02.02 Binay V Domingo
02.02 Binay V Domingo
02.02 Binay V Domingo
*
G.R. No. 92389. September 11, 1991.
________________
* EN BANC.
509
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000157dff9477eb10584ba003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 1/10
10/20/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME201
510
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000157dff9477eb10584ba003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 2/10
10/20/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME201
511
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000157dff9477eb10584ba003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 3/10
10/20/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME201
PARAS, J.:
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000157dff9477eb10584ba003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 4/10
10/20/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME201
512
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000157dff9477eb10584ba003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 5/10
10/20/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME201
supra, and the alleged public safety, general welfare, etc. of the
inhabitants of Makati.
Anent the second contention, let it be stressed that Resolution
No. 60 is still subject to the limitation that the expenditure
covered thereby should be for a public purpose, i.e., that the
disbursement of
513
514
515
516
o0o
Copyright2016CentralBookSupply,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000157dff9477eb10584ba003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 10/10