European Journal of Soil Biology: Original Article
European Journal of Soil Biology: Original Article
European Journal of Soil Biology: Original Article
Original article
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Gurukul Kangri University, Haridwar (U.A.) 249404, India
S.B.S.P.G. Institute of Biomedical Sciences and Research, Balawala, Dehradun (U.A.) 248161, India
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 9 September 2008
Received in revised form
4 April 2009
Accepted 7 April 2009
Available online 19 April 2009
Handling editor: Kristina Lindstrom
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LES4, an isolate of tomato rhizosphere was found to be positive for several plant
growth-promoting attributes like production of indole acetic acid, HCN and siderophore, solubilization of
inorganic phosphate along with urease, chitinase and b-1-3-glucanase activity. In addition, it showed
strong antagonistic effect against Macrophomina phaseolina and Fusarium oxysporum. P. aeruginosa LES4
caused halo cell formation and other morphological deformities in mycelia of M. phaseolina and
F. oxysporum. Root colonization was studied with Tn5 induced streptomycin resistant transconjugants of
spontaneous tetracycline-resistant LES4 (designated LES4tetrastrep) after different durations. The strain
was signicantly rhizospheric competent, as 17.4% increase in its population was recorded in sesame
rhizosphere. Seed bacterization with LES4 resulted in signicant increase in vegetative growth parameters and yield of sesame over non-bacterized seeds. However, application of LES4 with half dose of
fertilizers resulted in growth equivalent to full dose treatment, without compromising with the growth
and yield of sesame. Moreover, the oil yield increased by 33.3%, while protein yield increased by 47.5%
with treatment of half dose of fertilizer along with LES 4 bacterized seeds, as compared to full dose of
fertilizers.
2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
PGPR
Chemical fertilizer
Macrophomina phaseolina
Fusarium oxysporum oilseed crop
Sesame
1. Introduction
Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) is an important oilseed crop, next
to soybean and groundnut but has low yield potential [35]. India
rank rst in the world in area (about 2.47 m ha annually, 40% of the
world) and production (0.74 m tones, 27% of the world). In intensive
cropping system, supplementing soil nutrients by use of chemical
fertilizer is considered inevitable for obtaining optimum yield of
crops, however, their utilization efciency remains low, due to loss
by volatization, denitrication, leaching and conversion into
unavailable forms. Continuous use of chemical fertilizers subverts
the soil ecology, disrupt environment, degrade soil fertility and
consequently shows harmful effects on human health [1] and
contaminates ground water [15]. Presence of chemicals in sesame
had been major impediment in the promotion of sesame export.
Export consignments of sesame are sometimes unsuitable in the
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 91 1334 246 767 (O), 265 469 (R), 91 983 730
8897 (M); fax: 91 1334 246 767 (O).
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (P. Pandey), maheshwaridk@
gmail.com (D.K. Maheshwari).
1164-5563/$ see front matter 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.04.002
Growthinhibition C T=C100
where C radial growth of fungus in control, T radial growth of
fungus in dual culture. Fungal hypha surrounding zone of inhibition, and from control plates were observed under the microscope
by standard procedure.
335
336
Table 1
Antagonistic effect of P. aeruginosa strain LES4 on dual culture plate at 28 1 C
against M. phaseolina and F. oxysporum.
Fungal
pathogen
Incubation
(h)
Growth in dual
culture (mm)
Growth in
control (mm)
Growth
inhibition (%)
M. phaseolina
48
72
96
120
21.0
22.3
22.7
22.9
0.08
0.04
0.06
0.07
41.2
51.4
60.7
81.9
0.05
0.04
0.08
0.08
49.0
56.6
62.0
72.0
F. oxysporum
48
72
96
120
20.0
21.1
21.6
21.8
0.08
0.09
0.05
0.09
40.0
42.5
51.7
71.8
0.04
0.08
0.11
0.12
50.0
50.3
58.2
69.6
337
Fig. 1. Post-interaction morphological changes in F. oxysporum due to P. aeruginosa LES4, (A) hyphal tip degradation, (B) halo cell formation, (C) cytoplasm coagulation, (D) hyphal
perforation, (E) digestion of fungal cell wall as compared to (F) control (bar 10 mm).
laminarin. Therefore, their role in lysis of the cell wall and hence
biocontrol cannot be ruled out. This fact was supported by the
morphological changes in hypha, observed after interaction of
M. phaseolina and F. oxysporum with LES4.
An integrated approach wherein microbial inoculants applied
along with reduced level of fertilizers so as to obtain better
growth and yield is essentially required [24,37]. The main
objective of this work was to access the efciency of PGPR to
reduce the use of chemical fertilizers, without compromising with
the growth and yield of sesame. The results of this study suggest
that P. aeruginosa LES4 in combination with half dose of fertilizers
signicantly inuenced the yield viz. number of capsule per plant,
number of seeds per capsule as well as seed weight and oil yield
of S. indicum L. Earlier also, a strong positive correlation between
338
Fig. 2. Post-interaction morphological changes in M. phaseolina due to P. aeruginosa LES4, (A) sclerotial cease in M. phaseolina, (B) halo cell formation, (C) mycelial deformities in
M. phaseolina as compare to (D) control (bar 10 mm).
Table 2
Root colonization of S. indicum L. by P. aeruginosa LES4 and standard strain MTCC-1934.
Bacterial population (log10 cfu)
Treatments
P.
P.
P.
P.
aeruginosa
aeruginosa
aeruginosa
aeruginosa
30 DAS
LES4
MTCC-1934
LES4 half dose fertilizers
MTCC-1934 half dose of fertilizers
6.25
5.27
6.75
5.88
60 DAS
0.12
0.09
0.12
0.12
6.35
5.34
6.86
5.89
90DAS
0.14
0.11
0.11
0.14
7.10
6.16
7.33
6.87
120 DAS
0.13
0.14
0.17
0.19
7.34
6.72
7.53
6.90
0.12
0.18
0.19
0.16
339
Table 3
Morphological, physiological and biochemical characters of uorescent Pseudomonas strains with standard strains.
Characteristics
LES1
LES2
LES3
LES4
LES5
LES6
LES7
MTCC-102
MTCC-103
MTCC-1934
Gram reaction
Growth at
4 C
41 2 C
Generation time (h)
Fluorescent diffusible pigment
Endospore
Capsule
Non-uorescent non-diffusible pigment
PHB accumulation
Motility
Urease
Oxidase
Catalase
VP test
MR test
H2S production
Gelatin hydrolysis
Starch hydrolysis
Arginine hydrolysis
Citrate utilization
1.2
(bg)
1.3
(y)
1.4
(bg)
1.2
(bg)
1.4
(y)
1.3
(bg)
1.2
(bg)
1.3
(y)
1.3
1.2
(bg)
Utilization of carbon as
Glucose
Maltose
Mannose
Trehalose
Mannitol
Ribose
Meso-Inositol
Abbreviations: , positive; , negative; y, yellow; bg, blue green; VP, Voges Proskauer, MR, methyl red; H2S, hydrogen sulde; PHB, poly-b-hydroxylbutyrate; P. putida MTCC102; P. uorescens MTCC-103 and P. aeruginosa MTCC-1934.
Table 4
Plant growth-promoting and antifungal properties of isolated uorescent Pseudomonas species.
Strains
IAAA
Phosphate solubilizationB
SiderophoreC
HCND
ChitinaseE
b-1,3-glucanaseF
Antagonism against
M. phaseolina
Antagonism against
F. oxysporum
LES1
LES2
LES3
LES4
LES5
LES6
LES7
MTCC-1934
MTCC-103
MTCC-102
Abbreviations: A, IAA negative; , IAA positive; B, phosphate solubilization negative; , phosphate solubilization positive; C, absence of halo formation; , small
halos < 0.5 cm wide surrounding colonies; , medium halos > 0.5 cm wide surrounding colonies; , large halos > 1.0 cm wide surrounding colonies; D, HCN negative;
, HCN positive; E, chitinase negative; , chitinase positive small halos < 0.5 cm wide surrounding colonies; , medium halos > 0.5 cm wide surrounding colonies; F, b1,3-glucanase negative, , b-1,3-glucanase positive; G, no inhibition; , 025% inhibition; , 2650% inhibition; , 6085% inhibition against M. phaseolina; P. aeruginosa
MTCC-1934; P. uorescens MTCC-103; P. putida MTCC-102.
Table 5
Interactive effect of Biofertilizers and Integrated Nutrient Management Protocol on the seed germination and growth and yield component of S. indicum L. cv. ST-1 after 120 DAS.
Treatment
T-1
T-2
T-3
T-4
T-5
P. aeruginosa LES4
P. aeruginosa LES4 half
dose fertilizers
Half dose of fertilizers
Full dose of chemical
fertilizers
Control
SEM
CD at 1%
CD at 5%
Germination
(%)
Root
Length
(cm)
Fresh
weight (g)
Dry
weight (g)
Shoot
Length
(cm)
Fresh
weight (g)
Dry
weight (g)
Leaf
area (cm2)
Capsules/
plant
92.0
98.0
16.1
18.7
38.0
45.6
21.1
27.5
165
206
204
247
107.5
128.8
768
875
98.2
128
89.3
90.1
14.0
17.8
38.6
42.8
20.2
26.0
163
200
201
242
97.5
114.5
759
853
98.7
123
76.2
0.732
3.161
2.255
10.2
0.437
1.886
1.346
27.6
0.756
3.264
2.329
14.2
0.247
1.068
0.762
130
0.563
2.432
1.735
146
1.168
5.044
3.599
74.1
0.611
2.640
1.883
569
0.939
4.054
2.893
48.2
1.185
5.119
3.653
Values are mean of 10 randomly selected plants from each set; ns, not signicant; *signicant at 5% LSD; **signicant at 1% level of LSD as compared to control; full dose of
chemical fertilizers N404040, P30, K30; half doses of chemical fertilizers N202020, P15, K15.
340
Table 6
Interactive effect of Biofertilizers and Integrated Nutrient Management Protocol on the yield and yield component of S. indicum L. after 120 DAS.
Treatment
T-1
T-2
T-3
T-4
T-5
P. aeruginosa LES4
P. aeruginosa LES4 half dose fertilizers
Half dose of fertilizers
Full dose of chemical fertilizers
Control
SEM
CD at 1%
CD at 5%
2004
2005
Mean
2004
2005
Mean
649
987
719
986
462
0.338
1.459
1.041
661
1011
763
998
476
1.514
6.539
4.666
655
999
741
992
469
1.432
6.183
4.412
2.73
3.01
2.59
2.92
2.40
0.845
0.365
0.260
2.84
3.04
2.65
3.03
2.48
0.115
0.500
0.357
2.78
3.02
2.62
2.96
2.44
0.158
0.685
0.489
Oil content
(%)
Oil yield
(kg/ha)
Protein
content (%)
Protein yield
(kg/ha)
49.6
50.4
47.2
49.6
45.8
1.095
4.729
3.374
370
496
372
495
215
1.309
5.654
4.034
19.0
20.2
18.6
20.0
18.3
1.303
5.626
4.015
136
208
141
203
97
1.105
4.773
3.406
Data are mean of two years. Values of each year are mean of 10 randomly selected plants from each set; ns, not signicant; *signicant at 5% LSD; **signicant at 1% level of LSD
as compared to control; full dose of chemical fertilizers N404040, P30, K30; half doses of chemical fertilizers N202020, P15, K15.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the TMOP & M, CSIR, New Delhi for
nancial assistance.
References
[1] S. Ayala, E.V.S.P. Rao, Perspective of soil fertility management with a focus on
fertilizer use for crop productivity, Curr. Sci. 82 (2002) 797807.
[2] M. Bano, J. Musarrat, Characterization of a new Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain
NJ-15 as a potential biocontrol agent, Curr. Microbiol. 43 (2002) 182186.
[3] S. Bhaita, R.C. Dubey, D.K. Maheshwari, Antagonistic effect of uorescent
pseudomonads against Macrophomina phaseolina that causes charcoal rot of
groundnut, Ind. J. Exp. Biol. 41 (2003) 14421446.
[4] M.M. Bradford, A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microorganism quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding,
Anal. Biochem. 72 (1976) 248254.
[5] K. Das, V. Katiyar, R. Goel, P solubilization potential of plant growth-promoting
Pseudomonas mutants at low temperature, Microbiol. Res. 158 (2003)
359362.
[6] S.S. Duhoon, A. Jyoteishi, M.R. Deshmukh, N.B. Singh, Optimization of
Sesamum indicum Production through Bio-natural Inputs. In: 4th International
Crop Science Congress, The Regional Institute, Sydney, 2004.
[7] C. Dunne, J.J. Crowely, Y. Moenne-Loccoz, D.N. Dowling, F.J. de Brujin, F. OGara,
Biological control of Pythium ultimum by Stenotrophomonas maltophislia W81
is mediated by an extracellular proteolytic activity, Microbiology 143 (1997)
39213931.
[8] B.R. Glick, The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria, Can.
J. Microbiol. 47 (1995) 109117.
[9] A.K. Gomez, A.A. Gomez, Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research, John
Wiley and Sons, New York, 1984.
[10] A.O. Adesemoye, M. Obini, E.O. Ugoji, Comparison of plant growth-promotion
with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis in three vegetables, Braz.
J. Microbiol. 39 (2008) 423426.
[11] M.Saraf Tank, Enhancement of plant growth and decontamination of nickelspiked soil using PGPR, J. Basic Microbiol. 49 (2009) 195204.
[12] C.P. Gupta, A. Sharma, R.C. Dubey, D.K. Maheshwari, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
as a strong antagonist of Macrophomina phaseolina and Fusarium oxysporum,
Cytobios 99 (1999) 183189.
[13] M. Hofte, K.Y. Seong, E. Turkeyviteh, W. Verstraete, Pyoverdin production by
the plant growth benecial Pseudomonas strains 7NSK2-ecological signicance in soil, Plant Soil 130 (1991) 249257.
[14] J.G. Holt, N.R. Krieg, P.H.A. Sneath, J.T. Staley, S.T. Williams (Eds.), Bergeys
Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Williams and Wilkins Press, Baltimore,
USA, 1994.
[15] K.K. Joshi, V. Kumar, R.C. Dubey, D.K. Maheshwari, Effect of chemical fertilizer
adaptive variants, Pseudomonas aeruginosa GRC2 and Azotobacter chroococcum
AC1 on Macrophomina phaseolina causing charcoal rot of Brassica juncea,
Korean J. Environ. Agric. 25 (2006) 228235.
[16] A.R.S. Kartha, A.S. Sethi, A cold percolation method for rapid gravimetric
estimation of oil in small quantities of oilseeds, Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 27 (1957)
211217.
[17] J.W. Kloepper, R. Lifshitz, R.K. Zablotowich, Free-living bacterial inoculum for
enhancing crop productivity, Trends Biotechnol. 7 (1989) 3943.
[18] A. Kumar, N. Vij, G.S. Randhawa, Isolation and symbiotic characterization of
transposon Tn5-induced arginine auxotrophs of Sinorhizobium meliloti, Ind.
J. Exp. Biol. 41 (2003) 11981204.
[19] B. Kumar, R.C. Dubey, D.K. Maheshwari, Biocontrol of Macrophomina
phaseolina: prospects and constraints, in: T. Satyanarayana, B.N. Johri (Eds.),
Microbial Diversity: Current Perspectives and Potential Applications, IK
International Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, 2005, pp. 471492.