IFRS Pocket Guide
IFRS Pocket Guide
IFRS Pocket Guide
2016
inform.pwc.com
Introduction
1 Introduction
This pocket guide provides a summary of the recognition and measurement
requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued up to
August 2016.
The information in this guide is arranged in five sections:
Accounting principles.
Balance sheet and related notes.
Consolidated and separate financial statements.
Other subjects.
Industry-specific topics.
More detailed guidance and information on these topics can be found on
inform.pwc.com in the Accounting topic home pages and in the IFRS Manual of
Accounting. A list of PwCs key IFRS publications are provided on the inside
frontcover.
PwC
Contents
Contents
1
Introduction 1
12
14
14
7.2
15
7.3
16
7.4
16
7.5
17
7.6
18
7.7
19
7.8
21
7.9
22
7.10 IFRS 9
22
25
26
27
11
36
12
37
13
40
14
Taxation IAS 12
42
15
44
PwC
Contents
45
16
45
17
46
18
47
19
48
20
49
21
Inventories IAS 2
51
22
52
23
55
24
55
57
25
57
26
58
27
58
61
29
63
30
64
Other subjects
65
31
65
32
66
33
67
34
69
Industry-specific topics
70
35
Agriculture IAS 41
70
36
71
PwC
73
PwC
PwC
The remaining text of the 1989 Framework (in the process of being updated),
which includes:
Underlying assumption, the going concern convention.
Elements of financial statements, including financial position (assets,
liabilities and equity) and performance (income and expenses).
Recognition of elements, including probability of future benefit, reliability
of measurement and recognition of assets, liabilities, income and expenses.
Measurement of elements, including a discussion on historical cost and
itsalternatives.
Concepts of capital and its maintenance.
The IASB has issued an exposure draft on the areas of the Conceptual Framework
that are being updated, including: elements of financial statements, recognition
and derecognition, the distinction between equity and liabilities, measurement,
presentation and disclosure, and fundamental concepts (including prudence,
business model, unit of account, going concern and capital maintenance). The
final revised Framework is aimed to be published in 2017.
PwC
PwC
PwC
Additional line items or sub-headings are presented in this statement when such
presentation is relevant to an understanding of the entitys financial performance.
10
PwC
Material items
The nature and amount of items of income and expense are disclosed separately
where they are material. Disclosure may be in the statement or in the notes. Such
income/expenses might include restructuring costs; write-downs of inventories
or property, plant and equipment; litigation settlements; and gains or losses on
disposals of non-current assets.
Other comprehensive income
An entity shall present items of other comprehensive income grouped into those
that will be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss and those that will not be
reclassified. An entity shall disclose reclassification adjustments relating to
components of other comprehensive income. The IAS 1 amendments clarify that
the entitys share of items of comprehensive income of associates and joint
ventures is presented separately, analysed into those items that will not be
reclassified subsequently to profit or loss and those that will be so reclassified
when specific conditions are met.
An entity presents each component of other comprehensive income in the
statement either (i) net of its related tax effects, or (ii) before its related tax
effects, with the aggregate tax effect of these components shown separately.
Statement of changes in equity
The following items are presented in the statement of changes in equity:
Total comprehensive income for the period, showing separately the total
amounts attributable to the parents owners and to non-controlling interest.
For each component of equity, the effects of retrospective application or
retrospective restatement recognised in accordance with IAS 8.
For each component of equity, a reconciliation between the carrying amount at
the beginning and the end of the period, separately disclosing changes
resulting from:
profit or loss;
other comprehensive income; and
transactions with owners in their capacity as owners, showing separately
contributions by and distributions to owners and changes in ownership
interests in subsidiaries that do not result in a loss of control.
PwC
11
12
PwC
PwC
13
PwC
In addition, requirements for fair value measurement and disclosures are covered
by IFRS 13.
PwC
15
16
PwC
Financial liabilities are at fair value through profit or loss if they are designated at
initial recognition as such (subject to various conditions), if they are held for
trading or if they are derivatives (except for a derivative that is a financial
guarantee contract or a designated and effective hedging instrument). They are
otherwise classified as other financial liabilities.
Financial assets and liabilities are measured either at fair value or at amortised
cost, depending on their classification. Changes are taken to either the income
statement or to other comprehensive income.
Reclassification of financial assets from one category to another is permitted under
limited circumstances. Various disclosures are required where a reclassification has
been made. Derivatives and assets designated as at fair value through profit or loss
under the fair value option are not eligible for this reclassification.
17
18
PwC
Assets
An entity that holds a financial asset may raise finance using the asset as security
for the finance, or as the primary source of cash flows from which to repay the
finance. The derecognition requirements of IAS 39 determine whether the
transaction is a sale of the financial assets (and therefore the entity ceases to
recognise the assets) or whether finance has been secured on the assets (and the
entity recognises a liability for any proceeds received). This evaluation might be
straightforward. For example, it is clear with little or no analysis that a financial
asset is derecognised in an unconditional transfer of it to an unconsolidated third
party, with no risks and rewards of the asset being retained.
Conversely, derecognition is not allowed where an asset has been transferred, but
substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset have been retained through
the terms of the agreement. However, the analysis may be more complex in other
cases. Securitisation and debt factoring are examples of more complex transactions
where derecognition will need careful consideration.
Liabilities
An entity may only cease to recognise (derecognise) a financial liability when it is
extinguished that is, when the obligation is discharged, cancelled or expired, or
when the debtor is legally released from the liability by law or by the creditor
agreeing to such a release.
PwC
19
20
PwC
21
7.10 IFRS 9
The publication of IFRS 9 in July 2014 is the culmination of the IASBs efforts to replace
IAS 39. IFRS 9 was released in phases from 2009 to 2014. The final standard was issued
in July 2014, with a proposed mandatory effective date of periods beginning on or after
1 January 2018. IFRS 9 has not yet been endorsed for use in the EU, but endorsement is
expected by the end of 2016. Early application of IFRS 9 will be permitted. The Board
also amended the transitional provisions to provide relief from restating comparative
information and introduced new disclosures to help users of financial statements
understand the effect of moving to the IFRS 9 classification and measurement model.
22
PwC
PwC
23
Impairment
The impairment rules of IFRS 9 introduce a new, forward looking, expected
credit loss (ECL) impairment model which will generally result in earlier
recognition of losses compared to IAS 39. These changes are likely to have a
significant impact on entities that have significant financial assets, in particular
financial institutions.
The new impairment model introduces a three stage approach. Stage 1 includes
financial instruments that have not had a significant increase in credit risk since
initial recognition or that have low credit risk at the reporting date. For these
assets, 12-month expected credit losses (that is, expected losses arising from the
risk of default in the next 12 months) are recognised and interest revenue is
calculated on the gross carrying amount of the asset (that is, without deduction
for credit allowance). Stage 2 includes financial instruments that have had a
significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition (unless they have low
credit risk at the reporting date) but are not credit-impaired. For these assets,
lifetime ECL (that is, expected losses arising from the risk of default over the life
of the financial instrument) are recognised, and interest revenue is still
calculated on the gross carrying amount of the asset. Stage 3 consists of financial
assets that are credit-impaired, which is when one or more events that have a
detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset have
occurred. For these assets, lifetime ECL are also recognised, but interest revenue
is calculated on the net carrying amount (that is, net of the ECL allowance).
In many cases, application of the new requirements will require significant judgement
in particular when assessing whether there has been a significant increase in credit
risk (triggering a move from stage 1 to stage 2 and a consequential increase from
12month ECL to lifetime ECL) and in estimating ECL including the effect of forward
looking information. IFRS 9 also introduces significant new disclosure requirements.
24
PwC
Hedging
The hedging rules of IFRS 9 better aligns hedge accounting with managements
risk management strategies. Also, some of the prohibitions and rules in IAS 39
are removed or changed, making hedge accounting easier or less costly to achieve
for many hedges. For instance, IAS 39s 80-125% bright line test is replaced with
a requirement for there to be an economic relationship between the hedged item
and hedging instrument and no imbalance between their weighting that would
create ineffectiveness. Risk components can be designated for non-financial
hedged items provided the risk component is separately identifiable and reliably
measurable and there will be less income statement volatility for entities using
options or forwards for hedging. Both of these changes will likely result in more
hedges qualifying for hedge accounting than under IAS 39. See chapter 46 of the
IFRS Manual of Accounting for further details.
IFRS 9 provides an accounting policy choice: entities can either continue to apply
the hedge accounting requirements of IAS 39 until the macro hedging project is
finalised, or they can apply IFRS 9 (with the scope exception only for fair value
macro hedges of interest rate risk).
This accounting policy choice will apply to all hedge accounting and cannot be
made on a hedge-by-hedge basis.
8F
oreign currencies and hyper-inflationary economies
IAS 21 and IAS 29
Many entities do business with overseas suppliers or customers, or have overseas
operations. This gives rise to two main accounting issues:
Some transactions (for example, those with overseas suppliers or customers) may
be denominated in foreign currencies. These transactions are expressed in the
entitys own currency (functional currency) for financial reporting purposes.
A parent entity may have foreign operations such as overseas subsidiaries, branches
or associates. The functional currency of these foreign operations may be different
to the parent entitys functional currency and therefore the accounting records may
be maintained in different currencies. Because it is not possible to combine
transactions measured in different currencies, the foreign operations results and
financial position are translated into a single currency, namely that in which the
groups consolidated financial statements are reported (presentation currency).
PwC
25
The methods required for each of the above circumstances are summarisedbelow.
Expressing foreign currency transactions in the entitys functional currency
A foreign currency transaction is expressed in an entitys functional currency using the
exchange rate at the transaction date. Foreign currency balances representing cash or
amounts to be received or paid in cash (monetary items) are retranslated at the end of
the reporting period using the exchange rate on that date. Exchange differences on such
monetary items are recognised as income or expense for the period. Non-monetary
balances that are not re-measured at fair value and are denominated in a foreign
currency are expressed in the functional currency using the exchange rate at the
transaction date. Where a non-monetary item is re-measured at fair value in the financial
statements, the exchange rate at the date when fair value was determined is used.
Translating functional currency financial statements into a presentation currency
Assets and liabilities are translated from the functional currency to the
presentation currency at the closing rate at the end of the reporting period. The
income statement is translated at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions
or at the average rate if that approximates the actual rates. All resulting exchange
differences are recognised in other comprehensive income.
The financial statements of a foreign operation that has the currency of a
hyper-inflationary economy as its functional currency are first restated in
accordance with IAS 29. All components are then translated to the presentation
currency at the closing rate at the end of the reporting period.
26
PwC
PwC
27
Revenue IAS 18
Revenue arising from the sale of goods is recognised when an entity transfers the
significant risks and rewards of ownership and gives up managerial involvement
usually associated with ownership or control, if it is probable that economic
benefits will flow to the entity and the amount of revenue and costs can be
measured reliably.
Revenue from the rendering of services is recognised when the outcome of the
transaction can be estimated reliably. This is done by reference to the stage of
completion of the transaction at the balance sheet date, using requirements
similar to those for construction contracts. The outcome of a transaction can be
estimated reliably when: the amount of revenue can be measured reliably; it is
probable that economic benefits will flow to the entity; the stage of completion
can be measured reliably; and the costs incurred and costs to complete can be
reliably measured.
Examples of transactions where the entity retains significant risks and rewards of
ownership and revenue is not recognised are when:
the entity retains an obligation for unsatisfactory performance not covered by
normal warranty provisions;
the buyer has the power to rescind the purchase for a reason specified in the
sales contract and the entity is uncertain about the probability of return; and
when the goods are shipped subject to installation and that installation is a
significant part of the contract.
Interest income is recognised using the effective interest rate method. Royalties
are recognised on an accruals basis in accordance with the substance of the
relevant agreement. Dividends are recognised when the shareholders right to
receive payment is established.
IFRIC 13 clarifies the accounting for award credits granted to customers when
they purchase goods or services, for example under frequent flyer or supermarket
loyalty schemes. The fair value of the consideration received or receivable in
respect of the initial sale is allocated between the award credits and the other
components of the sale.
28
PwC
PwC
29
The term probable has a different meaning under IFRS (where it means more
likely than not that is, greater than 50% likelihood) and US GAAP (where it is
generally interpreted as 75-80% likelihood). This could result in a difference in
the accounting for a contract if there is a likelihood of non-payment at inception.
However, the boards decided that there would not be a significant practical effect
of the different meaning of the same term because the population of transactions
that would fail to meet the criterion in paragraph 9(e) of IFRS 15 would be small.
Two or more contracts (including contracts with related parties of the customers)
should be combined if the contracts are entered into at or near the same time and
the contracts are negotiated with a single commercial objective, the amount of
consideration in one contract depends on the other contract, or the goods or
services in the contracts are interrelated. A contract modification is treated as a
separate contract only if it results in the addition of a separate performance
obligation and the price reflects the stand-alone selling price (that is, the price the
good or service would be sold for if sold on a stand-alone basis) of the additional
performance obligation. The modification is otherwise accounted for as an
adjustment to the original contract either through a cumulative catch-up
adjustment to revenue or a prospective adjustment to revenue when future
performance obligations are satisfied, depending on whether the remaining
goods and services are distinct. While aspects of this model are similar to IAS 11/
IAS 18, careful consideration will be needed to ensure the model is applied to the
appropriate unit of account.
2. Identify the separate performance obligations in the contract
An entity will be required to identify all performance obligations in a contract.
Performance obligations are promises to transfer goods or services to a customer
and are similar to what we know today as elements or deliverables.
Performance obligations might be explicitly stated in the contract but might also
arise in other ways. Legal or statutory requirements to deliver a good or perform
a service might create performance obligations even though such obligations are
not explicit in the contract. A performance obligation may also be created
through customary business practices, such as an entitys practice of providing
customer support, or by published policies or specific company statements. This
could result in an increased number of performance obligations within an
arrangement, possibly changing the timing of revenue recognition.
30
PwC
PwC
31
PwC
PwC
33
An entity can expense the cost of obtaining a contract if the amortisation period
would be less than one year. Entities should evaluate whether direct costs incurred in
fulfilling a contract are in the scope of other standards (for example, inventory,
intangibles, or property, plant and equipment). If so, the entity should account for
such costs in accordance with those standards. If not, the entity should capitalise
those costs only if the costs relate directly to a contract, relate to future performance,
and are expected to be recovered under a contract. An example of such costs may be
certain mobilisation, design, or testing costs. These costs would then be amortised as
control of the goods or services to which the asset relates is transferred to the customer.
The amortisation period may extend beyond the length of the contract when the
economic benefit will be received over a longer period. An example might include
set-up costs related to contracts likely to be renewed.
Licensing
IFRS 15 includes specific implementation guidance on accounting for licences of IP.
The first step is to determine whether the licence is distinct or combined with other
goods or services. The revenue recognition pattern for distinct licences is based on
whether the licence is a right to access IP (revenue recognised over time) or a right
to use IP (revenue recognised at a point in time). For licences that are bundled with
other goods or services, management will apply judgement to assess the nature of
the combined item and determine whether the combined performance obligation is
satisfied at a point in time or over time. In addition, the revenue standard includes
an exception to variable consideration guidance for the recognition of sales- or
usage-based royalties promised in exchange for a licence of IP.
Principal versus agent considerations
When an arrangement involves two or more unrelated parties that contribute to
providing a specified good or service to a customer, management will need to
determine whether the entity has promised to provide the specified good or
service itself (as a principal) or to arrange for those specified goods or services to
be provided by another party (as an agent). Determining whether an entity is the
principal or an agent is not a policy choice. IFRS 15 includes indicators that an
entity controls a specified good or service before it is transferred to the customer
to help entities apply the concept of control to the principal versus agent
assessment. The assessment should be made separately for each specified good or
service. An entity could be the principal for some goods or services and an agent
for others in contracts with multiple distinct goods or services.
34
PwC
35
PwC
PwC
37
PwC
Re-measurement gains and losses comprise actuarial gains and losses, return on
plan assets (excluding amounts included in net interest on the net defined benefit
liability or asset) and any change in the effect of the asset ceiling (excluding
amounts included in net interest on the net defined benefit liability or asset).
Re-measurements are recognised in other comprehensive income.
The amount of pension expense (income) to be recognised in profit or loss is
comprised of the following individual components unless they are required or
permitted to be included in the costs of an asset:
service costs (the present value of the benefits earned by active employees); and
net interest costs (the unwinding of the discount on the defined benefit
obligation and a theoretical return on plan assets).
Service costs comprises the current service costs, which is the increase in the
present value of the defined benefit obligation resulting from employee services
in the current period, past-service costs (as defined below and including any
gain or loss on curtailment) and any gain or loss on settlement.
Net interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset) is defined as the change
during the period in the net defined benefit liability (asset) that arises from the
passage of time. [IAS 19 para 8]. The net interest cost can be viewed as
comprising theoretical interest income on plan assets, interest cost on the defined
benefit obligation (that is, representing the unwinding of the discount on the plan
obligation) and interest on the effect of the asset ceiling. [IAS 19 para 124].
Net interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset) is calculated by multiplying
the net defined benefit liability (asset) by the discount rate, both as determined at
the start of the annual reporting period, taking account of any changes in the net
defined benefit liability (asset) during the period as a result of contribution and
benefit payments. [IAS 19 para 123]. The discount rate applicable to any financial
year is an appropriate high quality corporate bond rate (or government bond rate
if appropriate) in the currency in which the liabilities are denominated. Net
interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset) can be viewed as effectively
including theoretical interest income on plan assets.
PwC
39
Past-service costs are defined as a change in the present value of the defined benefit
obligation for employee services in prior periods, resulting from a plan amendment
(the introduction or withdrawal of, or changes to, a defined benefit plan) or a
curtailment (a significant reduction by the entity in the number of employees
covered by a plan). Past-service costs need to be recognised as an expense generally
when a plan amendment or curtailment occurs. Settlement gains or losses are
recognised in the income statement when the settlement occurs.
IFRIC 14, IAS 19 The limit on a defined benefit asset, minimum funding
requirements and their interaction, provides guidance on assessing the amount
that can be recognised as an asset when plan assets exceed the defined benefit
obligation creating a net surplus. It also explains how the pension asset or liability
may be affected by a statutory or contractual minimum funding requirement.
40
PwC
The accounting treatment under IFRS 2 is based on the fair value of the instruments.
Both the valuation of and the accounting for awards can be difficult, due to the complex
models that need to be used to calculate the fair value of options, and also due to the
variety and complexity of schemes. In addition, the standard requires extensive
disclosures. The result generally is reduced reported profits, especially in entities that
use share-based payment extensively as part of their remuneration strategy.
All transactions involving share-based payments are recognised as expenses or
assets over any vesting period.
Equity-settled share-based payment transactions are measured at the grant date
fair value for employee services; and, for non-employee transactions, at the fair
value of the goods or services received at the date on which the entity recognises
the goods or services. If the fair value of the goods or services cannot be estimated
reliably such as employee services and circumstances in which the goods or
services cannot be specifically identified the entity uses the fair value of the
equity instruments granted. Additionally, management needs to consider if there
are any unidentifiable goods or services received or to be received by the entity, as
these also have to be recognised and measured in accordance with IFRS 2.
Equity-settled share-based payment transactions are not re-measured once the
grant date fair value has been determined.
The treatment is different for cash-settled share-based payment transactions:
cash-settled awards are measured at the fair value (as defined in IFRS 2 and not as
defined in IFRS 13) of the liability. The liability is re-measured at each balance
sheet date and at the date of settlement, with changes in fair value recognised in
the income statement, cash-settled awards are measured at the fair value of the
liability. The liability is re-measured at each balance sheet date and at the date of
settlement, with changes in fair value recognised in the income statement.
PwC
41
14 Taxation IAS 12
IAS 12 only deals with taxes on income, comprising current tax and deferred tax.
Current tax expense for a period is based on the taxable and deductible amounts that
will be shown on the tax return for the current year. An entity recognises a liability in
the balance sheet in respect of current tax expense for the current and prior periods
to the extent unpaid. It recognises an asset if current tax has been overpaid.
Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured
at the amount expected to be paid to (recovered from) the taxation authorities,
using the tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted
by the balance sheet date.
Tax payable based on taxable profit seldom matches the tax expense that might be
expected based on pre-tax accounting profit. Tax laws and financial accounting
standards recognise and measure income, expenditure, assets and liabilities in
different ways.
Deferred tax accounting seeks to deal with this mismatch. It is based on the
temporary differences between the tax base of an asset or liability and its
carrying amount in the financial statements. For example, an asset is revalued
upwards but not sold, the revaluation creates a temporary difference (if the
carrying amount of the asset in the financial statements is greater than the tax
base of the asset), and the tax consequence is a deferred tax liability.
Deferred tax is provided in full for all temporary differences arising between the
tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial
statements, except when the temporary difference arises from:
initial recognition of goodwill (for deferred tax liabilities only);
initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business
combination and that affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit; and
investments in subsidiaries, branches, associates and joint ventures, but only
where certain criteria apply.
42
PwC
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to
apply to the period when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax
rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance
sheet date. The discounting of deferred tax assets and liabilities is not permitted.
Generally, the measurement of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets
reflects the tax consequences that would follow from the manner in which the
entity expects, at the balance sheet date, to recover or settle the carrying amount
of its assets and liabilities. The carrying amount of a non-depreciable asset (e.g.,
land) can only be recovered through sale. For other assets, the manner in which
management expects to recover the asset (that is, through use or through sale or
through a combination of both) is considered at each balance sheet date. An
exception has been introduced for investment property measured using the fair
value model in IAS 40, with a rebuttable presumption that such investment
property is recovered entirely through sale.
Management only recognises a deferred tax asset for deductible temporary
differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available
against which the deductible temporary difference can be utilised. This also
applies to deferred tax assets for unused tax losses carried forward.
Current and deferred tax is recognised in profit or loss for the period, unless the
tax arises from a business combination or a transaction or event that is
recognised outside profit or loss, either in other comprehensive income or directly
in equity in the same or different period. The tax consequences that accompany,
for example, a change in tax rates or tax laws, a reassessment of the recoverability
of deferred tax assets or a change in the expected manner of recovery of an asset
are recognised in profit or loss, except to the extent that they relate to items
previously charged or credited outside profit or loss.
PwC
43
44
PwC
PwC
45
Any expenditure written off during the research or development phase cannot
subsequently be capitalised if the project meets the criteria for recognition at a
later date.
The costs relating to many internally generated intangible items cannot be
capitalised and are expensed as incurred. This includes research, start-up and
advertising costs. Expenditure on internally generated brands, mastheads, customer
lists, publishing titles and goodwill are not recognised as intangible assets.
Intangible assets acquired in a business combination
If an intangible asset is acquired in a business combination, both the probability
and measurement criterion are always considered to be met. An intangible asset
will therefore always be recognised, regardless of whether it has been previously
recognised in the acquirees financial statements.
Subsequent measurement
Intangible assets are amortised unless they have an indefinite useful life.
Amortisation is carried out on a systematic basis over the useful life of the
intangible asset. An intangible asset has an indefinite useful life when, based on
an analysis of all the relevant factors, there is no foreseeable limit to the period
over which the asset is expected to generate net cash inflows for the entity.
Intangible assets with finite useful lives are considered for impairment when
there is an indication that the asset has been impaired. Intangible assets with
indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet in use are tested annually for
impairment and whenever there is an indication of impairment.
PwC
47
PwC
asset and discount them using a pre-tax market rate that reflects current
assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
All assets subject to the impairment guidance are tested for impairment when
there is an indication that the asset may be impaired. Assets that are note
amortised, such as goodwill, indefinite lived intangible assets and intangible
assets that are not yet available for use, are also tested for impairment annually
even if there is no impairment indicator.
Both external indicators (for example, significant adverse changes in the
technological, market, economic or legal environment or increases in market
interest rates) and internal indicators (for example, evidence of obsolescence or
physical damage of an asset or evidence from internal reporting that the
economic performance of an asset is, or will be, worse than expected) are
considered, when considering whether an asset is impaired.
An asset seldom generates cash flows independently of other assets. Most assets
are tested for impairment in groups of assets described as cash-generating units
(CGUs). A CGU is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates inflows
that are largely independent from the cash flows from other CGUs.
The carrying value of an asset is compared to the recoverable amount. An asset or
CGU is impaired when its carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. Any
impairment is allocated to the asset or assets of the CGU, with the impairment
loss recognised in profit or loss.
Goodwill acquired in a business combination is allocated to the acquirers CGUs
or groups of CGUs that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business
combination. However, the largest group of CGUs permitted for goodwill
impairment testing is an operating segment before aggregation.
49
PwC
lease (off balance sheet). IFRS 16 contains an optional exemption for certain
short-term leases and leases of low-value assets; however, this exemption can
only be applied by lessees.
In the income statement lessees will have to present interest expense on the lease
liability and depreciation on the right-of-use asset. In the cash flow statement the
part of the lease payments that reflects interest on the lease liability can be
presented as an operating cash flow (if it is the entitys policy to present interest
payments as operating cash flows). Cash payments for the principal portion of the
lease liability are classified within financing activities. Payments for short-term
leases, for leases of low-value assets and variable lease payments not included in
the measurement of the lease liability are presented within operating activities.
As under IAS 17, the lessor has to classify leases as either finance or operating,
depending on whether substantially all of the risk and rewards incidental to
ownership of the underlying asset have been transferred. For a finance lease, the
lessor recognises a receivable at an amount equal to the net investment in the
lease which is the present value of the aggregate of lease payments receivable by
the lessor and any unguaranteed residual value. If the contract is classified as an
operating lease, the lessor continues to present the underlying assets.
For both, lessees and lessors IFRS 16 adds significant new, enhanced disclosure
requirements.
IFRS 16 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January
2019. Earlier application is permitted, but only in conjunction with IFRS 15,
Revenue from contracts with customers. In order to facilitate transition, lessees
can choose a simplified approach that includes certain reliefs related to the
measurement of the right-of-use asset and the lease liability, rather than full
retrospective application; furthermore, the simplified approach does not require
a restatement of comparatives. In addition, as a practical expedient entities are
not required to reassess whether a contract is, or contains, a lease at the date of
initial application (that is, such contracts are grandfathered).
21 Inventories IAS 2
Inventories are initially recognised at the lower of cost and net realisable value
(NRV). Cost of inventories includes import duties, non-refundable taxes, transport
PwC
51
and handling costs and any other directly attributable costs less trade discounts,
rebates and similar items. NRV is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of
business, less the estimated costs of completion and estimated selling expenses.
IAS 2 requires the cost for items that are not interchangeable or that have been
segregated for specific contracts to be determined on an individual-item basis.
The cost of other items of inventory used is assigned by using either the first-in,
first-out (FIFO) or weighted average cost formula. Last-in, first-out (LIFO) is not
permitted. An entity uses the same cost formula for all inventories that have a
similar nature and use to the entity. A different cost formula may be justified
where inventories have a different nature or use. The cost formula used is applied
on a consistent basis from period to period.
PwC
53
PwC
23 E
vents after the reporting period and financial
commitments IAS 10
It is not generally practicable for preparers to finalise financial statements
without a period of time elapsing between the balance sheet date and the date on
which the financial statements are authorised for issue. The question therefore
arises as to the extent to which events occurring between the balance sheet date
and the date of approval (that is, events after the reporting period) should be
reflected in the financial statements.
Events after the reporting period are either adjusting events or non-adjusting
events. Adjusting events provide further evidence of conditions that existed at the
balance sheet date for example, determining after the year end the
consideration for assets sold before the year end. Non-adjusting events relate to
conditions that arose after the balance sheet date for example, announcing a
plan to discontinue an operation after the year end.
The carrying amounts of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date are adjusted
only for adjusting events or events that indicate that the going-concern assumption in
relation to the whole entity is not appropriate. Significant non-adjusting post-balancesheet events, such as the issue of shares or major business combinations, are disclosed.
Dividends proposed or declared after the balance sheet date but before the
financial statements have been authorised for issue are not recognised as a liability
at the balance sheet date. Details of these dividends are, however, disclosed.
An entity discloses the date on which the financial statements were authorised for issue
and the persons authorising the issue and, where necessary, the fact that the owners or
other persons have the ability to amend the financial statements after issue.
PwC
55
56
PwC
PwC
57
IFRS 10 does not contain any disclosure requirements; these are included within
IFRS 12. Reporting entities should plan for, and implement, the processes and
controls that will be required to gather the required information. This may
involve a preliminary consideration of IFRS 12 issues such as the level of
disaggregation required.
The IASB amended IFRS 10 in October 2012 (effective 1 January 2014 as
endorsed by the EU) to incorporate changes to how investment entities account
for entities they control. Entities that meet the definition of an investment entity
are exempt from consolidating underlying investees that they control; instead,
they are required to account for these subsidiaries at fair value through profit or
loss under IFRS 9 or IAS 39.
58
PwC
the parties involved. For example, any transaction contingent on the completion
of another transaction may be considered linked. Judgement is required to
determine when transactions should be linked.
All business combinations, within IFRS 3s scope, are accounted for using the
acquisition method. The acquisition method views a business combination from
the perspective of the acquirer and can be summarised in the following steps:
Identify the acquirer.
Determine the acquisition date.
Recognise and measure the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities
assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree.
Recognise and measure the consideration transferred for the acquiree.
Recognise and measure goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase.
The acquirees identifiable assets (including intangible assets not previously
recognised), liabilities and contingent liabilities are generally recognised at their
fair value. Fair value is measured in accordance with IFRS 13. If the acquisition is
for less than 100% of the acquiree, there is a non-controlling interest. The
non-controlling interest represents the equity in a subsidiary that is not
attributable, directly or indirectly to the parent. The acquirer can elect to
measure the non-controlling interest at its fair value or at its proportionate share
of the identifiable net assets.
The consideration for the combination includes cash and cash equivalents and the
fair value of any non-cash consideration given. Any equity instruments issued as
part of the consideration are fair valued. If any of the consideration is deferred, it
is discounted to reflect its present value at the acquisition date, if the effect of
discounting is material. Consideration includes only those amounts paid to the
seller in exchange for control of the entity. Consideration excludes amounts paid
to settle pre-existing relationships, payments that are contingent on future
employee services and acquisition-related costs.
PwC
59
60
PwC
PwC
61
Non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale or as held for
distribution are:
measured at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value less costs
tosell;
not depreciated or amortised; and
presented separately in the balance sheet (assets and liabilities should not
beoffset).
A discontinued operation is a component of an entity that can be distinguished
operationally and financially for financial reporting purposes from the rest of the
entity and:
represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operation;
is part of a single co-ordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of
business or major geographical area of operation; or
is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view for resale.
An operation is classified as discontinued only at the date on which the operation
meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale or when the entity has disposed
of the operation. Although balance sheet information is neither restated nor
remeasured for discontinued operations, the statement of comprehensive income
information does have to be restated for the comparative period.
Discontinued operations are presented separately in the income statement and
the cash flow statement. There are additional disclosure requirements in relation
to discontinued operations.
The date of disposal of a subsidiary or disposal group is the date on which control
passes. The consolidated income statement includes the results of a subsidiary or
disposal group up to the date of disposal; the gain or loss on disposal is the
difference between (a) the carrying amount of the net assets plus any attributable
goodwill and amounts accumulated in other comprehensive income (for
example, foreign translation adjustments and available-for-sale reserves); and (b)
the proceeds of sale.
62
PwC
63
64
PwC
Other subjects
Other subjects
31 Related-party disclosures IAS 24
Under IAS 24, disclosures are required in respect of an entitys transactions with
related parties. Related parties include:
Parents.
Subsidiaries.
Fellow subsidiaries.
Associates of the entity and other members of the group.
Joint ventures of the entity and other members of the group.
Members of key management personnel of the entity or of a parent of the
entity (and close members of their families).
Persons with control, joint control or significant influence over the entity (and
close members of their families).
Post-employment benefit plans.
Entities (or any of their group members) providing key management personnel
services to the entity or its parent.
Finance providers are not related parties simply because of their normal dealings
with the entity.
Management discloses the name of the entitys parent and, if different, the
ultimate controlling party (which could be a person). Relationships between a
parent and its subsidiaries are disclosed irrespective of whether there have been
transactions with them.
Where there have been related party transactions during the period,
management discloses the nature of the relationship, as well as information
about the transactions and outstanding balances, including commitments,
necessary for users to understand the potential impact of the relationship on the
financial statements. Disclosure is made by category of related party and by major
type of transaction. Items of a similar nature may be disclosed in aggregate,
except when separate disclosure is necessary for an understanding of the effects
of related party transactions on the entitys financial statements.
PwC
65
Other subjects
Management only discloses that related party transactions were made on terms
equivalent to those that prevail in arms length transactions if such terms can
besubstantiated.
An entity is exempt from the disclosure of transactions (and outstanding
balances) with a related party that is either a government that has control, joint
control or significant influence over the entity or is another entity that is under
the control, joint control or significant influence of the same government as the
entity. Where the entity applies the exemption, it discloses the name of the
government and the nature of its relationship with the entity. It also discloses the
nature and amount of each individually significant transaction and the
qualitative or quantitative extent of any collectively significant transactions.
PwC
Other subjects
PwC
67
Other subjects
68
PwC
Other subjects
PwC
69
Industry-specific topics
Industry-specific topics
35 Agriculture IAS 41
Agricultural activity is defined as the management of biological transformation
and harvest of biological assets (living animals and plants) for sale or for
conversion into agricultural produce (harvested product of biological assets) or
into additional biological assets.
Biological assets that meet the definition of bearer plants are measured either at
cost or revalued amounts, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses
under IAS 16.
All other biological assets, including produce growing on a bearer plant are
usually measured at fair value less costs to sell, with the change in the carrying
amount reported as part of profit or loss from operating activities. Agricultural
produce harvested from an entitys biological assets is measured at fair value less
costs to sell at the point of harvest.
The fair value is measured in terms of IFRS 13.
One of the most significant changes with regard to the fair value measurement of
biological assets as a result of the introduction of IFRS 13 is the market to which
the entity should look when measuring fair value. Before IFRS 13, IAS 41
required the use of entity-specific measures when measuring fair value. IFRS 13
looks to the principal market for the asset. The fair value measurement should
represent the price in that market (whether that price is directly observable or
estimated using another valuation technique), even if the price in a different
market is potentially more advantageous at the measurement date. [IFRS 13 para
18]. In the absence of a principal market, the entity should use the price in the
most advantageous market for the relevant asset.
70
PwC
Industry-specific topics
PwC
71
Industry-specific topics
72
PwC
Index
IFRS 2
Share-based payment
40
IFRS 3
Business combinations
58
IFRS 4
Insurance contracts
26
IFRS 5
61
IFRS 6
Extractive industries
71
IFRS 7
14
IFRS 8
Operating segments
36
IFRS 9
Financial instruments
14
57
IFRS 11
Joint arrangements
64
IFRS 12
57
IFRS 13
14
IFRS 15
27
IFRS 16
Leases IFRS 16
49
IAS 1
IAS 2
Inventories
51
IAS 7
66
IAS 8
12
IAS 10
55
IAS 11
Construction contracts
27
IAS 12
Income taxes
42
IAS 16
49
IAS 17
Leases
49
IAS 18
Revenue
27
IAS 19
Employee benefits
37
IAS 20
27
PwC
73
Index
IAS 21
25
IAS 23
Borrowing costs
47
IAS 24
Related-party disclosures
65
IAS 27
58
IAS 28
Investment in associates
63
IAS 29
25
IAS 32
14
IAS 33
44
IAS 34
67
IAS 36
Impairment of assets
48
IAS 37
52
IAS 38
Intangible assets
45
IAS 39
14
IAS 40
Investment property
47
IAS 41
Agriculture
70
Interpretations
IFRIC 12 Service concession arrangements
69
28
IFRIC 14 IAS 19 The limit on a defined benefit asset, minimum funding requirements
and their interaction
40
36
29
72
IFRIC 21 Levies
54
74
PwC
PwC
75
This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute
professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining
specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy
or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, its members, employees and agents do not accept or assume any liability,
responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance
on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
2016 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. All rights reserved. In this document, PwC refers to the UK member
firm, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see
www.pwc.com/structure for further details.
161027-150635-CB-OS