THE RAINBOW SWASTIKA

A REPORT TO THE JEWISH PEOPLE

ABOUT NEW AGE ANTISEMITISM
by Hannah Newman

Welcome to one Jew's analysis of a

Kinder, Gentler Final Solution.
INTRODUCTION FOR READERS PRO AND CON
Notes for Jews involved in the New Age Movement, for debunkers of conspiracy
theories and skeptics, and for those who have never been happy with the Age of
Aquarius.

A. HOW BIG A CONSPIRACY?

Leading New Agers make some pretty fantastic claims. Are they exaggerating? How
can they function if the Benevolent Conspiracy is as big as they say?

B. HUMAN HISTORY ACCORDING TO THE NEW AGE

Human evolution takes on epic proportions -- and definitely racist tones. Guess how
the Jews rate... but reincarnation and karma explain everything. The fact that 80% of
humanity must be weeded out to save dear Mother Earth is only part of the Big
Cosmic Picture.

C. THE GODS OF THE NEW AGE

The "Creator", the "Christ"... They don't mean what Jews think they mean. But that's
part of The Plan. Meet the NA Hierarchy, their "trinity" and Lucifer... (who?!) What
do "The Masters" offer mankind, what do they want from us, and how is their track
record so far?

D. 'THE PLAN' OF THE NEW AGE

The goal of "The Plan": world peace. But first the Hierarchy has a score to settle in an
ancient War. Next they will deal with "world problems" like the Jews. Read about
your date with Planetary Initiation, who is running the New Humanity Project, and
what nuclear disarmament is really for.

E. NEW AGE VIEWS ON JEWS AND JUDAISM

The "Jewish Problem": how we ruined mankind with Judaism, Zionism and just being
ourselves. Why we had to do it, why the New Age has to undo it. They don't hate the
Jews. (The secular Jews do it for them.) But the "Dark Force" behind the Jews is
another matter.

F. NAZISM AND NEW AGE

Hitler the adept occultist, Gnostic guardian of the Grail, messiah of the New
Humanity. Fellow occultists knew it, Hindus and Western New Agers recognized it,
the neo-Nazis celebrate it. Yet few historians have explored this link. Why do so
many Holocaust scholars miss it?
G. THE TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIETY
More than a familiar slogan, "Transformation" is the New Age strategy to get us to
conform to The Plan, either knowingly or unwittingly. Media and entertainment have
done their jobs well. There are hiccups in Transformation, however, as well as
resistant portions of humanity.

H. EDUCATION IN THE NEW AGE

The New Age is grooming the emerging generation, with or without parental
permission. Just how far back it started will shock Americans. What do Alice Bailey,
the UN, the Clintons, and Littleton, CO have in common? A look inside the Trojan
Horses of the World Core Curriculum and Outcome Based Education. Even home-
schooling is not out of their reach.

I. MISSIONIZING AMONG JEWS

This section is twice as long as any other, which should tell you something already.
Why have NA missionaries invested so much in penetrating the Jewish community?
More importantly, how do most of them manage to blindside the anti-missionaries and
other Torah guardians? (Kabbalists could tell you, if they chose to.) Learn about the
"networking effect": how it has hurt us and how it can help us. A "short" list of the
most successful NA Missions, both in Israel and abroad, in the secular, traditional and
orthodox communities. Brace yourself.

J. WHAT TO DO: A JEWISH RESPONSE

Hopeless situation? For many Jews, yes. For yours truly, no. It all depends on where
you're expecting help to come from.... and whether you're willing to commit to
personal and community "transformation" of another kind. But it will mean hard
decisions, and the Hierarchy is counting on you to shrug it off and go back to sleep.
Copywrite Note: None of the material by Hannah Newman is restricted.
You are permitted to quote, reprint, and distribute it freely -- on two conditions:
-- that you offer it without charge. That's the only way to handle material which has such drastic
implications for an entire people.
-- that you take care to distinguish between what I wrote and any comments you might feel
compelled to add. I have invested hundreds of hours in research, and many more in choosing my
words carefully, in order to accurately portray this phenomenon without sensationalism and with
a minimum of subjectivity. Please respect that.

"Who is this Hannah Newman... and why should we believe her?"

I'm a nobody, actually. I have no academic degree even remotely related to this field. No list of
published books, teaching stints, or associations with Big Names. No sponsors, no financial
backers, no authority endorsing my efforts. I have never lectured on this subject, nor do I ever
intend to. This research is not connected with my job, and was done completely in my spare time
over several years. Among other things, this means I have no reputation to protect, no superiors
to satisfy (except the G-d of Israel, who I acknowledge with no apologies), no agenda for fame
or notoriety. No reason to lie to you.

For you, the faithful skeptic, that's good news. You'll have to judge the material on its own
merits. To that end, I've supplied you with plenty of sources and links. I'm available to answer
questions and challenges by e-mail. And I have confidence that as a thinking human being, you
can satisfy yourself as to my reliability.

For any fans who are distressed because they want to recommend my work but don't know how
to describe me, I'd be quite happy to be known as "an Israeli housewife who did her homework."

Offered humbly in the Jewish spirit of "world service" - for the sake of Heaven,
HN
 Introduction to

THE RAINBOW SWASTIKA

Notes from the Author B"H 12/00 - Kislev 5761

This article appeared originally as "Masters of the Blinding Light: What the Jewish People Should Know
About the New Age Movement", posted to the Web in 3/97 (Adar Bet 5757) courtesy of the Jewish
Student Union, University of Colorado. A copy was filed at that time in the archives of the Sassoon
Center for the Study of Antisemitism (Hebrew University, Jerusalem). It was removed from the U of
Colorado webserver in 10/99, without notice or explanation. But for those interested, it can still be
found on other sites.

This is a newer version with many important additions, as well as updated facts and better links.
As before, all the material in this series is drawn directly from New Age leaders themselves,
either as direct quotes or summaries from primary sources. Only occasionally did I resort to
second-hand information (someone else writing about the New Age from the outside); these are
duly noted and are limited to sources either neutral or favorable to New Age philosophy.
Undocumented quotes were considered hearsay and not used at all. [Any of my own comments
or opinions are enclosed in brackets like this, to distinguish them from the objective report.] If
anyone has other documented evidence pertaining to any subject addressed here, feel free to
contact me.

*NOTE:* There are NO copyright restrictions to any of this material, as far as I am concerned.
You may quote, reproduce and distribute it on two conditions: (1) that you leave it as it stands -
do not "put words in my mouth" or delete text without making it clear that you've done so; and
(2) that it is offered free of charge.

But first, a few words to the different readers checking out these pages.
All the material from this point until Part A are of course my own perceptions. But
they are based on four years of intensive absorption of the New Age mentality, and I
submit them with the confidence that they are accurate.
News for Jews involved in New Age groups:
In a nutshell, the 'New Age' is a political/religious movement which seeks to unite the world under the
guidance of non-human spirits, in the process singling out Judaism - and eventually the Jewish people -
for destruction. One of the "new" things about the "new" age is a human race purged of all Jewish
presence.

"That's ridiculous!..." you will automatically say. If "New Age" stands for anything, it stands
for a new era of enlightened equality for all peoples and all religions. Are you willing to test this
claim? If it's true, then we can find New Age leaders everywhere teaching that historical
Judaism - the Judaism which survived and developed over 4000 years, known today as "orthodox
Judaism" - is as enlightened a religion as any other on the planet, right? Oops.

"Well, okay -- there is the Jewish people, and then there's Judaism." The fact that orthodox
Judaism is targeted for elimination in the coming new age will come as a shock to some involved
in New Age groups which preach 'tolerance for all religions of the world'. Others are aware of it,
but feel that Judaism really is a separatist, arrogant religion, based on an outmoded, narrow code
called Torah which has been needlessly restricting humanity; of course it has to go, or at least be
overhauled until its distinctives are removed. But as far as hostility toward ethnic Jewish
identity, most New Agers will say with confidence: "No way! Jews are fully accepted in New
Age circles."

If you believe this, you've been had! Two things to think about:

1. An assault on Judaism is an attempt to eliminate the Jews. At the risk of stating the obvious,
if there were no actual Abraham, Isaac and Jacob; no event in history called the Exodus; no Sinai
experience, or "Promised Land", or "chosen people"; and especially no "God of Israel" who did
the choosing and the promising... then there is no legitimate basis for carrying on about
descendants called "Jews". In this framework, Jewish heritage can no doubt be appreciated for
its edifying fables. But Jewish heritage cannot be allowed to intrude on real-world politics,
religious consensus or social conscience -- anymore than Little Red Riding Hood can file assault
charges in a court of law against the Big Bad Wolf.

If the Jewish Bible does not chronicle a real history of the Jews, then all that we have are people
living in delusions of identity, and insisting that the rest of the world play along. (This is exactly
what New Age architect Alice Bailey concluded.) Like a deranged individual who can't separate
fantasy from reality, the Jews are dysfunctional at best, and possibly dangerous to themselves
and others. In dealing with those who refuse to give up the fantasy, isolation and confinement
may be necessary for the good of all.

You have just had a glimpse into the internal logic of "The Plan" (the unassuming title New Age
leaders have given their agenda). The Jewish people, whether they know it or not, are a
dysfunctional segment of humanity. Anyone who humors them is not doing them or the world
any favors. Their rehabilitation must begin by eliminating the religion which gave them these
delusions -- a religion so powerful that it unfortunately has infected other religions and peoples
with a belief in the One G-d as revealed to Israel.
To set things right, part of New Age "transformation of society" involves spreading
disinformation about the Jewish religion. There is no concern here for factual accuracy. Truth is
irrelevant to the art of molding public opinion in an Entity War (as New Ager and UN leader
Robert Muller has described it). The goal behind delegitimization of this religion is to remove its
influence from other spiritual systems (especially from Christianity, the daughter religion of
Judaism and the most "corrupted" by it). If possible, the goal is to remove Jews from its
influence as well; and those who crave to be accepted by the world will eagerly help them trash
Judaism... and their peoplehood along with it. As for Jews who refuse to give up this "identity"
delusion, The Plan has a final solution (benevolent of course).

If you support the "progressive" idea that Jews have a future without the "old-age" Judaism, then
dare to test it. Go out and see if you can find Jewish children raised without loyalty to Torah,
who still care to identify themselves as Jews. You will find some - but then search for their
children.... Talk to the many who have left the Jewish label behind as irrelevant, and you will
find them both intelligent and brutally honest. They have simply faced the truth more squarely
than their parents: "the new Judaism" cannot justify itself to the next generation. (This is not to
be confused with those who reject Judaism for hypocrisy, lukewarm worship, racial arrogance,
all of which are sins against Torah - this is a completely different issue which is legitimate and
will be discussed elsewhere. Here I mean the "new Judaism" which rejects Torah itself as the
sin.)

2. The New Age is founded on spiritual racism. If you believe Jewish people are accepted as
equals in the coming Age of Aquarius, you are uninformed concerning the doctrine of "racial
karma". This is a basic teaching of Theosophy, the mainspring of the New Age Movement, and
is expanded in the writings of Alice A. Bailey. It limits all Jews to inferior spiritual status,
regardless of their "enlightened behavior". Never heard of it? This series of articles is dedicated
to acquainting you with this and other foundational teachings of New Age philosophy which are
"overlooked" in courses for seekers, seminars for world servers, and low-level initiations into
esoteric schools and societies. The truth of my claims can be verified by anyone with access to
the unabridged works of key New Age leaders quoted in the series.

Facts for Debunkers and Skeptics:

1. "Is this another hysterical conspiracy theory?" Your skepticism is understandable and necessary.
However, to my knowledge this is the first conspiracy which has proudly called itself one, and gone
public with details of its agenda. The ringleaders display a confidence and an openness that plainly says
(rightly or wrongly) that no one can stop them. What is more unsettling, they are convinced that no one
in his right mind will WANT to stop them. Not even the Jews. Their antisemitism is presented as
benevolent correction which will be embraced by the Jews themselves -- once they really understand
their need. Let me be clear here: New Agers generally do NOT hate the Jews. But this makes their Plan
no less antisemitic... and far more dangerous.
"The Rainbow Swastika" is a condensed description of the philosophy and plans of this so-called
Enlightenment - from their own sources. Everything mentioned in this series is publicly
distributed by various NA groups. You can verify each statement for yourself. As I stated
above, the material is either directly quoted or summarized from explanations by leading New
Age spokesmen and their disciples - not what others say about them. Direct quotes are noted
with the source, and sources for my summaries can be provided. Those sources which I know
are available on the Internet are hot-linked for your convenience. Any comments of my own or
from non-NA sources are in [brackets]. Only the last part (A Jewish Response) is completely
drawn from my own thoughts.

2. "Who's worried about a lunatic fringe group?" As you will see later, Alice Bailey was one
of the most antisemitic occultists of this century. For those who insist that Bailey's doctrine is
safely marginalized among obscure occultists, it will come as a shock to discover that she was
indirectly awarded the UNESCO Peace Education Prize in 1989, and that her teachings are
already incorporated in schools around the world, including U.S. public schools (via the "Goals
2000" program). "Lunatic," perhaps. "Fringe"? No longer. Especially not with global star Robert
Muller openly promoting her teachings.

The "Benevolent Conspiracy" (as New Age leader Marilyn Ferguson called it, back in 1980) has
been so successful that today it is the standard for social, political and religious acceptability. It
is consciously supported by a surprising number of prominent public figures and grassroots
groups (although not all are aware of the antisemitism), and its teachings are being unknowingly
absorbed by many more. For these reasons alone, it is urgent that we be informed about their
platform.

I have heard from skeptics who don't doubt the existence of a New Age conspiracy (benevolent
or otherwise), and who recognize the danger to the Jewish people, but who are sure that such a
movement will never have the world support to pull off its agenda. They point to the repeated
postponements of New Age predictions of a World Teacher emerging by a certain date to guide
mankind into a 'planetary (Luciferic) initiation', a one-world government and a "new age". These
delays are actually the result of Divine veto - for now - which New Agers indirectly
acknowledge and which they unable to circumvent. To attribute these glitches to a disorganized
movement is dangerous, and ignores the fact that the growth of New Age influence worldwide is
solidifying exponentially each year. Read before you scoff, please.

3. "You can't generalize about the New Age Movement; it's too broad and variable for all
those groups to be lumped with Alice Bailey." Whether they name Bailey as the source for their
beliefs is not important - the test is whether they embrace her philosophy. I have yet to find a
group calling itself "New Age" that does not anticipate and welcome the demise of the "Old
Age". Most do not question who set the parameters for the "old" which has to go, they do not
presume to challenge the "Ancient Wisdom". If they are reciting The Great Invocation, relying
on spirit guides for enlightenment, denouncing "separatism" as the world's great evil, and/or
denigrating Judaism as "an outmoded spiritual system", then they are Bailey's disciples teaching
Bailey's creeds. [For other commonalities, see below]
Notes for Opponents of New Age Teaching:
It's a rare individual these days who does not have a friend or relative mesmerized by the New Age light-
and-love doubletalk. If you do, you know how painful it is to watch someone close to you losing their
psychological stability, abandoning their normal responsibilities and relationships, and slipping away
into a self-absorbed quest for do-it-yourself godhood (doomed to fail again and again). The linked
information below will add to your distress -- especially if you and/or your friend are Jewish. But you
also gain insight as to how someone could fall for such empty promises and contradictions. That insight
can give you leverage to help them get back to solid ground. If you have faith in the G-d of Israel, you
will find Him an interested and indispensible Ally in rescuing the people you care about.

Even if you don't personally know someone who has been turned upside-down by New Age
thinking, if you are Jewish and/or love the Jewish people, you have an interest in preserving the
Jewish community, and in defending them against plots to eliminate them. But you can't fight
what you don't understand. So, whatever your motivations, here are some basic facts to equip
you:

1. Different new branches, same old roots: The premises of New Age (NA hereafter),
sometimes called the New World Order, are most clearly mapped out in a religious society called
Theosophy (founded 1875 by Helena Blavatsky), which coined many of the "code words" found
in this material and which remains a prime source for piecing together NA foundations. Most if
not all of NA concepts predate Theosophy, as its founder freely admitted. They borrowed
heavily from classical Hinduism and Tibetan Buddhism, with large doses of Gnosticism,
astrology and other occultic power-quests. So despite the name "New" Age, we are surveying an
ancient system of worship, found in various forms around the world (Babylonian, Egyptian,
Norse, Atlantian, Pan/animist, American Indian, and other religions dependent on enpowerment
from various spirit-guides). This is why New Age teaching is so easily adapted to so many
cultures. Alice Bailey, the next major NA leader, "channeled" the extensive directives for the
framework of the New Age -- what she called the New World Order -- and fully subscribed to
Theosophy as well.

2. Logic not required: The discerning reader will notice some NA statements that contradict
others, especially regarding good and evil, fate and choice, equality and elitism, truth and
falsehood, and the origins of Maitreya / Lucifer. Pointing out these contradictions to hard-core
New Agers will not cause them to doubt. Since they have accepted the Hindu worldview that
truth, good and reality are whatever each finds within himself (at any given moment), they will
patiently reply that your demand for consistency in any of these is arbitrary, unimaginative and
unnecessarily narrow. Do not expect logical analysis, empirical observation or comparative
argument to be taken seriously, as NAers respect subjective experience only (and then only for
the one who experienced it first-hand). There are also a few contradictions about the origin of
the Jews, but interestingly there are no contradictions about the destiny of those who insist on
retaining the faith of their fathers.

3. Deliberate riddles: Public pronouncements and teachings of New Age leaders, although
usually in English, can seem like a foreign language - recognizable terms are used in
unintelligible contexts or given contradictory associations. These are known in esoteric societies
as 'blinds' or code words - riddles deliberately coded to convey still-classified information over
the heads of the uninitiated or hostile observers. The blinds used in New Age are many, and
match those used in the occult (per Helena Blavatsky, _The Secret Doctrine_, p.435). Thus, we
on the outside can know only as much as NA spokesmen see fit to tell us; as in all occult groups
some information is presumably shared only with top-level initiates. However, the riddles are
being publicly unlocked with increasing frequency on a voluntary basis, showing that NA sees
its power base as sufficient to withstand any hostility to its agenda. In other cases, there are
"leaks" by high-level leaders who have jumped ship, showing that even hard-core NA loyalists
are prone to disillusionment after years of self-made reality.

4. Exploiting naive idealists: From my personal experience, I find there is a surprising number
of people applauding the "New World Order", "the Age of Aquarius", the "new Humanity" or the
"Ancient Wisdom", who are woefully uninformed as to where all this came from and where it is
leading. This is often because they have chosen to back one attractive NA issue without checking
the foundations of the Movement, or because they haven't checked a range of NA sources. Most
of these supporters are in the lower ranks, many of them working hard for their causes in the
conviction that NA will really make the world a better place for everyone, Jews included. It is in
the interest of the upper leadership to promote this illusion and keep working-level New Agers
from catching on to the real agenda, since many would refuse to cooperate if they knew. Even
so, there is already enough talk about 'global purges', destined to wipe out 80% or more of the
world's population, to make it clear that not only the Jews, but many dedicated "world servers",
will be judged unfit for the New Age once the elite power structure is in place. It takes time for
these dedicated "light-workers" to digest the fact that they are being used and lied to, and
sometimes there is a period of denial, but they deserve to know the truth. I therefore recommend
passing this information not only to opponents of the New Age but also to its supporters -- and
doubly so if they are Jews or are married to Jews.

The series begins immediately below, with links to all the segments at the end. Feedback, of
course, is welcome and even expected - whether your response is appreciation, doubt or outrage.
My only request is that you read everything before responding. -- HN
A. How Big a Conspiracy?
_The Aquarian Conspiracy_ by 'Marilyn Ferguson' (pub. 1980) was the first major book by NA leadership
claiming to catalog the extent of their movement. Ferguson had proclaimed then: "They have coalesced
into small groups in every town and institution. They have formed what one called 'national non-
organizations.' Some conspirators are keenly aware of the national, even international, scope of the
movement and are active in linking others.... There are legions of conspirators... in corporations,
universities, hospitals, on the faculties of public schools, in factories, in doctors' offices, in state and
federal agencies, on city councils and the White House staff, in state legislatures, in volunteer
organizations, in virtually all arenas of policy-making in the country [U.S.]... [including] at the cabinet
level of the United States Government." (_The Aquarian Conspiracy_, p.23, 24, 235).

Wasn't she exaggerating? Considering the statements of other like-minded spokespeople which
we will examine in this series, and the tremendous changes our society has experienced since this
New Age manifesto was published, it's more accurate to say that Ferguson broke it to us gently.
We are indeed confronting "a new mind" being orchestrated on a global scale. Only it is not
"new". [Nor is its conspiracy "benign" from a Jewish point of view, as we will see.]

Contrary to past esoteric groups which were shrouded in secrecy, New Age is quite obliging in
identifying the members of their "benign conspiracy", whom the leading spokesmen claim are all
supportive of "The Plan" for a "New World Order". The extent to which NA thought has
become acceptable is evidenced by the fact that the writings of Alice A. Bailey, the main
architect of the Plan, and Helena P. Blavatsky, the "grandmother of New Age", can now be
accessed online - complete with outrageous passages about the Jews and Judaism. [My quotes
from these two are drawn from these online versions.] New Age "Directories" have been on sale
since the early 1970s, and mushroomed in 1975 when the movement received "transmissions"
from "the ascended Masters" (their spirit guides) to go public. One such early directory
(_International New Consciousness Directory_, New Age Media, 1979) contained 10,000 groups
(excluding branches) in North America alone. [One can only guess at the number after 20+
years.... so I cannot list more than a representative sample. Many of the entries are from the
research of U.S. attorney Constance Cumbey and are listed in her work _The Hidden Dangers of
the Rainbow_.]

1. There are umbrella groups actively "networking" other smaller organizations into the Plan.
Here is a partial list of the older, more established groups: the International Cooperation Council
(since changed to Unity in Diversity - a network of 300+ organizations), Lucis Trust (publisher
of Alice Bailey's books, once called Lucifer Publishing; also the parent org of World Goodwill),
Stanford Research Institute (educational material, including a "New Age Manifesto"), the Lorian
Association (headed by David Spangler), Share International (headed by Benjamin Creme),
Amnesty International, World Federalists (world politics), The Networking Institute (prominent
in the Far East), The New Group of World Servers (social action, founded by Bailey), "Whole
Earth catalogs" (environment and nutrition, with esoteric religion thrown in), the First Earth
Battalion (US Military), Planetary Citizens (global politics), the Rainbow Coalition (interracial
unity), The Temple of Understanding (interfaith dialog, closely connected with the UN), New
York's Cathedral of St. John the Divine (home to the previous group and others), the Pacific
Institute (courses for management).

Most of the network umbrella groups have some connection with Planetary Initiative for the
World We Choose, run by a "World Council of Wise Persons" and/or a "Coordinating Council"
[not known if they are the same]. This group publicizes dates of its meetings at the UN, and is
not shy about publicizing names of past and present "Wise Persons": Buckminster Fuller,
Norman Cousins, Dr. Carlos Romulo, Brooke Newell (once VP of Chase Manhattan Bank),
Gerhard Elston (ex-director of Amnesty International), Helen Kramer (Int'l Assoc. of
Machinists), Robert Muller (Chancellor, UN University for Peace), Donald Keys (of Planetary
Citizens).

2. Philosophical and/or religious societies [they define themselves as philosophical or

educational to avoid legal complications with US constitutional law, but they are religious in
nature] which were founded by New Age figures in obedience to spirit-guides, and which teach
occult enlightenment through spirit-guides: Arcane School, Seven Rays Institute,
Anthroposophy, Waldorf schools, Theosophical Society, Transcendental Meditation, 'A Course
in Miracles' (interfaith study group), New Thought courses, Silva Mind Control, New Acropolis,
Scientology, to name a few. [Ironically, many of these groups, even those with decidedly racist
teachings, have found a ready following in Israel, of all places. See relevant entries in the
Missionizing section.]

3. Prominent individuals who publicly laud(ed) the New World Order described by Bailey
include world-class figures (some of whom have since passed away): Willie Brant (German ex-
chancellor), Prof. J. Tinbergen (Nobel Prize winner), George Bush (ex-U.S. president), Robert
Kennedy (veteran U.S. Senator, former Attorney General), Margaret Mead (anthropologist), Carl
Rogers (psychotherapist), Eric Fromm (psychologist), Barbara Marx Hubbard (Democratic
nominee for VP in 1984), Robert Muller (former Asst. UN Secretary General), U Thant (Muller's
UN boss and mentor), Donald Keys (founder of Planetary Initiative and pivotal UN figure),
Aurelio Peccei (founder of the Club of Rome), Isaac Asimov (scientist and sci-fi writer), Alvin
Toffler (author of 'Future Shock'), George Christie (founder of Intelsat Consortium of 106
countries), pop singers John Denver and Judy Collins, historians William Irwin Thompson and
Theodore Roszak, actress Shirley MacLaine, psychic Edgar Cayce. [Actually, the list is getting
so long it would be easier to list those who actively oppose NA goals.]

4. Aggressive promotion of the New Age agenda, besides through the above organizations, is
going on through the following more general groups and activities: Montessori, Greenpeace,
Sierra Club, Zero Population Growth, Planned Parenthood, Hunger Project, Voluntary
Simplicity, Bread for the World, most disarmament groups, the Council on Foreign Relations,
the Club of Rome, Skull and Bones (Yale fraternity), the International Legal Commission (UN
consultant), UNESCO (key UN agency), World Council of Churches (ecumenical Christian),
Unitarian churches, Bahai and Sufi sects (Moslem), The Door (NYC medical facility), many
interfaith dialog projects, most health food stores, the entertainment industry.
[Note: many well-meaning people participate in these, simply from a desire to further
international understanding or make the world a better place. For the innocent souls who have
not learned what "planetary initiation" and "global cleansing action" mean to New Agers, a rude
awakening is coming, especially if they are Jewish.]

5. According to Ferguson, governmental groups (U.S.) which have embraced New Age include:
the Department of Defense (invited Ferguson as keynote speaker at their annual dinner in 1982,
shortly after her book circulated), the National Institute of Mental Health, the Department of
Health, Education and Welfare. Industrial giants which require their managers to attend New
Age seminars: General Motors, AT&T, Chrysler Corporation, several oil companies, Lockheed,
Blue Cross-Blue Shield. [Ferguson's list is 20+ years old at this point; we can assume the NA
influence to be significantly wider by now.] New Age teaching has entered the school systems
through the World Core Curriculum, written by Robert Muller, promoted by the UN, and
acknowledged to be based on "the teachings set forth in the books of Alice A Bailey by the
Tibetan Teacher, Djwhal Khul." (WCC Manual, Preface)

How Can Something This Big Function?

Described by Ferguson (_Aquarian Conspiracy_) as the opposite of a beaurocracy, "Its
organizational chart would resemble a badly knotted fishnet.... Its center is everywhere.... Its life
does not hinge on any one [group or leader]." The networks take the same action, she said, not
because they collude together, but because they share the same assumptions. "The shared
assumptions are the collusion." (p.217) In other words, they are evidence of design, but not
human design.

NA spokesmen have no anxiety about their movement being sabotaged from within, due to their
deliberate structure of the "badly knotted fishnet". Each network is independent of the others and
no one organization or leader is indispensable; therefore, anyone causing a PR disaster or
deciding to fight the Plan can be eliminated without damaging the network, with others taking
over the function. [The Jim Jones Guyana fiasco was a good example: the _Spiritual Community
Guide_ of 1972 listed his People's Temple as a 'New Age spiritual center'; after the mass suicide,
_New Age Magazine_ branded him as "a dangerous example of Christian fundamentalism" and
he was quietly removed from the Guide. The switch is documented by Cumbey, _Hidden
Dangers of the Rainbow_, p.60]

Although it is claimed that New Age has no central core or structure, there are numerous
organizational charts, a world center (Findhorn Community in Scotland), and several "holy sites"
where "masters" can be found - including Jerusalem [which helps explain world pressure to
delegitimize this city as Israel's capital and the seat of Judaism]. NA has its priesthood too,
certain spokesmen whose words are received as law. They include: Helena Blavatsky, Alice
Bailey, Benjamin Creme, David Spangler, Marilyn Ferguson, Mark Satin, Peter LeMesurier,
Maharishi Yogi, George Gurdjieff, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, H.G. Wells, Nicholas Roerich,
Buckminster Fuller, George Trevelyan. [One of the most popular and influential priests today is
Robert Muller, who I consider to be Alice Bailey's direct heir. Keep an eye on him if you want to
track new developments in global-level NA.] Certain popular spirit guides being channeled
today are taken so seriously that they are hosted at the United Nations, through an unpublicized
group called SEAT, the "Society for Enlightenment and Transformation" - these spirits include:
Kryon, Lord Maitreya and "The Group" .

New Age "Bibles" (books studied and meticulously applied) are where one can find detailed
New Age goals and instructions. Some of these are: _Reappearance of the Christ and the
Masters of Wisdom_ (Creme), (Bailey) _The Secret Doctrine_ (Blavatsky) [Aryan race theory],
_Revelation: the Birth of a New Age_ (Spangler) [describing the 'Luciferic initiation' as a NA
requirement], _The Open Conspiracy, Blueprints for a World Revolution_ (Wells) (calls for
"destructive criticism of personal-immortality religions"), _The Critical Path_ (Fuller) [plans for
undermining monotheistic religions by use of computers], _The Armageddon Script_
(LeMesurier) (plans to stage a "second coming of Christ" to satisfy Christian expectations), _The
New Genesis: Shaping a Global Spirituality_ (Muller) (calls for the New Age to begin in 2000,
p.186). Other, more ancient books which are studied include _The Aquarian Gospel_ (a gnostic
work) and the _Urantia_ series (source unknown). All of Alice Bailey's works are studied,
including _Externalisation of the Hierarchy_, _The Rays and the Initiations_, _Education in the
New Age_ and _The Problems of Humanity_ [these give information about the Plan for the New
World Order, the problem of the Jews and the evils of their G-d].

Regardless of claims that the movement has no basic required doctrine, there is no group calling
itself "New Age" that does not revere "The Plan" and "The Great Invocation" (the New Age
prayer for the Plan's success), both transmitted by Bailey from her 'spirit guide', an entity called
"Djwhal Khul" (often shortened these days to "DK"). While the Invocation is marketed as a
generic prayer adaptable to all religions and deities, its careful wording has been handed down
from Alice Bailey's spirit guide and explained to higher-level initiates as an invitation to the
'Hierarchy of Ascended Masters' to "anchor the Plan on earth" and to return the "ruler of
humanity" (Lucifer) to his rightful place at the head of an adoring world.

The following parts in the series describe in more detail the doctrine supported by New Age
leaders in key positions today, its tenets traced back to the writings of Alice Bailey and/or
Helena Blavatsky.
B. Human History According to the New Age

In spite of cautions like the above, NAers are supremely confident that their society is free of
"lethal nonsense". On the contrary, they are convinced that the very survival of civilization
depends on their success in reshaping mankind's understanding of its own origins and destiny. In
their view, any "lethal nonsense" that exists is to be found in those who do not accept any of the
doctrines that follow.

1. Mankind as a whole is continually evolving upward, physically and/or spiritually. There is

no meaningful difference between material and spiritual in this evolution - what we consider
physical "reality" is maya [Hindu term for illusion], no different from dreams or imagination. In
fact, once men's minds are released from accepting the "illusion" of physical limitations,
anything and everything is possible for humanity. Therefore, the material (physical) world is
actually an evil, in that it holds us back from developing our full potential. Bailey identified the
"Dark Forces" in part as materialism and the persistence in relating to matter as real
(_Externalisation of the Hierarchy_ Section II, p.74-75). Hindu yogis devote their lives to
escaping the "maya" of this life through physical deprivation and self-inflicted suffering. So do
Theosophists, in keeping with the Gnostic tradition (see Blavatsky, _The Secret Doctrine_ I,
p.70) Tibetan Buddhists try to escape it through prolonged isolation and silent meditation.
Inevitably, all who accept such a view of earthly existence see death as a welcome escape and a
helping hand in human evolution - as did Bailey (_Externalisation_ II, p.75).

The NA doctrines most familiar to us are tailored to Western demands for a quicker and less
painful path, but their offer of "personal transformation" sets the same goal for the initiate:
escape from the limitations of this life, at least mentally if one is not ready for the physical step.
[A quick survey of popular movies of recent years will show how energetically we are being
indoctrinated to free ourselves from "the physical plane", or the material world. An especially
powerful apologetic is _The Matrix_, which a gnostic acquaintance recommended to me as a
good presentation of his belief system. And lest viewers miss the fact that they are being
preached at, in the final moments of the flick, the main character - "Neo" (Greek for "new man"),
in league with "Morpheus" (Greek for "change", also the god of dreams) - turns into a
combination of Superman and messiah and takes over the dialog. All sense of fictional plot
dissolves as he directs an old-fashioned altar call straight at the viewing audience, inviting them
to join him in this kind of "freedom... where everything is possible". The same tactic was used
with more subtletly in _The Truman Show_, where Truman ("true man") finally catches on to his
illusory "life", defies his manipulative "creator" Christoff (also named deliberately) and steps
right out of his "existence" - to the cheers of his vast audience waiting for him on the "outside".]

We have evolved through several "root-races" (the 1st was the "Lemurian", and the 2nd the
"Atlantean", the latter dated by NA mythology as ending 26,000 years ago). We are nearing the
end of the 3rd, the "Aryan root-race" [Yes, it's the same Aryan race found in Nazi doctrine -
except they identified the location not as Atlantis but Hyperborea]. Each root-race goes through
stages which produce "subraces", representing stair-steps upward toward the next race in which
mankind acquires new attributes and abilities. According to Alice Bailey, these ages change
every 2000 years, and are reflected in the astrological signs. We are currently at a transition
stage between two ages in our "planetary evolution": about to enter the "6th subrace" of the
Aryan root. [This is only one example of the strange math which plagues New Age history - to
pass through 5 ages of Aryan race-history since Atlantis would only take 10,000 years, leaving
another 16,000 unaccounted for....] To complicate human history even further, Theosophist G. de
Purucker claims that we are witnessing the birth of "the 6th subrace of our present 5th [rather
than 3rd] root-race"; according to him, the Lemurian and Atlantean are the 3rd and 4th; root-
races 1 and 2 are unidentified. He names the Aryan race as "one of the very first subraces of our
own 5th root-race" [not the root-race itself, which remains nameless], noting that the Aryan race
is declining but will rise again [revived subraces are not mentioned by Bailey]. Meanwhile, our
current subrace won't die out for another 427,000 years, and by his "Brahmanical" calculations, a
single root-race lasts not 26,000 years but "8.6 million years"! (See _The Fountain-Source of
Occultism_, published by the Theosophical Society.) [Before we laugh, we must remember that
these histories - both versions, in fact - are not attributed by NAers to confused humans, but to
disembodied spirit beings who propose to guide mankind to higher wisdom. In view of their
track record on "wisdom" so far, I wouldn't trust them with my personal bank account, let alone
mankind's future....]

In order to reach each new subrace, the highest form of mankind must make a collective
"quantum leap" across an evolutionary gap; other inferior strains are left behind and eventually
die out as the newly empowered root (sometimes called the new "starseed") takes over. [Anyone
who remembers the classic movie, _2001: A Space Odyssey_, will recall the unexplained scenes
with the obelisk that mysteriously appears, and the sudden leap of higher consciousness in those
who touched it. This was one of the earliest media efforts to introduce the NA "quantum-leap
evolution" doctrine to Western society at large. But at that time (1970) New Age "change
agents" were still under orders by the "Hierarchy" to keep a low profile; thus viewers were
shown nothing but a visual riddle, the keys to which were shared only with the initiated.]

The new subrace is considered literally a new, "mutated" species of man. John White
(_International Cooperation Council Directory_, 1979, p.13-15) coined the name homo noeticus
which is "a newer and higher form of humanity taking control of the planet... while the older
species [homo sapien] dies out from a massive dose of irrationalism." This concept of the old
species dying out to make way for the new was also held by Hitler (see him quoted in _Spear of
Destiny_, Trevor Ravenscroft, p.250). White continues, "Outwardly these mutant humans
resemble the earlier forms. The difference is inward, in their changed mentality, in their
consciousness." In de Puruker's words, "Its forerunners are very few; they are strange people...
freaks of nature." [The idea of humans mutating upward is also being sold nonstop to our society
through entertainment, especially for children - you will be hard-pressed to find a kiddie cartoon,
computer game, toy or popular movie where the "hero" is not some mutant blend of human/non-
human elements, either visibly or "spiritually" or both. This, of course, flies in the face of real
life on our planet; all branches of science have shown that mutations are never an advantage to a
species and always die out quickly. Positive mutations simply do not exist on earth - let alone a
single extra-terrestrial composite remotely like the _Star Trek_ or _Star Wars_ heroes we all
grew to know and love. But hard evidence is no barrier to NA thought, which holds the
imaginary to be as valid as the real.]
2. The term "New Age" refers to the (astrological) Age of Aquarius which is about to begin, as
soon as there is a "critical mass" of "initiates" or enlightened ones ready to make this leap to the
next subrace. The pop group Fifth Dimension released their hit, "Age of Aquarius" around 1970,
whose lyrics explain in detail the astrological signs of its arrival. [The 40-something crowd will
remember the seemingly unrelated song that was awkwardly tacked onto the end of this song,
urging us all to "let the sunshine in" - another clear indoctrination effort.] The term "fifth
dimension" itself is a code phrase referring to "the plane of the spirit guides". (See NAer Jose
Arguelles, interviewed by The Intergroup for Planetary Oneness, _Meditation Magazine_
Summer 1987.) The "old age" being replaced is named by Alice Bailey as the "Age of Pisces",
which ushered in the "Christian dispensation". Conservative Christians are creating an obstacle
to mankind reaching this critical mass, since they are unreasonably attached to their old
dispensation, and their influence must be neutralized. The Jews, who refused even to leave their
"Age of Aries" (the time of the Torah) to enter the Age of Pisces, (to merge with Christianity) are
doubly behind in their evolutionary development (Bailey, _Reappearance of the Christ_, p.81) -
and as a result, double trouble is caused by the lingering influence the Jewish religion has on
society. [Enacting a solution to this is central to the NA Plan]

3. This 'evolutionary progress' depends on four major concepts, handed down, it is taught,
mainly from Babylonian and Hindu religion: reincarnation, karma, human eugenics, and
balance with the Earth.

3a. Reincarnation (each soul returning many times into different bodies). This concept is so
popular that not much needs to be explained here. [However, note that the "evidence" for
reincarnation is problematic: it is always subjective (based on someone's narrative which cannot
be verified or falsified); and it is always self-serving. Everyone's "past-life memory" is
fascinating, rather than mundane as we might expect billions of lives to be. And a past life
invariably justifies what one already wants to do in this life.] We are encouraged to embrace our
past lives, to build upon them rather than regret them - no matter how unsavory we "were". The
one exception is the Jews. Only Jews are expected to reject their present identity as Jews, which
is the unfortunate result of a shameful past incarnation as... what else?... Jews again. (See
_Externalisation_ II, p.78).]

Classic reincarnation holds that there is a limited number of souls being recycled over eons
through thousands of lives. Obviously there is a problem with this theory, as there are far too
many people on earth today to tally with the smaller number of reincarnated souls from the past.
To resolve this, one theory holds that souls have had to "split" in order for each person on earth
to carry a "spark" of something human. Jewish proponents of reincarnation usually hold this
view. [The very idea of one soul being shared by many people clashes with the central Jewish
doctrine of the resurrection of the dead at the End of Days, when each soul is restored to its
original body. Who will be resurrected with which body, and from which life? As a doctrine
which no one can find clearly spelled out in the Torah or Prophets, reincarnation enjoys an
undeserved reputation as a pillar of Judaism.] But the more popular explanation is that there
must be subhumans walking around, bodies without viable souls inhabiting them. [Compare with
Nazi propagandist Rosenberg's statement.] As de Purucker of the Theosophical Society explains
it: "All the stronger, more advanced egos [or, reincarnating souls]... take embodiment in the new
race, whereas the bodies of the decaying race are given over to less developed egos which enter
them... [until they will] finally be the vehicles for only the least developed egos of the human
stock." (_Fountain_, "Racial Cycles and Yugas") At the bottom of de Purucker's soul-barrel are a
"few Lemurian bodies still going on and on - so-called because they are of direct Lemurian
descent - [which] offer vehicles to the very lowest class of the human stock." (Bailey identified
the Lemurian race as the Jews.) The lack in certain circles of "openness to the light" of NA
teaching is explained as one clue that these are the ones lacking developed souls. Other
"symptoms" mentioned by Theosophical Society co-founder W.Q. Judge are genetic, physical or
mental deformities, anti-social behavior and Chinese nationality [sic]; egos may even "desert"
their bodies, leaving functioning but soul-less shells. ("Why Races Die Out", _Path_, Oct. 1891)
For Anthroposophist (former Theosophist) Rudolf Steiner, the under-developed souls were found
in dark-skinned bodies (taught in all Waldorf Schools under "Racial Ethnography").

What then would be the most humane response, given our "overcrowded" planet and the
beneficial effect of physical death? The benevolent NA program is already underway.

3b. Karma [Hindu term] means that this life contains rewards or punishments for good or bad
deeds done in your previous lives, meted out by an impersonal mechanism called "the universal
law of harmony, which unerringly maintains equilibrium in the cosmos" (William Q. Judge,
"The Ocean of Theosophy"). Not only individuals, butraces and even planets are affected by
karma, as Alice Bailey discusses in _Initiation, Human and Solar_ (p.41). It is not explained
how the punishment for a certain individual's actions can be passed on to another (innocent)
individual through genetics, nor is it explained how that would be fair, but anyone who inherits a
genetic defect is assumed to merit the punishment. Similar rules apply to "racial" karma and to
explain the suffering of the Jews. In other words, descendents inherit the payment for their
ancestors' behavior as well as for their own.

This "cosmic law of nature" literally never makes a mistake. "There is no such thing as pure
innocence, even in a tiny babe. Every soul carries within it the scars of centuries of wrong
thinking and wrong doing." (Dr. Rodney Romney, _Journey to Inner Space_, p.127) Past lives
which are lived wrongly bring about karma which must be worked off without complaint. Flying
in the face of all New Age social activism, the purist interpretation of karma logically concludes
that no one should try to alleviate their own or another's suffering, lest we interfere with the
outworking of their karma, upset the balance of cosmic justice, and prolong someone's dreary
journey through future lives. [This rationale has long been followed in India, where sick and
starving people 'of low caste' are left to die in the streets.] W.Q. Judge taught extensively on this
theme ("The Ocean of Theosophy") and commented on its application to the Jews. The cosmic
balance maintained by karma is alternately described in Oriental terms of "yin-yang" where light
and darkness (good and evil) are needed in equal portions for a person, an ethnic race or the
cosmos to be whole. [Like its twin doctrine, reincarnation, the "evidence" for karma is always
subjective, and it is always self-serving for those already living well. The iron rule that
"everyone has got exactly what they deserve" cannot help but legitimize the status quo for those
who like things as they are: a classic example of circular reasoning.]

3c. Eugenics (improving the race through breeding): It is agreed that theoretically it is
"immoral" for spiritually or physically inferior creatures to use up space and limited resources on
our "overpopulated Spaceship Earth", which should be used to nurture the people who are better
equipped to carry the human race to higher levels. Moreover, the purity of the human race
becomes downgraded as such "lower egos" reproduce and interbreed with the "better stock"; this
in turn jeopardizes the success of the next quantum leap to a new subrace. In such a context,
eugenicists see themselves not as racists, but responsible leaders working for the good of
humanity, undertaking a noble and necessary (but misunderstood) task - even a holy task:
"There is now no reasonable excuse for refusing to face the fact that nothing but a eugenics
religion can save our civilization from the fate that has overtaken all previous civilizations."
(George Bernard Shaw quoted by Mark Haller, _Eugenics_, p.19)

The outer defects which are taken to be outworkings of negative karma make it easier to identify
the spiritually "inferior" strains of humanity which will "endanger" human progress. Two
strategies can then be employed: to strictly segregate the superior humanity from contact and
mingling with inferior strains, and to hasten the demise of the undesired strains by preventing
reproduction and by cutting short their natural lifespans wherever possible. Both strategies have
been institutionalized in this century on a nationwide level, most notably in the Hindu caste
system and in the Nazi racial purity laws. [Theosophy was the conduit from the former to the
latter - more in the Nazism section]

A look at the history of "Planned Parenthood" (until 1942 called "The American Birth Control
League") will reveal that its founders, Margaret Sanger, Madison Grant and Dr. Lothrop
Stoddard, advocated a strong eugenicist worldview, proclaimed on the masthead of the _Birth
Control Review_ as "Creating a Race of Thoroughbreds". [Americans of that era were quite
receptive to racial purity ideas, and the masthead did not create the furor it undoubtedly would
today.] "For race betterment is such an intensely practical matter: when peoples come to realize
that the quality of the population is the source of all their prosperity, progress, security and even
existence; we shall see much-abused 'eugenics' actually moulding social programmes and
political policies... we or the next generation..." (Stoddard, _The Rising Tide of Color against
White World Supremacy_, 1930) Sanger advocated not only the "elimination of human weeds"
in a social context, but approved of the "sterilization of genetically inferior races." (_The Pivot of
Civilization_, p.101,108,123) Although she proposed a peaceful path to "racial purification," in
which people would be educated and paid to foster "more children from the fit, fewer from the
unfit", Sanger had no quarrel with the Nazis' compulsory sterilization program. Another BC
League member, Harry Laughlin, received an honorary MD degree from the University of
Heidelberg, in appreciation of his "contributions to the Third Reich". (Richard Hertz, _Chance
and Symbol_, p.107) In return, a number of American eugenicists urged the Eugenics Record
Office (a BC League enterprise) to make Adolf Hitler an honorary member. (see Robert Proctor,
_Racial Hygiene_, p.103) Although this was not done, Nazi articles were printed and Nazi
sterilization policies were praised in the _Birth Control Review_, even after American
eugenicists were invited to witness their coercive and often brutal methods. [see more under
Nazism section].

Has Planned Parenthood distanced themselves from the unsavory history of their organization?
Not if their Annual Report of 1985 is the last word: "Proud of our past, and planning for our
future." The "planning" has included birth control and/or sterilization of the "mentally retarded"
[Project 3], the "physically handicapped" [Project 4] and "psychiatric patients, criminals, and
prisoners" [Project 6]. (Planned Parenthood Federation of America, "A Five Year Plan 1976-
1980")

[While it is true that PP circulated a statement in Feb. 1998 ("The Truth About Margaret
Sanger", see the PPFA on-line Library & Resource Center) to "refute" Sanger's "alleged racism",
their efforts are embarrassing. For example, Sanger is exonerated from the racist masthead of
the _Birth Control Review_ because she did not personally invent the slogan; and then for
"proof" they quote her assessment of "the raising of human thoroughbreds" as "the noblest and
most difficult art". There are also cases of outright denial. One example: claiming that the
review by Havelock Ellis of Stoddard's _Rising Tide_ was published by Sanger in order to
denounce Stoddard's racism, while ignoring the fact that Stoddard remained a co-leader in good
standing at the BC League. Another: refuting Sanger's motto, "More children from the fit, less
from the unfit" by attributing it to the editors of _American Medicine_ who were summarizing
her article published therein, omitting the fact that Sanger reprinted this line in the May 1919
_BCR_ alongside her article.) In some cases, unsavory Sanger quotes are denounced as
nonexistent, whereas other sources have cited book and page for them - the Sanger statement
cited above from _Pivot_ about "human weeds" and "genetically inferior races" is specifically
dismissed as an "allegation" by "anonymous anti-family planning activists"). I know of no other
attempt by PP to deal with Margaret Sanger's eugenics.]

Did Planned Parenthood target only poor black communities for eugenic control, as most people
believe? Not if the locations of their birth control clinics are any indication. Sanger herself
opened one in the Brownsville section of New York - not a neighborhood of poor Afro-
Americans, but immigrant Slavs, Hispanics, Italians... and Jews. [In the 1998 statement, the
PPFA "refutes" the fact that Sanger targeted these groups for population control by saying that
she was not promoting "abortion" among them, only "birth control"....] Were Sanger's
"undesirables" limited to the socially unproductive and genetically dysfunctional? Not if we
consider her own declaration that "dysgenic races" should rightly include "Fundamentalists and
Catholics" - a purely religious consideration. (see _Woman's Body, Woman's Right_, Linda
Gordon, p.229-334.) We will see later that, according to Bailey's New World Order, religious
conviction does indeed affect one's fitness for the new human subrace. [Some sources claim that
Margaret Sanger was indeed a Theosophy devotee, which would explain many of her
convictions, but I have not yet found documentation for this claim.]

Nazi Germany was not the first country with racial purity laws. The US Supreme Court
sanctioned forced sterilization of "undesirables" for over 40 years - the only difference being that
racial desirability was evaluated by social/health criteria rather than by ethnic/religious
background. Following the Supreme Court ruling on "Buck v. Bell" (1927), in which Justice
Oliver Wendell Holmes upheld the "Eugenics Laws" of several states, these laws were adopted
by a total of 30 American states between 1927 and 1933. Before the landmark case, 17 states had
already enacted compulsory sterilization laws, beginning with Indiana in 1907. These laws
followed the "Model Eugenical Sterilization Law" of the Eugenics Record Office, (founded in
1910 and directed by BC League's Harry Laughlin) which called for forcibly sterilizing "criminal
mental patients, retarded, blind, deaf, diseased, alcoholics, and dependents on society"; these
laws also required segregation of the physically and mentally disabled in state-run institutions
(where sterilization took place routinely). The State of Virginia added "unwed mothers,
prostitutes, petty criminals and children with disciplinary problems" to their list. [As we know,
Hitler rounded up the Jews only after legislating forced sterilizations and abortions, euthanasia,
elimination of the physically and mentally disabled, and disposal of social misfits. The U.S. legal
system must therefore be held responsible for encouraging Nazi eugenic policy, having enacted
similar laws before Hitler even came to power. The Nazi Law for the Prevention of Progeny with
Hereditary Disease did not come into being until 1933.] The U.S. eugenics laws were repealed
by the Supreme Court only in 1972. [see the _Pro-Life Activist's Encyclopedia_, The American
Life League, Chapters 53 and 105, on line via the Web]

After the Nazis took eugenics to its logical and horrifying conclusions, American eugenics saw
the wisdom of going "underground", promoting what their British counterparts admiringly called
"crypto-eugenics": working through gradual, incremental education and media exposure to
increase public tolerance (and with it legal sanction) for selection programs. It is part of the
crypto-eugenics strategy to educate people that "quality of life" takes priority over life itself.
"Society legalizes abortion to enhance the quality of human life." (Dr. H.G. Whittington, writing
on abortion counseling strategy) "Upon the quality of human life all else depends." (Stoddard,
_Rising Tide_ p.i) [Today, we are so accustomed to the mantra "Quality of Life" that many fail
to notice the growing list of conditions that supposedly "threaten quality of life" - or the fact that
most of them are less a threat to a fulfilled existence than to society's bank accounts. Evaluating
"quality of life" by monetary cost is one of the most insulting, dehumanizing, materialistic
travesties of our society... and not a word of protest from the NA philosophers who loudly
denounce materialism as a global evil! So much for New Age integrity.]

The first resistance to selection which the crypto-eugenicists tackled was abortion, which after
decades of effort has finally resulted in the fetus being accepted as an unresponsive subhuman by
most sectors of society - except for the deeply religious Jew or Christian, the informed anatomy
student, and the reasonably alert pregnant woman. Second on the list is euthanasia, or "assisted
suicide", which is only now beginning to show fruit. The next "selection" process to be
introduced is infanticide. Moving gradually from early-stage permissiveness, legislation in the
U.S. has been steadily pushing abortion limits which have now reached to the very moment of
birth; "partial-birth abortion" was recently (Aug. 2000) sanctioned by the Supreme Court in a
controversial 5-4 decision (which incidently invalidates contrary laws in 30 states and the
sensitivities of 2/3 of the American public). From there, it is a short step to the proposal which
seemed lunatic less than 3 decades ago: "Most birth defects are not discovered until birth. If a
child were not declared alive until 3 days after birth, the doctor could allow the child to die if
the parents so choose, and save a lot of misery and suffering. I believe this view is the only
rational, compassionate attitude to have." (Nobel Prize winner and ethicist Dr. James D. Watson,
1973, emphasis mine.) Margaret Sanger, more than a generation before Watson, already saw
cases where even perfectly healthy babies should be spared the "misery" of life: "The most
merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is to kill it." (Sanger, _Women
and the New Race_, 1920, p.67) And her colleague, Madison Grant, saw infanticide as a natural
process which could aid the "preservation of the species", if it weren't for the "sentimental
beliefs" inherited from Judaism and Christianity. As could be expected, "quality of life" was
cited when the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the "euthanasia" of "Baby Doe" of Bloomington,
Indiana (1982-3), which in fact was premeditated infanticide (death by starvation) of an
unwanted child.
In fact, some would like to go even farther, equating the "quality of life" which merits being born
at all with a genetic forecast of good health for one's entire life: "If we could tell what fetuses
are going to be affected with cancer in their 40s and 50s, I would be for aborting them now." (Dr.
Cecil B. Jacobson, Chief of the Reproductive Genetics Unit, George Washington University
Hospital, quoted in _Psychology Today_, Sep. 1975, p.22) This will likely be the first
application of the famous Genome Project, which is endeavoring to identify and "map" as many
as possible of the 10,000+ human genes: "It is highly likely that within a decade [from 1990],
tests for a variety of aberrant genes [those which show a higher-than-average chance of
developing a disease or disorder] will be cheap and easy enough to permit testing of large
numbers of people.... As the list of known defective genes grows, there will be mounting
pressure for mass screening of the population, at least of the newborn population.... As prenatal
genetic diagnosis becomes simpler and easier, the temptation will arise to use it for less severe
genetic aberrations...." (Jerry Bishop and Michael Waldholz, _Genome_. See pp.17-20, 278,
308). [To put things in perspective, ponder the fact that The Genome Project is a multi-billion-
dollar effort, mostly financed by the US government. Why aren't the champions of humanism
protesting about the many social needs that could be alleviated with those billions? Why should
an academic research project rate such an outrageous budget? Because it's the eugenicist's spiral
stairway to heaven, promising a powerful shortcut to "creating a race of thoroughbreds"; or in
NA terms, it provides micro-screening for the "starseed" quality needed to populate the coming
Age of Aquarius.]

Most assume that abortion and euthanasia laws uphold "pro-choice", ie, that such "selections"
are explicitly left up to the affected individual or family. Isn't the abortion credo summed up in
"My body, my choice..."? A less-publicized element in landmark abortion laws, such as "Roe v.
Wade" (1973) and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code (1962), is that the doctors - not
the parents - are given "the basic responsibility" for deciding abortions. Could abortion
legislation ever be interpreted to force certain women to abort their babies for the "good of
society"? The sacred assumption of "woman's right to choose" was suspended years ago in
China, where a nationwide forced-abortion program is funded by the UN "Fund for Population
Assistance" [sic]. What about the newer movement for assisted suicide, respecting an
individual's "right to die with dignity"? The World Health Organization reported that at least 50
million "missing" Chinese women are possible euthanasia victims in a country that chooses to
place higher value on its males. (WHO Regional Committee for the Western Pacific, in a UN
report released Sept. 26, 1997) How could this take place with the knowledge and approval -
and assistance - of that global champion of Human Rights, the United Nations?

The answer is alarmingly simple. In the New Age Plan to which the UN is dedicated,"quality of
life" is a collective value, not to be interpreted by the selfish desires of an individual or group.
Certain forward-looking global figures have been telling us for decades that the individual's
"quality of life" is secondary to that of the community: "Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness
are basic rights. But they are the rights of the individual and were listed [in the Declaration of
Independence] at such a time when the literatures of freedom and dignity were concerned with
the aggrandizement of the individual. They have only a minor bearing on the survival of a
culture." (B.F. Skinner, prominent Harvard psychologist and writer). "The ill-conceived 'love of
neighbor' has to disappear, especially in relation to inferior or asocial creatures... in order to
secure the maintenance of a hereditarily sound and racially pure people.... The life of an
individual has meaning only in the light of that ultimate aim." (Dr. Arthur Guett, Nazi Director
of Public Health) "We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best
citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the
strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices." (U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell
Holmes, in Buck v. Bell) "Society as the trustee of life is responsible to [collective] life for
every botched [individual] life that comes into existence... [therefore society should] make it
impossible for them ever to see the light of day." (Friedreich Nietzsche) [in all of the above,
emphasis is mine to show parallels]

3d. Balance with the Earth is a NA principle which reminds mankind that in the midst of all his
advances, he must not forget that he is also part of a Bigger Design in the cosmos. We might
assume that this is meant to offset the eugenic mentality of omnipotence and impart a humbler
perspective of man's position - and so it is at the grassroots level. However, it is a two-tiered
philosophy which further serves the eugenics policy with regard to the upper ranks of NA
leadership.

Part of man's enlightenment is to realize his responsibilities to care for the Earth. [Please note
that New Agers are not speaking here about ecology, although they use genuine ecology to
attract caring, responsible people. We are now examining a religion in which man serves the
Earth, capital "E", as a goddess/mother.] While man is certainly obligated to take better care of
the planet's resources, in the NA value system the Earth does not exist to serve and sustain man;
nor is man, for all his uniqueness in nature, to be regarded as superior to nature in any way. Both
concepts, derived from Judaism, are arrogant and wrong. "To give preference to the life of a
being simply because it is a member of our species would put us in the same position as racists."
("bioethicist" Peter Singer, _Animal Liberation_. Significantly, Professor Singer is now
Chairman of Princeton University's "Center for Human Values".) In the same spirit, U.S.
Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes (champion of compulsory sterilization laws as
noted in the eugenics section) commented, "I see no reason for attributing to man a significance
different in kind from that which belongs to a baboon or a grain of sand."

But it is not enough that man is no longer to be considered the crowning achievement in creation,
or even that "Mother Earth's needs" must come before those of global humanity. By some
peculiar reverse logic, man in his newly-found godhood begins his divine "at-one-ment" with
Nature by admitting that he is an alien, an intruder, a blight on Nature: "Human happiness and
certainly human fecundity are not as important as a wild and healthy planet. I know social
scientists who remind me that people are part of nature, but it isn't true.... We have become a
plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth.... Until such time as homo sapiens should decide to
rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along." (U.S. National Park
Service biologist David Graber, reviewing Bill McKibben's _The End of Nature_ in _The Los
Angeles Times_, Oct. 22, 1989) "The real enemy [which humanity must unite to fight] is
humanity itself." (_The First Global Revolution_, Club of Rome, p.115) "[Mankind is] the
cancer of the planet." (U.S. Department of State Bulletin, Jan. 31, 1966, p.176) Accordingly, the
U.S. government is currently setting aside huge tracts of American land which will be off-limits
to human beings, including locations where forcible population transfer will be necessary.
Clearly the much-publicized NA creed of "returning to Nature" can mean something not
anticipated by many who have jumped on the "Earth First" bandwagon.
To deal with this "cancer" which is humanity, not only is the quality of human life to be strictly
controlled, but the quantity as well. Drastic reduction of the human "plague" is a NA mandate of
the highest order, and therefore (human) over-population is sold by the Western media and
government as the greatest menace facing the Earth today, beginning with the landmark book,
_The Population Bomb_, by Paul Ehrlich: "We must cut out the cancer of population growth.
Coercion? Perhaps, but coercion in a good cause." (p.11) The Georgia Guidestones, a tourist site
dubbed "America's Stonehenge", is a monument to New Age priorities, and over-population gets
attention from first to last - literally. Engraved on huge granite slabs in 12 different languages
(including Hebrew) are a NA equivalent to the Ten Commandments, said to be dictated by
anonymous "guides". Guideline Number One specifies that earth's population must be reduced
to 1/2 billion in order to "balance with Nature", implying that at least 80% of humanity must be
eliminated. Guideline Number Ten reads: "Be not a cancer on the earth - leave room for nature,
leave room for nature." While the Guidestones were erected by an anonymous group which
cannot claim to represent NA leadership worldwide, prominent figures concur that catastrophic
population reductions are necessary for humanity's advancement: "The total world population
should be not more than 2 billion, rather than the current 5.6 billion [in 1994]." (Cornell
University professor David Pimentel, speaking at the American Association for the
Advancement of Science) The UN was even more specific: "A reasonable estimate for an
industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1
billion. At the more frugal European standard, 2 to 3 billion would be possible." ("UNEP Global
Assessment Report", Phase One Draft, sec.9) [According to the UN Population Census table, its
1 billion limit would take us back to the global population of the year 1804, and 2 billion to
1927.] At the "State of the World Forum", sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation and attended
by many world leaders (San Francisco, 1995), Dr. Sam Keen, a respected NA philosopher,
proposed the more stringent Georgia Guidestones level of 1/2 billion: "Cut the population [of
roughly 5.8 billion that year] by 90% and there aren't enough people left to do a great deal of
ecological damage." (William Jasper, "Global Gorby", _The New American_, Oct. 30, 1995) Al
Gore, U.S. Vice President at the time, went so far as to blame over-population in Third World
countries for global warming. (_Washington Times_, "Third World Birth Control Tops Gore's
List of 'Global Warming' Cures", Oct. 1997) [How an abundance of dark-skinned babies can
affect global temperatures more than an abundance of American cars, power plants, shopping
malls and air conditioners is a mystery I'm still pondering. The fact that the man wasn't laughed
out of office provides yet more food for thought.]

[Note: Reputable scientists have been offering proof that the earth is not overpopulated at all, but
that the available land, food and populations are not being managed efficiently. Consider Colin
Clark, former Director of the Oxford University Agricultural Economic Institute, who
determined that with today's technology enough food can be produced to feed 35.1 billion people
with "an American-type diet" using only 50% of the earth's land mass. Or Roger Revelle, former
Director of the Harvard Center of Population Studies, who came up with a figure providing a
2500-calorie diet for 40 billion, using only 25% of land - and having enough left over for
growing fiber, rubber, coffee/tea, and even tobacco! One would think that New Agers would be
delighted with this display of "unlimited human potential" to manage life on the planet. But such
research (by "former" directors) is carefully ignored by colleagues, the U.S. government, the UN
and the media. This curious fact points to an ulterior motive in perpetuating an "over-population
crisis". The NA mandate for eugenics identifies the true agenda.]
Some leading personalities are uneasy about what amounts to a global purge, although they
recognize its necessity: "This is a terrible thing to say: In order to stabilize world population, we
must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say
it." (Jacques Cousteau, _UNESCO Courier_, Nov. 1991) Others have been quite matter-of-fact
about it: "I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from
increasing. There are others... If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in
every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full.... The state
of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it? Really high-minded peole are
indifferent to suffering, especially that of others." (Bertrand Russell, _The Impact of Science on
Society_, p.xv)

[According to some scientists, there is evidence that Russell's suggestion above - written in 1953
- is being followed today, with global epidemics being encouraged both actively and passively
(by withholding cures), as a method of world population reduction. Dr. J. Gordon Edwards, a
biologist who fought the 1960s ban on DDT, asserts the ecological damage attributed to this
pesticide was fabricated; the real "problem" with DDT was that it had prevented 500 million
malaria-related deaths since its introduction in the 1950s, a result which the then-President of
the Club of Rome, Alexander King, termed "my chief quarrel with DDT... In Guyana, within two
years, it had almost eliminated malaria.... It has greatly added to the population problem." See
these and other quotes in "Remembering _Silent Spring_ and its Consequences", a monograph
by Gordon. A similar claim is made by Dr. Leonard Horowitz; see _Gulf War Syndrome: The
Spreading Epidemic Coverup_, and _Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola_.]

In summary, we see that the guiding principle for NA human evolution is "survival of the fittest",
also known as "social Darwinism". [Here is a clue to the inexplicable force-feeding to
schoolchildren of the obsolete theory of Darwinist evolution. This hypothesis has become so
hard to support that it has many prominent scientists squirming, while NA groups like World
Goodwill continue to trumpet it as "proven scientific fact". See another SearchLight article for
choice quotes from scientists. See also my forecast of a new "mutation" in store for
Darwinism.] A necessary preparation for the leap upward is the isolation, refinement and
preservation of the top 10% of humanity as the new "seed". The major NA efforts at
indoctrination are therefore designed to get the other 90% of humanity to accept this elitist
selection as necessary and just, and if possible to secure their cooperation in the purge. [To the
extent that the masses rely on the "truths" of karma and reincarnation, they can be persuaded to
accept billions of deaths, including their own, with attitudes ranging from resignation to serenity
to anticipation. In the near future, as many as possible among the 90% will probably be
encouraged to voluntarily take their own lives, choosing from a variety of pleasant ways to "go
on to the next life". It is no accident that a whole genre of apocalyptic movies has sprung up
recently, whose heroes are ordinary characters (usually from the over-40 generation) who can
prevent the end of human life only by accepting their own deaths. Examples: _Armageddon_,
_Deep Impact_, _Independence Day_, _End of Days_.... Is this a subliminal preparation for
many of the "old order" to adopt an imaginary "messiah" role by sacrificing their lives for the
future of the "new" humanity? See more on "death by choice" as a preparation for the global
purge, in the "Plan" section.]
High on the list of those 90% which must be eliminated are the Jews who insist on Jewish
identity: "When humanity has solved the Jewish problem (with the understanding and
cooperation of the Jew)... it will do so by fusing the problem in one vast humanitarian situation.
When that happens [the dissolution of the "Jewish race"], the problem [the presence of
"separation" and "hate" in the world] will be rapidly solved and one of the major difficulties will
disappear off the face of the earth. Racial fusion will then be possible... and then there will be
peace on earth." (Alice Bailey, _Externalisation_ II, p.77) In other words, the entire fusion
process which is to further human evolution is on hold until the Jews disappear as a group. She
named this as one of four major "world problems" that must be solved within "the next two
centuries" (the other three are humanity's attachment to old-age notions of national territory, sex
and death). When Jews forget that they are Jews, "we shall see a very different world." (_The
Destiny of Nations_ p.34-35)

And what of Jews who have concluded that their offense to humanity is simply the ancient
Jewish religion? Their solution is to exchange the Sinai-covenant-based identity for one based
on the Holocaust legacy, or Zionism, or Jewish culture and ethics, in the conviction that the
"family of man" will have no objection to a non-religious Jewishness. [Such "progressive Jews"
are advised to wake up and smell the coffee: each one of these substitute identity-anchors is
being attacked today with the same vigor, and with the same objections, as the "outmoded"
religion they discarded. It is clear that NO basis for Jewish consciousness will be allowed in the
New Humanity - religious or secular. See more details in the Views on Jews section.] Actually,
the possibility of a secular Jewish identity independent of the Jewish religion is debated among
Jews, but not among New Age philosophers. Bailey distinguishes between two subgroups, "the
Jews and the narrow-minded religious devotees", acknowledging that secular and religious Jews
have different reasons for "regard[ing] themselves as the Chosen People"; yet she concludes:
"The world problem [of Jewish identity] is essentially a religious problem." (_The Destiny..._
p.35) We may logically conclude that for Bailey disciples, any kind of Jewish identity
whatsoever will be considered a religious obstacle to human evolution, a matter to be resolved in
the planned global purge.

4. The "rebirth" process in human evolution, Nature's destructive purge: Each time a new
subrace is about to begin, there are great upheavals in human society, with corresponding "birth
pangs" in "Mother Earth" (also addressed by the goddess-name "Gaia"). Since mankind and
nature are spiritually "interdependent" and interconnected, one expresses the turmoil of the other,
also a foundational belief of pantheism.

In the previous upheaval heralding a new subrace, the "brilliant and spiritually advanced"
civilization of Atlantis was destroyed in a great Flood (an event that Bailey acknowledged was
recorded in the Torah book of Genesis, but with "distortions"). However, New Agers run into
three major difficulties here:
(1) They cannot explain why the advanced spiritual state of Atlantis did not qualify them to make
the quantum leap to the Aryan subroot, and Bailey herself does not attempt it. There are
conflicting theories among NAers on what the Atlanteans did to merit their destruction, most
agreeing only that it was karma which overtook these pre-Flood peoples. An alternate story is
that the "ascended masters" themselves sank Atlantis, considering it a failed experiment due to
human unfaithfulness to The Plan. Still another teaching is that they lost a war with the
"Lemurians", survivors of an older race (Bailey identifies that race with today's Jews:
_Externalisation_, p.77). However Bailey (or more accurately, her guide the "Tibetan Master"),
unwilling to attribute failure to the Hierarchy, says elsewhere that the Atlantean war was caused
by the Hierarchy's decision to lead humanity into union of the opposites: spirit/matter, good/evil,
light/dark, right/wrong. (See _Initiation, Human and Solar_, IV, p.35) The only explanation
universally shunned by NAers is that the disaster was judgment on a corrupt humanity, dealt out
by a transcendent Judge as stated in the Jewish tradition.
(2) There is no explanation for how the law of human evolution was defied - not once but twice -
with the race of Jews managing to outlive both the destruction that wiped out Atlantis (the
"superior race") and the preceding cataclysm in which Atlantis was to replace their "dying race".
Or, if we switch to Bailey's short-age scenario, there is no explanation for why the Jews did not
die out when their Aries Age ended and the new Piscean (Christian) Age commenced 2000 years
ago, as the law of human evolution says must happen. [Besides the puzzle of the Jews' staying
power, I have yet to grasp how Bailey reconciles the Jews having an age of dominance in two
mutually exclusive eras, Lemuria and Aries. To my knowledge, the Jews were the only "race"
she named as leading humanity more than once in history. I dunno... maybe the cosmos called
for an encore?]
(3) To make matters worse, Bailey turns the whole evolutionary theory upside-down by
assigning the losers of humanity the privilege of starting the new race: "At the close of this solar
system, a certain percentage of the human family will fail to make the grade and will then be
held in pralaya, or in solution, until the time for the manifestation of the next and third solar
system comes around. Then they will constitute the advanced guard and the symbol of the
coming humanity of that system. The same thing occurred in the system before this one
[involving] those whom we now call the Jews." (_Externalisation_ II p.76) [Sounds promising -
since the Jews are once more identified as "not making the grade", will they lead the Aquarian
Age as well?]

No matter - the problematic Jews are still here, and by all calculations they've worn out their
cosmic welcome for this age. This verdict and its implications are what concern us at present.

Since we are now on the verge of a new subrace, we can expect to see great upheavals again,
both in society and in "Mother Earth", in the form of famines, storms, earthquakes, plagues,
chaos, social breakdown, violence and crime, disease, despair, insanity, etc., increasing until the
new age is "birthed". Some of the destruction will be managed by deliberate wars as well.
Barbara Marx Hubbard, a founder of the "Congressional Clearinghouse for the Future" and one-
time Democratic nominee for Vice President [she lost and went on to better things as a prime
channeler] describes this stage of history as "the time of the silence in Heaven. This is the cosmic
instant immediately preceding the onslaught of the intensified selection process [note the
recycled Nazi term], or tribulations. What the angels are waiting for, dearly beloved, is you of
my New Order of the Future. [clearly Hubbard is not speaking here, but her spirit guide] You
represent the possibility of the avoidance of the painful process of selection, which means the
destruction of the self-centered who cannot inherit the powers of co-creation." (_The Revelation:
Our Crisis is a Birth_, p.162. Previously published under the title, _The Book of Co-Creation_)
John Randolph Price, architect of World Healing Day and World Instant of Cooperation, and
founder of the Quartus Foundation, relays what his spirit guide "Asher" told him: "Nature will
soon enter her cleansing cycle. These individuals [two billion people who have no "ring of
protection" around them] with their lower vibratory rates will be removed during the next two
decades." (quoted in _Like Lambs to the Slaughter_, Johanna Michaelson, p.307-310) It was
actually Price's spirit guide, "Asher", who dictated this information and more in a book,
_Practical Spirituality_. His "World Healing Meditation", written in 1984, must be read with
Price's/Asher's definition of "healing" and "cleansing" in mind. [See more such quotes in the
"Plan" section.]

These cataclysmic events are not to be resisted or remedied; they are the "cosmic birth" process,
which like all birth tends to get messy for a time. It is "a passing away of the old framework"
with "the Light beginning to expose and correct malfunctions in the created order... not an age to
fear, but to rejoice." (Romney, _Journey_) Global disasters have the benefit of weeding out the
inferior seeds of humanity, whose bad karma was coming due anyhow. In spite of this, many
NA groups focus on relief projects for both humanity and nature. [Critics have charged that very
little money is actually used to relieve suffering among the people they are claiming to help.
Given this observation, which dovetails well with the attitude expressed throughout this section,
the only logical motive for NA relief projects is to draw sincere social activists into their orbit to
indoctrinate them with NA "enlightenment."]

The two purging processes - natural disasters and organized "population assistance" programs
driven by eugenicist philosophy - help the evolutionary progress by purging the human race of
residue from inferior races, which will increase the "purity of the root stock" as all "natural
selection" tends to do. With a little help, of course.
C. The Gods of the New Age

[Important note to orthodox Jewish readers: Jews are commanded in the Torah to shun the
study of idolatrous religions. However, the law of pikuach nefesh requires us to make an
exception here -- ignorance on this subject is destroying our people. The main tenets of NA
religion are important to grasp, not least because familiar religious terms are given radically
different meanings while allowing outsiders to define them as they like (for example, the Great
Invocation). This ploy has allowed NA "change agents" (as they are known to insiders) to
infiltrate the unsuspecting Jewish community in the Trojan Horse of semantics. They say all the
"right" things, work hard in service and scholarship, win leadership positions, and only then do
they set out to reshape the old concepts to fit the "new paradigm". So please do not skip this
section under any circumstances.]

[One other note about quotes below relating to "Jehovah": Readers will notice that I am quite
careful about spelling "G-d" in such a way as to avoid writing it out. Those familiar with
Orthodox Jewish custom will understand it as a mark of reverence for the One we worship, and
therefore may be confused by the fact that I spell out the name "Jehovah", assumed by many to
be the phonetic Name of G-d. According to rabbinic authorities, this is actually a misnomer
based on an uninformed transliteration of the Tetragrammaton (G-d's four-letter Name in the
Hebrew Bible has the vowels deliberately changed to avoid making the correct pronunciation
available). Because "Jehovah" is not the actual Name, I decided to quote it in this section as it
appears - and because it is a name used only for the G-d of Israel, it serves us well here.]

New Age Religion is based on a blend of practically every religious and occult philosophy found
in the world, rejecting only Torah-based Judaism and early (pre-Constantine, pre-gnostic, Judaic)
Christianity. The blend is known as "The Ancient Wisdom" and harmonizes surprisingly well; it
is outlined methodically in a 19th-century Western system called "Theosophy". Following are
the spiritual principles by which NA groups can be identified, no matter which label they give
themselves. [As elsewhere, I concentrate on Alice Bailey's writings, since she is the single most
prominent NA theologian vis a vis the UN; those of Helena Blavatsky are a close second, since
so many groups trace their worldview to Theosophy.]

1. The highest "God".

God is not the Creator (although there is a Creator, or perhaps two, as we will see). The Most
High God does not "do" anything, He just is. The very title "God" is a misnomer which limits the
concept; Theosophists prefer abstract Principles. The ultimate Divine has no name, no definition,
and therefore no accessibility. Man cannot begin to know "the God" of New Age thought; but
for the purpose of indoctrination, NA missionaries will revert to the traditional title and attributes
when dealing with the uninitiated. However, the Jewish idea of one personal G-d who rules
alone is so offensive that the knowledgeable NAer will not even pretend to be speaking the same
language at that point. Helena Blavatsky [HPB] called the "God of Abram, Isaac and Jacob" a
"spiteful and revengeful" deity. (_The Secret Doctrine_ I, p.439, footnote) [For a fuller
description, see below.] The Divine has no personality or self-consciousness - hence, no
revelation from Him is possible, let alone what the Jews have claimed to receive. [One might
then question the very notion of "theosophy", which means "knowledge of God". The answer is
that Theosophy identifies the individual created being as the "god" which needs to be known.]

He (It) is nothing more than an Energy Force which is everywhere (and nowhere), in everything
(and in every non-thing). Everything in the universe is God, and is destined to become God.
(One might think that the first would eliminate the need for the second, but the former is a
universal state of being, while the latter is an individual state of consciousness.) This godhood
includes people (with or without physical bodies), animals, objects, planets, stars and unseen
energies, as well as "Nirvana" or the Great Void - where HPB says "all is absorbed in the spirit
of the most Powerful," and individual consciousness and activity cease.

2. Who is the "Hierarchy"? NA history teaches that they appeared (the word used is
"descended") on earth 18 million years ago, during the Lemurian Age, introducing themselves in
both physical and etheric bodies [presumably apparitions] as "Brothers of Light". They made
their home in "Shamballa" (when on the spiritual plane) and (on the physical plane) in the Gobi
Desert, Shigatse and the Himalayas. They are most often referred to as the "Hierarchy of
Ascended Masters", and sometimes as the "Space Brothers" or just the "Brotherhood" - a group
of ancient beings, many of whom once started out on our (earthly human) plane, but have now
evolved to the level where they are no longer shackled by physical matter and can be considered
divine (to be addressed as "great Lord" or "Master").

The flowchart for the Hierarchy is vast and very confusing, but to simplify the picture, Alice
Bailey presents the Hierarchy in various geometric figures throughout her work _Externalisation
of the Hierarchy_. Directly under "The One about whom naught may be said", is a committee of
7 "Cosmic Logi", followed by 7 "Solar Logi", followed by 7 "Heavenly Men". There are also 7
"Rays" of pure energy emanations. The "Heavenly Man" in charge of earth's evolution is "Sanat
Kumara". Although he is presented as several levels down from the Top, we have no way to
make contact with this being's "colleagues" or "superiors"; Sanat Kumara is therefore considered
the Head of the Hierarchy as far as earthlings are concerned (see more below).

2a. Upward Mobility on the Cosmic Ladder: Judging by Bailey's multileveled flowcharts, these
enlightened beings are more rank-conscious than any corporation on earth. [Just the name
"Hierarchy" says it all.] When someone is initiated into the "Ageless Wisdom", he starts on a
very long path (spelled out in detail by Bailey in _Initition, Human and Solar_) which places a
premium on self-propelled upward progress, measured by "service". [Please note that the NA
concept of "service" is frequently misunderstood. It is not the volunteerism freely rendered out of
compassion for the less fortunate, which rightly inspires admiration; NA "service" resembles the
bonded conscription now outlawed in most societies - forced labor to get out of debtor's prison.
In short, the motive for "service" on the part of better-informed NAers is (pardon the pun)
intensely self-serving.] At the 1st level, the task of the initiate is to serve the Plan as a tiny piece
in the vast, huge Design, working off his karmic debt as it comes to him, without complaint.
Most enlightened individuals cannot hope to advance beyond this level in their present lives. The
few elite who become 2nd level initiates must dedicate all their efforts to serve their "group",
working out their group karma as a team. Not much is said in _Initiation_ about 3rd level
initiates, who can be assumed to be working out racial karma (either individual or group service
to their race, to bring them "enlightenment" by swelling the ranks of "world servers"). It is at the
4th level that the enlightened one (now ranked as a "Master") finally reaches the break-even
point with human karma, and begins to help work off the "planetary" karmic debt. At the 5th
level, the Master sheds the restraint of a physical body but still is bound to service: now to
further the plans of the "three Logoi" (or simply "the Logos") who are at "Chohan" level (two of
them at 6th level, and one at the 7th or "Buddha" level, a state "completely free in the one cosmic
entity".

While this Logos trinity [see below] is considered the collective CEO for the Hierarchy on earth,
around them are others which make up the "central esoteric group of Six, who, with the Lord of
the World, form the heart of hierarchical effort." (_Initiation_, p.30) Below these are assorted
"Solar Angels" or "Greater Builders", which Bailey says "from the Christian standpoint, are the
Holy Spirit" (_Cosmic Fire_, p.617). The fact that the Christians learned this "misnomer" and
many other mistakes from the Jews is evidence of the need for Christianity to be "purged" of
Jewish influences. [Curiously, in _Secret Doctrine_ HPB expressly identifies "Solar Angels" as
"fallen Angels", a uniquely Jewish/Christian idea derived from the Hebrew Nefilim, beings who
were on earth in pre-Flood times - Genesis 6:4. "Fallen" denotes an abrupt involuntary
movement downward... far from flattering, especially when presented as an unchanged position.
Even more curiously, Bailey makes sure to footnote this quote in _Cosmic Fire_, IID, p.953.
Jewish influence is indeed hard to shake off.] There are also "Devas", "Pitris", "Builders",
"Brothers of Light", and numerous other "Masters" - among the last are Kut Humi [NA uses a
few variant spellings, sic in Bailey's _Initiation_], Morya, Rakoczi (alias St. Germain), Serapis,
Jupiter, Jesus, Hilarion (alias St. Paul), Kryon, to name a few - with the most popular today being
Bailey's own guide, "The Tibetan Master" or "Djwhal Khul" (also credited with dictating
Blavatsky's _The Secret Doctrine_).

2b. All Masters are carefully grouped by level of initiation, and are themselves dedicated to
upward mobility. They are commissioned to teach others of lower rank who are ready to improve
their own standing. It is to one or more of those at the Master levels that NA disciples appeal for
enlightenment and empowerment. But except for the "teacher-disciple" label, the process more
closely resembles a "Fortune 100" corporation than an educational or spiritual center. One may
not choose his/her teacher; a disciple is approached by a Master according to his/her spiritual
aptitude and experience, and the disciple's progress is monitored by the Master who submits
regular "supervision reports to the Head of one of the three departments", noting when the
learner is "nearing the Portal of Initiation" to the next level. His name is then submitted to the
Brotherhood Lodge, and his "application" is decided by ballot vote. (p.110) Promotion to a
higher degree of initiation entitles one to pass to a correspondingly higher Master. Initiates (those
in a body or out) who perform exceptionally might attain to the "Inner, or Closed" circle, an elite
power base hidden within each Brotherhood, becoming participants in a "Group Mind" which is
not accessible to rank-and-file Brothers (this applies especially to "walk-ins" - see below). [In
this context, I note that more than a fair share of NAers have claimed to be a disciple of
Maitreya, and even his direct mouthpiece to humanity - as though he were an ordinary Master
rather than part of the nearly-unapproachable Logos. But such presumption doesn't seem to faze
those hungry for "divine transmissions". Even at the UN, where the Society for Enlightenment
and Transformation regularly hosts channelers, this obstensibly knowledgeable group saw no
incongruity in "Lord Maitreya" addressing a meager 40-member audience with no higher
standing than the "UN Staff Recreational Council".... On the other hand, his "message" was so
unoriginal and vague that it deserved the obscurity it received.]

3. The god who represents the Hierarchy to man: Maitreya the Christ. At the crucial times of
new ages, such as the advent of a "subrace" [see Human History section], a spirit known as
"Maitreya" or "World Teacher" - the most "highly evolved being" known to man - descends from
a hidden high place or "power vortex" (variously identified as the Himalayas or outer space) and
"overshadows" a chosen spokesman, who then relays his "transmissions", which are instructions
from the Hierarchy to guide the human race into the next cycle of "evolution". Five times
previously at a key "transition time" (one for each subrace), Bailey relates (through Djwhal
Kuhl) that Maitreya chose Buddha, Hermes, Zoraster, Orpheus, and Jesus as his vehicles. [in
spite of the Jews starring in the 4th subrace of Aries, there is no mention of Maitreya meeting
Moses...] In the early 1900s, it was predicted by Theosophical Society leader Annie Besant that
Maitreya would inhabit a physical body this century; a young Hindu named Jiddu Krishnamurti
was chosen in the 1920s as the vehicle. Although the "overshadowing" was reported to have
taken place for a few moments (_The Theosophist_ 47/4, Jan. 1926), conveying a message from
the "Brotherhood", it failed to become permanent. But the "descent" of Maitreya has been
consistently expected by Theosophists and other NAers since those days.

More recently, Maitreya has chosen the British disciple of Bailey, Benjamin Creme, NA teacher
and the figurehead of World Goodwill and Share International, to occasionally channel his
instructions - or so Creme has been claiming since 1981. [Creme was the first since Krishnamurti
to claim overshadowing from Maitreya, but he now has competition - the Lord Maitreya being
entertained at the UN is not apparently channeled by Creme.] Maitreya, according to Creme, has
held the "office of Christ" for the last 2600 years. [Aha! that's why he never mentioned Moses -
he missed him by about 1000 years... but then that means he also missed the earlier subraces
which Bailey said he was supposed to guide...] Although the Christian title is used often, Creme
and other NA spokesmen insist that Maitreya is the one all the world faiths are waiting for,
including Jews who await the Messiah. At some point, Maitreya (by then in a physical body) will
allow Lucifer to enter the human vehicle as well, when all are "freed from the unreasoning fear"
of that latter name - an event which will usher in the "Luciferic initiation" [see in The Plan
section]

4. The god who brings inner Light to man: Lucifer.

Lucifer is a Latin word meaning "light bringer", according to the Theosophical Society (Ina
Belderis, "Some Light on Lucifer", _Sunrise Magazine_, Oct/Nov. 1996). Bailey and her disciple
Creme both identified him with the one the Jews called "helel ben shahar" (Isaiah 14:12), which
they translate as "shining one, son of the morning" (_The Beacon_, vol. XLVII, no 9, 1978, pub
by Lucis Trust). This is directly taken from Bailey's own title for Lucifer (_Esoteric Psychology
I_, p.395), where she acknowledges that he led a "war in Heaven" when "some of the sons of
God fell from their high estate." However, she dismisses the event as "a trifling incident" in
cosmic terms, and urges us to "readjust your sense of values". Belderis concurs that people have
overreacted to this being's fall: "And yet it is this lucifer, the bright one or lightbearer, that came
to be understood by so many as the name for Satan, Lord of Darkness." Due to Christian
tradition - originally drawn from Jewish tradition of course - Lucifer's activity and intentions
have come to be deliberately slandered, whereby he was renamed "Satan", from the Hebrew
"hasatan" or "the enemy". [This other name, however, didn't bother Helena Blavatsky in the
least. See below.] Lucifer is also identified by New Agers as "the anointed cherub who was in
the Garden of Eden" (see Ezekiel 28:12-15), and honored for being the first "god" to offer to
share godhood with mankind (appearing to Adam and Eve as the serpent).

But since many from the "old paradigm" are not able to accept his proper name, Lucifer allows
men to call him "Krishna", "Buddha", or even "Christ/Messiah", and to honor him in a veiled
symbolic form. This being and his mission are indeed already symbolized in many cultures, say
NAers. Astrologically he is represented by the planet Venus, known as the Morning Star, "the
first radiant beam that does away with the darkness of night. It is a symbol of the development of
the divine light in man." (Belderis) Accordingly, "Morning Star" is the name of one of the more
popular pieces by occultist composer Richard Wagner. The Grail legend, a tale full of Luciferic
symbolism, was the theme for another of Wagner's works, "Parsifal" (see _Wagner's Parsifal_ by
Rolf May, where the Grail itself is "the stone which fell from Lucifer's crown as he plunged to
earth [bringing] the mental principle to evolving humanity," or "as Wagner remarked, 'Grail
consciousness'".) [For more on the Grail, see the Nazism section.] The Greeks presented him as
Prometheus, the gnostics as Ophiomorphos, the Norse legends as Loki, the Chinese as the
Dragon. Egyptians and Hindus worship the cobra, and many others the serpent, as forms which
Lucifer has taken on to bring wisdom to man. Witches worship Lucifer in the form of a goat-
man, known in nature cults as "Pan" (the deity honored at Findhorn and credited with their
miraculous agricultural methods; see _The Magic of Findhorn_ by Paul Hawken). Findhorn
leader Robert Ogilvie Crombie (or "Roc") claims that Pan appeared to him and "sadly" confessed
that he is "the devil" of the Jewish-Christian tradition; concerning this "giant faun" Roc says:
"For his purpose he had to find someone who showed no fear of him.... It is important for the
future of mankind that belief in the Nature Spirits and their god Pan is reestablished and that they
are seen in their true light." (_The Magic of Findhorn_, p.217)

Lucifer is personally in charge of human evolution [see below]. As such, he presides over the
coming "planetary initiation", the ultimate goal in the New Age "Plan". He, with the
intermediary help of Maitreya, is credited by Creme (in various essays, interviews and lectures)
as having "nourished" all the genius which humankind has produced, including Freud, Jung,
Picasso, Mahatma Gandhi, Karl Marx and Einstein (all of these reaching a "2nd level" initiation).
Lucifer arrived here 18-1/2 million years ago from the planet Venus, which became known by
one of his names, "The Morning Star".

The number 666, revered by many occultists as Lucifer's sacred number, is to be used wherever
possible to hasten his appearance. According to Creme (see his radio interview with Art Bell,
July 10, 1998), this number represents "the beast" or the "Antichrist energy", which is not to be
feared but simply accepted and even welcomed as the "destructive aspect" of God himself. This
energy is "deliberately released" to destroy the old and make way for the new. Creme also
repeated Bailey's teaching that this destructive energy is "the Will aspect" of the Divine which
worked through both the Roman emperor Nero and Hitler. [Creme gets a bit befuddled here as he
tries to point out the beneficial service rendered by Hitler in destroying evil, while remaining
politically correct in keeping Hitler on the side of evil.] Among the other informative bits,
Creme notes in his interview that this eradication of the "old conceptions" will hit Bible-based
faith in particular: "The people who will find it probably hardest of all to accept Maitreya are the
leaders of the Christian and - uh - the Jewish organizations." In the same breath, though, he
makes it clear that he really means the Jews: "They had the same problem 2000 years ago when
Jesus was there among them and they didn't recognize him." [It is standard NA tactic to fault the
Jews for rejecting Christ, which both Jews and Christians fail to recognize as manipulation.
Unfortunately, interviewer Bell chose not to pick up on the clear implications for how the Jews
will fare in Maitreya's kingdom. His only reply was, "Yep, yep, I know."]

[This number 666 is not meaningful to Jews, but early Christian tradition, while still close to its
Jewish roots, called it "the number of the beast", an evil being empowered by "the dragon" to
make war against the Jews and Christians who refuse to worship him - see New Testament,
Revelation 13. This creature corresponds to numerous Jewish aggadot (legends) describing
"Armilus", an idol that Satan brings to life and that is accepted by the nations as "god" and
"messiah"; he also makes war against Israel when they refuse to acknowledge him. As for Satan
himself, the Jewish tradition refers to "Samael", which HPB inexplicably endorses. See below.]

4a. Lucifer and "Christ": One of the earliest outspoken promoters of Lucifer is David Spangler,
one of the original leaders of Findhorn (in Scotland) and now a lecturer and author in the U.S.
The back cover of one of his books promotes him as "the shaman of the New Age Movement".
(_Emergence: The Rebirth of the Sacred_, 1984) Spangler, a staunch Bailey disciple, is
noteworthy for his articulate weaving of the various NA concepts of Lucifer into a single
presentation, a 1977 book with the interesting title, _Reflections on the Christ_. The title, far
from indicating confusion, emphasizes Spangler's conviction that Lucifer and the Christ are
"twin sides" of the same "power" (see Spangler's recent book, co-authored with Professor
William Irwin Thompson, _The Reimagination of the World_); therefore, Lucifer is to be
considered literally a "reflection of the Christ", and vice versa. This energy may or may not be
personified, as the situation demands. In _Reflections_ Lucifer is variously described (all in the
same sentence) as "an angel, a being, a great and mighty planetary consciousness." (p.38)
According to Spangler, "the light that reveals to us the path to the Christ come from Lucifer. He
is the light giver." His task is to "prepare man in all ways for the experience of Christhood."
(p.43) Conversely, "Christ is the same force as Lucifer but moving in seemingly the opposite
direction." (p.38) [I would caution Jews not to apply this understanding to the Christian "Christ".
Spangler would be the first to agree that his "Christ" is not a Jew from the 1st century.]

4b. Lucifer, aka Satan, aka "Jehovah": Blavatsky, unlike later Theosophists, has no difficulty
in reconciling Lucifer and Satan as the same being: "Lucifer is the LOGOS in his highest, and
the "Adversary" [Satan] in his lowest aspect - both of which are reflected in our Ego." (_The
Secret Doctrine_, II, p.162) About Satan himself, HPB (_SD_ II, p.388-389) sets aside her
contempt of orthodox Judaism long enough to cite the "Rabbins" [sic] and the Talmud which
records that "'the evil Spirit, Satan, and Samael, the angel of Death, are the same' - (Babba Battra
[sic], 16a)." She also relies on "the Rabbins [sic] teaching that 'Kin [sic] (Cain), the Evil, was the
Son of Eve by Samael, the devil who took Adam's place'". These two rabbinic quotes are
[somehow] seen by her to support a revised, "correct reading of verse 1 (chapter iv, Genesis) in
the original Hebrew text" which proves that "Cain is identical with Jehovah". HPB refers here to
Eve's declaration, "Kaniti ish et Hashem", translated as, "I obtained a man with G-d".
[For the real rabbinic interpretation, see Rashi's simple comment, "b'zeh shutafim anu imo" - "in
this [act of creation] we [Adam and Eve] are partners with Him [G-d]." At any rate, it's strange
that HPB should fuss over the "original Hebrew" when she writes, "The Hebrew Bible exists no
more [except as] garbled falsifications." Stranger still that the all-knowing "Masters" related to
her that the "square letters Jews rely on are characters of an unknown, dead language" which
cannot be traced farther back than "the fourth century A.D." The discovery of the Dead Sea
Scroll of Isaiah must have come as a nasty shock to the enlightened ones. Yet HPB has Israeli
disciples studying at the Theosophical Society center in Tel Aviv.]

Confident of her line of reasoning, HPB then forms the following conclusion (_Doctrine_ II,
p.389): "It becomes easy to see that Jehovah (mankind, or 'Jah-hovah') [sic - a sample of HPB's
Hebrew proficiency] and Satan (therefore the tempting Serpent) are one and the same in every
particular." [a sample of her blatant contradictions - or shall we say, those of the "Masters" who
dictated to her. For her other comments on "Jehovah", see below.] She goes on: "Satan represents
metaphysically simply the reverse or the polar opposite of everything in nature. He is the
'adversary', allegorically, the 'murderer', and the great Enemy of all, because there is nothing in
the whole universe that has not two sides... But in that case, light, goodness, beauty, etc., may be
called Satan with as much propriety as the Devil, since they are the adversaries of darkness,
badness, and ugliness." Elsewhere, she neatly sums up: "Lucifer is divine and terrestrial light,
the 'Holy Ghost' and 'Satan', at one and the same time." (p.513) Interestingly, Blavatsky
repeatedly quotes Jewish "Kabalists" who support the idea that Satan is to be honored as the
"cosmic reflection of God". (p.234) [See more under Kabbalah in the Missionizing section.]
However, she dismisses any enlightenment on the part of the Jews; they merely learned it "from
the Chaldeans and Egyptians". (p.240)

In the end (p.513), however, HPB clings to a sort of monotheism of her own: "Satan is the god
ofour planet, and the only god." (p.234, emphasis hers) She also resorts to the same labels later
used by Alice Bailey: "And now it stands proven that Satan, or the Red Fiery Dragon... and
Lucifer, or 'Light-Bearer,' is in us: it is our Mind... the emanation of the very essence of the pure
divine principal Mahat (Intelligence), which radiates direct from the Divine mind."

5. The god who "created" man: Sanat Kumara.

NA messages to the public encourage "faith in the loving Creator" or "thanksgiving to the Lord
of Creation", phrased to allow everyone his own interpretation. For themselves, however, the
Creator is the head of the Hierarchy, known as Sanat Kumara [SK]. He has other titles as well:
"Ancient of Days", "Lord of the World", "Youth of Endless Summers" and "The One Initiator"
(ie, the one who initiates mankind to higher evolutionary levels). Bailey calls his "Council
Chamber" by the term found in the Jewish book of Psalms, "the secret place of the Most High".
(_Education in the New Age_, p.62) SK is credited as the "founder and initiator of all the most
important movements." Bailey claims (_Externalisation_, p.465) that both Christians and Jews
are actually worshiping him in their attempts to identify "God". [This shows her ignorance of
Judaism; even while calling him "the Most High", she place SK far below the Ultimate God on
her charts, automatically eliminating from him the central attribute of the G-d of Israel. On the
other hand, it shows her intent to deceive, since elsewhere she writes that her "Lord of the
World" is "totally otherwise" compared to the Adon Olam of the Jews - see _Externalisation_,
p.551] Although SK's level of enlightenment earned him the right to enter into "Nirvana", he
instead made the "supreme sacrifice" of turning back to creation and taking the responsibility to
create us into gods. Bailey relates that he "came down" to earth in the middle of the Lemurian
age, taking physical form, and although he later returned to the spirit plane, he "has remained
with us ever since." (_Initiation_, p.28-29) [As we saw above, Bailey disciple Benjamin Creme
makes identical claims for Lucifer, but this is not accidental, as we will see.]

6. The New Age Trinity, or Logos.

Sanat Kumara [SK], Maitreya the Christ [M], and Lucifer [L] are presented to the world as a
trinity. Known as the Planetary Logos, they administer 3 spiritual Energies: respectively, [SK]
Shamballa, the planetary Head, with the principles of Will-Power-Plan; [M] Hierarchy, the
planetary Heart, Love-Wisdom-Unity; and [L] Humanity, the planetary Throat, Intelligence-
Self-Conciousness- Creativity. Elsewhere (p.109) Bailey calls them "The Departmental Heads...
three great Beings", using Hindu terms and assigning to them 3 respective spheres of activity:
"Manu" (SK - matter, form, body, not-self; relating to governments and races), "Bodhisattva"
(M- spirit, life, self; realized in religions and beliefs) and "Mahachohan" (L - intelligence, mind,
soul; expressed in science, civilization and education). Notice that matter is equated with "not-
self"; this follows the ancient gnostic idea that the physical must be destroyed to bring forth the
true "self". Bailey affirms that Sanat Kumara's job is indeed to destroy, using the Shamballa
energy, to make room for the new (_Externalisation_ II, p.89). She saw the devastation of the
Nazis as an outworking of this destructive Shamballa force, calling it "right and good, provided
we understand why it is taking place and by what it should be succeeded." (_From Bethlehem to
Calvary_ p.463) Lucis Trust, the organization dedicated to distributing Bailey's writings,
considers the Shamballa force to be "a demonstration of the beneficent will of God", in that it
"tends to destroy all forms that hinder the emergence of a new and better world [especially in]
the political field." (from Lucis Trust essay explaining Shamballa, Sept. 1999. They also
expected a "release of the Shamballa force" in the year 2000.) [I would assume that if it happens,
this would be triggered by a "new" UN. But since the "new UN" is way behind schedule, we
needn't set our watches.]

6a. Who is the Head of the Logos? According to Bailey, Sanat Kumara is the only one known to
man who attained the 7th initiation, placing him at the summit of the Logos pyramid as the one
who "alone is self-sufficient". (_Initiation_, p.92) Bailey waxes eloquent in describing SK's
purity and sinless state (_Initiation_, p.28-29). She characterizes him as the incarnation of "one
of the 7 spirits before the Throne - the greatest of all Avatars". She also borrows liberally from
Christian imagery, even quoting New Testament passages to describe him. In this passage, she
even goes so far as to say that Sanat is "literally the Planetary Logos Himself", and describes the
Logos as taking "the form of Sanat Kumara", the other two being "the outcome of the triple
nature of the Planetary Logos." These call into question whether Maitreya and Lucifer have a
separate identity at all, or are to be considered emanations of Sanat Kumara. For the sake of
comparison [or confusion], when Bailey charts the "three great planetary centers" (_The Destiny
of Nations - The Influence of the Rays Today_, p.23-24) she lists "Humanity" (Lucifer's domain)
as the first "expression of divine livingness", having been manifested "in the first solar system";
chronologically this makes Lucifer the senior partner in the Logos. Then "Hierarchy"
(Maitreya's responsibility) appeared "in the second solar system" (our present era) but is yet to
"come into full manifestation upon the physical plane". "Shamballa" (Sanat's rule and "the
directing center for the Hierarchy") is not due to manifest until "the next solar system"; however,
for reasons unexplained, it is only now that the three "meet simultaneously at various stages of
livingness." Even more curious, "it is only through human beings that these centers can ever
come into true functioning activity." [From this it may be concluded that puny, unascended man
is actually in control of the mighty Logos, who is/are dependent on his invitation and
involvement in order to truly function.]

However, according to Bailey disciple Benjamin Creme, it is Maitreya who is the only being to
have evolved to a 7th degree initiation, as opposed to Buddha (6th) or Jesus (4th/5th). The lines
between Maitreya, Sanat and Lucifer are even more blurred in the teachings of Creme, who has
urged people to address the New Age messiah as either Maitreya or Sanat Kumara. Since 1997,
Creme has further revised his presentation of Maitreya on his websites. Whereas Maitreya was
always the name of the spirit speaking through Creme, whom no one was allowed to see "until
he chooses to reveal himself", now a photograph of "Maitreya" is displayed, while the "master"
now speaking through Creme "has a name known only to an inner circle" and goes by "Master
___" [sic with a blank line], or the "Avatar [manifestation] of Synthesis". Until recently
Maitreya was the highest initiate (7th degree) in the cosmos; Creme now claims that Master ___
is so much higher that his level cannot be revealed; "we wouldn't comprehend it." [This shift
may be a stage toward uniting all the diverse titles and images mentioned above under the name
Lucifer, a necessary step for the planned Luciferic initiation where allegiance to this name alone
will be allowed.] Creme still speaks of Maitreya, but his relationship to "Master ___" is unclear.

Blavatsky is more direct in identifying the head of the Logos: for her it is "Satan". He is "one
with the Logos" which is ultimately one force. He also bears the title "Kumara" and is the oldest
and highest of the angelic gods. (_Doctrine_ II, 103, 234-235) (For more on Satan's centrality in
Theosophy, see HPB's chapter, "Satan, a Centripetal Force", p.245)

7. The NA gods "overshadowing" humans: from teachers to tenants.

Humans are gods, if only they knew it. But Creme clarifies that when people pray, they are not to
pray to themselves, but to "the God within" or the "God immanent". This is their higher god-self
whom they do not yet know as their self. God being in all, this higher self is in union, or "at-
one-ment", with other selves higher up in their spiritual evolution - ancient spirits who have
mastered their godhood and "ascended" into "a higher vibration" (no longer needing bodies).
These beings, who already know their higher selves as god, are divine from our standpoint. They
know of our race's condition and have offered mankind their help in evolving into godhood. So
in practical terms, prayer is directed to these higher beings as though to "God", and responses are
"transmitted" from them. Since they are united with the Divine, the enlightened worshiper is
expected to accept their every word as Divine Truth, even if it seems like nonsense or contradicts
what they said yesterday. If he does so, the recipient will gain knowledge, power, health and
inner peace, and come closer to his own godhood.

In response to human need, some of these Masters become "Avatars" by occasionally taking up
residence on the physical plane within a human host, known as "incarnation" (in their own body)
or "overshadowing" (sharing the body with another soul). There are different degrees of
overshadowing, ranging from divine impressions (resulting in channeling and dictation of
"wisdom" literature) to the host actually "stepping out" of his body to allow the "master" full
control. (see Bailey's _A Treatise on Cosmic Fire_, p.756-757) This last stage transforms the
outwardly normal-looking person into a body hosting an alien resident; the human owner is
known in NA parlance as a "walk-out", and the spirit-tenant is a benevolent "walk-in".
[Interesting that not even the toughest NA cynics question the motives or integrity of these
strangers who ask us to surrender our rightful property to them. Is there such a thing as a
spiritual "free lunch"? Read on.] A detailed explanation of the phenomenon is available in the
landmark 1979 book: _Strangers Among Us: Enlightened Beings from a World to Come_, by
Ruth Montgomery, a walk-in enthusiast. [Although outdated, it is useful in presenting the basics
of this belief.] Montgomery, who claims to have received her information through channeling,
writes: "Most Walk-ins zealously guard the secret of their altered identity, because people tend to
fear" the phenomenon (p.47) and would launch "witchhunts" (p.125). But walk-ins can be
identified by their unusual powers, including mind-reading, the power to "forestall" human
activity (p.30) and the ability to insert thoughts into a human mind which he thinks are his own
(p.71). ["Star Wars" fans will recall the ability of the "Jedi knight" to do all of these.]
Montgomery was told that walk-ins number into the "tens of thousands [as of 1979]" (p.13), and
she prophesies of a walk-in US President at some point (p.207).

It is common for disincarnate spirits to approach a human host and ask for entry. But step-by-
step instructions are provided in _Strangers_ for people who don't want to wait to be
propositioned. Montgomery elaborates on the reasons a human host decides to "check out" of
his body and permit an "exalted one" to move in: a reluctance to face "the coming holocaust"
(p.71), being "discouraged or heartsick" (p.34), and "wishing for a long period of rest from
worldly cares" (p.44). These voluntary walk-outs will be exempt from the "bad karma" normally
incurred by failing to fulfill one's life purpose, since they are contributing to the good of others.
[What a deal.... Who doesn't want "a rest from worldly cares"?? As society becomes more
chaotic, "walk-out volunteers" can be expected to increase exponentially. How convenient for
the disembodied spirits who admittedly crave a human vehicle - especially when other "walk-
ins" have the power of thought control to induce a sense of discouragement into a desirable
potential host!]

[No one seems disturbed at this peculiar situation. Here are perfected beings, who "when
unburthened [sic] of their terrestrial tabernacles, their freed souls [are] united forever with their
spirits [and] rejoin the whole shining host." (Blavatsky, _Isis Unveiled_ II, p.159) Now they
suddenly need a primitive vehicle again - and cannot acquire one by simple reincarnation, but
insist on confiscating a body already inhabited. As for the ostensible intention to help mankind,
an ulterior motive for a spirit entering a human host is inadvertently identified: self-advancement
in the "Brotherhood". See _Strangers_ p.31, 94-95.] The one queer exception to the "walk-in"
possibilities is Mr. Logos himself, Sanat Kumara, who for all his great power is "not able" [or
should that be, not permitted ?] to function in a physical body. (See _Initiation, Human and
Solar_, p.28.) The take-over of spirits "entering directly into adult bodies" is apparently a
ticklish maneuver and must be coordinated by certain "Brotherhoods" specializing in this service
(_Strangers_ p.96).

8. The "self-conscious unfoldment" leads to death of mind and personhood.

Strangely, what Bailey calls "the great plan [of the Logos] for the self-conscious unfoldment of
life" (_Initiation_, p.29), which starts with affirming our own godhood, is destined to end in "no-
name-ness", as NA leader Dr. Jose Arguelles puts it. (_Meditation Magazine_, published by the
Intergroup for Planetary Oneness, Summer 1987) To participate in the Group Mind requires the
loss of everything that makes us unique - including the individual mind which NAers spend so
much effort in developing, and all psychic powers they have labored to acquire. According to
Montgomery, the human mind is "vacated" so that "the entity slips in" (_Strangers_ p.25). But
NA philosopher Manly P. Hall is more honest, calling it not a vacating process but a death: "The
mind... must be ultimately sacrificed in order that the Great Work be accomplished. By the death
of the mind consciousness is released to complete perfection." (_Lectures on Ancient
Philosophy_ p.65) As Hall describes it, the only difference between Eastern and Western paths to
godhood is that the latter teaches "the perfection of the mind before its rejection, whereas the
Eastern schools are prone to regard the mind as a hindrance, to be discarded at the very
beginning of spiritual growth." The Eastern path "slays the mind", while in the Western path the
mind comes to "a realization of its own insufficiency", and commits suicide "as a willing
sacrifice." (p.67) [Don't look now, but the bottom just fell out of the NA "unlimited potential of
the human mind".] Bailey describes the loss of individuality as well, where "the lesser light... of
the personality (personal self) is absorbed into the greater light of the Angel or soul." The
original personality becomes only a "shell" which has undergone "the fires of purification".
(_Glamour - A World Problem_, p.269-270) The implication is that personhood is a defilement,
an illusory "glamour" which blocks one from godhood. [So much for the popular conception that
NA supports the quest for individual freedom... "I gotta be me" is the very antithesis of NA
enlightenment.]

8. Masters of God-Men or of Puppets? The Hierarchy promotes the idea that every possible
universe is equally "real" in your mind, where as an enlightened person you can "create your
own reality" at will. But once the individual mind is "sacrificed" to oblivion as a "hindrance",
where is reality to be found? The answer must be that reality is being createdby other minds,
pre-determined and presented for the now-mindless NA initiate to follow without alteration. All
NA plans for world domination (known in the UN under the euphemism "Global Governance")
and all NA evaluations (who is "more highly evolved" than others, how one moves up, who is to
be considered unsalvagable for the "quantum leap") are set exclusively by "revelations" from the
above-mentioned "masters of wisdom". These spirits have chosen certain physical spokesmen to
transmit their knowledge to the world without critique; this is why they are known as
"channelers". (In Tenach days they were called witches, spiritists and mediums, and were
unfairly persecuted by a few of the Jewish leaders and by many Christians but welcomed by
many others.) The New Age is densely populated with such human transmitters. [When they are
quoted throughout this series it should be kept in mind that they themselves do not take credit for
their statements or books, and some even prefer anonymity. Skeptics may insist that these
channelers are conjuring up "messages" from their own minds, which is likely in many cases.
However, there are too many instances of such people conveying real, verifiable information that
is not accessible to them on a human level; some are undeniably receiving knowledge from a
source outside themselves. The curious thing is that only one remarkable instance is enough to
validate a channeler in the eyes of NA psychic-junkies: any subsequent mistakes or contradictory
directives are excused, as well as outright transgression of noble NA principles. For examples,
read on.]

Even global events were/are directed on the order of these unseen beings: World Healing Day,
which John Randolph Price relates was in obedience to his spirit-guide's instructions to activate a
"critical mass" for a "simultaneous global mind link." Within a year, he enlisted support from
over 500 million people in 77 countries, including political leaders, and by the appointed date
(31/12/86), he estimated that one billion took part. (It is possible that the warning of Ruth
Montgomery's guides of a world war in 1987 provided extra motivation to rally around this
particular date.) Price also took direct dictation from his guide "Asher" in writing his books,
_The Planetary Commission_ (see "John & Jan's Excellent Adventure", _Earthlight Magazine_,
1996) and _Practical Spirituality_. The "World Healing Meditation" written for World Healing
Day, focuses on humanity's godhood and visualizes that "all false beliefs and error patterns are
dissolved. The sense of separation is no more, the healing has taken place, and the world is
restored to sanity." [It sounds great until we remember who is responsible for the "false belief"
and "separation" in the world.] The Prices are dedicated disciples of the "Ancient Wisdom
Teachings", as was Alice Bailey, and they regularly teach at "Mystery Schools" around the
world. Hillary Clinton, US First Lady for two terms and candidate for New York Senator,
revealed in 1996 that she regularly consults with "the spirit of Eleanor Roosevelt" for advice.
(_The Skeptic Magazine_, "Ten Years of Skeptism") [Hillary is solidly behind NA educational
principles - see that section for details.]

Foundational documents which are attributed to dictation by the "ascended masters" are
zealously studied by NA disciples. They include _The Urantia Books_, _The Cosmic Gospel_,
_The Secret Doctrine_ (actually a rewrite of the _Book of Dzyan_), _The Externalisation of the
Hierarchy_, _The Rays and the Initiations_, to name only a few. You will remember that these
are listed in the introduction with human authors, but each of the authors in question claimed to
merely have taken dictation from "supermortal personalities". Prime players were "El Morya"
and "Master Kuthumi", both of them "5th degree initiates" who dictated _Isis Unveiled_ to
Helena Blavatsky - as claimed in a "direct testimony" attributed to the spirit (El Morya, _The
Chela and the Path_, p.122) There are other works for which spirits are directly named as the
authors: examples are _The Mahatma Letters to AP Sinnett_ (Theosophical Publishing House,
Adyar, India); "A Message to the Members of the Theosophical Society from an Elder Brother"
(_The Theosophist_ 47/4, p.7). Possibly the single most widely-read "ghost-writer" [sorry for
the pun, it was irresistible] is the "The Tibetan Master", aka "Djwhal Khul" or just "DK", the
source of all of Alice Bailey's books (except for _From Bethlehem to Calvary_, which he did not
dictate but fully endorsed). Since these classic works were published, many more have been
produced with credits given to spirit guides, through human authors like John Randolph Price
(writing for "Asher"), Barbara Marx Hubbard (for "the elders"), David Spangler (for "John",
"Pan" and simply "God") and Ruth Montgomery.

There is one all-inclusive document that does not exist on the physical plane, which occultists
say may be briefly glimpsed only at the 'highest level of consciousness': this is called the
"Akashic Record", said to be an imprint of all past and future events.

9. How good are the NA gods as Guides? A sample of their track record:
9a. Joint Cooperation and Responsibility - Although the "Masters" revealed to Blavatsky that
they are "bound together in one spiritual solidarity of thought and deed," (_Isis Unveiled_ II,
p.159), their united deed does not always bring about the promised results. They have even
admitted making errors in choosing their vehicles - repeatedly - after confirming the wisdom of
their choices. If these were indeed errors of judgment, not only is the specific "Master" to blame,
but the entire Hierarchy, since "there is the closest co-operation in all departments... Owing to
the Unity of consciousness of those who are free from the three lower planes, what transpires in
one department is known in the others." (Alice Bailey, _Initiation Human and Solar_, p.106) Yet
when an earthly channel proves disappointing, it is not the infinitely more advanced god-entity
who takes responsibility, but the hapless human who had previously been promoted as a Light to
the enlightened. For example, Krishnamurti was hailed as a true vehicle of Maitreya by the
Theosophical Society, and he asserted with obvious devotion in 1927, "I am blending into the
consciousness of the one Teacher... He will completely fill me." (_Krishnamurti: The Years of
Awakening_, p.241). Only 5 years later, his "Teacher" publicly disowned him in a most
humiliating manner: "It became all but impossible for him to be used any longer as my medium."
("Lord Maitreya", _Through the Eyes of the Masters: Meditations and Portraits_, p.66) Even
Alice Bailey herself, who dedicated her life as a channel for the "Masters", got the ax nearly 30
years ago in a similarly ungrateful tone: "In the past we have had to withdraw our support from
those who were given the opportunity to represent us. The one who for a time had the
opportunity of representing the master Djwal Kuhl soon lost that authority through intellectual
pride and the brittleness of the lower mental body, which can never be the channel of the mind of
God. Thus I expose to you the false teachings subtly woven into the work of Alice Bailey, whose
failure to surrender totally rendered her unfit as an instrument of the Tibetan Master." ("Master
Kuthumi", "An Expose of False Teachings", _Pearls of Wisdom_ 19/5, Feb. 1, 1976, p.28) [This
is a warning to NA channels everywhere to expect no thanks for their years of service if they
should fall from favor for any reason. It also represents a crisis of confidence for those who base
their lives on "transmissions from the Masters". If Bailey's works are shot through with "false
teaching", then the Hierarchy did not show a basic level of responsibility by stopping the UN,
Lucis Trust, Robert Muller and all the other NA missionaries now spreading Bailey's teachings
in their entirety. On the other hand, if Bailey teachings are still valid, then there must be false
Masters roaming about, feeding disinformation to gullible NA audiences... in which case one
might ask why all transmissions and "Masters" should not be considered suspect.]

9b. Judging Human Development - The "Masters" have an iffy track record in prediction as
well, even when they blame humans in advance for any potential error. Ruth Montgomery
relayed from her "Guides" the warning that a nuclear World War III would take place in 1987,
unless enlightened humanity banded together to "send forth the energies toward peace." They
gloomily predicted, however, that this war was "unlikely to be averted." (_Strangers..._ p.191)
"Were there millions of Walk-ins working in unison, that catastrophe could perhaps be
prevented, but in this present age of prosperity how many luxury lovers are likely to say to a
disincarnate, 'Take my place.'" (p.53-54) [Here, compared to only 10 pages earlier, we see an
abrupt switch from the compassionate offer to relieve discouraged individuals of their
burdensome lives, to a guilt-trip laid on those who are not discouraged, castigating them as
"luxury lovers" for not sacrificing their bodily rights for the Cause.] The "Guides" also predicted
that the then-President Jimmy Carter would be succeeded by another Democratic president who
would try to right things, "but this will come too late, as war will already have broken out."
(p.195) Although there was still no mass recruitment for the homeless walk-ins, 1987 came and
went without World War III, and the White House did not see another Democratic president for
the next three terms. [Perhaps this statement was not meant to be a prediction, but rather an
attempt to instruct enlightened voters in America. If so, it revealed both a misunderstanding of
voter priorities and a powerlessness to influence human decisions. If they cannot "guide the little
wills of men" in such a minor issue, how can they be trusted to steer a safe global course?]

9c. The Masters' handling of the "Master Jesus" is of special interest to Jews, since their most
famous son is the only Jew honored with the title of "Master of the Wisdom". He is identified by
Bailey as a 5th degree initiate. In _From Bethlehem to Calvary_, she claims he attained it at his
death, resulting in his release from physical restraints (what onlookers interpreted as a
"resurrection"). For reasons unspecified, however, he was found unworthy of this level and was
returned to the 4th degree, as evidenced by his later reincarnation in a teacher Bailey calls
"Appollonius of Tyana" where he [again] received the 5th degree. (_Initiation_ VI, p.56-57) But
even then, Bailey's (that is, Djwahl Kuhl's) description of him in the "The Lodge of Masters"
marks him as something of a failure, in that "his pupils are frequently distinguished by...
fanaticism". [Summary: Jesus is the only "master" known to have been demoted from the 5th
degree, and certainly the only "master" whose service is described with disapproval, be it ever so
faint. This implies a grave error of judgment by the Masters who are responsible for promoting
souls to a "Teacher" level. Or it implies open prejudice against the only "master" with a Jewish
background. Neither possibility speaks well of the Hierarchy.]

9d. The War on Evil - Since all is god, this includes good and evil, which are merely different
sides of the Divine. David Spangler (_Reflections on the Christ_) labels them the "light side"
and the "dark side," or "the Christ side" and the "Lucifer side," which are equally necessary for
wholeness. Spangler calls this union "the Luciferic initiation" (p.43). (The negative feedback
Spangler received for being so outspoken back in 1977 apparently caused him to later downplay
this comment, saying he had meant the Lucifer label "as a joke, really"; but he reaffirmed the
need to unite with one's "shadowy side" to attain "balanced energies". See _Reimagination of the
World_, David Spangler and William Irwin Thompson, p.7) Bailey wrote that the Atlantean war
against the Black Lodge was in reality the Hierarchy's attempt to lead humanity into union of the
cosmic opposites: spirit/matter, good/evil, light/dark, right/wrong. (See _Initiation, Human and
Solar_, IV, p.35) Yet the Hierarchy has been carrying on a cosmic war with the "Black Lodge"
for ages, and has every intention of continuing. [But why declare eternal war on an entity - and in
_Externalisation_ (p.76) even order their disciples to avoid any contact with the "efforts" of that
entity - when by their own doctrines such an entity must be as much "God" as the Hierarchy are?
It appears that there is a place for the unforgivable cosmic sins of "fear" and "separation", when
it suits the Hierarchy. What or Who could trigger such a fit of spiritual regression in these
"perfect beings"?]

[We can understand it best in this way: In NA reality, "evil" is clearly not a problem to eradicate
if it is merely the "dark side" of the cosmos. As we have seen, the "evil" which must be
eliminated in the New Age is identified as "separation". It is no accident that the Jewish concept
of holiness means to "separate oneself" or "turn away" from evil deeds and evil men; as the
Vilna Gaon and other sages pointed out, the ceremonial laws of separation in the Torah are
symbolic of the spiritual separation which is the essence of holiness (see commentaries on
Parashat Kedoshim). The NA path to personal godhood requires the direct opposite: spiritual
union with evil. So it is actually holiness which is the evil targeted for elimination.]
9e. Ethics and Justice - Because karma has taken over the dispensing of reward and punishment,
morality and victims are obsolete concepts from the old "dualist dispensation". All injury and
suffering is merited, whether the sufferer is aware of his offense or not. On the other hand, since
good and evil are both necessary for spiritual perfection, those who injure or wrong others need
only to be taught that man is his own satan just as man is his own salvation, and that evil is not
moral guilt but spiritual imbalance. Evil energies, as Spangler says, are simply energies used out
of timing or out of place, or just not suited to the needs of evolution. In accordance with this
idea, prisons and mental hospitals are investing heavily in "higher consciousness" training as
rehabilitation. Due to reincarnation, there is also no such thing as murder, so in the New Age no
one can be prosecuted for being the instrument of karma in sending someone on to their next life;
on the contrary, it can be counted a service. [All this being established NA doctrine, what of the
NA groups working for "human rights"? See the Humanity section which shows that "human
rights" is interpreted as the rights of "humanity", not individual human rights.]

10. The "other" creator: the G-d of the Jews.

Gnosticism forms the base of Theosophical belief about the G-d of the Jewish Bible (discussed at
length by HPB, _The Secret Doctrine_, II p.243-244) She identifies him as a gnostic
"Demiurgos" (a minor deity) named "Ilda-Baoth, whom several sects regarded as the God of
Moses." Curiously, she goes out of her way to add that Ilda-Baoth is the "Demiurge of the
Nazarenes" as well. [This is the historical term for the earliest disciples of Jesus, who were all
Jews.] She describes him as "not a pure spirit, he was ambitious and proud, and rejecting the
spiritual light of the middle space offered him by his mother Sophia-Achamoth, he set himself to
create a world of his own." He successfully "created" the physical universe, but only with help
from "Sophia", who immediately regretted her part in the endeavor. HPB goes on to describe his
creation of man as "a failure", resulting in "a monster, soulless, ignorant and crawling on all
fours." Sophia steps in again, and endows man with a soul, which fills Ilda-Baoth with "rage and
envy" as he watches his creature set out to follow the divine ray within, aspiring to godhood. In
order to block man's ascension, the demiurge deliberately (and quite unfairly) leaves mankind
ignorant of good and evil, the first initiation into spiritual awareness. He leaves man with only
materialistic life, "physical immortality - a kind of static immortality that would have
transformed man into an undying 'Wandering Jew'." [Implied here is that the Jews, whom Bailey
does not hesitate to label as still "wandering", are a living example of the uninitiated who have
no place of "rest" in the new humanity.] One third of the angelic gods refused to go along with
this creator's scheme to withhold enlightenment from his creatures; they "rebelled", and led by
Lucifer, they approached man to offer him god-consciousness. (See more in her chapter, "The
Secret of the Fall of the Angels", II, p.75) "It is but natural," HPB concludes (p.243), "to view
Satan, the Serpent of Genesis, as the real creator and benefactor, the Father of Spiritual
mankind. For it is he who was the 'Harbinger of Light,' bright radiant Lucifer, who opened the
eyes of the automaton created by Jehovah, as alleged." [See how the Nazis adopted this idea, in
that section.]

Bailey also describes the G-d of the Jews, but some effort is needed to identify Him beneath the
occult terminology (_A Treatise on Cosmic Fire_ D, p.947-951). In the abstract terms reserved
for highly placed Entities, she first calls him a "great manifestation". But, unlike the
"manifestations" of the Logos, he was erroneously created by the mind of man - a misguided
attempt which resulted in "distortions of the astral light". This manmade entity is also personified
as "The Dweller on the Threshold", a being who is blocking the doorway to enlightenment, and
who must be done away with. "A gigantic thought form hovers over the entire human family...
energized by the insane desires and evil inclinations of all that is worst in man's nature, and kept
alive by the prompting of his lower desires.... It is this piece of creative bungling, if so it might
be called, which the Great Ones are occupied in destroying." While she at first refers to this
"product of man's ignorance and selfishness" as though discussing a figment of the imagination,
she finally calls Him the "evil entity". [We therefore have an "Entity War". See Robert Muller's
strategies in such a war.] Moreover, the "Great Ones" are training humans to be "cooperators in
the work of destruction," by directing the "interplanetary force" created by "certain mantrams
and words" against this Being and against those who follow Him. [The Great Invocation is the
most widely used example.] This force in turn empowers the "solar Gods" [and here, either
Bailey or the editor notes that these are identified in _The Secret Doctrine_, II, p.287 as "the
Fallen Angels"] to descend and manifest on the physical plane and wage a "war in heaven".
Finally, Bailey says, "The hated 'Dweller on the Threshold' thus gradually dies for lack of
sustenance." [Here the true nature of the Hierarchy momentarily peeps out: their desire to destroy
the "Dweller" has its source in hatred, an evil motive attributed to only the most unenlightened
of humans. Jews, for instance. It also betrays fear, another unenlightened attribute.]

Bailey names three things by which this evil Entity "is kept alive and vitalized": (1)"wrong" and
"selfish" thoughts ["selfish" is translated as refusal to surrender one's identity to the Group];
(2)"the fostering care of the brothers of the shadow, and those representative of what may be
called 'cosmic evil'"; (3)the energy remaining from "an earlier solar system, and an emanation
form which is no longer considered in this solar system to be a principle." Seeing that Bailey
counts the current solar system as only the "second", we have only one other. The race hailing
from that system is clearly guilty for bringing their unwelcome "Emanation form" along with
them - one who in that age was considered a "principle", in other words a God. So when she
relates: "Under the Law of Karma it [the entity] has to be dissipated by those who have created
it," all NA disciples know exactly whose job it is to put to death this outdated "god thought". In
summary, the "Great Ones" have arrived to help mankind "break loose from the influence" of
this "persistent vampire". [Many kids' cartoons feature godlike villians who are "persistent
vampires": for example the huge demon in the immensely popular "Dijimon" called
"Myotismon" who keeps returning after being vanquished by the 7 energized spirit-guides.]

11. The Black Lodge, Repository of Cosmic Evil

Bailey's theories of human evolution and Jewish history have cosmic roots in the ancient war of
the "Great White Lodge" against the [not so Great] "Black Lodge", the latter using the "Dark
Force" as their power source. [Yes, look again at the "Darth Vadar" character of _Star Wars_
fame. In the most recent episode in this series, _Episode One: The Phantom Menace_, we are
taken back in time and introduced to him as a child who is identified as the "chosen one" who
would "bring balance to the Force". But, as we already know, he later turns to the "dark side"
through events which will no doubt be revealed in a future episode. As Bailey taught, the Jewish
people were also "chosen" in the distant past, destined to "produce that balancing" in their
pivotal position between the "Dark Forces" on one side and the Hierarchy-humanity alliance on
the other (_Externalisation_, p.74) But they too turned to the Dark Side after rebelling against
the "service of light", and were condemned to wander.]
It was the last round of this war between Light and Dark that ended the Atlantean Age and forced
the Hierarchy, champions of the White Lodge, to withdraw into space and leave earth in the
hands of the inexplicably victorious Black Lodge. While great detail is devoted to the White
Lodge, much information on the Black Lodge leaders is withheld: "They are not the problems of
humanity but of the Hierarchy". (_Externalisation_, p.74) The goals of these other "Masters",
Bailey writes, "are as inscrutable to you as are the plans of the Ruler of Shamballa [Sanat
Kumara]." (p.76) [This places the Spirit(s) opposing the New Age at the same evolutionary level
of the Logos, if not higher. Thus we are faced with a NA admission that it is possible for highly
evolved beings to be evil - in spite of Blavatsky's statement that those who exist beyond the
physical plane are perfected beings, united with "the whole shining host." (Blavatsky, _Isis
Unveiled_ II, p.159) In light of such a situation, why should we accept that the Hierarchy is
good simply because they exist at a higher plane?] Although the Black Lodge remains nameless,
their activities are described: "The Forces of Darkness are powerful energies, working to
preserve that which is ancient and material.... They consequently block deliberately the inflow of
that which is new and life-giving; they work to prevent the understanding of that which is of the
New Age; they endeavor to preserve that which is familiar and old... to bring blindness to the
peoples and to feed steadily the existing fires of hate, of separateness, of criticism and of
cruelty." (_Externalisation_ II, p.75) [How interesting that in a war waged in the name of
freedom of thought, "criticism" must be considered every bit as evil as "hate". Also interesting is
the fact that "familiar and old" disqualifies Judaism, but not Theosophy or the "Ageless
Wisdom".]

The only ways NA disciples can fight the Forces of Darkness are to refuse to entertain any
thoughts which their agents promote, to faithfully recite the Great Invocation, and to try to make
contact with "the forces of Shamballa or of the Hierarchy." (p.73, 76) Meanwhile, "the forces of
separateness and of hate... use the Jewish race to stir up world difficulty." (p.77) [Just how these
tools of Darkness stir up trouble is detailed in the Views on Jews.] It is only when "the mind
aspect (the third [Lucifer] aspect of the personality) is more fully developed, then the focus of
the effort of the Dark Forces will change and the problem of the Jews will disappear." (p.88)
[Elsewhere, Bailey makes it clear that for the "problem of the Jews" to disappear, the Jews
themselves have to disappear.]
D. The Plan of the New Age

All who subscribe to the New Age must submit to "The Plan" in its entirety or be left out of the
"New World Order". It should be noted that this "Plan" is universally accepted among New
Agers as literally having a superhuman origin. Alice Bailey is not the author, only the
transcriber. Likewise, no leader today at any level takes credit for formulating the Plan. From
the UN on down, every "World Server" has his/her assigned task, but no one has the authority to
change or cancel any segment; to do so would be to reject the Hierarchy and jeopardize the
coming New Age itself. [Readers who are tempted to selectively evaluate this section, as
horrendous in some parts and not so bad in others, must keep in mind three important results of
this belief:
(1) The Plan is a non-negotiable package.
(2) New Agers do not doubt its wisdom.
(3) No one feels personally responsible for the consequences of carrying it out.]

As noted before, the Hierarchy of "Masters" will need to use human agents, and even inhabit
human hosts, in order to carry this out. Therefore the Plan calls for patient incremental progress
which does not overstep public tolerance: "The occult Hierarchy of the planet functions...[like]
any great international, powerful corporation.... They send out scouts and they test reactions to
their plans. Finally, when they are ready, they move forward." (Foster Bailey, "Changing
Esoteric Values," a lecture in London, 1954)

The specific stages of the Plan were "transmitted" in detail through Bailey directly from "Djwhal
Khul", the Tibetan Master, beginning in the 1930s, but much of it was shared only with inner-
circle disciples until 1975, when the NA leaders received instructions to go public. Most of the
agenda can be found in Alice Bailey's _Externalisation of the Hierarchy_. Key NA disciples
have released additional how-to books, such as H.G. Wells' _The Open Conspiracy_ and Barbara
Marx Hubbard's _The Manual for Co-Creaters of the Quantum Leap_.

The Plan is the organized program of the spiritual Hierarchy to get a selected portion of mankind
to the "next evolutionary level". [Get more background info in the Humanity section.] Since
quality is vital for starting the next "root-race", only selected "starseed" people are designated to
make the quantum leap into the next level of human transformation, but even these need careful
preparation by more advanced spirits lest they "burn out" in the transition. The Plan is quite
lengthy, and proposes many global changes, but here are facets that affect the Jewish people in
some way.

1. The Plan for World Religions:

"I [Djwahl Kuhl, not Alice Bailey] have sought - with love and understanding - to point out the
faults of the world religions...." Thus begins the outline of the "Masters' Plan" for world religions
(_Externalisation_ IV, p.543). Inexplicably, the only "world religion" whose "faults" are pointed
out thereafter is Judaism, with Christianity suffering from corruption by Judaism. Here is the
relevant text [emphasis mine]:

1. The reorganisation of world religions - if in any way possible - so that their out-of-date
theologies, their narrow-minded emphasis, and their ridiculous belief that they know what is in
the mind of God may be offset, in order that the churches may eventually be the recipients of
spiritual inspiration.
2. The gradual dissolution - again if in any way possible - of the orthodox Jewish faith, with its
obsolete teaching, its separative emphasis, its hatred of the Gentiles and its failure to recognize
the Christ. [We note elsewhere that a "separative emphasis" such as maintaining a Jewish
identity is enough to classify someone as part of the problem.] In saying this, I do not fail to
recognize those Jews throughout the world who acknowledge the evils and who are not orthodox
in their thinking; they belong to the aristocracy of spiritual belief to which the Hierarchy itself
belongs. [This obvious attempt at flattery sounds hollow when we realize that keeping company
with the Hierarchy means accepting their verdict on the racial karmic debt owed by all Jews,
orthodox or not.]
3. Preparation for a revelation which will inaugurate the new era and set the note for the new
world religion [which will be brought personally by] the appearance of the Hierarchy on earth,
bringing the new revelation. (p.544-545)
David Spangler, Buckminster Fuller and Foster Bailey (Alice's husband) confirmed that religious
freedom must end in the New Age, to be replaced by a world-state religion.

We are told beforehand by Alice/"DK" (p.543): "It is this revelation which lies behind all the
activities which now engross the attention of the Hierarchy." In other words, the New Age is a
religion, from beginning to end. [And apparently it has identified Judaism as the only religion
which can possibly compete with it; hence it must be removed from the field. This is the time-
honored strategy of a monopoly which knows its inferior product can't stand up to comparison
with a challenger. Are the New Age gods so insecure that they can't face a little bit of
competition? Why not let humanity judge for themselves which is the superior religion?]

It is only after this "evil" religion of Judaism is neutralized that the Plan for the Universal "World
Religion" can proceed: "This second group [of World Servers] will implement this new
[universal] religion. By the time they come into control the old theological activities will have
been completely broken; Judaism will be fast disappearing." [Note that the qualifier
"orthodox" is now missing] Bailey continues with other interesting predictions of the state of
world religions at that point: "Buddhism will be spreading and becoming increasing [sic]
dogmatic; Christianity will be in a state of chaotic division and upheavals." (_Externalisation_,
p.573) [If the Hierarchy's directive is followed, we can expect Buddhism to eventually break
with its current image of gentle tolerance for all faiths, and even express itself more in line with
the antisemitic tone of the famous Zen Buddhist Master Haku'un Yasutani, teacher of several
American Zen leaders. For background, see "Yasutani Roshi: The Hardest Koan," _Tricycle
Magazine_, Fall 1999. See also the involvement of Tibetan Buddhists in Nazi Germany.]

2. The Plan for Reviving the Cosmic Religious War

This aim of the "Masters" to eliminate "the orthodox Jewish faith" is a continuation of an ancient
war between the "White Lodge" (the Hierarchy) and the "Black Lodge" (source of
Jewish/Christian teaching). Bailey describes it (_Externalisation_ II, p.71-77) as "the great
struggle between the Lords of Light and the Lords of Material Form, also called the Dark
Forces." [See more on this in the "Gods" section.] In spite of the direct intervention of the
"Shamballa energy" itself (or Sanat Kumara himself), the Hierarchy was defeated, bringing about
the fall of the Atlantean civilization and immanent global destruction. Bailey refers to the final
end of Atlantis in a catastrophe which obliterated all traces of the far superior civilization: "This
historical event has been preserved for us in the universal legend of the great flood", she
confesses, referring specifically to Noah's ark. (p.124) [Since Bailey relies on the Jewish Bible
for information about that time, surely we may also do so - noting the state of humanity during
the period the "Masters" held control of earth. It is also revealing that the rainbow, the symbol
which declared an end to that war, has been commandeered by the losers as a symbol of their
return to fight again.] But it wasn't that the "Masters" were driven out by their Archenemy; "for
the good of humanity, the Hierarchy withdrew into the background, leaving man to find his own
way out...." (p.125) [A great example of responsible nurturing, to leave mankind alone with the
chaos of a world disaster. But perhaps they had their own wounds to lick.]

But Bailey tells us of an outcome which from a NA viewpoint was an inexplicable mix-up: the
"nucleus" rescued from this destruction was not the advanced Atlantean seed, but the inferior
seed of the older Jewish race, "salvaged in spite of themselves... by the Great White Lodge", a
remnant which today is symbolized by the unworthy Jewish race. (p.125) [How ingenious to be
a symbol of oneself. This circular identification passes without comment by Bailey or her
"Master". No comment on the "switched babies" either, a bungling of such cosmic proportions
that one wonders how the Masters could dare to show up again on this planet....]

She also notes here that the "present world crisis" (as of 1939, the date of writing) has its source
in this ancient conflict which never really ended. [Her view of a link between Hitler's war on the
Jews and this Cosmic War becomes clearer in other comments by Bailey.] The White Lodge is
headed by the three-fold energy of the "Logos", locked in battle with "two other [energies] also
struggling for expression". The outcome of this spiritual war is so crucial it "will determine the
trend of world affairs." These two Dark Forces are identified as "the forces of materialism", and
"the force emanating from that section of humanity which is found in every part of the world and
which we call the Jewish people." [more on this in the "Views on Jews" section].

After the Atlantean destruction, the masters of the White Lodge were forced to withdraw into
space and leave earth in control of the Black Lodge. But they saw to it that White Lodge
teachings were preserved in Babylon, [probably entrusted to the one named in the Torah as
founder of Babylon, Nimrod, whose name in Hebrew means "we will rebel"] to be passed down
to "guardians of the ancient wisdom" in each generation (collectively called "the White
Brotherhood") - Egyptians, Aztecs, Incas, Mayans, Hindus, Buddhists, Chinese (Taoism),
American Indians, and assorted enlightened ones who were branded as heretics by "restrictive
Judaism and Christianity" . Among the last two, certain groups are identified: the Cathars, the
Knights Templar (both connected with "Holy Grail" lore), Freemasons (held to have been
established by King Solomon in his more "enlightened" years), Gnostics and Kabbalists (Jewish
Lurians, and Christian or "Hermetic Qabalists").
While both Black and White Lodges consist of disembodied spirit beings, they each seek
partnership with human beings. The Hierarchy who left is now returning (from a spiritual
hideout identified in NA as "Shamballa") to reclaim their "inner government" on planet earth,
which will finally put the 'Black Lodge' out of business. In short, they plan to launch (or re-
open) a religious war-to-end-all-wars, without which the New World Order cannot be fully
established. That is why the "worn-out Jewish dispensation", which includes a certain strain of
Christianity as an offshoot, is to be outlawed and replaced by the "New World Religion". This
will be mandatory and will have to be imposed ("in any way possible") for the good of all.

It is this next round that the Hierarchy hopes to restore their earlier position as Guides grounded
on earth - a position equivalent to "God" in conventional terminology. The return is to begin
with the "reappearance of the Christ" first as a "higher consciousness" in the hearts of men, and
then as "overshadowing" in which they hear his voice; in this way, says Bailey, "he will
duplicate himself repeatedly", increasing his effectiveness accordingly. Finally, he will be able
to "move among men in a public manner." The use of the "Great Invocation" is meant to further
this event; in fact, "he cannot proceed with his assigned mission" unless humanity cooperates by
using that NA prayer. (_Discipleship_ II, p.171-173)

3. The Plan to Solve the "Four World Problems"

"The major quarrel" between these two cosmic forces, according to Bailey, revolves around "the
freedom of the average citizen to think for himself," and the weapons of choice are "material
domination" by the Black Lodge as opposed to "spiritual control" by enlightened individuals
exercised under the guidance of the Hierarchy. The battle lines where these two forces openly
clash have produced "four problems" that must be solved (_The Destiny of Nations - The
Influence of the Rays Today_, p.34-35) as the New Age dawns [note their close correlation with
current political and social changes]:

"1. The problem of territorial possessions, which is the group correspondence within the family
of nations to the materiality [sic - to be distinguished from materialism] of the individual." [Note
the echoes heard in the "State of the World Forum".] In cases like the US and Israel, where
territorial nationalism is upheld in a democracy and cannot be dismantled (as was the Soviet
Union) by command from the top, NA spokesman Benjamin Creme and others promise the end
of democracy, if possible with democratic states themselves voting it out of existence. [The NA
group "New Acropolis" is actively working to that end in Europe and South America. And given
the scope of the FEMA laws already enacted in the US, the end of American democracy is one
Presidential phone call away. Anyone not familiar with these unpublicized laws or how they are
to be activated can find out plenty with a simple web search.] There is to be a single
government, tax system, currency, identity register, language and religion (latest NA projection
for its inauguration is the year 2000). [Many web sites are debating this issue, while the UN
proceeds with its "Global Governance" program.]

"2. The problem of sex which will involve a truer understanding of the law of attraction." Was
Bailey advocating a return to Victorian values, or perhaps its opposite, a form of hedonism?
Actually, she condemned neither. The "problem" to be corrected here is the motivation for
engaging in sex. The exclusive life-long commitment expressed in physical/spiritual union -
firmly established in the Jewish Bible, Genesis 2:24 - are not for the New Age, and neither are
the family relationships which spring from that commitment and its sexual expression. [The
effectiveness of destroying this motivation through popular music, literature, TV and cinema
needs no comment. The steady erosion of the nuclear family as a natural result of sex, achieved
through social and legal pressures, is also self-evident.] What Bailey advocates to take the place
of "old age" motivations has nothing to do with commitment, or even with physical pleasure, but
exclusively with the fulfillment of a psychic obligation: "The sex relation has therefore only one
major objective, which is to provide physical bodies for incarnating souls." (_Education in the
New Age_ IV, p.137) Eventually, the "uncontrolled response to the sex urge and desire" will be
considered unenlightened. (p.138) So how then are we to understand Bailey's reference to a
"law" of "attraction"? The "attraction" here is the craving of disembodied spirits for a human
host; the "law" is that hosts must be provided one way or another. Ideally, NA parents are to be
educated to offer their children as hosts even before birth.

"3. The problem of death, which is in reality the problem of the relation between... life and
form. This problem will be solved in the realm of psychology, by scientific recognition of the
true nature of the individual or soul and of the persona." [In NA terminology, "form" means
"physicality" or "materiality", the term we encountered in Problem 1; in other words, we attach
too much value to physical life. But that too is being duly remedied. The "sanctity of human
life", another concept rooted in Jewish tradition which places saving lives as a top priority, is
merely evidence in NA eyes of the evil "force of material domination" working through the
Jews.] Bailey herself so completely accepted the idea that death was beneficial that she saw the
carnage of World War II as merely "surgery" to remove a "virus", and the Holocaust as a lesson
in right human relations. But the necessity of fostering a casual attitude toward death is clear on
two accounts: the coming global purge, and the elimination of any NA rejectionists.

"4. The problem of the Jews which is symbolically the problem of humanity as a whole." [This
can be interpreted in several ways: everything that is wrong with humanity is personified in the
Jews as a group, and/or the Jews are the physical manifestation of what humanity is doing
wrong. As we will see, either way the Jews must fix the problem, not humanity.] Significantly,
Bailey emphasizes that the Jewish problem "is essentially a religious problem". [Emphasis
mine. For the rest of this quote and her solution, see Views on Jews.]

4. Options in the Plan: Initiation or Death / Initiation and Death

All who wish to enter the New Age must undergo an "energy activation" or "rebirth", usually
marked by a subjective trance-induced "light experience" where one meets either a "spirit guide"
or one's "higher self" (no difference since all is one). The resulting "altered state of
consciousness" will eventually lead to a "Luciferic initiation" into the "new humanity", or a
submission to Lucifer as the leading divinity representing the Logos. This event is anticipated
and discussed by many NA leaders; following are examples.

NA celebrity Barbara Marx Hubbard, one-time member of the Presidential Committee of

National Curriculum and Democratic nominee for Vice President (1984) writes that the chosen
elite (that is, the 10-20% of earth's population who are judged fit to remain) will know they have
received Initiation when they "instantly feel a subtle change of electricity in their bodies," and
when "I [an unidentified entity, presumably the Initiator, Lucifer] will be enabled to contact all
of you at once." (_The Revelation_, p.235-6) This new mankind, by then directly linked with the
being who David Spangler calls "the angel of man's evolution" (_Reflections on the Christ_,
p.37), will continue on their journey to "godhood" at the new level, which includes a personal
experience of the "knowledge of good and evil". [Sounds like Genesis 3:5, and it's meant to.]
NAers confirm that this knowledge is what Lucifer offered to Eve in the Garden, and it's being
offered again today. Only it's been misunderstood, due to fear inherited from the superstitious
Jews. Since God has both a good and an evil side, and one cannot attain complete godhood with
only one side. "Lucifer comes to give us the final gift of wholeness. If we accept it, then he is
free and we are free. That is the Luciferic initiation. It is one that many people now, and in the
days ahead, will be facing, for it is an initiation into the New Age." (Spangler, _Reflections_,
p.45)

As NA leader Dr. Jose Arguelles puts it, this initiation is a passive "surrender to the higher
galactic intelligence", involving "receptivity" and something he calls "a galactic imprinting" [not
specified if this is spiritual or physical]. This imprinting will be done in groups and will trigger
"an actual evolutionary shift of major proportions... homo sapiens on the evolutionary scale will
be ended." (_Meditation Magazine_, published by the Intergroup for Planetary Oneness, Summer
1987) Arguelles indicates that individuals must make the choice. But the channeler for the spirit
guide "Alder" says that the "world Initiation... is being brought to birth by a universal access
[sic, application?] of Pain and of Pressure", which she/he says is "leading naturally" to the right
choice. (Vera Alder, _The Initiation of the World_, p.109) [So much for voluntary cooperation...
but this fits in with what we are told about the tactics of spirits hoping to become "walk-ins".]

Foster Bailey made it clear that the NA initiation would not only be mandatory but would create
a caste system: "[Young and old alike] will have to live with the New Age standards. Those who
do not will end up as irreconcilable outcasts." (_Things to Come_, p.39) Those who cannot
surrender (having no souls), or who will not (not sufficiently developed in their spiritual
journey), will simply be "sent on to their next life" in a global "cleansing action" (Alice Bailey,
_The Rays and the Initiations_ p.754-755). Barbara Marx Hubbard puts it even more bluntly:
"People will either change or die. That is the choice." (_Happy Birth Day Planet Earth!_ p.32)
Hubbard makes it clear, however, that the human agents of the Plan of Love and Light will never
be guilty of murder, or even of mercy-killing: "New Choices enter history. Death by choice.
Life by choice.... The dignity of humans requires death and life, by choice not coercion", giving
rise to a "new science [called] thanatology, the art of dying with grace." ("The Future - Previews
of Coming Attractions" _First Foundation News_ Aug.1995, p.4)

"Death by choice" hints at the fact that the "misfits" who reject NA will not be the only ones
required to face death. "Dying with grace" is the message of the "death education" curriculum
taught as part of New Age Education; the underlying concept being "the beneficient nature of
death" to remove that which has outlived its time. (_Externalisation_ II, p.75) [For more on this,
see the "Humanity" section and also below.] This being taught to NA disciples as preparation for
the predicted "cleansing cycle of Nature", which will remove the majority of humanity which
suffers from "lower vibratory rates", as told to John Randolph Price by his spirit guide
"Asher". When Price, founder of "World Healing Day", balked a bit at the mass involuntary
death of billions of people, his guide replied, "Who are we to say that these people did not
volunteer to be a part of the destruction and regeneration." (see _Practical Spirituality_ by Price)
[Part of the social transformation process concentrates on educating humanity that the "global
purge" is necessary and beneficial; any opposition to the idea will be silenced in the clean-up
operation itself, and then presented as people who subconsciously wanted to be purged.]

Hubbard's spirit guides gave her a similar picture of things to come: "Out of the full spectrum of
human personality, one fourth is electing to transcend... one fourth is destructive [and] they are
defective seeds. In the past they were permitted to die a 'natural death'.... Now as we approach
the quantum shift from the creature-human to the co-creative human - the human who is the
inheritor of god-like power - the destructive one fourth must be eliminated from the social
body.... Fortunately, you are not responsible for this act. We are. We are in charge of God's
selection process [note the recycled Nazi term] for planet Earth. He selects, we destroy. We are
the riders of the pale horse, Death." (_The Revelation: Our Crisis is a Birth_, p.235) The
"selection process" is necessary, we are told, because of the danger that the "defective seeds"
might "reproduce their defective disconnection [and] destroy forever the opportunity of Homo
sapiens to become Homo universialis." From the clear delineation here, only 25% of humanity
qualifies to "transcend", and at least 25% of humanity is too dangerous to leave alive -
particularly those afflicted with genetic "disconnection" like the "wandering Jew". [Hubbard,
who informs interviewers at every opportunity that she was born to a Jewish family, apparently
thinks her own racial karma will be overlooked by the Hierarchy because of her devotion, or else
she is resigned to leaving with the "defective seeds".] But what of the remaining 50% passed
over in this "selection process"? Their destiny is "death by choice." Neither destructive nor
transcendent, they will accept the initiation and then be expected to vacate the planet for the
good of humanity. [Not that the 25% chosen to remain will be so lucky either; at initiation they
will be expected to surrender their bodies and minds in psychic union with an "ascended"
master. As powerful as they are, these spirits will have to work through the relatively weak and
primitive physical plane; hence the need for initiating humans for the purpose of inhabiting their
bodies. See the description of "walk-ins", in the "gods" section.]

5. Who Will Direct World Affairs Under the Plan?

5a. Naturally, it is the "Hierarchy" who will ultimately control world affairs when the "Christ
reappears" physically, "leading to the definite restoration of the Mysteries." (Alice Bailey,
_Externalisation_, p.570.) Their closest assistants on the human plane, according to Foster
Bailey, Alice's husband, are the higher-level initiates in the Masons: "When the Mysteries are
restored, and Masonry resumes its true function, the G.M. [Grand Master] will also resume his
ancient prerogatives, for he will be chosen for his initiate rank, and that involves initiate
knowledge. He will be restored to his ancient status, and his right to authority will be
recognized." (_The Spirit of Masonry_, p.79) NA philosopher and Masonic leader Manly P.
Hall concurs that the Masonic Grand Master is at the final level of human contact with the
"spiritual consciousness" that originates in the "spiritual hierarchy". (_The Lost Keys of
Freemasonry_, p.35-36) Alice also looked forward to a future Masonic Movement which, "when
it can be divorced from politics and social ends and from its present paralysing condition of
inertia, will meet the need of those who can, and should, wield power. (_Externalisation_, p.511)
[Note Hitler's partiality to certain of the "old" Masonic lodges, in the Nazism section. Also, for a
wealth of direct quotes confirming the Luciferian orientation of the top Masonic leadership, see
Gary Kah, _En Route to Global Occupation_)
5b. Mouthpiece of the Hierarchy: a "New" United Nations. This world body as it functions
today is only a shadow of what NA leaders envision for it. Robert Muller, who invested at least
30 years of his life there, loses no opportunity to sing its praises, calling the UN "the meta-
organism of human and planetary evolution." ("A Letter to All Educators in the World") He
dedicated his landmark book, _New Genesis: Shaping a Global Spirituality_, to "the United
Nations, the first universal organization of this planet." Muller expects the UN to bring nothing
less than "a moral and spiritual Renaissance." (_The Temple of Understanding Newsletter_,
Spring 1995) Both he and the Hindu mystical teacher-in-residence at the UN, Sri Chinmoy
Kumar Ghose, go so far as to speak of the UN as a spiritual entity, or perhaps the collective
channel for the Spiritual Entity expected to arrive: "No human force will ever be able to destroy
the United Nations, for the UN is not a mere building or a mere idea; it is not a manmade
creation. The UN is the vision-light of the Absolute Supreme.... The divine success and supreme
progress of the United Nations is bound to become a reality. At his choice hour, the Absolute
Supreme will ring his own victory-bell here on Earth through the loving and serving heart of the
United Nations." (Muller quoting Chinmoy, "My Testament to the UN") But Muller is aware
that the present UN does not have the power needed to fulfil its mission: "The world's survival
requires an enormously strengthened second generation United Nations." ("Fifty Years Later: A
Testimony", 1995)

At some point, Robert Muller himself may be tapped to head this New UN, an event which
seemed close to happening in 1995. [His decision at that time to withdraw I suspect was a matter
of timing; he is slated to head the "second generation", which was not fully ready in 1995.] But
even if Muller never officially leads the UN, his leadership in it is assured. As his NA colleague
Barbara Marx Hubbard writes, Muller "has a full scale plan of action to carry us into the 21st
century. He 'wins' in influence, no matter whether or not he is elected [to the post of UN
Secretary General]. He activates the support of the critical mass... to support the advanced
United Nations that he advocates." (_The Social Potential Movement_, p.18) [For a taste of what
Muller has already activated, see his role in New Age education.]

One key group, the "UN Commission on Global Governance", called a World Conference in
1998 "for the purpose of submitting to the world the necessary treaties and agreements for
ratification and implementation by the year 2000." [The attempt to obtain ratification in 2000
failed, but the patient NA Planners have merely scaled down their incremental progress
accordingly.] In their 1995 report to the UN, "Our Global Neighborhood" (available on line),
this distinguished panel outlines the results of over 7 years of careful work. In the Foreword, the
Co-Chairmen go to great pains to reassure the reader that global "governance" is "not global
government", lest we think a worldwide police-state is in the making. And yet, they admit that
governance cannot function without "systems and rules", and must in fact enforce them: "The
very essence of global governance is the capacity of the international community to ensure
compliance with the rules of society." (Chap. 6, "Enforcing International Law") We are also
promised that national sovereignty will be respected; however, a nation's sovereignty is "limited
by the fundamental interests of humanity, which in certain severe circumstances must prevail
over the ordinary rights of particular states." (Chp. 2, "Adopting Old Norms") [The
circumstances which override national self-determination are not specified, but according to UN-
supported philosopher Alice Bailey, it is in the "fundamental interests of humanity" to eliminate
both territorial nationalism and the "Jewish problem" which gave rise to the sovereign Zionist
state.]

To "ensure compliance" there is a "UN World Constitution" which includes an agreement by

"the governments of the nations... to order their separate sovereignties into one government, to
which they surrender their arms." Other arrangements include: A UN Trusteeship Council which
will take control of the "global commons", or all international waters and air space; a UN
Economic Security Council to set up a global funding and barter system, with the power to
withhold funding from uncooperative nations; a single monetary and taxation system that will
require all commerce to be conducted via a universally registered credit number for each earth
citizen; and a standing UN army to assume peacekeeping responsibilities in areas of conflict
(pinpointed by Dr. Henry Lamb, Executive VP of the Environmental Conservation Organization
and Chairman of Sovereignty International). [See also the research of government insider Gary
Kah, _En Route to Global Occupation_, which documents the early covert activities of the
"World Constitution and Parliament Association" during the early to mid 1980s.]

UN Global Management is shared by the Five Regional Groups. These five Regions, created
over 50 years ago, are the member-pool for all voting members of all the UN commissions,
councils, committees, working groups and other decision-making forums. The UN Charter
states: "Regional groups are for the UN increasingly important potential partners whose
cooperation could be engaged... to delegate responsibility." (Chap. VIII) The UN report,
"Renewing the United Nations: a Programme for Reform", submitted in July 1997 by the
Executive Coordinator for Reform, Mr. Maurice Strong [himself a dedicated NA disciple],
specifies that the Regional Groups "will be intensified and they will increasingly become
partners of the UN." (Point No. 116) The major structural changes proposed for the new UN
"can be done only with the approval" of these five Groups. (UN report, "UN Reform: the First
Six Weeks", Feb. 1997) For over 50 years, all member-states of the UN (now numbering 188)
have been assigned a place among these Regional Groups - except one. Israel has been denied
membership in any Regional Group, making the Jewish State the only nation unable to make a
meaningful contribution to this global body since her admission 51 years ago. [This is a long and
interesting story - see my report entitled, "A Nation That Dwells Alone". Pay particular attention
to the final update, which exposes the mockery of Israel's more recent "admission to
membership" in a Regional Group.] The 1998 report of the UN Environmental Program (UNEP)
omits any mention of Israel in its 264 pages, in spite of this country's notable contributions to the
environment. Where mention of that country is unavoidable in the Western Asia section, it is
labeled "Palestine". (_B'nai Brith News_, March 9, 1998) Even the "Committee on Mid East
Questions", a branch of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (136 democracies) has no Israeli presence,
in spite of 3 vacant seats (as of Sept. 1998) and the fact that 25% of all UN resolutions have
related to Israel. But all of this is to be expected, given the close affinity between UN policy and
Alice Bailey's teachings. [See her comments on Zionism for context.]

In 1976, right after the Plan went public, the "ascended Masters" gave orders to establish five
world centers in anticipation of the New World Order, according to Benjamin Creme. They are
located in New York, London, Geneva, Darjeeling and Tokyo. [Their locations, however, do not
appear to coincide with the UN's Five Regional Groups.] A nucleus of "world servers" has also
been trained to run these centers. International committees have been quietly working on multi-
stage programs for implementing the New Order from these centers; many of them have already
recruited resources and personnel and need only the signal to become operational.

6. Global Groups Destined to Think for Humanity

A group of human deputies has already taken up the mantle of world management in the name of
the the UN and the Hierarchy.
6a. A milestone conference was held in 1995, dubbed "The State of the World Forum", and
sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation. In attendance were more than 400 of the power elite
from 50 countries, under the guidance of Mikhail Gorbachev, James Baker and George Shultz
(one former Communist dictator and two former US Secretaries of State). The strong power
base of the conference was further underlined by the presence of personages like billionaire
"eco-warrior" Maurice Strong, former UN mogul Robert Muller, former US National Security
Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, former US President George Bush, former UK Prime Minister
Margaret Thatcher, network media-maker Ted Turner, print media giant Rupert Murdoch and
computer media prince Bill Gates. [African National Congress leader Thabo Mbeki was almost
comical when he expressed pleasure at representing the poor and suffering African peoples in
this forum, which is so unlike other global circles where "the world's agenda is addressed only by
the powerful."] The strong New Age orientation was evident from other participants: Barbara
Marx Hubbard, John Denver, Shirley MacLaine, Matthew Fox, Carl Sagan, Jeremy Rifkin,
Willis Harman and Deepak Chopra.

Ted Turner gave an Executive Summary of the Forum's task: "To help chart the way for
humanity." Gorbachev elaborated: "To launch a multi-year process, culminating in the year
2000, to articulate the fundamental priorities, values and actions necessary to constructively
shape our common future.... We are in dire need of redefining the parameters of our society's
economic, social, political and spiritual development." [This kind of priority would confirm the
claim by Benjamin Creme in a 1998 radio interview with Art Bell, that Mikhail Gorbachev is a
Maitreya disciple.] The steering committee which will "reinvent the paradigm of our existence"
is to be called the "Brain Trust", described as "a kind of United Nations Council of Elders."
They are not identified further except as (in the words of John Naisbitt) "leaders who will lead by
'moral authority'.... The point is not what [such a leader] is going to do; the point is who he is
going to be." [Track record of performance is thus replaced by spiritual destiny. Or perhaps this
refers to who his body is hosting.]

The areas in most "dire need" were discussed, leading gradually to the bottom lines found at
every NA forum. (1) From Gorbachev: "To change the nature of consumption." [Oddly, none of
Gorbachev's well-heeled listeners, much less Gorby himself, "redefined" any "parameters" by
refusing to pay $5,000 a head to stay at the luxurious Fairmont Hotel and enjoy the fabulous
dinners created by a flock of famous chefs recruited for the Forum....] (2) To "address the
problem of controlling the world's population." [See the recommendation of Dr. Keen, another
Forum participant.] (3) From Brzezinski: To move toward "eventual globalization [by]
progressive regionalization," since "national sovereignty is no longer a viable concept."
[Precisely the UN's multi-stage goal of Global Governance, already in progress.] (4) From Kassa
Kebede, former UN ambassador: To transfer armaments (especially those of the US) to
"international control" and form a standing army under UN command. [More goals of the UN -
see "Our Global Neighborhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance"
mentioned above.] (5) From Willis Harman, President of Noetic Sciences: To usher in "a new
social order" which acknowledges "the connectedness of everything, an emphasis on intuition
and the assumption of inner divinity." (6) From Rupert Sheldrake, Theosophist: To tap into the
"morphogenic field" which connects all life and thought and provides access to "the Ageless
Wisdom".

Last, but in NA priorities definitely not least: Fritjof Capra, author of an essay distributed free to
all participants ("The Turning of the Tide", printed in _ReVision: A Journal of Consciousness
and Transformation_, Fall 1993) condemns "the Judaeo-Christian tradition" for supporting male
domination and the superiority of rational thinking, for "anti-ecological" attitudes, and for
hindering the proper understanding of nature. Its "image of a male god [sic], personification of
supreme reason and source of ultimate power, who rules the world from above by imposing his
divine law on it", and the view that natural laws are "reflections of this divine law, originating in
the mind of God", must inevitably make way for the new spiritual path of the future.

6b. Special military branches are being prepared to help maintain order on behalf of the
Hierarchy, using not only conventional force but also psychic powers acquired by initiation.
Among these are the "First Earth Battalion" of "guerilla gurus" founded by Barbara Marx
Hubbard; and the "Task Force Delta", a strategy-planning division of the US Army utilizing
psychologists and parapsychologists (where Hubbard is also a member). Colonel John B.
Alexander, co-author of _The Warrior's Edge_, advocates psychic weapons for mind
manipulation of the "enemy" and discusses the use of "remote viewing" (clairvoyance and mind-
reading) with the casual attitude of someone long past the introductory stage of initiation: "[The]
ethical difficulties [of remote viewing] are not unlike those involved with the introduction of any
other new, invasive technology [sic]." (p.154) The Colonel's concern for ethical standards is
heartening - until we read how he "resolves" the difficulties: "All intelligence techniques require
ruthlessness, duplicity, and absolute integrity. No, these are not contradictions in terms. If you
are using influence technologies correctly, you can and will achieve your objective by the
manipulation of others. Recognize what you are doing; we do. If this manipulation is for the
eventual benefit of these others as well as yourself, then you are adhering to the warrior ethic."
(p.216)

6c. The working class of the new humanity is organized as "The New Group of World Servers",
often shortened to NGWS. [Please acquaint yourself with the NA notion of "service", which is
not what most people associate with the word.] Not all World Servers are consciously serving
the Plan, however - this group is multilevel, ranging from full initiates "who are consciously part
of the Great White Lodge" to ordinary folks who "respond to the idealism" and know nothing of
the Hierarchy. (_Discipleship in the New Age_ II, p.204) All individuals who are considered fit
for the New Age will be required to "serve" as an expression of their "love". Those who are not
considered eligible include "those people who, clinging to reactionary methods of finding and
expressing truth, prefer obedience to authority to clear thinking and self-imposed guidance of
their own soul." (_The New Group of World Servers_, Lucis Trust, p.3) [Read that one again,
friends: Those who refuse to totally surrender to the Masters' absolutist authority are accused of
clinging to an outmoded "obedience to authority", and people who insist on the freedom to form
and follow their own individual convictions rather than unquestioning NA group-think are guilty
of rejecting "clear thinking" and the "guidance of their own soul". George Orwell's 1984
"Double-Speak" has arrived.]

World Servers, in direct contrast, are those who affirm "the fundamental truths by which
humanity has evolved", truths which will eventually "lead humanity into a new age of peace and
plenty." One way to bring about this "peace" is to "repudiate violently the unproven". [Apart
from this interesting new strategy for making "peace", we see here that even though NAers view
their version of human evolution as "proven", it is preferable to convince the skeptics through
"violent repudiation" than simply presenting the vast evidence in its favor.] The World Servers
placed in leadership will "recognise no authority save that of their own souls." (_The NGWS_,
p.7) ["Their own souls" by that point will no longer be their own, of course, in the accepted sense
of autonomy and ownership, but NA redefinition of these concepts has neatly solved that
dilemma.] The primary function of these World Server leaders is to "utilize all the known
methods to reach the general public. They stir the middle class to activity and, through them,
arouse the masses." (p.6) [Leaving the rank-and-file servers among "the masses" to the "guidance
of their own soul" is apparently not as trustworthy as it was only 3 pages earlier....] The very
first task of the NGWS in rebuilding on the ruins of World War II was to be "the development of
right human relations, through the education of the masses." (_The Rays and the Initiations_,
p.88) [Learn what the term "right human relations" means for the Jews, in the "Views on Jews"
section.] Their second task will be to install the new world religion, the only one allowed in the
New Age.

7. The Plan for Selective Disarmament

The concept of a "New World Order" was coined by Bailey's Hierarchy decades before US
President George Bush made it a familiar political phrase. From the beginning, forced
"disarmament" was seen to immediately precede the NWO: "In the preparatory period for the
New World Order there will be a steady and regulated disarmament. It will not be optional. No
nation will be permitted to produce and organise any equipment for destructive purposes."
(_Externalisation_, p.191) Disarmament, in the context of a global anti-war movement, was the
first order issued to "change agents" from NA leader H.G. Wells, in his strategic book, _The
Open Conspiracy_.

This mandatory disarmament applies especially to nuclear weapons - but not for the reason that
many activists think. "The atomic bomb [was] used only twice destructively... its [constructive]
uses are twofold at this time: (a) as a forerunner of that release of energy which will change the
mode of human living and inaugurate the new age wherein we shall not have civilisations and
their cultures but a world culture and an emerging civilisation... (b) as a means in the hands of
the United Nations to enforce the outer forms of peace, and thus give time for the teaching... to
take effect. The atomic bomb does not belong to [at that time, 1957] the three nations who...
own the secrets at present. It belongs to the United Nations for use - or let us rather hope, simply
for threatened use - when aggressive action on the part of any nation rears its ugly head... [or for
use on] political groups of any powerful religious organisation, who are as yet unable to leave
politics alone." (_Externalisation_, p.548) Clearly, disarmament is to be "regulated" and
"steady" but not universal. Its purpose is to put nuclear weapons exclusively in the hands of the
UN, for the purpose of pressuring any national, political or religious entity which tries to oppose
the new worldwide political/religious blend by following their own blend. The only nations
which combine religion and politics are the Vatican city-state, the radical Moslem countries, and
of course the Jewish State. [Of these, the only nation possessing nuclear weapons is Israel. This
puts into perspective the ever-increasing pressure from the UN on Israel to sign the Nuclear
Nonproliferation Pacts and open her nuclear facilities to UN supervision. The next step will be
disarmament, then use "as a means to enforce the outer forms" of a UN-sponsored, NA religious
agenda on Israel.]

The multitudes of peace activists recruited into the various disarmament movements would be
shocked to learn that human evolution actually requires mass destruction now and then. The
benefits of world war, Bailey says, have never been appreciated by the unenlightened. After
confessing that a direct blast of "the Shamballa energy" (the energy which triggers destruction)
was responsible for World War II (and specifically for Hitler's success), she defends this
deliberate "widespread stimulation" by claiming that "the so-called 'evil results' of the Shamballa
force" have brought spiritual growth. To those disciples distressed about the "ghastly world war
at this time", she breezily explains that in the view of the Hierarchy, "The fate of the form life
[physical life] and of outer organizations is deemed of small importance"; in fact "destruction of
the outer form" must take place to allow "the building of the new and more adequate outer
expression. This accounts for the world crisis at this time." (_Externalisation_ II, p.108) Earlier,
she firmly states that the "Shamballa force" is dedicated to "the destruction of that which is
undesirable and hindering in the present world forms (in government, religion and society)."
(p.72) In effect, Bailey here validates Hitler's obsession with destruction. Not only that, but she
claims that his inspiration came directly from the Hierarchy. [For more of Bailey's comments on
Hitler's activity, see the Nazism section.]

But meanwhile, the general revulsion toward destruction and death expressed by the uninitiated
masses is useful; it can be harnessed to further the NA Plan for disarmament.

It is noteworthy that in the same breath with disarmament, Wells also targeted communism for
elimination, a prospect that seemed impossible right up until the day it suddenly happened. [I
personally do not mourn the demise of Soviet communism, with its dehumanizing oppression.
But as we have seen, the Plan of the enlightened leaders and their spirit guides does not take into
account physical misery, so it would be a basic mistake to presume humanitarian motives for
Wells' directive. Based on the self-proclaimed extent of the "Benevolent Conspiracy", and based
on the prominent position Mikhail Gorbachev holds in a major NA power forum, the "surprise"
collapse of the Soviet Union during his tenure was due to more than internal problems, likely
triggered on command from "Above".] It should not be forgotten that the massive nuclear
arsenal of the USSR was only partly dismantled at the time of its collapse, and unknown
numbers of nuclear weapons are reported "missing". [Perhaps quietly passed into UN hands for
the Plan's future "peacekeeping" effort outlined above by Bailey?] The next target is clear, given
the strong American antagonism expressed recently (and much too belatedly to be sincere)
toward communist China, complete with rhetoric reminiscent of the old "Cold War". [Why is
there no corresponding sabre-rattling at communist Vietnam, Korea, or Cuba? The answer may
lie in the fact that only China has nuclear capability - and China's nuclear arsenal is destined for
the UN cache as soon as the regime collapses.]
E. New Age Views on Jews and Judaism

Notes to keep in mind in this section:

(1) NA doctrine makes a separation between Christians and Jews in racial matters, but Christians
who embrace their historical Jewish roots and the Jewish Scriptures are ranked at the same
spiritual level as Jews, and they are likely to receive the same treatment.
(2) Most of the quotes are from Alice Bailey, giving the impression that these were her own
personal bias against the Jews; however, as the architect of the New Age, she - or the "Tibetan
Master" Djwhal Khul if you will - embedded this rejection of the Jews in the NA Plan.
(3) Therefore, rejection of the Jews is implicit for everyone who supports this blueprint for a new
humanity; and that applies to every prominent NA spokesman, including Bailey's apparent
successors, Robert Muller and the UN.
(4) New Agers sincerely do not consider themselves antisemitic, since in their view this means
hatred of the Jews. They do not hate the Jews any more than we would hate someone who is
severely deformed or mentally deranged. It's just that one doesn't allow the spiritually
unbalanced to assume leadership, or to run about unrestrained, damaging the spiritual potential
of those around them - especially if they can be sent to a "better place" where they will get help
and be happier.
(5) Although all the following information is readily accessible, it does not appear to be common
knowledge among NAers. Many rank-and-file World Servers have no idea of NA attitudes
toward Jews and will be truly shocked to read this documentation.

1. The Origin of the Jews According to the Masters

A few Atlanteans (the 2nd rootrace) survived the calamity which wiped out their civilization, in
the process losing many of their spiritually advanced powers. For some unexplained reason,
descendants from an "older, inferior root-race" also survived: the Jews.

Bailey variously identifies the Jews as the 1st rootrace Lemurians, the 4th Aryan subrace who
ruled the age of Aries, a race originating in the previous solar system, and a reincarnated species
from the moon and other planets. [The apparent contradiction is resolved by that supremely
convenient theory, reincarnation, which allows the Jews to return over and over in history -
except that, unlike any other group in NA cosmology, they mysteriously repeat the same roles
and same mistakes each time around.] Whatever their origin, Jews are alien to the human race.
The most notable achievement of this race is that it somehow defies the sacred and immutable
law of human evolution: although spiritually undeveloped and inherently flawed, it inexplicably
refuses to die out and give way to the "superior root". [See where Bailey tries to solve the
dilemma by actually claiming that the White Lodge deliberately rescued the inferior seed from
destruction....]

2. The "Jewish Force"

In addition to the Big Three Energy Forces which comprise the Logos, Bailey notes a powerful
fourth Energy working alongside them, but not in cooperation: "The Jewish Force".
(_Externalisation_ II, p.89) Although discussed as an impersonal energy source, the fact that "It"
is ranked equal with the Logos implies that, like the Logos, there is a Personality or
"Manifestation" by which this Force relates to humanity - the G-d revered by the Jews. (Bailey is
ambiguous on this point, sometimes acknowledging Him distinctly and other times relegating
Him to "a thought form", a mental fabrication of the Jews themselves. See the "Gods" section.)
She characterizes this Force as "temporary, producing separation", and locates It in the
"planetary Solar Plexus"; Its sphere of activity is "emotion". Whereas the other 3 operate through
Will, Love-Wisdom and Intellect, the Jewish Energy operates through "magic and money".
Elsewhere (p.74) she links the Jewish Force with the "force of materialism, streaming out... from
the Dark Forces or the Black Lodge". [More on the Black Lodge in the "Gods" section. See also
Blavatsky's link of the Jewish G-d with materialism.] Together, these two forces (the Jews and
materialism) "increase the already prevalent tension in the world." As a result, the Jews "wield
most potently that peculiar concretisation of energy which we call money. They constitute, in a
strange manner, a unique and distinctly separated world center of energy." (p.76) In this way,
the "sin" of "separateness" is viewed by NA as originating with the Jews and afflicting them in a
unique way, akin to an "original sin" which they are born with. [This is important to remember in
decoding a favorite mantra in NA circles, eliminating "separatism" in the world. While the
masses think of an abstract concept or behavior, the enlightened ones focus on the Jewish race as
"constituting" a "world center" of Separatism - the sin personified.]

2a. But the Jews are not alone in their offense; they are being used by the Black Lodge. NAers
are not told much about this powerful spiritual foe, except that in addition to "materialism" it is
characterized by "Cosmic Evil". Another revelation is that just as the Hierarchy needs human
agents to channel their energies and cooperate with their activities, so also the Black Lodge
needs vehicles through which to work on earth. This is important for understanding why the line
in the carefully worded "Great Invocation" reads: "Seal the door where Evil dwells," rather than
simply "banish the Evil". [We have more clues in Bailey's description of this Evil she calls the
"Dweller on the Threshold" in the "Gods" section.] Humanity is not expected to ever do battle
with the Evil Entity, which exists on a level with the Hierarchy themselves; humanity's task is to
deal with the earthly "door" by which the Black Lodge makes contact with earth, also known as
"brothers of the shadow and those representatives of what may be called 'cosmic evil'." (_A
Treatise on Cosmic Fire_ p.949). Bailey provides clues by which to identify them: "The true
nature of cosmic evil finds its major expression in wrong thinking, false values, and the supreme
evil of materialistic selfishness and the sense of isolated separativeness." (_A Treatise on the
Seven Rays_, p.753) [Compare this with the quote at the top of this section, and the composite
identity becomes clearly Jewish.] Bailey's disciples have rated that last evil as the most
dangerous: "The Ageless Wisdom teaching informs us, in no uncertain terms, that separation is
the greatest heresy, or evil, from which the most serious world problems spring." (_The
Beacon_, Lucis Trust, July-Aug. 1982)

Since it is acknowledged that Jews are the ultimate separatists (see above) - but also that Jewish
separateness was right and necessary in an earlier age (see below) - what the NA ethical system
does in effect is equate "evil" with "obsolete". So then, cosmic evil lurks behind or within any
"door" who sees value in retaining this outdated "separate" designation, or who so much as
supports the right of other Jews to retain it.
3. Loving the Problematic Jews
In one passage (_Externalisation_ II, p.128), Bailey cautions NA disciples not to generalize
about nations being totally under the Forces of Darkness; "only those with no vision and an
intolerant and prejudiced spirit" would paint a people so unfairly. However, one group does
deserve this generalized description: "those who through inclination or ancient karma are the
descendants of the Lords of darkness; their actions and ideals make possible the activity of the
forces of materialism." Even in the case of individuals among this group who appear to
recognize "some form or other of idealism" that a NAer might be tempted to appreciate, "they
are misguided and full of response to the will-to-power." Quite a problem for the rest of mankind
to have incurable sons of Darkness among them.

Even so, NA disciples are to deal with this tool of the Dark Force with "minds clear from
prejudice and free from hatred." (p.78) We are told that the "Jewish problem... is so old and so
well known" that the Masters find it difficult to express it in a way "that will not arouse in the
Jewish reader above all an undesirable reaction." Nevertheless, for the next ten pages they
(dictating to Bailey) proceed to list the many faults of the Jews "in a spirit of love". (_Problems
of Humanity_ IV, p.96-106)

Since Jews typically identify "antisemitism" with "hatred", the New Age can thus claim to be on
high moral ground - the Jews are not hated. They are simply recognized as a problem to be
solved in a loving way. Bailey elsewhere comments that "Jews frequently lower the atmosphere
of any district in which they reside." This too she insists is not an antisemitic statement but
simply "an absolute truth". (_Unfinished Autobiography_) Moreover, she does not claim credit
for this idea; the Hierarchy related to her in vivid detail why the Jews do this, and how they can
rectify it.

4. The "Jewish Problem" and its Effects

In outlining the four world problems which must be solved as the New Age begins, the
"Masters" had the most to say about Number Four, the "problem of the Jews." After analyzing
the influence of the "Rays" on the Jews, they explain: "The Jew, with his emphasis upon his
position as one of the 'chosen people,' has stood symbolically throughout the centuries as the
representative of the wandering, incarnating soul, but the Jewish people have never reognized the
symbolic mission with which their race was entrusted, and they have taken to themselves the
glory and the honor of the Lord's elect. The Jew made this mistake and, as an Oriental race, the
Jews have failed to hold before the Orient the divine nature of mankind as a whole, for all are
qually divine and all are the Lord's elect." (_The Destiny of Nations - The Influence of the Rays
Today_, p.34) Translated from mysticalese, this means that the Jews were originally taught the
concept of chosenness symbolically, in order to teach it to all of Humanity; they somehow
misunderstood it as literally applying to themselves. The idea of "bnai ha'brit", the Jewish
people being recipients of a Covenant made with the most high G-d at Sinai, is considered a
fabrication from beginning to end.

As an interesting sidenote relating to Christianity, the above quote continues: "Calvin and all
who followed his lead made the same mistake..." thus placing many mainstream fundamental
Christians within the parameters of "the Jewish problem", and by implication subject to the same
"solution".
5. The "Jewish Problem" Expressed as Zionism
If Jewish religion (covenant-based identification) is evil, then Zionism, or identificiation with
Israel, the ancient Land promised through covenant, is doubly evil. [Combine the two into the
religious Zionist, and we have manifold evil! This implies that the Israeli settlers, so thoroughly
group-bashed by global media for vague "crimes against humanity", are being viewed as
transgressors on levels that go beyond political correctness.] The Holocaust, which justified a
Jewish homeland in the eyes of the world, for Alice Bailey only had the unfortunate effect of
bringing the Jews "under the control of a glamour" which encouraged them to expect a land of
their own. She categorically states, "Today the Jewish people are engineering trouble.... They
are claiming a land to which they have no possible right." Moreover, the motive was "greed and
not any love of Palestine behind it." (emphasis hers) [Although I have to admit, showing "greed"
for sand, rocks and swamp which didn't interest anyone else indicates a rather deficient
understanding on the part of those said to be human symbols of "greed and selfishness".] And
not only that, but "the Zionists prevented the displaced Jewish persons (only 20% of the whole)
from discovering how welcome they are in many countries throughout the world."
(_Externalisation_ IV, p.615) [The Evian Conference, which a few years earlier made it quite
clear "how welcome" the Jews were, must have escaped the notice of the "Masters". These Wise
Ones also forgot all about "the problem of WHY the many nations, from the time of the
Egyptians, have neither liked nor wanted them." See below.]

While the White Lodge has been organizing the World Servers, the Black Lodge (see above) "is
working through the group which is controlling the destiny of Russia and also through the
Zionist movement." (_The Rays and the Initiations_, p.679) On the next page, however, Alice
rethinks the first group: "The true communist platform is sound; it is brotherhood in action." The
only other group she named as tools of the Black Lodge, the Zionists, remain an unqualified
"real danger to world peace and human development... [they] run counter to all the plans of the
spiritual Hierarchy and mark a point of triumph of the forces of evil." (p.681)

5a. Bailey (more accurately, the Hierarchy) was horrified when the State of Israel was actually
established, blaming the American Jews for coercing the UN into this "mistake". In fact, the
Zionists single-handedly "lowered the prestige" of the United Nations and "made its position
both negative and negligible to the world." (_Rays and Initiations_, p.681) Not only this, but "the
Zionist Dictators... were attempting (somewhat unsuccessfully) to be to the Jewish people what
Stalin and his group, and Hitler and his gang, have been to their people.... They worked through
the same methods." (p.634-636) [Two things to note here: first, the eerily familiar equation of
Zionists with Nazis; second, Bailey's convenient castigation of two dictators she had elsewhere
praised, merely to manipulate natural public rejection of Hitler and Stalin against the Zionists as
well.] Bailey lamented that the U.S. had decided to support "aggression and territorial theft"
when "they could have worked for the Principle of Harmony [achieved through conflict and
destruction - p.623] and permitted time and the non-separativeness of the nations to adjust and
solve the Jewish problem." (p.636)

All in all, Bailey knew that the specter of Zionism filled all NA disciples with "a deep
discouragement and a sense of futility and hopelessness." Nevertheless, they must make "the
effort to expose the truth and clarify the problems which must be solved. The opposing forces of
entrenched evil must be routed before He for Whom all men wait, the Christ, can come." (p.615-
616) [Here we understand by implication that Maitreya can only come to a post-Zionist world in
which the nation of Israel has been in some way neutralized, either politically impotent by UN
occupation or spiritually impotent by total conversion to the NA mentality. There are now
pressures on both of these fronts: witness the increasing calls for international intervention in the
Palestinian war on Israel, as well as the intense NA missionary efforts underway in Israeli
society. At any rate, it is in preparation for the coming of Maitreya that the UN has steadfastly
barred Israel from any meaningful activity in that world forum which is to be the mouthpiece of
the Hierarchy. And by the way, don't be fooled by the brief fanfare surrounding Israel's recent
"admission" to one of the UN Regional Groups - it was a hollow charade, probably enacted to
defuse annoying public pressure.]

6. The "Jewish Problem" as Racially Inevitable

But we are not to think that only religious Jews and Zionists are the evil separatists. After Bailey
identifies the "Jewish people" as a problem, she [or the "Tibetan Master"] hastens to add, "What
I say here has no specific reference to any individual; I am considering the world problem,
centering around the Jews as a whole." (_Externalisation_ II, p.74, emphasis mine) By calling it
a "world problem" she means that (a) the Jews' unique and collective "racial karma" [those not
familiar with this term, see Humanity section] will trouble the entire world until the race itself
disappears; and (b) it is in the world's interest to put an end to the separate and distinct identity
which Jewish people cherish.

Bailey alternately blames this "Jewish problem - a problem which... is, at this time, causing the
deepest concern to many, including members of the planetary Hierarchy," on a vague
astrological event "back in the very night of time" when "the sun was in the constellation of
Gemini, a fact established by "my [Djwahl Kuhl's] access to records more ancient than any
known to man." (_Esoteric Psychology I_, p.393) This caused them to "manipulate forces and
energies, and to 'pull strings' in order to bring about desired ends", (p.394) the source of Jewish
materialism. Their separatist delusion actually stems from a misunderstanding dating from their
initial appearance during the Lemurian Age (which preceded the Atlantean); Bailey concludes
that once you know that history, "you can come to an understanding of the Jew, his separateness,
his desire for racial purity and his interest in that which is commercial and tangible. The Jew,
down the ages, has insisted upon being separated from all other races [because] he brought over
from the previous system the knowledge (necessary then but obsolete now) that his race was the
'chosen people.'" (_Externalisation_, p.77) But in both of these faults the Jews are not innocent,
for there was more involved than a poor astrological influence and a radical change of mission.
The ancient "founders of the modern Jewish race" [numbering three, which Bailey said Masons
would be able to identify] actively "resented the command" to let go of material wealth; instead
"they sought to hold that which they had gathered" out of "love of riches". The "Masters" then
met to decide the fate of these rebellious disciples who refused to enter the "Path". Since they
"loved the possessions of the world more than they loved the service of light", they were cursed
to "know no peace". Bailey concludes: "The three [rebels] went forth in sorrow and revolt, laden
with their treasures, and thus the history of the wandering Jew began." (_Esoteric Psychology I_,
p.397)

From this it is obvious that all Jewish people have a singularly low potential for entry into the
new humanity, even in the best circumstances. Compare Bailey's assessment of the "Jewish
Problem" with "The Negro Problem". The two minorities are compared in _Problems of
Humanity_, Chapter IV, with one paragraph each, followed by a ten-page analysis of the Jewish
problem. The "Negro problem" is neatly summed up as the "problem of the white people" who
are responsible for the African's separateness; "The Negro is struggling to end it and, therefore,
the spiritual forces of the world are on the side of the Negro." Not so for the Jews, who
"constitute an international minority of great aggressiveness, exceedingly vocal." Only in the
Jews is separateness a "sin... deeply inherent in the race itself." The sinful desire to keep the
Jews separate is also found in other nations "among whom they live, but for the perpetuation of
the separation the Jews are largely responsible." (_Humanity_ p.95-96) In an odd revision of
history, a few countries were singled out as never exhibiting strong hostility toward the Jews -
Great Britain, Holland, France and Italy - because Jewish identity in those nations was "less
marked".

How do the Jews perpetuate their separation and provoke nearly universal hostility? For one
thing, "their extremely materialistic tendencies" have caused them to adopt "undesirable and
devious business methods, which have made them greatly disliked and mistrusted in the world of
business" - although at the same time they somehow built a reputation as "patrons of the
beautiful" and "the world's great philanthropists". (p.97) Then there is "the untidy effect they
have on any community", due to "centuries of tent-dwelling [sic]." They "live off" the
surrounding peoples and "take what they want... no matter what the cost to others," in order to
survive through persecution and wandering. Add to all this the commitment "to preserve... their
national religion, their national taboos and the ancient landmarks", and we have a picture of "the
most reactionary and conservative race in the world." (p.97-98) All of these faults have been
amplified by centuries of "racial purity" mandated by "the orthodox Jews". With such a history,
it is no wonder that "as a race, he is nowhere liked and people are on guard against him and his
methods," (p.99) and that "no country anywhere wants to open its doors and offer the unwanted
Jews asylum." (p.104) [Something mysterious happened to the "welcome" waiting for them "in
many countries throughout the world" which the Zionists stubbornly ignored. (_Externalisation_
IV, p.615, quoted above) ] And lest we try to belittle the effect of the Jews by noting other
migrating peoples in history, the "Tibetan Master" emphasizes: "There is no other problem like it
in the world today." (_Humanity_ p.103) The Jews are "the problem child within the family of
nations." (p.104)

6a. Jewish Shells: Nevertheless, the enlightened ones applaud the occasional "individual Jew"
who does not fit this model. They make it clear that this is not the Jew who is "a good citizen,
law-abiding, kindly and decent in his ways, anxious to play his part in community life and ready
with his money when asked for it" - for such a Jew "still remains apart", afflicted with "the
Ghetto tendency" toward "a separate identity". No, the only Jews acceptable to the New
Humanity are those who merely "function in Jewish bodies and bear Jewish names", having
"outgrown" their Jewish souls. (p.99) However, even these individuals cannot escape the
"racial" debt owed by them as a former part of the Jewish people; they will simply be expected to
accept physical purging (what the unenlightened view as "death") in a spirit of understanding and
cooperation. "Right human relations" means that the Jews must consider the good of everyone
else, and make the noble decision to absent themselves from humanity in order not to endanger
this delicate stage in the rest of the world's "human relations". [The concept of "right human
relations" is applied by the "Masters" to the Jews in a way most NA Jews have never fully
investigated. Far too many have fallen for the bait of conditional participation in certain circles
which NA offers the "individual enlightened Jew", and in their eagerness to be accepted, far too
few have read the fine print of the Plan.]

7. The "Jewish Problem" and the Holocaust

The Holocaust was not a reason to found a Jewish State; it was simply the latest in a series of
reasonable rejections by other nations. On a spiritual level, it was the Jews' "racial karma"
catching up with them. As Bailey/DK wrote in 1949: "Today the law [of racial karma] is
working, and the Jews are paying the price, factually and symbolically.... They regard
themselves as the chosen people... [but] it is Humanity which is the chosen people... They
demand the so-called restitution of Palestine, wresting it away from those who have inhabited it
for many centuries." [Ever wonder why this myth never seems to retreat before the unadorned
historical facts? Consider the central NA role cast for the global media and the UN.] Bailey
continues: "They have never yet faced candidly and honestly (as a race) the problem of WHY
[her emphasis] the many nations, from the time of the Egyptians, have neither liked nor wanted
them.... Yet there must be some reason, inherent in the people themselves, when the reaction is
so general and universal. The evil karma of the Jew today is intended to end his isolation, to
bring him to the point of ...renouncing a nationality that has a tendency to be somewhat parasitic
within the boundaries of other nations." (_Esoteric Healing_, p.263ff)

[It is intriguing that Holocaust denier David Irving parroted these very sentiments in an interview
with _The Guardian_ (March 19, 2000) during his landmark lawsuit against Deborah Lipstadt:
"Jews should not be asking who pulled the trigger, but why? When the Nazis asked the Slovaks,
the Hungarians, the Czechs, and others to give over their Jews, everyone did so gladly. Why did
the Americans and Roosevelt refuse to let the [Holocaust refugee ship] St. Louis dock? What is
it about these people that no one wanted them?" He also names various Jewish bodies as "some
of the traditional enemies of truth," and although he never elaborates which "tradition" he
embraces for his "truth", he identifies the "Jewish problem" with a word high on Bailey's list of
Jewish racial traits: "Greed."]

The small matter of Jewish genocide at the hands of the Nazis was clearly in progress (referred
to in present tense) as Bailey wrote the chapter on "The Racial Problem" (_Externalisation_, II
beginning p.194, emphasis mine). Acknowledging that Germany's claim to racial purity is
dubious, and that "any attempt to enforce so-called 'racial purity' is foredoomed to failure" since
mankind is "the product of many fusions", she notes an exception - the one race which cannot
mingle with others: "The major racial problem has, for many centuries, been the Jewish, which
has been brought to a critical point by Germany. This problem is also capable of solution if
properly recognized for what it is, and if coupled with an effort by the Jews themselves to solve
it, and to be cooperative in the world efforts to adjust their problem. This they have not yet done
because the average Jew is lonely and unsettled, able to do little to put himself right before the
world. Instinctively and intellectually, the Jew is separative... he possesses no sense of fusion
with other peoples." [With a flourish, she and her Wise Teacher display their abysmal ignorance
- not only ignorance of the German-Jewish society which required so much effort for the Nazis
to dislodge from their midst. But concerning "the world efforts to adjust their problem", we can
conclude that the "Tibetan Master" actually considered global abandonment of the Jews to the
Nazi killing machine to be for their good.]
7a. Bailey saw the "Shamballa forces" at work during World War II (and specifically through
the Nazis) as an "energy of destruction [which] has its side of beauty when the spiritual values
are grasped." Its value was in the "great energy of purification", visibly evidenced by
"widespread fires" burning out "much evil", after which "the new world will be built upon the
ruins of the old... under the guidance of the New Group of World Servers." (_The Rays and the
Initiations_, p.86-88) From the viewpoint of the Hierarchy, who directed this force in
conjunction with "karmic law" (p.85), the war was "a major surgical operation made in an effort
to save the patient's life. A violent streptococci [sic] germ and infection had menaced the life of
humanity (speaking in symbols) and an operation was made in order to prolong opportunity and
save life, not to save the form [physical life]. This operation was largely successful. The germ,
to be sure, is not eradicated and makes its presence felt in infected areas in the body of
humanity." (_Education in the New Age_, p.111) Bailey is careful not to identify who the
"germ" symbolizes here, and elsewhere she refers to "the bitter and unpardonable attack made
upon [the Jews] by Hitler" (_Problems of Humanity_ p.96). But the group Bailey names as the
post-war rebuilders of the world, the "New Group of World Servers", warns us all to beware of
certain "religious experiments which spread the virus of hatred and separation". (from an
introductory NGWS brochure adorned with a "666") If separation is the "virus", and religion is
the "carrier", the Jews are prime candidates for being the "infection" which threatens the life of
humanity (even if Bailey did not approve of the brutal form "surgery" Hitler chose). Bailey
continues in _Education_: "Another surgical operation may be necessary,... in order to dissipate
the infection and get rid of the fever. It may not, however, be needed, for a process of
dissipation, distribution and absorption has been going on and may prove effective." (p.112) [In
other words, the Jews are so effectively assimilating, dismantling their historical roots and
contributing to their own demise, that the "infection" may fade from humanity of its own accord,
without the need for another war against them.]

8. The Hierarchy's Solution for the "Problem"

Bailey earnestly insists: "There has never been a time when the Gentile world has been more
keen to do what is right by the Jew or more anxious to solve his problem and make restitution for
all he has suffered." (_Humanity_, p.105) So what does the New Age expect from today's Jews?
"Changed inner attitudes are needed on both sides, but very largely on the side of the Jews."
Sounds reasonable, doesn't it? So does "right human relations", the NA goal set for the Jewish
people.

But aren't the Jews already in the forefront of humanitarian causes? Sorry, that's not on the list.
Maybe it's tolerance: Jewish acceptance of other belief systems and identities is an area that
could stand improvement in some circles - although Jews are again among the most liberal
regarding freedom of expression, lifestyle and religious practice. But service to others and
tolerance of others cannot atone for the "evil" of the Jews' own "separateness" from others. Jews
who want to live as Jews in a homeland of their own are morally wrong, and Jews who are
content to live as Jews among the nations are "parasitic". That leaves only one solution, which
Bailey carefully spells out: "Release from the present situation [will only be achieved] when the
Jew forgets that he is a Jew." (_Externalisation_ p.267, emphasis mine)

So what Bailey means by achieving "right human relations" is basically Jewish self-erasure:
"When the Jew and the narrow-minded religious devotees [note here two groups: the broad-
minded secular "Jew" and "narrow-minded religious" Jews] recognize their identity with all
other people [Jewish distinction is illegitimate], and express this identity through right
relationship, we shall see a very different world." (_The Destiny of Nations - The Influence of
the Rays Today_, p.35) And where must the "expression of right relationship" start? With
shedding of the "taboos, habits and religious observances" which identify them as a unique
people and which constitute "an international problem". (_Humanity_, p.103)

But, lest we think the NA demand for "self-erasure" will stop at Jews becoming non-Jews, we
need to follow the NA concept of "right human relations" to its end.

8a. In spite of his new generic identity as just "people", there is some unfinished business with
the rest of humanity. "The Jew needs to recognize his share in bringing about the dislike which
hounds him everywhere", and stop his "constant, almost abusive, demands for the Gentile to
shoulder the entire blame and end the difficulty." (_Humanity_ p.103-104) In other words, the
Jews have to stop whining about the injustices done to them in the past. NA sees no conflict in
warning the Jews that their unique "evil karma" requires them to accept unusually harsh
suffering, while at the same time chiding them for thinking they have suffered more than other
peoples: "They forget that millions in the world today have suffered as they have, and that ...the
concentration camps of Europe [contained] only 20 percent Jews." (_Externalisation_ IV, p.615)
[With this nifty statistic Bailey obscures a far more significant one: the percentage of Jews
whose deaths left nothing behind to count in the camps.]

All of these requirements are leading up to the fact that there is only one Jewish response
guaranteed to solve the problem of "the Jews as a whole". Only when "he grasps, as a race, the
significance and inevitability of the Law of Karma... [and] realizes that the law is working out
and incidently releasing him for a greater future" can he help solve the "Jewish problem".
(_Externalisation_ II, p.78) From this we know that the Jews will not find release from their
"racial sins" and "right relations" through world service furthering the NA agenda, or even
through the abandonment of all Jewish tradition. They are required to acknowledge the karmic
justice of Jewish suffering throughout history, and to accept the planned obliteration of all Jews
gracefully... it's going to be better in the next life. [Although we can't be too sure; as we learned
earlier in this section, the Jewish race has already reincarnated several times as a result of this
karma - each time ending up with a karmic debt large enough to justify their place as the cosmic
whipping boy.]

9. The Root Problem: the G-d of the Jews

By far the "major factor" which makes the Jew so problematic is his religion, or more
accurately, his G-d: "The Jews are God's chosen people; they must be preserved in physical
purity and their wellbeing is of major importance to Jehovah; they have a messianic destiny, and
Jehovah is jealous of their contacts and interest in any other people or God. To these divine
requirements they have, as a people, been obedient and hence their plight in a modern world."
(_Humanity_ IV p.100)

Taking the cue from Helena Blavatsky's assertion (_The Secret Doctrine_, II p.471) that the Jews
have "a religion of hate and malice toward everyone and everything outside itself," Bailey
elaborated: "The word 'love' as it concerns relation to other people is lacking in their religious
presentation, though love of Jehovah is taught with due threats." (p.100) [If the reader is amazed
at the ignorance displayed here concerning Biblical and Jewish teaching, that was just the warm-
up.] Bailey [or her "Master"] continues to confidently inform us that Jewish religion has almost
nothing to say about "the concept of a future life, dependent upon conduct and behavior to others
and on right action in the world of men" but is only occupied with "the keeping of numerous
physical laws and rules related to physical cleanliness." [In one stroke the Jewish teachings of
Olam Ha-Ba, the world to come, and Yom Ha-Din, judgment before the Holy One, are erased
and only the purity laws are left.] Not only that, but the Jew "enforces" these petty rules even
when "incovenient to others". These contribute to the "irritating factor" which causes Gentile
hostility at every turn.

The main promoter of Bailey's works follows her example in blaming human misery on Jewish
religious concepts [and greatly misrepresenting them in the process]: "Fundamentalism [a
trigger-word for orthodox monotheism] minimizes the value of the human being, [in its]
tendency... to emphasize the awesome might and power of God transcendent 'above and outside'
His Creation [rather than] God immanent within the human heart. This ancient misconceived
split between God and humanity has worked great mischief. It has caused people to feel little,
expendable and utterly vulnerable unless they rigidly follow certain rules or formulas." (Lucis
Trust, World Goodwill Newsletter, Summer 1982) The G-d of the Jews, as Bailey puts it, is "the
rather unpleasant soul" of the Jewish nation. (_Humanity_ V, p.141)

But ultimately, what angers the Gentile more than anything about the Jews is not so much their
persistent behavior as their G-d Himself: "He [the Gentile] intensely dislikes the cruel and
jealous Jehovah of the Jews and looks upon the Old Testament as the history of a cruel and
aggressive people - apart from the Psalms of David, which all men love." (_Humanity IV_,
p.101) [Only someone who never read much of the Jewish Bible could write such lines - and
only total illiteracy could have singled out the victory songs of Israel's most famous warrior-king
as the Jewish Bible's only pacifist literature!]

10. Judaism is Evil

The "Tibetan Master" minces no words: "[I have sought] to indicate the evils of Judaism. The
present world faiths must return to their early simplicity, and orthodox Judaism, with its deep
seated hate, must slowly disappear; all must be changed in preparation for the revelation which
Christ [Maitreya] will bring." (_Externalisation_ IV, p.543)

Part of the "Plan" relayed to Bailey in 1946 contained the reasoning for this firm commitment of
the Hierarchy to rid the world of the Jewish religion: "2. The Gradual Dissolution of Orthodox
Judaism. Reason. a. Because of its presentation of a wrathful Jehovah, caring only for his chosen
people. This is a basic evil. [This is a basic distortion, for anyone familiar with the Jewish Bible
can verify that the Jewish G-d relates the righteous of all nations.] The Lord of the World, the
God in whom we live and move and have our being is totally otherwise. b. Because of its
separateness. c. Because it is so ancient that its teachings are largely obsolete."
(_Externalisation_,p.551) [If "ancient" means "obsolete", there is no reason Judaism should be
disqualified while the teachings of the Hierarchy are honored for even greater antiquity.]
Elsewhere, other evils of Judaism are mentioned: "hatred of Gentiles" [another slur from the
Biblically illiterate] and "failure to recognize the Christ." (p.544). She waxes eloquent on this
last fault, concluding with: "The difficulty with the Jew is that he remains satisfied with the
religion of nearly five thousand years ago and shows as yet little desire to change." (_The
Reappearance of the Christ_, p.81 - see the rest of this quote in the "Nazism" section.) [I ask
Jewish readers to keep in mind that here Bailey does not mean the Christian "Christ"; she rejects
the "feeble Christ which historical Christianity has endorsed." (_Externalisation_, p.590)
However, she and other NAers was/are not above using the Jewish-Christian controversy. It has
functioned admirably as a smokescreen to confuse the Jews as to NA doctrine, as well as to
prevent strategic cooperation between the two religious groups who are targeted for elimination.]

11. Collusion Among Secular Jews

One of the enigmas about the secular Jewish response to NA antisemitic propaganda is a curious
eagerness to believe the worst about their more religious brethren and their own traditional
religion, usually without even bothering to check facts. Indeed, some of those in the forefront of
helping to promote this disinformation are secular Jews themselves, whether from a desire to
justify their own abandonment of orthodoxy, or from a sense of spiritual sibling rivalry, or an
acceptance of the NA price for acceptance into their circles, or simply uncharacteristic
gullibility. The kinds of charges against the orthodox - and especially against the "ultra-
orthodox" - accepted at face value are the type that would be immediately denounced as
antisemitic if the target had been some nonreligious Jewish practice or subgroup. But because
it's the "religious fundamentalists" being bashed, secular reaction often ranges from smug
neutrality to fervent co-bashing. [It apparently escapes their notice that every blow to historical
Judaism rattles their own windows. Historically, demonizing orthodox Jews has been the first
act in delegitimizing the entire Jewish community. I beg the secular Jewish thinker to examine a
centerpiece in the infamous Nazi film, _The Eternal Jew_: it is a gruesome distortion of orthodox
Jewish life, a fact which barely disturbed the well-assimilated German Jewish community in the
early days when that film was released. If the assimilated Jews of today ignore equally
slanderous attacks currently underway on their religious brethren, in the illusion that only the
"extremist" Jews are on the hit list, then they have learned nothing at all from the Holocaust.]

A good example of smug neutrality was Jewish (non)reaction to the "news report" printed in the
newspaper of Arizona State University in late 1994. It described orthodox Jews attacking and
cursing non-orthodox worshipers at the Western Wall in Jerusalem, with their "adorable little
children" stoning a helpless paraplegic in a wheelchair, as security guards passively looked on. A
law student at ASU who demanded documentation for the story after its circulation discovered it
to be a total fantasy fabricated by a fellow-student in journalism. Yet it had been accepted as
factual by the Head of the ASU Journalism Department and the Director of the school's Walter
Cronkite School of Journalism. Even worse was an equally false report printed in the _New
York Times_ on June 13, 1997, about yeshivah youths at the Wall hurling human excrement at
non-orthodox worshipers. (See these and other legends demonizing religious Jews documented
by journalist Avi Shafran: "Open Season on the Orthodox", _Moment Magazine_, Feb.2000.)
Shafran makes the point that, had the story been about "ordinary" Jews, many Jewish anti-
defamation groups would have immediately rallied to refute the antisemitic slander. But because
the "scandal" involved a group which the general Jewish community has somehow accepted as
indefensible, it passed without editorial challenge from the general Jewish community.
11a. Some of the strongest examples of fervent co-bashing of orthodox Jews are from the Israeli
community. One is the recent movie _Kadosh_, a fantasy written by a secular Israeli which casts
haredi marriage as loveless and oppressive, with such unsupportable distortions of orthodox life
that the Israeli daily _Ha'Aretz_, not noted for religious sympathies, reviewed it with a succinct:
"We have become our own antisemites." However, _The New York Times_ reviewer Stephen
Holden accepted it as an accurate portrayal of "the sort of oppression" inflicted on orthodox
Jewish women - a "fear and loathing of sex" and "a primitive notion of women's bodies as
unclean". [Note the similar caricature drawn above by Bailey of a Judaism obsessed with ritual
cleanness] This, Holden noted, is shared by "Moslem fundamentalists and extreme sects in other
religions". The Israeli media regularly airs prominent figures uttering some of the most
outrageous antisemitic remarks on record. Hebrew University Professors Moshe Zimmerman
and (the late) Yeshayahu Leibowitz respectively likened orthodox Jewish children in Hebron to
Hitler Youth and the Israeli army to the SS. Sculptor Yigal Tumarkin remarked that when he
sees haredi families he "can understand the Nazis". One of the most chilling pronouncements
was from Shulamit Aloni, former Minister of Education: "The religious draw on the same dark
forces that fed Fascist Nazism." [It is most significant in several respects: first because Aloni so
smoothly incorporates Bailey's own terminology in condemning Judaism, second because this
was from someone entrusted with the nation's school system, and third because she afterward
received the Israel Prize for her "contributions to Israeli society".]

12. "Rescuing" Christianity from its Jewish Roots

The vigorous effort of the NA to pull in the Christians makes use of the New Testament with
their own interpretations, avoiding passages which draw on Jewish scriptures. But there remain
Jewish concepts which Christianity assimilated, and which Bailey asserts must be eliminated
completely to "restore" the Christian religion to "purity", or as quoted above, its "early
simplicity". As implied here, both Bailey and Blavatsky believed in an earlier, Judaica-free
Christianity which at some later point was "corrupted" by Jewish missionaries, resulting in the
form we know today. But [in typical disregard for logic] NAers also argue that Judaism must be
exorcised not because it is newer, but because it is too old: "God the all-powerful, all-knowing
and unchanging", as well as "God the lawgiver and message-sender... are no longer fit ways of
symbolizing God." (Eugene Fontinell, _Toward a Reconstruction of Religion_) Either way, this
makes the Christian Bible (Old and New Testament) hopelessly unreliable and in need of a
complete overhaul, directed by the "Ascended Masters". Following are a few examples [Please,
no debates from theology experts - the descriptions are very general and are meant for
comparison only]:

- The Holy Spirit. In orthodox Judaism, Ruach HaKodesh, a manifestation of the one and only
G-d in His relationship to men. In basic Christianity, one personality in the three-person God
which guides men. Must be redefined as the "Solar Angels" who collectively do the holy
spiritual work, furthering the Plan of the "Heavenly Man" Sanat Kumara.
- The Kingdom of G-d. In orthodox Judaism, Malchut HaShamayim, the rule of the one and only
G-d over Heaven and creation, climaxing in the days of the Messiah; also the acknowledgement
of that rule by every living thing, which will usher in the Olam HaBa, a new heaven and earth
filled with G-d's glory. In basic Christianity, roughly the same, with added dimension of the
afterlife in Heaven. Must be redefined as "the next kingdom in nature", ruled by the new
humanity who is God; there is no "heaven".
- Jesus. In orthodox Judaism, a Jew who lived in the first century of the Common Era; some
consider him a teacher or reformer calling the Jews to repent, others consider him a heretic and
false messiah; was put to death by the Romans. In basic Christianity, a Jew who was the Christ
(Messiah) promised to the Jews; brought a New Covenant to the Jews and later to the world;
most view him as the Son of the God of Israel and/or a teacher of selfless love; was put to death
by the Romans as a spiritual sacrifice for sin; risen from the dead, now seated in Heaven. Must
be remade into a lower-ranked ascended Master, several levels below the Logos; when on earth
he surrendered his body for use by the Christ (as did Krishna, Buddha and others) to teach
mankind the occult Ageless Wisdom; at his sacrificial death he attained the 5th initiation,
resulting in a disembodied state mistaken for "resurrected"; later lost this level, recovered it in
another [non-Jewish] reincarnation, and "is presently [1922] living in a Syrian body," according
to Bailey.
- The Coming of the Messiah. In orthodox Judaism, the arrival of G-d's designated king and
Torah teacher par excellence; a direct descendent of King David who will rule Israel and the
nations in righteousness from Jerusalem. In basic Christianity, a second arrival of Jesus; follows
the same description as Judaism except for teaching Torah. Must be redefined as the appearance
of Maitreya the Christ (sic in the West, in the East his title is the Bodhisattva), who will
overshadow a human host (most emphatically not a Jew this time); as the "World Teacher" and
"the Head of all religions of the world" (by which time Judaism will no longer be recognized as a
religion); he will restore the ancient Mysteries beginning with a Luciferic Initiation; mankind
will be prepared for his coming by Master Jesus and others who will direct their disciples
(including "the Church") to follow him. "A great deal of reactionary stupidity will have to be
eliminated before He can come... as the new generation assert their hold over human thinking."
(_Externalisation_, p.576)
- The Serpent in the Garden. In the Jewish Bible, the creature who sabotaged man's Paradise by
tempting Eve to transgress G-d's command; he was justly punished for his act, as were Adam and
Eve for their disobedience. In Christianity, the same, and/or Satan's first appearance in human
history as tempter and deceiver, directly causing mankind to be infected with a congenital sin
problem. Must be redefined as the heroic Lucifer who offered godhood to mankind in the
Lemurian age; their acceptance was not a "fall" but an "ascension". The Jews hopelessly
muddled the story and transmitted it as the first sin, while the Christians used the Jewish story to
portray man as sinful and unworthy; both versions short-circuit the path to godhood and slander
the "God of Humanity".
- Atoning for Sins. In the Jewish Bible, requires a substitute sacrifice specified by G-d to be
offered by the sinner, who has already renounced his/her deed and made whatever restitution was
possible; in post-Temple orthodox Judaism, the sacrifice was dropped out of necessity, but is
mentioned in penitential prayers as a memorial before G-d and as a practice to be reinstated. In
Christianity, the animal sacrifices are collectively symbolized and/or actualized in the sacrifice
of Jesus as the once-for-all atonement for sin, similarly applied to a sinner who has repented. In
both faiths, the sin is "forgiven", never to be remembered. Must be redefined as service in order
to pay off karmic debt, often extending into future reincarnations; no substitute can be accepted
under any circumstances, and no sin can be "forgiven" by simply repenting from it.

(For Bailey's "transformation" of terms like "God", "Creator", "Ancient of Days" and "Lord of
the World", see the "Gods" section. For her redefinition of key words in the Great Invocation,
such as "Love" and "Light", see that section of "The Plan".)
12a. There are some Jewish concepts which cannot be "redeemed" in a NA Christianity; these
will simply have to be erased. Singular among the Jewish doctrinal "failures" is the concept of
the "blood sacrifice" (_Externalisation_, p.543) [Interestingly, this is thought by most Jews to be
exclusively a Christian teaching, but Bailey is correct that its source is Judaism. Sometimes our
enemies perceive our foundational teachings better than some Jews.] The following examples
are included in the New Age list of faulty teachings [And alongside these I point out the
substitutes which NA embraces, all of which are inferior, hypocritical or dehumanizing]:
- "blood sacrifices" - as mentioned, this is the most offensive to NAers [yet pagan religions
from the Middle East, Africa and South America which historically sacrificed animals, or even
human beings, seem exempt from condemnation].
- "sin" with its "penalty" - considered demeaning and abusive, causing unnecessary feelings of
anxiety and unworthiness over perfectly human activities [notwithstanding the fact that karma
metes out far more ruthless penalties than Torah, and not for acts of disobedience but for even
unknown offenses or things not under our control].
- "purification by blood" - considered cruel, superstitious and needlessly violent [yet NAers
must expect to be "purified" by "eighteen fires" which cause pain, the loss of own's personhood
and possibly physical destruction - see Bailey's _Glamor - A World Problem_, p.269].
- "substitute sacrifice" - one may not expect a substitute to pay for his sins or save him [but the
NA firmly requires 80-90% of the world's population to sacrifice themselves for the elite 10-20%
destined for the "quantum leap"].
- "God transcendent" - "God" is not to be found outside creation [on the other hand, NA insists
that the Most High cannot be known at all, pushing transcendence to absurdity].
- "chosenness" - no one group is a "chosen people" - and certainly not the Jews [the objection
loses its meaning since it is never applied to the many other tribes with traditions of being chosen
- not to mention themselves, the elite "starseed" chosen for the next race by the Masters].
- "separatism" - this is no less than human rebellion against the United Will of the Hierarchy,
which must be either reversed or the rebels removed, in order for humanity to progress. [This
progress is to be initiated by none other than Lucifer, who Bailey admits caused "war and
disruption" in "the council chamber of the Most High". But this revolt of the Very First
Separatist was an admirable show of new "initiative", while the revolt of the "founders of the
Jewish race" was cause for a curse. See _Esoteric Psychology I_, p.394-396]
F. Nazism and the New Age

While most Jews are sure that Hitler represented the Christian community, his associates knew
better. In this section we see not only that Hitler rejected Christianity, but that there is also ample
research showing that Hitler founded far more than a political regime - the Third Reich was an
occult-based religious movement to usher in the same New Age examined in this series. [For
documentation besides the Angeberts, see also D. Sklar, _The Nazis and the Occult_; Joseph
Carr, _The Twisted Cross_; Robert G.L. Waite, _The Psychopathic God - Adolf Hitler_; Gerald
Suster, _Adolf Hitler, The Occult Messiah_; Trevor Ravenscroft, _The Spear of Destiny_.]

The Nazi President of the Danzig Senate, Hermann Rauschning (who defected to the Allies and
in 1939 wrote the book quoted above), recorded statements made by Hitler which are
unintelligible except from a NA orientation. [The fact that Rauschning included quotes which he
admitted he did not understand only adds to the credibility of his testimony, for these often turn
out to be occultic references of the kind meant to be understood by fellow-initiates alone.]

[One of the best sources I have seen is the Angeberts' book quoted above. The strength of their
work is ironically due to their positive attitude toward the occult: it appears they rather admire
the "Ancient Wisdom" as expressed in Gnosticism, Catharism and other esoteric movements, and
they trace its threads through history with nostalgia as well as academic interest. Their far-
ranging documentation allows them to conclusively show that Nazism was/is an initiation into
the classical Gnostic "path of enlightenment", but unlike me the authors do not fault the "Ancient
Wisdom" itself for the infamous results. On the contrary, "the prime lesson to be learned is that
the practice of occultism and magic is fraught with danger and, therefore, not to be entrusted to
just anyone." (p.160) This book is valuable for its uninhibited look at the many movements and
occultists - including unlikely names like Plato, Nietzsche, Goethe and Pythagorus - who shared
Hitler's dream of the Holy Grail and a new-age return of the ancient Hyperborean godmen with
their "sacred sciences". The English publisher is MacMillan (1974), McGraw-Hill (1975) in
paperback.]

Hitler turned against Christianity from his early teens and sought his destiny in the occult. He
later joined with associates who also embraced those teachings, and together they built a state
guided by the same occultic principles and goals repeated in today's NA. And no wonder,
because he drew on the same esoteric sources as the NAers of today. [How have so many
scholars overlooked this all-important key to understanding the Nazi mentality? In the words of
the Angeberts' English translator, Lewis A.M. Sumberg, nearly all historians missed the "militant
neo-Paganism" and "Gnostic racism" in Nazism "because they have brought conventional
outlooks and methodologies to their examination of an unconventional phenomenon." (_The
Occult and the Third Reich_, p.x) We must either re-assess the Nazi philosophy with these roots
exposed, or be forced to settle for theories which fail to completely explain Nazi priorities. Its
unconventional nature lay in "magic thought allied to science and know-how" (Angeberts, p.179)
- exactly the hybrid being encouraged today by NA leaders like Peter Russell. Sumberg's
observation in 1974 about this blind spot among historians fell mostly on deaf ears, which makes
it more difficult now - but more urgent than ever - to recognize that not only is Nazism not dead,
we are now surrounded by a "kinder, gentler" version of the same philosophy, sprouted from the
same roots and having the same priorities.]

1. Hitler and the Occult

According to available sources (see above), Hitler first made contact in 1909 with other
occultists, the first of these being Goerg Lanz von Lieberfels and Guido von List, after coming
across their occultic-racist magazine _Ostara_ in Vienna. (Sklar, p.5. For samples of the typical
copy published in _Ostara_, and how Hitler later echoes it, see p.17-22) Besides his publishing
activities, Lanz was known for starting a society called the "Order of New Templars" which
imitated the traditions of occultic Grail lore. (Angeberts, p.237) Lanz would later claim credit for
influencing Nazi ideology - a claim which has some merit considering that one of his books was
found in Hitler's personal library (now archived in the Library of Congress in Washington, DC).
As for List, he founded the "Armanen", a Germanic pagan priestly order which apparently
accepted Hitler into their brotherhood; evidence is in another occultic book from Hitler's library
bearing an inscription from a comrade to Adolf, "my dear Armanen brother." (Sklar, p.48) Books
by List were found stamped with the insignia of the SS Ahnenerbe (the Nazi Ancestral Research
division), indicating that his teachings were studied by SS candidates. (As an aside, Angeberts
note that the documents dealing with the Ahnenerbe itself, which they identify as "the Nazi
Occult Bureau", are listed in the U.S. National Archives but for some reason are not available to
researchers - p.259-260) Both Lanz and List were obsessed with blood purity, the Jewish threat,
Grail legends and a "new world order". Both embraced the swastika as a central symbol,
borrowing it from Hindu mysticism. [see comments below]

By 1913, Adolf had passed the novice stage in his occult pursuits. (Carr, p.95) In 1918 (age 29)
he claimed to hear voices announcing that he was "selected by God to be Germany's messiah"
(Carr, p.36); later he made contact with an "ascended master" whom he identified as Lucifer or
"the beast from the pit". He eventually became convinced he was the reincarnation of Woden (or,
Woton). At some point, he discovered two German occultists who eloquently expressed his own
understanding of Aryan religion and destiny: Richard Wagner [details later] and Friedrich
Nietzsche. These influenced Nazi thought so heavily that the authors of _The Occult and the
Third Reich_ name them as "the two prime initiators of the Third Reich", (p.119) and devote two
entire chapters to documenting this claim. To these can be added a third, who lived before Hitler
and tried to weld Wagnerian and Nietzschean thought into one work: the British occultist
Houston Stewart Chamberlain, who wrote in his epic _Foundations of the Nineteenth Century_
(1900): "Every Mystic is, whether he will or not, a born Anti-Semite." (Sklar, p.11)

Another occultist to influence Hitler's thinking was Dr. Karl Haushofer, who was introduced to
Hitler in 1924 while the latter was in Landsberg prison. Haushofer, a Blavatsky disciple,
combined a dubious "science" called "geopolitics" with Eastern mystical texts and _The Secret
Doctrine_ principles, and claimed to have clairvoyant powers. It was Haushofer who schooled
Hitler in _The Secret Doctrine_. (Carr, p.93) His geopolitical theories found their way into
_Mein Kampf_. (Sklar, p.62) It was also Haushofer who forged Hitler's alliance with Japan
basing his case on astrological predictions (Sklar, p.69), and who gave him the "Lebensraum"
concept. As the Nazi conquest advanced, Haushofer applied his theories through prophecies
which overruled the military leadership in directing troop movements. (Sklar, p.69) Besides
Hitler, Haushofer had other prominent disciples: Rudolf Hess, later to become Hitler's secretary;
and Anton LaVey, who gained notoriety in later years for his promotion of Satanism. LaVey
dedicated his work _The Satanic Bible_ in part to "Karl Haushofer, a teacher without a
classroom." (Sklar, p.63) Haushofer's fortunes fell, however, when his son Albrecht conspired in
the 1944 coup against Hitler and was arrested; father Karl was sent to Dachau.

Hitler, like today's NA philosophers, firmly believed in the coming of a new species of
humanity. Like modern New Agers, he expected them to be a literal "mutation" of homo sapiens,
achieved by arriving at "higher levels of consciousness". He also believed that the new humanity
would be free of "the dirty and degrading chimera called conscience and morality," as well as
"the burden of free will" and "personal responsibility" which should rightly be borne only by the
few with the fortitude to make the awful decisions necessary for the good of humanity. (Sklar,
p.58)

Hitler's associate, Bernhard Forster (who happened to be Nietzsche's brother-in-law) related to

Hermann Rauschning how Hitler had proclaimed that he "would bring the world a new
religion,... the blessed consciousness of eternal life in union with the great universal life... when
the time came. Hitler would be the first to achieve what Christianity was meant to have been,
[without] any fear of death [or] the fear of a so-called bad conscience. Hitler would restore men
to the self-confident divinity with which nature had endowed them." Forster then added his own
opinion: "He drew his great power from intercourse with the eternal divine nature." (Sklar, p.54-
55) [The reader should note the familiar "cosmic consciousness" vocabulary here, more
appropriate to the founder of a religion than to a political schemer.]

The Nazi sacred symbols and concepts - the swastika or "gamma cross", the eagle, the
red/black/white color scheme, and ancient Nordic runes (one of which became the insignia of the
SS ) - were all adopted from occult traditions going back centuries, shared by Brahmins, Scottish
Masons, Rosicrucians, Manichaeans and others. (Angeberts give detailed histories, p.194-200)
The Nazi motto, "One Reich, One Folk, One Fuehrer", reflected the standard 3-fold power
circles of the occult. (See a good example in Bailey's _Discipleship in the New Age_ II, p.165,
where the Great Invocation is to be explained on three distinct levels.) The Reich was the
psychic adepts of the Nazi Party, which would build the bridge between the Folk (the masses
which unite into a cosmic Entity greater than its parts) and the Fuehrer (the initiates in the elite
leadership which unite with Hitler, the divine incarnation). The outer fringe, the Folk, are taught
what they can handle: blind obedience, group service, a new history and identity. The Party elite
such as the SS are taught something different: psychic knowledge, tapping into the "Vril Force",
self-denial, brotherhood mission, medieval lore, fearlessness of death. The innermost circle was
privy to the hard-core Gnostic teaching on the Grail, immortality and godhood. Many neo-Nazi
groups continue to pursue these topics with devotion. But under it all was the invisible presence
of "Unknown Superiors" (Angeberts, p.178, quoting Rudolf Olden, _Hitler the Pawn_, written
1936. Rauschning used the same term - p.233) who taught Hitler himself and who were assumed
by his associates to endow him with his uncanny hypnotic power.

Concerning Hitler's relationship with these Unknowns, there is not much known besides his
reference to a guiding voice of "Providence". However, we do have a vivid account related by an
unnamed associate of Hitler to Rauschning (both were not sure what to make of it), in which
Hitler wakes up in the middle of the night in total panic at some unseen visitation: "Hitler was
standing there in his bedroom, stumbling about, looking around him with a distraught look. He
was muttering: 'It's him! It's him! He's here!' His lips had turned blue. He was dripping with
sweat. Suddenly he uttered some numbers which made no sense, then some words, then bits of
sentences. It was frightening. He used terms which were strung together in the strangest way and
which were absolutely weird. Then, he again became silent, although his lips continued to move.
He was given a massage and something to drink. Then all of a sudden, he screamed: 'There!
Over there! In the corner! Who is it?' He was jumping up and down, and he was howling."
(Rauschning, p.285-286) [Whatever the reader may conclude about the Unknown Superiors,
whether a figment of a sick mind or real entities, please remember that both Nazi cosmology and
NA religion view(ed) them as real and independent beings - and also as extensions of one's own
untapped divinity. No provision is made in either system for the possibility of ascended beings
who first seduce their channels and then torment them. Yet stories similar to the above are not
uncommon in NA circles. From those who leave the New Age after such an experience, the
verdict is uniform: the Guides are clever deceivers with evil motives. For those who stay, the
solution is to blame oneself for the "bad trip" and blindly dive in deeper; this was apparently
Hitler's choice.]

Hitler's personal devotion to occult principles was proven ultimately by his self-inflicted death.
His choice of April 30 for his suicide may well have been meant as a sacrifice; it was the eve of
Beltane (known in Germany as Walpurgisnacht), identified on popular Wiccan websites as a
Druid feast in honor of the deity Bel. In witchcraft, this "power-point" day is regarded as a "great
sabbat" equal in potency to Halloween. According to Wiccans, Bel is derived from the Canaanite
Baal; but Helena Blavatsky goes farther in _The Secret Doctrine_ (vol.2), reconstructing an
astrological trinity of Bel/Baal (sun-god, father), Christos (Mercury, son) and Lucifer (Venus,
holy spirit). [more on the Lucifer connection in "Gods of the New Age"] As for Hitler's suicide
itself, this was not a cowardly act from an occultist viewpoint, but rather an honorable practice
known among the Druids, as well as among the Cathari "Perfects", those medieval guardians of
the Grail, who called it the rite of "Endura". A curious requirement of the "Endura" was that it
was always to be done by pairs of intimate friends, a detail known by the Nazis (Angeberts p.28)
which makes sense of Hitler's joint suicide with his new wife Eva Braun. Incidently, Hitler's
associates Karl Haushofer and Goebbels also killed themselves in ceremonial fashion along with
their wives. (Angeberts, p.275, note 11)

2. Hitler and Christianity

Not only did Hitler regard Christianity as a defective, failed enterprise, he saw himself as
replacing both its God and its Christ. At one of the huge Nuremberg rallies hung a gigantic
poster of himself, with the caption stolen from the Christian gospel of John: "In the beginning
was the Word." German youth were indoctrinated from infancy to pray to Hitler, who they were
taught was sent from heaven to protect them. (Sklar, p.56) Nazi-approved sermons in German
churches proclaimed, "Adolf Hitler is the voice of Jesus Christ." And lest some readers
[especially Jews] should conclude from this that Nazi Christians viewed Hitler as the mouthpiece
of the New Testament Jesus, the statement is clarified to leave no doubt: "If Jehovah has lost all
meaning for us Germans, the same must be said of Jesus Christ, his son.... He [Jesus] certainly
lacks those characteristics which he would require to be a true German. Indeed, he is as
disappointing, if we read the record carefully, as is his father [the G-d of Israel according to
Christian tradition]." ("What the Christian Does Not Know About Christianity", quoted by Sklar,
p.56)

In Hitler's words, Christianity "only added the seeds of decadence such as forgiveness, self-
abnegation, weakness, false humility and the very denial of the evolutionary laws of survival of
the fittest [social Darwinism]," and would obviously be a handicap to the new species which he
was personally commissioned by the "masters" to see properly birthed and nurtured. But Hitler
perceptively placed the ultimate blame where it is due: "Conscience is a Jewish invention. It is a
blemish, like circumcision.... There is no such thing as truth, either in the moral or in the
scientific sense. The new man would be the antithesis of the Jew." (Sklar, p. 57-58) Nietzsche
likewise considered the Christian Bible nearly worthless because of its Jewish origin: "In
Christianity, seen as the art of sacred lying, we're back with Judaism.... The Christian is but a
Jew of more liberal persuasion." (_Antichrist_, quoted in Angeberts, p.126) [Compare with the
NA view of how Judaism "defiled" Christianity.] In this context, antisemitism was not a starting
point for the inner Nazi society as it was for the masses; Jew-hatred was the inevitable result of
absorbing these bedrock occult teachings.

The nurture of the new humanity included the need to "encourage the growth of a violent,
domineering, intrepid, cruel youth... nothing weak or tender in it." (Angeberts, p.209,
Rauschning quoting Hitler) This reached its climax in SS training, and it corresponded to the
Nazi view of "pure" Gnostic, Hindu and Buddhist philosophy, which did not teach compassion
and gentleness, but Aryan duty and honor above all (Angeberts, p.220-221). [This would seem
confirmed by the presence of Tibetan Buddhists in Hitler's Berlin, as well as Bailey's prediction
that Buddhism is destined to drop its image of gentle pacifism.]

But there was an obstacle to sweeping away the Jew and raising this cruel new generation, in the
person of that "Jew of more liberal persuasion", the Bible-believing Christian. Knowing that
Christian Germany would not easily accept an open return to paganism, Nazism attempted to
wean the masses from standard Christianity by removing the Jewish-influenced "negative" parts,
that is the Old Testament and most of the New Testament, imposing gnostic meanings on key
passages, adding colorful pagan legend, and repackaging it in their 1920 platform as "positive
Christianity" (Angeberts, p.202-203). [This term is freely used today by many groups, some of
them fervent NAers offering the same package to naive Christians, for the same purpose.]

Hitler's vision of returning to "pure" pagan religion was echoed, or more accurately anticipated,
by psychoanalyst Carl Jung in 1923: "We [Germans] need new foundations. We must dig down
to the primitive in us, for only out of the conflict between civilized man and the Germanic
barbarian will there come what we need: a new experience of God." (Sklar, p.134) When
esotericist Jakov Wilhelm Hauer founded the Nordic Faith movment, Jung urged participation on
the part of Germans who were "intelligent enough not only to believe but to know that the god of
the Germans is Wotan and not the Christian God." ("Wotan", essay by Jung - emphasis his,
quoted by Sklar, p.134) The Nazis reciprocated by making Jung President of the German
Medical Society for Psychotherapy in 1933, at which time he finally found a forum from which
to expound a belief he had held since 1918: the need to distinguish between "German" and
"Jewish" psychology. (The Society's Dec. 1933 issue) In his view, such a distinction was not
antisemitic, it was liberating for both Aryans and Jews. (Sklar 136-137) When the Jews were
fleeing Nazi Germany in ever-increasing numbers, Jung advised his followers in England to keep
up their "negative feelings" about Jews and resist allowing them to participate as colleagues, as
he also did. [See further details about Jung in Harvard Professor Richard Noll's books.] As for
the destruction being wreaked by the Nazis, Noll notes that Jung viewed them as the necessary
precursors to the great "light", those whose task was to destroy to make "rebirth" possible.
[Compare with Bailey's assessment below.] It took until 1945 for Jung to finally denounce the
Nazi extermination of the Jews, but he never retracted his proposal for a "Germanic, Jew-free
psychotherapy". (Sklar, p.138-139)

To remove the "bad seeds" of Christian (that is, Jewish) thinking, Nazi preparation of children
for the new humanity would be diligent from cradle to grave, centered around the notion that
they were born to die for their god, wmbodied in their Fuehrer. The education began with
revised fairy tales teaching new-humanity principles of heroes struggling and dying to set their
race free. Then group membership started at age 10, followed by continuous reinforcement in
group settings for the remainder of their lives, "so that they shall in no case suffer a relapse, and
they don't feel free again as long as they live," as Hitler bluntly put it. (Sklar, p.110) There was
non-stop activity which required passive participation, allowing no time for reflection or
discussion.

And what did Christian leaders think of Hitler? Although many Christians eventually bought
into "positive Christianity", apparently there was enough opposition to necessitate an early purge
of that community. Before launching his "final solution", Hitler made an effort to remove all
churches and pastors who showed the least resistance to policies already in operation. For
example, refusal by a church to sponsor a Hitler Youth chapter was sufficient grounds to close it
down. Leaders whose integrity would not yield to political expediency, who could not be
discredited by scandal, and who had the potential to influence Christians at large, were
imprisoned indefinitely (Dietrich Bonnhoefer for example). Although Hitler did not close down
many Catholic churches, especially where local support was strong, he vented his rage on Pope
Pius XI, who had issued an encyclical condemning him as "a mad prophet possessed of repulsive
arrogance" ("Mit Brennender Sorg", March 14, 1937).

2a. Hitler and the Pope

This Catholic leader and his successor, Pius XII, have long been the subject of controversy for
their publicly ambivalent statements regarding the Jewish genocide taking place in their times.
However, in the eyes of the Third Reich, Pius XI had already gone too far with his encyclical,
and Nazi General Ludendorf was convinced that Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli, then the Vatican
Secretary of State and soon-to-be Pope Pius XII, was behind the wording of this document and
"behind all the anti-German activities of Rome's policy". (Pinchas Lapide, _Three Popes and the
Jews_, p.120) The Nazi government lodged a harsh protest with the Vatican shortly afterward
(April 12, 1937 - see Georg May, _Kirchenkampf oder Katholikenverfolgung_, p.582). When
Pius XII came to power in 1939, he appeared to adopt a more diplomatic tone, making his
position much harder to identify. [It is not my aim here to evaluate whether Pius XII did or did
not do enough to oppose the Holocaust. There is a great number of published papers which come
to conflicting conclusions, but the prevailing opinion today is that Pius XII failed abysmally by
remaining silent in the face of Nazi genocide. For open-minded readers, I recommend a
documented rebuttal from the Catholic side, which ironically relies on the research of several
Jewish scholars, especially Israeli historian Pinchas Lapide. My goal here is to show the Nazi
response to what Pius XII did say, and to suggest motives for it.] Yet the so-called "Silent Pope"
came under attack in Nazi political cartoons published in _Der Stuermer_, which showed the
pontiff kissing rabbis. (reported to me by German researcher Robert Jesolowitz, who has them on
file)

In what most historians consider a vague protest, Pius XII referred to "those hundreds of
thousands who, without any fault of their own, sometimes only by reason of their nationality or
race, are marked for death or progressive extinction" (Christmas Message 1942). Vague or not,
his message was not missed by the Nazi leadership. Himmler's deputy Reynhard Heydrich
responded with: "The Pope has repudiated the National Socialist New European Order... He is
virtually accusing the German people of injustice toward the Jews and makes himself the
mouthpiece of the Jewish war criminals." (quoted by Lapide, p.137) In Italy, the editor of
_Regime Fascista_ wrote: "The Church's obstruction of the practical solution of the Jewish
problem constitutes a crime against the New Europe." (Michael Schwartz, _The Persistent
Prejudice: Anti-Catholicism in America_, p.246) [Besides the obvious Nazi conviction that
Catholics were heeding a covert call from the Pope for resistance, note the familiar phrase "New
European Order", its only difference being on a regional scale rather than today's global goal.]

[It can be - and usually is - argued that Pius XII did not do enough, given his vast resources and
global influence. On the other hand, Lapide shows that he did substantially more than other
leaders who were not caught in Hitler's hammer-lock, such as the U.S. government which turned
away Jewish refugees even though immigration quotas left room for over one million between
1933 and 1943. (Documentation of American inaction is available in _While Six Million Died_,
by Arthur D. Morse.) This sense of perspective is often lost by over-reliance on the 1963 German
drama, "Der Stellvertreter" (performed as "The Deputy" in London that same year), which
repeats Heydrich's charge of "war criminal", only this time presenting the Pope as an accomplice
for the Nazi side by his "silence". Aside from the fact that the charge itself is debatable, I have
yet to see anyone portray then-President Roosevelt as a "war criminal" for his refusal to get
involved at a much lower risk.]

[Four points about "The Deputy" which reflect on the NA-Nazi connection: (1) This play
focusing on Pius XII to the exclusion of many other silent "Deputies" was introduced by
playright Rolf Hochhuth as a "fantasy", yet it has come to be regarded by many as a definitive
"work" on the Holocaust Pope. In sharp contrast, many students of the Holocaust have never
heard of Pinchas Lapide's assessment of Pius XII, based not on fantasy but on solid research. (2)
This initiative to elevate Pius to "war criminal" status did not come from the Jewish community
but from post-Nazi Germany, where no small number of unrepentant war criminals were able to
continue their lives - and their occultic beliefs. (3) "The Deputy" was strongly criticized by
Lapide, who said that world Jewry did not endorse this view of Holocaust history. For some
reason, few Jews are aware of this disclaimer, let alone in agreement. Point (2) conveniently
serves the NA divide-and-conquer strategy toward Jewish-Christian relations, manipulating this
painful history of the Church failing the Jews while covering up their own designs against both
groups. Points (1) and (3) show the unapologetic history revision commonly seen in the New
Age framework - not merely a retroactive application of create-your-own-reality, but
disinformation with an agenda.]

[But Point (4) is perhaps the most telling: One of the earliest records of Pius XII denouncing the
Nazi movement dates back to April 1935, when Pacelli was still a Cardinal: "These ideologues
are in fact only miserable plagiarizers who dress up ancient error in new tinsel." (address at
Lourdes to 250,000 pilgrims) By recognizing the return of the "ancient error" which the Church
had repeatedly battled in the past - occultic Gnosticism - this pope declared himself a formidible
enemy in the arena most important to the Nazis: the ancient cosmic-religious War of Light
against Darkness. I would submit that his evident knowledge of the occult roots of Nazism
disturbed Hitler and his fellow-initiates far more than anything Pius did later, for they were in the
process of burying all such traces [see below]. This is the best explanation for the hysterical
tirades reportedly directed personally at Pacelli by Hitler, and even a plot in 1940 to kidnap him.
The threat from this pope did not end with the Third Reich, because the real "War" was - and is -
still in progress. On the contrary, Pius XII was so highly esteemed that at his death (1958),
Israel's Foreign Minister Golda Meir eulogized him in the name of the Jewish State, and the
Israeli public called for a forest of 860,000 trees to be planted in honor of the estimated number
of Jews saved by this Righteous Gentile. Surviving guardians of the Gnosis must have realized
that Pacelli's continuing influence on the Jewish people could do great damage to the future of
the Plan if they came to comprehend his analysis of Nazism. This is the only reasonable
explanation for the total reversal of his reputation within five short years, after unknown parties
financed and heavily promoted a reconstructed pseudo-history of Pius XII on the stages of
Europe. Today, not many Jews are interested in anything this Nazi "deputy" had to say.]

3. Hitler and the Mufti

And what about Islam, the third monotheistic religion? While Hitler ranted against Christianity
and Judaism, expressing "a violent feeling of anger at the idea that some Germans were able to
be taken in by theological doctrines devoid of any depth," he contrasted these hated teachings
with "those of Confucius, of Buddha and of Mohammed" which provided spiritual "sustenance".
(Angeberts, p.246) In this context, Hitler's friendship with Haj Amin al Husseini, Mufti of
Jerusalem - which included asylum in 1941, the honorary rank of SS Major and an acceptable
racial "genealogy" - can be understood as more a sign of respect than political expedience. There
were even cases of Nazis relocating to Arab countries and converting to Islam. (p.275-276 note
14) In this opinion, Hitler had the backing of the Thule Society, whose founder Sebottendorf
praised Islam for having a "vitality greater than that of Christianity" which flowed "from a
torrent which nourished everything" - that same "thread of lost knowledge" which was the goal
of the Nazi quest. (Angeberts, p.165-166) [This raises other ideas for why Hitler's Mein Kampf
is so popular among some Moslems; besides the expected political admiration for brute force,
there may also be a consensus of spiritual worldviews.]

4. The Nazi Mentality - Group Mind

The Nazi goal was group-think, or the eradication of private conviction and dissent. As stated
above, the "burden" of free choice and decision-making could be entrusted only to the few with
the enlightenment and courage to implement the new age without flinching. For the masses, it
was enough that they submit to the leadership, which would weld them into one entity through a
common psychic experience. [Today this would be called a guided group "light experience",
practiced by most NA channelers on their followers. See the parallels in the "Transformation"
Section.]

[Eerily, this group-think is the stated goal and the practical outcome of the UN-sponsored World
Core Curriculum, as well as the American OBE (Outcome Based Education) which incorporates
the WCC into US public schools. Alice Bailey disciple Robert Muller, author of the WCC,
presents planetary group-think as the proper goal for all enlightened individuals. The first
principle of the WCC Manual clearly states that "the group idea, group good and group
understanding" are to "replace all limited, self-centered objectives, leading to group
consciousness". The UN Global Governance Commission goes farther, branding "some
assertions of particular identities" as nothing less than "intolerance", a cardinal sin in the New
Age. (See the massive report by the Commission on Global Governance, "Our Global
Neighborhood", and search for the "Core Value" of "mutual respect".) Obviously, someone at the
top will have to bear the "burden" of dictating the parameters for group-think. Yet the question of
who will wield this immense power over the rest of mankind, and whether they might abuse it, is
never brought up - seemingly not worth troubling ourselves about. The New Age global forum
known as "Planetary Initiative for the World We Choose" is an example of those who have
donned the mantle of choice for the group, as is the "State of the World Forum", but as usual the
question is never answered how the "We" who "choose" were themselves chosen.]

Hitler's contention that free will is a burden to the masses was confirmed by the popular reaction.
Said one young Nazi to the press in the glory days of the Reich: "We Germans are so happy - we
are free of freedom." (Sklar, p.152) For many, it was a relief not to be saddled with personal
convictions and responsibility for what was happening, as a perceptive professor reflected after
the war: "I suppose we were grateful. Who wants to think?" (see _They Thought They Were
Free_, Milton Mayer)

On the other hand, cultivation of personal will and initiative is a noble duty incumbent on the
high-level occult initiate destined to lead the pliant, group-conscious new humanity. Hitler was
obsessed with the potential of the human will. So was Helena Blavatsky: "...that mysterious and
divine power latent in the will of every man, and which, if not called to life, quickened and
developed by Yogi training, remains dormant in 999.999 men out of a million." (Sklar, p.51) It
was likely this fascination which lay behind the title of that definitive Nazi propaganda piece in
1934, _The Triumph of the Will_. [The reader will remember that "Will" is not a mere human
effort but is deified in NA as an attribute of Sanat Kumara.] A German youth interviewed by a
French writer in 1937 explained the Nazi triumph of will not in militaristic but in gnostic terms:
"I am studying the conception of the world.... We refuse to think and to be; we refuse to stand by
helplessly under the determinism of the so-called laws of matter. What we want is inside, an
inner structure.... We shall not let anyone stop us from building before God and before men that
which must be built!" The writer then remarked on the similarity of Nazi sentiment to the (as he
thought) extinct French Templar philosophy. (Alphonse de Chateaubriant, quoted in Angeberts,
p.175)

5. New Age Leaders Commenting on the Nazi Experiment

And what is the opinion in the NA community to this infamous historical figure who so closely
resembles them? Ambiguous, to say the least. When pressed to comment publicly about Nazism,
most will say the politically correct thing and applaud the fact that "the monster" Hitler failed. [It
takes a bit of sleuthing to find out what they say to one another.]

New Age references to Hitler are sometimes veiled in positive generalities. Examples are Alice's
husband Foster Bailey, and David Spangler, a Findhorn leader (a NA community in Scotland
where the goat-god Pan is worshiped). F. Bailey tactfully does not name Hitler but describes a
disciple who tried to put the Plan of the New Age gods into action "on a regional scale in the
Rhine River valley" (_Running God's Plan_, p.14). Spangler, dedicated to "anchor the Plan on
earth" by establishing other NA communities like Findhorn, distances the New Age Aryans from
Nazi Aryans only in that the "blond, blue-eyed Germanic race which Hitler spoke of" was
unnecessarily narrow - the Aryans "are actually a more wide-ranging and ancient super-race".
(quoted by Constance Cumbey, _Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow_, p.107) As an avowed
disciple of Bailey and Blavatsky, he can be assumed to hold the same views about need to
safeguard the "purity" of the Aryan race.

Then there is the schizoid response to Hitler - condemning his brutality while justifying his
philosophical premises. This describes Alice Bailey (_The Externalisation of the Hierarchy_ II,
p.122-127), who called Nazism a "peculiarly distorted blend of Fascism and Communism", yet
included it in "the great world ideologies" birthed by the "Shamballa force" (a flow of energy
from the Hierarchy directed at the world). Says Alice, "The objective [of the Hierarchy] was to
stimulate the free will of the masses; the result upon them has been relatively good." And what
prompted the "masters" to trigger these beneficial ideologies, including Nazism? "It was the
acuteness of the situation and the wide extent of the cleavage." Which cleavage is that? "The
cleavage between the two groups... the forces of materialism and... the energy of light." The
forces of materialism are known to Bailey as the "Dark Forces", which "work to preserve that
which is ancient and material... and feed... separateness." The Jews' insistance on retaining their
chosen-people identity "made it possible for the forces of separativeness and hate to use the
Jewish race"; therefore, the Jews are the tools of the Dark Forces. (_Externalisation_ II, p.76-77)
Here it took a bit of effort to piece the picture together, but later Bailey is more outspoken:
"Hitler, who lifted a distressed people upon his shoulders; Lenin, the idealist; Stalin and Franco
are all expressions of the Shamballa force and of certain little-understood energies.... We call
these people dictators, demagogues.... But all these leaders are... being used to engineer great and
needed changes and to alter the face of civilisation." (_Externalisation_ II, p.134-5) So then,
according to this channeler whose teaching is energetically promoted by the UN, Hitler was
empowered by the Hierarchy to continue the ancient and honorable War against Darkness,
personified by the Jews -- precisely what Hitler himself claimed. [See more Bailey comments on
the "beauty" of World War II in general, in the "Views on Jews" section.]

It is no wonder, then, to find New Age factions which openly applaud the Third Reich. Savitri
Devi Mukherjee, a French convert to Hindusim who became an influential mystical leader in the
West, firmly believed that Hitler was an "avatar" (divine manifestation), a being in natural
harmony with the Hindu tradition. She considered him the embodiment of twin mystical light
sources, "the sun and the lightning." [See _Hitler's Priestess: Savitri Devi, the Hindu-Aryan Myth
and Neo-Nazism_, Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke] Devi's book about her human idol (_The
Lightning and the Sun_) bears the dedication: "To the god-like Individual of our times; the Man
against Time; the greatest European of all times; both Sun and Lightning: ADOLPH HITLER, as
a tribute of unfailing love and loyalty, for ever and ever." [capitals in original. It is likely that the
tribute, "the Man against Time", referred to Hitler's reversal of the swastika's direction from the
Hindu orientation which symbolized harmonic movement with the sun, to the opposite direction,
that is, against time.] Devi, now deceased, still has a following in India, known as the
"Hindutva" movement.

Naturally, Devi's book is heavily promoted by neo-Nazis such as Canadian Ernst Zundel, as are
her tapes, "for serious students of the occult". Zundel himself follows the time-honored Nazi
obsession with occult and psychic phenomena, particularly UFOs. Another major neo-Nazi
center in New Zealand offers a book catalog which contains as many titles on the occult as on
politics - dealing with runes, Atlantis, Norse religion, magicians, and Hitler-as-god. The best
personal example of neo-Nazi ideology merged with NA thought is David Icke, former BBC
commentator turned Green Party activist and "son of the godhead" guru, whose seminars are
crowded with NAers and neo-Nazis alike. Likewise the British magazine _Rainbow Ark_ and
the Australian periodical _Nexus_, which Icke recommends to his followers. (For a good
overview of Icke, see "From Green Messiah to New Age Nazi", _Left Green Perspectives_, Jan.
1996.) [Note the quotes by Icke, many of which are almost verbatim Bailey teachings.] Also
worthy of mention is the "New Acropolis", ostensibly a NA philosophy club to outsiders, but a
Fascist group known by insiders to be imitating the Third Reich.

Reasons for Hitler's failure to usher in the new humanity are given by various NA sources: he
was premature; he did not coordinate with the "Hierarchy" but tried to build a rival power base
[see below for confirmation]; his vision for mankind wasn't global enough; he was blocked by
the "old order". If any of Hitler's NA critics detected any weakness in him toward the
Christianity which they are working to eliminate, they have yet to mention it.

[Here it's appropriate to speculate why prominent New Agers in recent decades have refused to
follow the Baileys (and by implication the spirit guide "DK") in rationalizing the Nazi war on the
Jews. On the contrary, many are hard at work to perpetuate the memory of Nazi brutality in the
Holocaust, even emphasizing their savage treatment of the Jews. There are two possible
explanations: (1) The high-profile NAers are not necessarily high-ranking NAers, particularly in
the entertainment industry - they may be uninformed about the NA doctrines of human evolution
and Jewish karma, and honestly believe that New Age thought could never sanction Nazi
antisemitism. (2) High-ranking NAers, who know the true roots of Nazism, are promoting the
evil of the Nazi-brand Final Solution in order to more effectively contrast the benevolence of
their own Solution - something like the "good cop / bad cop" strategy where two interrogators
pretend to be on opposite sides to manipulate the suspect into trusting the "good guy" to protect
him from the "bad guy". Or call it reverse camouflage: next to pitch black, gray can look fairly
white.]

6. The "Missing" Link: The Thule Society

The same year Hitler had his New Age revelation, Baron Rudolf von Sebottendorf, an avid fan of
Helena Blavatsky, founded the "Thule Society", a spiritist group which borrowed heavily from
HPB's _The Secret Doctrine_. Thule in occultic, Greek and Viking lore was the capital of an
ancient ice-island called Hyperborea (known in Hindu legend as the "White Isle"), inhabited by
superhumans with psychic powers who eventually founded the Aryan race. After an unexplained
disaster, survivors of Hyperborea took refuge first in the "West" [meaning west of India, perhaps
Babylon?], then in the Gobi desert, and later in Tibet; their spirit mentors retreated to a hidden
spiritual center called "Asgard" (variously located in space or in a subterranean city). [Fans of
the TV series "Stargate" will recognize this as the name of the benevolent alien race which offers
hidden knowledge to the SG-1 team in times of need.] In Scandinavian myth, Asgard was the
abode of the gods, connected with earth by a rainbow bridge. (Angeberts, p.280 note 43) These
beings, headed by one known in Hindu/Buddhist tradition as "the Lama of lamas" or "King of
the world", can only be contacted on the spiritual plane. The symbol of this "Master" is the
swastika, "symbol of the central power of the gem of Heaven". (Angeberts, p.96, quoting J.
Marques-Riviere, _In the Shadow of the Tibetan Monastaries_) [Note the similarity to the NA
history of the "White Lodge" retiring to "Shamballa". I would also guess that the "gem of
Heaven" is a symbolic reference to Lucifer's stone, or the Grail.] The Thule mythology was
apparently embraced long before the Thulists by Nietzsche, who began his final work,
_Antichrist_, with the words: "Let us see ourselves for what we are. We are Hyperboreans."
(Angeberts, p. 124)

The goal of Thule members was to break the barrier of the "small self" - consisting of physical
reality and (upon promotion to their inner circle) moral constraints - so as to merge with the
"divine self" in the unseen spirit realm. (Sklar, p.33) That in turn allowed the initiate to reach the
"universal energy fields" (Carr, p.108) which would "awaken the sleeping powers within" and
access superhuman psychic abilities which had once belonged to the proud Aryan race.
Attainment to this new level would lead to their thousand-year mastery over the earth. Thulist
powers were embodied in pagan deities, specifically Woden/Woton; their symbols were the
swastika (an ancient "rune" symbolizing the sun, the moving wheel of life and the process of
transmutation) and the red eagle (which Sebottendorf defined as the symbol of the death-to-life
experience - Sklar, p.40). Thule discipline required blind, unquestioning obedience to the
enlightened master in whatever he may ask, which would create conditions for personal
transformation. (Sklar, p.46) Sebottendorf called this the "Fuehrerprinzip" ("the Fuehrer
principle"), and he concocted a formal response by which to salute such a god-man: "Sieg, Heil!"
("Glory, Hail!") (Sklar, p.34) Thule initiates fervently awaited someone worthy of that title to
whom they could submit. When Hitler joined the Society, Thule member Dietrich Eckart
prophesied that the day had come; he began introducing him in Munich occult circles as "the
long-awaited savior". To Alfred Rosenberg he said: "I believe in Hitler; above him there hovers a
star." (Sklar, p.53) Eckart was following his own mission revealed to him in a seance: that when
"Lord Maitreya" [none other!] would soon make his appearance as a German messiah to "lead
the Aryan race to final victory over the Jews", he, Eckart, was charged with the responsibility of
"nurturing" him. (Carr, p.110)

The Thule Society considered the Jew ("Juda") their cosmic enemy. As early as 1920,
Sebottendorf advocated a "Final Goal" of "cleaning out the Jews once and for all", using "the
most ruthless measures, including Sammellager [concentration camps] and sweeping out the
Jewish vermin with an iron broom." (Sklar, p.57) [Readers will recognize the same terms made
infamous by later Nazi propaganda.]

Thule did not stop with a war of words, however. Society members were implicated in the
assassination of then-President of Bavaria, a Jew named Kurt Eisner. When police arrived to
arrest suspects, Sebottendorf threatened to ignite an anti-Jewish pogrom. Whether due to
expedience or to Thule's wealthy backers, law-enforcers backed down. (Sklar, p.42) One year
later (1919), the Thule Society established a political arm, the NSDAP, an acronym for the rather
cumbersome name later shortened to the "Nazi" party. Sebottendorf wanted the new party run by
his "Fuehrer principle", but he was overruled in favor of elected leaders. Shortly thereafter,
Thule absorbed several beleagured occult groups such as the Germanen Orden. Interestingly,
Sebottendorf attacked certain kindred groups, specifically Rudolf Steiner's Anthroposophists and
the Freemasons - denouncing the former as a corrupted version of the truth, and the latter as Jew-
ridden. [Since there was little actual difference in doctrine, the likely motive was either to
discredit Thule's closest occult competitors, or to eliminate those considered too "weak", that is,
too compassionate to carry out the necessary purge for the new humanity. Hitler later adopted
the same strategy - see below.] Thule also joined forces with the "Free Corp", a paramilitary
group comprised of demobilized soldiers who knew no other life. When the Thule Society finally
disbanded, the NSDAP and Free Corp (by now known as the Storm Troopers) continued,
marching under the Thule sign of the swastika.

Thule Society members or supporters who became key Nazi officials included: Max Amann
(Editor of Nazi Party publications), Hans Frank (governor of Occupied Poland), Anton Drexler
(founder of the German Workers' Party), Gottfried Feder (co-founder of the Nazi Party), Karl
Harrer (first chairman of the NSDAP), Rudolf Hess (Hitler's Minister of State), Dr. Heinz Kurz
(SS leader), Feiedrich Krohn (designer of Nazi insignia), Ernst Roehm (leader of Storm
Troopers), Alfred Rosenberg (Foreign Services chief, propagandist, author of _The Myth of the
Twentieth Century_), Julius Streicher, (Gauleiter of Franconia), and of course Hitler himself (as
a "visiting brother"). [list supplied by Sebottendorf, _Before Hitler Came_, quoted in Angeberts,
p.169] Dietrich Eckart, a leading Thulist who died in 1923, deserves posthumous Nazi
membership; among his last words was this proclamation: "Follow Hitler! He will dance, but it is
I who will call the tune." (Carr, p.87) Eckart took credit for initiating Hitler into Blavatsky's
_Secret Doctrine_ and for putting him in contact with "the powers"; Hitler later dedicated _Mein
Kampf_ to Eckart.

7. Why would Nazis attack fellow-occultists?

According to research (see _Adolf Hitler, The Occult Messiah,_ Gerald Suster), Hitler was
devoted to Theosophy and kept a copy of Blavatsky's _The Secret Doctrine_ by his bedside. Yet
from the 1920s, his thugs ruthlessly attacked and killed adherents of Theosophy, Anthroposophy,
Freemasons and others who shared the same occult doctrines. He banned their groups from the
Third Reich, and publicly denounced occultists Rudolf Steiner and Aleister Crowley. He
ignored astrologers, seance mediums, fortune tellers and similar groups, until 1942 when they
also were banned. This has led historians to assume that Hitler was simply anti-occult, a
conclusion that fails to explain all the evidence to the contrary.

The Nazi relationship to the Thule Society in particular begs for an explanation. By 1933, when
occultist Sebottendorf sought to revive Thule, he found himself roundly rejected by the Nazi
party he had nurtured. He retaliated by writing a book, _Bevor Hitler Kam_ (Before Hitler
Came), claiming credit for Thule's role in launching Hitler into leadership. The book was
apparently popular and sold well, until the Nazis confiscated all available copies and sent the
author into enforced retirement. Thus Nazi origins in the occultic Thule Society, as well as Nazi
plagiarism of many Theosophical and Thule terms, were buried; to this day they remain
relatively unknown to many students of the Holocaust.

One explanation is camouflage. Hitler seemed determined to keep his occult roots hidden from
the general public; the groups and individuals he targeted for early elimination were those who
knew of those roots and who might expose him (thereby challenging his control of the "Plan").
This would explain why the Nazis burned every available copy of Sebottendorf's book which
proclaimed those roots, and why Rudolf Hess's defection to the West in 1941 prompted Hitler to
outlaw all remaining occultists in the Third Reich, such as astrologers, mediums and even parlor
magicians. (Carr, p.88-100)

Such actions can be also be understood as attempts to eliminate competition. Hitler recognized
occultic power in each of the banned groups which could compete with his own occult
enterprise, and eliminated them from the field. He considered Steiner a particular threat, making
him the first target. [According to Angeberts, Steiner was an avowed practitioner of "white
magic" who viewed Hitler as a tool of "black magic" - p.160. Since they both believed they
manipulated the same Force, this equality would have suggested to Steiner the possibility of
thwarting Hitler, a direct threat which Hitler in turn would have recognized.] This would make
sense of the fact that he confiscated (rather than burned) all the books of the outlawed groups,
and is the only explanation for his treatment of the Thule founder to whom he owed so much.
Heinrich Himmler confirmed this when he defended the official Nazi policy banning astrology:
"We cannot permit any astrologers to follow their calling except those who are working for us."
(SS astrologer William Wulff, _Zodiac and Swastika_, quoted by Sklar, p.2) While Himmler fell
back on the traditional esoteric rationale, "It is not for the broad masses", who would
misinterpret the occult secrets, the fact that recognized adepts were also disenfranchised betrays
more of an attempt to clear the field.

Hitler did make one exception, however; his 1942 law banning secret societies and confiscating
their assets specifically exempted the "old Prussian" Freemason lodges, otherwise known as the
Bavarian Illuminati. This group followed the Nazi racial purity ideal far more closely than the
"humanitarian Freemasonry" (as the Angeberts distinguish the different streams), and in fact the
Bavarian sect shared Hitler's disdain for the other branches of Freemasons, not to mention for the
Jews as well. (p.157) [This would imply another reason why Steiner and the Freemasons, as
"humanitarian" strains of occultism, were ruthlessly attacked by both Thulists and Nazis: they
were considered too compassionate to do what was needed to usher in the New Age.]

8. Gnostic-Nazi-New Age Convergence

The one esoteric legend in particular which captivated the Nazis was the Quest for the Holy
Grail. While popular mythology presents the Grail as the cup Jesus Christ used at his last
supper, occult groups dismiss this materialistic interpretation as a "blind" to preserve for
initiates the Grail's true meaning: the quest for the divine bloodline or racial purity (See _Holy
Blood, Holy Grail_, Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh & Henry Lincoln), which would bring with
it supermortal Knowledge and immortality. Alternately, the Grail was defined in gnostic
symbolic style as the "philosopher's stone", the "third eye" or the spiritual "crown" of Lucifer
which fell from his forehead when he lost his place in heaven (Angeberts, p.264 note 14). In real
terms, that "seeing eye" is the Knowledge of self-as-god which Lucifer exhibited, and which he
offered mankind in the Garden of Eden. Hitler saw in Wagner's _Parsifal_ a detailed parable of
the Nazi calling as "a religious brotherhood of templars to guard the Holy Grail, the august
vessel containing the pure blood". (Hitler to Rauschning, quoted in Angeberts, p.155) The Grail
defined here as the "vessel" refers to the racially pure body which holds the blood that can absorb
god-knowledge. [See more about Wagner's Luciferism in the "Gods" section.] The racially
inherited god-consciousness idea appears in the Gnostic teaching of a divine lineage descended
from Jesus Christ (not a Jew but a Gnostic initiate) who didn't actually die on the cross, and who
achieved a singular level of Aryan racial purity and corresponding god-consciousness (his Jewish
identity was dismissed as an Oriental fiction). In search of this holy blood which contains the
coveted god-knowledge, every member of the SS was screened for purity of Aryan lineage, and
was taught his duty to father as many racially pure children as possible. Himmler believed that if
conception took place in an Aryan cemetery, the resulting child would receive the spirit of "all
the dead heroes" buried there; accordingly, lists of Nordic cemeteries were published in the SS
periodical _Das Schwarze Korps_. (Sklar, p.114)

Gnosticism had another, lesser-known influence on Nazi religion, which also appears in New
Age thought: the Jewish God (as they mispronounce it, "Jehovah") is not the Most High and
only God, but a "demiurge" pretending to be such. Blavatsky agreed that the Gnostics "were
right in regarding the Jewish God as belonging to a class of lower, material and not very holy
denizens of the invisible world." (quoted in Sklar, p.144) (For more evidence on the gnostic roots
of New Age, see Stephan Hoeller's "The Hermetic-Gnostic Roots of Theosophy", sold on tape by
the Theological Society.) In Blavatsky's understanding, "only angels of a low hierarchy" could
have created "those wretched races, in a spiritual and moral sense, which grace our globe." [Not
shy about contradicting herself, Blavatsky also identified the Jewish God as Cain, son of Eve by
Satan.] The "moral wretchedness" referred to is Jewish enjoyment of everyday life (everything
from meals to sex) and their continual thanksgiving for every material blessing. This attitude was
feared and hated by the gnostics, who considered the body and the physical world a prison which
the mind must reject and transcend through meditation and magical rites, and escape to the "real"
or spiritual world. The "spiritual wretchedness" is the Jewish "Old Testament", rejected by
gnostics as evil, which teaches that the Creator of heaven and earth is the Most High God. Since
materialism is evil, and "Jehovah" created the physical world, He must be evil as well: not
merely a usurper of the title "God", but in fact Satan. [For more details, see the "Gods" section.]
The Jews who persist in spreading their teachings (in their Bible) are the tools of Satan, and their
influence in the world is deadly to human souls. Hitler reiterated this gnostic doctrine: "The Jew
is the anti-man, the creature of another god. He must have come from another root of the
human race." (Sklar, p.146) [compare with Bailey's similar assessment] Hitler was also known
for his severely simple lifestyle, voluntarily shunning material pleasures, physical appetites and a
meat diet - all classic Gnostic elements of "purification from the world".

The NA cosmology placing the Jews in alliance with cosmic Evil neatly reinforced the Nazi
pursuit of racial purity: not only was the Aryan race threatened with defilement on a genetic
level, but on a spiritual level as well. Both NA and Nazism clearly borrowed from the
Zoroastrian teaching (originating in Persia in the 6th c. BCE and experiencing a comeback
through NA endorsement) and the Cathari, both of whom taught that Moses was an evil magician
who received his law from "the god of Darkness", and that this "Devil caused the Deluge".
(Angeberts, p.262 notes 24,25) The gnostic themes of the Grail quest and the cosmic struggle
between Light and Darkness were portrayed in Richard Wagner's _Parsifal_, a favorite opera of
Hitler. Being an occult initiate, Hitler was aware of the gnostic message behind "the absurd
externals of the story [Parsifal], with its Christian embroidery... [the real message was] pure,
noble blood, in [whose] protection and glorification the brotherhood of the initiated have come
together." (Sklar, p.146, emphasis mine) Gnosticism also clarifies some otherwise unintelligible
proclamations, like those by Nazi apologist Alfred Rosenberg: "The earth-centered Jew lacks a
soul"; and "[The continuing existence of the Jew] would lead to a void, to the destruction not
only of the illusory earthly world but also of the truly existent, the spiritual." These statements,
and also his insistence that "The denial of the world needs... to grow so that it will acquire a
lasting predominance over affirmation of the world," (Sklar, p.147-148) only makes sense to a
Gnostic. [The Theosophy studied by Rosenberg as a Thulist was his likely source - see similar
statements.]

9. Other New-Age Threads Preserved in Nazism

Reichsfuehrer SS Heinrich Himmler first entered the Thule Society orbit as a fighter in the Free
Corp, by which time he was already a devoted occultist. He was especially fascinated with
reincarnation and karma (individual and racial); he became convinced that he was the
reincarnation of King Heinrich I the Fowler (10th c), who spoke to him in his sleep. (Sklar, p.85)
He was similarly obsessed with legends of the medieval order of Teutonic knights (a secret
brotherhood which required Germanic racial purity for eight generations), the meaning of
ancient Nordic runes, the Hindu/Buddhist idea of sacrificial detachment from the consequences
of daily life, and the precepts of the _Kautilya Arthasastra_, a cynical, amoral Hindu philosophy
utilizing deceit. (Sklar, p.91) When he was given command of the SS, he molded his Black
Guards after a combination of all these. He required his officers to read the mystical research of
SS Colonel and Ahnenerbe member Otto Rahn: _Crusade Against the Grail_ (1933) and
_Lucifer's Court in Europe_ (1936). [Both are available in German and French only, far as I
know.] Himmler's nickname, the "Black Jesuit", stems from his slavish imitation of the (equally
secretive) brotherhood of Jesuit priests, whose literature he avidly studied (Sklar, 86-87, citing
Nuremberg Trials witness Walter Schellenberg). He made use of the time-honored Jesuit practice
of "spiritual Exercises" - intensive visualization to create personal and group reality. (Sklar,
p.88) [The explanation that visualization is not a powerful, time-honored occult manipulation of
others, but merely a new psychological self-help exercise, is promoted only to deceive the few
who still have scruples against occult practices.]

Himmler, like his Thule fellows and like most NAers today, denied the existence of objective
reality. Not surprisingly, he went on to advocate "freeing" science to pursue research
unhampered by notions of provable truth - especially science dealing with ancient origins.
[Leading evolutionists are only recently beginning to admit that their research is similarly "free"
of objectivity, even proposing that Darwinism might be better classified as philosophy or myth
than as science. See my sample list of quotes.] This attitude was shared by the Nazi leadership,
and led their rejection of valid astronomy and physics in favor of occult-based pseudo-theories
such as the "doctrine of eternal cosmic ice" concocted by Hans Hoerbiger, a mechanical
engineer. It was Dietrich Eckart who introduced his protege Hitler to Hoerbiger's work, and its
similarity to Thule mythology on new ages birthed from ice was immediately recognized.
Hoerbiger himself declared war on "objective science" as "a pernicious invention" (Angeberts,
p.183), advocated substituting the "uselessness" of mathematics with a mystical "knowing" of
the universe, and targeted Albert Einstein as an archenemy (emphasizing the latter's Jewish
origin no less than his pernicious scientific work). Hoerbiger's cause was taken up by the Hitler
Youth, and later by the SS Ahnenerbe, and Storm Troopers became fanatic supporters who
disrupted meetings of conventional astronomers with shouts and threats. (Sklar, p.75-77) It was
Hoerbigerian weather forecasting (continuing after his death in 1931) that fixed 1941 as a mild
winter, convinced the Nazis to leave behind heavy winter gear for the invasion of Russia, and
sent them into a record-breaking cold front which marked a turning point in the war. Even after
the disaster, no one admitted the bankruptcy of Hoerbiger's theory. (Amazingly, works praising
his theories continued to be published as late as 1952 - see Angeberts, p.277 note 14) On the
contrary, Hitler blamed the German people for the defeat in Russia: "The nation has proved itself
weak, and the future belongs solely to the stronger eastern nation. Besides, those who remain
after the battle are of little value; for the good have fallen." (Sklar, p.81) [This follows the pattern
of the "ascended masters" themselves, who invariably blame their devoted servants when things
go wrong.]

True to Hitler's vow, "We shall wash off the Christian veneer and bring out a religion peculiar
to our race" (Sklar, p.147), SS soldiers underwent occult initiations and ceremonies, to replace
their Christian faith and names with ancient Germanic names and worship rites (Hitler being
their incarnate deity), and to harness latent spiritual forces believed to reside in the Aryan
psyche. (Sklar, p.100) [This was not an abrupt change, since these SS candidates had grown up
in 1920s Germany, where the occult, psychic phenomena and paganism were quite trendy.
Presumably their parents, school teachers, civic leaders and other role models had already
contributed to the next generation's conditioning by their own immersion in Eastern mysticism
and spiritism. The implications for today's youth, who are being raised on an even more potent
and invasive brew of the same, are unmistakable.] Secrecy, a total dedication that erased all
other loyalties, unquestioning obedience, isolation from 'common society', a sense of self-
sacrifice, a place in an exalted and ancient line of "guardians" [as the black-cloaked, Force-
wielding Jedi Knights were described in "Star Wars"], and a strict observance of hierarchal status
were the methods of fostering unity - all of them borrowed from occult societies.

But under it all, the abject fear was instilled in SS men of being found unworthy of their exalted
status, especially through the sin of independent thinking. The group-think to which they had
been subjected since early childhood sank to new depths to minimize the chances of such a
mishap. A required achievement for SS candidates was Kadavergehorsam, or "dead-body
[unfeeling, robotic] obedience". In merciless drills, they were trained to disregard their own
emotions and consciences by performing acts of brutality on self and others usually associated
with satanic cult rituals. (See descriptions in Sklar, p.96-100) (Such practices in satanism are
meant to produce an altered state of consciousness and, as they believe, to channel the natural
horror response into psychic energy which empowers spells.) In the resulting numbness, they
could carry out the most horrific orders without thinking, and walk among sickening sights
without flinching. Himmler firmly believed in the holiness of this ultimate devotion, in which the
SS suffered and sacrificed more than their victims. For him, the unsung "glory" of the SS was "to
have stuck it out... and to have remained decent fellows." As for Himmler himself: "I try to reach
a compromise in my own life; I try to help people and do good, relieve the oppressed and remove
injustices wherever I can. Do you think my heart is in all the things which have to be done
simply from reasons of state?" The extreme sacrifices of the SS, he said, were required in part by
German racial Karma; an individual "oughtn't to think of himself". (Sklar, p.90-91)
[Undoubtedly, many NAers will view themselves in precisely the same light when they are
required to take part in necessary future purges. The view is already prevalent in NA that
individual human rights must give way to humanity's rights, and this includes inflicting pain as
well as enduring it.] It was also German Karma, Himmler said, that they be "saved" by "a figure
of the greatest brilliance" - meaning not Hitler, but the spirit "incarnate" in him and possessing
him. (Sklar, p.157)

An inner circle of SS officers took on the roles of Teutonic knights, complete with coat-of-arms,
and met regularly at Himmler's Wevelsburg fortress for deep meditation, week-long
visualization sessions (Sklar, p.88) and contacts with disembodied spirit masters. The very
insignia of the SS was loaded with occult meaning; the twin lightning bolts were an ancient
Nordic power rune. [Savitri Devi also focused on the imagery of twin cosmic light sources in her
adoration of Hitler.] The Ahnenerbe branch of the SS invested huge sums in trips to Tibet to
search for an ancient Aryan clan, (Angeberts, p.95) and exhaustive efforts were made to harness
supernatural powers for the Nazi war effort: everything from pendulum divination and ESP to
yoga and Zen Buddhism was investigated. (Sklar, p.101-103) Himmler was certain that his
British adversaries were doing the same kind of research, and possibly with more success. (In
reality, the British were aware of the high regard Himmler and others had for astrology, and
commissioned astrologer Ludwig von Wohl to predict what kind of advice they were getting
from Nazi stargazers.) Hitler's strict vegetarianism was a matter of principle because of
reincarnation of souls into animal bodies. (This was not only Hindu and Buddhist belief but
Cathar as well - Angeberts, p.238) In fact, Nazis were seen to show great respect for animal life
even while slaughtering human beings (see note 6 by Angeberts' translator, p.281). [This peculiar
devaluation of humans below animals is a pillar of Hindu life as well, where the sacred cows and
cobras of India fare far better than the luckless human born to a low caste. In the West animal
rights are threatening to eclipse human rights as well, reflected in the "Earth First" mentality.]

Yet another ancient belief adopted by the Nazis was the dualist cycle of the universe - a cosmos
full of energies at polar opposites carrying on a continual battle, colliding to bring temporary
balance and transmuting to a higher state of being, evolving into a new polarization, renewed
battle, and on endlessly. Fire and Ice, Light and Darkness, Matter and Spirit, Good and Evil, the
human races all followed this spiral path. Each "new world order" could not proceed without the
destruction of the "old order"; therefore destruction is as healthy as the following restructure.
This cosmology was shared by many cultures: the Zoroastrians of Persia (who greatly impressed
Nietzsche), the Hindu writers of the Veda, the Greek gnostics (particularly Pythagoras, who
carried the concept from Egypt), the Manachaeans (gnostic Christians), the Cathars, Nordic
legends (Angeberts, p.68ff) and Germanic lore tranmitted mostly through Wagner (p.154). It is
also a pillar of Theosophical teaching and of Alice Bailey, who clearly approved of Hitler's role
in destroying the old order and "establishing of a new world order", as Hitler described it in
Bailey's own words. (Angeberts, p.155)

A tactic especially interesting to Jews which was shared by both Nazism and NA is faulting the
Jews for rejecting Jesus as their Messiah. Like Hitler, no NA leaders accept Jesus's claims as
recorded in the New Testament, yet they make much of the fact that the Jews did not either.
While Hitler drew on Martin Luther's vitrolic condemnation of the Jews for stubbornly rejecting
Jesus, Alice Bailey simply adds this rejection to her tally of the Jews' karmic debt: "Christ came
to bring an end to the Jewish dispensation which should have climaxed and passed away as a
religion... In the rejection of Christ as the Messiah, the Jewish race has remained symbolically
and practically in the [astrological] sign of Aries, the Scapegoat [actually Aries is a ram, as noted
elsewhere in her book, but the purpose for this "mistake" is self-evident]... they will repeat their
ancient sin of non-response to the evolutionary process. They rejected that which was new and
spiritual in the desert [by making the golden calf at Sinai]; they did it again in Palestine 2000
years ago; will they do it again, as opportunity is offered to them?" (Alice Bailey, _The
Reappearance of the Christ_, p.81)

[Here we have a masterful "catch-22", for if the Jews reject Maitreya as a false messiah, they will
"remain the Scapegoat" and be removed from the new humanity as they deserve. If they accept
him, they will accept his assessment that past karma requires their annihilation - first spiritual
erasure and then physical death. The only question is whether they will go out in submission or
in rebellion, but go they will...]

Knowing that Christians are susceptible to such reasoning, today's NAers have become adept at
using "Christian" arguments against the Jews. Christians coming from an environment that never
mentioned Alice Bailey will recognize the eerie similarity of Bailey's quote above to the
widespread Christian doctrine known as "Replacement Theology", the belief that the Jewish
dispensation ended with Christ and that the failure of Jews to accept him cost them their place as
G-d's chosen people. But the Christian linkage is maintained on the NA side for its PR value
only; it rallies support among Christians for their own goals, while they work for the end of both
the Jews and the Christians, as did Hitler. [A case can be made that the very existence of this as a
"Christian" theology may be due to NA infiltration into Christian leadership. Only someone who
is indifferent to the survival of Christianity could support such a belief, because if Replacement
happened to the Jews, there is no guarantee that it won't happen next time to the Christians!
Precisely the argument that NA uses.]

Besides all the above common ground, there is universal reverence in NA and Nazism
for Tibetan Buddhism. Blavatsky and other Theosophists considered the Tibetan Himalayas the
home of the Hierarchy themselves. According to some opinions, Hitler sent SS officers to the
Himalayas not only to seek out the source of the Aryan race, but if possible to make contact with
"Asgard" and consult directly with the "ascended masters". A colony of Tibetan Buddhists
flourished in Berlin (Angeberts, p.215). The translator of Angeberts' work, Lewis Sumberg,
notes that the Russian troops entering Berlin in May 1945 found "the corpses of a thousand men
of Himalayan origin, in German uniform, but carrying no papers or identification." (p.281-282)
[One wonders what today's Dalai Lama might be conveniently forgetting in relation to his
community's Nazi affiliations, each time he proclaims the Tibetan Buddhist's identification with
the suffering of the Jews.]

A virtually unknown component in Nazism is the glorification of homosexuality as a path to

higher consciousness and superhuman power. In accordance with widespread occult practice
dating back to the Greeks, promotion in the SS brotherhood was conditional on adopting
"warrior" or super-masculine homosexuality. The homosexuals who were despised and were
sent to the camps were exclusively the effeminate kind. [See _The Pink Swastika:
Homosexuality in the Nazi Party_, Scott Lively & Kevin Abrams, on line via the Web. I
recommend an annotated version, an interesting blend of the original, somewhat flawed text with
a reader's hostile comments; the end result is a welcome correction of minor points and an
unintentional confirmation of the authors' main contentions.] It is interesting to note the rising
popularity of "warrior" images in entertainment (both male and female-Amazon types) which
combine occult powers with subtle homosexual or anti-heterosexual attitudes. [A good, blatant
example is the cheesy "Xena" TV series newly arrived on Israeli TV - read the character
histories.]

10. Nazi and American Eugenicists Working Together

The agreement among eugenicists from these two vastly different societies (for more details, see
the eugenics section) reveals yet another thread borrowed from ancient occult-based societies
both in the East (India) and West (classical Greece). While the Nazis were open about the
necessity of "blood purity" to elevate the human race, Americans were more circumspect, veiling
their goal of "racial thoroughbreds" in more acceptable social/humanitarian terms - undesirables
in the U.S. were ostensibly targeted because they were "uneducated and poor", not because they
were racially inferior. The Nazis understood the restrictions to which their U.S. colleagues were
subjected and did not protest. They closely followed the writings of Madison Grant, associate of
American Birth Control League director Stoddard, who advocated the ancient Spartan practice of
infanticide as a natural weeding-out process. The Nazis publicly thanked both Grant and
Stoddard for "awakening in Germany the movement for the preservation and increase of the
Nordic race." The U.S. League likewise took a great interest in ongoing Nazi developments, and
published an article in May 1933 entitled "Eugenic Sterilization, an Urgent Need", by Ernst
Rudin, Director of Genetic Sterilization and founder of the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene. A
group of American eugenists sat as guest judges in the German "eugenic courts" in the 1930's,
and returned with highest recommendations: "The [Nazi] sterilization law is weeding out the
worst strains in the Germanic stock in a scientific and truly humanitarian way." (Lothrop
Stoddard, 1940, after spending 4 months in Germany) [For excellent source material, see
Professor Stefan Kuhl's _The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, & German
National Socialism_]

11. Never in a Vacuum...

Countless historians and sociologists have tried to analyze how Nazism became the new value
system for a civilized, humanistic people seemingly overnight. The fact is that Nazi doctrine was
introduced to an entire generation of Germans raised on magic, cosmic mythology, medieval
lore, tales of secret guardians of the Ancient Wisdom and mystical god-men. The titles being
published and devoured were reminiscent of today's blockbuster movies in the science fiction,
mythology and "world disaster" genres: _Ulysses' Bow_, _The Great Dream_, _The Seventh
Ring_ (an actual end-of-the-world novel), _The Star of the Alliance_. (See Angeberts, p.253-255
for a list of German bestsellers between 1896 and the 1930s.) Astrology, Theosophy,
experiments in "animal magnetism", clairvoyance and other ESP, combinations of "white"
sorcery and science, seances, and other occult pursuits were widespread and trendy. Some were
involved purely for entertainment or psychological manipulation, but others took it quite
seriously as a door to enlightened knowledge and spiritual power. The reasons for this stampede
away from reason and into mysticism have been attributed to a complex environment: the
upheaval in German society and economy, an inner emptiness and fatalism which stifles personal
initiative, an erasure of moral and spiritual boundaries which leaves youth with nothing to
believe in and nowhere to belong, disintegration of traditional family authority, a social
devaluation of personhood which makes one ashamed of having private values and goals at
variance with the group. (Sklar, p.150) [I would propose that all these conditions are not the
cause for the abandonment of rational thinking, so much as the result of a society accepting
theosophical principles like Karma and Group Mind.]

What happens then is inevitable. Out of the chaos and apathy (the destruction of the old order)
rises a mass movement (a new order). It feeds on the loss of individual thinking, but in return
promises a secure, responsibility-free place in the Group Mind where thinking is done for you. It
removes all rights to family autonomy, but guarantees a lifelong brotherhood; outlaws all
religions except its own, but provides ego-friendly answers for all life's questions. It requires
you to die, but offers a Supreme Opportunity to give up your life with honor and dignity, and a
sense of intrinsic value as a tiny cog in the Vast Plan. It's better than being lost and lonely. And
after all, there is no real death, nor is there any particular reason to hang onto this life; why not
pay the karma sooner than later? At the head of the movement is an enlightened individual who
apparently has a direct connection with that which the whole society has been seeking: Asgard,
home of the Hierarchy across the Rainbow Bridge. And he declares that the time has come for
the new humanity, for a return to our long-lost god consciousness, and he has been
"overshadowed" and sent to guide us there. Only first, there is a "virus" that must be removed
from the body of humanity so that it does not endanger the pure "seeds". And now you have a
Cause to fight for - a personified yet dehumanized Darkness on which to vent your righteous
rage as Sons of Light.

[Thus a whole generation of German youth was prepared to receive a NA messiah and obey his
every command. How did it happen that a vulnerable society at its lowest point had the
misfortune to cross wires with a loser, an obscure little man, and inexplicably welcomed him
hysterically as an "avatar" - a divine channel? And how did he proceed to turn the "Shamballa
force" loose across a continent and rip through the Jewish community, with millions to help him
and no one to stop him? Was it just a ghastly conjunction of random social trends? If so, we are
witnessing an eerie repeat coincidence - the same occultic atmosphere, and another mass
movement based on the same foundations, calling for unity against the same "virus". This time it
is on a far wider scale and has a global media-driven culture to accelerate its spread. At this
point, the movement appears to be securely entrenched; only its "avatar" is lacking. And all this
within two generations of the last nightmare encounter. The evidence suggests that we should
not only acknowledge the familiar face of this movement, but stop viewing it as a "repeat" and
recognize it as a continuation of something that never really went away.]
G. The Transformation of Society

Helena Blavatsky was told by the "Masters Morya and Koot Hoomi" that humanity would be
ready for the New Age sometime at the end of the 20th century. By that time, "besides a large
and accessible literature ready to men's hands, the next impulse will find a numerous and united
body of people ready to welcome the new torch-bearer of Truth. He will find the minds of men
prepared for his message, a language ready for him in which to clothe the new truths he brings,
an organization awaiting his arrival." (_The Key to Theosophy_, p.306, italics in original). The
Plan itself, Alice Bailey was told by the "Tibetan Master", was to be meanwhile kept among
adepts, or trusted occult initiates. "The Plan will be restored on Earth through illumination
[initiation] and goodwill [service], and when that takes place Christ will return to Earth."
(_Discipleship in the New Age_ II, p.171) Bailey's "Tibetan" guide (aka "Djwahl Kuhl")
confirmed Blavatsky's message that open implementation of the Plan would not be possible until
"the end of this [20th] century," when the generation then coming of age "will inaugurate the
framework, structure and fabric of the New Age [to] develop the civilisation of the Aquarian
Age." (_Rays and Initiations_, p.109.)

To all indications, the global transformation of humanity into one big, happy welcoming
committee is nearly on schedule, give or take a decade. The most intensive preparatory work
began in the 1970s, and it is steadily gaining momentum as it approaches "critical mass".
Following are the ways NAers are achieving this remarkable "paradigm shift", which among
other things plans to solve the "Jewish problem".

1. Conditioning Society to Accept the Plan

Certain stages prior to publicizing the Plan were to be carefully followed (Djwahl Kuhl to Alice
Bailey, _Externalisation_, Section IV). Bailey specified that the "Triangles" groups (so named
because, according to Blavatsky, the Triangle "symbolizes the Angelic Beings" - _Doctrine_ II,
p.79) are responsible "to work with the minds of men, and with a factor which is used and
exploited by leaders everywhere: the effort is to impress these minds with certain ideas which are
necessary to human progress." (_Discipleship_ II, p.171) The "factor" to be "exploited" is
gradual infiltration of society with "change agents". The ideas "necessary to human progress"
which they must "impress" on the masses (especially the young) are the occult teachings known
as "the Ageless Wisdom". They are introduced in a pre-planned order: planetary evolution and
the ultimate destiny of man for godhood; the interconnectedness of all life and matter; the
'kingdom of God' brought by "soul-controlled men" on earth; all men being at different stages in
this evolution towards the goal of "godness"; some beings having achieved soul-control already,
approaching perfection or godhood; these god-beings having a Plan to get all men to their level if
we will cooperate.

1a. Introductory Encounters: Unlike the East, where these pagan teachings are familiar, in
Western society there is a need to break down traditional monotheistic (and/or atheistic)
resistance to them. To ease penetration, NA encourages "light encounters", psychic experiences
which seem to carry the individual beyond normal consciousness into a new realm of spiritual
sensation. Also known as "a doorway to higher consciousness", the suitably impressed person
will be encouraged to seek this experience on a regular basis. The only way to achieve it,
however, is through passivity and a willingness to submit one's mind to outside control of a
"guide" [a technique which the same NAers call "brainwashing" when denouncing
fundamentalist cults].

This "encounter" can be arrived at by individuals making efforts within themselves, but guided
groups are the preferred context. In this environment, the "higher consciousness" experience is
triggered by willing submission to a leader or moderator who becomes the "energy channel". (He
or she usually remains detached from the group experience as a facilitator - or as some would
view it, as a manipulator.) Participants at the New Age lectures of Bailey disciple Benjamin
Creme have reported that he functions in this manner, silently panning the audience with a glassy
stare, until people begin to exhibit symptoms of a passive trance state. One observer even
witnessed a visible energy manifestation during Creme's channeling session, which was
explained as "overshadowing by Maitreya" and which had a mind-numbing effect on the
audience. (See "What I Saw in Atlanta", by freelance writer Jeff Eastwood) In many other group
settings, gurus and teachers lead students into self-induced trances before beginning "learning
sessions". For those who want to learn how to lead groups into these encounters, step-by-step
videos are available, such as "The Complete Guide to Channeling", narrated by NA leader
Barbara Marx Hubbard (1988).

The master occultist Adolf Hitler was also known for his eerie ability to trigger in people what
could be called altered states of consciousness, either one-on-one or in a crowd. Outsiders who
watched him guide crowds to hysterical euphoria attributed it to his study of mass psychology
(Sklar, _The Nazis and the Occult_, p.119). Others who encountered this phenomenon at close
range - beginning with Hitler's early friend August Kubizek (see _The Young Hitler I Knew_,
quoted in Sklar, p.50) - were convinced that his power did not come from himself but from
channeling a supernatural presence, which eventually was referred to in Nazi circles as the
"Unknown Superiors". Described as a "gift" to "impose his will" on listeners, "moving them"
and drawing them "into his hidden interior", the effect was "a sort of dizziness, which it took
some doing to shake off." (Jean & Michel Angebert, _The Occult and the Third Reich_, p.232-
233)

This experience becomes a doorway to various "paths of enlightenment". The "door" and the
"enlightenment" remain uniform, but the choice of "path" can be tailored to individual tastes:
high-tech, intellectual, well-mannered; or primitive, bizarre, brutal. The common goal is an
almost-continual "altered state of consciousness". The mind is trained to shut out all
independent ideas and initiatives, and to passively welcome a state of "group-think" which
follows the Hierarchy's directives and is freed from any other restraint (such as traditional
morality). Disciples with no patience for plodding toward enlightenment can "accelerate on their
path" through drugs, blood sacrifices or deviant sex acts. (In Hindu tradition this path is Tantra
Yoga, among Jewish Kabbalists it's the Sabbateans and Frankists, and under the generic label it
is Satanism). Once a person receives spirit guides, who go by various names borrowed from the
seeker's background, the paths merge into one "Path" and the personalities merge into one
"Group Mind", preparing everyone for the "mass planetary initiation" into the New World Order
under Lucifer's guidance. The "doorway" swings both ways. Guides actually prefer eventual
control of both mind and body, which necessitates the human tenant to "leave" in a psychic
manner of speaking so that the disembodied spirit can exercise full control (see the concept of a
"walk-in" in the "Gods" section).

1b. "Let your mind go, trust your instinct." This message is repeated endlessly through the
major entertainment, medical and educational spokespeople in today's society, beginning with
TV programs for the very young and intensifying the message to the teen approaching
adulthood. The process for inviting a "walk-in" to take over begins with, "Blank your mind and
listen to your intuition. Don't try to reason with logic." (Ruth Montgomery, _Strangers Among
Us_, p.154) "Star Wars" creator George Lukas tells his millions of fans in all sincerity:
"Ultimately the Force is the larger mystery of the universe. And to trust your feelings is your
way into that." ("Of Myth and Men," _Time Magazine_, Apr.26, 1999)

They have taken up their cue from the "Masters", who gave this particular principle as the
necessary starting point on the "path" to "initiation": "In past instructions we have seen that
teaching upon the subject of initiation is given by me [Djwahl Kuhl] (as by all the Masters) in
three ways: 1. By Hints.... Initiation is never taken unless the intuition is becoming active.
Spiritual instinct, the lowest aspect of the intuition, indicates readiness for the first initiation...."
(_Discipleship_ II, p.267) It becomes clear why rational thinking must be substituted for
"instinct", when we look at the methods of indoctrination which follow this initial stage:

2. By the use of certain great Formulas (one of which [The Great Invocation] has already been
given to you), certain definite revelations become possible. These formulas are six in number;
they contain the six prerequisites for initiation... [and] deal with the six relationships: [The six
relationships in summary are] [1]group feeling, alignment [and] the group antahkarana [or
"rainbow bridge" which channels the inflow from the Hierarchy], [2]changes in the soul nature
[living in] the Eternal Now, [3]the nature of life [and] the circulation and interplay of energy,
[4]divine Purpose [of] Shamballa, [5]the nature of death [and 6] the constructive work of the
Destroyer.
3. Through the presentation of Points of Revelation.... [the three Points summarized, followed by
my translation to everyday terms:] [1]The present vision must become... a habit... below the
threshold of consciousness [shutting off rational thinking becomes unconscious habit]; [2]A new
and totally different recognition must assume control.... [inability to return to rational thinking];
[3]The disciple realizes that initiation is not a process of soul-personality fusion but of Monad-
personality integration [pretense of "self-actualization" can then be dropped for the reality of
initiation: having one's identity engulfed by that of a "Master" - the simplest translation of
"Monad"]. (_Discipleship_ II, p.267-268)

[Note also the six-six-six motif in point no.2, which periodically crops up in NA doctrine. See
my notes on this "number of the beast" in the "Gods" section.]

People who are not eager to shut off their minds, or who are less than enthusiastic about death
and destruction, can be prepared to accept the Plan in gradual increments. They are introduced
to the Ageless Wisdom teachings through less unsettling "spiritual paths", but still working
toward the first prerequisite for initiation: the point of abandoning cognitive thinking and
passively receiving guidance on an "intuitive" (non-critical) level. Some of the more subtle
avenues that lead its practitioners to this point are: holistic health, global unity, pagan and eastern
religions, animal/tree worship, mind-altering drugs like LSD (endorsed by Bailey and Ferguson
as "tools for transformation"), hypnosis, alternative healing such as homeopathy and acupuncture
(these two favored by Creme as "part of the great shift in consciousness"), yoga, TM, kundalini
and chakras, martial arts, science fiction, witchcraft, Freemasonry, Kabbalah, UFOlogy, black or
white magic, spiritism, psychic powers, guided imagery, hypnotherapy, EST, psychological
rebirthing, self-actualization, Jungian psychology, sex orgies, and the "magick" of Aleister
Crowley - to name a few.

1c. Global Rallying Points: While most people are left to their own devices in choosing paths of
enlightenment, the New Age sponsors group reinforcement at the global level. Besides a show of
strength which has PR value and lends legitimacy to the movement, this global activity also
serves to coordinate indoctrination efforts, and takes advantage of the "contagious" nature of
crowd psychology to spread altered states of consciousness. The more well-known of these
rallying points are: "Harmonic Convergence" days (to meditate or pray for world transformation
- the first and best publicized was in 1987), "Earth Day" (celebrating the personhood of the Earth
and our relations with "Her"), "Mind-Body-Spirit Festivals" (to experience oneness in diversity),
"World Instant of Cooperation" (Dec. 31st of each year, one hour of meditation and "harmonic
resonance" for "the oneness of life"), and "Declaration of World Thanksgiving" (interfaith effort
"honoring the spirit of human gratitude" as a "healing force"). [Prominent orthodox rabbis like
Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz have participated in World Thanksgiving, according to their full-color
brochure - no doubt unaware that they were the only participants whose "Lord of creation" is not
Maitreya or Lucifer! We might ask, why are they even invited? Their endorsement is solicited to
build credibility in the Jewish community which implicitly trusts in its leaders. More in the
Missionizing section.]

2. The "Rainbow Bridge" or the "Spiral Tower"

These individual and group efforts are ultimately intended to collectively build what is called
the "antahkarana", defined as a mystical "planetary rainbow bridge", created by the upward
thrust of spiritual/mental energies from humanity at one end and the downward response of the
Hierarchy at the other, which will eventually "unite Humanity and the Hierarchy". This rainbow
bridge is built by a "science of manipulating [incoming] energies and [outgoing] forces." (fully
dissected in Bailey's _Education in the New Age_ chap.V) Once it is completed, the bridge will
be "electrified" or "energised", and will serve as the avenue by which the Hierarchy can carry on
"full planetary inter-communication" in order for Sanat Kumara to direct world affairs.
Curiously, "the Masters cannot and do not work [on building this bridge] without Their chosen
physical plane focal points", which Bailey goes on to explain are the human channels: New Age
change agents, working to bring "new and desirable trends in education." (p.109) Clearly, the
focus of the spiritual Hierarchy is on the children, and these "trends" are exclusively religious in
nature: "Education is a deeply spiritual enterprise." (_Problems of Humanity_, p.34)

[The omnipresence of the rainbow in modern decor, jewelry, animated media, children's toys and
stories, organizational titles and logos, etc., now takes on new meaning - especially those
symbols which are designed to light up. The attentive reader will remember that the rainbow as
a spiritual symbol also appears in the Jewish Bible as a sign to Noah after the Flood, and here the
parallels are intriguing. In the Torah, it is a Divine covenant with humanity. The Hierarchy has
claimed it as different kind of pledge to humanity. Both sides even agree on the context of the
rainbow's first appearance: as Torah relates, G-d's creation of the rainbow was in the context of a
global catastrophe in which the Hierarchy admits being directly involved - and inexplicably
defeated by a nameless Opponent. What the Hierarchy has done, then, is to confiscate this
Biblical symbol of their final defeat and reassign it to symbolize their return from defeat.]

[Why did NA steal the "logo" of their archenemy rather than simply adopting a symbol of their
own? The implication is not only the reliability of Torah, but several other interesting ideas: (1)
The rainbow reminder in Torah must be so humiliating and dangerous to the defeated ones that it
is imperative to overwrite its meaning, even at the risk of being considered unoriginal. Perhaps
one of the dangers is: (2) The Torah context surrounding the rainbow may have more to say
about that Cosmic War that merits further study, and can expose the strategies of these self-
declared enemies of the Jewish G-d. Along this line there is the possibility that (3): The
Hierarchy views G-d's promise to man, to never destroy the earth again on their account, as a
limitation that will work in their favor; hence their flaunting of the symbol by which G-d bound
Himself to that enduring promise. Last but not least: (4) It shows that this is a War in which
covenantal symbols are hotly contested; Jews would do well to appreciate the power of the
symbols entrusted to us as much as our enemies apparently do.]

Bailey cited the "New Group of World Servers" as the best example of Rainbow Bridge builders
on a global level. Not all members of the NGWS are conscious of this process, or even aware of
the existence of the Hierarchy. (_Discipleship_ II, 204) The only requirement is that they
practice the occult traditions of group meditation and seek to "serve". Their main service consists
of "constant and uninterrupted group meditation" on the Plan; specifically the next stage of the
Plan to be put into operation. As the beginners practice this group-think, they are introduced to
their "Ashram" or inner group; in time, they will be increasingly aware of their spiritual
counterpart, the "greater Ashram of Sanat Kumara", which is building from the other end of the
Rainbow. In their function as bridge builders, the NGWS are also conduits to receive
"impressions" from the Hierarchy, as well as radars for homing in on unaffiliated individuals
who can receive those "impressions" through meditation. The resulting "Path of Light" will
allow the "Christ" to come. (p.206-207)

Teilhard de Chardin, a NA philosopher who influenced Robert Muller, Barbara Marx Hubbard,
Peter Russell and many other NA leaders of today, expressed the same bridging process in the
symbol of a spiral tower: representing human evolution revolving in cycles, with a periodic
"leap" in consciousness continually taking humanity higher. His underlying assumption is a
process of "complexifying" which ultimately will manifest itself as an interrelated whole with
the upper realms (of the spirit), which are symbolically but also physically trying to descend. The
goal at the end of this process is to meld minds into an intangible dimension which De Chardin
calls the "noosphere", a mystical planetary consciousness equivalent to Bailey's "Group Mind".
(See de Chardin's book, _The Phenomenon of Man_) As a result, some prominent NA
organizations have adopted the Spiral as an alternate symbol of ascension. Examples are "The
Templeton Foundation" which uses it in their logo, and "The Center for World Thanksgiving"
which has actually built spiral structures at their headquarters. [The eerie resemblance of this
"modern architecture" to ancient ziggurats and towers left by extinct pagan cultures suggests that
the symbolism of the spiral structure is as old and widespread as NA doctrine itself, and that the
design of many pagan temples may indeed have reflected the same theories of human evolution.
It also makes for interesting conjectures about the design and purpose of the Biblical Tower of
Babel, since NA marks its own beginnings in Babylon.]

2a. What happens once this Rainbow Bridge is established?

As Barbara Marx Hubbard puts it, the completion of the Rainbow Bridge will mean the
completion of planetary consciousness, in which all individuality will be surrendered. The
transformation will trigger a kind of "birth". However, like the physical birth process, it's
"dangerous, and there's nothing guaranteed"; it could lead to "a baby that kills the mother", in
other words, "Armageddon". Or it could result in a "normal [collective mass consciousness]
baby". But meanwhile, even progress towards it completion is believed to have an effect on
human events. Hubbard implies that the Harmonic Convergence of 1987 made a great
contribution toward the Bridge building, resulting in (among other changes) the collapse of
Communism. (see Hubbard's interview with "Thinking Allowed" host Dr. Jeffrey Mishlove,
1998)

From Hubbard's point of view, the Bridge is being irrevocably pieced together, and its
completion will be as irreversible as a birth. But from a different source, we learn that the
complete Bridge may also materialize briefly in history, only to dissolve again. Alice Bailey
writes of a temporary formation of the Rainbow Bridge, and proudly points to an example of
what happens when the "Shamballa" force has this kind of "unimpeded" access to humanity: "the
planetary crisis" of "the World War (1914-1945) [sic]." That crisis was "beneficent" in several
ways from a NA point of view, principly in that it flushed out "evil from its hidden place and
brought the opposing forces [challenging the Hierarchy] to the surface of existence, prior to their
'sealing'." (_Externalisation_ IV, p.535-536 - See related comments where this evil is likened to a
germ and the War to surgery.) From Bailey's, or Djwahl Kuhl's, other remarks, we can be sure
that Hitler's Nazism was not the "evil" being referred to here. We are told that the "sealing" of
evil is "still being carried slowly forward", as the "antahkarana" nears its final completion.

3. The Role of the Media in Transformation

Of course, no global indoctrination could get far today without cooperation from mass media.
NAers claim that the major news networks are firmly in their camp, not as chroniclers of human
events but as educators of the masses. Global leader Robert Muller enthusiastically supports
such a role for the media, urging "all schools of journalism" and "all media directors" to make
use of his masterpiece on NA education, the World Core Curriculum, which is already set up in
"a framework for World Media Coverage". ("A Letter to All Educators in the World")

This gives vital context to comments like the following: "Our job is to give people not what they
want, but what we decide they ought to have." (Richard Salant, ex-President, CBS News) "We
are going to impose our agenda on the coverage by dealing with issues and subjects that we
choose to deal with." (Richard Cohan, Sr. Producer, CBS political news) "I do have an ax to
grind... I want to be the little subversive person in television." (Barbara Pyle, CNN
Environmental Director) "I've become even more crafty about finding the voices to say the
things I think are true. That is my subversive mission." (Dianne Dumanoski, _Boston Globe_
reporter) "We in the press like to say we're honest brokers of information, and it's just not true.
The press does have an agenda." (Bernard Goldberg, CBS "48 Hours") [Most of these quotes are
relayed by Dr. Henry Lamb, "The Rise of Global Governance", University of Texas College of
Engineering website.]

[Dr. Lamb was referring here to the media hype about impending environmental disasters, but an
equally subversive media agenda exists regarding specific religious orientations, revealed in
widespread media bashing of those religions slated for extinction. I will present my
documentation in a later piece. Here I merely present evidence that key players in the media
admit to shaping our perception of reality following a specific agenda. To all appearances it is
The Agenda of the NA "Masters". A worthy sidenote: the corresponding attempts of the Israeli
media to implement this global "educational" agenda has had far less success with the Israeli
public than their counterparts overseas.]

3a. The Media schedules involve more than programming:

Not only are specific agendas fed to the public by the media, but their timing appears to be a
factor. David Rockefeller confirmed this by thanking "_The Washington Post_, _The New York
Times_, _Time Magazine_, and other great publications whose directors have attended our
[Bildenberger] meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would
have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the
bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and
prepared." (recorded at a Bildenberger meeting, Baden Baden, June 1991, emphasis mine) NA
personality and "leading spokesman for awakened warriorship" Dr. Jose Arguelles, indicated in a
1987 interview: "There are a number of moves occurring right now attempting to establish global
programming." (_Meditation Magazine_, published by the "Intergroup for Planetary Oneness",
Summer 1987) Today, the results of those "moves" are obvious and need no elaboration.

Arguelles went as far as to predict that within 5 years (by 1992), global media would be
receiving instructions telepathically from "the mediarchy" controlled by "the planetary
information council." [Note: "the" is in the original quote in both cases, as though their existence
were a given rather than a potential or a theory.] He continued: "From that then, as we move
through the next 20-25 years [roughly until 2010], the role of what we now have been referring
to as paranormal faculties or qualities or powers will become not only increasingly important but
increasingly dominant...." To which the interviewer added: "A real science of the spirit will
develop, which will no longer be treated as a strange religious or occult realm." In a nutshell, the
NA-oriented global media hopes to function as a teacher of occult ideas, eventually progressing
to a direct channel for the Hierarchy's directives and displays of power.

4. Use of "The Great Invocation" for Transformation

The most widely known of the rallying points is "The Great Invocation", a poetic prayer now in
over 50 languages, distributed by World Goodwill (a division of Lucis Trust, a Roster NGO
member of the powerful UN group known as ECOSOC). Its promoters promise "transforming
life changes" and "healing" if the Invocation is recited often enough. The stanzas were given in
their present form to Bailey's disciples by her guide "Djwahl Kuhl" [DK] in 1945. (See
_Discipleship in the New Age II, Part VII) The wording is so vague that any religion can live
with it, but Bailey/DK was quite clear that "it embodies the divine intent and summarizes the
conclusions of the thinking of the planetary Logos." (_Discipleship_, p.156)
It was emphasized at the time that the masses were not ready for the true nature of this
incantation. (p.149) To help its gradual infiltration, the ambiguity of the Invocation is carefully
calculated to gain public cooperation: "It can be so presented that the masses everywhere, the
general public, will be prompted to take it up and will use it widely.... The meaning of this
Invocation has been expressed in terms which are understandable, in a measure, to the average
person because of its familiar wording, based on many Scriptural terms. But the true inner
implications and significances are... not superficially apparent.... They mean one thing to the
ordinary man...; they mean another thing to the man upon the Probationary Path [en route to
enlightenment]...; these words mean still another thing to the disciple...; to initiates and to the
senior Members of the Hierarchy, they convey a still higher and more inclusive significance."
(p.150, 156)

4a. Deceptive use of The Invocation:

This "universal prayer" was to be explained in conflicting ways, depending on one's
"evolutionary status". Misinterpretation is not only allowed, but encouraged. The following
instruction is from _Discipleship_, starting p.165 (emphasis mine. Portions are repeated by Lucis
Trust, _The Use and Significance of the Great Invocation_, p.8): "First, the general public will
regard it as a prayer to God Transcendent [something which NAers themselves do not believe
in]...; as a demand for the working out of the will of God - a will of which they can know
nothing.... They will regard it finally as a prayer that some equally vague primeval condition of
blissful happiness may be restored.... This is, for them, entirely good and helpful.... I [Djwahl
Kuhl] have so worded and rendered the Invocation that the Christian world, through its
churches, may not find it impossible to use." The "Tibetan Master" even advised temporarily
altering part of the third stanza (from "Masters" to "Master") in order to further coax the
"Christian public" into using the Invocation. (p.157) [Although the "Jewish public" is even more
repelled by a plural divinity, their sensitivities are ignored - for the simple reason that the prayer
is ultimately directed against them. See in the Views on Jews section.]

Why is it helpful for the general public to misconstrue the meaning of what they are praying?
Because in NA teaching, as in all occult teaching, it is the act and not the intent which releases
power. If the understanding of the one performing it is defective, others who have the proper
"spiritual intelligence" can still harness the astral [spiritual] power being produced by the action.
Whenever the Invocation is recited, says the definitive booklet by Lucis Trust, that individual
"allies himself with the spiritual Hierarchy", whether he knows it or not. (_The Use and
Significance of the Great Invocation_, p.11) In fact, Alice Bailey (or DK) declares, "No one can
use this Invocation or prayer for illumination and for love without causing powerful changes in
his own attitudes." (_Discipleship_, p.168) It is expected that those who pray the Invocation in
ignorance of its true purpose will nevertheless be "transformed" by it. Understanding this point
explains why "The New World Prayer" is being so vigorously promoted without even an
elementary guide to interpretation.

But how are NA disciples to understand the same words? "To them it will convey the
recognition... of the spiritual Directors of our life [the Masters of Wisdom].... [As a result,] an era
of hierarchical propaganda, engineered by disciples and carried forward by esotericists, will
mature... [giving rise to] a new type of mystic... [who can] clearly indicate to others the
techniques of the Path." (p.166) Those who Bailey considered the most potent propagandists for
the Invocation and its "Path" are "The New Group of World Servers", "World Goodwill" and
"The Triangles".

4b. Here is the text from 1945, identical to that promoted in the World Goodwill Newsletter
(issued 1997, vol.2). The footnote and capitalizing are in the original. [Please do not use this in
prayer or even read it out loud - treat it as the idolatrous incantation it is. I would not even be
including it, if I were not convinced that this is a case of pikuach nefesh, with many lives in the
balance.]
------------------------
From the point of Light within the Mind of God
Let light stream forth into the minds of men.
Let Light descend on Earth.

From the point of Love within the Heart of God

Let love stream forth into the hearts of men.
May Christ* return to Earth.

From the centre where the Will of God is known

Let purpose guide the little wills of men -
The purpose which the Masters know and serve.

From the centre which we call the race of men

Let the Plan of Love and Light work out
And may it seal the door where evil dwells.

Let Light and Love and Power restore the Plan on Earth.

*In some translations of the Great Invocation the name by which the Coming One is known in
different religions is used, eg. the Lord Maitreya, Krishna, the Imam Mahdi and the Messiah.
----------------------------
Bailey explains two key concepts to be emphasized "once it is permissible" to use the prayer
publicly (_Discipleship_, p.149-150):

1. "May Christ return to Earth."... What is referred to is the externalisation of the Hierarchy and
its exoteric appearance on Earth... under its Head, the Christ, [who will] function openly and
visibly on Earth. This will happen when the purpose of the divine Will, and the plan which will
implement it, are better understood....
2. "May it seal the door where evil dwells."... The evil referred to has nothing to do with the evil
inclinations, [etc.] found in the hearts and minds of human beings... [but rather] the loosed forces
of evil... [the neutralizing of which] requires the imposition of a power beyond the human....
These evil potencies will be occultly "sealed" within their own place: what this exactly means
has naught to do with humanity. [Never mind that only a few pages later, "it is not the Hierarchy
which forces evil back into the place from whence it comes. It is struggling, aspiring and
suffering humanity to whom the task is committed." (p.159)]
As the old values like "separateness" are replaced with the new, "the door where evil dwells" will
close "through the sheer weight of public opinion and through right human desire. Nothing can
possibly stop it." (p.175)

Following is a brief glossary of other coded phrases in the text of the Invocation. Note the
capitalized words; these refer to divine entities or attributes, as opposed to the same word
without caps, meaning earthly or human replications. Most of these key words are found in
Bailey's description of the "Planetary Logos". The rest can be deduced from her worldview.

- "the point of Light ...Love" - respectively, the unseen source of mind illumination, or Lucifer
("lightbearer" of the Logos); and spirit activation, or Maitreya.
- "the Mind... Heart... Will of God" - attributes of the Logos expressed in planetary spheres by
Lucifer ("mind" or intelligence), Maitreya ("heart") and Sanat Kumara ("will" or head, and Plan);
this is why "light" is paired with "mind", "love" with "heart", and "will" with "purpose".
(_Discipleship_, p.158-159, 169.)
- "the centre" - also called "Shamballa", in Hindu mythology the energy core supporting the
Hierarchy; center with a small "c" refers to their earthly headquarters, "the City of the Gods... a
sacred island in the Gobi Desert." (_Externalisation_, p.255; also _Discipleship_, p.159.) [See
the parallel with the "Hyperborea" of gnostic/Nazi tradition.]
- "Let light... love stream forth" - the "light" experience when one encounters a spirit guide and
receives spiritual illumination; the "love" experience when one acknowledges unity with the All;
"stream forth" means to externalize and spread the transformation to others.
- "...center which we call the race of men" - the core of mankind which receives the Shamballa
"energy activation"; the "race" being the "seed" destined to make the "quantum leap" to the
Aquarian Age.
- ...The "Plan of Love and Light work out" - the Plan of the Hierarchy, the group of disembodied
spirit beings represented to us earthlings by the triune "Logos" of Sanat Kumara, Maitreya and
Lucifer . This Plan was dictated verbatim to Alice Bailey. "Plan" is one of Sanat's attributes,
"Love" is the Divine Principle attributed to Maitreya, and "Light" is Lucifer's trademark (his
name means "light-bearer"). To "work out" is to "externalise" from the spiritual plane to the
physical.
- "Let Light descend on Earth" (or in an alternate version, "from the Morning Star... let Christ
stream forth") - let Lucifer (also known as the Morning Star) "externalise" and "anchor the Plan"
on the planet, functioning as the Initiator of mankind into the next level toward godhood, taking
the position of supreme mediator between humanity and the Hierarchy.
- "May Christ return" - a prayer for Maitreya to overshadow as many people as possible, and
finally to inhabit one person in order to act publicly.
- "Let purpose guide the little wills of men" - let the Planetary Logos redirect the reluctant and/or
unaware segments of humanity. Bailey consistently refers to the unitiated as "those with little
wills".
- "The purpose which the Masters know and serve" - "purpose" is equated with "plan" and "will",
the initiative of Sanat Kumara; the "purpose" as Bailey describes it emanates from "the Council
Chamber of Shamballa [which] seeks to influence human will." (_Discipleship_ II, p.172)
- "Seal the door where evil dwells" (or in another version, "bolt and charge the corridor where
evil spirits tarry") is to shut out the "Black Lodge", those workers of "cosmic evil" who block the
Plan, by eliminating their human tools, those who plunged the world into monotheism (see
Bailey, _The Rays and the Initiations_, p.754-5). In other words, all identifiable Jews.
- "Let Light and Love and Power restore the Plan on Earth" - permit Lucifer (Light), Maitreya
(Love) and Sanat Kumara (Power) (this is the order of their "externalisation" or appearance on
earth, which must take place in stages) to reactivate the Plan, which was interrupted by the
victory of the Black Lodge. The reactivation involves a deified Earth (capital "E") goddess.

According to researcher Gary Kah ("The Occult Roots of Global Education"), an earlier (1940)
version of The Great Invocation exists, parts of which express the Hierarchy's purpose in clearer
language:
----------------------
Come forth, O Mighty One.
The hour of service of the Saving Force has now arrived.
Let it be spread abroad, O Mighty One.

Let Light and Love and Power and Death

Fulfill the purpose of the Coming One.
----------------------
The addition of "Death" here probably refers to the "Shamballa" force which comes in the wake
of Sanat (Power). Apparently, society wasn't quite transformed enough to accept such candor; it
was revised accordingly in 1945. But the progress of education is such that we can expect the
earlier version to be re-introduced without undue risk sometime soon.

5. Children's Entertainment and the Plan

The most vigorous efforts at transformation by far are directed at the children, Jewish and non-
Jewish alike. Bailey and the Hierarchy recognized that child education is central to the
transformation of society. So much effort has been focused on that arena that Bailey wrote an
entire book on the subject (_Education in the New Age_).

This is a vast subject which cannot be covered in the limited space here. [I devote an entire
section to describing the NA educational program in the schools alone.] But a spot-check of the
popular cartoons, movies, toys, pop and rock songs, magazines, computer games, public school
activities and literature will reveal almost universal reinforcement of the NA teachings
mentioned in this series. [Anyone can easily verify this: survey the most widely promoted TV
shows, electronic games, children's movies, public library books and toys; use as a control group
the best of these produced before 1968. You will notice the radical "paradigm shift" around that
time towards Eastern and occult orientations, radiating from certain landmarks such as _Star
Trek_, _2001, A Space Odyssey_ and the Beatles. This of course means that those who have
innocently absorbed NA religion include today's young adults who matured during the last 30
years, with everything this implies.] It is hard to find children's entertainment today which does
not revolve around religious (other than Jewish or Christian) customs and heroes, occult legends
(such as Atlantis, UFO aliens, dragon lore), psychic powers or magic rites (even using real
spells, as in "Dungeons & Dragons"). Virtually all of these have in common a presentation of
disembodied spirits as guides and power sources. As Western society has become conditioned,
NA religious orientation is becoming so pervasive that those who reject it are seen as
unreasonable (the "sheer weight of public opinion" which Bailey mentions is a calculated part of
the Plan - _Discipleship_, p.175).
The ruthlessness which which this transformation is being carried out is obvious in recent
remakes of classic tales, "modernized" by inserting New Age scenes, often without concern for
the original story line. For example, a new version of "William Tell" (dubbed in Hebrew on
Israeli educational TV) had Tell and his famous arrows empowered by spirit guides - it so
disrupted the original plot that half the story had to be rewritten, with several new characters.
[Why didn't the producers simply write a new story? I'm guessing that such reworked films are
deliberately targeting the families who are trying to filter out overt NA doctrine, but who relax
when they see the title of an old favorite which they remember from their own childhood as safe
viewing. I personally would never have suspected the violence that had been done to this old
story of Swiss bravery in the face of tyranny - I just happened to spot it on my way through the
TV room.] Other examples are multiplying as the TV and movie industries recycle old stories
with a NA slant at an increasing rate.

Radically altering a famous story while keeping the former title amounts to false advertising and
calculated deception. But rather than denying or defending such duplicity in dealing with
children, NA spokesmen respond with the counter-accusation that children must be "cured" of
the "sick" values they learn in a traditional home. NA culture is being exported to children all
over the world, including Israel, with this "cure" in mind.

6. Neutralizing Opposition to the Plan

NA requires the death of self-identity and personality to implement its Plan. Therefore the
spiritual systems which attach intrinsic value to the individual soul will undermine this scheme:
what H.G. Wells called the "personal immortality" religions. Only historical monotheism (all
three versions of which sprang from Judaism) honors the human being as G-d's crowning
achievement, views each person as an eternally unique entity, and teachs individual
accountability to (the only) G-d, who Himself is pure, just and merciful. [It is logical that only a
G-d whose own personhood is well defined could accept an "I - Thou" relationship with
individual humans, and affirm their personalities rather than swallow them up. It's a fact worth
pondering, especially by dedicated humanists.] Since these values erect a serious obstacle to the
Plan for obliterating individuals in a total Group identity, a way had to be found to delegitimize
the monotheistic faiths.

6a. Name-Calling and Negation: Accordingly, the NA talent for hijacking and redefining terms
was employed. All three targeted religions were labeled "fundamentalist" religions. The original
meaning of the word, "back to the source teachings", became lost in the heavily promoted new
definition of "obsolete, inflexible and intolerant". [Just how "fundamentalism" came to be a
religious stigma which provokes a negative Pavlovian social response - and how it is invariably
applied only to the faiths which do not fit in the Plan - would make a fascinating study. Ever
hear reports on "fundamentalist Wiccans" or "Buddhist fundamentalism"? Why not?]
"Monotheistic" no longer meant simply "one god", but "exclusivist, narrow," and above all
"separatist". [Note here also the double standard in NA that excuses many pagan religions which
encourage and even demand separation from nonbelievers] Regarding Jewish religious practices
in particular, nothing is spared from attack, even it means outright fabrication. [This will have to
be documented in a separate article, but circumcision and ritual slaughter are only two examples
which will ring a bell.] And all too often, other Jews willingly supply the ammunition.
A more sophisticated version of this technique was outlined by Robert Muller in 1981, while he
was serving at the UN as the "idea man" for the Secretary General (he served a total of three
SGs, until his "active retirement" in 1984). In an interview with a New Age magazine, Muller
shared a strategy he called "Entity Promotion": "If I wanted to make a fortune, I would leave
the UN and start a new profession called 'entity promotion'. It would go far beyond public
relations and advertising. I would say to my customers, 'You want to promote an entity? A race,
a religion, an institution,... anything, you name it. I will tell you how to do it.' Over the years, I
have gathered two files on entity promotion. The first deals with every possible technique to
prove that your entity is superior. You need a flag, a hymn, an education, a creed, a protocol, a
language, famous persons, preferably even heroes and martyrs, etc." [This was ostensibly meant
as a tongue-in-cheek mockery of nationalism and religious fundamentalism. However, when one
notes that the UN has established every single one of these "entity promotion" props, while under
the leadership of Muller, it is hard to chuckle.]

Muller goes on to describe a very interesting side of entity promotion: "My second file deals
with ways to diminish other entities. Lie about them, denigrate them, do not cease to repeat that
they are bad, accuse them of anything and everything. The human species is still at the stage
where this is the predominant game on the planet.... We need entities." ("An Interview with
Robert Muller: Toward a Global Politics [sic]", _The Center Magazine_, Nov-Dec. 1981,
emphasis mine.) [Here also, after viewing the disinformation campaign waged by global-minded
people against the Jewish religion and especially the Jewish State, Muller's "sarcasm" begins to
sound more like a veiled directive from the world-class successor of Alice Bailey. It is a
directive that is clearly being followed to the letter. And, not only does humanity "need entities",
the Hierarchy needs an Entity War. And Bailey has identified the G-d of the Jews as the "evil
entity" to be "diminished".]

6b. "Relocation" or "Purging": As the Luciferic initiation approaches, those who refuse to
relinquish monotheism and/or Jewish identity will be sent to "another dimension" or "level of
vibration", somewhere outside of this physical incarnation, where they will be happier and better
off, according to Alice Bailey, Nicholas Roerich and David Spangler. The latter put it delicately,
saying that "those attuned to the old world" would be "transported through the [cosmic] law of
attraction" to "another planet, plane of existence or level of earth's consciousness where they can
be contained.... The main point is that they will lose, for the time being, their access to the etheric
planes of power and the ability to control or influence the developments upon earth."
(_Revelation, Birth of a New Age_, p.163-4) [An application of the call to "seal the door where
evil dwells" as it is worded in the Great Invocation. The "evil" is the one G-d, the "door" is those
who believe in Him, and the "sealing" is their physical removal.]

This relocation activity, known in the "old age" as mass murder or massacre, goes by other easy-
to-digest euphemisms as well, and is presented as part of the planetary "global purge" or
"cleansing action". Benjamin Creme's term for it is "a necessary sword of cleavage". (_The
Reappearance of the Christ_, appendix, "How the Plan is Working Out") As he puts it, there is
no choice: "It is indeed a matter of share [not only economic resources and governmental power,
but religious belief and identity] or [humanity will] die." Barbara Marx Hubbard, with her
characteristic directness, explains in her _The Book of Co-Creation_ that "the elders" view those
who reject the "quantum transformation" as a growing cancer which must be removed "before
the whole body is destroyed." [For more details see the "Plan" section.] All rebellion against this
purge will simply be recognized as part of the "destructive one-fourth" of humanity which
Hubbard says must be removed to save the human race, giving the public impression that the
Group Mind stands vindicated by opposition rather than challenged.

6c. Dividing and/or Conquering: At this present stage, those opposing the Plan are being
neutralized in two less drastic ways. One is to win them over by infiltration [see Missionizing
section]. The other is to turn the various remaining orthodox monotheists one against another.

The single most notorious tool used by NA propagandists in history was "The Protocols of the
Learned Elders of Zion". Composed by unknown sources whose identity is still debated among
scholars, there is nevertheless ample evidence that NA agents were involved, if not in its writing,
certainly in its distribution. The individual who is acknowledged in a rare early edition of
"Protocols" to have "found" the document was none other than Yuliana Glinka, a devoted
Theosophist and Helena Blavatsky's personal companion. According to the text, Glinka "felt it
her Christian [sic!] duty" to release it in Russia (where it was called "The Secret of the Jews").
The book was translated into English by Victor Marsden, a British racial supremacist who fled
England to join Hitler, and then circulated in the U.S. by occultist Henry Ford. Ford was not
only awarded the Nazi Supreme Order of the German Eagle in 1938, but he was also applauded
for his "faith" by the Theosophical Society. (_The Theosophist_, December 1938, p.239).
Blavatsky herself wrote at least one antisemitic tract with content remarkably similar to
"Protocols", published by the Theosophical Society in 1888. (see _The Occult Establishment_ by
James Webb) [And Alice Bailey's repeated referral to the Jews as a "world problem" continues to
heap fuel on the fire.]

The effect of "Protocols" on the history of Jewish-Christian and Jewish-Moslem relations hardly
needs comment. To this day, most Jews are convinced that "Protocols" is a disgusting piece of
Christian slander, while far too many Christians and nearly all Moslems believe the book to be
an expose of Jewish ambition. From the NA point of view it was and continues to be a stroke of
genius which keeps their main targets at one another's throats, unaware of the need to unite
against the NA Plan to eliminate monotheism. [The success is made more enjoyable, no doubt,
by the irony that they didn't have to invent a story: the Aquarian conspiracy to rule the world was
simply put in the mouths of the Jews, whose own mission to be "a light to the nations" was easily
edited to include the element of forced conquest. The added bonus is that whenever evidence of a
world conspiracy turns up, their main target for liquidation can catch hell for it!]

The divide-and-conquer strategy also works well within the community, unfortunately.
Orthodox-bashing is where the "change agents" have ample help from the non-orthodox Jewish
sector, who for reasons of their own, see no reason to defend their more observant brethren - and
even enjoy throwing a few punches themselves. The phenomenon is documented in an article
aptly called "Season on the Orthodox", in which author Avi Shafran reviews a number of serious
charges made by secular Jews against religious Jews in the area of behavior and ethics, all of
which were investigated and proven baseless. (See the source, along with other examples in the
"Views on Jews" section.) Shafran's most important point in this context relates to a typically NA
allegation that is most likely to upset the secular Jewish community: the charge of orthodox
separativeness. The rumor that orthodox Judaism classifies non-orthodox Jews as non-Jews - like
the rumor that it brands Gentiles as subhuman - is totally false; yet secular Jews help undermine
the entire community by believing and repeating it (and naively dismiss the idea that injury to the
orthodox community has any effect on them).

6d. Preventative Indoctrination: The most effective neutralizing strategy is intensive

"education", starting with the new generation. The NA has invested so much in this strategy,
with such success, that an entire section is devoted to it. While today's older adults are still
somewhat resistant to NA transformation, those born in the 1960s have been exposed to little
else.

7. Hiccups in the Transformation

All the NA progress aside, there still seem to be blocks to achieving global transformation. And
they have little or nothing to do with any organized opposition from monotheists, which is
relatively feeble.

7a. Fault lines within NA itself: These have existed from the earliest days of the Theosophical
Society. The organization founded by Helena Blavatsky successively broke into 4 competing
religious groups: (1) The Theosophical Society (headed by Annie Besant); (2) Anthroposophy
(Rudolf Steiner, David Spangler); (3)The Arcane School, the "School of Ageless Wisdom", and
Lucis Trust (Alice Bailey, Benjamin Creme, Robert Muller); (4) "I AM", "The Church Universal
and Triumphant" (Guy & Edna Ballard, Elizabeth Clare Prophet). Even today, cutting comments
by one group toward the other(s) can be found. [Conflicting theologies were not at issue so much
as severe ego clashes. All these offshoots still have in common a reverence for Blavatsky's
writings, allegiance to Bailey's "Master" Djwhal Khul and the Hierarchy, and a commitment to
the Plan in its entirety.] Even today, beneath the "unity" there is an excess of competitive
malice, while the leaders exhorting "simple living" are addicted to luxury and social elitism.
Everything has its price, as former NA leader Randall Baer notes. [For a fascinating and well-
documented first-person account, see his book, _Inside the New Age Nightmare_. Baer also
relates several attempts on his life after he left this "network of Light and Love". In fact,
according to the publishers, Huntington House, Baer died under mysterious circumstances only a
week after his book was released. For those reasons alone, this book is a must-read.]

7b. Chronic delays: Also, for reasons unpublicized, the time for Maitreya to show himself as
deity to the world, the "Day of Declaration", has been postponed quite a few times since the first
date set in 1925. In 1981, massive advertising of the Day drew world attention to the non-event;
at that time it was world media which was blamed for not being enlightened enough to seek him
out (the reason publicized by the Tara Center, then headquarters for Maitreya followers). Other
dates came and went with less fanfare.

Some sources claim that December 31, 1999 was the most recent Declaration date, to have been
symbolized (or perhaps triggered) by placing a "gold" (actually, copper) cap on the great
Egyptian pyramid of Khufu at Giza. The mystical significance of this ceremony is traced to a
channeled message by NA prophet Edgar Cayce (died 1945) which linked capping the pyramid
with rediscovery of the "Hall of Records from Atlantis", the "return of the Christ" and the
establishment of a "New World Order". Indeed, there was a lavish ritual scheduled by the
Egyptian government for that date, which a pantheon of global personalities were scheduled to
attend; it was cancelled only two weeks beforehand without a coherent explanation. Curiously,
one of the rumors included Arab suspicions that the capstone was part of a Zionist and/or
Masonic plot to announce world domination, even though the whole event was conceived by an
Egyptian government official. (For a detailed report, including the Cayce prophecy, see the
Egyptian News Digest No. 16, and scroll down to 18 December, "The Golden Capstone
Controversy".)

7c. Monotheistic influence is likewise showing more longevity than anticipated. In 1945,
Maitreya announced that he would reveal himself when (among other global reforms) "people
are released from authoritarian supervision of their religious thought." By his own admission, he
must be invited by mankind to take over on a religious/spiritual level. Each postponement of
Maitreya's "Day of Declaration" would indicate that the "release" from religion is not yet
sufficient; meanwhile all three monotheistic religions appear to be experiencing some measure of
revival among the youth worldwide. This is precisely the group which NA is counting on most to
welcome Maitreya and hand over Planet Earth, the group which NA change agents have invested
most of their efforts to indoctrinate.

The increasing frustration among some NA spokesmen is vented at the outdated faith systems
which refuse to obey the "laws of human evolution" and die out. Lucis Trust (_World Goodwill
Newsletter_, Summer 1982) cited "three prominent examples" of "rising fanatical religious
fundamentalism [causing a rise in] blatant militarism"; they named the U.S. - specifying "those
who expect... the biblically prophesied global cataclysm", Iran (no particulars) and Israel (also no
specifics, implying that merely pairing them would say enough). Goodwill called these three
"frightening... dangerous... a threat to world peace", although they are only "victims of fear".
Others appear vexed by the new level of cooperation between articulate conservative Christians
and Jews (for example, the organization called "Toward Tradition"), the unity of Jews and
Christians in support of Israel, and the rising numbers of self-assertive young Jews and
Christians. In accordance with the first method of neutralizing opposition, they are branded as a
sinister conspiracy of sorts. [Although these groups are aware that they inspire a hatred among
liberals that seems exaggerated at times, they usually assume that it is their political agenda
which is the threat, failing to recognize it as a religious war.]

7d. The elusive Israeli society: One obvious monkey wrench in NA plans to solve the "Jewish
problem" of "Zionism" is the unexpectedly persistent leaning of the Israeli public to nationalism
and Judaism, despite heavy media saturation in favor of the global pan-religious mindset. [Israeli
media has been faithfully mimicking the global media in nearly every indoctrination effort, but
it seems to backfire here.] Although there is substantial shifting towards NA religion through
missionary infiltration, the Israeli media has not been nearly as successful with the Zionist
problem. Local media anchormen and politicians had met with apparent success in promoting
NA global values and denigrating nationalism; they have now lost nearly all the ground gained
for the Plan, due to the current mini-war perpetrated in a brutal manner by the Palestinian
Authority (and condoned by the UN) which has revived a nationwide Israeli patriotism that was
nearly comatose. Some Israeli globalists themselves have left the ranks of the enlightened to
rejoin the obsolete fight for Zionist survival.
The Israeli media itself is suffering from a credibility gap which never plagues the likes of CNN
or BBC - not least being local media people who have been caught clumsily fabricating
rightwing religious "crimes" for broadcasting. Eitan Oren, an Israel cameraman for a major local
TV network, filmed an initiation ceremony in 1995 for a non-existent "rightwing extremist"
group that vowed on camera to kill then-Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. The resulting footage
was aired nationwide and provoked strong revulsion against the religious nationalist camp,
which escalated nearly out of control when the assassination actually took place. However, much
of the NA success in dividing Israeli society was reversed when the bogus nature of the
ceremony was discovered years later. A prolonged public outcry ensued; Oren and his boss were
briefly investigated by the Israeli Attorney General but never charged; as of Apr. 2000 Oren has
been serving time... on the Ethics Committee of Israel's Journalist Association. And Israeli
public distrust of their own media has grown exponentially. Small competing news agencies now
easily win a wide hearing when denouncing such people for undermining Jewish identity and
survival, slandering innocent segments of Israeli society, and covering up liberal secular crimes.
The Israeli justice system and NA-leaning government officials have joined the media in
dodging accusations of criminal collusion, coming from Knesset members, independent
journalists and watchdog groups such as Israel Media Watch. These critics are occasionally
joined by members of the liberal caste (such as the media paper _The Seventh Eye_, Voice of
Israel broadcaster Carmit Guy, and secular Knesset members).

The frustration of the Israeli media over their failure to influence Israeli politics is betrayed by
reactions which only serve to further discredit them in the public eye. Most recently,
professional colleagues expressed shock at the tone of media coverage when conservative,
traditional Moshe Katzav was elected Israel's President over ultra-liberal, media-beloved (and
NA enthusiast) Shimon Peres; they questioned the media use of "traitors" to describe those who
had exercised their democratic right, as well as the publishing of post-election polls which
"proved" that Peres should have won. (Berel Wein, _Jerusalem Post_, Aug. 11, 2000) The same
frustration was evident when, after vigorous media support of Shimon Peres against Benyamin
Netanyahu in the 1996 election for Prime Minister, the "wrong man" won then also. The bashing
of Netanyahu by Israeli media began the day after his election and continued long after his
resignation and election defeat in 1999; yet public support for him remains strong enough for
pundits to fear he may run in the next election.

The failure to delegitimize orthodox Jews in Israel is more clearly seen with passing time. An
interesting example is the mounting controversy over the assassination of Prime Minister
Yitzhak Rabin (1995), which was reported with such anti-orthodox bias that at first religious
Israelis were blamed wholesale (and occasionally beaten in the streets by angry seculars). While
the media continues to assign guilt to the rightwing religious community for Rabin's death, and
lately hints that the rabbinic community may be a threat to PM Ehud Barak's safety as well, the
attention of their audience has wandered to evidence that the religious "assassin" may not have
actually been the one to kill Rabin, and that the religious community may have been framed. [For
a fully documented report, I recommend _Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin?_ by Barry Chamish,
now available in several languages.] Each year, the anniversary memorial for Rabin produces
less anti-orthodox sentiment than the previous year. Last year at that time, the media was forced
to give (very brief) coverage to the late PM's daughter and son, and even his widow Leah, calling
for a new investigation into his death. Media bashing of the orthodox is not even taken seriously
in Israel these days: a poll in mid-2000 which "showed" that a majority of religious Israelis will
not obey Israeli civil law provoked immediate skepticism from secular public figures, and a
recent Israeli TV drama ("Reaching for Heaven") which portrays the newly observant Jew [in my
opinion] as negative and dysfunctional was criticized by a secular reviewer as unbalanced.
(_Jerusalem Post_, Nov. 17, 2000)

8. The Future of the Transformation

In spite of the inexplicable setbacks in the spiritual momentum of the Plan, NA leaders like
Creme are confident that we are about to see its completion: "There is no doubt that there will be
opposition... but the need for change will become so overwhelmingly obvious, that they will find
themselves increasingly powerless to stop the momentum." (_Reappearance of the Christ,_ 1980)
The overall mood of NA is summed up in a popular bumper sticker some years back: "My karma
just ran over your dogma."

Various comments imply that Maitreya is not above "convincing" reluctant countries through
disasters both natural (either triggered or allowed without rescue) and man-made (such as
nuclear threats per Alice Bailey's Plan). While these are regrettable, the end will justify the
means: "These peoples will eventually be replaced by the new root race about to make its
appearance in a newly cleansed world; nevertheless, for the moment, this is a tragedy." ("Cosmic
Countdown," _Guardian Action Publications_, 1982, p.12) Any underground resistance
movement is viewed as highly unlikely to succeed, as Zbignew Brezhinsky (National Security
Advisor under President Jimmy Carter) assures us: "Soon it will be possible to assert almost
continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files [which] will be
subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities." [Date of this statement is not known, but
surrounded as we are today by microchip videos, interactive software, mobile communication
and Global Positioning Satellites, we cannot doubt the technological capability to execute such a
program. Popular movies like _The Net_ and _Enemy of the State_ vividly present scenarios
which are entirely plausible with today's technology.]
H. Education for the New Age

The above quote from Professor Chester Finn was published in 1991, in his article, "Reinventing
Local Control" (_Education Week_, Jan.23, 1991, p.40) Under the Bush (Sr.) administration,
Finn was given a mandate to "fix" American education; his efforts were seen as successful
enough to earn him the title, "The Wizard of Education" (name of article by Thomas Toch, _US
News and World Report_, Jul.15, 1991, p.46) While the choice of a moniker associated with
witchcraft may [or may not] have been unintentional, his call for "change agents" is both
deliberate and prophetic regarding the U.S. Department of Education's endorsement of a major
tool in laying the groundwork for the New Age. And if Finn leaves any doubt as to which
"encrusted" or obsolete practices were slated for "change", we have only to survey the fruit of his
efforts: "America 2000", later renamed "Goals 2000". [Or simply see below.] This is merely the
U.S. version of an education being promoted worldwide. It is deeply religious in nature, as we
will see - "separation of religion and state" in America notwithstanding.

Alice Bailey wrote an entire volume on this subject: _Education in the New Age_. "What is
man; what is his intrinsic purpose in the scheme of things?" is the question she poses to launch
the NA child on his/her educational journey. It is a question asked repeatedly throughout human
history, yielding a rich variety of answers. Only now, there is to be one answer only - the Right
Answer. The Hierarchy's Answer. As for the traditional "3 R's", the nuts and bolts of education,
the Hierarchy named as one of the "goals" of the New Education: "to give true meaning to
'reading, writing and arithmetic'" - that is, to perceive the "higher realities" rather than to practice
the basic academic skills; to recognize "the higher mind" rather than discipline one's own mind
through scholarship. (p.16) [If anyone has been puzzled why OBE has adopted "creative literacy"
(a spell-it as-you-feel system) and other subversive unlearning tools which are making a hash of
American academic standards, they need search no farther for an answer. But this article is long
enough without going into more detail. I leave that to the many others who are documenting the
academic failures of "Goals 2000".]

1. Education as "Rainbow Building"

Alice Bailey saw global education as a "bridging work", referring to the Rainbow concept on a
horizontal level, to prepare mankind for the vertical bridging with the Hierarchy. The goal is
reduced to "the smooth functioning of the One Humanity". [A rather beaurocratic aim, but one
worthy of a directorship that calls itself the "Hierarchy" - and a goal that closely echoes Aldous
Huxley's _Brave New World_ in title, timing and content.] This functioning, she writes,
necessitates removing any obstacles that cause "separation": racial, national, religious and
economic class consciousness. (_Education_ III, p.90) [Sounds great, until we encounter one
notable multi-exception to all of these: Jewish identity, a blend of unique ethnicity, nationhood
and religion producing the worst kind of "separation" there is. At least Jews are not guilty of
"economic class" obstacles. But then again, economic separativeness clearly does not strike the
same chord in NA hearts as other wars against "separation" - witness the financial elite attending
the pivotal "State of the World Forum".]
Bailey indicated four foundational concepts that must be absorbed by schoolchildren: simplicity
(guaranteed to "kill" materialistic thinking), cooperative goodwill, loving understanding and
world citizenship. The child is to be taught to harness his/her "energies" of life and knowledge
in the service of "love". Love is defined here as "group relationship, in order that knowledge
should be subordinated to the group need and interests." This is achieved by reorienting the
educational goals themselves, in three specific ways: (1) The child is to be taught "from infancy
that all that he... is being taught is with the view to the good of others more than of himself."
History is no longer studied from the standpoint of "facts" or "achievement" but of "racial
growth in consciousness". This leads to a consciousness of one's "responsibility". (2) All of life
is qualitatively the same - not only all human life, animate life, or even all metabolic life, but
"the total life pulsing throughout all forms, all kingdoms in nature, all planets, and the solar
system". This leads to a consciousness of "relationship" and "blood Brotherhood". (3) Everyone
is born to "service", a lesson to be reinforced continually from earliest years through vocational
decisions. The end result will be to "link head, heart and throat into one unified and functioning
agency," in individual and group imitation of the Planetary Logos. (_Education_ III, p.92-94)

But all of this is only the "primary step" to "the building of the antahkarana" on the horizontal
level, also known as the "Science of Right Relations". ["Right human relations" for the Jews
must take on a unique character; this now refers to the rest of Humanity] This is followed by the
"Science of the Antahkarana", or the vertical rainbow-bridge building. The latter, recognized as
a "new and true science of the mind", is a purely spiritual, that is religious, discipline. Its goals
are to "end the fear of death", "negate all separateness", and open children up to "impressions
from the higher spiritual realms. Thus he will more easily be initiated into the purposes and
plans of the Creator." (p.95-96) Clearly "education in the New Age" is nothing more or less than
preparation for the Planetary Initiation.

Building this "second half of the antahkarana" will destroy old "misconceptions" which we now
accept as reality: "the illusion of appearance, the illusion of evolutionary unfoldment [note that
this is first taught as a basic principle; it will later be discarded], the illusion of separateness, and
the illusion of distinctive identity - that illusion which makes us say 'I am.'" (_Education I, p.24-
25) Other "illusions" to be destroyed through education: that war is an agony to be avoided (it is
actually a "surgical operation"), that destruction and world suffering are evil (the "Custodians of
the Plan" see it otherwise) (_Education_ IV, p.111-112)

Other "sciences" to be taught in the NA educational curriculum include: "the Science of

Meditation", (skills for working "white magic") which should "dominate the new educational
methods" in schools everywhere, and whose goal is to "build the first half of the antahkarana"
and to "produce sensitivity to the higher impressions"; "the science of visualisation", preparing
pupils for "the science of vision". This last "science" is the tool for building "the second half of
the anthkarana", that is making contact "between the [human] soul and the spiritual triad [or
Logos]". Last but not least: the "Science of Service", essentially driven by "identification with
group purposes and plans" and ultimately by "knowledge of the Plan". (p.96-98)

If there seems to be major redundancy in this NA curriculum (group service, receptivity to

group-think, group-identity, group life) it may reflect some doubt as to just how easy it is to strip
all children of all individual initiative, opinion and aspiration. In fact, "it will be only common
sense to realize that this integration is not possible for every student". (p.89) No alternative is
suggested for these kids, except a minimal attempt to train them in the Science of Right Human
Relations. The success of this education ultimately depends on having access to the child "from
infancy", [or even before] while it is still easy to establish "group control" [p.97, a rare slip in the
Hierarchy's careful terminology]. Bailey's "Masters" are also hoping that the first graduates of
New Age education who become parents themselves will make their control job easier, since
"they themselves will have been brought up under this new and different regime". [Another
interesting choice of terms: "regime" as defined in the dictionary is either a natural process or a
domineering government in power. The reader - and the parent - can judge which more
accurately describes what is being done to the NA child.] And, finally, Bailey hints at some
deliberately orchestrated time, "when in late adolescence, a crisis, needed and planned, is
precipitated" in the NA pupil's life [by human or spirit agent?], in order to make sure that each
child chooses what his/her "destiny ordains". (p.89) [If NA education "ends the fear of death",
and "destiny ordains" an early departure from the physical plane for 80% of earth's population,
we shouldn't be surprised at an explosion of teen suicides and/or murders. Especially if the NA-
educated kid happens to be carrying the weight of Jewish racial karma.]

2. Bailey's Legacy: Today's Global Education

Bailey counted on "the coming two generations" to build this bridge into the global educational
system. She tellingly announced: "An international system of education, developed in joint
conference by broadminded teachers and educational authorities in every country, is today a
crying need and would provide a major asset in preserving world peace." (p.87, emphasis mine)
This is what has taken place - verbatim - within exactly two generations. All of her educational
principles are now the pillars of the "international system of education" called the World Core
Curriculum. It was spearheaded by "broadminded" Bailey disciple, the Chancellor Emeritus of
"the UN University for Peace" Robert Muller, in "joint conference" with representatives of 155
nations at the "World Conference of Education for All" (Thailand, 1990), where the Curriculum
was further modified and expanded. The WCC was, Muller wrote, a response to "an outcry by
educators expressing the need for a global curriculum." ("The Need for Global Education",
_New Era_, World Fellowship of Education, London, 1975) It is being vigorously distributed to
"educational authorities in every country", with 1996 declared the International Year of Global
Education by UNESCO. It was considered such an "asset in preserving world peace" that it won
Muller the UN Peace Prize for Education in 1989.

2a. Robert Muller's Contribution: Muller is best known for his decades of service as Assistant
Secretary General of the UN (serving with U Thant, Kurt Waldheim and Javier Perez de
Cuellar), but this report examines him as "the father of global education", a title given him for
his compilation of the World Core Curriculum. The WCC was first used in the few "Robert
Muller Schools" around the world, alternately known as "Schools of the Ageless Wisdom", to
"enable the student to become true planetary citizens". Muller acknowledges that the WCC is
based on the teachings of "Alice Bailey and Djwahl Kuhl" [sic], as well as "Master Morya"
("Preface", WCC Manual, Nov. 1986). He also called it "a product of the United Nations." ("A
Letter to All Educators in the World") [The UN's role in the Plan is outlined elsewhere.] The
_World Core Curriculum Journal_ (published by the Robert Muller Schools, March 1989)
proclaims, "Our task at this time is to develop a Global Curriculum Guide which will serve as a
guide for the 'New Age Education'," (vol 1, p.32) liberally quotes from Bailey's _Education_, and
enshrines the goal of "group think". There is an entire section on a curriculum called the "Earth-
Gaia Teaching Unit" (p.48-50) which promotes the personification of the Earth [capital "E"] as
the pagan goddess Gaia. His WCC includes an outline, under the category of "Our Planetary
Home", which quotes Bailey's description (_Education_, p.126) of the manifestation of the
Hierarchy in "every type of consciousness, from that of the infinitesimally small to that of the
infinitely great."

2b. Bill Clinton's Contribution: During his tenure as Governor of Arkansas, Clinton
incorporated New Age teaching in his Governor's School, a summer school for gifted high-
schoolers (est. 1979). It involved isolating the 17-year-olds from all contact with their parents
and the outside world for six weeks, while introducing them to a new paradigm of relative
morality determined by group consensus, and the technique of "divorcing yourselves from your
bodies" in order to achieve contact with a Higher Guide. Although the program resulted in many
negative reviews from graduates, and at least one documented suicide, it continued to be offered
in Arkansas public schools. (See the documentary video, "The Guiding Hand", produced in 1992
by Geoffrey Botkin, a former student at the Governor's School and one of its most outspoken
critics. He also includes footage of the School's own promotional video, showing the students
practicing the "divorce" exercise, mentioned above, as part of their "Death Education"
curriculum.) Bailey saw youthful rebellion against parents as a healthy trend enabling the
"human family" to supplant them. (_Education_ IV, p.131) This was reinforced by a guest
speaker at Clinton's School, author Ellen Gilchrist: "Students, do me a favor. Totally ignore your
parents. Listen to them, but then forget them." (from "Guiding Hand")

2c. The Contribution of "Religious Humanism" and "Transcendentalism": An excellent

article tracing the history of Outcome Based Education was written by Dr. William Coulson, a
close colleague of prominent figures Carl Rodgers and Abraham Maslow, and co-editor with
Rodgers of the groundbreaking series in humanistic education, _Studies of the Person_. Among
Coulson's revelations are his tracing of the familiar OBE concepts [the core of "Goals 2000" -
see below] back to earlier "self-actualization" and "values clarification" experiments, which in
turn find roots in the "religious humanism" of John Dewey and the Transcendentalist religious
movement among 19th century New England intelligentsia. [My own brief survey of the latter
revealed enough common ground with Theosophy to establish that we come full circle to NA
doctrine again.] Equally noteworthy are Coulson's quotes from Abraham Maslow's journal
expressing serious misgivings over Rodgers' experiments in "universal benevolence" and his
own "self actualization" theories. [What a shame Barbara Marx Hubbard never heard; she cites
Maslow and his SA concept as one of her guiding lights.] Maslow found himself criticizing the
new education for "ignoring the distinction between who should teach and who should learn,"
and for a philosophy of trusting man's higher nature which lacked "a theory of right and wrong",
a disabling element which promotes what he called "the 'value-free' disease." Coulson refers to
one Rodgers-trained teacher who confessed that the phenomenon of students calling one another
racist names and scribbling obscenities on school walls was a direct result of this new education:
"The impression we got was that we were free to do our own thing and that the kids should be
free to do their own thing. When the kids heard that, they were off."

As a representative sample of OBE's heritage, Coulson quotes "a passage by a best-selling author
in the Studies of the Person textbook series", whom he refuses to identify except as "a high-
ranking official of the U.S. Department of Education." Coulson relates: "Later he went to jail for
sex crimes, a result that was not unrelated to his beliefs, for in 1974 he'd written of his own
personal growth as a kind of religious imperative: 'I have grown to the place where I now have
what might be called "a religion of the self." I believe that most of the answers are within myself
and that learning to tap the love and beauty and strength within myself is really a worshiping of
the inner self. In essence, I believe in God. God is within each of us. We are all God.... I now
meditate to the God within my own inner self; and each time I meditate, I discover new resources
of boundless love and beauty within myself.'" [Bailey never said it better.] Coulson competently
traces other OBE precepts back to this "self-worship".

The only blind spot in Coulson's well-reasoned piece is his position that OBE "is so contrary to
common sense and the protective instincts of parents that it demanded cosmic justification. Enter
the New Age movement." The New Age movement, as we have seen, is not the tail on the OBE
dog, but the driving force which gives OBE its vision, goals and methodology. Not only has
OBE changed "brand names" repeatedly in American history, as Coulson shows; OBE under all
its labels is only one of a hundred "brand names" disguising the infinitely older NA "Wisdom".

3. Infiltration of NA Education into Public Schools - Easy Does It.

Due to natural resistance in traditional educational institutions, introduction would have to be
subtle and incremental. "The schools will make but small beginnings and will be launched in a
way that will appear at first as too unimportant to be noticeable." (_Letters on Occult
Meditation_, p.309. Quote attributed not to Alice Bailey but to "the Tibetan Master", in _The
Journal of Esoteric Psychology_, Spring-Summer 1997.) [The success of the penetration is easily
demonstrated: I will wager that virtually no reader of these pages has a clear idea of when New
Age teachings first infiltrated into his/her school system.]

Taking the cue from his spiritual mentor, Robert Muller was careful to introduce the "ageless
wisdom" gradually into the U.S., the country which he called "the most powerful and stubborn
obstacle to the further evolution of this planet." ("2000 Ideas for a Better World", Idea No. 1968.
His "2000 Ideas" are easily found on the Internet.) The patience of Muller and other change
agents was rewarded: Bailey's educational Plan was openly implemented in the "Outcome Based
Education" (OBE) plan of the American educational project "Goals 2000", later renamed
"Project Global 2000". Its "small beginnings, too unimportant to be noticeable" in the U.S. can
be variously traced to 1974 (the first "School of Ageless Wisdom"), or 1980 (the pilot "Robert
Muller School" in Arlington, VA with 16 students, operating quietly for five years before
receiving full academic accreditation), or perhaps to 1979, when then-Governor of Arkansas Bill
Clinton introduced a prototype of the WCC in his prestigious Governor's School. By 1986,
Muller's WCC was openly hailed as "a useful model" for Goals 2000 (George Cawelti, "Toward
a World Core Curriculum", _Education Leadership_, Dec. 86/Jan. 87). Certainly 1989 was a
beginning (the first inclusion of the "Ageless Wisdom" in an experimental "Goals 2000"
curriculum in Eugene, OR School District 4J), as was 1991 (the crafting of "America 2000"
under the Bush administration) and 1992 (an experiment with "Outcome Based Education"
launched in Cottage Grove High School, South Lane School District 45J3, Oregon Dept. of
Education). The latter was declared a success on national TV by Marc Tucker, Executive
Director of the "National Center on Education and Economy", a creation of the Carnegie
Foundation which counts Hillary Clinton and David Rockefeller among its Board members.
[Students and parents, on the other hand, called it an abysmal failure and an orchestrated fraud.
By 1996, the controversy erupted in a group lawsuit, which of course received scant media
attention.] From the obscure testing ground of the first NA school to the fully legislated NA
education now operative in America, no more than 30 years had passed.

3a. The NA principles of Alice Bailey are being progressively spread to all school children. They
are already securely embedded in the system adopted by the U.S. Department of Education for
public schools across the country. One of the schools which incorporated OBE in its
experimental stage was Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado (Jefferson County), the
site of a student-led massacre a decade later. [While no solid conclusions can be drawn here, just
knowing this detail provides a horribly plausible explanation for what went wrong in that quiet
"normal" community. Littleton, we should note, was only No. 6 in 8 incidents of "unexplained
random shootings" of classmates within two years, committed by students aged 11-18. It is not
hard to guess why the government and media, which publicly claim to be at a loss for a plausible
cause in every one of these incidents, uniformly fail to mention an educational curriculum which
includes both "death education" and the teaching that no personal values may be condemned by
external authority.]

Private schools are eventually to be included in OBE monitoring as well, under the auspices of
the National Education Goals Panel, which declared in 1991 that the National Goals 2000
framework "must take into account those students who do not attend public elementary and
secondary schools [in] our measure of progress." (_Potential Strategies for Long-Term Indicator
Development_, Report No. 91-08, p.37) Nor will home-schooling provide an escape. Iowa
legislators have already authorized the Department of Education to dictate which tests home-
schooled children will be required to take in order to be accepted as "educated"; if they should
fail to pass an OBE-based exam favored by this federal body, state law will consider them
"truant" and in need of child welfare intervention. On the national level, the National Education
Association (NEA) has proposed that home-schooled children be required to use "a curriculum
provided by the State Department of Education" and "meet all state requirements" to pass. (NEA
1992-93 Resolutions, pub. Sept. 1993)

3b. An important tangent: Are "Goals 2000" and OBE being forced on Americans, or not?
This is being hotly debated at the moment. Parents and local school authorities claim to have
found evidence that the "voluntary" nature of OBE is a sham designed to deceive the public, a
strategy which is sanctioned at the highest government levels. The federal "Goals 2000 Educate
America Act" itself contains plans (S.1150) to eventually replace the high school diploma with
the CIM (Certificate of Initial Mastery, awarded through OBE). However, the Education
Department, in an effort to deflect growing opposition, gives high profile on its website to a 1996
"Amendment to the Goals 2000 Educate America Act", which "does not require [any Goals 2000
participant] to provide OBE." [Their case would be greatly strengthened if they could point to
even one Goals 2000 participant who has been authorized to provide an alternate framework
instead of OBE, but none appear anywhere on the site.] This amendment also states that Goals
2000 itself is a "completely voluntary" program; yet a clause in the "Elements of the State Goals
2000 Action Plan" requires participating states to "monitor... [and] improve schools that are not
meeting the state content standards voluntarily adopted by the state," showing that the
"voluntary" clause applies only at the state level. And the states which have already "voluntarily
adopted" Goals 2000 currently total 49 or 50 (cited by different sources). [This situation
confirms freedom in American education in the same way that the "election" of "President"
Saddam Hussein by 99% of Iraqi citizens confirms democracy.] Plans to make CIMs a
requirement for students to leave high school and/or enter college were presented years ago by
the states of Oregon (House Bill 3565, 1991, p.10) and Iowa ("Policy Study 94-2", 1994, p.44),
while bills in Oregon and Mississippi legislatures sought to link the CIM to "employability"
(none passed as yet).

Parents also charge that the U.S. Government is misleading the public in presenting OBE as
"locally driven" when it is actually pre-determined from the federal level. The same Education
Department webpage mentioned above reassures everyone that the Goals 2000 curriculum is
truly subject to local input and control - all are invited to get involved. However, the Association
for Supervision and Curriculum Development must not have been informed; they write: "Local
control has been, and continues to be, the most durable myth, or operating principle, of
educational governance in the United States." (_The Governance of Curriculum_, 1994, p.3)

4. OBE as a tool for NA "Change Agents"

While Outcome Based Education is under attack both in the U.S. and Europe for promoting
illiteracy and other scholastic deficiencies, there is only room here to note parallels with Bailey's
radical NA agenda to prepare society to receive the Hierarchy. [For other avenues used by
"change agents", see the previous section called "The Transformation of Society".]

One of the most brilliant perceptions in Dr. Coulson's article [see above] relates to the published
claim by OBE to be "a tool for change" in society. Coulson responds with: "Change, which is a
fundamental theme of, and preferred justification for, Outcome Based Education, has long been
an invariant in the quasi-therapeutic or 'religious' strand of American public-school education,
the strand identified by historian Richard Hofstadter as anti-intellectual. In that sense, OBE is
based on a contradiction. Today's OBE leaders may claim to be leading the way toward a future
vastly different from the past; but in spite of frequent changes of name, the basis of the
movement now called OBE hasn't varied in a hundred years. In other words, the necessity of
change is a questionable assertion. It all depends on what is said to need changing." [Emphasis
mine. Note also the ease with which Coulson repeatedly associates OBE with a "religious"
movement.]

What "needs changing", Coulson continues, is apparently "little... except the brand names under
which they market their curricula and philosophies. In 1972, Rogers permitted me to quote him
concerning how to deal with the many critics of his own version of the movement. He said, 'I'd
change the name just as fast as needed to keep ahead of the critics.'" Coulson himself then reels
off a whole list of generic titles which are all OBE in disguise: the child study movement, the
mental hygiene movement, progressive education, life adjustment, classroom encounter,
sensitivity training, humanistic education, values clarification, youth decision making, critical
thinking, mastery learning and cooperative learning. [The variant names given by different states
and districts for their "Goals 2000" programs follow a similar scatter-and-hide strategy, in their
attempts to avoid tipping off critics with the telltale "OBE" label. Examples I found are
"Outcome Developmental Driven" (Mason City, Iowa school), "The New Standards Project"
(MacArthur Foundation and Pew Charitable Trust), "High Success Network" (by Spady, used in
Oregon), "Affective Education" (widely used), and mysterious acronyms like "STW", "TQM"
and "DAP". This is probably why a search in the on-line database of the U.S. National Center for
Education Statistics with the keyword "OBE" yields nothing at all.]

With this in mind, we proceed to "what is said to need changing" by OBE architects and
promoters - which, not surprisingly, coincide with the things Alice Bailey and her NA change
agents claim "need changing".

4a. "Old Misconceptions" Eradicated by OBE: OBE's own creator, William Spady, confirmed
its purpose in accordance with NA goals: "the complete transformation of our educational
system [relating to] orientations - the attitudinal, affective, motivational and relational elements."
[emphasis mine] The "transformation" is so "complete" that implementing OBE in the U.S.
requires the repeal of hundreds of existing state laws involving education (in Washington State
there are no less than 218 scheduled for cancellation - such as requirements to teach the federal
and state constitutions, concepts of objective morality, truth, justice, patriotism and the principles
of free government and citizenship; and also the observance of "traditional and religious"
holidays).

In other countries, the WCC is recognized as radical in even a more basic way: the Director of
the Robert Muller School in Buenos Aires, Argentina, Mrs. Gabrielle Roncoroni Christeller,
commends this "new education" which teaches that the "human right of each individual [is to] be
transcended" [superseded] by duties "to our total planetary home, to the total human family, to
the universe, to the heavens [the Hierarchy] and to our role and fulfillment in the eternal stream
of time". (Muller, "2000 Ideas for a Better World", Idea No. 1914) She is quoting here directly
from the outline of the WCC teaching priorities: "I. Our planetary home and place in the
universe; II. Our human family; III. Our place in time." Only at the end appears "IV. The miracle
of individual human life." [Human rights activists, take note: All of these obligations take
priority over what we used to regard as "basic human rights". Do not be shocked to find that
when your favorite humanist group talks about "human rights", they actually mean "humanity's
rights" and not individual rights. As Bailey taught, individual identity is an "illusion".]

To fulfill Bailey's goals of removing the "illusion" of death, OBE offers a class in "Death, Dying
and Suicide" for high-schoolers, which, in the words of one Oregon OBE student, "glamorizes
death". The Ohio Board of Education's "Vision 21" OBE plan has added to this the goal of
eliminating the "illusion" that intellectual development is a worthy investment; they have
adopted the "theory of multiple intelligences" created by Harvard University's Howard Gardner,
which claims that while racial genetics will determine or limit academic intelligence [sic!!], all
pupils have "interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligence" which must be developed.
[Translating into Bailey terminology, we can see the NA transformation agenda more clearly: the
only human potential ("intelligence") inherent in everyone is service to the group
("interpersonal"), the first half of the "antahkarana"; and surrender of inner self-determination to
the Masters ("intrapersonal"), which is the second half of the "antahkarana".]

4b. OBE Creates an Authority Vacuum: In order to meet the Hierarchy's demand for group-
think, OBE (at least in Virginia, since 1986) requires teachers, under the guise of "guidance
counseling", to create "cognitive dissonance" in children aged five and up. They are then to
withhold adult input, in order to force reliance on "an answer acceptable to the peer group". Its
purpose is "to remodel [the] entire political, economic and social structure [as well as individual]
identity." (_Elementary School Guidance and Counseling Journal_, April 1981). There is a
section of OBE testing designed to find out what kind of social pressure is sufficient for the child
to conform to group goals and surrender to group consensus, a concept known as "threshold
testing". (See _Educating for the New World Order_, Beverly Eakman, p.47) This method of
creating an authority vacuum is directly out of Bailey's _Education in the New Age_, which
directs teachers to reject children's pleas for answers "that rest on the authority of the [teacher]",
and "force" them to "an inward search" beginning at age five. (p.25)

At the same time, children are urged to rely on another entity such as "Pumsy the dragon".
"Pumsy" is mandatory curriculum in Virginia public elementary schools as of 1983, part of a
course in which children must earn a Certificate of Mastery (CIM) in "Clear Mind". As 6-year-
olds are introduced to "Pumsy" in a teacher-guided trance state, they are taught to resort to this
"friend" to rid themselves of a "mud mind" and achieve a "Clear Mind" (and not to discuss it
with parents). The child thus learns the first steps toward "an integrated personality", one in
which his individual identity has merged "with the Whole" (the "spiritual triad" or Hierarchy).
(Bailey, _Education_ I, p.26) The goal is to permanently leave behind the world of "mud", that
is, the concrete aspects of existence: "He lives first the life of dreams, and then the life of
thought." (p.28) To summarize, the external authorities of the child's everyday world (teachers,
parents, etc.) are delegitimized and replaced by the supreme authority of the "inner self", and
eventually the (even more) supreme authority of the "group self". However, since these
routinely prove inadequate for guidance in many of life's challenges, the resulting authority
vacuum is filled by another external source, this one under the guise of another (unknown) side
of the self. The fact that this entity is not really one's own self is revealed by Bailey's candid
description of the actual "guides of humanity", whose desire is to merge with (and then
submerge) the individual self.

[In plain language, the ideal result of this "education" is a generation living in lifelong denial that
there are aspects of life and authorities outside one's personal control. On the other hand, it is a
lifelong dependency on a "higher" entity for guidance, due to the inevitable out-of-control
circumstances of life - circumstances which they are taught don't really exist. Meanwhile, the
reaction toward the few who maintain control over their lives, without the crutch of constant
"entity contact", is nothing but pity for that poor unenlightened, unempowered soul. At the same
time, this mindset roundly condemns those who depend on the G-d of the Jews for external input
and guidance, calling them "automatons" and "unthinking" - in spite of the Biblical G-d
allowing, and even requiring, far more initiative and personal autonomy than the NA "gods". Go
figure.]

4c. OBE's "No-Fail" Really Means "No-Pass": Instead of demonstrating mastery of academic
material and/or analytical skills (reading, writing, math), the pupil is "graded" against a "Locus
of Control", and is awarded a "Certificate of Mastery" if he/she has exhibited the desired
behavioral and attitudinal "outcomes". No one can "fail" and there are "no 'right' answers"; but if
appropriate "learning outcome" is not demonstrated, the child is "remediated", or re-taught, by
"facilitators" using special material from the "National Diffusion Network". The material is
taught over and over indefinitely, until the desired "outcome" appears. The Pennsylvania Dept.
of Education is not shy about calling OBE a "behavior modification plan based on control
theory", a system credited to psychiatrist William Glasser. And if teachers (in Washington State
for example) do not demonstrate "accountability" in OBE teaching - that is, their classes are not
satisfactorily "mastering" these concepts - they too are placed under "remediation" by "mentor
teachers" in the classroom, until their record improves, or until they are fired.

4d. OBE Allows No Parental Challenge: The same "technologies for expanding and
transforming personal consciousness" which Marilyn Ferguson praised in her 1980 landmark
book, _The Aquarian Conspiracy_, are now being taught across the board to youth without the
knowledge and permission of the parents, and even over parental objections. In many cases,
students are encouraged not to discuss with their new studies with parents, and may be
encouraged to jettison their parents' values across the board. [For an example, see the advice
given to gifted students at Bill Clinton's Governor's School summer program.] Bailey viewed
youthful rebellion against parents as "desirable" and even necessary, to break the family's "united
front" and substitute "group life", (_Education_ IV, p.130-131) which then becomes a "new form
of family unit." (p.128) [It is important to read Robert Muller's many "Ideas" on the "family"
with this specific definition in mind. See more below.]

What is the proper role for parents in the New Age? To be educated to serve "the Law of
Rebirth", by providing physical vehicles for "incarnating souls", and through psychic contact
with "forces emanating from Shamballa" to create a "light body" for the baby before birth. In
other words, the only reason to be parents is to produce "vehicles" for the cause of reincarnation,
and to ensure that those "vehicles" will be born with a link to the Hierarchy. (_Education_ IV,
p.138, 140) Anything less is to be considered "unthinking procreation of children", a most
unenlightened attitude which only contributes to the population problem. (So when, in a 1998
interview, NA leader Barbara Marx Hubbard laments those who "have babies without thinking",
fellow initiates will necessarily see her as referring to more than simple family planning or
population control.)

4e. OBE Misleads Parents: Not surprisingly, NA educators expected that a bit of subterfuge and
even lying to parents would be necessary to give such drastic subversion a chance to succeed.
Alert parents in the Cottage Grove High School OBE experiment found instructions along these
lines to their school administrators in the U.S. government-issued _Community Action Tool
Kit_ (from the office of the Secretary of Education) and _The Change Agents Manual_. [Since
this issues from the same office that assures us the OBE program is completely voluntary, a
healthy skepticism is appropriate regarding any reassurances from that quarter.]

This deception is necessary, as Harvard Professor of Education and Psychiatry, Dr. Chester
Pierce pointed out in 1972, in his keynote address to the Association for Childhood Education
International: "Every child in America entering school at the age of five is insane, because he
comes to school with certain allegiances toward our founding fathers, toward his parents, toward
a belief in a supernatural being [all learned at home]. It is up to you, teachers, to make all of
these sick children well by creating the international children of the future." (quoted in several
sources; see Kathy Collins who quotes it with approval, "Children are Not Chattel," _Free
Inquiry_, pub. by the Council for Democratic and Secular Humanism, Fall 1987. Collins'
premise: "Children are not 'owned' by their parents." p.11) Decades earlier, in 1946, psychiatrist
Brock Chisholm (then head of the UN's World Health Organization) confessed, "We have
swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents.... Whatever the cost, we
must [reject] the mistaken old ways of our elders.... If it cannot be done gently, it may have to be
done roughly or even violently." (quoted favorably by Hillary Clinton, _It Takes a Village_,
p.15) American courts are backing this sentiment with legislation, as in the May 18, 1990
decision by the California Superior Court that a teacher's right to free speech in the classroom
supersedes the personal convictions of parents. As Texas Federal District Judge Melinda
Harmon succinctly put it: "Parents give up their rights when they drop the children off at public
school." (quoted in _Schooling for a Global Age_, James Becker ed., p.xiii)

4f. The OBE War on the (Traditional) Family: Alice Bailey blamed the traditional family unit
for promoting "separativeness, selfishness and individual, isolated exclusiveness". (_Education_
IV, p.130) Her ideal of family life was that it serve the Hierarchy, viewing both the sexual
relationship and childrearing with the sole motive of furthering human evolution (p.132).
Following instructions to "deal with the whole problem of parenthood" (p.133) through
education, parental training programs are offered under OBE to bring the entire family into NA
education, under the label of "enlightened social engineering". This is not to produce family
harmony so much as to eradicate conflicts with home-taught values - conflicts in which "the
educational institution frequently comes under scrutiny and must pull back." (Professor John
Goodlad, member of the Governing Board of UNESCO's Institute for Education. See "Guide to
Getting Out Your Message," _National Education Goals Panel Community Action Toolkit: A
Do-It-Yourself Kit for Education Renewal_, p.6. Goodlad repeats this comment in Foreword,
_Schooling for a Global Age_, p.xiii.) Professor Goodlad, who also served with Bill Clinton in
the 1980s on the UNESCO Commission on Global Education, warned colleagues that "most
youth still hold the same values as their parents", a situation which may cause society to "decay".
("Report of Task Force C: Strategies for Change," _Schooling for the Future_, no.9, 1971) As
for older family members, Number Five of the Eight National Goals enshrined in "Goals 2000"
not only specifies that OBE performance be used to determine job placement after graduation,
but suggests that the adult workforce be required to undergo OBE training to continue to be
employable.

4g. OBE Foot in the Door at Home: By the mid-1990s, at least one state (Ohio) made the
"parental educational or training program" compulsory in certain cases, with refusal to attend
constituting "parental education neglect" - not only a "misdemeanor" but theoretically grounds
for removing the children from the home. (See "Ohio Revised Code", 1996, Sec. 2919.222)
Elsewhere, the PAT program (Parents As Teachers) was gradually introduced until it became
federal law under Goals 2000 (1994): In this framework, parents have the "right" to teach their
own children, provided that they fulfil the same "duties" expected of teachers. In such a
framework, social service workers can be authorized to inspect homes and rate parental
performance (not only in the context of home-schooling, but in general childraising and values
education) - with the option of removing "poorly taught" children. Likewise, parents who refuse
to accept social services in the PAT framework can be classified as having homes with children
"at risk". (see "Revised Risk Factors Form", Parents As Teachers National Center, Inc.) The
"Parental Rights and Responsibilities Act" of 1996, thought by many to provide balance to this
issue, merely reinforced the PAT concept, conditioning those "rights" on the "responsibilities"
redefined by the New Education. The National Assessment of Educational Process (NAEP) test
given to students every four years (grades 4, 8, 12) includes both academic material and a survey
about the child's home life and family habits, another way of pinpointing "problem" families.

For the moment, privately run schools are still able to filter out a good bit of this indoctrination.
The majority of these are under the auspices of Christian or Jewish religious institutions. But
even parents of these children may not rest easy, especially the Jews. NA "change agents" have
penetrated Jewish life in other ways, as we will see in the next section.
I. New Age Missionizing Among Jews

In the previous segments, we examined the philosophies underpinning the New Age or "Age of
Aquarius", an age which not everyone is qualified to enter. We saw the open hostility expressed
by New Age thinkers toward Jews and especially Judaism. We noted the high caliber of people
who embrace the NA concepts of "unity in diversity" and "the evil of separatism", focusing on
the role played by the United Nations and related groups. Given the admittedly low potential of
Jews as a "race" to enter the New Age, they must be viewed as unworthy of indoctrination
efforts.

Wrong. In fact, missionary efforts among the Jews are springing up so quickly that this survey is
certain to be out of date within months of writing. [So the reader should consider this section -
already far longer than any other in the series - as only a sample of the more prominent groups
and personalities.]

1. Efforts Among Secular Jews

Missionary efforts among secular Jews are concentrated mainly in appeals to world harmony and
cooperation as taking priority over any narrow group interests, playing on the Jewish sense of
responsibility to humanity. Beginning by touching on the innermost nerve of the secular Jewish
community - persecution in general, and the Holocaust in particular - the "Tibetan Master", Alice
Bailey's spirit guide, reassures them that their suffering is being taken into account by the entire
Hierarchy: "The fate of the Jews in the world war is a terrible tale of cruelty, torture and
wholesale murder, and the treatment of the Jews down the ages is one of the blackest chapters in
human history. For it there is no excuse or condonation, and right-thinking people everywhere
are aware of this and are eagerly demanding that these persecutions end. The spiritual forces of
the world and the spiritual leaders of humanity (both those working on the outer plane [human]
and those guiding from the inner side of the veil [disembodied spirits]) are seeking a solution."
(_Problems of Humanity_ IV, p.102) Many Jews, in great relief, read no farther and eagerly give
their support to the Age of Aquarius.

But the very next sentence throws the burden on the victims: "The solution, however, will be
found only when the Jews themselves seek to find the way out." Out of what? The "world
problem" which they themselves have caused. [See more details on how the Jews caused their
persecution, and even the Holocaust, and what is expected of them.] The promise is then made
that if the Jews will be more forthcoming, "shoulder their own responsibilities" and work on
"right human relations" (p.104-105), antisemitism will disappear. If they will renounce their
dogma of distinct peoplehood, and join the "brotherhood of man" [as if they can't do both], they
will be fully accepted. [Besides being an unfair guilt trip, you would think this could be easily
dismissed by liberal Jews, many of whom are already in the forefront of human rights causes.
Yet too many have accepted the NA idea that Jews have to atone for their existence by denying
any uniqueness - even a claim to unique depths of suffering.]
1a. Post-Identity Hopes:Many are the gullible secular Jews (with Israelis in the forefront) who
have "shouldered their own responsibilities" of dismantling their heritage, under the assumption
that they will earn for themselves a place in the New Age. From archaeology to 20th-century
history, Jewish scholars are scrambling to undo the "dogmas" of Zionism and bury the historical
evidence of Jewish rights to the Land of Israel, hoping to redeem themselves in the eyes of the
New Humanity. Israeli politics, education, legal system and public image are all being
overhauled in the attempt to exorcise the demons of "distinct peoplehood". Great energy is
invested in marginalizing orthodox Judaism, in the assumption that our religion is the only
obstacle to "right human relations". Behind all these is the conviction that membership in the
NA "brotherhood of man" will be our reward, if we will just make ourselves less us and more
everyone-else. [These self-hating Jews have managed to ignore the NA celebration of "diversity"
with regard to every other tribe on earth, including those with closed religious systems and
separatist customs even more exclusive than Judaism. They never ask why only the Jews are
offensive by being "separate".] The major point missed by these converts to the NA faith is that
after erasing Jewish identity markers, Jews will have only passed from one of Bailey's
unacceptable categories to another: from that of the separatist "problem child of humanity" to
that of the spiritually improved but racially tainted. As we study the NA views on the Jews, we
see that "right human relations" between the Jews and humanity goes beyond erasing borders, or
even collective invisibility. It requires the Jews to accept that there is no relational place for
their race in this stage of human evolution. The "brotherhood of man" will open up to Jews only
in future lives... perhaps.

1b. NA Religion Disguised as Philosophy or Science: These varieties of secular repackaging are
not necessarily targeting Jews, but due to the disproportionately high numbers of intellectual
Jews who have embraced them, they are worth mentioning. [For brevity I will not go into detail
here, but I have documentation for each entry.] The NA beliefs they have in common are: the
existence of a collective ancient wisdom, accessible from within the human mind and enhanced
by input from "higher intelligences"; the unlimited potential of humanity, to be tapped by
creating one's own reality; and the obstacle which orthodox Judaism and related "fundamentalist"
religions pose to individual and social progress.

One example is the revival of classical Greek/Roman philosophy. This is best exemplified by
"New Acropolis", a global forum now in 40 countries, which combines Theosophy and Fascism.
[Full documentation would require another article, but below are a few details. For excellent
source material on New Acropolis and other NA cults, see the website by Dutch historian Dr.
Herman de Tollenaere]

Another example is Jungian psychology: Carl Jung was devoted to his spirit guide "Philemon",
to occult practices and to racist Ayranism. (See Harvard professor Richard Noll's books, _The
Jung Cult_ and _The Aryan Christ: The Secret Life of Carl Jung_, the sources for details which
follow.) An excellent analysis of Jung's indebtedness to Theosophy and other mystery religions,
based on Noll's research, is offered by Janet Biehl at "The Social Ecology Project". Researcher
D. Sklar (_The Nazis and the Occult_) outlines Jung's experiences as a child in a spiritist family,
which convinced him that he was chosen by God to be a prophet of the Age of Aquarius. Pivotal
life events continued to revolve around spiritist and occultic involvement; Jungian psychologist
Morton Kelsey states that Jung viewed witchcraft and shamanism as beneficial exercises (as does
Kelsey himself). A key turning point was Jung's self-induced psychotic breakdown in December
1913, in which he was "transformed" into the Mitraic lion-headed god, "Aion". This experience
directly led to his key concepts of "archetypes", the "collective subconscious" mind and the
irrelevance of reality in the face of perceived reality [ideas long taught in Hinduism and occult
circles]. His quotes concerning his brand of psychoanalysis show that he wanted to duplicate his
1913 experience in others. [We might say that his efforts to lose his mental stability were so
successful that he dedicated the rest of his career to helping others lose theirs....] Jung's stated
goals are "self-deification" and the corresponding "death" of one's "personal being", which as
Noll points out are the components of a gnostic initiation experience. But perhaps one of the
biggest shocks for Jewish Jungian fans will be the discovery that Jung's ideal psychotherapy
system was one in which "German psychology" would be kept carefully separate from any taint
of "Jewish psychology" [see the Nazism section for details].

And then there is NA religion parading as "science" in neo-Darwinism and evolutionism. One
of the leading thinkers in this field, Dr. Michael Ruse, has proposed that the myth of evolution as
"science" be laid to rest, pointing out that it is actually a "secular religion" due to its reliance on
"metaphysical" assumptions. [Regarding this last item, which might tempt creationists to
celebrate, I have good news and bad news. Yes, this can level the playing field in the fight to get
equal time for creationism in public education, and lay to rest the unfair science-religion
dichotomy which has censored Biblical models. There are a growing number of scientists who
are ready to ditch Darwin as science. But monotheists will face a worse situation when
evolutionism undergoes the "paradigm shift" which physicist-psychologist Peter Russell (a
Bailey disciple and Findhorn member) insists must transform all sciences: from a system that has
"no place for God" and comes up with too few answers, to a spiritual system where "God" is
"within human consciousness" and factual answers are not necessary. (See
"Science and Spirituality", _World Goodwill Newsletter_, No.2, 1997. WG is a branch of Lucis
Trust, publisher of Bailey's works.) Biblical creationism will then be challenged by a synthesis
of evolution-creation in which all the current flaws of standard evolution are plugged with NA
teaching: the missing links will be solved by visitations from alien "creators" who triggered
"quantum leaps" in human evolution; life's irreducible complexity will be acknowledged with
references to forces and deities no less impressive than the G-d of the Bible; and any remaining
inconsistencies can be ignored and explained (as Russell says) as "maya" - the illusion of
material reality. Under those circumstances, we can expect the current reluctance among
scientists to allow creationism into the schools will give away - not in defeat but in the
confidence that whatever creation science has to say will no longer threaten them. They will
expect the children to be so indoctrinated that Biblical models will not impress them.]

2. Spiritual "Salads" - Judaism Laced with Paganism

For those who cannot be so easily divorced from Judaism, there is an attempt to wean observant
and traditional Jews away from the Torah by promoting very Jewish concepts side by side with
very un-Jewish ones. They are finding acceptance, or at least benefitting from benevolent
neglect, in the orthodox community. A prominent Kabbalist revered by thousands in Israel,
Rabbi Kadouri, performs divination by reading palms after they rest for a moment on a Torah.
[My next-door neighbor was thrilled to relate this experience to me last year.] The followers of
the late Shlomo Carlebach hold a weekly kumsitz in the cemetery, tying blue strings to his grave
to "absorb his aura" and be worn as bracelets. ("Life in the Cemetery", _Jerusalem Post_, Sep.19,
1997) Jewish community centers, established to foster Jewish identity, are offering classes in
both Torah and yoga, the latter not even bothering about Jewish trappings. Posters can be seen
around Jerusalem advertising Torah combined with Tai Chi. The "Elat Chayyim Jewish
Spiritual Retreat Center" has a Tai Chi Reiki Master ["Chi" is a Chinese Buddhist term for the
underlying force of the universe which can be harnessed by thought power] and a resident yoga
instructor, whose training was not in Judaism but in Eastern paganism. [I can assert without
reservation that yoga is idolatrous, having practiced it myself for 11 years before discovering
Torah Judaism. While some insist that hatha yoga is only physical exercise, I confirmed with
several teachers that the physical postures themselves are viewed as acts of worship to the deity
for which they are named (the "cobra", the "lion", the "sun dance", etc.). This fact is omitted
when introducing yoga to Westerners, but like other esoteric doctrines it is gradually revealed as
the disciple advances. Moreover, worship is understood to take place even if the lower-level
practitioner is unaware of what he is doing. This is also the attitude behind the vague NA prayer,
the "Great Invocation".]

The number of practices forbidden by Torah which are cloaked in Torah garb are bewildering,
and rarely are any of them challenged by the Torah community. [It can be argued that such
people do not represent normative orthodox Judaism; however, by openly promoting such ideas
in the orthodox community without being disowned, they are successfully undermining the
authority of Torah in its own community - an essential part of the New Age Plan.] Some of these
practices which date back centuries are even hotly defended by the groups with the strictest
standards of Torah observance, such as praying to dead tzaddikim (sages considered especially
connected to G-d during their lives) for healing, spouses, ability to conceive, hidden wisdom and
other favors. [Jews who support this practice, yet who are revolted at the idea of others relating
to Jesus in the same manner because "it's idolatrous to pray to a human being" or because "we
Jews don't need a mediator between us and G-d", have a problem not only with their Torah
observance but with basic credibility.]

2a. One bestselling "salad" is worth listing separately: the Buddhism-Judaism mix. Promoted
under the brand name "Jewish Renewal", it has swelled to an international movement in its own
right and will be examined later. It has the dubious honor of fooling the greatest number of loyal
Jews, who do not object because Buddhists do not bow before an idol (at least not while the
West is watching). Buddhism is also considered non-threatening to Jews because of its image of
peaceable tolerance for all faiths. [This image has afforded the Dalai Lama a warm welcome in
Israel; however, it clashes with past Buddhist affinities for Nazism, and Bailey expected
Buddhism to revert to militancy at the proper stage of the Plan.] As a result, "lectures [in Israel]
by visiting Buddhist teachers are invariably packed." ("The New Believers", _The Jerusalem
Report_, Apr. 2, 1998)

A brief investigation of the Buddhist faith will show that the lack of statues is not a rejection of
idolatry, as in Judaism, but rather an acceptance of the Divinity in everything, as both Pantheism
and NA affirm. Using an idol would unnecessarily limit the Buddhist's concept of god. More
accurately, the fullest expression of the Divinity in Buddhism is nothingness, the Great Void.
The ultimate goal in Buddhism is to become "enlightened" (the literal meaning of "Buddha")
concerning the meaninglessness of physical existence, to aspire to godhood (achieved through
progressive disconnection with the physical, and negation of the individual) and union with
"Nirvana", the Divine Negation of existence. All of this is totally in tandem with NA doctrine
and practice. [Compare this with the "loss of self" in NA teaching to achieve higher
enlightenment; Tibetan Buddhism is the source. Note also the radical standards of "simplicity"
and renunciation of worldly luxuries urged upon Buddhist and NA disciples, compared with the
opulent lifestyles of their leaders. A Jewish admirer of the Dalai Lama, who was a guest at the
latter's residence, describes it as a "palace"... albeit a "fairly modest palace" by American
standards. See the Katz diary below for source.] The same article in _The Jerusalem Report_
notes repeatedly that Jews enamoured with Buddhism often incorporate Sufi (Islamic mystical)
techniques as well on the path to self-as-god, including Islamic trance music and Moslem
prayers. [Sufism is yet another form of the "ancient occult wisdom", with a goal to undermine
and eliminate monotheistic Islam.] And as we will see below, Jews who step into Buddhism are
prone to adopt blatantly idol-centered faiths as well.

3. Jewish Renewal - The Spiritual Salad-Bar Movement

In terms of spiritual salads, Jewish Renewal offers a five-star buffet. This movement is a direct
extension of the Jewish-Buddhist mix described above. It is so widespread and popular, and
comes in so many packages, it deserves a detailed examination.

The "father" of Jewish Renewal (hereafter JR) is the grandfatherly Reb Zalman Schachter-
Shalomi, a prolific PhD author, counseling psychologist and Lubavitcher rabbi. He still dresses
in the Hassidic tradition and verbally identifies with Judaism, but it isn't long before he reveals
where his heart is. In an interview with "Thinking Allowed" host Dr. Jeffrey Mishlove [who also
interviewed NA leader Barbara Marx Hubbard that year - see number (2a) in the section on
Transformation], Schachter-Shalomi is introduced as a wide-ranging Jewish scholar: professor
emeritus at Temple University (psychology of religion, mysticism), founder of P'nai Or (later
renamed Aleph Alliance, outlined below), director of the "Spiritual Eldering Project".
Schachter-Shalomi himself mentions various synagogue posts and a stint at the University of
Manitoba. But soon he is speaking of Sufi legends and describing the "Ancient of Days" [a
Tenach term for G-d] as "a thing... an archetype" that "is needed by our mother, the Earth".
Similarly, in an interview promoting his 1997 book, _Paradigm Shift_, [the title itself being a
favorite NA code] Schachter-Shalomi first speaks of creating the "Havurah movement" and
_The Jewish Catalog_; he defines Jewish Renewal as "based on Kabbalah, Hasidism and other
forms of Jewish mysticism." He mentions his appreciation for his Habad training. Reviewers of
his book applaud his "love of Torah" (Dr. Moshe Waldoks) and his "contribution to the revival
of Jewish spirituality" (Dr. Arthur Green). But then he urges us to "let go of the old paradigms
rather than cling to obsolete ways of thinking." These obsolete ways are to be replaced by "newly
emerging ways of looking at reality" which are not derived from Torah but from "the coming to
an end of one era and the dawning of a new one"; this is what shapes his "recontextualization of
Judaism".

Like the leaders of "CLAL" [see below], Reb Zalman justifies his "paradigm shift" by pointing
to the changes Judaism underwent after the Temple's destruction, and like CLAL he makes the
claim that "all of our practices and belief had to be reframed" at that time. [We will test this
claim later.] But he goes farther: Judaism also passed through "paradigm shifts" with Abraham,
Moses, Auschwitz, Hiroshima... and "the moon walk". [If you are wondering how you missed
the shattering trauma that hit Judaism after the Apollo moon landing, you are not alone. Even
the recovery of the Western Wall in 1967, as momentous as it was, didn't cause "all our practices
and beliefs" to be "reframed".... However, be aware that man's brief hip-hop on the moon is high
on the NA list of milestone events in human evolution. So is the first use of nuclear weapons at
Hiroshima, mentioned as a "shift point" by the JR leader but largely passed over by orthodox
Jewish commentators.] From here, the Jewish Renewal rebbe heads straight for his goal to
"delaminate our faith-treasures from earlier maps [of reality]" and paste them onto "new maps"
which meet "the demands of our era". (Interestingly, the Reb's claim to formulating a
"recontextualization" which "renews" Judaism is ridiculed by modern followers of the messianic
pretender Sabbatai Zevi, who accuse JR of plagiarizing their 300-year-old heretical traditions.)

Where does the Reb look for his "new maps"? To a renewed study of Torah? Nope, to
"feminism, human potential [another NA code phrase], ecology and Whole Earth thinking [also
NA code]." A "new map" is also needed for the concept of Tshuvah (repentance): "one connects
first the higher centers of one's being", [which in NA is the first stage of "antahkarana", or
Rainbow bridge-building] then connects "with God", [the second stage of "antahkarana"]. It is
only after this that "one implements what one needs from the tradition to round out one's life."
[But as we have seen, once the Rainbow bridge is completed, one needs nothing from "outmoded
Judaism" - on the contrary, one recognizes the need for its destruction.] He admits that fellow-
Jews do not accept his "modify[ing] a long standing and Divinely revealed tradition". But as if
to make sure enlightened readers appreciate his skill as a change agent, Reb Zalman describes
how his disciples have "mainstreamed" his teachings into regular orthodox synagogues "without
explicitly attributing the source", and have successfully "blended into the acceptable scene". As
an example [and perhaps as yet another coded signal] he mentions the "rainbow colored tallit" he
personally designed. [Watch below for how many leaders in various organizations turn out to be
Reb Zalman disciples, and you will see his boast is not an idle one.]

Schachter-Shalomi's personal view of "Divinely revealed tradition" mirrors that of other Jewish
groups discussed in this section. Similar to CLAL's ever-changing Torah, he proclaims that
Divine revelation is still unfolding, well beyond Torah boundaries. And like the Kabbalah
Centre, he doesn't hesitate to teach Kabbalah to students who have no grounding in basic Torah -
he too is confident that if Jewish Renewal students "follow the inclination of their own inner
core", this will compensate for the lack of Torah. Reb Zalman even castigates the old school of
Kabbalah, "esoteric teachers [who] demanded that the seekers relinquish and deny their sacred
encounters outside of the tradition [that is, required them to turn from idolatry] and begin basic
[Torah] observances." [Schachter consistently uses "tradition" or "traditional Torah" where
orthodox rabbis would say simply "Torah".] In harmony with this attitude, one of Schachter-
Shalomi's main responsibilities is chairing the "World Wisdom Department" at the Naropa
Institute, a private college where Buddhist meditation is required daily and "each class or degree
program integrates varying degrees of Buddhist philosophies and traditions". Naropa's Fall 1997
course schedule listed Reb Zalman's "Core Texts of Jewish Mysticism", alongside studies of
Aztec death celebration (student is instructed to bring an offering of flowers, bread and fruit),
Yoruban ancestor-worship, Druid shamanism, Sufi trance music, Taoist religion, the "Shambhala
Tradition" of meditation (taught by Naropa's founder), Kundalini Yoga, and about a dozen
Tibetan Buddhist courses.
Other JR-related groups are springing up too fast to document. Here is a short-list of the older
centers:

3a. Aleph Alliance for Jewish Renewal: This organization, centered in Philadelphia, is under
the direct leadership of Zalman Schachter-Shalomi. Prominent members of Aleph regularly
appear in the forefront of the other groups listed in this section, especially Elat Chayyim.
Conversely, the latter is promoted with equal fervor on the Aleph website. The 3-fold vision of
Aleph Alliance explicitly calls for "Jewish spirituality" and never mentions any spiritual path
outside of Judaism. Quite the contrary, the FAQ asserts: "It is an important part of Aleph's
mission to make the 'hidden' treasures of Judaism known and accessible" to all those "spiritually
sensitive Jews [who] have sought spiritual expression in other faith traditions." However, a brief
survey of the Elat Chayyim faculty [see below] and Schachter-Shalomi's own spiritual journey
[see also the summary above] will show that the "treasures" they themselves have studied and
now offer are from many other faiths besides Judaism, principly from Buddhism. [Thus, instead
of attracting Jewish seekers to authentic Judaism, they give added encouragement to look
elsewhere for the "treasures", just as they have. Reb Zalman's allegiance to the Naropa Institute,
whose "learning philosophy is rooted in Buddhist tradition", is alone enough to discredit
historical Judaism as self-sufficient.] Aleph, like Schacter-Shalomi, clearly accepts the
"universality of spiritual truths" and is proud of its "synthesis of these wide-ranging
experiences", not to reaffirm Judaism but to create a "unique" teaching. [Actually, "universality"
is used advisedly. The Aleph FAQ notes one exception to their acceptance of all spiritual paths:
an entire heading is inexplicably devoted to their "position" on the miniscule sect of "Messianic
Judaism", where the tone switches momentarily from free-spirited liberality to a rather prim
disapproval of groups "which actively target Jews for recruitment" and which use "deceptive
practices" to present Christian teaching in a Jewish context. A rather curious stand for a
movement whose leader proudly "integrated" his Catholic studies into a "unique" teaching being
sold as Jewish, and whose recommended list is topped by a "Jewish" Center teaching Eastern
pagan practices.]

3b. Arthur Waskow: One of the most active Aleph leaders is this rabbi who heads what could be
called the Green JR contingent. Waskow shifts the mission of the Jewish people as "light to the
nations" from spiritual revelation of the only G-d, to saving and healing the Earth-as-God. His
manifesto is embodied in his article, "And the Earth is Filled with the Breath of Life". Waskow's
"re-invention" of Judaism goes beyond the usual JR revisionism, in that it works retroactively
back to the very origins of Torah. The ancient Temple offerings were not in obedience to the G-
d of the Covenant, but in honor of a pantheistic Divinity: "The earth, the rain, the sun, the seed,
and our work -- together, adam and adamah, the earth and human earthlings, grew this food. It
came from the Unity of Life; so we give back some of it to that great Unity." The purpose of the
Jewish people is indistinguishable from the purpose of humanity in general, which is to attain
union with the universe: "For the universe to continue on this journey toward self-awareness,
there needs to be a species capable of self-awareness - made up of individuals who can reflect
upon their own selves, and also able as a species to reflect upon itself and to see itself as part of
the Unity of the universe - on which it is also capable of reflecting. That is what it means to live
in the Image of God." Throughout the article, Waskow's choice of pronouns for G-d is "It".
[Compare all these elements with Bailey and the "Hierarchy" on the solution to "the Jewish
problem". Waskow has apparently tried to address every Jewish "fault" named in NA literature.]
Key NA concepts are used freely, such as "leaps" in cosmic and human evolution (using the
imagery of a spiral), the idea that "earth is Spirit" and the equivalence of Jewish "renewal" with
"transformation". The "idols" to be avoided by Jews are not foreign gods adored by the nations,
but "mere carved-out pieces of the Whole, things of partial value that we elevate to ultimates,"
anything short of the impersonal "great Unity". Prayer is directed to the "mystery of allness in
the world" - not to the G-d described by Abraham as "the most high God, Maker of heaven and
earth." The covenantal signs of the Jewish people like the Sabbath and kosher dietary laws are
reassigned as ways to "heal the planet".

Of special relevance is Waskow's liberal [mis]use of a central pillar of Judaism - the Shema - in
order to retrofit Torah to Earth-worship: "For example, look at the second paragraph of the
Sh'ma, the one that says, 'And if you act on Torah then the rain will fall, the rivers will run, and
the earth will be fruitful and you will live well. And if you don't act on Torah, if you reject it, if
you cut yourself off from this great harmony of earth, then the great harmony will cease to be
harmony and will cut itself off from you... and you will perish from all this good adamah that you
grew up with.'" (emphasis mine) [All Jews who know the Shema will recognize a certain artistic
license being exercised here, despite its appearance as a direct quote. But Waskow goes beyond
paraphrase to outright misquoting. Compare his caricature with the real Shema as translated in
the Hertz Siddur (with my emphasis to highlight the removal of G-d): "If you listen diligently to
My commandments which I command you this day, to love the L-rd your God, and to serve Him
with all your heart and with all your soul, I will give the rain of your land in its season.... Take
heed to yourselves, lest your heart be deceived, and you turn aside, and serve other gods and
worship them; and the anger of the L-rd be kindled against you, and He shut up the heavens, that
there be no rain... and you perish quickly from off the good land which the L-rd gives you."
(Deuteronomy 11:13-17) Such misquoting by an educated Jew like Waskow can only be
deliberate. It is an attempt to hide the fact that Torah condemns Jewish "Renewal". The
question then is: If Torah must be mutilated to lend support to this system, why doesn't JR just
leave Torah behind - as they actually have among themselves? For whose benefit is this pretense
of a Torah framework?]

If the "re-invention" of the Shema is not enough, consider the Torah account of Cain murdering
Abel. Waskow's "renewal" process "transforms" it into an example of G-d as the failing Parent,
whose love is so limited He "can respond fully to just one brother." Waskow invites us to "share
Cain's initial anger at his 'parent's' favoritism" which so provoked poor Cain that he could not
express it verbally; "only his face flushed with anger gave a hint - and in the story, God had no
more clue to what that meant than did the teachers and parents of Littleton [site of a horrifying
student-led massacre]." On a par with the worst parenting of today, G-d cannot listen to His
offspring: "God asks Cain the right questions but does not wait for an answer. And God does not
notice when there is no answer. He responds only with a sermon." But there is hope: "The Bible
teaches that even God, or especially God, can learn from mistakes." ("Cain at Littleton",
_Moment Magazine_, Oct-Nov. 1999) [Before dismissing Waskow as a frum fruitcake with only
marginal influence, consider that he is named by the UN as one of 40 "Wisdom Keepers" of the
world - quite a distinction in a global forum crawling with mystics of all religions.]

3c. Elat Chayyim Jewish Spiritual Retreat Center: As mentioned briefly already, Elat
Chayyim's teaching staff includes masters in Eastern religions. Besides the yoga and Tai Chi
masters, there is a leadership trainer who describes herself as a "faithful Jew and a passionate
Buddhist", an astrologer, a "Jewish shaman", a Jungian psychotherapist, a Zen Master and a
veteran sadhu (Hindu hermit). One yoga teacher works mainly with children. [Those who think
that these children are not being indoctrinated, and that yoga can be practiced without pagan
worship, need to do a little homework. See my comments above.] Another teacher authored a
book about the "myths of Genesis". At least 17 of the 69 Elat teachers are dedicated to
promoting pagan religion, New Age, or some other system which clearly rejects Torah
boundaries, making the "Retreat Center" definitely "Spiritual" but hardly "Jewish". The main
attraction is Reb Schachter-Shalomi himself, whose profile explains that his "belief in the
universality of spiritual truth led him to study with Sufi Masters, Buddhist teachers, Native
American elders, Catholic monks and humanistic" teachers. His position at the Naropa Institute
is proudly included in his qualifications to teach at this "Jewish retreat center".

Besides Schachter-Shalomi's direct teaching, his influence is felt at Elat Chayyim through the
fact that nearly half the teaching staff (31 of 69) are networked with him in some way - having
been personally mentored by him and/or serving on his "Aleph" staff. Another notable entry is
Rabbi Arthur Waskow, considered by many to be Schacter-Shalomi's equal in JR - here we are
told of his title of "Wisdom Keeper" at the UN. [Since the UN is clearly promoting New Age
"Wisdom", this title does not bode well for Jewish fans of Waskow... or even for Waskow
himself, if he should come to realize what this "Wisdom" advocates for all Jews.] The spiritual
reach of Elat Chayyim extends to Israel through seminars conducted there by at least 10 of these
teachers; three of them are actually based in Israel. Last, but certainly not least, "orthodox"
teachers Yitz and Blu Greenberg are both happy members of the Elat Chayyim teaching staff
[see below for the significance of this fact].

3d. Rasheit Institute for Jewish Spirituality: Rabbi Rami Shapiro (yet another teacher at the
Elat Chayyim Center) takes yogic practices and TM philosophies into Jewish prayer, claiming he
has discovered this common ground in Kabbalistic meditation. But the parallel becomes
contrived when, for example, he teaches his disciples that "Kavvanah is focused attention
whereby 'a person empties the mind of all thought and sees the self within the greater presence of
the Divine.' (Maimonides)" Whether or not such a quote from Rambam exists is an open
question, since Shapiro gives no proper reference by which to check it. [But he completely
clashes with the mainstream Jewish concept of kavanah, described as the elimination of all
exterraneous thought and the awareness of standing before the presence of G-d (Rabbi Hayim
Halevy Donin, _To Pray As a Jew_, p.19, emphasis mine.) Notice how radical a change is
effected by editing the two lone words which I emphasized here. The subtle alteration would go
undetected by Jews with a thin background in Judaism.] Shapiro also has no scruples about
mistranslating key Hebrew phrases to insert NA notions; examples are "Ribbon shel Olam" [sic],
normally meaning "Master" or "Lord" of the Universe, is changed here to an impersonal "Source
of the Universe"; gerushin becomes not withdrawing from earthly distractions but the "practice
of repeating a sacred phrase [mantra]"; and dvekut, literally meaning "clinging" to G-d and the
commandments, is equated with the central NA goal of "God-consciousness", recognizing the
"Godliness" of the sand and air. For recommended reading on the discipline of musar (ethical
conduct), Shapiro's first title is _Krishnamurti's Journal_, guidance from a Hindu who became a
NA channel for Maitreya. (See "MINYAN", Soul Craft Directory) In his "Brief Introduction to
Jewish Meditation" (same site), Shapiro calls the Amidah prayer a form of rabbinic "yoga",
citing unspecified "rabbis" who taught that the custom of bowing was not to honor G-d but
"loosened the spine and opened the body to the flow of divine energy" (a clear reference to the
Hindu kundalini doctrine). The Hassidic teaching of avodah be-bittul is defined as "self-
annihilation - a Jew is no longer a Jew", or even a human being. [Since I am not sure what
Hassidism teaches about this, I hope some authority will contact me to either verify or refute
Shapiro's claim.]

3e. "Metivta Center for Contemplative Judaism": Located in Beverly Hills, California, most of
the Metivta seminars are conducted by Rabbi Jonathan Omer-Man, a member of the JR dialog
delegation visiting the leader of Tibetan Buddhism, the Dalai Lama. At the 1990 meeting in
Dharamsala, Omer-Man expressed interest in the Buddhist "meditational practice known as
'deity-yoga', wherein the practitioner visualizes an aspect of divinity and then proceeds to
identify with the mind-created deity." (from the diary of delegate Nathan Katz, published by the
Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, Mar. 1, 1991) Not surprisingly, Metivta offers a curious
selection of books for "contemplative Judaism": not only Kabbalah and "Jewish meditation", but
a "Shambhala Guide" to Jewish mysticism. [The concept of Shambala is anything but Jewish.]
We can see the networking effect, as the names Rami Shapiro (see above), Melinda Ribner
(author of _New Age Judaism_) and David Zeller (head of "Yakar", an Israeli Jewish Renewal
center) are recommended by Metivta - all of whom also happen to teach at Elat Chayyim (see
above).

3f. _Tikkun Magazine_: Recent contributors to _Tikkun_ include many featured in this section,
for example Rami Shapiro, Arthur Waskow and Blu Greenberg. The Editor, Michael Lerner, was
ordained as a rabbi by Schachter-Shalomi, but even before that he was a JR enthusiast who
authored _Jewish Renewal: A Path to Healing and Transformation_ [By equating this Jewish
movement with the most popular NA buzzwords available, Lerner was not only acknowledging
the nature of JR but code-signaling his personal credo as well.] In this book, Lerner follows
Waskow's initiative in "renewing" Torah retroactively by observing that Abraham's supreme act
of faith in the Akedah [offering up his son to G-d] was actually a delusion.

In their editorial statement on "Spirituality", _Tikkun_ reassures readers that they embrace the
pure NA concept of "a recognition of the ultimate Unity of All Being" and a "world [that] is
filled with a conscious spiritual energy". On the other hand, many established religions "have
little to offer in the way of spirituality" except for the "renewal movements... and TIKKUN tries
to support them all." Lerner's "synagogue" in San Francisco is dedicated to "build this kind of
spirituality within the framework of traditional Jewish religious practice." However, his
"community is not specifically a Jewish community... it supports all religous and all spiritual
communities which identify with Emancipatory Sprituality as described in _Spirit Matters_."
This refers to Lerner's book, released in June 2000; his vision of "emancipation" includes
repudiating the "reactionary spirituality that is given to veiling women and circumcising men."
(quoted in the Kirkus Review of the book, found on Amazon) [Since circumcising men is the
primary "traditional Jewish religious practice", the earlier reassurance is less than reassuring....]

In an excerpt of _Spirit Matters_ posted on the _Tikkun_ website, we are told: "The inner change
that we need most to make is to recognize ourselves as part of the Unity of all Being, manifesting
the goodness and love of the universe." This is accomplished by meditation and prayer; useful
resources to get us there are suggested, none of them from mainstream Judaism. As for the
Jewish G-d (unmistakably identified by the Tetragrammaton), we are instructed to relate to Him
as "the omnipresent possibility of possibility" or "the Force of Healing and Transformation."
Again, learning resources are offered: among them _Awakening the Buddha Within_ and other
Buddhist/Hindu publications, but not a single Jewish title. In fact, the only Jewish models cited
in this 5-page sample as worth incorporating into _Tikkun's_ brand of "spirituality" are
philanthropy (honored with a single reference) and hospitality (the only value which Lerner
attaches to his Shabbat experiences).

Compare this approach with Lerner's "Founding Editorial Statement" in the Fall 1986 issue, and
we can see how far _Tikkun_ has drifted from its initial commitment: "The pressure to be
'universalist' and to reject a particularistic identity 'in order to be taken seriously' is the major
way that Jews were oppressed in the United States.... America offered a seductive deal: 'give up
those elements in your identity that make you stand out and be different and we will let you fit
into the society...' It is no longer clear why we should accept this offer." Editor Lerner promises
here that for those Jews who are "uncomfortable in the presence of another Jew who is 'too
Jewish'... Tikkun's Jewish articles will be a source of embarrassment." [Apparently the value of
Jewish particularism could not compete with the subsequent "seductive deal" of prominence in
NA circles. Now _Tikkun_ is an embarrassment to the same Jews Lerner once pledged to
represent.]

4. Kabbalah as a NA Tool
The mystical side of orthodox Judaism is too complex for a complete analysis here. Suffice to
say that Jewish Kabbalah has become a salad of gems mixed with impurities. This is the
assessment of both the Torah and NA. From a Torah standpoint, what real insight there is to be
found in Kabbalah is invariably based firmly on Tenach passages. They stand in contrast to
questionable ideas which clash with basic Torah; these are not found in Tenach but are found in
pagan religions. From the NA viewpoint, Jewish Kabbalah gets similarly mixed reviews, but for
the opposite reason: its only value is found in teachings which are not Torah-based but are NA
beliefs: reincarnation; soliciting help from angels, demons and departed human spirits; light and
darkness, good and evil, uniting in balance to make "God"; self-induced trances resulting in
visions or astral (out-of-body) travels; and harnessing of supernatural powers by pronouncing
sacred names. [It is noteworthy that none of these can be supported by a clear (pashat or darash)
Torah passage, while some are expressly forbidden; yet these are the best-known elements of
Kabbalah among Jews today. The fact that these are accepted by so many otherwise
knowledgeable Torah-keeping Jews, in spite of their dubious links to Torah, only weakens
Jewish resistance to NA missionaries introducing other doctrines progressively farther from
Torah.]

4a. There is an attitude among Kabbalists that a mekubal (Kabbalistic master) has spiritually
advanced beyond the need to obey the above prohibitions in Torah, which are meant for the
"average" Jew. [I confirmed this in dialog with an Israeli student from a family with a long line
of respected mekubalim.] With the perceived freedom to explore the occult world, it is no
wonder that anti-Torah concepts became integrated into Kabbalah. Helena Blavatsky had no
difficulty locating quotes from Jews in the Kabbalistic tradition to show that they also admire
Lucifer, aka Satan. For example, she repeats the "glowing" praises of "Kabalist" Eliphas Levi:
"It (Satan) is that Angel who was proud enough to believe himself God; brave enough to buy his
independence at the price of eternal suffering and torture; beautiful enough to have adored
himself in full divine light; strong enough to still reign in darkness amidst agony, and to have
made himself a throne out of this inextinguishable pyre." (Blavatsky quoting from Eliphas Levi,
_Historie de la Magie, p.16-17, _The Secret Doctrine_ II, p.506)

The same admiration for this "Dragon of Wisdom" was celebrated in the destructive heresies
of Sabbetai Zevi and the Frankists, which are thriving today in the form of the "Donmeh"
whose well-educated members effortlessly connect nihilism (the benefits of destruction),
Luciferian elements ("the Holy Serpent" and "The Treatise on the Dragons") and Gnostic
teaching with Sabbatean and Lurianic Kabbalah. The blend harmonizes nicely with Blavatsky's
teachings, particularly about the Serpent as God (_Secret Doctrine_, p.215.) As a curious side
note, "Donmeh" leader Yakov Leib haKohain insists that Jewish Renewal springs directly from
Sabbatean practice, and scoffs at JR leaders for "inventing a wheel for which there is already a
300 year old patent, while loudly congratulating themselves for their brilliant discoveries."
("Jewish Renewal, Hermetic Cabala, and Sabbatai Zevi", on the Donmeh website)

4b. The Kabbalistic doctrine of reincarnation is possibly the single most useful inroad into
Judaism for NA. Consider the recent assertion by Rabbi Ovadia Yosef (a former Chief Rabbi of
Israel and a haredi leader with a huge Israeli following) that the six million Jewish Holocaust
victims were reincarnated sinners sent into the Nazi death machine to pay for their past-life sins
(_Jerusalem Post_, Aug.11, 2000). [The resemblance to Bailey's own pronouncement is either
the coincidence of the year or impressive evidence of NA infiltration into orthodox thought. It is
interesting that several response articles in the _Post_, emphasized the lack of Torah, Mishnaic
or Talmudic foundation for the doctrine of reincarnation. I confirmed this in dialog with several
Kabbalist students, who remained strangely undisturbed by this lack of support.] However,
_Post_ columnist Amotz Asa-El's denial that reincarnation ever entered mainstream Judaism is
clearly wishful thinking, considering the stature of the rabbi which prompted his commentary.
And contrary to claims that only Sephardic (oriental) Judaism is prone to accepting Eastern
influences, Chabad of California publishes a well-written and attractive magazine circulated
worldwide among nonreligious Jews, and features articles which credit Kabbalah with the Hindu
doctrine that "in future incarnations, we can fall to the vegetational life of trees or even the
inanimate life of stones." ("Does a Stone Have a Soul?", by Laibl Wolf, _Farbringen_, Spring
1999)

4c. Why NA Loves Kabbalah: NA spokesmen applaud Jewish teachers for recently releasing
Kabbalah from the restricted access imposed on it by past generations of Jewish sages, for
making its teachings available to all (Jewish and non-Jewish alike), and especially for
encouraging free exploration without rabbinic supervision. Even orthodox Jewish teachers of
Kabbalah are hailed by NA as partners who are furthering the Plan. Whether they are deliberate
or unwitting partners, it is anticipated that the results will be the same. Why? Because the
freedom surrounding Kabbalah today has created an unguarded passageway between NA and
Judaism, discarding the last shreds of orthodox Jewish discipline and Torah framework, and
allowing the introduction of "new" guides who do not need Jewish community approval.
Kabbalistic teachers can now include outright NA disciples, identifiable by their lack of concern
for a Jewish frame of reference; the spiritism (contact with disembodied spirits) in Kabbalah is
sufficient for achieving their goal of getting as many people as possible, as quickly as possible,
into the spirit realm where the "Ascended Masters of the Hierarchy" await. The ultimate NA
goal is to gain full control of Kabbalah in the Jewish community, taking it through successive
"transformations" until it is finally severed from all links with the Torah, thus "recovering" its
"purity". The many Jews who are captivated by Kabbalah [and who, like my above-mentioned
friends, are not bothered by the absence of Torah links] will be led away from Torah with ease.

While in the past most Jews hotly contested the idea that Kabbalah had any kinship with New
Age, some Jews are now promoting the idea that Jewish Kabbalah really does affirm NA
teaching [which would imply either a gross ignorance of NA teaching and/or Kabbalah, or a
knowledge of their commonality which escapes the average Jew]. This view is reflected in a
book published in April 2000 by a Jewish company; its author actually proposes that Judaism
take the credit for today's NA teaching: "Many people will be surprised to find that Judaism is
fundamentally aligned with what we think of as the New Age. Many of the things we associate
with the New Age are not new but are part of Kaballah." (cover text, _New Age Judaism_,
published by Simcha Press). The only kind of "Judaism" which could "fundamentally" agree
with NA is the Renewal kind, and predictably, both author and publisher turn up elsewhere in
Schachter's Jewish Renewal orbit.

[This would be a good place to demonstrate how a concerned researcher can use the network
effect to uncover hidden NA foundations. This book with its full title, _New Age Judaism -
Ancient Wisdom for the Modern World_, has a seemingly positive goal: to show that Judaism
already possesses what New Age religion offers, therefore Jews need not leave Judaism.
However, the first thing we note is that it was written by Jewish Renewal teacher Melinda Ribler.
Although her mentor, the late Rabbi Shlomo Carlebach, recommends her as someone "who never
forgets there is one God", and although she claims the endorsement of unnamed "prominent
Orthodox rabbis", Ribler is on the faculty of the very unorthodox Elat Chayyim Center, whose
curriculum clearly rejects any "one God" idea - except in the sense that He/It is everything. We
also find Ribler's book promoted by the similarly eclectic Metivta Center. Moving one step
behind this scene, we discover is that "Simcha Press", the Jewish-sounding publisher of Ribler's
book whose official specialty is "Jewish spirituality", is actually a brand-new (June 2000)
subsidiary of "Health Communications, Inc." Taking one more step backstage, we identify HCI
as a "a full-service medical education and communications company... publishers of _The
International Journal of Drugs, Devices and Diagnostic Research_". This seems strange after
Simcha describes them as "publishing books in the realm of personal growth", a NA code signal.
We probe further. Upon entering the HCI on-line bookstore, among the links we notice a tiny
word: "Spiritual". Clicking there, we see the books offered by HCI include titles like _The Tao
of the Ride_ and _Wings of Soul: Releasing Your Spiritual Identity_; featured are personalities
like the Luciferian Barbara Marx Hubbard, billed as one of "the most brilliant thinkers" of today,
and Hindu author Kauthilya, "the Aristotle and Machiavelli of India". Sampling one HCI book,
_Golden Eggs: Spiritual Wisdom for Birthing Our Lives_, we find ourselves coming full circle,
with the authors urging us to follow Carl Jung, Barbara Marx Hubbard and other teachers of
"personal and global transformation"; by the end of Chapter One, the book has become nothing
more than a hymn of praise to the gnostic goddess Sophia. Our possible conclusions: (a) The
author of _New Age Judaism_, its publisher, the mother company and its market have all failed
to notice that Ribler's orientation and book diametrically oppose the other "wisdom books" being
promoted here. (b) Ribler, a well-meaning but naive Jewish writer is being used to lend
legitimacy to HCI's new Jewish division. She is also being used by Metivta, Elat Chayyim and
Jewish Renewal in general, while she herself is totally unaware that she is spiritually out of step
with all her colleagues. (c) Ribler, Simcha Press, HCI and I are all assuming this book to be
totally in harmony with NA idolatry. The only people fooled by the "Jewish" title, the "Jewish"
publisher and the "orthodox" endorsements are the unsuspecting Jewish browsers at the
Jerusalem International Book Fair where Simcha Press has a table.]

4d. The Kabbalah Centre and Rabbi Philip ("Shraga") Berg: As the most controversial
promotor of Jewish Kabbalistic teaching, yet possibly the most successful, the Kabbalah Centre
(KC) deserves a detailed report. The Centre has been strongly denounced as a dangerous cult by
the Task Force on Cults and Missionaries (See "The Truth about the Kabbalah Centre" published
by the LA branch). The orthodox community of Toronto, where KC headquarters are located,
declared a harem on Berg (divorced him from community involvement). Unethical conduct and
fraud, manipulation and violent intimidation, cultlike exploitation, hard-sell tactics and profit
margins of up to 500% are included in the charges from different branches of the Task Force on
Cults and Missionaries, Jews for Judaism and other community cult-fighters. According to the
Los Angeles Task Force on Cults, some of his quotes from the Talmud and the Zohar are also
fictitious. So is his "Yeshivah Kol Yehuda in the U.S." which he claims to head (reportedly an
attempt to pose as a branch of a respected Jerusalem yeshivah by the same name). The KC was
banned in South Africa by the Chief Rabbi and Rabbinical Association; but Canadian Rabbi
Emanuel Schochet, who was instrumental in bringing this about, found himself being sued by the
KC in Canada for libel as a result. Other rabbinical councils (possibly intimidated by R.
Schochet's ordeal) have contented themselves with simply posting public warnings about Berg.
Leading Kabbalists in Israel such as Rabbi Ovadia Yosef have reportedly joined in denouncing
his conduct and teachings.

As a sort of response to all the above, the KC official website [featuring high-class graphics but
poorly edited text], lists as one of the FAQs the question of why there is so much rabbinic
opposition to them. Their answer is revealing: Every pioneer bringing "positive and profound
change" to human "civilization" has met with resistance; "the establishment" simply doesn't
appreciate them. [This hints that their mission is not to affirm Jewish tradition but to challenge
and "transform" it, for which they are willing to suffer persecution.] Yet in spite of rabbinic
opposition, Berg has managed to amass a small fortune - in 1989 he registered a net worth of
$9.6 million, with net gains of $6.1 million and gross profits of $2.5 million from sales of the 24-
volume _Zohar_ ...at the New York Centre alone. New branches are springing up every year.
Besides Toronto, the KC now has branches in the U.S. (NYC - Queens and Manhattan, Chicago,
LA, Las Vegas, San Diego, San Fernando Valley, Philadelphia, North Miami, Boca Raton) and
in Mexico City, Paris, Sao Paulo (Brazil), London, Santiago (Chile) and Buenos Aires
(Argentina). Not to mention four branches in Israel (Tel Aviv, Haifa, Tiberias, Jerusalem).

But our main interest in this report is KC's teaching about Kabbalah itself, which strongly
follows NA thought. According to the KC website, their brochures [I have one in Hebrew] and
their salespeople [I have met two at my door], studying Kabbalah brings life-changing benefits
on all levels: cures for any illness, domestic harmony, wealth, career success, relief from
emotional problems, spiritual enlightenment, answers to all life's questions, supernatural powers,
divination of the future, elimination of war and hatred. Actually, Kabbalah is just another
spiritual path which unlocks one's limitless human potential: "It is important to understand that
the spiritiual [sic] knowledge of our universe is already known within our souls. The act of
learning Kabbalah is merely the instrument that stirs and awakens this knowledge from within
us." Not only that, but the KC is not even about Kabbalah really: "Unfortunately, division and
separation does cause severe damage. Once again, the sole purpose of The Kabbalah Center is to
remove these negative and destructive barriers and to look for ways to unite." (from the website
FAQ, emphasis mine) This single-minded determination to end "separation" [commanded by G-
d for the Jews but forbidden in the NA] comes from, of all places, Kabbalah itself: "Kabbalah
teaches us that unity can only occur through diversity."

To benefit from the KC's "unity in diversity" [a clear code phrase used by NAers everywhere],
participants need not accept Judaism. Torah and the mitzvot are optional and need not enter the
equation at all. Berg's students, Jews and non-Jews alike, may come from any spiritual
background, absorb whatever they find useful at his Centre (for a hefty fee), and continue on the
spiritual path of their choice. In every city where KC has offices, the _Zohar_ is sold door-to-
door by Berg disciples, without regard for whether the buyer is a Jew or non-Jew, monotheist or
pagan (In Israel, the sales efforts range far beyond the immediate vicinity of their offices). Berg
admits that most students (and some teachers) cannot even read Hebrew, but no matter. Not only
is basic Torah study not required, or identification with Judaism, but one doesn't even need to
read and understand the _Zohar_ itself - just staring blankly at it by day and putting it under your
pillow at night will bring you spiritual fulfillment. This is Berg's interpretation of "open study of
Kabbalah," and he cites Kabbalists such as Rabbi Abraham Azulay for support. He could have
also cited Kabbalists Sabbatai Zevi and Jakob Frank, as the Task Force article observes.

And what is Berg's personal commitment to orthodox Judaism, which he says he embraces?
"Judaism is not concerned with conforming to a strict religious way of life [involving] certain
ritual tasks. On the contrary, the goal is to connect to metaphysical forces through which we can
fulfill our Desire to Receive.... To say that a particular deed or action is 'halachically incorrect' is
not to say that one is doing wrong, is not an observant Jew or is not fitting into the mainstream of
Judaism. We are merely making the observation that the particular action in question is not
properly connecting with the energy pattern available to it." (_The Kabbalah Connection_,
p.43,44) Thus the object of Berg's "Jewish" worship moves from G-d to the familiar NA
"forces", and "Jewish" conduct becomes an issue of energy alignment rather than obedience to
Divine commands. As for the Torah, its purpose is to "completely fulfill all our needs" - and the
_Zohar_ is its magic charm. Berg dismisses out of hand the Torah references to G-d rewarding
those who do good and punishing those who do evil: "We are taught from childhood [this idea].
Never believe it." (_The Wheels of the Soul_, p.46) [Compare this with Bailey's call to rid the
world of this and other "primitive" ideas, as well as the call by NA educators to shed our
poisonous childhood teachings.] Freed from the Torah prohibitions against divination and
communing with the dead, Berg is accustomed to using astrology and seances as often as Torah
and _Zohar_ to "counsel" his disciples.

5. Undermining Orthodox Judaism From Within

In contrast to the above mutants of Judaism which are self-proclaimed breakers and re-makers of
Torah, this segment deals with leaders and groups who claim (and are believed by many) to be
working for change within the parameters of Torah. While Jewish Renewal rabbis will identify
themselves as "post-denominational" or "flexidox", this group will unflinchingly say "orthodox
Jew". It takes patient probing to peel off the public image and the "kosher" teachings, revealing
where their inner loyalties lie.

[Separating the Baby from the Bathwater: Under these conditions, misjudgments are easy in
either direction: to mistake fifth columns for pillars of the community - or the opposite. The key
is to make a distinction between legitimate protest and covert sabotage. It's entirely proper to say
that Judaism can benefit from changes in ways permitted by Jewish law, and to point out the
many options which are not being utilized. It's also right and necessary to criticize areas of
Judaism which have deviated from Torah, with the intent of bringing Jewish practice more in
line with both the letter and spirit of the commandments. But it's quite another thing to say that
Judaism can benefit by "freeing itself" from the Torah.]

[Some orthodox factions view any criticism of today's orthodox Judaism as subversive - any
demand for change is a sinister plot, and any exposure of corrupt leadership is a betrayal. This
attitude ignores both the message of the entire Tenach (which obligates small and great to the
same standards of righteousness) and the historical development of Judaism itself (which has
periodically changed to reflect new situations and disagreements among the sages). In fact, I
submit that it is this orthodox refusal to clean house which has alienated so many Jews from the
Torah community, and has allowed NA to become so overpopulated with Jewish disciples.
Leaders who deny real sins in the orthodox world think they are protecting the reputation of
Torah Judaism, but they are actually harming it. Not only are they failing to deal with
malpractice of Torah which is to blame for those sins, but pretending that the community's
Torah-keeping is above reproach gives credibility to the NA claim that it is Torah itself which is
to blame for those sins. They are driving honest, disillusioned Jews into the arms of the NA
infiltrators named below, for example in dealing with the "orthodox feminist movement".
Perhaps some of the NA infiltrators themselves have embraced NA transformation in reaction to
the see-no-evil attitude of orthodox leadership. If so, they are Jews who can perhaps be brought
to repentance, but only after orthodox Judaism repents and stops excusing its own Torah-
breakers.]

Following are some influential leaders and organizations identifying with orthodox Judaism,
who are actually working for the "liberation" of Judaism from the confines of the Torah. [The
real tip-off is when the supposedly "kosher" names keep turning up in organizations
diametrically opposed to what orthodox Judaism stands for. Another tip-off is the recurrence of
well-known NA phrases repeated by ostensibly orthodox Jews. This throwing about of phrases is
a recognized method of "networking" and "code-signaling" among NA "change agents" who are
trying to avoid public detection while communicating with one another. If the collusion is
energetic and the pool of NA leaders is relatively small - the situation we have in the Jewish
community - it produces what I call the network effect: the same handful of names and phrases
keep turning up in an unexpected variety of places and contexts, signaling a covert connection.
Earlier, I showed how the network effect can be used to spot NA missionaries in the Jewish
community. The effect is even stronger in the smaller orthodox community.]
5a. Rabbi Irving ("Yitz") and Blu Greenberg: No other "change agents" can match the
credibility and influence attained in the orthodox community by this husband-wife team.
Between them are so many credentials, chairmanships, speaking tours and books that an entire
section could be devoted to them. [We'll have to settle for a small sample.]

The main thing worthy of the reader's attention is the strategy employed by both Greenbergs.
When speaking in the orthodox world, they themselves stick to statements which are sometimes
daring but always kept within boundaries acceptable to orthodoxy. As a result, they are viewed
as representing the orthodox community in many Jewish frameworks, including Bnai Brith, the
U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, Hadassah and various university courses on Judaism. For an
example of Blu's "kosher" statements, one can pick up one of her excellent books, _How to Run
a Jewish Household_, or read her statements as President of the Jewish Orthodox Feminist
Alliance. When speaking to a wider, more receptive audience, however, they hint at their agenda
but take care to use terminology which cannot be pinned down as subversive. In time-honored
NA fashion, they use ambiguous code words which are interpreted in different ways by initiated
and uninitiated listeners. Examples are seen in the context of "dialog" with the Buddhist leader,
the Dalai Lama. [This purposeful ambiguity used by many "change agents" is exemplified in the
NA universal prayer, "The Great Invocation".] Clearer hints of the Greenbergs' NA sympathies
are found in those leading the organizations they have founded and still help to steer - while the
well-groomed and charismatic personalities are publicly promoting NA teaching, Blu and Yitz
remain nearly invisible in a background supportive role.

[Watch for this methodology used by others, which is tremendously successful in preserving an
image of respected orthodox leadership. Don't just analyze their public pronouncements - check
the views of the editors whose magazines feature their articles, the philosophies of the
educational facilities inviting them to lecture, the beneficiaries of the fundraisers they attend,
whose Boards they serve on. If you find mutually exclusive identities being silently supported
by the same person, you can suspect either a NA infiltrator or someone about to be humiliated by
his/her own naivete. There are cases where a respected name in the community is recruited for
simple PR value, and he/she lends support based on a superficial review of an enterprise which
seems to have good references. Community leaders, please take personal responsibility to
check the affiliations and worldviews of a group before you let them use your good name. It is
no longer enough to know that some other reputable leader has endorsed them - for all you know,
your colleague may be totally relying on the endorsement which preceded his... and so on... back
to the "change agent" who benefits from all of you!]

The best evidence of the Greenbergs' true inner orientation is the ease with which they team up
with overt NA leaders and organizations: they seem to see no problem with teaching, writing and
otherwise working for the success of enterprises totally at variance with monotheism - not to
mention orthodox Judaism. Only on rare occasions are they found "slipping": personally
espousing views that would be considered heretical by the orthodox community. Such stray
quotes are not given wide coverage. An example is one of Blu's comments in the _Genesis_
PBS TV series, where like Arthur Waskow she "re-invents" Torah: for her, the Flood "story is
not about the accountability of human beings." Rather, "God was a perfectionist. In desperation,
God would rather destroy His creation than accept it as less than perfect." (The entire statement
is quoted with approval by an obscure Episcopalian vicar, but is not found at the _Genesis_
website where Blu's quotes on that episode are recorded.) Another example is her following
statement in a BBC radio interview which was apparently never transcribed.

5b. The "Orthodox Feminist" movement: BBC's World Service radio program, "Focus on
Faith" (Feb. 20, 1997), featured Blu Greenberg in an interview [this was the first time I heard of
her or her husband]. She was already known as a prolific writer, guest speaker and prominent
spokesperson for orthodox women, but she was identified here only as "the wife of an orthodox
rabbi" [which was all I knew about her when writing my original article, "Masters of the
Blinding Light"]. The topic was an upcoming International Conference on Feminism and
Orthodoxy, a forum on "women's equality in the context of Jewish law." Greenberg was
advocating wider participation in synagogue prayers, a greater teaching role and other modest
reforms. A minute later she was heard to say that because the Torah contains laws that "foster
male domination and portray a masculine God... it's time to ask if the Torah is divine after all."
[It's hard to imagine why someone who doubts this central pillar of orthodox Judaism would
remain in it, except to enlist support from those inside to remove the offending pillar.] As it
turned out, Greenberg's Feminist Conference itself drew more fire from the mainstream orthodox
community than her anti-Torah statement on the BBC. [Either that, or none heard that broadcast
except myself. Unfortunately, I was told by the BBC's Religious Programming Department that a
transcript was not available. After a survey of Greenberg's public statements, I have concluded
that this was a rare occurrence for her, and was possibly a comment to the reporter not even
meant for inclusion in the broadcast.]

A sampling of the Jewish press covering the Feminist Conference indicates that Jewish leaders
who sensed something was wrong did not dig deep enough to discover the NA roots.
Controversy remained at the surface, revolving around the various proposals tabled for female
community leadership (some halachically prohibited and some not). Even at that level, rebuttals
from the orthodox leadership were hasty, contradictory, and appeared to be less concerned with
Jewish women's needs than with justifying the status quo, right or wrong. [A condition I noted
earlier - perfect for the agenda of NA "change agents". I would suggest that NA missionaries
noted this achilles heel in orthodox Judaism years ago, and planned how to exploit the standard
defensive reaction which fears to acknowledge any shortcomings.] Through articles bearing
titles like "Seeking to Silence Women" (_The Jewish Week_, Mar. 7, 1997) and "Ban on
Women's Prayer Groups" (_Daily News Bulletin_, Feb. 5, 1997), the orthodox feminists were
portrayed as a second-class group challenging an inflexible power clique which is too threatened
to even implement reforms permitted by Jewish law. The Rabbinical Council of Queens made
matters even worse when they issued a hasty ruling only to change it a few months later, and
then justified the "mistake" of their earlier ruling by pleading ignorance concerning the
discontent among orthodox women: "We looked at this as a local issue. We never dreamt it
would be an international cause." ("Queens Rabbis Affirm Ban", _The Jewish Week_, Mar. 7,
1997)

Closer to the heart of the matter, haredi (ultra-orthodox) writer Levi Reisman ("Feminism - A
Force That Will Split Orthodoxy?", _The Jewish Observer_, May 1998, p.37) astutely
recognized the potential danger in this movement to erase vital Torah boundaries. Yet he gives
similarly mixed signals by trying to blacklist feminism across the board: denying any halachic
support for various proposals to expand female leadership, while dismissing each [non-existent]
halachic support as either a minority opinion, or a temporary endorsement later retracted, or just
irrelevant. But to his credit, Reisman notes that any orthodox traditions which tend to "diminish"
women are not in keeping with true halachah (Jewish law); he urges, "We need to communicate
this message not only to our women but to our men as well." He also agrees with the feminist
charge that minyanim (quorums for public prayer) are not easily available to women, and
criticizes women's sections in orthodox synagogues as "too often cramped, uncomfortable and
totally isolated". [I add to this my own discovery that some synagogues in Israel have no
women's section.] He cites with approval two haredi synagogues which responded to the
feminist challenge by prompting finding creative solutions for their own women. [If enough
orthodox leaders would follow suit, as well as crack down on abusive husbands and other Torah-
breakers in matters relating to women, the "orthodox feminist" cause would lose much of its
appeal for Torah-observant women.]

Having gotten the message that change was not forthcoming from the Torah sages, observant
Jewish women came flocking to Greenberg's call to initiate change themselves. The first
Feminist Conference expected 300-400 participants and were overwhelmed by over 1000; a year
later, Feb. 1998, the second Conference planned for 1400 and over 2000 women showed up.
Moreover, the original backing by a handful of orthodox leaders was supplemented the second
year by prominent names like Dr. Mandell Ganchrow (President of the Orthodox Union kashrut
authority), Rabbis Haskel Lookstein (Cong. Kehilath Jeshurun), Adam Mintz (Lincoln Square)
and Shlomo Riskin (Efrat, Israel). Their support seemed only to confirm Blu Greenberg's
comment, "We're part of the mainstream now." ("Orthodox Feminists Move From Fringes",
_JTA_, Feb. 17, 1998) The formation of a new "Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance" was a
direct result, and response has been strong and multi-national. So far, rabbinic leaders in the
opposition have failed to offer an alternative, and in some cases have further betrayed the trust
placed in them, compounding the dilemma for women who want to remain submitted to rabbinic
authority. A case in point is the open letter to haredi criminal Rabbi Aryeh Deri, written by
influential orthodox writer Naomi Ragen: "The noted rabbis who stood beside you at the prison
gates, blessing you and comparing you to [Biblical] Joseph, undermined any reason for women
to continue honoring a partriarchy whose male leadership behaves so disgracefully." ("Hiding
Behind the Torah", _Jerusalem Post_, Sep.8, 2000) [How sad that this writer, whose novels
always portray both the negative and the positive of haredi life, is so provoked by rabbinic
whitewashing of a convicted Torah-breaker that she plays right into feminist hands, actually
supporting the NA agenda to dismantle orthodox Judaism. How sad that no response was
published to answer her reasonable challenge. The NA missionaries win this round by default.]

In the midst of all the smoke and noise over whether women have adequate opportunity within
today's Orthodox Judaism to express their (feminine) Jewishness, nearly all of the community is
missing the more covert [and far more destructive] "orthodox feminist" agenda. Blu Greenberg
only hints at this larger program, commenting that the Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance "plans
to network with women from Judaism's other denominations", from whom she says "I learn a
tremendous amount." ("Successful Conference Spawns New Orthodox Feminist Alliance",
Jewish Telegraph Agency, Jul. 3, 1997) Blu does not elaborate on how she deals the goals of
those other Jewish feminists which are militantly hostile to orthodox Judaism. But the
organization founded and still guided by husband Yitz Greenberg, CLAL, promotes these anti-
Torah goals in their "Encore" archival collection. An example is "Feminism: Giving Birth to a
New Judaism", a 1981 essay published in the 1990s by CLAL and promoted in 2000 on their
website. In it, feminist Martha Ackelsberg shares a "new vision" of a "Judaism" purged from the
"patriarchal" and "sexist" language of "traditional Jewish liturgy" [Since nearly all traditional
Jewish liturgy quotes directly from the Torah, Prophets or Writings, the offensive Bible will have
to go also.] The "New Judaism" must reject "the image of God expressed in it [this liturgy, and
by extension, Torah] and the relationship between God and the people of Israel conveyed
through it" as similarly tainted. Ackelsberg emphasizes that a sexless translation of Hebrew
prayers will not suffice [certainly not for those who pray in Hebrew, where gender is
unmistakable...]; it will take nothing less than "new modes of religious expression which
incorporate the femaleness of God", and eventually "a liturgy which can address a genderless,
non-personal God." [Thus, the efforts of the Greenbergs combine to promote an "alliance" in
which Orthodox Jewish women are encouraged to "network with" and "learn from" visionaries
of a "new Judaism" that is neither new nor Judaism. Either Blu and Yitz are living light-years
apart spiritually and never noticed, or we have here a masterful smokescreen for NA infiltration
which has fooled thousands of earnest Torah-observant women - and a few good rabbis as well.
Even those who have challenged the orthodox feminist movement have failed to realize the true
nature of the threat they are confronting.]

Orthodox-Buddhist "dialog": Assuming that the participants and rabbinic backers of the
Orthodox Feminist Conferences are aware of the interfaith dialog which Blu and Yitz Greenberg
are maintaining with Tibetan Buddhist leaders, they may have accepted it as the Greenbergs
present it: mutual encouragement of two peoples dealing with exile. But the fact that the rest of
the dialog team is solidly in the JR (Jewish Renewal) camp reveals that the real agenda is that of
Zalman Schachter-Shlomi: to "renew" Judaism and make it "relevant" to modern society by
incorporating Buddhism into Jewish thought. The documentary film, "The Jew in the Lotus"
(written by Roger Kamenetz, directed by Laura Chiten, winner of the Outstanding Personal
Vision Award at the 1998 New England Film Festival), shows the Greenbergs standing with Reb
Zalman as "Jewish Renewal icons" (from a review at the San Francisco Jewish Film Festival,
July 7, 1998). Kamenetz also documents ("Partners in Exile", World Tibet Network News, Dec.
27, 1999) some of what Yitz Greenberg shared with the Dalai Lama when the Buddhist leader
asked for the secret of Jewish survival: "The reinvention of Judaism by the rabbis [who] changed
it from a temple-based cult to a religion of memory." This answer sums up the main rationale of
the JR movement for claiming the right to "reinvent" Judaism once again.

[But read that quote again. Whereas JR is known for discarding orthodoxy, Greenberg as an
ostensibly "orthodox" rabbi is presenting a version of rabbinic history which defies explanation.
The first flaw here is that the rabbinic prayers are not merely "in memory" of the Temple cult,
but explicitly look forward to a complete and literal reinstatement of Temple-based worship. The
second is that Judaism as a "religion of memory" was not a rabbinic "reinvention" but was
mandated as far back as Sinai - or at the Exodus if we consider the "memorial" of Passover.
More basic than either of these, the Torah states continually that it is G-d who is the secret of
Jewish survival - the only Reason why the Jews outlived those dark times when we not only
neglected our "religion of memory", but we made a religion out of trying to forget! How awful
that instead of the amazing truth, an inquiring non-Jewish religious leader received an answer
from an "orthodox rabbi" which cannot even stand up to the facts of basic Judaica, let alone
explain the mystery of Jewish longevity. But most relevant to our examination is the serious
question of Yitz Greenberg's right to call himself either "orthodox" or "rabbi".]

Another account of the same interfaith meeting presents an interesting contrast. Nathan Katz, a
dialog team member who kept a journal (briefly mentioned above) of this 1999 encounter,
expresses misgivings which one would expect from an orthodox Jew (he identifies himself only
as a "committed Jew"). Among the things that he challenges is the delegation's answer to the
Dalai Lama's question about Jewish survival (offered mainly by Greenberg, quoted above). Katz:
"One idea was being overlooked, I offered, the belief that G-d's providence ensured Jewish
survival." He writes that Schachter-Shalomi did not respond directly, except to mention a need
to answer "how" the Jews survived (origin) as well as "why" they did (purpose). [This non-
answer was apparently to pacify Katz rather than to enlighten the Buddhist leader, who never did
hear about G-d's role in Jewish survival. Nathan writes three days later: "Listening to the Dalai
Lama talk about us, one gets the impression that we Jews survived by an act of will."] Another
astute observation was the dilemma posed by the Dalai Lama's customary title, "Your Holiness",
which Katz feels can "imply that he is divinity, an idea which would compromise an observant
Jew." Katz, recognized as a "scholar of South Asian religions including Tibetan Buddhism", was
drawing on a well-informed background. He notes that a "discussion" of this issue took place,
but although he records the Greenbergs' apprehension over how to keep kashrut (dietary laws) in
such a venue, no worry on their part is mentioned over possibly idolatrous titles. Witnessing the
spectacle of orthodox Jewish intercourse with a foreign religion brought Katz to muse: "This sort
of dialog must raise issues of avodah zarah", a term meaning worship forbidden in the Torah -
although Katz only knows it as "a derogatory term meaning 'other people's worship'". Katz
knows that this is "something to be avoided by observant Jews. Is Tibetan Buddhism avodah
zarah, or is it another name of G-d?" This was properly a question for the Greenbergs to grapple
with, but apparently Katz was the only one troubled by the possibility. In fact, even Hinduism
posed no conflict for the "observant Jews" in the group; a Jew turned Hindu guru completed their
minyan (minimum quorum) for synagogue prayers.

The only real confrontation came over the great numbers of Jews leaving Judaism to join
Tibetan Buddhism. But again, the one who spoke up was not the orthodox rabbi or rebbetzin,
but the academic expert Katz. And, speaking "on behalf of us all", his complaint was not that
Jews were being compromised in their covenant with their own G-d, but that "we suffer from a
brain drain on a community level." It was the Dalai Lama who returned the issue to a spiritual
level, where it belonged. His response began with a recommendation for Judaism to imitate
Buddhism, but he ended with a challenge to basic Torah Judaism to prove itself: "If you have
these spiritual values [as we do], then there is no reason to fear; if you have no such values, then
there is no reason to hold on." In other words, if Judaism is spiritually satisfying, Jews should
feel no need to tack on pieces of another religion. If not, then it would be better just to abandon
Judaism for a more satisfying religion. Then, with keen insight into the fatal flaw of Jewish
Renewal, he added: "If you cannot provide spiritual satisfaction to others and at the same time
insist on holding on to them, then that is foolishness." If Judaism is not adequate as itself, all
attempts to "renew" it as a way to keep Jews at home will fail. Why hold people to something
that has failed them? Why not let them move on to pure Buddhism? [According to Bailey's spirit
guide, Buddhism is indeed scheduled to replace Judaism, and even become aggressive in
supplanting other religions.]
"CLAL - The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership": This organization was
founded by Yitz Greenberg in 1974, ostensibly to reach out to marginal Jews and bring them into
a Jewish framework. In reality, CLAL is busy doing the opposite: breaking down the historical
Jewish framework in order to include the NA spirituality which the marginal Jews have
accepted. The key question would be: Is CLAL engaged in naive compromise to appeal to all
tastes, or deliberate efforts to undermine traditional Judaism? We have a pointed answer from
CLAL, set apart in its own paragraph for added emphasis: "Transformation has always been
integral to CLAL's mission." (CLAL Update, Fall 1997) [Watch as we run into some of the most
popular "blinds", or code words used in NA. By repeating terms like "transformation", "higher
wisdom", "new era" and "new paradigm" - terms foreign to Jewish thought but basic to NA
teaching - the "change agents" are signaling their presence to other like-minded colleagues. The
unitiated, meanwhile, take the phrases at face value and translate them based on their own
definitions.] The CLAL faculty affirms that "the Eternal Torah means not the 'Never Changing
Torah', but rather the 'Eternal, Never-Stopping Revelation'... a Higher Wisdom, an Ultimate
Wisdom, is 'out there,' like the radio waves that fill the cosmos. We only need to 'tune in'."
(Rabbi Natan Margalit, "New Paradigms for Revelation", CLAL Spotlight, July 1998)
[Orthodox Jews will to be shocked to hear that the Torah entrusted to us at Sinai is in perpetual
flux, and that G-d is composed of impersonal, unfeeling waves of energy floating "out in the
cosmos". But New Agers will nod in agreement.] Yitz Greenberg handed the reins of CLAL to
his disciple Irwin Kula in 1997, but he continues his mission of "mentoring emerging rabbinic
leaders in our CLAL Fellowship Program." (Update)

The current President of CLAL, Rabbi Irwin Kula, is proud to acknowledge Rabbi Greenberg as
his mentor. Kula, described in the 1997 CLAL Update as a talented speaker who "dazzled" his
audience, is firmly in support of Jews who are "redefining Judaism", because "the 'journey' into
the future has 'different roadmaps' for different Jews." (interview with Jewish Telegraph Agency,
"Focus on Issues", Nov. 18, 1997) In a definitive article called "Jewishness in a New Era:
Continuity, Discontinuity or Transformation?", Kula dismisses community worries about a crisis
of lost Jewish identity; what Jewish leaders take for assimilation is merely "normalization of the
Jewish condition". Today's Jews, he says, have merely switched their "modes of expression":
from the "institutions and practices created in another era" to a shedding of "boundary-
maintaining Jewish behaviors" which no longer make sense. Not that Jews have "become like
everyone else", but they are finding "new forms that are appropriate to their full and equal
participation in a broader human community." And what are CLAL's red lines in the "re-
imagining of Jewishness"? There are none - not from Torah or even from CLAL itself: "The
assumption that any one of us knows exactly what it is that needs to be preserved from the past
becomes problematic. A new context inevitably will demand far-reaching changes in the very
nature of Jewishness." How far-reaching? As far as creating "new kinds of Jewish community
that are more attuned to the era in which we live." In a nutshell, whatever practice or principle in
Judaism is "too circumscribed for this new era in Jewish history", we are free to trash if we want
- actually, the new era "will demand" it.

Like Yitz Greenberg, for justification Kula points to the rabbinic cancellation of animal
sacrifices after the Temple's destruction. He smoothly draws the parallel: the forced
abandonment of that practice due to calamity is just like today's wholesale abandonment of the
4000-year Jewish framework for its being "less attuned" to our age. [More amazing, here is a
"rabbi", trained by another "orthodox rabbi", who thinks that Rabbinic Judaism left behind both
the Temple sacrifice and "the belief in its continued importance". Can it be that Greenberg never
taught Kula the many rabbinic prayers which anticipate the restoration of the Temple sacrifice?
But since Kula insists on this parallel, let him follow it. We should now expect CLAL to
compose Tisha-Be'Av-style kinot for this new and wider abandonment they are witnessing, so
much like the abandonment of the Temple.] As a preview of what Kula's ideal of "Jewishness in
a New Era" might look like, we can consider that in this 3-page article, there is not a single
occurrence of the words "Torah", "covenant", "commandments", or any reference to the G-d of
Israel in any form.

Elsewhere, CLAL shows scant respect for Torah-keeping Jews, as well as an evasion of their
challenges. A commentary by Andrew Silow-Carroll, spotlighted by CLAL from among "the
latest thoughts and reflections by CLAL faculty and associates", quotes Orthodox writer David
Klinghoffer who asks why anyone would embrace Jewish religion if they don't believe it is from
a Divine Source. Rather than grappling with the question or offering an alternate religious
anchor, Silow-Carroll simply rejects Klinghoffer for his "dismissal of the various ways some 83
percent of North American Jews live their Jewish lives," implying that the question of whether
Jewish religion can survive without a divinely ordained Torah, or any other objective "Truth", is
unworthy of a response. Then, as if to deny the possibility of "Jewish lives" without Jewish
religion (a reality which Klinghoffer apparently recognizes), Silow-Carroll claims that secular
Jews practice a religion of their own. He offers a list of "seemingly secular behaviors" which he
knows a Torah-based Jew will call "substitutes for Judaism" but which he prefers to call a "re-
invention" of Judaism. Included in this list of "religious" activities: discussing common (Jewish)
acquaintances, eating lox and pastrami, scanning news reports for "Jewish" names, and idolizing
the Jewish comedians, lawyers and professional wrestlers. Jewish doctors are to be "our modern
priesthood". [One teeny problem. After discarding traditional Judaism, he fails to "re-invent" a
way to identify "Jewish" habits and heroes, leaving us to fall back on circular reasoning: they are
"Jewish" if we decide that they are.] Silow-Carroll sees these behaviors as a more than adequate
replacement for the Sinai Covenant. Well, almost... his list of "secular behaviors" also includes
suspiciously traditional-sounding activities: Bible classes, eating matza on Passover, Shabbat
celebrations, wearing kippot, and even engaging in "Midrash, creative retelling of classic Jewish
texts" - in short, many of the same behaviors practiced by Klinghoffer's narrow-minded
community and so resented by Silow-Carroll.

How influential is CLAL? Most of CLAL's faculty members are simultaneously teaching at
other institutions (both overtly NA and conventionally Jewish), and/or leading one or more
congregations/study centers, and/or publishing and lecturing, which greatly amplifies the scope
of this one organization's influence.

6. New Age Missionaries in Israel

As a stronghold of Jewish identity, Zionist nationalism and monotheism, Israelis must be viewed
by NA change-agents as totally hopeless, and we would assume that our tiny homeland would be
avoided by NA teachers looking for disciples. On the contrary. Israel has become something of
a plum pie, where NA cults are jostling one another for bigger shares. And it has proven to be
easy pickings, as long as no one mistakes them for Christian missionaries. While Christians
would be deported for the tricks these NA zealots use, the latter enjoy apparent immunity here
and lavish support from abroad. They have unobstructed access to Israeli Jews (even among the
orthodox and children) to openly teach various brands of paganism -- often charging top price for
it. Some of these neo-pagans will even castigate the Jews for rejecting Jesus Christ. Meanwhile,
the guardians of Jewish identity in Israel do nothing.

6a. Our Dangerous Double Standard: Following are two examples.

A magazine for religious Israeli youth (Otiot, Aug. 8, 1997) accepted a full-color, full-page ad
for an animated movie based on famous tales of a man who did exploits as the "son of God".
Produced in the U.S., was voice-dubbed in Hebrew [just for Israeli kids] and was shown all over
Israel. The movie was advertised and screened for almost the entire year. If it had featured Jesus
Christ, the country would have erupted with protests; but the star was "only" Hercules. [Now
stop and ponder why the god-man revered by Constantine and the Christians is a dangerous
threat, while the god-man revered by Antiochus and the Hellenists is only an amusing fairy tale.
The Maccabeans, who gave their lives to resist Hellenism, must have turned in their graves.
Score one easy success for New Age indoctrination, thanks to our double standard.] We should
note that Hercules is not a fairy tale in NA thought, but a sun-deity from the Grail legends (_The
Occult and the Third Reich_, Jean & Michel Angebert,, p.263 note 7) and respected "ascended
master" to whom one can pray for enlightenment. Blavatsky not only identified Hercules as a
sun-god, but also as an image of Satan. (_Doctrine_ II, p.237, note) [After that great movie,
Israeli kids will certainly remember the name of Hercules with affection as they grow.]

A group of sweet-faced, modestly dressed girls filed into a large Tel Aviv company several years
ago. They went from desk to desk offering books for sale. Most workers glanced at them
curiously, thinking they were an orthodox group, and returned to their work. Some bought
books. Only one worker noticed the Krishna picture inside the book. He approached some of
the girls and asked where they were from; they smiled without answering and glided away from
him, continuing their activity. When he alerted his nearest colleague, an orthodox Jew who had
just bought a book, she looked at him blankly. The "Jews for Krishna" left the building at their
leisure, without being challenged, and with more funding for their next missionizing campaign.
This happened the same week that a mass-mailed Christian tract "HaShalom" was being
zealously gathered by orthodox community leaders for burning. (Source: my husband, the one
who recognized the Krishna photo)

Lesson to be learned? Israel has become an oasis for NA cults because of the one-track
mentality in dealing with missionary activity. The word has gotten around the Aquarian
network.

Following are only a few NA mission-minded groups currently enjoying freedom in Israel,
while teaching Jews (including children) doctrines which are idolatrous, racist, anti-Torah,
and/or just plain fraudulent.

6b. New Acropolis: Haifa and Tel Aviv.

This philosophical society is better known in Europe and South America than in North America.
A movement founded in 1957 by Argentinian-born Italian Blavatsky disciple Jorge Agel
Livraga, it is today headquartered in Brussels with thriving branches in Spain, Turkey, Italy,
France, Brazil, Chile... and Israel. [If you click on the Israel site, be sure to look at their "pictures
of... activities in Israel", one of which shows off their new Hebrew book promoting Helena
Blavatsky.] NAer Bernardino del Boca, considered by some to be the founder of the New Age
movement in Italy, once called it "one of the great hopes of the Aquarian Age." (quote supplied
by a European watchdog group which requests anonymity) "New Acropolis" presents itself as an
intellectual anti-racist club at the beginner level, but as disciples advance the lessons become
more militaristic and mystical, a blend of Fascist romanticism which was emulated by the SS of
the Third Reich. In Spain, a flyer authored in the 1970s by the New Acropolis leader in Turkey is
entitled [translated from Spanish]: "For Madmen Only: The Virtues of the New Man", followed
by a quote from Adolf Hitler and comments in defense of his vision for the New Humanity.
According to Dutch researcher Michiel Louter, New Acropolis is considered by authorities in
France, Belgium, Italy and Germany to be a dangerous cult working to undermine democracy.
[More accurately, New Acropolis wants to return "democracy" to its original "purity". Students
of Plato will remember that the classical Greek concept of a "utopian Republic" is a democracy
ruled by an elite citizenry, which regularly weeds out weak or unproductive members, and
honors the practice of homosexuality, pedophilia, eugenics, euthanasia and infanticide. The
unrecognized fact is that the values of "democracy" so sought after in today's society -
compassion for the weak, an impartial justice system and the equality of all men before a
Supreme Being - are in reality derived from the Torah and were despised by the original
"democrats" as intolerable weakness.]

According to two former Acropolis members [names withheld], the supreme source of their
philosophy is "the Masters of Wisdom", who they believe were the architects of the Third Reich;
Hitler's failure was due to his disobedience to "his Masters". High-ranking members are taught
that the "Manu" [who Bailey identifies with Sanat Kumara] will aid them in destroying
undesirable races. [One ex-member commented that he couldn't make sense of this kind of talk,
but for my readers who have persevered this far these references will need no explanation.]
They also report that special areas of the Acropolis schools had Nazi literature available, among
them _Mein Kampf_ and _Mythus des 20. Jahrhunderts_ (The Myth of the Twentieth
Century_). Other required reading for the Inner Circle is Miguel Serrano's _Adolf Hitler, el
Ultimo Avatar_ which presents Hitler as a sun god. [Compare this with Savitri Devi's Hindu
version of the same.] Higher-ranking members are taught the Nazi salute, as evidenced in the
members-only magazine for the "New Acropolis Security Forces" [sic].

New Acropolis is not a newcomer to Israel; the group has been free to attract Israelis to its ranks
for more than a decade. One former leader reports that the New Acropolis International
Conference held in Rome in 1990 included Israelis, all of them dressed in black shirts and
saluting an imperial Roman eagle, legionnaire style. Courses are regularly held in Israel on "The
Key to Inner Wisdom" (all in Hebrew). The "Eastern Wisdom" category is Hinduism, Buddhism
and Tibetan Buddhism; "Western Wisdom" is largely Greek Platonic and Stoic philosophy.
"History" combines Greek, Roman, Egyptian and Hindu thought. Only in "Sources of Wisdom"
does one find a brief pass at Judaism via Kabbalah, in the company of Greek mythology and
New Age principles.

6c. The Theosophical Society: Tel Aviv.

That Helena Blavatsky has an Israeli following is remarkable, not only because of her antisemitic
writings, but also because of her vast ignorance of Jewish history: "The name YHVH was
unknown to Moses or any Jew before David. Neither David nor Solomon recognized the Law of
Moses; they built temples [sic] along the lines of Venus worship... The Hebrew Bible exists no
more. There is much dishonesty surrounding even the writing of the Septuagint (the original
Tenach, from which all Hebrew copies are made); yet people persist in talking of the ancient
Hebrew as if one man alive knows one word of it!.... Scholars do not carry the now-known
Hebrew letters beyond the 4th century AD." (from a collection of quotes sent to me by a NA
acquaintance, unreferenced) [Madame HPB could be forgiven for her 19th-century ignorance,
but what possesses modern Israelis to accept her as a teacher of wisdom? And what kind of
wisdom did her spirit Guides display here?]

6d. Association for Jewish Renewal: Kibbutz Lotan, Sinai (temporarily).

Over the last two years or more, JR leaders have been fostering a nascent community of Israelis,
with direct involvement by American JR Rabbi Shefa Gold and local leader Yoram Getzler.
Devotees include mostly Israeli seekers just back from India, who gather for spiritual encounters
in the desert. A band called "Sheva" plays trance music from India and Sufi tradition. (See "The
New Believers", _The Jerusalem Report_, Apr.2, 1998)

Other Jewish Renewal activity is not official or centralized, but consists mostly of seminars
offered by visiting JR teachers from the States. [For an overview of JR beliefs and activities, see
the entry above.] The most obvious involvement is through the large number of Elat Chayyim
teachers who conduct seminars in Israel on a regular basis: Moshe Budmor, Lynn Gottlieb, Blu
and Yitz Greenberg, Eve Ilsen, Carol Kestler, Leah Novick, Gershon Winkler. A few Elat
Chayyim faculty are based in Israel: David Friedman (Tsefat), Mordechai Gafni (unspecified),
Menachem Kallus (Jerusalem), David Zeller (Jerusalem). Only Zeller has his own organization,
"Yakar", which he describes (in a personal letter to me) as "orthodox renewal, still within the
bounds of halacha with the most liberal and loving applications". He matches the Blu Greenberg
strategy in this self-definition as well as his associations. While he prefers to identify with
Shlomo Carlebach, Zeller expresses an affinity for Schachter-Shalomi's teaching.

6e. Waldorf schools/Anthroposophy: Jerusalem.

There are 600 Waldorf schools in 32 different countries, including Israel. All are dedicated to
teaching the philosophies of Rudolf Steiner, a German occultist who joined the Theosophical
Society and then broke away to form a rival "spiritual science" which he named
"Anthroposophy". In the U.S., a supervisory association monitors all 125 American Waldorf
schools to ensure that they all "stay true to the teachings of Steiner." His worldview (received
through channeling) is a blend of theosophy, gnosticism, holistic earth-worship, and racism.

Concerning the last, Waldorf schools include the study of "racial ethnography", where children
learn from Steiner that the Nordic and Aryan races are the "best section of mankind... skillful and
intelligent," while dark-skinned races have large bodies and small, underdeveloped souls and
"are all stupid". ("Special Ed?" _The Daily Northwestern_, Oct.17, 1997) Black Africans "have
the peculiarity to suck off light and warmth from spaces around them" which causes their skin to
turn black from the heat. All that absorbed energy results in the "fact" that "the negro has strong
urges... as if he is boiled up from the sun itself..." (translated for me by German researcher
Robert Jesolowitz from a 1923 Steiner speech in Dornau, Switzerland) During this course,
children at the Waldorf school in Evanston, Illinois practice drawing blond children walking in
bright sunlight; black children ("moon people") walk in the weak light of the moon, and black
souls are drawn as babies. ("Special Ed") Steiner opposed interracial marriage, since "mixing of
blood causes the force of clear vision to die" in the higher species of humanity. (translated from
German by Swedish researcher Fredrik Bendz, unreferenced)

Waldorf schools are coming under attack in the U.S., Holland and Germany for their racist and
occultic orientation, as well as for deception concerning their religious nature. (See "Are Waldorf
Schools 'Non-Sectarian'?", _Free Inquiry_, Spring 1994) Waldorf schools are also haunted by
more than a little superstition: modern technology is so evil that pupils may not visit science
museums, and computers are an "incarnation of the evil spirit Ahriman". (David B. Black, _The
Computer and the Incarnation of Ahriman_, p.35) This evil deity has its origins in
Zoroastrianism, an esoteric religion dating from the 6th c. BCE which is enjoying a comeback in
NA circles. [One could make a case for Steiner adopting more than just Ahriman from that
ancient Persian religion; Zoroaster was also decidedly hostile to the G-d of the Torah - see the
Nazism section for details, and for the common ground between Theosophy and Nazism.]

Concerning the Jewish people in particular, Anthroposophists in Germany quote Steiner in

singling out the Jews as the group most clearly demonstrating the undesirable
"Gruppenseelenhafte" or "Group Soul Qualities" (Steiner disciple Irene Diet in _Das
Goetheanum_, Nr.20, May 17, 1998) A broadcast by the German news program "Report Mainz"
(Feb. 28, 2000) revealed that antisemitic and racist teachings are widely promoted in today's
Waldorf schools, to which the President of the Zentralrat (Central Council of Jews in Germany),
Paul Spiegel, replied: "I have been receiving [such reports] for the past one and a half years," and
added that until now parents were afraid to identify themselves. The information which left
Spiegel "shocked" is currently being documented. ("Wortwechsel", Germany's
Swedwestfernsehen, Mar. 19, 2000)

A Waldorf school in Jerusalem also got some bad press when it briefly came under attack a few
years ago. But judging from media reports, the only issue investigated was whether it was a
Christian mission, after which it was "cleared" to carry on its activities without interference. A
Waldorf kindergarten in Jerusalem, "Gan HaShemesh", also received mixed reviews in a
_Jerusalem Post_ article on parenting (June 16, 1999), mainly for its "stress on the magical" and
its diet of violent fairy tales, but no mention was made of the international controversy raging
over the Waldorf curriculum.

6f. Kibbutz Harduf: near Shfaram.

Another brainchild of Steiner was "biodynamic farming" (not to be confused with ecological
techniques), which resembles farming methods of Findhorn, the famous New Age mecca in
northern Scotland. For biodynamic farmers, the earth is an organism which breathes twice a day
and has a spiritually alive soil. To nurture it, different homeopathic concoctions are applied to
transfer the "astral forces" of the ingredients to the crops. Or, if something more potent is
preferred, Steiner advises old-fashioned witchcraft: "You catch a fairly young field mouse and
flay it... We take the skin, when Venus stands in the sign of Scorpio, and burn the skin... Now
take the ash which results and sprinkle it out on the fields." (translated by Bendz)
Israel is one of the few countries which hosts a community completely run by Steiner's
philosophies. Kibbutz Harduf, producer of health foods and host to Steiner seminars, has been a
member of the United Kibbutz Movement since 1985. Members embrace Steiner's teachings
without reservation, and see themselves as offering "a better alternative to the hazara b'teshuva
[return to Torah Judaism] movement." (_Jerusalem Post_, Aug. 1, 1986) Accordingly, their
vegetarian restaurant does double-duty, generating income and serving as a front to "to spread
the word" of Steiner's gospel. The _Jerusalem Post Magazine_ gave two positive (if perplexed)
critiques of Harduf ("Community of Spirit", Aug. 1, 1986; "In Steiner's Footsteps", Nov. 19,
1999). Anthroposophy was presented as a legitimate alternate Jewish lifestyle, referring to
Steiner's teaching with a superficial rosiness that gave no real information.

6g. Scientology: Tel Aviv.

One of Steiner's early occultic colleagues, L. Ron Hubbard, started his own cult of "dianetics",
which teaches that all human misery was caused by the space-tyrant Xenu, who transported
people to Earth 75 million years ago, dropped them into volcanoes and exploded hydrogen
bombs on them. Hubbard identified himself as the new Maitreya (competing with Theosophy's
choice at that time, Krishnamurti), chosen by the "ascended masters" to bring mankind the
solution. [For a full treatment, see "Pseudo-Buddhism in the Form of Scientology", Dialog
Center International, Denmark.] This spiritual solution (which can set you back as much as
$50,000 a year) developed into the "Church" of Scientology, now a multi-million-dollar global
enterprise known for ruthless exploitation and intimidation, especially by lawsuit. The Church's
"fair game law" targets any critics who becomes a threat as fair game, at which point every
method, legal or otherwise, is used to destroy them. _Time Magazine_ labeled Scientology "the
cult of greed," and Cynthia Kisser, former Director of the Cult Awareness Network (CAN),
called it "the most ruthless, the most classically terroristic... lucrative cult the country [U.S.] has
ever seen." Kisser should know; she experienced their tactics first-hand when Scientology,
through a string of bogus but financially draining lawsuits, forced CAN into bankruptcy in 1996
-- and then in late 1997 bought the organization (rights to the name, logo, and case files,
including those against Scientology!). All CAN staff have been replaced with Scientology
church members. (For the whole story, see the transcript of the "60 Minutes" production with
Leslie Stahl, Dec.28, 1997) [It is not known how this affects the CAN office which is said to be
located in Israel. I have not been able to locate them.]

Reactions outside the U.S. to Scientology? The Supreme Court of Victoria, Australia, after
hearing evidence against this group, had strong words: "Scientology is evil; its techniques are
evil; its practice is a serious threat to the community, medically, morally and socially." (Justice
Anderson) Germany's courts are currently examining several charges against Scientology
involving human rights abuse and anti-democratic activities (and Germany is also suffering from
the church's "fair game law" - in a well-funded publicity blitz, Scientology has likened the
government's investigation to Hitler's persecution of the Jews). Some societies will never need
to react to Hubbard's mega-church, like black Africa and China, due to his opinion that Zulus
belong in a "madhouse," and that "the trouble with China is, there are too many Chinks there,"
and similar assessments on India, South Africa, Arabs, American blacks, and "yellow and brown
people" in general.
What about Israel? Scientology is alive and well, free to run its "College of Dianetics" at 12
Shonzino St., Tel Aviv. Scientologists regularly accost people in Israel's business district with
literature in several languages, pressuring them to take their "personality test," the first step to
draw seekers into the long, expensive process of "recovering" from the ancient cosmic disaster.

6h. Transcendental Meditation: Hararit, central Galilee.

The Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, founder of TM, is a charismatic guru who manages to convince
initiates that he promotes a non-religious "technique", despite the fact that the mantras are names
of Hindu deities and the puja (initiation ceremony) is a hymn to at least 20 Hindu gods. [See
"The Steps of Initiation into Transcendental Meditation", a transcription of the standard puja, the
exact wording of which must be perfectly memorized by TM teachers. Then go to to the line,
"Teacher performs puja" and check out the translation provided to see the list of deities.] In
1977, U.S. courts finally caught on and ruled that TM was a religion, which removed from it the
legal right to be taught in public schools there. Germany's High Court in 1989 ruled that TM is
neither religion nor science, but a destructive cult. In India, the Maharishi's huge NOIDA
ashram was plagued by scandal when workers went on a 3-month strike, protesting malnutrition,
unsanitary conditions and neglect which resulted in the deaths of several ashram children. The
TM leader resolved that unpleasantness by closing the ashram for "a vacation", firing or
transferring all 200 teachers, and turning the children loose to find their way home across India
(some of whom never made it). [See the testimony of Indian physician Govind Sharma.]

The Maharishi's "technique" nevertheless continues to generate millions of dollars for his
organization, with Israelis being the largest national group among his trainees. Journalist Esther
Hecht notes that the Israeli TM disciples, including educated professional people, treat their guru
much the same as Habad devotees treat their Rebbe Shneerson: having his picture in every room
and on every publication, and invoking his name repeatedly in everyday conversation. ("Peace of
Mind", _Jerusalem Post_, Jan.23, 1998. Also source of other details in this paragraph.) As of
1997, "His Holiness" had hoped to exit Holland (which was pressuring him to take his
"dangerous activity" elsewhere) and relocate personally to Israel, setting up court at his pilot TM
village of Hararit. To date he has not done so [perhaps the Interior Ministry is being stubborn
about proof of Jewishness...] At that time Hararit had a long-term plan to also absorb 7000
sidhis (advanced meditators) to effect cosmic changes and help usher in the "dawn of the Age of
Enlightenment". This plan was blocked by the Israeli watchdog group, "Forum Against Cults".
However, the TMers did manage to form a new kibbutz, "Yahad", and an Ayurveda (TM-based
medical) clinic.

6i. The Kabbalah Centre: Jerusalem, Haifa, Tel Aviv.

Philip Berg's black-kippahed, fast-talking salesmen make the rounds door to door on a regular
basis, trying to sell the Zohar to religious and secular, Jews and non-Jews, housewives and teens,
promising instant spiritual profit (and collecting healthy profits of the more worldly kind). [See
the main entry above for more details.]

As is clear in this handful of examples, NA missionaries to the Israelis are equally comfortable in
Eastern garb, Western business suits, or kippah and tsitsit. The fact that they have found easy
entry into Israeli society, in spite of other countries rejecting them, indicates either high
sophistication on their part or astonishing naivete on the part of Israel (or both). [But what their
success really shows is the persistent spiritual hunger among Israelis, who are grabbing at every
new spiritual fad that drifts by, one after another. Why do they fall for them - manipulative
mystical con games, deceptions that promise enhanced Jewishness while systematically
destroying every reason for being Jewish? That which sustained the Jewish people for thousands
of years, and has seen us through every attempt to erase us, is still available. But many Israelis -
out of disappointment, anger, or ignorance - have given up on Torah and gone on a restless
search for a substitute for Jewish faith in the Jewish G-d. Yet the reason they keep switching
"spiritual paths" is that they will never really be satisfied with anything less than that for which
they were created. This constitutes both a challenge and a hope for our future.]

6j. Israeli Media and Entertainment

None of this takes into account the daily indoctrination coming through the myriad "healers" and
channelers offering peace and enlightenment on the streets of Israel, who receive mostly positive
publicity in local papers. And we have yet to mention the government-sponsored Israeli TV,
especially children's entertainment. A casual sampling of Israel's "educational network" will
show a steady diet of heroes who rely on psychic powers, alien helpers, personal transformations
(symbolized in physical changes) and even actual pagan deities. From "Digimon" to Disney,
from "X-Men" to "X-Files", in 10-minute cartoons and full feature movies, in fantasy plots and
real life plots, NA religion is being aimed at Israeli children aged 1 to 18. These programs are
usually dubbed in Hebrew, and appear most often during the hours when working parents are
away from the home. The same thing can be said for the movie and home video offerings, after-
school activities, computer games and bestselling Hebrew books, and even acquisitions at the
public library. [Imagine the predictable Israeli reaction if Christian missionaries were to target
Jewish children using any one of these methods, and we see how well NA has done its work -
Israeli kids sit in front of the TV cheering for spirit-guide heroes, devour library books full of
pagan mythology in Hebrew, or trot off to yoga classes where they bow to Indian deities, and no
one notices.]

7. The Goal of Converting the Jews to NA Thinking

All these tremendous efforts to bring both secular and traditional Jews, diaspora and Israeli Jews
alike, over to NA doctrine have but one goal, judging by NA sources. It is not in order to
"liberate" Jews from their identity so as to receive them into the spiritual family of Man
[although that would be bad enough]. As we have seen, the Jews as a group are flatly considered
unsuitable material for the New Age. The goal of converting Jews is to make them voluntarily
accept the "cleansing action" which is to remove them from this "physical plane of existence".
[See the end result of "right human relations" in the "Views on Jews" section.]

In accordance with Alice Bailey's analysis on the Holocaust, other NA spokesmen continue to
preach that the Jews always bring on their own suffering. In other contexts (such as Christian
denunciation of the 'Christ-killers') this is highly offensive to any Jew. But after accepting the
twin NA concepts of reincarnation and some form of "karma" [such as "tikkun", a Kabbalistic
doctrine which only differs from standard karma in teaching that G-d rather than a cosmic force
sends a Jew into multiple lives to repair mistakes or cosmic imbalance], it will begin to sound
logical that if Jews are being repeatedly singled out for suffering and untimely death, they as a
group must indeed owe some collective karmic debt. The NAers are confident that Jews who
accept the karmic view of suffering will also accept the karmic requirement of passive
submission to whatever befalls themselves and their loved ones - especially if appropriate spirits
of their "luminaries" [the ranking system for advanced practitioners of Kabbalah, corresponding
to the NA ranking of their "Iluminati" or "enlightened ones"] appear to them with promises of a
favorable future life as a reward for voluntary submission. Such visitations will be credited by
NA teachers to the activity of Maitreya - his merciful contribution to help ease the passage of the
Jewish race from this dimension.

7a. A NA-Manufactured Messiah

For those who cling tightly to Torah-from-Sinai Judaism, even "Messiah" is scheduled to appear,
to command them to obey Maitreya whom he also serves. Leading occultist Peter LeMesurier, in
his book _The Armaggedon Script_, outlines the "script" for a simulated arrival of the Jewish
Messiah (p.231-233) tailored for Jewish acceptance. He is to arrive in Israel incognito, and
devote himself to studying everything expected of the Messiah: Tenach prophecies, Dead Sea
Scrolls, current Jewish expectations, prophecies from other religions. He must then harness the
science of earthquake prediction to show up on the Mount of Olives during an earthquake. He
will proceed to Jerusalem from the east, accompanied by a procession in shining white, enter the
tomb of King David, and come out miraculously dressed in perfumed royal robes, as David
reincarnated. His ascension to the Temple Mount to be crowned King of Israel will be a matter of
course, given his popular support. What about resistance from suspicious Jews and/or
Christians? "The massed forces of the Old Age, however, will be unable to check their headlong
onrush. In large measure they will go on to destroy each other in a massive, mutual venting of
long pent-up aggression." (p.237) [This confident assumption shows awareness of the NA plan to
keep Jews and Christians mistrustful of each other. Or perhaps it refers to the ongoing conflict
between Jews and Moslems, which more accurately displays a seemingly unstoppable
"aggression"; that rift also serves the Plan.] Meanwhile, this messiah will go on to lead the
"youth of the world" in "spreading the already developing ideas and values upon which the New
Age is to be founded.... It is for the soul of man that the New David will have to fight."

Was LeMesurier's "script", written in 1982, taken seriously by anyone? Major publishers in the
U.S. and England snapped the book up, as well as a British book club which made it a featured
selection. A group of 125 prominent Carl Jung disciples met the following year to discuss the
plan's feasibility - from a Jungian viewpoint, acting out the "messiah myth" might help release
humanity's "collective unconscious" from its long fixation on the "apocalypse idea" which is
holding back spiritual enlightenment. Among the attendees were Dr. Robert Jay Lifton of Yale,
leading Jungian scholar James Hillman and Wolfgang Giegerich of the Jung Institute in Stuttgart.
(See _New Age Journal_ Sep. 1983, cited by attorney Constance Cumbey, _A Planned
Deception_, p.11)

This nod to ancient Jewish tradition is considered a final strategy to wean the Jews away from
the religion of their forefathers. In view of all the NA missionary efforts directed at Jews, the
preferred scenario is that before leaving the scene, the Jews would first put their G-d to death by
admitting that their faith and its Object are flawed, outdated, unsatisfying, incapable of real life
without injections of pantheist spirituality, or even a total fiction. As Bailey wrote (_A Treatise
on Cosmic Fire_ IID, p.948), the "Law of Karma" dictates that the "gigantic thought form", the
G-d which the Jews were responsible for introducing to the world, "has to be dissipated by those
[humans] who have created it." A Jewish effort to terminate their own G-d would mean a more
complete payment of karma as far as NA is concerned. As far as the priorities of the Hierarchy
are concerned, it would mean a final victory in their "Spiritual War", which is actually more
against the "Dark Force" behind the Jews than against the Jews themselves.

But the Hierarchy has expressed fear of telling their disciples too much about that "Force", which
gives us a hint that - even after all the investment and boasting - the outcome of this War is not
really under their control.
J. What to Do: A Jewish Response

To date I have not seen a single Jewish response to the threat which the New Age Plan poses to
our people, not to mention the rest of mankind. I have no idea why.

Truth be told, I feel like David might have felt watching Goliath taunt "the armies of the living
G-d" with no one to answer the challenge. More accurately, I'm blown away with the realization
that hardly anyone has even noticed that there's a Goliath standing there.

I realize that some Jews are going to squirm uneasily at my personal response. Some will accuse
me of "preaching", as though prophetic-style warnings and urgings were the sole domain of
evangelical Christians. Whose prophets are they, anyway? Some will say it is not a "Jewish"
response because it is too "spiritual". To these, I can only suggest that we listen carefully to the
New Agers, who may see our weaknesses better than we do: Alice Bailey always said that the
Jews tend to deal with a spiritual problem on a rationalistic, material level. And we do. Throw
money at it, convene a conference, set up committees, file the reports. Maybe even launch an
educational program. But meanwhile the real battlefield, which begins and ends in the individual
spirit, remains abandoned to our sworn cosmic enemies... to their smug delight.

It wasn't always that way with the Jewish people. Our own Book is filled with stories of battles
waged by Jews who knew how to fight on the ground and in the spirit as well. Our most
celebrated king, David son of Jesse, did not hesitate to combine the two strategies, a discipline
which he learned long before his ascension to the throne. To his dying day, he attributed his
success to a relationship with that same Entity who is so hated by our New Age adversaries.
There were prophets too, whose bold words and acts of faith we all look upon as some kind of
inheritance, whether we believe them or not. But today's Jews who take those Bible stories as
historical fact, who relate to its advice and promises like money in the bank, are considered a bit
out of touch by their more "rational" brethren.

Well, as humbling as it may be, a realistic grasp on life - particularly Jewish or Israeli life -
requires acknowledging that some of what we Jews experience supersedes rational
comprehension. The presence of an identifiable Jewish people, through 4000 years and repeated
attempts at annihilation, is itself a historical fact that defies rational explanation. It has no
historical parallel. Let's consider for a moment all you skeptical, secular readers out there who
still cling to the label "Jew" in the year 2000: just explaining you requires more than a rational
answer.

So here I offer my response, after coming to terms personally with all that awaits the Jewish
people in the Age of Aquarius. In a word, the only antidote for New Age "transformation" is a
very Old Age concept: Restoration. Let's get back to the place we belong spiritually.

The process of Restoration begins within and moves progressively outward, as follows:
1. Restoring Your Own Jewish Spirituality
- for Secular Jews

1a. "Where did we go wrong?"

Many concerned Jews have been asking themselves this question while watching this generation
stampede into Eastern religious cults, into intermarriage, into anything that comes along, leaving
their people far behind without a thought. Some of you may have asked it while reading this
series, coming to the realization that we have been heavily sabotaged from within the community
as well as outside... and we never even noticed. You deserve an answer. An answer that goes
beyond the material "solutions" we are so fond of implementing and get such meager results
from.

The New Agers are right about one thing: the answer will come from within. Not in the sense
they mean: we don't have "all the answers" within us. But we do have the one answer which will
trigger our deliverance. It is actually the answer to two questions: "Where did we go wrong?" --
and the one G-d always asks when His people go wrong: "Where are you?"

We went wandering off, and now we're lost.... (If we weren't lost, Hannah's series would be
unnecessary....)

Okay, okay - I'm lost. I see this tidal wave coming our way, and I have no idea which way to
run.

This is the only answer we can offer with any authority. But it's the only answer which our G-d
needs from us in order to step into the picture. Either that's our answer, or we can continue to
nurse our pride, tell ourselves that everything is okay, that we're not lost. The Jewish population
worldwide is growing, antisemitism is dying out, and we are in no danger at all from these New
Age "fringe lunatics" in the UN, the educational system, the media and the synagogues.... Who
are we kidding?

Restoring the Jewish community starts with yourself. It's "I" plus "you" that makes "we". If
"we" are ever going to regain the ground lost to NA in our community, we're going to have to dig
down to the very bedrock - whatever it was that kept the Jewish people alive for all this time -
and reclaim what we lost. Personally.

And if you're wondering how to find your way back to that bedrock, the NAers have betrayed
their knowledge of what and where it is. It's the only thing they truly fear. They are frantically
trying to demolish it, before we wake up and catch on. It's Jewish faith in the one and only G-d.
Not a life dedicated to understanding the Mishneh and Gemara - that doesn't threaten The Plan in
the least. What scares them is the in-their-face kind of faith you read about in the Torah and
Prophets, the kind of faith that carries no fear or doubt because it can see Who is on top. Tidal
wave or not.

It is my conviction that G-d knew long ago what we would face in every generation, including
this ultimate challenge to our spiritual and physical survival. That being so, He embedded
advice for us in the words of His prophets. As you will see, the few examples I include below
are amazingly relevant in their choice of words. Coincidence? How could our prophets of
millennia past have known the very terminology the Hierarchy would use today in their bid to re-
open their ancient war? The writers of the Bible couldn't have known, but the Opponent of the
Hierarchy certainly would have - He "sat [as King] for the Flood" (_Psalms_ 29:10, literal
translation), the last encounter where the Hierarchy admits being defeated by the Force behind
the Jews.

Strengthen your personal faith in your G-d.

Regardless of your attitude toward Jewish religious tradition, take time to study the many
historical accounts of attempts to annihilate the Jews and their G-d (for these two are linked by
our enemies without exception), and what caused these attempts to fail.

Whether you choose Biblical incidents or those from history (from the Maccabees to modern
Israel), you will notice a pattern. It consists of a few courageous people fighting against
impossible odds, plus some mysterious turn of events which evened the odds for them. The
people involved were not often impressive physically or mentally, but they distinguished
themselves in their willingness to sacrifice their lives, if necessary, to cling to the G-d of Israel,
to the same old patch of ground in the Middle East, or to their Jewishness (which in the end all
amounts to the same thing, considering how the Jews came to be in the first place). While many
did indeed give up their lives, many more survived to relate unusual circumstances of
deliverance and even outright supernatural intervention. This is documented in every war the
modern State of Israel has fought, including the 1991 Gulf War.

Consider the alternatives for the future.

In the interests of realism, let us acknowledge that, based on the evidence, there is no chance of
surviving this New World Order on our own strength. Either the New Age Plan will succeed in
making the world "judenrein", or our G-d will even the odds once again.

If we don't believe that Israel has a G-d, we might as well dismantle the State of Israel, delete
Passover from our calendars, apologize to Hitler, take our "karma medicine" and leave the world
without a fuss. Even if we should believe that G-d is not real, the New Age very definitely
believes it. They also know about our being chosen by G-d as His instruments in the world, and
they will not rest until they "seal the door" to that hated Force - down to the last Jew.

In the event that you do not believe in G-d, yet you do believe that the Jewish people is a
historically valid entity, and that we have every right to perpetuate our identity, then you are left
with explaining why. What history or origins will you base your conviction on? To what can
you attribute the crazy staying power of a people who hold the record as the all-time favorite
target for annihilation - including several efforts at self-erasure? If you don't fall back on some
kind of Higher Power as an explanation, your rational processes will begin to suffer from
cognitive dissonance.

Of course you can always accept the humbling but satisfying answer that the G-d of Israel lives.
Not that we understand everything He has done with our people, but He is apparently there - and
involved. He's been keeping some very unlikely promises, in the face of some very impressive
opposition. He is not daunted by His own people's skeptism, or their outright denial of His
existence. His promises include dealing a final blow to "the wise men of Babylon" who "rule the
whole earth" [never achieved until this day of global culture] and "the daughter of the Kasdim"
with her "sorceries" (Jer. 50 and 51, Isa. 14 and 47). It is noteworthy that "Helel ben Shahar",
the New Agers' "light-bearer", receives judgment from G-d as the king of Babylon (Isa. 14:3-23).

2. Restoring Your Own Jewish Spirituality

- for Observant Jews

"Have I been taught real Torah?"

You may have never questioned whether what you have absorbed is really a Jewish faith,
especially if you are in orthodox circles. But since New Agers are boasting control of the culture
we have grown up in, and even penetration into the Torah community, it's time to investigate.

Is everything you have accepted about the nature of G-d and man, good and evil, based on the
teachings of the eternal, unchanging Torah? Is it based on teachings of Jewish leaders who
never violated Deuteronomy 4:2 or 12:32 by cancelling or "reinventing" Torah? Does your
community believe that certain Torah commandments can be disregarded by certain rabbis or
mekubalim because of their lofty spirituality?

Are your leaders teaching Torah, or are they (even unknowingly) offering a mixture of Torah
and "universal ideas" from other religions? It's true that Torah contains universal ideas, but with
clear boundaries and exclusions. Of special relevance here, we are explicitly commanded not to
"inquire" how idol worshipers "serve their gods" so that we can "do likewise" for our own G-d.
(Deut. 12:30) Is there anything in the body of today's accepted traditions passing as "Jewish"
that can be found in ancient mystery religions, but not in Torah? Do you even know the Five
Books well enough to answer that question?

(Isaiah 8:19-20, literal translation from Hebrew:)

"And when they say to you, 'Seek the mediums [channelers] and wizards [adepts in occult
mysteries] who chirp and mutter; shall not a people seek its god on behalf of the living among
the dead?' To the Law and to the Testimony, if they will not speak according to this word: that it
has no dawn [shahar]."

In other words, do not follow those leaders who refuse to confirm the fact that this is not the
"dawning of a new age" and that Lucifer is not "son of the morning". Do not follow those who
condone occult activities like communing with the dead. If you can't find such a rabbi to teach
you, then stick to "the Law and the Testimony" on your own.

My rabbi, right or wrong.

Have you been taught not to scrutinize what the sages taught for possible error? Have you been
taught that your rabbis cannot be in error? (Infallibility was an old Catholic doctrine, if you
please, and even they only applied it to the Pope!) If a leader you admire is following after
something forbidden by Torah, do you feel obligated to follow him into it, or to stand on
Deuteronomy 13? If false teachers of Torah were not possible, the Prophets would never have
warned against them (see Ezekiel 34, Jeremiah 2:8, Zephaniah 3, Isaiah 28:7-14, etc).
Speaking of the Prophets, do you really believe that their words are from G-d, that "all his
words" given through the Prophets "are truth and righteousness", as the Haftarah blessing says?
Have you ever taken time to study the Prophets, or are there entire passages of "truth and
righteousness" which you've never even read once? Perhaps you been taught that the sages and
rabbis have veto power over the Prophets - did you ever think to ask how that is possible if "not
one" word of the Prophets "will turn back and return empty"? What will you do if you don't get
an answer: stay or leave?

3. Restoring Those Around You

Educate the Jewish people to distance themselves from all groups which herald the New Age,
and to disassociate themselves from all unJewish teachings.

Our main strength in this regard is: what are we lacking in our Tenach that we would need to
supplement it with these foreign teachings? The Dalai Lama's challenge must be, and can be,
answered.

Why would Jews need a teaching about "karma" to pay for sins, when we can have Forgiveness
with the promise, "I will remember your sins no more"? What Jew needs "reincarnation" when
we've been promised Resurrection? Why accept the existence of evil in G-d when we have far
better explanations in the books of Genesis, Job and Psalms? Which "channeler" has a track
record anywhere near that of our own Prophets - and why are our people so ignorant of those
amazing Jewish prophecies? (Israelis will know what I'm talking about; the old saying is still
repeated by secular Israelis: "Anybody who lives in Israel and doesn't believe in miracles is just
not being realistic....")

It is not enough, however, to say we don't need NA; we must disassociate ourselves from it in
order to avoid the Divine judgment which NAers are destined to reap for their alliance with those
eternal losers, the rebellious Hierarchy. Since the New Agers agree that Babylon, the chief
guardian of the "ageless wisdom", has never ceased to exist spiritually, the following prophecy is
quite as relevant for today as when it was given to the physical kingdom:

(Jeremiah 51:5-7, literal translation from Hebrew:) "For Israel has not been widowed, nor Judah,
of his G-d the L-rd of Hosts, though their land is filled with guilt more than with the Holy One of
Israel. Flee out of Babylon, and let every man save his life [or soul]; do not be cut off in her
iniquity; for it is a time of vengeance to the L-rd, a wage He will pay to her. A cup of gold is
Babylon in the hand of G-d, making all the earth drunk; nations have drunk her wine; therefore
nations will go mad [yithollelu - interestingly, same root as Isaiah's helel, "the shining one" who
fell from Heaven]. Suddenly has Babylon fallen and is broken..."

The rest of that chapter is very interesting as well. Israel is commanded, in addition to leaving
physical Babylon, to specifically "flee from the Kasdim" (Chaldeans); these were the elite
sorcerers of Babylon and possessors of the "secret doctrines". (see Isaiah 48:20; Jeremiah 50:8)
Arm your children with discernment.
It is not possible to shield your children from the indoctrination now in progress. The New Age
is counting on the young generation to usher in their Plan, and no effort has been spared to reach
them. If you filter the TV and movies, they will get it through Disney productions and other
innocent-looking programs. If you turn off access to the Internet, they will find it in many
computer and video games. If you eliminate TV, computer and movies, they will be exposed in
the classroom, on the school computer network, and in the libraries. If you home-school, they
will learn it at the homes of their relatives or friends. Limiting their circles to "kosher" families,
friends and organizations will not ensure their protection either, since Jewish communities have
long been infiltrated [see the Missionizing Section]. Even relocating to Israel will not spare them
from the onslaught [see the survey of NA religions operating in Israel, which only highlights the
larger groups].

The only solution is to teach them how to spot the NA indoctrination, how to test it with Torah,
and how to actively reject it for the fraud it is. Sit with them and point out examples (you'll have
no shortage of material). Rent a video and pause it periodically to discuss with them why people
find these concepts attractive, what is wrong with them from a Torah standpoint, and also where
the Jews are being slandered in subtle ways. The role of villian in the more recent sci-fi
productions often has Jewish mannerisms, or alternately fits the description of Bailey and others
as a "vampire" who feeds on humanity; and occasionally the bad guy is openly identified as
Jewish (for example, the recent movie version of _X Men_, where the archvillian is clearly a
bitter Holocaust survivor). In my own attempts to educate children, I have found that kids as
young as 7 can learn to identify NA messages with accuracy and explain why they are
unacceptable.

4. Restoring the Jewish Community

Reconcile and Reunite.

No one can ignore the friction in the community over different approaches to Jewish observance
and lifestyle. It is not my intention to endorse one over another, although my own choices have
been made with confidence. My point here is that this is no time to argue over what is surely a
footnote to the threat facing the community. I stand by my contention that unless we rally
around the Torah, our individual faith will not stand the test to come. But even if we do not
resolve this issue, we have a better chance defending ourselves together than in separate corners.
The snap judgments of the secular against the "Torah fanatics" and the orthodox against the
"Torah breakers" must be replaced by a more thoughtful examination of the Other Side, with the
realization that a media controlled by our common enemy will have an interest in feeding us
misconceptions about each other to divide and conquer. If we have half a brain, we will invest
more in dialog, to make sure the Other Side learns who we are without having to rely on the
media. If we're really smart, we will make a joint commitment to protect all Jews from being
delegitimized by NA propaganda, even when their lifestyle drives us up the wall.

Accelerate the gathering of Diaspora Jews to Israel.

It is obvious now more than ever that the Jews have no way of defending themselves outside the
Land. When the Global Governance system becomes operational, it will be international policy
to discriminate against Jews, to take away their children who have been "wrongly indoctrinated"
and to target the whole lot of us for "cleansing action".

The only defensible position for Jews of any persuasion is to stand with their own people in their
own land, where we have survived enemy attacks time and again (though rationally we can't
explain why...). It is also the best defensive policy for Israel -- the more the better, since even
with G-d's help, "Five will chase one hundred" but "a hundred will chase ten thousand."
(Leviticus 26:8)

According to the published NA timetable, this leaves world Jewry about one to three years to
consolidate in their land before they may be faced with the "Luciferic initiation" or the
alternative. (G-d may decide to postpone their Plan again as He has apparently done several
times, but who wants to gamble on this chance with their family?)

5. Restoring an Ancient Relationship

If the NA has its way, the Jews will be eliminated, along with any non-Jews who show loyalty to
the Jewish Bible and people. The latter group is clearly a potential ally in resisting NA
domination, but the largest contingent among these has ironically been the group under heaviest
suspicion by Jews: the evangelical Christians. Even more ironically, this group more than any
other has a faith system that most closely parallels that of religious Jews. With those
Evangelicals who are not infected with "replacement theology" (which I suspect is a NA
invention anyway), Torah Jews are highly compatible. These alone among the Christians are
interested in moving backward theologically toward the earliest roots of Christianity, where their
first leaders were actually Jews - and Jews who respected Torah, no less.

In a certain sense, this subgroup is the equivalent of younger brothers to the Jews, with a
potential for a relationship that has not been as supportive in perhaps 1800 years. Yet most Jews
continue to single out these particular Christians as objects of suspicion and mistrust, because of
the strength of their convictions and their willingness to talk about what they believe to
everyone. Including Jews.

What's the matter with us? If a group systematically excluded Jews from receiving information
about any other subject on earth, we would yell "antisemitism". Yet we react in anger and disgust
when these Christians refuse to discriminate against Jews in offering what they consider
valuable. The Jewish "Jesus allergy" belongs to another time and place, when the Jews were a
homeless people, second-class, without right of refusal and at the mercy of a dominating Church
(not evangelical, I should point out, but Catholic) which was intent on forcing Church teaching
on us.

We welcome "interfaith" activities with the kinds of Christians who won't bother us about their
faith because they have none to share - they don't take our Bible seriously anymore (and
therefore, don't be surprised if the day comes when they don't take Jews seriously either). Even
with the group which once offended us most, the Catholics, all is forgiven since they no longer
consider Jews worth recruiting. But we react with medieval hostility to one of the strongest
allies the Jews will ever have, rejecting them precisely for the quality that makes them such firm
friends: they are so convinced of their beliefs that they think others should consider them. Are
we threatened by a group that believes our Prophets strongly enough to see a Jewish Messiah in
them? What does that say about our attitude toward those Books which we ourselves gave
them? What does it say about our confidence in our own identity?

Some will reply that we avoid anything to do with the Christians in general because of their habit
of denigrating the Jewish people for rejecting Jesus. Okay. Why aren't we avoiding and
ostracizing the New Agers from our communities for the same reason? Our one-track idea of
"soul stealers" has blinded us to the point where far more souls are being stolen by pagan mystics
than by any church we know.

The New Age has an interest in keeping Jews and Evangelicals at odds with each other. An
alliance for mutual strengthening on social and spiritual levels would present a formidable front
to the NA onslaught on both our communities. They would happily encourage us to continue
viewing Evangelicals as "deceptive" for explaining their faith in terms of our traditions, while
they plant suspicions among the Christians that orthodox Jews are "deceptive" for secretly
slandering Gentiles in our Talmud. An organization like "Toward Tradition" must infuriate
NAers because it is successfully bringing observant Jews and evangelical Christians together to
work in a broad area of common values, without allergic reactions to the faith of the other side.
Curiously, it bothers many Jews for the same reason: the historical friction and mutual suspicion
have been set aside for more urgent issues, and that alone constitutes grounds for suspicion. (See
"Onward Christians' Rabbi", _The Jerusalem Report_, Apr.24, 2000)

If this Jewish-Christian cooperation spreads, there's no telling what damage it may do to The
Plan.

6. Restoring Disillusioned New Agers

Here I have in mind Jews primarily, but any human being who is willing to listen is worthy of
our efforts. After all, our G-d has promised to take a people for Himself from among the nations
(see Isaiah 51:4 and Amos 9:12, among others). What better "world service" could we perform
than to offer the one thing that NA is trying to withhold from these seekers? Just think: our
unique G-d is now the "forbidden fruit" in the Garden of Aquarius! And there will certainly be
hungry inhabitants in that Garden who have discovered that the standard fare leaves one rather
hollow inside.

Mount an aggressive campaign of information.

Judging from my own personal dialog with many in the various NA networks, even those in
direct contact with spirit guides have doubts at times about the validity of their path. Some have
expressed disillusionment over the savage power struggles, back-stabbing and ego trips running
rampant among supposedly "enlightened" people, even at the highest levels. It appears that the
world peace, unity and goodwill (at least at this stage) are falling short of all the rosy
predictions. I believe that this will always be the case unless true repentance (in Biblical terms)
takes place. But I also believe that, as the NAers themselves predict, there will eventually be a
leader strong enough to force a semblance of unity on all parties, using psychic or spiritual
power (probably gained by the "Luciferic initiation") to whip them into line.

Until that time, we must take advantage of the disarray in the NA ranks. Besides the weak points
noted above, here are others that can be used:

6a. "The Masters" and their slaves: Many "initiates" are disappointed in their failure to find
the inner peace they were promised. Instead they are struggling with psychic powers going out
of control, unpleasant "visitations" from spirits, and nameless overwhelming fears, all of which
increase the "higher" they "ascend". It is almost taboo for them to admit to these frightening
problems, but such people will be open to possible explanations. To them I propose the
following thought:

As mentioned before, some information has been (and likely is now being) withheld from the
public by NA leaders, on the pretext that people are not yet "evolved" enough to accept it. Such
items of information revealed lately, however, have turned out to be not deep concepts, but
unpalatable programs which a few short years ago were considered immoral - thus the real
obstacle was that they could not be revealed until the public resistance was weaker. In this
context, even the highest level New Agers, those at the level of Robert Muller, ought to be
asking themselves how they can be sure the "ascended masters" have been straight with even
their highest human disciples. I would submit that just as NA leaders have hidden certain
"controversial" elements of the Plan from the public, there can just as easily be parts of the Plan
kept from all humanity by these "benevolent" spirit guides, proposals which would meet with
human resistance, even from Robert Muller, if fully known. The increasing lack of personal
serenity and equilibrium as one moves toward the future "initiation" ought to raise questions, for
that was not part of the deal.... For such seasoned political double-talkers and cynical "reshapers
of society" as those in the NA to never imagine they might be beaten at their own game by a
higher intelligence shows astonishing naivete.

6b. Why are They afraid of the Jewish Force? One reality of life which stubbornly refuses to
be explained away by the most clever NA arguments is: our presence. The Jews, supposedly an
inferior race, have not only somehow survived the centuries which wiped out all other
contemporary civilizations (including super-charged Atlantis and the Third Reich), but survived
intensive attempts by enemies to "help" it into oblivion.

We as a people are a monkey wrench in the NA theory of human evolution, mainly because our
G-d is a thorn in the eye of the "ascended masters". Get rid of the Jews and their Book, and their
G-d will disappear too - or at least be proven faithless. But they seem powerless to do it, and as a
result they openly hate our G-d. (I'm speaking of the "higher intelligences" now, since they are
the self-proclaimed authors of the cosmic War to the death.) A declaration of war implies the
recognition of a threatening power to be opposed - a dead giveaway that the "ascended masters"
know our G-d exists; not only that, but His strength is dreaded (all their recorded ridicule
notwithstanding).

One might be annoyed by a fiction, but one would certainly not feel threatened - especially
entities at the level of enlightenment and self-control which the "Hierarchy" claims. Those who
respond that the "Masters" have declared war only on "the outmoded idea" of the Jewish G-d
must explain why the "Masters" themselves confess that the physical Jewish people have always
been and continue to be their target, down to the last person. "Ideas" are eliminated through
education. People are eliminated through physical death.

More than anything, New Agers respect displays of power and supernatural events. It should be
pointed out to them that even if they consider this G-d of the Jews only an "idea", it must be one
powerful "Idea" to preserve a distinct people against impossible odds and a long line of enemies
over 4000 years. It clearly beat anything the Atlanteans had, since their civilization collapsed in
competition with it. The New Age shouldn't be so quick to reject an Idea with that kind of
"vibration level" - perhaps they should read the Bible for themselves before rejecting it....

7. Answering the Challenge - Spirit to Spirit

We need to remember that the New Agers are the human puppets of an unseen adversary in this
war. The real battle is actually raging over all our heads; their gods vs. our G-d.

But calling it a "spiritual" war does not keep the battle in the ethereal and abstract realms. As we
have seen, the Hierarchy's Cosmic War must be anchored on earth, among flesh and blood
people, in order to carry on. In Biblical accounts of wars involving Israel, the line between the
spiritual and the physical was usually a dotted line - crossovers between the seen and the unseen
worlds were taken as a matter of course. Modern Israelis are aware of the same porous state
between material and spiritual, again most noticeable during the many wars (declared and
otherwise) this nation has sustained in its 53 short years.

Spiritual wars call for spiritual weapons. According to the Torah, G-d Himself is both shield
and sword for Israel (Deuteronomy 33:29). In the Prophets, we see the valiant warrior Gideon
launching his attack on the Midianites with a dual arsenal: "a sword for the L-rd and for
Gideon!" (Judges 7:20) The servants of G-d are given words which function as effectively as a
"sharp sword". (Isaiah 49:2) Specifically, the very words of the Prophets are weapons which can
cut an adversary of G-d to bits (Hosea 6:5). For this reason alone, every Jew who takes a stand
against the NA threat ought to become adept at finding the right words in the Prophets for each
situation.

Build your expertise in handling these powerful spiritual weapons. How does such a weapon
work? Simpler than you think. Do as the prophets themselves did: speak the appropriate words
of G-d to whoever needs to hear them, human or spirit. (Be prepared for possible confrontations
with hostile spirit guides.) G-d will see to the rest, including guidance on what physical steps
should be taken. (Naturally, one can't really do this if one lacks the faith to deal with unseen
realities. The first step may be to study the examples of those who did have such faith, namely
the prophets, judges and righteous kings of Israel.)

Two of my favorite personal weapons:

The first is addressed to the NA Hierarchy and their servants - Isaiah 8:9-14 (with various
possible translations from the literal Hebrew). Its relevance will intrigue readers who have
stayed with me through the entire series:

Rage, you peoples, and be shattered; and give ear, all remote places of the earth. Gird yourselves,
and you will be shattered; gird yourselves, and you will be shattered. Take counsel with advice
[or, as in some translations, devise a Plan], but it will come to nothing; speak the word, but it will
not stand, for G-d is with us.

For thus the L-rd spoke to me with a strong hand and disciplined me from walking in the way of
this people, saying: "You are not to say, A conspiracy! to all that this people say is a conspiracy
[literally, Connection! to all which this people say is interconnected], and you shall not fear their
fear or be afraid of it [esteem it/him]. It is the L-rd of Hosts whom you should regard as holy.
And He shall be your fear, and He shall be your dread [or, high esteem]. Then He will become a
sanctuary...."

The second one - Isaiah 60:1-2 - is dedicated to the Jewish people, who are not going to be left in
the dark when the Age of Aquarius descends on this planet:
Arise, shine; for your Light has come, the glory of the L-rd has risen upon you.
Behold, darkness will cover [the] earth, and deep darkness [the] nations.
And on you the L-rd will rise, and on you His glory will be seen.

This concludes the Series.