This document describes the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system, which provides a standardized method to classify rock masses based on their geologic properties and conditions. The RMR system assigns numerical values and ratings to 5 parameters: rock strength, rock quality designation, spacing of discontinuities, condition of discontinuities, and groundwater conditions. Based on the total ratings from these parameters, the rock mass is assigned to one of five classes, with Class I being very good rock and Class V being very poor rock. The classes describe expected engineering properties and behaviors of the rock mass.
This document describes the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system, which provides a standardized method to classify rock masses based on their geologic properties and conditions. The RMR system assigns numerical values and ratings to 5 parameters: rock strength, rock quality designation, spacing of discontinuities, condition of discontinuities, and groundwater conditions. Based on the total ratings from these parameters, the rock mass is assigned to one of five classes, with Class I being very good rock and Class V being very poor rock. The classes describe expected engineering properties and behaviors of the rock mass.
Table 4: Rock Mass Rating System (After Bieniawski 1989).
Parameter Range of values
Strength Point-load >10 MPa 4 - 10 MPa 2 - 4 MPa 1 - 2 MPa For this low range - uniaxial of strength index compressive test is preferred intact rock material Uniaxial comp. >250 MPa 100 - 250 MPa 50 - 100 MPa 25 - 50 MPa 5 - 25 1-5 <1 strength MPa MPa MPa Rating 15 12 7 4 2 1 0 Drill core uality 90% - 100% 75% - 90% 50% - 75% 25% - 50% < 25% Rating 20 17 13 8 3 Spacing of discontinuities >2m 0.6 - 2 . m 200 - 600 mm 60 - 200 mm < 60 mm Rating 20 15 10 8 5 Very rough surfaces Slightly rough surfaces Slightly rough surfaces Slickensided surfaces Soft gouge >5 mm thick Condition of discontinuities Not continuous Separation < 1 mm Separation < 1 mm or Gouge < 5 mm thick or Separation > 5 mm (See E) No separation Slightly weathered walls Highly weathered walls or Separation 1-5 mm Continuous Unweathered wall rock Continuous Rating 30 25 20 10 0 Inflow per 10 m None < 10 10 - 25 25 - 125 > 125 tunnel length (l/m) Groundwa (Joint water press)/ < 0.1 0.1, - 0.2 0.2 - 0.5 > 0.5 0 ter (Major principal ) General conditions Completely dry Damp Wet Dripping Flowing Rating 15 10 7 4 0 (See F) Strike and dip orientations Very favourable Favourable Fair Unfavourable Very Unfavourable Tunnels & mines 0 -2 -5 -10 -12 Ratings Foundations 0 -2 -7 -15 -25 Slopes 0 -5 -25 -50
Rating 100 81 80 61 60 41 40 21 < 21
Class number I II III IV V
Description Very good rock Good rock Fair rock Poor rock Very poor rock
Class number I II III IV V
Average stand-up time 20 yrs for 15 m span 1 year for 10 m span 1 week for 5 m span 10 hrs for 2.5 m span 30 min for 1 m span Cohesion of rock mass (kPa) > 400 300 - 400 200 - 300 100 - 200 < 100 Friction angle of rock mass (deg) > 45 35 - 45 25 - 35 15 - 25 < 15
Discontinuity length (persistence) <1m 1-3m 3 - 10 m 10 - 20 m > 20 m
Rating 6 4 2 1 0 Separation (aperture) None < 0.1 mm 0.1 - 1.0 mm 1 - 5 mm > 5 mm Rating 6 5 4 1 0 Roughness Very rough Rough Slightly rough Smooth Slickensided Rating 6 5 3 1 0 Infilling (gouge) None Hard filling < 5 mm Hard filling > 5 mm Soft filling < 5 mm Soft filling > 5 mm Rating 6 4 2 2 0 Weathering Unweathered Slightly weathered Moderately weathered Highly weathered Decomposed Ratings 6 5 3 1 0
Strike perpendicular to tunnel axis Strike parallel to tunnel axis
Drive with dip - Dip 45 - 90 Drive with dip - Dip 20 - 45 Dip 45 - 90 Dip 20 - 45 Very favourable Favourable Very unfavourable Fair Drive against dip - Dip 45-90 Drive against dip - Dip 20-45 Dip 0-20 - Irrespective of strike Fair Unfavourable Fair * Some conditions are mutually exclusive . For example, if infilling is present, the roughness of the surface will be overshadowed by the influence of the gouge. In such cases use A.4 directly. ** Modified after Wickham et al (1972).
Estimasi Sumberdaya Batubara Menggunakan Perbandingan Metode Polygon Dan Cross Section Di Pit I Pt. Atoz Nusantara Mining, Pesisir Selatan, Sumatera Barat