Seismic Performance of Shear Wall Buildings With Gravity-Induced Lateral Demands
Seismic Performance of Shear Wall Buildings With Gravity-Induced Lateral Demands
Seismic Performance of Shear Wall Buildings With Gravity-Induced Lateral Demands
6/19/13
BMD
Real
buildings
In
design:
Vancouver,
Canada
BIG.dk
6/19/13
SDOF
Study
k
FGILD
Fyt
Fyc
VGILD
Clough
MGILD
a = FGILD /Fy
SDOF
Study
The
yield
strengths
of
the
model
were
adjusted
to
suit
the
applied
load,
FDL =
aFy
:
F
Fyt =Fy+FDL
Fy
D
Fyc=-Fy+FDL
-Fy
max ( 0)
max ( = 0)
6/19/13
6/19/13
MDOF Study
MDOF
Study
Concrete
core
walls
N
=
5,
10,
20,
30,
40,
50
storeys
Yielding
was
assumed
to
occur
within
a
plasAc
hinge
length
of
0.5lw
The
hinge
zone
was
assumed
to
not
exceed
the
height
of
the
rst
storey
PlasAc
hinge
6/19/13
300
300
4600
4600
25
10
300
450
6000
5500
30
20
450
550
8000
7500
35
30
600
700
9000
9000
40
40
700
800
11500 10750
45
50
800
850
13500 13750
50
200,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
100,000
50,000
Moment
(kNm)
0
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Moment (kNm)
150,000
1.5 -1.0
50,000
0
-0.5
0.0
-50,000
-50,000
-100,000
-100,000
-150,000
-150,000
Curvature (rad/km)
0.5
1.0
1.5
Curvature (rad/km)
R = 2.0, = 0.1
6/19/13
DeniAons
=/
=0= /
MGILD
MGILD
M
Myy
==
M
MEmax
/Ra=0
Emax/R
My = MEmax/R
6/19/13
Inclined
Columns
Example
Vancouver:
Ra=0
=
4.0
a =
0.4
Higher
a =
More
slope
required
Taller
Structure
=
Less
slope
Higher
Ra=0
=
Less
slope
Slope = 1.7
Slope = 5.7
N = 5
N = 50
6/19/13
CanAlever
Wall
20
storey,
=0=2.0
=0.0
=0.2
=0.4
Coupled Wall
20 storey,
=0.0
=0=2.0
=0.2
=0.4
Coupling
beam
=0=4.0
=0.0
=0.4
6/19/13
Braced
Frames
8
storey,
Ra=0
=
4
=0.0
=0.2
max ( 0) max ( 0)
=
max ( = 0) max ( = 0)
10
6/19/13
Can>levered
Coupled
=0=2.0
=0=2.0
=0=6.0
11
6/19/13
Variability
, =0.2, =0=2.0
RecommendaAon
12
6/19/13
Probability
of
Collapse
, =30, =0=2.0
1.0
alpha=0.0
Probability
of
Collapse
0.8
alpha=0.4
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
2
3
Sa
(T1
=
3.0
s)
[g]
Type
Notes
(1) (3)
(7)
(1) (3)
(4) (7)
(5) (7)
(3) (7)
(4)
13
6/19/13
Code Requirement
No requirements
MulAply
displacements
by
1.2
0.2 a
0.05 a
Nonlinear
response
history
analysis
where:
a
=
QG
/
Qy
QG
QG
QG
QG
14
6/19/13
Conclusions
Gravity-induced
lateral
demands
can
result
in
amplied
displacement
demands
and
increased
collapse
potenAal.
Large
hysteresis
more
suscepAble
to
ratcheAng
Need
NL
analysis
for
QGILD
>
0.05Qy
QuesAons?
THANK YOU!
15
6/19/13
Case
Studies
Case
Study
Descrip>on
1.98
1.54a
1.21
1.09a
0.71
2.27
1.77a
1.15
1.92
1.43 a
0.93
1.83
1.39a
0.90
Gravity
System
Irregularity
Strengthened
Coupling
Beams
1.32
1.05
16
6/19/13
Adebar et al 2007
CanAlevered
Walls
N
=
30
stories
R
=
4
Alpha
=
0.4
LA
2
1.5
1.5
Sa(T1) [g]
Sa(T1) [g]
Vancouver
2
0.5
0.5
10
10
17
6/19/13
18
6/19/13
VariaAon of b with R
19