Senate Hearing, 110TH Congress - Caring For Our Seniors: How Can We Support Those On The Frontlines?

S. HRG.
110701
CARING FOR OUR SENIORS: HOW CAN WE

SUPPORT THOSE ON THE FRONTLINES?
HEARING
BEFORE THE
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING

UNITED STATES SENATE
ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS
SECOND SESSION
WASHINGTON, DC
APRIL 16, 2008
Serial No. 11026

Printed for the use of the Special Committee on Aging
(
Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 2009
46167 PDF
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 5121800; DC area (202) 5121800
Fax: (202) 5122250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 204020001
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 5011
Sfmt 5011
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE

HERB KOHL, Wisconsin, Chairman
RON WYDEN, Oregon
GORDON H. SMITH, Oregon
BLANCHE L. LINCOLN, Arkansas
RICHARD SHELBY, Alabama
EVAN BAYH, Indiana
SUSAN COLLINS, Maine
THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware
MEL MARTINEZ, Florida
BILL NELSON, Florida
LARRY E. CRAIG, Idaho
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, New York
ELIZABETH DOLE, North Carolina
KEN SALAZAR, Colorado
NORM COLEMAN, Minnesota
ROBERT P. CASEY, Jr., Pennsylvania
DAVID VITTER, Louisiana
CLAIRE McCASKILL, Missouri
BOB CORKER, Tennessee
SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island
ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania
DEBRA WHITMAN, Majority Staff Director
CATHERINE FINLEY, Ranking Member Staff Director
(II)
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 5904
Sfmt 5904
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
CONTENTS
Page
Opening Statement of Senator Herb Kohl .............................................................

Opening Statement of Senator Bill Nelson ...........................................................
Opening Statement of Senator Susan Collins .......................................................
Opening Statement of Senator Ken Salazar .........................................................
Opening Statement of Senator Bob Casey .............................................................
Prepared Statement of Senator Gordon Smith .....................................................
1
3
3
4
5
29
PANEL I
John Rowe, MD, professor, Department of Health Policy and Management,
Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY ........
Robyn Stone, DPH, executive director, Institute for the Future of Aging
Services, American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging, Washington, DC .............................................................................................................
5
20
PANEL II
Martha Stewart, founder, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, New York,
NY .........................................................................................................................
Todd Semla, PharmD, president, American Geriatrics Society, Evanston, IL ...
Mary McDermott, personal care worker and board of directors member, Wisconsin Home Care Commission, Verona, WI .....................................................
Sally Bowman, PhD, associate professor, Department of Human Development
and Family Services, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR .........................
39
50
64
69
APPENDIX
Prepared Statement of Senator Susan Collins ......................................................
Prepared Statement of Senator Robert P. Casey ..................................................
Prepared Statement of Senator Barbara Boxer ....................................................
Dr. Robyn Stones Responses to Senator Smith Questions ..................................
Martha Stewarts Responses to Senator Smith Question ....................................
Dr. Todd Selmas Responses to Senator Smith Questions ...................................
Mary McDermotts Responses to Senator Smith Question ..................................
Sally Bowmans Responses to Senator Smith Questions ......................................
Statement from National Center on Caregiving, Family Caregiver Alliance .....
Statement of The American Health Care Association and National Center
for Assisted Living ...............................................................................................
Statement submitted from the Association of American Medical Colleges ........
Statement submitted by the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry .....
Statement submitted by AARP ...............................................................................
Final report from the Direct Care Workforce Issues Committee .........................
83
84
85
86
88
89
92
94
96
99
107
123
128
142
(III)
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 5904
Sfmt 5904
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 5904
Sfmt 5904
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
CARING FOR OUR SENIORS: HOW CAN WE

SUPPORT THOSE ON THE FRONTLINES?
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 16, 2008
U.S. SENATE,
Washington, DC.
The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 3:02 p.m., in room
SD562, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Herb Kohl (chairman of the committee) presiding.
Present: Senators Kohl, Carper, Nelson, Salazar, Casey,
Whitehouse, Smith and Collins.
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR HERB KOHL, CHAIRMAN
The CHAIRMAN. I want to thank you all for being here today. We
will commenceRanking Member Senator Smith from Oregon will
be here shortly. Today, we will be discussing the need to train, support, and expand the range of those individuals caring for older
Americans. The Aging Committee has a long and a proud history
of moving Congress forward on issues of long-term care.
Last year, this Committee held three hearings on the subject of
long-term care in America. However, we primarily focused on the
facilities themselves and the Federal standards that applied to
them, rather than the people who fulfill the promise and meet the
obligations of care. Today, we are shifting our focus to those caregivers.
Millions of older Americans receive care in a medical facility
from a licensed professional, such as a doctor or nurse, or from a
certified nurse aide at a long-term care facility. You can also receive hands-on care in your own home by hiring a home-health aide
or perhaps a live-in personal care attendant. However, the majority
of older Americans in need of care rely on a third group, namely,
their own family.
There are more than 44 million people providing care for a family member or friend nationwide. These caregivers frequently do
the same work as a professional caregiver, but they do so voluntarily and with little or no training. To their loved ones they are
the doctor and nurse, the assistant, therapist, and oftentimes, the
soul source of emotional and financial support.
You probably know someone who cares for a family member. Perhaps a friend, a neighbor, or a co-worker. If you dont, I am willing
to bet that in 10 years you certainly will. In fact, in 10 years it
might well be you or myself. By the year 2020, it is estimated that
the number of older adults in need of care will increase by fully
one-third.
(1)
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
2
The unfortunate fact of the matter is that, while our country is
aging rapidly, the number of health care workers devoted to caring
for older Americans is experiencing a shortageone that will only
grow more desperate as the need for these caregivers skyrockets.
Given current workforce trends, it is expected that, in the coming
decades, we will fall far short of the number of health care workers
trained to treat older adults than what we will need.
We indeed face many challenges. We know that few nursing programs require coursework in geriatrics, and that in medical
schools, comprehensive geriatric training is a rarity. For the direct
care workforce, which includes home health aides and personal
care attendants, we know that Federal and State training requirements vary enormously, despite the fact that studies show that
more training is correlated with better staff recruitment as well as
retention. We also know that family caregivers want enhanced education and training to develop the necessary skills to provide the
best possible care for an ailing family member.
Fortunately, knowing what we need to change is just half the
battle. After this hearing, we plan to incorporate todays lessons
into legislation to expand, train and support the workforce that is
dedicated to providing care for the older members of our population.
The Committee is honored to welcome two distinguished panels
of witnesses to discuss how we can meet the needs of the long-term
care workforce today and work toward its expansion by tomorrow.
We will be reviewing the major recommendations released Monday
by the Institute of Medicine for improving and expanding the skills
and preparedness of the health care workforce. Also we will hear
many other perspectives and suggestions from nationally recognized experts with backgrounds in policy, medicine, academics,
business and even the art of living.
The United States will not be able to meet the approaching demand for health care and long-term care without a workforce that
is prepared for the job.
Again, we would like to thank all our witnesses for their participation today. At this time, we will introduce our first panel.
Our first witness today will be Dr. John Rowe, a professor in the
Department of Health, Policy and Management at Columbia University School of Public Health. Dr. Rowe is testifying today as
chairman of the Institute of Medicines Committee on the Future
Health Care WorkForce for Older Americans. Throughout his distinguished career, Dr. Rowe has held many leadership positions in
top health care organizations and academic institutions, including
a stint as CEO of Mt. Sinai NYU Health System and as founding
director of the Division on Aging at the Harvard Medical School.
Our next witness will be Dr. Robyn Stone, executive director of
the Institute for the Future of Aging Services. Dr. Stone is a noted
researcher and leading international authority on aging and longterm care policy. Formerly, she served as executive director and
chief operating officer of the International Longevity Center in New
York. Dr. Stone also held several prominent roles in the field of
aging under the Clinton administration, including assistant secretary for aging in the Department of Health and Human Services.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
3
Before we commence with our first panel, I would like to call
upon my colleagues who are sitting up here on the dais for any remarks and comments that they wish to have.
Senator Nelson.
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR BILL NELSON
Senator NELSON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

I am concerned, as we look down the road, that we have the
proper health care for older adultsgeriatrics primary health care,
and preventive medicine. That is certainly true in a constituency
such as mineFlorida, where we have a high percentage of the
population that is age 65 and older.
Mr. Chairman, one that of the little spin-offs that we are having
a problem with back on a Medicare bill in the late 1990s, a freeze
was put in place on all of the residency programs for medical
schools that Medicare funds, the result of whichwith no growth
since 1998your high population increase States, such as Florida
and Nevada, have not had the residencies to train the doctors.
Those States educating the doctors.
But then these doctors go to another residency program. What
we find is that a doctor is likely to stay and practice in the area
in which they did their residency. As a result, States like mine and
Nevada, and about half of the other States are educating the doctors and then losing them. Now, that is a terrible situation for a
population like Floridas that is aging. You need those residencies
in geriatrics, regular care, internal medicine and preventive care.
So it is one of the issues we are going to have to address. Thank
you, Mr. Chairman.
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you for that interesting comment, and a
very important comment.
Senator Collins.
OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. SUSAN COLLINS, A U.S.
SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF MAINE
Senator COLLINS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I want to commend

you for calling this hearing to examine our Nations future health
workforce in the face of a rapidly aging population. I think this
hearing is particularly significant in light of a recent report from
the Institute of Medicine that sounded a warning that we are facing a dramatic and critical shortage of doctors, nurses and other
health care professionals who are adequately trained to manage
the special health care needs of our Nations growing population of
seniors.
We know that in this country, the most rapidly growing part of
the population are those who are age 85 and older, the oldest old.
Like Senator Nelsons state, Maine is a State that is disproportionately elderly. I am very concerned about access to health care as
my generation and others join this population segment.
We know that older Americans consume far more health care resources than any other age group. We also know that there is a
real shortage of health care provides who are trained in geriatrics.
In fact, the numbers are truly astonishing. The experts have projected that we need some 36,000 geriatric doctors to care for our
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
4
70 million seniors by the year 2030. But only 7,000about 1 percent of all physiciansare currently certified in geriatrics.
Senator Boxer and I have introduced a bill to take the first steps
in this area. It has the support of AARP and other organizations.
I look forward to working with the Chairman who has been such
a leader in focusing on this issue. I would ask that my full statement be put in the record. Again, thank you for focusing on this
very important issue.
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you. By unanimous consent, your full
statement will be entered into the record, Senator Collins.
Senator SALAZAR.
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR KEN SALAZAR
Senator SALAZAR. Thank you very much, Chairman Kohl, for

holding this hearing on the Aging Committee on this very important issue. I come today here to the Committee with you to address
the severe shortage of long-term care professionals available to care
for older Americans.
Although the workforce shortage has been documented for many
years, new reports that have been issued by the Institute of Medicine show that many workers who are working in long-term care
settings are inadequately trained to do the job. Furthermore, vast
improvements are needed in geriatric education and curriculums as
well as new incentives, to recruit and retain a highly qualified
workforce.
Without a doubt, these are some of the greatest challenges facing
long-term care today. The situation will only get worse. In three
short years, 75 million baby boomers will begin to turn 65. Between 2005 and 2020, the elderly population of the U.S. is expected
to double. We must ensure that our health care system include
high-quality professionals to meet the growing demand for longterm and chronic care.
Personally I have experienced taking care of many of our loved
ones. My mother today is 86 years old. Fortunately, she continues
to live on our ranch in southern Colorado. My siblings and I share
the responsibility of caring for her. She is doing very well.
Most individuals and families have to make tough decisions on
how best to take care of their loved ones. At the very least, we all
want the peace of mind that the caregiver we hire to do the job has
been adequately trained and meets the highest possible standards.
I am hopeful that the witnesses today will address that issue of the
kinds of standards that we should have for professional caregivers.
This hearing is critical for us to identify the most effective policy
solutions to meet these health care challenges that we are now in
the midst of and will only find to be more challenging in the days,
weeks, months, years ahead.
Again, I want to thank Chairman Kohl and Ranking Member
Smith for holding this hearing.
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you, Senator Salazar.
Senator CASEY.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
5
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR BOB CASEY
Senator CASEY. Mr. Chairman, thank you very much for holding
this hearing. I will submit a longer statement for the record. But
I did want to commend you for calling this hearing because, in my
home State of Pennsylvania, we have a demographic challenge.
Our fastest growing population is 85 and up, as it is in many
states, I think. But we are, depending on how you count it, second
or third in the ranking of the states for the number of people over
the age of 65. It is a critically important challenge for Pennsylvania, and I know, for the nation as a whole.
When I was in State Government, I spent a good deal of time on
the issue of long-term care. Some of the most inspiring people I
met were people who were delivering that carecertified nurses
aides, nursing assistants, whatever categories you use or titles you
use. They were people who did back-breaking work and delivered
care in ways thatit is hard to describe how much they have benefited our families, doing that kind of work.
After I was in State government for a while, I had the experience, I guess you would call it, that all of us have when a loved
one is in the hospital. My father was in a long-term care setting
before he died. I was able to see first-hand what that care delivery
and care coordination and the quality of the care that we are talking about here today is all about. I realized then, more so than I
did as a public official, the kind of skill that is required in delivering quality care to older citizens in the twilight of their lives.
So this issue is important to me personally. But it is a major
issue in our State. We need to roll up our sleeves and work on it.
I am grateful you called this hearing. Thank you.
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much, Senator Casey.
We will now hear from our first panel. First Dr. Rowe and then
Dr. Stone.
Dr. Rowe.
STATEMENT OF JOHN ROWE, PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, MAILMAN SCHOOL OF
PUBLIC HEALTH, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, NEW YORK
Dr. ROWE. Senator Kohl and members of the Committee. Thank

you for the opportunity to testify before you on the critical health
care needs of older Americans. As noted by Senator Kohl, I am
Chair of the Institute of Medicines Committee on the future
healthcare workforce for older Americans. I am here to discuss the
findings and recommendations of the report that we have released
early this week.
To start with, I think there is a great myth here in Washington
about care of the elderly. The myth is that all we have to do to ensure older Americans access to care is to fix the issues related to
the Medicare Trust Funds solvency and sustainability. I think that
that is half of the problem. We first have to make sure that the
health care workforce is adequate with respect to its numbers and
its capacity to deliver the care. Even having the money in the system isnt going to get the care to older people if there is no one to
provide care.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
6
So it is about time that we turned our attention to this. I compliment you, Senator Kohl and the Committee, for having us here
today to discuss this.
Now, the future demandand I think we can look at this as a
kind of demand side and supply side issue, Senatorthe future demand for geriatric care is driven by basically two factors. The first
is the dramatic increases in the number of elderly that all of you
are very familiar with. The second, as noted by Senator Collins, is
the fact that the elderly utilize a disproportionate proportion of
health care resources. So the 12 percent of our population that is
over 65 uses 35 percent of the hospital stays, and 34 percent of the
medicines. By 2030, when the population of elders is 20 percent of
our population, they will dominate our health care system. That is
the demand side. How about the supply side? Well, on the supply
side, the answer is quite simple. We are in denial. We are woefully
unprepared. But fortunately, we think at the Institute of Medicine
that it is not too late. The supply and the organization of the
health care workforce for older individuals needs to be dramatically
enhanced, or it will simply be inadequate. Let me give you a couple
of facts.
As Senator Collins noted, there are only about 7,000 certified
geriatricians in the entire United States. More frightening is that
this is 22 percent lower in the year 2000. So we are actually going
in the wrong direction.
With respect to geriatric psychiatry, there is currently one for
every 10,000 older people in the United States. By 2030, at the current rate, there will be one for every 20,000 older people, whether
he or she needs a psychiatrist or not.
Less than one percent of the nurses, pharmacists and physician
assistants we have currently specialize in geriatrics while only 4
percent of the social workers do. This means that most health care
professionals, including doctors, nurses, social workers and others,
receive very, very little training in caring for the common problems
of older adults.
Standards for the training of nurse aides and home health aides
must be strengthened. In the State of California, there are higher
training requirements for dog groomers, crossing guards and cosmetologists than there are for nursing aides and home health
aides. Informal caregivers, the family and friends of older adults,
are also ill-prepared for their significant roles. Innovative new approaches to delivering care to older adults that have been shown
to be effective and efficient are not being implemented.
We suggest three approaches. The first approach is to enhance
the geriatrics competence of all professional caregivers. We believe
there needs to be more training in the schools of medicine, nursing
and social work. We believe that these professionals all should
demonstrate competence as a function of obtaining their licensure
or certificationnot just demonstrate that they had the hours of
training, but demonstrate that they have the competence.
In addition, we believe that the number of hours that direct
workers and nurses aides be given in instruction be increased from
the current level of 75 hours, which is the Federal standard, to 120
hours.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
7
The second bucket, if you will, of our three recommendations is
to increase the recruitment and the retention of geriatric specialists. We need them. We are not saying that every old person needs
a geriatrician any more than anybody with a heart needs a cardiologist. That is not what we are saying.
What we are saying is we need specialists who can train the rest
of the workforce on how to take care of the common problems of
the elderly, who can do research and develop new models of care
and, in fact, can take care of particularly complex and difficult patients.
Unfortunately, there is an economic disincentive to going into
geriatrics. In 2005 a geriatrician in this country made, on average,
$163,000. An internistwith less trainingmade $175,000. So if
you spend the extra year or two to do a fellowship in geriatric medicine, you are decreasing your future earning potential with our
current reimbursement strategies for geriatric care. This suggests
to me that our society does not value this additional training.
We have a number of suggestions and recommendations in our
report that go to specific ways that we can enhance loan forgiveness, provide scholarships and enhance payments. I would just
mention one for you. The National Health Service Corps is well-established, and has been very effective in developing physician manpower for underserved populations. We are calling for a National
Geriatric Health Service Corps using the same model. We think
that is something that could be put in place pretty quickly.
The third recommendation we have has to do with new models
of care. We have a fascination with studying demonstration
projects for new approaches to care. Many of these have been found
to be effective and cost-efficient, and yet they languish on the shelf,
because once the funding for the research project is over, there is
no funding to promulgate or sustain them. Therefore, they are just
dropped, and the next demonstration project is developed.
We need some follow up and some commitment at CMS to
change this so that new models of care which have been shown to
be effective and efficient can in fact be sustained and can permeate
to our society. Because even if we do the things we are recommending in this report, we are still going to fall short in the workforce. We have to be smarter, more effective and more efficient in
how we deliver the care.
We very much appreciate the opportunity to share our recommendations and our findings with you. Thank you very much.
[The prepared statement of Dr. Rowe follows:]
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.001
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.002
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.003
10
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.004
11
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.005
12
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.006
13
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.007
14
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.008
15
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.009
16
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.010
17
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.011
18
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.012
19
20
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you, Dr. Rowe.
Dr. Stone.
STATEMENT OF ROBYN STONE, DPH, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,
INSTITUTE FOR THE FUTURE OF AGING SERVICES, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF HOMES AND SERVICES FOR THE
AGING, WASHINGTON, DC
Ms. STONE. Chairman Kohl, Ranking Member Smith and members of the Committee, I am really pleased to have the opportunity
today to testify on behalf of the Institute for the Future of Aging
Services, which is the applied research institute of the American
Association of Homes and Services for the Aging, where I am the
senior V.P. for Research.
From the beginning of our institute, and actually going back a
heck of a lot longer than thatI have been trying to push this
issue for the last 25 yearsone of our signature areas has been the
development of a quality long-term care workforce.
I really commend you, this Committee and also the IOM for finally shining a light on what is the critical piece of our system.
Without the people who do the work, all the financing and delivery
in the world is not going to solve our problem.
Based on our own work, some of which is included in the written
testimony, and the efforts of others such as the IOM, I would like
to spend my remaining time laying out for your consideration five
broad workforce improvement goals and some possible strategies
for achieving them, some of which Dr. Rowe has already alluded.
The first is to expand the supply of new people entering the longterm care field. The need to do this is obvious. The traditional labor
pool paid of caregivers is shrinking. Regardless of the vision of
long-term care reform, the field will need new sources of personnel.
The U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services and Labor
should be working together to develop the data infrastructure to
track workforce shortages and to report to Congress on the status
of the long-term care workforce over time.
Second, workforce development funding needs to be channeled to
the recruitment and training needs of long-term care employers.
Much of that money goes to other health sectors. Funneling more
of those dollars specifically in the long-term care sector will help.
Third, information on long-term care careers should be targeted
to post-secondary education and professional schools. Long-term
care employers need to be encouraged to zero in on labor that has
been poorly tapped in long-term care, such as Hispanics and African-Americans who are underrepresented in nursing careers; young
people coming out of high school, individuals with disabilities; and
older people who either cannot afford to retire or who want to work
part-time.
We also need to think about expanding financial incentives such
as tuition subsidies and debt relief and incentive payments for
those who choose a long-term care profession.
The second goal is to create more competitive long-term care jobs
through wage and benefit increases, including exploring ways to
achieve more wage parity between long-term care and acute care,
and to explore how to leverage current Federal and State long-term
care financing to raise wages and improve benefits, including im-
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
21
plementing incentives such as pay for performance and other approaches that target payments effectively to address workforce
issues.
The third goal is to improve working conditions and the quality
of the jobs themselves. Higher wages and better benefits are not
likely to be sufficient, because high turnover is a sign of unhappy
employees. The Federal Government could grant financial incentives and/or regulatory relief to employers and states that achieve
measurable improvements in working conditions and are able to
demonstrate reduced turnover and improved job satisfaction while
maintaining quality of care.
We could also think about creating one or more centers on longterm care leadership and management innovation to develop, identify and disseminate education and training programs, apprenticeships and best practices.
The fourth goal is to make larger and smarter investments in
workforce education and development. In my judgment, one of the
most important workforce improvement prioritiesand Dr. Rowe
talked about this as wellshould be to highlight the need to
rethink and totally redesign the preparation, credentialing and ongoing training of long-term care administrators, medical directors,
nurses, allied health professionals and direct care workers.
Finally, the fifth goal is to moderate the demand for long-term
care personnel. It is unlikely that the need for new workers can
ever be completely reconciled with our growing demand because of
our aging of our population. We need to promote significant investment in developing and testing and disseminating promising technologies designed to improve service delivery efficiency and to reduce the demand for hands-on care.
In addition, we have to provide better incentives to family caregivers who are already carrying the bulk of this work. This should
include considering things like giving social security credits to
those who leave the workforce to perform full-time care giving and
to really further develop programs, so families know where to turn
to for help and have more than the crumbs that they are getting
currently through some of our programs.
Allowing states to consolidate current grants related to long-term
care service organization and delivery and education and trainingas Dr. Rowe was saying, we need to go beyond demos and actually get some of our promising models to scale, so that they become the norm rather than the exception.
In closing, what is most important is that any approach be
broad-based and address the multiple issues that have and will
drive todays workforce problems and future trends. Long-term care
must be viewed as a related but independent sector from health
care. Workforce improvement initiatives must be targeted specifically to the development of long-term care professionals across the
full spectrum of settings, and not just included as an afterthought
in efforts to bolster the hospital and ambulatory care workforce.
AAHSA and IFAS continue to explore solutions at the policy and
practice levels and have recently created a national Workforce cabinet comprised of a range of stakeholders who are interested in addressing this crisis. We look forward to working with the Senate
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
22
Special Committee on Aging to ensure continued progress in this
area. Thank you very much.
[The prepared statement of Ms. Stone follows:]
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.013
23
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.014
24
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.015
25
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.016
26
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.017
27
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.018
28
29
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you, Dr. Stone.
This time we will turn to members of the Committee for questions and comments. We will start with the Ranking Member, Senator Smith.
Senator SMITH. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. For the record, I
would like to put my statement in the hearing record.
The CHAIRMAN. We will do it.
[The prepared statement of Senator Smith follows:]
PREPARED STATEMENT
OF
SENATOR GORDON H. SMITH
I want to thank Senator Kohl for holding this important hearing today. The work
of our health care providers and caregivers is crucial to helping of our elderly family
members age with dignity. Unfortunately, workforce shortages in this vital health
care and aging support system continue to plague the industry. Identifying the best
methods to recruit and retain caregivers in the aging network is an issue of particular interest for me, and I thank the panelists for sharing their expertise on this
topic with us today.
I particularly want to thank Sally Bowman from Oregon State University for flying across the country to share her knowledge about this field with us.
I also look forward to testimony from Dr. Rowe. As a member of the Finance Committee, I am charged with ensuring the efficiency of our Medicare and Medicaid systems. While I am a strong supporter of both programs, each faces challenges as our
nation ages and health care costs continue to explode. I look forward to hearing Dr.
Rowes recommendations for system reform.
Last year, I had the pleasure of serving as a member of the National Commission
for Quality Long-Term Care, which was co-chaired by former Senator Bob Kerrey
and former Speaker Newt Gingrich. The Commission studied in depth the needs and
constraints placed upon the long-term care workforce. On any given day, the longterm care workforce serves about 10 million Americans, the vast majority of whom
are elderly. But the workforce suffers from low retention rates and a shortage of
trained professionals.
The Commission learned that long-term care professionals feel that they need
more training, that they have high rates of injury and that many are paid what they
feel are inadequate wages. These are just some of the many problems that we must
look at in order to ensure that when help is needed, it can be provided.
We also know that caregivers, who may be the child or spouse of an elderly or
disabled person, suffer from the stress of trying to lead their own life while helping
their loved ones stay in their home. Some caregivers may have disabilities themselves and struggle under the pressure of trying to avoid living in a facility. I am
a strong proponent of supports, including respite care, for these caregivers including
the Family Caregiver Support Program in the Older Americans Act.
I urge support for the work that I have done with Senator Lincoln to encourage
the Appropriations Committee to increase funding to programs in the Older Americans Act. Again, this year, we led a letter asking appropriators to provide a nine
percent increase in funding. Although more is needed, we believe this is a good start
in making our seniors a priority and helping them to remain healthy and in their
homes, where they want to be, as they age.
As some of you may know, I am from the small community of Pendleton, OR. I
want to emphasize the particular difficulties that are faced in maintaining a health
care and support system in rural areas. Remote locations, small numbers of patients, and difficulties in training and maintaining staff, are just some of the problems that lead to reduced access to help our loved ones in rural communities.
Like most health care professions, nurses are facing devastating shortages, especially in rural communities. Senator Clinton and I have introduced the Nursing
Education and Quality of Health Care Act to increase the nurse workforce in rural
areas, expand nursing school faculty and develop initiatives to integrate patient
safety practices into nursing education.
Whether its nurses, physicians or allied health care workers, as the number of
older Americans grows, the shortage of all health care professionals will be exacerbated.
In recent years, federal funding for programs to strengthen the health care workforce has taken a direct hit. I have written a letter to my fellow colleagues indicating my strong support to increase this funding, which will improve the geographical distribution, quality and diversity of the health care professions workforce.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
30
As we discuss the challenges facing elder care at todays hearing, it is important
to keep in mind that by 2030, the number of older adults in the United States will
nearly double as the 78 million members of the baby boom generation begin turning
age 65 in 2011. Our health and support systems are drastically lagging behind
where we should be at this point in time to plan for the future.
I hope that todays hearing will inspire some new and effective ways that we can
ensure providers of care are there when our seniors are in need.
With that, I turn to Chairman Kohl.
Senator SMITH. I want to give a particular thank you to Sally

Bowman from Oregon State University for flying across the country. She will be on the next panel. I appreciate these two excellent
presentations.
I wonder, Mr. Rowe, is there a State that is doing much of what
you described? Is there a model out there that we should look to,
or other states can look to, for achieving some progress in this area
of preparing for a geriatric generation that is coming?
Dr. ROWE. I am wishing it was Oregon. But I am not sure.
Senator SMITH. I was hoping you were going to say so.
Dr. ROWE. I dont think so. But I do think that, if you look across
the states and, you know the states are laboratories of democracy,
rightthere is a lot of different stuff going on. Much of it offers
good models. You will find some models of Medicaid in some states,
and some other models in other states focusing on different elements of the health care spectrum that are best practice. I think
that one can assemble a profile of all the best practice. Some medical schools do a much better job of committing to geriatrics. Some
nursing schools do a much better job than others.
There are good best practices, and models out there that do work
and can be replicated, no question.
Senator SMITH. Isnt it a fact that people respond to incentives?
Dont we need to look at things at the Federal level to incent physicians and nurses to go into geriatrics?
Dr. ROWE. Absolutely, and nurses and social workers. Some people have asked me since Monday, when we released the report, how
can geriatricians make less than internists? How can that be? It is
because all of their patients are on Medicare; whereas the internist
is practicing with a population that has some Medicare beneficiaries, and other people paid by private insurers that have paid
generally higher than Medicare. Internists have a different payer
mix and a greater possible income.
So obviously, the fix to that is not too difficult, Senator; because
there areif you increase the payment from CMS for individuals
with geriatric expertisewho have a board certification or a qualificationit is not going to cost that much. There are only 7,100 of
them in the United States. It would at least provide an incentive,
or rather, at least it would remove a disincentive for those individuals, with geriatric expertise.
Senator SMITH. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Dr. ROWE. Thank you.
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much, Senator Smith.
Senator CARPER.
Senator CARPER. Thank you. My colleagues that were here before
me, Mr. Chairman. I just have one question. I am going to ask this
question tongue-in-cheek. Then I would like to yield to them.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
31
Dr. Stone, you said in your statement, you mentioned the term
aging baby boomers? I was wondering how old do you have to be
to be considered an aging baby boomer?
Dr. STONE. You have to be 60 this year.
Senator CARPER. I will just tell you that. Thank you. [Laughter.]
Dr. STONE. Sorry.
Dr. ROWE. I think there is some flexibility around that, Senator.
Senator CARPER. All right. Let me hasten to add, I asked the
same question of Senator Nelson before he left. He said it is a
question of mind, not of body.
Ms. STONE. Of course.
Dr. ROWE. Of course.
Dr. STONE. I have been aging for 30 years with the work I have
been doing. I love every minute of it.
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much.
Senator SALAZAR.
Senator SALAZAR. Dr. Rowe and Dr. Stone, thank you for the testimony. The question I would have is on the issue of standards.
Dr. Rowe, I think you characterized it as this is a place in life
where there really are no standards for those who work in the profession providing direct care; that we have higher standards for
probably people who work in shops and lots of other places than
we do in this area.
What would you propose that we do in terms of standards? Is
that a function that we ought to leave to the states to devise standards? Is it something that has to be done at the national level?
What kind of standards would you propose?
Dr. ROWE. Well, first of all, I think it is important to recognize
that the standards the number of federal training hours of that are
required, which we think should be increased significantly, have
not changed in 20 years.
The training now for these individualsnurses aides, home
health aidesis pretty much procedural training, how to shift a patient from a bedside to a commode, or into a wheelchair, or to help
change dressings or the clothing of a patient, rather than background information about the aging process and about the characteristics of geriatric medicine and identifying risk factors for falls
or medication adverse effects. So there is a real curriculum we
think could be added.
There are Federal and State standards for some of these providers and just State standards for others. We feel that the Federal
standards should be increased from 75 to 120 hours; and that the
State should meet at least those standards, although if they wanted to have more, that would be fine.
But it is a dual requirement. So there is a Federal role here,
which is obviously germane to your Committee.
Senator SALAZAR. Dr. Stone, do you have a comment?
Dr. STONE. Yes. I would add a couple of things. First of all, I
think Dr. Rowe was talking about the kinds of training that is provided now and that could be. I will give you an example of a program in Wisconsin that we evaluated a number of years ago called
Wellspring, which is a quality improvement model in nursing.
These CNAs were the leaders of clinical research teams. They
had training together with the nurses and nurse practitionersoff-
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
32
site training for several days and around each clinical area; then
they came back and were really taught, not just through observation, but actually more like an assessment without doing it. I think
CNAs were not allowed to actually do the assessment. But they are
the nurses eyes and ears.
Within a year of doing this program, working around incontinence careand I have a doctorate in public healthand I will tell
you that these CNAs were amateur epidemiologists. They understood everything that was involved in the care that they were providing. They were no longer just moving somebody to a toilet. They
were helping them with hydration and preventing decubitus ulcers.
The empowerment and the knowledge that was imparted to these
folks was totally different than the kind of training that they get
today. That is really what we are talking about here. It is not just
a numbers game. It is really a qualitative difference in the kind of
training, which then translates in the work that they are going to
be doing.
Dr. ROWE. It enhances their self-esteem and their enjoyment and
retention in the workforce.
Dr. STONE. I would say that, Senator Smith, on your end, Oregon
has the best Nurse Delegation Act in country.
Senator SMITH. That is what I was expecting.
Dr. ROWE. Yes. Well, she had more time to come up with something.
Dr. STONE. Because of the Nurse Delegation Act in Oregon, the
development of this frontline workforce has been phenomenal.
Many other states have actually looked to Oregon to replicate that,
to allow more good delegation; which is not just letting people do
anything, but delegating where they have had significant training
in dementia care and medication management, which leaves the
other levels of staffand Jack actually talked about this at the
IOM report release a couple of days agoto do the work that they
need to do, so that everybody really becomes a team.
Senator SALAZAR. Thank you, Chairman Kohl.
The CHAIRMAN. Senator Casey.
Senator CASEY. Keep it up. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Dr. Stone, Dr. Rowe, thank you for your testimony. But also
thank you for the scholarship that goes into the testimony itself
and the experience.
I am trying to think of itmust have been 10 years ago now that
the Philadelphia Enquirer did a whole series on, as a lot of newspapers have over the years, on long-term care. One line from one
of those series, one of those stories, I should say, in the series has
stayed with me forever. The writer said something along the lines
of advocates for the frail elderly say that life can have quality and
meaning, even to the very last breath. Such a simple yet profound
statement about the end of life and the value of it.
There is one thing I wanted to ask you about, because you both
addressed it in different ways and with a lot of scholarship. It is
the challenge of recruiting and retaining, but especially recruiting
people to do this workthe back-breaking work, in many cases
with low wages and inadequate benefitsall of the things that we
know that are not attractive about this work.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
33
My sense of it is, spending some time with direct-care workers,
especially CNAs and people at that level of the workforce, is that
they really do have a sense of mission about it and a sense of purpose. I just wanted to get your reaction to thisboth of you have
talked about the urgency of recruitment and retention. Both of you
have talked about the wage and benefits aspects of this.
But let me ask you this. Somewhere along the way in the last
8 or 10 years, I read a study done of what these workers bring to
the table in terms of their own attitudes about their work. At least
in one survey, I remember that wages and benefits werent at the
top of the list. It was the stake they had in the management of the
place in a long-term care setting, or their involvement with the
care.
Dr. STONE. Right.
Senator CASEY. They wanted to feel like they were part of the
decisionmaking and how care was delivered. I just wanted to have
you speak to the broader question of recruitment, but in addition
what motivates people to do this work, and how we can incentivize
motivating it?
Dr. STONE. I could talk from the direct care worker area. We
have done a lot of work in this. Clearly, that is true. The organization of the work and the involvement in the actual activities that
go on every day is what really makes the difference for these folks.
No. 1 is caring for the people. I mean, there is a tremendous connection. Second is having the empowerment and the support from
organizations, whether it is a home-care agency or a nursing home
or assisted living or a hospital, to really do that work as part of
the team.
The beauty of the geriatric focus is that everybody across the entire spectrumwhether it is the physician, the nurse, the social
workers, the allied health professionals, the frontline caregivers
all are getting this kind of interdisciplinary training around how to
really work together. In the best of all worlds, where you have seen
real models work, everything rises.
One of the things that I really like about the IOM report and this
Committee today, that we are not just talking about direct care
workers, we are not just talking about physicians, nurses, social
workers. We are talking about it across the spectrum. This has got
to be a systemic change, because we can help the direct care workers. I mean, they already are committed to what they do. But unless we get the entire system to work together around this, it is not
going to work.
So we need everybody in this together at every single level.
Dr. ROWE. I think that the difficulties that we are having in generating and sustaining the workforce differ at each level. There are
tremendous drivers with respect to morale and conviction and dedication for the direct care workers. But then the characteristics of
other parts of the workforcethe shortages of other workers to
help them get their work doneand their low salary, drives them
out.
At the nursing end, the problem is not enough instruction, not
enough faculty. There arent enough geriatric nurse faculty in
American nursing schools to train individuals to be specialists in
nursing.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
34
On the physician side, there are a lot of funded genetic fellowship programs that go vacant every year, because physicians arent
applying for them. About half of the slots in the country go vacant.
Part of that has to be that the average medical student graduate
has $100,000 in debt. They are looking at the specialty, which is
the lowest paid. So that has to be, at least for some of them, an
important consideration.
But I think the secret here is a commitment to help the entire
workforce, not just one piece of it; because our problem is compounded by the deficiencies in each level. If we had deficiencies at
one level, but we were OK in the others, we could work it out. We
need a commitment to help the entire workforce by having the sophistication to recognize that the different elements of the workforce have different problems and need different fixes. There is not
a one-size-fits-all fix here.
Dr. STONE. I would like to just add one little thing. This is about
economic development, because these are the sectors that are growing in the 21st century. So it is also an investment in our economy
to think about how we shift a little bit from where we have been
putting a lot of our resources and redistribute into where the jobs
are going to be over the next 20 and 30 years. So it is a challenge.
But it is also an incredible opportunity.
Senator CASEY. Thank you.
Dr. ROWE. Thank you.
The CHAIRMAN. Well, thank you both very much. You have been
informative and helpful. We appreciate it.
Yes, sir, Senator Carper.
Senator CARPER. I actually did have a serious question too. Could
I?
The CHAIRMAN. Sure.
Senator CARPER. Thanks. I am going to be stuck on that first
question for a while.
Somewhere in what I have read coming into the hearing today,
I noted that we are going to need an additional roughly 3 million,
3.5 million people to provide health care for us aging baby boomers
and others in our population just to maintain the current ratio of
providers to the total population. We do a whole lot in our state,
our congressional delegation. We try to help Delaware Technical
Community College, University of Delaware, Lesley College, some
of our hospitals where they train nurses, to try to make sure that
they have the resources they need to train the workforce that will
be needed to take care of the rest of us.
On the other hand, though, we also look to a couple of our hospitals. We have a VA hospital in northern Delaware that we are
very proud of. They use information technology. In fact, we do this
nationwide through the VA in ways that enable us to save costs,
save lives, make your folks providing the health care more productive. I am sure you are familiar with the work that they have done.
Another of our larger hospitals is called Christiana Care. They
have a visiting nurses associationI think they use a telehealth
systemthat they find is a cost-effective, user-friendly way to manage nursing resources and need for services.
Have you identified any technologies that are being developed or
used to reduce the demand for hands-oncare using well-trained
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
35
hands to provide the care that we are going to need? Or some technologies that are still being developed? Can you give us some examples that we might find encouraging?
Dr. ROWE. We have a section of our report that deals with technologies, Senator, specifically. There are various technologies and
remote monitoring technologies, so that problems are detected
sooner, and somebody isnt lying on the floor of their kitchen for
three days without anyone knowing it; and therefore is much more
ill when they are discovered than they would have been with earlier intervention.
Senator CARPER. Give us a couple of others.
Dr. ROWE. Well, one can have technologies where you can understand what individuals vital signs, blood pressure and pulse and
temperature and monitoring those, so you know the effects of various medications. There are technologies that help move patients,
that make it much easier for individuals to move patients around
and position them.
There are a whole variety of recommendations here that we
think NIH and other organizations have a real opportunity to conduct additional research on that might be very helpfuland that
could help to make up for the shortage, Senator, in the workforce;
because we are just not going to get there. Even if you and your
colleagues did everything that we recommended and other groups
would recommend, it is really going to be hard to get there.
So we are going to have to rely on these new technologies. We
have to invest in more bioengineering research.
Senator CARPER. Dr. Stone.
Dr. STONE. I would just add a couple of things. One is in the area
of medication management, which is a big one, particularly for people living in the community. There are increasing technologies for
actually helping patients with more self-management. To the extent that can happen, we can have less need for people to be in peoples homes, and monitoring them. I would also like to put in a
plug for AAHSAs Center for Aging Services Technology.
Senator CARPER. What is it called?
Dr. STONE. The Center for Aging Services Technology, which is
one of the centers within the American Association of Homes and
Services for the Aging, which has brought together researchers,
providers and companies who are actually interested in exploring
technologies that are going to mitigate the need for some of this
labor, but also provide efficiency, to complement the labor that is
needed as well. So it is not an either/or. It really is complemetarity.
Dr. ROWE. If we have the technologies, then we have to have the
standards to train the health care workers in the use of the technology.
Dr. STONE. Right.
Dr. ROWE. This is a very, very important consideration. So that
is going to even further enhance the training requirements. You
cant just, you know, wheel the technology into the room. We have
to have somebody who understands how to apply it and how to understand what it is telling them.
Senator CARPER. We used to visit my mom when she was living
down in Florida. She had early dementia. I remembersome of my
colleagues may recall with relatives of their own, or people in the
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
36
audiencewe kept her medicines in what looked like a fishing
tackle box. There are certain medicines you are supposed to take
in the morning and at noon, in the afternoon, you know, with
meals and so forth. We were always concerned that she took the
right medicine at the right time.
My sister and I used to say, I wonder if anybody has ever actually looked at the medicines she is taking. They were prescribed
by a range of different physicians who probably never met each
other, never talked to each other. We were wondering, Does anybody ever think about what all these medicines taken together do
to our mom? So are you suggesting that we have some technology
that actually does that kind of thing these days? That is good. That
is a good thing.
Last question, if I could, Mr. Chairman.
My youngest son is a senior in high school, graduating. His
girlfriend has an older brother who is going through med school.
He is going through his rotations right now. We were talking to
him not long ago and saying, Well, what kind of doctor do you
want to be? He told ushe obviously hadnt really made up his
mind. But I dont think he is thinking about specializing in geriatrics.
He told us about some of the things that medical students are
most interested in becomingdermatologists, are like, right at the
top of the list. We said, Why? He said it was because it is the
nature of the work. It is not bad. It is not heavy lifting. They are
paid pretty good. They are paid pretty good.
Dr. ROWE. On average, $300,000.
Senator CARPER. Yes.
Dr. ROWE. Versus $163,000 for geriatrics.
Senator CARPER. Versus what?
Dr. ROWE. Versus $163,000 for geriatrics.
Senator CARPER. That would give somebody pause, wouldnt it?
It is about what we make around here, isnt it?
Dr. ROWE. It is not that dermatology isnt important. It is obviously important. But it is an interesting comparison.
Senator CARPER. You are suggesting that one of the reasons why
the pay for those specializing in geriatrics isnt high is because a
lot of the compensation comes from Medicare. If you look at what
we pay for Medicare compared to what people can
Dr. ROWE. I recognize that we have a Medicare trust fund problem. But the fact is that if we paid geriatricians who have qualifications and a way to recognize that, given the scale of the financial problems you folks deal with, there are only 7,100 of them in
the United States. It is just not going to cost that much. It might
remove a disincentive, so that half those fellowships will not go
empty every year.
Senator CARPER. Very well. Thank you both very much.
Thanks, Mr. Chairman.
The CHAIRMAN. Senator Whitehouse, do you have any comment
or question?
Senator WHITEHOUSE. Im trying to get my microphone to work.
There we go. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, yes.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
37
This has been a matter of considerable interest in Rhode Island.
As you probably know, Richard Besdine at the Brown University
Medical School is probably
Dr. ROWE. I wrote a text book with Richard Besdine.
Senator WHITEHOUSE. Well, he was probably the first person to
get specialized geriatric education. He had to go over to Scotland
to get it at the time. There was no such thing in the United States.
Since then, as you have pointed out, it continues to be a very
underrepresented field. The financial incentives arent great.
But it is a highly specialized field. People really need to know
how the body of a very elderly person is truly different than the
body of younger people and be able to appreciate that in the way
they treat them.
But the cost issue is considerable. I wonder if you could comment
on whether you find opportunities, or where you find opportunities,
in improved coordination of care that may ideally lead to cost savings as a result of chronic care being better managed, that could
then be plowed back into.
Dr. ROWE. Yes.
Senator WHITEHOUSE. Increased reimbursement for the geriatric
community.
Dr. ROWE. I think it is a very sophisticated question. Dr. Besdine
at Brown University and I founded the program in geriatrics at
Harvard Medical School together many years ago, along with Dr.
Wetle. I know him well.
We do speak in our report, the IOM report, about models of care
that have proven to be cost-effective and have improved quality of
care. There are a number of characteristics of these programs.
There is a long list of them here.
Senator WHITEHOUSE. One of them is improved information technology support.
Dr. ROWE. Some of them relate to that. Some of them are just
interdisciplinary teams, job delegation. IMPACT is a program the
Hartford Foundation funded to recognize and treat depression in
the elderly early, which was very effective and cost-efficient. But
once the study was over, there was no funding to keep it going, because the kinds of things the people were doing in the team were
not supported by Medicare.
So the point we have made in the discussion is that there needs
to be a consideration of how to sustain new models. We have a
whole bunch of proven things that we are not implementing into
our health care system.
Senator WHITEHOUSE. I would love to follow up with you offline
on that.
Dr. ROWE. It would be our pleasure, Senator.
Senator WHITEHOUSE. I think there has been a lot of work done
on this. It seems to me that the next step is to find some pilot
projects where it can be given a little bit more real-world shakeout.
Then perhaps put in systemwide
Dr. ROWE. You have some integrated health systems in Rhode Island that could implement these in several hospitals at once.
Senator WHITEHOUSE. Yes, great.
Dr. Stone.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
38
Dr. STONE. I would just like to add one thing, however, because
we have about 25 years of history in this. The problem is that we
also need to have people trained to do it. The whole new issue
around the medical home, for example, that is supposed to be the
new panacea for coordinationunless you have people who are
trained to understand how to coordinate, the model will not work.
You have to get back to what people can do in order to actually implement that.
Senator WHITEHOUSE. Yes. You have an airplane, you have got
to have pilots who can fly it.
Dr. ROWE. Yes. It is not a naturally occurring event.
Dr. STONE. It is not just going to happen.
Dr. ROWE. We need to get these people together and they will
start behaving differently.
Ms. STONE. Yes.
Dr. ROWE. They need to be trained.
Senator WHITEHOUSE. Understood.
I thank the Chairman.
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much, Senator Whitehouse.
We thank the first panel. We appreciate you being here.
Moving on to the second panel, our first witness will be Martha
Stewart, who needs little introduction. In addition to being the
founder of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, which includes her
expansive multi-media portfolio of award-winning brands, Ms.
Stewart has experienced life as a family caregiver for her mother,
Martha Kostyra.
In 2007, Martha was inspired to open the new Martha Stewart
Center for Living at the Mt. Sinai Medical Center in New York.
The center is an outpatient facility for geriatric medicine, which
provides clinical care and education for patients, offers training for
physicians and coordinates healthy aging research and practices.
We will hear from Dr. Todd Semla, who is the president of the
American Geriatrics Society, where he has been a member of the
editorial board of Annals of the Long-term Care since 2002. Dr.
Semla is a clinical pharmacy specialist with the U.S. Department
of Veterans Affairs Pharmacy Benefits Management Service, as
well as an associate professor at Northwestern Universitys
Feinberg School of Medicine.
Next, we will hear from Mary McDermott, a member of the board
of directors for the Wisconsin Quality Home Care Commission. A
former corporate systems efficiency expert, Ms. McDermott left her
job in 2000 to become a full-time care provider for her parents. She
understands long-term care training and quality of care issues, as
both a service provider and a family caregiver.
Senator Smith, would you like to introduce your witness?
Senator SMITH. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Ms. Sally Bowman is a respected professor of human development and family sciences at Oregon State University, where she
has been a faculty member since 1994. She will share with us her
experience working with families who have long-term care needs
and the importance of gerontology specialists. Thank you, Sally.
The CHAIRMAN. We thank you all for being here. Just one comment. Martha Stewart does need to leave rather soon. So we are
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
39
going to ask her to give her testimony and answer questions. Then
we will move on to the other three.
Ms. STEWART.
STATEMENT OF MARTHA STEWART, FOUNDER, MARTHA
STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA, NEW YORK, NY
Ms. STEWART. I appreciate the invitation to testify before you

today and am honored to be here. You have chosen a subject that
is increasingly critical to our quality of lifenot only for older
Americans but for family members who care for them. I look forward to learning from the work of the Committee as it continues
to examine this issue.
The experience of the distinguished professionals on your panel
today will be important as well. I especially appreciated the remarks of Dr. John Rowe and Dr. Stone.
I respond to your invitation today as a member of a family whose
eyes were opened by personal experience and to share what we
have been learning at the Martha Stewart Center for Living at
Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York City.
My professional life has been centered on the home, the wellbeing of the family, and everything that these subjects encompass.
When I began working in this area more than 25 years ago, the
subject of homemaking as it relates to families was largely overlooked, though the interest was clearly broad and the desire for information strong. My colleagues and I soon discovered we were satisfying a deeply felt unmet need.
Today I see a similarly unmet need. Our aging relatives and the
families who care for them yearn for basic information and resources. We all know that this is a significant sector of our society.
More than 75 percent of Americans receiving long-term care rely
solely on family and friends to provide assistance. The majority of
these caregivers are women, many of whom are also raising children. Often, these women are working outside the home as well.
I understand the challenges family caregivers face. My mother,
Martha Kostyra, passed away last year at the age of 93. My siblings and I were fortunate that she was in good health almost until
she died. But we still came to know first hand the number of issues
that needed to be managed.
First, it is difficult, especially in smaller cities and rural locations, to find doctors experienced in the specific needs that arise
with age. Think of all that this includes: the effect of medications
on elderly patients; how various medicines interact with one another; warning signs for depression and onsets of other conditions
increasingly common in the elderly.
How do we ensure that they take their medications? How do we
help structure our parents lives so that they can live independently for as long as possible? How do we support the generation of
caregivers who devote so much of themselves to their parents
aging process?
This only touches on the myriad of issues, of course. Worry is the
backdrop for everything these families do. What if the parent falls?
What if she leaves the burners on? What if he takes his medications twice or forgets to take them at all?
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
40
Now I am learning even more about the physical, emotional and
financial toll that the experience can exact. Caring for an aging
parent or loved one can be another full-time job. In fact, 43 percent
of baby boomers have taken time off from work, and 17 percent
have reduced hours to help care for an aging parent. They do this
at a time when their expenses are rising.
One recent study found that half of those caring for a family
member or friend 50 years or older are spending, on average, more
than 10 percent of their annual income on caregiving expenses.
Many dip into savings and cut back on their own health care
spending to cover the bill. Is it any wonder that family caregivers
are at increased risk of developing depression, anxiety, insomnia
and chronic illnesses themselves?
In our Kostyra family, we were grateful to be there for my mother, who had given so much to us and was a well-loved presence in
our lives and in the lives of her 13 grandchildren. Our experience
in her final years, and my resulting awareness of the issues many
Americans face, is one of the reasons for the creation of the Center
for Living. The goal of the Center, which is dedicated to my mom,
is to help people to live longer, healthier, productive lives even as
they age.
We have set a goal at the Center to use research and the practice
of geriatric medicine to try to elevate the level of eldercare and its
importance in our society. Did you know that there is currently one
geriatrician to every 8,500 baby boomers? That is clearly not adequate.
We are also working to develop new tools and resources for caregivers. We are collaborating with a large number of organizations
and motivated, experienced individuals, many of whom have been
studying these issues for years. There are numerous devoted and
knowledgeable people in arena, and we hope we can all learn from
each other.
This is a field that eventually impacts most families in emotional
and encompassing ways. Yet sometimes it is the simple solution
that holds an answer. Not long ago at the Center, a woman
brought in her father who had suffered a stroke two years earlier.
After the stroke, he had been told that he could never eat again
and was placed on a feeding tube. He was devastated and depressed. He had spent his life as someone with a passion for good
food, and his future looked very bleak to him.
At the Center, a doctor experienced in geriatric care asked the
man to drink a glass of water. He did, without a problem. If he
can do this, the doctor said, he can eat. This simple exchange
improved the mans quality of life immeasurably. I am sure it improved the quality of his daughters life, too, knowing that her father was happier and could eat.
I want to share with you three things I have learned from our
work at the Center and that others may find useful. One, we must
make an effort to coordinate care. Most older Americans have several doctors. It is important for these doctors to cooperate with one
another and work closely with caregivers.
Two, it is important that we as a society recognize the stresses
and challenges that caregivers face and support them as best we
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
41
can. We want to ensure that their health isnt undermined by the
demands of eldercare.
Three, we must encourage families to open up a dialog now. Even
if your older relatives are in good health, as my mom was, it is important to plan for a day when they might not be.
I have always been a firm believer in the role of preparation and
organization in progressing toward a goal. My concern today is
whether our country and our overstretched medical system can possibly meet the demands of those 76 million baby boomers who will
start turning 65 in the next two years. We are on the cusp of a
health and caregiving crisis that has to be addressed now. I know
you recognize this, and that is why we are here today.
I thank you for your dedication to this important matter and for
the opportunity to express my thoughts.
In fact, I am here with Dr. Brent Ridge, who was a geriatrician
at Mt. Sinai hospital. Brent is now working with me on the Center
for Living and on other initiatives involving caregiving. We are
writing a handbook for caregivers. We have gotten as far as a very
complete outline. Now we are starting on the actual text.
It is a very difficult job. There are lots of handbooks, lots of
guidebooks. But very few of them address all the very serious subjects that a caregiver and the aging population really have to face.
So thank you very much again for inviting me here.
[The prepared statement of Ms. Stewart follows:]
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.019
42
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.020
43
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.021
44
45
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you, Ms. Stewart. In what ways do you
think the Martha Stewart Center for Living at Mt. Sinai Medical
Center meets the needs of older adults, their families as well as to
professionals who serve them?
Ms. STEWART. Well, in many, many ways. We rebuilt the geriatric center at Mt. Sinai to make it a very comfortable and welcoming place. There are more than 3,000 patients that visit the
Center on a regular basis. Every patient at the Center is assigned
to a clinical social worker to help patients and families with the
many social and financial issues that accompany aging.
In addition to over 20 geriatricians at the Center, there are also
cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, nutritionists, psychiatrists, gynecologists and pain specialists, all in one place, which
really does facilitate the coordination of the care of these patients.
Electronic medical records rather than paper charts are used
here, so that all doctors can easily access patient information and
can check up on the care of these patients. That way, there isnt
a medicine that is going to react badly with another medicine,
which oftentimes does happen with these patients.
My mom visited, oh, I dont know how many different doctors.
She was alwaysand when I called her up, she was always going
to another doctor. I said, Mom, are you taking all your records?
She said, Oh, I know exactly what I am doing. But not really. I
mean, because it was very complicated. I couldnt even understand
what she was taking. I mean, I saw the drawers of things. So this
is terribly important, this medical records sharing that is going on
now.
We have wellness lectures and yoga and Tai Chi and meditation
classesits also very important just to encourage the aging to do
those very vital exercises. Every medical student who graduates
from Mt. Sinai rotates through the Martha Stewart Center for Living, so that they graduate having some exposure to managing the
care of this special patient population. So that is another way to
encourage the universities, the medical schools, to get students into
thinking about geriatric medicine.
We just opened the Center, as I said, late last year. So it is really
too early to pronounce our model successful. But we are confident
that it will be and that our complete approach to patient care can
be integrated into other medical facilities in this county and hopefully elsewhere.
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you.
Senator SMITH.
Senator SMITH. Ms. Stewart, I think we are all grateful that you
are here. Certainly I admire your Center for Living. What you just
described is ideal. Your mother was in a rural area. I am from a
rural part of Oregon. I think about all the things that we need to
do yet in Government. In fact, we are holding this hearing to try
to elicit good ideas.
It seems to me, with the demographic aging of our country, if
people are counting on Government to fix it all, make it perfect, I
think our faith in that is probably going to be disappointed.
But you spoke about your mother. It reminded me of how we lost
our mother. My mother had 10 children. It was, at the end of a
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46
wonderful, beautiful life, when she had a very sudden bout of pancreatic cancer. We all took turns at her bedside taking care of her.
It just does seem to me that one of the missing ingredients here
that is part of living is that we will all die. Her death was, in fact,
if it can be described as beautiful, it was that. It was because she
had her family around.
I wonder if you have a message for American families as to our
responsibility to our parents, not just to be there, but perhaps to
become more educated. Is there a part of your Center that trains
family members to take care of their moms as they are dying?
Ms. STEWART. Well, that is what the book will help, the book
that we are working on, the Care Living Guide, which I hope will
encourage the children of the aging to take it very seriously that
mom or dad plans for the future. You know, my mom just didnt
she really didnt plan.
She had six kids. We were all well-off. We could all take care of
her. She was self-sufficient. She never asked us for anything. She
had been a teacher. She had her pensions. She did all her bookkeeping herself. She did her tax returns herself. She was quite an
astute and intelligent woman.
But she never really said, you know, maybe I shouldnt really be
in western Connecticut. It wasnt so rural, but she still needed a
car to get anywhere. She became her friends chauffeur. She was
chauffeuring friends that were younger than she was, because she
was still able to drive at 93.
But she didnt plan to, you know, go to a warmer climate. She
didnt plan to make herself more comfortable as she aged. She really felt that the activity around her was the most important thing.
We continued to give her that activity. I mean, she did 40 segments
on my television program. Even her own children didnt realize
that. They didnt realize what a fantastic contributor she had been
to my life and to the lives of so many other older people in America. She gave them lots of hope that they could age gracefully as
my mother had.
But even that aside, the whole aging and the whole dying process
just made me realize that you have to plan. You have to have help.
You have to have intelligent resources, not just financial, but from
everyone to get old gracefully and live well until you die.
Senator SMITH. Perhaps to Americans living in rural places, a
word of counsel to become educated and, literate on caring for our
parents.
Ms. STEWART. Absolutely. Very important.
Senator SMITH. Probably good counsel to all of us to be nice to
our kids and keep family relationships strong, because if you live
in Pendleton, OR, like I do, you may not have all of the care that
you might in Connecticut, for example.
Ms. STEWART. Well, even in Connecticut, some of her friends
dont have any careones without children and withoutI see it
all the time. They come to me asking for help. I am there to help
them, because it is a community.
Senator SMITH. Well, I thank you for what you are doing. It is
commendable example for all of us. You have added measurably to
this hearing and to bringing our focus on this emerging problem.
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you, Senator Smith.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
47
Senator SALAZAR.
Senator SALAZAR. Thank you very much, Chairman Kohl.
Thank you, Ms. Stewart, for testifying here today and to all the
panelists as well for being here today. Thank you also for leading
the way in helping us figure out what we ought to be doing with
our elderly population and dealing with long-term care issues.
I have a question of you, because frankly you are a master of
marketing and communication throughout the country and
throughout the world. I think when I hear Senator Smiths question to you about how we get our families involved and educated
about long-term health care issues, it goes way beyond that.
I come from a family of eight children. My family has lived on
the same farm for 150 years, almost 300 miles south of Denver,
CO. We took care of my father until he passed away from Alzheimers at age 85. My mother, who is 86, still lives on the ranch.
We take turns taking care for her. So I understand the importance
of the nexus between the children and the parents.
But I also think that, as a society, we arent very good in terms
of planning for those later stages of life, whether it is financial
planning, whether it is medical planning, if long-term health care
is a part of that. So based on your expertise and communications,
how is it that we can move our society to having a more honest and
educated view of what we do as we get through the aging process?
Ms. STEWART. Well, things have changed, I think, tremendously
in the United States. We have become more youth-centric than
aging-centric. I think that that has towe have to have a shift because of this huge number of baby boomers that are reaching 65
years old. That is still not old. I mean, you are still a vital person
at 65 years old.
But as you get older, you realize that you have to rely on others
many times for transportation, for meals, for just living expenses.
We have not really done a good job in teaching our children to care
for the elderly. Our advertising is still focused on the young. We
should be focusing more on the aging population.
I think that is all going to happen. I am working on a magazine
for women over 50 now. I need this magazine. I know all my
friends need this magazine. One doesnt exist in this country without trying to encourage and inform, and I am going to spend the
rest of my time doing this kind of educating. I think that there are
other people in my position that can also be very, very helpful. But
that doesnt mean that we cant also focus in Government on these
issues and medicine on these issues to get people focused on the
care and the well-being of the aging population.
Senator SALAZAR. I appreciate it very much. Senator Whitehouse
and I once worked together as attorneys general for a number of
years and had a number of initiatives with AARP and other organizations trying to deal with it.
Ms. STEWART. They have done a phenomenal job. But they dont
reach everybody. That is a problem.
Senator SALAZAR. Sometimes I wonder there are a lot of efforts
out there from lots of organizations and lots of wonderful-meaning
people. But I wonder how effective we are being in terms of actually reaching the population at a point where they are making decisions for the long-term. Sometimes, my senses is that we have
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
48
made some progress. But if there is 100 miles to go, we have gone
maybe only the first mile
Ms. STEWART. I think there are 100 miles. I think that we really
do have to focus. I intend to, as an individual. I hope many other
people do too.
Senator SALAZAR. Thank you for being here today.
Ms. STEWART. Thank you.
Senator CASEY.
Senator CASEY. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Ms. Stewart, thank you for your testimony and for the insight
you bring to us from a personal perspective as well, which I think
informs all of us.
I was looking at your testimony in the last section, when you
have I guessthere are three bullet points. The second one, when
you talk about, It is important that we as a society recognize the
stresses and challenges that caregivers face and support them as
best we can.
I was thinking about one initiative in Pennsylvania about 20
years ago it started. I am pretty sure it is still being funded. It was
called Aid to the Caregiver. It was an innovative way to have Government help a little bit to provide aid or respite care of one kind
or another. I think there have been similar models in the Federal
Government.
But I just wanted to have you expand upon that point in terms
of what you have seen, either in the public sector or the private
sector and non-profit sector, of models or programs that speak to
the goal of trying to give some aid or relieve some of that stress.
Ms. STEWART. Well, there is Gail Hunt who heads up the National Alliance for Caregiving. She has been a wonderful resource
to us at the Center for Living at Mt. Sinai also. Dr. Robert Butler,
who founded the department at Mt. Sinai. It is the oldest geriatric
department in America. I dont know if you know that. Now, he has
also founded the International Longevity Center. He is actively involved in confronting this caregiving crisis.
So there are people really working in this area, really trying to
help solve the problem. It is just a question of focus. It really is
and a large focus.
Senator CASEY. What is it about the way that that kind of respite care is given? In other words, if you have a particularly difficult situation you are caring for, and it is usually women that are
doing thiscaring for an older relative, a parent or something like
that. What do you think is theand this is a broad generalizationbut what do you think is the most common relief they can be
provided with?
Is it taking a day off? Or is it more giving them a break a couple
hours a day. Or is it a longer break?
Ms. STEWART. It is very hard to say. I personally work 7 days
a week. I have many jobs that I do for my company. But I always
tried to see my mother ever single Sunday. Someone would go to
pick her up, bring her to my house. The last 6 months or so, she
wasnt really driving a distance. She could drive around town, but
couldnt really drive a distance any longer. I live about 35 minutes
from where my mother lived.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
49
But I would have her over, try to entertain her. On her 93rd
birthday, I had a dinner party for her. She controlled the conversation. We asked her to just reminisce. I had all my friends there
not her friends, but my friends. So they could really get to know
her. Who knew she was going to die a few months later?
But it was fascinating, because she really wanted to be independent. But she really wanted to have the interaction. Making
time to have the time to be interactive with an elderly person in
your family, or taking the time to just contribute to an organization, so that you could give time to somebody else, it is very important. It is just a way of living.
That is what we are trying to do in the Center. We are trying
to be a place where you can go, learn and be cared for, and feel
wanted. I think that is really one of the major things.
In New York, there are many older people. I was looking up the
statistics today about the numbers of elderly. In New York, 13 percent are over 85 years old; in Pennsylvania, 15.15 percent; Maine,
14.4 percent; Florida is the highest, 16.79 percent. That is a lot of
people. It is getting to be bigger and bigger and bigger over 65 now.
So we just have this big challenge.
Senator CASEY. Thank you very much.
Ms. STEWART. Wish I could answer all the questions.
Senator WHITEHOUSE.
Senator WHITEHOUSE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you for being here, Ms. Stewart. I was struck by the question of the distinguished senator from Oregon, because I did not
know until this minute that we shared the common experience of
having our mothers die from pancreatic cancer.
Ms. STEWART. Painful and horrible.
Senator WHITEHOUSE.Senator Salazar mentioned, when we
were attorneys general, we did a certain amount of work on, in my
case, particularly end-of-life care, which is sort of a particularly
sensitive and tender aspect of all of this; but also one that is potentially very ennobling.
The experience that I have seen and heard of from too many people is that, at that time, there are far too many Rhode Islanders
and far too many Americans who are experiencing far too much
pain, who are experiencing far too much either confusion about or
failure of, their advance directives, and far too many who are experiencing continuing medical intervention that is well-intentioned,
but is kind of on the dont just stand there, do something theory.
Frankly, everybody would be better off if the family had the
chance to stop, settle down and deal with the occasion and experience of that loved ones passing away. I just think we are terrible
at that in this country, by and large.
I was delighted to hear that Senator Smiths family had the experience of having a beautiful death. We have had a beautiful
death in my family. We have also had some pretty unpleasant
ones. The difference seems to follow along these lines. It is something you can prepare for, if it is done right. But there is very little
support for those decisions.
In fact, institutions seem to be leaning very strongly in favor of
less pain medication, with continuing confusion over what the ad-
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
50
vance directive means, and general disinterest in complying with
them. Then for Gods sake, lets not stop doing things until it is all
over, even if that is highly painful and costly emotionally to the
family.
I am just wondering what thoughts you bring to that particular
issue.
Ms. STEWART. Well, I am a fighter. I am going to be here forever.
I am never willingly going to die. I wish I could find the fountain
of youth that we are all looking for. But you cant really, I think
in this Committee, approach it that way.
You just have to really encourage support of caregiving and support of geriatric medicine to deal with the problems of the elderly.
I think that that is really what we have to focus on, having places
like the Mt. Sinai Center, the Martha Stewart Center for Living
that will really help those patients with many, many, many different problems there and not burden the family with everything.
The family cant really take the brunt of it all.
I dont think it is just the family. The family will help, but a lot
of people dont have large families and lots of kids. What is going
to happen to those people?
So it is a huge challenge. It has to be dealt with, as I said, in
a very systematic and careful way to develop programs and encourage the universities to encourage people to study geriatric medicine
and provide subsidies for caregivers. I dont really know anything
about any of that. All I know is that they need information, education and help.
Senator WHITEHOUSE. Well, you are a great communicator. You
are a great person at helping Americans experience the transitions
and passages of their lives, birthdays and things like that in a
more favorable way than they might otherwise. I would urge you
to think about the end-of-life care. Thank you.
Ms. STEWART. Thank you.
The CHAIRMAN. Ms. Stewart, thank you so much for being here.
You have helped us immeasurably and we appreciate your giving
us your time today.
Ms. STEWART. Excuse me for having to leave. I have some other
obligations I have to go to. But I greatly appreciate the invitation.
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you so much.
We now turn to the second member of the panel, Dr. Todd Semla.
STATEMENT OF TODD SEMLA, PHARMD, PRESIDENT,
AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, EVANSTON, IL
Dr. SEMLA. Good afternoon Chairman Kohl, Ranking Member

Smith and members of the Committee. Thank you for inviting the
American Geriatrics Society to address the Committee on preparing
our nations health care workforce for the growing number of older
Americans.
The American Geriatrics Society is a non-profit organization of
7,000 health professionals dedicated to improving the health, independence and quality of life of older Americans. Geriatricians are
primary care physicians who complete residencies in family practice or internal medicine, and at least one additional year of fellowship training in geriatric medicine.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
51
Geriatricians specialize in the often complex health condition and
requirements of older adults. As Dr. Rowe stated, today there are
fewer than 7,200 certified geriatricians practicing in the United
Statesroughly half the number needed.
There are similar shortages in other disciplines. In all disciplines, there are insufficient number of geriatrics faculty to train
upcoming geriatricians and conduct aging research. Today I will
offer some solutions for your consideration. Many parallel the recommendations of the recently released IOM report on the geriatrics
workforce.
We need to establish Federal loan forgiveness programs for geriatric health professionals. Encouraging future physicians burdened
with school loans to consider a career in geriatrics is a challenge
because of financial disincentives, as you have heard. In most fields
of medicine, additional training results in higher income, but not
so in geriatrics. A national loan forgiveness program would offset
at least a portion of the financial burden of pursuing a career in
geriatrics.
As you heard Senators Boxer and Collins have introduced a geriatrics loan forgiveness bill. We support the principles underlying
this bill.
We need Congress to reauthorize expand and fund Title VII
health professions programs. We have specific recommendations for
the three programs that are critical to training health care professionals in geriatrics.
First, AGS recommend expanding the Geriatric Academic Career
Awards (GACA) to support not only career development for geriatric physicians in academic medicine, but also junior geriatrics
faculty in other health professions such as nursing, pharmacy and
social work. We recommend creating a mid-career GACA award
that would support and retain clinician educators as they advance
in their careers.
Second, we recommend expanding the Geriatric Education Center Program to support 14 additional GECs. Currently there are 48
in 36 states. Ideally, the mandate of the GECs would also be expanded to include training of direct-care paraprofessionals.
Third, we recommend that Congress consider expanding the geriatric faculty fellowship programs by creating mid-career fellowships that would allow faculty from all disciplines to receive training in caring for older adults.
We need to support Title VIII nursing workforce development
programs, the largest source of Federal funding for advanced nursing education supporting almost 50,000 nurses and trainees in
2008. The Title nursing comprehensive geriatric education program
supports training for nurses who care for the elderly, curricula relating to geriatrics care and training of faculty in geriatrics.
We need to expand and enhance support for geriatric research,
education and clinical centers also known as GRECCs. These are
centers of geriatric excellence within the VA At the outset, we believe five new GRECCs should be established and funded, which
would be in keeping with the congressional authorization in 1985.
We need to address problems with Medicare GME policy. The
number of Medicare-funded graduate medical education slots has
not increased since the enactment of the Balance Budget Act of
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
52
1997. We need to expand the number of GME slots, particularly in
the field of geriatrics, and resist proposed funding cuts to this program.
We need to provide adequate coverage for necessary and cost-effective services. We must reform Medicare and the nations health
care system to realign reimbursement and incentives. Senators
Lincoln and Collins have introduced legislation that would fill a
major gap in Medicare by covering geriatric assessment and care
coordination services for beneficiaries of multiple chronic conditions, including dementia. Changes like this to Medicare coverage
are important incentives for geriatricians and other primary care
providers.
We need to collaborate to train and prepare the direct care workforce and family caregivers. AGS commends the IOM report for recommending increased standards for all direct care workers. We are
also developing materials for certified nursing assistants with a
focus on care of older adults.
In addition to our AGS Foundation for Health and Aging, we provide support and information to informal caregivers through programs like Eldercare at Home. We would be pleased to collaborate
with the Committee on any efforts to develop programs for both direct care and informal caregivers.
To conclude, there are already serious shortages of geriatrics
health care providers. Given the coming silver tsunami, these
shortages will reach crisis proportions unless we work together now
to address them.
Thank you again for the opportunity to participate in todays important and timely hearing.
[The prepared statement of Dr. Semla follows:]
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.022
53
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.023
54
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.024
55
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.025
56
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.026
57
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.027
58
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.028
59
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.029
60
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.030
61
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.031
62
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.032
63
64
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you, Dr. Semla.
Ms. MCDERMOTT.
STATEMENT OF MARY MCDERMOTT, PERSONAL CARE WORKER AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEMBER, WISCONSIN QUALITY HOME CARE COMMISSION, VERONA, WI
Ms. MCDERMOTT. I would like to thank Chairman Kohl and

Ranking Member Smith and other distinguished members of the
Committee for this opportunity to speak to you today about home
care. I am here today with SEIU, the largest health care union in
the country with almost a million members of health care workers.
In the last 11 years I have had the opportunity to view home
care from several perspectives. Currently I provide hands-on assistance for my mother and coordinate work of several other caregivers. I am also an officer on the board of directors for the Wisconsin Home Care Commission, a nonprofit organization established in 2006 to assist consumers looking for providers of home
care and personal care services.
Before taking on the care of my parents, I worked as an efficiency expert analyzing, designing cost-effective quality standards,
core competency curriculums, training programs and operational
processes. My background has enabled me to bring important professional expertise into this very personal arena.
In 1997, my mother suffered a stroke and, along with my disabled father, moved from Michigan to my home in Wisconsin, so
that I could assist them in providing the care that they needed.
We, like many families, wanted to avoid putting my parents in a
nursing home.
Families want choices in their long-term care for their loved
ones. My experience is that caregivers who choose this field often
lack medical and geriatric skills and knowledge. This is particularly true of people who care for family members and are often isolated and unaware that support is even available.
Direct care workers, like other workers, need career support that
includes continuing education, training, career guidance. Such
training can help individual caregivers in the field create long-term
caregiving relationships with their clients and reduce the turnover
that we are now seeing nationally.
I was fortunate to work with my parents, very high-quality RNs
and LPNs to obtain the training that I needed to care for my parents and then to train others to care for my parents. I cannot begin
to express my appreciation to Dr. Barczi and the geriatrics team
at the VA Hospital in Madison for the training that they gave on
an as-needed basis.
They were also very valuable in giving me support, when I needed it, on making health care decisions for my father; and gave me
valuable suggestions as how to approach care planning as changes
occurred with my fathers health status. Their partnering with us
significantly reduced hospitalization, cost and improved the quality
of the care that was provided in my home.
I know from personal experience that direct care can be physically demanding and emotionally challenging. We in the field
struggle to retain the current workforce, given the low wages, the
lack of health and other benefits available and the lack of opportu-
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
65
nities for any advancement. Homecare workers wages are among
the lowest in the service sector. One in five health care workers
lives below the poverty level.
Under a recent Supreme Court ruling, most home care workers
are not entitled to even minimum wage or the overtime protection
of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Congress can rectify this by passing S. 2061, the Fair Home Health Care Act. I urge the members
of this Committee to sign on to that important legislation.
Until we treat home care workers with the respect they deserve,
pay them a living wage, give them health care, we fail as a country
to provide the professional workforce that is so desperately needed
with our growing population of seniors and the people with disabilities. A knowledgeable, experienced and responsive worker can significantly improve the quality of life for many clients.
Some states are offering home care training for aides and personal care workers. But in some places, it has been local unions
who have been addressing this training gap. After developing a
registry to enable consumers to choose from among available workers, the Wisconsin Home Care Commission will offer supportive
services for both home care workers and consumers, including
training.
SEIU supports the development of a core competency curriculum,
which emphasizes consumer choice and preferences and requires
training in communication, problem solving and relationship skills.
Such training enables workers to understand and respond to consumer preferences and to provide them with the high quality of
care that they deserve.
While training is crucial to the development of a professional
workforce, it is only one factor. We need to do a better job with
Federal and State funding for long-term care and improving wages
and benefits. If we dont, the training alone will not be enough.
Again, I thank the Committee for giving me this opportunity to
speak today. I welcome any questions.
[The prepared statement of Ms. McDermott follows:]
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.033
66
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.034
67
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.035
68
69
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you, Ms. McDermott.
Dr. Bowman.
STATEMENT OF SALLY BOWMAN, PHD, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND
FAMILY SCIENCES, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY, CORVALLIS, OR
Ms. BOWMAN. Good afternoon, Ranking Member Smith, Mr.

Chairman and Committee members. I appreciate this opportunity
to share my remarks today, focusing first on the links among living
arrangements, health and caregiving; and second on the need for
educational strategies to train a sustained and capable workforce
of professionals, paraprofessionals and informal family caregivers.
In late life, the individual preference to age in place means that
housing, health care services and personal caregiving are intertwined. Consumers and health care providers have positively responded to the philosophy that older individuals should be able to
receive services in the least restrictive physical environment possible.
The challenge and the opportunity is to link services to individual needs, rather than to the type of residential setting in which
the individual happens to live. The advantage of this approach is
that declining health status does not require multiple relocations
for an individual. Moving from place to place is difficult for aging
persons and their family members and is problematic for health
care coordination.
How will the desire to age in place affect baby boomers? They
will reside in a wide variety of home, community and institutional
settings, receiving services from a combined workforce of professionals, paraprofessionals and informal caregivers. Projections indicate that the greatest growth in long-term care settings will be in
assisted living, residential care and home and community-based
services.
This will make Senator Smith happy. Oregon was the first State
to apply for and receive a Medicaid waiver to provide home and
community-based services in 1981. For over 25 years, Oregons financing, reimbursement and licensing policies have favored the
growth of adult foster care, assisted living, and residential care facilities while reducing nursing home use. These policies resulted in
savings in public resources. At the same time, they provided living
arrangements that valued independence and privacy.
Indeed, many frail older adults, with both physical and cognitive
disabilities, are living in all these diverse long-term care settings
and in the community rather than in nursing homes. Because Medicaid daily reimbursement rates for adult foster homes, assisted living and residential care facilities in Oregon are less than half the
daily rates for nursing facilities, the decrease in Medicaid cases in
nursing facilitiesfrom 69 percent to 37 percent over 14 years has
resulted in considerable savings of tax dollars.
So for example, in 2004, reimbursement of Medicaid long-term
care recipients who resided in adult foster care, assisted living and
residential care facilities rather than nursing homes saved Oregon
taxpayers about $700,000 per day.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
70
The goal of combining individualized care with a normal life is
a challenge regardless of the physical setting. It highlights the
need for a well-trained network of formal and informal caregivers.
The projected shortfall in formal and informal workers needed to
care for these aging baby boomers, including myself, requires increased efforts in education and training at every level.
Geriatric Education Centers, GECs, are and will continue to be
a key player in this effort. These centers focus on the training of
professional workers in long-term careincluding physicians,
nurses, social workers, allied health workers. GECs have helped to
provide aging-related education to these health care workers and
have also been essential to incorporating geriatric curricula into
the training of new professionals.
The Oregon GEC focuses on outreach to rural areas where, in
comparison to urban areas, a larger percentage of the population
is older, disabled and suffers from chronic diseases. Yet most rural
health care providers have not received geriatric training.
As part of our participation in the Oregon GEC and also part of
the land-grant mission, the Oregon State University Extension
Service in the College of Health and Human Sciences has offered
a regional 2-day gerontology conference for 300 to 400 direct care
practitioners annually for the past 32 years. This conference
reaches frontline workers and community service providers who
serve an aging population.
Collaborative partnerships involving higher education institutions, community colleges, private foundations, state and local government units on aging, nonprofits and employers can all expand
opportunities to meet the educational needs of informal family
caregivers. Educational and training strategies may include publications for late-life decisionmaking; Web-based checklists; interactive board games; community education workshops, both series
or as single events; and one-on-one consultations.
The nationally disseminated caregiver training program, Powerful Tools for Caregiving, was produced by a partnership in Oregon
between a community-based hospital and Oregon State University
faculty members. Evaluations have shown that family caregivers
become empowered to practice self-care strategies and develop tools
that enhance their caregiving efforts.
Because the vast proportion of long-term care to older adults is
provided by family members and by paraprofessionals, attention
should focus on supporting these frontline caregivers. Because longterm care requires one-on-one assistance, labor is the major cost
and determinant of quality of care.
Recruitment and retention of direct care workers in all types of
long-term care organizations continues to be a significant challenge. The Better Jobs Better Care national demonstration projects
have shown that key dimensions of job satisfactionsuch as adequate training, rewards and incentives, career ladders, reducing
workloadsall affect intentions to stay in or leave the workforce.
Changes in public policies at the state and local levels and related
funding will be required to institutionalize management practices
that can lower the turnover rates of frontline workers.
Thank you for this opportunity.
[The prepared statement of Ms. Bowman follows:]
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.036
71
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.037
72
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.038
73
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.039
74
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.040
75
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.041
76
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.042
77
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.043
78
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.044
79
80
The CHAIRMAN. Thank you, Dr. Bowman.
Questions from the panel?
Senator SMITH.
Senator SMITH. You speak of the importance of Oregons Geriatric Education Center to rural areas. The conference, you hold it
every year? Where do you hold it? Different places? What kind of
attendance do you have?
Ms. BOWMAN. We hold that event in Corvallis, because that is
our tradition. We get a vast proportion of participants from the
rural areas actually not from the metro areas. There are other conferences for family caregivers and for practitioners held around the
State. You, in fact, hold one yourself.
Senator SMITH. I do, yes.
Ms. BOWMAN. You get a fantastic attendance, because you have
great speakers. I think you also give free lunch.
Senator SMITH. Yes, we do. You all heard there is no such thing.
But there is at my aging conference, a free lunch.
Well, you know, listening to your testimony, a comment about
Ms. Stewart that, you know, in some urban areas, maybe there are
more caregivers, there are more professional people. But I wonder
if, in your judgment, end-of-life care is as good or better in rural
areas in Oregon.
Ms. BOWMAN. Well, I think you have to look at the whole continuum of care and compare it, rural to urban areas. I think if we
are going to talk about end-of-life care, one of the things that I
didnt hear mentioned was the role of hospice. So often people bring
in hospice 3 hours before the patient dies.
There are resources. But, you know, one of the wonderful things
about rural areas is the social support system.
Senator SMITH. That is right.
Ms. BOWMAN. The friends and neighbors who check on people
who are living alone. So I think we need to emphasize that importance of the rural support. Through the GEC, we try to do road
shows and do as much as we can to provide geriatric training to
the rural health care practitioners in those areas.
Senator SMITH. Well, I think I appreciate you mentioning hospice. I think they are working alongside the angels as far as I am
concerned. I have seen the work they do as both wonderful and
merciful. I would simply add a word of encouragement to families
to bring hospice in earlier, because theyat least in our familys
casethey were helpful in training and making sure we did the
right things. They are present in rural areas. They certainly are in
rural Oregon.
But I appreciate your focus on rural Oregon. Obviously I care
about all of Oregon. So I wonder if you have any comment about
how we are doing in our urban centers of Portland and Eugene and
Corvallis perhaps as well. How are doing? Are we up to speed? Got
a lot more work to do?
Ms. BOWMAN. You know, I think the wonderful thing about not
having enough resources is that you partner to get things done.
What I have been so proud of and so pleased about are the variety
of partnerships to meet the needs of families in this State. The
Family Caregiver Support Program, the Alzheimers Association,
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
81
AARP, the universities, community collegeseveryone partners to
try to meet that need.
Senator SMITH. Are they communicating in that partnership?
Ms. Bowman. They do. I think we cant underestimate the importance of community education workshops, whether it is the extension service or whoever. You know, I, for example, did a workshop
in Enterprise, Oregon. I think they closed down the nursing home.
There were 100 people there. What they said to me was nobody
ever comes to Enterprise, Oregon.
So I think the importance of getting training for family members
as well as all the health care workers we have talked about today
who need geriatric trainingI think we can do it. But we have to
really work on public-private sector partnerships.
Senator SMITH. Well, for our CSPAN audience, if you ever go to
Enterprise, Oregon, you wont want to leave. It is one of the most
beautiful parts on Planet Earth.
Again, Sally, thank you for coming this long way across the Oregon Trail to the nations capital, and your testimony; and Mary,
yours as well. Todd, thank you for your participation today.
The CHAIRMAN. We thank the panel profusely for being here and
giving us your wisdom and your experience. This whole area of caring for seniors in our society is daunting in terms of the needs, the
kind of things that we need to do to attract people to the area, to
see that they get trained and paid, so that our seniors can get the
care that they need and deserve and must have in the years ahead.
We appreciate your being here. We appreciate your testimony.
You can be sure we will continue to be in touch with you. Thank
you so much.
Thank you all for being here.
[Whereupon, at 4:49 p.m., the Committee was adjourned.]
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 6633
Sfmt 6633
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
APPENDIX
PREPARED STATEMENT
OF
SENATOR SUSAN M. COLLINS
MR. CHAIRMAN, thank you for calling this hearing to examine our nations future health workforce needs in the face of our rapidly aging population.
This afternoons hearing is particularly significant in light of the report issued by
the Institute of Medicine (IOM) earlier this week. The IOM report, titled Retooling
for an Aging America, sounds a warning that we are facing a critical shortage of
doctors, nurses, and other health care professionals who are adequately trained to
manage the special health care needs of our nations growing population of seniors.
America is growing older. Today, more than 37 million Americans are age 65 and
over, and these numbers will rise dramatically when the baby boom turns into a
senior boom. Over the next twenty years, the number of Americans over the age
of 65 is expected to more than double. In Maine, more than a quarter of our population will be over 65 in 2030.
Nowhere does the aging of America present more risk and opportunity than in
the area of health care. It is not just that there will soon be more older Americans.
It is also that older Americans are living longer. Americans 85 and olderour oldest oldare the fastest growing segment of our population. This is the very population that is most at risk of the multiple and interacting health problems that can
lead to disability and the need for long-term care.
Older Americans consume far more health care resources than any other age
group. Moreover, their health care needs are very different from those of younger
persons. While younger people typically come in contact with the health care system
for treatment of a single, acute health care condition, older people often have multiple, chronic conditions like heart disease, diabetes, arthritis, and Alzheimers diseaseor any combination of the above.
Geriatrics is a medical specialty or style of practice that is specifically designed
to address the complex health care needs of older patients. The essence of geriatrics
lies in coping rather than curing. Its emphasis is on helping older adults maintain
their quality of life and ability to function independently, even in the presence of
chronic age-related diseases and disabilities.
With its emphasis on maintaining functional independence, geriatrics offers
great promise not only for improved health and quality of life for older persons, but
it also has the potential to reduce overall medical and long-term care costs. According to a report by the Alliance for Aging Research, the U.S. realizes at least $5 billion in health and long-term care savings for every month that the physical independence of older people is extended. According to the Alliance, this is a conservative estimate.
Unfortunately, as the IOM report reveals, we are facing a dramatic shortage of
health care professionals who are adequately prepared to deal with the complex
health care needs of seniors.
Despite the obvious need, relatively few physicians, nurses and other health care
professionals are pursuing careers in geriatrics or gerontology. While experts have
projected that 36,000 geriatricians will be needed to care for our 70 million seniors
in 2030, only 7,000about one per cent of all physiciansare currently certified
geriatricians. Only about one percent of nurses are certified gerontological nurses
and only 3 percent of advanced practice nurses specialize in care of the aging.
Moreover, while most physicians do care for older patients, very few receive formal geriatric training. While almost all medical schools require some geriatric exposure, the IOM report notes that this training is often inadequate. Less than 35
percent of our nursing baccalaureate programs require coursework in geriatric settings.
In the face of the approaching tidal wave of aging Americans, we simply cannot
afford to ignore the IOMs warning. That is why I was pleased to join Senator Boxer
in sponsoring the Caring for an Aging America Act, which takes some important
(83)
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
84
first steps to ensure that our health and long-term care workforces are prepared to
meet the needs of our aging population.
Our legislation would provide $130 million in federal funding over five years to
attract and retain health care professionals and direct-care workers with training
in geriatrics by providing them with loan forgiveness and career advancement opportunities. It would also create a Health and Long-Term Care Workforce Advisory
Panel for an Aging America to examine and advise the Secretary of Health and
Human Services, the Secretary of Labor and Congress on workforce issues related
to our aging population.
Again, MR. CHAIRMAN, thank you for calling this hearing, and I look forward
to working with you on this important issue.
PREPARED STATEMENT
OF
SENATOR ROBERT P. CASEY, JR.
Mr. Chairman, I want to thank you for scheduling this important hearing. It is
critical that we fully investigate all issues surrounding the direct care workforce and
the increasingly older population in America.
This is a critical time for the health care workforce in this country. With the first
of the baby boom generation on the cusp of retirement, the demand for direct care
workers will increase exponentially in the coming years and decades. It is estimated
the number of adults aged 65 and older will almost double from 37 million to over
70 million between 2005 and 2030. This is an 8 percent increase from 12 percent
to 20 percent of the United States population.
In Pennsylvania, the projected increase is slightly larger. People over 65 will comprise 22.6 percent of the population by 2030 going from 1.9 million to over 4 million
older citizens.
As the baby boom generation ages, we will need more caregivers and we will also
need to change our approach to care, emphasizing greater prevention and more coordinated care. Shortages in caregivers for older citizens exist across the spectrum
of care. The direct care workforce is woefully inadequate to meet the needs of the
increasing number of older citizens who will require care. By 2030 it is estimated
we will need an additional 3.5 million health care workers to care for our older citizens, a 35 percent increase from today.
With respect to physicians, only one percent of all physicians in the United States
are currently certified as geriatricians. Experts project we will need 36,000 geriatricians by 2030.
The nation is already experiencing a severe shortage of registered nurses and less
than 1 percent are certified gerontological nurses. Without increases, the total supply of nurses is projected to fall 29 percent below requirements by the year 2020.
In Pennsylvania, projections indicate the state will need an additional 24,610 direct care workers. This is an increase of 19 percent and a rate of growth nearly
three times the state average for all occupations.
We must begin to address these shortages right now or we will suffer the consequences of our inaction tomorrow.
Almost every person in this room has a family member or a friend who has required long term care. From my experience with my father, who was hospitalized
for a significant period of time toward the end of his life, I know what a positive
impact that knowledgeable and skilled health care professionals can have.
On Monday, the Institute of Medicine released a study entitled Retooling for and
Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce. This document provides us
with a detailed roadmap to expanding the direct care workforce, meeting the increasing needs of older citizens, and changing our approach to the models of care
we provide our citizens in order to emphasize greater prevention, and more effective
coordination of care.
This report highlighted three main goals we must achieve: 1) increase the training
and educational opportunities for all providers of geriatric health care; 2) improve
upon the recruitment and retention of all providers and specialists in geriatric
health care by improving wages, benefits and working conditions; and 3) redesign
models of care so that prevention and coordination of care are prioritized and older
citizens themselves can participate as much as possible in their own care.
These are important steps forward that we must take. Our older citizens need and
deserve quality and coordinated health care as they age. These are our parents and
our grandparents and theyve worked hard for us and for our country. Now we owe
them respect and dignity as they age. It will take time to build up the workforce
we need, this is not something we can accomplish overnight. This is a daunting
task, but a task we simply must undertake.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
85
I look forward to hearing the testimony of all the witnesses today as they share
their knowledge and experiences with the committee. I look forward to working with
them, the members of this committee and others to ensure that our older citizens
will have the care they needand deservein their later years.
PREPARED STATEMENT
OF
SENATOR BARBARA BOXER
I would like to thank Senator Kohl, Ranking Member Smith, and members of the
Senate Special Committee on Aging for having this hearing, and bringing attention
to this important issue. I also want to commend the Aging Committee for its long
and influential history of exploring and investigating issues that concern our senior
citizens and their families.
California is home to 3.9 million people age 65 and older, more than any other
state. That population is projected to increase to 8.3 million by 2030, growing from
11 percent to 18 percent of the state population.
Preparing our workforce for the job of caring for older Americans is an essential
part of ensuring the future health of our nation. Right now, there is a critical shortage of health care providers with the necessary training and skills to provide our
seniors with the best possible care. This is a tremendously important issue for
American families who are concerned about quality of care and quality of life for
their older relatives and friends.
Quite simply, the demographic imperative is clear: with the number of adults
aged 65 and older projected to almost double from 37 million today to nearly 72 million by 2030, we must start now if we are going to adequately train the health care
workforce to meet the needs of an aging America. We cannot afford to wait any
longer.
According to the Institute of Medicine, only about 7,100 U.S. physicians are certified geriatricians today; 36,000 are needed by 2030. Just 4 percent of social workers and only 3 percent of advance practice nurses specialize in geriatrics. Recruitment and retention of direct care workers is also a looming crisis due to low wages
and few benefits, lack of career advancement, and inadequate training.
It is clear that there is a need for federal action to address these issues, and that
is why Senator Collins and I have introduced the Caring for an Aging America Act
(S. 2708). Senator Collins has been a strong leader on aging issues and I look forward to working with her and this Committee to move this legislation forward.
The Caring for an Aging America Act would help attract and retain trained health
care professionals and direct care workers dedicated to providing quality care to the
growing population of older Americans by providing them with meaningful loan forgiveness and career advancement opportunities.
Research suggests that geriatricians have the highest job satisfaction ratings
among all physician specialties, and they find working with older adults to be richly
rewarding. Yet despite high job satisfaction rates, it remains difficult to recruit adequate numbers of health and social service practitioners to the fields of geriatrics
and gerontology, which remain among the least well-compensated specialties. This
is why Senator Collins and I introduced our bill. The Caring for an Aging America
Act would help to address these financial disincentives.
Specifically, for health professionals who complete specialty training in geriatrics
or gerontologyincluding physicians, physician assistants, advance practice nurses,
social workers and psychologiststhe legislation would link educational loan repayment to a service commitment to the aging population, modeled after the successful
National Health Services Corps. The bill would also expand loan repayment for registered nurses who complete specialty training in geriatric care and who choose to
work in long-term care settings, and expand career advancement opportunities for
direct care workers by offering specialty training in long-term care services. Lastly,
the legislation would establish a health and long-term care workforce advisory panel
for an aging America.
Ensuring we have a well-trained health care workforce with the skills to care for
our aging population is a critical investment in Americas future. This legislation
offers a modest but important step toward creating the future health care workforce
that our nation so urgently needs.
Our bill has strong support from the health care and senior communities. The report released this week by the Institute of Medicine, Retooling for an Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce, endorses the financial incentives in our
billincluding loan forgiveness linked to serviceas a key way to recruit geriatric
providers in the health professions.
The Caring for an Aging America Act has been endorsed by nearly 30 national
organizations, including AARP, American Academy of Physician Assistants, Amer-
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
86
ican College of Nurse Practitioners, American Geriatrics Society, American Psychological Association, Coalition of Geriatric Nursing Organizations, and the National
Association of Social Workers.
I look forward to working with my colleagues to ensure that we meet our obligations to the seniors of our nation to improve their care. We owe it to our parents,
grandparents, and ourselves.
DR. ROBYN STONES RESPONSES
TO
SENATOR SMITHS QUESTIONS
Question 1Support and Training for Caregivers

In the testimony that each of you provided, you state that you believe training
opportunities should be made available for informal caregivers. I agree and I feel
that we should work to better support our nations caregivers, as they are the backbone of the system to ensure the safety and welfare of our seniors. They also help
seniors age in their homes, where all of us would prefer to be as we get older. I
am working with Senator Lincoln to increase funding to the National Family Caregiver Support Program run by the Administration on Aging. I think the help provided by this program, primarily coordinated by the Area Agencies on Aging located
throughout each state, is so important. But more supports must be made available
as the number and needs of caregivers increases.
Question 1. How do you think we can engage the aging network, including Area
Agencies on Aging, State Agencies on Aging, and other entities to facilitate additional training and help for informal caregivers?
Answer. The SUAs, the AAAs and other aging network organizations have multiple opportunities to improve upon and expand training for informal caregivers.
First, they need to recognize that family and other informal caregivers face the
same challenges as paid direct care workers including how to provide care to their
loved one (both the clinical and technical aspects of the care delivery), how to communicate with the formal sector (including communication related to cultural competence), how to make decisions in crisis situations and how to take care of themselves. Since community colleges, vocational tech schools, and other educational institutions are developing more comprehensive training programs for direct care
workers (certified nursing assistants, home health aides, and personal care workers), aging network providers should consider partnering with these entities to offer
the same curriculum and teaching methods to informal caregivers. Many nursing
homes also provide both orientation and in-service training to direct care workers
and could provide a venue for offering training programs to informal caregivers in
the community. These organizations should also partner with local workforce investment boards in their communities (funded through Department of Labor) who are
charged with career development for entry level workers in the long-term care sector. Finally, I believe the Family Support Program, administered through the Older
Americans Act, has been a great symbolic gesture to the millions of informal caregivers across the country. But the resources are limited and the ability of the AAAs
and other organizations to provide assistance to families varies tremendously. The
Congress should look at options for expanding the resources to this program through
the OAA and also ensuring that the organizations are meeting some standard in
terms of the services offered to caregivers.
Question 2Support for Community Health Centers
Community Health Centers (CHCs) are the foundation of the nations health care
safety net. I believe these centers have an important role in keeping the doors open
to patients who otherwise might be unable to afford health coverage. In Oregon,
health centers provide over 130 points of access, where upwards of 180,000 Oregonians receive care each year.
However, the success of these centers, and indeed, our entire health care system,
is directly dependent on a well-trained health professions workforce. A March 2006
study in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that CHCsespecially those in rural areasare understaffed, including shortages of family physicians, dentists, pharmacists and registered nurses.
Question 2. Although there are existing health professions programs to encourage
health care providers to serve in these settingsthey still are not receiving the support they need. Do you believe they are effective? What more could be done to encourage medical professionals to practice medicine in rural/underserved areas?
Answer. The Community Health Centers have targeted primarily families and
children; relatively few of these organizations have identified the geriatric population as a key user group. This is ironic given the fact that most rural communities
are aging much more rapidly than their urban counterparts. The first step in ameliorating this situation is to build the capacity of the CHCs to care for the elderly
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
87
population, including hiring staff that are trained in geriatrics and gerontology and
that know how to meet the needs of rural elders. Special financial incentives need
to be created to attract physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants,
nurses, social workers, therapists and others who are interested in caring for the
geriatric population, including debt relief surrounding educational expenses and stipends that allow people to live in these communities. The CHCs also need to expand
their use of technology to help reach the elderly in remote, frontier areas. Finally,
they need to understand the aging network resources that are in most rural communities (including the AAAs, senior centers, special transportation programs, rural
nursing homes and senior housing providers) and partner with these organizations.
Question 3Medicare and Medicaid Legislative Relief
Each of the panelists testimony mentioned the important role that Medicare and
Medicaid play in the topic of ensuring a robust health care workforce. As a member
of the Finance Committee, I am deeply committed to ensuring that the system
works for our beneficiaries and responds to our nations demographic change. I feel
that apart from big funding increases to ensure appropriate training and recruitment of professionals, we also need to make sure administration of the Medicare
and Medicaid programs is running smoothly and were reducing burdens on training
opportunities. A bill that I have introduced with Senator Lincoln, the Long-Term
Care Quality and Modernization Act, would among other things, allow nursing facilities to resume their nurse aide training program when deficiencies that resulted
in the prohibition of the training have been corrected and compliance has been demonstrated, instead of the current two-year wait period.
Question 3. Knowing the great need to educate our nurses with more experiences
in geriatrics, what support can be given to schools of nursing and long-term care
facilities to develop strong clinical partnerships?
Answer. Many nursing homes have developed excellent home grown training
programs for their direct care workers that not only help them to do the their current work but provide career ladders or lattices for these individuals. Given the lack
of quality training programs in many communities, I commend you for your efforts
to allow nursing homes to resume training programs as soon as possible. In addition, there are relatively few opportunities for nursing students to have rewarding
clinical placements in nursing homes and other long-term care settings. When they
do, however, many become committed to this sector and seek out job opportunities
there. The Congress needs to consider mechanisms for supporting nursing school
placements in nursing homes, assisted living and home care that provide meaningful and challenging experiences for students who then will help to expand the labor
pool in these settings. This might entail developing Centers of Excellence where
Nursing School/Nursing Home partnerships that meet certain criteria would be eligible for multiple years of funding to support the training program and placements
costs. I would suggest that similar programs be developed for medical and social
work schools to prepare medical directors and clinical social workers for this growing field.
Question 4National Service Corps vs. Title VII (Health Professions) Programs
We understand older Americans tend to utilize health services more than younger
individuals, and by 2030, 20 percent of the U.S. population (71 million Americans)
will be age 65 or older. Conversely, many health professionals are retiring as this
population will require greater demand of our public health workforce. As you know,
the President proposed to zero out many health professions programs in the Fiscal
Year 2009 budget. Through the years, the Administration has conveyed that funding
direct primary care through the National Health Service Corps is a better investment than funding HRSAs Title VII programs, which they believe lack focused objectives.
Question 4. What are your thoughts on this issueis the National Health Services
Corps a better program to improve the placement of providers in underserved areas
and support training in primary care?
Follow Up: a. What are your suggestions for improving the efficacy of or expanding Title VII programs as we face the aging of our population and of the healthcare
workforce?
Answer. I do not believe that these options are mutually exclusive. I strongly recommend developing a specific track in the National Health Services Corp for people
who are interested in working in geriatric settingsincluding nursing homes, assisted living and home care. For this to work, however, funds would need to be dedicated specifically to these settings to attract the best and the brightest. At the
same time, it is important to strengthen the Title VII programs that invest in educational opportunities for the professions as well as helping to develop a larger
cadre of health professionals in the field. In particular, some resources need to be
redeployed to target the development of the geriatric workforce, including physi-
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
88
cians, nurses and ancillary health professionals who would be interested in geriatric/long-term care settings if financial incentives were available. I would, furthermore, recommend strengthening the Geriatric Education Centers across the country
that have helped to train many health professionals in the field.
Question 5Recruiting a More Diverse Workforce
In your testimony, you mention the need for long-term care employers to focus
on new sources of labor that previously have been poorly utilized in the health care
workforce, such as minorities and retirees.
Question 5. How do you think long-term care employers can best be encouraged
to do this and are there models for ways that employers can effectively reach out
to better recruit from these under-utilized groups?
Answer. With respect to older adults and retirees as prospective caregivers in the
long-term care sector, one of our BJBC studies found that elderly individuals and
employers are interested in expanding these opportunities. This may be a viable option for many older adults who cannot afford to retire as well as those who are interested in pursuing a caring career. Title V of the Older Americans Act currently
focuses on job development for older adults. I recommend that a special program
be developed to create partnerships between the Title V providers and long-term
care employers (nursing homes, assisted living and home care) to explore the potential of using this program to expand the labor pool. The National Health Services
Corps could also experiment with a Retiree Corps that could be recruited to work
in these settings. Both of these options, of course, would require sufficient training
resources to prepare and support this workforce. In addition, a study would be required to explore challenges to the recruitment of older workers including issues related to access to Medicare and Social Security benefits and physical barriers (e.g.,
the need to lift residents/clients) that would deter the hiring of elderly workers.
With respect to a more diverse workforce, the direct care workforce in long-term
care settings is already incredibly ethnically, racially and culturally diverse. The
real issue here is to develop culturally competent workplaces that respect all caregivers and that provide training in the overt and more subtle cultural differences
that can cause communication problems and poorer quality care delivery. Employers
also need to explore mechanisms for hiring a more diverse supervisory and clinical
staff including nurses, social workers, therapists, medical directors, primary care
physicians and administrators. This could start with the development of partnerships between these employers and historically black colleges and universities and
their counterparts in the Hispanic community. Resources could also be provided to
employers with a diverse direct care workforce to help them develop career ladders
for CNAs, home care aides and personal care workers who are interested in becoming nurses, social workers and administrators in this sector. Finally, some providers
have developed strategies for recruiting foreign professionals (particularly nurses)
into this sector (although most of this recruitment has been for hospitals). A targeted strategy needs to be developed that recognizes a code of ethics as it relates
to both the countries or origin and the needs of the workers who come to work in
the U.S. through these routes.
MARTHA STEWARTS RESPONSE
TO
SENATOR SMITHS QUESTION
Question 1Geriatric Education & Training at Mount Sinai

I understand the Martha Stewart Center for Living supports the education of both
practicing and future physicians, as well as patients, caregivers and the community.
Further, physicians at the Center also support education through community talks,
screenings and health fairs.
Question 1. Would you describe how this model of care was created and how it
has benefited the patients who receive care at the Center for Living?
Answer. The Martha Stewart Center for Living, now with 4,000 patients, is one
of the largest outpatient practices in the country catering specifically to the health
care needs of older adults. The models of care have been developed over time at the
Department of Geriatrics and Adult Development at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, which was founded by Dr. Robert Butler and is the oldest such department
in the country. Doctors, nurses, and social workers at the Center continue to innovate their approach. Patients see the Center as their medical home, and its interactive programming allows them to become active participants in managing their
well-being.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
89
TODD SEMLAS RESPONSES
TO
SENATORS SMITH QUESTIONS
Question 1Lack of Nurse Educators

Currently, less than one percent of the nations 2.4 million practicing nurses are
certified as gerontological nurses or geriatric advanced practice nurses. This statistic
underscores the importance of educating students in gerontology. In 2007, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing reported that 40,285 qualified applicants
were turned away from baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs. The top reason cited by schools of nursing was a lack of expert faculty. The bill I introduced
with Senator Clinton, The Nursing Education and Quality of Health Care Act of
2007, would help to address the faculty shortage by creating a Nurse Faculty Development program focused on offering scholarships and fellowships for nurses who
wish to become faculty.
Question 1. Knowing the demand for educators is high, what other support can
be given to nurses who wish to become geriatric nurse faculty?
Answer. AGS recognizes that the shortage of faculty in schools of nursing with
baccalaureate and graduate programs is a continuing and expanding problem. AGS
requests that Congress supports providing $200 million in fiscal year 2009 appropriations funding for Title VIII Nursing Workforce Development Programs, the largest source of funding for advanced nursing education. As stated in our testimony,
before the Senate Special Committee on Aging, Title VIII nursing comprehensive
geriatrics education program supports training for nurses who care for elderly, curricula on geriatric care, and training of faculty in geriatrics. In addition, the programs are the largest source of federal funding for advanced education nursing;
workforce diversity; nursing faculty loan programs; nurse education, practice and retention; comprehensive geriatric education; loan repayment; and scholarship.
AGS also requests that Congress support all Title VII Health Professions Programs at FY 2005 levels of $300 million. Specifically, we ask that Congress fund
Geriatrics Health Professions Programs under Title VII at least at the FY 2007 levels of $31.5 million. Title VII Geriatrics Health Professions Programs supports three
initiatives: Geriatric Education Centers (GECs) Program, geriatric faculty fellowships, and Geriatric Academic Career Awards (GACAs) all which are critical to improving recruitment and retention of Geriatrics Health Professionals. The AGS supports efforts to develop and enhance the GACA program to support junior geriatrics
faculty and expand its availability to other health care professionals, including
nurses. We also support establishing a mid-career GACA award that would support
and retain clinician educators as they advance in their careers. In addition, we recommend creating a GACA-like award for advance practice nurses.
In addition to the suggestions outlined in our testimony, we ask Congress to
consider the recommendations contained in the June 2005 American Association of
Colleges of Nursing (AACN) white paper entitled, Faculty Shortages in
Baccalaureate and Graduate Nursing Programs. The paper addresses the scope of
the problem and strategies for expanding the supply of nursing faculty (See http://
www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/whitepapers/facultyshortages.htm for more information).
Among the strategies to alleviate the shortage and expand the supply of nursing
faculty are:
Identify any existing regulatory requirements that limit nurses with non-nursing graduate degrees from teaching in nursing programs, so that efforts to remove
these barriers can be planned.
Utilize the expertise of junior faculty by partnering them with senior, fully
qualified faculty who can provide course oversight and faculty support without requiring the more labor-intensive team teaching.
Remove impediments to graduate study for working nurses, such as offering
more convenient times for courses, encouraging partnering institutions to offer students more flexible work schedules to accommodate class schedules, and offering
courses specifically for partnering health care facilities, possibly at their site(s).
Examine college/university retirement policies and work to eliminate unnecessary restrictions to continued faculty service, particularly mandatory retirement
ages and financial penalties for retired faculty who return to work part-time.
In collaboration with the Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, the AACN also
administers a Geriatric Nursing Education Project (GNEP), which is funded by the
John A. Hartford Foundation. The GNEP incorporates several complementary programs to ultimately improve nursing care for older adults through curriculum enhancement, faculty development and scholarship opportunities. (See http://
www.aacn.nche.edu/education/Hartford/index.htm for more information).
The programs include:
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
90
Awards for Excellence in Gerontological Nursing Education
A Faculty Development Institute Offered through the Geriatric Nursing Education Consortium
New Series of Web-Based Interactive Case Studies Available
The AACN also administers The John A. Hartford Foundation funded Enhancing
Geriatric Nursing Education for Baccalaureate and Advances Practice Nursing Programs, an initiative that supports gerontology curriculum development and new
clinical experiences in 30 selected baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs.
(See http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education/Hartford/ShowcasingInnovations.htm for
more information).
According to projections from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), there will be
more than one million vacant positions for registered nurses (RN) by 2010 due to
growth in demand for nursing care and net replacements due to retirement. It is
critical that we ask Congress to implement the recommendations from AACN and
continue to encourage our nursing workforce to participate in the program opportunities outlined above to ensure we have an adequate and well-trained nursing workforce to care for the aging population.
Question 2Public Health Emergencies
In the event of a public health emergency, public health providers at the local
level will be among the first responders.
Question 2. Does HRSA train individuals so they are able to respond to the needs
of vulnerable populations, such as seniors?
Answer. AGS Recommendations: Currently, HRSA does not train individuals so
they are able to respond to the needs of vulnerable populations such as seniors, in
the event of a public health emergency.However, it would seem like a natural extension of their training as it is estimated that some 3.4 million, or 34 percent, of all
calls for emergency medical services involve older patients. Our rapidly aging population will only increase the pressure on our emergency medical system. This population has specific and often complex medical needs. To ensure that older adults receive quality care prior to arriving at the hospital, first responders must acquire the
additional knowledge, skills, and attitudes that encompass the basic concepts of
geriatric medicine.
In 2003, AGS and the National Council of State Emergency Medical Services
Training Coordinators (NCSEMSTC), along with Jones and Bartlett Publishers
(J&B) partnered to develop a program that will train prehospital professionals (first
responders, EMTs, and paramedics) to deliver state-of-the-art care to older adults.
The continuing education curriculum called GEMS (Geriatric Education for Emergency Medical Services) emphasizes the unique conditions and needs of older patients. (See http://www.gemssite.com/ for more information).
As Americas 77 million baby-boomers age, the number of emergency calls involving older patients will likely rise significantly. People are living longer and therefore
are often sicker and present more complicated conditions. Emergency responders are
going to have to be well-trained at recognizing serious medical problems in the elderly.
The AGS believes that first responders must be aware of the complexities of treating older people or they may not take correct action. Communications are particularly important and EMS providers will need to recognize symptoms of drug interaction, dementia, elder abuse, and heart disease, all common problems among older
people.
Unfortunately, there is no identified source of funding that would support states
offering such training to EMS providers. Congress could look at creating an
Emergency Medical Services Geriatrics program that is modeled on the Federal
Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) Program. This program was
developed in 1984 and since that time, Federal grant money has helped all 50
States, plus the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, American Samoa, US Virgin Islands, Guam, and Puerto Rico. (See http://
bolivia.hrsa.gov/emsc/ for more information).
The EMSC program has improved the availability of child-appropriate equipment
in ambulances and emergency departments. Federal grants to States and territories
have supported hundreds of programs to prevent injuries, and has provided thousands of hours of training to EMTs, paramedics and other emergency medical care
providers. The success of the program has led to legislation mandating EMSC programs in several states, and to educational materials covering every aspect of pediatric emergency care.
The EMSC Program is saving childrens lives. A similar program focused on geriatric patients is needed as well as these populations both present unique health care
needs that require additional training. Such a program would support the state
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
91
training coordinators in ensuring that EMS providers receive training in the unique
health care needs of older adults.
Question 3Importance of Social Workers
In your written testimony you mentioned the importance of loan forgiveness and
specifically mention social workers. As you may know, yesterday was World Social
Work Day, and I was honored to introduce a bill with Senator Mikulski to work to
increase the number of social workers and ensure federal assistance exists to help
them remain in their field, including loan forgiveness. As you also mention in your
testimony, care coordination is important for so many of our vulnerable elderly with
chronic health conditions, and while we may not think of them in this capacity, social workers do a great deal to ensure care is coordinated for so many of our vulnerable citizens.
Question 3. What do you think are the best ways to support social workers who
focus on our elderly vulnerable populations and how can we perhaps better train
them in care coordination models that youve discussed today?
Answer. AGS Recommendations: The AGS believes that social workers trained in
the field of geriatrics are imperative and therefore, strongly supports incentives for
social work students who train to care for our aging population. Incentives, such as
federal loan forgiveness legislation, are among the remedies needed to make careers
caring for older adults more appealing and to address recruitment and retention
problems.
The National Institute of Aging estimates the nation will require 70,000 trained,
aging savvyprofessional social workers by 2020. Currently, only 5% of social workers are trained in aging issues.
As stated in our testimony, the AGS strongly supports the Caring for an Aging
America Act introduced by Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), which would, among
other things, establish the Geriatric and Gerontology Loan Repayment Program for
social workers, along with physicians, physician assistants, advance practice nurses
and psychologists who complete specialty training in geriatrics or gerontology and
who agree to provide full-time clinical practice and service to older adults for a minimum of two years. While loan forgiveness is a very good start, it is also important
to find a method to support specific training programsas all schools do not equally
prepare students for practicing with older adults and for care coordination.
The Hartford Partnership Program for Aging Education (HPPAE) was created to
meet the workforce demand for geriatric social workers by training and educating
more than 1,000 social workers in older adult care and to establish a specialized
aging curriculum in Masters of Social Work programs across the country. The
HPPAE is an eight-year initiative coordinated by the Social Work Leadership Institute (SWLI) at the New York Academy of Medicine and is funded by the John A.
Hartford Foundation. In 1999, 80 percent of the HPPAE graduates who participated
in the programs pilot study went on to pursue careers in the field of aging. Currently, 72 schools in 32 states have adopted the Hartford Partnership Program for
Aging Program. Graduates of these programs are highly sought after by employers
in the field. (See http://www.socialworkleadership.org/nsw/ppp/about.php for more
information)
In addition, current practitioners and those who enter the aging field do not always stay in the field because of challenging working conditions. Continuing education focused on care coordination and payment for care management are important methods to increase retention.
The AGS also supports creating a GACA-like award for social workers. The Geriatric Academic Career Awards (GACA) funded under Title VII Health Professions
Programs of the Public Health Service Act supports the career development of newly
trained geriatric physicians in academic medicine.
The field of geriatrics promotes preventive care, with an emphasis on care management and care coordination that aims to help older patients maintain functional
independence in performing daily activities and improve their overall quality of life.
Social workers are an important part of the geriatric team. Now is the time to address social work recruitment into the field of aging and build on programs that
train social workers to provide care coordination and case management.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
92
MARY MCDERMOTTS RESPONSES
TO
Question 1Nursing Shortage in Rural Areas

In Oregon, our nursing shortage is most acute in rural areas, as I can imagine
is the case in Wisconsin. Our schools are turning away potential nursing students
that could be serving in these areas. Since the 2002 academic year, the number of
qualified applicants turned away by Oregon nursing schools has increased by more
than 300 percent, with more than 1,500 qualified applicants being turned away in
2007.
Question 1. I am curious if Wisconsin is experiencing similar challenges, and as
a personal care worker, could you share with us what effects older Americans are
experiencing from the health care workforce shortage, including nurses and other
health care professionals, in rural areas?
Answer. The problems with nursing schools which you site for Oregon are identical in Wisconsin. This happened to my daughter who was a four point student and
wanted to be a nurse. When she reached the point in her education to enter the
nursing program she was told there was a two year wait before she could continue
her education. Long story short, she changed directions. My sister-in-law, a surgical
RN in California complains that the nurses coming out of nursing school now are
inadequately trained as they attempt to rush as many through as possible. This is
a complaint I have heard from RNs in WI, MI, NJ, NC, and FL. The problem appears to be on two levels, limited training availability and inadequate training. The
impact to the elderly is they have less availability to nursing professionals and people who are available lack some basic training and most generic training.
The farther you get from communities with populations of ten thousand the worse
the problem becomes and the elderly are forced to rely on friends, family, and neighbors. While I personally feel the old fashioned community support model is beneficial to all parties involved, it should not be the sole avenue of home care support.
It does not provide the consistent preventive professional service that older people
need. It can also diminish their feelings of independence, dignity, and can cause
feelings of being a burden which leads to depression with its corresponding health
care issues. They are also open to criminal predators who target the elderly.
I have worked in a consulting capacity with a few home health care agencies over
the last ten years to improve their hiring and training practices as well as the quality of their care. Actually I think they got tired of my stealing their employees. An
agency will receive $25.00-40.00 dollars per hour and pay their workers between
$5.00-9.00 per hour. The agencies are in a population base of 400,000 and my community has a population of 9,000, but I advertised in the larger population. When
the agencies placed ads in good economic times, they average between three to five
responses from uneducated people or students. They are lucky if they get one qualified person and will need to run ads repeatedly to get that one person. During bad
economic times they may get eight to twelve responses with the same results of a
possible one qualified person.
There is a perception, which for the most part is true, that privately advertised
home care pays more. Consequently the ads get more attention as well as a greater
number of highly trained overly qualified people. Generally these are people who are
looking to supplement their income, flexible hours that will work with their familys
needs. Also included are those who work better outside of an institutional environment and professional home care workers. I set up a system of three team members
with myself as back-up between 1997 and 1999. The team included one RN ($27.00
per hour), one LPN ($17.00 per hour), and one CNA ($9.00 per hour). In 1998 I was
told both my parents were in critical condition and would most likely not live six
months. I utilized each team memberss talent/training level to the tasks best suited
with the mandate to spoil my parents rotten. It must have worked well since my
father lived until October 2005 and my mother is still alive.
Once we passed this critical and financially burdensome stage, we switched the
team profile to two CNAs daily and one RN for weekly visits. By this time I had
become able to train aides in my parents care, including the generic skills that most
were lacking. In 1998 the ads we ran generated eight responses of which three were
qualified. In 2000 we had ten responses of which two were qualified. In 2003 we
had 150 responses. Twelve people over qualified foreign licensed RNs and LPNs (one
of which was a doctor) highly trained medical personnel which had to be retrained
and re-licensed in this country, from Ireland, Russia, and Palestine, and Romania.
Their employment needs were too temporary to suit our situation and their monetary expectations were no longer feasible for us. Three respondents were students
in medical fields and two were professional home care workers. The majority of respondents were not fit for a phone conversation. Several did not speak English.
Even when English was their native language they took the term unintelligible to
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
93
whole new level. Imagine the dire health consequences of miscommunications with
people who maybe hard of hearing or suffering from dementia when being cared for
by such workers. We hired one student willing to make a one year commitment who
is now a medical assist specializing with the disabled and elderly and one professional home care who still works here 4 hours a week.
While the numbers may look like an upturn is occurring with people in the home
health field it is not. Economic conditions and population growth through immigration have an increasingly greater impact on the number of those who are responding
to ads for home care work. Workers who are in the field because of economic reasons
are not always the best because they leave as soon as their financial issue is resolved or are not consistent on the job. It is impossible not to notice that for private
care ads, as well as agency ads, qualified applicants have flat lined or even declined,
though the number of responses has increased.
Many people who have found themselves in the position of suddenly making care
decision for their parents have sought direction from me over the years. It is always
the case that solving their problems is much more difficult when their parents live
in small towns. I cant tell you how many times I hear Thank God for that lady
next door. Programs targeting rural areas are most certainly warranted and will
only increase in necessity with the experiential growth that our population of seniors is experiencing.
Question 2Caregiver supports
In your testimony, you mention that you are a caregiver for your mother and that
you also were for your father. You also mention that you did extensive work to ensure an appropriate and trained team was hired to help you care for them. I know
that the purpose of funding through the Older Americans Act is to help provide supportive services and referrals for the elderly and their family members to help seniors stay in their home, and out of facilities, as they age.
Question 2. Did you receive any information, referrals or caregiver help through
your local Area Agency on Aging and how do you think we can better ensure that
caregivers, like you, receive the support you need?
Answer. From 1997 to 1999, I was exposed to many doctors, hospital social workers, nursing care facilities. With all the health care professionals I dealt with not
one provided the information or resources that would have saved me over
$300,000.00. I did aggressively go after information in the first year. The only option
anyone wanted to speak to me about was putting my parents in a nursing home.
It was a learning experience without direction. Thankfully that fit my career specialty, so developing processes and analyzing needs allowed me to put together the
perfect team profile and care plan for my parents. In 2000, I left my career to pick
up some of the time with my parents and reduce cost of care. While I made many
inquiries, most agencies were only interested in their special area that related to
some funding table, while others only wanted to talk about nursing homes. Finally
in 2003, while at the mall getting a battery for my fathers watch, a woman working
at the kiosk and I started talking about health care costs. I said I didnt know how
much longer I could afford my health insurance because I was taking care of my
parents and it cost me $480.00 per month which, along with everything else, was
breaking me financially. She said her sister took care of their parents and got
health insurance and was paid to do so. She gave me the number to call for the
state agency and from that point on we received help and information. Yes, I had
called the county and state agency previously, but was only given misdirection and
useless information.
Subsequently, I discovered that too many agencies had small qualifying focuses
and an inability to understand where to direct people who may not fit their particular profile. Everyone is protecting their small piece of the pie and failing to provide cost effective solutions. Each agency has a set of rules which may conflict with
others, causing more confusion as well as increased cost to those providing care and
those getting care. This situation enables those prone to fraud, a lucrative playing
field, which in turn reduces the availability of services. The conflicting regulations
are a nightmare for both care recipients and administrators of the various programs. One example occurred in my home when a doctor ordered a blood draw after
a hospitalization. The private agencys RN we hired could not do the blood draw because of Medicare restrictions from another agency whose RNs could not perform
the task due to liability and some other restriction. It had to be done and the two
agencies actually got into a fight over the rules and regulations they each work
under with my mother caught in the middle. Not one tolerant of silliness when a
persons health is at risk. I just hired a private nurse to come in and get the blood
the doctor needed. Other options, proposed by the two agencies would have had adverse consequences for my parents, which both agencies agreed they did not want
to see.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
94
Addressing this issue is currently underway in Wisconsin, and is also one of the
proposed goals for the Wisconsin Quality Home Care Commission. To this end, there
have been many positive efforts in Wisconsin. Persuading any agency to work efficiently and cooperatively with other agencies (governmental, qusi governmental, or
private) is a very difficult task to accomplish. If someone told you that merging the
states of Oregon and Washington would save 10 million dollars a year and would
improve the services to both states, but you would have to fine another job and
could no longer control the money to the state, how fast would you jump on that
band wagon? And how do you convince the law makers of Oregon that they should
now use the laws of Washington?
I discovered several ways the county and state could cut cost and improve services. However, with the current protect your turf attitude, the majority of initiatives
will continue to be layered costly fix after costly fix instead of real solutions. This
will continue until the financial back is broken and the baby gets thrown out with
the bath water in cut backs. I am very proud of the initiatives that have taken place
in Wisconsin since I found myself in this life altering circumstance in 1997. People
in this state now have better access to information. But there is so much more work
to be done. The first paragraph of Charles Dickens A Tale of Two Cities runs
though my mind regularly when I reflect upon this unexpected phase in my life.
While one of the most rewarding of my accomplishments, it has also been one of
the most difficult. It is the conditions in which I found the elderly and the care
givers which drive my conscience to help make things a little better. This world that
I have adventured into is so far from who I am that I do stand in awe of those who
have chosen this as a career path. I also pray they will at some point in time receive
the recognition and assistance they so justly need and deserve.
When my job is finished here, I have the option to avoid the homecare field if I
so choose, but I cant avoid getting old any more than you can. What caliber of person do you want in your home making decisions that could mean the difference between life and death?
SALLY BOWMANS RESPONSES
TO
Question 1Geriatric Education Centers and the Aging Network

In your written testimony you mention the great publications and information
that OSU has worked on related to ensuring elderly consumers and their caregivers
are aware of the options available to them.
Question 1. How do you ensure that seniors and their caregivers have access to
this information, and do you work with the aging network, such as the State Unit
on Aging and Area Agencies on Aging to ensure that the products are offered where
seniors and their caregivers will have access to the information?
Answer. OSU Extension Service publications on aging are available for free on the
OSU web site. They can also be ordered for a small charge. They are included in
the next eXtension national Family Caregiving website located at
www.extension.org. Because we are part of the national network of University Extension Services, other Universities also utilize our educational materials with their
audiences.
In addition, our partners in the state, including the State Unit on Aging, AARP,
Area Agencies on Aging, and our Oregon Geriatric Education Center partners,
OHSU and PSU, distribute our publications at health fairs and trainings. We share
our educational materials in these venues, and disseminate up-to-date lists of educational resources at events and conferences. We also actively co-teach with partners
from other agencies, thus expanding our outreach. For example, we collaborated
with AARP on a statewide Prepare to Care project, in which one of our activities
was viewing the recent PBS special, Caring for your Parents, at selected locations
around the state, followed by a panel of local and state experts.
Our OSU Extension faculty members with county assignments partner with the
State Unit on Aging, regional Area Agencies on Aging, nonprofit agencies, and businesses to provide trainings in chronic disease self-management, tai chi, strong
women, and family caregiving to older adults and their family members. Other
workshops and events include medication management, optimal aging, aging in
place, financial planning in later life, etc. These offerings are available in both
urban and rural areas, although not in every county due to funding limitations for
staffing.
Question 2Federal Geriatric Programs
For Fiscal Year 2008 (FY08), Congress provided $31 million for geriatric programs. In FY07, Oregon received $390,000. Unfortunately, the Presidents FY09
budget zeroed out geriatrics programs, including the Geriatric Education Centers
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
95
Program, Geriatric Training for Physicians, Dentists, and Behavioral and Mental
Health Professionals and Geriatric Academic Career Awards Program.
Question 2. In your testimony, you speak to the importance of Oregons Geriatric
Education Center to rural areashow would you evaluate its success?
The Oregon Geriatric Education Center has fostered a collaborative relationship
between OHSU, PSU, and OSU in the area of geriatrics and gerontology. One of
the results of that collaboration is that we work together on developing train ing
opportunities around the state. We provide a resource center of educational materials that are lent to professionals and to long-term care facilities. We develop curricula, if there is a gap in educational resources. The OHSU geriatrics physician
who serves on the GEC is very active in providing geriatric training to other physicians around the state. In addition, we partner with geriatricians through their professional association. We report our activities and our outreach in the federal reports, and we are also working together this year to improve our evaluation of outcomes. In short, the Oregon GEC helps focus the energy of the three Oregon universities on working together on health programs and aging. It provides leverage that
helps us respond to private foundation grant-related opportunities.
Follow Up: What other incentives could help induce physicians to pursue careers
in geriatrics?
Answer. Financial incentives, such as scholarships and loan repayment programs,
have been shown to be effective in recruiting health care providers, such as physicians and nurses, to practice in specific fields, such as geriatrics. Research also provides evidence that if you want to recruit health care providers to practice in rural
areas, the greatest likelihood of success is if you recruit amongst students who grew
up in rural areas. If you want to recruit health care providers to serve older adults
from minority groups, the greatest likelihood of success is if you recruit amongst
students from minority groups. If you want to recruit health care providers to work
with older adults, the greatest likelihood of at some point in their life. These findings should inform the design of recruitment programs because they will contribute
to their overall success.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.045
96
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.046
97
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.047
98
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.048
99
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.049
100
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.050
101
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.051
102
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.052
103
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.053
104
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.054
105
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.055
106
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.056
107
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.057
108
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.058
109
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.059
110
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.060
111
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.061
112
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.062
113
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.063
114
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.064
115
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.065
116
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.066
117
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.067
118
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.068
119
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.069
120
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.070
121
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.071
122
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.072
123
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.073
124
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.074
125
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.075
126
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.076
127
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.077
128
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.078
129
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.079
130
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.080
131
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.081
132
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.082
133
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.083
134
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00139
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.084
135
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.085
136
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.086
137
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.087
138
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.088
139
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.089
140
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.090
141
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00146
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.091
142
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00147
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.092
143
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.093
144
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.094
145
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00150
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.095
146
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00151
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.096
147
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00152
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.097
148
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00153
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.098
149
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00154
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.099
150
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00155
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.100
151
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.101
152
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00157
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.102
153
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.103
154
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00159
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.104
155
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00160
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.105
156
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00161
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.106
157
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00162
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.107
158
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00163
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.108
159
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00164
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.109
160
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00165
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.110
161
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00166
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.111
162
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00167
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.112
163
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00168
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.113
164
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00169
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.114
165
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00170
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.115
166
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00171
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.116
167
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00172
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.117
168
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00173
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.118
169
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00174
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.119
170
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00175
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.120
171
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00176
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.121
172
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00177
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.122
173
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00178
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.123
174
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00179
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.124
175
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00180
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.125
176
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00181
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.126
177
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00182
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.127
178
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00183
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.128
179
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00184
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.129
180
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00185
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.130
181
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00186
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.131
182
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00187
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.132
183
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00188
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.133
184
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00189
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.134
185
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00190
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.135
186
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00191
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.136
187
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00192
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.137
188
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00193
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.138
189
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00194
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.139
190
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00195
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.140
191
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00196
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.141
192
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00197
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.142
193
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00198
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.143
194
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00199
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.144
195
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00200
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.145
196
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00201
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.146
197
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00202
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.147
198
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00203
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.148
199
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00204
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.149
200
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00205
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.150
201
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00206
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.151
202
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00207
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.152
203
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00208
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.153
204
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00209
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.154
205
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00210
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.155
206
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00211
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.156
207
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00212
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.157
208
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00213
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.158
209
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00214
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.159
210
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00215
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.160
211
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00216
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.161
212
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00217
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.162
213
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00218
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.163
214
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00219
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.164
215
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00220
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.165
216
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00221
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.166
217
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00222
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.167
218
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00223
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.168
219
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00224
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.169
220
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00225
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.170
221
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00226
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.171
222
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00227
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.172
223
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00228
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.173
224
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00229
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.174
225
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00230
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.175
226
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00231
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.176
227
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00232
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.177
228
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00233
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.178
229
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00234
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6601
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.179
230
231
VerDate Aug 31 2005
15:01 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 000000
PO 00000
Frm 00235
Fmt 6601
Sfmt 6011
H:\DOCS\46167.TXT
SAG
PsN: JOYCE
46167.180

Senate Hearing, 110TH Congress - Caring For Our Seniors: How Can We Support Those On The Frontlines?

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Senate Hearing, 110TH Congress - Caring For Our Seniors: How Can We Support Those On The Frontlines?

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Senate Hearing, 110TH Congress - Caring For Our Seniors: How Can We Support Those On The Frontlines?

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

S. HRG.

CARING FOR OUR SENIORS: HOW CAN WE

SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING

APRIL 16, 2008

Serial No. 11026

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

Opening Statement of Senator Herb Kohl .............................................................

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

CARING FOR OUR SENIORS: HOW CAN WE

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

Senator NELSON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Senator COLLINS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I want to commend

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

Senator SALAZAR. Thank you very much, Chairman Kohl, for

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

Dr. ROWE. Senator Kohl and members of the Committee. Thank

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009

VerDate Aug 31 2005

15:01 Jan 26, 2009