Task 2 (A) (Answers) : Project A - TV Station
Task 2 (A) (Answers) : Project A - TV Station
Task 2 (A) (Answers) : Project A - TV Station
PROJECT A - TV STATION
YEARS
Description
Future Value
X Discount
Rate (RM
000 000)
Present
Value
1-5
Set Up
Cost
Annual
Running Cost
Value Of
asset
Released
Earning
Earning
Earning
Earning
Earning
(250,000,0
00)
RM100 X
4.212
RM40 X
0.747
RM60 X
0.943
(421,200,000)
29,880,000
56,580,000
(150% X
RM60 =
RM90) X
0.890
80,100,000
(150% X
RM90 =
RM135) X
0.840
113,400,000
(150% X
RM135 =
RM202.5) X
0.792
160,380,000
Net
Present
value
(150% X
RM202.5 =
RM303.75) X
0.747
226,901,250
(3,958,750
)
PROPOSAL B - SATELLITE
YEARS
Description
RM 000 000
1-6
Set Up
Cost
Annual
Running
Cost
Value Of
asset
Released
Earning
Earning
Earning
Earning
Earning
Earning
(120% X
RM138.24
=
RM165.88
8) X
0.747
123,918,3
36
(120% X
RM165.888
=
RM199.066)
X 0.705
(1/2 X
RM700)
Future Value
X Discount
Rate (RM
000 000)
Present
Value
(350,000,0
00)
(1/2 X)
RM50 X
4.917
(1/2 X)
RM10 X
0.705
RM80 X
0.943
(120% X
RM80 =
RM96) X
0.890
(120% X
RM96 =
RM115.2) X
0.840
(120% X
RM115.2=
RM138.24)
X 0.792
(122,925,00
0)
3,525,000
75,440,000
85,440,000
96,768,000
109,486,08
0
140,341,530
Page | 4
Net
Present
value
161,993,9
46
Task 2 (b)(Answers)
Project A have a negative Net Present Value (NPV) values should be rejected because the present value of the stream of benefits is
Scope planning specifies the in-scope requirements for the project and facilitates creating the work breakdown structure.
Preparing the work breakdown structure specifies the breakdown of the project into tasks and sub tasks.
Project schedule development specifies the entire schedule of the activities detailing their sequence of execution.
Page | 5
Resource planning specifies who will do what work at which time of the project and if any special skills are needed to accomplish the
project tasks.
Budget planning specifies the budgeted cost to be incurred in the completion of the project.
Risk management planning charts the risks, contingency plan and mitigation strategies.
Page | 6