Emerson Plan
Emerson Plan
Emerson was one of Taylors associates. He guaranteed time wages but wanted to
reward efficiency. For the determination of a workers level of efficiency, it was
necessary to see the time for a job or set a task for a unit of time. On that basis
efficiency could be determined.
If a worker does a job in 10 hours and if the standard time is also 10 hours, his
efficiency is 100%. If he does the same job in 20 hours, his efficiency is 50% and if
he does the job in 8 hours, his efficiency is 125%. Bonus become payable only when
efficiency reaches 66-2/3%. For efficiency below 66- 2/3%, he gets only the time
wage.
The bonus at 66-2/3% is very small but it becomes 20% when efficiency reaches
100%. A worker showing 100% efficiency will get wages at the hourly rate for the
time spent by him plus 20% of the wages. If the worker does a job in less than the
standard time, that is, if his efficiency is greater than 100%, he will get the wages
for the actual time spent by him plus 20% of the wages earned plus one per cent for
every one increase in the efficiency percentage.
Bedeaux Plan
Under this plan, the minute is the time unit described as the standard minute
and accounted as Bedeaux point B. In determining the Bs, the time of
operation and the time of rest taken into account. Thus, B may be defined as
a fraction of a minute of effort plus a fraction of compensation rest always
aggregating unity. The standard time for each job is fixed after undertaking
time and motion study and expressed in terms of Bs. The standard time for a
job is the number of Bs allowed to complete it. Thus, if the standard time
required for a job is five hours, it will be expressed as 300 Bs.
The workers who are not able to or are just able to complete the work
within standard time are paid at the normal time rate. Those who are able to
complete their work earlier are paid bonus equal to the wages for time saved
as indicated by the excess of B point over the actual time taken.
Generally, the bonus paid to the worker is 75% of the wages for time
saved. The remaining 25% goes to the foreman. The working of the Bedeaux
plan is explained with the help of the following illustration:
Standard time (S)
300 Bs (5 hours)
240 Bs (4hours)
Rate of wages (R )
60 Bs
1 hour
(300-240 x 6)/60
=
Rs.6.00
=
=
5 x 6 + 75% x 6
Rs. 34.50
To the workers who are potentially high producer, Merrick plan is good
incentive system. It seems reasonable to pay production bonus at 110% of
the basic piece rate to the workers when they reach 83% task because many
workers should be able to reach 83 % task with a little extra effort. When
they do so, they will be encouraged to reach the 100% task
By introducing the basic piece rate for low output, Merrick
removed the punitive wage rate originated by Taylor. In fact, Merricks plan is
only a modified form of Taylors plan. Like Taylors plan, Merricks plan also
does not guarantee minimum wages for the workers. Another drawback of
the system is the existence of a wide gap in slabs. As is obvious from the
plan, all workers producing 1% to 82% of the standard output are considered
as sub-standard workers and are paid the same piece rate.
Gantts Task and Bonus Wage PlanIt was developed by Henry L. Gantt, a close associate of F.W. Taylor. Under it, standard time
for every task is fixed through time and motion study. Minimum time wage is guaranteed to all
workers. A worker who fails to complete the task within the standard time receives wages for
actual time spent at the specified rate. Workers who achieve or exceed the standard get
extra bonus varying between 20% to 50% of the hourly rate for the time allowed for the task.
Suppose, the standard time fixed for the job 8 hours and the time rate is Rs 10 per hour and
the rate of bonus is 25 per cent. A worker who completes the task in 10 hours he will be paid
Rs. 80( 8 * Rs. 10) only. On the other hand, the worker who completes the task in 6 hours will
receive Rs. 100 (Rs. 80 + 25 % of Rs. 80). Therefore, the actual rate comes out to be Rs.100 /
6 =Rs. 16.67 per hour.
Under this method, minimum wage is assured to all workers, wages increases progressively
with increase in efficiency, and at the same time inefficient workers are not penalized
severally.
Merits:
If the group members possess similar skills and abilities, group bonus may be
distributed among them on an equal basis; or
If the group members have different basic rates of wages, the bonus may be
distributed in proportion to the basic rates as under priestmans output bonus plan; or
Such percentage may be determined on the basis of skill, experience and basis rate of pay of
each individual worker.
Where the workers constituting a group possess similar skills, abilities, experience:
and
Where the finished product is the result of collective efforts of group members.
Priestmans Plan
Under this plan productivity of the group as a whole is the starting point. Standard output is
laid down for the group. However, a minimum wage is assured to each group member. The
group members become entitled to the bonus if their output exceeds the standard. The bonus
is paid in proportion to the excess of actual output over the standard output. For example, if
the actual production is 20 per cent higher than the standard output, the wages of each group
member will rise by 20 per cent. The additional wage of each member is his bonus.
The main benefit of Priestmans Plan is that it brings about a team spirit among the group
members. This scheme can be successful only if the number of workers in the group is small.
However, as no distinction is made between efficient and inefficient workers, no regard is
paid to efficiency of the individual.
It rewards employees for meeting specific goals in terms of quality, service and job
performance e.g., an employee may be paid Rs. 20 extra for each one per cent improvement
over baseline (minimum performance). Suppose the baseline is 90% and the group achieves
93% performance, this would mean each group member would receive Rs. 60 bonus based on
group performance.