Peripheral Ossifying Fi Broma: ASE Eport
Peripheral Ossifying Fi Broma: ASE Eport
Peripheral Ossifying Fi Broma: ASE Eport
45]
CASE REPORT
ABSTRACT
The peripheral ossifying fibroma (POF) is an exophytic gingival mass of fibrous
connective tissue covered with a surface epithelium associated with the formation of
randomly dispersed foci of a mineralized product consisting of bone, cementum-like
tissue, or dystrophic calcifications having a recurrent rate of nearly 20%. It is one
of the most common reactive gingival lesions, which have often been called by the
generic term epulis. This case report describes the clinical and histopathological
findings of POF, its differential diagnosis, and treatment.
INTRODUCTION
Peripheral ossifying fibroma (POF) is an oral
pathologic condition that appears in the mouth as
an overgrowth of gingival tissue due to irritation
or trauma. A gingival fibroma is derived from
cells of the periodontal ligament and usually
developing in response to local irritants such as
plaque and calculus on associated teeth. It may
be mistaken for other more common exophytic
gingival lesions such as fibrous hyperplasia or
pyogenic granuloma.[1] POF is localized reactive
enlargement of the gingiva that typically measures
less than 1.5 cm at its greatest dimension.[2] It
is relatively common, accounting for 9.6% of
all biopsied gingival lesions.[3] The POF may be
pedunculated or sessile and does not blanch upon
palpation; it mostly occurs between the ages of
Address for correspondence:
Dr. Ameet Mani, Dept. of Periodontics & Oral
Implantology, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences,
Rural Dental College, Loni - 413736, Ahmednagar,
Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
82
CASE REPORT
A female patient aged 32 years reported to the
Department of Periodontics, Rural Dental College,
Loni, with the chief complaint of bleeding and
swelling in the buccal and palatal aspect of 25 and
26 regions since 6 months. The swelling started
as a small growth and grew to the present size. It
posed no other problems other than interfering
with food intake. Bleeding was noticed with slight
ulceration due to indentation of lower teeth on
occlusal side which caused discomfort during
mastication to the patient.
Intraoral examination revealed a single, unilateral
growth on buccal and palatal aspect of 25 and 26
Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization | May-August 2010 | Vol 2 | Issue 2
[Downloaded free from http://www.jicdro.org on Monday, November 28, 2016, IP: 202.67.42.45]
Mani, et al.: Peripheral ossifying fibroma
Histopathological findings
Section shows a parakeratinized stratified
squamous epithelium with proliferation. There
was forking and arcading of rete ridges. The
connective tissues just below the epithelium were
fibrocellular, made up of proliferating fibroblasts
arranged in strands and whorls with areas of
globular calcified masses resembling cementumlike material and osteoid tissue. Rest of the
connective tissue was fibrocellular with blood
vessels and chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate
suggestive of POF as shown in Figure 5.
DISCUSSION
POF can occur at any age, although it appears
to be somewhat more common in children
and young adults.[7] The present clinical case
report concerns a relatively common gingival
lesion. In 1982, Gardner described the nature
of the POF which had been considered the
extraosseous counterpart of the central ossifying
fibroma.[8] Most reported series of cases show a
predilection for occurrence in females by a ratio
ranging from 2:1 to 3:2. Plaque, calculus, rough
restorations, illfitting dentures, microorganisms,
masticatory forces, minor trauma, trapped food
and debris, and iatrogenic factors all influence
the development of these lesions. In most
instances (<5%), a POF lesion is associated with
radiographic signs and tooth migration.[9] For this
reason, POF is considered not to be neoplastic,
but rather to be a hyperplastic reaction due to
inflammation.[10] POFs may exhibit diffuse radioopaque calcifications, but not all lesions exhibit
these radiographic features. Majority of these
lesions are not associated with radiographic
destruction of bone.[11]
The POF must be differentiated histologically
from the peripheral odontogenic fibroma. The
main histological differences are the presence
of odontogenic epithelium in the peripheral
odontogenic fibroma and the presence of
displastic dentin in the POF.[12]
The treatment requires proper surgical
intervention that ensures deep excision of the
lesion including periosteum and affected PDL.
Thorough root scaling of adjacent teeth and/or
removal of other sources of irritation should be
accomplished.[13]
Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization | May-August 2010 | Vol 2 | Issue 2
83
[Downloaded free from http://www.jicdro.org on Monday, November 28, 2016, IP: 202.67.42.45]
Mani, et al.: Peripheral ossifying fibroma
84
Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization | May-August 2010 | Vol 2 | Issue 2
[Downloaded free from http://www.jicdro.org on Monday, November 28, 2016, IP: 202.67.42.45]
Mani, et al.: Peripheral ossifying fibroma
CONCLUSION
The POF is a well-defined pathologic entity
among reactive gingival lesions. They are most
common in females, found most often in the
maxillary incisor-cuspid region, but may occur at
any gingival site. As of the POF behavior pattern,
a proper treatment protocol is warranted with
close follow-up.
7.
8.
9.
REFERENCES
10.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
11.
12.
13.
Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization | May-August 2010 | Vol 2 | Issue 2
85