South Africa Education Overview
South Africa Education Overview
South Africa Education Overview
Key Indicators
5% of GDP (2014) on Education
17.8% of total government spending on Education
educationinnovations.org
South Africas National Qualifications Framework (NQF) recognizes three broad bands of education: General
Education and Training (GET), Further Education and Training (FET), and Higher Education and Training (HET).
Schooling spans 13 years or grades, from grade R (the reception year) through to grade 12. Under the South African
Schools Act of 1996, education is compulsory for all South Africans from age 7 to age 15, or upon the completion of
grade 9. GET includes Adult Basic Education and Training. Alongside academic schooling, technical and vocational
education and training (TVET) is catered for by the state-run FET College sector.
As reflected across the range of indicators used to measure enrollments across the system, since 1994 educational
provision has expanded considerably, with what now amounts to universal access in the GET phase of compulsory
schooling. Virtually all primary-age children are in school, with equal numbers of girls and boys on both counts the
1
UN Millennium Development Goals of 2000 have been met. In total, the public schooling system has over 12 million
2
learners, 440 000 teachers in over 30 000 schools .
In addition, South Africa has made significant gains in increasing access at the lower end of the system - 89% of 5-6
year-olds attended an Early Childhood Development (ECD) center or school in 2011. Grade R enrolments in public
3
schools increased from 544 000 in 2009 to just under 800 000 in 2014 .
The equality of access has unfortunately not translated into equality of opportunity. As measured on international and
4
regional tests , literacy and numeracy performance of South African children is well below that of their counterparts in
5
countries of similar (and even lower) economic status. This has led some researchers to conclude that many schools
serving low- income communities have not significantly improved in terms of educational outcomes since 1994.
Educational inequality is deeply entrenched, leading some to characterize schooling in South Africa as a dual
6
economy in which a majority of (mainly poor) children are locked into a low-quality system which is able to offer little
in the way of meaningful educational opportunities.
Most of the countrys 52 million people speak an indigenous language as their mother tongue. South Africas
education system generally sees children making the switch to either English or Afrikaans, the only languages of
instruction at schools, in Grade 4 by which time they are expected to have understood basic concepts in their mother
tongue. However, research undertaken by the South African Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) has
revealed that too many students are competent in neither their native nor a second language, with predictably serious
7
consequences for their academic performance and cognitive development . Home language proficiency is critical to
later educational success and the issue is further complicated by the fact that many of their teachers are also are not
8
fluent in English .
This is against a backdrop of noteworthy efforts by the State to bring about redress, particularly in resource
provisioning. For instance, since 2007 when the government introduced no-fee schools, access to free education has
grown significantly, with 8.8 million children attending the 60% of public schools, which do not charge fees (up from
9
the 40% in 2009) . In addition, through the National School Nutrition Programme (NSNP) almost an equivalent
10
number (8.7 million) of learners are provided with a daily meal .
11
South Africa has one of the highest GINI co-efficients in the world and it is generally accepted that socio-economic
status (SES) is the biggest single determinant of academic achievement, for children who live in poverty have
multiple disadvantages ill health, poor nutrition, poor housing. In some schools, parental involvement is limited by
daunting poverty, illiteracy, low parental self-perceptions, poor channels of communication and economic insecurity;
12
all of which contribute to educational underachievement . Yet even allowing for this, the countrys underperformance relative to its neighbors in Southern Africa with similar levels of poverty and significantly fewer
resources, is difficult to explain.
Suffice to say the roots of South Africas educational difficulties run deep and the collateral damage of Bantu
Education is felt in the system to this day. What has become apparent is the extent to which poor quality teaching and
learning has been perpetuated by what is by and large an under-skilled, poorly-incentivized, yet highly-unionized
teaching corps, many of whom were themselves products of inferior education. Unfortunately, attempts to improve
teaching through qualifications have not resulted in a concomitant improvement in learner performance and
numerous professional and organizational development initiatives over the past two decades have in turn failed to
impact positively on this problem.
educationinnovations.org
The recruitment, retention and deployment of teachers are part of a wider problem faced in the system as a whole.
Whereas the best performing education systems tend to be characterized by highly selective teacher recruitment
programmes, South Africa faces the same challenges as other middle-income countries (such as Brazil) in that
teaching tends to attract the lowest 40% of graduates. Coupled with the current remuneration structure the system
offers little reward to teachers who perform well and the flat age-wage profile in turn offers few incentives to remain in
the teaching profession after the initial few years.
A further explanation for why learning outcomes are poor is because of poor language proficiency.
This is not to suggest that the state is failing to act. Given the fact that education is a priority in terms of both its goals,
as well as its budgetary allocation, the persistent low performance in the academic achievement of learners has
prompted the government to undertake a number of initiatives to improve the quality of schooling. Action Plan to 2014
(part of a longer term plan called Schooling 2025) has sought to act upon what has been identified as the key
13
impediments to improving education . Initiatives include: a curriculum review which has resulted in a streamlined and
more coherent policy and the development of a series of Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statements (CAPS)
developed for all subjects for Grades R to 12. From 2014, CAPS is being implemented across all grades of schooling.
The classroom level delivery of the new, more tightly structured curriculum is reinforced in two subject areas,
Mathematics and Languages, through a series of prescribed workbooks. These are provided free of charge to all
Grade R to 9 learners in public schools. In addition, in the foundation phase (Grades R-3) learners receive workbooks
covering the Life Skills curriculum. The development of CAPS is in large part a response to the failed post-apartheid
experiment with Outcomes Based Education (OBE) which was controversial from the outset with both teachers and
policy-makers. After much criticism and a recognized implementation failure, OBE was phased out from 2010.
Following a Teacher Development Summit held in July 2009, a new, strengthened, integrated plan for teacher
development has been developed. The implementation of a nationally coordinated system of Continuing Professional
Teacher Development (CPTD) commenced in 2013, with roll-out anticipated to take place over a three-year period
(2013-2015).
Finally, the Accelerated Schools Infrastructure Delivery Initiative (ASIDI) forms part of a broader infrastructure
programme aimed at achieving a level of optimal functionality with an emphasis on the improvement of existing
schools infrastructure. The issue of physical resourcing has been a contentious one in recent years, with civic society
organizations, such as Equal Education, having through court order, compelled the Minister of Basic Education to
publish for comments the amended draft regulations covering minimum norms and standards for public schooling
infrastructure.
educationinnovations.org
2013, in a landmark ruling the Constitutional Court clarified the states obligations and role in providing subsidies. The
judgment found that the unqualified right to basic education in terms of Section 29(1)(a) of the Constitution applies
also to learners in independent schools.
In recent years, partly in response to the challenges facing public school system to provide educational opportunities,
there has been a growth in schools catering for the lower income market. The emergence of low-fee private schools
16
signals what may be a significant shift in this area . Linked to this, there is growing interest in what has been
17
categorized as contract schools a term that describes a model where there is partnership between the
government (which finances the school) and a private sector provider (which manages it). Proponents of this model
argue that contract schooling can bring private sector energy, funding and creativity into the public school sector and
in so doing, lift its overall performance. As tends to be acknowledged, evidence on the efficacy of the US charter
schools is complex and changing and equivalencies to the South African context are not easily found in the examples
are cited from elsewhere in the developing world.
There are still significant challenges faced by advocates of a contract school model - the practicalities of enabling
schools to switch to a governance model which sees the decentralization of management control to allow for the
hiring and firing of principals and teachers (which is deemed to be central to the effectiveness of contract schooling)
seems unlikely in the present political climate.
When it comes to the involvement of the corporate sector in state schooling, corporate social investment (CSI) in all
20
levels of education amounted to around R2 billion per annum in 2009. CSI funding going towards schooling is R1,33
billion, with the remainder allocated to early childhood development (ECD), tertiary education and adult basic
education and training (ABET). Almost half of all expenditure in all levels of education (around R956 million) goes
towards infrastructure and Mathematics, Science and Technical education. Companies direct funds either to service
providers or, particularly in the case of school building and refurbishment projects, to the National or Provincial
Departments of Basic Education who identify schools in most need of support. In recent years, there has been a
trend away from making available funds (other than relatively small grants) directly to schools or to school
foundations.
There is an extensive range of non-profit institutions (NPIs) in South Africa with around 85 000 NPIs presently
21
registered with the Department of Social Development . Of these, 6 000 are active in the education sector. The
majority are classified as voluntary associations, but there are a significant number (319) of non-profit organisations
(NPOs) and 311 Trusts. A number of these trusts channel the CSI spend of large South African corporations.
In response to the challenges faced by the State education system, over the years significant amounts of CSI money
have been assigned to a range of school improvement initiatives, both at a national and regional level. Given the poor
performance in literacy and numeracy, there has been a particular focus on building primary school teachers subject
knowledge and pedagogic skills. Unfortunately, these efforts have by and large not led to desired improvements in
22
learner achievement . This has lead to what has been characterized in some quarters as donor fatigue.
23
Partly in reaction this, a major initiative called the National Education Collaboration Trust (NECT) has recently been
launched. The NECT was established in mid-2013 as a civil society, corporate and government partnership dedicated
to supporting educational reforms and enhanced learner performance. The initiative brings together government,
business, labor and civil society in order to pool resources. In addition to focusing directly on school-level
improvements, the NECT seeks to strengthen the District and Circuit Offices of the Department of Basic Education
(DBE). The lack of adequate organizational support from DBE structures is recognized as a contributing factor to the
failure of the system as a whole.
Whilst the NECT has high-level political backing, significant business buy-in and critically, support for teacher unions,
it remains to be seen whether or not its ambitious District-wide improvement model can impact positively on the 2
million learners in the 4 000 schools in the eight rural education Districts targeted for the first round of interventions
over the next couple of years.
Meanwhile, without any other significant game changer in sight, the South African schooling system will continue to
punch well below its weight in terms of educational outcomes.
educationinnovations.org
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
www.un.org/milleniumgoals/
Education Statistics in South Africa 2011, Department of Basic Education March 2013. Pretoria.
South African Country Report: Progress on the Implementation of the Regional Education and Training Plan.
SADC & COMEDAF, May 2011. Sourced at:
a. http://www.education.gov.za/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=B3Ql1NJKS3g%3D&tabid=358&mid=1261
The Quality of Primary School Inputs in South Africa. SACMEQ Policy Brief no 2, September 2011
Bergman, M.M. and Bergman, Z. 2011. Perspectives of Learners and Teachers on
b. School Dysfunction. Education as Change 15 (supplement 1): S3548. Van der Berg, S. 2008.
How Effective Are Poor Schools? Poverty and Educational Outcomes in South Africa Studies in
Educational Evaluation 34 145-154.
Salem & Hoadley (2009) .The dual economy of schooling and teacher morale in South Africa. International
Studies in Sociology of Education, 19, 2 pp. 119-134. Fleisch, B. (2008). Primary Education in Crisis.
Cape Town: Juta.
South Africa: Mother Tongue Tied By A Eysha Kassiem, 2011
Chisholm, L. (2011). The challenge of South African schooling: dimensions, targets and initiatives. 2011
Transformation Audit: From Inequality to Inclusive Growth.
South African Country Report.
Op cit.
StatsSA (2014) Poverty Trends in South Africa. An examination of absolute poverty between 2006 and
2011. Report number: 03-10-06.
Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American schooling system.
South African Country Report
Op cit.
www.isasa.org
Association of Christian schools (www.acsi.co.za); association of muslim schools (ams-sa.org); catholic
schools (www.cso.org.za)
www.historicschools.org.za
CDE in Depth no 10, Hidden Assets: South Africas low-fee private schools, August 2010.
The Missing Sector. Contract Schools: International experience and South African prospects. Centre for
Enterprise Development (CDE), August, 2013.
Corporate Social Investment in Schooling in South Africa, National Business Initiative (NBI), February 2010.
The status of the non-profit institution satellite account for South Africa. Statistics South Africa, March 2013.
Khupe, C., Balkwill, K., Osman, R., & Cameron, A. (2013). A needle in a haystack: a search for value in turnaround strategies for schools in difficult circumstances. Educational Researcher, 55, 2, 165-179.
nect.org.za
educationinnovations.org