Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a lawsuit filed by Donald X. Kidd under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied relief to Kidd. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding no merit to Kidd's appeal. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision based on the reasoning provided in its July 24, 1990 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a lawsuit filed by Donald X. Kidd under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied relief to Kidd. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding no merit to Kidd's appeal. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision based on the reasoning provided in its July 24, 1990 opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1991-02-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 925 F.2d 1456 Docket: 90-7094

    Original Title

    Donald X. Kidd v. Ed Murray, Director of the Department of Corrections, David A. Williams, Warden of the P.C.C. State Farm, 925 F.2d 1456, 4th Cir. (1991)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a lawsuit filed by Donald X. Kidd under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied relief to Kidd. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding no merit to Kidd's appeal. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision based on the reasoning provided in its July 24, 1990 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a lawsuit filed by Donald X. Kidd under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied relief to Kidd. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding no merit to Kidd's appeal. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision based on the reasoning provided in its July 24, 1990 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    925 F.

    2d 1456
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Donald X. KIDD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Ed MURRAY, Director of the Department of Corrections,
    David
    A. Williams, Warden of the P.C.C. State Farm,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 90-7094.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 4, 1991.
    Decided Feb. 22, 1991.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge.
    (CA-89-173-R)
    Donald X. Kidd, appellant pro se.
    Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia,
    Richmond, Va., for appellees.
    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Donald X. Kidd appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Kidd v. Murray, CA-89-173-R (E.D.Va. July 24,
    1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like