United States v. Minor, 4th Cir. (2010)

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-4878

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KEVIN BERNARD MINOR,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
(8:06-cr-00028-DKC-2)

Submitted:

November 29, 2010

Decided:

December 20, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam


opinion.

Arthur S. Cheslock, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Barbara


Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt,
Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:
Kevin Bernard Minor pled guilty pursuant to a written
plea

agreement

to

conspiracy

to

distribute

and

possess

with

intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine and fifty


grams

or

more

of

cocaine

possession of a firearm.

base,

and

to

being

felon

in

Minor was sentenced to 138 months of

imprisonment for the drug charge and to a concurrent term of ten


years on the gun charge.

On appeal, counsel has filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting


there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but raising the
following issues: (1) whether Minors guilty plea was adequate,
and (2) whether Minor was properly sentenced.
has filed a motion to dismiss.

The Government

For the reasons that follow, we

dismiss in part and affirm in part.


We agree with the Government that Minor knowingly and
voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence in his plea
agreement,

except

for

conditions

not

extant

in

this

appeal.

United States v. Broughton-Jones, 71 F.3d 1143, 1146 (4th Cir.


1995).

This appeal waiver was specifically reviewed at Minors

plea hearing, which generally complied with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11.


United States v. General, 278 F.3d 389, 400 (4th Cir. 2002).
Because

Minor

waived

only

his

right

to

appeal

his

sentence,

however, we grant only the Governments motion to dismiss the


appeal of Minors sentence.
2

The issues raised in counsels Anders brief fail for


the reasons previously discussed: Minors plea hearing contained
no reversible error and Minor waived appellate review of his
sentence.

In

accordance

with

Anders,

we

have

reviewed

the

record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for


appeal.

We therefore affirm Minors convictions.

This court

requires that counsel inform Minor, in writing, of the right to


petition

the

Supreme

Court

of

the

United

States

for

further

review.

If Minor requests that a petition be filed, but counsel

believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel


may

move

in

representation.

this

court

for

leave

to

withdraw

from

Counsels motion must state that a copy thereof

was served on Minor.


We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before

contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
DISMISSED IN PART;
AFFIRMED IN PART

Despite notice, Minor has not filed a pro se supplemental

brief.

You might also like