Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.

Barrister & Solicitor [Alberta, Inactive]

914 950 Drake Avenue

August 23, 2010

International Criminal Court

Attention: Office of the Prosecutor

Via e-mail: [email protected]

Dear Sir/Madam:

Re: Prosecution Pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Statute of Rome

Further to the above-captioned, this is to request that you investigate a crime

against humanity committed in Canada beginning in the late 1980s the

institutionalization and militarization of human experimentation in violation of

Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which also

includes violations of the U.N. conventions on enslavement and torture.

This prosecution will be in compliance with the Courts rules and protocols

because the cause of action of enslaving, torturous human experimentation was

adjudicated in the Federal Court of Canada. The action was launched in

September 2002 and dismissed on a nominal technicality before reaching the

Examination for Discoveries stage in October 2005. The pleadings are on this

website.

Proof that the then Associate Chief Justice of the Court, Allan Lutfy, was

maliciously biased and through his rulings as case management judge and that

of the other two judges so appointed through his Orders, includes the fact that all

seven affidavits filed pursuant to motions were not examined on, leaving my

credibility as plaintiff in tact. Further where motions upon filing are on average

resolved same day or within a few weeks, two of them, including the adjudication

of two privilege claims, took a full two years demonstrative of a Bench seeking

to protect this domestically and internationally unlawful program.

When the defendant, the Government of Canada, took its first step in the action it

claimed production of documents privilege on two grounds national security

and injury to international relations. The latter derives from access to information

legislation in which a government can withhold documents and records on the

grounds that release to the public would injure Canadas relations with a foreign

government. Both claims were upheld by the court.

For a full description of how the litigation proceeded go to this website:

http://federalcourtlawsuit.synthasite.com.
 3

The two claims of privilege and how the court adjudicated motions led to a five-

year research project which discovered that the Government of the Peoples

Republic of China (PRC) was secretly granted joint governance status in Canada

in the late 1970s by the countrys government of the day, the Liberal Party of

Canada, led by then Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau, with the complicity of

the countrys so-called old money families. This status was in violation of

Canadas constitution and the international laws on sovereignty.

With the PRC and its wealthiest nationals enjoying, inter alia, the ability to

formulate domestic and foreign policy and make executive decisions and over

two decades emigrated military and intelligence personnel to Canada that

protected these unconstitutional and unlawful interests, a military program

launched jointly by Canadian and Chinese authorities wanted to achieve what the

failed so-called mind control experiments of the 1950s and 1960s (aka MK

Ultra) sought, namely an ability to manipulate consciousness and motor

functions. Beginning in the late 1980s I became a victim of an institutionalized,

militarized Article 7 violation involving hypnosis and was enslaved by it; and

beginning in the late 1990s tortured with its results. The R&D continued

throughout the last decade, achieving more capabilities; one of which was to

cause more pain and suffering and to terminate life.

What led to a maliciously biased Bench was discovered through the research

project. Two centuries of nepotism and patronage and the fact the Liberal Party
 4

of Canada governed Canada for some 75% of the 20 th century led to a complete

consolidation of political power that is no different than many authoritarian

regimes. The only difference with them is that this paradigm of governance has

been successfully operating behind a faade of democratic respectability. My

research on the domestic evolution of Canadas political system is on this

website: http://rc2010.yolasite.com in the Antecedents section. The evidence

about the PRCs joint governance in Canada up to the present is posted on this

website: http://chinaincanada.yolasite.com.

The aggressive prosecution of the litigation as plaintiff led to the government and

its security apparatus engaging in obstruction of justice initiatives, including

multiple daily death threats, which led me to claim political asylum in the United

States on February 19, 2004. Three weeks later, feeling I had dissipated that

increasing pressure to cause me physical harm I withdrew the application,

returned to Canada and began the research project.

Observing through 24.7 surveillance of my residence I was undertaking this

academic investigation in conjunction with said prosecution, the police in the city

in which I was resident, Vancouver, British Columbia, punitively and in violation

of the Criminal Code of Canada fabricated evidence in mid-August 2004 with the

intent of involuntarily incarcerating me in a mental institution. The attempt was

unsuccessful and was viewed as guilty conscience evidence. For your

purposes, this is more evidence of the institutionalization of this unlawful

program.

I not only launched the unsuccessful litigation seeking quantum for my economic

losses, pain and suffering and for punitive damages, I also conducted an

edification campaign that involved all three levels of government (federal,

provincial and municipal) and all four constituents of the administration of justice

(Bench, Bar, law enforcement and attorneys general) between August 2007 and

July 2009, trusting a collective awareness about the non-transparent nature of

Canadian governance as described and my circumstances would naturally lead

to reform. I also triggered many non-judicial accountability institutions. (All

initiatives and results are posted at http://chinaincanada.yolasite.com.) None

were successful but one. The National Security Division of the Royal Canadian

Mounted Police commenced a formal investigation in September 2008 pursuant

to a statute that attracts a life sentence for what was alleged. One of the named

targets was then Attorney General of Canada, Robert Nicholson. The

investigation lasted no more than six months before it was cancelled, presumed

through political and geo-political interference.

This now two-decade violation of Article 7 involving enslavement and torture

rises to the level of a crime against humanity because:

(i) it is institutionalized, i.e., managed, funded and supervised by

complicity of, but not limited to, the Canadian Security and Intelligence
Agency, law enforcement and the Federal Court of Canada;

(ii) it is a military program of the governments of Canada and the PRC;

(iii) and the R&Ds results of the program created convert capabilities
employed throughout the world as part of the PRCs global hegemony
foreign policy; strategic benefits of the results include (a) the ability to
clandestinely undermine the integrity and proper functioning of
institutions of democracy and capitalism to advance international
totalitarianism expansion and (b) by-pass security protocols for military
and intelligence agencies, corporations trade secrets and confidential
information of lawyers and doctors.

Ive taken all reasonable steps to resolve this violation of domestic and

international law with no success; and all my failed attempts emboldened the

malfeasant parties to be more aggressive in pursuing these unlawful policies,

practices and goals. The nature of the described activities and their purposes,

therefore, warrants prosecution of, inter alia, top political officials dating back to

the early 1990s, including Prime Ministers Brian Mulroney, Jean Chrtien and

Paul Martin and current Prime Minister Stephen Harper, and the former head of

Canadas Canadian Security and Intelligence Service, Ward Elcock.

Best regards,

Brad Kempo, Barrister & Solicitor