Guide For Sea Trials PDF
Guide For Sea Trials PDF
Guide For Sea Trials PDF
Bulletin
3-47
ii
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Prepared by
Published by
The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers
99 Canal Center Plaza, Alexandria, Virginia 22314
Copyright 2015 by the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers
with rights reserved.
iii
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
This Bulletin was prepared under direction from the Ships Machinery Committee
for
i
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Abstract
This guide covers progressive speed, maneuvering, and endurance sea trials of self-propelled surface
ships displacing 300 tonnes or more, powered by hydrocarbon fuels such as petroleum, natural gas or
bio fuel, and driven by diesel or Otto cycle engines, gas turbine, or electric motors. References are
made to applicable international standards. This Bulletin does not cover dock trials, tests, or
demonstrations that can be conducted dockside, which are covered in SNAME T&R Bulletin 3-39,
Guide for Shop and Installation Tests.
This Guide is intended to assist users in applying IMO maneuvering standards and to allow the
owner, designer and builder to rate the vessels maneuvering performance relative to statistical data of
vessel maneuvering characteristics. The Guide summarizes the procedures to be used in assessing a
vessels maneuvering performance.
SNAME welcomes comments and suggestions for improvement of this Guide. Comments or
suggestions can be sent electronically to [email protected].
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Preface
This document evolved from the worldwide use of The Society of Naval Architects and Marine
Engineers' (SNAME) Code for Sea Trials - 1973 (Technical and Research Code C-2) dealing with sea
trials. The Ships' Machinery Committee of the Society's Technical and Research Program assigned
the initial expansion and update of the document to Panel M-19 (Ship Trials) with the assistance of
Panel H-10 (Ship Controllability). At that time the document was altered from being a "code" to
being a "guide". The resulting Guide was published in 1989. Continuing its popularity and
frequency of citation in ship specifications, the National Shipbuilding Research Program (NSRP)
provided support for the 2015 update of the guide. While the basic guidelines remain solid, updates
were long overdue in recognizing technological advances in sea trial instrumentation, the change
from steam propulsion to diesel and other modern propulsion systems, recognition of other
technological advances and updates of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and other
standards organizations regarding a number of areas including ship maneuverability, instrumentation,
and environmental issues. Representatives from the SNAMEs Ship Production Committee., NSRP,
and volunteers including senior marine engineers and naval architects from all fields of interest
provided comments. The consensus of these efforts were included in the guide as approved and
issued. The final draft was reviewed by the Ships' Machinery Committee with plans to undergo a
periodic updating process that would provide for regular updating and improvements to the guide.
The basic concept followed in this guide is to provide information on a sufficient variety of sea trials
and tests to enable an owner or acceptance authority to choose those suitable for the type of ship and
operation involved. Positive contractual invocation of specific individual trials is recommended
rather than having them invoked as a package without proper consideration. This avoids burdening
the industry with expensive trials not needed by the owner.
The guide provides a list of those trials recommended as necessary to demonstrate that the ship as
built and delivered will perform as specified. Absence of an at-sea test or trial from those
recommended does not imply a negative recommendation by the Society, but merely that the primary
objective of such a test or trial is to provide design data to meet some other important objective, rather
than to prove the ship under trial. Similarly, the omission of requirements is not intended to negate
the value of the efforts which are directed to verifying design standards, scale factors, and margins
rather than the acceptability of the ship. Some examples of omitted requirements are the extensive
processing of trial data and the correcting of trial data to a design baseline when the data obtained
clearly indicate that the ship is satisfactory. Such tests, trials, data processing, and data correcting
should be separately and specifically invoked when desired.
Trial recommendations are based on the assumption that all operability testing and machinery
checkouts have been previously conducted at the dock insofar as conditions at the shipbuilder's plant
permit. Methods of analysis of results from trials are not included herein, in general, but may be
found in the technical literature and in other guides of the Society.
Section 1 of the guide includes general remarks applicable to any sea trial and provides a basic
recommendation for trials to be conducted. Sections 2, 3, and 4 provide instructions for sea tests and
trials. Section 5 provides a brief description of instruments used for trials and a bibliography of
publications which can be consulted for detail. It also includes instructions for instrumentation
peculiar to trials, in particular, torsionmeters. Section 6 establishes a format and provides illustrative
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
forms for the presentation of sea trial reports. Appendices include definitions of terms peculiar to sea
trials as they are employed in the guide and a procedure for adjusting turning circle test data for drift.
Disclaimers
This guide is intended to be advisory only. There is no implication of warranty by SNAME that
successful performance of the recommended trials will ensure that a ship will comply with the
requirements of the contract specifications, regulatory bodies or classification societies, or that it will
perform satisfactorily and safely in service.
The opinions or assertions of the authors are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of
SNAME or any government agency.
It is understood and agreed that nothing expressed herein is intended or shall be construed to give any
person, firm, or corporation any right, remedy, or claim against SNAME or any of its officers or
members.
Acknowledgements
The Committee gratefully acknowledges the contributions of the members of the Society, industry,
and government who have been generous in assisting the working group in accomplishing its task.
The National Shipbuilding Research Program (NSRP) is recognized for providing funding that
allowed for active involvement of shipbuilding professionals and completion of this update in a
timely and meaningful manner. The American Bureau of Shipping is recognized for allowing a
number of figures from their publications available for the update. Student Samantha Adornati from
Stevens Institutes under the direction of Professor Raju Datla is recognized for drafting and/or
revising figures in the guide.
i
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
ii
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................
Preface ......................................................................................................................................................
Disclaimers .............................................................................................................................................. i
Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. i
TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... iii
LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................... ix
LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ ix
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 SUPERSESSION ......................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 ORIGIN ........................................................................................................................................ 1
1.3 PURPOSE .................................................................................................................................... 1
1.4 SCOPE.......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.5 TRIAL OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 1
1.5.1 Demonstration of Operability ................................................................................................ 1
1.5.2 Demonstration of Performance.............................................................................................. 2
1.5.3 Demonstration of Endurance ................................................................................................. 2
1.5.4 Demonstration of Economy ................................................................................................... 2
1.5.5 Demonstration of Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) .................................................. 2
1.5.6 Demonstration of Controllability........................................................................................... 2
1.5.7 Establishment of Operating Performance Baseline ............................................................... 2
1.5.8 Provision of Forensic Data .................................................................................................... 2
1.5.9 Provision of Design Data....................................................................................................... 2
1.5.10 Classification and Safety Requirements .............................................................................. 3
1.6 SHIP AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ....................................................................... 3
1.6.1 Sea Trial Loading Conditions ................................................................................................ 3
1.6.2 Water Depth........................................................................................................................... 3
1.6.3 Wind, Waves, and Currents ................................................................................................... 4
1.7 LIST OF TRIALS AND SELECTION ........................................................................................ 4
1.8 RECOGNITION OF UNCERTAINTY ....................................................................................... 6
1.9 PLANNING.................................................................................................................................. 6
1.9.1 Design Accommodation ........................................................................................................ 6
iii
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
iv
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
2.6 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR GAS TURBINE PROPULSION PLANT TRIALS ...... 18
2.6.1 Auxiliary Components......................................................................................................... 18
2.6.2 Fuel Rate Data Required ..................................................................................................... 18
2.6.3 Power ................................................................................................................................... 19
2.6.4 Trial Data and Report .......................................................................................................... 19
2.7 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR ELECTRIC DRIVE PROPULSION PLANT TRIALS 19
2.7.1 Auxiliary Components......................................................................................................... 19
2.7.2 Power ................................................................................................................................... 19
2.7.3 Trial Data and Report .......................................................................................................... 19
2.8 CENTRALIZED PROPULSION CONTROL SYSTEM TEST ................................................ 20
2.8.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 20
2.8.2 Procedure ............................................................................................................................. 20
2.8.3 Trial Report ......................................................................................................................... 20
3.0 MANEUVERING AND SPECIAL TESTS ................................................................................... 23
3.1 SELECTION OF TESTS ........................................................................................................... 23
3.2 PREPARATION ........................................................................................................................ 24
3.3 REPORTS .................................................................................................................................. 24
3.4 AHEAD STEERING .................................................................................................................. 24
3.5 ASTERN STEERING ................................................................................................................ 27
3.6 AUXILIARY MEANS OF STEERING..................................................................................... 27
3.7 TURNING CIRCLES ................................................................................................................. 27
3.8 "Z" MANEUVER*..................................................................................................................... 32
3.9 INITIAL TURNING TESTS ...................................................................................................... 35
3.10 PULLOUT TESTS ................................................................................................................... 37
3.11 THE DIRECT SPIRAL TEST.................................................................................................. 40
3.12 THE REVERSE SPIRAL TEST .............................................................................................. 43
3.13 THRUSTER TESTS................................................................................................................ 46
3.13.1 Bow Thruster Tests............................................................................................................ 46
3.13.2 Other Thrust Devices ......................................................................................................... 48
3.13.3 Special Thruster Tests ....................................................................................................... 48
3.14 QUICK REVERSAL FROM AHEAD TO ASTERN (CRASH ASTERN STOPPING
TESTS) .................................................................................................................................... 48
3.15 QUICK REVERSAL FROM ASTERN TO AHEAD .............................................................. 51
3.16 LOW SPEED CONTROLLABILITY MANEUVERS ............................................................ 51
3.17 SLOW STEAMING ABILITY ................................................................................................ 53
3.18 EMERGENCY PROPULSION SYSTEMS............................................................................. 53
v
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
vi
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
5.3.5 Barometers........................................................................................................................... 62
5.3.6 Manometers ......................................................................................................................... 62
5.3.7 Manometers for Flow Measurement.................................................................................... 63
5.3.8 Liquid Columns ................................................................................................................... 63
5.3.9 Zimmerli Gage..................................................................................................................... 63
5.3.10 Absolute Pressure Gages ................................................................................................... 63
5.3.11 Gage Protection from Pressure Pulsation .......................................................................... 63
5.3.12 Further Information ........................................................................................................... 63
5.4 FLOW MEASUREMENTS ....................................................................................................... 63
5.4.1 Types of Instruments ........................................................................................................... 63
5.4.2 Positive Displacement Flow Meters .................................................................................... 63
5.4.3 Meter Installation for Precise Measurements ...................................................................... 64
5.4.4 Orifice Plate, Flow Nozzle, and Venturi Tube .................................................................... 64
5.4.5 Indicating and Recording Mechanism for Orifice Plate, Flow Nozzle, and Venturi Tube . 64
5.5 TORQUE AND POWER MEASUREMENTS.......................................................................... 65
5.5.1 Power Determined Indirectly............................................................................................... 65
5.5.2 Power Determined From Torque Measurements................................................................. 65
5.5.3 Shaft Torsionmeters............................................................................................................. 65
5.6 SHAFT-POWER METERS ....................................................................................................... 66
5.7 SHAFT THRUSTMETERS ....................................................................................................... 66
5.7.1 Purpose of Thrustmeter ....................................................................................................... 66
5.7.2 Useful Installations .............................................................................................................. 66
5.7.3 Types of Instruments ........................................................................................................... 66
5.8 SHAFT SPEED MEASUREMENTS......................................................................................... 66
5.8.1 Propeller Revolution Counters ............................................................................................ 66
5.8.2 Portable Tachometers and Speed Indicators ........................................................................ 67
5.8.3 Additional 'Information ....................................................................................................... 67
5.9 FLUE AND EXHAUST-GAS ANALYSES ............................................................................. 67
5.9.1 Orsat Analyzer ..................................................................................................................... 67
5.9.2 Manual and Automatic Types of Flue Gas Analyzers ......................................................... 69
5.9.3 Additional Information ........................................................................................................ 69
5.10 VISCOSITY MEASUREMENTS............................................................................................ 69
5.11 ELECTRICAL MEASUREMENTS ........................................................................................ 69
5.11.1 Measuring Devices ............................................................................................................ 69
5.11.2 Calibration ......................................................................................................................... 69
5.11.3 Additional Information ...................................................................................................... 69
vii
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
viii
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
ix
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
x
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 SUPERSESSION
This Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME) T&R Bulletin 3-47(2015) "Guide
for Sea Trials (Progressive Speed, Maneuvering, and Endurance)" supersedes T&R Bulletin 3-47
Guide for Sea Trials 1989.
1.2 ORIGIN
This Guide was developed by updating the 1989 Guide for Sea Trials-1989 that was produced by
SNAME Panel M-19 (Ship Trials) with assistance from Panel H-10 (Ship Controllability) and
approved by the Ships Machinery Committee of SNAME. This update effort was supported by
funding from the National Shipbuilding Research Program. Those contributing to the update include
a variety of volunteers from organizations including shipbuilders, ship owners, ship designers,
operators, Classification Society, Government organizations and others. Publications of other
SNAME Technical Panels, Classification Societies, and international standards organizations were
consulted to check compatibility and various sources in the technical literature were researched for
advances and current trends. The recommendations include incorporation of ISO 15016.2 Guidelines
for the assessment of speed and power performance by analysis of speed trial data and IMO
Resolution MSC.137 (76), Standards for Ship Maneuverability.
1.3 PURPOSE
The purpose of the Guide is to provide ship owners, designers, operators, and builders with definitive
information on ship trials to form a basis for contractual agreement.
1.4 SCOPE
The Guide covers sea trials of self-propelled surface ships, commercial or naval, displacing 300
tonnes or more, powered by hydrocarbon fuels such as petroleum, natural gas and bio fuels and
driven by diesel or Otto cycle engines, gas turbine, or electric motors. It does not cover dock trials,
tests or demonstrations that can be conducted dockside. For these type of tests refer to SNAME
Technical and Research Bulletin 3-39, Guide for Shop and Installation Tests-1985.
Nothing in this Guide should be construed to delete or modify requirements of specified regulatory
bodies.
1.5 TRIAL OBJECTIVES
A sea trial may have one or more of the following objectives depending on the position of the ship in
its class, the innovative content of its design, and the needs or desires of its owners.
1.5.1 Demonstration of Operability
The ship propulsion and control systems can be shown to operate in their design modes only at sea,
and the shipbuilder and customer both benefit from a demonstration of proper operation that verifies
the correctness of construction, manufacture, and installation.
1
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
2
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
of innovative features or to advance the state of the shipbuilding art may be called for. In such cases
it is important that the design authorities who will use the data specify requirements in detail,
including instrumentation, operating conditions, and procedures. The IMO, for instance, gathers data
on ship maneuverability in its developing and refining of standards and has detailed specific
maneuvers that are included herein.
1.5.10 Classification and Safety Requirements
Classification societies and safety authorities often require demonstration of equipment and systems
which affect safety of the ship, its cargo or its crew.
1.6 SHIP AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Proper ship and environmental conditions during trials are often critical for achieving useful results.
1.6.1 Sea Trial Loading Conditions
Where possible, trials will be carried out in the design load draft condition.
However, due to limitations in ballast capacity, Contractor's Sea Trials will frequently be performed
at other drafts. Separate trials in the ballast condition may be required. For uniformity in selecting
ballast drafts for oil tankers, consideration should be given to those specified by IMO 73/78
MARPOL for designed ballast draft capability for tankers.
In all cases, the fore and aft drafts at the time of the trial must be recorded. For ships not provided
with full draft capability via ballasting, trial drafts will not approximate maximum design draft, and
demonstrations of capabilities that are draft dependent, such as ship's speed and maneuverability, are
of limited value. In such cases it is advisable to specify model tests at anticipated trial drafts as well
as maximum design draft, as without such tests, extrapolation of trial results depends on uncertain
estimates. Trials should be conducted at drafts as close as practicable to the model test conditions. In
the absence of model test data as a reference point, standardization results at other than the maximum
design draft is not recommended.
1.6.2 Water Depth
The most demanding operational requirements for many ships are met in shallow water during coastal
and port navigation. Unfortunately, the usual practice is to perform ship trials in deep water for
standardization and comparative purposes. The adequacy of a ship's capabilities in shallow water,
particularly maneuvering characteristics, must usually be inferred or predicted based on its success in
deep water, and from comparison of its deep water characteristics relative to other vessels.
Ships interact with the bottom, with banks, and with other vessels in restricted waters with very
significant effects on ship movement. Trials should therefore always be made in deep unconfined
waters where possible.
To minimize the possibility of such effects on the underway performance trial results of the ship,
water depth, other than for special trials to investigate shallow water capabilities, should always
exceed five times the mean draft of the ship. During speed trials additional depth is needed based on
speed and vessel midship section area:
H > 5.0 (Am)1/2
H > 0.4 V2
where:
3
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
4
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Guide
Name Recommendation Paragraph
Economy Trials First of a Class only 2.2
Endurance Trials All Ships 2.3
Astern Trial All Ships 2.4
Diesel Propulsion If Elected 2.5
Gas Turbine Propulsion If Elected 2.6
Electric Drive If Elected 2.7
Centralized Propulsion Control System All Ships 2.8
Ahead Steering All Ships 3.4
Astern Steering All Ships 3.5
Auxiliary Means of Steering All Ships 3.6
Turning Circles First of a Class only 3.7
Z Maneuver First of a Class only 3.8
Initial Turning First of a Class only (1) 3.9
Pullout First of a Class only 3.10
Direct Spiral First of a Class only 3.11
Reverse Spiral If Elected (2) 3.12
Thruster First of a Class only 3.13
Quick Reversal from Ahead to Astern All Ships 3.14
Quick Reversal from Astern to Ahead All Ships 3.15
Low Speed Controllability If Elected 3.16
Slow Steaming Ability All Ships 3.17
Emergency Propulsion Systems If Elected 3.18
Navigation Equipment All Ships 3.19
Standardization Trials First of a Class only 1.5, 2, 4
(1) Derived from paragraphs 3.7 and 3.8
(2) Alternative to "Direct Spiral"
5
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Bulletin 3-47 does not address noise and vibration measurements which are generally not performed
on sea trials. It is recommended that these tests, however, should be coordinated with related aspects
of the sea trials program. Ahead endurance trials offer an opportunity for concurrent measurements
for airborne noise.
1.8 RECOGNITION OF UNCERTAINTY
Although ship designers, builders, and trial personnel may exercise greatest diligence in pursuing
their art at the most advanced state, there is inherent in the measurement of ship performance an
unavoidable uncertainty. No measurement is perfect and shipboard conditions preclude the use of the
most precise techniques. Since the major ship performance parameters involve measurement of many
fluctuating quantities, each with an element of uncertainty, the cumulative effect might be
considerable. By applying probability techniques to the degree of fluctuation and the inherent
precision of the instruments involved, including their calibration, it is possible to identify the degree
of certainty with which a ship's performance can be determined.
It is important that all parties to a ship construction program recognize the uncertainty of trial results
and take it into consideration when establishing performance target/bonus/penalty levels.
Knowledge of how much the precision of the individual measurements affects the performance
determination and the range of precision available for the instruments involved enables the trial
planner to make an intelligent and economic decision on instrumentation. The reader is referred to
ISO 15016.2 Section 5.1 for a discussion on required accuracy for torque measurements.
1.9 PLANNING
From award of a contract until delivery of the official trial report, sea trials require continual
planning. Trial instrumentation requirements should be incorporated in design; prearrangements may
be required for obtaining and calibrating trial instruments; trial readiness checks should be included in
production planning; trial data acquisition, processing, and reporting systems should be developed,
installed, and checked; instructions and procedures should be developed for trial operating and data
crews; and these crews should be trained.
A prerequisite to all planning is a clear understanding as to the tests and trials to be conducted, the
depth of instrumentation and the data to be reported. If this Guide is properly cited in the ship's
specifications, requirements should be clear. If the Guide is not cited or there remains an area of
doubt, the shipbuilder, owner, and regulatory bodies involved, should reach agreement as soon as
possible after the award of a contract, using this Guide as a basis for understanding.
Presuming that agreement has been reached, the actions outlined below can be taken as applicable.
References in this guide are made on occasion to other documents that provide additional useful
information.
1.9.1 Design Accommodation
(a) If a torsionmeter is to be installed, care should be taken in its location on the shafting
with adequate clearance provided (ISO 15016.2 addresses various issues). If required,
special surface finish and dimensional constraints should be imposed. If the shaft is
hollow, the supplier of the rough machined unit should be alerted to provide precise
internal diameter measurements. Mounting of signal transfer equipment or brush rigging
should also be considered (current practice includes the use of wireless links from shaft
mounted strain gages).
6
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
(b) If special trial fuel meters are to be installed, systems should be designed to
accommodate them.
(c) If special gages, thermometers or orifices are to be installed, sensing points should be
selected and the necessary fittings, wells, or flanges provided.
(d) If fuel samples are to be taken during trials, a sampling connection or method should be
provided.
1.9.2 Pre-Arrangements
(a) If the shaft is to be calibrated, the shafting production schedule should be adjusted to
provide for calibration availability; the torsionmeter should be requested if furnished by
the government, or procured or overhauled if furnished by the contractor; the torqueing
gear should be made ready, the calibration accomplished and the instrument factors
established. Unless permanent torque meters are installed, this measurement is done
using strain gages installed just prior to trials and calibrated using shunt resistors.
Material properties of the shaft need to be provided by the manufacturer or assumed
based on ISO 15016.2
(b) Plant operating conditions and modes; ship draft conditions; and shaft power levels
should be established for each trial and the owner's concurrence obtained.
(c) Plant operating and ship's ballasting and de-ballasting instructions should be prepared and
distributed to trial crew supervisors.
(d) Signal system should be designed and installed.
(e) Correction factors should be obtained and the concurrence of owners technical
representatives established.
(f) Data instructions and station bill should be prepared and distributed.
(g) Special trial instruments should be installed and all instruments which will provide trial
data calibrated, red line settings made and water legs measured. Sensor calibration
should include addressing remote or indirect means the sensor relies on for accuracy.
(h) Data forms (paper or digital) should be prepared and the graphical interface checked
against the ship as built, preferably by using them for Dock Trials to allow for proper
data quality assurance.
(i) Trial operating crew and data crew should be trained unless previously trained or
experienced.
(j) Calculation sheets or a data acquisition system (DAS) and computerized quality analysis
(QA) sheets should be prepared, with dummy calculations and correction tables or plots
provided.
(k) GNSS tracking system, if to be aboard, including antenna should be installed and
checked.
(l) A sample of the fuel expected to be burned should be sent to a laboratory for gravity and
heat content determination when fuel rates are to be calculated.
(m) Trial agenda, procedures, and schedules should be prepared and furnished to the owners
for comment.
(n) Trial control and the data acquisition system should be planned and facilities installed,
including appropriate communications and reference material.
7
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
8
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
2.1 GENERAL
2.1.1 Scope of This Section
This section contains recommendations for conducting internal combustion engine, gas turbine, and
integrated electric propulsion plant trials with the ship underway under specified conditions. The
propulsion plant is considered to include propulsion plant machinery, all auxiliaries and systems
required for its operation and other such apparatus as are necessary for the operation of the ship under
trial conditions. The instructions herein are intended to cover testing of the propulsion plant as an
integrated system underway and do not cover ship or shop tests of individual equipment items, dock
trials, or dockside tests required by specifications or regulatory bodies, unless prescribed herein as
incidental to the trials.
Specific requirements for these types of propulsion plants can be found beginning with paragraph 2.2.
2.1.2 Specific Objectives
Specific objectives of propulsion plant trials may be one or more of the following:
To demonstrate satisfactory operation of the propulsion plant for a specified period of time at
specified power, usually maximum design power.
To determine the rate of fuel consumption of the plant when operating at specified shaft
power and other specified operating conditions.
To determine performance characteristics of the machinery plant or components thereof, as
agreed.
To demonstrate satisfactory operation of propulsion plant controls from all stations.
To obtain propulsion plant data for future use in evaluating service performance.
Note that the power level of the propulsion plant may be specified in terms of revolutions per minute
when trial draft or other conditions make full power unattainable within shaft speed limitations.
2.1.3 Pre-Trial Agreements
Prior to the trials, there should be a clear understanding with respect to the following:
The specific objectives of the trials.
The trial agenda and tentative schedule.
Conditions and methods of operation during the trial.
Corrections, if any, to be applied for deviations from specified conditions or specific
standards.
Measurement methods, temporary test equipment and instrumentation.
Trial drafts.
Duration of each trial run. Frequency of readings and measurements including digital
sampling rates.
2.1.4 Trial Preparations
Preparation for propulsion plant trials as, defined in this section should include the following:
Calibration of shafting to determine modulus of rigidity, or if the shaft is not to be calibrated,
then an agreement on the modulus to be used.
Installation and calibration of torsionmeter.
9
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Calibration of trial fuel meters. Where ships meters are used as trial or trial back-up
instrumentation, they should also be calibrated.
Calibration of special gages and meters. Records of calibrations should be available prior to
trials and carried onboard during trials.
Installation of trial equipment as required.
Ascertaining that all machinery and equipment is in proper working condition.
Preparation of the trial ballasting plan to provide the prescribed submergence of the propeller.
Control and records of fuel onboard to provide for trials a homogeneous, known, supply.
Analysis of the fuel to be burned including heating value, specific gravity, viscosity
characteristics, and other pertinent properties.
2.1.5 Trial Duration
Duration of each Propulsion Plant Trial should be as set forth in Table 2 and Table 3 unless otherwise
specified or agreed.
Unless otherwise agreed, any run, which has been interrupted by machinery casualties necessitating
slowing down or stopping, should be entirely rerun. If the interruption of a run is due to operating
error or maneuvering from the bridge due to traffic or other safety situations, only the disrupted
portion of the run need be repeated.
10
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
11
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
12
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
13
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
14
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Note: Fuel Properties should be determined by post trial analysis of a thorough mix of fuel samples
taken at a minimum of four equally spaced intervals during the run.
Also note that if Coriolis type meters are used, the fuel consumption rate can be obtained directly as
mass per unit time so that d) and e) above are not required.
2.2.7 Trial Report
See tables in Section 6.0, Trial Data and Report.
2.3 PROPULSION PLANT AHEAD ENDURANCE TRIALS
2.3.1 Purpose
The primary purpose of Ahead Endurance Trials is to demonstrate satisfactory ahead operation of the
propulsion plant at specified operating conditions as contractually required or agreed. This should
include specific shaft power or revolutions per minute for a prescribed period of time.
Since satisfactory operation and performance of the machinery plant is equally essential for
endurance and economy trials, they may be conducted concurrently when specifications for both are
the same for shaft power, period of run time, and fuel. For Endurance Trials the emphasis is on
attaining and sustaining the required power level. Fuel rate is a secondary interest. For Economy
Trials the fuel and power data are the essentials. Other data including possible auxiliary load levels
are used to explain results to correct for off-standard conditions.
Sometimes Endurance Trials are specified to include a demonstration of satisfactory operation of the
propulsion plant under service conditions during a specified voyage of the ship. Such trials and the
details thereof are subject to agreement between the parties involved and are not covered by this
section.
If the ship is designed to operate on more than one fuel, (HFO and MGO or Natural Gas, for
instance), an endurance run may be required for each type of fuel to demonstrate capabilities and to
demonstrate the ability to switch from one fuel to another.
2.3.2 Measurements and Instrumentation
Economy Trial instrumentation and data systems are generally adequate for Endurance Trials. When
both trials are specified, the requirements and discussions of paragraph 2.2 apply. When only
Endurance Trials are specified, paragraph 2.2 is applicable, except that special fuel meter calibration
may not be required and power level may be determined without use of a torsionmeter as discussed
below. However, it is recommended that a torsionmeter be used for at least the first ship of a class so
that corrections to the alternative methods discussed below can be developed both for future trials and
for use in checking service performance.
When a torsionmeter is fitted, power should be derived from the average torque and RPM for the trial
period as set forth in paragraph 2.2. However, upon agreement or by specification, torsionmeters may
be omitted and power approximated from one or more of the following:
1. Propeller revolutions per minute with model test data.
2. On ships with direct drive, prime mover parameters and conditions, and manufactuer's shop
test or design data.
3. On ships with electric drive, electrical input to the propulsion motor(s) with manufacturer's
data on motor efficiency and power consumption of shaft-driven auxiliaries.
Even when trial power is determined by use of a torsionmeter, a comparison should be made with
power derived from engine data, particularly where a torsionmeter is not to be permanently fitted.
15
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
16
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Special agreements should be made prior to trials for observing the performance of the auxiliary
components mentioned above.
2.5.2 Revolutions
Same as paragraph 2.2.5(c) except for installations having a reduction gear and/or a slip type coupling
between the engine and the shaft. Then, both engine revolutions and shaft revolutions should be
obtained.
2.5.3 Fuel Measurements
Same as paragraph 2.2.5(d) except as follows:
a) The fuel consumption of the main and auxiliary engines and any other fuel consuming
equipment in operation should be measured separately.
b) Systems that return fuel to the upstream side of the supply meter should have the return
measured separately.
2.5.4 Fuel Rate Data Required
Same as paragraph 2.2.5(e) except as follows:
Include return fuel oil meter readings with other meter data. In addition, fuel rate corrections for
variations of the following data from design conditions should be provided by the engine
manufacturer:
a) Inlet air temperature.
b) Inlet air pressure.
c) Inlet air moisture content.
d) Engine RPM.
e) Exhaust pressure.
f) Fuel oil heating value.
The purpose of these corrections is to properly evaluate diesel engine performance. Suitable test
devices should be provided on trials to accurately measure these variables.
2.5.5 Power
When torsionmeters are not required to be fitted, brake power for diesel engines may be estimated by
the following methods:
a) Rack Position - Brake power may be closely approximated by careful observations of fuel
injection rack positions and comparison of these with data taken during shop tests where
output is measured directly on a water or electric brake or equivalent. For maximum
accuracy it is necessary that shop tests and ship's trials utilized comparable fuel.
b) Slip Coupling - On installations using a slip type coupling, the torque transmitted can be
closely approximated by comparing the engine RPM and shaft RPM with slip data supplied
by the coupling manufacturer.
c) Indicator Cards Indicator cards or equivalent may be taken on each cylinder, and the brake
KW (BKW) may be computed with very good results for low or medium speed units. Engine
efficiency data, other correlating data, or sample correction curves are also needed with the
indicator card data to compute BKW.
Each of the above methods may be used to determine brake power. An agreed allowance for gear or
coupling losses must be applied to obtain shaft power, if these elements are in the power train.
When a torsionmeter is fitted, the correlation between the shaft KW (SKW) determined from the
torsionmeter and the BKW determined from engine data should be established during the trials.
17
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
18
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
e) Exhaust pressure.
These corrections are required to properly evaluate gas turbine performance. Suitable test devices
should be provided on trials to provide the necessary data. Barometric pressure and relative humidity
of the outside air should be recorded to permit evaluation of air inlet and exhaust duct systems. The
shipbuilder, however, is responsible for designing the air inlet and exhaust systems to meet design
turbine inlet and exhaust conditions, and no correction to the ship's overall fuel rate should be
permitted for excessive pressure loss in these systems.
2.6.3 Power
When torsionmeters are not fitted, brake power for gas turbine engines may be estimated from the
engine RPM, internal gas pressures and temperatures and/or fuel oil flow with sufficient accuracy for
endurance trial purposes. Sample reference curves and correction factors will be very useful to
develop estimates.
When torsionmeters are required to be fitted, a correlation should be established during trials between
the power determined from the torsionmeter and the engine brake power as ascertained by the engine
pressure, RPM, and temperature data.
2.6.4 Trial Data and Report
See tables in Section 6.0, Trial Data and Report.
2.7 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR ELECTRIC DRIVE
PROPULSION PLANT TRIALS
Electric drive propulsion as covered in this section consists of electrical power generating equipment
and propulsion motor(s). Prime movers associated with the electric propulsion generators such as gas
turbine, and diesel engines are covered in paragraphs above and are not repeated in this section.
2.7.1 Auxiliary Components
The following are examples of auxiliary components which may be part of the electric drive
propulsion plant:
a) Heat exchanger units.
b) Independently powered pumps.
c) Attached pumps.
d) Independently powered fans
e) Control equipment and safety devices.
f) Power transmission elements including gears, clutches, shaft brakes, couplings, controllable
pitch propeller, etc.
Special agreements should be made prior to trials for observing the performance of the auxiliary
components listed above.
2.7.2 Power
Power output from the propulsion motor can be determined from the torsionmeter when installed or
from the instruments if not installed. Agreements should be made prior to trials regarding
instrumentation to be used for power determination during trials.
2.7.3 Trial Data and Report
See tables in Section 6.0, Trial Data and Report.
19
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
20
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Notes:
1. Positions ordered may be in terms of RPM rather than telegraph position.
2. Report any actuation of alarms and safety devices.
3. Report any excursions in plant conditions or controls.
4. The table will have to be adjusted for tests with controllable pitch propellers to include pitch and other
considerations involving rpm.
5. Speeds (maximum, full sea speed, etc.) to be tested need to be defined and agreed upon.
21
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
22
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
23
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
is the speed at which the ship may be expected to navigate in areas where maneuvers are normally
required, and are not restricted by insufficient water depth or channel boundaries.
In the case of slow, full form ships this speed may be close to design sea speed. For fast, fine-form
ships on the other hand, it may be a much lower proportion of design speed. The following formula is
suggested as a guide to selecting test speed:
VT = CB x VD
where: VT = test speed
VD = design speed
CB = block coefficient at the design draught
This formula provides test speed values for bulk carriers and dry cargo/container ship types which are
often used in general practice. Unless otherwise indicated tests should be commenced at the test
speed.
3.2 PREPARATION
Proper preparation is essential to obtain meaningful data and avoid aborting mandatory tests.
Detailed instruction for performing each test, including maneuvering diagrams and data sheets where
pertinent, should be prepared in advance. Test conductors and data takers should be instructed in
their duties, shown their station, checked out on instruments, and have their understanding of the test
verified.
3.3 REPORTS
Reports should present the data in tabular or diagrammatic format. Sample diagrams and data sheets
are shown in this Section and in Section 6. Reports should include, where pertinent, discussion of the
significance of findings and an explanation of data anomalies. Reported information should be of
sufficient detail to provide the data required to prepare the Pilot Card, Wheelhouse Poster, and
Maneuvering Booklet described in IMO Resolution A.601(15) and the first order steering quality
indices K and T.
3.4 AHEAD STEERING
With the ship in the trial ballast condition and proceeding ahead at maximum trial shaft RPM, move
the rudder at maximum rate as follows:
1. Midships to Hardover Right - Hold ten seconds.
2. Hardover Right to Hardover Left - Hold ten seconds.
3. Hardover Left to Hardover Right - Hold ten seconds.
4. Hardover Right to Midships - Maneuver complete.
After ship's speed has been restored, use the other steering power unit and repeat the above rudder
movements in opposite sequence. For rudder movement rate, use the average degrees per second for
total time from start to 5 degrees before ordered angle. Throttle setting for single screw ships should
not be changed during the test. For multi-screw ships, the throttle may be adjusted as necessary to
correct unacceptable overspeed or overtorque.
The following data should be recorded on Table 5 during the test:
a) Time of test and base course.
b) Time required for each rudder movement.
c) Maximum rudder angles.
24
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
25
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
26
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
27
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
e) Ship's position at suitable intervals from GNSS equipment. If GNSS equipment is not
installed, ship's track should be obtained by radar, shore station tracking, or visual
observation of the wake. Observation intervals should coincide with heading data intervals.
f) Shaft RPM at beginning and end of each circle.
g) Depth of water and sea condition.
h) Wind direction and velocity.
i) Trial draft fore and aft.
Turning circle tests may be specified at depths, drafts, speeds, and rudder angles other than those
given if ship's maneuvering characteristics require further exploration.
At the completion of each of the turning circle tests a pullout test may be performed to provide
information on the ship's dynamic stability. For further information see paragraph 3.10.
Turning circles should be plotted and tactical dimensions reported as illustrated in Figure 1 and
Figure 2. Figure 1 shows the historic test resulting in measures of advance, transfer, and tactical
diameter. Using todays high precision position tracking systems, maximum ship advance and
transfer measurements are included (see Figure 2). The entire swept path can also be depicted in the
plot
.
28
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
29
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
30
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Final Diameter
Time to Clear Base
Course
Advance to Clear
Base Course
Maximum Advance
any Part of Ship
Drift Correction
Direction Rate
31
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
32
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
33
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Ship Name
Test Date
Time Test Began
Base Course
Shaft RPM (Beginning)
Shaft RPM (End)
Depth of Water
Sea Condition
Wind Direction
Wind Velocity
Trial Draft (fwd)
Trial Draft (aft)
34
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
35
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
36
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
37
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
38
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Ship Name
Test Date
Time Test Began
Base Course
Rudder Angle
Shaft RPM (Beginning)
Shaft RPM (End)
Depth of Water
Sea Condition
Wind Direction
Wind Velocity
Trial Draft (fwd)
Trial Draft (aft)
39
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
A steady turning rate is the difference between successive ship headings and should be noted as the
test progresses. When these differences are reasonably constant for at least six consecutive readings,
data is recorded and the rudder is ordered to the next setting.
40
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Ship Name
Test Date
Time Test Began
Base Course
Rudder Angle
Shaft RPM (Beginning)
Shaft RPM (End)
Depth of Water
Sea Condition
Wind Direction
Wind Velocity
Trial Draft (fwd)
Trial Draft (aft)
Notes:
A total of 6 readings of constant rate of heading change is needed to calculate average
rate in Degrees/Second. This calculation is done for each step.
1 20 R
2 15 R
3 10 R
4 5R
5 3R
6 1R
7 0
8 1L
9 3L
10 5L
11 10 L
41
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
12 15 L
13 20 L
14 15 L
15 10 L
16 5L
17 3L
18 1L
19 0
20 1R
21 3R
22 5R
23 10 R
24 15 R
25 20 R
1 1.0 R
2 0.8 R
3 0.6 R
4 0.4 R
5 0.2 R
6 0.1 R
7 0
8 0.1 L
9 0.2 L
10 0.4 L
11 0.6 L
12 0.8 L
13 1.0 L
42
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
43
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
rate of turn have been obtained. Steady rate of turn should usually be obtained fairly rapidly since
rate-steering is easier to perform than normal compass steering.
The test should be performed at the following steady rates of turn in degrees per second: 1.0R, 0.8R,
0.6R, 0.4R, 0.2R, 0.1R, 0, 0.1L, 0.2L, 0.4L, 0.6L, 0.8L, and 1.0L.
The following data should be recorded:
(a) Before starting the test:
1. Time of test and base course
2. Ship speed and corresponding RPM
3. Wind velocity and direction
4. Depth of water and sea condition
5. Trial drafts
(b) The average rudder angle associated with each associated steady state turn rate measurement
point.
This procedure should be repeated for a range of yaw rates until a complete yaw rate versus rudder
angle relationship is established, e.g., between 20 degrees left to 20 degrees right rudders.
The results of the spiral tests should be presented in accordance with the diagrams provided in Figure
8. The pronounced "S" shape on Figure 8 illustrates a ship with instability, and this instability
provides a hysteresis loop like that illustrated in Figure 7 (b), Unstable Ship, for the rate of change of
heading.
44
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Ship Name
Test Date
Time Test Began
Base Course
Rudder Angle
Shaft RPM (Beginning)
Shaft RPM (End)
Depth of Water
Sea Condition
Wind Direction
Wind Velocity
Trial Draft (fwd)
Trial Draft (aft)
Notes:
A total of 6 readings of constant rate of heading change is needed to calculate average rate in
Degrees/Second. This calculation is done for each step.
45
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
46
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
a
30 o Left 30 o Left 30 o Left 30 o Left 30 o Left
0o 0o 0o 0o 0o
NOTES: 1. Ship is to be heading into the wind at the beginning of each test.
2. If elapsed time reaches 10 minutes prior to 30 o change in ship heading,
terminate the test at this point.
3. If Thruster is effective at 6 knots, ship speed is to be increased at 3 knot
intervals until thruster is no longer effective.
a Reverse Thruster and/or Shift Rudder
47
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
48
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
For the purpose of obtaining operating data, additional stopping tests may be conducted from other
initial speeds and using other stopping aids such as rudder cycling, as agreed. Figure 9 displays the
plotted trajectory.
49
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Ahead to Astern
Ship Name Trial Date
Time to Test Time to Start Shaft Astern
Base Course Time to Ordered RPM
Astern
Shaft RPM Time to Stop Ship
(Beginning)
Depth of Water Ahead Reach
Sea Condition Note: Also to be included are maximum
Wind Direction excursions of RPM, torque, data for
Wind Velocity diesel or gas turbine plants, at frequent
Trial Draft (Fwd) intervals during maneuver.
Trial Draft (Aft)
Final Heading
Astern to Ahead
Time of Test Trial Draft (Fwd)
Base Course Trial Draft (Aft)
Shaft RPM Final Heading
(Beginning)
Depth of Water Time to Start Shaft Ahead
Sea Condition Time to Ordered RPM
Ahead
Wind Direction Time to Stop Ship
Wind Velocity Maximum RPM Ahead
Torque (If Available)
50
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Rudder
Ship Name
Angle Elapsed Time (Sec)
Trial Date 6K 5K 4K 3K
Time of Test Start 10R
Shaft RPM (6k) Attain 10R
a
(3k) Start 0
b
Depth of Water Attain 0
Sea Conditions Start 35R
a
Wind Direction Attain 35R
Wind Velocity Start 35L
a
Trial Draft (Fwd) Attain 35L
Trial Draft )Aft) Start 0
Attain 0
a. Rudder angle is to be held for 30 seconds before starting next rudder movement
b
b. Ship Speed is to be restored prior to starting the 35 rudder movement
c. Test is to be continued in decreasing 1-knot intervals until the rudder is no longer effective.
52
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
53
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
4.1 PURPOSE
Standardization trials comprise a systematic series of runs over a measured distance to establish the
relationship between speed, shaft power, and shaft RPM of a ship at designated drafts. These
relationships are required for one or more of the following purposes:
a) To fulfill contractual obligations.
b) To obtain performance data to be used in the design of subsequent vessels.
c) To determine the relationship between ship's speed and shaft RPM to be used by the owner as
an aid to navigation after applying the corrections for service conditions.
4.2 GENERAL PLAN
The general plan for conducting standardization trials provides for several consecutive runs at each
selected speed point alternating in direction over a measured distance at substantially constant shaft
power. The observed speeds, powers, and RPM are averaged for each speed point.
4.3 TRIAL AREA
Considerations in selecting the trial area for speed runs are method of distance measurement, depth of
water, and accessibility to builder's shipyard.
4.3.1 GNSS
Deployment of Global Navigation Satellite Systems permits trial area selection solely on the basis of
depth and accessibility.
4.3.2 Depth of Water
The point at which depth of water affects a ship's speed is dependent on its speed, draft, and length.
Minimum recommended depth for standardization runs is given in Section 1.6.2.
4.4 WIND AND SEA
The effect of wind on standardization can be very serious and should be considered carefully in
conducting a trial. The effect of wind varies widely with the wind direction and duration, the type of
ship, its speed, and other conditions. It is greatest for comparatively slow vessels having high bulky
superstructures relative to the underwater body. For example, a high-sided, shallow-draft ship will be
more affected by wind than a deeply laden seagoing tanker.
The direction of the wind relative to the course is also an important factor. The hightest resistance
occurs when the relative wind is about 25 degrees off the bow but remains relatively high from 0 to
45 degrees. The wind resistance becomes zero when the relative wind is slightly abaft the beam.
Although the effects of wind described above may be largely eliminated by analysis, the calculation is
only approximate and, therefore, the correction should not be allowed to become too great, if accurate
trial results are required.
Furthermore, many ships require helm to counteract the aerodynamic effect of the wind. This causes
increased drag which cannot be eliminated by any of the customary methods of analysis.
54
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
55
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
It is essential that the shaft RPM be steadied prior to entering the measured course. Throttle and
machinery operating conditions should not be adjusted during the run. However, to shorten the
approach run at low speeds it is permissible to increase the power on the turns provided the power is
decreased promptly when the ship has straightened away. When increasing to a higher speed point,
power should be increased when the turn is begun. When reducing to a lower speed point, power
should be held until the turn is complete.
4.8 DATA REQUIREMENTS
See Table 16 for a Data Sheet for speed and power data recording.
The following data should be recorded during standardization trials:
a) Elapsed time for each run over the measured distance to determine speed and RPM.
b) Total shaft revolutions for each run over the measured distance.
c) Average propeller torque if torsionmeter is installed; if not, see Section 2.5.5 for means for
determining shaft power from internal combustion engines or 2.6.3 for gas turbines.
d) Sufficient data to determine the displacement and trim of the ship.
e) Clock time at start of each run over the measured distance to identify run and for use in the
trial analysis.
f) Ship's heading for each run over the measured distance.
g) A record of any unusually large rudder angles used on the measured distance or on the
straight approach to it.
h) The approximate size and direction of waves on each run.
i) Apparent Wind speed and direction for each run.
j) Current conditions from current tables or from other observations such as buoy
positions, for each run.
k) Depth of water for each run.
l) Temperature and density of water in the Standardization Area.
m) Air temperature
56
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
STANDARDIZATION RESULTS
Speed Run Shaft Power Total Distance Elapsed RPM Knots
Point Revolutions Traveled Time
I 1
2
Avg
II 1
2
Avg
III 1
2
Avg
IV 1
2
Avg
Etc.
TRIAL CONDITIONS
Speed Time Wind Waves Current
Point Run of Trial Heading (Estimated) (Estimated) (Estimated) Water Depth
Vel. Dir. Height Dir. Vel. Dir.
I 1
2
II 1
2
III 1
2
IV 1
2
Etc.
1. Record data for additional speed points or additional runs at a given speed point when
NOTES: applicable
2. Speed/Power and Speed/RPM curves should be appended to this
figure.
3. Type of range used _____________.
57
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
58
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
59
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
60
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
precision of fluid temperature measurement, consideration must be given in locating the sensing
element to sense an average sample of the fluid. Where high pressures are involved, a thermowell is
the safest installation.
5.2.3 Adapters for Sensing Elements
If pressure, velocity, and temperature are moderate, the temperature sensing element of the measuring
device can be introduced through a pressure gage test connection and held in place by an adapter.
The adapter must be designed as a pressure boundary
5.2.4 Instrument compatibility
Temperature measuring instrumentation should be compatible with the fluid, pressure and
temperature in the system in which it is to be used.
5.2.5 Calibration and Sea Trials
It is recommended that the ship's temperature instrumentation intended for use in obtaining sea trial
data and all sea trial temperature instrumentation be calibrated in the shop or on the ship where
practical within a two week period prior to sea trials. It is further recommended that the means for
verifying the accuracy of important thermometers be available during sea trials.
5.2.6 Special Thermocouples
Special thermocouples may be made to suit requirements. Instructions and material for the
fabrication of thermocouples are outlined in the Instruments standards publication referenced in
reference (d). A pressure test of these thermocouples is essential for safety.
5.3 PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS
61
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
sensing lines empty or full of liquid. Vacuum lines should be self-draining or be provided with loop
seals to establish a known water leg. Means of venting gage lines should be provided adjacent to the
gage or other suitable place. Gages should be connected to steam lines with a loop seal in the sensing
line near the gage to protect the Bourdon tube from high temperature.
Bourdon type gages should be protected from shock, violent pressure pulsation, and high temperature.
The gage should be located in a zone of normal room temperature, protected from direct radiation and
hot surfaces, and carefully mounted to avoid distortion or warping of the gage case.
5.3.3 Zero Adjust for Elevation
Pressure gages installed in liquid and steam systems for test data should be zero adjusted for
differences in elevation between the gages and their sensing points, where the adjustment exceeds the
precision tolerance specified for the gage. The gage tolerance should not be greater than plus or
minus one smallest scale division of the gage. Liquid gage sensing lines should be vented of gases to
ensure that they are full of liquid. Steam gage sensing lines should be full of water when zeroing the
gages, either from prefilling or from service condensation. Steps should be taken to ensure that
vacuum gage sensing lines are empty. When ship's instrumentation is used for trial purposes, the
correction for elevation differences between the gage and the sensing line connection to the ship
system should be noted on the data sheet. This information should be so noted at the gage also. For
installation and procedural steps to avoid water-leg error see reference (e).
5.3.4 Calibration and Sea Trials
It is recommended that the ship's pressure instrumentation intended for use in obtaining sea trial data
and all sea trial pressure instrumentation be calibrated in place within a two week period prior to sea
trials. It is further recommended that the means for calibration of important gages be available during
sea trials.
5.3.5 Barometers
Barometers measure atmospheric pressure, and this information is required for determining absolute
pressures from readings on Bourdon gages, deadweight gages, and open-end oil, mercury or water
columns. Barometers are of two kinds, aneroid, i.e., bellows type, and mercury column. Either type,
if properly designed, manufactured, and calibrated, and carefully handled, will be satisfactory. The
barometer should be located in the same compartment as the instruments requiring correction to
absolute values. Barometers can be calibrated and certified if necessary. When an absolute pressure
gage is used, no barometer correction is necessary. See paragraph 5.3.9.
5.3.6 Manometers
Manometers, also known as U-tube type gages, are liquid column gages that are widely used for
measuring relatively small differences in gas pressure, viz., differences between a gas pressure and
the atmosphere, or other pressure differential. They have an indication scale stated in inches,
generally, which is attached beside the liquid column.
Columns should be mounted vertically. The use of inclined gages at sea is not advised as they are
affected too much by the motion of the ship.
Mercury filled gages should not be used on systems containing copper or its alloys. If the mercury
escapes into the system, these materials are degraded by amalgamation.
Manometers installed on a high-pressure line should be provided with cutoff valves and a valved
cross-connection to make it possible to avoid blowing out the liquid when putting the gage on the
line. They must be carefully designed and constructed to withstand their rated operating pressures,
which should not be exceeded for safety reasons.
62
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
63
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
c) Meters should be installed and back pressure maintained so that they will be kept filled with
liquid at all times. This is particularly important when measuring hot fluids where pressure
changes close to the meter can cause the fluid to flash into vapor. Air or vapor passing
through a meter will produce an error in the reading and may damage the meter.
d) Meters should be located on the discharge side of the pump and preferably on the inlet side of
heaters. Pressure drop across the meter at maximum expected flow should be determined and
included in the system design.
e) If a control valve is used, it is preferable to locate it on the discharge side of the meter.
f) Meter should be used to measure only the liquids for which it was designed.
g) The meter size should be chosen so that it will operate as near its rated capacity as possible.
When precision is required readings below 10 percent of the rated meter capacity should be
avoided.
h) Since these meters are essentially volume-flow measurement devices, the density of the fluid
is necessary to determine the mass flow. This requires precise temperature measurement of
the fluid in the line connected to the meter. Upstream fluid temperature is preferred.
i) Meters of this type are usually designed for and made of material having specific temperature
limits, which should not be exceeded. The operating temperature range for any meter will be
provided by the manufacturer.
j) The precision of these meters is degraded by fluid densities errors, wear, corrosion, dirt
deposits, and friction. Care should be exercised to eliminate these causes of errors insofar as
possible.
k) Systems should be thoroughly flushed before the installation of meters. Pre-Sea Trial
operation of the system should be performed without meters unless checking meter
operability. This will help prevent meter malfunction during trials due to dirt accumulation.
5.4.3 Meter Installation for Precise Measurements
For precise liquid measurements, e.g., fuel rates for guarantee purposes, two identical positive
displacement flow meters installed in series are recommended to insure no loss of data due to failure
of a meter, and to provide a check measurement. If meter bypasses are installed, each should be fitted
with two block valves and a vent between them so that absolute closure can be verified. A preferred
arrangement is to provide individual bypass lines for each meter with the meter isolating valve and
differential pressure gage connected to the meter inlet and outlet to indicate when the meter is
sticking. A sampling connection should be provided in the active line upstream of the meter.
5.4.4 Orifice Plate, Flow Nozzle, and Venturi Tube
Fluid flow measurement may also be accomplished by differential pressure measurement across an
accurately designed orifice plate, flow nozzle or venturi tube. Reference (g) provides a complete
description of orifice, flow nozzle, and venturi flow measurement design and installation procedures
including differential pressure indication secondary element identification. See the meter
manufacturer's information for specifics about the accuracy and installation requirements.
5.4.5 Indicating and Recording Mechanism for Orifice Plate, Flow Nozzle, and
Venturi Tube
Commercial flow meters of the orifice or nozzle type usually include an indicating and recording
mechanism. The errors in this mechanism, due to friction and paper displacement, may be
determined by connecting a suitable liquid column differential pressure gage in parallel with the
indicator or recorder to obtain a direct reading of the differential. To convert this reading to a mass
flow value, it is necessary to know the absolute pressure upstream of the device, the fluid
temperature, the size and type of orifice or nozzle, the inside diameter of the pipe, and the flow
coefficient of the orifice or nozzle. References (h), (i) and (j) will be helpful for this determination.
64
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
65
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
66
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
run is determined, to obtain total revolutions for a run. When standardizing a ship, an observer at a
range station operates the shift-switch at the beginning and end of a run. The counter in use is read
and reset to zero by the computer room observer before the next run. When not standardizing, the
electric counter may be shifted by the trial signal system. The ship's counter should also be read on
the same interval as the electric counter to obtain accurate backup data.
For trials that do not include standardization or accurate fuel rate and water rate measurement, the
installation of special counters is not essential. Sufficient accuracy is available from the permanently
installed revolution counters read on the same established time interval as the sea trial signal system.
Ship's shaft speed indicators in the engine room and on the bridge should be adjusted for minimum
error over the operating range prior to sea trials. This requires detachment from the sensing point and
driving the transmitter through the operating speed range at known RPM. All receivers which will be
simultaneously operative should be actuated when calibrating.
During sea trials, accuracy of shaft speed indicators should be checked by comparison with counters.
The accuracy of the shaft revolution signal is particularly important when it is used as a control
element.
5.8.2 Portable Tachometers and Speed Indicators
Portable tachometers and speed indicators can be used to obtain rotating speeds of auxiliary
machinery during sea trials and are not subject to the precision and reliability required of propeller
revolution measuring equipment.
When instantaneous speeds are necessary to evaluate transient conditions, speed recorders should be
used. Recorders may be actuated by calibrated tachometer generators or electromagnetic pickups
driven by the unit to be observed. Sometimes the signal for the installed tachometer can be utilized to
drive the recorder.
When totally enclosed machinery is used it may be difficult or sometimes impossible to reach the
shaft with the ordinary type of tachometer, and in such cases the vibrating-reed frequency indicator
may be used. Care must be taken to avoid reading harmonics of the fundamental speed.
The stroboscopic speed-measuring instrument may be useful for measuring frequency of motion of
any moving part which is visible but where a mechanical tachometer is not suitable. These
instruments operate on the principles of interrupting vision at the same frequency as the motion,
whereby the moving part appears to stand still. The instrument has a frequency indicator to determine
the frequency at which motion stops.
Stroboscopes will also stop motion when they are set at any multiple of the speed of the machine.
The operator should preset the stroboscope at the expected fundamental speed to avoid errors.
5.8.3 Additional 'Information
For further details about types of instruments and precautions for their use to measure shaft speed see
reference (q).
5.9 FLUE AND EXHAUST-GAS ANALYSES
5.9.1 Orsat Analyzer
For trial purposes, historically a frequently used instrument for flue-gas analysis is the Orsat.
Basically, all Orsats are identical in principle; that is, they all have a number of pipettes containing
chemical reagents which absorb the respective gas constituent from the sample. The major difference
67
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
in the various commercially available Orsats is in the design of the pipettes. Some Orsats have the
contact type of pipette while others use the bubbling type of pipette.
A contact type of pipette usually is filled with many small diameter glass tubes, rods, or in some
instances, with a fibrous type of material. The purpose of the tubes, or rods, is to supply a maximum
of exposed surface to which the required chemical reagent can adhere. As the gas sample enters the
top portion of the pipette, the reagent is driven from the pipette into a reservoir. The gas, as it
proceeds to occupy the entire volume of the pipette, passes over the wetted surface provided by the
filler material.
In the bubbling type of pipette, the gas sample enters the bottom of the pipette and the sample bubbles
up through the chemical reagent. Filler material for providing exposed absorption surface is not
required and, consequently, a volume of the reagent equal to the unabsorbed volume of the sample is
displaced by the gas. The displaced reagent flows into a reservoir and remains there until the gas
sample is returned to the collecting burette.
A common type of Orsat is provided with a measuring burette and, usually, three pipettes. These are
interconnected by a capillary manifold and appropriate stopcocks for routing the gas sample through
the apparatus. The pipettes, when filled with the proper chemical reagent, will absorb volumes of
carbon dioxide (CO2), oxygen (02), and carbon monozide (CO).
The following absorbing reagents are used in the pipettes:
CO2 pipette - Potassium hydroxide solution
O2 pipette - Alkaline solution of pyrogallic acid
CO pipette - Acid solution of Cuprous chloride
The best results are obtained when these solutions are prepared immediately prior to testing. Full
descriptions of the methods for preparing the solutions are stated in reference (ad).
To process a gas sample to obtain an analysis, a known volume of flue gas is drawn into the
graduated burette. In successive operations the gas sample is forced into the CO 2, O2, and CO
absorbing pipettes. Before the sample is allowed to pass from one pipette to the next it is returned to
the graduated burette. The measured difference in volume, after each individual gas has been fully
absorbed, is considered as the amount of that particular gas present in the flue gas.
The difficulty in obtaining a representative sample from a stratified gas stream is the greatest cause of
error in gas analysis. There is no single correct method of sampling which is applicable in all cases.
One method, which results in obtaining an approximately true sample, requires the taking of a number
of simultaneous individual samples at different points in a given plane of a gas cavity or duct.
Where high-temperature gas samples must be taken it is customary to use a water-cooled sampler.
This sampler is generally constructed from materials similar to the ordinary open-end tube, usually of
brass or stainless steel, used for sampling cool gases, but it is fitted with a water-cooled jacket.
Water-cooled sampler tubes are superior to refractory tubes since there is less gas composition change
due to chemical reactions. Further, refractory tubes are often brittle and subject to breakage if
improperly handled. Thus, refractory tubes are usually inferior for service and functional reasons.
A continuous gas sample is most desirable as it eliminates the need for purging the sampling lines of
the residue from a sample taken previously. For this purpose, an air aspirator generally is used. For
sea trials, continuous temporary lines should be run from each uptake through a valved manifold to an
air aspirator powered by the ship's compressed air system. The arrangement of valves should allow a
new sample to be pulled from either uptake to the Orsat equipment for each sample reading. Two
sampling lines are necessary when regenerative type air heaters are installed; one is connected
68
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
upstream and one downstream of the air heater. Both are needed to determine air leakage across the
air heater. The comparative readings can be used to compute the corrected stack temperature.
Lead, glass, or gum-rubber piping should be used to connect the sampling tube to the gas analyzer.
Copper or brass piping also is satisfactory, but in no case should ferrous materials be used.
5.9.2 Manual and Automatic Types of Flue Gas Analyzers
There are a variety of manual and automatic types of gas analyzers available as portable or ship
installed equipment. These kinds of instrumentation are valuable for determining equipment
performance and the content of exhaust gases which enter the environment. See reference (ac) for
further information about measuring particulate matter in a gas stream.
Some automatic types of gas analyzers will indicate percent oxygen, percent carbon dioxide, net stack
temperature, percent excess air, carbon monoxide concentration, particulate matter in the flue gas, and
the percent combustion efficiency. Instrument manufacturers need to be consulted for details
regarding gas sampling requirements and measurement data available on various instruments for the
specific flue gases exhausting from the ship.
The shipbuilder and owner may agree to use ship installed flue and exhaust gas analyzers to collect
equipment performance data during the conduct of sea trials. The sea trial plan should specify the
analyzers to be used, when they are to be used, and the approved methods for analyzer calibration.
5.9.3 Additional Information
For more information see reference (ad) and contact manufacturers of equipment.
5.10 VISCOSITY MEASUREMENTS
The measurement of viscosity is sometimes required during sea trials. The viscosity of fuels for the
propulsion plant or auxiliaries, or for cargo may be necessary to resolve problems during sea trials.
For measurement information see reference (af).
5.11 ELECTRICAL MEASUREMENTS
5.11.1 Measuring Devices
For ships with alternating current, a portable analyzer equipped with an ammeter, voltmeter, power-
factor indicator meter, and kilowatt meter will be useful. Isolated usage of the meters is also possible.
For most A.C. motor installations the input current is sufficiently reliable for indicating the motor
load. A portable tong-type ammeter will be found satisfactory for measuring the motor current.
Since this meter clamps around the cable one phase at a time and does not have to be inserted in the
circuit, it is more convenient to use than the analyzer for this application. A portable poly-phase watt-
meter may be installed to assure accurate measurement of generator loads. Additional electrical
measuring equipment is available for evaluation of diesel electric plants including harmonics, and hot
spots in switchboards, load centers, and power panels.
5.11.2 Calibration
Recently calibrated shipboard electrical instruments should be sufficiently accurate for all uses except
special performance tests. Before sea trials they should be carefully inspected for signs of damage,
and the due dates for the next calibration should be following the completion of sea trials.
5.11.3 Additional Information
Electrical measuring Instruments and testing apparatus are covered in detail by reference (k).
69
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
70
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
For purposes of sea trials, it is best to use DDGNSS Dual Differential GNSS equipment that can
provide sub-meter position accuracy and heading information.
5.14 TIME MEASUREMENTS
5.14.1 Types of Instruments
The following types of timing instruments may be used for trial data:
a) Ship's Clocks
b) Stop Watches
c) Electric Timers and Clocks
d) Chronographs
A detailed description of each of the above instruments is stated in reference (ag).
5.14.2 Synchronizing Clocks
Ship's clocks may be used to time events. Prior to departure, the master clock should be set to the
correct time and secondary units synchronized with the master. Time pieces furnished for trials
should be synchronized with the ship's system to avoid disagreement in reporting events.
5.14.3 Stop Watches
Stop watches most suitable for sea trial data are electronic watches and timers. These watches and
timers are battery powered. All stop watches should be checked against a time piece of known
accuracy before the trials begin. The combined stop watch and time piece should be adjusted and
regulated so that it does not gain or lose more than thirty seconds over a twenty-four hours period.
5.14.4 Electric Timers and Clocks
Electric timers may have a synchronous motor drive and depend upon the ship's power frequency for
accuracy. Electric stop clocks with accuracy controlled by quartz crystals are available with dials
readable to one one-hundredth of a second. Special timers may be designed and used where
desirable. They may have a master clock with accuracy controlled by a quartz crystal design. When
71
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
electric time measuring devices dependent on ships power are used for sea trials, caution should be
exercised to maintain ships generator frequency at 60 cps. Electronic timers may replace electric
times to maintain standard item, if shipboard power frequency is not constant or is uncertain.
5.14.5 Recorders
Recording instruments should be inspected regularly to see that the paper-driving mechanism and
paper marking device operate properly to provide correct time indications.
72
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
6.1 GENERAL
A trial report should be prepared by the shipbuilder and delivered to the owner and others as specified
or within sixty days after the completion of trials. The report should present the trial results, relate
them to requirements, and should contain all data and information needed to evaluate the results
reported.
This section provides organization and sample formats for identifying the ship and its major
characteristics and reporting data for the tests and trials covered in Sections 2, 3, and 4 where sample
formats are also found for reporting. In some cases the data are reported directly as taken, in others
one or more reductions are required to reach the value to be reported in either tabular or graphic
forms. Copies of raw data sheets, if legible and interpretable, may be used for directly reported data.
Raw data need not be supplied for values reported in reduced form, but supporting data for such
values should be retained and held available for the owners or other acceptance authorities for the life
of the contract.
Data forms are included for all trials and tests for which procedures are provided by the guide
regardless of contract requirement for such a trial or test. Inclusion of the data sheet should not be
construed to require that a test or trial be performed.
Similarly, data sheets list all data pertinent to the test or trial of a typical plant or system or
equipment. A particular ship may not have an instrument or gage to provide a data item, or might not
be designed to include the component or apparatus to which the data pertains. Guide data sheets,
thus, should be taken as a recommendation rather than an absolute requirement, and data not included
on the data sheets but available and pertinent should be included in the report. Also, the presence of a
data item does not constitute a requirement to install special instrumentation to provide it. Such
requirements are imposed by the section of the guide requiring the test or trial.
Critical data as defined by Table 2 and Table 3 should be instrumented to the extent required to
provide confidence in the results.
6.2 DATA PLAN
Since the Guide is for general application it cannot cover with precision the particular contractual or
technical circumstances of a particular ship or class of ship. It is important therefore, as set forth in
Section 1, for the shipbuilder to study the guide, the contract, and the ships specifications, and
prepare a data plan. This plan should include data forms suited to the location and function of the
instruments to be read, a system for transmitting raw performance data to a central computing station
for processing and process for making data available to authorized parties aboard ship. Data forms
should distinguish between data from special sea trial instruments and data from ships instruments.
6.3 DATA CREW TRAINING
As Section 1 states in general terms, the data crew should be trained in advance of trials in the use and
location of the instruments to be read, the corrections to be applied, and the calculations to be made.
Training should include familiarization with the data forms so that entries will be made in the correct
column, and the instrumentation for data items which should be read on the mark of the data interval.
The mark is provided by the sea trial signal system.
73
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
74
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Total Correction
Corrected Fuel Rate
a. Average Flow of two meters if two are installed. Flows to be corrected from meter
calibration curves.
b. From fuel Analysis report for sample collected during
trials.
c. Correction factors as agreed upon prior to test. Note in each case whether correction
is plus or minus.
NOTE: Make separate evaluation sheet for test at each specified
power.
75
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Total Correction
Corrected Fuel Rate
a. Average Flow of two meters if two are installed. Flows to be corrected from meter
calibration curves.
b. From fuel Analysis report for sample collected
during trials.
c. Correction factors as agreed upon prior to test. Note in each case whether correction
is plus or minus.
NOTE: Make separate evaluation sheet for test at each
specified power.
76
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
77
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Table 20 and it data sheets reflects the recommended content for reporting operating data for a typical
ship with main propulsion diesel or gas turbine installation.
a) Type of ship
Example: Single-screw
Low speed diesel driven
Combination bulk and general cargo ship.
(e) Capacities*
78
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
(a) Number of days between sea trials and most recent drydocking.
(b) Wind direction and velocity.
(c) Sea state.
79
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Ship Name
Trial Date
Trial: Economy, Ahead Endurance, Astern Endurance, Boiler Overload
Shaft Horsepower
Shaft Speed
Time and Duration of Run
Users should develop their own format for reporting the results of this test depending upon the
equipment available. However, the following information should be recorded. Note that the
information is divided into the following categories: Electric Drive, Diesel Propulsion Plant, and Gas
Turbine Plant.
Note: This introductory Table is followed by Tables containing Data Sheets which are provided on
pages 81 through 86 (Table 21 through Table 25).
80
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Fuel Oil
Lube Oil
81
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Cooling Water
Sea Temperatures
Salt Water Pump Discharge Pressures
C. W. Pump Discharge Pressures
Heat Exchanger In and Out Pressures (Salt Water)
Heat Exchanger In and Out Temperatures (Salt Water)
Heat Exchanger In and Out Pressures (C. W.)
Heat Exchanger In and Out Temperatures (C. W.)
C. W. Temperature to Engine
C. W. Temperature from Engine
Air
Starting Air Pressure
Control Air Pressure
Diesel Engine
F. O. Consumption and Type and Properties of Fuel Used
Other Pertinent Data as Applicable
Boiler Systems
Waste-Heat Boilers
Number in Operation
Feed Pressure
82
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Other Data
The data for the following other systems as mutually agreed upon,
Should be included in the trial report:
Distilling Plant
Auxiliary Steam Systems
Other Salt Water Systems
Other Fresh Water Systems
Other Air Systems
Sewage Systems
Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Systems
83
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
ELECTRIC DRIVE
Prime Mover
Class
B Power Output
Voltgae, Terminal
Voltage, Field Excitatioin
Current Field Excitation
Class
B RPM
Current Output
Voltage, Filed Excitation
Current, Field Excitation
84
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Fuel Oil
F. O. Consumption
F. O. Pump Discharge Pressure
F. O. Pressure to Engine
F. O. Pressure from Engine
F. O. Temperature at Meter
F. O. Settler Temperature
F. O. Temperature to Engine
F. O. Type and Properties
Lube Oil
L. O. Strainer IN and Out Pressures
L. O. Type and Properties
Cooling Water
Heat Exchanger In and Out Temperatures
85
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Generator
Generator in Operation
Frequency
Voltage
Current
Power Factor
Class B Power Output
Load g
Driver F. O. Consumption and Type of Properties of Fuel Used
Other Data
The data for the following systems, as mutually agreed upon,
should be included in the trial report:
Distilling Plant
Auxiliary Boiler Data (Including F.O. Consumption)
Auxiliary Steam Systems
Engine Starting Systems
Ship's Service Air Systems
Control Air Systems
Salt Water Systems
Fresh Water Systems
Sewage Systems
Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Systems
86
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
REFERENCES
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers has published Performance Test Codes (PTC) for
testing of land plants, and has published Supplements on Instruments and Apparatus which describe
each type of instrument and the capabilities and limitations of each. See references (a) and (b) for
additional information. In most publications the inherent precision, calibration procedures, and
installation instructions are included. The Naval Ship Engineering Center has published "Standards"
which provide details on the installation of sensing connections and other information pertinent to
shipboard measurements. These documents are listed below and are referenced in the pertinent
portions of the text.
a. General Instructions, Performance Test Code, The American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, PTC 1 - 2011
b. Definitions and Values Code, Performance Test Code, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
PTC 2 - 2001)
c. Temperature Measurement Performance Test Code, The American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, PTC 19.3 - 1974 (R2004)
d. Lempa, M.S., editor, Instrument Standards, Naval Ship Engineering Center, Philadelphia Division
e. Pressure Measurement Performance Test Code, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
PTC 19.2 2010
f. Application, Part II of Fluid Meters: Interim Supplement on Instrument and Apparatus, Fairfield,
N.J., The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, PTC 19.5 - 1972
g. Bean, Howard S., Fluid Meters - Their Theory and Application, 6th edition, New York, The American
Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1971
h. Miller, R. W., Flow Measurement Engineering Handbook, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1983
i. Stein, Peter K., Measurement Engineering, Phoenix, AZ, Stein Engineering Service Inc., 1964
j. Electrical Measurements in Power Circuits, Part 6, Performance Test Code, Fairfield, N.J., The
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, PTC 19.6 - 1955
k. Measurement of Indicated Power, Performance Test Code, Fairfield, N.J., The American
Society of Mechanical Engineers, PTC 19.8 - 1970(R1985)
l. Gas Turbine Power Plants, Performance Test Code, The American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, PTC 22 - 12014
m. Steam Turbines, Performance Test Code, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, PTC-6
2004
n. Appendix A to Test Code for Steam Turbines, Performance Test Code, The American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, PTC 6A - 2000
o. Measurement of Shaft Power, Performance Test Code, The American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, PTC 19.7 1980 (R1988)
p. (R1988)Measurement of Rotary Speed, Performance Test Code, The American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, PTC 19.13 - 1951
87
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
q. Code for Shipboard Vibration Measurements, SNAME, 99 Canal Center Plaza, Alexandria, Virginia
22314, 1975, Book No. C-1
r. Machinery Vibration Measurements, SNAME, 99 Canal Center Plaza, Alexandria, Virginia 22314,
1976, Book No. C-4
s. Acceptable Vibration of Marine Steam and Gas Turbine Main and Auxiliary Machinery Plants,
SNAME, 99 Canal Center Plaza, Alexandria, Virginia 22314, 1976, Book No. C-5
t. Ship Vibration and Noise Guidelines, SNAME, 99 Canal Center Plaza, Alexandria, Virginia
22314, 1980, Book No. 2-25
u. Guidelines for the Use of Vibration Monitoring for Preventive Maintenance, SNAME, 99 Canal Center
Plaza, Alexandria, Virginia 22314, 1987, Book No. 3-42
v. Measurement of Industrial Sound, Performance Test Code, Fairfield, N.J., The American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, PTC 36 - 1998
w. Boilerwater/Feedwater Test and Treatment, Naval Ships Technical Manual S9086-GX-STM-02,
Chapter 220V2, 15 December 1987
x. Design of Dissolved-Oxygen Testing Cabinet, U.S. Naval Engineering Experiment Station, February 29,
1940, Report No. B-1158
y. Density Determination of Solids and Liquids, Performance Test Code, Fairfield, N.J., The
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, PTC 19.16 - 1965
z. Determining the Concentration of Particulate Matter in a Gas Stream, Performance Test Code, Fairfield,
N.J., The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, PTC 38 - 1980 (R1985)
aa. Flue and Exhaust Gas Analysis, Performance Test Code, Fairfield, N.J., The American Society
of Mechanical Engineers, PTC 19.10 1981
bb. Water and Steam in the Power Cycle (Purity and Quality, Leak Detection and Measurement),
Performance Test Code, Fairfield, N.J., The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, PTC 19.11 -
1997
cc. Determination of the Viscosity of Liquids, Performance Test Code, Fairfield, N.J., The American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, PTC 19.17 - 1965
dd. Measurement of Time, Performance Test Code, Fairfield, N.J., The American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, PTC 19.12 - 1958
NOTE: ASME Publications are available from The American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
Marketing Department, at ASME.org SNAME Publications are available from the Publications
Department, SNAME, 99 Canal Center Plaza, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. Various Naval
publications are available from the Commanding Officer, Naval Publications and Forms Center, Attn:
Code 106, 5801 Tabor Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19120-5009. ASTM publications are available from
The American Society for Testing and Materials, 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
88
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS
The terms defined below were selected to contribute to the clarity of the foregoing sections. No
attempt has been made to cover all the shipbuilding terms which may be of interest and no claim is
made that the definitions provided represent an industry consensus. The definitions do, however, tell
what is meant whenever the term is used in this guide. They are not identical with definitions used in
other SNAME publications, but they do not conflict. Definitions are set forth as they apply to
sections of the guide.
A.1 GENERAL TERMS.
First-of-a-class - the first ship built to a specific design by a particular shipyard.
Forensic Data - data relative to maneuverability and other ship characteristics which might have a
bearing on legal action involving the ship or its owners.
Acceptance Authority - the organizations designated by the owner or contract to rule on the
acceptability of trial performance.
Regulatory Bodies - the organizations designated by the owner or by law to enforce regulations
relative to the safety of the ship, its crew or cargo, for example: U.S. Coast Guard, International
Commission for Safety of Life at Sea, U.S. Public Health Service, Canadian Ministry of Transport.
Classification Society - an organization which publishes standards of construction for various classes
of ships, monitors their observance and maintains a register listing each vessel classified and giving
its class and principal characteristics. For example: American Bureau of Shipping, Lloyds Register of
Shipping, Det Norske Veritas.
"If Elected" - a term used in this guide to designate a trial or test which will be accomplished only if
explicitly required by the contract or specifications.
Uncertainty - the probability that measurement of a ship's performance parameter will not be within a
prescribed range.
Sea Trials - at-sea operation of a ship's propulsion plant and other ships' machinery and systems
which cannot be properly tested at the dock, to determine performance capability or to demonstrate
satisfaction of requirements.
Builder's Sea Trials - preliminary sea trials conducted by the builder to verify readiness for official
sea trials. Upon agreement between the builder and acceptance authority, specific trial events may be
officially conducted during builder's trials.
Official Sea Trials - sea trials conducted to demonstrate acceptability of the ship to the owner or his
designated representative.
Full Load Draft - the maximum draft permitted by the cognizant classification society for the season
and waters in which the trials will be conducted.
Ballast Draft - the maximum drafts obtainable without use of dry cargo spaces, using the ship's ballast
system as installed.
Trial Drafts - the drafts during the trial under consideration. See 4.10(d) for method of determination.
Free Route - operation of the ship on an elected course with minimum use of the helm without
restriction from shallow water effects, channel constraints, or traffic.
89
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
90
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
91
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
determined, and a series of such positions traces the ship's track. The ship's position iscalculated using
the two ranges, the distance between the surveyed points, and the position of the surveyed points.
Standardization - operation of the ship over a measured distance on reciprocal courses at specified
draft and propulsion powers to determine the speeds obtainable at such propulsion powers.
Ship's Track - the line describing the positions of a point on the ship from which range measurements
are taken during the period of interest.
A.5 INSTRUMENTATION
Trial Instrument - a calibrated instrument provided by the builder to measure a particular aspect of
ship performance during sea trials. The trial instrument is normally removed by the builder after
trials.
Jacking Zero - the no-torque torsionmeter reading determined by rotating the shaft in each direction
with the turning gear and taking the mean of the average readings from both ahead and astern.
Torsionmeter Constant - the constant used in reducing torsionmeter signals to shaft torque. It is
obtained by calculation using the known shaft dimensions, the characteristics of the torsionmeter, and
a standard modulus of rigidity of the shaft material; or by calibration of the torsionmeter while
mounted on the shaft.
Water Leg the correction to pressure gage readings necessary to determine pressure at the sensing
point when it is not at the same elevation as the pressure gage and the sensing line is known to
contain liquid.
Red Hand Setting position of an adjustable fixed marker on an instrument dial face, which
prescribes the high and/or low limits of safe operation.
92
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
B.1 PRINCIPLE
A.1.1 The plot derived from shore based reference station data indicates the ship's overground track,
i.e., over the sea floor. What is wanted is the track through the water, as this is what is
characteristic of the ship, not the track reflecting the particular condition present during the
trial. Comparisons of ship with ship or ship with a standard are valid only if both are drift
corrected. The tracking precision available from modern positioning systems makes drift
correction meaningful. Drift correction is not recommended for imprecise tracking methods.
A.1.2 After the ship's turn reaches equilibrium, and there is no drift, the ship's track will be a perfect
circle, and repeated turns will coincide. If there is drift, tracks will be distorted circles, and no
two will coincide. The degree and location of distortion can be used to measure drift. The
procedure is outlined below. The term "Execute" as used in the procedure means the time at
which the helm order is given.
B.2 PLOTTING OVERGROUND TRACK
A.2.I Plot the change of ship's heading versus time (SHVT).
A.2.2 Plot the ship's position versus time (SPVT).
A.2.3 Using the SPVT, determine ship's position at suitable time intervals (say 30 seconds).
A.2.4 Plot ship's position at the selected intervals, on rectangular coordinates, as shown in Figure 11,
using base course for the horizontal axis and orienting the plot to show the ship approaching
from top left for a right turn or bottom left for a left turn. Use a scale sufficient to resolve the
drift distance encountered.
A.2.5 Fair a dashed line through the plotted points. This will represent the overground track of the
ship during the maneuver.
B.3 DETERMINATION OF DRIFT
A.3.1 The test procedure stated in paragraph 3.7 calls for holding full rudder until ship's heading has
changed 540 degrees; thus, the second time around will lap the first by 10 degrees, some part of
which will be a factor where the drift displacement of the second circle was maximum, and
there was a steady rate of turn both times around. The point at which a steady rate of turn is
reached can be verified from the SHVT. The point will be where the slope of the change
heading curve is approximately constant.
A.3.2 Determine from SHVT the time for heading changes at 10 degree intervals for the portion of
the lapped sector of the first circle for which turning rate is steady and the displacement of the
second circle is maximum. Similarly determine the time to reach selected heading change
points plus 360 degrees. Determine from the SPVT the ship's position at these times. Plot these
positions as indicated on Figure 11.
A.3.3 Connect the plotted position points at which ship's heading is 360 degrees apart and which fall
within that portion of the lapped sector for which turning rate is steady. If there are insufficient
points to describe the tracks properly, plot more points using the SHVT and SPVT. The mean
length of these connections will be proportional to the distance the ship drifted during a full
93
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
turn. The proportionality factor will be the scale of the plot. The mean direction of the
connections taken from first toward the second time the same heading is reached will be the
direction of drift relative to base course. Indicate drift direction by an arrow as shown on
Figure 11. Drift direction in compass terms can be obtained by adding or subtracting base
course as appropriate. Report results on Figure 1 or 2.
B.4 DETERMINATION OF DRIFT RATE
A.4.1 Determine the time from "execute" for each of the connected points, using the SHVT.
A.4.2 Subtract the time to reach the heading the first round from the time to reach it the second round.
A.4.3 Take the mean of these values as the mean time to turn 360 degrees.
A.4.4 Divide the mean drift distance as plotted by the mean time for a 360 degrees turn to obtain the
mean rate of drift expressed in inches of plot per second from "Execute".
B.5 PLOTTING THE DRIFT CORRECTED TURNING CIRCLE
A.5.1 Using the time plots, determine the time to or from "Execute" for each plotted point of the
overground plot.
A.5.2 Multiply the times from "Execute" for each plotted point by the drift rate. This will be the drift
distance in inches of plot.
A.5.3 Taking the "Execute" point as the origin representing zero time and zero drift, lay off a line
extending from each plotted point in a direction opposite the direction of drift after "Execute"
and in direction of the drift before "Execute".
A.5.4 Mark off on these lines a distance representing drift as prepared for paragraph A.5.2. These
points will define the drift corrected track.
A.5.5 Pick up a best-fit center using a compass for the drift corrected points which are in the portion
of the track in which the turning rate is steady.
A.5.6 Draw a best-fit circle around this enter.
A.5.7 Fair a line through the remaining points, including a few prior to "Execute", to redefine the base
course.
B.6 DETERMINATION OF TURNING CIRCLE DIMENSIONS
A.6.1 Scale off the corrected plot and multiply by the scale factor, the dimensions defined in
paragraph A.3 in Appendix A.
A.6.2 Determine the change of heading for each plot point for corrected circle using the SHVT. When
plotting a circle for paragraph A.6.3, indicate the ship's heading by orientation of a scaled
representation of the ship's outline as shown on Figure 1 or 2.
A.6.3 Replot the corrected circle; appropriately label and indicate the turning dimensions as
illustrated in Figure 1 or 2 and include this in the trial report.
B.7 CALCULATION OF DRIFT RATE IN KNOTS
A.7.1 Multiply the drift rate in inches of plot per second from paragraph A.4.4 by the scale factor and
apply a dimensional constant to convert to knots. Report on Figure 1 or 2.
94
SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin 3-47 (2015)
Guide for Sea Trials
Example:
Drift Rate (knots) = Drift rate (inches/sec) x scale factor (feet or yards/inch)
Dimensional constant (feet or yards/nautical mile)(hour/secs)
95