Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 19 views

    Howard Ray Barnes v. James N. Rollins, Warden, Attorney General of The State of Maryland, 930 F.2d 913, 4th Cir. (1991)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Howard Barnes appealed a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Barnes' appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny habeas corpus relief. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Howard Ray Barnes v. James N. Rollins, Warden, Attorney General of The State of Maryland, 930 F.2d 913, 4th Cir. (1991)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    19 views2 pages
    Howard Barnes appealed a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Barnes' appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny habeas corpus relief. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1991-04-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 930 F.2d 913 Docket: 91-6765

    Original Title

    Howard Ray Barnes v. James N. Rollins, Warden, Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 930 F.2d 913, 4th Cir. (1991)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Howard Barnes appealed a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Barnes' appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny habeas corpus relief. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    19 views2 pages

    Howard Ray Barnes v. James N. Rollins, Warden, Attorney General of The State of Maryland, 930 F.2d 913, 4th Cir. (1991)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Howard Barnes appealed a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Barnes' appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny habeas corpus relief. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    930 F.

    2d 913
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Howard Ray BARNES, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    James N. ROLLINS, Warden, Attorney General of the State of
    Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 91-6765.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted March 18, 1991.
    Decided April 19, 1991.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-90-2115-HAR)
    Howard Ray Barnes, appellant pro se.
    Diane Elizabeth Keller, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for
    appellees.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Howard Ray Barnes appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas
    corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the
    district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the


    reasoning of the district court. Barnes v. Rollins, CA-90-2115-HAR (D.Md.
    Dec. 14, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    2

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like