Matt Keagle, "The Regimental Coat of The 4th Connecticut Regiment, Guidelines"
Matt Keagle, "The Regimental Coat of The 4th Connecticut Regiment, Guidelines"
Matt Keagle, "The Regimental Coat of The 4th Connecticut Regiment, Guidelines"
By Matthew Keagle
Nowhere was the uniform of the 4th Connecticut clearly spelled out, but the
evidence indicates that soldiers were issued brown coats turned up with red. In the spring
of 1777 commissary Andrew Huntington shipped cloth containing 17 pieces of brown
wool, and a part of a piece of red wool. 1 Another inventory of cloth contained, 12 Pc
Cloth / Blue & Brown as well as, 24 yards Red facings. All of this fabric was intended
for, soldiers Cloaths and there was even, I Pc fine Red Cloth that presumably was
meant to make facings for officers uniforms.2 That the 4th Connecticut had uniforms
made out of this wool is uncertain, but probable. The fact that they did wear brown
uniforms is almost certain.
Brown was clearly a common uniform colour in Connecticut, evident as early as
1776 with the colonys demand for brown coats and waistcoats. The council of safety
had representatives in Boston buying clothing early in 1777 and urged, that one
regiment be of Dark brown3 A, well dressed deserter belonging to the 4th Connecticut
in April of 1777 wore, a Suit of Regimentals, the Coat brown faced with red, and he
probably represents the first example of the uniform of the 4th Connecticut. The brown
faced red coats may have been issued that spring and based on notes in Captain Fitchs
papers he was still issuing uniforms to men as late as December of that year. 4
Despite his uniform coat (and what were probably military overalls) the deserter
still wore a good deal of civilian clothing. Whether this clothing was civilian clothing
issued to him, or what he enlisted with, is unknown. The uniform of the regiment during
the summer and fall of that year seems to be pretty well illustrated by a deserter from
Captain Fitchs company in November who also, wore away a brown regimental coat
faced with red,...5 By the fall of the year the brown faced red regimental coat appears to
have been standard. While soldiers who died at Valley Forge clearly had regimental
coats, their colours are not specified but they were almost certainly brown faced red.
Another indicator of the colour of the uniforms issued in 1777 is that of the
uniforms issued in 1778. In that year the state received cloth from Otis and Andrews in
Boston and ordered John Bigelow to oversee the construction of uniforms from that
shipment.6 Bigelow was to ensure that the cloth was made into uniforms under the
observation of the officers of the various Connecticut regiments to ensure it matched
those in use at the time. Even General Washington understood, that the Cloaths were
made to suit the uniforms of the respective Regts.7
1
Andrew Huntington to Joshua Elderkin, May 27, 1777. Connecticut Archives, Revolutionary War, Vol.
XI, 461, Connecticut State Library (CSL).
2
Inventory of Cloth, Jul. 18, 1777. Connecticut Archives, Revolutionary War, Vol. XI, 463, CSL.
3
Council of Safety Minutes, Feb, 14, 1777. in Charles J. Hoadly, ed., The Public Records of the State of
Connecticut, vol. 1, (Hartford: Press of the Case, Lockwood &Brainard Co., 1894), 173.
4
Capt Andw Fitchs Minet Book. Andrew Fitch Account Books and Papers, CSL.
5
Connecticut Gazette, Oct. 3, 1777.
6
Council of Safety Minutes, Dec. 10, 1777, Jan. 19, Mar. 26, 1778. in Hoadly, Public Records, 576.
7
George Washington to Jedediah Huntington, Nov. 19, 1778. in George Washington Papers, LOC.
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?ammem/mgw:@field(DOCID+@lit(gw130256)) (Accessed May 15,
2008)
Thus when five men deserted from the regiment in November they all took away,
a Suit of Regimental Cloaths, the Coat dark brown with red Facings, light brown Vest
and Breeches, trimd with Continental Buttons marked USA.8 This probably represents
new, complete uniforms from Bigelow. It should come as no surprise that they match the
brown faced red uniforms of 1777, since they would have been made to match those,
further confirming the uniform of the regiment.
John Durkee, who had been the Colonel of the 4th Connecticut, died in May of
1782 on leave in Connecticut and present in the inventory of his estate were three Broad
Cloth Regimental Coats. Of these, the highest valued, and presumably the least worn
was made of blue broadcloth, the least valuable, and presumably most worn, was made of
brown broadcloth.9 The 4th Connecticut, like the other regiments from New England,
was ordered to wear a uniform of, Blue faced with White according to Washingtons
instructions of October 2, 1779. Knowing that fully equipping the men would take time
the General also desired the officers, to endeavor to accommodate their Uniforms to this
Standard, that when the men come to be supplied there may be a proper uniformity.10
Accounts of cloth issued to the officers of his regiment in 1780 clearly indicate
that blue and white were being supplied as early as February 1780.11 Durkee himself
probably followed Washingtons order, or he may have had a new coat made up when he
became the Colonel of the new 1st Connecticut Regiment in 1781, which was partly
formed from his old Regiment.12 If that was the case the blue uniform could have been as
little as a year old when he died, and at most no more than two years old, and worn
during fairly static campaigning. The brown regimental coat could have been made as
early as 1777, and worn during the active campaigns of that year, through his injury at the
battle of Monmouth, and beyond, while his men were wearing their brown faced red
coats.13
14
Congress to Secret Committee, Feb. 17, 1777, quoted in Marko Zlatich, Specifications for Imported
Continental Army Uniforms, 1775-1778, Military Collector and Historian Vol. XXXXIV, No. 3 (Fall
1992), 120.
15
Philip Katcher, Uniforms of the Continental Army, (York, PA: George Shumway, 1981), 106.
16
Jedediah Huntington to George Washington, Mar. 10, 1779. George Washington Papers, LOC.
http://memory.loc.gov/cgibin/ampage?collId=mgw4&fileName=gwpage056.db&recNum=715&tempFile=./temp/~ammem_H5sC&fi
lecode=mgw&next_filecode=mgw&itemnum=1&ndocs=100 (Accessed May 16, 2008)
17
Connecticut Gazette, Dec.11, 1778.
that no designs are known to have been issued, and few, if any, regimental buttons are
known to exist from Connecticut at all.18
18
Don Troiani, Military Buttons of the American Revolution, (Gettysburg, PA: Thomas Publications, 2001),
108.