Ge 9 Cell

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

GE Nine-cell matrix

This matrix was developed in 1970s by the General Electric


Company with the assistance of the consulting firm,
McKinsey & Co, USA. This is also called GE multifactor
portfolio matrix.
The GE matrix has been developed to overcome the obvious
limitations of BCG matrix. This matrix consists of nine cells
(3X3) based on two key variables:
i)

business strength

ii)

industry attractiveness

The horizontal axis represents business strength and the


vertical axis represent industry attractiveness

The business strength is measured by considering such factors


as:

relative market share

profit margins

ability to compete on price and quality

knowledge of customer and market

competitive strengths and weaknesses

technological capacity

caliber of management
Industry attractiveness is measured considering such factors
as :

market size and growth rate

industry profit margin

competitive intensity

economies of scale

technology

social, environmental, legal and human aspects

The industry product-lines or business units are plotted as


circles. The area of each circle is proportionate to industry
sales. The pie within the circles represents the market share of
the product line or business unit.
The nine cells of the GE matrix represent various degrees of
industry attractiveness (high, medium or low) and business
strength (strong, average and weak). After plotting each
product line or business unit on the nine cell matrix, strategic
choices are made depending on their position in the matrix.
Spotlight Strategy
GE matrix is also called Stoplight strategy matrix because
the three zones are like green, yellow and red of traffic lights.
1)

Green indicates invest/expand if the product falls in green


zone, the business strength is strong and industry is at least
medium in attractiveness, the strategic decision should be to
expand, to invest and to grow.

2)

Yellow indicates select/earn if the product falls in yellow


zone, the
business strength is low but industry attractiveness is high, it
needs caution and managerial discretion for making the
strategic choice

3)

Red indicates harvest/divest if the product falls in the red


zone, the business strength is average or weak and
attractiveness is also low or medium, the appropriate strategy
should be divestment.
3

Comparision GE versus BCG Thus products or business units in the green zone are almost
equivalent to stars or cashcows, yellow zone are like question
marks and red zone are similar to dogs in the BCG matrix.
Difference between BCG and GE matrices
BCG Matrix

GE Matrix

1. BCG matrix consists of


four cells

1. GE matrix consists of nine


cells

2. The business unit is rated


against relative market share
and industry growth rate

2. The business unit is rated


against business strength and
industry attractiveness

3. The matrix uses single


measure to assess growth
and market share

3. The matrix used multiple


measures to assess business
strength
and
industry
attractiveness

4. The matrix uses two types


of classification i.e high and
low

4. The matrix uses three


types of classification i.e
high/medium/low
and
strong/average/weak

5. Has many limitations

5.
Overcomes
many
limitations of BCG and is an
improvement over it

Advantages
1)

It used 9 cells instead of 4 cells of BCG

2)

It considers many variables and does not lead to simplistic


conclusions

3)

High/medium/low and strong/average/low classification


enables a finer distinction among business portfolio

4)

It uses multiple factors to assess industry attractiveness and


business strength, which allow users to select criteria
appropriate to their situation
Limitations

1)

It can get quite complicated and cumbersome with the


increase in businesses

2)

Though industry attractiveness and business strength


appear to be objective, they are in reality subjective
judgments that may vary from one person to another

3)

It cannot effectively depict the position of new business


units in developing industry

4)

It only provides broad strategic prescriptions rather than


specifics of business policy

Mckinseys 7S Framework
Mckinseys 7S Framework The framework suggests that
there is a multiplicity of factors that influence an
organizations ability to change and its proper mode of
change. Because of the interconnectedness of the variables, it
would be difficult to make significant progress in one area
without making progress in the others as well. There is no
starting point or implied hierarchy in the shape of the
diagram, and it is not obvious which of the seven factors
would be the driving force in changing a particular
organization at a certain point of time. The critical variables
would be different across organizations and in the same
organizations at different points of time.
The 7 S
Superordinate goals are the fundamental ideas around which
a business is built
Structure salient features of the unitss organizational chart
and inter connections within the office
Systems procedures and routine processes, including how
information moves around the unit
Staff personnel categories within the unit and the use to
which staff are put, skill base, etc
Style characterization of how key managers behave in order
to achieve the units goals
6

Shared values strategy the significant meanings or guiding


concepts that the unit imbues on its members
Skills distinctive capabilities of key personnel and the unit
as a whole
The 7 S model can be used in two ways
1. Considering the links between each of the Ss one can identify
strengths and weaknesses of an organization. No S is strength
or a weakness in its own right, it is only its degree of support,
or otherwise, for the other Ss which is relevant. Any Ss that
harmonises with all the other Ss can be thought of as strength
and weaknesses
2. The model highlights how a change made in any one of the
Ss will have an impact on all the others. Thus if a planned
change is to be effective, then changes in one S must be
accompanied by complementary changes in the others.
Structure

Strategy

Systems

Super ordinate goals

Skills

Style

Staf

You might also like