Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Medical Management of Nonsurgical Patients
Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Medical Management of Nonsurgical Patients
Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Medical Management of Nonsurgical Patients
Aortic Stenosis:
Pathophysiology,
Diagnosis, and Medical
Management of
Nonsurgical Patients
THERESA CARY, RN, MSN, ACNS-BC, CCRN, CHFN
JUDITH PEARCE, RN, BSN, CCRN
As the average lifespan continues to increase, nurses are managing more patients with aortic stenosis. When
an asymptomatic patient begins to manifest signs and symptoms due to progressive narrowing and stiffening
of the aortic valve, the only effective therapy is surgical replacement of the valve. But, some patients cannot
undergo or do not opt for surgery. Nurses are challenged by the tenuous balance between the narrow range
of preload and afterload to maintain forward blood flow and adequate cardiac output in patients with severe
aortic stenosis. Understanding the complex normal anatomy and physiology of the aortic valve can help
nurses appreciate the consequences of this type of stenosis. Nursing care for patients with aortic stenosis
requires advanced skills in patient assessment and an appreciation of the hemodynamic responses to activities of daily living and to nursing interventions such as administration of medications. (Critical Care Nurse.
2013;33[2]:58-72)
ortic stenosis is caused by narrowing of the orifice of the aortic valve and leads
to obstruction of left ventricular outflow. This stenosis is rare in persons less than
50 years old.1 Calcification of the aortic valve is the most common cause of aortic
stenosis in adults in industrialized countries and affects more than 4% of North
American and Europeans more than 75 years old.2 In a study3 of 338 North American patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis, the mean age was 71 (SD, 15) years. Aortic
stenosis was also associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates than were diseases involving other cardiac valves.4 For example, in a study5 of 161 patients, patients with moderate and
CNE
This article has been designated for CNE credit. A closed-book, multiple-choice examination follows this article,
which tests your knowledge of the following objectives:
1. Describe the pathophysiology of aortic stenosis
2. Identify clinical manifestations of aortic stenosis
3. Discuss medical and nursing management of nonsurgical patients with aortic stenosis
2013 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ccn2013820
58
CriticalCareNurse
www.ccnonline.org
D
Ao
Ao
PA
PA
RA
LA
MV
TV
MV
TV
PV
AV
AV
PV
LV
RV
Figure 1 Normal heart valve function. All 4 valves open and close in response to pressure changes during diastole and systole
to ensure forward progression of blood flow through the heart. A, Open tricuspid and mitral valves. In early and mid diastole,
blood flows passively into the right and left ventricles through the tricuspid and mitral valves, respectively. In late diastole, the
right and left atria contract. B, Closed tricuspid and mitral valves. In early systole, increasing ventricular pressures force the tricuspid and mitral valves to close. All 4 valves are closed briefly as the increase in ventricular pressure continues in response to
ventricular contraction and twist (isovolumetric contraction). C, Open pulmonic and aortic valves. During mid systole, when ventricular pressures exceed pulmonic and aortic pressures, the pulmonic and aortic valves are forced to open, and blood is ejected
into the pulmonary vasculature and aorta, respectively. D, Closed pulmonic and aortic valves. In late systole, ventricular muscle
begins to relax and untwist. Back pressure against the pulmonic and aortic valves force the valves to close (isovolumetric relaxation).
Abbreviations: Ao, aorta; AV, aortic valve; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; MV, mitral valve; PA, pulmonary artery; PV, pulmonic valve; RA, right atrium; RV, right
ventricle; TV, tricuspid valve.
Reprinted with permission, Cleveland Clinic Center for Medical Art & Photography, 2012. All rights reserved.
Authors
Theresa Cary is a clinical nurse specialist in the medical
cardiology step-down units at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Judith Pearce is a nurse manager in the coronary and heart failure
intensive care units at Cleveland Clinic. Lieutenant Colonel Pearce
is also a flight nurse with the 445th Aeromedical Evacuation
Squadron at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio.
Corresponding author: Theresa Cary, RN, MSN, ACNS-BC, CCRN, CHFN, Cleveland
Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195-5245 (e-mail: [email protected]).
To purchase electronic or print reprints, contact The InnoVision Group, 101 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656. Phone, (800) 899-1712 or (949) 362-2050 (ext 532);
fax, (949) 362-2049; e-mail, [email protected].
www.ccnonline.org
CriticalCareNurse
59
during diastole to prevent regurgitation of blood from the aorta back into
the left ventricle (Figures 4 and 5).
To enhance the integrity of the aorFibrous ring of
aortic valve
tic valve when closed, the leaflets
Fibrous skeleton
abut at a thickened area slightly
below their free margins.10,11
The aortic valve leaflets have 3
unique layers that synergistically
Fibrous ring of
Fibrous ring
contribute to valve function and
tricuspid valve
of mitral valve
competence.13 Each layer contains
valvular interstitial cells that help
maintain valve structure and function,
inhibit angiogenesis in the leaflets,
Atrioventricular bundle
and repair cellular damage.13,14 The
layer facing the aorta is the fibrosa,
Figure 2 Fibrous skeleton of the heart.
made primarily of collagen fibers
Reprinted with permission, Cleveland Clinic Center for Medical Art & Photography, 2005. All rights reserved.
that help evenly distribute the pressure load on the leaflets surface.11
and a counterclockwise rotation of the base occur just
Facing the left ventricle is the ventricularis, made primabefore systole as left ventricular pressure increases
rily of elastic fibers that help maintain the leaflets shape.
(known as isovolumetric contraction). This movement is
The soft middle layer, the spongiosa, has glycosaminofollowed by a sustained counterclockwise rotation of the
glycans and proteoglycans that cushion and minimize
apex and a clockwise rotation of the base during the ventricular ejection phase to essentially wring blood content
from the left ventricle2,12 (Figure 3). Ventricular twist augments ejection of blood through the aortic valve and into
the aorta and reduces myocardial oxygen demand.12
Diastole involves myocardial relaxation and progressive
untwisting, producing a suction effect that pulls blood
into the left ventricle.12
Closure of the mitral and tricuspid valves marks the
onset of systole and produces a sound known as S1, best
auscultated at the fifth intercostal space, left midclavicular line. Closure of the pulmonic and aortic valves marks
the end of systole and produces a sound known as S2,
best auscultated at the second intercostal space at the
left or right sternal border.
Fibrous ring of
pulmonary valve
60
CriticalCareNurse
www.ccnonline.org
Commissure
Aortic Stenosis
Aorta
Right coronary artery
www.ccnonline.org
Fibrosa
Spongiosa
Ventricularis
Left ventricle
CriticalCareNurse
61
62
CriticalCareNurse
www.ccnonline.org
Table 1
Parameter
Definition
Preload
Afterload
Systemic vascular resistance
(SVR)
Volume of blood in the ventricle at end diastole (producing a stretch of ventricular muscle cells)
Resistance the heart must overcome to eject blood from the ventricle
Resistance to blood flow in all systemic vasculature
Reflects
Normal range
2-7 mm Hg
Systolic 15-30 mm Hg
Diastolic 4-12 mm Hg
2-12 mm Hg
LV afterload
Systolic 90-140 mm Hg
Diastolic 5-12 mm Hg
Systolic 90-140 mm Hg
Diastolic 60-90 mm Hg
Effects of moderate to
severe aortic stenosis
Increases
Increases when PA systolic
pressure >60 mm Hg (severe
pulmonary hypertension)
May increase
Increases
Decreased preload causes decreases
in LVP and AP, increased SVR
Increased preload causes
increased LVP to maintain AP
Increases
Increases
Decreases
www.ccnonline.org
compromise of atrial kick as a result of atrial fibrillation, ventricular pacing, and/or intravascular fluid volume overload may precipitate pulmonary congestion,
hypotension, and angina.7,21,22 Atrial arrhythmias may
result from an extension of calcific infiltrates from the
aortic valve into the conduction system.1,10,11 In one study,22
chronic atrial fibrillation was predictive of heart failure
and stroke and new-onset atrial fibrillation was associated with cardiac decompensation (see Case Report).
CriticalCareNurse
63
Case Report
r S was 84 years old, 178 cm tall, and weighed 72 kg. He came to the emergency department
because of increasing shortness of breath, intermittent chest pressure, and dyspnea on exertion for the
past 3 weeks. He stated that he had slept in his recliner for the past 2 nights because of the increasing
shortness of breath. Vital signs on admission were heart rate 148 beats per minute, respiratory rate 24 breaths
per minute, oxygen saturation 93% on 6 L of oxygen via nasal cannula, and blood pressure 109/59 mm Hg. A
12-lead electrocardiogram revealed rapid atrial fibrillation. Mr Ss medical history included hypertension, multivessel coronary artery disease, hypercholesterolemia, dilated cardiomyopathy, and aortic stenosis with an aortic valve
area of 0.6 cm2. He had been evaluated for aortic valve replacement 6 months earlier, but he refused to have
surgery. Two attempts to cardiovert him from atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm were unsuccessful. He was given
aspirin 325 mg orally and amiodarone 150 mg intravenously followed by continuous infusion at 1 mg/min. A nitroglycerin infusion was started at 20 g/min. He received furosemide 80 mg intravenously to promote diuresis and
heparin 5000 IU subcutaneously. Admission laboratory studies included electrolyte levels, coagulation studies,
and serum level of brain natriuretic peptide. The results were normal except for the level of brain natriuretic peptide, which was 2800 pg/mL (reference range, <130 pg/mL). Chest radiography revealed pulmonary congestion.
During the preceding 30 minutes, his respiratory rate had increased to 32 breaths per minute, with worsening
shortness of breath and oxygen saturation levels of 86% to 88% on 100% oxygen via a nonrebreather mask. He
was intubated and admitted to the coronary intensive care unit. The diagnosis was decompensated heart failure,
severe aortic stenosis, and uncontrolled atrial fibrillation. On arrival to the unit, his heart rate was 89 beats per
minute and his blood pressure was 112/78 mm Hg. Ventilator settings were assist control at a respiratory rate of 12
breaths per minute and fraction of inspired oxygen 0.50. A pulmonary artery catheter was placed, and hemodynamic values were measured and calculated: pulmonary artery pressure 78/36 mm Hg, right atrial pressure 21
mm Hg, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure 29 mm Hg, cardiac output 2.89 L/min, and systemic vascular
resistance 1882 dynes sec cm-5. An additional 40 mg of furosemide was given intravenously, and sodium
nitroprusside 5 g/min was started to decrease blood pressure and reduce the systemic vascular resistance.
Table 2
Grade
Aortic jet
velocity, m/s
Mild
<3.0
<25
Moderate
3-4
25-40
Severe
>4
>40
a Based
64
CriticalCareNurse
www.ccnonline.org
Table 3
Clinical manifestation
Causes
Significance
Diastolic dysfunction
Decreased cardiac output with exercise
Angina
Syncope
Heart failure
a Based
Clinical Manifestations
The classical clinical manifestations of angina, syncope, and heart failure do not occur until late in aortic
stenosis.15 Because of the prolonged latency period of
asymptomatic disease progression, patients are often
unaware of their condition until a systolic murmur is
detected during a physical examination, evaluation of
new onset of atrial fibrillation, or cardiac catheterization
for symptomatic coronary artery disease. Patients typical initial descriptions include decreased exercise tolerance, dyspnea on exertion, exertional dizziness, and
lightheadedness24 (Table 3). Many patients do not recognize the initial manifestations of aortic stenosis because
of the gradual change in hemodynamic status. Decreased
exercise tolerance manifested as exertional dyspnea or
fatigue has been attributed to cardiac ischemia, elevated
left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and decreased
cardiac output.1 Angina may occur in patients with CAVD
as a consequence of coronary artery disease.1 In patients
without coronary artery disease, angina may be due to
decreased subendocardial blood flow and/or increased
myocardial oxygen demand associated with concentric
hypertrophy.2,25 Blood flow to the myocardium may be
limited by insufficient capillary density into the hypertrophied left ventricular muscle and/or by endocardial
compression due to increased filling pressures.7,8
Syncope occurs because of decreased cerebral perfusion associated with decreased cardiac output or during
exercise and times of decreased preload, such as after
www.ccnonline.org
CriticalCareNurse
65
Table 4
Study
Purpose
Doppler echocardiography
Estimation of severity of aortic stenosis, left ventricular size, and ejection fraction
Estimation of pulmonary pressures, aortic valve gradient, aortic valve area
Assessment of thickening of aortic valve leaflet, reduced leaflet motion, reduced valve opening
Cardiac catheterization
Assessment of coronary arteries to determine need for simultaneous coronary artery bypass surgery
and aortic valve replacement
Direct measurement of left ventricular and ascending aortic pressures to determine aortic valve
pressure gradient
Determination of left ventricular systolic pump function quantified by measuring left ventricular
end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, and ejection fraction
12-Lead electrocardiography
Evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy: Increased R-wave amplitude of the QRS complex in lead V6,
increased S-wave amplitude in lead V1
ST-segment depression and T-wave inversion in leads facing the left ventricle: I, aVL, V5, and V6
Chest radiography
Stress testing
a Based
66
CriticalCareNurse
www.ccnonline.org
Medical Management
of Asymptomatic Patients
Currently no known medical therapy is available to prevent CAVD or delay the progression of aortic stenosis.21,24
Treatment focuses on reducing cardiovascular risk factors,
including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking tobacco,
high cholesterol levels, overweight, and lack of exercise.24
Periodic evaluation by a health care provider includes
echocardiographic monitoring and education about progression of aortic stenosis, recognition of signs and symptoms of worsening aortic stenosis, and prompt reporting of
the signs and symptoms at the onset.1,19,24 Having patients
compare current activity level with past activity level may
indicate if usual activity has been altered to avoid signs and
symptoms.24 Physical activity is not restricted in mild aortic
stenosis, but competitive sports should be avoided by
patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis.21
Guidance for medication therapy is limited and is
primarily based on expert consensus. Statin therapy has
been evaluated as a means of retarding progression of
valvular stenosis. In some studies,29-31 statins were effective in slowing the progression of aortic stenosis, but the
results of larger randomized controlled trials32-34 did not
support those findings. Current guidelines recommend
statin therapy for patients with aortic stenosis and
hypercholesterolemia to reduce cardiovascular events.1,21
Antibiotic prophylaxis before dental and other invasive
procedures was standard therapy for patients with aortic
stenosis until recently. Currently, antibiotic prophylaxis
is indicated solely for patients with rheumatic aortic
stenosis, to prevent recurrent rheumatic fever.21 The
changes in the guidelines were based on newer evidence
that bacteremia from routine activities such as tooth
www.ccnonline.org
CriticalCareNurse
67
Table 5
Procedure
Indication
Description
Aortic valve is removed and a new valve (mechanical or biological) is sewn to the annulus of the
native valve
a Based
Medical Management
of Symptomatic Patients
Once severe aortic stenosis has been diagnosed, retrospective analyses24 reveal that the onset of signs and
symptoms can be anticipated within 5 to 10 years. After
onset, without surgical intervention, the mean life
expectancy is 2 to 3 years21 (Table 5). Surgical repair is
the only effective treatment for symptomatic aortic
stenosis;
For patients who do not have surgical
however,
repair, medical management of angina,
some
exertional syncope, and signs and
patients
symptoms of heart failure becomes
may not
necessary.
be considered surgical candidates or may require medical stabilization before surgery; other patients refuse surgical
options altogether.6,25 For patients who do not have surgical repair, medical management of angina, exertional
syncope, and signs and symptoms of heart failure
becomes necessary.
Treating angina in patients with severe aortic stenosis is a challenge. Among patients with aortic stenosis,
the 20% to 60% who experience angina also have coronary
68
CriticalCareNurse
www.ccnonline.org
en hours after admission to intensive care, Mr Ss blood pressure was 98/51 mm Hg; he was receiving
sodium nitroprusside 50 g/min. Cardiac output increased to 3.6 L/min and systemic vascular resistance
decreased to 1180 dynes sec cm-5. Urine output was 1500 mL, respirations were 16 breaths per
minute, and oxygen saturation was greater than 98%. A trial of continuous positive airway pressure was started.
Mr S tolerated the intervention with no increase in respirations and no decrease in oxygen saturation. Echocardiography revealed an ejection fraction of 15% (normal 55%-70%). The left ventricle appeared concentric, with
severely decreased left ventricular function. Mr S also had severe aortic stenosis, with a peak gradient of
80 mm Hg (mean gradient 48 mm Hg). The area of the aortic orifice was 0.6 cm2. On auscultation, a harsh systolic ejection murmur was heard at the second intercostal space at the right sternal border. Eleven hours after
admission to the cardiac unit, Mr S was extubated and started on 6 L of oxygen via nasal cannula. A multidisciplinary team that included the cardiologist, cardiothoracic surgeon, clinical nurse specialist, and bedside nurse met
with Mr S and his family to discuss management options. Mr S insisted that he still did not want surgery or any
other intervention and requested that a do-not-resuscitate order be placed in his record. Treatment was started
with oral amiodarone 400 mg 3 times per day and warfarin 5 mg daily for atrial fibrillation. Nitroglycerin and
sodium nitroprusside infusions were titrated off as oral medications (isosorbide dinitrate 10 mg 3 times per day
and captopril 25 mg 3 times per day) were started. Mr S continued taking medications that he had been taking at
home: digoxin 0.125 mg daily, furosemide 20 mg daily, and pravastatin 40 mg daily. The pulmonary artery
catheter was removed.
Nursing Considerations
Caring for medically managed patients with aortic
stenosis requires knowledge and understanding of the
tenuous balance between the narrow range of preload
and afterload necessary to maintain forward blood flow
and adequate cardiac output. In the intensive care unit,
medication management is based on the desired hemodynamic parameters; a pulmonary artery catheter is
used to calculate adequate preload, afterload, and cardiac
www.ccnonline.org
CriticalCareNurse
69
Table 6
Blood
Cardiac
Heart rate pressure Preload Afterload Contractility output
Treatment
Vasodilators (nitrates)
-Blockers
Angiotensin-converting
enzyme inhibitor
Low-dose intravenous or
low-dose sublingual nitroglycerin; avoid hypotension
Diuretics
Nursing considerations
strategies to comply with modifying risk factors for coronary artery disease, as described previously.8 Patients with
aortic stenosis must be educated to recognize worsening
of signs and symptoms and to promptly report the changes
to the appropriate health care provider. Symptomatic
patients should be evaluated for surgical replacement of
the aortic valve.8,21 For symptomatic patients who are nonsurgical candidates (or who refuse surgery), education
should include prevention of worsening symptoms or
onset of new symptoms through balanced activity and
rest and the impact of medication adherence on cardiac
function and pathological changes associated with aortic
stenosis. All nonsurgical patients should be assessed for
appropriate coping mechanisms and psychosocial support
systems and should be referred, as needed, for counseling
and discussion of resuscitation status (see Case Report,
Update 2).
70
CriticalCareNurse
Conclusion
Medical management of patients with asymptomatic
aortic stenosis is challenging. Severe symptomatic aortic
stenosis cannot be corrected with medical therapy, but
some patients do not desire surgical intervention or
meet criteria for surgical repair or replacement of the
calcified aortic valve. Acute and critical care nursing
care is difficult because of patients tenuous hemody-
www.ccnonline.org
Now that youve read the article, create or contribute to an online discussion
about this topic using eLetters. Just visit www.ccnonline.org and click Submit a
response in either the full-text or PDF view of the article.
To learn more about caring for patients with aortic stenosis, read
A New Option for the Treatment of Aortic Stenosis: Percutaneous
Aortic Valve Replacement by Lauck et al in Critical Care Nurse,
June 2008;28(3):40-51. Available at www.ccnonline.org.
References
1. Kurtz CE, Otto CM. Aortic stenosis: clinical aspects of diagnosis and
management, with 10 illustrative case reports from a 25-year experience.
Medicine. 2010;89(5):349-379.
2. Ozkan A, Kapadia S, Tuzcu M, Marwick TH. Assessment of left ventricular function in aortic stenosis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8(9):494-501.
3. Pai RG, Kapoor N, Bansal RC, Varadarajan P. Malignant natural history
of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: benefit of aortic valve replacement.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(6):2116-2122.
4. Grimard BH, Larson JM. Aortic stenosis: diagnosis and treatment. Am
Fam Physician. 2008;78(6):717-724.
5. Schueler R, Hammerstingl C, Sinning JM, Nickenig G, Omran H. Prognosis of octogenarians with severe aortic valve stenosis at high risk for
cardiovascular surgery. Heart. 2010;96(22):1831-1836.
6. Ben-Dor I, Pichard AD, Gonzalez MA, et al. Correlates and causes of
death in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis who are not
eligible to participate in a clinical trial of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Circulation. 2010;122(11 suppl):S37-S42.
7. Carabello BA, Paulus WJ. Aortic stenosis. Lancet. 2009;373(9667):956-966.
8. Otto CM, Bonow RO. Valvular Heart Disease: A Companion to Braunwalds
Heart Disease. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2009.
9. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, et al. Clinical factors associated with
calcific aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29(3):630-634.
10. Ho SY. Structure and anatomy of the aortic root. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;
10(1):i3-i10.
11. Saremi F, Achenback S, Arbustini E, Narula J, eds. Revisiting Cardiac
Anatomy: A Computed-Tomography-Based Atlas and Reference. Hoboken, NJ:
Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.
12. Bloechlinger S, Grander W, Bryner J, Dnser MW. Left ventricular rotation:
a neglected aspect of the cardiac cycle. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(1):156-163.
13. Rajamannan NM, Evans FJ, Aikawa E, et al. Calcific aortic valve disease:
not simply a degenerative process: a review and agenda for research
from the National Heart and Lung and Blood Institute Aortic Stenosis
Working Group. Executive summary: calcific aortic valve disease-2011
update. Circulation. 2011;124(16):1783-1791.
14. Hinton RB, Yutzey KE. Heart valve structure and function in development
and disease. Annu Rev Physiol. 2011;73:29-46.
15. Vahanian A, Otto CM. Risk stratification of patients with aortic stenosis.
Eur Heart J. 2010;31(4):416-423.
16. Akat K, Borggrefe M, Kaden JJ. Aortic valve calcification: basic science to
clinical practice. Heart. 2009;95(8):616-623.
17. Steiner I, Kasparov P, Kohout A, Dominik J. Bone formation in cardiac valves:
a histopathological study of 128 cases. Virchows Arch. 2007;450(6):653-657.
18. Mohler ER III, Gannon F, Reynolds C, Zimmerman R, Keane MG,
Kaplan FS. Bone formation and inflammation in cardiac valves. Circulation. 2001;103(11):1522-1528.
www.ccnonline.org
19. Bonow RO, Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P, eds. Braunwalds Heart Disease:
A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier
Saunders; 2012.
20. Mutlak D, Aronson D, Carasso S, Lessick J, Reisner SA, Agmon Y. Frequency, determinants and outcome of pulmonary hypertension in
patients with aortic valve stenosis. Am J Med Sci. 2011;343(5):397-401.
21. Bonow R, Carabello BA, Chaterjee K, et al; American College of Cardiology/
American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2008
focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the
management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force
on practice guidelines. (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines
for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). Endorsed
by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2008;52(13):e2-e142.
22. Greve AM, Gerdts E, Boman K, et al. Prognostic importance of atrial
fibrillation in asymptomatic aortic stenosis: the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis study. Int J Cardiol. In press.
23. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al; American Society of Echocardiography; European Association of Echocardiography. Echocardiographic
assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical
practice [published correction appears in J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(5):
442]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(1):1-23.
24. Otto CM. Calcific aortic valve disease: new concepts. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;22(4):276-284.
25. Nadir MA, Wei L, Elder DHJ, et al. Impact of rennin-angiotensin system
blockade therapy on outcome in aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;
58(6)570-576.
26. Aronow WS. Recognition and management of aortic stenosis in the elderly. Geriatrics. 2007;62(12):23-32.
27. Mookadam F, Moustafa SE, Khandheria B. Management of aortic valve
disease in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction. Expert Rev Cardiovasc
Ther. 2010;8(2):259-268.
28. Bergler-Klein J. Natriuretic peptides in the management of aortic stenosis.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2009;11(2):85-93.
29. Shavelle DM, Takasu J, Budoff MJ, Mao S, Zhao XQ, OBrien KD. HMG
CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) and aortic valve calcium. Lancet. 2002;
359(9312):1125-1126.
30. Pohle K, Mffert R, Ropers D, et al. Progression of aortic valve calcification:
association with coronary atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk factors.
Circulation. 2001;104(16):1927-1932.
31. Rosenhek R, Rader F, Loho N, et al. Statins but not angiotensin-converting
enzyme inhibitors delay progression of aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2004;
110(10):1291-1295.
32. Cowell SJ, Newby DE, Prescott RJ, et al; Scottish Aortic Stenosis and Lipid
Lowering Trial, Impact on Regression (SALTIRE) investigators. A randomized trial of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in calcific aortic stenosis.
N Engl J Med. 2005;352(23):2389-2397.
33. Rossebo AB, Pedersen TR, Boman K, et al. Intensive lipid lowering with
simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):
1343-1356.
34. Chan KL, Teo K, Dumesnil JG, Ni A, Tam J, et al; ASTRONOMER Investigators. Effect of lipid lowering with rosuvastatin on progression of aortic
stenosis: results of the Aortic Stenosis Progression Observation: Measuring Effects of Rosuvastatin (ASTRONOMER) trial. Circulation. 2010;
121(2):306-314.
35. Rossebo AB, Pedersen TR, Allen C, et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) study.
Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(7):970-973.
36. Khot UN, Novaro GM, Popovic ZB, et al. Nitroprusside in critically ill
patients with left ventricular dysfunction and aortic stenosis. N Engl J
Med. 2003;348(18):1756-1763.
37. Turkoski BB, Lance BR, Tomsik EA. Drug Information Handbook for
Advanced Practice Nursing. 12th ed. Hudson, OH: Lexi-Comp Inc; 2011.
38. Aksoy O, Yousefzai R, Singh D, et al. Cardiogenic shock in the setting of
severe aortic stenosis: role of intra-aortic balloon pump support. Heart.
2011;97(10):838-843.
CriticalCareNurse
71