Interview with Dr. Pavel Zavalny President of the Russian Gas Society, Deputy Chairman...

Page 1 of 3

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Search for an article here

HOME

NATURAL GAS

ABOUT US

NEWS BY COUNTRY

CONTACT US

CALENDAR

SO U TH

SHALE GAS

PIPELINES

SPONSORSHIPS

STR EA M

CBM

TIGHT GAS

PARTNERS

OIL SHALES

LNG

TSO

GAS TO POWER

SHALE OIL

NEWSLETTER

TR A N SP O R T

O fficialw ebsite ofthe planned gas pipeline through the Black Sea

November 09th, 2014

12:00am

Posted In: Pipelines, Natural Gas, News By Country,

South Stream Pipeline, Russia, Featured Articles

Search Archives
Date

Tweet

Share

Like

South Stream Should be Considered a PanEuropean Project

Category

Country

Keyword
Search
Latest Articles
Click here for recent articles.
Press Notes
Irish Times: Enel to proceed
with domestic gas
exploration
Bloomberg: LNG Will Offer
Protection Against Gas
Supply Halts: IEA
APA: Azerbaijani President:
"The European market is the
most profitable for us"
LEP: Gas fracking hopes
'premature'

We recently has the opportunity to receive the views of Dr. Pavel Zavalny, President of the
Russian Gas Society and Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Energy.
1. Why do you think Russias natural gas offer is the best choice for Europe today and in the midterm?
There are a lot of arguments in favor of a continued commitment to Russian gas. First of all, there
is our reputation, earned during the decades of reliable supplies. Europe is the biggest export
market for Russian gas. Our gas-transportation system is already in place. It is connected with the
major gas-pipeline systems in Western, Central and Eastern Europe.
The vast majority of analysts agree that European demand for imported gas will continue to grow
in the foreseeable future, totaling about 70% of aggregate demand, despite increasingly lower
levels of gas consumption in the EU. Gas production within Europe is declining. By 2040 it may
drop to about 40% of its current level.
How will Europe satisfy its need for gas? Political instability in Africa and in the Middle East rules
out any hope of reliable supplies from those areas. This is equally applicable to pipeline gas from
Algeria and Libya, as well as to LNG shipments from those countries or from Egypt or Nigeria.
LNG exports from the United States will hardly satisfy the growing European demand for imported
gas. First of all, it is estimated that the US can export no more than 50-60 billion cubic meters (per
year). Most of this volume will be delivered to the Asia-Pacific region and other markets.

Telegraph: Fracking won't

cut bills and ministers
'oversold' shale gas benefits,
experts say
More
Featured Articles
Russia Can Survive No More
Than 1.5 Years of Western
Sanctions, Say Experts
Turkey's Energy Strategy:
Kurdistan Over Iraq
Interview: Marcelino Oreja,
CEO of Enags
Could There Be a Central
Asian Nabucco?

South
Stream
Transport
Official
w ebsite of
the planned
gas pipeline
through the
Black Sea

South Stream Should be

Considered a Pan-European
Project
More
Press Releases

Secondly, any reasonable estimate of the price of American gas that can be shipped to Europe in
the next few years comes to about $450 per 1,000 cubic meters, making it clearly no cheaper than
Russian gas.
Let us not forget that LNG market, unlike pipeline gas, is very volatile. LNG will always find its way
to the premium markets. That is the case now. Despite the fact that the quantity of LNG available
throughout the world remains stable since 2013, the geography of its sources has significantly
changed. Imports of LNG to the EU have fallen 50% over the two last years.
Gas from Russia is far more reliable. Its quantities and prices are predictable, because it is based

Hungarian Ministry of
National Development: V4
take uniform action for
energy supply security
Nord Stream Final Load Test
Successfully Completed
Wintershall: Shale gas
strengthens natural gas
long-term

on the traditional model of oil pricing tied to the spot market. However, it certainly requires more

http://www.naturalgaseurope.com/south-stream-pan-european-project

11/12/2014

Interview with Dr. Pavel Zavalny President of the Russian Gas Society, Deputy Chairman... Page 2 of 3

specific guarantees and a long-term commitment, in terms of quantities and prices, from the
consumer, i.e., the European Union.
2. What is the Eastern European consumers stand on Russias gas? Is there any difference
between the countries that may have access to alternative pipelines and those who totally depend
on Ukraine as a transit country?
A number of countries in Eastern Europe - primarily Bulgaria, Slovakia, Hungary, and the Czech
Republic - are historically quite dependent on Russian gas that passes through Ukraine. They will
have to take the risk associated with transit through the transit country that is now torn by conflict
and instability. The construction of the South Stream pipeline can eliminate such threats in the
future and improve energy security in the Eastern Europe.
But the countries of Western and Central Europe are practically immune to this risk, because they
get reliable natural gas supply from such pipelines as Yamal-Europe and Nord Stream. In fact,
Nord Stream is not currently operating at 100% capacity. For political reason Brussels decision on
Gazproms access to OPAL pipeline is being delayed again and again. Furthermore, Western and

OGP: EU domestic shale

gas production could add a
million jobs, new study
shows
Gazprom: South Stream
advancing steadily

LNG Natural Gas

Pipeline Oil Gas
Gas Prices

More
Calendar
Turkmenistan Oil and Gas
Conference 2014
Universal Oil & Gas 2014
Atlantic Council Energy and
Economic Summit

Central Europe have a well-developed system of LNG infrastructure.

More

3. Chancellor Angela Merkel claimed that foreign policy should take priority over economic
cooperation. Brussels and Sofia seem to share Merkels opinion, as their position towards the
South Stream pipeline is ambiguous. In your opinion, what will happen to the pipeline if tougher
sanctions are implemented?
The situation with the South Stream project proves that political considerations are more important
than economic forecasts and common sense. Strategically, South Stream should be considered a
pan-European project. It will facilitate the integration of the regional gas markets and the
development of the gas-transportation system. South Stream will help funnel a significant amount
of direct investment into the economies of the EU member states. The local communities hit by
the global financial crisis will get thousands of jobs across Europe. Its operation will generate
revenue for companies, as well as lucrative tax income for governments.
Meanwhile the Eurocrats are hindering the urgent work for political reasons. We face growing
destabilization in Ukraine and Prime Minister Yatsenyuks direct threats to block Russian gas
export to Europe. In such situation the European policy of red tape is absolutely inexplicable.
South Stream is a vital project for Europe. Who would benefit from its failure? The answer is:
those who desire a general escalation of tensions and the introduction of retaliatory sanctions in
other words, a third party. The US, to be precise. Europe will only suffer.
4. Why does the Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation believe that the Ukraines law
enabling the sale of the country's gas transportation system to a group of international investors
violates the WTO rules and regulations?
Decisions made by the government of Ukraine and the Verkhovna Rada on the Ukrainian gastransportation system do not allow Russia, a full-fledged WTO member, to participate in the
management of that system. According to this piece of legislation, only companies from the US
and the EU have the right to invest in it. The law is politically selective, and for this reason the
Russian government considers it a violation of the WTO regulations.
I would like to point out that Russia, conscious of its responsibility for Europe's energy security
and placing a high priority on strictly adhering to its contracts, has repeatedly made the offer to
Ukraine and Europe to create a two- or three-party consortium that would not only manage the
gas-transportation system, but also maintain it in good technical condition. Unfortunately, our
business offers were not supported.

Recommend

Tweet

Share

2015 N atural
Gas Outlook

SE Europe
energy industry

A PolarVortex Is Com ing

This YearLearn H ow To
ProfitIn OurN ew Rpt

Getthe latestnew s,
regulations,projects and
events.Try forfree!

Home | Natural Gas | News By Country | Shale Gas | Pipelines | CBM | Tight Gas | Oil Shales | LNG | TSO | Gas to Power | Shale Oil | Technology | Environment | Featured Articles

http://www.naturalgaseurope.com/south-stream-pan-european-project

11/12/2014

Interview with Dr. Pavel Zavalny President of the Russian Gas Society, Deputy Chairman... Page 3 of 3

About Us | Contact Us | Calendar | Sponsorships | Partners | Newsletter

2014 NATURAL GAS EUROPE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Fully or partially reproduced material must be attributed to Natural Gas Europe with hyperlink (www.naturalgaseurope.com)

http://www.naturalgaseurope.com/south-stream-pan-european-project

11/12/2014