The document summarizes feedback from 6 users on enhancing teamwork experiences. Key pain points included unresponsive team members, lack of coordination, difficulty coordinating with all members, free riding, and no common meeting place. Insights included a desire to choose team members, using incentives to encourage contribution, preference for working together in person over dividing work individually, and feeling less pressure when work is divided equally. It was remarked that peer evaluations after projects could assess contributions and that a common meeting place could improve coordination and accommodate members' preferences.
The document summarizes feedback from 6 users on enhancing teamwork experiences. Key pain points included unresponsive team members, lack of coordination, difficulty coordinating with all members, free riding, and no common meeting place. Insights included a desire to choose team members, using incentives to encourage contribution, preference for working together in person over dividing work individually, and feeling less pressure when work is divided equally. It was remarked that peer evaluations after projects could assess contributions and that a common meeting place could improve coordination and accommodate members' preferences.
The document summarizes feedback from 6 users on enhancing teamwork experiences. Key pain points included unresponsive team members, lack of coordination, difficulty coordinating with all members, free riding, and no common meeting place. Insights included a desire to choose team members, using incentives to encourage contribution, preference for working together in person over dividing work individually, and feeling less pressure when work is divided equally. It was remarked that peer evaluations after projects could assess contributions and that a common meeting place could improve coordination and accommodate members' preferences.
The document summarizes feedback from 6 users on enhancing teamwork experiences. Key pain points included unresponsive team members, lack of coordination, difficulty coordinating with all members, free riding, and no common meeting place. Insights included a desire to choose team members, using incentives to encourage contribution, preference for working together in person over dividing work individually, and feeling less pressure when work is divided equally. It was remarked that peer evaluations after projects could assess contributions and that a common meeting place could improve coordination and accommodate members' preferences.
1. Male, 23 1. Unresponsive Has the desire to work Thinks that the place of team members in teams, as long as he meeting/working of the 2. Thinks its a has co-operative team has no relevance waste of time members. Also, wants to the quality of work to choose his team- produced. mates.
2. Male 25 1. No mechanism to find Everyone is ready to At end of each group
out who actually put the work if there is good work peer evaluation effort enough incentives for can be done to rate the 2. Prefer to work the group work amount of contribution individually by each member for grading.
3. Male 22 1. Lack of Instead of dividing At the end of day group
coordination work into parts, prefer work should not be 2. Fragmented work doing it while sitting fragmented, should not together by mutual be mere points contribution assorted together User Pain Points Interesting Insights Remark 4. Male 21 1. Difficult to Working in groups In most of the group works, coordinate with which are formed on tasks are being distributed all the members their own are better within the members and 2. Cant force compared to PGP not putting collective others to do the groups efforts work
User Pain Points Interesting Insights Remark
5. Female, 22 Free riding takes place Sometimes feel less A common meeting hall pressurized when work should be there where all is divided equally and the members can sit everyone contributes. together and work simultaneously and possibly complete the given work easily and quickly. Place does matter because some girls are never comfortable in boys hostel and they cannot work properly.
User Pain Points Interesting Insights Remark
6. Male 22 Free riding Likes to work in groups There should be a common takes place when members can place where everyone can No common meet personally and meet place suiting theyre accommodating everybodys of each others opinion convenience