Princeton Solid Acid
Princeton Solid Acid
Princeton Solid Acid
v
A A
v
A
v
A
v . ,. -v
reactor.
Olefin conversion
.
'it. 80
- -
- -
C8s
-
""'
Integrated
approach
s:i- Moving a new refin-
g ery process from incep-
CD
a; tion to commercializa-
(/)
--
Cs-C-z.
- ~ mize the reactor design
and process conditions,
0 -
~
'r - v
Cs+
.,. ~
- 0
and finallyto demon-
0
0 2 3 4 5 6 strate the performance
Catalyst age, kg olefin/kg catalyst on an appropriate pilot
scale.
-"'
parts of a single process that should be B <(
little else that is different in these two tion section, which minimizes capital already in place. The primary changes
reactors except for the physical size of costs.6 The separation section resembles entail adding some optional feed-treat-
the vessel. those used in typical liquid-acid alkyla- ing equipment and installing a small
One added advantage of the isoparaf- tion plants and, as such, can be easily reactor recycle pump and a recycle
fin alkylation process is the low heat of retrofitted into existing liquid acid al- hydrogen compressor for the catalyst
reaction, which minimizes the need for kylation plants, catalytic polymerization reactivation section. Minimal modifica-
large heat-transfer surfaces to be inte- units, and idle MTBE units. tions to the existing distillation units
grated within the reactor volume. The revamp of a catalytic polymer- are required.
The new process scheme consists of ization unit is simple because two or Fig. 4 shows a revamp configuration
two swing-bed reactors and a separa- more multistage fixed-bed reactors are using multiple olefin feed stages with
product recycle. The reactor is operated
in a swing mode such that one reactor
is on alkylation while the other is on
catalyst regeneration.
CORRECTION Alkylation cycle lengths are designed
Figs. 2 and 6 in the article "Refiners to see strong returns near-term de-
to be 12-24 hr to simplify reactor op-
spite looming capacity buildup" by Aileen Jamieson (OGJ, Mar. 13, 2006,
eration. Every 12-24 hr, the alkylation
p. 52) contained errors. Fig. 2 mistakenly listed Dubai crude for the Singa-
pore margin calculation. Fig. 6 erroneously listed the blue bars as grassroots reactor is removed from service and the
and the green bars as expansions. The correct figures are shown here. solid-acid catalyst is regenerated with
excess hydrogen under mild conditions.
The regeneration step lasts 2 hr. Due to
REFINING MARGINS Fig. 2
the small amount of coke build up on
the catalyst surface, hydrogen consump-
-0- Northwest Europe (Brent) tion is minimized.
- - US Gulf Coast (West Texas Intermediate)
10
- - Singapore (Minas)
Acknowledgment
This work was partially funded
8 through grants from the US Department
of Energy and the National Science
Foundation. +
References
4
1. Mukherjee, M .. and Sundaresan,
S., "ExSact- A Step-out Isoparaffin
2 Alkylation Technology, Part 1. Catalyst
Development," World Refining, Janu-
ary /February 2005, pp. 28-31.
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2. Mukherjee, M. and Sundaresan S.,
"ExSact-A Step-out Isoparaffin Alkyla-
tion Technology. Part 2. Reactor Devel-
opment," World Refining, March 2005,
REGIONAL REALISTIC ADDITIONS. 2005-15 fig. 6
pp. 22-26.
3.5
3. Simpson, M.F., Wei, J., and Sun-
'O
3.0 DExpansions daresan, S., "Kinetic Analysis oflsobu-
:0 2.5
c
0 Grassroots tane/ Butene Alkylation over Ultrastable
~E 2.0 H-Y Zeolite," Industrial Engineering
and Chemistry Research, 1996, No. 35,
i- 1.5 pp. 3861-73.
.~
'ij
www.pennwellbooks.com