This document provides a list of legal cases and principles related to partnership, joint ventures, and corporations. It includes 9 legal cases cited, with principles around delectus personae, universal partnership of all present property, and universal partnership of profits. It also poses a question around whether failing to form a corporation but intending to divide profits means the parties have formed a partnership instead.
This document provides a list of legal cases and principles related to partnership, joint ventures, and corporations. It includes 9 legal cases cited, with principles around delectus personae, universal partnership of all present property, and universal partnership of profits. It also poses a question around whether failing to form a corporation but intending to divide profits means the parties have formed a partnership instead.
This document provides a list of legal cases and principles related to partnership, joint ventures, and corporations. It includes 9 legal cases cited, with principles around delectus personae, universal partnership of all present property, and universal partnership of profits. It also poses a question around whether failing to form a corporation but intending to divide profits means the parties have formed a partnership instead.
This document provides a list of legal cases and principles related to partnership, joint ventures, and corporations. It includes 9 legal cases cited, with principles around delectus personae, universal partnership of all present property, and universal partnership of profits. It also poses a question around whether failing to form a corporation but intending to divide profits means the parties have formed a partnership instead.
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Assignment (July 20, 2016) Codal and Cases:
ART. 1767-17691. Ang Pue vs. Secretary of Commerce 5SCRA 645
2. G.R. No. 126881; October 3, 2000 HEIRS OF TAN ENG KEE vs.C OURT OF APPEALS 3. G.R. No. 127405; October 4, 2000; MARJORIE TOCAO and WILLIAM T. BELO v. COURT OF APPEALS and NENITA A. ANAY Principle of Delectus Personae PARTNERSHIP, JOINT VENTURES and CORPORATION 4. * READ DEAN CESAR L. VILLANUEVA (CLV) JOINT VENTURE. Kindly open separately attached document. POSER (CLV) : A, B, C, D and E agreed to form a corporation to engage in a business with the intention of dividing the profits among themselves. For one reason or another, the corporation failed to materialize due to some defects in the articles of incorporation. Do we then consider, at the very least, that they have formed a partnership with a separate juridical personality? 5. G.R. No. 136448;November 3, 1999 LIM TONG LIM vs. PHILIPPINE FISHING GEAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 6. G.R. No. 84197 July 28, 1989 PIONEER INSURANCE & SURETY CORPORATION vs. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS, BORDER MACHINERY & HEAVY EQUIPMENT, INC., (BORMAHECO), CONSTANCIO M. MAGLANA and JACOB S. LIM, respondents. G.R. No. 84157 July 28, 1989JACOB S. LIM vs. COURT OF APPEALS, PIONEER INSURANCE AND SURETY CORPORATION, BORDER MACHINERY and HEAVY EQUIPMENT CO., INC,, FRANCISCO and MODESTO CERVANTES and CONSTANCIO MAGLANA,respondents. Art. 1770 7. G.R. No. L-21906 December 24, 1968 INOCENCIA DELUAO and FELIPE DELUAO vs. NICANOR CASTEEL and JUAN DEPRA ART. 1771; 1772 and 1773 8. G.R. No. L-24193;June 28, 1968; MAURICIO AGAD vs. SEVERINO MABATO and MABATO and AGAD COMPANY 9. G.R. No. 134559. December 9, 1999; ANTONIA TORRES, assisted by her husband, ANGELO TORRES; and EMETERIA BARING vs. COURT OF APPEALS and MANUEL TORRES READ: J. PARAS for Arts. 1777-1780
UNIVERSAL PARTNERSHIP OF ALL PRESENT PROPERTY (UPAP) and