Unesco - Eolss Sample Chapters: Chemistry of Wastewater
Unesco - Eolss Sample Chapters: Chemistry of Wastewater
Unesco - Eolss Sample Chapters: Chemistry of Wastewater
Ellis
CHEMISTRY OF WASTEWATER
Timothy G. Ellis
Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State
University, Ames, Iowa, USA
Keywords: wastewater, biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand,
suspended solids, turbidity, nitrogen, phosphorus, nitrification, denitrification,
surfactant, endocrine disruptors, Ascaris, nitrosomonas, nitrobacter, Schistosomiasis,
hypoxic zone, Giardia, Cryptosporidium, olfactometer
U
SA N
M ES
PL C
E O
C E
H O
AP L
TE SS
R
S
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Wastewater Analysis
2.1. Biochemical Oxygen Demand
2.2. Chemical Oxygen Demand
2.3. Solids
2.4. Nitrogen
2.5. Phosphorus
2.6. Bacteriological
3. Wastewater Composition
3.1. General
3.2. Municipal
3.3. Endocrine Disruptors
4. Wastewater Quantities
5. Conclusion
Glossary
Bibliography
Biographical Sketch
Summary
U
SA N
M ES
PL C
E O
C E
H O
AP L
TE SS
R
S
Suspended solids
Nutrients
Priority pollutants
Refractory organics
Heavy metals
U
SA N
M ES
PL C
E O
C E
H O
AP L
TE SS
R
S
Pathogens
Dissolved inorganics
In order to measure the extent to which a wastewater discharge will impact the
dissolved oxygen concentration in a receiving stream (i.e. the body of water that the
wastewater is discharged into), a measure of the oxygen consuming organic matter must
be determined. One way to determine this is to measure the disappearance of oxygen
from a bottle containing oxygen saturated water, a prescribed volume of the wastewater
sample, a small amount of active biomass (primarily bacteria) seed, and any necessary
nutrients for biomass growth. This is a direct measurement of the oxygen consuming
capacity of the wastewater and is termed the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) test
(see Biochemical Oxygen Demand).
The general form of the equation for decomposition of organic matter during the BOD
test is:
biomass
(1)
U
SA N
M ES
PL C
E O
C E
H O
AP L
TE SS
R
S
It should be noted that oxygen is consumed in the reaction and biomass is the catalyst
for the reaction. Actually, the organic matter is the growth substrate (carbon and energy
source) for the generation of new biomass, an end product of the reaction. Essential
macro- and trace nutrients are also required for sustained growth of the microorganisms.
Using glucose as an example (and ignoring the substrate being incorporated into
biomass):
C6 H12 O6 +6O 2 6CO 2 +6H 2 O
(2)
(3)
U
SA N
M ES
PL C
E O
C E
H O
AP L
TE SS
R
S
2NH 3 +3O 2
2NO -2 +2H + +O 2
(4)
nitrobacter
2NO3- +2H +
(5)
As can be seen from these two equations, the amount of oxygen required for
nitrification is significant (and can actually exceed the amount of oxygen required to
satisfy the BOD). Stoichiometrically, each milligram of nitrogen from ammonia (NH3N) requires 4.57 mg of oxygen to transform it biochemically to nitrate. If a wastewater
contains 200 mg L-1 BOD5 and 44 mg L-1 NH3-N, the oxygen required for BOD
removal and nitrification will be approximately the same. In practice, the total oxygen
requirement is not realized since some of the ammonia is converted into new cell
material, and the actual demand is usually closer to 4.3 mg O2 per mg NH3-N. In
practice, however, the value of 4.57 mg O2 per mg NH3-N is often used as a
conservative estimate.
U
SA N
M ES
PL C
E O
C E
H O
AP L
TE SS
R
S
In the BOD test, the carbonaceous BOD is usually the desired measurement since
ammonia can be measured quickly and directly (e.g. using an ammonia probe). On the
other hand, the BOD test is typically run for 5 days (designated as BOD5). The reason
for the 5-day BOD dates back to the early 19th Century in England where it was
determined that it took approximately 5 days for wastewater to travel from London to
the mouth of the Thames River. Thus, by the time the wastewater traveled to the mouth
of the river, its 5-day oxygen demand had been realized, and the impact on the river
could be accounted for. The five-day time period is also convenient since it usually
takes the slow growing nitrifiers in the seed culture longer than five days to achieve
significant numbers to impact the oxygen consumption noticeably. Nevertheless,
Standard Methods published in 1998 recommend the use of a nitrification inhibitor
during the BOD test so that only oxygen uptake associated with the oxidation of organic
compounds (i.e. carbonaceous BOD or CBOD) is measured during the test. This
inhibitor, allylthiourea, is not thought to significantly affect the growth of the
heterotrophic organisms (those organisms that use the carbonaceous BOD as a carbon
and energy source).
2.2. Chemical Oxygen Demand
An alternative to the BOD test for determining the oxygen consuming potential of a
wastewater sample is the chemical oxygen demand (COD) test. As the name implies,
the carbonaceous oxygen demand is oxidized chemically in the COD test. Like BOD,
the units for COD are in milligrams of oxygen per liter (mg L-1). The advantage of this
test is that it is quick and reproducible. The disadvantage is that not all of the measured
COD can be degraded biologically. Therefore, there is still a need to ascertain what the
biodegradable portion of the oxygen demand is, since that is how the performance of
biological wastewater treatment systems (e.g. activated sludge, trickling filters,
anaerobic digesters, rotating biological contactors, oxidation ponds, and lagoons) will
be evaluated. In addition, the BOD (not COD) is the component that is expected to
induce an oxygen demand in the receiving stream. There are also some interferences in
the COD test. For instance, low molecular weight fatty acids and aromatic hydrocarbons
may not be well oxidized during the test and inorganic ions (chloride and nitrite for
instance) may be oxidized. The addition of certain catalysts during the test can eliminate
most of these interferences.
U
SA N
M ES
PL C
E O
C E
H O
AP L
TE SS
R
S
The real advantage of the COD test is that it is a measure of the energetics of the
system. If one wants to keep track of a biological reaction, they must know what the
energetics of the reaction are (i.e. what are the electron donors and electron acceptors
for the system). Microorganisms degrade pollutants in biological treatment systems to
our benefit, but also so that they can grow and reproduce. They require two major
things: carbon and energy for growth. They also need lesser quantities of macro
nutrients, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur in addition to trace amounts of
micronutrients. If we can keep track of the flow of carbon and the flow of energy in a
system, we can understand the nature and extent of the biochemical reactions occurring.
If we can keep track of, and manipulate, the biochemical reactions, we can engineer
biological treatment systems to our advantage. The two main items to monitor are
carbon and energy. Unfortunately, carbon is difficult to keep track of since upon
mineralization of an organic compound, it is solubilized in water or released as a gas in
the form of carbon dioxide (CO2). The best way to track changes in carbon species is
through 14C labeling, but this obviously requires sophisticated laboratory procedures
and equipment (e.g. radiolabeled carbon compounds and liquid scintillation counting).
Energy equivalents, or specifically electrons, are much easier to measure. When we
measure the amount of oxygen consumed in a reaction, we are in essence measuring the
electrons transferred from the organic compound to the terminal electron acceptor (i.e.
oxygen). Performing a mass balance on electrons is much simpler than on carbon, since
all we need to do to balance electrons is measure the chemical oxygen demand of our
starting and end products and measure the amount of oxygen consumed during the
reaction (or methane produced if it is an anaerobic or methane producing reaction).
For instance, consider the reaction in Eq. (2) in which glucose is converted to carbon
dioxide and water by a stoichiometric amount of oxygen (1.067 milligrams of oxygen
per milligram of glucose). If we know the concentration of glucose both before and after
biological treatment and calculate the biomass concentration before and after, we will
know how much oxygen was consumed during the conversion of glucose to biomass
and end products. This way we have a much better indication of what the reactions are
than if we simply measure the total carbon concentration before and after treatment. In
addition, the analysis of COD is much more practical than the analysis for specific
pollutants.
The advantages of the COD test are that it is relatively fast and the results are
reproducible. The disadvantage is that it measures everything, including nonbiodegradable organic matter that can be oxidized by potassium dichromate. In addition,
the test produces a small amount of hazardous waste that must be disposed of properly.
Thus, the measured oxygen demand in the COD test may differ due to sampling and
analytical error, and possible interferences in the COD procedure. The measured BOD
may differ for the same reasons in addition to the fact that a portion of the compound
will be incorporated into new biomass. A list of the theoretical oxygen demand of a
variety of substances that can be found in municipal and industrial wastewater is
provided in a book by Pitter and Chudoba published in 1990. The list of chemicals is
organized by compound type (e.g. hydrocarbons, alcohols/phenols, aldehydes, ketones,
quinones, organic and amino acids, esters, ethers, amines, amides, nitriles, halogen and
nitro- derivatives, heterocyclic compounds, saccharides, alkyl benzene sulfonates and
alkyl sulfates, dyes, and miscellaneous substances). From this extensive list of
chemicals, two points should be noted. First, there is a large number of compounds that
can be present in a wastewater samples. Second, the oxygen demand that could be
exerted from a known quantity of a specific pollutant can be quickly determined.
2.3. Solids
U
SA N
M ES
PL C
E O
C E
H O
AP L
TE SS
R
S
Table 2. Solids matrix showing the relationship between volatile, fixed, dissolved, and
suspended solids. Rows can be added from the bottom to get the constituents on the top
(e.g. FSS+VSS=TSS) and analogously columns can be added from the right (e.g.
TDS+TSS=TS).
Bibliography
U
SA N
M ES
PL C
E O
C E
H O
AP L
TE SS
R
S
Csuros M., Csuros C. (1999). Microbiological Examination of Water and Wastewater, 324 pp. Boca
Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press. [This text provides a brief but comprehensive description of some of
the microbiological characteristics of natural water sources.]
Ellis T.G., Eliosov B. (2002). Field Validation of Biokinetic Coefficients for Predicting Degradation of
Organic Compounds, Project 98-CTS-3 final report submitted to the Water Environment Research
Foundation, 160 pp. Alexandria, Virginia, USA. [This report provides details on predicting the removal
efficiencies and effluent concentrations of individual contaminants in wastewater treatment plants.]
Metcalf and Eddy (1991). Wastewater Engineering. Treatment Disposal Reuse. G. Tchobanoglous, F.L.
Burton (Eds.), pp. 1820. New York: McGraw-Hill. [This is an indispensable volume on the design of
wastewater treatment systems.]
Pitter P., Chudoba J. (1990). Biodegradability of Organic Substances in the Aquatic Environment, 306
pp. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press. [This is a unique book that compiles biodegradation rate data
for an extensive list of organic compounds.]
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1998) American Public Health
Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation, 20th Edition, 1220
pp. Washington, D.C. [This is an essential handbook describing the analytical methods used for water
and wastewater.]
Biographical Sketch
Timothy Ellis has been teaching in the Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental
Engineering at Iowa State University since 1995. Currently he is an Associate Professor of
Environmental Engineering. He received his Ph.D. in environmental systems engineering in 1995 at
Clemson University with Professor Les Grady where he furthered the development of respirometric
techniques for measuring biodegradation rates of xenobiotic organic compounds. He received his M.Sc.
degree in environmental engineering in 1988 at Georgia Tech with Dr. Fred Pohland where he studied the
biodegradation of consumer polymer products in simulated landfill environments. In addition to his
graduate studies, he has worked for Parsons Engineering Science in Fairfax, Virginia and in Abu Dhabi,
United Arab Emirates where he was involved in the process design of water and wastewater treatment
facilities, including a 10 million gallons per day (MGD) sequencing batch reactor (SBR) facility for the
City of Abu Dhabi. Prior to his masters degree, he worked for the City of Baltimore at the Back River
Wastewater Treatment Plant in process control, design, and start-up.
At Iowa State University Dr. Ellis has been involved in teaching and research in biological processes for
the treatment of wastewater and residuals. His recent research involves several new technologies,
including the static granular bed reactor (SGBR), an anaerobic process that takes advantage of anaerobic
bacterias propensity to form dense granules. He is also involved in research to provide early warning
detection of toxic or inhibitory compounds in water and wastewater. He is active in committees with the
American Society of Civil Engineers, Water Environment Research Foundation, and Water Environment
Federation. He has authored or co-authored over 50 publications appearing in international journals and
conference proceedings. He has been the major professor for over 20 MS and PhD students. In addition,
he holds a patent for the SGBR (U.S. Patent 6,709,591).
U
SA N
M ES
PL C
E O
C E
H O
AP L
TE SS
R
S