Food Production and Management in Malaysia
Food Production and Management in Malaysia
Food Production and Management in Malaysia
(School of Government, UUM College of Law, Government and International Studies (UUM COLGIS),
06010 UUM Sintok, Kedah DarulAman, Malaysia)
ABSTRACT : The study examined how the relationship between the management problem and the food
production. The goal is show that the management problem is trying to overcome in the food production. This
has been done by examining the food production concept to address the management problem. The study
analyzes the management problem in food production through telephone number directory sampling of 53
farmers interviewed by telephone in 2014. Data collection and data analysis was used a quantitative approach
through questionnaire survey. Upon the examination of the phenomenon, it becomes clear that the food
production concept cannot deal with the management problem. Through showing that the food production
concept not affects the management problem, this research highlights the importance of deal with the
management problem.
INTRODUCTION
The increase of people had drawn the concern on increase food production at low-priced and seemly
more vital [1]. National yield is the main approach to assuring passage to low-priced food in poor states with
restricted ability to import food [2]. The investigation on dissimilarities in biodiversity among organic and
conventional farms was described by lower yields in organic farms and not by varied management practices
basically [3]. The increasing corpus of literature related with contract farming had investigated its pertinent and
connections among the amounts of variables in order to acquire a better understanding on being incorporated in
contract farming and agriculture generally [4]. The literature on agricultural management examined contract
farming as a new institutional planning including agriculture and industry which could help to decrease the risks
and ambiguities included in agriculture [5]. Literature discusses that contract farming can perform an important
role in enhancing the agricultural production of peasant farmers [6]. Nevertheless, the farmers were very
shortage in the knowledge of marketing the agriculture production [7].
The study on food production by Grunowand van der Vorst[8] reports that a number of food security
crises, the pattern and execution of traceability systems became a vital instruments for organizing security risks
in the food industry. An effective management of food security risks demands the attention of the numbers of
potentially recalled productions, influenced areas or users, and logistics attempts associated to resolution the
security difficulty. The study presented a yield and dissemination program model for food supply network to
deal with the problems. The weak connections along the food supply network challenged the food yield which
had point out by Jeo[9]. Food is regard as to be secure if there is sensible manifested reality that no loss will
happen from its consumption under awaited conditions of usage. The obligation for organizing the numerous
institutions incorporated in food security managements is based on the associated agencies.
In food supply network, the farmers have to employ Good Agricultural Practices, merchants of
products or raw materials at local or international level have to employ Distributions Practices, and producers
have to employ Good Manufacturing Practices. Food supply network workers have to employ either nationwide
(obligatory) criterion or nonpublic (volunteer) criterion. Chain advocates contribute the required incentive while
chain enablers contribute the command and rule. In spite of the existent lawful arrangement for food security
and quality controls, many processed food outputs in the Kenyan market are of sub-criterion quality. The
informal economy need to be very strongly monitored by the food security agencies to support the application of
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) and impartial business because it is the main provider of
food productions to the nationals markets. Security and quality management in the food supply network has cost
implications and earnings are a restricting determinant for all the stakeholders and the accomplishment of food
security management system. Poverty reduction would encourage the buying power of national users,
subsequently promoting hygiene-based encouraging rather than price-based need for food [9].
In Malaysia, the food production permanents parks established to make certain the ability to be
sustained of the countrys food supply. The aim of the project is to create food production permanent region and
produced entrepreneurs in the agricultural sector as well as to foster private sector involvement in the field of
food production. The execution of this concept demands arrangements among the Federal Government and the
www.ijhssi.org
41 | P a g e
www.ijhssi.org
42 | P a g e
www.ijhssi.org
43 | P a g e
www.ijhssi.org
44 | P a g e
II.
Table 1 and 2 shows the Kruskal Wallis 2 statistic is not significant, 2 (df = 2) = 0.020, p = 0.990 (p >
0.05), with the mean rank management problem score of 26.25 for Strongly Disagree, 27.10 for Disagree, 26.26
for Agree. The significance value (p) is greater than 0.05, which indicates that there was no significant
difference between the concepts of food production and management problem. Thus the null hypothesis is
rejected and there were no difference between the concepts of food production and management problem.
Tilman et al.[23] indicates that enhancements in the control of weak competitors of yields, crop disease and
pathogens, and herbivores could importantly enhance productions. Three cereals as wheat, rice and corn supply
60 percent of human food. These yields obtain from once-rare weedy species; have change into the three richest
plants on earth. The amount of illness and the illness incidence should enhance equivalent to host great amount
and this distracting likelihood exhibit the probable imbalance of a worldwide program of food yield in which
merely three yields account for so great ratio of yield. The comparative deficiency of eruptions of illness on
these yields is evidence to plant reproduction and farming practices. For all three cereals, stock farmers have
been fortunate at enhancing fighting to abiotic stresses, pathogens and illness, and at employing these
protections in space and time in order to sustain production stableness in spite of low crop variety in continued
cereal systems. Allied insect management and biotechnology that recognizes enduring immunity via various
gene resources should pay progressively vital function.
A Spearmans rho rank correlation was run to determine the relationship between the concepts of food
production and management problem among 53 TKPMs participant. There was no correlation between the
concepts of food production and management problem which was statistically no significant (r s = 0.067, p =
0.632. Table 3 shows that the concepts of food production and management problem do not reaching statistical
significance at the level of p < 0.05. Thus the null hypothesis is rejected and there were no relationship between
the concepts of food production and management problem. Jermar[24] show that the effectiveness of irrigation
water utilizes is the fundamental difficulty of intensive agriculture. Irrigation programs are in the early phase if
operation needed serving short-run goals for example to attain local self-sufficiency in food yields. Their
operation should in the long-term however be based on water-utilize concept and should manifest the valuable
growth of agriculture consequence from the demand for further concentration and diversification of yield. The
shortage of trained water management workers on sites that are frequently distant from inhabitants centers,
shortage of technicians and other workers of lower phase of proficiency and the nonexistence of farmers
experience in irrigation methods outcome in small performance effectiveness and decrease the advantages
anticipated from the programs. Flachsbarth et al. [25] show that harvest enhancements rely on the adoption of
different conventional and agro-ecological administration practices containing the usage of great-yielding
cultivars and improved administration practices to decrease abiotic and biotic plant pressures. John and Fielding
[26] show that The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) examined panelists with
provincial proficiency for 12 of the 15 food-instable and drought-inclined cultivation arrangements focused by
to recognize the most important of ten yield restrictions for maize farming in every of the cultivation
arrangements. While drought were indicated to be a usual limitations for all of the cultivation arrangements in
the investigation due to the diversity that occurs among cultivation arrangements, CIMMYT intended to utilize
the implied knowledge of maize study and expansion specialists. The panel of specialists evaluates the
comparative significance of some groups of yield limitations which could be classify into four groups: biotic,
abiotic, crop administration and socio-economic limitations.
www.ijhssi.org
45 | P a g e
Management problem
Figure 1: Conceptual framework of the relationship between the concept of food production and
management problem
The state government
provides and gazette land
as The Food Production
Permanent Park/
Technology Park
Entrepreneurs/private
Anchor Company
Rent the land and cultivate
The Food
Production
Permanent
Park
Commercial
production,
Continuous
and quality
(GAP/SALM)
Markets
and
marketing
Figure 2:The implementation of food production permanent park program concept in Malaysia
Table 1: Ranks OfThe Concept Of Food Production And Management Problem
The concept of food
N
Mean Rank
production
Management problem
Do Not Know
Strongly Disagree
2
26.25
Disagree
47
27.10
Agree
4
26.25
Strongly Agree
Total
53
Chi-square
df
Asymp. Sig.
www.ijhssi.org
46 | P a g e
CONCLUSION
The results confirm that the concepts of food production did not affect management problem and no
significant difference between the concepts of food production and management problem. An implication of the
research is generating strategy to enhance water productivity [27]. Due to restricted water supply in the resource
of several irrigation arrangements particularly in the non-rainy season extension of irrigated regions in remain
irrigation arrangements must draw from savings obtained from good water administration. Acquiring a stable
water supply from the arrangement is one of a main difficulty [28]. Supplemental irrigation is one of the
techniques to retain rainwater which can be formulated differentness. The farmers required to develop a section
for water collecting and storage for example a little water-gathering pond for irrigation. Supplementary
irrigation may be interpreted as the addition of restricted volumes of water to basically rain-fed yields, in order
to enhance and balance productions throughout times when rainfall fails to supply adequate water for normal
plant growing. Supplementary irrigation is an efficient reaction to reducing the destructive impacts of water
content pressure on the production of rain-fed yields throughout drought. A deficiency of water content in the
dry rain-fed sections frequently take places throughout the near all responsive phases of crop growing
(blossoming and cereal filling). As an outcome, rain-fed yield growing is inadequate and subsequently the
production is insufficient. Supplementary irrigation with a restricted volume of water utilized mostly throughout
the crucial harvest growing phases; result in a large enhancement in production and water
production.Supplementary irrigation in rain-fed sections is based on three fundamental characteristics which is
water is utilized to a rain-fed harvest that would generally generate several production without irrigation;
second, because rainfall is the primary resource of water for rain-fed harvests, supplementary irrigation is
merely utilized when the rainfall unsuccessful to supply basic water content for enhanced and steady yield.
Third, the volume and period of supplementary irrigation are optimum timetable not to supply water content
stress-free states during the growth season, but instead to assure that a lowest volume of water is available
throughout the crucial phases of harvest growth that would allow optimum production [29]. The advantages of
this research is has broad geographical access because it using telephone interviews and the limitation of this
research is has no feeling on the situation situated because lowlikelihood to generate a good interview setting
[30].
V.
Acknowledgements
The research was funded by Research Acculturation Grant Scheme/RAGS, S/O number: 12739.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
Chakraborty, A. J., Nandi, A. K. and Bera, B.K. (2015). A study on economic viability of tomato (Solanumlycopersicon)
cultivation by organic system of farming. Journal Crop and Weed, 11 (Special Issue), 62-66.
DSilva, J. L., Mohamad Shaffril, H. A., Uli, J. and Abu Samah, B. (2009). A review of contract farming and factors that impinge
youths acceptance to contract farming. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 328-338.
Demeke, M., Di Marcantonio, F. and Morales-Opazo, C. (2013). Understanding the performance of
food production in sub-Saharan African and its implications for food security. Journal of Development and Agricultural
Economics, 5(11), 425-443.
Gabriel, D., Sait, S.M., Kunin, W. E. and Benton, T. G. (2013). Food production vs. biodiversity: comparing organic and
conventional agriculture. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50 (2), 355-364.
Singh, S. (2013). The practice of contract farming in India: making it inclusive and effective. Food Chain, 3(3), 137.
Parirenyatwa, K. T. and Mago, S. (2014). Evolution and development of contract farming in Zimbabwe: a reflection for
agribusiness. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(20), 237-244.
Banakara, S. and Kote, A. B. (2012). An empirical analysis of marketing of oilseeds in Haveri District of Karnataka state of
India. International Journal of Current Research and Review, 4(11), 16-29.
Grunow, M. and van der Vorst, J. 92010). Food production and supply chain management. OR Spectrum, 32, 861-862.
Joe, O. (2010). Food safety and quality management in Kenya: An overview of the roles played by various stakeholder. African
Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 10(11), 4379-4396.
KementerianPertanian&IndustriAsasTani Malaysia. (2015). Projekberimpakbesar. Retrieved 14 July 2015. from
http://www.moa.gov.my/web/guest/projek-berimpak-besar
MdRazak, M. I., Mohd Amir Hamzah, A. S., Abas, N., Idris, R. and Ibrahim, Z. (2013). Sustaining food production for food
security in Malaysia. Journal of Economics and Development Studies, 1, 19-25.
Barrow, C. J., Weng, C. N. and Masron, T. (2009). Issues and challenges of sustainable agriculture in the Cameron Highlands.
Malaysian Journal of Environmental Management, 10(2), 89-114.
Soong, S. F. V. (2007). Managing halal quality in food service industry. UNLV
Abdullah, F. A. and Abu Samah, B. (2013). Factors impinging farmers use of agriculture technology. Asian Social Science,
9(3).120-124.
JabatanPertanianNegeri Perak. (2015). Taman KekalPengeluaranMakanan (TKPM) (di bawah
kendalianJabatanPertanian). Retrieved on 14 July 2015, from http://www.pertanianperak.gov.my/index.php/fokus/projekberimpak-tinggi-hip/tkpm
Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Abdul Nasir, A. F., Idris, K., Uli, J. and DSilva, J. L. (2010). Agriculture
project as an economic development tool to boost socio-economic level of the poor community: the case of Agropolitan project
in Malaysia. African Journal of Business Management, 4(11), 2354-2361.
Man, Norsida and MohdNawi, Nolila. (2010). The practices of contract farming among fresh fruit and vegetable suppliers in
Malaysia. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 5(3), 321-330.
www.ijhssi.org
47 | P a g e
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
Rong, A. and Grunow, M. (2010). A methodology for controlling dispersion in food production and distribution. DTU Orbit
The research information System.Research-peer-review-Journal article-Annual report year, 957-978.
Ogato, G. S., Boon, E. K. and Subramani, J. (2009). Gender roles in crop production and management practices: a case study of
three rural communities in Ambo District, Ethiopia. J Hum Ecol, 27(1), 1-20.
White, P. J., Crawford, J. W., Alvarez, M. C. D. and Moreno, R. G. (2012). Soil management for sustainable agriculture. Applied
and Environmental Soil Science, 2012.
Sagar, S. S. M. (2012). Integrated risk management in agriculture: an inductive research. The Journal of Risk Finance,13(3), 199214.
Pardossi, A., Incrocci, L., Incrocci, G., Malorgio, F., Battista, P., Bacci, L., Rapi, B., Marzialetti, P. and Hemming, J. (2009).
Root zone sensors for irrigation management in intensive agriculture, Sensors, 9(4), 2809-2035.
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R. and Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive
production practices. Nature, 418, 671-677.
Jermar, M. K. (1989). Water management for food production: strategy plan. Water resources management, 3, 299-313.
Flachsbarth, I., Willaarts, B., Xie, H., Pitois, G., Mueller, N. D., Ringler, C. and Garrido, A. (2015).
The role of Latin America,s land and water resources for global food security: environmental trade-offs of future food production
pathways. Plos ONE10(1).
John, A. and Fielding, M. (2014). Rice production constraints and new challenges for South Asian smallholders: insight into de
facto research priorities. Agriculture & Food Security, 3(18).
Mancosu, N., Snyder, R. L., Kyriakakis, G. and Spano, D. (2015). Water scarcity and future challenges for food production.
Water, 7, 975-992.
Sharma, K. R. (2008). Food production: the critical role of irrigation water. Hydro Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and
Environment, 3, 1-3.
Oweis, T. and Hachum, A. (2012). Supplemental irrigation: a highly efficient water-use practice. Syria: ICARDA.
Opdenakker, R. (2006). Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum: Qualitative
Social Research, 7(4).
www.ijhssi.org
48 | P a g e