Grosz 2007
Grosz 2007
GROSZ DISARRAY:
Works on Paper by George Grosz
Pucker Gallery
BOSTON
DIE GOLDGRAEBER
(THE GOLD MINERS)
1915-1916
Lithograph on
Japon Nacre Paper
8 1/2 x 5 1/2
A World in
2 GROSZ DISARRAY:
he political and cultural quagmire of Post- and communists provide a complete picture of the societal
3
digits, and in a futurist of the works gathered in this
interpenetration of mul- exhibition, Grosz mastery of
tiple planes and propor- the often unforgiving medium
tion, he depicts an urban of watercolor is wonderfully
landscape in the distance evident. In Krauskopf (1925)
with an uncomplicated Grosz complements his clear
grid work. In Familie- and deft usage of line with
nessen (1922), the deft- controlled application of wa-
ness by which Grosz characterizes the profiles of the cast tercolor to enhance the presence and volume of his subject.
of characters present is emblematic of his ability to present However, Grosz used watercolor to work counter intuitively
types with the utmost simplicity. The street scene images to his mastery of line as well. In works like Burlesque (1933)
Schuler (1929) and Parisian Street Scene (1924) illustrate and New York Faces (1933) Grosz appears to have wet the
how Grosz could generate such dynamic movement with the paper before applying the watercolor, and we see the beauti-
use of line. The flurry of scratchy lines that outline the head ful ways in which the color stains and swims as the paper
and arm of the street worker or gardener in the background absorbs it. The artists use of the paper is impressively exqui-
of Schuler represent motion and energy with stunning sim- site. In areas of these two works where Grosz has applied
plicity. Grosz is able to fill a Paris street with bustling self no color we see the paper used as highlight. The restraint of
satisfied human (chattel), sometimes omitting feet or hands the artist allows the paper to create the illusion of depth and
to emphasize the incessant ebb and flow of the human tide. three-dimensionality. Grosz may have been insecure about
The success of Grosz drawings early in his career frustrated his ability to paint, but like Van Gogh, his unending quest to
the artist to a certain degree. Grosz wanted to be recognized best his weakness produced masterpieces.
among the pantheon of German, Dutch and Belgian masters The Weimar years and George Grosz meteoric rise to
like Brueghel, Bosch, and Altdorfer, among others, and to preeminence in the art world of the early 20th century, led
do so, he felt that his paintings had to achieve the admira- to the second dilemma of Grosz career that is evident in this
tion and acclaim that his works on paper did. exhibition: George Grosz: Satirist or Artist? As Grosz said:
Grosz had been academically trained as a draughts-
man; however he was self-taught as a painter. Much like In 1917 ... I began to draw what moved me in little satiri-
Van Gogh, and perhaps due to his autodidactic approach cal drawings. Art for Arts sake seemed nonsense to me ...
to painting, Grosz was plagued by self doubt in his abili- I wanted to protest against this world of mutual destruc-
ties as a painter, and sought ways to successfully adapt his tion ... everything in me was darkly protesting. I had seen
draughtsmanship to painting. The figure played a prominent heroism ... but it appeared to me blind. I saw misery, want,
role in much of Grosz artwork, and in his paintings the fig- stupor, hunger, cowardice, ghastliness. (Hess p. 80)
ures were often conceived as drawings. Grosz experimented
with different painting media, trying to find a form where Painting in search of aesthetic beauty did not make sense
the old and more recognized Grosz was not lost. Water- to Grosz in the post-World War I world. Art had to have a
color was a very suitable extension for his work. In several sociopolitical agenda, and because of that Grosz turned to
KRAUSKPF
(PORTRAIT)
1925
Pen and India Ink with
Watercolor on Paper
12 1/4 x 10
4
satire. In Berlin Street Scene (1928) Grosz depicts a mother depicts inner character and dignity. With Metzerwagen
and daughter out for a stroll and perhaps some shopping. (1930-1931) Grosz captures a quotidian German country
The young lady is ironically positioned in front of the win- life scene. Probably painted on the occasion of a trip to the
dow advertisement of a butcher shop in the background country, Grosz frees himself of his cruel vision of the world
that reads Todays Fresh Pig. The young subject of this and allows himself to enjoy his craft. In New York Types
painting has no care for the tragic past of recent history or (1933) and Manhattan Faces (1934) Grosz has found him-
what fate may promise for the future. Frhlingsanfang or self in the United States, and he regales in discovering the
The Beginning of Spring (1928) speaks to the unchanging faces and personalities of New York City. He fills the picture
sexual mores of society. Desire does not necessarily end with planes with the visages of a city in perpetual motion, and he
the passing of youth. We see a young, possibly still pubes- avoids the tendency to irony.
cent, acne afflicted woman, accompanied or pursued by a George Grosz wrestled with the inner demons that
less seemingly innocent gentleman. With Couple in New pulled him from draughtsman to painter, and satirist to
York (1933) Grosz criticizes the rich upper crust of New artist for arts sake for the duration of his career. These
York high society, by depicting gaunt and stretched, self-sat- insecurities are similar to those that many artists deal with.
isfied faces, donning fur. These might as well be the faces Grosz strength as an individual and an artist is manifest
of the dead. Greenwich Village Tombstone (1934) evokes a in the way the he approached and dealt with his perceived
trendy artists loft where a poet holds forth to the drunk and weaknesses directly. If Grosz felt he could not paint then
adoring. This soiree is bathed in the smoke of cigarettes and he painted, and if he felt that he could not produce art
alcohol vapors. Nascent culture is created and appreciated for arts sake then he did precisely that. This exhibition
by the hopelessly vapid and unimportant. Grosz was trans- brings together excellent examples of George Grosz pro-
lating the vitriolic satire that had ruthlessly gained acclaim digious talent. Grosz and his oeuvre are products of his
in Europe to the United States. He felt trapped by not only generation and the time in which he lived, but his muse,
the style, but the subject the public identified him with and human beings, is timeless. The outcome of the interaction
expected of him. between artist and his muse speaks to generations to come
Like all good artists, Grosz tested himself and explored of the artists exacting presentation of the worlds inhabit-
through his creation. At times Grosz fought the satirist in ants and their foibles. Grosz saw, experienced and created
himself. Krauskopf (1925) displays Grosz desire to produce a his keen perception of the human condition at its worst.
well conceived and straight forward portrait. The painting goes
further than a representation of the subject, and Grosz Marc N. Schepens
Pucker Gallery, Boston
SOURCES CONSULTED
Flavell, M. Kay. George Grosz, A Biography. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988.
Hess, Hans. George Grosz. New York: MacMillan Company, 1974.
Whitford, Frank. The Berlin of George Grosz: Drawings, Watercolours and Prints, 1912-1930. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997.
Ecce Homo: 100 Drawings by George Grosz. New York: Dover Publications, 1976.
Love Above All and Other Drawings: 120 Works by George Grosz. New York: Dover Publications, 1971.
5
FRUHLINGSANFANG
(BEGINNING OF SPRING)
1928
Watercolor,
Pen and Ink on Paper
23 3/4 x 18 1/8
EIN AMERIKANISCHER BILDERBOGEN
(Costume design of a gangster for
the American Illustrated Page)
Watercolor over Pencil on Paper
15 7/8 x 10 3/4
FAMILIENESSEN
(FAMILY DINING)
1922
Ink, Pen and Brush on Paper
20 x 14
OLD LADY
1930
Watercolor and Ink on Paper
22 x 15 1/2
BEIM RHEIN-WEIN
(MAN WITH RED WINE)
1929
Watercolor on Paper
15 1/2 x 19 3/4
9
FAMILY STROLL
1932
Watercolor on Paper
Laid on Board
25 x 19
10
BURLESQUE SHOW
1933
Watercolor on Paper
24 1/2 x 17 3/16
ALLEGORIE
1922
Pen and Ink on Paper
16 x 22
Private Collection
11
12
13
15
By the end of the 1920s, he had exhausted his rage at seductive nudes in the hope of becoming a more respected
Weimars decadence which served as overture to Hitlers artist in the traditional mold.
take-over. A pessimist by then, he seemed to take a truer In 1958 Grosz became an extraordinary member of
measure of Hitler and the Nazis. Thus, having secured the Akademie der Kunst and in 1959 was awarded a Gold
a teaching position at The Art Students league of New Medal from the National Institute of Arts and Letters, sev-
York in 1932, Grosz left Germany days before Hitlers eral months before his death in Germany.
rise to power. In America, Grosz quickly realized serious His end was like a tragic scene from his own works.
political satire was of no great interest. Humor was to be A group of workers found Grosz dying on his door step.
strictly funny. Ironically, his heroes were unable to save him. Yet his mas-
His watercolors show the fascination he held for the terful satiric work, the equal of Daumier, and an artistic
New Yorkers; men on street corners reading newspapers, parallel to the dramas of Bertolt Brecht, still endures.
smoking cigars, and women in fur collar coats provide a
splendid glimpse of Manhattan in the 1930s. Eager to Rozita Shay
Americanize, he began painting romantic landscapes and Soufer Gallery, New York City
A World in
GROSZ DISARRAY:
Works on Paper by George Grosz