Bus Law Mcqs 2016
Bus Law Mcqs 2016
Bus Law Mcqs 2016
24. Boy Tigas entered into a contract of sale wherein Boy Tigas will
bought a knife with Jun for P3,000. However Boy Tigas bought the
knife to kill karding his mortal enemy. The contract between Boy Tigas
and Jun is:
a. Valid
b. Void
c. Rescissible
d. Unenforceable
e. Voidable
25. If movable property should have been sold to different vendees,
the ownership shall be transferred to the person
A. Who have paid in good faith the purchase price in full.
B. Who in good faith first recorded it in the Registry of
Property.
C. Who present the oldest title in good faith.
D. Who had first taken possession in good
faith.
26. M makes a negotiable promissory note for P10 000 with the name of the payable in blank. The
note is stolen by P who inserts his name as payees and then endorse the note to A, then A to
B, and B to C, who is a holder in due course. On maturity, C cannot enforce the note against
A. M B. P C. A D. B
27. A issued a note payable to bearer. He delivers the note to B. B endorsed the note specially to
C, and C negotiates the note by delivery to D. Which of the following is not correct?
A. D can enforce the note against C C. D can enforce the note against B
B. D can enforce the note against A D. C can enforce the note against B
32. Every negotiable instrument is presumed to have been issued for a valuable
consideration. The presumption is
A. Prima facie B. Conclusive C. Absolute D. Final
33. Which of the following is negotiable instrument?
A. Pay to the order of C and reimburse yourself if out of the rentals of my house in Manila. (Sgd) A
To: B and X
B. Pay to C or his order P1M out of the rentals of my house in Manila. (Sgd) A To: B or in his
absence X
C. Pay to C P1M (Sgd) A To: B
D. Pay to bearer C P1M. Reimburse yourself out of the house rentals of my house in manila. (Sgd) A
to B
34. M makes a note payable to bearer and delivers the same to P who endorses it to X in this
manner. Payable to X. (Sgd) P
A. No, because the special endorsement of P has made the notice to be payable to order and must
be endorsed to negotiate
B. No, because Y did not acquire title to the instrument due to lack of proper endorsement
C. Yes, because M, as make, is absolutely liable to pay the instrument in the hands of any holder
D. Yes, because an instrument originally payable to bearer remains to be payable to bearer despite
special endorsement made thereon
38. P, by means of fraud, induced M to issue a promissory note payable to the order of P for
P21,000. The note was indorsed by P to A, and A to H. A and H had agreed to a consideration
of P20,000 (or a discount of P1,000). Initially, H gave A the amount of P18,000. Before he could
give the balance of P2,000 to A, H learned that P's title was defective. Is H a holder in due
course?
a. Yes, for P21,000
b. Yes, for P18,900
c. Yes, for P18,000
d. No, he is not a holder in due course because he obtained knowledge of a defect in the title of a prior
party before he could pay in full to A, the agreed consideration of P20,000.
39. Partners A, B and C contributed: P-P1M; B-P2M; C service. After exhausting the
partnership assets, the creditors still have a claim for P.3M. For how much are the
partners liable to the creditors for the partnership liability?
A. Only A and B are liable equally to the creditors being capitalists
B. Only A and B are liable 1/3 and 2/3, respectively
C. All of A, B and C are liable pro rata to the creditors
D. C is not liable being an industrial partner who is exempt from losses
40. A and B are co-owners of a parcel of land from which they derive profits in equal
sharing being co-heirs in inheritance. Is there a partnership?
A. There is a partnership because of the equal sharing of profits
B. There is no partnership because co-ownership by itself does not establish a
partnership despite the sharing of profits
C. There is no partnership since in partnership division of profits is not always necessary
among partners
D. There is partnership they being co-owners and co-possessors