Sla
Sla
Sla
Appendix A
Appendix A to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
APPENDIX-3.5G
Edition
Edition Date
Status
:
:
:
APIRGG/18 - WP-17
Appendix A
Appendix A to WP-17 on Agenda Item 3.5
DOCUMENT APPROVAL
The following table identifies all management authorities that have successively approved the
present issue of this document.
In witness whereof, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date previously
mentioned in this Agreement.
DATE
Aeronautical
Information
Services
Data Originator
Regulator
Edition: 0.5
Proposed Issue
Page 2
APIRG/18 - WP-17
Appendix A
Appendix A to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
DOCUMENT CHANGE RECORD
The following table records the complete history of the successive editions of the present
document.
EDITION
Edition: 0.5
DATE
Proposed Issue
SECTIONS
PAGES
AFFECTED
Page 3
APIRG/18 - WP-17
Appendix A
Appendix A to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................
1.1
Scope ........................................................................................................................
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
Term ..........................................................................................................................
Conventions ............................................................................................................
2.
1.5.1
Time .......................................................................................................................
1.5.2
1.5.3
2.2
Regulation ............................................................................................................
Optional Services ....................................................................................................
2.3
Exclusions ...............................................................................................................
2.4
2.5
Limitations ...............................................................................................................
Entities Involved ......................................................................................................
2.6
2.6.2
AISP ......................................................................................................................
2.7
3.
3.1
3.2
3.3
Reviews ................................................................................................................
3.3.3
3.4
4.
REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................
4.1
Refer to docs and add a short description ...........................................................
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
1:
2:
3:
4:
Edition: 0.5
Page 4
APIRG/18 - WP-17
Appendix A
Appendix A to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
TABLE 5: POINTS OF CONTACT .............................................................................................. 8
Edition: 0.5
Proposed Issue
Page 5
S LA / 1
3.5G-6
Appendix 3.5G to WP-17 on Agenda Item 3.5
1.
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Scope
This Service Level Agreement (SLA) documents the agreed provision of service for the supply of
aeronautical information (Data) by [organisation name] (The Data Originator) to [organisation
name] (The AISP) and the agreed standards to which the said information shall be published by
the AISP. This SLA is overseen and managed by the [organisation name] (The Regulator).
1.2
1.3
Edition: 0.5
Proposed Issue
Page 6
S LA/1
Address
Entity
Re presentative
[Insert Regulator
details here]
[Insert AISP
details here]
[Insert Data
Originator details
here]
Ta b le 1: Pa r ti e s to Ag r e eme n t
1.4
1.5
Term
The term of this SLA shall be as follows:
Start Date:
End Date:
Duration:
Once agreed The AISP and The Data Originator cannot withdraw from all or part of
this agreement within the above dates.
[Add any other agreed constraints of / specification for the scope here.]
1.6
Conventions
Within this SLA, the following conventions are used:
Page 7
Proposed Issue
Edition: 0.5
S LA / 1
3.5G-8
Appendix 3.5G to WP-17 on Agenda Item 3.5
1.6.1 Time
1.6.2 Presentation of Date and Time in All-numeric Form
This SLA uses Co-ordinated Universal Time (UTC) as described in Attachment D of
Annex 5.
This SLA uses the procedures for writing the date and time in all-numeric form as
described in Attachment E of Annex 5.
Times expressed as a number of Office hours include the hours from 8:00 to 16:00
Dutch local time (Monday to Friday).
Times expressed as a number of Office hours include business hours, Monday
through Friday, excluding designated holidays.
Unless specifically mentioned otherwise, all durations specified are in working days.
1.6.3 Quality Attributes / Definitions
Accuracy:
Integrity: A degree of assurance that an aeronautical data item and its value have not
been lost or altered since its origination or authorised
amendment.
Timeliness: A characteristic by which either data is provided or actions performed,
with sufficient time remaining so as not to impact later actions
and possibly jeopardise the achievement of the required result
within due time.
1.6.4 Data Categories
The following data classifications are used within this document:
Routine: There is a very low probability when using corrupted routine data that the
continued safe flight and landing of an aircraft would be severely at
risk with the potential for catastrophe.
The permitted maximum error rate is 1 in 1000, providing an integrity
-3
level of 1 x 10 .
Edition: 0.5
Proposed Issue
Page 8
S LA / 1 I
APIRG/18/WP-17 to the Agenda
Essential: There is a low probability when using corrupted essential data that the
continued safe flight and landing of an aircraft would be severely at risk
with the potential for catastrophe.
The permitted maximum error rate is 1 in 100,000, providing an
-5
integrity level of 1 x 10 .
Critical: There is a high probability when using corrupted critical data that the
continued safe flight and landing of an aircraft would be severely at
risk with the potential for catastrophe.
The permitted maximum error rate is 1 in 100,000,000, providing an
-8
integrity level of 1 x 10 .
1.7
Edition: 0.5
Proposed Issue
Page 9
S LA / 1
APIRG/18/WP-17
2.
2.1
Service Description
The Data Originator will provide the AISP with the Data for which it is responsible as
listed in Table 2, below.
Ta b le 2: Da ta to be Pr o vide d
The AISP will, in turn, publish the information within the National Publication and in
accordance with ICAO and National regulations.
2.1.1
Regulation
[Detail here the regulation that applies to this SLA]
2.2
Optional Services
[Detail any further services required here]
2.3
Exclusions
[Detail any further services required here]
2.4
Limitations
[Detail any further services required here]
2.5
Entities Involved
[Detail any the entities involved here]
2.6
Service Levels
2.6.1
Data Originator
All Data shall be provided in accordance with the following criteria:
1. The Data shall include its effective date.
2. The Data shall include its period of validity.
3. The Data shall be provided with the requested publication.
4. The Data shall be prepared in accordance with the following standards:
a. [List standards here]
Additionally, the Data Originator shall provide each of the identified Data items in
Table 2, in accordance with the following specific criteria:
Edition: 0.5
Proposed Issue
Page 10
APIRG/18/WP17
S LA / 1
3.5G-11
Appendix 3.5G to WP-17on Agenda Item 3.5
2.6.1.1
The Data shall be provided at least [insert timeliness requirement] days prior to
the effective date.
The Data shall be provided by [insert delivery requirement] means.
The Data shall be provided in [insert required format of delivery].
The Data shall be provided with the following quality attributes:
Attribute
Accuracy
Resolution
X1
20 m
1 second
Critical
X2
1 ft
0.1 ft
Essential
X3
n/a
n/a
Routine
Note
Textual data
AISP
The AISP shall process the Data upon receipt.
The AISP shall present a draft publication including the Data for approval by [insert
approver] at least [insert timeliness requirement] days prior to the effective date.
The AISP shall publish the Data within the requested publication unless otherwise
agreed, in writing, with the Data Originator.
[Add more requirements for the publication of information]
2.7
Edition: 0.5
Proposed Issue
Page 11
APIRG/18/WP17
S LA / 1
3.5G-12
Appendix 3.5G to WP-17on Agenda Item 3.5
Measure
Description
Target
1
date .
Late provision
must
be
alerted to the
AIM as soon
as known. The
publication of
this
information will
then be the
subject
of
negotiation.
Format
Draft Publication
95%
required
2
date .
by
due
100%
within
one
day
following
due
2
date .
Publication
Quality of
Publication
95%
required
date.
by
due
Measure
Quality of Data
Timeliness
Description
The Data is delivered by the Data 100%
Originator to the AIM with the required
quality levels.
Target
by
due
100%
within
three
days
following due
Edition: 0.5
Proposed Issue
Page 12
S LA / 1
APIRG/18/WP-17
3.5G-13
Appendix 3.5G to WP-17 on Agenda Item 3.5
3.
3.1
MANAGEMENT ELEMENTS
Rewards and Remedies
[Detail rewards and remedies here]
3.2
Escalation Procedures
3.3
SLA Lifecycle
3.3.1
Reporting
[Detail any reporting here]
3.3.2
Reviews
[Detail any reviews here]
3.3.3 Change Process
[Detail the change process here]
3.4
Points of Contact
[Insert AISP
details here]
[Insert Data
Originator details
here]
Primary Contact
Secondary Contact
[Insert
Primary Contact
details
here,
including
name,
role/job
title,
address,
telephone, fax
and email]
[Insert
Primary Contact
details
here,
including
name,
role/job
title,
address,
telephone, fax
and email]
[Insert
Primary Contact
details
here,
including
name,
role/job
title,
address,
telephone, fax
and email]
Ta b le 5: Poi nt s o f Con t a c t
Edition: 0.5
Proposed Issue
Page 13
S LA / 1
APIRG/18/WP-17
3.5G-14
Appendix 3.5G to WP-17 on Agenda Item 3.5
4.
FUTURE INTENTIONS
4.1
General
Although outside the scope of this SLA, AIM and the [Data Originator] have a number of
intentions for improvement which may have a consequential impact on this SLA.
The following sections outline these and should be considered during the review of the
SLA, once it is in operation.
4.2
5.
REFERENCES
5.1
Edition: 0.5
Proposed Issue
Page 14
APIRG/18 WP/17
Appendix B
a) Proposal for Amendment to the AFI Basic ANP (Doc 7474 Vol. II) for the introduction of
a new Section related to e-TOD
World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS-84)
67.
In order to ensure that quality (accuracy, resolution and integrity) and traceability
requirements for the WGS-84 related geographical coordinate data are met, States must take measures
to develop and introduce a quality system programme. This programme containing procedures,
processes and resources should be in conformity with the International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) 9000 series of quality assurance standards.
(Insert the following new Text)
Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Requirements
(FASID Table AIS 9)
68.
Recognizing that significant safety benefits for international civil aviation will be
provided by in-flight and ground-based applications that rely on quality electronic Terrain and
Obstacle Data (eTOD), States should make every effort to implement the eTOD provisions in
accordance with Chapter 10 of Annex 15 and Doc 9881.
69.
FASID Table AIS-X sets out the requirements for the provision of Electronic Terrain
and Obstacle Data (e-TOD) to be provided by States.
70.
The implementation of e-TOD should involve different Administrations within and
outside the Civil Aviation Authority i.e.: AIS, Aerodromes, Military, National Geographic and
Topographic Administrations/Agencies, procedure designers, etc.
71.
States, while maintaining the responsibility for data quality and availability, should
consider to which extent the provision of electronic terrain and obstacle data could be delegated to
national geodetic Institutes/Agencies, based on Service Level Agreement reflecting such delegation.
72.
States should consider carefully the required level of details of collected terrain and
obstacle data with particular emphasis on obstacle data and associated cost.
73.
States should take into consideration the requirements for update/maintenance of data,
especially related to obstacles.
74.
States should work co-operatively with regard to the cross-border issue, for the sake of
harmonization and more efficient implementation of e-TOD.
(Renumber the following paragraphs)
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Type of each of the runways to be provided. The types of runways, as defined in Annex 14, Volume 1, Chapter I,
are:
NINST
non-instrument runway;
NPA
non-precision approach runway
PA1
precision
approach runway, Category III.
Requirement for the provision of Terrain data for Area 1, shown by an X against the State or territory to be
covered.
Requirement for the provision of Terrain data for Area 2 (TMA), shown by an X against the aerodrome to
be covered.
Requirement for the provision of Terrain data for Area 2 (45 Km radius from the ARP), shown by an
X against the aerodrome to be covered.
Requirement for the provision of Terrain data for Area 3, shown by an X against the aerodrome to be covered.
Requirement for the provision of Terrain data for Area 4, shown by an X against the runway threshold to be
covered.
Requirement for the provision of Obstacle data for Area 1, shown by an X against the State or territory to be
covered.
10
Requirement for the provision of Obstacle data for Area 2 (TMA), shown by an X against the aerodrome to
be covered.
11
Requirement for the provision of Obstacle data for Area 2 (45 Km radius from the ARP), shown by an
X against the aerodrome to be covered.
12
Requirement for the provision of Obstacle data for Area 3, shown by an X against the aerodrome to be covered.
13
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
Area 2
TMA
45
Km
ALGERIA
DAUA
RS
DAAG
RS
04
22
ADRAR/Touat
05
23
ALGER/Houari Boumediene
09
27
DABB
RS
01
19
ANNABA/El Mellah
05
23
DABC
CONSTANTINE/Mohamed Boudiaf
RS
DAUG
RS
GHARDAIA/Noumrate
DAUH
Irara
RS
HASSI-MESSAOUD/Oued
14
32
16
34
12
30
NPA
NPA
PA2
PA1
NPA
NPA
PA1
NPA
NINST
NPA
PA1
NPA
PA1
NPA
PA1
NINST
18
36
1
01
19
PA1
NPA
DAUI
IN-SALAH/
AS
05
23
NPA
NPA
DAOO
RS
07
25
NPA
PA2
ORAN/Es Snia
DAAT
TAMANRASSET/Aguennar
AS
02
20
08
26
DABS
RS
11
29
TEBESSA/Tbessa
12
NPA
PA1
NPA
NPA
NPA
NPA
NINST
REMARKS
Area
3
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
10
11
12
13
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
45
Km
30
DAON
RS
TLEMCEN/Znata
DAUZ
RS
ZARZAITINE/In Amenas
09
27
NPA
NPA
05
23
15
33
NPA
NPA
ANGOLA
FNHU
RS
HUAMBO/Albano Machado
FNLU
RS
LUANDA/4 de Fevereiro
NPA
NPA
11
29
05
23
07
25
NPA
PA1
BENIN
DBBB
RS
COTONOU/Cadjehoun
06
24
NPA
PA1
BOTSWANA
FBFT
FRANCISTOWN/
Francistown
RS
11
29
NINST
NINST
08
26
PA1
NPA
FBKE
RS
KASANE/Kasane
08
26
NPA
NINST
FBMN
RS
MAUN/Maun
08
26
NINST
NINST
FBSP
SELEBI-PHIKWE/SelebiPhikwe
12
30
NINST
PA1
NINST
Area 2
Area
3
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
45
Km
Area 2
Area
3
RS
BURKINA FASO
DFOO BOBO-DIOULASSO/BoboDioulasso
RS
DFFD
OUAGADOUGOU/Ouagadougou
RS
06
24
04L
22R
PA1
NPA
PA1
NPA
BURUNDI
HBBA
RS
BUJUMBURA/Bujumbura
18
36
PA1
NPA
CAMEROON
FKKD
RS
DOUALA/Douala
12
30
NPA
PA2
FKKR
RS
GAROUA/Garoua
09
27
PA1
NPA
FKKL
RS
MAROUA/Salak
13
31
NPA
NINST
FKKN
N'GAOUNDERE/NGaoundere
AS
03
21
NPA
NINST
FKYS
RS
01
19
NINST
PA2
YAOUNDE/Nsimalen
CAPE VERDE
GVFM
RS
PRAIA/Francisco Mendes
04
22
NPA
NINST
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
GVAC
RS
01
19
07
25
45
Km
Area 2
Area
3
Area
4
PA1
NPA
BANGUI/M'Poko
17
35
FEFT
RS
BERBERATI/Berberati
17
35
NPA
PA1
NPA
NINST
CHAD
FTTJ
RS
N'DJAMENA/N'Djamena
05
23
PA1
NPA
COMOROS
10
28
NPA
NPA
FMCZ DZAOUDZI/Pamanzi,
Mayotte I.
RS
16
34
NINST
NPA
02
20
PA1
NPA
FMCV
RS
ANJOUAN/Ouani
CONGO
FCBB
RS
BRAZZAVILLE/Maya-Maya
FCPP
Neto
RS
POINTE NOIRE/Agostino
06
24
PA1
NPA
17
35
NPA
NPA
COTE D'IVOIRE
DIAP
ABIDJAN/Felix Houphouet
Boigny Intl
RS
03
21
NPA
PA2
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
DIBK
RS
BOUAKE/Bouake
03
21
45
Km
Area 2
Area
3
NPA
PA1
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
OF THE CONGO
FZNA
RS
GOMA/Goma
18
36
NINST
NPA
FZAA
RS
KINSHASA/N'Djili
06
24
NPA
PA1
FZIC
AS
KISANGANI/Bangoka
13
31
NPA
NPA
FZQA
AS
LUBUMBASHI/Luano
07
25
PA1
NPA
FZWA
AS
17
35
NPA
NINT
DJIBOUTI
HDAM DJIBOUTI/Ambouli
RS
09
27
NPA
PA1
EGYPT
HEBL
RS
ABU-SIMBEL/Abu-Simbel
HEAX
RS
ALEXANDRIA/Alexandria
HESN
RS
ASWAN/Aswan
HECA
RS
CAIRO/Cairo Intl
15L
33R
15L
33R
NPA
NPA
NPA
NPA
04
22
18
36
NPA
NPA
NPA
NPA
17
35
NPA
PA1
05L
23R
05R
23L
16
34
PA2
PA2
PA2
PA2
NPA
NPA
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
HEGN
RS
HURGHADA/Hurghada
16
34
NPA
PA1
HELX
RS
LUXOR/Luxor
02
20
NPA
PA1
15
33
NPA
NPA
04L
22R
04R
22L
PA1
NINST
17
35
NPA
NINST
04
22
14
32
NINST
NPA
HEMM MERSA-MATRUH/MersaMatruh
RS
HESH SHARM EL SHEIKH/Sharm
El Sheikh
RS
HESC
RS
HETB
RS
TABA/Taba
45
Km
Area 2
Area
3
Area
4
EQUATORIAL GUINEA
FGSL
RS
MALABO/Malabo
05
23
PA1
NPA
ERITREA
HHAS
RS
ASMARA/Asmara Intl
HHSB
RS
ASSAB/Assab
07
25
12
30
PA1
NPA
12
30
NPA
NINST
ETHIOPIA
HAAB
RS
07
25
NPA
PA1
HADR
RS
15
33
NINST
NPA
FRANCE (ILE DE LA REUNION)
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
FMME SAINT-DENIS/Gilot La
Reunion
RS
12
30
14
32
45
Km
NINST
NPA
PA1
NINST
GABON
FOON
RS
FRANCEVILLE/M'Vengue
15
33
PA1
NPA
FOOL
RS
LIBREVILLE/Leon M'Ba
16
34
PA1
NPA
FOOG
RS
03
21
NPA
PA1
GAMBIA
GBYD
RS
BANJUL/Banjul Intl
14
32
NPA
PA1
GHANA
DGAA
RS
ACCRA/Kotoka Intl
03
21
NPA
PA1
DGSI
RS
KUMASI/Kumasi
02
20
NPA
NPA
DGLE
RS
TAMALE/Tamale
05
23
NPA
NPA
GUINEA
GUCY
RS
CONAKRY/Gbessia
06
24
PA1
NPA
GUXN
RS
KANKAN/Diankana
10
28
NPA
NINST
GULB
RS
LABE/Tata
06
24
NINST
NINST
Area 2
Area
3
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
GUNZ
RS
N'ZEREKORE/Konia
18
36
45
Km
Area 2
Area
3
NPA
NINST
GUINEA-BISSAU
GGOV
RS
03
21
NPA
PA1
KENYA
08
26
PA2
NPA
03
21
15
33
NPA
PA1
HKJK
RS
06
24
PA2
NPA
HKEL
RS
ELDORET/Eldoret Intl
LESOTHO
FXMM MASERU/Moshoeshoe I. Intl
RS
04
22
NINST
PA1
LIBERIA
GLRB
RS
MONROVIA/Roberts Intl
04
22
PA2
NPA
LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA
HLLB
RS
BENGHAZI/Benina
HLLS
RS
SEBHA/Sebha
HLLT
RS
TRIPOLI/Tripoli Intl
15L
33R
15R
33L
PA1
NPA
NPA
PA1
13
31
PA1
NPA
06
24
09
PA1
PA2
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
45
Km
27
18
36
MADAGASCAR
FMMI
RS
ANTANANARIVO/Ivato
11
29
PA1
NPA
FMNA
RS
ANTSIRANANA/Arrachart
13
31
NPA
NINST
FMNM MAHAJANGA/Amborovy
RS
14
32
NPA
NINST
FMNN
RS
NOSY-BE/Fascene
05
23
NPA
PA1
FMMS
RS
SAINTE-MARIE/Sainte-Marie
01
19
NPA
NPA
FMMT TOAMASINA/Toamasina
RS
01
19
NPA
PA1
FMSD
RS
07
25
NPA
NPA
TOLAGNARO/Tolagnaro
MALAWI
FWCL
RS
BLANTYRE/Chileka
10
28
PA1NP
A
NPA
FWLI
RS
LILONGWE/Lilongwe Intl
14
32
PA1
NPA
MALI
GABS
RS
BAMAKO/Senou
06
24
PA1
NPA
GAGO
RS
GAO/Gao
07
25
NPA
NINST
GAKY
RS
KAYES/Kayes
08
26
NPA
NINST
Area 2
Area
3
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
10
28
NPA
NINST
GAMB MOPTI-BARBE/Mopti-Barbe
RS
05
23
NPA
NINST
GANR
RS
08
26
NPA
NINST
07
25
PA1
NPA
GAKL
RS
KIDAL/Kidal
NIORO/Nioro
GATB TOMBOUCTOU/
Tombouctou
RS
45
Km
MAURITANIA
GQPA
RS
ATAR/Atar
04
22
NPA
NINST
GQNI
RS
NEMA/Nema
10
28
NINST
NPA
GQPP
RS
NOUADHIBOU/Nouadhibou
03
21
PA1
NPA
GQNN
RS
NOUAKCHOTT/Nouakchott
05
23
PA1
NPA
GQPZ
RS
ZOUERATE/Zouerate
28
10
NPA
NPA
MAURITIUS
FIMP
MAURITIUS/Sir Seewoosagur
Ramgoolam Intl
RS
14
32
PA1
NPA
MOROCCO
10
28
NPA
PA1
18
36
PA1
NINST
17
35
NPA
PA2
Area 2
Area
3
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
GMFK
Cherif
AS
ERRACHIDIA/Moulay Ali
GMFF
RS
FES/Sass
13
31
NPA
PA1
10
28
NPA
PA1
GMMX MARRAKECH/Mnara
RS
10
28
PA1
NPA
GMMZ OUARZAZATE/Ouarzazate
RS
12
30
NPA
PA1
GMFO
RS
06
24
PA1
NINST
GMME RABAT/Sal
RS
04
22
PA1
NPA
GMTT
RS
TANGER/Ibnou-Batouta
10
28
NPA
PA1
GMAT
RS
TAN-TAN/Plage Blanche
14
22
NPA
NINST
GMTN TETOUAN/Saniat-Rimel
RS
06
24
NPA
NINST
OUJDA/Angads
45
Km
MOZAMBIQUE
FQBR
RS
BEIRA/Beira
FQMA
RS
MAPUTO/Maputo Intl
12
30
06
24
05
23
PA1
NPA
NPA
PA1
NAMIBIA
FYKT
KEETMANSHOOP/Keetmans
hop
RS
FYWB
RS
04
22
18
36
09
27
12
30
NPA
NPA
NPA
NPA
Area 2
Area
3
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
FYWH WINDHOEK/Hosea
KutakoWindhoek
RS
08
26
16
34
45
Km
PA1
NPA
NIGER
DRZA
RS
AGADES/Sud
DRRN
RS
DRZR
AS
ZINDER/Zinder
07
25
NPA
NINST
09R
27L
09L
27R
PA1
NPA
06
24
NPA
NINST
NIGERIA
DNAA
RS
ABUJA/Nnamdi Azikiwe
04
22
NPA
PA1
DNCA
RS
CALABAR/Calabar
03
21
NPA
PA1
DNIL
AS
ILORIN/Ilorin
05
23
PA1
NPA
DNKA
RS
KADUNA/Kaduna
05
23
PA1
NPA
DNKN
Intl
RS
06
24
05
23
01L
19R
01R
19L
PA2
PA2
NPA
PA2
05
23
PA2
NPA
03
21
NPA
PA1
08
26
PA1
NPA
PA2
PA2
Area 2
Area
3
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
45
Km
Area 2
Area
3
RWANDA
HRYR
RS
KIGALI/Gregoire Kayibanda
10
28
NPA
PA1
SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE
FPST
RS
11
29
PA1
NPA
SENEGAL
GOGS
RS
15
33
NINST
NPA
18
36
03
21
PA2
NPA
GOSS
RS
18
36
NPA
NINST
GOTT
TAMBACOUNDA/Tambacounda
RS
06
24
NPA
NPA
GOGG
RS
10
28
NINST
NPA
ZIGUINCHOR/Ziguinchor
SEYCHELLES
FSIA
RS
MAHE/Seychelles Intl
13
31
NPA
PA1
SIERRA LEONE
GFLL
RS
FREETOWN/Lungi
12
30
NPA
PA1
SOMALIA
HCMI
AS
BERBERA/Berbera
05
23
NINST
NINST
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
HCMV BURAO/Burao
RS
13
31
NINST
NINST
HCMH HARGEISA/Hargeisa
RS
06
24
NPA
NPA
HCMK KISIMAYU/Kisimayu
AS
05
23
NPA
PA1
HCMM MOGADISHU/Mogadishu
RS
05
23
NPA
PA1
45
Km
Area 2
Area
3
SOUTH AFRICA
FAAB ALEXANDER
BAY/Alexander Bay
RS
FABL
BLOEMFONTEIN/Bloemfont
ein
AS
FACT
RS
FADN
RS
DURBAN/Durban
FAJS
JOHANNESBURG/Johannesb
urg
RS
FAGM
RS
FALA
RS
JOHANNESBURG/Rand
LANSERIA/Lanseria
01
19
07
25
11
29
NPA
NINST
02
20
12
30
PA1
NPA
NINST
NINST
01
19
16
34
PA1
NPA
05
23
NPA
PA1
03L
21R
03R
21L
15
33
PA2
MINST
PA2
PA2
NINST
NINST
18
36
NPA
NPA
06L
24R
06R
24L
17
35
NPA
NINST
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
FAUP
RS
UPINGTON/Upington
01
19
08
26
45
Km
NPA
NPA
SPAIN
GCLP GRAN CANARIA/Gran
Canaria, Canary I.
RS
GCHI
RS
HIERRO/Hierro, Canary I.
MELILLA/Melilla
GCFV FUERTEVENTURA/
Fuerteventura, Canary I.
RS
GCXO TENERIFE NORTE/Los
Rodeos, Canary I.
RS
GCTS TENERIFE SUR/Reina Sofia,
Canary I.
RS
03L
21R
03R
21L
PA1
NPA
NINST
NINST
16
34
NPA
NINST
01
19
NPA
NINST
04
22
NPA
NPA
15
33
NPA
NINST
01
19
PA1
NPA
12
30
NPA
NPA
08
26
PA1
NPA
SUDAN
HSSJ
RS
JUBA/Juba
13
31
PA1
NINST
HSKA
AS
KASSALA/Kassala
02
20
NINST
NINST
HSSS
RS
KHARTOUM/Khartoum
18
36
PA1
NPA
HSPN
RS
18
36
NPA
PA1
Area 2
Area
3
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
45
Km
SWAZILAND
FDMS
RS
MANZINI/Matsapha
07
25
NPA
NINST
TOGO
DXXX
RS
LOME/Tokoin
DXNG
NIAMTOUGOU/Niamtougou
RS
05
23
NPA
PA1
03
21
PA1
NPA
TUNISIA
DTTJ
RS
DJERBA/Zarzis
09
27
PA1
NPA
DTMB
RS
MONASTIR/Habib Bourguiba
08
26
PA1
NPA
DTTX
RS
SFAX/Thyna
15
33
NPA
NPA
DTKA
RS
TABARKA/7 NOVEMBRE
09
27
NPA
PA1
DTTZ
RS
TOZEUR/Nefta
09
27
DTTF
RS
GAFSA/Ksar
DTTA
RS
TUNIS/Carthage
PA1
NPA
05
23
PA1
NPA
01
19
11
29
NPA
PA1
NPAIN
ST
PA1NP
A
Area 2
Area
3
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
45
Km
Area 2
Area
3
Area
4
UGANDA
HUEN
RS
ENTEBBE/Entebbe Intl
17
35
PA1
NPA
05
23
PA1
NPA
HTKJ
Intl
RS
KILIMANJARO/Kilimanjaro
09
27
PA1
NPA
HTZA
RS
ZANZIBAR/Zanzibar
18
36
NINST
NPA
WESTERN SAHARA
GSAI
RS
EL AAIUN/El Aaiun
GSMA
RS
SMARA/Smara
04
22
NPA
PA1
17
35
NINST
NINST
04
22
NINST
NPA
ZAMBIA
FLLI
Intl
RS
LIVINGSTONE/Livingstone
FLLS
RS
LUSAKA/Lusaka Intl
FLMF
RS
MFUWE/Mfuwe
FLND
RS
NDOLA/Ndola
10
28
15
33
NPA
PA1
NPA
10
28
PA1
NPA
08
26
NPA
NPA
10L
28R
10R
28L
NPA
PA1
NPA
ZIMBABWE
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix C
Appendix C to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
STATE, TERRITORY OR AERODROME FOR
WHICH eTOD IS REQUIRED
OBSTACLE DATA
REQUIRED
Area 2
CITY/AERODROME
RWY
No
RWY
TYPE
Area
1
TMA
FVBU
RS
BULAWAYO/Bulawayo
13
31
NPA
NPA
FVHA
RS
FVFA
Falls
RS
HARARE/Harare
06
24
PA1
PA1
12
30
PA1
NINST
VICTORIA FALLS/Victoria
45
Km
Area 2
Area
3
Area
4
Area
1
Area 3
TMA 45Km
REMARKS
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix D
Appendix D to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
AFI Region
E-TOD IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Updated Timelines
Timelines:
GLOBAL
REGIONAL
NATIONAL
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix D
Appendix D to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Global
States
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix D
Appendix D to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Global
States
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix D
Appendix D to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Global
States
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix D
Appendix D to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Global
States
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix D
Appendix D to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Global
States
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix D
Appendix D to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Global
States
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix D
Appendix D to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Global
States
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix D
Appendix D to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Global
States
X = Implemented
N = Non Implemented
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix D
Appendix D to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
P = Plan Implementation
APIRG/18 WP/17
Appendix E1
Appendix E1 to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Environment
Efficiency
Safety
KPI
Proposed
Metrics
AIS and data
.
.
.
.
Benefits
reductions in fuel consumption;
improved planning and management of flights;
efficient use of airspace;
improved safety
programmes
Number of States having implemented QMS
Number of States having developed eAIP
Number of States having developed a National Plan for the transition from AIS to
AIM
Strategy
Short term (2010-2011)
Medium term (2011 2015)
ATM OC
COMPONENTS
AUO, ATM SDM
TASKS
Improve the
compliance with the
AIRAC system
Use of the internet,
including the ICAO
AFI Forum, for the
advance posting of
the aeronautical
information
considered of
importance to users;
Signature of service
Level Agreements
between AIS and
data originators;
Foster the
implementation of
AFI QMS based on
the AFI Region
Methodology for the
implementation of
QMS ;
Monitor the
implementation of
QMS until complete
TIMEFRAME
START-END
RESPONSIBILITY
STATUS
Ongoing
States &
AFI AIMTF
Valid
2009 2011
States &
ICAO
Valid
2009 2011
States
Valid
2009 2011
ICAO &
AFI AIMTF & States
Valid
2008 - 2013
ICAO &
AFI AIMTF
Valid
APIRG/18 WP/17
Appendix E1
Appendix E1 to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
implementation of
the requirements by
all AFI States;
Foster the
development of
eAIPs by AFI States;
Monitor the
implementation of
AIS automation in
the AFI Region in
order to ensure
availability, sharing
and management of
electronic
aeronautical
information;
Foster the
development of
National/regional
AIS databases;
Linkage to GPIs
2009 - 2013
2008 -2013
2010 2015
States &
AFI AIMTF
ICAO &
AFI AIMTF
ICAO &
AFI AIMTF & States
Valid
Valid
GPI-5: performance-based navigation; GPI-11: RNP and RNAV SIDs and STARs; GPI-18:
Aeronautical Information
AO
AOM
ATM SDM
AUO
CM
DCB
TS
Valid
Aerodrome Operations
Airspace Organization and Management
ATM Service Delivery Management
Air User Operations
Conflict Management
Demand and Capacity Balancing
Traffic Synchronization
------------
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix E2
Appendix E2 to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Benefits
Environment
Efficiency
Safety
KPI
Proposed
Metrics
ATM OC
COMPONENTS
ATM CM
ATM OC
2008-2012
States
AFI AIM TF
to review
2008-2012
States
AFI AIM TF
to review
AFI AIM TF
to review
2010-2012
States
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix E2
Appendix E2 to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
ATM AUO
Linkage to GPIs
2013
States
2015
States
2015
States
2008-20092012
States
2011- 2013
APIRG
States
2013
States
AFI AIM TF
to review
AFI AIM TF
to review
AFI AIM TF
to review
APIRG/18
AFI AIM-TF
APIRG/18 WP/17
Appendix E3
Appendix E3 to WP17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Benefits
Efficiency
Safety
ATM OC
COMPONENTS
AIS/MAP
Linkage to GPIs
TIMEFRAME
START-END
2008 - 20092011
RESPONSIBILITY
STATUS
States/ANSPs
Survey for
APIRG
States/ANSPs
Survey for
APIRG
2008 - 20092011
States/ANSPs
2008 -20092011
States/ANSPs
Survey for
APIRG
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F1
Table AIM-1
Responsibility for the provision of AIM Services
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AIP
MAP
IAID
Pre-Flight
Briefing
Remarks
State
1
Angola
Benin
Burkina Faso
Botswana
Burundi
Cape Verde
Central African
Republic
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Cote dIvoire
Democratic Republic
of Congo
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritanie
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and
Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Swaziland
Togo
Uganda
United Republic of
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F2
Table AIM-2
Provision of AIM products and services based on the
Integrated Aeronautical Information Database (IAID)
1
2
4
5
6
7
Name of the State or territory for which the provision of AIM products and services based
on the IAID is required.
Requirement for the implementation and designation of the authoritative IAID, shown by:
FI Fully Implemented
PI Partially Implemented
NI Not Implemented
Note 1 The IAID of a State is a single access point for one or more databases (AIS,
Terrain, Obstacles, AMDB, etc). The minimum set of databases which should be
integrated is defined in Annex 15.
Note 2 Information providing detail of PI should be given in the Remarks column (the
implemented components of the IAID).
Note 3 The information related to the designation of the authoritative IAID should be
published in the AIP (GEN 3.1)
Requirement for an IAID driven AIP production, shown by:
FC Fully compliant (eAIP: Text, Tables and Charts)
PC Partially compliant
NC Not compliant
Note 4 AIP production includes, production of AIP, AIP Amendments and AIP
Supplements
Requirement for an IAID driven NOTAM production, shown by:
FC Fully Compliant
NC Not compliant
Requirement for an IAID driven SNOWTAM production, shown by:
FC Fully Compliant
NC Not compliant
Requirement for an IAID driven PIB production, shown by:
FC Fully compliant
NC Not compliant
Requirement for Charting systems to be interoperable with the IAID, shown by:
FC Fully compliant
PC Partially compliant
NC Not compliant
Requirement for Procedure design systems to be interoperable with the IAID, shown by:
FI Fully Implemented
PI Partially Implemented
NI Not Implemented
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F2
10
11
Requirement for ATS systems to be interoperable with the IAID, shown by:
FI Fully Implemented
PI Partially Implemented
NI Not Implemented
Action Plan short description of the States Action Plan with regard to the provision of
AIM products and services based on the IAID, including planned date(s) of full
compliance, as appropriate.
Remarks additional information, including detail of PC, NC, PI and NI, as
appropriate.
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F2
AIP
NOTAM
SNOWTAM
PIB
Charting
Procedure
design
ATS
Action Plan
Remarks
10
11
State
1
Angola
Benin
Burkina Faso
Botswana
Burundi
Cape Verde
Central African
Republic
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Cote dIvoire
Democratic
Republic of Congo
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Madagascar
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F2
IAID
AIP
NOTAM
SNOWTAM
PIB
Charting
Procedure
design
ATS
Action Plan
Remarks
10
11
State
1
Malawi
Mali
Mauritanie
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and
Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Swaziland
Togo
Uganda
United Republic of
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
APIRG18 - WP/17
Appendix F3
Table AIM-3
Terrain and Obstacles datasets and Airport Mapping
Databases (AMDB)
EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE
Column
1
Name of the State or territory for which Terrain and Obstacles datasets and AMDB
are required.
Compliance with requirement for the provision of Terrain datasets, shown by:
FC Fully compliant
PC Partially compliant
NC Not compliant
Compliance with requirement for the provision of Obstacle datasets, shown by:
FC Fully compliant
PC Partially compliant
NC Not compliant
Action plan short description of the States Action Plan with regard to compliance
with the requirements for provision of Terrain and Obstacles datasets and implementation
of AMDB.
State
1
Angola
Benin
Burkina Faso
Botswana
Burundi
Cape Verde
Central
African
Republic
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Cote dIvoire
Democratic
Republic of Congo
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritanie
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and
Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
Terrain
Datasets
Obstacle
datasets
AMDB
Action Plan
Remarks
AIS
State
1
South Africa
Swaziland
Togo
Uganda
United Republic of
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Terrain
Datasets
Obstacle
datasets
AMDB
Action Plan
Remarks
APIRG18 - WP/17
Appendix F4
Table AIM-4
Aeronautical Data Quality
EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE
Column:
1
2
9
10
APIRG18 - WP/17
Appendix F4
Establishment
of formal
agreements
Digital data
exchange
with
originators
Metadata
Data
quality
monitoring
Data
integrity
monitoring
AIRAC
adherence
Action Plan
Remarks
10
State
1
Angola
Benin
Burkina Faso
Botswana
Burundi
Cape Verde
Central African
Republic
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Cote dIvoire
Democratic
Republic of Congo
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
APIRG18 - WP/17
Appendix F4
QMS
Establishment
of formal
agreements
Digital data
exchange
with
originators
Metadata
Data
quality
monitoring
Data
integrity
monitoring
AIRAC
adherence
Action Plan
Remarks
10
State
1
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritanie
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and
Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Swaziland
Togo
Uganda
United Republic of
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F5
Table AIM-5
World Geodetic System-1984 (WGS-84)
1
2
6
7
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F5
FIR/ENR
Terminal
AD
GUND
Action Plan
Remarks
State
1
Angola
Benin
Burkina Faso
Botswana
Burundi
Cape Verde
Central African
Republic
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Cote dIvoire
Democratic Republic
of Congo
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Madagascar
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F5
FIR/ENR
Terminal
AD
GUND
Action Plan
Remarks
State
1
Malawi
Mali
Mauritanie
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and
Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Swaziland
Togo
Uganda
United Republic of
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
APIRG18- WP/17
Appendix F6
Table AIM-6
AERONAUTICAL CHARTS
EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE
Column
1
Name of the State or territory for which aeronautical charts are required.
Compliance with the requirements for the Enroute Chart ICAO (ENRC) and the ATC
Surveillance Minimum Altitude Chart ICAO (ATCSMAC), shown by:
FC Fully compliant
PC Partially compliant
NC Not compliant
Compliance with requirements for charts related to terminal areas (IAC, ARC, SID,
STAR, VAC) shown by:
FC Fully compliant
PC Partially compliant
NC Not compliant
Compliance with the requirement for Aerodrome charts (ADC, ADGMC and APDC),
shown by:
FC Fully compliant
PC Partially compliant
NC Not compliant
Compliance with the requirements for Obstacle Charts (AOC-A, PATC, AOC-E) shown
by:
FC Fully compliant)
PC Partially compliant
NC Not compliant
Action plan short description of the States Action Plan with regard to aeronautical
charts implementation, including planned date(s) of full compliance, as appropriate.
VII-AIM X-2
ENR &
ATCSMAC
Charts
related to
Terminal
Areas
AD
Charts
Obstacle
Charts
WAC
Action Plan
Remarks
State
1
Angola
Benin
Burkina Faso
Botswana
Burundi
Cape Verde
Central African
Republic
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Cote dIvoire
Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
Djibouti
Equatorial
Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritanie
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and
Principe
Senegal
AIS
ENR &
ATCSMAC
Charts
related to
Terminal
Areas
AD
Charts
Obstacle
Charts
WAC
Action Plan
Remarks
State
1
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Swaziland
Togo
Uganda
United Republic
of Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F7
1
2
3
2
Sheet number(s)
3
Remarks
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F7
South Africa
Swaziland
Togo
Uganda
United Republic of Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
---------------
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F8
Table AIM-8
Pre-Flight Information Services
1
2
5
6
Compliance with the requirements for the availability of the elements of the
Integrated Aeronautical Information Publications (IAIP), maps and charts to the
flight operations personnel, shown by:
FC Fully compliant
PC Partially compliant
NC Not compliant
Requirement for a common point of access to aeronautical information and meteorological
information briefings, shown by:
FI Fully Implemented
PI Partially Implemented
NI Not implemented
Action Plan short description of the States Action Plan with regard to Pre-Flight
Information Services, including planned date(s) of full compliance, as appropriate.
Remarks additional information, including detail of PC, NC, PI and NI, as
appropriate.
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F8
IAIP
Aeronautical
Information and
Meteorological
information
Integrated Briefing
Action Plan
Remarks
PIB
AD
State
1
Angola
Benin
Burkina Faso
Botswana
Burundi
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Cote dIvoire
Democratic Republic of
Congo
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea Bissau
Kenya
Area
FIR
route
2
Narrow
route
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F8
IAIP
Aeronautical
Information and
Meteorological
information
Integrated Briefing
Action Plan
Remarks
PIB
AD
State
1
Lesotho
Liberia
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritanie
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Swaziland
Togo
Uganda
United Republic of
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Area
FIR
route
2
Narrow
route
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F9
Table AIM-9
AIM Certification
EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE
Column:
1
2
Name of the State or territory for which implementation of AIM Certification is required.
Availability of AIM Regulations, shown by:
FC Fully compliant
PC Partially compliant
NC Not compliant
Note. Please provide in the Remarks column detail of PC and NC.
Compliance with the requirements for the establishment of a Safety Oversight System for
ensuring the effective implementation of safety-related policy and procedures in the area of
AIM, shown by:
FC Fully compliant
PC Partially compliant
NC Not compliant
Note 1. Please provide in the Remarks column detail of PC and NC.
Note 2. A Safety Oversight System is based on the eight (8) Critical Elements (CEs) as
defined in the ICAO Safety Oversight Manual (Doc 9734, Part A).
Note 3. As part of the Safety Oversight System, States should, in particular:
a) establish an entity responsible for the safety oversight of the AIS/AIM service
provider(s)(not necessarily limited to the safety oversight of AIM) with clearly defined
functions and responsibilities, or delegate this function to a Regional/Sub-Regional
Organization;
b) ensure the availability of sufficient number of qualified AIM inspectors;
c) establish minimum qualifications and experience for the AIM inspectorate staff ;
d) establish detailed job descriptions reflecting all the regulatory and safety oversight tasks
for the AIM inspectorate staff;
e) establish the necessary procedures for the AIM inspectorate staff;
f) establish and implement a formal surveillance programme for the continuing supervision
of the AIS/AIM service provider(s) and ensure that safety oversight is effectively
conducted; and
g) establish and implement a mechanism/system for the elimination of deficiencies identified
by the AIM inspectorate staff.
Compliance with the requirements for implementation of AIM certification, shown by:
FC Fully compliant
PC Partially compliant
NC Not compliant
Note 4. AIM Certification may be performed within the framework of ANS Certification
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F9
5
6
Action Plan short description of the States Action Plan with regard to the implementation
of the different requirements of AIM certification, including planned date(s) of full
compliance, as appropriate.
Remarks additional information, including detail of PC and NC, as appropriate.
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F9
State
1
Angola
Benin
Burkina Faso
Botswana
Burundi
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Cote dIvoire
Democratic Republic of
Congo
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Madagascar
Malawi
AIM
Regulations
AIM Safety
Oversight
AIM
Certification
Action Plan
Remarks
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix F9
State
1
Mali
Mauritanie
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Swaziland
Togo
Uganda
United Republic of
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
AIM
Regulations
AIM Safety
Oversight
AIM
Certification
Action Plan
Remarks
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix G
Amendment of the AIS Parts of the AFI Basic ANP and FASID in order to introduce/develop
Planning material related to the transition from AIS to AIM consisting of new AIM Tables.
This amendment proposal to Doc. 7474 (Vol. I and II) relates to the requirement for an
overview of the Air Navigation Plan and the requirements for FASID tables, along with
amendments to text which will be relevant to operations within the AFI Region of
responsibility.
1.
INTRODUCTION
1.1 The material in this part complements that contained in Part x AIM of the AFI Basic
ANP and should be taken into consideration in the overall planning processes for the AFI
region.
1.2. This part contains the details of the facilities and services to be provided to fulfill the
basic requirements of the plan as agreed between the provider and user States concerned.
Such agreement indicates a commitment on the part of the State(s) concerned to implement
the requirement(s) specified. It provides a structured framework for States to plan and to
monitor their progress and supports regional and national plans to implement the transition to
AIM. This element of the FASID, in conjunction with the AFI Basic ANP, is kept under
constant review by APIRG in accordance with its schedule of management, in consultation
with user and provider States and with the assistance of the ICAO AFI Regional Office.
1.3. To satisfy new requirements arising from the Global Air Traffic Management Operational
Concept, aeronautical information services must transition to a broader concept of
aeronautical information management, with a different method of information provision and
management given its data-centric nature as opposed to the product-centric nature of AIS.
AIM is the dynamic, integrated management of aeronautical information services safely,
economically and efficiently through the provision and exchange of quality assured digital
aeronautical data in collaboration with all parties.
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix G
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix G
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix H
Appendix H J-1
AFI REGION QESTIONNAIRE FOR STATES TRANSITION FROM AIS TO AIM
Sample
Have you developed a National Plan for the transition from AIS to AIM?
If Yes, is it based on the ICAO Roadmap (Phases 1, 2 and 3) ?
YES
NO
No formal plan has been developed for the whole transition but a set of initiatives for several steps of the Roadmap.
Phase 1 is fully covered by our initiatives / Phases 2 and 3 are partly covered by our initiatives.
STATE
b) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 1 in your State?
P-03 AIRAC adherence monitoring
Implemented
Planned
(specify how)
(specify when/how)
Sample
Implemented up to the process step publication in the
frame of the Quality Management System.
STATE
Additional
comments/clarification required
There seems currently no
effective means available to
monitor the process steps after
publication, (which is beyond
our influence and control
(mailing).
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix H
Appendix H J-2
b) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 1 in your State?
P-03 AIRAC adherence monitoring
Implemented
Planned
(specify how)
(specify when/how)
STATE
Additional
comments/clarification required
b) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 1 in your State?
P-05 WGS-84 implementation
Sample
Implemented
(specify how)
Implemented since 1998
Planned
(specify when/how)
Additional
comments/clarification required
Geoid
Undulation
implemented
not
yet
STATE
b) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 1 in your State?
P-04 Monitoring of States differences to Annex 4 and Annex 15
Implemented
Planned
(specify how)
(specify when/how)
Sample
During preparations for ICAO USOAP all differences to
Annex 4 and Annex 15 have been identified and recorded,
using standard checklists supplied from ICAO. Since then,
some of those differences are removed and some standards
are changed, checklists were updated.
Differences are published in the AIP.
STATE
Additional
comments/clarification required
Dialogs are conducted concerning
differences between CAA and
service provider about measures
and time frame.
AppendixH J-3
b) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 1 in your State?
P-17 Quality
Implemented
(specify how)
Sample
Planned
(specify when/how)
Additional
comments/clarification required
Data exchange tool will improve
data integrity.
STATE
2.
Planned
(specify when/how)
Additional
comments/clarification required
State policy under development
APIRG/18 WP/17
Appendix H
Appendix H J-4
a) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 2 in your State?
Implemented
(specify how)
Additional
comments/clarification required
STATE
a) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 2 in your State?
P-06 Integrated aeronautical information database
Implemented
Planned
(specify how)
(specify when/how)
With the introduction of a system based on
Sample
AISP operates a database of static aeronautical data based
AIXM 5.1 an integration of the static and
on AICM/AIXM 4.5 and a separate database for dynamic
dynamic database is expected.
aeronautical data.
The deadline for the transition to AIXM 5.1 is
The database was converted to the current AIXM 4.5
not specified yet.
version with the effective date of 4 th of June 2010.
Additional
comments/clarification required
a)
Sample
What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 2 in your State?
P-07 Unique identifiers
Implemented
Planned
(specify how)
(specify when/how)
AISP uses a model of unique feature identification based on With the introduction of a system based on
natural keys in compliance with AIXM 4.5.
AIXM 5.1 the universally unique identifier
(UUID) model will be implemented.
We expect possible difficulties in the transition
process to the new unique identifiers.
Additional
comments/clarification required
STATE
b) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 2 in your State?
P-07 Unique identifiers
Implemented
Planned
(specify how)
(specify when/how)
STATE
.
a) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 2 in your State?
P-08 Aeronautical information conceptual model
Additional
comments/clarification required
APIRG/18 WP/17
Appendix H
Appendix H J-5
Sample
Implemented
Planned
(specify how)
(specify when/how)
The data model which is used by AIXM 4.5 is implemented. With the introduction of a system based on
AIXM 5.1 the appropriate data model will be
implemented.
Additional
comments/clarification required
b) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 2 in your State?
P-08 Aeronautical information conceptual model
Implemented
(specify how)
Planned
(specify when/how)
Additional
comments/clarification required
STATE
a) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 2 in your State?
P-11 Electronic AIP
Implemented
(specify how)
Planned
(specify when/how)
STATE
b) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 2 in your State?
P-11 Electronic AIP
Implemented
Planned
(specify how)
(specify when/how)
No
Sample
Initial eAIP produced May 11. Operational
version planned for Sep 11.
STATE
a) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 2 in your State?
P-13 Terrain
Implemented
Planned
(specify how)
(specify when/how)
Terrain datasets are available, but unfit to cover
Sample
all eTOD requirements. Implementation is
planned until mid 2013
STATE
Additional
comments/clarification required
Additional
comments/clarification required
AIP available in digital format
(PDF) on CD and on the web
Additional
comments/clarification required
Implementation Project is
ongoing, charging mechanism
under discussion.
State policy under development.
APIRG/18 WP/17
Appendix H
Appendix H J-6
b) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 2 in your State?
P-13 Terrain
Implemented
(specify how)
STATE
Planned
(specify when/how)
Additional
comments/clarification
a) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 2 in your State?
P-14 Obstacles
Implemented
(specify how)
Sample
Planned
(specify when/how)
Additional
comments/clarification
required
State policy under
development.
STATE
b) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 2 in your State?
P-14 Obstacles
Implemented
(specify how)
Planned
(specify when/how)
STATE
Additional
comments/clarification
required
a) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 2 in your State?
P-15 Aerodrome mapping
Implemented
(specify how)
Sample
STATE
No
Planned
(specify when/how)
No concrete planning available yet, still under
review.
Additional
comments/clarification
required
APIRG/18 WP/17
Appendix H
Appendix H J-7
3. Phase 3 Information Management (2011 2016)
a) What do you consider a realistic timeframe for the implementation of Phase 3?
We believe that the foreseen implementation time frame of Phase 3 is too ambitious and think that 2013-2018 would be a more realistic time frame.
Sample
STATE
a) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 3 in your State?
P-09 Aeronautical data exchange
Sample
Implemented
(specify how)
An AIXM interface from/to the central aeronautical
database (refer to P-06) is available.
Planned
(specify when/how)
It is planned to implement the exchange model
and mechanisms together with AICM 5.1. This
starts in 2013
Additional
comments/clarification required
Not implemented between data
providers and AIS
STATE
b) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 3 in your State?
P-09 Aeronautical data exchange
Implemented
Planned
(specify how)
(specify when/how)
Additional
comments/clarification required
STATE
a)
What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 3 in your State?
P-10 Communication networks
Implemented
Planned
(specify how)
(specify when/how)
AISP has been using the Internet for static and dynamic data Migration to AMHS completed. For some
Sample
exchange for some time already. AFTN is also being used,
specific services Internet is being used.
currently in the role of a backup network for dynamic data
exchange.
Starting August 2010 the AISP is using PENS for dynamic
data exchange.
Additional
comments/clarification required
In some specific cases the ANSP
is delivering aeronautical data to
customers (airlines) through
business-to-business (B2B) web
services (industry standard).
Briefing services (self- and home
briefing) are provided by making
use of the Internet in line with the
ICAO Doc 9855 (requires update
in line with latest developments).
APIRG/18 WP/17
Appendix H
Appendix H J-8
STATE
a)
What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 3 in your State?
P-12 Aeronautical information briefing
Implemented
Planned
(specify how)
(specify when/how)
For many years the ANSP is applying enhanced NOTAM
Sample
selection criteria for the delivery of NOTAMs to airlines
going beyond the ICAO provisions (enhancing the
operational relevance for the airline). This procedure is
applied in agreement with the Regulator.
Additional
comments/clarification required
Despite the constraints with the
current NOTAM selection
criteria, the presentation of all
required pre-flight information
(AIS, FPL and MET) has been
improved in an integrated system
allowing for custom tailored
information.
b) What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 3 in your State?
P-12 Aeronautical information briefing
Implemented
(specify how)
Planned
(specify when/how)
Additional
comments/clarification required
STATE
a)
What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 3 in your State?
P-16 Training
Implemented
(specify how)
Sample
Planned
(specify when/how)
Additional
comments/clarification required
Currently it is not clear what is
expected under the training
header. ICAO training manual has
to be developed to reflect the new
competencies required by the
transition to AIM, before national
requirements can be developed.
APIRG/18 WP/17
Appendix H
Appendix H J-9
STATE
a)
What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 3 in your State?
P-18 Agreements with data originators
Sample
Implemented
(specify how)
Partially achieved, some requirements in current CAA
publications.
Planned
(specify when/how)
By July 2013 Implementation of CAA Policy
for Agreements with Data Originators.
Additional
comments/clarification required
Under Development. See P-01.
STATE
a)
What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 3 in your State?
P-19 Interoperability with meteorological products
Sample
STATE
Implemented
(specify how)
Partially implemented, pre-flight information briefing is
provided in harmonized way (one stop shop) in accordance
with current ICAO Annex 3 and ICAO Annex 15
requirements.
Planned
(specify when/how)
Next step (fully integrated briefing) will be
implemented after the design and
implementation of the appropriate data exchange
technology is finished (WXXM Weather
Exchange Model).
Additional
comments/clarification required
Appendix H J-10
P-20 Electronic aeronautical charts
Implemented
(specify how)
Planned
(specify when/how)
Sample
a)
Additional
comments/clarification required
More detailed specification are
required; Annex 4, Chapter 20
Electronic Aeronautical Chart
Display is too general.
What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 3 in your State?
P-20 Electronic aeronautical charts
Implemented
(specify how)
Planned
(specify when/how)
Additional
comments/clarification required
STATE
a)
What is the status of implementation of the following steps of Phase 3 in your State?
P-21 Digital NOTAM
Implemented
Planned
(specify how)
(specify when/how)
Plan to provide digital NOTAM by Jul 2017.
Sample
Additional
comments/clarification required
AIXM 5.1 will be the enabler to
digital NOTAM.
STATE
4. Do you expect any specific difficulty which could impede the transition from AIS to AIM?
YES
NO
Appendix H J-11
Sample
x
x
key
stakeholders supplying aeronautical data.
x
Non-agreement by airports to establishment of SLA with State AIS for provision of data.
x
Justification to aerodromes for additional costs related to the provision of survey data for digital mapping.
x
Funding, decision making on all levels, manpower capacity, availability of knowledge, technical infrastructure,
acceptance
by all stakeholders, timescales unrealistic.
STATE
5. What kind of assistance/support do you expect from ICAO to expedite the transition from AIS to AIM?
Sample
Specific guidance material for implementation of each subject. Development of more detailed guidance materials, manuals, best
practices
examples and other supporting documents.
x
Expeditious revisions to Annex 15 and 4 when appropriate.
x
Regional workshops and seminars to ensure consistency in the transition to AIM.
x
STATE
6. Do you have any suggestion to update/improve the ICAO Roadmap for the Transition from AIS to AIM?
Sample
In the first version of the Roadmap document the description of the steps is quite basic and insufficient. Those definitions should be
expanded and/or reference to specific standards, manuals and other documents should be provided within it.
x
Timelines should be permanently monitored and adapted accordingly.
x
STATE
STATE
ICAO Doc 9881 is only a draft, but the content is paramount for the transition to AIM - e.g. the attributes of terrain and obstacle data
need
clear definitions and explanations including examples of obstacles together with attributes.
x
Appendix H J-12
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix I
Appendix I to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Status report against the 21 steps of the ICAO Roadmap for the transition from AIS to AIM
APIRG/18 WP/17
Appendix I
Appendix I to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Appendix -H
Date Last
Amended:
Phase 1 Consolidation
Phase 2 Going Digital
Phase 3 Information Management
P~03 P~04 P~05 P~17 P~01 P~02 P~06 P~07 P~08 P~11 P~13 P~14 P~15 P~09 P~10 P~12 P~16 P~18 P~19 P~20 P~21
Angola
Benin
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Cote dIvoire
Democratic Republic of
C
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
APIRG/18 WP/17
Appendix I
Appendix I to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritanie
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Swaziland
Togo
Uganda
United Republic of
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
X= Implemented
N= Non Implemented
P= Plan Implementation
APIRG/18 WP/17
Appendix I
Appendix I to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix J
Appendix J to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
NOTAM Templates related to the operational impact and limited access of airspace and
routes affected by volcanic ash
NOTAM Templates
General
Structure of NOTAM content
For each operational area, a short description is given for in which situations the examples can
be used. It follows by a description of the structure of the NOTAM text, providing the
sequence of the free text information to be inserted in item E). The structure of the
information is in accordance with a dedicated digital NOTAM event scenario.
Filling instructions and NOTAM codes
The NOTAM examples include some instructions in completion of the qualifier line, the
recommended NOTAM code and instruction in how to describe a published airspace in item
E).
Navigation warnings
Type of operational impact/event
These templates apply for the issuance of navigation warnings for potential volcanic activity:
a)
pre-eruption notification and outbreak of a volcano including detailed information
regarding the activity,
b)
volcano ash contamination areas forecast spread and movement, for which an area
restriction has not been established
Structure of information
The examples follow the structure of the digital NOTAM event scenario Ad-hoc special
activity area:
airspace type activity/reason location note (ex. name of volcano) geometry
(horizontal/vertical) note(s);
The structure of the information is illustrated by color coding in the NOTAM example 2.2.3.1
with the following meaning:
Red = airspace type
Blue =activity/reason for the area establishment
Green =location note of the activity
Purple = Geometry
Orange = airspace activity note #1(there may be as many Notes as necessary)
Brown = airspace activity note #2 (there may be as many Notes as necessary)
NOTAM examples
Pre-eruptive volcanic alert
(A0777/10 NOTAMN
Q) BIRD/QWWLW*/IV/NBO/W/000/999/6337N01901Wxxx**
A) BIRD B) 1002260830 C) 1002261100
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix J
Appendix J to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix J
Appendix J to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Coordinates defining the lateral limits of the area (polygon) should be enumerated in
clockwise order, each point separated by space-hyphen-space. The last and the first points of
the list shall be the same.
Airspace restrictions
Type of operational impact/event
These templates apply for established temporary airspace restrictions for areas affected by
volcanic activity:
a)
temporary airspace restriction due to outbreak of volcanic eruption,
b)
temporary airspace restrictions based on forecast ash contamination areas spread and
movement
Structure of information
The examples follow the structure of the digital NOTAM event scenario Ad-hoc special
activity area:
airspace type activity/reason location note (ex. name of volcano) geometry
(horizontal/vertical) note(s);
The structure of the information is illustrated by color coding in the NOTAM example 2.3.3.1
with the following meaning:
Red = airspace type
Blue =activity/reason for the area establishment
Green =location note of the activity
Purple = Geometry
Orange = airspace activity note #1(there may be as many Notes as necessary)
Brown = airspace activity note #2 (there may be as many Notes as necessary)
NOTAM examples
Established temporary airspace restriction for confirmed volcanic eruption
(A0255/11 NOTAMN
Q) BIRD/QRDCA*/IV/NBO/W/000/500/6337N01901Wxxx**
A) BIRD B) 1103260800 C) 1103261200
E) TEMPORARY DANGER AREA ESTABLISHED FOR CONFIRMED VOLCANIC
ERUPTION VOLCANO KATLA 1702-03 ICELAND-S AS FOLLOWS: CIRCLE WITH
CENTRE 6337.5N 01901.5W AND RADIUS OF XXXNM*** VOLCANIC ASH CLOUD
REPORTED REACHING FL500. AIRCRAFT ARE REQUIRED TO REMAIN CLEAR OF
AREA AND MAINTAIN WATCH FOR NOTAM/SIGMET FOR BIRD AREA.
F) SFC G) FL500
*) Recommended NOTAM code: QRTCA Temporary restricted area activated, QRDCA
Danger area activated and QRPCA Prohibited area activated, based on States decision
on established restriction.
**) A radius shall be included in the qualifier line in a way that encompasses the total area of
influence of the NOTAM.
***) XXX is a distance established by the Provider State and shall correspond to the radius in
the qualifier line
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix J
Appendix J to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
Established airspace restriction including volcanic ash area of High [or High/Medium or
High/Medium/Low] contamination
(A0503/10 NOTAMN
Q) EGGN/QRTCA/IV/NBO/W/000/350/xxxxNxxxxxW (or E)xxx*
A)EGPX B)1005182300 C)1005190500
E)TEMPORARY RESTRICTED AREA ESTABLISHED FOR VOLCANIC ASH AREA OF
HIGH CONTAMINATION AS FOLLOWS: 5812N 00611W - 5718N 00216W - 5552N
00426W - 5629N 00652W - 5812N 00611W**)
F)SFC G) FL350
(A0886/10 NOTAMR A0884/10
Q) BIRD/QRDCA/IV/NBO/W/000/250/xxxxNxxxxxW(orE)xxx*
A) BIRD B) 1011301214 C) 1011301814
E) TEMPORARY DANGER AREA ESTABLISHED FOR VOLCANIC ASH AREA OF
MEDIUM AND HIGH CONTAMINATION AS FOLLOWS:
7134N 00843W - 7134N 00801W - 6931N 00508W - 6606N 00732W - 6208N 01334W 6254N 01419W - 6823N 00925W - 7134N 00843W**)
F)SFC G)FL250
*) The geographical reference (coordinates lat/long) shall represent the approximate centre
of a circle whose radius encompasses the whole area of influence. A radius shall be included
in a way that encompasses the total area of influence of the NOTAM.
**) Definition of the area should be done by radius/circle or coordinates only. Definition of
airspace by the use of geographical or administrative features such as State borders, rivers,
sea shores etc) is not supported by the digital NOTAM event scenario and is therefore not
recommended. If operational necessary, this can be defined by providing a simplified polygon
larger than the area and excluding a neighboring FIR, for example.
Coordinates defining the lateral limits of the area (polygon) should be enumerated in
clockwise order, each point separated by space-hyphen-space. The last and the first points of
the list shall be the same.
Aerodrome/heliport closure
Type of operational impact/event
These templates cover the event of a temporary closure of an airport/heliport. The closure can
be total (any traffic is forbidden) or partial (with the exception of particular operations, flight
or aircraft categories).
Structure of information
The proposed structure of data items in the examples follow the digital NOTAM event
scenario Airport/Heliport closure:
designator - operational status - forbidden operation - permitted operation reason - start
closure - end closure note(s)
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix J
Appendix J to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
The structure of the information is illustrated by color coding in the NOTAM example
2.3.3.1, with the following meaning:
Red = designator
Blue =operational status (closure/limitation)
Green = forbidden operation (flight/aircraft)
Purple = permitted operation (flight/aircraft) and PPR details
Orange = reason for aerodrome/heliport closed
Indigo = start closure
Pink = end closure, schedule
Brown = further instructions concerning the airport closure Note (there may be as many Notes as necessary)
NOTAM examples
Aerodrome/Heliport closed for all traffic
(A1340/10 NOTAMN
Q)EFIN/QFALC/IV/NBO/A/000/999/6455N01252E/010
A)EFOU B) 1012151600 C) 1012151900EST
E) AD*) EFOU CLOSED FOR ALLTRAFFIC DUE TO VOLCANIC ASH AREA OF HIGH
CONTAMINATION FORECAST FOR INFO CALL + 35885207700
*) If the designator concerns a heliport, the word HELIPORT shall be included.
Aerodrome/Heliport closed for IFR traffic
(A0468/10 NOTAMN
Q)EFIN/QFALT/I/NBO/A/000/999/6455N012521E/010
A)EFOU B) 1003211000 C) 1003211300EST
E) AD EFOU CLOSED FOR IFR TRAFFIC DUE TO VOLCANIC ASH AREA OF
MEDIUM CONTAMINATION FOR INFO CALL + 35885207700
APIRG/18 - WP/17
Appendix J
Appendix J to WP/17 on Agenda Item 3.5
The structure of the information is illustrated by color coding in the NOTAM example 2.5.3.1
with the following meaning:
Red = route availability
Blue =route designator
Green = start point (designator of the significant point, and the type in case of a navaid)
Purple = end point (designator of the significant point and the type in case of a navaid)
Indigo = lower level/upper level
Orange = start time/end time/schedule
Pink = reason (explanation of the situation that triggered the closure of the route)
Brown = further instructions concerning the route portion closure Note (there may be as many Notes as
necessary)
:
NOTAM examples
Area Navigation (RNAV) routes portion closure with vertical layer
(A0515/10 NOTAMN
Q) ENOR/QANLC/I/NBO/E/285/400/6230N00300E/085
A)ENOR B) 1004151200 C) 1004151400EST
E) RNAV ROUTE SEGMENTS CLSD
UM 996 ISVIG VIGRA DVOR/DME (VIG)
UL727 ISVIG FLORO DVOR/DME (FLO)
UP607 INGAL FLORO DVOR/DME (FLO)
FROM FL285 TO FL400
DUE TO VOLCANIC ASH AREA OF HIGH CONTAMINATION FORECAST
ATS route *) portion closure with vertical layer
A0515/10 NOTAMN
Q) LFFF/QARLC/IV/NBO/E/200/400/4920N0015E/060
A)LFFF B) 1011030800 C) 1011031000EST
E) ATS ROUTE SEGMENTS CLSD UL612 XAMAB RESMI FROM FL 200 TO FL 400
03 NOV 2010 08:00 TO 03 NOV 2010 10:00EST DUE TO TEMPORARY ESTABLISHED
DANGER AREA FOR VOLCANIC ASH AREA OF MEDIUM AND HIGH
CONTAMINATION.
*)The second and third NOTAM code letters AR apply for conventional ATS routes, TACAN
routes and routes other than Area Navigation routes.