In The Court of Hon'Ble Sessions Judge, Chandigarh
In The Court of Hon'Ble Sessions Judge, Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
Petitioners
Versus
State of U.T., Chandigarh.
Respondent
First
Anticipatory
Bail
Petition
Under
complainant Mehak Sehgal D/o Mr. Anil Kumar Sehgal R/o H.No. 3320,
Sector 23 D, Chandigarh.
4. That the petitioners have never demanded any dowry nor have subject
the complainant to any sort of cruelty.
5. That the marriage was a simple marriage and it has been solemnized
without any pomp and show.
6. That it is pertinent to mention here that the mother in law of the
complainant i.e the petitioner No . 2
recently got operated for fixing of stunt in heart from PGI. That she was
discharged from PGI on 15/01/2016 and is under observation and is
advised complete bed rest. The Discharge & Follow Up card is
exhibited as Ex P-1
7. That it is pertinent to mention here that the complainant stated
insulting and picking up quarrels on every small things with the
petitioners/ applicant and their son after a week of marriage. That
petitioners/ applicant and their son tried to fulfill all the demands of the
complainant but complaint was getting rigid day by day and uses to
taunt and harass applicants/ petitioners by her acts. That to the
surprise of the petitioners/ applicants daughter in law left the house of
the petitioners and went back to her own house on
20/
10/2015 taking all her jewellery and isthri dhan along and threatened
the applicant/ petitioner and his patents that she will implead them
all in false criminal case. The reason being unknown to the petitioners.
8. That it is pertinent to mention that after about one month from the
above date petitioners / applicants and their son were called by
Women Cell Sector 17, Chandigarh as a complaint was filed in the SSP
Office, Sector 9, Chandigarh wherein false allegations have been
leveled against the petitioners/applicants regarding cruelty and dowry
by the complainant.
9. That all the allegations made in the complaint are totally false and
baseless and infact it was Mehak Sehgal the complainant who use to
harass and insult the petitioners/ applicants and their son and use to
threat them to implead them all in a false criminal case.
10.
their son as and when was called to the women cell went there to give
their statements and have joined the investigation, but has came to
know that an FIR has been registered against the present petitioners/
applicants and his parents u/s 406, 498-A although the FIR number is
not known to the petitioners.
11.
That
the
petitioners
have
every
Applicants / Petitioners
Through Counsel
Petitioners
Versus
State of U.T., Chandigarh.
Respondent
and
Mrs.
Sushma
Mahajan
W/o
We, the above named deponent, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as
under:1. That we have gone through the contents of the Anticipatory Bail
Application. The contents of the Anticipatory Bail Application are
dreated under our kind concern and supervision. No part of it is false
and nothing material has been concealed therein. We affirm that the
contents of the Anticipatory Bail Application are true and correct to our
knowledge.
2. That the contents of the Anticipatory Bail Application may read as part
of this affidavit.
Place: Chandigarh
Date:30/01/2016
Verification:-
Deponents
Place: Chandigarh
Deponents
Date:30/01/2016
Versus
State of
U.T., Chandigarh.
INDEX
SR.
PARTICULARS
DATED
PG. NO.
NO.
1.
Petition
29.01.2016
1-3
2.
Affidavit
30.01.2016
4-5
3.
09.01.2016
4.
exhibited as Ex P-1
Power of attorney
29.01.2016
CHANDIGARH
DATED: 29.01.2016