Scribd
Upload
701 views

Issues in Knowledge Representation: Inverses

The document discusses several key issues in knowledge representation, including important attributes, relationships between attributes, choosing the appropriate level of granularity, representing sets of objects, and finding the right structure. It provides examples and explanations for each of these issues and why they are important for facilitating inference from stored knowledge.

Uploaded by

Senthil Murugan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
701 views

Issues in Knowledge Representation: Inverses

The document discusses several key issues in knowledge representation, including important attributes, relationships between attributes, choosing the appropriate level of granularity, representing sets of objects, and finding the right structure. It provides examples and explanations for each of these issues and why they are important for facilitating inference from stored knowledge.

Uploaded by

Senthil Murugan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Issues in Knowledge Representation

The fundamental goal of Knowledge Representation is to facilitate


inferencing (conclusions) from knowledge. The issues that arise while
using KR techniques are many. Some of these are explained below.

Important Attributes: Any attribute of objects so basic that they


occur in almost every problem domain?
Relationship among attributes: Any important relationship that
exists among object attributes?
Choosing Granularity : At what level of detail should the
knowledge be represented ?
Set of objects: How sets of objects be represented?
Finding Right structure: Given a large amount of knowledge
stored, how can relevant parts be accessed?

Important Attributes:
There are two attributes "instance" and "isa", that are of general
significance. These attributes are important because they support
property inheritance.

Relationship among attributes:


The attributes we use to describe objects are themselves entities that
we represent. The relationship between the attributes of an object,
independent of specific knowledge they encode, may hold properties
like:
Inverses , existence in an isa hierarchy , techniques for reasoning
about values and single valued attributes.

Inverses :
This is about consistency check, while a value is added to one attribute.
The entities are related to each other in many different ways. The figure
shows attributes (isa, instance, and team), each with a directed arrow,
originating at the object being described and terminating either at the
object or its value. There are two ways of realizing this:

first, represent both relationships in a single representation; e.g.,


a
logical
representation,
team(Pee-Wee-Reese,
Brooklyn
Dodgers), that can be interpreted as a statement about Pee-Wee-

Reese or BrooklynDodger.

second, use attributes that focus on a single entity but use them in
pairs, one the inverse of the other; for e.g., one, team =
BrooklynDodgers , and the other, team = Pee-Wee-Reese, . . . .

This second approach is followed in semantic net and frame-based


systems, accompanied by a knowledge acquisition tool that guarantees
the consistency of inverse slot by checking, each time a value is added to
one attribute then the corresponding value is added to the inverse.

Existence in an isa hierarchy :


This is about generalization-specialization, like, classes of objects and
specialized subsets of those classes, there are attributes and
specialization of attributes.
Example, the attribute height is a
specialization of general attribute physical-size which is, in turn, a
specialization of physical-attribute. These generalization-specialization
relationships are important for attributes because they support
inheritance.

Techniques for reasoning about values :


This is about reasoning values of attributes not given explicitly. Several
kinds of information are used in reasoning, like,
Height: must be in a unit of length,
Age: of person cannot be greater than the age of person's parents.
The values are often specified when a knowledge base is created.

Single valued attributes :


This is about a specific attribute that is guaranteed to take a unique
value. Example, a baseball player can at time has only a single height
and be a member of only one team. KR systems take different
approaches to provide support for single valued attributes.

Choosing Granularity
Regardless of the KR formalism, it is necessary to know :

At what level should the knowledge be represented and what are


the primitives?."

Should there be a small number or should there be a large number


of low-level primitives or High-level facts.

High-level facts may not be adequate for inference while Low-level


primitives may require a lot of storage.

Example of Granularity:

Suppose we are interested in following facts:


John spotted Sue.

This could be represented as


Spotted (agent (John), object (Sue))

Such a representation would make it easy to answer questions such are :


Who spotted Sue?

Suppose we want to know:


Did John see Sue?

Given only one fact, we cannot discover that


answer. We can add other facts, such as

Spotted (x, y)

saw (x, y)

We can now infer the answer to the question.

Set of objects
There are certain properties of objects that are true as member of a
set but not as individual;
Example: Consider the assertion made in the sentences :
"there are more sheep than people in Australia",
and "English speakers can be found all over the
world."
To describe these facts, the only way is to attach assertion to the sets
representing people, sheep, and English.
The reason to represent sets of objects is : If a property is true for all
or most elements of a set, then it is more efficient to associate it once
with the set rather than to associate it explicitly with every elements of
the set . This is done,
in logical representation through the use of universal quantifier,
and

in hierarchical structure where node represent sets and inheritance


propagate set level assertion down to individual.

However in doing so, for example: assert large (elephant), remember

to make clear distinction between,

whether we are asserting some property of the set itself,


means, the set of elephants is large, or
asserting some property that holds for individual elements of the
set , means, any thing that is an elephant is large.

There are three ways in which sets may be represented by.


(a) Name, as in the example Fig. Inheritable KR, the node - BaseballPlayer and the predicates as Ball and Batter in logical representation.
(b) Extensional definition is to list the numbers, and
(c) Intensional definition is to provide a rule, that returns true or false
depending on whether the object is in the set or not.

Finding Right structure


This is about access to right structure for describing a particular
situation. This requires, selecting an initial structure and then revising
the choice. While doing so, it is necessary to solve following problems:
how to perform an initial selection of the most appropriate
structure. how to fill in appropriate details from the current
situations.

how to find a better structure if the one chosen initially turns out
not to be appropriate.

what to do if none of the available structures is


appropriate. when to create and remember a new
structure.

There is no good, general purpose method for solving all these


problems. Some knowledge representation techniques solve some of
them.

You might also like