Bourtoom 2008
Bourtoom 2008
Bourtoom 2008
com
Abstract
Biodegradable blend films from rice starchechitosan were developed by casting film-solution on leveled trays. The influence of the ratio of
starch and chitosan (2:1, 1.5:1, 1:1, and 0.5:1) on the mechanical properties, water barrier properties, and miscibility of biodegradable blend
films was investigated. The biodegradable blend film from rice starchechitosan showed an increase in tensile strength (TS), water vapor
permeability (WVP), lighter color and yellowness and a decreasing elongation at the break (E ), and film solubility (FS) after incorporation
of chitosan. The introduction of chitosan increased the crystalline peak structure of starch film; however, too high chitosan concentration yielded
phase separation between starch and chitosan. The amino group band of the chitosan molecule in the FTIR spectrum shifted from 1541.15 cm1
in the chitosan film to 1621.96 cm1 in the biodegradable blend films. These results pointed out that there was a molecular miscibility between
these two components. The properties of rice starchechitosan biodegradable blend film and selected biopolymer and synthetic polymer films
were compared; the results demonstrated that rice starchechitosan biodegradable blend film had mechanical properties similar to the other
chitosan films. However, the water vapor permeability of rice starchechitosan biodegradable blend film was characterized by relatively lower
water vapor permeability than chitosan films but higher than polyolefin.
2007 Swiss Society of Food Science and Technology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0023-6438/$34.00 2007 Swiss Society of Food Science and Technology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2007.10.014
1634 T. Bourtoom, M.S. Chinnan / LWT - Food Science and Technology 41 (2008) 1633e1641
viscosities. Rice starch and its major components, amylose and content of about 14 g/100 g sample (determined in triplicate
amylopectin, are biopolymers, which are attractive raw mate- by vacuum drying at 70 C and <1 mmHg pressure for 24 h,
rials for use as barriers in packaging materials. They have EYELA, Model VOS-300VD, Japan) and peak viscosity
been used to produce biodegradable films to partially or entirely (8 g/100 g sample solid) of 500 BU (Brabender unit, Model
replace plastic polymers because of its low cost and renewabil- VISKOGRAPH, Germany). Commercial grade chitosan flake
ity, as well as possessing good mechanical properties (Xu, Kim, (approximately 85% degree of deacetylation) with average
Hanna, & Nag, 2005). However, wide application of starch film molecular weight of about 75 kDa was purchased from Bona
is limited by its mechanical properties and efficient barrier Fides Marketing Co. Ltd. (Thailand).
against low polarity compounds (Azeredo, Faria, & Azeredo,
2000; Kester & Fennema, 1986). This constraint has led to 2.2. Film preparation
the development of the improved properties of rice-based films
by modifying its starch properties and/or incorporating other Rice starch was dissolved in distilled water at concentra-
materials. Jagannath, Nanjappa, Das Gupta, and Bawa (2003) tions of 1, 2, 3, and 4 g/100 ml by heating the mixtures on
blended starch with different proteins to decrease the water hot plates and stirring until it gelatinized (85 C for 5 min).
vapor permeability of the films and to increase their tensile The mixtures were then cooled to 27 2 C. The chitosan
strength. However, these films still did not perform well solution (2 g/100 ml) was prepared by dispersing 20 g of
compared to synthetic polymer based films. chitosan in 1000 ml of acetic acid (1%, v/v; SigmaeAldrich
In the present article, we reinforced the mechanical strength Chemie, Darmstadt, Germany). After the chitosan dissolved
of rice starch film by mixing with chitosan, a 1,4 linked-2- completely, the solutions were filtered through a polyester
deoxy-2-aminoglucose, prepared by N-deacetylation of chitin screen (mesh no. 140 with mesh opening of 106 mm) by
(Xu et al., 2005). Chitosan provides unique functional, nutri- vacuum aspiration to remove any small lumps in the solution.
tional, and biomedical properties, and its present and potential While pulling a vacuum with an aspirator, the vacuum flask
uses range from dietary fiber to a functional ingredient and pro- containing the chitosan solutions was sealed with a rubber
cessing aid. Some of the well known applications of chitosan in- stopper and held for a few hours to de-gas the solution, which
clude its use for prevention of water pollution, medicine against prevented the formation of air bubbles in the films when the
hypertension, antimicrobial and hypocholesterolemic activity, casting solvent evaporated. A series of starchechitosan blend
flavor encapsulation, seed coating, film-forming, and controlled films was prepared by mixing 100 ml of the starch solutions
release of food ingredients and drugs (Dunn, Grandmaison, & (1, 2, 3 and 4 g/100 ml) with 100 ml of the chitosan solution
Goosen, 1997; Muzzarelli, 1985, 1996; Muzzarelli & De (2 g/100 ml). Sorbitol was added as 40% (w/w) of the total
Vincenzi, 1997; Onishi, Nagai, & Machida, 1997; Struszczyk solid weight in solution. The mixtures were cast onto flat,
& Pospieszny, 1997). Relatively low cost, widespread availabil- leveled, non-stick trays to set. Once set, the trays were held
ity from a stable renewable source, that is, shellfish waste of the overnight at 55 C for 10 h undisturbed, and then cooled to
sea food industry, along with chitosans ability to form a good ambient temperature before peeling the films off the plates.
film, are primary reasons to seek new applications of this Film samples were stored in plastic bags and held in desicca-
polymer (Bangyekan, Aht-Ong, & Srikulkit, 2005). Numerous tors at 60% RH for further testing. All treatments were made
investigations have been reported on the studies of films made in triplicate.
from chitosan (Butler, Vergano, Testin, Bunn, & Wiles, 1996;
Caner, Vergano, & Wiles, 1998; Park, Marsh, & Rhim, 2002; 2.3. Film testing
Singh & Ray, 1998; Wiles, Vergano, Barron, Bunn, & Testin,
2000) and chitosan blends with natural polymers 2.3.1. Conditioning
(Arvanitoyannis & Biliaderis, 1998; Hasegawa, Isogai, Onabe, All films were conditioned prior to subjecting them to
Usuda, & Atalla, 1992; Hosokawa, Nishiyama, Yoshihara, & permeability and mechanical tests according to the Standard
Kubo, 1990; Lazaridou & Biliaderis, 2002; Xu et al., 2005) method, D618-61 (ASTM, 1993a). Films used for testing
or synthetic polymers (Arvanitoyannis, Psomiadou, Nakayama, water vapor permeability (WVP), tensile strength (TS), and
Aiba, & Yamamoto, 1997; Guan, Liu, Zhang, & Yao, 1998). elongation (E ) were conditioned at 60% RH and 27 2 C
This study shows the preparation and characterization of by placing them in desiccators over a saturated solution of
biodegradable blend films from rice starchechitosan as well Mg(NO3)2$6H2O for 72 h or more. For other tests, film
as their mechanical and water barrier properties. The possible samples were transferred to plastic bags after peeling and
molecular miscibility between rice starchechitosan has also placed in desiccators.
been investigated.
2.3.2. Film thickness
2. Materials and methods Thickness of the films was measured with a precision dig-
ital micrometer (Digimatic Indicator, Mitutoyo Corporation,
2.1. Materials Japan) to the nearest 0.0001 (5%) at five random locations
on the film. Mean thickness values for each sample were
Native rice starch (Thai Flower brand) used was obtained calculated and used in water vapor permeability (WVP) and
from Bangkok Starch Industrial Co. Ltd. and had a moisture tensile strength (TS) calculations.
T. Bourtoom, M.S. Chinnan / LWT - Food Science and Technology 41 (2008) 1633e1641 1635
2.3.3. Film solubility calculated by dividing the maximum force by the initial spec-
A modified method from Jangchud and Chinnan (1999) was imen cross-sectional area, and the percent elongation at the
used to measure film solubility. Film pieces, 20 mm 20 mm, break was calculated as follows:
were dried at 70 C in a vacuum oven for 24 h and then weighed
to the nearest 0.0001 g for the initial dry mass. Films were im- E 100 dafter dbefore dbefore
mersed into 20 ml of distilled water in 50 ml screw cap tubes
containing 0.01 g/100 g sodium benzoate. The tubes were cap- where, d was the distance between grips holding the specimen
ped and placed in a shaking water bath for 24 h at 25 2 C. A before or after the break of the specimen.
portion of the solution was removed and set aside for later use in
protein solubility tests as described later. The remaining solu- 2.3.6. Color
tion and film piece were poured onto (Whatman #1) qualitative A CIE colorimeter (Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc., VA,
filter paper, rinsed with 10 ml distilled water, and dried at 70 C USA) was used to determine the film L*, a*, and b* color
in a vacuum oven for 24 h to determine the dry mass of the film. values [L* 0 (black) to 100 (white); a* 60 (green) to
Five measurements were taken for each treatment. Total soluble 60 (red); and b* 60 (blue) to 60 (yellow)]. The
matter was calculated from the initial gross mass and the final standard plate (calibration plate CX0384, L* 92.82,
dry mass using the following equation: a* 1.24, and b* 0.5) was used as a standard. Color
(means of five measurements at different locations on each
film mass before test film mass after test specimen) was measured on 10 cm 10 cm segment of film.
%FSdb
film mass before test Total color difference DEab , hue angle (H ), and chroma
100% (C ) were calculated using the following equation:
was used to compare mean differences of the samples. If the chitosan ratio of 1:1 and 0.5:1.0. The increasing TS values
differences in mean existed, multiple comparisons were of the biodegradable blend films, with the increase of rice
performed using Duncans Multiple Range Test (DMRT). starch and chitosan ratios from 2:1 to 0.5:1, are attributable
to a high formation of intermolecular hydrogen bonding
3. Results and discussion between NH
3 of the chitosan backbone and OH of the rice
starch. The amino groups (NH2) of chitosan were protonated
3.1. Tensile strength (TS) and elongation at the break (E ) to NH 3 in the acetic acid solution, whereas the ordered
crystalline structures of starch molecules were destroyed
A biodegradable or edible film must withstand the normal with the gelatinization process, resulting in the OH groups
stress encountered during its application and subsequent being exposed to readily form hydrogen bonds with NH 3 of
shipping and handling of the food to maintain its integrity the chitosan. The number of NH 3 groups increased with in-
and barrier properties. Tensile strength is the maximum tensile creased chitosan ratios in the film-forming solution. However,
stress sustained by the sample during the tension test. If the TS of biodegradable blend film prepared at the starch to
maximum tensile stress occurs at either the yield point or chitosan ratio of 1:1 and 0.5:1 was not significantly different.
the breaking point, it is designated tensile strength at yield This phenomenon indicated the critical ratios of the greatest
or at break, respectively (ASTM, 1991). High tensile strength miscibility of the two main film-forming components.
is generally required, but deformation values must be adjusted Elongation at the break (E ) is an indication of the films
according to the intended application of the films. That is, flexibility and stretchability (extensibility), which is deter-
whether it is undeformable material to provide structural mined at the point when the film breaks under tensile testing
integrity or reinforce structure of the food (Gontard, Guilbert, and is expressed as the percentage of change of the original
& Cuq, 1992). The TS of biodegradable blend films from rice length of the specimen between the grips of a film to stretch
starchechitosan with different chitosan ratios is shown in (extend). The value of E was affected by the chitosan ratios
Fig. 1A. The TS of biodegradable blend films was affected (Fig. 1B). The average E values of the biodegradable blend
by the chitosan ratios. The results demonstrated that the TS film behaved inversely to the TS value, decreasing from
of biodegradable blend films increased with the addition of
chitosan, and the maximum occurred at the rice starch and
A 9.0
a
A 45.0 8.0 a
Water vapor permeability
a a 7.0
(g.mm/m2.day.kPa)
40.0
Tensile strength (MPa)
6.0 b
35.0 b
b
5.0 c
30.0
25.0 4.0
20.0 3.0
15.0 2.0
10.0 1.0
5.0 0.0
2:1 1.5:1 1:1 0.5:1
0.0
2:1 1.5:1 1:1 0.5:1 Ratio g starch : chitosan
Ratio g starch : chitosan
B 45.0 a
B 40.0 ab
15.0 a
bc
Elongation at break (%)
35.0
Film solubility (%)
c
b 30.0
10.0 c c 25.0
20.0
15.0
5.0
10.0
5.0
0.0 0.0
2:1 1.5:1 1:1 0.5:1 2:1 1.5:1 1:1 0.5:1
Ratio g starch : chitosan Ratio g starch : chitosan
Fig. 1. Effects of chitosan ratios on (A) tensile strength (TS) and (B) elonga- Fig. 2. Effects of chitosan ratios on (A) water vapor permeability (WVP) and
tion at break (E ) of the biodegradable blend films. aec Means with the differ- (B) film solubility (FS) of the biodegradable blend films. aec Means with the
ent letters represent significantly different value at p 0.05 using Duncans different letters represent significantly different value at p 0.05 using Dun-
Multiple Range Test. cans Multiple Range Test.
T. Bourtoom, M.S. Chinnan / LWT - Food Science and Technology 41 (2008) 1633e1641 1637
A 90.0 a
A 25.0 a
89.5 ab b
20.0
89.0 bc c
88.5 15.0
E*
d
88.0 c 10.0
L*
87.5
5.0
87.0
86.5 0.0
86.0 2:1 1.5:1 1:1 0.5:1
85.5 Ratio g starch: chitosan
85.0
2:1 1.5:1 1:1 0.5:1 B 185.0 a a a a
Ratio g starch : chitosan 180.0
Hue angle
175.0
B 0.0 170.0
2:1 1.5:1 1:1 0.5:1 165.0
160.0
-1.0
155.0
150.0
-2.0 2:1 1.5:1 1:1 0.5:1
a*
c
-5.0 c 3.00
Ratio g starch : chitosan 2.00
1.00
C 25.0
a 0.00
2:1 1.5:1 1:1 0.5:1
20.0 a Ratio g starch: chitosan
Fig. 4. Effects of chitosan ratios on (A) DE*, (B) hue angle and (C) chroma
15.0 b values of the biodegradable blend films. aed Means with the different letters
b*
5.0
Fig. 5. Attenuated total reflection (ATR) spectra of rice starch film, chitosan film and typical rice starchechitosan biodegradable film with the ratio of rice starch to
chitosan of 1:1.
3.3. Film solubility (FS) of biodegradable blend films decreased with the addition of
chitosan. The decreasing FS values of the biodegradable blend
Water resistance is an important property of biodegradable films had a rice starch and chitosan ratio decreasing from 2:1
or edible films for applications as food protection where water to 0.5:1 (Fig. 2B). These results could arise from the fact that
activity is high, or when the film must be in contact with water higher chitosan content induced a rice starch and chitosan
during processing of the coated food (e.g. to avoid exudation interaction and resulted in a decrease in the FS.
of fresh or frozen products) (Gontard et al., 1992). Generally,
higher solubility would indicate lower water resistance. 3.4. Film color
However, a high solubility may be an advantage for some
applications. Film solubility is advantageous in situations Color of the packaging is an important factor in terms of
when the films will be consumed with a product that is heated general appearance and consumer acceptance (Srinivasa,
prior to consumption and may also be an important factor that Ramesh, Kumar, & Tharanathan, 2003). The results of the
determines biodegradability of films when used as packaging measurements performed on the blend films color were
wrap. Biodegradable blend film pieces produced from rice expressed in accordance with CIELAB system and the rectan-
and chitosan maintain their integrity (i.e., did not dissolve or gular coordinates (L*, a*, and b*) and the total color
break apart) even after 24 h of incubation with gentle motion. difference DEab , hue angle, and chroma were calculated.
This indicates that the rice starch and chitosan intra and/or The main difference observed was that biodegradable blend
intermolecular network remained intact and only the mono- films with higher content of chitosan had lighter color as indi-
mers, small peptides, and non-protein material were soluble cated by the L* value (Fig. 3A) and DEab (Fig. 4A). Similar
(Stuchell & Krochta, 1994). The FS of the biodegradable changes were also observed in a* (Fig. 3B). The measure of
blend films as a function of chitosan in the film-forming solu- b* and chroma (yellowness) values increased when the rice
tions is shown in Fig. 2B. The results demonstrated that the FS starch and chitosan ratio of 2:1 to 0.5:1 (Figs. 3C and 4C).
T. Bourtoom, M.S. Chinnan / LWT - Food Science and Technology 41 (2008) 1633e1641 1639
Intensity
1.5:1
ratio g
FTIR spectroscopy was used to determine the interactions Starch: chitosan
1:1
between rice starch and chitosan. The infrared spectra of
rice starch, chitosan, and their blends are shown in Fig. 5. 0.5:1
The broad band of rice starch film at 3233.41 cm1 was the Chitosan powder
OeH stretching. The peak at 2908.04 cm1 corresponded to
the CeH stretching, while the band at 1335.74 cm1 was Chitosan film
The X-ray diffractograms of rice starch powder, chitosan 3.7. Comparison of rice starchechitosan biodegradable
powder, and rice starchechitosan biodegradable blend films blend film with selected biopolymer and synthetic
are shown in Fig. 6. As observed, the rice starch powder polymer films
showed a typical A-type diffraction pattern with strong
reflection at 17 and 17.5 . The dried regular rice starch films, The mechanical properties (tensile strength and elongation
after gelatinization, had different structures. The amorphous at break) of rice starchechitosan biodegradable blend film and
structure was observed in the rice starch film. The results dem- of various films were compared (Table 1). Rice starche
onstrated that the chitosan powder was in a crystalline state chitosan biodegradable blend film had mechanical properties
Table 1
Tensile strength (TS), elongation at break (E ) and water vapor permeability (WVP) of various films
Film type Test condition Tensile strength (MPa) Elongation at break (%) Water vapor permeability Reference
(g mm/m2 day kPa)
Rice starchechitosan 25 C, 60% RH 27.5e38.1 8.1e13.0 4.11e7.08 Current study
Cassava starch 25 C, 75% RH 9.0e17.0 9.0e28.0 Mali et al. (2006)
Corn starch 25 C, 75% RH 3.8e4.3 4.0e10.0 Mali et al. (2006)
Chitosan 25 C, 50% RH 27.0 33.3 52.73 Xu et al. (2005)
Chitosan 25 C, 50% RH 39.1 10.8 13.22 Srinivasa, Ramesh, and
Tharanathan (2007)
Chitosan-native corn starch 25 C, 50% RH 40.3 28.0e61.1 Xu et al. (2005)
Chitosan-waxy corn starch 25 C, 50% RH 33.7 45.0e61.1 Xu et al. (2005)
Low density polyethylene 38 C, 90% RH 7.6e17.3 500.0 0.08 Briston (1988)
High density polyethylene 38 C, 90% RH 17.3e34.6 300.0 0.02 Briston (1988)
Cellulose acetate 38 C, 90% RH 48.5e82.7 15.0e45.0 e Briston (1988)
Polyester 38 C, 90% RH 178.0 70.0e100.0 Briston (1988)
Cellophane 38 C, 90/0% RH e e 7.27 Taylor (1986)
1640 T. Bourtoom, M.S. Chinnan / LWT - Food Science and Technology 41 (2008) 1633e1641
Lourdin, D., Valle, G., & Colonna, P. (1995). Della influence of amylase Nunthanid, J., Puttipipatkhachorn, S., Yamamoto, K., & Peck, G. E. (2001).
content on starch films and foams. Carbohydrate Polymers, 27, Physical properties and molecular behavior of chitosan films. Drug
275e280. Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 27, 143e157.
McHugh, T. H., Avena-Bustillos, R., & Krochta, J. M. (1993). Hydrophilic Onishi, H., Nagai, T., & Machida, Y. (1997). In M. F. A. Goosen (Ed.),
edible films: modified procedure for water vapor permeability and Applications of chitin and chitosan. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing.
explication of thickness effects. Journal of Food Science, 58, 899e903. Park, S. Y., Marsh, K. S., & Rhim, J. W. (2002). Characteristics of different
Mali, S., & Grossmann, M. V. E. (2003). Effects of yam starch films on molecular weight chitosan films affected by the type of organic solvents.
storability and quality of fresh strawberries. Journal of Agricultural and Journal of Food Science, 67, 194e197.
Food Chemistry 7005e7011. Singh, D. K., & Ray, A. R. (1998). Characterization of grafted chitosan films.
Mali, S., Grossmann, M. V. E., Garcia, M. A., Martino, M. N., & Carbohydrate Polymers, 36, 251e255.
Zaritzky, N. E. (2006). Effect of controlled storage on thermal, mechanical Srinivasa, P. C., Ramesh, M. N., Kumar, & Tharanathan, R. N. (2003).
and barrier properties of plasticized films from different starch sources. Properties and sorption studies of chitosan-polyvinyl alcohol blend films.
Journal of Food Engineering, 75, 453e460. Carbohydrate Polymers, 52, 431e438.
Meenakshi, P., Noorjahan, S. E., Rajini, R., Venkateswarlu, U., Rose, C., & Srinivasa, P. C., Ramesh, M. N., & Tharanathan, R. N. (2007). Effect of plas-
Sastry, T. P. (2002). Mechanical and microstructure studies on the ticizers and fatty acids on mechanical and permeability characteristics of
modification of CA films by blending with PS. Bulletin of Material chitosan films. Food Hydrocolloids, 21, 1113e1122.
Science, 25, 25e29. Struszczyk, H., & Pospieszny, H. (1997). In M. F. A. Goosen (Ed.),
Murray, D. G., & Luft, L. R. (1973). Low-D.E. corn starch hydrolysates. Food Applications of chitin and chitosan. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing.
Technology, 27, 32e40. Stuchell, Y. M., & Krochta, J. M. (1994). Enzymatic treatments and thermal
Muzzarelli, R. A. A. (1985). In G. O. Aspinall (Ed.), The polysaccharides. effects on edible soy protein films. Journal of Food Science, 59, 1322e1337.
London, UK: Academic Press. Taylor, C. C. (1986). Cellophane. In M. Bakker (Ed.), The Wiley encyclopedia
Muzzarelli, R. A. A. (1996). Chitosan-based dietary foods. Carbohydrate of packaging technology (pp. 159e163). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Polymers, 29, 309e316. Wiles, J. L., Vergano, P. J., Barron, F. H., Bunn, J. M., & Testin, R. F. (2000).
Muzzarelli, R. A. A., & De Vincenzi, M. (1997). In M. F. A. Goosen (Ed.), Water vapor transmission rates and sorption behavior of chitosan films.
Application of chitin and chitosan. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing. Journal of Food Science, 65, 1175e1179.
Myers, A. W., Meyer, J. A., Rogers, C. E., Stannett, V., & Szwarc, M. (1962). Xu, X. Y., Kim, K. M., Hanna, M. A., & Nag, D. (2005). Chitosan-starch
The permeation of water vapor. In M. Kouris (Ed.), Permeability of plastic composite film: preparation and characterization. Industrial Crops and
films and coated paper to gases and vapors. TAPPI Monograph Series No. Products, 21, 185e192.
23. New York: Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. Yin, Y. J., Yao, K. D., Cheng, G. X., & Ma, J. B. (1999). Properties of
Nelson, K. L., & Fennema, O. R. (1991). Methylcellulose films to prevent lipid polyelectrolyte complex films of the chitosan and gelatin. Polymer
migration in confectionery products. Journal of Food Science, 56, 504e509. International, 48, 429e433.