12 - Project Monitoring, Evaluation and Control 2-Evaluation, Forecasting, Control
12 - Project Monitoring, Evaluation and Control 2-Evaluation, Forecasting, Control
12 - Project Monitoring, Evaluation and Control 2-Evaluation, Forecasting, Control
I.
II.
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
Favorable
Variance < 0
Unfavorable
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
A. CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUE
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
= 50 %
Resource Work = 50 %
Cost Incurred = 40 %
EM-504: Project Management Framework And Tools
Farhan Saleem
EXAMPLE
ID
Activity Name
Baseline
Duration
Predecessor
Budgeted
Quantity
Baseline
Cost
Weightage
to Project
Site Layout
10 days
L/sum
$ 10,000
2.62 %
40 days
A (FS)
10,000 cft
$ 50,000
13.12 %
Grading
30 days
B (SS + 20)
15,000 cft
$ 60,000
15.75 %
Sub Base
60 days
C (SS + 10)
15,000 cft
$ 75,000
19.69 %
Compaction
40 days
D (FF+ 20)
1800 sft
$ 36,000
9.45 %
Carpeting
80 days
E (SS+20)
1500 sft
$ 150,000
39.37 %
Farhan Saleem
EXAMPLE
10
11
50
31
Grading
60
41
Sub Base
100
81
Compaction
120
101
Carpeting
180
Farhan Saleem
EXAMPLE
January 05
February 05
March 05
April 05
May05
June 05
Site Layout
10/10 x 10,000
10,000
10/10 x 10,000
10,000
10/10 x 10,000
10,000
10/10 x 10,000
10,000
10/10 x 10,000
10,000
10/10 x 10,000
10,000
21/40 x 50,000
26,250
40/40 x 50,000
50,000
40/40 x 50,000
50,000
40/40 x 50,000
50,000
40/40 x 50,000
50,000
40/40 x 50,000
50,000
Grading
1/30 x 60000
2000
29/30 x 60000
58,000
30/30 x 60000
60,000
30/30 x 60000
60,000
30/30 x 60000
60,000
30/30 x 60000
60,000
Sub Base
0/60 x 75000
0
19/60 x 75000
23,750
50/60 x 75000
62,500
60/60 x 75000
75,000
60/60 x 75000
75,000
60/60 x 75000
75,000
Compaction
0/40 x 36000
0
0/40 x 36000
0
10/40 x 36000
9,000
40/40 x 36000
36,000
40/40 x 36000
36,000
40/40 x 36000
36,000
Carpeting
0/80 x 150000
0
0/80 x 150000
0
0/80 x 150000
0
20/80x 150000
37,500
51/80 x 150000
95,625
80/80 x 150000
150000
38,250
10.04%
141,750
37.20%
191,500
50.26%
268,500
70.47%
326,625
85.73%
381,000
100%
TOTAL
Farhan Saleem
EXAMPLE
% Baseline Cost
100
85.73
80
70.47
60
50.26
40
37.20
20
10.04
-
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
Day No.
Farhan Saleem
January 05
February 05
March 05
April 05
May05
June 05
Site Layout
10/10 x 2.62%
2.62%
10/10 x 2.62%
2.62%
10/10 x 2.62%
2.62%
10/10 x 2.62%
2.62%
10/10 x 2.62%
2.62%
10/10 x 2.62%
2.62%
21/40 x 13.12%
6.89%
40/40 x 13.12%
13.12%
40/40 x 13.12%
13.12%
40/40 x 13.12%
13.12%
40/40 x 13.12%
13.12%
40/40 x 13.12%
13.12%
Grading
1/30 x 15.75%
0.53
29/30 x 15.75%
15.23%
30/30 x 15.75%
15.75%
30/30 x 15.75%
15.75%
30/30 x 15.75%
15.75%
30/30 x 15.75%
15.75%
Sub Base
0/60 x 19.69%
0
19/60 x 19.69%
6.24%
50/60 x 19.69%
16.41%
60/60 x 19.69%
19.69%
60/60 x 19.69%
19.69%
60/60 x 19.69%
19.69%
Compaction
0/40 x 9.45%
0
0/40 x 9.45%
0
10/40 x 9.45%
2.36%
40/40 x 9.45%
9.45%
40/40 x 9.45%
9.45%
40/40 x 9.45%
9.45%
Carpeting
0/80 x 39.37%
0
0/80 x 39.37%
0
0/80 x 39.37%
0
20/80x 39.37%
9.84%
51/80 x 39.37%
25.10%
80/80 x 39.37%
39.37%
10.04%
37.20%
50.26%
70.47%
85.73%
100%
TOTAL
Farhan Saleem
EXAMPLE
% Baseline Work
100
85.73
80
70.47
60
50.26
40
37.20
20
10.04
-
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
Day No.
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
10
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
11
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
12
Rizwan Farooqui
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
13
Farhan Saleem
The three measures BCWS, ACWP, and BCWP are the basis of
the control analysis by which variations/ deviations in time and
schedule are detected
Farhan Saleem
14
Variances (1)
SV: schedule variance; BCWP-BCWS
The difference between the budgeted cost of work performed (BCWP)
and the budgeted cost of work scheduled (BCWS) indicates (in
monetary units) the deviation between the work content performed
and the work content scheduled for the control period.
A positive difference indicates that the project is ahead of schedule,
and a negative difference implies that the project is late. If the
absolute value of the difference is very small, then in terms of work content,
the project is on schedule.
Farhan Saleem
Variances (2)
Example Schedule Variance
Activity A, the work performed is worth $300 more than what was planned
for the control period; in activity B, the work performed is exactly equal to
what was planned; and in activity E, the work performed is worth $1,628 less
than what was planned for the period.
The cumulative variance is an indication in terms of work content performed.
Farhan Saleem
15
Variances (3)
CV: cost variance; BCWP-ACWP
Deviations in cost are calculated based on the work content actually
performed during the control period.
The cost variance (CV) is defined as the difference between the budgeted
cost of work performed (BCWP) and the actual cost of work performed
(ACWP).
A positive CV indicates a lower actual cost than budgeted for the control
period, while a negative CV indicates a cost overrun.
Farhan Saleem
Variances (4)
Example Cost Variance
Farhan Saleem
16
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
17
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
18
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
19
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
20
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
21
= BCWP ACWP
=$7,600 - $7,700
=-$100
A negative value of CV represents a cost overrun. Based on
the status report the actual cost is greater than that earned by
$100.
Schedule variance, SV = BCWP BCWS
=$7,600 - $7,600
=0
Since the SV is zero, the project is progressing as planned.
The project is not ahead of or behind the planned schedule.
EM-504: Project Management Framework And Tools
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
22
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
23
Farhan Saleem
Farhan Saleem
24
Farhan Saleem
100%
Farhan Saleem
25