Highway Capacity Manual
Highway Capacity Manual
Highway Capacity Manual
___________
NCHRP 3-55(2)A
Planning Applications for the
Year 2000 Highway Capacity Manual
Final Report
Prepared for
National Cooperative Highway Research Program
Transportation Research Board
National Research Council
Richard Dowling,
Dowling Associates
with the Assistance of:
Kittelson Associates
Dr. Alan Horowitz
Reynolds, Smith and Hills
Dr. William McShane
Deakin, Harvey, Skabardonis
September 1, 1999
Acknowledgement
This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials, in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the
National Cooperative Highway Research Program which is administered by the Transportation
Research Board of the National Research Council.
Disclaimer
This copy is an uncorrected draft as submitted by the research agency. A decision concerning
acceptance by the Transportation Research Board, and publication in the regular NCHRP series
will not be made until a complete technical review has been made and discussed with the
researchers. The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the
research agency. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the
National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, the American Association of
State Highway and Transportation Officials, or of the individual states participating in the
National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
Dowling Associates
Transportation Engineering, Planning & Research
September 1, 1999
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 995, Oakland, CA. 94612 510-839-1742 FAX 510-839-0871
P970030
project for the Year 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Ms. Barbara Ostrom, Mr. Robert Bryson, Mr. James
Altenstadter, Mr. Alfred Tavares, Dr. James Gattis, Mr. Brian Gardner, Mr. Thomas Hicks, Mr. Davey Warren
all made valuable contributions to this effort.
Finally, I would like to thank Mr. Ray Derr of your staff, who organized the Washington D.C workshop,
diligently reminded us of upcoming deadlines and deliverables, and kept us informed of relevant parallel
research being sponsored by NCHRP and TCRP.
Sincerely,
Richard Dowling
Principal
RGD/E:\WORK\PROJECTS\proj98\355cont\finrep\finrep.doc
NCHRP 3-55(2)A
Final Report
September 1, 1999
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................... 1
1.1 PROBLEM STATEMENT ................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................. 1
1.3 OVERVIEW OF WORK PLAN........................................................................................................... 1
CHAPTER 2 WORK PERFORMED ......................................................................................................... 3
APPENDIX A. LITERATURE REVIEW
APPENDIX B. PLANNING APPLICATIONS WORKSHOP
APPENDIX C. DEFAULT VALUES SURVEY
APPENDIX D. URBAN STREET CONCEPTS
APPENDIX E. FREEWAY CONCEPTS
APPENDIX F. HIGHWAY CONCEPTS
APPENDIX G. ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLE FACILITIES
APPENDIX H. CORRIDOR ANALYSIS
APPENDIX I. AREA-WIDE ANALYSIS
NCHRP 3-55(2)A
Final Report
September 1, 1999
Chapter 1
Project Overview
1.1 Problem Statement
The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) and the Clean Air Act Amendments
(CAAA) have made planning analyses more relevant to national policy issues and concerns. Current
techniques for estimating speeds and service volumes are inadequate to meet present transportation
planning needs. Research was needed to determine the most appropriate techniques to estimate speeds
and service volumes for use throughout a broad range of planning applications.
Existing capacity analysis techniques for use in transportation planning do not adequately reflect the
broad range of operating conditions. For example, most planning models and evaluation techniques do
not adequately consider the effects of traffic signals in the estimation of speeds on arterial roads.
Transportation Research Board (TRB) Special Report 209, Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), indicates
that signalization characteristics are just as important as traffic and roadway characteristics and the
volume-to-capacity ratios are inappropriate for evaluating the operation of arterials. However, volumeto-capacity ratios continue to be emphasized in planning analysis techniques.
Improved speed and service volume estimation techniques will provide more consistent and reliable
inputs to a variety of planning applications. It is hoped these techniques will be widely adopted by the
transportation planning community and incorporated into planning processes.
The first part of this research developed planning techniques for estimating speed and service volumes
for individual facilities. The continuation portion of this project will extend these planning techniques to
systems level analyses (A system being defined as a combination of transportation facilities located in a
corridor or selected area).
The first part of this research resulted in the publication of NCHRP 387, Techniques to Estimate Speeds
and Service Volumes for Planning Applications. The continuation portion of this project will result in
two new sections of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). One section (to be called Part II of the new
HCM) will provide default values and input data estimation techniques for planning applications of the
analytical techniques contained in the Highway Capacity Manual. The other section (to be called Part IV
of the new HCM) will provide techniques for corridors and area-wide analyses.
NCHRP 3-55(2)A
Final Report
September 1, 1999
4. preparing three of the six chapters for Part II of the HCM 2000, General concepts and Estimated
Values;
5. preparing three of the chapters for Part IV of the HCM 2000, Corridor and Areawide Analyses;
6. developing sample problems for the chapters prepared for Part II and Part IV of the HCM 2000;
and
7. preparing the Final Report.
NCHRP 3-55(2)A
Final Report
September 1, 1999
Chapter 2
Work Performed
Task 0. Amplified Research Plan
The amplified research plan was delivered to TRB. Comments were received on September 17, 1997 and were
responded to in the September, 1997 Quarterly Progress Report.
Note that the chapter numbers have been changed in the latest edition of the HCM 2000. They are currently chapters 10, 12,
and 13. Readers should look for the corresponding chapter in the HCM 2000 with the same title.
NCHRP 3-55(2)A
Final Report
September 1, 1999