Final Shape of C.p.c.syllabus
Final Shape of C.p.c.syllabus
Final Shape of C.p.c.syllabus
Code
: CPC 601
Principal Teachers: ..
Prof. H. Padhi
DR. PURANJOY GHOSH
MECHANICAL DATA
1. Course:
2. Subject:
Compulsory
4. Paper:
5. Paper Code:
CPC - 601
6. Subject Overview:
This
paper
is
to
help
law
7. Name of the
Principal Teachers:
Prof. H. Padhi
8. Name of the
Supporting teacher:
9. Credit hours/week:
Hours.
OBJECT
o The Object is to introduce the students to the basic principles of the
Procedural Law regarding the Civil Suits in India
OBJECTIVES
To impart the knowledge amongst the students regarding various
Principles of Procedural Law being followed by the Civil Courts in
India
To introduce the students to the functional understanding of
various aspects of the Civil Proceedings
clarification of any doubt regarding the subject even after the class hours. The
lecture will be mainly on the topics mentioned in the course outline. Students
are expected to attend the lectures regularly and actively participate in the
discussions. They are expected to read the portions from the text books and
come to the class. Necessary reading materials will be provided to the students
on the subject to the maximum possible extent. No doubts should be left un
clarified and the teacher should be consulted for that purpose. All students
are expected to bring the bare act every day in the class.
EVALUATION SYSTEM
There
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
ANNEXURE - I
DETAILED SYLLABUS
Module: 1
o
Module 2:
o
Important Concepts Res Sub-Judice (S. 10) Res Judicata (S. 11)
Restitution (Sec. 144) Caveat (Sec. 148A) Inherent Powers of Courts (Ss.
151 & 152)
[Cr. H. - 3]
Indian Bank v. Maharashtra State Co-op. Marketing Federation Ltd., (1998) 5 SCC 69
Res Sub-judice
Radha Devi v. Deep Narayan, (2003) 11 SCC 759 Stay of suit
Satyadhyan Ghosal v. Deorjin Debi, AIR 1960 SC 941 Res Judicata
Lal Chand v. Radha Krishan, (1977) 2 SCC 88 Principles of Res judicata & Res judicata
in Public interest
Daryao v. State of U.P., AIR 1961 SC 1457 Applicability of Res Judicata
Swamy Atmananda v. Sri Ramakrishna Tapovanam, (2005) 10 SCC 51 Res Judicata &
Estoppel
Sheodan Sigh v. Daryao Kunwar, AIR 1966 SC 1332 Conditions of Res Judicata [Saroja
v. Chinnusamy, (2007) 8 SCC 329]
Devilal Modi v. STO, AIR 1965 SC 1150 [State of U.P. v. Nawab Hussain, (1977) 2 SCC
806] Constructive Res Judicata [Pondicherry Khadi & Village Industries Board v. P.
Kulothangan, (2004) 1 SCC 68]
Sulochana Amma v. Narayanan Nair, (1994) 2 SCC 14 Res Judicata & Court of
Concurrent Jurisdiction
Bhagat Ram v. State of Rajasthan, (1972) 2 SCC 466 Applicability of Res Judicata in
Criminal Proceedings
M.S.M. Sharma v. Dr. Shree Krishna, AIR 1960 SC 1186 Res Judicata in Writ Petitions
Union Carbide Corpn. v. Union of India, AIR 192 SC 248 Doctrine of Restitution
Mahijbhai Mohanbhai v. Patel Manibhai, AIR 1965 SC 1477 Order of Restitution not
Decree but Right to Appeal exists
Ram Chandra Aggarwal v. State of U.P., AIR SC 1888 Proceedings and Caveat
Manohar Lal v. Seth Hiralal, AIR 1962 SC 527 Inherent Power of Courts [Raj Narain v.
Indira Nehru Gandhi, (1972) 3 SCC 850; State of U.P.v. Roshan Singh (2008) 2 SCC 488]
Chinnamarkathian v. Ayyavoo, (1982) 1 SCC 159 Extent of Inherent Power
Manohar Lal v. Seth Hiralal, AIR 1962 SC 527 Inherent Power not in case of Injunction
Abuse of Process of Court
Mahendra Manilal v. Sushila Mahendra, AIR 1965 SC 364 Limitations of Inherent Power
Module 3:
o
Framing of Suit(Ord. II, Rr. 1 -3) Parties to Suit (Ord. I Rr. 1,3,8-10)
Joinder of Parties Misjoinder of Parties Nonjoinder of Parties
Representative Suit - Joinder of Causes of Action Split of Cause of Action
[Cr. H. - 4]
Ramesh Hirachand v. Municipal Corpn. of Greater Bombay, (1992) 2 SCC 326
Necessary & Proper Parties
Kasturi v. Iyyamperumal, (2005) 6 SCC 733 Determination of Necessary Party
Laxmishankar v. Yashram Vasta, (1993) 3 SCC 49 Misjoinder & Non-Joinder of Parties
Diwakar Shrivastava v. State of M.P., 1984 Supp SCC 214 Representative Suit [T.N.
Housing Board v. T.N. Ganapathy, (1990) 1 SCC 608]
Module 4:
o
Pleadings (Ord. VI, Rr. 2, 15) Plaint (Ord. VII, Rr. 1, 7) Return of Plaint
(Ord. VII. R. 10) Rejection of Plaint (Ord. VII, R. 11) Amendment (Ord.
VI R. 17) Written Statement (Ord. VIII, Rr. 1,3-5) Set Off (R. 6) Counter
Claim (R. 6A)
[Cr. H. - 5]
Amar Chand v. Union of India, (1973) 1 SCC 115 Return of Plaint [P.V. Papanna v. K.
Padmanabhaiah, (1994) 2 SCC 316]
Shamsher Singh v. Rajinder Prashad, (1973) 2 SCC 524 Rejection of plaint fresh plaint
the same cause of action
Food Corpn. of India v. Yadav Engineer & Contractor, (1982) 2 SCC 499 Expression
Written Statement
Ganesh Trading Co. v. Moji Ram, (1978) 2 SCC 91 Object of Amendment [Rajesh Kumar
v. K.K. Modi, (2006) 4 SCC 91]
Kisandas v. Rachappa Vithoba, ILR (1909) 33 Bom 644 Amendment when allowed;
Pirgonda Patil v. Kalgonda Patil, AIR 1957 SC 363 [B.K. Narayana v. Parameswaran,
(2000) 1 SCC 712]
Union of India v. Karam Chand Thapar and Bros. (Coal Sales) Ltd., (2004) 3 SCC 504
Meaning of Set off; Equitable Set-off
Laxmidas v. Nanabhai, AIR 1964 SC 11 Counter Claim
Rohit Singh v. State of Bihar, (2006) 12 SCC 734 Person can file Counter Claim
Discovery & Inspection (Ord. XI) Settlement of Issues (Ord. XIV, Rr. 1-3)
Hearing of Suit (Ord. XVIII, Rr. 1,4,5)
[Cr. H. - 2]
Raj Narain v. Indira Nehru Gandhi, (1972) 3 SCC 850 Meaning of Interrogatories
Sita Ram v. Radha Bai, AIR 1968 SC 534 Importance of Issues
Naresh Shridhar v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1967 SC 1 Hearing of Suit [P.N.Eswara
Iyer v. Registrar, Supreme Court of India, (1980) 4 SCC 680]
Module 5:
o
Interim Order Commissions (Ss. 75-78; Ord. XXVI) Arrest & Attachment
before Judgment (Ord. XXXVIII) Costs (S. 35; Ord. XXA) Interest (S. 34)
Judgment (S. 33; Ord. XX, Rr. 1-3, 5, 5A) - Decree (S. 33; Ord. XX, Rr. 6,
6A, 7, 8, 11)
[Cr. H. - 2]
Anil Rai v. State of Bihar, (2001) 7 SCC 318 Time-limit to pronounce Judgment [R.C.
Sharma v. Union of India, (1976) 3 SCC 574]
Samarendra Nath v. Krishna Kumar, AIR 1967 SC 1440 Alteration in Judgment [Kewal
Chand v. S.K.Sen, (2001) 6 SCC 512]
Foreign
Brij Lal v. Govindram, AIR 1947 PC 192 Foreign Judgment [Badat & Co v. East India
Trading Co. AIR 1964 SC 538; Satya v. Teja Singh (1975) 1 SCC 120]
R. Viswanathan v. Rukn-ul-Mulk Syed Abdul, AIR 1963 SC 1 Jurisdiction [Sankaran
Govindam v. Lakshmi Bharathi, (1975) 3 SCC 351]
Roshanlal v. R.B. Mohan Singh, (1975) 4 SCC 628 Enforcement of Foreign Judgment
Appeal (Ss. 96, 107; Ord. XLI Rr. 1, 5, 23, 23A, 24, 25, 27) Appeal from
Orders (S. 104; Ord. XLIII)
[Cr. H. - 4]
Nagendra Nath Dey v. Suresh Chandra Dey, AIR 1932 PC 165 Appeal [Shankar
Ramchandra v Krishnaji Dattatreya, (1969) 2 SCC 74; Dayawati v. Inderjit, AIR 1966 SC
1423]
Garikapati Veeraya v. N. Subbiah Chaudhry, AIR 1957 SC 540 Appeal a right [Anant
Mills Co. Ltd. State of Gujarat, (1975) 2 SCC 175]
Ganga Bai v. Vijay Kumar, (1974) 2 SCC 393 Difference between Suit & Appeal
Associated Cement Co. Ltd. v. Keshvanand, (1998) 1 SCC 687 Appeal & Revision [Hari
Shanker v. Rao Girdhari Lal, AIR 1963 SC 698]
Katikara Chintamani Dora v. Guntreddi Annamanaidu, (1974) 1 SCC 567 No Appeal
against Consent Decree
Ravinder Kumar v. State of Assam, (1997) 7 SCC 435 Cross Objections [Hari Shankar v.
Sham Manohar, (2005) 3 SCC 761]
Mohd. Akbar Khan v. Motai, AIR 1948 PC 36 Power of Remand
Panna Lal v. State of Bombay, AIR 1963 SC 516 Power to modify Decree [Mahant
Dhangir v. Madan Mohan, 1987 Supp SCC 528; S. Nazeer Ahmed v. State Bank of
Mysore, (2007) 11 SCC 75]
Harcharan Singh v. Shivrani,(1981) 2 SCC 535 Second Appeal [Chunilal V. Mehta &
Sons v. Century Spg. & Mfg. Co. Ltd., AIR 1962 SC 1314]
[Cr. H. - 2]
Module 6:
o
Module 7:
o
Module 8:
Law of Limitation
o
[Cr. H. - 3]
Roghunath v. Gokul AIR 1958 SC 827 Extent of Benefit to the Litigant [Safar Khan v.
Board of Revenue AIR 1958 SC 39]
o
o
[Cr. H. - 2]
ANNEXURE II:
DAY TO DAY SCHEDULE
S. No.
Teaching
Topics
Credit Hours
Methodology
1.
Lecture &
Substantive
Law
Case Studies
Significance
of
Module - 1
Distinction
&
Procedural
Procedural
between
Civil
&
Law
Law
Criminal
Procedure
Concept of Procedure & Suit History of
[1+1] =2
2.
Module - 2
3.
do-do-
4.
-do-
[2+2]=4
Irregular
exercise
[2+2]=4
of
Jurisdiction
5.
Module - 3
-do-
[1+2+1]=4
6.
Module - 4
-do-
[2+1+2]=5
7.
-do-
[1+1+1+2]=5
8.
-do-
9.
Module - 5
-do-
[1+2]=3
[1+2+1+1+1]=
Temporary Injunctions
Receiver
10
-do-
Judgment Decree
Foreign Judgment Conclusiveness of
Foreign Judgments
[2+2]=4
Execution
11.
12.
13.
-do-doModule 6
-do-
Appeal
Appeal from Orders
[2+2]=4
2
Second Appeal
Suits
in
Particular
Proceedings
Cases
Suits
by
&
Special
or
against
[2+2+1+2+2
+1+1+]=10
Interpleader Suit
Suits by Indigent Persons - Suits by or
against Minors & Unsound Mind
Suits relating to Public Nuisance & Public
Charities
Compromise of Suit in Representative Suit
- Compromise by Next Friend or Guardian
14.
Module - 7
-do-
Execution
Questions
determined
by
Execution Court
Execution by Transfer - Execution against
[1+1+3+1+
1+3+3]=13
Legal Representatives
Power of Execution Court Arrest &
Detention
Execution of Specific Movable Property
Specific Performance of Restitution of
Conjugal Rights & Injunction
Attachment
of
Immovable
Property
Objection to Attachment
Proclamation of Sale Set aside a Sale on
ground of Irregularity Set aside a Sale on
ground
of
Judgment-Debtor
had
no
15.
-do-
Review
Revision
[2+2+1]=5
16.
Module - 8
-do-
Law
of
Limitation
Introduction
[3+1+1+1]=6
Applications
Computation of Period of Limitation
Acquisition of Ownership by Possession
Schedule Periods of Limitations
Annexure - III
SUGGESTIVE READINGS
M.P. Jain, The Code of Civil Procedure, Lexix Nexix, 3rd edition, 2011.
C.K. Takwani, Eastern Book Company, 6th edition, 2009.
Mulla, Code of Civil Procedure, Universal Law Publishing Company,
2008.
Sarkar, Code of Civil Procedure, Lexis Nexis, 11th edition, 2006.
Mitra B.B. The Limitation Act, Eastern Book Company, 21st edition, 2005.
REFERENCE BOOKS
o Thakker C.K. Code of Civil Procedure, Eastern Book Company, 2005
o Majumdar P.K. and Kataria R.P., Commentaries on the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908, Universal Publishing Company, 2008.
Manupatra
Lexis and Nexis
West Law
ANNEXURE IV
EXPERT ASSOCIATED