ta'anith folio 31), J.P Stehaln presents a glorious scenario of the
Messianic era - without Jesus Christ as the Messiah:

"… when the Messianic era arrives. After the return of the Jews from all nations and parts of the world…
the Messiah, we are told in the Talmud, will entertain them at a gorgeous banquet, where they will be
seated at tables and regaled with wine from Adam's wine-cellar. The first course is to consist of a roasted
ox named Behemoth, so immense that every day it eats up the grass upon a thousand hills; the second of
a monstrous fish Leviathan; the third of a female Leviathan boiled and pickled; the fourth of a gigantic
roast fowl known as Barjuchne, of which the egg alone was so enormous that when it fell out of the nest it
crushed three hundred tall cedars and the white overflowed threescore villages. This course is to be
followed up by "the most splendid and pompous Dessert," that can be procured, including fruit from the
Tree of Life and "the Pomegranates of Eden which are preserved for the Just."

"At the end of the banquet "God will entertain the company at a ball"; He Himself will sit in the midst of
them, and everyone will point Him out with his finger, saying: "Behold, this is our God: we have waited for
Him, we will be glad and rejoice in His salvation." 31.

Sin and Salvation

Romans 3:23
"For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God."

From "The Differences between Judaism and Christianity, we see the great partition between Jewish and
Christian thought on sin confirmed.

"Judaism does not accept the notion of original sin, the idea that people are bad from birth and cannot
remove sin by themselves but need an act of grace provided by the sacrificial death of Jesus as
atonement for all of humanity's sins. For Christians, there are no other forms of salvation other than
through Jesus." 32.

Dr. Epstein goes on to explain that Jewish thought about sin and atonement. The sinner may seek
forgiveness from God through human works:

"He [Jesus] also did not absorb the sins of people. For Jews, sins are removed not by Jesus'
atonement but by seeking forgiveness. Jews seek forgiveness from God for sins against God and from
other people (not just God) for sins against those people. Seeking forgiveness requires a sincere sense of
repenting but also seeking directly to redress the wrong done to someone. Sins are partially removed
through prayer which replaced animal sacrifice as a way of relieving sins. They are also removed by
correcting errors against others. " 33.

Hyam Maccoby explains:

"... There was no concept of a Suffering Messiah who would die on the cross to purge mankind of sin….
To the Jews salvation was a physical not a purely spiritual concept. The Messianic age, to the Jews, was
to be the culmination of human history on earth. 34.

Also, regarding prayer Maccoby believes that it is possible for man to approach God in a sinless
condition:

"…The belief in the efficacy of prayer was very strong among the Pharisees…. Only the most concerted
beam of concentration, directed from Gethsemane to God, could obliterate the traces of the sins of Israel,
and bring about the hour of redemption. Jesus alone was not sufficient…This explains why Jesus
narrowed down his company to the Twelve on that night. He wanted the company of those on whom
he could most rely, for the power of sinless prayer would be far more important than the strength of
mere number." 35.

Heaven and Hell

The writings of Dr. Epstein present the Jews' overly spiritualized and less severe view of the afterlife:

"...Traditionalists gave the name Gehenna to the place where souls were punished. Many Jewish thinkers
noted that since, essentially, God is filled with mercy and love, punishment is not to be considered to
be eternal. There are, similarly, many varying conceptions of paradise, such as that paradise is the place
where we finally understand the true concept of God. It is also possible that there is no separate Heaven
and Hell, only lesser or greater distance from God after death. In addition, punishment might be self-
determined on the basis of suffering in kind the suffering the person brought about. That is, Judaism
doesn't have a clear sense of Heaven and Hell, with different places in Hell for different punishments.
Rather, the idea is that God uses the afterlife to provide ultimate justice and for the wicked to seek some
sort of final redemption." 36.

Note Scripture says:

Romans 6:20-23:
"For when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness. What fruit had ye then in those
things whereof ye are now ashamed? For the end of those things is death. But now being made free from
sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life. For the
wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. "

Hebrews 9:27:

"And as it is appointed unto man once to die, but after this the judgment.

Oneness Doctrine & the Trinity

Dr. Epstein summarizes the Jewish doctrine of "oneness" as opposed to the "Trinity" or Christian doctrine
of three Persons in one God.

"Judaism insists on a notion of monotheism, the idea that there is one God. As Judaism understands this
idea, God cannot be made up of parts, even if those parts are mysteriously united. The Christian
notion of trinitarianism is that God is made up of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit.
Such a view, even if called monotheistic because the three parts are, by divine mystery, only one God, is
incompatible with the Jewish view that such a division is not possible. The Jewish revolutionary idea is
that God is one. This idea allows for God's unity and uniqueness as a creative force. Thus, for Jews, God
is the creator of all that we like and all that we don't. There is no evil force with an ability to create equal to
God's. Judaism sees Christianity's trinitarianism as a weakening of the idea of God's oneness." 37.

Peter Michas, of Messengers of Messiah, asserted in an email discussion this belief in the "oneness"
doctrine.

"… Yet the minute I saw the Hebrew thinking of the oneness and the rest of it, it was never unclear to me
again." 38.

In his book, THE ROD OF AN ALMOND TREE IN GOD'S MASTER PLAN, Peter. Michas expands upon
his approval of the Hebrew viewpoint of God and the Trinity.

"The unity of Yeshua HaMashiach with God the Father and the Holy Spirit has never been clearly
understood from the doctrine of the Trinity..." 39.

"To understand the true relationship of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit, it is
essential to preserve the concept of oneness..." 40.

"The aspect of the Father may be simply understood as the Will of God. The aspect of the Son may be
understood as the Word of God. The aspect of the Spirit of the Holy One may be understood as the
Power of God..." 41.

"To say God is three 'persons' opens the door to misunderstanding God. God is Spirit and cannot
be reduced to the concept of a person..." 42.

"The Spirit of the Holy One is the very essence of the power of God the Father and not some separate
entity." 43.

Peter Michas refers to the Godhead as three "aspects" and the Holy Spirit as an "essence" rather than a
Person. It is already established by the Jewish people themselves that the Judaic teachings reject the
doctrine of three Persons in one God. They do not believe God would manifest in the flesh as Jesus
Christ nor do they believe that He is God. Their oneness doctrine is that there cannot be a Father, Son
and Holy Spirit, which means the rejection of Jesus Christ as divine Savior and Lord.

There is no Trinity concept in Judaism, unless, however, one embraces the Jewish Kabbalah.

"M. Vulliaud quotes Isaac Meyer's assertion that, "the triad, of the ancient Cabala is Kether, the Father;
Binah, the Holy Spirit or the Mother; and Hochmah, the Word or the Son." But in order to avoid the
sequence of the Christian Trinity this arrangement has been altered in the modern Cabala of Luria and
Moses of Cordovero, etc." 44.

The Jewish Encyclopœdia clarifies that the Cabalistic trinity is not to be confused with Christianity.

"... The Jewish Encyclopœdia…goes on to say that what appears to be Christian in the Cabala is only
esoteric doctrine." 45.

2 John 7:

"For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh.
This is a deceiver and an antichrist."

2 John 9:

"Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the
doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son."

Christians & the Chosen People

Jewish people characterize Christians in terms different from what we may think.

Avi ben Mordechai states that Jews are specifically called to proselytize:

"… He said to go out into all the world (as you go) and make talmidim of all the goyim. …we are His
talmidim or students of His Oral Traditions which is the proper definition of the term "Gospel." We are to
follow His Mishnah and Gemara, i.e., His Talmud, and take it to the goyim, teaching them to
observe all that He commanded us!…" 46.

Isn't this precisely the ministry of Peter Michas, Jacob Prasch and other Hebrew Roots teachers: taking
the Talmud to the goyim. The term "goyim" which Mr. Mordechai uses needs to be understood in its
historical context. Citing information from the Kabbalistic book, the Zohar, a part of the Jewish mysticism
which Avi ben Mordechai teaches, we note:

"… the Chosen People…forms the basis of all Talmudic and Cabalistic writings. …According to the
Zohar, "All Israelites will have a part in the future world," and on arrival there will not be handed over like
the goyim (or non-Jewish races) to the hands of the angel Douma and sent down to Hell.5. Indeed the
goyim are even denied human attributes." 47.

For More on Avi ben Mordechai see: Avi ben Mordechai & Millennium 7000

According to The Emek ha Melek, the work of the Cabalist Naphtali, a disciple of Luria, the goyim are of
the devil:
"…Thus the Zohar again explains that the words of the Scripture "Jehovah Elohim made man", mean that
He made Israel. 6. The seventeenth-century Rabbinical treatise Emek ha Melek observes: " Our Rabbis
of blessed memory have said: "Ye Jews are men because of the soul ye have from the Supreme Man
(i.e, God). But the nations of the world are not styled men because they have not, from the Holy and
Supreme Man, the Neschama (or glorious soul) but they have the Nephesch (soul) from Adam Belial,
that is the malicious and unnecessary man, called Sammael, the Supreme Devil." 7" 48.

Another way of saying or spelling goyim, is Goi. Rev. I. B. Pranaitis, in his online work, The Talmud
Unmasked, notes that this term has been removed from recent editions:

"Goi - Race, or people. The Jews also call a man a Goi - a gentile; they call a gentile woman a Goiah. ...
It is mostly applied to non-Jews, or idolators. In Jewish books which treat of Idolatry, worshippers of
idols are often called by this single word Goi. For this reason, in more recent editions of the Talmud the
use of the word Goi is purposely avoided and other words for non-Jews are substituted.

It is well known that in the Jewish language, the Jews call Christians among whom they live, Goim. Nor
do the Jews deny this.

Sometimes in their popular magazines they say that this word means nothing harmful or evil. But the
contrary can be seen in their books written in the Hebrew language. For instance, in Choschen
Hammischpat (34, 22), the name Goi is used in a depraved sense:

"Traitors and Epicureans and Apostates are worse than Goim"49.

Indeed the whole idea of gentiles or "goyim" studying the Jewish oral law as suggested by Jacob Prasch,
Peter Michas, Avi ben Mordechai and others, is in direct disobedience to the proclamations in the
Talmud. Even a Christian who is found studying the Law of Israel merits death. Sanhedrin (59a) states:

"Rabbi Jochanan says: A Goi who pries into the Law is guilty to death. "Even a Christian who is found
studying the Law of Israel merits death."

It seems very perplexing indeed that leaders of the Hebrew Roots movement would direct our thoughts to
the teachings of the sages in the Talmud, Mishna and Midrash, when these same sages have been
teaching the Jewish people to destroy the writings of the Christians including the New Testament.

"Shabbath 116a. Jews must destroy the books of the Christians, i.e. the New Testament."

Christian Jews

The organization, Jews for Judaism, "the Worlds foremost countermissionary organization", insinuates
that the Jews are not fooled by Christians who assume a Jewish image to proselytize them. Even Jews
recognize the great divide between Judaism and Christianity.

"… Though Hebrew Christianity claims to be a form of Judaism, it is not… It deceptively uses the sacred
symbols of Jewish observance (i.e. community Passover seders, menorahs, messianic services, etc.) as
a cover to convert Jews to Christianity, a belief system antithetical to Judaism… Hebrew Christianity
is not a form of Judaism and its members, even if they are of Jewish birth, cannot be considered
members of the Jewish community. Hebrew Christians are in radical conflict with the communal
interests and the destiny of the Jewish people. They have crossed an unbreachable chasm by
accepting another religion. …"
"… practice of any other religious tradition has been understood to lead to the loss of rights to full
participation in the Jewish community…Our history has clearly shown that when confronted with a group
of Jews which has adopted another faith and seeks to convert others, we must stand firm in asserting that
this other faith is not Judaism and that its adherents have forfeited their privileges as Jews. Jewish
tradition believes that the opportunity to return to participation in the Jewish community is always open.
When this occurs, all privileges are restored." 50.

This repudiation of those who apostatize from Judaism is stronger in the Talmud teachings of the Oral law
of the sages. Hilkhoth Akum (X, 2) states that defectors must be killed.

"These things [supra] are intended for idolaters. But Israelites also, who lapse from their religion and
become epicureans, are to be killed, and we must persecute them to the end. For they afflict Israel and
turn the people from God." 51.

Non-Jews or converted Jews who affect a Jewish demeanor or compromise Christian doctrine, meaning
inclusion of New Testament doctrine, to appeal to the Jewish mindset are surrendering the precious pearl
of Jesus Christ who alone leads to salvation. The ecumenical approach does not lead Jews to Jesus
Christ, but patronizes their religion of dead works, and results in the Christian's acceptance of religion on
Jewish terms.

Galatians 5:1-8

"Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with
the yoke of bondage. Behold, I Paul, say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you
nothing. For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. Christ
is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace. For
we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision
availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love. Ye did run well; who did hinder
you that ye should not obey the truth? This persuasion cometh not of him that calleth you.

Common Ideas

Contemporary Jewish thought reflects the same aversion to Jesus Christ as historical Judaism:

"Jews vary about what they think of Jesus as a man. Some respect him as an ethical teacher who
accepted Jewish law, as someone who didn't even see himself as the messiah, who didn't want to start a
new religion at all. Rather, Jesus is seen by these Jews as someone who challenged the religious
authorities of his day for their practices. In this view, he meant to improve Judaism according to his own
understanding not to break with it." 52.

Hyam Maccoby sums up Jewish thought regarding Jesus as this:

"With the composition of the Gospels, then, a fictitious Jesus was created, suitable for the needs of
the Hellenistic Gentile-Christian Church. The Prophet King, human and Jewish, who was revered but not
worshiped by the Jewish-Christian Church was turned into a Divine Sacrifice. Jesus, who was, in reality,
an apocalyptic Pharisee rabbi who claimed the titles of Prophet and King, was turned into a pagan
god." 53.

Dr. Epstein concludes:

"Whatever the Jewish response is, one point is crucial. No one who is Jewish, no born Jew and no one
who converts to Judaism, can believe in Jesus as the literal son of God or as the messiah. For the Jewish
people, there is no God but God." 54.
We could elaborate further on the Jewish thought regarding the New Testament, the writings of Paul, who
was viewed as a heretic, and the disciples. We could expand the idea that many Jews believe that James
and Peter were Pharisaic Rabbis, who believed in the Jewish idea of the Messiah-- that Jesus was not
divine.

We could expand on the theory that James, believed to have been the head of the Nazarene movement,
was not in any way in conflict with the teachings of the Pharisees, but was devout in promoting them. We
could expand on the Jewish idea that Paul, not Jesus, is viewed as the originator of Christianity, of the
concept of Jesus being divine, and that notion came from Greek paganism. We could, but one only has to
go to Jewish sites and see that their beliefs are diametrically opposed to Christianity. Sadly, we would
also see the denial of the virgin birth and condemnation of all connected to Christ. They are devout in
their convictions.

While the Hebrew or messianic movements urge us to embrace "our foundational Hebrew roots",
Scripture tells us that our foundation is none other than Jesus Christ:

I Corinthians 3:11:

"For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ. "

If Jewish teachers or teachings cannot entertain the idea of a divine Christ or Messiah, sin, salvation,
eternity, and other issues, what then? How are we to learn the 'True Meaning' of Scripture from them,
unless we reject the very truths of Jesus Christ, salvation, sin and the rest of the New Testament?

As stated above, "No one who is Jewish, no born Jew and no one who converts to Judaism, can believe
in Jesus as the literal son of God or as the messiah."

Jewish convictions proclaim a Christian cannot be considered Jewish or adopt the Jewish beliefs, rituals
and ceremonies, and still remain a Christian. It would be like becoming a Christian Muslim or a Christian
Mormon -- an impossibility.

Romans 2:28-29 : "For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which
is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the
heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God."

Galatians 3:2

"This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?"

We cannot be both. Cultural heritage and genealogy cannot take precedence over our faith and
obedience to Christ. If it does, we are not serving Him, as we should.

If the Talmud and other Jewish works are upholding the doctrines as described above, from the past and
today, what business do Christians have embracing these teachings, rituals and ceremonies and the
reasons for them?

Reason tells us that the theology of the Jewish Rabbis and teachers, which are opposed to the very
foundations of our beliefs, influences every aspect of their sacred books…and their teachings. We need
to explore the instructions within the Talmud further.

Next: To Embrace Hebrew Roots IV: The Talmud & Demonology

All Scripture Quotes from the Authorized King James Bible

Footnotes

1. Jewish Encyclopædia, article on Jesus; as Cited in: Nesta H. Webster," Secret Societies and
Subversive Movements", p. 20; Omni Publications, 1964
2. Rev. I. B. Pranaitis; The Talmud; Part One, ch.1, Jesus Christ in the Talmud;
holywar.org/txt/talmud_unmasked.html
3. Ibid.
4. Ibid.
5. cf. Baring-Gould, op.cit., quoting Talmud, treatise Sabbath, folio 104, (S. Baring-Gould, The
Counter Gospels, 1874); 5. Ibid., p.55, quoting Talmud, treatise Sanhedrim, folio 107, and Sota,
folio 47; Eliphas Levi, La Science des Esprits, pp.32,33. As Cited in Nesta H. Webster, op.cit.,
p..20
6. Rev. I. B. Pranaitis; op.cit. Part One, Ch. 1, Jesus Christ in the Talmud
7. Andrew Gould, "SOME DISTURBING ASPECTS OF THE SO-CALLED "HEBREW ROOTS'
MOVEMENT, AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS, 1998
8. Ibid.
9. Rene Guenon, Le Theosophisme, (1921) p.193, quoting Le Lotus for December, 1887; as Cited
in: Nesta H. Webster, op.cit.,p.299.
10. Elipha Levi, La Science des Esprits, p. 40; as Cited in: Nesta H. Webster, Ibid., p.20.
11. The book was translated in Latin by Raymond Martin; German by Luther under the name Schem
Hamphorasch; French by Gustave Brunet, Evangiles Apocryphes; as Cited in: Nesta H. Webster,
Ibid., p.21.
12. 2. Graetz, Geschichte der Juden, III. 216-52 as Cited in: Nesta H. Webster, Ibid., p. 23
13. Nesta H. Webster, Ibid., p.20
14. Ibid., p.22.
15. Joseph Barclay, The Talmud, pp.38,39; cf Drach , op.cit I. 167 as Cited Webster, Ibid. p. 18-19.
16. Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein; "The Differences between Judaism and Christianity"; The Conversion to
Judaism Home page: http://www.convert.org/differ.htm
17. Jews for Judaism, http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/javasite/webdocs/messianicjudaism.html
18. Hyam Maccoby; "Revolution in Judaea: Jesus and the Jewish Resistance"; p. 100; Ocean Books;
1973
19. Ibid., p.101-102.
20. Ibid.,p.106.
21. Ibid.,p. 128.
22. Jews for Judaism, http://www.jewsforjudaism
23. Hyam Maccoby, op. cit., p.100.
24. Jewish Guardian for January 25,1924; as Cited in: Nesta H. Webster, op.cit.,p. 375.
25. Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein, op.cit., http://www.convert.org/differ.htm
26. Maccoby, Ibid. , acknowledgements.
27. Ibid., p. 147-148
28. Ibid., p. 194
29. Ibid., p. 149
30. Ibid., p. 102-103
31. J.P Stehaln, The Traditions of the Jews, II.215-20, quoting from the Talmud treatises Baba Bathra
folio 74b, Pesachim folio 32, Bekhoroth folio 57, Massektoth Ta'anith folio 31. The Zohar also
refers to the female Leviathan (section Bô, de Pauly's trans., III.167) Drach shows that amongst
the delights promised by the Talmud after the return to Palestine will be the permission to eat
pork and bacon. --De l'Harmonie entre l'Eglise et la Synagogue, I. 265, 276, quoting treatise
 Hullin, folio 17, 82. As Cited in, Pg. 372, "Secret Societies and Subversive Movements" by Nesta
H. Webster; Omni Publications, Eighth edition, 1964.]
32. Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein, op.cit., http://www.convert.org/differ.htm
33. Ibid.
34. Maccoby, op. cit., p. 105.
35. Maccoby, Ibid., p. 194-195
36. Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein, op.cit., http://www.convert.org/differ.htm
37. Ibid.
38. Peter Michas; Ha-Talmidim Trinity Discussion; also see Rod of the Almond Tree.
39. Peter Michas, THE ROD OF AN ALMOND TREE IN GOD'S MASTER PLAN, WinePress
Publishing, (Mukilteo, WA 98275) Chapter 14. p. 255-56.
40. Ibid. p. 256.
41. Ibid. p.257.
42. Ibid. p.257.
43. Ibid. p.257.
44. Paul Vulliaud, La Kabbale Juive: histoire et doctrine, Vol. II. p. 411, as Cited in Nesta H. Webster,
op.cit., p.15.
45. Jewish Encyclopœdia, article on Cabala, p.478; Cited in: Webster, Ibid. p. 15.
46. Avi ben Mordechai, Halacha, www.millenium7000.com/halacha.htm
47. Zohar, treatise Toldoth Noah, folio 59b, (De Pauly trans., I, 347; 5. Zohar, treatise Lekh-Lekha,
folio 94a (De Pauly trans., I, 535); as Cited in: Nesta H. Webster, op.cit.,p.13.
48. Zohar, treatise Bereschith, folio 25a (De Pauly trans. I, 161); 7. The Emek ha Melek is the work of
the Cabalist Naphtali, a disciple of Luria; as Cited in Ibid.,p.13
49. Rev. I. B. Pranaitis; The Talmud Unmasked; holywar.org/txt/talmud_unmasked.html
50. Jews for Judaism, www.jewsforjudaism.org/javasite/webdocs/chalenge.html
51. Pranaitis, op.cit.
52. Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein, op.cit., http://www.convert.org/differ.htm
53. Maccoby, op. cit., p. 246.
54. Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein, op.cit, http://www.convert.org/differ.htm

http://www.seekgod.ca/embrachrist.htm

To Embrace Hebrew Roots: Part IV

The Talmud & Demonology

Please note: Research into the Hebrew Roots & Messianic movements constitutes research into
Judaism as well as the occult. We fully respect each persons right to believe or utilize what resources
they choose. We however, see a clear distinction in believing the Messiah has come versus utilizing
resources which still await His coming. That is how and why we must evaluate all to Christ and the New
Testament as well as the Tenach. We do not wish to edit or criticize Judaism, but recognize it as distinct
from our Christian beliefs, just as many in Judaism also see a distinction and separateness from our
beliefs, and we jointly have mutual respect for our differences and each other.

Psalms 1:1-2

" Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners,
nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the Lord; and in his law doth he
meditate day and night."
In order to fully understand what the Talmud sages believe and teach in their expansive Sacred Jewish
books, we need to seek information and weigh it to the Word of God. Investigating the Hebrew Roots
movement, which promotes the study of the writings of the Talmud, Midrash and Mishnah, we find the
common thread of Jewish Mysticism.

The well-respected Gershom Scholem's "On the Kabbalah and Its Symbolism" gives some insight into the
subliminal process through which mystics of all religions use Scripture to justify their aberrant exegesis of
Scripture:

"...not my intention to discuss mystical exegesis in its concrete application to the Bible. Vast numbers of
books have been written by Jewish mystics attempting to find their own ideas in, or read them into, the
Biblical texts... Many productive minds among the Kabbalists found this a congenial way of expressing
their own ideas, while making them seem to flow from the words of the Bible. It is not always easy, in a
given case, to determine whether the Biblical text inspired the exegesis or whether the exegesis was a
deliberate device, calculated to bridge the gap between the old and the new vision by reading completely
new ideas into the text. But this perhaps is to take too rationalistic a view of what goes on in the mind of a
mystic. Actually the thought processes of mystics are largely unconscious, and they may be quite
unaware of the clash between old and new which is of such passionate interest to the historian. They are
thoroughly steeped in the religious tradition in which they have grown up, and many notions which strike a
modern reader as fantastic distortions of a text spring from a conception of Scripture which to the mystic
seems perfectly natural. For one thing can be said with certainty about Kabbalists is this: they are, and do
their best to remain, traditionalists, as is indicated by the very word Kabbalah, which is one of the Hebrew
words for 'tradition.'" 1.

Some will argue that mysticism is far removed from the Judaic writings. Hebrew Roots leaders advocating
the study of the Mishnah or Midrash would most likely not provide information on occultism so that we
might compare. However, history reveals that mysticism has had a profound influence in Judaism, and is
chiefly conveyed in the sacred writings.

"Mysticism and mystical experiences have been a part of Judaism since the earliest days. The Torah
contains many stories of mystical experiences, from visitations by angels to prophetic dreams and visions.
The Talmud considers the existence of the soul and when it becomes attached to the body. Jewish
tradition tells that the souls of all Jews were in existence at the time of the Giving of the Torah and were
present at the time and agreed to the Covenant…"2.

"The Sacred Books of the Jews, shows that the Rabbis who contributed to the Talmud did not maintain
pure Biblical teachings.

"The Rabbis of the Talmud speculated on these mysteries, particularly when they were commenting on
Genesis and the visions of Ezekiel. The speculations were later embroidered by new ideas that entered
Jewish thought from the Syriac Greeks, the Zoroastrian Babylonians, and the Gnostic sect of the
Byzantium Christians. From these foreign and domestic concepts and myths, the Jews wove into their
mysticism ideas of upper and neither worlds, angels, and demons, ghosts and spirits - ideas that had
been unknown or of little importance to the Jews until then." 3.

We find that even the renowned Avi ben Mordechai teaches Jewish mysticism. An email from James
Trimm of SANJ, announced "Torah Talk" with Avi ben Mordechai as planning to teach Genesis from the
esoteric or mystical point of view:

"…we are going to be addressing Genesis Chapter 1 in relation to the creation story... You’ll also get an
introduction into what is called by the Jewish Mystics "Ein Sof" and "Nothingness," concepts taught by
Paul in Colossians 1:15 and by Yochanan in the book of Yochanan 1:1-3. This is part of our program for
January 16, 1999, on Torah Talk, as we unveil the Creation Story at its Scientific and Mystical levels." 4.
For More on Avi ben Mordechai see: Avi ben Mordechai & Millennium 7000

Ein Sof is the theosophical designation of god of infinity who is "primordial nothingness" and "the
annihilation of thought", according to The Essential Kabbalah, by Daniel C. Matt.

"The first sefirah [emanation of Ein Sof] …is sometimes referred to as Ayin, Nothingness…In [the] primal
state, God is undifferentiated being, neither this nor that, no-thingness… In the depths of Binah [second
sefirah] lies Hokhmah, Wisdom. The mystic is nourished from this sphere. Profound and primal, it cannot
be known consciously, only absorbed. In the words of Isaac the Blind, one of the earliest kabbalists of
Provence, 'The inner, subtle essences can be contemplated only by sucking, not by knowing.' Beyond
Hokhmah is the Nothingness of Keter, the annihilation of thought. In this ultimate sefirah human
consciousness expands, dissolving into infinity." 5.

Scripture tells us that God is approachable and knowable through Jesus Christ:

John 14: 6,7

"Jesus saith unto him, " I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. If
ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have
seen him."

John 14:21:

"He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall
be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him."

John 14:23:

"Jesus answered and said unto him, " If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love
him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him."

Talmudic Magic

The Talmud encompasses specific teachings involving demonology, legends and myths. Regarding
demonology in Europe author and historian, Nesta Webster shows the preoccupation of the Talmudic
rabbis with demons.

"…demonology in Europe was essentially a Jewish science…Thus the Talmud says: " if the eye could
perceive the demons that people the universe, existence would be impossible. The demons are more
numerous than we are: they surround us on all sides like trenches dug round vineyards. Every one of us
has a thousand on his left hand and ten thousand on his right. The discomfort endured by those who
attend rabbinical conferences ...comes from the demons mingling with men in these circumstances.
Besides, the fatigue one feels in one's knees in walking comes from the demons that one knocks up
against at every step. If the clothing of the Rabbis wears out so quickly, it is again because the demons
rub up against them. Whoever wants to convince himself of their presence has only to surround his bed
with sifted cinders and the next morning he will see the imprints of cock's feet.1". 6.

The Talmud teachings are entwined with magical practices and superstition.

"The same treatise goes on to give directions for seeing demons by burning portions of a black cat and
placing the ashes in one's eye: "then at once one perceives the demons2." The Talmud [treatise Hullin]
also explains that devils particularly inhabit the water spouts on houses and are fond of drinking out of
water-jugs, therefore it is advisable to pour a little water out of a jug before drinking, so as to get rid of the
unclean part.2" 7.

Another section of The Babylonian Talmud provides these warnings about demons, sex, and epileptic
children:

"Gittin 70a. The Rabbis taught: "On coming from a privy (outdoor toilet) a man should not have sexual
intercourse till he has waited long enough to walk half a mile, because the demon of the privy is with him
for that time; if he does, his children will be epileptic." 8.

Recognized as 'pro-Semite' writer, Hermann L. Strack, is quoted from his book "The Jews and Human
Sacrifice":

"…A strongly "pro-Semite" writer quotes a number of Jewish medical writings of the eighteenth century,
republished as late as the end of the nineteenth, which show the persistence of these magical formulae
amongst the Jews…as follows: "For epilepsy kill a cock and let it putrefy." "In order to protect yourself
from all evils, gird yourself with the rope with which a criminal has been hung."…"Fox's blood and wolf's
blood are good for stone in the bladder, ram's blood for colic, weasel blood for scrofula," etc.--these to be
externally applied." 9.

An article on Teutonic Magic by F. Hälsig in "Hastings' Encyclopœdia on Religion and Ethics" provides
some insight on past Jewish magical practices in the Talmud.

"… [The] article on Magic in Hastings' Encyclopœdia goes on to say that the magical formulae handed
down in Latin in ancient medical writings and used by monks were mainly of Eastern origin, derived from
the Babylonish, Egyptian and Jewish magic…2."

"…if we turn to the Talmud [tract Sabbath] we shall find cures recommended …For example: The eggs of
a grasshopper as a remedy for toothache, the tooth of a fox as a remedy for sleep, viz. the tooth of a live
fox to prevent sleep and of a dead one to cause sleep, the nail from the gallows where a man was
hanged as a remedy for swelling.3." 10.

In the Babylonian Talmud, we find further directions for superstitious and occultic practices:

"Gittin 69a . To heal his flesh a Jew should take dust that lies within the shadow of an outdoor toilet, mix
with honey and eat it." 11.

"Gittin 69b. To heal the disease of pleurisy ("catarrh") a Jew should "take the excrement of a white dog
and knead it with balsam, but if he can possibly avoid it he should not eat the dog's excrement as it
loosens the limbs." 12.

Galatians 5:20-21 states:

"Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, Envyings, murders,
drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past,
that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God."

Since the Talmud is steeped in superstition and occult lore, it should be no surprise to us that those
propagating its use would also be promoting occult superstition. Peter Michas sent an email with a list of
recommended books deemed necessary in order to study under him, and this book list includes the
Talmud. Mr. Michas occasionally sends out chain letters for "good luck". It should also be noted that, that
besides occult leanings, Peter has a penchant for sending out to his email list--his students-- tasteless
and vulgar jokes, (i.e. bar humor, sexual or suggestive and so on), which can easily be verified.

"In a message dated 1/23/99 3:47:42 PM Mountain Standard Time,

[email protected] writes:

" The origination of this letter is unknown, but it brings good luck to everyone who passes it on. Just
forward it to five of your friends to whom you wish good luck. You will see that something good happens
to you four MINUTES from now if the chain is not broken. You will receive good luck in four minutes…"

This is from a "leader" who is being esteemed to lead the flock of Jesus Christ to understand "Truth" and
become "Holy". Nowhere can such a precedent be found in Scripture of a man of God indulging in
superstition and coarse jesting. On the contrary we read:

Ephesians 5:3-4:

"But fornication, and uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh
saints; Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of
thanks."

Philippians 4:8: tells us what we are to focus on

"Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just,
whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there
be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things."

Scripture reminds us in Matthew 12:37:

" For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned."

What a person says, promotes and calls "good" is a clear indication of their character. We are
admonished to be holy.

1 Peter 1:14-16:

"As obedient children, not fashioning yourselves according to the former lusts in your ignorance: But as
he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation; because it is written, Be ye
holy; for I am holy."

Talmudic Demonology

Deuteronomy 18:10-12a:

"There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the
fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, Or a charmer, or a
consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all that do these things are an
abomination unto the Lord…"

The Talmud obviously has much in it that would not be acceptable for those who really believe the word
of God. The issue of demonology and related topics in the Talmud crosses over into Kabbalistic
teachings. The Jewish Kabbalistic beliefs about demons are found in one of its main books, the Zohar.
Future sections will discuss the Kabbalah and its influence on Judaism and the Talmud.

The respected Jewish scholar, Gershom Scholem, provides this education on demons according to the
Talmud and the transition of Talmudic demonology to the Zohar:

"According to Talmudic tradition, demons are spirits made in the Friday evening twilight, who, because
the Sabbath has intervened, have received no bodies. From this later authorities drew the inference
(which is perhaps implicit in the Talmudic sources) that the demons have been looking for bodies ever
since, and that this is why they attach themselves to men. This entered into a combination with another
idea. After the murder of Abel by his brother, Adam decided to have no further dealings with his wife.
Thereupon female demons, succubi, came to him and conceived by him; from this union, in which Adam's
generative power was misused and misdirected, stem a variety of demons, who are called nig'e bn Adam,
'Spirits of harm that come from man.'1. …practices are systematized in the Zohar, which develops the
myth that Lilith, Queen of the demons, or the demons of her retinue, do their best to provoke men to
sexual acts without benefit of woman, their aim being to make themselves bodies from the lost seed." 13.

In his article on "Jewish Magic" M. Gaster states:

"…These ideas [Talmud demonology] received a fresh impetus from the publication of the Zohar, which, a
Jewish writer tells us, " from the 14th century held almost unbroken sway over the minds of the majority of
the Jews. In it the Talmudic legends concerning the existence and activity of the shedhim (demons) are
repeated and amplified, and a hierarchy of demons was established corresponding to the heavenly
hierarchy… Manasseh [ben Israel]'s Nishmat Hayim is full of information concerning belief in demons
...1." 14.

Further reference to the Zohar teachings reveals that men and women have sex with demons during their
sleep.

"See the Zohar, treatise Bereschith, folio.54b, where it is said that all men are visited in their sleep "by
female devils." These demons never appear under any other form but that of human beings, but they
have no hair on their heads…In the same way as to men, male devils appear in dreams to women, with
whom they have intercourse." 15.

We find further correspondences between Talmudic and Kabbalistic sources concerning demons and the
succubi mentioned above. These unholy unions are found in historical accounts of witches' confessions,
i.e., The Witch Cult in Western Europe, Historie de la Magie en France and in, Hastings' Encyclopedia of
Religion and Ethics, article on Jewish Magic by M. Gaster.

"…the vile confessions made by both Scottish and French peasant women accused of witchcraft
concerning the nocturnal visits paid them by male devils 2. find an exact counterpart in passages of the
Cabala, where it is said that, "the demons are both male and female, and they both endeavor to consort
with human beings- a conception from which arises the belief in incubi and succube.3." 16.

Biblically, we know that to embrace sorcery or witchcraft and such, is an abomination before God. Despite
Old Testaments warnings, the Talmud provides 'solutions' for protecting oneself from the onslaught of
demonic attack and disease, as seen for example, in treatise Berakhoth, folio 6:

" … The Talmud also gives directions on the manner of guarding against occult powers and the onslaught
of disease. The tract Pesachim declares that he who stands naked before a candle is liable to be seized
with epilepsy. The same tract also states that "a man should not go out alone on the night following the
fourth day or on the night following the Sabbath, because an evil spirit, called Agrath, the daughter of
Ma'hlath, together with one hundred and eighty thousand other evil spirits, go forth into the world and
have the right to injure anyone they would chance to meet." 17.
The Talmudic Myth of Lillith

2 Timothy 1:7:

"For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love and of a sound mind."

When studying the various teachings in the Talmud about demons, one immediately comes across
reference to the name Lilith. This is significant because today, there is a movement worldwide that
speaks of "Lilith rising."

The previous information regarding the Sabbath, Agrath, the daughter of Ma'hlath, and the demons are
connected to Lilith in the Talmud, Midrash and Zohar.

Lilith is equated with a "first Eve", the feminine dark side of the divine and goddesses such as Isis,
Astarte, the Black Madonna or Queen of Demons and other false gods. The myth of Lilith involves a total
perversion of Biblical Creation and Adam and Eve.

The Jewish, "LILITH Magazine", presents "All you ever Wanted to Know about Lilith", which was originally
printed in their premier issue in the fall of 1976, and provides this insight to the identity of Lilith.

"Commentators have often translated "lilith" as "night-monster," associating the name with layil, the
Hebrew word for night; thus, Rabbi Hanina forbids men to sleep alone in a house at night lest they fall
prey to her (Shabbat 151b). (The Akadian "lilitu," a female spirit wind, is probably a more accurate
etymology, however.)" 18.

It becomes apparent that there are many versions of Lilith, but author, Judy Weinberg, presents two of
the most common teachings as they are found in the Talmud and Midrash.

"Two separate and distinct beings-Lilith of the Talmud and Eve 1 of the midrash-came together into one,
to become Lilith, Adam's first mate. We can see this process of integration in the Alphabet itself. In the
beginning of this account, Lilith is characterized as a woman (ishah). By the end of the story, however,
her children are called demons (sheydim) and she herself has powers that can only be warded off by the
mystical means of an amulet. Thus, having equated his protagonist with Lilith of the Talmud, the author
was forced to assign her the characteristics attributed to her by that work." 19.

"…The first available version of the Creation story which associates the name Lilith with a "first Eve" is
included in the Alphabet of Ben-Sira , a work probably written sometime in the Gaonic period (600-1000
C.E.). This account merges into two separate and distinct traditions-that of the Lilith of the Talmud and
that of the "first Eve" of the midrash (legends)." 20.

Talmudic Myth in the NIV

It is difficult to determine exactly why Lilith materialized in the Talmud, since there is no record of her in
the Torah. "LILITH Magazine" states:

"The personality called "Lilith" in the Talmud shows no connection with Adam at all. From the four specific
references to Lilith in the Babylonian Talmud, we learn only that she is a wild-haired and winged creature
with nymphomaniac tendencies (Erubin 100b, Niddah 24b, Shabbat 151b); and the mother of demons
(Bava Batra 73a )." 21.
Lilith Magazine also declares that Lilith is mentioned in the Bible.

"Such a characterization of Lilith may have been drawn from the single Biblical mention of "lilith" (Isaiah
34:14):

The wild creatures of the desert shall meet with the jackals, the goat demon shall call to his fellow, the
lilith shall also repose there and find for herself a place of rest." 22.

Upon attempting to verify this verse in the Authorized King James Bible, we see no such mention of Lilith,
or the goat demon, but rather this.

" The wild beasts of the desert shall also meet with the wild beasts of the island, and the satyr shall cry to
his fellow; the screech owl also shall rest there, and find for herself a place of rest."

It should be noted that the NIV translation allows for the interpretation of the previous quote of this verse
to include demons and the Lilith teachings.

Desert creatures will meet with hyenas, and wild goats will bleat to each other; there the night creatures
will also repose and find for themselves places of rest.

The footnotes to this verse include reference to… " Desert creatures...hyenas ... wild goats. Sometimes
connected with demons… night creatures. Outside the Bible a related Semitic word refers to a "night
demon."

From the web site, "Lilith and the Talmud," we learn that one would find Lilith and related topics covered
in these sections of The Babylonian Talmud,

"b. Erubuin 18b: "Rabbi Jeremia ben Eleazer said, "During those years (after their expulsion from the
Garden) in which Adam, the first man Was separated from Eve, he became the father of ghouls and
demons and lilin." Rabbi Meir said, "Adam, the first man, being very pious and finding that he has caused
death to come into the world, sat fasting for 130 years, and separated himself from his wife for 130 years,
and wore fig vines for 130 years. His fathering of evil spirits, referred to here, came as a result of wet
dreams." 23.

"Section b. Erubin 100b, refers to Lilith growing long hair; B. Nidda 24b refers to Lilith as a demoness with
a human appearance except that she has wings;" 24.

b. Shab. 151b of The Babylonian Talmud states:

" One may not sleep alone in a house, for Lilith takes hold of whoever sleeps alone in the house." 25.

b. Baba Bathra 73-b continues with:

" Rabba bar bar Hana said, " I once saw Hormin, a son of Lilith, running on the battlements of Mahoza….
When the demonic government heard of it, they killed him [for showing himself]." 26.

Talmudic Bestiality

The Babylonian Talmud, the accepted and preferred version, further teaches that Adam committed
bestiality.
"Yebamoth 63a. States that Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals in the Garden of Eden." 27.

That seems to imply that Adam stayed in the Garden and was not expelled after the original sin, or that
he was busy committing these acts before the record of events in Genesis involving the sin that caused
both he and Eve to be expelled.

According to one source, who summarizes the quotes, the Talmud further promotes such uncleanness
through obscene teachings regarding bestiality and sex with children.

"Yebamoth 59b. A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a Jewish priest. A woman
who has sex with a demon is also eligible to marry a Jewish priest." 28.

"Sanhedrin 55b. A Jew may marry a three year old girl (specifically, three years "and a day" old)." 29.

"Sanhedrin 54b. A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old" 30.

Kethuboth 11b. "When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing." 31.

Note: Please see James Trimm Responds for a response to these quotes.

There is no Scripture to support these unholy teachings. One can't help but wonder when, or if, people
like Peter Michas, Jacob Prasch, Avi ben Mordechai and the myriad of other Hebrew Roots leaders
promoting the study of these "Sacred Books", would have unveiled these very select teachings to
Christians.

God warns that we are not to add to or take away from His holy, perfect word and that we are to become
pure in thought and action.

Matthew 5:8:

"Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God."

1 John 1:6:

"If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth."

Makhlath and Agrath

Angelo Rappoport in, "The Story of Lilith" from Ancient Israel: Myths and Legends, shows the relationship
of Makhlath and Agrath to Lilith and the Sabbath, mentioned previously.

The she-demon Makhlath (the dancer) and her daughter Agrath 4. are two female demons who live in
strife with Lilith. Lilith is accompanied by four hundred and eighty hosts of evil spirits and destroying
angels, and she is constantly howling. Makhlath is accompanied by four hundred and seventy-eight hosts
of evil spirits. She and her daughter Agrath, from the Zend word Agra = beating, are in constant enmity
with Lilith.

Constant war is waged between them, and they meet on the day of atonement. Whilst they are thus
engaged in quarrel and strife, the prayers of Israel ascend to Heaven, whilst the accusers are absent,
being otherwise engaged.5." 32.
"Agrath commands hosts of evil spirits and demons, and rides in a big chariot. Her power is paramount
on Wednesdays and Saturdays, for on these days Agrath, the daughter of Makhlath, roves about in the
air accompanied by eighteen myriads of evil spirits.6." 33.

Psalm 40:4:

"Blessed is that man that maketh the Lord his trust, and respecteth not the proud, nor such as turn aside
to lies."

The Midrash: Lillith and Creation

The Midrash, promoted by many leaders in the Hebrew Roots movement such as Jacob Prasch, carries
the concept of Lillith as being associated with the "First Eve."

"The midrash (legends) of Genesis Rabbah discusses a "first Eve" but does not mention Lilith. According
to Rabbi Hiya, she "returned to dust" (22:7). Judah, son of Rabbi Hiya, states that in the beginning God
created Eve for Adam, but when Adam saw her being made with sinews and blood, he grew disgusted
and became alienated from her. Thereupon God caused this first Eve to return to nothingness and
proceeded to create a second Eve for Adam (18.4)." 34.

Angelo Rappoport provides the most common version of Lillith, which perpetuates the idea that Lilith
became the consort of Adam and their union started a line of demons:

"…She is supposed to have been the first wife of Adam. She had been one of the wives of Sammael, but
of a wild, heroic and passionate nature she left her spouse and joined Adam. From their union issued the
demons or Shedim, who rode about in the world as wicked spirits…Lilith, like Adam, had been created
from the dust (Adamah) of the earth. But as soon as she had joined Adam they began to quarrel, each
refusing to be subservient and Submissive to the other. "I am your lord and master," spoke Adam, "and it
is your duty to obey me." But Lilith replied: "We are both equal, for we are both issued from dust
(Adamah), and I will not be submissive to you…. And when Lilith saw this she spoke the Ineffable Name
of the Creator and soared up into the air. Thereupon Adam stood in prayer before the Creator and thus
he spake: " O Lord of the Universe, the woman Thou hast given me has fled from me."

"And the Holy One, blessed be His name, sent at once three angels whose names were Senoi, Sansenoi,
and Sammangelof, to fetch and bring Lilith back to Adam…but she refused to return. And the angels
spake to this rebel, this she-demon: "We will drown thee in the sea." But she made answer: "Know ye not
that I have been created for the purpose of weakening and punishing little children, infants and babes. I
have power over them from the day they are born until they are eight days old if they are boys, and until
the twentieth day if they are girls." She swore to them in the name of the living God that whenever she
came and saw the names or images or faces of these three angels, Senoi, Sansenoi, and
Sammangelof, upon an amulet or cameo in the room where there was an infant, she would not touch it.
But because she did not return to Adam, every day a hundred of her own children or spirits and demons
die." 35.

Mr. Rappoport cites other authors who relate that the myth of Lilith perpetuated the use of incantations,
amulets and cameos for protection against the demon.

"…The legend of Lilith and the message of the three angels is found in several sources of Rabbinical lore
in some of which it is quoted from the Alphabetum Siracidis.2.
The book known as the Sefer Rasiel describes the formula to be written upon amulets or cameos and to
be placed in the rooms where there are new-born babes. It refers to Lilith as the first Eve, and conjurers
her in the name of the three angels and the angel of the sea to whom she had sworn not to harm the
babes in whose rooms she found written on paper the names of the three angels.2.

Lilith is thus a female night demon, and is also known under the name of Meyalleleth or the howling one.
2." 36.

Isaiah 5:20:

"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that
put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter."

The Talmud & Kabbalah: Adam the Bisexual

According to author Judy Weinberg, the Talmud, Midrash and Zohar present Adam as a hermaphrodite
or bisexual:

"The Zohar (the central work of Jewish mysticism) develops a theory that Adam originally comprised both
male and female elements. This is based on Talmudic and midrashic statements that "Adam, who was
the first man, had two full faces" (Brachot 61a, Erubin 18b). Rabbi Samuel ben Nachman said: "When the
Holy One, blessed be He, created the first man, he created him as a hermaphrodite." Rabbi Levi said the
same thing:

"When man was created, he was created with two body fronts, and He sawed him in two, so that two
bodies resulted, one for the male and one for the female (Lev. Rab. 14:1)." 37.

Weinberg shows how Adam's "bisexuality" links to Lilith.

"The Zohar picks up on this theme of Adam's bisexuality but now draws the connection with Lilith:

"The female was attached to the side of the male until God cast him into a deep slumber... God then
sawed her off from him and adorned her like a bride and brought her to him, as it is written, "And He took
one of his sides and closed up the place with flesh. " I have found it stated in an old book that the word
"one" here means "one woman" to wit the original Lilith, who was with him and conceived from him. Up to
that time, however, she was not a help to him, as it is written, "but for Adam there was not found a
helpmeet for him." (134b)."

"Other references in the Zohar describe Lilith as a competitor to "the female affixed to his side."(see III
19a, II 276b, I 19b). " 38.

When we look to Genesis, we see no reference to this occult teaching. A review of what is being taught
through Planned Parenthood, in Public Health, Mental health institutions, the educational system and
many liberal churches would reveal the foundational New Age teachings of bisexuality and androgyny.
Getting in touch with one's feminine or masculine side is the esoteric cliché found in psychology today.

Proverbs 28:4:

"They that forsake the law praise the wicked: but such as keep the law contend with them."

Controversies over giving credit to Lilith vs. the other demons seems to consume the intellectual and
spiritual capabilities of Jewish scholars.
"….Kabbalistic tradition has numerous portrayals of Lilith as a demon, often linking her to other such
female spirits as Naamah, Machlah and Agrat. In fact, Lilith is often confused with them. Yaalkut Re'uveni
claims, for instance, that both Lilith and Naamah had intercourse with Adam and brought forth "plagues to
the world." However, elsewhere the Zohar identifies Naamah as "the mother of demons" while Lilith, it
seems, only functions as their governess: "

"Naamah "goes forth and makes sport with men and conceives from them through their lustful
dreams."...[The offspring] all go to the ancient Lilith who brings them up. She goes out into the world and
seeks her little ones and when she sees little children she cleaves to them in order to kill them and
insinuate herself into their spirits (Zohar III, 76b)." 39.

The tradition of Lilith as a slayer of children is seen in the midrash in Numbers Rabbah: "...like Lilith, who,
when she can find no strange children, slays her own" (16:25). This Lilith seems to resemble the
Babylonian demon Labartu or Lamashtu, for the child-slayer image has no foundation in the Talmud and
certainly no connection with the first Eve. Since scholars differ widely as to the dating of Numbers
Rabbah, it is difficult to determine whether the author of the Alphabet based his portrayal of Lilith as the
evil spirit who harms babies on this source, or whether both drew from a common antecedent. In any
case, the unity of the motifs of promiscuity and child-slaying does not occur until the time of the Zohar
(see Zohar 119b)…" 40.

Creation, as we understand it in the Bible, takes a definite perverted twist in the Talmud, Mishna, Midrash
and Zohar, by introducing Lilith, demons, bisexuality and other esoteric concepts.

Through the study of Biblical truth, we know that Lucifer and demons exist. There is no question on that.
However, no where in Scripture are found the ideas, myths, perversion of Scripture or blatant witchcraft
which are presented in the very writings of the "sages", whom Hebrew Roots leaders recommend.

Teachings of the Sages or Ancient Wisdom

Some might suggest that these teachings are ancient, outdated and no longer apply. However, it is
exactly these sources of teachings--the Talmud, Midrash, the Mishnah---the Oral teachings of the Sages--
which we are encouraged to study to find understanding of our Hebrew Roots.

Avi ben Mordechai calls "the Gospel" what Jesus called "traditions of men."

"…It is halacha that was recognized during the First and/or Second Temple periods. …Understanding the
concept that a Jewish talmid is a student of the rabbis’ Mishnah and Gemara (Mishnah is the Oral
Tradition and the Gemara is the commentary and discussion, i.e., Mishnah + Gemara = Talmud,
hence "talmidim"), I also recognize that our Rabbi Y’shua also had His Gemara (discussion and
teaching) on the rabbinic Mishnah and the written code of Sinai. Thus, we are His talmidim or students of
His Oral Traditions which is the proper definition of the term "Gospel." We are to follow His Mishnah
and Gemara, i.e., His Talmud…"41.

In "Explaining the Midrash" Jacob Prasch promotes The Midrash, or Ancient Wisdom, as an important
element of New Testament scholarship.

"…The clearest set of guidelines in Midrash are the Seven Midroth attributed to Rabbi Hillel, the founder
of the Pharisaic School of Hillel, where Rabbi Shaul (St. Paul) was educated as a rabbi by Rabbi
Gamaliel, the grandson of Hillel….A classical work of Midrash in Judaism is the Midrash Rabba on
Genesis (Berashith). Another is Lamentations Rabba. …Both of these kinds of midrashim are haggadic.
There are also wide bodies of midrashic literature which are halakik, but these are of less importance to
New Testament scholarship…"
"It takes the wisdom of the ancients to really understand these things…not the wisdom of the 16th
century, but the wisdom of the first century…"42.

What would make any teachings more or less important---we need to clearly see the foundations of all
these teachings. To do less would be to disobey God. My research reveals that these commentaries and
teachings have rarely changed in scope and intent, but rather have just been supplemented.

According to Peter Michas, since Jesus quoted from these writings of old, these works are worthwhile and
able to help us fully comprehend the Bible. His e-mail messages are posted to "Ha-Talmidim" or The
Students, meaning just as Avi ben Mordechai has stated, students of the Talmud's Mishnah and Gemara.

"… The New Testament is in the pattern of the Jewish traditional work of Torah, Mishnah, Haggadah,
Halakah, Talmud and Midrash, but inspired by God Himself for the common people. These Hebraic
works as well as the Inspired Scriptures were quoted from by Jesus and all the writers of the New
Testament. But even now, to have full comprehension, we must read the scriptures in the proper Hebraic
context…Most all of the Judaic writings have been preserved for us and now translated into proper
English directly from the Hebrew…" 43.

When were these Hebrew Roots leaders going to divulge the teachings in the rest of the Talmud, Mishna
and Midrash that directly pertain to Christians and the Talmud?

"Rosh Hashanah 17a. Christians (minnim) and others who reject the Talmud -Will go to hell and be
punished there for all generations." 44.

"Sanhedrin 90a. Those who read the New Testament ("uncanonical books") -Will have no portion in the
world to come." 45.

It has already been established that Jesus Christ was rejected and condemned in many Jewish writings
including the Talmud. These major works include teachings that uphold occult practices. What Scripture
recommends that we study the Jewish traditions or practice the occult???

Israel had been warned, as are we in Isaiah 32:6:

"For the vile person will speak villany, and his heart will work iniquity, to practice hypocrisy, and to utter
error against the Lord, to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to
fail." [villany- wicked, detestable, or disgraceful things]

If we go again to the writings in the Talmud being advocated and supported by Peter Michas, Jacob
Prasch, James Trimm, Avi ben Moredechai and so many others we read these unholy teachings that are
so contrary to the word of God.

"Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a Gentile." 46.

Proverbs 12:22:

"Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord: but they that deal truly are his delight."

Scripture asks and we must ask ourselves in Amos 3:3:

"Can two walk together, except they be agreed?"

2 Peter 3:17:
"Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the
error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness."

We can see that there are many connections between the Talmud, Midrash, Mishna and the Kabbalah. If
we conclude that Jewish mysticism, which is diametrically opposed to the Bible, determines these
teachings, why would we follow them?

Jeremiah 49:16 speaks of those who think they are hiding in the Rock, and are deceived by their own
hearts.

"Thy terribleness hath deceived thee, and the pride of thine heart, O thou that dwellest in the clefts of the
rock, that holdest the height of the hill: though thou shouldest make thy nest as high as the eagle, I will
bring thee down from thence, saith the Lord."

Some have suggested that the Kabbalah is simply a facet of otherwise positive Jewish mysticism that is
totally misunderstood by Christians, and these teachings are not of the occult. Many would deny any
connections and state that the Kabbalah is not used, connected nor promoted, while others would agree
with the following.

A Jewish Encyclopedia offered by Messengers of Messiah and promoted by Larry Rowland claims in its
introduction to contain "the essential teachings of Judaism." However, the reader is informed that those
teachings include The Apocrypha and the Kabbalah.

"…the introduction to the book "Encyclopedia of Jewish Concepts,"…You can read the intro. for yourself
and make up your own minds. I would like to add, in its defense that some of the best known Jewish book
sellers advertise it in their catalogues, i.e. Jonathan David Co., Menorah Publications, Source for
Everything Jewish to name but a few. Jonathan David Co. writes: "Encyclopedic in scope, this work by
one of the foremost contemporary scholars provides an interesting, lucid overview of the basic, universal
concepts of Judaism. …" …NOTE: -: For those interested, it can be obtained at a better price from
Messengers of Messiah Intl. Min; Pastor Peter A. Michas; P.O. Box 125; Troy, IL., 62294.)…" 47.

"INTRODUCTION: Encyclopedia of Jewish Concepts

The purpose of this book is to provide in a single handy volume the essential teachings of Judaism. It is
written for those who want an up-to-date and easily intelligible account of basic Jewish concepts, a
knowledge of which brings meaning to what may otherwise seem empty phrases …. Knowledge of
Jewish values has reached an abysmally low point. It is of the utmost importance that the Jewish heritage
be looked upon as a whole, not as a mere series of precepts and concepts linked together. Its study must
not be the prerogative of specialists, but should be shared by the multitudes…"

"In all ages the rich literature of Judaism had a certain number of books of permanent value, which were a
source of enjoyment to every class of Jews. There has not been a single period which did not make some
permanent contribution to posterity. Each era deposited behind it a sort of layer. For thousands of years
our people thought and felt and expressed itself in various styles and forms. The Bible, the Apocrypha,
the Talmud, Philosophy, Kabbalah, Poetry, Ethics, Hasidism-each of these represents an entire era with
its own atmosphere and character." 48.

The Jewish Encyclopœdia, in an article on the Cabala, provides these observations.

"... The fact is that the main ideas of the Zohar find confirmation in the Talmud. As the Jewish
Encyclopœdia observes, " the Cabala, is not really in opposition to the Talmud," and "many Talmudic
Jews have supported and contributed to it.4" 49.
Adolphe Franck's fundamental study of Jewish Mysticism in La Kabbale,

"…does not hesitate to describe it as "the heart and life of Judaism…5" 50.

P. Vulliaud, in his work, La Kabbale Juive: histoire et doctrine, quotes Greenstone from The Messiah
Idea, who states;

"The greater number of the most eminent rabbis of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries believed
firmly in the sacredness of the Zohar and of the infallibility of it's teaching. 6." 51.

What exactly is the Kabbalah? Where did it come from, and why is The Zohar being sold door to door in
places where it was once forbidden literature? Why is the Cabala now being presented to children in the
United States through such programs as the Jr. Great Programs for gifted children grades 4-8. In their
revised Jr. Great Books Program, beginning Sixth graders will be reading "The Mysteries of the Cabala"
by Isaac Bashevis Singer. This book is promoted as acceptable because, as stated to an inquiring parent
by a representative of the Junior Great Books program, "it is mysticism, not occultism." A follow-up phone
call yielded little information:

"I talked with the same person, Tom Kershner (I'm guessing on the spelling). He remembered our
previous conversation but didn't want to talk to me and quickly sent me on to a woman who is one of the
Great Books editors. Her name is Ann Speltz (guessing on spelling). I asked why they chose the story
called THE MYSTERIES OF THE CABALA by Isaac Bashevis Singer. She told me it matches their
criteria. I asked what that was. She said she could send me a two page write-up on that. I asked her to
tell me. She told me it is a story of very high literary quality. It was written by a Nobel Prize winner. It is
discussible because the meaning is not obvious. The meaning is not explicit, therefore 'everybody pools
what they notice about the story'. The better readers help the not so good readers to understand. I asked
her if the fifth and sixth graders will be curious about the Cabala after they read this. She said they won't
because they'll be interested in the character (the boy). I said the boy is interested in the Cabala so won't
the readers be too? Then she said a mouthful. She told me they won't be interested because the Cabala
is about Judaism -- and then she acted like she had said too much and quickly told me that someone had
come in that she had to talk to and asked for my address to mail me the 2-page criteria." 52.

Ephesians 5: 6--11:

"Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the
children of disobedience. Be not ye partakers with them. For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are
ye light in the Lord: walk as children of light: [For the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness and righteousness
and truth;] Proving what is acceptable unto the Lord. And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of
darkness, but rather reprove them."

All Scripture Quotes from the Authorized King James Bible

Next Section:

To Embrace Hebrew Roots V: The Kabbalah

Footnotes:
1. Gershom Scholem, On The Kabbalah and Its Symbolism, p.33, Schocken Books, New York,
1996,1965.
2. http://baptist1.com/judaism/kabbalah.htm
3. Harry Gersh "The Sacred Books of the Jews,"
http://marlowe.wimsey.com/rshand/streams/thera/canaan.html
4. James Trimm, The Society for the Advancement of Nazarene Judaism: http://www.nazarene.net
5. Daniel C. Matt, The Essential Kabbalah, Harper Collins, 1996, p. 7,8,11.
6. Talmud, treatise Berakhoth, folio 6; as Cited in Nesta H.Webster, p. 80, Secret Societies and
Subversive Movements" Omni Publications, Eighth edition, 1964.
7. Talmud, treatise Hullin, folios 143,144; as Cited in Webster, Ibid. p. 80.
8. Michael A. Hoffman II & Alan R. Critchley, The Campaign for Radical Truth in History;
http://www.hoffman-info.com
9. Hermann L. Strack, The Jews and Human Sacrifice, Eng. Trans. pp. 140,141 (1900) as Cited in
Webster, op. cit., p. 82.
10. (2). Hastings' Encyclopœdia, article on Teutonic Magic by F. Hälsig.; 3. Talmud, tract Sabbath; as
Cited in Webster, Ibid., p. 82.
11. Michael A. Hoffman II & Alan R. Critchley, op. cit.
12. Ibid.
13. Gershom Scholem, "On The Kabbalah And Its Symbolism," p.154, Schocken Books, 1965/1996
14. Hastings' Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, article on Jewish Magic by M. Gaster as Cited in
Webster, op. cit., p. 80-81.
15. As Cited in Webster; Ibid., p. 81.
16. Footnote: 2. Margaret Alice Murray, The Witch Cult in Western Europe, and Jules Garinet,
Historie de la Magie en France, p. 163 (1818) ; 3. Hastings' Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics,
article on Jewish Magic by M. Gaster. As Cited in Webster; Ibid., p. 81.
17. Webster, Ibid.p.80.
18. Judy Weinberg, "All you ever Wanted to Know about Lilith", "LILITH Magazine" original printed
Fall of 1976. ; www.lilithmag.com/resources/lilithsources.shtml
19. Ibid.
20. Ibid.
21. Ibid.
22. Ibid.
23. Lilith in the Talmud; "Talmud citations are informed by the translations of I. Epstein. (The
Babylonian Talmud .. London: Socino Press, 1978) and Raphael Patai, Patai81,pp.184f.). Cited
on: http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~humm/Topics/Lilith/talmud.html.
24. Ibid.
25. Ibid.
26. Ibid.
27. Michael A. Hoffman II & Alan R. Critchley, op. cit.
28. Ibid.
29. Ibid.
30. Ibid.
31. Ibid.
32. 4. Pesachim,112b; Numbers Rabba, 12; 5. Yalkut Chadash, s.v. Keshaphim, No.56.; Angelo
Rappoport, The Story of Lilith from Ancient Isael: Myths and Legends;
http://www.cjnetworks.com/~lilitu/lilith/rappoport.html
33. 6. Pesachim, 112b., Rappaport, Ibid.
34. Lilith Magazine, op.cit., www.lilithmag.com/resources/lilithsources.shtml
35. Rappoport, op. cit., http://www.cjnetworks.com/~lilitu/lilith/rappoport.html
36. Alphabetum Siracidis (Sepher Ben Sira), edit. Steinschneider, 1858. See on Lilith. Gaster, in
Monatsschrift fuer Gesch. u. Wissenschaft d. Judent., Vol. XXIX (1880), pp. 553-555. 3. Elia
Levita, Tishbi s.v. Lilith.; As Cited, Ibid.
37. Lilith Magazine, Ibid., www.lilithmag.com/resources/lilithsources.shtml
38. Ibid.
39. Ibid.
40. Ibid.
 41. Avi ben Mordechai, Halacha, www.millenium7000.com/halacha.htm
42. Jacob Prasch; Explaining the Midrash; www.cw.co.za/moriel/midrash.html
43. Peter Michas, http://www.ez/com/~peterm/HB.GK.RF.HTML
44. Michael A. Hoffman II & Alan R. Critchley, op. cit.
45. Ibid.
46. Ibid.
47. "Larry G. Rowland" ; uJEWI7: (fr. Larry R) The Kabbalah 4-15-98;
48. "Encyclopedia of Jewish Concepts," Ibid.
49. Jewish Encyclopœdia, article on Cabala; as Cited in Nesta H. Webster, op.cit.,p. 9.
50. Adolphe Franck, La Kabbale,p. 288; as Cited Ibid. p. 9.
51. P. Vulliaud, La Kabbale Juive: histoire et doctrine, I. 256, quoting Greenstone, The Messiah Idea,
p. 229; as Cited in Webster, Ibid. p. 9.
52. Connie Spillman, phone conversation 2/1/99 with Great Books Foundation,
1-800-222-5870.

http://www.seekgod.ca/embracnotal.htm