World Justice Project's Rule of Law Index 2015 Report
World Justice Project's Rule of Law Index 2015 Report
World Justice Project's Rule of Law Index 2015 Report
The WJP Rule of Law Index 2015 report was prepared by the World Justice Projects research team. The Indexs conceptual
framework and methodology were developed by Mark D. Agrast, Juan Carlos Botero, and Alejandro Ponce. Data collection
and analysis for the 2015 report was performed by Juan Carlos Botero, Alyssa Dougherty, Amy Gryskiewicz, Matthew
Harman, Joel Martinez, Alejandro Ponce, Christine S. Pratt, Kelly Roberts, and Joshua Steele, with the assistance of Mame
Adjei, Priya Agarwal-Harding, Mariam Ahmed, Ayzada Bengel, Travis Glynn, Megan Kabre, Laurie Kontopidis, Samantha
Liberman, Stephen Lurie, Biola Macaulay, Marion Muller, Kedar Patel, Karina Pena, Ronen Plechnin, Alex Randall, and
Christina Vachon.
Lead graphic designer for this report was Bryce de Flamand.
Lead website designer was Dan McCarey.
WJP Rule of Law Index report was made possible by the generous supporters of the work of the World Justice Project
listed in this report on pages 186-187.
ISBN (print version): 978-0-9882846-9-2
Copyright 2015 by the World Justice Project. The WJP Rule of Law Index and the World Justice Project Rule of Law Index
are trademarks of the World Justice Project. All Rights Reserved. Requests to reproduce this document should be sent to
Alejandro Ponce, The World Justice Project, 1025 Vermont Avenue, N.W., Suite 1200, Washington, D.C. 20005 U.S.A.
E-mail: [email protected]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Rule of Law Around the World
Country Specific Data and Online Tools
4
6
7
8
10
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Global Insights
Perceptions of Corruption
Regional Experiences with Petty Bribery
The Global Status of Requesting Government Information
Freedom of Opinion and Expression
Freedom of Assembly and Association
Perception of Police Discrimination
Crime Victimization by Region
Vigilante Justice
Perceptions of Regulatory Enforcement
The Global Experience with Civil Justice
Problems Facing Access to Civil Court Systems
Problems Facing Civil Court Systems
Problems Facing Criminal Investigation Systems
Problems Facing Criminal Justice Systems
Perceptions of Police Accountability
32
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
45
46
47
48
49
50
Country Profiles
How to Read the Country Profiles
54
56
Methodology
Contributing Experts
Acknowledgments
About the World Justice Project
159
170
181
184
Executive Summary
Executive Summary
Effective rule of law reduces corruption, combats poverty and disease,
and protects people from injustices large and small. It is the foundation
for communities of peace, opportunity, and equity underpinning
development, accountable government, and respect for fundamental rights.
The World Justice Project (WJP) joins efforts to produce
reliable data on rule of law through the WJP Rule of Law
Index 2015, the fifth report in an annual series, which
measures rule of law based on the experiences and
perceptions of the general public and in-country experts
worldwide. We hope this annual publication, anchored
in actual experiences, will help identify strengths and
weaknesses in each country under review and encourage
policy choices that strengthen the rule of law.
The WJP Rule of Law Index 2015 presents a portrait
of the rule of law in each country by providing scores
and rankings organized around eight factors: constraints
on government powers, absence of corruption, open
government, fundamental rights, order and security,
regulatory enforcement, civil justice, and criminal justice
(A ninth factor, informal justice, is measured but not
included in aggregated scores and rankings). These
factors are intended to reflect how people experience
rule of law in everyday life.
5 | Executive Summary
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Denmark
0.87
Norway
0.87
Croatia
0.60
35
Moldova
0.48
69
South Africa
0.58
36
Ukraine
0.48
Sweden
0.85
70
Hungary
0.58
37
China
0.48
Finland
71
0.85
Senegal
0.57
38
Tanzania
0.47
72
Netherlands
0.83
Malaysia
0.57
39
Zambia
0.47
73
New Zealand
0.83
0.57
40
Kyrgyzstan
0.47
74
Austria
0.82
Jordan
0.56
41
Russia
0.47
75
Germany
0.81
Jamaica
0.56
42
Cote d'Ivoire
0.47
76
Singapore
0.81
Tunisia
0.56
43
Ecuador
0.47
77
Australia
0.80
10
Macedonia, FYR
0.55
44
Burkina Faso
0.47
78
Republic of Korea
0.79
11
Bulgaria
0.55
45
Mexico
0.47
79
United Kingdom
0.78
12
Brazil
0.54
46
Turkey
0.46
80
Japan
0.78
13
Mongolia
0.53
47
Uzbekistan
0.46
81
Canada
0.78
14
Nepal
0.53
48
Madagascar
0.45
82
Estonia
0.77
15
Panama
0.53
49
Liberia
0.45
83
Belgium
0.77
16
Belarus
0.53
50
Kenya
0.45
84
0.76
17
Philippines
0.53
51
Guatemala
0.44
85
France
0.74
18
Indonesia
0.52
52
Egypt
0.44
86
United States
0.73
19
Albania
0.52
53
Sierra Leone
0.44
87
Czech Republic
0.72
20
Argentina
0.52
54
Iran
0.43
88
Poland
0.71
21
Morocco
0.52
55
Nicaragua
0.43
89
Uruguay
0.71
22
Thailand
0.52
56
Honduras
0.42
90
Portugal
0.70
23
El Salvador
0.51
57
Ethiopia
0.42
91
Spain
0.68
24
Sri Lanka
0.51
58
Myanmar
0.42
92
Costa Rica
0.68
25
India
0.51
59
Bangladesh
0.42
93
Chile
0.68
26
Serbia
0.50
60
Bolivia
0.41
94
0.67
27
Malawi
0.50
61
Uganda
0.41
95
Slovenia
0.66
28
Colombia
0.50
62
Nigeria
0.41
96
Georgia
0.65
29
Peru
0.50
63
Cameroon
0.40
97
Italy
0.64
30
Vietnam
0.50
64
Pakistan
0.38
98
Botswana
0.64
31
Kazakhstan
0.50
65
Cambodia
0.37
99
Romania
0.62
32
Belize
0.49
66
Zimbabwe
0.37
100
Greece
0.60
33
Dominican Republic
0.48
67
Afghanistan
0.35
101
Ghana
0.60
34
Lebanon
0.48
68
Venezuela
0.32
102
6 | Executive Summary
COUNTRY
7 | Executive Summary
2.
3.
4.
Business environment. Imagine an investor seeking to commit resources abroad. She would
probably think twice before investing in a country where corruption is rampant, property rights are
ill-defined, and contracts are difficult to enforce. Uneven enforcement of regulations, corruption,
insecure property rights, and ineffective means to settle disputes undermine legitimate business
and drive away both domestic and foreign investment.
Public works. Consider the bridges, roads, or runways we traverse daily or the offices and
buildings in which we live, work, and play. What if building codes governing their design and safety
were not enforced, or if government officials and contractors employed low-quality materials in
order to pocket the surplus? Weak regulatory enforcement and corruption decrease the security of
physical infrastructures and waste scarce resources, which are essential to a thriving economy.
Public health and environment. Consider the implications of pollution, wildlife poaching, and
deforestation for public health, the economy, and the environment. What if a company was pouring
harmful chemicals into a river in a highly populated area and the environmental inspector turned
a blind eye in exchange for a bribe? While countries around the world have laws to protect the
publics health and the environment, these laws are not always enforced. Adherence to the rule of
law is essential to effective enforcement of public health and environmental regulations and to hold
government, businesses, civil society organizations, and communities accountable for protecting the
environment without unduly constraining economic opportunities.
Civil Justice. Imagine an individual having a dispute with another party. What if the system to settle
the dispute and obtain a remedy was largely inaccessible, unreliable, or corrupt? Without a wellfunctioning justice system a core element of the rule of law individuals faced with a dispute have
few options other than giving up or resorting to violence to settle the conflict.
This sub-factor does not address the issue of whether transitions of political power take place through democratic elections. Rather, it examines
whether the rules for the orderly transfer of power are actually observed.
This sub-factor looks at the prevalence of electoral fraud and intimidation
(for those countries in which elections are held), the frequency of coups
detat, and the extent to which transition processes are open to public
scrutiny.
3
improper influence
6.3 Administrative proceedings are conducted without
unreasonable delay
6.4 Due process is respected in administrative proceedings
6.5 The government does not expropriate without lawful process
and adequate compensation
guaranteed
4.3 Due process of law and rights of the accused
4.4 Freedom of opinion and expression is effectively guaranteed
4.5 Freedom of belief and religion is effectively guaranteed
4.6 Freedom from arbitrary interference with privacy is
effectively guaranteed
4.7 Freedom of assembly and association is effectively guaranteed
4.8 Fundamental labor rights are effectively guaranteed
Factor 5: Order and Security
5.1 Crime is effectively controlled
5.2 Civil conflict is effectively limited
5.3 People do not resort to violence to redress personal grievances
The WJP has produced the Rule of Law Index for each
Significant effort has been devoted during the last four years
to collecting data on informal justice in a dozen countries. Nonetheless, the complexities of these systems and the difficulties
of measuring their fairness and effectiveness in a manner that
is both systematic and comparable across countries, make
assessments extraordinarily challenging. Although the WJP has
collected data on this dimension, it is not included in the aggregated scores and rankings.
1
1
The WJP developed the conceptual
framework summarized in the
Indexs 9 factors and 47 sub-factors,
in consultation with academics,
practitioners, and community leaders
from around the world.
2
The Index team developed a set of
five questionnaires based on the
Indexs conceptual framework, to be
administered to experts and the general
public.
Questionnaires were translated into
several languages and adapted to reflect
commonly used terms and expressions.
9
5
The team sent the questionnaires to
local experts and engaged in continual
interaction with them.
6
The Index team collected and mapped
the data onto the 44 sub-factors with
global comparability.
4
Polling companies conducted pre-test
pilot surveys of the general public in
consultation with the Index team, and
launched the final survey
10
To illustrate whether the rule of law in a
country significantly changed over the
course of the past year, a measure of
change over time was produced based
on the annual difference in the countrylevel factor scores, the standard errors
of these scores (estimated from a set of
100 bootstrap samples), and the results
of the corresponding t-tests.
11
The data were organized into country
reports, tables, and figures to facilitate
their presentation and interpretation.
8
The data were subject to a series of
tests to identify possible biases and
errors. For example, the Index team
cross-checked all sub-factors against
more than 60 third-party sources,
including quantitative data and
qualitative assessments drawn from
local and international organizations.
Further information about the methods employed to produce the Index scores and rankings can be found in the Methodology section of this report.
Comprehensive/Multi-dimensional: While
other indices cover particular aspects of the rule
of law, such as absence of corruption or human
rights, they do not yield a full picture of rule of
law compliance. The WJP Rule of Law Index is the
only global instrument that looks at the rule of law
comprehensively.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
High score
SCALE
0.9-1.0
0.8-0.89
0.7-0.79
0.6-0.69
0.5-0.59
0.4-0.49
0.3-0.39
Low score
0.2-0.29
0.1-0.19
0.0-0.09
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Denmark
Norway
Sweden
Finland
Netherlands
New Zealand
Austria
Germany
Singapore
Australia
Republic of Korea
United Kingdom
Japan
Canada
Estonia
Belgium
0.87
0.87
0.85
0.85
0.83
0.83
0.82
0.81
0.81
0.80
0.79
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.77
0.77
0.76
0.74
0.73
0.72
0.71
0.71
0.70
0.68
0.68
0.68
0.67
0.66
0.65
0.64
0.64
0.62
0.60
0.60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
France
United States
Czech Republic
Poland
Uruguay
Portugal
Spain
Costa Rica
Chile
United Arab Emirates
Slovenia
Georgia
Italy
Botswana
Romania
Greece
Ghana
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Croatia
South Africa
Hungary
Senegal
Malaysia
0.60
0.58
0.58
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.55
0.55
0.54
0.53
0.53
0.53
0.53
0.53
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.49
0.48
0.48
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
Jordan
Jamaica
Tunisia
Macedonia, FYR
Bulgaria
Brazil
Mongolia
Nepal
Panama
Belarus
Philippines
Indonesia
Albania
Argentina
Morocco
Thailand
El Salvador
Sri Lanka
India
Serbia
Malawi
Colombia
Peru
Vietnam
Kazakhstan
Belize
Dominican Republic
Lebanon
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Moldova
Ukraine
China
Tanzania
Zambia
Kyrgyzstan
Russia
Cote d'Ivoire
Ecuador
Burkina Faso
Mexico
Turkey
Uzbekistan
Madagascar
Liberia
Kenya
Guatemala
Egypt
Sierra Leone
Iran
Nicaragua
Honduras
Ethiopia
Myanmar
Bangladesh
Bolivia
Uganda
Nigeria
Cameroon
Pakistan
Cambodia
Zimbabwe
Afghanistan
Venezuela
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.46
0.46
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.43
0.43
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.40
0.38
0.37
0.37
0.35
0.32
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
High score
SCALE
0.9-1.0
0.8-0.89
0.7-0.79
0.6-0.69
0.5-0.59
0.4-0.49
0.3-0.39
Low score
0.2-0.29
0.1-0.19
0.0-0.09
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Botswana
Ghana
South Africa
Senegal
Malawi
Tanzania
Zambia
Cote d'Ivoire
Burkina Faso
Madagascar
Liberia
Kenya
Sierra Leone
Ethiopia
Uganda
Nigeria
Cameroon
Zimbabwe
0.64
0.60
0.58
0.57
0.50
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.44
0.42
0.41
0.41
0.40
0.37
31
34
36
38
61
72
73
76
78
82
83
84
87
91
95
96
97
100
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
New Zealand
Singapore
Australia
Republic of Korea
Japan
0.83
0.81
0.80
0.79
0.78
0.76
0.57
0.53
0.53
0.52
0.52
0.50
0.48
0.42
0.37
6
9
10
11
13
17
39
47
51
52
56
64
71
92
99
Malaysia
Mongolia
Philippines
Indonesia
Thailand
Vietnam
China
Myanmar
Cambodia
SCORE
Georgia
0.65
0.57
0.55
0.53
0.52
0.50
0.50
0.48
0.48
0.47
0.47
0.46
0.46
29
40
44
50
53
60
65
69
70
74
75
80
81
Macedonia, FYR
Belarus
Albania
Serbia
Kazakhstan
Moldova
Ukraine
Kyrgyzstan
Russia
Turkey
Uzbekistan
COUNTRY
GLOBAL
RANKING
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Denmark
Norway
Sweden
Finland
Netherlands
Austria
Germany
United Kingdom
Canada
Estonia
Belgium
France
United States
Czech Republic
Poland
Portugal
Spain
Slovenia
Italy
Romania
Greece
Croatia
Hungary
Bulgaria
0.87
0.87
0.85
0.85
0.83
0.82
0.81
0.78
0.78
0.77
0.77
0.74
0.73
0.72
0.71
0.70
0.68
0.66
0.64
0.62
0.60
0.60
0.58
0.55
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
12
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
23
24
28
30
32
33
35
37
45
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Uruguay
Costa Rica
Chile
Jamaica
Brazil
Panama
Argentina
El Salvador
Colombia
Peru
Belize
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Mexico
Guatemala
Nicaragua
Honduras
Bolivia
Venezuela
0.71
0.68
0.68
0.56
0.54
0.53
0.52
0.51
0.50
0.50
0.49
0.48
0.47
0.47
0.44
0.43
0.42
0.41
0.32
22
25
26
42
46
49
54
57
62
63
66
67
77
79
85
89
90
94
102
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
0.67
0.56
0.56
0.52
0.48
0.44
0.43
27
41
43
55
68
86
88
Jordan
Tunisia
Morocco
Lebanon
Egypt
Iran
SOUTH ASIA
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Nepal
Sri Lanka
India
Bangladesh
Pakistan
Afghanistan
0.53
0.51
0.51
0.42
0.38
0.35
48
58
59
93
98
101
High score
SCALE
0.9-1.0
0.8-0.89
0.7-0.79
0.6-0.69
0.5-0.59
0.4-0.49
0.3-0.39
Low score
0.2-0.29
0.1-0.19
0.0-0.09
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Denmark
Norway
Sweden
Finland
Netherlands
New Zealand
Austria
Germany
Singapore
Australia
Republic of Korea
United Kingdom
Japan
Canada
Estonia
Belgium
0.87
0.87
0.85
0.85
0.83
0.83
0.82
0.81
0.81
0.80
0.79
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.77
0.77
0.76
0.74
0.73
0.72
0.71
0.71
0.70
0.68
0.68
0.67
0.66
0.64
0.60
0.60
0.47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
30
33
35
75
France
United States
Czech Republic
Poland
Uruguay
Portugal
Spain
Chile
United Arab Emirates
Slovenia
Italy
Greece
Croatia
Russia
HIGH INCOME
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Costa Rica
Botswana
Romania
South Africa
Hungary
Malaysia
0.68
0.64
0.62
0.58
0.58
0.57
0.57
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.55
0.55
0.54
0.53
0.53
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.49
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.47
0.47
0.46
0.43
0.32
25
31
32
36
37
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
49
50
53
54
56
60
62
63
65
66
67
68
71
77
79
80
88
102
Jordan
Jamaica
Tunisia
Macedonia, FYR
Bulgaria
Brazil
Panama
Belarus
Albania
Argentina
Thailand
Serbia
Colombia
Peru
Kazakhstan
Belize
Dominican Republic
Lebanon
China
Ecuador
Mexico
Turkey
Iran
Venezuela
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Georgia
Ghana
Senegal
Mongolia
Philippines
Indonesia
Morocco
El Salvador
Sri Lanka
India
Vietnam
Moldova
Ukraine
Zambia
Kyrgyzstan
Cote d'Ivoire
Uzbekistan
Guatemala
Egypt
Nicaragua
Honduras
Bolivia
Nigeria
Cameroon
Pakistan
0.65
0.60
0.57
0.53
0.53
0.52
0.52
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.50
0.48
0.48
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.46
0.44
0.44
0.43
0.42
0.41
0.41
0.40
0.38
29
34
38
47
51
52
55
57
58
59
64
69
70
73
74
76
81
85
86
89
90
94
96
97
98
LOW INCOME
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Nepal
Malawi
Tanzania
Burkina Faso
Madagascar
Liberia
Kenya
Sierra Leone
Ethiopia
Myanmar
Bangladesh
Uganda
Cambodia
Zimbabwe
Afghanistan
0.53
0.50
0.47
0.47
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.44
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.41
0.37
0.37
0.35
48
61
72
78
82
83
84
87
91
92
93
95
99
100
101
Denmark
Norway
Sweden
Finland
Netherlands
New Zealand
Austria
Germany
Singapore
Australia
Republic of Korea
United Kingdom
Japan
Canada
Estonia
Belgium
Hong Kong SAR, China
France
United States
Czech Republic
Poland
Uruguay
Portugal
Spain
Costa Rica
Chile
United Arab Emirates
Slovenia
Georgia
Italy
Botswana
Romania
Greece
Ghana
Croatia
South Africa
Hungary
Senegal
Malaysia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Jordan
Jamaica
Tunisia
Macedonia, FYR
Bulgaria
Brazil
Mongolia
Nepal
Panama
Belarus
Philippines
Absence of Corruption
Regulatory Enforcement
Open Government
Civil Justice
Indonesia
Albania
Argentina
Morocco
Thailand
El Salvador
Sri Lanka
India
Serbia
Malawi
Colombia
Peru
Vietnam
Kazakhstan
Belize
Dominican Republic
Lebanon
Moldova
Ukraine
China
Tanzania
Zambia
Kyrgyzstan
Russia
Cote d'Ivoire
Ecuador
Burkina Faso
Mexico
Turkey
Uzbekistan
Madagascar
Liberia
Kenya
Guatemala
Egypt
Sierra Leone
Iran
Nicaragua
Honduras
Ethiopia
Myanmar
Bangladesh
Bolivia
Uganda
Nigeria
Cameroon
Pakistan
Cambodia
Zimbabwe
Afghanistan
Venezuela
Fundamental Rights
Criminal Justice
Top
Tercile
Middle
Tercile
Bottom
Tercile
Factor 1: Constraints on
Government Powers
Factor 1 measures the effectiveness of the institutional checks on government power by the legislature, the
judiciary, and independent auditing and review agencies, as well as the effectiveness of non-governmental oversight by the media and civil society, which serve an important role in monitoring government actions and holding
officials accountable. This factor also measures the extent to which transitions of power occur in accordance with
the law and whether government officials are held accountable for official misconduct.
High score
SCALE
0.9-1.0
0.8-0.89
0.7-0.79
0.6-0.69
0.5-0.59
0.4-0.49
0.3-0.39
Low score
0.2-0.29
0.1-0.19
0.0-0.09
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Denmark
Finland
Norway
Sweden
Netherlands
Germany
Austria
New Zealand
Australia
Belgium
United Kingdom
Portugal
Estonia
Republic of Korea
Costa Rica
France
Canada
Poland
Japan
Uruguay
United States
Singapore
Chile
Czech Republic
0.92
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.87
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.83
0.81
0.80
0.79
0.79
0.79
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.77
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.74
0.74
0.71
0.69
0.69
0.69
0.66
0.65
0.64
0.63
0.63
0.62
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Spain
Italy
Ghana
Senegal
Greece
Indonesia
Botswana
Romania
Tunisia
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Nepal
Georgia
Slovenia
India
Philippines
South Africa
Jamaica
Brazil
Peru
Croatia
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.61
0.61
0.61
0.61
0.60
0.59
0.58
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.56
0.56
0.55
0.55
0.54
0.54
0.53
0.53
0.53
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.50
0.49
0.49
0.49
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
Malawi
Morocco
Lebanon
Kenya
Colombia
Albania
Mongolia
Liberia
Tanzania
Bulgaria
Panama
Malaysia
Sierra Leone
El Salvador
Mexico
Kyrgyzstan
Nigeria
Guatemala
Serbia
Hungary
Pakistan
Zambia
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Jordan
Dominican Republic
Argentina
Cote d'Ivoire
Belize
Macedonia, FYR
Sri Lanka
Thailand
Ukraine
Myanmar
Moldova
Honduras
Madagascar
Afghanistan
Cameroon
Bangladesh
Vietnam
Burkina Faso
China
Ecuador
Uganda
Russia
Egypt
Bolivia
Kazakhstan
Iran
Turkey
Ethiopia
Belarus
Nicaragua
Cambodia
Uzbekistan
Zimbabwe
Venezuela
0.49
0.49
0.49
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.46
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.42
0.41
0.41
0.40
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.38
0.37
0.37
0.37
0.36
0.35
0.35
0.33
0.31
0.26
0.19
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
High score
SCALE
0.9-1.0
0.8-0.89
0.7-0.79
0.6-0.69
0.5-0.59
0.4-0.49
0.3-0.39
Low score
0.2-0.29
0.1-0.19
0.0-0.09
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Denmark
Norway
Singapore
Sweden
Finland
New Zealand
Netherlands
Japan
Australia
0.96
0.93
0.93
0.91
0.90
0.90
0.89
0.86
0.84
0.84
0.83
0.83
0.82
0.82
0.82
0.81
0.81
0.78
0.78
0.75
0.75
0.73
0.72
0.71
0.69
0.68
0.66
0.65
0.65
0.63
0.60
0.59
0.59
0.54
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Austria
Germany
United Arab Emirates
Republic of Korea
United Kingdom
Canada
Belgium
Uruguay
Estonia
United States
France
Georgia
Chile
Portugal
Spain
Costa Rica
Czech Republic
Poland
Botswana
Malaysia
Slovenia
Jordan
Italy
Greece
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Croatia
Senegal
Jamaica
Macedonia, FYR
Thailand
Romania
China
South Africa
Belarus
Tunisia
Hungary
Panama
Philippines
Morocco
Turkey
Belize
Argentina
Egypt
Ethiopia
Sri Lanka
Brazil
Vietnam
Ecuador
Kazakhstan
Ghana
Russia
0.54
0.53
0.53
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.51
0.51
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.49
0.49
0.49
0.49
0.48
0.48
0.47
0.47
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.45
0.45
0.44
0.44
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.41
0.40
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
El Salvador
Colombia
Iran
Myanmar
Mongolia
Serbia
India
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Cote d'Ivoire
Zambia
Bulgaria
Nepal
Burkina Faso
Indonesia
Nicaragua
Lebanon
Tanzania
Albania
Dominican Republic
Malawi
Uzbekistan
Madagascar
Pakistan
Ukraine
Honduras
Peru
Bolivia
Mexico
Guatemala
Kyrgyzstan
Sierra Leone
Zimbabwe
Moldova
Liberia
Venezuela
Kenya
Nigeria
Bangladesh
Cambodia
Uganda
Cameroon
Afghanistan
0.40
0.40
0.39
0.39
0.38
0.37
0.37
0.37
0.37
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.33
0.33
0.30
0.30
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.27
0.27
0.27
0.27
0.27
0.27
0.25
0.23
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
High score
SCALE
0.9-1.0
0.8-0.89
0.7-0.79
0.6-0.69
0.5-0.59
0.4-0.49
0.3-0.39
Low score
0.2-0.29
0.1-0.19
0.0-0.09
COUNTRY
0.0-0.09
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Sweden
New Zealand
Norway
Denmark
Netherlands
Finland
Canada
United Kingdom
Australia
Republic of Korea
United States
Japan
Austria
Estonia
Germany
Belgium
France
Chile
Costa Rica
Poland
Uruguay
Czech Republic
Portugal
0.81
0.81
0.81
0.78
0.76
0.76
0.75
0.74
0.74
0.73
0.73
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.70
0.69
0.68
0.68
0.67
0.65
0.64
0.64
0.63
0.63
0.62
0.62
0.61
0.61
0.60
0.59
0.58
0.58
0.57
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Singapore
Spain
South Africa
Italy
Georgia
Slovenia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Indonesia
Croatia
Macedonia, FYR
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Botswana
Greece
India
Brazil
Colombia
Nepal
Ghana
Mexico
Ukraine
Argentina
Panama
Moldova
Peru
Belize
Bulgaria
Philippines
Romania
Sri Lanka
Dominican Republic
Albania
Senegal
Hungary
Jamaica
El Salvador
Tunisia
Morocco
Serbia
Tanzania
Ecuador
Kyrgyzstan
Malawi
Honduras
Russia
Thailand
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.54
0.54
0.53
0.53
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.50
0.50
0.49
0.49
0.49
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.47
0.47
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.44
0.44
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.42
0.41
0.40
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.38
0.36
0.35
0.32
0.32
0.32
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
Guatemala
Liberia
Zambia
Bangladesh
Madagascar
Mongolia
Jordan
Nigeria
Belarus
Kenya
Bolivia
Lebanon
Turkey
Pakistan
Nicaragua
Kazakhstan
Vietnam
China
Malaysia
Afghanistan
Burkina Faso
Egypt
Uganda
Cote d'Ivoire
Ethiopia
Cameroon
Sierra Leone
Venezuela
Cambodia
Iran
Myanmar
Uzbekistan
Zimbabwe
High score
SCALE
0.9-1.0
0.8-0.89
0.7-0.79
0.6-0.69
0.5-0.59
0.4-0.49
0.3-0.39
Low score
0.2-0.29
0.1-0.19
0.0-0.09
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Finland
Denmark
Norway
Sweden
Austria
Germany
Netherlands
Belgium
New Zealand
Australia
Estonia
Portugal
Czech Republic
United Kingdom
Canada
Uruguay
Costa Rica
France
Spain
Slovenia
Poland
Japan
Italy
Chile
Republic of Korea
United States
Romania
Singapore
0.91
0.91
0.90
0.90
0.87
0.87
0.85
0.84
0.83
0.82
0.81
0.80
0.80
0.79
0.79
0.79
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.77
0.77
0.76
0.74
0.74
0.73
0.73
0.73
0.72
0.70
0.69
0.67
0.67
0.66
0.66
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Ghana
Croatia
Bulgaria
Argentina
Jamaica
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
0.66
0.65
0.65
0.64
0.63
0.63
0.62
0.62
0.61
0.61
0.61
0.61
0.60
0.60
0.59
0.58
0.58
0.57
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.54
0.54
0.53
0.53
0.53
0.52
0.52
0.52
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
Greece
Hungary
Georgia
South Africa
Senegal
El Salvador
Panama
Dominican Republic
Ukraine
Mongolia
Brazil
Peru
Albania
Malawi
Liberia
Serbia
Macedonia, FYR
Nepal
Guatemala
Botswana
Mexico
Lebanon
Burkina Faso
Moldova
Colombia
India
Tunisia
Sierra Leone
Ecuador
Bolivia
Indonesia
Philippines
Jordan
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Vietnam
Kyrgyzstan
Tanzania
Thailand
Belize
Cameroon
0.52
0.51
0.51
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.49
0.49
0.48
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.45
0.45
0.44
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.41
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.38
0.36
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.31
0.29
0.22
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
Kenya
Sri Lanka
Malaysia
Cote d'Ivoire
Russia
Madagascar
Belarus
Nicaragua
Kazakhstan
Honduras
Morocco
Nigeria
Bangladesh
Zambia
Cambodia
Uzbekistan
Pakistan
Venezuela
Uganda
Afghanistan
Turkey
Ethiopia
Egypt
China
Myanmar
Zimbabwe
Iran
High score
SCALE
0.9-1.0
0.8-0.89
0.7-0.79
0.6-0.69
0.5-0.59
0.4-0.49
0.3-0.39
Low score
0.2-0.29
0.1-0.19
0.0-0.09
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Japan
Denmark
Finland
Singapore
Uzbekistan
0.93
0.92
0.92
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.89
0.89
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.87
0.86
0.86
0.86
0.86
0.85
0.85
0.83
0.82
0.82
0.82
0.81
0.81
0.81
0.81
0.81
0.80
0.79
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Sweden
Canada
Republic of Korea
Austria
Czech Republic
Australia
Germany
New Zealand
Estonia
Norway
Malaysia
United Kingdom
Hungary
Belgium
Netherlands
Poland
Georgia
Moldova
United States
Slovenia
Botswana
Belarus
France
Croatia
Kazakhstan
Spain
Jordan
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Vietnam
Bulgaria
Mongolia
China
Romania
Nepal
Myanmar
Indonesia
Macedonia, FYR
Morocco
Portugal
Greece
Albania
Serbia
Kyrgyzstan
Tunisia
Thailand
Ghana
Italy
Madagascar
0.79
0.79
0.79
0.78
0.78
0.77
0.77
0.77
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.74
0.73
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.71
0.71
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.69
0.69
0.69
0.69
0.69
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
Ethiopia
Uruguay
Philippines
Senegal
Chile
Panama
Zambia
Costa Rica
Jamaica
Sri Lanka
Egypt
Burkina Faso
Turkey
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
El Salvador
Nicaragua
Belize
Cambodia
Lebanon
Russia
Brazil
Bangladesh
Cote d'Ivoire
Zimbabwe
Peru
Iran
South Africa
Ecuador
Malawi
Argentina
Uganda
Sierra Leone
Ukraine
Dominican Republic
Bolivia
India
Tanzania
Honduras
Colombia
Liberia
Guatemala
Kenya
Venezuela
Cameroon
Mexico
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Nigeria
0.68
0.68
0.68
0.68
0.68
0.67
0.66
0.65
0.63
0.63
0.63
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.61
0.61
0.61
0.60
0.60
0.59
0.59
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.57
0.57
0.56
0.55
0.54
0.54
0.52
0.42
0.30
0.27
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
High score
SCALE
0.9-1.0
0.8-0.89
0.7-0.79
0.6-0.69
0.5-0.59
0.4-0.49
0.3-0.39
Low score
0.2-0.29
0.1-0.19
0.0-0.09
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Singapore
Norway
Sweden
Netherlands
New Zealand
Denmark
Austria
Australia
Finland
Republic of Korea
Germany
United Kingdom
Canada
Japan
0.86
0.86
0.82
0.82
0.82
0.81
0.81
0.81
0.79
0.78
0.77
0.77
0.77
0.76
0.75
0.75
0.74
0.73
0.73
0.73
0.68
0.66
0.65
0.63
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.60
0.60
0.57
0.57
0.56
0.55
0.55
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Estonia
France
Belgium
Uruguay
United States
United Arab Emirates
Botswana
Chile
Czech Republic
Georgia
Spain
Costa Rica
Slovenia
Poland
Portugal
Ghana
Italy
South Africa
Belarus
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Iran
Greece
Romania
Panama
Morocco
Jamaica
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.53
0.53
0.53
0.52
0.52
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.49
0.49
0.49
0.49
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.47
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.45
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
Senegal
Tunisia
Kazakhstan
Indonesia
Turkey
Thailand
Hungary
Jordan
Brazil
Nepal
Philippines
Mexico
Macedonia, FYR
Peru
Bulgaria
Colombia
Sri Lanka
Ecuador
Croatia
Mongolia
El Salvador
Malaysia
Russia
Cote d'Ivoire
China
Burkina Faso
Zambia
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
India
Kenya
Albania
Belize
Malawi
Nigeria
Argentina
Serbia
Tanzania
Uzbekistan
Moldova
Ukraine
Kyrgyzstan
Dominican Republic
Lebanon
Nicaragua
Vietnam
Bolivia
Madagascar
Honduras
Myanmar
Guatemala
Sierra Leone
Cameroon
Egypt
Uganda
Liberia
Bangladesh
Afghanistan
Ethiopia
Pakistan
Zimbabwe
Cambodia
Venezuela
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.37
0.37
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.35
0.33
0.26
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
High score
SCALE
0.9-1.0
0.8-0.89
0.7-0.79
0.6-0.69
0.5-0.59
0.4-0.49
0.3-0.39
Low score
0.2-0.29
0.1-0.19
COUNTRY
0.0-0.09
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Netherlands
Norway
Singapore
Denmark
Germany
Sweden
Republic of Korea
Austria
New Zealand
Finland
0.86
0.86
0.84
0.83
0.82
0.81
0.80
0.79
0.78
0.78
0.76
0.75
0.74
0.74
0.74
0.72
0.71
0.70
0.70
0.69
0.67
0.65
0.65
0.64
0.64
0.63
0.63
0.63
0.63
0.62
0.62
0.61
0.61
0.61
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Estonia
United Kingdom
Japan
Australia
Belgium
Uruguay
Canada
France
Czech Republic
United States
Poland
Portugal
Spain
Slovenia
Georgia
Costa Rica
Romania
United Arab Emirates
Belarus
Jordan
Chile
Botswana
Ghana
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Greece
Italy
Malaysia
Macedonia, FYR
South Africa
Iran
Mongolia
Argentina
Cote d'Ivoire
Bulgaria
Croatia
Senegal
Hungary
Brazil
Tunisia
Malawi
0.59
0.58
0.57
0.57
0.56
0.56
0.55
0.55
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.53
0.53
0.53
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.49
0.49
0.49
0.49
0.48
0.48
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
Jamaica
Kazakhstan
Morocco
Colombia
Dominican Republic
Tanzania
El Salvador
Albania
Russia
Panama
Nigeria
Turkey
Belize
Ukraine
Uzbekistan
China
Uganda
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Sri Lanka
Burkina Faso
Zambia
Serbia
Kenya
Thailand
Philippines
Vietnam
Kyrgyzstan
Lebanon
Zimbabwe
Honduras
Liberia
Mexico
Indonesia
Moldova
Sierra Leone
Peru
Nepal
India
Ecuador
Madagascar
Pakistan
Egypt
Bangladesh
Myanmar
Bolivia
Cameroon
Guatemala
Ethiopia
Nicaragua
Venezuela
Afghanistan
Cambodia
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.44
0.44
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.42
0.42
0.41
0.41
0.40
0.39
0.39
0.37
0.37
0.37
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.35
0.32
0.29
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
High score
SCALE
0.9-1.0
0.8-0.89
0.7-0.79
0.6-0.69
0.5-0.59
0.4-0.49
0.3-0.39
Low score
0.2-0.29
0.1-0.19
0.0-0.09
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Finland
Denmark
Singapore
Norway
Austria
0.85
0.84
0.82
0.82
0.82
0.79
0.78
0.77
0.77
0.77
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.75
0.74
0.74
0.72
0.71
0.69
0.67
0.67
0.66
0.64
0.63
0.63
0.62
0.61
0.60
0.58
0.58
0.57
0.56
0.55
0.55
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Sweden
New Zealand
United Arab Emirates
Australia
United Kingdom
Germany
Republic of Korea
Netherlands
Poland
Japan
Canada
Estonia
Czech Republic
Belgium
Portugal
France
United States
Slovenia
Italy
Spain
Botswana
Romania
Croatia
Malaysia
Costa Rica
Chile
Hungary
Jordan
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Georgia
Uruguay
0.54
0.54
0.51
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.49
0.49
0.48
0.47
0.46
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.37
0.37
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
South Africa
Vietnam
Ghana
Tunisia
Greece
Belarus
India
Jamaica
Sri Lanka
China
Malawi
Uzbekistan
Bulgaria
Macedonia, FYR
Senegal
Thailand
Albania
Egypt
Nepal
Mongolia
Kazakhstan
Argentina
Iran
Ethiopia
Lebanon
Serbia
Cote d'Ivoire
Zambia
Philippines
Tanzania
Brazil
COUNTRY
SCORE
GLOBAL
RANKING
Dominican Republic
Burkina Faso
Ukraine
Zimbabwe
Nigeria
Russia
Indonesia
Turkey
Ecuador
Madagascar
Peru
Uganda
El Salvador
Moldova
Colombia
Kyrgyzstan
Sierra Leone
Morocco
Nicaragua
Bangladesh
Kenya
Panama
Cameroon
Liberia
Mexico
Pakistan
Guatemala
Myanmar
Belize
Cambodia
Bolivia
Afghanistan
Honduras
Venezuela
0.37
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.31
0.31
0.30
0.30
0.29
0.28
0.25
0.24
0.21
0.16
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
Global Insights
The WJP Rule of Law Index 2015 introduces a new feature to the report:
global insights on the rule of law. This section presents findings from
the Rule of Law Indexs main sources of data and presents: 1) individual
questions taken from the General Population Poll, and 2) individual
questions taken from the expert surveys. This section is intended to
complement the Index scores and help users further engage with the
data that is used to construct the Index. Visit the WJP Rule of Law Index
webpage, http://data.worldjusticeproject.org/, for more information.
Perceptions of Corruption
Corruption is when officials abuse their power for their own interest, making the absence of corruption one of the
hallmarks of a society governed by the rule of law. The World Justice Project asked 1,000 citizens in each country
how many people they thought were involved in corrupt practices in the five institutions listed below. 47 countries
identify parliament/congress as the institution with the most corrupt members. Regionally, people from Sub-Saharan
Africa hold the most negative perceptions of corruption in their institutions.
12
COUNTRIES
7
4
32
COUNTRIES
47
COUNTRIES
How many of the following people in your country do you think are involved in corrupt practices?
Officers working in the national government
Judges and magistrates
Members of parliament/congress
The police
Sub-Saharan Africa
46%
South Asia
44%
49%
46%
32%
34%
37%
34%
32%
41%
21%
34 | Perceptions of Corruption
49%
48%
49%
57%
52%
21%
37%
48%
42%
22%
47%
47%
18%
25%
19%
63%
44%
42%
29%
64%
31%
23%
45%
50%
Corruption can take many forms including bribery, nepotism, extortion, fraud, embezzlement, and involvement
with organized crime and may involve a variety of public servants. The chart below presents regional averages for
people who had to pay a bribe in their dealings with the police, in order to receive medical treatment, or to obtain a
government permit.
s
Ea
tA
sia
acifi
&P
E a s te r
ro p
e&
Ce
nt
ra
l
As
ia
43
%
me
ric
ibbean
ca & Car
meri
in A
Lat
37%
n Eu
th A
13
%
29
%
21%
%
22
27%
8%
9%
6%
7%
49%
16%
24
%
19
15%
Mid
%
26
st
Af
ric
ub
-
Sa
South Asia
35 | Regional Experiences with Petty Bribery
or
n
ra
ha
&
42%
th
eE
a
37%
%
58
ca
fri
dl
32
%
Governments are the custodians of public information on behalf of the people. In an open government citizens have
the right to access and use public records freely. The following chart reflects worldwide experiences of those who
requested information from the government. Data for each of the 102 countries surveyed can also be found at data.
worldjusticeproject.org/opengov
11%
Requested information
from the government
72%
Received
information
28%
5% Other
Time
75%
Percentage of respondents who received the
information in less than
a month
Corruption
13%
Percentage of
respondents who had to
of the
pay aPercentage
bribe to obtain
respondents
who had to
information
pay a bribe to obtain the
information
Satisfaction
Quality of Information
68%
62%
Percentage of respondents
who were very satisfied or
satisfied with the process of
requesting the information
Percentage of respondents
who described the supplied
information as pertinent
and complete
As a basic human right, freedom of speech enables people to freely comment on government policies, to peacefully
disagree with each other and their government, and ultimately to engage in policymaking and ensure government
responsiveness. The following chart presents the percentage of respondents who answered Strongly agree or Agree
to the following statements: a) people, b) civil society organizations, c) political parties, d) the media can express opinions
against government policies and actions without fear of retaliation.
Civil society Political
The people organizations parties The media
0%
Afghanistan
70%
66%
67%
70%
Kyrgyzstan
68%
60%
64%
58%
Albania
73%
40%
58%
50%
Lebanon
73%
70%
72%
69%
Argentina
79%
68%
74%
68%
Liberia
92%
90%
87%
85%
Australia
91%
84%
87%
82%
Macedonia, FYR
54%
34%
49%
33%
Austria
88%
76%
83%
78%
Madagascar
66%
70%
71%
58%
Bangladesh
40%
31%
31%
28%
Malawi
80%
75%
79%
68%
Belarus
31%
18%
40%
31%
Malaysia
44%
41%
45%
48%
Belgium
82%
76%
79%
78%
Mexico
58%
48%
51%
36%
Belize
72%
72%
73%
60%
Moldova
66%
49%
53%
23%
Bolivia
67%
55%
54%
48%
Mongolia
67%
59%
62%
55%
65%
52%
70%
31%
Morocco
63%
69%
67%
50%
Botswana
87%
88%
92%
83%
Myanmar
19%
22%
33%
29%
Brazil
71%
61%
66%
53%
Nepal
81%
81%
85%
79%
Bulgaria
89%
73%
81%
46%
Netherlands
91%
88%
87%
90%
Burkina Faso
56%
46%
50%
38%
New Zealand
97%
96%
96%
94%
Cambodia
51%
50%
53%
26%
Nicaragua
72%
72%
74%
71%
Cameroon
60%
53%
69%
53%
Nigeria
64%
65%
71%
61%
Canada
90%
81%
84%
82%
Norway
90%
89%
85%
89%
Chile
78%
70%
79%
68%
Pakistan
60%
55%
63%
62%
China
0%
0%
0%
8%
Panama
75%
72%
71%
71%
Colombia
68%
49%
57%
48%
Peru
76%
65%
69%
61%
Costa Rica
83%
78%
84%
74%
Philippines
76%
81%
69%
70%
Cote d'Ivoire
56%
46%
50%
43%
Poland
65%
46%
66%
56%
Croatia
68%
49%
73%
45%
Portugal
81%
67%
80%
61%
Czech Republic
87%
68%
77%
61%
Republic of Korea
80%
86%
86%
88%
Denmark
93%
89%
89%
88%
Romania
73%
50%
73%
63%
Dominican Republic
83%
79%
83%
80%
Russia
52%
46%
60%
57%
Ecuador
63%
60%
63%
60%
Senegal
91%
88%
88%
85%
El Salvador
69%
67%
70%
68%
Serbia
81%
40%
60%
51%
Estonia
76%
67%
71%
74%
Sierra Leone
73%
76%
69%
77%
Ethiopia
44%
35%
44%
34%
Singapore
37%
38%
40%
44%
Finland
88%
82%
84%
83%
Slovenia
55%
27%
47%
23%
France
82%
68%
80%
67%
South Africa
83%
76%
81%
77%
Georgia
92%
89%
93%
89%
Spain
72%
58%
76%
58%
Germany
89%
84%
86%
86%
Sri Lanka
55%
56%
65%
61%
Ghana
87%
79%
88%
81%
Sweden
91%
86%
86%
86%
Greece
75%
51%
60%
38%
Tanzania
75%
66%
69%
63%
Guatemala
66%
58%
68%
65%
Thailand
84%
76%
78%
70%
Honduras
64%
57%
69%
58%
Tunisia
89%
86%
87%
86%
32%
34%
35%
21%
Turkey
49%
54%
62%
48%
Hungary
54%
31%
48%
25%
Uganda
32%
36%
34%
37%
India
72%
61%
63%
74%
Ukraine
42%
68%
23%
30%
Indonesia
84%
81%
87%
89%
32%
44%
45%
48%
20%
22%
23%
United Kingdom
86%
80%
84%
82%
Iran
Italy
77%
61%
72%
51%
United States
84%
75%
79%
77%
Jamaica
76%
69%
76%
60%
Uruguay
89%
78%
89%
77%
Japan
91%
91%
91%
89%
Uzbekistan
58%
5%
52%
32%
Jordan
47%
46%
48%
66%
Vietnam
48%
45%
45%
55%
Kazakhstan
34%
36%
47%
47%
Zambia
41%
26%
47%
42%
Kenya
66%
71%
76%
61%
Zimbabwe
15%
18%
21%
20%
100%
data
not
available
*Egypt and
Venezuela have
been omitted
from this chart
due to lack of
significant data
Freedom of assembly is also necessary for robust civic participation. The following chart presents the percentage
of respondents who answered Strongly agree or Agree to the following statements: a) people can freely join any
(unforbidden) political organization they want, b) people can freely join together with others to draw attention to an issue or
sign a petition, c) people can freely attend community meetings, d) people in this neighborhood can get together with others
and present their concerns to local government officials.
ls
to
an
ns ficia
ity
to
n
cal
un
cer t of
ion titio
liti
mm
con men
ent a pe
po
o
t
t
c
t
y
n
n
a ign
n tion
end s Prese gover
na
s
aw
Joi aniza
Dr e or
Att eting
al
u
loc
org
iss
me
ls
to
an
ns ficia
ity
to
n
cal
un
cer t of
ion titio
liti
mm
con men
ent a pe
po
o
t
t
c
t
y
n
n
a ign
n tion
end s Prese gover
na
s
aw
Joi aniza
Dr e or
Att eting
al
u
loc
org
iss
me
0%
Afghanistan
66%
83%
77%
67%
Kyrgyzstan
61%
77%
79%
71%
76%
61%
Albania
66%
85%
79%
74%
Lebanon
76%
80%
Argentina
82%
88%
85%
81%
Liberia
93%
90%
Australia
92%
97%
97%
93%
Macedonia, FYR
92%
94%
87%
61%
Austria
96%
93%
93%
86%
Madagascar
85%
84%
85%
73%
Bangladesh
69%
74%
71%
59%
Malawi
88%
84%
90%
75%
Belarus
87%
53%
91%
54%
Malaysia
51%
55%
58%
53%
Belgium
93%
95%
94%
89%
Mexico
57%
70%
66%
86%
Belize
77%
85%
79%
70%
Moldova
82%
79%
86%
66%
Bolivia
83%
86%
90%
86%
Mongolia
79%
86%
81%
59%
73%
83%
72%
45%
Morocco
59%
63%
65%
58%
Botswana
92%
95%
94%
86%
Myanmar
30%
32%
42%
41%
Brazil
60%
74%
74%
64%
Nepal
76%
Bulgaria
91%
90%
69%
79%
Netherlands
92%
95%
94%
91%
Burkina Faso
75%
81%
73%
67%
New Zealand
94%
99%
87%
99%
Cambodia
72%
71%
75%
45%
Nicaragua
81%
79%
87%
76%
Cameroon
84%
75%
82%
67%
Nigeria
64%
75%
70%
64%
Canada
90%
95%
94%
91%
Norway
92%
96%
92%
93%
Chile
88%
87%
93%
84%
Pakistan
60%
70%
63%
49%
China
2%
16%
21%
17%
Panama
83%
80%
88%
76%
Colombia
74%
79%
80%
71%
Peru
79%
88%
87%
80%
Costa Rica
86%
86%
94%
88%
Philippines
77%
79%
84%
70%
Cote d'Ivoire
77%
84%
83%
75%
Poland
68%
86%
84%
81%
Croatia
72%
85%
87%
76%
Portugal
92%
93%
91%
76%
Czech Republic
94%
94%
96%
92%
Republic of Korea
85%
89%
92%
84%
Denmark
94%
97%
94%
92%
Romania
77%
85%
82%
83%
Dominican Republic
92%
90%
91%
87%
Russia
76%
79%
82%
80%
Ecuador
81%
82%
77%
80%
Senegal
97%
93%
95%
86%
El Salvador
74%
73%
76%
69%
Serbia
99%
79%
87%
72%
Estonia
94%
89%
92%
87%
Sierra Leone
63%
80%
76%
78%
Ethiopia
39%
60%
60%
43%
Singapore
71%
55%
70%
77%
Finland
94%
90%
91%
91%
Slovenia
91%
66%
74%
56%
France
92%
89%
91%
86%
South Africa
89%
88%
89%
82%
Georgia
93%
91%
93%
83%
Spain
89%
77%
78%
73%
Germany
91%
94%
96%
90%
Sri Lanka
82%
82%
74%
67%
Ghana
83%
82%
87%
76%
Sweden
91%
96%
91%
92%
Greece
82%
71%
82%
73%
Tanzania
65%
71%
59%
Guatemala
78%
73%
82%
72%
Thailand
72%
74%
90%
74%
Honduras
76%
69%
75%
67%
Tunisia
87%
88%
88%
79%
35%
43%
50%
46%
Turkey
68%
68%
72%
66%
Hungary
81%
67%
73%
50%
Uganda
54%
48%
70%
44%
India
72%
90%
64%
62%
Ukraine
81%
91%
92%
80%
Indonesia
92%
80%
84%
68%
46%
50%
61%
65%
Iran
26%
53%
40%
United Kingdom
88%
94%
93%
89%
Italy
85%
87%
87%
72%
United States
90%
94%
93%
89%
Jamaica
65%
82%
88%
67%
Uruguay
97%
94%
96%
94%
Japan
87%
94%
96%
90%
Uzbekistan
98%
9%
33%
65%
Jordan
64%
73%
38%
62%
Vietnam
45%
78%
84%
Kazakhstan
71%
68%
74%
72%
Zambia
37%
51%
52%
71%
Kenya
67%
76%
88%
61%
Zimbabwe
21%
33%
36%
30%
100%
78%
data
not
available
*Egypt and
Venezuela have
been omitted
from this chart
due to lack of
significant data
In recent years, news reports and investigations have put a spotlight on the treatment of criminal suspects by police
in Europe and North America. The findings of these reports often focus on the disparate treatment suspects receive
based on their personal characteristics. The chart below presents the hypothetical case of two equally suspected people
being detained for the same crime and asks people whether they believe certain characteristics would put a suspect at a
disadvantage. In nearly all Western European and North American countries, a majority of respondents believe that being
of a different ethnic group than the police officers involved or being a foreigner would put suspects at a disadvantage.
Imagine the local police detain two people equally suspected of committing a
crime. In your opinion, which of the following characteristics would place one of
them at a disadvantage?
The suspect is of a different ethnic group than the police officers involved
73%
80%
75%
78%
75%
74%
60%
58%
51%
40%
AUSTRIA
66%
63%
BELGIUM
66%
BULGARIA
CANADA
69%
54%
57%
65%
CROATIA
73%
79%
39%
CZECH REPUBLIC
80%
70%
DENMARK
78%
ESTONIA
FINLAND
88%
76%
FRANCE
81%
71%
72%
32%
21%
GERMANY
65%
74%
GREECE
80%
HUNGARY
77%
PORTUGAL
78%
68%
SWEDEN
72%
UNITED KINGDOM
NETHERLANDS
81%
73%
36%
NORWAY
ITALY
31%
ROMANIA
72%
78%
UNITED STATES
33%
83%
26%
SLOVENIA
SPAIN
In each indexed country, the World Justice Project asked 1,000 people living in the three largest cities if they or anyone in
their households had been a victim of burglary, armed robbery, extortion, or homicide in the past three years. The regional
averages of these responses are presented in the chart below. Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America & the Caribbean
report the highest rates of victimization, while the East Asia & the Pacific region reports the lowest.
During the past three years, did you or anyone in your household experience a(n):
Burglary
Homicide
E a s te r
n Eu
ro p
e&
Ce
nt
ra
l
As
ia
th A
me
ric
ibbean
ca & Car
meri
in A
Lat
t
as
sia
acifi
&P
Extortion
15
9%
1%
3%
2%
0.2%
2%
2%
1%
4%
18%
7%
8%
2%
11%
5%
5%
2%
7%
6%
4%
4%
7%
13
%
7%
%
13
Mid
11%
a
r ic
dl
st
Af
eE
a
an
ar
&
Af
ric
ub
-
Sa
South Asia
40 | Crime Victimization by Region
th
or
27
Vigilante Justice
Resorting to intimidation or violence to resolve disputes or seek redress demonstrates citizens lack of trust in their formal
or informal justice systems ability to effectively enforce codified laws and procedures, often due to perceived problems
with capacity or corruption. When citizens take matters into their own hands, equal protection and due process mandates
are often violated. The map below presents regional perceptions on the likely outcomes of a situation in which a criminal is
apprehended by neighbors after committing a serious crime.
26%
% The criminal
gets beaten by
the neighbors
30%
35%
% The criminal
gets beaten by
the neighbors
% The criminal
gets beaten by
the neighbors
26%
% The criminal
gets beaten by
the neighbors
Sub-Saharan Africa
East Asia & Pacific
56%
% The criminal gets beaten
by the neighbors
41 | Vigilante Justice
South Asia
58%
% The criminal gets beaten
by the neighbors
57%
% The criminal gets beaten
by the neighbors
Around the world, environmental regulations vary widely due to differences in polices, institutional environments,
and political choices. Whatever those differences may be, regulations are futile if they are not properly enforced
by authorities. Ensuring compliance with regulations is thus a key feature of the rule of law. The infographic below
presents the peoples view in each region of the likely outcomes of a situation in which a company is found to be
polluting beyond legally permitted levels.
er
ic a
eE
&
ast
N o rt h
A fric a
l
dd
41%
ean
st
COMPANY
COMPLIES
WITH LAW
a ri b b
Ea
26%
&C
ti n
Am
rn
COMPANY
COMPLIES
WITH LAW
Eu
ro p
e&
al A sia
C en tr
28%
COMPANY
COMPLIES
WITH LAW
As
ia
&
30%
COMPANY
COMPLIES
WITH LAW
Pa
ci
So
fi c
48%
Su
EF
COMPANY
COMPLIES
WITH LAW
TA
&
or
th
Am
e ric
ic a
E U,
42%
A fr
COMPANY
COMPLIES
WITH LAW
an
ar
35%
b-
ah
COMPANY
COMPLIES
WITH LAW
As
East
th
Around the world, peoples ability to use legal channels to resolve their disputes is often impeded by obstacles such as
financial barriers, complex procedures, corrupt personnel, the influence of powerful actors in judicial decision-making,
a lack of knowledge, disempowerment, or exclusion. The following chart presents the aggregated experiences of nearly
12,000 people who, in the last three years, faced a conflict with someone who refused to fulfill a contract or pay a debt.
RESOLUTION MECHANISM
Which one of the following mechanisms was used
to solve the conflict?
23% Filed a
Lawsuit In Court
7% Other
24% No Action
Was Taken
11%
YES
24% Renegotiated
the Contract or Debt
Directly With The
Other Party
FAIRNESS
In your opinion, was the process objective
and unbiased?
63%
...
YES
DURATION / TIME
How long did the case take to resolve?
18%
26%
19%
6%
18%
43%
15%
5%
11%
LEGAL ASSISTANCE
Did you or your household member receive
legal assistance during this process?
64%
YES
22 % It
was free
of charge
46%
17% It
was very
expensive
27%
13%
14%
29% It was
somewhat/
moderately
expensive
SATISFACTION
Regardless of the outcome, please tell us how
you feel about the way the process was handled
31% It was
reasonably
priced
CORRUPTION
At any stage of the judicial process, did
the following officers ask you, or expect
you, to pay a bribe?
26%
26%
18%
Court staff
Police
% Yes
The table below presents the findings from the 2015 Qualified Respondents Questionnaire (QRQ), which includes the
opinions of over 2,500 legal academics and practitioners.
SCALE
Very important
Kyrgyzstan
Lebanon
Liberia
Macedonia, FYR
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Mexico
Moldova
Mongolia
Morocco
Myanmar
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Korea
Romania
Russia
Senegal
Serbia
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Tanzania
Thailand
Tunisia
Turkey
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Vietnam
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Afghanistan
Albania
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Ethiopia
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guatemala
Honduras
Hong Kong SAR, China
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Iran
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Co
ur
tf
ee
s
At
to
rn
ey
fe
La
es
ck
of
leg
Lo
al
ca
aid
tio
no
Du
fC
ra
ou
tio
rth
no
Bi
ou
fc
as
se
as
ag
s
es
ain
st
Cu
m
ar
m
gin
be
ali
Co rsom
ze
rru
dp
ep
pt
eo
r
ion oce
ple
La
du
ck
re
of
s
aw
ar
en
es
so
fr
em
ed
ies
Co
ur
tf
ee
s
At
to
rn
ey
fe
La
es
ck
of
leg
Lo
al
ca
aid
tio
no
Du
fC
ra
ou
tio
rth
no
Bi
ou
fc
as
se
as
ag
s
es
ain
s
t
Cu
m
ar
m
gin
be
ali
Co rsom
ze
rru
dp
ep
pt
eo
ro
i
ce
on
ple
La
du
ck
re
of
s
aw
ar
en
es
so
fr
em
ed
ies
The table below presents the findings from the 2015 Qualified Respondents Questionnaire (QRQ), which includes the
opinions of over 2,500 legal academics and practitioners.
SCALE
Very serious
Kyrgyzstan
Lebanon
Liberia
Macedonia, FYR
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Mexico
Moldova
Mongolia
Morocco
Myanmar
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Korea
Romania
Russia
Senegal
Serbia
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Tanzania
Thailand
Tunisia
Turkey
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Vietnam
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Afghanistan
Albania
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Ethiopia
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guatemala
Honduras
Hong Kong SAR, China
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Iran
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Du
ra
tio
no
In
fc
ef
as
fic
es
ien
te
To
nf
of
or
ew
ce
co
m
In
en
ur
ad
tm
tp
eq
er
ec
ua
s
ha
o
t
nn
e
In
nis
re
ad
el
m
so
eq
s
ur
u
In
ce
a
t
ef
s
fic e se
ien lec
t A tio
Co
DR n/t
rru
ra
s
pt
ini
ion
ng
Ju
of
dic
jud
ial
ge
ind
s
ep
en
de
nc
e
Du
ra
tio
no
In
fc
ef
as
fic
es
ien
te
To
nf
of
o
ew
rc
em
co
In
en
ur
ad
tm
t
pe
eq
ec
rs
ua
ha
o
te
n
In
nis
n
re
ad
el
m
s
eq
ou
s
rc
In uat
es
ef
e
se
fic
ien lec
t A tio
Co
DR n/t
rru
ra
s
pt
ini
ion
ng
Ju
of
dic
jud
ial
ge
ind
s
ep
en
de
nc
e
How serious are the following problems in civil and commercial courts in the city
where you live?
The table below presents the findings from the 2015 Qualified Respondents Questionnaire (QRQ), which includes the
opinions of over 2,500 legal academics and practitioners.
SCALE
Very significant
Kyrgyzstan
Lebanon
Liberia
Macedonia, FYR
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Mexico
Moldova
Mongolia
Morocco
Myanmar
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Korea
Romania
Russia
Senegal
Serbia
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Tanzania
Thailand
Tunisia
Turkey
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Vietnam
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Afghanistan
Albania
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Ethiopia
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guatemala
Honduras
Hong Kong SAR, China
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Iran
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
La
ck
of
pr
oa
De
ct
ive
fic
ien
inv
tm
es
In
tig
e
ad
ch
at
eq
an
ion
ua
ism
m
te
In
et
s
wi
co
to
ho
tn
m
ob
ds
es
pe
ta
s
t
in
en
In
p
r
e
ad
t in
ot
v
i
eq
ec
de
ve
tio
ua
nc
sti
te
n
e
ga
re
Pr
to
s
rs
os
ou
ec
rc
ut
es
or
Co
ial
In
rru
de
pt
pe
inv
nd
Co
es
en
tig
rru
ce
at
pt
o
pr
rs
os
ec
ut
or
s
La
ck
of
pr
oa
De
ct
ive
fic
ien
inv
tm
es
In
tig
e
ad
ch
at
eq
an
ion
ua
ism
m
te
In
et
s
wi
co
to
ho
t
m
ob
ds
ne
pe
ta
ss
t
i
en
ne
In
pr
ad
t in
ot
vid
eq
e
ve
ct
ua
ion ence
sti
te
ga
re
Pr
to
so
r
os
s
ur
ec
ce
ut
s
or
Co
ial
In
rru
de
pt
pe
inv
nd
Co
es
en
tig
rru
ce
a
pt
to
pr
rs
os
ec
ut
or
s
How significant are the following problems for the criminal investigative service
(prosecutors, investigators, judicial police officers, etc.) in the city where you live?
The table below presents the findings from the 2015 Qualified Respondents Questionnaire (QRQ), which includes the
opinions of over 2,500 legal academics and practitioners.
SCALE
Very significant
Kyrgyzstan
Lebanon
Liberia
Macedonia, FYR
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Mexico
Moldova
Mongolia
Morocco
Myanmar
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Korea
Romania
Russia
Senegal
Serbia
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Tanzania
Thailand
Tunisia
Turkey
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Vietnam
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Afghanistan
Albania
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Ethiopia
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guatemala
Honduras
Hong Kong SAR, China
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Iran
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Ex
ce
ss
ive
pr
De
elay
tri
al
of
de
ca
Po
te
s
es
nt
or
ion
jud
i
cia
In
ld
ad
ec
eq
isi
ua
on
te
In
s
ad
re
eq
so
u
ua
r
Co
c
t
es
rru e cr
im
pt
ina
ion
Ju
l
de
dic
fe
ial
ns
ind
e
Bi
ep
as
e
nd
ag
ain
en
In
ce
st
ad
m
eq
ar
gin
ua
te
ali
AD
ze
dp
Rs
eo
ple
Ex
ce
ss
ive
pr
De
elay
tri
al
of
de
c
as
Po
te
es
nt
or
ion
jud
i
c
In
ial
ad
de
eq
cis
ua
ion
te
In
s
ad
re
eq
so
ur
ua
Co
ce
te
s
rru
cr
im
pt
ina
ion
Ju
l
de
dic
fe
ial
ns
ind
e
Bi
e
pe
as
nd
ag
ain
en
In
ce
st
ad
m
eq
ar
gin
ua
te
ali
AD
ze
dp
Rs
eo
ple
How significant are the following problems in criminal courts in the city where
you live?
The police occupy an important position in upholding the rule of law, and play a powerful role in interactions between
average citizens and the formal justice system. Nonetheless, police officers are not above the law they serve. The following
table presents perceptions of respondents on police performance in the following areas: 1) whether police act according
to the law, 2) whether police respect the basic rights of suspects, and 3) whether police are punished for violating the law.
Police act
according to
the law
Police
respect the
basic rights
of suspects
Police act
according to
the law
%Always/Often
Afghanistan
Albania
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Ethiopia
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guatemala
Honduras
Hong Kong SAR, China
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Iran
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
0%
%Always/Often
67%
50%
47%
73%
49%
73%
39%
36%
24%
94%
90%
70%
92%
87%
58%
25%
26%
18%
37%
63%
54%
93%
91%
62%
58%
48%
41%
19%
22%
19%
88%
79%
73%
90%
84%
82%
22%
21%
24%
63%
58%
38%
74%
65%
58%
28%
30%
22%
38%
30%
50%
88%
82%
58%
70%
60%
58%
89%
88%
93%
48%
39%
42%
79%
74%
67%
63%
51%
61%
63%
42%
66%
91%
85%
47%
94%
93%
75%
56%
48%
60%
62%
55%
52%
39%
29%
48%
63%
56%
55%
96%
91%
73%
57%
58%
56%
95%
91%
79%
89%
84%
60%
78%
57%
74%
89%
86%
52%
39%
43%
54%
77%
57%
29%
50%
53%
61%
59%
55%
54%
95%
95%
100%
66%
64%
49%
48%
50%
54%
54%
47%
58%
67%
56%
55%
83%
72%
38%
35%
23%
32%
100%
97%
99%
83%
65%
66%
41%
25%
30%
27%
23%
36%
Police
respect the
basic rights
of suspects
Kyrgyzstan
Lebanon
Liberia
Macedonia, FYR
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Mexico
Moldova
Mongolia
Morocco
Myanmar
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Korea
Romania
Russia
Senegal
Serbia
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Tanzania
Thailand
Tunisia
Turkey
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Vietnam
Zambia
Zimbabwe
39%
31%
36%
62%
43%
52%
43%
30%
56%
66%
68%
42%
23%
21%
43%
32%
33%
44%
92%
90%
92%
24%
25%
25%
44%
56%
43%
60%
39%
49%
79%
72%
73%
98%
76%
89%
78%
55%
63%
89%
88%
66%
100%
100%
99%
66%
59%
61%
21%
23%
24%
95%
92%
75%
31%
13%
19%
79%
72%
64%
31%
30%
24%
98%
83%
94%
62%
34%
65%
88%
82%
61%
100%
96%
98%
65%
52%
59%
55%
35%
48%
69%
63%
65%
52%
66%
54%
70%
63%
60%
93%
87%
91%
65%
60%
47%
58%
59%
59%
88%
82%
49%
49%
40%
49%
93%
89%
51%
58%
43%
52%
96%
84%
95%
55%
39%
46%
59%
46%
57%
35%
28%
33%
31%
51%
37%
100%
99%
89%
91%
84%
63%
83%
75%
53%
81%
73%
73%
36%
26%
58%
34%
28%
32%
79%
69%
71%
53%
43%
48%
41%
26%
33%
100%
ABSENCE OF
CORRUPTION
OPEN
GOVERNMENT
FUNDAMENTAL
RIGHTS
Afghanistan
Albania
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Bolivia
Botswana
Brazil
COUNTRY/TERRITORY
ORDER &
SECURITY
REGULATORY
ENFORCEMENT
CIVIL
JUSTICE
CRIMINAL
JUSTICE
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Ethiopia
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guatemala
Honduras
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Iran
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
CONTRAINTS ON
GOVERNMENT
POWERS
ABSENCE OF
CORRUPTION
OPEN
GOVERNMENT
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kyrgyzstan
Lebanon
Liberia
COUNTRY/TERRITORY
Macedonia, FYR
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Mexico
FUNDAMENTAL
RIGHTS
ORDER &
SECURITY
REGULATORY
ENFORCEMENT
CIVIL
JUSTICE
CRIMINAL
JUSTICE
Moldova
Mongolia
Morocco
Myanmar
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Korea
Romania
Russia
Senegal
Serbia
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Tanzania
Thailand
Tunisia
Turkey
Uganda
Ukraine
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Vietnam
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Country Profiles
Brazil
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Upper middle income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Overall Score
Constraints on
Government
Powers
Section 1
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
5/19
13/31
46/102
Section 3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.61
5/19
7/31
Absence of Corruption
0.46
8/19
18/31 55/102
Open Government
0.56
4/19
6/31
Fundamental Rights
0.61
9/19
11/31 46/102
0.66
9/19
22/31 76/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.51
6/19
16/31 50/102
Civil Justice
0.53
5/19
13/31 48/102
Criminal Justice
0.37
6/19
22/31 68/102
4.4
6.2
Order and
Security
Brazil
Global Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Income Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Regional Rank
Section 2
0.54
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
42/102
38/102
High
Section 4
Civil Justice
0.7
0.6
0.58
0.6
0.58
7.2 No discrimination
0.63
0.53
0.36
7.3 No corruption
0.61
0.36
0.69
0.59
0.68
0.73
0.28
Displays
the countrys
1.6 Lawful transition of power
disaggregated scores
for each of the sub-factors that
Absence of Corruption
compose the WJP Rule of Law
2.1 No corruption in the
Index. Eachexecutive
of the 44
sub-factors
branch
2.2 No corruption
in the
is represented
by a gray
line drawn
judiciary
from the center to the periphery of
2.3 No corruption in the
police/military
the circle. The
center of the circle
2.4 Noto
corruption
in the possible
corresponds
the worst
legislature
score for each sub-factor (0), and
the outer edge
ofGovernment
the circle marks
Open
the best 3.1
possible
score
for each
Accessible laws
sub-factor (1).
3.2 Stable laws
Displays
the
countrys
Displays the
featured
Presents the individual
4.6 Right to privacy
0.56
7.6 Effective enforcement
0.32
0.77
overall rule of law score,
countrys individual factor
sub-factor scores under4.7 Freedom of association
0.69
7.7 Impartial and effective ADRs
0.67
along with its overall global,
scores, along with the global,
lying each of the factors listed in
4.8 Labor rights
0.64
income and regional ranks.
regional and income group
Section 3 of the country profile.
0.43
Criminal Justice
The overall rule of law score is
rankings. The distribution of scores The featured countrys score is
8.1 Effective investigations
0.26
and Security for the global rank, regional
0.64by takingOrder
calculated
the simple
rank,
represented by the purple
bar
Timely and effective
5.1 Absence
of crime
average of the eight
individual
and income rank0.54
is spread8.2amongst
and labeled at the end of0.34
the bar.
0.59
adjudication
factors listed in the
tableofincivil conflict three tiers high, 1medium, and low The average score of the countrys
5.2 Absence
8.3 Effective correctional system
0.19
0.18
Section 3 of the country profile.
as indicated by the color of the box region is represented by the
5.3 Absence of violent redress
0.45
8.4 No discrimination
in which the score is found.
orange line. The average0.26
score
8.5 No corruption
of the countrys income 0.53
group is
Regulatory Enforcement
It also features upward and
by the green
line.
8.6 No improperrepresented
gov. influence
0.68
0.5
6.1 Effective regulatory
0.51
downward
arrows
to
illustrate
Each
sub-factor
score
is
scaled
enforcement
8.7 Due process of law
0.36
0.56
of law in a
between 0 and 1, where 1 is the
6.2 No improper influence whether the rule0.63
0.62
country changed in the past year.
highest score and 0 is the lowest
6.3 No unreasonable delay
0.32
Further
information
about
the
score.
0.57
6.4 Respect for due process
0.5
statistical procedure to construct
6.5 No expropriation w/out these arrows can0.57
be found in
adequate compensation
the Methodology section of this
report.
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Afghanistan
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.35
6/6
15/15
101/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Afghanistan
South Asia
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.44
5/6
9/15
Absence of Corruption
0.23
6/6
15/15 102/102
Open Government
0.43
6/6
8/15
89/102
Fundamental Rights
0.38
6/6
12/15
95/102
0.42
5/6
15/15 100/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.36
5/6
12/15
Civil Justice
0.32
6/6
14/15 101/102
Criminal Justice
0.24
6/6
15/15 100/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
82/102
97/102
High
Civil Justice
0.59
0.31
0.37
0.34
0.33
7.2 No discrimination
0.11
0.4
0.27
7.3 No corruption
0.1
0.3
0.6
0.33
0.59
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.23
0.47
0.65
0.43
0.25
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.34
0.08
0.31
0.18
Open Government
0.37
0.39
0.59
0.36
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
0.35
0.68
0.35
0.26
0.21
0.33
8.4 No discrimination
0.13
8.5 No corruption
0.22
0.2
0.27
Regulatory Enforcement
57 | Country Profiles
Criminal Justice
0.35
0.31
0.42
0.26
0.49
Albania
Criminal
Justice
Region: Eastern Europe & Central Asia | Income group: Upper middle income
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.52
5/13
16/31
53/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.55
3/13
12/31 52/102
Absence of Corruption
0.36
9/13
27/31 78/102
Open Government
0.52
6/13
16/31 54/102
Fundamental Rights
0.6
4/13
13/31 48/102
0.76
7/13
11/31 47/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.45
8/13
25/31 71/102
Civil Justice
0.5
6/13
20/31 59/102
Criminal Justice
0.43
6/13
16/31 54/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Albania
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.6
0.6
0.56
0.55
0.68
7.2 No discrimination
0.52
0.54
0.51
7.3 No corruption
0.35
0.46
0.58
0.43
0.57
0.74
0.45
0.56
0.48
0.56
0.68
0.65
0.53
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.41
0.29
0.42
0.31
0.85
1
0.42
0.46
0.47
0.33
8.4 No discrimination
0.48
8.5 No corruption
0.39
0.38
0.51
Regulatory Enforcement
0.43
0.53
0.59
0.52
58 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.5
0.42
0.44
0.43
0.45
Argentina
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Upper middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.52
7/19
17/31
54/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.49
13/19
21/31 71/102
Absence of Corruption
0.48
7/19
17/31 51/102
Open Government
0.56
7/19
9/31
44/102
Fundamental Rights
0.66
4/19
4/31
33/102
0.61
12/19
27/31 84/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.43
13/19
27/31 75/102
Civil Justice
0.55
4/19
10/31 42/102
Criminal Justice
0.39
5/19
18/31 59/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Argentina
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.41
0.62
0.58
0.36
0.79
7.2 No discrimination
0.65
0.58
0.54
7.3 No corruption
0.59
0.31
0.64
0.35
0.63
0.82
0.3
0.62
0.61
0.65
0.71
0.72
0.58
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.45
0.63
0.6
0.23
0.54
1
0.28
0.28
0.3
0.29
8.4 No discrimination
0.52
8.5 No corruption
0.52
0.3
0.54
Regulatory Enforcement
0.46
0.57
0.62
0.57
59 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.38
0.57
0.39
0.35
0.44
Australia
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.8
3/15
10/31
10/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Australia
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.83
2/15
9/31
9/102
Absence of Corruption
0.84
4/15
9/31
9/102
Open Government
0.74
2/15
9/31
9/102
Fundamental Rights
0.82
2/15
10/31 10/102
0.89
5/15
12/31 13/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.81
3/15
8/31
Civil Justice
0.74
6/15
15/31 15/102
Criminal Justice
0.77
4/15
10/31 10/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
8/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.86
0.63
0.5
0.87
0.9
7.2 No discrimination
0.54
0.68
0.8
7.3 No corruption
0.92
0.79
0.85
0.91
0.84
0.88
0.59
0.93
0.88
0.81
0.89
0.9
0.73
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.8
0.94
0.93
0.7
0.91
1
0.75
0.68
0.76
0.71
8.4 No discrimination
0.57
8.5 No corruption
0.88
0.96
0.8
Regulatory Enforcement
0.64
0.7
0.8
0.82
60 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.78
0.92
0.77
0.73
0.83
Austria
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.82
6/24
7/31
7/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.85
7/24
7/31
Absence of Corruption
0.83
6/24
11/31 11/102
Open Government
0.72
9/24
13/31 13/102
Fundamental Rights
0.87
5/24
5/31
0.9
5/24
10/31 11/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.81
5/24
7/31
7/102
Civil Justice
0.79
6/24
8/31
8/102
Criminal Justice
0.82
4/24
5/31
5/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Austria
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
7/102
5/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.85
0.72
0.66
0.83
0.96
7.2 No discrimination
0.77
0.78
0.87
7.3 No corruption
0.88
0.77
0.89
0.86
0.89
0.86
0.71
0.97
0.98
0.93
0.92
0.72
0.8
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.82
0.92
0.92
0.65
0.92
1
0.78
0.63
0.87
0.84
8.4 No discrimination
0.7
8.5 No corruption
0.89
0.92
0.87
Regulatory Enforcement
0.65
0.71
0.83
0.7
61 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.81
0.89
0.79
0.75
0.81
Bangladesh
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.42
4/6
11/15
93/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Bangladesh
South Asia
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.44
6/6
10/15 84/102
Absence of Corruption
0.27
5/6
12/15 98/102
Open Government
0.47
4/6
5/15
73/102
Fundamental Rights
0.42
4/6
9/15
88/102
0.65
3/6
7/15
76/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.37
4/6
11/15 96/102
Civil Justice
0.39
5/6
11/15 93/102
Criminal Justice
0.33
4/6
10/15 88/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.52
0.54
0.42
0.47
0.31
7.2 No discrimination
0.36
0.49
0.31
7.3 No corruption
0.28
0.33
0.38
0.37
0.38
0.54
0.36
0.44
0.24
0.46
0.53
0.47
0.49
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.33
0.3
0.2
0.24
0.74
1
0.2
0.29
0.4
0.33
8.4 No discrimination
0.42
8.5 No corruption
0.28
0.26
0.31
Regulatory Enforcement
0.45
0.51
0.49
0.44
62 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.38
0.26
0.36
0.33
0.52
Belarus
Criminal
Justice
Region: Eastern Europe & Central Asia | Income group: Upper middle income
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.53
4/13
15/31
50/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.35
12/13
30/31 97/102
Absence of Corruption
0.5
3/13
11/31 43/102
Open Government
0.46
10/13
24/31 78/102
Fundamental Rights
0.46
10/13
26/31 82/102
0.81
4/13
4/31
29/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.55
2/13
4/31
34/102
Civil Justice
0.62
2/13
3/31
30/102
Criminal Justice
0.48
3/13
10/31 43/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Belarus
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.27
0.76
0.53
0.32
0.45
7.2 No discrimination
0.73
0.4
0.5
7.3 No corruption
0.62
0.56
0.23
0.33
0.23
0.61
0.75
0.33
0.23
0.69
0.36
0.69
0.56
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.46
0.61
0.6
0.34
0.91
1
0.53
0.54
0.55
0.42
8.4 No discrimination
0.7
8.5 No corruption
0.48
0.18
0.5
Regulatory Enforcement
0.41
0.5
0.36
0.55
63 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.59
0.55
0.67
0.56
0.4
Belgium
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.77
11/24
16/31
16/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.81
8/24
10/31 10/102
Absence of Corruption
0.81
10/24
17/31 17/102
Open Government
0.7
12/24
16/31 16/102
Fundamental Rights
0.84
8/24
0.86
12/24
18/31 21/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.73
12/24
18/31 18/102
Civil Justice
0.72
10/24
16/31 16/102
Criminal Justice
0.67
13/24
20/31 20/102
4.4
Regulatory
Enforcement
Belgium
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
8/31
8/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.87
0.78
0.64
0.8
0.95
7.2 No discrimination
0.82
0.7
0.77
7.3 No corruption
0.86
0.75
0.84
0.76
0.83
0.83
0.45
0.9
0.83
0.74
0.89
0.77
0.85
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.8
0.87
0.91
0.66
0.87
1
0.71
0.55
0.65
0.43
8.4 No discrimination
0.58
8.5 No corruption
0.84
0.86
0.77
Regulatory Enforcement
0.56
0.7
0.79
0.74
64 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.76
0.85
0.55
0.68
0.83
Belize
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Upper middle income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.49
11/19
23/31
66/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.47
14/19
22/31 73/102
Absence of Corruption
0.48
6/19
16/31 50/102
Open Government
0.55
10/19
12/31 48/102
Fundamental Rights
0.5
16/19
24/31 73/102
0.68
8/19
20/31 71/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.44
12/19
26/31 72/102
Civil Justice
0.49
11/19
23/31 64/102
Criminal Justice
0.29
16/19
30/31 97/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Belize
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.52
0.46
0.56
0.45
0.48
7.2 No discrimination
0.38
0.33
0.28
7.3 No corruption
0.57
0.28
0.56
0.45
0.55
0.57
0.39
0.68
0.31
0.48
0.63
0.63
0.72
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.44
0.57
0.53
0.39
0.65
1
0.4
0.32
0.28
0.13
8.4 No discrimination
0.33
8.5 No corruption
0.51
0.19
0.28
Regulatory Enforcement
0.46
0.51
0.63
0.59
65 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.37
0.59
0.29
0.44
0.52
Bolivia
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Lower middle income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.41
18/19
22/25
94/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.38
17/19
23/25 92/102
Absence of Corruption
0.34
16/19
20/25 87/102
Open Government
0.45
17/19
18/25 80/102
Fundamental Rights
0.53
15/19
10/25 65/102
0.59
14/19
19/25 89/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.4
16/19
20/25 86/102
Civil Justice
0.37
16/19
22/25 95/102
Criminal Justice
0.25
17/19
24/25 99/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Bolivia
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.38
0.4
0.45
0.27
0.58
7.2 No discrimination
0.42
0.45
0.43
7.3 No corruption
0.22
0.33
0.49
0.23
0.49
0.68
0.26
0.39
0.52
0.38
0.61
0.61
0.55
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.43
0.21
0.35
0.35
0.68
1
0.09
0.26
0.16
0.02
8.4 No discrimination
0.45
8.5 No corruption
0.3
0.13
0.43
Regulatory Enforcement
0.37
0.43
0.51
0.51
66 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.37
0.44
0.46
0.32
0.41
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Regional Rank
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.57
2/13
7/31
40/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Overall Score
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Region: Eastern Europe & Central Asia | Income group: Upper middle income
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.57
2/13
9/31
Absence of Corruption
0.43
7/13
21/31 61/102
Open Government
0.59
2/13
3/31
31/102
Fundamental Rights
0.66
1/13
6/31
35/102
0.72
10/13
Regulatory Enforcement
0.53
3/13
9/31
Civil Justice
0.52
4/13
15/31 51/102
Criminal Justice
0.51
2/13
7/31
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
46/102
15/31 55/102
41/102
37/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.65
0.62
0.57
0.58
0.78
7.2 No discrimination
0.68
0.5
0.64
7.3 No corruption
0.59
0.47
0.61
0.49
0.6
0.66
0.38
0.63
0.58
0.26
0.68
0.64
0.67
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.4
0.57
0.54
0.22
0.86
1
0.31
0.45
0.58
0.37
8.4 No discrimination
0.59
8.5 No corruption
0.53
0.4
0.64
Regulatory Enforcement
0.53
0.68
0.58
0.57
67 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.46
0.4
0.51
0.61
0.64
Botswana
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.64
1/18
2/31
31/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.6
4.7
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Botswana
Sub-Saharan Africa
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.63
3/18
2/31
32/102
Absence of Corruption
0.65
1/18
2/31
29/102
Open Government
0.57
2/18
5/31
35/102
Fundamental Rights
0.56
6/18
16/31 55/102
0.81
1/18
3/31
28/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.66
1/18
1/31
22/102
Civil Justice
0.61
1/18
5/31
33/102
Criminal Justice
0.61
1/18
1/31
27/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.74
0.58
0.47
0.75
0.53
7.2 No discrimination
0.44
0.41
0.54
7.3 No corruption
0.83
0.59
0.61
0.62
0.61
0.65
0.55
0.7
0.28
0.61
0.7
0.76
0.61
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.67
0.79
0.72
0.44
0.8
1
0.64
0.63
0.53
0.54
8.4 No discrimination
0.61
8.5 No corruption
0.83
0.59
0.54
Regulatory Enforcement
0.44
0.49
0.72
0.63
68 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.66
0.78
0.54
0.51
0.81
Brazil
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Upper middle income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.54
5/19
13/31
46/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.61
5/19
7/31
Absence of Corruption
0.46
8/19
18/31 55/102
Open Government
0.56
4/19
6/31
Fundamental Rights
0.61
9/19
11/31 46/102
0.66
9/19
22/31 75/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.51
6/19
16/31 50/102
Civil Justice
0.53
5/19
13/31 48/102
Criminal Justice
0.37
6/19
22/31 68/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Brazil
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
42/102
38/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.7
0.6
0.58
0.6
0.58
7.2 No discrimination
0.63
0.53
0.36
7.3 No corruption
0.61
0.36
0.69
0.59
0.68
0.73
0.28
0.77
0.56
0.32
0.69
0.67
0.64
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.43
0.64
0.59
0.18
0.54
1
0.45
0.26
0.34
0.19
8.4 No discrimination
0.26
8.5 No corruption
0.53
0.68
0.36
Regulatory Enforcement
0.5
0.56
0.62
0.57
69 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.51
0.63
0.32
0.5
0.57
Bulgaria
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.55
24/24
12/31
45/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.53
23/24
13/31 56/102
Absence of Corruption
0.39
24/24
25/31 71/102
Open Government
0.54
22/24
13/31 49/102
Fundamental Rights
0.67
22/24
3/31
32/102
0.79
20/24
7/31
36/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.49
23/24
20/31 56/102
Civil Justice
0.54
22/24
11/31 44/102
Criminal Justice
0.44
24/24
13/31 50/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Bulgaria
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.7
0.67
0.56
0.41
0.76
7.2 No discrimination
0.61
0.51
0.56
7.3 No corruption
0.47
0.33
0.66
0.46
0.65
0.79
0.34
0.59
0.48
0.58
0.73
0.75
0.67
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.37
0.47
0.54
0.17
0.87
1
0.5
0.33
0.46
0.47
8.4 No discrimination
0.52
8.5 No corruption
0.35
0.39
0.56
Regulatory Enforcement
0.43
0.58
0.62
0.53
70 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.58
0.45
0.5
0.45
0.49
Burkina Faso
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.47
9/18
4/15
78/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Burkina Faso
Sub-Saharan Africa
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.41
15/18
Absence of Corruption
0.38
8/18
4/15
73/102
Open Government
0.43
12/18
9/15
90/102
Fundamental Rights
0.55
7/18
4/15
58/102
0.69
7/18
5/15
67/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.46
6/18
2/15
67/102
Civil Justice
0.47
10/18
4/15
70/102
Criminal Justice
0.36
10/18
5/15
70/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
11/15 86/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.42
0.66
0.39
0.36
0.47
7.2 No discrimination
0.54
0.41
0.41
7.3 No corruption
0.45
0.24
0.54
0.46
0.53
0.75
0.47
0.51
0.29
0.3
0.68
0.68
0.61
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.4
0.49
0.48
0.14
0.8
1
0.27
0.32
0.49
0.27
8.4 No discrimination
0.45
8.5 No corruption
0.39
0.23
0.41
Regulatory Enforcement
0.28
0.38
0.57
0.48
71 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.4
0.53
0.36
0.38
0.61
Cambodia
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.37
15/15
13/15
99/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Cambodia
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.33
15/15
14/15
99/102
Absence of Corruption
0.27
15/15
13/15
99/102
Open Government
0.36
14/15
13/15
98/102
Fundamental Rights
0.42
13/15
10/15
90/102
0.68
15/15
6/15
72/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.33
15/15
15/15 101/102
Civil Justice
0.29
15/15
15/15 102/102
Criminal Justice
0.28
15/15
14/15
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
98/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.43
0.44
0.31
0.25
0.4
7.2 No discrimination
0.23
0.32
0.3
7.3 No corruption
0.15
0.28
0.37
0.19
0.37
0.55
0.4
0.35
0.28
0.2
0.51
0.56
0.46
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.29
0.19
0.23
0.36
0.86
1
0.18
0.32
0.41
0.27
8.4 No discrimination
0.37
8.5 No corruption
0.19
0.13
0.3
Regulatory Enforcement
0.37
0.46
0.42
0.18
72 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.29
0.26
0.6
0.24
0.28
Cameroon
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.4
17/18
24/25
97/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.6
4.7
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Cameroon
Sub-Saharan Africa
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.44
14/18
20/25
Absence of Corruption
0.25
18/18
25/25 101/102
Open Government
0.39
16/18
24/25
95/102
Fundamental Rights
0.5
10/18
15/25
74/102
0.54
17/18
23/25
98/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.39
14/18
23/25
92/102
Civil Justice
0.37
17/18
23/25
96/102
Criminal Justice
0.32
17/18
21/25
91/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
83/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.38
0.47
0.4
0.35
0.47
7.2 No discrimination
0.43
0.54
0.37
7.3 No corruption
0.27
0.43
0.49
0.3
0.49
0.67
0.34
0.45
0.42
0.28
0.62
0.53
0.45
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.3
0.25
0.24
0.19
Open Government
0.37
0.4
0.51
0.28
73 | Country Profiles
0.38
0.62
0.45
0.75
0.17
0.24
8.4 No discrimination
0.46
8.5 No corruption
0.25
0.13
0.37
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.42
0.37
0.26
0.38
0.53
Canada
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.78
9/24
14/31
14/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.78
13/24
16/31 17/102
Absence of Corruption
0.81
9/24
16/31 16/102
Open Government
0.75
6/24
7/31
Fundamental Rights
0.79
13/24
15/31 15/102
0.9
4/24
8/31
Regulatory Enforcement
0.77
9/24
13/31 13/102
Civil Justice
0.7
11/24
18/31 18/102
Criminal Justice
0.72
10/24
17/31 17/102
4.4
Regulatory
Enforcement
Canada
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
7/102
9/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.73
0.65
0.55
0.83
0.9
7.2 No discrimination
0.59
0.67
0.74
7.3 No corruption
0.9
0.77
0.82
0.85
0.82
0.85
0.47
0.86
0.77
0.73
0.88
0.83
0.72
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.76
0.91
0.89
0.7
0.92
1
0.78
0.65
0.68
0.67
8.4 No discrimination
0.61
8.5 No corruption
0.84
0.88
0.74
Regulatory Enforcement
0.69
0.68
0.81
0.8
74 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.7
0.85
0.74
0.73
0.81
Chile
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: High income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.68
3/19
25/31
26/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.74
3/19
22/31 23/102
Absence of Corruption
0.72
2/19
22/31 23/102
Open Government
0.68
1/19
18/31 18/102
Fundamental Rights
0.74
3/19
23/31 24/102
0.7
2/19
30/31 60/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.65
2/19
22/31 23/102
Civil Justice
0.61
3/19
27/31 32/102
Criminal Justice
0.56
2/19
28/31 32/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Chile
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.73
0.51
0.66
0.63
0.85
7.2 No discrimination
0.54
0.74
0.62
7.3 No corruption
0.65
0.65
0.79
0.74
0.79
0.81
0.42
0.91
0.86
0.55
0.83
0.72
0.66
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.74
0.75
0.86
0.52
0.78
1
0.33
0.43
0.57
0.26
8.4 No discrimination
0.55
8.5 No corruption
0.73
0.79
0.62
Regulatory Enforcement
0.54
0.69
0.73
0.76
75 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.6
0.73
0.73
0.45
0.75
China
Region: East Asia & Pacific | Income group: Upper middle income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.48
13/15
26/31
71/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.41
14/15
Absence of Corruption
0.51
9/15
Open Government
0.43
12/15
28/31 87/102
Fundamental Rights
0.32
14/15
30/31 99/102
0.78
10/15
8/31
Regulatory Enforcement
0.46
12/15
24/31 66/102
Civil Justice
0.48
9/15
24/31 67/102
Criminal Justice
0.45
9/15
12/31 47/102
4.4
Order and
Security
China
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
25/31 87/102
9/31
41/102
38/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.62
0.49
0.57
0.46
0.48
7.2 No discrimination
0.47
0.48
0.48
7.3 No corruption
0.38
0.57
0.13
0.25
0.12
0.23
0.73
0.22
0.22
0.48
0.19
0.52
0.31
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.47
0.4
0.65
0.51
Open Government
0.52
0.53
0.21
0.46
76 | Country Profiles
0.56
0.79
0.5
0.83
0.52
0.73
8.4 No discrimination
0.36
8.5 No corruption
0.6
0.11
0.48
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.57
0.49
0.53
0.32
0.38
Colombia
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Upper middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.5
9/19
20/31
62/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.55
7/19
11/31 51/102
Absence of Corruption
0.43
11/19
22/31 63/102
Open Government
0.56
5/19
Fundamental Rights
0.55
13/19
19/31 60/102
0.57
16/19
29/31 93/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.49
9/19
21/31 57/102
Civil Justice
0.51
7/19
18/31 55/102
Criminal Justice
0.34
11/19
27/31 83/102
4.4
Regulatory
Enforcement
Colombia
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
7/31
39/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.6
0.54
0.53
0.54
0.57
7.2 No discrimination
0.62
0.5
0.42
7.3 No corruption
0.52
0.45
0.59
0.55
0.59
0.66
0.23
0.61
0.54
0.42
0.62
0.71
0.43
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.47
0.53
0.53
0.17
Open Government
0.42
0.56
0.58
0.69
77 | Country Profiles
0.27
0.5
0.3
0.94
0.22
0.29
8.4 No discrimination
0.33
8.5 No corruption
0.44
0.38
0.42
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.46
0.6
0.39
0.33
0.67
Costa Rica
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Upper middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.68
2/19
1/31
25/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.78
1/19
1/31
15/102
Absence of Corruption
0.68
3/19
1/31
26/102
Open Government
0.68
2/19
1/31
19/102
Fundamental Rights
0.78
2/19
1/31
17/102
0.7
4/19
17/31 63/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.62
3/19
2/31
27/102
Civil Justice
0.63
2/19
1/31
27/102
Criminal Justice
0.57
1/19
4/31
31/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Costa
Rica
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.81
0.59
0.69
0.7
0.88
7.2 No discrimination
0.62
0.78
0.74
7.3 No corruption
0.74
0.63
0.83
0.77
0.83
0.88
0.31
0.95
0.83
0.54
0.87
0.77
0.64
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.66
0.77
0.8
0.49
0.69
1
0.4
0.47
0.43
0.34
8.4 No discrimination
0.55
8.5 No corruption
0.68
0.79
0.74
Regulatory Enforcement
0.55
0.64
0.76
0.76
78 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.61
0.62
0.63
0.61
0.63
Cote d'Ivoire
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.47
8/18
16/25
76/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.6
4.7
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Cote d'Ivoire
Sub-Saharan Africa
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.47
12/18
15/25 72/102
Absence of Corruption
0.4
6/18
12/25 69/102
Open Government
0.4
14/18
23/25 93/102
Fundamental Rights
0.47
12/18
17/25 79/102
0.63
8/18
17/25 77/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.46
5/18
10/25 65/102
Civil Justice
0.54
4/18
4/25
Criminal Justice
0.38
7/18
10/25 64/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
43/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.51
0.62
0.55
0.43
0.27
7.2 No discrimination
0.58
0.52
0.33
7.3 No corruption
0.46
0.41
0.5
0.43
0.49
0.67
0.63
0.47
0.2
0.54
0.64
0.63
0.57
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.41
0.42
0.49
0.3
Open Government
0.26
0.38
0.56
0.4
79 | Country Profiles
0.25
0.78
0.5
0.75
0.37
0.37
8.4 No discrimination
0.45
8.5 No corruption
0.38
0.39
0.33
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.4
0.49
0.42
0.34
0.65
Croatia
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.6
22/24
30/31
35/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.59
22/24
29/31 44/102
Absence of Corruption
0.54
21/24
30/31 35/102
Open Government
0.58
20/24
28/31 33/102
Fundamental Rights
0.67
21/24
28/31 31/102
0.81
18/24
24/31 31/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.48
24/24
30/31 60/102
Civil Justice
0.54
23/24
30/31 45/102
Criminal Justice
0.58
21/24
27/31 29/102
4.4
Regulatory
Enforcement
Croatia
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.61
0.64
0.63
0.48
0.77
7.2 No discrimination
0.57
0.58
0.62
7.3 No corruption
0.55
0.54
0.63
0.56
0.61
0.68
0.21
0.73
0.51
0.51
0.76
0.73
0.78
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.46
0.62
0.69
0.39
0.97
1
0.45
0.7
0.6
0.47
8.4 No discrimination
0.52
8.5 No corruption
0.59
0.59
0.62
Regulatory Enforcement
0.48
0.63
0.63
0.57
80 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.55
0.49
0.39
0.46
0.53
Czech Republic
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.72
14/24
20/31
20/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Czech Republic
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.74
16/24
23/31 24/102
Absence of Corruption
0.66
16/24
25/31 27/102
Open Government
0.64
15/24
21/31 22/102
Fundamental Rights
0.8
11/24
13/31 13/102
0.89
6/24
11/31 12/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.63
14/24
23/31 24/102
Civil Justice
0.69
13/24
20/31 20/102
Criminal Justice
0.69
12/24
19/31 19/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.75
0.77
0.68
0.68
0.92
7.2 No discrimination
0.85
0.72
0.8
7.3 No corruption
0.73
0.66
0.78
0.72
0.78
0.74
0.4
0.83
0.83
0.69
0.84
0.75
0.68
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.6
0.74
0.84
0.46
0.87
1
0.8
0.54
0.71
0.6
8.4 No discrimination
0.73
8.5 No corruption
0.72
0.74
0.8
Regulatory Enforcement
0.47
0.7
0.75
0.66
81 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.65
0.73
0.51
0.57
0.69
Denmark
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.87
1/24
1/31
1/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Denmark
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.92
1/24
1/31
1/102
Absence of Corruption
0.96
1/24
1/31
1/102
Open Government
0.78
3/24
4/31
4/102
Fundamental Rights
0.91
2/24
2/31
2/102
0.92
1/24
2/31
2/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.81
4/24
6/31
6/102
Civil Justice
0.83
3/24
4/31
4/102
Criminal Justice
0.84
2/24
2/31
2/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.9
0.81
0.73
0.96
0.94
7.2 No discrimination
0.9
0.79
0.89
7.3 No corruption
0.96
0.92
0.97
0.93
0.97
0.87
0.61
0.98
0.87
0.81
0.97
0.87
0.93
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.92
0.97
0.97
0.96
0.92
1
0.84
0.67
0.78
0.83
8.4 No discrimination
0.77
8.5 No corruption
0.97
0.96
0.89
Regulatory Enforcement
0.68
0.72
0.89
0.84
82 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.8
0.93
0.79
0.73
0.81
Dominican Republic
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Upper middle income
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.48
12/19
24/31
67/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Dominican
Republic
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.49
12/19
20/31 70/102
Absence of Corruption
0.36
13/19
28/31 79/102
Open Government
0.52
11/19
15/31 53/102
Fundamental Rights
0.61
8/19
10/31 43/102
0.59
13/19
28/31 88/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.42
14/19
29/31 82/102
Civil Justice
0.51
8/19
19/31 56/102
Criminal Justice
0.37
7/19
23/31 69/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.53
0.6
0.58
0.38
0.58
7.2 No discrimination
0.67
0.34
0.44
7.3 No corruption
0.4
0.31
0.67
0.4
0.66
0.7
0.39
0.69
0.53
0.46
0.72
0.65
0.69
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.38
0.44
0.47
0.14
0.63
1
0.15
0.34
0.45
0.24
8.4 No discrimination
0.33
8.5 No corruption
0.4
0.35
0.44
Regulatory Enforcement
0.4
0.57
0.62
0.51
83 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.31
0.49
0.41
0.31
0.56
Ecuador
Criminal
Justice
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Upper middle income
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.47
13/19
27/31
77/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.4
16/19
26/31 88/102
Absence of Corruption
0.45
9/19
19/31 57/102
Open Government
0.51
14/19
21/31 63/102
Fundamental Rights
0.53
14/19
21/31 64/102
0.62
11/19
26/31 82/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.49
10/19
22/31 59/102
Civil Justice
0.41
15/19
30/31 89/102
Criminal Justice
0.35
8/19
25/31 77/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Ecuador
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.35
0.52
0.47
0.33
0.56
7.2 No discrimination
0.42
0.5
0.51
7.3 No corruption
0.4
0.31
0.44
0.26
0.44
0.78
0.26
0.46
0.41
0.37
0.49
0.71
0.56
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.52
0.41
0.49
0.38
0.51
1
0.35
0.4
0.38
0.27
8.4 No discrimination
0.36
8.5 No corruption
0.39
0.13
0.51
Regulatory Enforcement
0.47
0.54
0.46
0.56
84 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.53
0.58
0.47
0.38
0.49
Egypt
Region: Middle East & North Africa | Income group: Lower middle income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.44
6/7
19/25
86/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.39
6/7
22/25 91/102
Absence of Corruption
0.47
5/7
5/25
Open Government
0.42
6/7
22/25 91/102
Fundamental Rights
0.32
6/7
25/25 98/102
0.69
5/7
14/25 66/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.39
7/7
24/25 93/102
Civil Justice
0.39
7/7
21/25 92/102
Criminal Justice
0.43
4/7
8/25
4.4
Order and
Security
Egypt
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
52/102
55/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.37
0.56
0.39
0.5
0.3
7.2 No discrimination
0.48
0.35
0.28
7.3 No corruption
0.63
0.54
0.22
0.46
0.21
0.29
0.3
0.34
0.11
0.16
0.46
0.35
0.31
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.48
0.59
0.45
0.38
Open Government
0.43
0.41
0.52
0.34
85 | Country Profiles
0.45
0.84
0.44
0.92
0.31
0.32
8.4 No discrimination
0.5
8.5 No corruption
0.54
0.46
0.28
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.52
0.53
0.02
0.42
0.47
El Salvador
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Lower middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.51
8/19
8/25
57/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.52
9/19
9/25
60/102
Absence of Corruption
0.43
10/19
9/25
62/102
Open Government
0.51
13/19
10/25 58/102
Fundamental Rights
0.62
6/19
4/25
0.68
6/19
15/25 69/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.48
11/19
9/25
62/102
Civil Justice
0.51
9/19
7/25
58/102
Criminal Justice
0.34
10/19
4.4
Order and
Security
El
Salvador
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
41/102
16/25 81/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.65
0.55
0.56
0.45
0.78
7.2 No discrimination
0.58
0.49
0.42
7.3 No corruption
0.42
0.3
0.63
0.39
0.63
0.8
0.46
0.61
0.63
0.55
0.64
0.58
0.53
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.49
0.43
0.52
0.26
0.58
1
0.47
0.24
0.26
0.18
8.4 No discrimination
0.36
8.5 No corruption
0.45
0.45
0.42
Regulatory Enforcement
0.34
0.55
0.57
0.58
86 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.42
0.55
0.5
0.38
0.52
Estonia
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.77
10/24
15/31
15/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.79
11/24
13/31 13/102
Absence of Corruption
0.78
11/24
19/31 19/102
Open Government
0.72
10/24
14/31 14/102
Fundamental Rights
0.81
9/24
11/31 11/102
0.88
8/24
15/31 16/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.75
10/24
16/31 16/102
Civil Justice
0.75
8/24
12/31 12/102
Criminal Justice
0.71
11/24
18/31 18/102
4.4
Regulatory
Enforcement
Estonia
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.78
0.84
0.57
0.81
0.92
7.2 No discrimination
0.87
0.65
0.77
7.3 No corruption
0.88
0.83
0.79
0.86
0.79
0.85
0.63
0.88
0.76
0.66
0.84
0.8
0.72
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.71
0.92
0.9
0.57
0.88
1
0.74
0.46
0.65
0.68
8.4 No discrimination
0.7
8.5 No corruption
0.85
0.84
0.77
Regulatory Enforcement
0.62
0.77
0.75
0.76
87 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.82
0.85
0.75
0.52
0.8
Addis Ababa
Ethiopia
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.42
14/18
9/15
91/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Ethiopia
Sub-Saharan Africa
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.36
17/18
Absence of Corruption
0.47
4/18
Open Government
0.39
15/18
11/15 94/102
Fundamental Rights
0.32
17/18
13/15 97/102
0.72
4/18
Regulatory Enforcement
0.36
17/18
13/15 98/102
Civil Justice
0.36
18/18
13/15 98/102
Criminal Justice
0.39
6/18
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
13/15 96/102
1/15
4/15
3/15
53/102
56/102
61/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.42
0.44
0.33
0.35
0.23
7.2 No discrimination
0.28
0.41
0.38
7.3 No corruption
0.25
0.44
0.28
0.25
0.28
0.5
0.43
0.26
0.09
0.43
0.28
0.53
0.35
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.44
0.32
0.5
0.61
Open Government
0.41
0.45
0.3
0.4
88 | Country Profiles
0.4
0.78
0.4
0.94
0.37
0.43
8.4 No discrimination
0.44
8.5 No corruption
0.47
0.25
0.38
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.36
0.43
0.34
0.18
0.49
Finland
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.85
4/24
4/31
4/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.88
2/24
2/31
2/102
Absence of Corruption
0.9
4/24
5/31
5/102
Open Government
0.76
5/24
6/31
6/102
Fundamental Rights
0.91
1/24
1/31
1/102
0.92
2/24
3/31
3/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.79
6/24
9/31
9/102
Civil Justice
0.78
7/24
10/31 10/102
Criminal Justice
0.85
1/24
1/31
4.4
Regulatory
Enforcement
Finland
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
1/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.86
0.87
0.59
0.86
0.96
7.2 No discrimination
0.86
0.8
0.92
7.3 No corruption
0.92
0.9
0.91
0.87
0.91
0.87
0.57
0.96
0.86
0.76
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.9
0.95
0.96
0.79
0.85
Criminal Justice
Order and Security
5.1 Absence of crime
0.92
1
0.83
0.67
0.8
0.82
8.4 No discrimination
0.83
8.5 No corruption
0.93
0.99
0.92
Regulatory Enforcement
0.7
0.71
0.83
0.79
89 | Country Profiles
0.91
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
0.77
0.9
0.77
0.76
0.75
France
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.74
12/24
18/31
18/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.78
12/24
15/31 16/102
Absence of Corruption
0.75
13/24
21/31 21/102
Open Government
0.69
13/24
17/31 17/102
Fundamental Rights
0.78
14/24
17/31 18/102
0.81
17/24
23/31 30/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.74
11/24
17/31 17/102
Civil Justice
0.7
12/24
19/31 19/102
Criminal Justice
0.66
15/24
22/31 22/102
4.4
Order and
Security
France
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.79
0.69
0.62
0.71
0.84
7.2 No discrimination
0.71
0.72
0.73
7.3 No corruption
0.81
0.75
0.82
0.69
0.82
0.82
0.59
0.89
0.72
0.71
0.88
0.75
0.76
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.74
0.84
0.87
0.55
0.88
1
0.54
0.54
0.69
0.57
8.4 No discrimination
0.61
8.5 No corruption
0.8
0.7
0.73
Regulatory Enforcement
0.55
0.7
0.77
0.72
90 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.72
0.83
0.66
0.67
0.81
Georgia
Criminal
Justice
Region: Eastern Europe & Central Asia | Income group: Lower middle income
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.65
1/13
1/25
29/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.62
1/13
4/25
36/102
Absence of Corruption
0.73
1/13
1/25
22/102
Open Government
0.61
1/13
1/25
29/102
Fundamental Rights
0.64
2/13
2/25
38/102
0.83
2/13
2/25
24/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.62
1/13
1/25
25/102
Civil Justice
0.63
1/13
1/25
26/102
Criminal Justice
0.54
1/13
1/25
35/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Georgia
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.6
0.75
0.6
0.56
0.69
7.2 No discrimination
0.68
0.6
0.55
7.3 No corruption
0.65
0.58
0.74
0.52
0.73
0.62
0.6
0.64
0.39
0.67
0.74
0.71
0.64
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.72
0.66
0.89
0.67
0.96
1
0.52
0.33
0.56
0.55
8.4 No discrimination
0.57
8.5 No corruption
0.77
0.46
0.55
Regulatory Enforcement
0.51
0.7
0.66
0.57
91 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.62
0.84
0.59
0.45
0.61
Germany
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.81
7/24
8/31
8/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Germany
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.85
6/24
6/31
Absence of Corruption
0.83
7/24
12/31 12/102
Open Government
0.72
11/24
15/31 15/102
Fundamental Rights
0.87
6/24
6/31
0.88
7/24
13/31 14/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.77
7/24
11/31 11/102
Civil Justice
0.82
4/24
5/31
Criminal Justice
0.76
7/24
12/31 12/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
6/102
6/102
5/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.84
0.76
0.68
0.88
0.92
7.2 No discrimination
0.83
0.7
0.83
7.3 No corruption
0.89
0.81
0.91
0.88
0.91
0.86
0.75
0.97
0.84
0.88
0.93
0.87
0.87
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.79
0.94
0.93
0.65
0.9
1
0.73
0.58
0.69
0.8
8.4 No discrimination
0.68
8.5 No corruption
0.88
0.87
0.83
Regulatory Enforcement
0.6
0.68
0.85
0.74
92 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.69
0.84
0.73
0.77
0.84
Ghana
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.6
2/18
2/25
34/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Sub-Saharan Africa
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.69
1/18
1/25
28/102
Absence of Corruption
0.44
5/18
8/25
59/102
Open Government
0.56
3/18
4/25
41/102
Fundamental Rights
0.69
1/18
1/25
30/102
0.75
2/18
9/25
52/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.57
2/18
2/25
31/102
Civil Justice
0.61
2/18
2/25
34/102
Criminal Justice
0.5
3/18
3/25
40/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Ghana
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.78
0.69
0.46
0.7
0.78
7.2 No discrimination
0.63
0.57
0.47
7.3 No corruption
0.55
0.56
0.79
0.75
0.79
0.69
0.54
0.74
0.68
0.59
0.8
0.73
0.58
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.42
0.58
0.42
0.34
0.8
1
0.45
0.45
0.47
0.35
8.4 No discrimination
0.5
8.5 No corruption
0.44
0.78
0.47
Regulatory Enforcement
0.39
0.49
0.73
0.63
93 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.47
0.56
0.46
0.59
0.74
Greece
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.6
21/24
29/31
33/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.65
19/24
27/31 30/102
Absence of Corruption
0.54
20/24
29/31 34/102
Open Government
0.57
21/24
29/31 36/102
Fundamental Rights
0.65
23/24
29/31 36/102
0.76
23/24
27/31 46/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.54
20/24
29/31 36/102
Civil Justice
0.59
20/24
28/31 35/102
Criminal Justice
0.49
23/24
30/31 42/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Greece
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.61
0.62
0.61
0.62
0.76
7.2 No discrimination
0.68
0.63
0.58
7.3 No corruption
0.72
0.5
0.69
0.63
0.68
0.66
0.19
0.88
0.65
0.48
0.76
0.81
0.52
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.53
0.73
0.76
0.15
0.81
1
0.46
0.42
0.51
0.27
8.4 No discrimination
0.37
8.5 No corruption
0.65
0.65
0.58
Regulatory Enforcement
0.43
0.62
0.63
0.6
94 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.52
0.49
0.61
0.43
0.66
Guatemala
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Lower middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.44
15/19
18/25
85/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Guatemala
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.51
11/19
12/25 64/102
Absence of Corruption
0.33
18/19
21/25 89/102
Open Government
0.48
16/19
14/25 70/102
Fundamental Rights
0.56
11/19
7/25
0.56
17/19
22/25 95/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.4
18/19
22/25 90/102
Civil Justice
0.36
17/19
24/25 97/102
Criminal Justice
0.3
15/19
23/25 95/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
54/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.56
0.39
0.35
0.42
0.63
7.2 No discrimination
0.34
0.47
0.47
7.3 No corruption
0.44
0.31
0.63
0.35
0.63
0.71
0.19
0.66
0.58
0.2
0.69
0.68
0.4
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.4
0.36
0.39
0.17
0.45
1
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.16
8.4 No discrimination
0.35
8.5 No corruption
0.34
0.31
0.47
Regulatory Enforcement
0.32
0.52
0.59
0.5
95 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.33
0.5
0.38
0.31
0.49
Honduras
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Lower middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.42
17/19
21/25
90/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.45
15/19
19/25
80/102
Absence of Corruption
0.34
14/19
19/25
85/102
Open Government
0.49
15/19
13/25
66/102
Fundamental Rights
0.45
18/19
19/25
85/102
0.58
15/19
21/25
92/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.4
17/19
21/25
88/102
Civil Justice
0.45
12/19
16/25
80/102
Criminal Justice
0.21
18/19
25/25 101/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Honduras
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.51
0.35
0.52
0.31
0.44
7.2 No discrimination
0.34
0.46
0.28
7.3 No corruption
0.42
0.39
0.57
0.26
0.55
0.62
0.36
0.46
0.34
0.53
0.6
0.72
0.44
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.39
0.37
0.36
0.25
0.41
1
0.31
0.14
0.19
0.08
8.4 No discrimination
0.28
8.5 No corruption
0.34
0.13
0.28
Regulatory Enforcement
0.42
0.47
0.54
0.53
96 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.33
0.46
0.43
0.25
0.53
Hong Kong
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.76
6/15
17/31
17/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.71
6/15
24/31 25/102
Absence of Corruption
0.84
5/15
10/31 10/102
Open Government
0.63
5/15
23/31 24/102
Fundamental Rights
0.7
6/15
27/31 29/102
0.91
3/15
6/31
Regulatory Enforcement
0.75
6/15
15/31 15/102
Civil Justice
0.76
4/15
11/31 11/102
Criminal Justice
0.79
2/15
6/31
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
7/102
6/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.79
0.8
0.66
0.78
0.84
7.2 No discrimination
0.76
0.69
0.79
7.3 No corruption
0.85
0.83
0.52
0.78
0.51
0.73
0.74
0.63
0.72
0.73
0.55
0.78
0.67
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.8
0.9
0.93
0.76
0.94
1
0.77
0.66
0.79
0.8
8.4 No discrimination
0.79
8.5 No corruption
0.86
0.87
0.79
Regulatory Enforcement
0.69
0.69
0.52
0.63
97 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.65
0.86
0.78
0.74
0.7
Hungary
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.58
23/24
5/31
37/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.49
24/24
18/31 66/102
Absence of Corruption
0.5
23/24
13/31 45/102
Open Government
0.51
24/24
17/31 56/102
Fundamental Rights
0.65
24/24
7/31
37/102
0.86
11/24
2/31
20/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.51
22/24
14/31 48/102
Civil Justice
0.53
24/24
12/31 47/102
Criminal Justice
0.55
22/24
5/31
4.4
Order and
Security
Hungary
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
33/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.38
0.61
0.53
0.43
0.86
7.2 No discrimination
0.54
0.55
0.64
7.3 No corruption
0.65
0.44
0.5
0.5
0.49
0.7
0.33
0.66
0.66
0.51
0.61
0.68
0.62
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.43
0.65
0.68
0.23
0.86
1
0.72
0.48
0.57
0.46
8.4 No discrimination
0.46
8.5 No corruption
0.58
0.66
0.64
Regulatory Enforcement
0.49
0.55
0.51
0.51
98 | Country Profiles
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.49
0.59
0.51
0.46
0.49
India
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.51
3/6
10/25
59/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
South Asia
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.62
2/6
5/25
Absence of Corruption
0.4
2/6
11/25 68/102
Open Government
0.57
1/6
3/25
37/102
Fundamental Rights
0.54
2/6
9/25
61/102
0.58
4/6
20/25 90/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.45
3/6
12/25 69/102
Civil Justice
0.42
3/6
19/25 88/102
Criminal Justice
0.47
1/6
4/25
4.4
Order and
Security
India
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
38/102
44/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.69
0.53
0.31
0.7
0.42
7.2 No discrimination
0.43
0.51
0.39
7.3 No corruption
0.47
0.38
0.69
0.63
0.69
0.69
0.24
0.73
0.47
0.38
0.68
0.46
0.47
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.41
0.45
0.55
0.2
Open Government
0.54
0.5
0.65
0.58
99 | Country Profiles
0.44
0.73
0.39
0.67
0.48
0.35
8.4 No discrimination
0.41
8.5 No corruption
0.55
0.62
0.39
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.38
0.46
0.41
0.39
0.6
Indonesia
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: East Asia & Pacific | Income group: Lower middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.52
10/15
6/25
52/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Indonesia
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.64
7/15
Absence of Corruption
0.37
14/15
Open Government
0.58
7/15
2/25
Fundamental Rights
0.52
8/15
11/25 66/102
0.77
12/15
6/25
42/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.51
7/15
5/25
45/102
Civil Justice
0.43
13/15
17/25 83/102
Criminal Justice
0.35
13/15
15/25 75/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
3/25
31/102
14/25 74/102
32/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.78
0.49
0.44
0.65
0.48
7.2 No discrimination
0.29
0.46
0.35
7.3 No corruption
0.33
0.55
0.74
0.48
0.74
0.47
0.6
0.69
0.39
0.35
0.72
0.53
0.54
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.5
0.29
0.43
0.28
0.95
1
0.35
0.44
0.48
0.13
8.4 No discrimination
0.24
8.5 No corruption
0.41
0.42
0.35
Regulatory Enforcement
0.49
0.56
0.68
0.57
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.5
0.61
0.48
0.37
0.6
Iran
Region: Middle East & North Africa | Income group: Upper middle income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.43
7/7
30/31
88/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.6
4.7
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.37
7/7
28/31
94/102
Absence of Corruption
0.42
6/7
23/31
64/102
Open Government
0.35
7/7
31/31
99/102
Fundamental Rights
0.22
7/7
31/31 102/102
0.62
7/7
24/31
80/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.54
2/7
5/31
35/102
Civil Justice
0.56
3/7
9/31
40/102
Criminal Justice
0.39
5/7
19/31
60/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Iran
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.26
0.42
0.53
0.48
0.2
7.2 No discrimination
0.47
0.4
0.37
7.3 No corruption
0.47
0.41
0.22
0.39
0.22
0.13
0.64
0.43
0.07
0.68
0.17
0.72
0.2
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.45
0.45
0.55
0.24
Open Government
0.4
0.46
0.25
0.28
0.4
0.55
0.46
0.92
0.4
0.4
8.4 No discrimination
0.4
8.5 No corruption
0.49
0.19
0.37
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.55
0.5
0.55
0.54
0.58
Italy
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.64
19/24
28/31
30/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.69
18/24
26/31 27/102
Absence of Corruption
0.59
19/24
28/31 33/102
Open Government
0.61
18/24
26/31 28/102
Fundamental Rights
0.74
18/24
22/31 23/102
0.74
24/24
28/31 53/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.56
19/24
28/31 32/102
Civil Justice
0.58
21/24
29/31 36/102
Criminal Justice
0.63
18/24
25/31 25/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Italy
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.72
0.65
0.62
0.7
0.91
7.2 No discrimination
0.61
0.63
0.69
7.3 No corruption
0.68
0.55
0.75
0.72
0.74
0.79
0.32
0.81
0.77
0.4
0.82
0.69
0.58
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.55
0.74
0.84
0.24
0.83
1
0.4
0.51
0.56
0.44
8.4 No discrimination
0.58
8.5 No corruption
0.73
0.87
0.69
Regulatory Enforcement
0.58
0.59
0.69
0.58
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.56
0.66
0.43
0.53
0.64
Jamaica
Criminal
Justice
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Upper middle income
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.56
4/19
9/31
42/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.61
4/19
6/31
41/102
Absence of Corruption
0.53
4/19
5/31
37/102
Open Government
0.51
12/19
Fundamental Rights
0.66
5/19
5/31
0.69
5/19
18/31 64/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.53
5/19
8/31
Civil Justice
0.52
6/19
16/31 52/102
Criminal Justice
0.46
4/19
11/31 45/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Jamaica
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
18/31 57/102
34/102
40/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.68
0.64
0.47
0.71
0.57
7.2 No discrimination
0.48
0.4
0.44
7.3 No corruption
0.68
0.46
0.73
0.7
0.72
0.91
0.33
0.7
0.61
0.35
0.77
0.6
0.59
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.51
0.63
0.63
0.36
0.8
1
0.29
0.4
0.41
0.23
8.4 No discrimination
0.33
8.5 No corruption
0.62
0.75
0.44
Regulatory Enforcement
0.38
0.48
0.65
0.53
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.5
0.71
0.35
0.44
0.64
Japan
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.78
5/15
13/31
13/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.76
4/15
18/31 19/102
Absence of Corruption
0.86
3/15
8/31
Open Government
0.72
4/15
12/31 12/102
Fundamental Rights
0.76
3/15
21/31 22/102
0.93
1/15
1/31
Regulatory Enforcement
0.76
5/15
14/31 14/102
Civil Justice
0.74
5/15
14/31 14/102
Criminal Justice
0.74
6/15
16/31 16/102
4.4
Regulatory
Enforcement
Japan
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
8/102
1/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.81
0.77
0.52
0.84
0.78
7.2 No discrimination
0.76
0.56
0.69
7.3 No corruption
0.96
0.77
0.8
0.72
0.8
0.68
0.62
0.8
0.84
0.73
0.79
0.87
0.74
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.78
0.92
0.95
0.78
0.92
1
0.86
0.68
0.65
0.66
8.4 No discrimination
0.73
8.5 No corruption
0.93
0.8
0.69
Regulatory Enforcement
0.7
0.75
0.75
0.7
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.7
0.89
0.73
0.7
0.78
Jordan
Region: Middle East & North Africa | Income group: Upper middle income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.56
2/7
8/31
41/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.49
5/7
19/31 69/102
Absence of Corruption
0.59
2/7
4/31
Open Government
0.46
4/7
23/31 76/102
Fundamental Rights
0.52
3/7
22/31 68/102
0.79
2/7
6/31
Regulatory Enforcement
0.51
5/7
15/31 49/102
Civil Justice
0.62
2/7
4/31
31/102
Criminal Justice
0.55
2/7
6/31
34/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Jordan
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
32/102
34/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.35
0.67
0.53
0.49
0.63
7.2 No discrimination
0.75
0.58
0.56
7.3 No corruption
0.77
0.57
0.48
0.58
0.47
0.36
0.48
0.48
0.46
0.58
0.43
0.63
0.57
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.57
0.71
0.76
0.32
0.94
1
0.44
0.53
0.6
0.43
8.4 No discrimination
0.49
8.5 No corruption
0.66
0.55
0.56
Regulatory Enforcement
0.46
0.44
0.43
0.5
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.44
0.59
0.44
0.5
0.58
Kazakhstan
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: Eastern Europe & Central Asia | Income group: Upper middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.5
7/13
22/31
65/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Kazakhstan
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.37
10/13
27/31 93/102
Absence of Corruption
0.45
5/13
20/31 58/102
Open Government
0.44
12/13
27/31 85/102
Fundamental Rights
0.46
11/13
27/31 84/102
0.81
5/13
5/31
Regulatory Enforcement
0.51
4/13
11/31 44/102
Civil Justice
0.51
5/13
17/31 53/102
Criminal Justice
0.42
7/13
17/31 58/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
32/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.34
0.55
0.44
0.32
0.49
7.2 No discrimination
0.4
0.41
0.44
7.3 No corruption
0.41
0.47
0.36
0.37
0.36
0.59
0.77
0.34
0.34
0.62
0.41
0.6
0.49
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.46
0.39
0.54
0.4
0.85
1
0.57
0.48
0.64
0.38
8.4 No discrimination
0.28
8.5 No corruption
0.46
0.26
0.44
Regulatory Enforcement
0.47
0.56
0.35
0.38
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.58
0.51
0.55
0.41
0.51
Kenya
Criminal
Justice
8.5
1.1
8.7
8.6
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.45
12/18
7/15
84/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Sub-Saharan Africa
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.56
6/18
Absence of Corruption
0.27
15/18
11/15 96/102
Open Government
0.46
11/18
7/15
79/102
Fundamental Rights
0.49
11/18
7/15
76/102
0.55
16/18
14/15 96/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.45
8/18
3/15
70/102
Civil Justice
0.47
12/18
5/15
73/102
Criminal Justice
0.32
16/18
11/15 89/102
4.4
Regulatory
Enforcement
Kenya
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
3/15
50/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.73
0.52
0.41
0.56
0.34
7.2 No discrimination
0.46
0.48
0.26
7.3 No corruption
0.4
0.43
0.6
0.52
0.59
0.74
0.38
0.55
0.26
0.51
0.68
0.59
0.54
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.33
0.36
0.22
0.17
Open Government
0.33
0.41
0.58
0.49
0.24
0.74
0.39
0.72
0.33
0.2
8.4 No discrimination
0.3
8.5 No corruption
0.24
0.5
0.26
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.53
0.47
0.32
0.35
0.57
Kyrgyzstan
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: Eastern Europe & Central Asia | Income group: Lower middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.47
10/13
15/25
74/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Kyrgyzstan
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.51
4/13
10/25 62/102
Absence of Corruption
0.3
12/13
22/25 90/102
Open Government
0.5
8/13
12/25 64/102
Fundamental Rights
0.51
8/13
14/25 70/102
0.75
9/13
8/25
Regulatory Enforcement
0.42
13/13
17/25 81/102
Civil Justice
0.46
12/13
15/25 77/102
Criminal Justice
0.34
13/13
18/25 84/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
49/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.61
0.52
0.55
0.41
0.48
7.2 No discrimination
0.4
0.56
0.35
7.3 No corruption
0.33
0.43
0.61
0.39
0.61
0.61
0.53
0.48
0.3
0.43
0.66
0.56
0.53
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.36
0.32
0.36
0.15
0.84
1
0.42
0.48
0.53
0.26
8.4 No discrimination
0.23
8.5 No corruption
0.31
0.18
0.35
Regulatory Enforcement
0.42
0.56
0.57
0.46
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.47
0.37
0.47
0.4
0.38
Lebanon
Criminal
Justice
Region: Middle East & North Africa | Income group: Upper middle income
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.48
5/7
25/31
68/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.56
4/7
10/31 49/102
Absence of Corruption
0.37
7/7
26/31 76/102
Open Government
0.45
5/7
25/31 81/102
Fundamental Rights
0.55
1/7
18/31 57/102
0.68
6/7
21/31 73/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.41
6/7
30/31 83/102
Civil Justice
0.45
6/7
27/31 78/102
Criminal Justice
0.39
6/7
20/31 62/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Lebanon
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.75
0.44
0.48
0.5
0.55
7.2 No discrimination
0.43
0.56
0.43
7.3 No corruption
0.37
0.38
0.69
0.41
0.69
0.64
0.37
0.5
0.51
0.47
0.71
0.63
0.45
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.37
0.38
0.51
0.2
Open Government
0.36
0.38
0.6
0.46
0.4
0.8
0.48
0.87
0.22
0.36
8.4 No discrimination
0.35
8.5 No corruption
0.44
0.38
0.43
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.34
0.38
0.48
0.39
0.46
Liberia
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.45
11/18
6/15
83/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Sub-Saharan Africa
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.54
7/18
Absence of Corruption
0.28
14/18
Open Government
0.48
7/18
4/15
71/102
Fundamental Rights
0.58
5/18
2/15
50/102
0.57
15/18
13/15 94/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.37
16/18
10/15 95/102
Civil Justice
0.44
14/18
7/15
Criminal Justice
0.32
18/18
12/15 92/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Liberia
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
4/15
54/102
10/15 94/102
81/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.7
0.48
0.39
0.49
0.54
7.2 No discrimination
0.36
0.28
0.3
7.3 No corruption
0.3
0.32
0.74
0.44
0.74
0.82
0.46
0.69
0.53
0.63
0.74
0.52
0.47
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.33
0.28
0.31
0.19
Open Government
0.35
0.44
0.66
0.47
0.3
0.63
0.38
0.83
0.22
0.26
8.4 No discrimination
0.38
8.5 No corruption
0.27
0.35
0.3
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.41
0.34
0.33
0.42
0.36
Macedonia, FYR
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Region: Eastern Europe & Central Asia | Income group: Upper middle income
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.55
3/13
11/31
44/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Macedonia,
FYR
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.47
6/13
23/31 74/102
Absence of Corruption
0.52
2/13
6/31
38/102
Open Government
0.57
3/13
4/31
34/102
Fundamental Rights
0.57
6/13
15/31 52/102
0.76
6/13
10/31 43/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.5
6/13
18/31 54/102
Civil Justice
0.57
3/13
7/31
Criminal Justice
0.44
5/13
14/31 51/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
38/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.43
0.66
0.63
0.35
0.58
7.2 No discrimination
0.67
0.52
0.47
7.3 No corruption
0.4
0.44
0.49
0.4
0.48
0.73
0.56
0.58
0.39
0.62
0.7
0.69
0.53
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.56
0.42
0.69
0.41
0.87
1
0.42
0.59
0.49
0.36
8.4 No discrimination
0.47
8.5 No corruption
0.51
0.19
0.47
Regulatory Enforcement
0.57
0.61
0.58
0.54
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.5
0.52
0.5
0.38
0.58
Madagascar
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.45
10/18
5/15
82/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Madagascar
Sub-Saharan Africa
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.44
13/18
8/15
81/102
Absence of Corruption
0.35
11/18
7/15
82/102
Open Government
0.47
9/18
6/15
74/102
Fundamental Rights
0.47
13/18
8/15
81/102
0.73
3/18
3/15
54/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.4
12/18
6/15
87/102
Civil Justice
0.41
16/18
10/15 90/102
Criminal Justice
0.35
13/18
7/15
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
78/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.52
0.65
0.37
0.38
0.22
7.2 No discrimination
0.6
0.45
0.34
7.3 No corruption
0.26
0.36
0.51
0.26
0.5
0.65
0.37
0.44
0.17
0.42
0.62
0.59
0.61
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.36
0.27
0.32
0.44
0.72
1
0.46
0.35
0.56
0.25
8.4 No discrimination
0.41
8.5 No corruption
0.29
0.22
0.34
Regulatory Enforcement
0.45
0.46
0.54
0.42
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.36
0.36
0.44
0.37
0.48
Malawi
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.5
5/18
2/15
61/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Malawi
Sub-Saharan Africa
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.57
5/18
2/15
47/102
Absence of Corruption
0.36
10/18
6/15
80/102
Open Government
0.5
6/18
3/15
65/102
Fundamental Rights
0.59
4/18
1/15
49/102
0.61
11/18
9/15
83/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.44
9/18
4/15
73/102
Civil Justice
0.52
6/18
1/15
50/102
Criminal Justice
0.45
4/18
1/15
48/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.65
0.49
0.45
0.63
0.62
7.2 No discrimination
0.53
0.41
0.34
7.3 No corruption
0.53
0.5
0.68
0.45
0.68
0.79
0.4
0.56
0.52
0.57
0.79
0.71
0.47
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.32
0.49
0.32
0.29
0.58
1
0.26
0.39
0.48
0.24
8.4 No discrimination
0.48
8.5 No corruption
0.43
0.77
0.34
Regulatory Enforcement
0.36
0.38
0.71
0.54
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.43
0.33
0.33
0.47
0.65
Malaysia
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: East Asia & Pacific | Income group: Upper middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.57
7/15
6/31
39/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Malaysia
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.52
10/15
Absence of Corruption
0.63
7/15
Open Government
0.43
13/15
29/31 88/102
Fundamental Rights
0.48
12/15
25/31 78/102
0.86
7/15
Regulatory Enforcement
0.47
11/15
Civil Justice
0.57
7/15
6/31
37/102
Criminal Justice
0.58
7/15
3/31
30/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
15/31 58/102
3/31
1/31
30/102
18/102
23/31 63/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.66
0.6
0.43
0.57
0.49
7.2 No discrimination
0.53
0.58
0.56
7.3 No corruption
0.66
0.55
0.37
0.41
0.37
0.29
0.63
0.43
0.6
0.55
0.37
0.77
0.54
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.54
0.68
0.71
0.56
Open Government
0.51
0.46
0.37
0.37
0.64
0.85
0.5
0.94
0.5
0.8
8.4 No discrimination
0.53
8.5 No corruption
0.77
0.55
0.56
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.44
0.6
0.47
0.48
0.38
Mexico
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Upper middle income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.47
14/19
28/31
79/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.51
10/19
16/31 61/102
Absence of Corruption
0.33
17/19
30/31 88/102
Open Government
0.56
6/19
Fundamental Rights
0.56
12/19
17/31 56/102
0.52
19/19
31/31 99/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.5
7/19
17/31 53/102
Civil Justice
0.44
13/19
28/31 82/102
Criminal Justice
0.31
14/19
29/31 93/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Mexico
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
8/31
42/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.6
0.4
0.44
0.47
0.47
7.2 No discrimination
0.34
0.49
0.36
7.3 No corruption
0.37
0.29
0.58
0.54
0.58
0.76
0.36
0.66
0.66
0.41
0.66
0.63
0.55
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.41
0.39
0.31
0.22
Open Government
0.43
0.61
0.56
0.62
0.26
0.47
0.33
0.75
0.22
0.33
8.4 No discrimination
0.25
8.5 No corruption
0.27
0.48
0.36
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.42
0.51
0.42
0.48
0.65
Moldova
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: Eastern Europe & Central Asia | Income group: Lower middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.48
8/13
12/25
69/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.45
8/13
18/25 79/102
Absence of Corruption
0.28
13/13
23/25 93/102
Open Government
0.55
5/13
6/25
46/102
Fundamental Rights
0.55
7/13
8/25
59/102
0.82
3/13
3/25
25/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.42
11/13
15/25 79/102
Civil Justice
0.43
13/13
18/25 84/102
Criminal Justice
0.34
12/13
17/25 82/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Moldova
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.6
0.62
0.48
0.33
0.58
7.2 No discrimination
0.48
0.4
0.37
7.3 No corruption
0.18
0.27
0.56
0.33
0.56
0.66
0.38
0.53
0.4
0.57
0.72
0.58
0.5
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.31
0.2
0.43
0.18
0.88
1
0.59
0.39
0.44
0.28
8.4 No discrimination
0.36
8.5 No corruption
0.29
0.23
0.37
Regulatory Enforcement
0.46
0.55
0.57
0.63
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.54
0.52
0.5
0.17
0.39
Mongolia
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: East Asia & Pacific | Income group: Lower middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.53
8/15
4/25
47/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Mongolia
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.54
9/15
Absence of Corruption
0.42
13/15
10/25 66/102
Open Government
0.46
10/15
16/25 75/102
Fundamental Rights
0.61
7/15
6/25
45/102
0.79
9/15
5/25
37/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.48
10/15
8/25
61/102
Civil Justice
0.55
8/15
3/25
41/102
Criminal Justice
0.42
11/15
9/25
57/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
8/25
53/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.6
0.59
0.49
0.49
0.66
7.2 No discrimination
0.57
0.44
0.44
7.3 No corruption
0.51
0.49
0.62
0.5
0.61
0.73
0.66
0.63
0.51
0.51
0.74
0.64
0.57
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.45
0.52
0.55
0.16
0.82
1
0.54
0.34
0.45
0.37
8.4 No discrimination
0.43
8.5 No corruption
0.44
0.47
0.44
Regulatory Enforcement
0.32
0.52
0.6
0.39
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.56
0.44
0.53
0.37
0.51
Morocco
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: Middle East & North Africa | Income group: Lower middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.52
4/7
7/25
55/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.57
3/7
7/25
48/102
Absence of Corruption
0.49
4/7
4/25
48/102
Open Government
0.51
2/7
11/25 60/102
Fundamental Rights
0.45
5/7
20/25 86/102
0.76
3/7
7/25
44/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.53
3/7
3/25
39/102
Civil Justice
0.51
5/7
6/25
54/102
Criminal Justice
0.33
7/7
19/25 86/102
4.4
Regulatory
Enforcement
Morocco
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.67
0.67
0.43
0.57
0.33
7.2 No discrimination
0.56
0.44
0.26
7.3 No corruption
0.48
0.58
0.53
0.47
0.53
0.34
0.57
0.63
0.23
0.49
0.54
0.6
0.68
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.55
0.37
0.48
0.55
Open Government
0.48
0.48
0.51
0.56
0.41
0.87
0.34
0.92
0.25
0.5
8.4 No discrimination
0.4
8.5 No corruption
0.46
0.19
0.26
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.54
0.57
0.49
0.43
0.64
Myanmar
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.42
14/15
10/15
92/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Myanmar
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.45
12/15
7/15
78/102
Absence of Corruption
0.42
12/15
2/15
65/102
Open Government
0.32
15/15
14/15 100/102
Fundamental Rights
0.31
15/15
14/15 100/102
0.77
11/15
2/15
41/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.4
14/15
7/15
89/102
Civil Justice
0.37
14/15
12/15
94/102
Criminal Justice
0.3
14/15
13/15
96/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.67
0.42
0.36
0.46
0.26
7.2 No discrimination
0.37
0.37
0.29
7.3 No corruption
0.27
0.53
0.31
0.22
0.3
0.29
0.42
0.38
0.19
0.47
0.31
0.51
0.42
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.52
0.19
0.5
0.46
Open Government
0.36
0.39
0.28
0.26
0.33
0.89
0.41
0.81
0.16
0.59
8.4 No discrimination
0.24
8.5 No corruption
0.39
0.26
0.29
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.29
0.5
0.5
0.39
0.32
Nepal
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.53
1/6
1/15
48/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
Fundamental
Rights
4.6
Order and
Security
Nepal
South Asia
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.62
1/6
1/15
35/102
Absence of Corruption
0.39
3/6
3/15
72/102
Open Government
0.56
2/6
1/15
40/102
Fundamental Rights
0.56
1/6
3/15
53/102
0.77
1/6
1/15
40/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.5
1/6
1/15
51/102
Civil Justice
0.42
2/6
9/15
87/102
Criminal Justice
0.42
3/6
2/15
56/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.74
0.48
0.42
0.63
0.48
7.2 No discrimination
0.29
0.48
0.38
7.3 No corruption
0.4
0.5
0.72
0.51
0.71
0.73
0.44
0.66
0.44
0.42
0.72
0.5
0.56
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.47
0.38
0.5
0.2
0.85
1
0.45
0.43
0.52
0.37
8.4 No discrimination
0.4
8.5 No corruption
0.42
0.44
0.38
Regulatory Enforcement
0.47
0.5
0.67
0.6
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.46
0.52
0.48
0.53
0.53
Netherlands
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.83
5/24
5/31
5/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Netherlands
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.87
5/24
5/31
5/102
Absence of Corruption
0.89
5/24
7/31
7/102
Open Government
0.76
4/24
5/31
5/102
Fundamental Rights
0.85
7/24
7/31
7/102
0.85
13/24
Regulatory Enforcement
0.82
3/24
4/31
4/102
Civil Justice
0.86
1/24
1/31
1/102
Criminal Justice
0.75
8/24
14/31 14/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
19/31 22/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.88
0.83
0.72
0.91
0.94
7.2 No discrimination
0.92
0.78
0.82
7.3 No corruption
0.95
0.86
0.89
0.92
0.89
0.86
0.76
0.92
0.81
0.9
0.88
0.84
0.81
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.85
0.94
0.93
0.83
0.91
1
0.65
0.5
0.65
0.79
8.4 No discrimination
0.72
8.5 No corruption
0.88
0.89
0.82
Regulatory Enforcement
0.64
0.75
0.82
0.82
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.77
0.87
0.83
0.74
0.91
New Zealand
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.83
1/15
6/31
6/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
New Zealand
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.85
1/15
8/31
8/102
Absence of Corruption
0.9
2/15
6/31
6/102
Open Government
0.81
1/15
2/31
2/102
Fundamental Rights
0.83
1/15
9/31
9/102
0.88
6/15
14/31 15/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.82
2/15
5/31
5/102
Civil Justice
0.78
3/15
9/31
9/102
Criminal Justice
0.77
3/15
8/31
8/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.86
0.79
0.71
0.9
0.91
7.2 No discrimination
0.73
0.66
0.82
7.3 No corruption
0.93
0.85
0.9
0.83
0.9
0.88
0.73
0.91
0.73
0.71
0.86
0.81
0.76
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.87
0.91
0.95
0.86
0.89
1
0.73
0.68
0.75
0.69
8.4 No discrimination
0.66
8.5 No corruption
0.93
0.87
0.82
Regulatory Enforcement
0.8
0.82
0.83
0.81
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.8
0.92
0.77
0.78
0.84
Nicaragua
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Lower middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.43
16/19
20/25
89/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.35
18/19
24/25 98/102
Absence of Corruption
0.37
12/19
15/25 75/102
Open Government
0.44
18/19
20/25 84/102
Fundamental Rights
0.46
17/19
18/25 83/102
0.68
7/19
16/25 70/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.41
15/19
18/25 84/102
Civil Justice
0.36
18/19
25/25 99/102
Criminal Justice
0.33
12/19
20/25 87/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Nicaragua
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.38
0.46
0.4
0.29
0.51
7.2 No discrimination
0.39
0.43
0.35
7.3 No corruption
0.34
0.26
0.45
0.17
0.45
0.68
0.31
0.28
0.27
0.31
0.49
0.57
0.49
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.46
0.27
0.5
0.25
0.67
1
0.38
0.36
0.52
0.28
8.4 No discrimination
0.3
8.5 No corruption
0.43
0.08
0.35
Regulatory Enforcement
0.43
0.35
0.48
0.52
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.4
0.55
0.36
0.29
0.45
Nigeria
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.41
16/18
23/25
96/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Sub-Saharan Africa
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.51
10/18
11/25
63/102
Absence of Corruption
0.27
16/18
24/25
97/102
Open Government
0.46
10/18
17/25
77/102
Fundamental Rights
0.44
14/18
21/25
87/102
0.27
18/18
25/25 102/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.44
10/18
13/25
74/102
Civil Justice
0.5
8/18
8/25
62/102
Criminal Justice
0.36
12/18
14/25
73/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Nigeria
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.64
0.52
0.49
0.52
0.33
7.2 No discrimination
0.58
0.39
0.29
7.3 No corruption
0.47
0.43
0.57
0.5
0.56
0.47
0.35
0.51
0.35
0.46
0.62
0.64
0.39
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.26
0.49
0.24
0.09
Open Government
0.32
0.43
0.55
0.52
0.41
0.34
0.39
0.04
0.22
0.42
8.4 No discrimination
0.48
8.5 No corruption
0.3
0.42
0.29
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.4
0.37
0.4
0.47
0.55
Norway
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.87
2/24
2/31
2/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.88
3/24
3/31
3/102
Absence of Corruption
0.93
2/24
2/31
2/102
Open Government
0.81
2/24
3/31
3/102
Fundamental Rights
0.9
3/24
3/31
3/102
0.87
9/24
16/31 17/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.86
1/24
2/31
2/102
Civil Justice
0.86
2/24
2/31
2/102
Criminal Justice
0.82
3/24
4/31
4/102
4.4
Regulatory
Enforcement
Norway
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.93
0.84
0.72
0.91
0.97
7.2 No discrimination
0.87
0.58
0.91
7.3 No corruption
0.93
0.92
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.84
0.84
0.97
0.87
0.89
0.95
0.79
0.9
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.94
0.97
0.95
0.87
Open Government
0.73
0.77
0.89
0.86
0.65
0.91
0.76
0.92
0.79
0.78
8.4 No discrimination
0.77
8.5 No corruption
0.92
0.92
0.91
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.77
0.92
0.86
0.85
0.91
Pakistan
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.38
5/6
25/25
98/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Pakistan
South Asia
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.49
3/6
13/25
67/102
Absence of Corruption
0.35
4/6
17/25
83/102
Open Government
0.45
5/6
19/25
83/102
Fundamental Rights
0.39
5/6
24/25
92/102
0.3
6/6
24/25 101/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.36
6/6
25/25
99/102
Civil Justice
0.4
4/6
20/25
91/102
Criminal Justice
0.31
5/6
22/25
94/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.62
0.39
0.47
0.53
0.28
7.2 No discrimination
0.37
0.43
0.27
7.3 No corruption
0.39
0.3
0.6
0.47
0.6
0.45
0.35
0.45
0.24
0.24
0.63
0.5
0.29
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.41
0.41
0.27
0.29
Open Government
0.33
0.41
0.56
0.48
0.27
0.58
0.34
0.04
0.27
0.29
8.4 No discrimination
0.28
8.5 No corruption
0.34
0.4
0.27
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.32
0.37
0.27
0.35
0.49
Panama
Criminal
Justice
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Upper middle income
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.53
6/19
14/31
49/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.53
8/19
14/31 57/102
Absence of Corruption
0.49
5/19
14/31 46/102
Open Government
0.55
8/19
10/31 45/102
Fundamental Rights
0.62
7/19
9/31
0.7
3/19
16/31 61/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.54
4/19
7/31
Civil Justice
0.5
10/19
21/31 61/102
Criminal Justice
0.32
13/19
28/31 90/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Panama
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
42/102
38/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.53
0.6
0.59
0.43
0.72
7.2 No discrimination
0.62
0.4
0.41
7.3 No corruption
0.52
0.35
0.65
0.31
0.65
0.76
0.34
0.82
0.58
0.45
0.66
0.66
0.55
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.57
0.43
0.62
0.34
0.7
1
0.41
0.24
0.27
0.13
8.4 No discrimination
0.42
8.5 No corruption
0.52
0.27
0.41
Regulatory Enforcement
0.5
0.48
0.63
0.6
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.52
0.67
0.45
0.43
0.63
Peru
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Upper middle income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.5
10/19
21/31
63/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.6
6/19
8/31
Absence of Corruption
0.34
15/19
29/31 86/102
Open Government
0.55
9/19
11/31 47/102
Fundamental Rights
0.6
10/19
12/31 47/102
0.63
10/19
23/31 79/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.5
8/19
19/31 55/102
Civil Justice
0.43
14/19
29/31 86/102
Criminal Justice
0.34
9/19
26/31 79/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Peru
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
43/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.63
0.54
0.43
0.46
0.64
7.2 No discrimination
0.48
0.63
0.46
7.3 No corruption
0.35
0.42
0.68
0.44
0.68
0.72
0.27
0.77
0.52
0.37
0.73
0.64
0.53
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.48
0.37
0.36
0.16
0.55
1
0.33
0.31
0.23
0.18
8.4 No discrimination
0.52
8.5 No corruption
0.3
0.38
0.46
Regulatory Enforcement
0.39
0.55
0.65
0.63
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.44
0.53
0.43
0.44
0.63
Philippines
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: East Asia & Pacific | Income group: Lower middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.53
9/15
5/25
51/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.6
4.7
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Philippines
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.61
8/15
6/25
39/102
Absence of Corruption
0.49
10/15
3/25
47/102
Open Government
0.54
8/15
7/25
50/102
Fundamental Rights
0.52
9/15
12/25 67/102
0.71
14/15
10/25 58/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.5
9/15
6/25
Civil Justice
0.46
11/15
13/25 75/102
Criminal Justice
0.38
12/15
12/25 66/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
52/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.69
0.52
0.5
0.68
0.35
7.2 No discrimination
0.5
0.58
0.39
7.3 No corruption
0.48
0.52
0.67
0.47
0.67
0.66
0.27
0.55
0.4
0.46
0.71
0.53
0.44
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.53
0.42
0.57
0.44
Open Government
0.49
0.57
0.62
0.48
0.48
0.73
0.31
0.81
0.29
0.6
8.4 No discrimination
0.26
8.5 No corruption
0.55
0.35
0.39
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.51
0.62
0.39
0.48
0.52
Poland
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.71
15/24
21/31
21/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.77
14/24
17/31 18/102
Absence of Corruption
0.65
17/24
26/31 28/102
Open Government
0.67
14/24
19/31 20/102
Fundamental Rights
0.77
17/24
20/31 21/102
0.85
14/24
20/31 23/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.6
17/24
26/31 29/102
Civil Justice
0.65
15/24
22/31 22/102
Criminal Justice
0.74
9/24
15/31 15/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Poland
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.79
0.73
0.6
0.79
0.9
7.2 No discrimination
0.77
0.75
0.71
7.3 No corruption
0.79
0.7
0.72
0.77
0.72
0.67
0.35
0.89
0.89
0.58
0.81
0.72
0.71
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.59
0.82
0.79
0.41
0.94
1
0.6
0.79
0.64
0.66
8.4 No discrimination
0.69
8.5 No corruption
0.76
0.92
0.71
Regulatory Enforcement
0.52
0.72
0.72
0.73
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.6
0.6
0.51
0.6
0.69
Portugal
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.7
16/24
23/31
23/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.79
10/24
12/31 12/102
Absence of Corruption
0.71
14/24
23/31 24/102
Open Government
0.64
16/24
22/31 23/102
Fundamental Rights
0.8
10/24
12/31 12/102
0.76
22/24
26/31 45/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.57
18/24
27/31 30/102
Civil Justice
0.65
16/24
23/31 23/102
Criminal Justice
0.67
14/24
21/31 21/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Portugal
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.79
0.73
0.63
0.76
0.93
7.2 No discrimination
0.81
0.79
0.71
7.3 No corruption
0.77
0.65
0.82
0.76
0.82
0.9
0.34
0.95
0.72
0.49
0.9
0.77
0.68
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.68
0.81
0.91
0.45
0.88
1
0.39
0.47
0.46
0.63
8.4 No discrimination
0.68
8.5 No corruption
0.8
0.94
0.71
Regulatory Enforcement
0.49
0.64
0.76
0.67
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.63
0.75
0.45
0.4
0.61
Republic of Korea
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.79
4/15
11/31
11/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Republic of Korea
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.79
3/15
14/31 14/102
Absence of Corruption
0.82
6/15
14/31 14/102
Open Government
0.73
3/15
10/31 10/102
Fundamental Rights
0.73
4/15
24/31 25/102
0.9
4/15
9/31
Regulatory Enforcement
0.78
4/15
10/31 10/102
Civil Justice
0.8
2/15
7/31
Criminal Justice
0.76
5/15
13/31 13/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
10/102
7/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.8
0.65
0.63
0.84
0.86
7.2 No discrimination
0.71
0.75
0.78
7.3 No corruption
0.89
0.74
0.77
0.75
0.76
0.69
0.8
0.85
0.66
0.88
0.72
0.9
0.72
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.77
0.9
0.88
0.72
0.9
1
0.8
0.62
0.8
0.78
8.4 No discrimination
0.64
8.5 No corruption
0.88
0.79
0.78
Regulatory Enforcement
0.71
0.75
0.7
0.75
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.62
0.82
0.95
0.81
0.7
Romania
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.62
20/24
3/31
32/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.63
20/24
3/31
33/102
Absence of Corruption
0.52
22/24
8/31
40/102
Open Government
0.53
23/24
14/31 51/102
Fundamental Rights
0.73
20/24
2/31
27/102
0.78
21/24
9/31
39/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.54
21/24
6/31
37/102
Civil Justice
0.63
19/24
2/31
28/102
Criminal Justice
0.6
20/24
2/31
28/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Romania
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.66
0.74
0.62
0.63
0.85
7.2 No discrimination
0.75
0.51
0.64
7.3 No corruption
0.63
0.53
0.71
0.63
0.7
0.76
0.49
0.73
0.61
0.61
0.79
0.71
0.71
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.46
0.63
0.68
0.29
0.89
1
0.46
0.64
0.57
0.44
8.4 No discrimination
0.65
8.5 No corruption
0.6
0.64
0.64
Regulatory Enforcement
0.41
0.45
0.65
0.61
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.54
0.51
0.49
0.53
0.62
Russia
Region: Eastern Europe & Central Asia | Income group: High income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.47
11/13
31/31
75/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.39
9/13
31/31 90/102
Absence of Corruption
0.44
6/13
31/31 60/102
Open Government
0.49
9/13
30/31 67/102
Fundamental Rights
0.47
9/13
31/31 80/102
0.67
12/13
31/31 74/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.46
7/13
31/31 64/102
Civil Justice
0.5
7/13
31/31 60/102
Criminal Justice
0.36
10/13
31/31 74/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Russia
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.4
0.56
0.53
0.32
0.48
7.2 No discrimination
0.54
0.44
0.4
7.3 No corruption
0.48
0.39
0.4
0.31
0.4
0.62
0.66
0.4
0.3
0.35
0.46
0.64
0.58
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.42
0.46
0.51
0.34
Open Government
0.47
0.58
0.42
0.47
0.38
0.84
0.45
0.7
0.37
0.46
8.4 No discrimination
0.43
8.5 No corruption
0.42
0.08
0.4
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.54
0.48
0.54
0.4
0.35
Senegal
Criminal
Justice
8.5
1.1
8.7
8.6
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.57
4/18
3/25
38/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Sub-Saharan Africa
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.66
2/18
2/25
29/102
Absence of Corruption
0.53
2/18
2/25
36/102
Open Government
0.52
4/18
9/25
55/102
Fundamental Rights
0.63
3/18
3/25
40/102
0.71
5/18
11/25 59/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.52
4/18
4/25
42/102
Civil Justice
0.53
5/18
5/25
46/102
Criminal Justice
0.44
5/18
7/25
52/102
4.4
Regulatory
Enforcement
Senegal
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.61
0.73
0.43
0.57
0.55
7.2 No discrimination
0.54
0.62
0.43
7.3 No corruption
0.53
0.56
0.77
0.5
0.76
0.72
0.51
0.83
0.37
0.53
0.81
0.71
0.63
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.52
0.52
0.61
0.48
0.83
1
0.3
0.38
0.53
0.2
8.4 No discrimination
0.63
8.5 No corruption
0.58
0.3
0.43
Regulatory Enforcement
0.34
0.54
0.73
0.46
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.46
0.54
0.43
0.53
0.66
Serbia
Region: Eastern Europe & Central Asia | Income group: Upper middle income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.5
6/13
19/31
60/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.5
5/13
17/31 65/102
Absence of Corruption
0.41
8/13
24/31 67/102
Open Government
0.51
7/13
20/31 61/102
Fundamental Rights
0.58
5/13
14/31 51/102
0.75
8/13
12/31 48/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.43
9/13
28/31 76/102
Civil Justice
0.47
11/13
25/31 72/102
Criminal Justice
0.38
8/13
21/31 63/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Serbia
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.56
0.57
0.51
0.36
0.67
7.2 No discrimination
0.69
0.47
0.49
7.3 No corruption
0.41
0.32
0.6
0.39
0.59
0.7
0.35
0.71
0.39
0.34
0.7
0.59
0.52
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.43
0.41
0.51
0.3
0.91
1
0.36
0.4
0.38
0.39
8.4 No discrimination
0.33
8.5 No corruption
0.41
0.29
0.49
Regulatory Enforcement
0.46
0.54
0.55
0.48
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.38
0.45
0.4
0.3
0.61
Sierra Leone
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.44
13/18
8/15
87/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Sierra Leone
Sub-Saharan Africa
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.52
9/18
6/15
59/102
Absence of Corruption
0.3
12/18
8/15
91/102
Open Government
0.39
17/18
12/15 96/102
Fundamental Rights
0.53
8/18
0.6
13/18
11/15 86/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.39
13/18
8/15
91/102
Civil Justice
0.43
15/18
8/15
85/102
Criminal Justice
0.33
15/18
9/15
85/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
5/15
63/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.57
0.53
0.56
0.38
0.54
7.2 No discrimination
0.51
0.46
0.38
7.3 No corruption
0.27
0.49
0.61
0.35
0.6
0.75
0.47
0.63
0.41
0.39
0.6
0.44
0.46
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.33
0.28
0.27
0.3
0.37
1
0.45
0.49
0.34
0.2
8.4 No discrimination
0.31
8.5 No corruption
0.27
0.35
0.38
Regulatory Enforcement
0.31
0.4
0.58
0.24
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.41
0.35
0.32
0.38
0.5
Singapore
Singapore
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.81
2/15
9/31
9/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Singapore
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.76
5/15
21/31 22/102
Absence of Corruption
0.93
1/15
3/31
Open Government
0.63
6/15
24/31 25/102
Fundamental Rights
0.72
5/15
26/31 28/102
0.91
2/15
4/31
4/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.86
1/15
1/31
1/102
Civil Justice
0.84
1/15
3/31
3/102
Criminal Justice
0.82
1/15
3/31
3/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
3/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.69
0.85
0.66
0.82
0.85
7.2 No discrimination
0.97
0.65
0.74
7.3 No corruption
0.89
0.92
0.59
0.84
0.59
0.78
0.93
0.88
0.62
0.88
0.56
0.74
0.74
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.92
0.92
0.93
0.95
0.94
1
0.79
0.68
0.85
0.97
8.4 No discrimination
0.85
8.5 No corruption
0.92
0.74
0.74
Regulatory Enforcement
0.68
0.58
0.55
0.7
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.8
0.96
0.83
0.92
0.81
Slovenia
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.66
18/24
27/31
28/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.62
21/24
28/31 37/102
Absence of Corruption
0.6
18/24
27/31 31/102
Open Government
0.6
19/24
27/31 30/102
Fundamental Rights
0.77
16/24
19/31 20/102
0.82
16/24
22/31 27/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.6
16/24
25/31 28/102
Civil Justice
0.64
18/24
25/31 25/102
Criminal Justice
0.63
17/24
24/31 24/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Slovenia
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.56
0.79
0.63
0.55
0.93
7.2 No discrimination
0.73
0.6
0.74
7.3 No corruption
0.7
0.59
0.6
0.65
0.59
0.88
0.42
0.82
0.73
0.54
0.75
0.82
0.76
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.52
0.74
0.7
0.42
0.91
1
0.54
0.61
0.6
0.55
8.4 No discrimination
0.63
8.5 No corruption
0.6
0.68
0.74
Regulatory Enforcement
0.56
0.6
0.62
0.63
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.61
0.69
0.59
0.47
0.63
South Africa
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.58
3/18
4/31
36/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.6
4.7
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
South Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.61
4/18
5/31
Absence of Corruption
0.51
3/18
10/31 42/102
Open Government
0.62
1/18
2/31
27/102
Fundamental Rights
0.63
2/18
8/31
39/102
0.62
10/18
Regulatory Enforcement
0.55
3/18
3/31
33/102
Civil Justice
0.56
3/18
8/31
39/102
Criminal Justice
0.5
2/18
8/31
38/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
40/102
25/31 81/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.64
0.53
0.47
0.63
0.63
7.2 No discrimination
0.47
0.51
0.5
7.3 No corruption
0.63
0.5
0.73
0.61
0.73
0.75
0.47
0.67
0.53
0.57
0.77
0.72
0.61
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.46
0.66
0.55
0.36
0.51
1
0.35
0.47
0.47
0.35
8.4 No discrimination
0.52
8.5 No corruption
0.56
0.65
0.5
Regulatory Enforcement
0.53
0.6
0.7
0.63
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.51
0.59
0.41
0.57
0.69
Spain
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.68
17/24
24/31
24/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.69
17/24
25/31 26/102
Absence of Corruption
0.69
15/24
24/31 25/102
Open Government
0.62
17/24
25/31 26/102
Fundamental Rights
0.78
15/24
18/31 19/102
0.8
19/24
25/31 33/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.62
15/24
24/31 26/102
Civil Justice
0.64
17/24
24/31 24/102
Criminal Justice
0.62
19/24
26/31 26/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Spain
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.69
0.72
0.73
0.62
0.84
7.2 No discrimination
0.76
0.62
0.77
7.3 No corruption
0.71
0.62
0.74
0.66
0.74
0.76
0.4
0.87
0.84
0.47
0.8
0.77
0.73
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.65
0.78
0.86
0.46
0.87
1
0.54
0.45
0.54
0.69
8.4 No discrimination
0.54
8.5 No corruption
0.73
0.6
0.77
Regulatory Enforcement
0.56
0.58
0.7
0.64
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.65
0.77
0.52
0.57
0.6
Sri Lanka
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.51
2/6
9/25
58/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Sri Lanka
South Asia
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.47
4/6
16/25 75/102
Absence of Corruption
0.46
1/6
6/25
54/102
Open Government
0.53
3/6
8/25
52/102
Fundamental Rights
0.49
3/6
16/25 77/102
0.69
2/6
13/25 65/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.49
2/6
7/25
Civil Justice
0.47
1/6
11/25 69/102
Criminal Justice
0.45
2/6
5/25
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
58/102
46/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.48
0.59
0.5
0.44
0.34
7.2 No discrimination
0.43
0.46
0.43
7.3 No corruption
0.57
0.46
0.51
0.39
0.51
0.68
0.35
0.46
0.21
0.44
0.57
0.62
0.57
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.49
0.57
0.57
0.22
Open Government
0.48
0.57
0.54
0.52
0.49
0.93
0.37
0.92
0.48
0.24
8.4 No discrimination
0.51
8.5 No corruption
0.61
0.27
0.43
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.57
0.58
0.42
0.42
0.46
Sweden
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.85
3/24
3/31
3/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.88
4/24
4/31
4/102
Absence of Corruption
0.91
3/24
4/31
4/102
Open Government
0.81
1/24
1/31
1/102
Fundamental Rights
0.9
4/24
4/31
4/102
0.9
3/24
7/31
8/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.82
2/24
3/31
3/102
Civil Justice
0.81
5/24
6/31
6/102
Criminal Justice
0.78
5/24
7/31
7/102
4.4
Regulatory
Enforcement
Sweden
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.8
0.75
0.71
0.87
0.97
7.2 No discrimination
0.73
0.8
0.9
7.3 No corruption
0.93
0.86
0.96
0.89
0.96
0.87
0.69
0.98
0.94
0.9
0.96
0.82
0.84
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.88
0.94
0.95
0.84
0.91
1
0.79
0.52
0.7
0.82
8.4 No discrimination
0.65
8.5 No corruption
0.9
0.93
0.9
Regulatory Enforcement
0.66
0.86
0.9
0.83
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.78
0.91
0.89
0.68
0.85
Tanzania
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.47
6/18
3/15
72/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Tanzania
Sub-Saharan Africa
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.53
8/18
5/15
55/102
Absence of Corruption
0.37
9/18
5/15
77/102
Open Government
0.51
5/18
2/15
62/102
Fundamental Rights
0.51
9/18
6/15
71/102
0.58
14/18
12/15 91/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.43
11/18
5/15
77/102
Civil Justice
0.51
7/18
2/15
57/102
Criminal Justice
0.37
9/18
4/15
67/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.69
0.49
0.47
0.54
0.52
7.2 No discrimination
0.62
0.36
0.29
7.3 No corruption
0.36
0.45
0.59
0.42
0.58
0.68
0.42
0.57
0.55
0.56
0.6
0.71
0.31
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.4
0.33
0.35
0.39
0.53
1
0.21
0.4
0.51
0.16
8.4 No discrimination
0.28
8.5 No corruption
0.39
0.6
0.29
Regulatory Enforcement
0.41
0.44
0.58
0.59
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.41
0.39
0.3
0.44
0.58
Thailand
Criminal
Justice
Region: East Asia & Pacific | Income group: Upper middle income
8.5
1.1
8.7
8.6
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.52
11/15
18/31
56/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Thailand
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.46
11/15
Absence of Corruption
0.52
8/15
7/31
Open Government
0.49
9/15
22/31 68/102
Fundamental Rights
0.5
11/15
23/31 72/102
0.75
13/15
14/31 51/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.51
8/15
13/31 47/102
Civil Justice
0.46
10/15
26/31 74/102
Criminal Justice
0.43
10/15
15/31 53/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
24/31 76/102
39/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.4
0.6
0.49
0.59
0.38
7.2 No discrimination
0.57
0.4
0.35
7.3 No corruption
0.66
0.41
0.56
0.47
0.56
0.65
0.42
0.39
0.28
0.13
0.6
0.51
0.6
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.52
0.61
0.54
0.41
Open Government
0.47
0.43
0.52
0.52
0.46
0.86
0.58
0.86
0.44
0.53
8.4 No discrimination
0.25
8.5 No corruption
0.58
0.36
0.35
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.44
0.57
0.47
0.55
0.52
Tunisia
Region: Middle East & North Africa | Income group: Upper middle income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.56
3/7
10/31
43/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.62
1/7
4/31
Absence of Corruption
0.5
3/7
12/31 44/102
Open Government
0.51
1/7
19/31 59/102
Fundamental Rights
0.54
2/7
20/31 62/102
0.75
4/7
13/31 50/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.52
4/7
10/31 43/102
Civil Justice
0.52
4/7
14/31 49/102
Criminal Justice
0.49
3/7
9/31
4.4
Order and
Security
Tunisia
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
34/102
41/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.7
0.54
0.48
0.59
0.5
7.2 No discrimination
0.62
0.57
0.49
7.3 No corruption
0.46
0.48
0.7
0.52
0.69
0.61
0.47
0.71
0.23
0.48
0.72
0.59
0.54
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.52
0.46
0.63
0.4
0.82
1
0.44
0.44
0.53
0.45
8.4 No discrimination
0.46
8.5 No corruption
0.57
0.51
0.49
Regulatory Enforcement
0.43
0.5
0.65
0.46
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.53
0.59
0.4
0.42
0.65
Turkey
Region: Eastern Europe & Central Asia | Income group: Upper middle income
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.46
12/13
29/31
80/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.37
11/13
29/31 95/102
Absence of Corruption
0.49
4/13
15/31 49/102
Open Government
0.45
11/13
26/31 82/102
Fundamental Rights
0.36
13/13
29/31 96/102
0.69
11/13
19/31 68/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.51
5/13
12/31 46/102
Civil Justice
0.49
8/13
22/31 63/102
Criminal Justice
0.35
11/13
24/31 76/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Turkey
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.4
0.53
0.47
0.4
0.44
7.2 No discrimination
0.54
0.29
0.41
7.3 No corruption
0.55
0.34
0.33
0.31
0.33
0.18
0.38
0.43
0.15
0.46
0.35
0.75
0.49
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.5
0.53
0.62
0.3
Open Government
0.44
0.52
0.34
0.5
0.42
0.89
0.33
0.85
0.41
0.32
8.4 No discrimination
0.23
8.5 No corruption
0.53
0.14
0.41
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.55
0.56
0.55
0.31
0.58
Uganda
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.41
15/18
12/15
95/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Uganda
Sub-Saharan Africa
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.39
16/18
12/15
Absence of Corruption
0.27
17/18
14/15 100/102
Open Government
0.41
13/18
10/15
92/102
Fundamental Rights
0.39
16/18
11/15
94/102
0.61
12/18
10/15
85/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.39
15/18
9/15
94/102
Civil Justice
0.48
9/18
3/15
68/102
Criminal Justice
0.34
14/18
8/15
80/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
89/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.41
0.52
0.43
0.37
0.28
7.2 No discrimination
0.57
0.45
0.29
7.3 No corruption
0.37
0.45
0.37
0.42
0.37
0.62
0.39
0.32
0.11
0.52
0.45
0.64
0.44
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.25
0.39
0.21
0.21
Open Government
0.25
0.43
0.42
0.54
0.34
0.73
0.34
0.85
0.41
0.23
8.4 No discrimination
0.35
8.5 No corruption
0.24
0.4
0.29
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.37
0.25
0.38
0.47
0.48
Ukraine
Criminal
Justice
Region: Eastern Europe & Central Asia | Income group: Lower middle income
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.48
9/13
13/25
70/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.45
7/13
17/25 77/102
Absence of Corruption
0.34
11/13
18/25 84/102
Open Government
0.56
4/13
5/25
43/102
Fundamental Rights
0.61
3/13
5/25
44/102
0.6
13/13
18/25 87/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.42
12/13
16/25 80/102
Civil Justice
0.49
9/13
9/25
Criminal Justice
0.36
9/13
13/25 71/102
4.4
Order and
Security
Ukraine
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
65/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.61
0.64
0.52
0.22
0.59
7.2 No discrimination
0.7
0.44
0.43
7.3 No corruption
0.35
0.32
0.58
0.31
0.58
0.68
0.56
0.56
0.49
0.36
0.83
0.61
0.67
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.36
0.37
0.36
0.28
Open Government
0.51
0.59
0.65
0.48
0.28
0.88
0.43
0.5
0.43
0.44
8.4 No discrimination
0.47
8.5 No corruption
0.27
0.23
0.43
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.42
0.35
0.5
0.45
0.37
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Region: Middle East & North Africa | Income group: High income
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.67
1/7
26/31
27/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
United Arab
Emirates
High income
group
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.58
2/7
30/31 45/102
Absence of Corruption
0.82
1/7
13/31 13/102
Open Government
0.48
3/7
31/31 69/102
Fundamental Rights
0.5
4/7
30/31 75/102
0.91
1/7
5/31
Regulatory Enforcement
0.68
1/7
21/31 21/102
Civil Justice
0.63
1/7
26/31 29/102
Criminal Justice
0.77
1/7
9/31
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
6/102
9/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.53
0.68
0.46
0.65
0.62
7.2 No discrimination
0.42
0.7
0.7
7.3 No corruption
0.81
0.77
0.34
0.67
0.34
0.46
0.72
0.48
0.44
0.67
0.25
0.64
0.49
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.82
0.83
0.86
0.79
0.98
1
0.74
0.7
0.8
0.77
8.4 No discrimination
0.75
8.5 No corruption
0.88
0.78
0.7
Regulatory Enforcement
0.62
0.47
0.36
0.47
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.75
0.89
0.69
0.44
0.64
United Kingdom
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.78
8/24
12/31
12/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
United Kingdom
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.8
9/24
11/31 11/102
Absence of Corruption
0.82
8/24
15/31 15/102
Open Government
0.74
7/24
8/31
Fundamental Rights
0.79
12/24
14/31 14/102
0.86
10/24
17/31 19/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.77
8/24
12/31 12/102
Civil Justice
0.74
9/24
13/31 13/102
Criminal Justice
0.76
6/24
11/31 11/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
8/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.83
0.7
0.58
0.83
0.9
7.2 No discrimination
0.62
0.59
0.82
7.3 No corruption
0.89
0.8
0.82
0.84
0.82
0.83
0.73
0.9
0.69
0.71
0.85
0.82
0.71
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.81
0.93
0.89
0.64
0.9
1
0.69
0.7
0.79
0.63
8.4 No discrimination
0.65
8.5 No corruption
0.86
0.9
0.82
Regulatory Enforcement
0.67
0.73
0.79
0.78
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.72
0.89
0.69
0.77
0.77
United States
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.73
13/24
19/31
19/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
United States
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.76
15/24
20/31 21/102
Absence of Corruption
0.75
12/24
20/31 20/102
Open Government
0.73
8/24
11/31 11/102
Fundamental Rights
0.73
19/24
25/31 26/102
0.82
15/24
21/31 26/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.73
13/24
20/31 20/102
Civil Justice
0.67
14/24
21/31 21/102
Criminal Justice
0.64
16/24
23/31 23/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.87
0.55
0.47
0.8
0.78
7.2 No discrimination
0.52
0.56
0.68
7.3 No corruption
0.85
0.68
0.83
0.77
0.82
0.78
0.59
0.84
0.67
0.67
0.87
0.81
0.68
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.73
0.87
0.84
0.59
Open Government
0.62
0.7
0.8
0.77
0.71
0.83
0.68
0.94
0.51
0.7
8.4 No discrimination
0.42
8.5 No corruption
0.78
0.74
0.68
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.67
0.84
0.6
0.79
0.74
Uruguay
Criminal
Justice
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: High income
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.71
1/19
22/31
22/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.76
2/19
19/31 20/102
Absence of Corruption
0.78
1/19
18/31 18/102
Open Government
0.65
3/19
20/31 21/102
Fundamental Rights
0.79
1/19
16/31 16/102
0.72
1/19
29/31 57/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.73
1/19
19/31 19/102
Civil Justice
0.71
1/19
17/31 17/102
Criminal Justice
0.54
3/19
29/31 36/102
4.4
Regulatory
Enforcement
Uruguay
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.72
0.74
0.75
0.72
0.9
7.2 No discrimination
0.75
0.67
0.59
7.3 No corruption
0.81
0.72
0.8
0.72
0.79
0.92
0.56
0.94
0.77
0.67
0.86
0.73
0.76
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.77
0.83
0.81
0.71
0.74
1
0.41
0.41
0.38
0.36
8.4 No discrimination
0.61
8.5 No corruption
0.76
0.66
0.59
Regulatory Enforcement
0.54
0.58
0.78
0.71
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.72
0.84
0.64
0.6
0.86
Uzbekistan
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: Eastern Europe & Central Asia | Income group: Lower middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.46
13/13
17/25
81/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Uzbekistan
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.31
13/13
25/25 100/102
Absence of Corruption
0.35
10/13
16/25
Open Government
0.32
13/13
25/25 101/102
Fundamental Rights
0.41
12/13
23/25
91/102
0.91
1/13
1/25
5/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.42
10/13
14/25
78/102
Civil Justice
0.49
10/13
10/25
66/102
Criminal Justice
0.44
4/13
6/25
49/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
81/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.11
0.69
0.47
0.21
0.36
7.2 No discrimination
0.58
0.45
0.35
7.3 No corruption
0.38
0.37
0.26
0.39
0.26
0.66
0.7
0.46
0.17
0.41
0.25
0.48
0.59
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.29
0.42
0.3
0.39
0.9
1
0.82
0.61
0.75
0.5
8.4 No discrimination
0.35
8.5 No corruption
0.32
0.22
0.35
Regulatory Enforcement
0.44
0.21
0.24
0.39
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.53
0.37
0.7
0.33
0.19
Venezuela
Criminal
Justice
8.5
Region: Latin America & the Caribbean | Income group: Upper middle income
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.32
19/19
31/31
102/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Venezuela
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.19
19/19
31/31 102/102
Absence of Corruption
0.27
19/19
31/31
95/102
Open Government
0.38
19/19
30/31
97/102
Fundamental Rights
0.39
19/19
28/31
93/102
0.54
18/19
30/31
97/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.26
19/19
31/31 102/102
Civil Justice
0.35
19/19
31/31 100/102
Criminal Justice
0.16
19/19
31/31 102/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.24
0.64
0.53
0.18
0.19
7.2 No discrimination
0.63
0.25
0.22
7.3 No corruption
0.26
0.11
0.2
0.05
0.2
0.73
0.19
0.18
0.06
0.28
0.42
0.51
0.66
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.33
0.21
0.37
0.19
0.37
1
0.26
0.18
0.13
0.02
8.4 No discrimination
0.29
8.5 No corruption
0.29
Regulatory Enforcement
0.39
0.38
0.34
0.42
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.42
0.44
0.14
0.11
0.2
0.22
Vietnam
Criminal
Justice
Region: East Asia & Pacific | Income group: Lower middle income
8.5
1.1
8.7
8.6
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
2.1
Global Rank
0.5
12/15
11/25
64/102
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.42
13/15
21/25 85/102
Absence of Corruption
0.46
11/15
7/25
Open Government
0.43
11/15
21/25 86/102
Fundamental Rights
0.52
10/15
13/25 69/102
0.79
8/15
Regulatory Enforcement
0.41
13/15
19/25 85/102
Civil Justice
0.46
12/15
14/25 76/102
Criminal Justice
0.5
8/15
2/25
4.4
Order and
Security
Vietnam
Income Rank
1.6
8.1
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
4/25
56/102
35/102
39/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.31
0.65
0.42
0.28
0.6
7.2 No discrimination
0.67
0.62
0.52
7.3 No corruption
0.31
0.55
0.38
0.24
0.38
0.49
0.58
0.36
0.6
0.41
0.32
0.58
0.57
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.54
0.35
0.46
0.48
Open Government
0.53
0.43
0.37
0.39
0.42
0.92
0.52
0.93
0.51
0.53
8.4 No discrimination
0.68
8.5 No corruption
0.56
0.29
0.52
Regulatory Enforcement
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.55
0.33
0.38
0.44
0.33
Zambia
Criminal
Justice
8.5
1.1
8.7
8.6
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.47
7/18
14/25
73/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Factor Factor
Trend Score
6.2
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Sub-Saharan Africa
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.49
11/18
14/25 68/102
Absence of Corruption
0.4
7/18
13/25 70/102
Open Government
0.48
8/18
15/25 72/102
Fundamental Rights
0.42
15/18
22/25 89/102
0.7
6/18
12/25 62/102
Regulatory Enforcement
0.45
7/18
11/25 68/102
Civil Justice
0.47
11/18
12/25 71/102
Criminal Justice
0.38
8/18
11/25 65/102
4.4
Regulatory
Enforcement
Zambia
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.51
0.42
0.42
0.4
0.28
7.2 No discrimination
0.43
0.43
0.35
7.3 No corruption
0.45
0.55
0.45
0.44
0.45
0.57
0.49
0.61
0.41
0.51
0.47
0.55
0.39
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.41
0.49
0.37
0.34
0.71
1
0.39
0.37
0.47
0.19
8.4 No discrimination
0.48
8.5 No corruption
0.38
0.4
0.35
Regulatory Enforcement
0.43
0.53
0.47
0.49
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.48
0.42
0.45
0.55
0.37
Zimbabwe
Criminal
Justice
8.5
8.7
8.6
1.1
1.2
Constraints on
Government
Powers
1.3
1.4
8.4
8.3
Income Rank
Global Rank
0.37
18/18
14/15
100/102
1.6
2.1
8.1
Absence of
Corruption
2.2
0.5
7.7
2.3
7.6
2.4
7.5
3.1
7.4
3.2
7.3
3.3
7.2
Open
Government
3.4
7.1
4.1
6.5
4.2
6.4
4.3
6.3
Regulatory
Enforcement
Regional Rank
1.5
8.2
Civil
Justice
Overall Score
Factor Factor
Trend Score
4.5
6.1
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.7
4.6
Fundamental
Rights
Order and
Security
Zimbabwe
Sub-Saharan Africa
Global
Rank
Constraints on Government
Powers
0.26
18/18
15/15 101/102
Absence of Corruption
0.28
13/18
9/15
Open Government
0.32
18/18
15/15 102/102
Fundamental Rights
0.29
18/18
15/15 101/102
0.63
9/18
Regulatory Enforcement
0.35
18/18
14/15 100/102
Civil Justice
0.45
13/18
6/15
79/102
Criminal Justice
0.36
11/18
6/15
72/102
4.4
6.2
Regional Income
Rank
Rank
Trending up
Trending down
Fundamental Rights
Low
8/15
92/102
78/102
Medium
High
Civil Justice
0.36
0.36
0.53
0.26
0.28
7.2 No discrimination
0.54
0.31
0.27
7.3 No corruption
0.44
0.36
0.19
0.17
0.19
0.55
0.47
0.1
0.04
0.55
0.21
0.47
0.43
Absence of Corruption
2.1 No corruption in the
executive branch
0.25
0.41
0.27
0.19
0.51
1
0.37
0.5
0.52
0.34
8.4 No discrimination
0.48
8.5 No corruption
0.3
0.12
0.27
Regulatory Enforcement
0.23
0.4
0.23
0.41
Open Government
http://data.worldjusticeproject.org
Criminal Justice
0.34
0.32
0.37
0.42
0.3
Methodology
Methodology
The WJP Rule of Law Index is the first attempt to systematically
and comprehensively quantify the rule of law around the world, and
remains unique in its operationalization of rule of law dimensions
into concrete questions.
The WJP Rule of Law Index 2015 report presents
(QRQs).
160 | Methodology
Table 2: The Indicators of the World Justice Projects Rule of Law Index
The World Justice Projects Rule of Law Index comprises 44 sub-factors organized around eight factors. The following
table presents a summary of the concepts underlying each of these sub-factors. A full map of the variables used to
calculate the Index scores is available in the methodology section of the WJP Rule of Law Index website.
161 | Table 2: The Indicators of the World Justice Projects Rule of Law Index
162 | Table 2: The Indicators of the World Justice Projects Rule of Law Index
163 | Table 2: The Indicators of the World Justice Projects Rule of Law Index
164 | Table 2: The Indicators of the World Justice Projects Rule of Law Index
DATA SOURCES
January 2015.
from the variable level all the way up to the factor level
Ponce (2011).
DATA VALIDATION
165 | Methodology
Cities Covered
Kabul, Kandahar, Herat
Methodology
Face-to-face
Polling Company
ACSOR Surveys, a subsidiary of D3 Systems, Inc.
Market Research & Polls - EURASIA (MRP-EURASIA)
Statmark Group
Survey Sampling International
Survey Sampling International
Albania
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bangladesh
Org-Quest Research
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Sample
1000
Year
2014
Face-to-face
1000
2013
Face-to-face
Online
Online
1000
1000
1008
2013
2013
2014
Face-to-face
1000
2013
Face-to-face
1000
2014
Online
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
1000
1020
1201
2013
2014
2013
Face-to-face
1000
2014
Face-to-face
1045
2012
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
1000
1027
2014
2013
TNS-RMS
Face-to-face
1000
2014
Indochina Research
Face-to-face
1000
2014
Cameroon
Liaison Marketing
Face-to-face
997
2013
Canada
Online
920
2014
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
D3 Systems, Inc.
IBI Partners
Statmark Group
CID-Gallup Latin America
TNS-RMS
Market Research & Polls - EURASIA (MRP-EURASIA)
Survey Sampling International
SIS International Research
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Online
Online
1000
1002
1017
1020
1000
1000
997
1050
2014
2013
2013
2014
2014
2013
2014
2014
Face-to-face
1000
2013
Ecuador
2014
Face-to-face
Phone/Face-toface
1000
Egypt
Statmark Group
D3 Systems, Inc./WJP in collaboration with local
partner
300/1000
2014/2012
Face-to-face
1009
2013
Norstat
Infinite Insight
SIS International Research
Survey Sampling International
ACT
Survey Sampling International
FACTS International Ghana Limited
Survey Sampling International
Online
Face-to-face
Online
Online
Face-to-face
Online
Face-to-face
Online
800
570
1050
1001
1000
1000
1005
1000
2014
2014
2014
2013
2014
2013
2013
2014
Face-to-face
1026
2013
Face-to-face
1020
2014
IBI Partners
Face-to-face
1010
2014
Face-to-face
1000
2014
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Online
1047
1011
1045
1000
2013
2014
2013
2014
Statmark Group
Face-to-face
1000
2014
IBI Partners
Face-to-face
1002
2013
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Cambodia
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Estonia
Ethiopia
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guatemala
Honduras
Hong Kong SAR,
China
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Iran
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
166 | Table 3: City Coverage and Polling Methodology in the 102 Indexed Countries & Territories
Country/Territory
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kyrgyzstan
Lebanon
Liberia
Cities Covered
Amman, Irbid, Zarqa
Almaty, Astana, Shymkent
Nairobi, Mombasa, Nakuru
Bishkek, Osh, Jalalabad
Beirut, Tripoli, Sidon
Monrovia, Kakata, Gbarnga
Macedonia, FYR
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Mexico
Sample
1004
1002
1003
1000
1003
1000
Year
2013
2013
2013
2013
2014
2013
Face-to-face
1000
2014
DCDM Research
Face-to-face
1000
2014
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
997
1011
2014
2014
Face-to-face
1005
2014
Face-to-face
1000
2014
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Online
1000
1000
1004
1000
1000
2014
2013
2013
2014
2013
IBI Partners
Telephone
1003
2014
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Online
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
1020
1048
1050
2007
1020
1231
1000
2014
2013
2014
2014
2014
2013
2013
Face-to-face
1000
2013
Online
Face-to-face
1001
1004
2014
2013
Face-to-face
1000
2013
VCIOM
Face-to-face
1000
2013
Liaison Marketing
Market Research & Polls - EURASIA (MRP-EURASIA)
TNS-RMS Cameroun Ltd.
Survey Sampling International
Market Research & Polls - EURASIA (MRP-EURASIA)
Quest Research Services
Survey Sampling International
PepperCube Consultants
Survey Sampling International
Consumer Options Ltd.
IBI Partners
BJKA Consulting (BJ Group)
TNS Turkey
TNS-RMS
Market Research & Polls - EURASIA (MRP-EURASIA)
Face-to-face
1001
2014
Face-to-face
1000
2014
Face-to-face
Online
1005
1000
2012
2014
Face-to-face
1000
2014
Face-to-face
Online
Face-to-face
Online
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
1000
1000
1030
1000
1000
1008
1000
1003
1002
2013
2013
2014
2013
2012
2013
2014
2013
2013
Face-to-face
1000
2014
Face-to-face
1610
2014
Online
Online
Telephone
1000
1002
1000
2013
2014
2012
Face-to-face
1000
2014
Face-to-face
1000
2013
Indochina Research
Face-to-face
1000
2014
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
1000
1005
2014
2012
Moldova
Mongolia
Morocco
Myanmar
Nepal
Netherlands
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Korea
Romania
New Zealand
Senegal
Serbia
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Tanzania
Thailand
Tunisia
Turkey
Uganda
Ukraine
Russia
United Arab
Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Vietnam
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Polling Company
WJP in collaboration with local partner
VCIOM
TNS-RMS
VCIOM
IIACSS
FACTS International Ghana Limited
Market Research & Polls - EURASIA (MRP-EURASIA)
Methodology
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
Face-to-face
167| Table 3: City Coverage and Polling Methodology in the 102 Indexed Countries & Territories
steps:
1.
2.
of the Index for each year. Last years scores are then
168 | Methodology
3.
4.
higher standard errors) and the fact that the GPPs are
169 | Methodology
Contributing Experts
The WJP Rule of Law Index 2015 was made possible by the
generous pro-bono contributions of academics and practitioners
who contributed their time and expertise. The names of those
experts wishing to be acknowledged individually are listed in the
following pages.
This report was also made possible by the work of the polling
companies who conducted fieldwork, and the thousands of
individuals who have responded to the General Population Poll
around the world.
Afghanistan
Daniel Sabsay
Universidad de Buenos Aires y Fundacin
Ambiente y Recursos Naturales
Isabell Kirisits-Ilek
Hewlett-Packard
Dmitry Semashko
Stepanovski, Papakul and Partners
Isabelle Pellech
Aschiana Organization
Ivo Greiter
Greiter Pegger Kofler & Partners
Elena Selivanova
Sysouev, Bondar, Khrapoutski SBH
Jernej Sekolec
Eugenia Chenverikova
Revera Consulting Group
Karin Bruckmller
Johannes Kepler University Linz
Helen Mourashko
Revera Consulting Group
Karl Stger
University of Graz
Amanullah Nuristani
Afghan Anti Corruption Network
Baryalai Hakimi
Kabul University
Hashmat Khalil Nadirpor
Legal Education Support ProgramAfghanistan
Hosai Rahim Wardak
Idrees Zaman
Cooperation for Peace and Unity
Jrgen Baumann
GIZ German Development Corporation
Kakail Nuristani
Basic Needs Support Organization
Afghanistan
Khalid Massoudi
Massoudi Legal Consultancy
Magdalena Ziembicka
Barnert Egermann Illigasch Rechtsanwlte
GmbH
Manfred Ketzer
Hausmaninger Kletter Rechtsanwlte
GmbH
Martin Reinisch
BKP Brauneis Klauser Prndl
Rechtsanwlte GmbH
Martin Risak
University of Vienna
Rupert Manhart
Austrian Bar Association
Olga Zdobnova
Vlasova Mikhel & Partners
Vadzim Samaryn
Belarusian State University
Valentina Ogarkova
Stepanovski, Papakul and Partners
Anonymous Contributors
Sandra Salinas
Sergio Reynolds Ruiz
Bufete Reynolds Legal Advice
Victor Vargas Montao
Herrera & Abogados Soc. Civ.
William Herrera Aez
Herrera & Abogados Soc. Civ.
Anonymous Contributors
Belgium
Aleksandar Sajic
SAJIC Banja Luka
Abayo J-P
CHRVS
Andrea Zubovic-Devedzic
CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz
Andre Puttemans
Universit Libre de Bruxelles
Arijana Hadiahmetovi
Mari & Co. Law Firm
Anne-Lise Sibony
University of Lige
Boris Stojanovi
Boris Stojanovi Law Office
Khalid Sekander
Mario Glanc
Universidad Isalud
Thomas Frad
KWR Karasek Wietrzyk Rechtsanwlte
GmbH
Mercedes Lorenzo
Hewlett-Packard Argentina SRL
Thomas Hofmann
PALLAS Rechtsanwlte Partnerschaft
Cindy Stalmans
Hewlett-Packard
Anonymous Contributors
Damien Gerard
Universit Catholique de Louvain
Edin Halapic
Nabil Shariq
Shajjan & Associates
Niamatullah Barakzai
Lex Ferghana
R. Michael Smith
Bowie & Jensen, LLC
Sammar Serat
NIL
P. Eugenio Aramburu
PAGBAM
Sandra Guillan
De Dios & Goyena Abogados Consultores
Santiago Legarre
Pontificia Universidad Catolica Argentina
Anonymous Contributors
Bangladesh
Abdul Awal
NRDS
Abdullahel Baki
Law Portal
Abu Sayeed M M Rahman
United Hospital Limited
Sanzar Kakar
Afghanistan Holding Group
Australia
AKM Nasim
Solidarity Center
Selay Ghaffar
HAWCA
Andrew Frazer
University of Wollongong
Al Amin Rahman
Fox Mandal Associates
Shoaib Timory
American University of Afghanistan
Andrew Goldsmith
Flinders University Centre for Crime Policy
& Research
Suraya Sadeed
Help the Afghan Children, Inc.
Wahidullah Amiri
Nangarhar University
Zabihullah
Coordination of Afghan Relief
Anonymous Contributors
Albania
Artan Bozo
BOZO & Associates
Breen Creighton
RMIT University
Dan Williams
Minter Ellison
Esther Stern
Flinders University of South Australia
Fiona McDonald
Queensland University of Technology
George Williams
University of New South Wales
Dorant Ekmekiu
Hoxha, Memi & Hoxha
Greg Patmore
University of Sydney
Drini Hakorja
Iain Stewart
Macquarie University
Enver Roshi
Faculty of PublicHealth Medical
University of Tirana
Gentiana Tirana
Tirana Law Firm
Gjergji Gjika
Gjika & Associates
Jonida Braja Melani
Wolf Theiss shpk
Mitat Dautaj
Catholic University
Oltjan Hoxholli
LPA Law Firm Albania
Shirli Gorenca
Kalo & Associates
Anonymous Contributors
Argentina
Adrin Goldin
International Society for Labour and
Social Security Law
Adrin Tellas
Agustn Allende
Alberto Gonzalez Torres
Baker & McKenzie, Sociedad Civil
Alejandro Carri
Asociacin por los Derechos Civiles
Alvaro Herrero
Laboratorio de Polticas Pblicas
Alvaro Jos Galli
Estudio Beccar Varela
Analia Duran
Allende & Brea
Carlos Marn
Estudio Bullo
Claudio Jess Santagati
Pontificia Universidad Catlica de
Argentina
James Hunt
University of Newcastle
Justice Chris Maxwell
Supreme Court of Victoria
Kate Burns
Rule of Law Institute of Australia
ASM Alamgir
IEDCR
Debra Efroymson
HealthBridge
Imteaz Ibne Mannan
Save the Children
K.A.R. Sayeed
United Hospital Limited
M. R. I. Chowdhury
M. R. I. Chowdhury & Associates
Mahua Zahur
BRAC University
Masud Khan
The Legal Circle
Mirza Farzana Iqbal Chowdhury
Daffodil International University
Mohammad Nafiu Alam
FM Associates
Mohammed Mutahar Hossain
Hossain & Khan Associates
Fontaine
Chu Liege Belgique
Henry
Avocats.Be
Nicolas Cariat
Olivier De Witte
Hpital Erasme ULB
Patrick Goffaux
Universit Libre de Bruxelles
Patrick Wautelet
University of Lige
Pierre-Olivier Mahieu
Allen & Overy LLP
Yves Lejeune
Universit Catholique de Louvain
Anonymous Contributors
Belize
Andrew Bennett
Glenn D. Godfrey & Co. LLP
Estevan Perera
Glenn D. Godfrey & Co. LLP
Fred Lumor
Fred Lumor & Co.
Marvin Manzanero
Ministry of Health of Belize
Melissa Balderamos Mahler
Marin Balderamos Arthurs LLP
Rondine Twist
Government of Belize
Said W. Musa S.C.
Musa Balderamos LLP
Victor Lizarraga
Universal Health Services Ltd.
Kate Eastman
Nasirud Doulah
Doulah & Doulah
Mary E Crock
University of Sydney
Bolivia
Neil James
Australia Defence Association
S M Shaikat
SERAC-Bangladesh
Adrian Barrenechea
BM&O Abogados
Nicholas Cowdery
University of Sydney; University of New
South Wales
Arletta Aez
OPS/OMS
Sayed Rubayet
Save the Children
Peter Cashman
University of Sydney
Sarah Joseph
Castan Centre for Human Rights Law
Simon Rice
Australian National University
Sonia Allan
Macquarie University
Thomas Faunce
Australian National University
Veronica Siow
Allens
Shusmita Khan
Eminence
Anonymous Contributors
Austria
Alexander Botian
Borovtsov & Salei law firm
Doris Wydra
Salzburg Centre of European Union Studies
Gerhard Jarosch
Austrian Association of Prosecutors
Belarus
Claudia Habl
GG - Health Austria
Anonymous Contributors
Christoph Konrath
Parliamentary Administration
Anonymous Contributors
Alexey Daryin
Revera Consulting Group
Anastasia Byckowskaya
Stepanovski, Papakul and Partners
Denis Aleinikov
Aleinikov & Partners Law Firm
Dmitry Kovalchik
Stepanovski, Papakul and Partners
Davorin Marinkovic
Esad Oruc
International Burch University
Hajrija Sijeri-oli
University of Sarajevo
Hana Kora
University of Travnik
Kasim Trnka
Lana Bubalo
University of Demal BijediMostar
Mehmed Spaho
Law Office Spaho
Mersida Sueska
University of Sarajevo
Milorad Sladojevic
Municipal Court Bugojno
Miodrag Simovi
Constitutional Court of Bosnia and
Herzegovina
Mirjana arkinovi
Nedad Smailagi
University of Poitiers
Randzana Hadzibegovic Haracic
Municipal Court Bugojno
Sakib Softi
University of Sarajevo
Samil Rami
Municipal Court Bugojno
Slaven Dizdar
Mari & Co. Law Firm
Tarik Prolaz
PETOSEVIC
Zlatan Balta
CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz
Zoran Dakic
Health Center Bijeljina
Anonymous Contributors
Botswana
Buhlebenkosi Ncube
Y S Moncho Attorneys
Dick Bayford
Bayford & Associates
Jaloni Pansiri
University of Botswana
John McAllister
University of Botswana
Kagiso Jani
Tshekiso Ditiro & Jani Legal Practice
Kwadwo Osei-Ofei
Osei-Ofei Swabi & Co.
Munyaka Wadaira Makuyana
Makuyana Legal Practice
Patrick Akhiwu
Pakmed Group
Piyush Sharma
Piyush Sharma Attorneys & Co.
Rekha A. Kumar
University of Botswana
Setho Mokobi
Bookbinder Business Law
Anonymous Contributors
Brazil
Alexandre Fragoso Silvestre
Miguel Neto Advogados
Andre de Melo Ribeiro
Dias Carneiro Advogados
Anna Thereza Monteiro de Barros
Pinheiro Neto Advogados
Carlos Ayres
Trench, Rossi e Watanabe Advogados
Cesar Augusto Infante Basso
Hewlett-Packard
Daniel Arbix
Google
Atanas Slavov
Sofia University
Boyko Guerginov
CHSH
Cameroon
Abane Stanley
Abeng Law Firm
Denitsa Sacheva
International Healthcare and Health
Insurance Institute
Atsishi Fon-Ndikum
Fon-Ndikum & Partners
Georgi P. Dobrev
Georgi P. Dobrev Law Office
Gergana Ilieva
KSK and Partners
Iana Roueva Madey
Barthlemy Tchepnang
CAJAD
Cabinet dAvocat Henri Job
Christian Dudieu Djomga
Isis Attorneys
Etakong Tabyang
The Global Citizens Initiative
Rick Molz
Concordia University
Matthew Murphy
MMLC Group
Sonny Goldstein
Goldstein Financial Consultants
Qiong Yan
Hewlett-Packard
William Goodridge
Supreme Court of Newfoundland and
Labrador
Xia Yu
MMLC Group
Anonymous Contributors
Chile
Alfonso Canales Undurraga
UH&C Abogados
Daniela Muradas
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Ivo Baev
Ivo Baev & Partners
Jean Crombois
American University in Bulgaria
Innocent Takougang
Foundation for Health Research &
Development
Edson Mazieiro
Murray Law Firm
Lachezar Raichev
Penkov, Markov & Partners
Cristian Fabres
Guerrero Olivos
Lidia M. Georgieva
Medical University - Sofia
Momiana Guneva
Burgas Free University
Nikolai Hristov
Medical University - Sofia
Marie-Jos Essi
Facult de Mdecine et des Sciences
Biomdicales
Felipe Asensi
Rio de Janeiro State University
Petko Salchev
Institute of Economic Research-Bulgarian
Academy of Science
Stanislav Hristov
Nkenglefac Yochembeng
Cabinet Marie-Andree Ngwe
Stanley B. Gyoshev
Xfi Centre for Finance & Investment,
University of Exeter
Fernando Lolas
Universidad de Chile
Gabriel del Ro
Aninat Schwencke & Cia.
Paul Watsop
Cabinet dAvocats
Samuel Nkoo-Amvene
Facult de Mdecine et des Sciences
Biomdicales
Veselka Petrova
Anonymous Contributors
Burkina Faso
Adrien Sosthne Zongo
Cabinet dAvocats Sosthne A. M. Zongo
Joaquim Falcao
Fundao Getlio Vargas
Julien Lalogo
Luciano Feldens
Pontifcia Universidade Catlica do Rio
Grande do Sul
Luiz Guilherme Marinoni
Marinoni Advocacia
Luiz Guilherme Primos
Primos e Primos Advocacia
Maria Celina Bodin de Moraes
Bodin de Moraes Vilela & Fernandes
Par Biencomma
Socit Civilie Professionnelle dAvocats
Yaguibou et Yanogo
Mauricio Faragone
Faragone Advogados
Michael Freitas Mohallem
Fundao Getlio Vargas
Cambodia
Alex Larkin
DFDL
Chak Sopheap
Cambodian Center for Human Rights
Zakariaou Njoumemi
Universit de Yaound I
Anonymous Contributors
Canada
Alison Manzer
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Brian Langille
University of Toronto
Brian Pukier
Stikeman Elliott
Bruce Grist
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
C.G. Harrison
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
Colin L. Soskolne
Constance MacIntosh
Dalhousie Health Law Institute
Daniel M. Campbell
Cox & Palmer
Fabien Glinas
McGill University
Finn Makela
Universit de Sherbrooke
Chandy NY
Legal Town Lawyer Group
Kem Ley
Frdric Bachand
McGill University
Narin Chum
Community Legal Education Center
Gaynor Roger
Shibley Righton LLP
Run Saray
Legal Aid of Cambodia
Glen Luther
University of Saskatchewan
Sek Sophorn
Rights & Business Law Office
Jabeur Fathally
University Of Ottawa
Sia Phearum
Housing Rights Task Force
Jula Hughes
University of New Brunswick
Sophea IM
Kaen Busby
University of Manitoba
Rosa Lima
Rosa Lima, PC
Sergio Cruz Arenhart
Ministrio Pblico Federal and
Universidade Federal do Paran
Soraia Saleh
Leite, Tosto e Barros Advogados Associados
Thiago Bottino
FGV Direito Rio
Victor Hugo Criscuolo Boson
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Anonymous Contributors
Bulgaria
Assen Vassilev
Center for Economic Strategy
Atanas Politov
PILnet
Nelson Enyih
Todor Dotchev
Institute for Political and Legal Studies
Thida Khus
Silaka
Tola Moeun
Community Legal Education Center
Vichuta Ly
Legal Support for Children and Women
Anonymous Contributors
Colombia
Irina Stoeva
Stoeva, Kuyumdjieva & Vitliemov
Martin Kamako
Cabinet Kamako
Anonymous Contributors
Daniel Bushatsky
Advocacia Bushatsky
Hyacinthe Fansi
SCP Ngassam Njik & Associs
Zhigang Yu
China University of Political Science
and Law
Jorge Canales G.
Estudio Jurdico PGYA
Jorge Sandrock Carrasco
Fundacin Hanns Seidel
Jorge Wahl S.
Larran & Asociados
Juan Enrique Vargas
Universidad Diego Portales
Lorena Pavic
Carey Abogados
Luis Eugenio Garca-Huidobro
Philippi, Prietocarrizosa & Ura
Luis Felipe Hubner
UH&C Abogados
Luis Parada
Bahamondez, Alvarez & Zegers
Manuel Jimnez Pfingsthorn
Jara del Favero Abogados
Mara Elena Santibnez Torres
Pontificia Universidad Catlica de Chile
Mara Isabel Cornejo Plaza
Universidad de Chile
Mara Norma Oliva Lagos
Defensoria laboral, Corporacion Asistencia
Judicial del Bio Bio.
Martn Besio Hernndez
Rivadeneira Colombara Zegers
Matas Donoso Lamas
Urenda & Cia.
Omar Morales C.
Montt y Ca. Abogados
Orlando Palominos
Morales & Besa
Patricio Morales Aguirre
Paula Snchez Birke
Bofill Mir & lvarez Jana Abogados
Roberto Guerrero del Ro
Guerrero Olivos
Sergio Gamonal Contreras
Universidad Adolfo Ibez
Anonymous Contributors
China
JIA Ping
Health Governance Initiative
Marc Laporta
Montreal WHO Collaborating Centre
Jiaona Chen
Hewlett-Packard
Orie Niedzviecki
Ellyn Law LLP
Kaiming Liu
Institute of Contemporary Observation
Richard Perras
Richard Perras
Liu Xin
China University of Political Science
and Law
Costa Rica
Alejandro Batalla Bonilla
Batalla Abogados
Alfonso Carro
Central Law Quirs Abogados
Armando A. Guardia
Guardia & Cubero
Csar Hines Cspedes
J. Federico Campos Caldern
LEXPENAL - Abogados Penalistas
Jos Luis Campos Vargas
Batalla Abogados
Jose Luis Pacheco Murillo
AB&P Consultores Juridicos
Radek Matou
Balcar Polansk Eversheds
Maksim Greinoman
Advokaadibroo Greinoman & Co
Nataline Fleury
Ashurst
Tomas Cihula
Kinstellar
Anonymous Contributors
Margit Vutt
Supreme Court of the Republic of Estonia
Nicolas Mathieu
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Tomas Matejovsky
CMS Cameron McKenna
Martin Kerdi
University of Tartu
Nicole Stolowy
HEC Paris
Sergio Amador
Batalla Abogados
Anonymous Contributors
Merle Erikson
University of Tartu
Olivier de Boutiny
BBG Associs
Pirkko-Liis Harkmaa
LAWIN Attorneys at Law
Pascale Lagesse
Bredin Prat
Tanel Kerikme
Tallinn University of Technology
Patrice Le Maigat
Universit de Rennes
Triinu Hiob
LAWIN Attorneys at Law
Philippe Marin
IM Avocats
Anonymous Contributors
Philippe Portier
Jeantet Avocats
Egypt
Ahmed El-Gammal
El-Shalakany Law Firm
Denmark
Bassem S Wadie
Urology and Nephrology Center
Cote dIvoire
Amin Alavi
Aarhus University
Habiba Hassan-Wassef
National Research Center
Dable
SCPA Dogue Abbe Yao
Ibrahim Kharboush
Alexandria University
Dogbemin Kone G.
SCPA Nambeya-Dogbemin & Associes
Khaled El Shalakany
Shalakany Law Office
M Lynda Dadi-Sangaret
Dadi-Sangaret & Associs
Laila El Baradei
American University in Cairo
Raphael Abauleth
Chalida Svastisalee
Metropolitan University College
Mohamed Abdelaal
Alexandria University
Afework Kassu
Addis Ababa University
Jacob Sand
Gorrissen Federspiel
Nada El Ezaby
Zaki Hashem & Partners
Fikadu Asfaw
Fikadu Asfaw and Associates Law Office
Anonymous Contributors
Anonymous Contributors
Jakob S. Johnsen
HjulmandKaptain
Croatia
Jens Rye-Andersen
Advokatfirmaet Jens Rye-Andersen
Somaya Hosny
Suez Canal University
Guadie Sharew
Bahir Dar University
Alan Soric
Attorneys Soric & Tomekovic Dunda
Ana Chelidze
Basisbank
Jrn Vestergaard
University of Copenhagen
Walid Hegazy
Hegazy Law Firm
Ana Padjen
Macesic & Partners Law Offices LLC
Davit Atabegashvili
Basisbank
Anonymous Contributors
Ana Stavljenic-Rukavina
DIU Libertas International University
Ekaterina Aleksidze
BGI Advisory Services Georgia
George Gotsadze
Curatio International Foundation
Mehari Redae
Addis Ababa University
George Nanobashvili
UNDP Georgia
Anonymous Contributors
Sylvia Soro
lUniversit de Bordeaux
Yabasse Lucien Abouya
Atchan For All
Youan Gotre Jules
ONG AMEPOUH
Anita Krizmanic
Macesic & Partners Law Offices LLC
Arsen Bacic
University of Split
Boris Kozjak
Lawyers Office
Boris avori
avori & Partners
Boidar Feldman
Mati & Feldman
Darko Jurii
General Hospital Dr.Josip Benevi
Emir Bahtijarevi
DTB
Hrvoje Banfic
University of Zagreb
Ivan Kos
PETOEVI
Ivana Manovelo
Macesic & Partners Law Offices LLC
Ivo Grga
Luka Kovai
Andrija Stampar School of Public Health
Marin Labar
Poliklinika Labar D.O.O.
Marko Lovric
Matko Paji
University of Split
Rudolf Gregurek
University of Zagreb
Sunana Roksandi Vidlika
University of Zagreb
Visnja Drenski Lasan
Law Firm Drenski Lasan
Zlatko Vlajcic
University Hospital Dubrava
Zoran Vujasin
Law Firm Vujasin & Duk J.T.D.
Zvonko Sosic
University of Zagreb
Anonymous Contributors
Czech Republic
Denisa Bellinger
Hewlett-Packard
Luk Prudil
AK Prudil a Spol., S.R.O.
Marek Antos
Charles University in Prague
Morten Broberg
University of Copenhagen
Dominical Republic
Ana Isabel Caceres
Troncoso y Cceres
Carlos Hernandez
Hernandez Contreras & Herrera. Abogados
Celina de Parada
David Claros
Garca & Bodn - Attorneys and
Counselors at Law
Dlmer Edmundo Rodrguez Cruz
Escuela Superior de Economa y Negocios
Diego Martn Menjvar
Consortium Centro Amrica Abogados
Eduardo Surez
Ministerio de Salud
Jaime Salinas Olivares
Garcia & Bodan El Salvador
Jose Eduardo Barrientos Aguirre
SBA, Firma Legal y Consultora
Elisabetta Pedersini
Aaron Suero & Pedersini
Julio Vides
Consortium El Salvador
Oscar Samour
Consortium Centro Amrica Abogados
Marie Janov
Ecuador
Martin Strnad
Havel, Holsek & Partners
Andrea Izquierdo
Sempertegui Ontaneda Abogados
Matej Smolar
FELIX A SPOL Advokatni Kancelar
Carlos Herdoza
Arzaga y Co. Abogados
Michal Hanko
Bubnk, Myslil & Partners
Pavel ern
Frank Bold
Pavel Holec
Holec, Zuska & Partners
El Salvador
Estonia
Andres Parmas
Tallinn Circuit Court
Andres Vutt
University of Tartu
Anneli Soo
University of Tartu
Gaabriel Tavits
University of Tartu
Irene Kull
University of Tartu
Jri Saar
University of Tartu
Kaja Plluste
University of Tartu
Kari Ksper
Estonian Human Rights Centre
Madis Kiisa
Law Office Laus & Parners
Ethiopia
Mulu Abraha
Tameru Wondm Agegnehu
Tameru Wondm Agegnehu Law Offices
Wondimu S. Yirga
Haramaya University College of Health
Sciences
Samira Denfer
Thierry Berland
SCP Avocats Berland & Sevin Dijon
Virginie Halley des Fontaines
Universit Pierre et Marie Curie
Yanick Alvarez-de Selding
Georgia
Giorgi Chkheidze
EWMI-JILEP
Gocha Svanidze
Law Firm Svanidze & The Partners
Grigol Gagnidze
NNLE, Georgian Barristers & Lawyers
International Observatory
Anonymous Contributors
Imeda Dvalidze
Finland
Kakha Sharabidze
Business Legal Bureau
Ari Miettinen
Fimlab Laboratories Ltd.
Iikka Sainio
Attorneys-at-Law Juridia Btzow Ltd
Johanna Niemi
University of Turku
Jukka Peltonen
Peltonen LMR Attorneys Ltd
Jussi Tapani
University of Turku
Liisa von Plato
Hewlett-Packard
Markku Fredman
Fredman & Mansson
Matti Ilmari Niemi
University of Eastern Finland
Matti Reinikainen
Attorneys Office Kolari & Co.Oy
Matti Tolvanen
University of Eastern Finland
Mika J Lehtimaki
Attorneys-at-Law TRUST
Mika Launiala
University of Eastern Finland
Patrick Lindgren
Advocare Law Office
Pekka Viljanen
University of Turku
Raimo Isoaho
University of Turku
Ketevani Krialashvili
Economic Policy Experts Center
Lasha Gogiberidze
BGI Legal
Nata Kazakhashvili
Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University
Otar Gzirishvili
JSC ,,Basisbank
Otar Vasadze
University of Georgia
Revaz Beridze
Eristavi & Partners
Tamara Tevdoradze
BGI Legal
Tinatin Gugunava
IDECO
Tsotne Murghulia
City Council of Zugdidi
Vera Doborjginidze
Lexpert Group Law Firm
Zurab Mukhuradze
Legal and Business Consulting
Anonymous Contributors
Germany
Alexander Baron von Engelhardt
Alexander Putz
Putz und Partner Steuerberater &
Rechtsanwlte
Anna Lindenberg
Sanna Leisti
Rule of Law Finland - ROLFI
Antje Schwarz
Daimler AG
Anonymous Contributors
France
Astrid Stadler
Universtiy of Konstanz
Axel Nagler
Rechtsanwlte Nagler & Partner
Carlos M. Herrera
Universit de Cergy-Pontoise -CPJP
Barbara Baur
Anwaltskanzlei
Catherine Cathiard
Jeantet et Associs
Bernd Weller
Heuking Khn Ler Wojtek
David Levy
Brigitte Kolb
Delga
Burkhard Klver
Ahlers & Vogel Rechtsanwlte
Francis Tartour
Gauthier Chassang
INSERM
C E Naundorf
Schirp Neusel & Partner Rechtsanwlte
mbB
Marie-Christine Cimadevilla
Cimadevilla Avocats
Carsten Momsen
Leibniz University
Catherine Hess
Ghana
Emanuel Callejas A.
Christian Schultze
AB&D Attorneys Berlin
Araba Sefa-Dedeh
University of Ghana Medical School
Gabriel Muadi
Muadi, Murga y Jimenez
Christian Wolff
Schock Rechtsanwlte GbR
Dinah Baah-Odoom
Ghana Health Service
Marcos Palma
Integrum
Maricarmen Rosal
Integrum
Christina Reifelsberger
Christof Kerwer
University of Wrzburg
Christoph Lindner
Dirk Vielhuber
Berufsgenossenschaft der Bauwirtschaft
Dominik Steiger
Freie Universitt
Friederike Lemme
Lemme + Al Abed Rechtsanwlte
Gernot A. Warmuth
Scheiber & Partner
Gregor Dornbusch
Hauke Achim Hagena
Lders Warneboldt & Partner
Henning Rosenau
University of Augsburg
Sam Okudzeto
Sam Okudzeto & Associates
Sam Poku
The Business Council for Africa
Pedro Trujillo
Universidad Francisco Marroqun
Anonymous Contributors
Hermann Bietz
Greece
Rodolfo Alegra
Carrillo & Asociados
Hubertus Becker
Becker Sennhenn Schuster Rechtsanwlte
Alex Afouxenidis
National Centre for Social Research
Rodrigo Callejas
Carrillo & Asociados
Anastasia Tsakatoura
KTLEGAL Law Offices
Jan Ricken
Kliemt & Vollstdt
Anna Damaskou
Transparency International Greece
Jessica Jacobi
Kliemt & Vollstdt
Anthony Mavrides
Ballas, Pelecanos & Associates L.P.C.
Carlos Danzilo
Bufete Honduraslaw
Juergen Nazarek
Athanasios Kikis
Athanasios Kikis & Partners Law Office
Claudia Midence
Bufete Arias & Muoz
Christina Papadopoulou
IRCT
Dionysios Pantazis
Pantazis & Associates Law Firm
Dionyssis Balourdos
National Centre for Social Research
Fotini N. Skopouli
Harokopio University
George Ballas
Ballas, Pelecanos & Associates L.P.C.
George Konstantinopoulos
ECOCITY NGO
Milton Carcamo
Lars Nitzsche
Kanzlei Joachim Ledele, Kehl, Germany
Lars Rieck
IPCL Rieck & Partner Rechtsanwlte
M. Nodorf
Manfred Weiss
Goethe University, Frankfurt
Martin Strer
RAe Strer Rehm Barfield
Mathias Brring
Matthias Kaiser
Wittch & Kaiser Notar Rechtsanwlte
Michael Zoebisch
rwzh Rechtsanwlte
Nelles Reinhold
Nicola Kreutzer
Law Firm Kreutzer & Kreuzau
Oliver Schellbach
Oliver Thamerus
Othmar K. Traber
Ahlers & Vogel Rechtsanwlte PartG mbB
Piet Klemeyer
Gollub Klemeyer Fachanwlte Partnerschaft mbB
R. Kunz-Hallstein
RA Oliver Bolthausen
BridgehouseLaw
Rainer M. Hofmann
Kanzlei im Hofhaus
Robert H. Leitermann
Thelen & Reiners
Anonymous Contributors
Honduras
Anonymous Contributors
Farzana Aslam
University of Hong Kong
James A. Rice
Lingnan University
Shahla Ali
University of Hong Kong
Anonymous Contributors
Italy
I C Dwivedi
National Election Watch
Alberto Fantini
Tonucci & Partners
Alberto Lama
Bureau Plattner
Jhelum Chowdhury
Alberto Zucconi
Istituto dellApproccio Centrato sulla
Persona
KS Subramanian
Nirmal Kanti Chakrabarti
KIIT University
Priyesh Poovanna
Hewlett-Packard
Puneet Misra
AIIMS
Rajas Kasbekar
Partner, Little & Co., Advocates & Solicitors
Rebbapragada Ravi
Samata
Ruchi Sinha
Centre For Criminology and Justice
Sankaran Ramakrishnan
Satish Murthi
Murti & Murti International Law Practice
Saurabh Misra
Saurabh Misra & Associates
Subhadra Menon
Public Health Foundation of India
Anna Simonati
University of Trento
Annita Larissa Sciacovelli
University of Bari
Antonella Antonucci
University of Bari
Antonio Viscomi
Universit Magna Graecia di Catanzaro
Astolfo di Amato
Astolfo di Amato e Associati
Carlo Casonato
University of Trento
Daniela Rampani
Hewlett-Packard
Davide Cacchioli
Emanuele Cortesi
Caffi Maroncelli & Associati
Emanuele Scafato
Societ Italiana di Alcologia
Enrico Maria Mancuso
Universit Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Francesca Valent
Direzione Centrale Salute
Guatemala
Anonymous Contributors
Giovanni Pasqua
ISISC
Anonymous Contributors
Wolfgang Hau
University of Passau
Yahya Rayegani
Farjam Law Office
Samaneh Hassanli
UNHCR
T. Ramakrishna
NLSIU, Bangalore
Rick Glofcheski
University of Hong Kong
Wolfgang Grttner
Parviz Azadfallah
Tarbiat Modares University
David Donald
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Yota Kremmida
Hewlett-Packard Hellas EPE
Andrs Hernndez L.
Carrillo y Asociados
Mohammad Rasekh
Shahid-Beheshti University
Gianantonio Barelli
Studio Caffi Maroncelli e Associati
Theodoropoulou Virginia
Pandeion University
Wolf Stahl
Kanzlei fuer Wirtschaftsrecht
Mohammad H. Zarei
Zarei Legal Services Institution
Danny Chan
Century Chambers
Raymond Leung
Hong Kong Bar Association
Bontha V. Babu
ICMR
Arash Izadi
Izadi Law Firm
Michael Chai
Bernacchi Chambers
Ulrich Keil
University of Muenster
Ashok Ramgir
Harsh Impex
Ahmad Daryani
Mazandaran University of Medical
Sciences
Subhrarag Mukherjee
Hewlett-Packard
Themis Tosounidis
KPAG Kosmidis & Partners Law Firm
Alvaro R. Cordon
Cordn, Ovalle & Asociados
Anil Paleri
Institute of Palliative Medicine
Abdolkarim Hamedi
Imam Reza Hospital
Lok Sang Ho
Lingnan University
Torsten Koller
Hewlett-Packard
Abhimanyu Shandilya
Hewlett-Packard India Sales Pvt. Ltd.
Iran
Avnita Lakhani
City University of Hong Kong
Stelios Gregoriou
Gregoriou Law Offices & Associates
Alexander Aizenstatd
Universidad Rafael Landivar
A. Nagarathna
National Law School of India University
Shomona Khanna
Stavros Karageorgiou
Karageorgiou & Associates
Thomas Jrgens
Jrgens Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH
India
Sabine Barth
Dostal & Sozien Rechtsanwlte
Thomas Feltes
Ruhr-Universitt Bochum
Anonymous Contributors
Shankar Das
TISS
Thomas B. Belitz
Advopartner Rechtsanwlte Belitz &
Partner
Zsolt Zengdi
Ruben A. Rodezno
Bufete Danzilo & Asociados
Panagiotis Gioulakos
Storch Katharina
Petra Bard
National Institute of Criminology
Roberto M. Zacarias
Roland Gross
Gross::Rechtsanwaelte
Stephan Sander
Terhedebrgge Heyn Sander
Katalin Parti
National Institute of Criminology
Shaffi Mather
Mather and Krishna
James Wong
Century Chambers
Stefan Sasse
GHMANN Rechtsanwlte
Gabor Baruch
Baruch Law Office
Hungary
Vipender Mann
KNM & Partners, Law Offices
Yadlapalli S. Kusuma
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Yashomati Ghosh
National Law School of India University
Anonymous Contributors
Indonesia
Alamo D. Laiman
Legisperitus Lawyers
Daniel Alfredo
Legisperitus Lawyers
Erline Herrmann
Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP
Lia Alizia
Makarim & Taira S.
Mardjono Reksodiputro
University of Indonesia; The National Law
Commssion of the Republic of Indonesia
Lorenzo Zoppoli
Universita di Napoli Federico II
Luigi Mori
Biolato Longo Ridola & Mori
Marco Esposito
Universit di Napoli Parthenope
Mariano Cingolani
University of Macerata
Mario Perini
Universit Degli Studi di Siena
Mario Rusciano
Universita di Napoli Federico II
Mitja Gialuz
University of Trieste
Pierpaolo Martucci
University of Trieste
Pietrantonio Ricci
Magna Graecia University
Marini Sulaeman
Legisperitus Lawyers
Pietro Faraguna
New York University School of Law
Ricardo Simanjuntak
Ricardo Simanjuntak & Partners
Sandi Adila
Roberto Bin
University of Ferrara
Sunardjo Sumargono
Law Office of Semar Suryakencana Cipta
Justiceindo
Tauvik M. Cakradipura
Paramdina Graduate School of Diplomacy
and Strategic International Policies
Akos Sule
Sule Law Firm
Tristam Moeliono
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik
Parahyangan
Andrs Jakab
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Anonymous Contributors
Roberto Caranta
Turin University
Roberto Ceccon
Ceccon & Associati - Avvocati
Roberto Rosapepe
University of Salerno
Roberto Toniatti
University of Trento
Madagascar
Silvia Borelli
University of Ferrara
Jean Akl
Akl Law Practice
Stefania Scarponi
University of Trento
Jihad Irani
Alexandra Rajerison
Cabinet Rajerison
Mohamed Y Olwan
Petra University
Khatoun Haidar
Synergy-Takamol
Bakoly Razaiarisolo
Roger El Khoury
HiiL
Nisreen Mahasneh
Roula Zayat
The Arab Center for the Development of
the Rule of Law and Integrity
Anonymous Contributors
Jamaica
Aisha Mulendwe
Alan Barnett
University of the West Indies
Allan S Wood
Althea Bailey
University of the West Indies
Anthony Clayton
University of the West Indies
Audrey Brown
Christopher Bovell
DunnCox
Eris D. Schoburgh
University of the West Indies
Harvey L. Reid
University of the West Indies
Jason M. Wilks
Florida State University
Jimmy Tindigarukayo
University of the West Indies
Joanne Wood Rattray
DunnCox
Marie Freckleton
University of the West Indies
Narda Graham
DunnCox
Norma Anderson
Rasha Laswi
Zalloum & Laswi Law Firm
Tamara Al Rawwad
University of Houston
Thaer Najdawi
A&T Najdawi Law Firm
Yousef Saleh Khader
Jordan University of Science and
Technology
Anonymous Contributors
Kazakhstan
Arlan Yerzhanov
BMF Group LLP
Asset Kussaiyn & Larissa Orlova
Michael Wilson & Partners, Ltd.
Nurzhan Albanov
Dentons Kazakhstan LLP
Yerjanov Timur
al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Zhanat Alimanov
Kimep University
Anonymous Contributors
Kenya
Angela Ochumba
New York University
Salah Mattar
Salah Mattar Law Firm
Souraya Machnouk
Abou Jaoude & Associates Law Firm
Wissam Kabbara
Lebanese American University
Anonymous Contributors
Jacques Rakotomalala
Cabinet dAvocats Rakotomalala
Esteban Puentes-Rosas
Ketakandriana Rafitoson
Liberty 32
Lonard Velozandry
Avocat au Barreau de Madagascar
Mamison Rakotondramanana
JurisConsult Madagascar
Alfred Hill
The Carter Center
Cecil Griffiths
Liberia National Law Enforcement
Association
Njara Andrianasoavina
Cabinet dAvocats
Francesco Andrianjanahary
Barreau de Madagascar
Liberia
F. Augustus Caesar
Caesar Architects Inc.
Olivia Rajerison
Cabinet Rajerison
Rija Rakotomalala
Cabinet dAvocats Rakotomalala
Rindra Hasimbelo Rabarinirinarison
Magistrature Malgache
Lury T. Nkouessom
Carter Center
Meredith Guardino
Anonymous Contributors
Malawi
Adamson S. Muula
University of Malawi
Dennis Mungata
Gichimu Mungata & Co Advocates
Pauline E. Dawkins
University of the West Indies
Francis Kairu
Transparency International Kenya
Rachael Irving
University of the West Indies
James Mangerere
Mangerere J and Co. Advocates
Anonymous Contributors
Annabel Mtalimanja
Republic of Malawi Judiciary
Shirley-Ann Eaton
University of the West Indies
Macedonia
Charles Mangani
University of Malawi
Suzanne Soares-Wynter
University of the West Indies
Aleksandar Godjo
Godzo, Kiceec & Novakovski
Kamau Karori
Iseme, Kamau & Maema Advocates
Elton Jangale
PFI Partnerships, Law Consultants
Monica Schiaffino
Littler Mendelson
Sylvia Mitchell
University of the West Indies
Kiingati Indirangu
Kairu Mbuthia & Kiingati Advocates
Eric Umar
University of Malawi
William Aiken
University of the West Indies
Anonymous Contributors
Noelle Kyanya
Japan
Peter Gachuhi
Kaplan & Stratton Advocates
Orville W. Taylor
University of the West Indies
Eduardo Campos
Nagasaki University
Hiroshi Nishihara
Waseda University
Kaoru Haraguchi
Haraguchi International Law Office
Mark Nakamura
International Education, Information
Center
Remigeo P. Mugambi
Muthoga Gaturu & Co Advocates
Thomas Nyakambi Maosa
Maosa and Company Advocates
Yvonne Wangui Machira
Tafiti Research Group Ltd.
Anonymous Contributors
Aleksandar Ickovski
Aleksandra Baleva Grozdanova
Godzo, Kiceec & Novakovski
Aleksandra Bojadjieva
Fiona Mwale
High Court of Malawi
Andon Majhosev
University Goce Delchev Stip
Gabriel Kambale
GK Associates
Besa Arifi
South East European University
Jack Nriva
Industrial Relations Court of Malawi
Deljo Kadiev
Jacques Carstens
Democratic Governance Programme
Doncho M. Donev
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University
Dori Kimova
Kimova Law Office
Ilija Nedelkoski
Cakmakova Advocates
Kyrgyzstan
Jadranka Denkova
University Goce Delchev Stip
Aikanysh Jeenbaeva
Aizhan Albanova
Katerina Lazareska
Savic Law Office
Akbar Suvanbekov
Republican Medical Scientific Library
Leonid Trpenoski
Trpenoski Law Firm
Azamat Kerimbaev
ABA Rule of Law Initiative
Ljupka Noveska
Karanovic and Nikolic Law Firm
Dinara Asanbaeva
AUCA
Maja Jakimovska
Cakmakova Advocates
Yasuhiro Fujii
Law Office of Yasuhiro Fujii
Elida K. Nogoibaeva
American University of Central Asia
Maja Risteska
A.D. Insurance Policy
Yasushi Higashizawa
Kasumigaseki Sogo Law Offices
Ermek Mamaev
Marija Blazevska A
Law Office Pepeljugoski
Masanori Tanabe
Sakai Law Office
Nobuo Koinuma
Tohoku Pharmaceutical University
Shigeji Ishiguro
Oguri & Ishiguro Law Offices
Toshiaki Higashi
University of Occupational and
Environmental Health
Anonymous Contributors
Jordan
Al-nawaysieh Abedulellah
Mutah University
Anwar Mahmoud Batieha
Jordan University of science and
Technology
Atallah Rabi
Jordan University of Science and
Technology
Azzam Zalloum
Zalloum & Laswi Law Firm
Firas T. Malhas
IBLAW
George Hazboun
International Consolidated for Legal
Consultations
Esenkulova Begaiym
American University of Central Asia
Idaiat Toktash
Lex Law Firm
Neda Milevska
CRPRC Studiorum
Malaysia
Ashgar Ali Ali Mohamed
International Islamic University Malaysia
Dato Vignesh Kumar Krishnasamy
M/s Balendran Chong
Nurhafilah Musa
National University Malaysia
Ravindra Kumar Rengasamy
Saltanat Moldoisaeva
Ministry of Health
Sinisha Dimitrovski
THEMIS SB Law Firm
Valentin Chernyshev
Suzana Stojkoska
Law Firm Cakmakova advocates
Svetlana Necheva
Law Office Pepeljugoski
Alfonso Rodriguez-Arana
LEGALMEX S.C.
Svetlana Veljanovska
Faculty of Law-Kichevo Macedonia
Alfredo Kupfer-Dominguez
Sanchez Devanny Eseverri, S.C.
Anonymous Contributors
Alonso Gonzlez-Villalobos
Elias Mattar
Abou Jaoude & Associates Law Firm
Adrian Belii
Universit dEtat de Mdecine et
Pharmacie
Alexander Turcan
Turcan Cazac Law Office
Alexey Croitor
Law Offices of Alexey Croitor
Ana Galus
Turcan Cazac Law Firm
Andrei Borsevski
Institute for Democracy
Chesov Ion
Universit dEtat de Mdecine et
Pharmacie
Eugeniu Graur
NGO CERTITUDE
Iulia Furtuna
Turcan Cazac Law Firm
Marica Dumitrasco
Academy of Sciencies of Moldova
Serghei Ostaf
Resource Center for Human Rights
Mongolia
Sami Mehmeti
Southeast European University
Moldova
Sharon Jeyaraman
Hewlett-Packard
Nurlan Alymbaev
Law Firm Alymbaev LLC
Antoine G. Ghafari
Anonymous Contributors
Zama Vitalie
Jyldyz Tagaeva
Lebanon
S. B. Cheah
S. B. Cheah & Associates
Pamela Veljanoska
Law Office Pepeljugoski
Anonymous Contributors
Anonymous Contributors
Mexico
Anonymous Contributors
B. Enkhbat
MDS & KhanLex
Badamragchaa Purevdorj
Open Society Forum
Batragchaa Ragchaa
A&A Partners Law Firm
Bayar Budragchaa
ELC LLP Advocates
Byambaa Saranchimeg
National Statistical Office of Mongolia
Erdenebalsuren Damdin
Supreme Court of Mongolia
G.Batjargal
MDS & KhanLex LLP
Ganbat Byambaa
City Health Services
Shirshak Ghimire
Pradhan & Associates
Khishigsaikhan
Open Society Forum
Shiva Rijal
Pioneer Law Associates
Graham McCready
New Zealand Private Prosecution Service
Limited
Helen Kelly
New Zealand Council of Trade Unions
Maizorig Janchivdorj
MDS and KhanLex LLP
Sudeep Gautam
CeLRRd, Nepal
Munkhjargal Munkhbat
MJL Attorneys
Sudheer Shrestha
Kusum Law Firm
Oyunchimeg Dovdoi
Public Participation for Sustainable
Development NGO
Anonymous Contributors
Jessica Palmer
University of Otago
Netherlands
Jim Roberts
Hesketh Henry
Sarangerel Batbayar
The National Legal Institute of Mongolia
Jyostana Haria
Justitia Chambers
Zanaa Jurmed
Center for Citizens Alliance
Annieke Bloemberg
Mesland & Vroegh Advocaten
Kathryn Guise
Brown Partners
Anonymous Contributors
Arjen Tillea
Transparency International Nederland
Kevin Riordan
Office of the Judge Advocate General
Arnold Versteeg
Macro & Versteeg Advocaten
Kim Workman
Robson Hanan Trust
Kris Gledhill
University of Auckland
Morocco
Abdellah Bakkali
Bakkali Law Firm
Ali Lachgar Essahili
Ali Lachgar Essahili Law Firm
Anis Mouafik
Anis Mouafik Law Firm
Briou Mustapha Said
BriouLaw
Else Frishman-Jansen
Eugenie Nunes
Boekel De Neree N.V
Lhassan Mbarki
Mimoun Charqi
Charqi Lex Consulting
H. Broeksteeg
Radboud University of Nijmegen
Mohamed Akinou
Mohamed Baske Manar
Jennifer Wademan
Thomas Dewar Sziranyi Letts
Malcolm Rabson
Marcelo Rodriguez Ferrere
University of Otago
Abraham Oladipupo
Ountoye & Oguntoye
Teingo Inko-Tariah
Accord Legal Practice
Adamu M. Usman
F.O. Akinrele & Co.
Terrumun Z. Swende
Benue State University
Adewale Akande
Stachys & Apelles Solicitors
Titilola Ayotunde-Rotifa
Valuespeak Solicitors
Yomi Dare
Yomi Dare & Company
Mary-Rose Russell
Auckland University of Technology
Eivind Smith
University of Oslo
Chinedum Umeche
Banwo & Ighodalo
Matthew Berkahn
Massey University
Erling Lind
Advokatfirmaet Wiersholm
Ivar Alvik
University of Oslo
N R Wheen
University of Otago
Richard D. Cantin
Juristructures LLP
Nick Crang
Duncan Cotterill Law Firm
Rita Kettani
Kettani Law Firm
M.J. de Heer
Vakbond De Unie
Nigel Hampton
Saad Moummi
Cour de cassation du Maroc
Soulaimane Fenjiro
R.H.G. Klatten
Qurrent Nederland B.V.
Alastair Hercus
Buddle Findlay
Precious O. Aderemi
Babalakin & Co.
Arild Vaktskjold
Hgskulen i Hedmark
Joost Italianer
NautaDutilh
Joseph Lovell
BNG Legal Myanmar
Bolaji Owasanoye
Human Development Initiatives
Omar M. Bendjelloun
Cabinet Bendjelloun
Alan Knowsley
Rainey Collins
Pontian N. Okoli
University of Dundee Law School
Mark Winger
Holmden Horrocks
Nesrine Roudane
NERO Boutique Law Firm
Nigeria
B.O. Jibogun
Legal Aid Council of Nigeria
Jeroen Bijnen
Hewlett-Packard
New Zealand
Patrick Okonjo
Okonjo, Odiawa & Ebie
Anonymous Contributors
Anonymous Contributors
Myanmar
Onjefu Adoga
Brooke Chambers Law Firm
Ayotunde Ologe
Synergy Legal Practitioners
Nassri Ilham
LInstitut National dHygine
Anonymous Contributors
Oluwole Agbo
Oluwole Agbo & Co.
Mark Bennett
Victoria University of Wellington
Anonymous Contributors
Oluwadamilare Yomi-Alliyu
Chief Yomi Alliyu & Co.
Marie Grills
RPB Law
JAC Meeuwissen
Trimbos Institute
Ayodele Atsenuwa
Legal Research and Resource
Development Centre, Lagos
Henk J. Snijders
University of Leiden
S.F.H. Jellinghaus
Tilburg University
Olusoji Elias
Olusoji Elias + Company
Marie Bismark
University of Melbourne
Mokhtar Benabdallaoui
MADA Center
Tarik Mossadek
Universit Hassan I. Settat
Michael Bott
Michqel Appleby
Pam Nuttall
AUT University Law School
Paul Gooby
Paul Michalik
Paul Roth
University of Otago
Penny Bright
Peter Watts
University of Auckland
Cosmas Emeziem
Uzoma Onyeike & Associates LP.
Deji Adekunle
Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal
Studies
E. L Okiche
University of Nigeria
E.M. Azariah
Legal Aid Council of Nigeria
Eno Ebong
Hewlett-Packard
Peter Williams
Petra Butler
Victoria University of Wellington
Rob Ord
Gbenga Odusola
Gbenga Odusola & Co
Norway
Katrina Hames
University of Bergen
Liss Sunde
Advokatfirma Rder DA
Magne Strandberg
University of Bergen
Niels R. Kir
Rime Advokatfirma DA
Ola Mestad
University of Oslo
Stella Tuft
Microsoft
Terje Einarsen
University of Bergen
Tina Sreide
University of Bergen
Tor Vale
Alberto Costi
Victoria University of Wellington
Sarah Bierre
University of Otago
Andrew Geddis
University of Otago
Scott Wilson
Duncan Cotterill Law Firm
Andrew Schulte
Cavell Leitch
Sonja M Cooper
Cooper Legal
Asha Stewart
Quigg Partners
Austin Forbes
Brian Keene
Stephen Franks
Franks Ogilvie
Nepal
C. S. Henry
Refugee Council of New Zealand
Steven Zindel
Zindels
Bijaya Mishra
Kalyan Law Firm
Caroline McLorinan
Auld Brewer Mazengarb and McEwen
Sylvia Bell
New Zealand Human Rights Commission
Chris Noonan
University of Auckland
Tony Ellis
Joseph E. O. Abugu
Abugu & Co., Solicitors
Trevor Daya-Winterbottom
University of Waikato
L. Omolola Ikwuagwu
George Ikoli & Okagbue
W. John Hopkins
University of Canterbury
W. Murray Thomson
University of Otago
Michael C Asuzu
University of Ibadan College of Medicine
Warren Brookbanks
University of Auckland
William Akel
Simpson Grierson
Obiajulu Nnamuchi
University of Nigeria
Anonymous Contributors
Oghogho Makinde
Aluko & Oyebode
Muzaffar Islam
Legis Inn Attorneys & Corporate
Consultants
Okechukwu Nwizu
George Ikoli & Okagbue
Oladimeji Oladepo
University of Ibadan College of Medicine
Nuzhat Huma
Gandhara University Peshawar
Bishnu Luitel
BG Law Foundation
Budhi Karki
Gourish Krishna Kharel
Kto Inc.
Madhab Raj Ghimire
PSM Global Consultants P. Ltd
Rabin Subedi
PILAL
Ram Chandra Subedi
Apex Law Chamber
Rudra Prasad Pokhrel
R P Pokhrel & Associates
Rup Narayan Shrestha
Avenue Law Firm
Sajjan Bar Singh Thapa
Legal Research Associates
Shankar Limbu
United Law Associates
D J Lyon
Lyon ONeale Arnold Lawyers
David V Williams
University of Auckland
Dean Kilpatrick
Anthony Harper
Denise Arnold
Lyon ONeale Arnold Lawyers
Erich Bachmann
Hesketh Henry
Evgeny Orlov
Equity Law
Nicaragua
Feona Sayles
Massey University
Gay Morgan
University of Waikato
Aubree Gordon
University of Michigan
Gordon Anderson
Victoria University of Wellington
Gbite Adeniji
Advisory, Legal Consultants
Godwin Etim
Aelex
Ulf Stridbeck
University of Oslo
Anonymous Contributors
Pakistan
Idowu Durosinmi-Etti
Adepetun, Caxton-Martins, Agbor & Segun
Faiza Muzaffar
Legis Inn Attorneys & Corporate
Consultants
Innocent Abidoye
Nnenna Ejekam Associates
Joe Okei-Odumakin
Women Arise for Change Initiative
Olasupo Olaibi
Supo Olaibi & Company
Olumide Ekisola
Adejumo & Ekisola
Hina Jilani
AGHS Legal Aid Cell
Khalid A Rehman
Surridge & Beecheno
Mansoor Hassan Khan
Khan & Associates
Muhammad Akram Sheikh
Akram Sheikh Law Associates
Muhammad Farhad Tirmazi
Farhad & Associates
Muhammad Nouman Shams
Qazi Law Associates
Muhammad Tahir Mansoori
International Islamic University Islamabad
Salman Safdar
Chmaber of Barrister Salman Safdar
Sarah Saleem
Aga Khan University
Emerico O. De Guzman
Accra Law Offices
Ferdinand M. Lavin
National Bureau of Invetigation
Umer Farooq
Ayub Medical College
Waheed Ahmad
Waheed Law Firm
Jesusito G. Morallos
Follosco Morallos & Herce Law Firm
Anonymous Contributors
Joanne B. Babon
Follosco Morallos & Herce Law Firm
Panama
Mbaye Seck
SCP GENI & KEBE
Ioan Lazr
Moustapha Ndoye
Cabinet dAvocats
Jonathan P. Sale
University of the Philippines School of
Labor and Industrial Relations
Ibis Sanchez-Serrano
Core Model Corporation, S.A.
Louisa M. Viloria-Yap
The Law Firm of Garcia Inigo & Partners
Pedro Pinto
PBBR & Associados
Mario Rognoni
Arosemena, Noriega & Contreras
Miguel B. Liceralde
Alga Law
Milagros Caballero
Morgan & Morgan
Victor Delgado
Universidad Catolica Santa Maria La
Antigua
Reginald A. Tongol
Regie Tongol Law and Communications
Firm
Miguel Andrade
Miguel Andrade Law Office
Republic of Korea
Peru
Reynald Trillana
Philippine Center for Civic Education and
Democracy
Alberto Varillas
Garca Sayn Abogados
Rhea Quimson
Hewlett-Packard
Hwang Lee
Korea University
Anonymous Contributors
Jaeseop Song
Shin&Kim
Anonymous Contributors
Poland
Agnieszka Helsztyska
Kancelaria Adwokacka
Andrzej Brodziak
Institute of Occupational Medicine and
Environmental Healh
Jacek Wierciski
University of Warsaw
Janusz Bojarski
Nicolaus Copernicus University
Elena Timoteo
Fernando M. Ramos Guevara
Barrios & Fuentes, Abogados
Joanna Kobza
School of Public Health
Haksoo Ko
Seoul National
Jinsu Yune
Seoul National University
Junsok Yang
The Catholic University of Korea
Lee Chang Woo
Donghwa Labor Counsultng Company
Sang Won Lee
Seoul National University
Sangbong Lee
Hwang Mok Park PC.
Sang-Il Kim
Ewha W. University
Larion Alina-Paula
Universitatea Stefan cel Mare Suceava,
Romania
Laura Lazar
Babes-Bolyai University from Cluj-Napoca
Anonymous Contributors
Mariana Sturza
uca Zbrcea & Asociaii
Marius Balan
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University
Mihai Dunea
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University
Mihail Romeo Nicolescu
Romeo Nicolescu Law Office
Miloiu Ciprian
AuxMundus - International Law and
Mediation Company
Moldoveanu Alexandru
uca Zbrcea & Asociaii
Nicolae-Bogdan Bulai
University of Bucharest
Oana Lucia Cornescu
uca Zbrcea & Asociaii
Ovidiu Podaru
Babes-Bolyai University
Radu Chirita
Chirita si Asociatii Law Firm
Radu Rizoiu
Rizoiu & Asociatii SCA
Roxana Iordachescu
SCA Iordachescu si Asociatii
Septimiue Panainte
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University
erban Pslaru
uca Zbrcea & Asociaii
Stoia Iulian Alexander
Bucharest Bar Association
Valerian Cioclei
University of Bucharest
Valerius M. Ciuca
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University
Anonymous Contributors
Russia
Joanna Kosiska-Wierciska
Kancelaria Adwokacka Adwokat dr Joanna
Kosiska-Wierciska
Sean C. Hayes
IPG Legal
A. Romanov
RANEPA
Julian Bielicki
Drzewiecki, Tomaszek & Partners
Soyoon Jang
Hewlett-Packard
Andrei Neznamov
Krzysztof Rastawicki
RMS Rastawicki Mianowski Sawicki sp.k.
Youngjoon Kwon
Seoul National University
Jaime Durand
Maciej Pakua
Medical University of Gdask
Romania
Marcin Olechowski
Soltysinski Kawecki & Szlezak
Michal Raczkowski
Uniwersytet Warszawski
Anca Grigorescu
BPV Grigorescu Stefanica
Monika Hartung
Wardyski & Partners
Andrei Danciu
Cataniciu & Asociatii
Luis Villar
Seguro Social del Per - EsSalud y
Universidad San Martin
Piotr Sadownik
Gide, Tokarczuk, Grzekowiak - Spka
Komandytowa
Bogdan C. Stoica
Popovici Nitu & Asociatii SCA
Philippines
Afdal Kunting
Zamboanga City Medical Center
Alfredo Z. Pio de Roda, III
Quasha Ancheta Pena & Nolasco Law
Office
Radosaw Skowron
KKPW Law Office
Tomasz Trojanowski
St. Wojciech Hospital
Anonymous Contributors
Portugal
Ana Carla Carvalho
RSA
Ana Paula Cabral
ISCET
Antnio Casa Nova
Escola Superior de Sade de Portalegre
Carlos Lopes Ribeiro
CR Advogados
Carolina Boullosa Gonzalez
ACE - Sociedade de Advogados
Duarte Vera Jardim
Jardim, Sampaio, Magalhes e Silva e
Associados - Sociedade de Advogados, RL
Eduardo Azevedo
CRMA & Associados, Soc. de Advogados
Eduardo Buisson Loureiro
Fernando Alves Correia
University of Coimbra
Anonymous Contributors
Corpodean Alexandru
Cosmin Flavius Costa
Costa, Negru & Associates - Attorneys
at law
Cristina Alexe
Cristina Alexe Law Office
Daniel Nitu
Babes-Bolyai University; SCA Iordachescu
& Associates
Dariescu Cosmin
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University
Diana Lavinia Botau
Babes-Bolyai University
Dragos Daghie
Universitatea Dunarea de Jos Galati
Elena Simina Tanasescu
Bucharest University
Flaviu Nanu
Flaviu Nanu Law Office
Florin Streteanu
University of Cluj-Napoca
Florina Firaru
Petosevic
Gavrila Simona Petrina
University Dunarea de Jos Galati
George Nedelcu
George NEDELCU - Law office
Ndiaye Semou
Universit Cheikh Anta Diop
Serbia
Danijela Kora-Mandi
Novi Sad Humanitarian Centre
Danilo Curcic
YUCOM - Lawyers Committee for Human
Rights
Dijana Malbasa
Novi Sad Humanitarian Centre
Dragan Psodorov
Joksovic, Stojanovic & Partners
Dusan S. Dimitrijevic
Law Office Dimitrijevic
Duan Stojkovi
Stojkovi & Prekajski
Jane Paunkovic
Faculty of Management
Jelena Zeleskov Djoric
Institute of Criminological and Sociological
Research
Nebojsa Stankovic
Stankovic & Partners Law Office
Nikola Jankovi
JPM Jankovi, Popovi, Miti
Petar Stojanovic
Joskovic, Stojanovic & Partners
Simonida Sladojevic - Stanimirovic
Valentina Krkovi
Law Office of Valentina Krkovi
Vladimir Marinkov
Guberina - Marinkov Law Office
Anonymous Contributors
Sierra Leone
Augustine Sorie-Sengbe Marrah
Yada Williams and Associates
Editayo Pabs-Garnon
Lambert & Partners
Emmanuel Saffa Abdulai
Society for Democratic Initiatives
Kortor Kamara
Saddleback Re
Lornard Taylor
Taylor & Associates
Moses Manskanu
Anonymous Contributors
Singapore
Boon Teck Chia
Chia Wong LLP
Elizabeth Siew-Kuan Ng
National University of Singapore
Eric Tin
Donaldson & Burkinshaw LLP
Konstantin Konstantinov
Chadbourne & Parke LLP
Maria Safarova
Hewlett-Packard
Maxim Likholetov
Magnusson
Gary Chan
Singapore Management University
Nikolai Kostenko
Moscow Helsinki Group
Simon Chesterman
National University of Singapore
Sergey Budylin
Roche & Duffay
Sergey Stepanov
Institute of Private Law
Viacheslav Vhasnyk
Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical
University
Vladimir Yarkov
The Urals State Law University
Anonymous Contributors
Senegal
Anonymous Contributors
Slovenia
Andrej Bukovnik
Petosevic Law Offices
Anton Gradiek
Dagra D.O.O.
Grega Strban
University of Ljubljana
Josip Sever
Matija Repolusk
Repolusk Attorneys at Law
Matja Jan
ODI Law Firm
Primoz Rozman
Blood Transfusion Centre of Slovenia
Suzana Kralji
University of Maribor
Mamadou BA
USADF
Tjaa Ivanc
University of Maribor
Anonymous Contributors
South Africa
Altair Richards
Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs, Inc.
Anne Pope
University of Cape Town
Avinash Govindjee
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
Budeli Mpfariseni
University of South Africa
Charnelle van der Bijl
University of South Africa
Susan Goldstein
Soul City Institute for Health and
Development Communication
Tamara Cohen
University of Kwazulu-Natal
Victoria Bronstein
University of the Witwatersrand
Yousuf Vawda
University of Kwazulu-Natal
Anonymous Contributors
Spain
Johan Sangborn
Swedish Bar Association
Karl-Arne Olsson
Grde Wesslau Advokatbyr
Marina Lorente
Garrigues Abogados
Karol Nowak
Lund University
Lassad Dhaouadi
Expert fiscal
Montserrat Casamitjana
Societat de Salut Pblica de Catalunya
i Balears
Lars Hartzell
Elmzell Advokatbyr AB
Mohamed Mokdad
Ministry of Health Tunisia
Laura Carlson
Stockholm University
Orlanda Daz-Garca
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
Oscar Morales
Lennart Khler
Nordic School of Public Health NHV
Madeleine Leijonhufvud
Stockholm University
Malin Sjstrand
University of Lund
Malin Winbom
Hewlett-Packard
Mrten Lundmark
Danowsky & Partners
Christa Rautenbach
North-West University
Clarence Tshoose
University of South Africa
Antonio Fernndez
Garrigues Abogados
Coenraad Visser
University of South Africa
Bernardo E. Macas G.
Servicio Canario de la Salud
Darcy du Toit
Social Law Project, University of the
Western Cape
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet
Universidad de Alicante
Carlos Campillo-Artero
Dejo Olowu
North-West University
Derek Hellenberg
University of Cape Town
Fawzia Cassim
University of South Africa
Francois Venter
North-West University
FT Abioye
University of South Africa
Gabriel Meyer
Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa
Graham Damant
Bowman Gilfillan Inc
Gusha X. Ngantweni
University of South Africa
Henri Fouche
University of South Africa
Hugh Corder
University of Cape Town
J.S. Horne
University of South Africa
Johan Burger
Institute for Security Studies
Johan Kruger
Centre for Constitutional Rights
Johan Olivier
Webber Wentzel
Johann Kriegler
Freedom Under Law
John Faris
Institute for Dispute Resolution in Africa
University of South Africa
M A du Plessis
University of the Witwatersrand
Marcel van der Watt
University of South Africa
Marinda Surridge
Hewlett-Packard
Marlize Ingrid van Jaarsveld
Fairleigh Dickinson University
Milton Seligson
Moses Phooko
University of South Africa
Neil Cameron
Stellenbeosch University
Ntombifikile Mtshali
University of KwaZulu-Natal
Paul Hoffman
Accountability Now
Pierre de Vos
University of Cape Town
Pieter Bakker
University of South Africa
Pieter du Toit
North-West University
PJ Schwikkard
University of Cape Town
Professor Basdeo
University of South Africa
Rudolph Zinn
University of South Africa
SS Terblanche
University of South Africa
Stephen M Monye
University of South Africa
Stuart Harrison
ENSafrica
Imen Nasri
Nizar Sdiri
Nizar Sdiri Law Firm
Radia Hennessey
Vineeta Foundation
Ridha Mezghani
R. Mezghani Law Office
Wajdi Hamza
Hamza Wajdi Avocats
Zied Gallala
Gallala Law Firm
Anonymous Contributors
Mats Hellstrm
Hellstrm Law
Turkey
Mauro Zamboni
Stockholm University
Altan Liman
Aydas Liman Kurman
Mikael Johansson
Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human
Rights and Humanitarian Law
Olle Marsater
University of Uppsala
Reinhold Fahlbeck
Lund university
Sverker Jnsson
Lund University
Anonymous Contributors
Xavier Castells
Universidad Autnoma de Barcelona
Anonymous Contributors
Sri Lanka
Tanzania
Eliud Wandwalo
Mukikute
Anusha Wickramasinghe
Camena Guneratne
Open University of Sri Lanka
Chrishantha Abeysena
University of Kelaniya
M.T. Leshabari
Muhimvbili University of Health and
Allied Sciences
Gamini Perera
Law Chambers Sri Lanka
Kandiah Neelakandan
Neelakandan & Neelakandan, Attorneysat-Law & Notaries Public
N. Sivarajah
University of Jaffna
P.A.D. Coonghe
University of Jaffna
Prathiba Mahanamahewa
Kotelawala Defence University
R. Surenthirakumaran
University of Jaffna
Sunil Madhawa Lokusooriya
Anonymous Contributors
Sweden
Anne Ramberg
Swedish Bar Association
sa Esbjrnson Carlberg
Hewlett-Packard Sverige AB
Birgitta Nystrom
Lund University
Bjorn Ohde
Advokataktiebolaget Roslagen
Boel Flodgren
Lund University
Catherine Lions
Umea University
Christer Thordson
Legal Edge AB
Claes Sandgren
Stockholm University
Daniel Drott
Advokatfirman Delphi
Fredrik Gustafsson
DLA Nordic KB
Gabriel Donner
Donner & Partners AB
Gran Millqvist
Stockholm University
Gunilla Lindmark
University of Uppsala
Gustaf Sjberg
Stockholm University
Jack gren
Stockholm University
Berrin Gkek
Anadolu niversitesi
Bertil Oder
Ko University
Burcay Erus
Bogazici University
Cagatay Yilmaz
Yilmaz Law Offices
Ece Gztepe
Bilkent University
Esenyel Barak Bal
Cailliau & olakel Law Firm
Fatih Selim Yurdakul
Yurdakul Law Office
Filiz Tepecik
Anadolu niversitesi
Gulum Ozcelik
Bilkent University
Halil I. Kardicali
Hewlett-Packard
Mahmut Bayazit
Sabanci University
Mahmut Kacan
MK Law Office
Thailand
Anant Akanisthaphichat
Thai Law Firm
Onur Demirci
DEMRC Law Office
Chanvit Tharathep
Ministry of Public Health
Osman Hayran
Istanbul Medipol University
Chulapong Yukate
ZICOlaw
R. Murat nok
Ko University & Press Council
Jeeranun Klaewkla
Mahidol university
Rukiye Seyran am
Cailliau & olakel Law Firm
Pawinee Chumsri
Cross Cultural Foundation
Snan Aslan
Peter Shuler
Siam Prmeier International Law Office
Ufuk Aydin
Anadolu niversitesi
Anonymous Contributors
Phil Robertson
Human Rights Watch
Uganda
Piyatida Pavasutti
Asia Inter Law Co., Ltd.
Adrian Jjuuko
Human Rights Awareness and Promotion
Forum
Anonymous Contributors
Tunisia
Abdelwahab Hechiche
University of South Florida
Andrew Kasirye
Kasirye, Byaruhanga & Co Advocates
Amine Hamdi
Zaanouni Law Firm & Associates
Amira Yahyaoui
Al Bawsala
Brian Kalule
AF Mpanga Advocates
Busingye Kabumba
Development Law Associates & Makerere
University
Damalie E. Naggita-Musoke
Makerere University
Daniel Ronald Ruhweza
Makerere University
Edith Kibalama
Kituo Cha Katiba
Hechmi Louzir
Institut Pasteur de Tunis
Edward Ssebbombo
Bobo Eco Farm Limited
Hedia Kedadi
Cabinet Kedadi
Emmanuel Luyirika
African Palliative Care Association
Imed Oussaifi
Avocat Prs La Cour Dappel, Sousse
TUNISIE
Francis Opedun
EvaMoR International Limited
George Omunyokol
GP Advocates and Solicitors
Mohammad Kawasmi
Al Tamimi and Company
Daniel Cody
Reed Smith LLP
J.B. Rwakimari
Abt Associates, Inc.
David E Birenbaum
Martn Fridman
Ferrere Abogados
John Magezi
Magezi Ibale & Co. Advocates
Shakeel A. Mian
Prudential Middle East Legal Consultants,
UAE
Jude Byamukama
BNB Advocates
Justus Orishaba Bagamuhunda
National Foundation for Democracy and
Human Rights in Uganda
Kallu C. Kalumiya
Kampala Associated Advocates
Kobel Allan
Magezi Ibale & Co. Advocates
Kwikiriza Benson A
Uganda Law Society
Laura Nyirinkindi
Pro Initiaitives Agency
Lilian Keene-Mugerwa
Platform for Labour Action
Namusobya Salima
Initiative for Social and Economic RIghts
Nicholas Opiyo
Chapter Four Uganda
Timothy Kyepa
Development Law Associates
Violet Gwokyalya
Mothers Against Malnutrition and Hunger
Anonymous Contributors
Stuart Paterson
Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
Tarek Nakkach
Hewlett-Packard
Anonymous Contributors
United Kingdom
Alan J. Masson W.S.
Anderson Strathern LLP
Amy Holcroft
Hewlett-Packard
Anne Bradshaw
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Cassam Tengnah
Swansea University
Christopher May
Lancaster University
Gareth Davies
Hewlett-Packard
Jacqueline Laing
London Metropolitan University
James Bell
Slater and Gordon LLP UK
Ukraine
Jeffrey Golden
The P.R.I.M.E. Finance Foundation
Alena Zolotarevskaya
Hewlett-Packard
Jill Stavert
Edinburgh Napier University
Andrii Gorbatenko
Legal Alliance
John Gardner
University of Oxford
Chernenko Zoryana
National University Kyiv-Mohyla Academy
JS Nguyen-Van-Tam
University of Nottingham
Eugene Pismensky
Lugansk State University of Internal Affairs
Katja Samuel
University of Reading
Igor Svechkar
Asters
Kiron Reid
University of Liverpool & ZNU Ukraine
Ivan Horodyskyy
Rule of Law Center of Ukrainian Catholic
University
Maryellen Reynolds
Reynolds Fitgerald Levine Walker Wong
Wu Johnson
Ivan Lishchyna
AstapovLawyers
Pat Walsh
Dickson Poon School of Law, Kings
College london
Karchevskiy Nickolay
Lugansk State University of Internal Affairs
Kostin Ilya
Legal Alliance
Lyubomyr Drozdovskyy
Khasin and Drozdovskyy Barristers
Association
Peter Hungerford-Welch
City University London
Peter McTigue
Nottingham Trent University
Rajkumar Bidla
Sathi All For Partnerhsips
Maksym Litvinov
Cybercrime Division MIA of Ukraine
Richard Ashcroft
Queen Mary University of London
Markian Malskyy
Arzinger
Richard W Whitecross
Edinburgh Napier University
Misiats Andrii
Atorney Co. Misiats and Partners
Sara Fovargue
Lancaster University
Oksana Holovko-Havrysheva
Ukrainian Catholic University
Simon Honeyball
University of Exeter
Oksana Kneychuk
AstapovLawyers International Law Group
Tonia Novitz
University of Bristol
Oleksandr Liemienov
Center for Political Studies and Analysis
Tony Ward
University of Hull
Oleksandr Skliarenko
Skliarenko and Partners
Anonymous Contributors
Ricardo Mezzera
Mezzera Abogados
Eleanor D. Kinney
Indiana University
Foeng Tham
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Anonymous Contributors
Sydney Chisenga
Corpus Legal Practitioners
Anonymous Contributors
Anonymous Contributors
Venezuela
Zimbabwe
James H. Pietsch
University of Hawaii
Jane H. Aiken
Georgetown University Law Center
Alberto Jurado
Asesora Legal Corporativa, A.C.
Andrew Makoni
Mbidzo Muchadehama & Makoni Legal
Practitioners
Jeffrey Aresty
Internet Bar Organization
John Hummel
Deschutes County, Oregon, USA
Andres Halvorssen
RDHOO Abogados
John Pollock
Public Justice Center
James F. Cleary
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine
and Public Health
John R. LaBar
Henry, McCord, Bean, Miller, Gabriel &
LaBar, P.L.L.C.
Jonathan Hiatt
American Federation of Labor-Congress of
Industrial Organizations
Catherina Gallardo
Zambrano Gallardo y Asociados
Dorelys Coraspe
Hewlett-Packard
Gabriel Ruan Santos
Academia de Ciencias Polticas y Sociales
Kepler B. Funk
Funk, Szachacz & Diamond, LLC
Laurel G. Bellows
The Bellows Law Group, P.C.
Leonard A. Sandler
University of Iowa Clinical Law Programs
J.C. Garantn-Blanco
Universidad Catlica Andrs Bello
Michele Forzley
ONeill Institute for National and Global
Health Law
Jesus Escudero
Torres, Plaz & Araujo
Myrna M. Weissman
Columbia University College of Physicians
and Surgeons
Patrick Del Duca
Zuber Lawler & Del Duca LLP
Paul Bender
Arizona State University
Peter Edelman
Georgetown University Law Center
Renaldy J. Gutierrez
Gutierrez & Associates
Rene M. Landers
Suffolk University Law School
Ricks P. Frazier
Massachusetts Executive Office of Housing
and Economic Development
Xiomara Magdaleno
HPCD Consultor
Anonymous Contributors
Vietnam
Huyen Dinh
Hewlett-Packard
Kent A. Wong
VCI Legal
Andrew Kaizer
Calhoun & Lawrence, LLP
Sherman L. Cohn
Georgetown University
Anjali B. Dooley
Law Office of Anjali B. Dooley, LLC
Stephen C. Veltri
Northern University
Linh D. Nguyen
VILAF
Anthony A Dean
Gibbons P.C.
Thomas Y. Mandler
Hinshaw & Culbertson
Arthur L. Hunter, Jr
Orleans Parish Criminal District Court
Tim K. Mackey
UC San Diego - School of Medicine
Abhimanyu Jalan
Clyde & Co
Barbara J. Fick
University of Notre Dame Law School
Timothy E. Dolan
Texas A&M International University
Chris Williams
Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
Blair Glencorse
Accountability Lab
Vernellia Randall
University of Dayton
Fahmy F. El-Hallag
AlSuwaidi & Company
Bruce P. Frohnen
Ohio Northern University College of Law
Anonymous Contributors
Bryan A. Liang
Global Health Policy Institute, UC San
Diego
Uruguay
Tuan A. Phung
VCI Legal
Ibrahim Elsadig
Dentons
Beatriz Murgua
Murgua - Aguirre - Abogados
Tung Tran
Phuoc & Partners
Escandor El Ters
V c Duy
Santa Lawyers Company
Karim Fawaz
Clyde & Co
Kavitha S. Panicker
Panicker Partners
Mirza R. Baig
Dubai Pharmacy College
Catherine C. Carr
Community Legal Services of Philadelphia
Christopher R. Kelley
University of Arkansas
Claudia Rast
Butzel Long
Melvin L M Mbao
North West University, South Africa
Pamela Mumbi
Street Law Zambia Project
A Renee Pobjecky
Pobjecky & Pobjecky LLP
Anonymous Contributors
Kakoma K Ernest
Ministry of Health
Shukhrat Khudayshukurov
Advokat-Himoya Law office
United States
Tarasov Andrey
LC Tarasov & Partners
Scott Radnitz
University of Washington
Jack Saul
International Trauma Studies Program
Sergiy Oberkovych
Gvozdiy & Oberkovych Law Firm
Chifumu K Banda
Robert J. Collins
University of Pennsylvania
Sergei Nezhurbida
Chernivtsi National University
Uzbekistan
H. David Kelly, Jr
Beins Axelrod, PC
Robert Burt
Yale Law School
Pavlo Lukomskyi
Salkom Law Firm
Zambia
Gabriel Gari
Queen Mary University of London
Gonzalo Gari Irureta Goyena
Posadas, Posadas, & Vecino
Haroldo Espalter
Hughes & Hughes
Vu Dzung
Anonymous Contributors
Casper Pound
Family Aids Support Organisation
Christopher Mhike
Atherstone & Cook Legal Practitioners
Clever Bere
Organising for Zimbabwe
John T. Burombo
International Bridges to Justice
Mercia Monica Tshuma
Zambezi Law Trust/ Masawi &Partners
Legal Practitioners
Mordecai Pilate Mahlangu
Gill Godlonton & Gerrans
Norma Lole
Women and Children Support Group
Nyasha Pamella Timba
Kantor & Immerman Legal Practitioners
Obey Shava
Mbidzo Muchadehama and Makoni Legal
Practitioners
Otto Saki
Governance Resources Group
Sharon Bwanya
Mawere & Sibanda Legal Practitioners
Simplicio Bhebhe
Kantor & Immerman Legal Practitioners
Anonymous Contributors
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgements
The World Justice Projects Honorary Chairs, Directors, Officers, Staff,
Financial Supporters, and Sponsoring Organizations listed in the last
section of this report.
The polling companies and research organizations listed in the
Methodology section of this report, and the contributing experts.
Academic advisors: Mark David Agrast, American
182 | Acknowledgments
183 | Acknowledgments
OUR APPROACH
The work of the World Justice Project is founded on
two premises: 1) the rule of law is the foundation of
communities of peace, opportunity, and equity, and 2)
multidisciplinary collaboration is the most effective way
to advance the rule of law. Based on this, WJPs mutuallyreinforcing lines of business employ a multi-disciplinary,
multi-layered approach through original research and
data, an active and global network, and practical, on-theground programs to advance the rule of law worldwide.
ENGAGEMENT
Engagement efforts include connecting and developing
a global network, organizing strategic convenings, and
fostering practical, on-the-ground programs. At our
biennial World Justice Forum, regional conferences, and
single-country sorties, citizens and leaders come together
to learn about the rule of law, build their networks, and
design pragmatic solutions to local rule of law challenges.
In addition, the World Justice Challenge provides seed
grants to support practical, on-the-ground programs
addressing discrimination, corruption, violence, and more.
HONORARY CHAIRS
The World Justice Project has the support of outstanding leaders representing a range of disciplines
around the world. The Honorary Chairs of the World
Justice Project are:
Madeleine Albright, Giuliano Amato, Robert Badinter,
James A. Baker III, Cherie Blair, Stephen G. Breyer,
Sharan Burrow, David Byrne, Jimmy Carter, Maria
Livanos Cattaui, Hans Corell, Hilario G. Davide, Jr.,
Hernando de Soto, Adama Dieng, William H. Gates,
Sr., Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Richard J. Goldstone, Kunio
Hamada, Lee H. Hamilton, Mohamed Ibrahim, Hassan
Bubacar Jallow, Tassaduq Hussain Jillani, Anthony M.
Kennedy, Beverley McLachlin, George J. Mitchell, John
Edwin Mroz, Indra Nooyi, Sandra Day OConnor, Ana
Palacio, Colin L. Powell, Roy L. Prosterman, Richard W.
Riley, Mary Robinson, Petar Stoyanov, Richard Trumka,
Desmond Tutu, Antonio Vitorino, Paul A. Volcker, Harold
Woolf, Andrew Young.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Sheikha Abdulla Al-Misnad, Emil Constantinescu, William
C. Hubbard, Suet-Fern Lee, Mondli Makhanya, William H.
Neukom, Ellen Grace Northfleet, James R. Silkenat.
DIRECTORS EMERITUS
President Dr. Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai
FINANCIAL SUPPORTERS
STRATEGIC PARTNERS
American Bar Association; American Public Health
Association; American Society of Civil Engineers;
Arab Center for the Development of the Rule of Law
and Integrity; Avocats Sans Frontires; Canadian
Bar Association; Club of Madrid; Hague Institute for
the Internationalisation of Law; Human Rights First;
Human Rights Watch; Inter-American Bar Association;
International Bar Association; International Chamber of
Commerce; International Institute for Applied Systems
Analysis; International Organization of Employers;
International Trade Union Confederation; Inter-Pacific
Bar Association; Karamah: Muslim Women Lawyers
for Human Rights; Landesa; NAFSA: Association of
International Educators; Norwegian Bar Association;
People to People International; Transparency
International USA; Union Internationale des Avocats;
Union of Turkish Bar Associations; U.S. Chamber of
Commerce; The World Council of Religious Leaders;
World Federation of Engineering Organisations; World
Federation of Public Health Associations
Laws of justice which Hammurabi, the wise king, established That the strong might not injure the
weak, in order to protect the widows and orphans..., in order to declare justice in the land, to settle all
disputes, and heal all injuries.
-CODEX HAMMURABI
I could adjudicate lawsuits as well as anyone. But I would prefer to make lawsuits unnecessary.
-ANALECTS OF CONFUCIUS
It is more proper that law should govern than any one of the citizens.
- ARISTOTLE, POLITICS (350 BCE)
If someone disobeys the law, even if he is (otherwise) worthy, he must be punished. If someone meets
the standard, even if he is (otherwise) unworthy, he must be found innocent. Thus the Way of the
public good will be opened up, and that of private interest will be blocked.
- THE HUAINANZI 139 BCE (HAN DYNASTY, CHINA)
The Law of Nations, however, is common to the entire human race, for all nations have established
for themselves certain regulations exacted by custom and human necessity.
-CORPUS JURIS CIVILIS
Treat the people equally in your court and give them equal attention, so that the noble shall not
aspire to your partiality, nor the humble despair of your justice.
-JUDICIAL GUIDELINES FROM UMAR BIN AL-KHATTAB, THE SECOND KHALIFA OF ISLAM
No freeman is to be taken or imprisoned or disseised of his free tenement or of his liberties or free
customs, or outlawed or exiled or in any way ruined, nor will we go against such a man or send against
him save by lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the land. To no-one will we sell or deny or
delay right or justice.
-MAGNA CARTA
Good civil laws are the greatest good that men can give and receive. They are the source of morals,
the palladium of property, and the guarantee of all public and private peace. If they are not the
foundation of government, they are its supports; they moderate power and help ensure respect for it,
as though power were justice itself.
-JEAN-TIENNE-MARIE PORTALIS. DISCOURS PRLIMINAIRE DU PREMIER PROJET DE CODE CIVIL
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights Everyone is entitled to all the rights
and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex,
language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
-UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS