Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Richard A. Parrott v. Richard Cheney, Secretary of Defense, 914 F.2d 248, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an employment discrimination suit brought by Richard A. Parrott against the Secretary of Defense. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding that Parrott's appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion. The appellate court declined to hold oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Richard A. Parrott v. Richard Cheney, Secretary of Defense, 914 F.2d 248, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an employment discrimination suit brought by Richard A. Parrott against the Secretary of Defense. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding that Parrott's appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion. The appellate court declined to hold oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1990-10-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 914 F.2d 248 Docket: 90-2005

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an employment discrimination suit brought by Richard A. Parrott against the Secretary of Defense. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding that Parrott's appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion. The appellate court declined to hold oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    15 views2 pages

    Richard A. Parrott v. Richard Cheney, Secretary of Defense, 914 F.2d 248, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an employment discrimination suit brought by Richard A. Parrott against the Secretary of Defense. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding that Parrott's appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion. The appellate court declined to hold oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    914 F.

    2d 248
    59 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1632

    Unpublished Disposition
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of
    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Richard A. PARROTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Richard CHENEY, Secretary of Defense, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 90-2005.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted April 24, 1990.
    Decided Sept. 11, 1990.
    Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Oct. 15, 1990.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Chief District Judge. (CA-88-3486-H)
    James G. Kolb, Rockville, Maryland, for appellant.
    Breckinridge L. Willcox, United States Attorney, Dale P. Kelberman,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for appellee.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before DONALD RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and N.
    CARLTON TILLEY, Jr., United States District Judge for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, sitting by designation.
    PER CURIAM:

    Richard A. Parrott has appealed from the order of the United States District
    Court for the District of Maryland granting summary judgment in favor of the
    defendant in Parrott's employment discrimination suit. Our review of the record
    and the district court's opinion discloses that Parrott's appeal is without merit.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parrott v. Cheney,
    CA-88-3486-H (D.Md. Nov. 7, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like