United States v. Richaco Holloway, 4th Cir. (2015)
United States v. Richaco Holloway, 4th Cir. (2015)
United States v. Richaco Holloway, 4th Cir. (2015)
No. 14-4908
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:13-cr-00540-PJM-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Richaco
entered
Fernandis
after
possession
of
(2012).
jury
firearm,
Holloway
denying
his
substantial
firearm.
Holloway
found
motion
evidence
him
in
argues
for
appeals
violation
that
criminal
of
being
guilty
the
of
18
judgment
felon
U.S.C.
922(g)
the
district
court
erred
acquittal
because
there
was
proving
that
he
knowingly
in
in
not
possessed
the
the
studio
firearm
was
the
found
same
at
the
firearm
American
that
Music
appeared
in
Group
a
(AMG)
music
video
when
the
motion
was
based
on
claim
of
insufficient
the
firearm
recovered
during
the
search,
and
reasonably
Holloway
argues
that
the
district
court
erred
in
that
this
statement
constituted
(J.A. 131).
lay
opinion
Holloway
testimony
courts decision is
own
perception,
is
helpful
to
the
jury
in
Fed. R.
knowledge
or
skill
or
education
that
is
not
in
United
Rule
clothing,
but
it
does
not
interdict
all
inference
omitted).
not
because
visits
abuse
Green
to
its
testified
the
determining
discretion
AMG
whether
to
studio,
the
in
his
his
admitting
personal
found
at
testimony
observations
observations
firearm
Greens
were
the
AMG
during
relevant
studio
to
was
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED