Alga Euglena
Alga Euglena
Alga Euglena
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Algal biofuels have caught worldwide attention, due to the success of first and second generation biofuels
Available online xxxx on combing environmental concerns in spite of many challenges. Microalgae are the potential and sus-
tainable fuel source with carbon neutrality, where selection of promising strain is crucial for effective bio-
Keywords: fuel generation. Euglena sanguinea one such robust freshwater species with high lipid productivity was
Microalgae explored on laboratory scale as well as in mass scale in raceway pond. The extracted oils fatty acid value
Euglena sanguinea was only 3.8 mg KOH g1 and had 93% triglycerides. Acid value was reduced to 0.3 mg KOH g1 by
Optimization
esterification and the optimized parameters obtained were: methanol/oil ratio: 0.36, H2SO4: 10 vol.%,
Biocatalyst
Biodiesel
time: 42 min. In the subsequent transesterification process natural, recoverable and eco-friendly white
mussel shell was used. Maximum yield of 98% was obtained at 6 wt.% of calcinated CaO for the reaction
time of 80 min at 0.35 methanol/oil ratio. The GC-MS analysis of the algal biodiesel showed the presence
of saturated fatty acids: C16:0, C18:0, C22:0, C24:0 and monounsaturated fatty acids C18:1 at appropriate
level to provide better oxidation stability and combustion properties to use it for automotive application
without any major engine modifications.
2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.018
0196-8904/ 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Kings AJ et al. Cultivation, extraction and optimization of biodiesel production from potential microalgae Euglena san-
guinea using eco-friendly natural catalyst. Energy Convers Manage (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.018
2 A.J. Kings et al. / Energy Conversion and Management xxx (2016) xxxxxx
conversion process. The process parameters were optimized to 0.5 kg of poultry litter was mixed in 5 l water and kept in a
minimize the acid value in the esterification process and then to closed container for fermentation at room temperature (30 C)
maximize the biodiesel yield in the transesterification process for 40 days. It was then filtered through 25 lm sieve and the fil-
using response surface methodology with lab scale experiments. trate was autoclaved at 120 C, 15 psi for 15 min and cooled. The
Finally, the FAME (fatty acid methyl esters) analysis was done composition of the filtrate is Nitrogen - 1.81%, Calcium - 1.1%, Iron
using GC-MS and the properties were compared with literature - 960 ppm, Manganese - 218 ppm, Zinc - 94 ppm, Copper - 27 ppm,
and standards. P2O5 - 1.47% and K2O - 0.98% separately.
100 g of seaweed (Gracilaria tenuistitata) was soaked in half litre
water and kept overnight for incubation. It was then heated to
2. Materials and methods 100 C for 6 h and the filtered using 25 lm mesh. The composition
of the extract is Carbohydrates - 5%, Protein - 0.5%, Lipids - 0.1%,
The process flow chart is shown in Fig. 1. Polyphenols - 0.25%, Nitrogen - 0.5%, Phosphorous - 0.68%,
Potassium - 2.0%, Calcium - 0.11%, Magnesium - 0.05%, Sodium -
2.1. Cultivation of microalgae 0.13%, Iron - 356 ppm, Zinc - 15.87 ppm, Copper - 17.62 ppm and
Manganese - 16.12 ppm along with traces of Cytokinin, Auxin,
The fresh water samples were collected from Vaadivilai (8110 N, Gibberelin [24].
77180 E), Kanyakumari District, Tamilnadu, India and filtered by 0.25 ml of the poultry litter filtrate solution was added to 0.5 ml
25 lm sieve. They were then enriched in Euglena medium having seaweed extract along with commercially available water soluble
a composition (g l1): Sodium acetate 1, beef extract 1, bacto- fertilizer (all 19 NPK) of 0.5 ml to prepare the low cost organic
tryptone 2, yeast extract 2. Vitamins (mg l1): vitamin compound medium. Culture was maintained in this medium at
B12 - 0.2; biotin - 0.1, thiamine (HCl) 100, niacin amide - 0.1. natural day/light setting with temperature variation between
The enriched samples were spread on a Euglena agar plate incu- 26 C and 32 C with a maximum day time light intensity of
bated at 30 C and were repeated until unialgal cultures of microal- 8000 lx. Then microalgae were cultivated in large scale with simi-
gae were obtained. The purified colonies were inoculated in 2 l lar conditions in raceway ponds (Fig. 2b) by frequently shaking it
Erlenmeyer flask with Euglena medium (pH 7) and incubated at gently using a paddle wheel rotated at 36 rpm. This species is pho-
30 C for a period of 15 days. Artificial photo period of 12:12 h totropic and heterotrophic in nature which can grow by using light
light/dark was provided using 3200 lx fluorescent light illumina- as the sole energy source or can utilize organic compound or both
tion. The cultures were shaken manually twice a day to avoid sed- for its energy source [25]. The purity of the culture was established
imentation of cells and microscopically observed for morphological by periodic microscopic observation and subculture. The log (max)
features such as size, shape and colour to establish culture purity. day was optimized as 12th day by observing its growth for 22 days.
So, the biomass were harvested on the log (max) day using 25 lm
sieves, dried in an oven and pulverized for oil extraction.
2.2. Mass propagation
2.3. Oil extraction and analysis
After initiating pure culture growth in the standard Euglena
medium, it was mass cultivated in a round cement tank with newly The oil was extracted from the powdered sample using a soxh-
derived low cost organic compound medium (poultry litter + sea- let extractor. The hexane: methanol (1:1) is used as the solvent
weed extract + all 19 NPK fertilizer) with culture volume of with microalgae powder in the ratio of 10:1 to achieve maximum
1000 l (Fig. 2a). lipid extraction [26]. The extraction was carried out for 6 h at a rate
Fig. 1. Step by step procedure of the conversion process of microalgae Euglena sanguinea to biodiesel.
Please cite this article in press as: Kings AJ et al. Cultivation, extraction and optimization of biodiesel production from potential microalgae Euglena san-
guinea using eco-friendly natural catalyst. Energy Convers Manage (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.018
A.J. Kings et al. / Energy Conversion and Management xxx (2016) xxxxxx 3
Fig. 2. Euglena cultivation in (a) round cement tanks (b) open raceway ponds.
of 8 cycles per hour at 70 C. Then the extract was filtered with to mass detector and capillary column, ELITE 1 (100 % Dimethyl
Whatman 40 filter paper and purified by simple distillation process poly siloxane) with nitrogen as a carrier gas with a flow rate of
to quantify algal oil. The free fatty acid (FFA) content, triglycerides, 1 ml min1. The initial temperature of the oven was maintained
unsaponified matter (UNSAP) and the moisture content was ana- at 110 C for 2 min, then raised to 280 C at a heating rate of
lyzed using titrimetric procedure. 5 C/min and kept for 9 min. The FAME contents were detected
by comparing the peak areas with those that of the National Insti-
tute of Standards and Technology (NIST, 2005).
2.4. Biodiesel conversion
Biodiesel properties such as density, viscosity, flash point and
pour point were determined using standard equipments and com-
Two stage conversion processes was needed to convert the
pared to biodiesel standards. Other properties such as iodine value,
Euglena oil to biodiesel. In the esterification stage, the FFA content
cetane number, oxidation stability, phosphorous content, ash con-
was reduced within the limit and the process parameters such as
tent and cloud point were determined from the microalgae FAME
methanol/oil ratio, acid concentration, duration and stirring speed
profile [2729].
were designed to optimize them, while the temperature was main-
tained constant at 70 C. 100 ml three-neck round bottom flask
with rotomantle set up along with a reflux condenser, thermome- 3. Experimental design
ter and sampling port was used for lab scale experiments. The oil-
methanol mixture was taken along with the designed amount of Design of experiments (DoE) is a statistical tool employed to
H2SO4 and heated at 70 C with gentle stirring for a stipulated per- identify the major influencing factor (process parameter) and to
iod. It was then taken out and kept in a separating funnel for determine the optimum quantity to achieve the desired objective
15 min to separate the fatty acids and triglycerides from the [30]. Influencing process parameters and their ranges were identi-
acid-water solution. With these optimized conditions, sufficient fied from pilot experiments in corroboration with literature. The
quantity of oil was esterified using 1000 ml round bottom flask central composite design (CCD) is capable of handling nonlinear
for the transesterification process. relationships, when experiments are conducted in a randomized
Similar procedure was adopted here also with the same setup run order to protect against the effects of time-related variables
used for the esterification process. However, newly derived CaO and also to satisfy the statistical requirements. Response surface
biocatalyst was used instead of acid catalyst in the transesterifica- methodology was employed for statistical analysis of the experi-
tion process. The separation of biodiesel (methyl esters) from glyc- mental data using design experts 7.0 version software.
erine and CaO (heterogeneous catalyst) takes more than an hour.
The separated biodiesel was distilled at 180 C under a vacuum 3.1. Esterification process
pressure of 700 mmHg and the excess methanol was recovered
for reuse. In this work, white mussel shells were collected from A three level four factor central composite design was taken for
the Manakudi coastal area (850 N, 77280 E), Kanyakumari, India, this process with 30 sets of experiments including 6 replicates of
washed in fresh water and kept in an oven for 4 h at 110 C to the central points, 8 axial points and 16 factorial points. The levels
remove the moisture content. It was then powdered, sieved of the factors involved shown in Table 1. The RSM was used to opti-
through 200 lm mesh and calcinated. The calcinated compound mize the process parameters with an objective to minimize the
(CaO) was confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) and FTIR acid value.
analysis.
3.2. Transesterification process
2.5. Characterization of biodiesel
A three level five factor central composite design was employed
FAME analysis was done by injecting 250 mg of algal biodiesel in this stage with 50 sets of experiments, consisting of 8 central
into gas chromatograph (GC Clarus 500 Perkin Elmer) connected points, 12 axial points and 30 factorial points. The RSM was
Please cite this article in press as: Kings AJ et al. Cultivation, extraction and optimization of biodiesel production from potential microalgae Euglena san-
guinea using eco-friendly natural catalyst. Energy Convers Manage (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.018
4 A.J. Kings et al. / Energy Conversion and Management xxx (2016) xxxxxx
Fig. 3. Microscopical observation of Euglena sanguinea at 400 (a) while moving (b) at the resting stage.
Please cite this article in press as: Kings AJ et al. Cultivation, extraction and optimization of biodiesel production from potential microalgae Euglena san-
guinea using eco-friendly natural catalyst. Energy Convers Manage (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.018
A.J. Kings et al. / Energy Conversion and Management xxx (2016) xxxxxx 5
Fig. 4. The XRD analysis results of white mussel shell after calcination.
Please cite this article in press as: Kings AJ et al. Cultivation, extraction and optimization of biodiesel production from potential microalgae Euglena san-
guinea using eco-friendly natural catalyst. Energy Convers Manage (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.018
6 A.J. Kings et al. / Energy Conversion and Management xxx (2016) xxxxxx
Table 3
Designed process parameters and its corresponding acid values of the esterification process.
Sl. No Methanol/oil (v/v) H2SO4 (vol.%) Stirring speed (rpm) Time (min) Temperature (C) Acid value (mg KOH g1)
1 0.25 6 350 50 70 1.83
2 0.35 10 625 60 70 1.43
3 0.25 6 900 50 70 1.62
4 0.25 6 900 30 70 1.92
5 0.25 14 350 30 70 1.44
6 0.45 14 350 50 70 0.85
7 0.55 10 625 40 70 0.59
8 0.35 10 625 40 70 0.34
9 0.45 14 900 50 70 0.65
10 0.45 14 350 30 70 1.3
11 0.45 6 900 30 70 1.63
12 0.45 6 900 50 70 0.9
13 0.15 10 625 40 70 1.59
14 0.25 6 350 30 70 1.92
15 0.35 10 625 40 70 0.37
16 0.45 6 350 50 70 0.92
17 0.35 10 625 40 70 0.39
18 0.35 10 75 40 70 1.24
19 0.35 10 625 40 70 0.29
20 0.25 14 350 50 70 1.39
21 0.35 18 625 40 70 0.81
22 0.25 14 900 30 70 1.24
23 0.35 10 625 40 70 0.33
24 0.35 10 625 40 70 0.35
25 0.35 10 1175 40 70 1.01
26 0.45 14 900 30 70 1.3
27 0.35 10 625 20 70 2.11
28 0.25 14 900 50 70 0.92
29 0.35 2 625 40 70 1.61
30 0.45 6 350 30 70 1.42
Fig. 6. The perturbation plot of the esterification process showing the influence of the process parameters on acid value.
with other alcohols, with a boiling point of 64.7 C, which makes it esterification process by simple distillation, which can be reused in
more suitable for biodiesel production [47,48]. The 3D surface plot the biodiesel conversion process or for other purposes.
and the corresponding contour diagram for the ester (biodiesel)
yield in relation with methanol/oil ratio and catalyst concentration 4.4.2.2. Effect of catalyst concentration. Alkaline catalyst is needed
is shown in Fig. 10a. Ester yield of around 98% was obtained even to facilitate the conversion of triglycerides into esters where natu-
at a methanol/oil ratio of 0.35, which was considered as the opti- ral CaO is used in the present study [50]. Insufficient amount of
mum minimum quantity. It can be noted that as the methanol/ catalyst, results in incomplete conversion within the stipulated
oil ratio increases the yield increases and gets saturated at the opti- time. However, the ester yield increases with CaO from 3 wt.%
mum limit [37]. The methanol increases the solubility, thus onwards and an optimum yield of around 98% was obtained when
encouraging the reaction with negligible mass transfer resistance the concentration was maintained between 6 wt.% and 8 wt.% by
[49]. Excess methanol was separated after esterification and trans- volume (Fig. 10a). Increasing the catalyst concentration beyond
Please cite this article in press as: Kings AJ et al. Cultivation, extraction and optimization of biodiesel production from potential microalgae Euglena san-
guinea using eco-friendly natural catalyst. Energy Convers Manage (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.018
A.J. Kings et al. / Energy Conversion and Management xxx (2016) xxxxxx 7
Fig. 7. The interaction plot among the esterification process parameter (a) the methanol/oil ratio and H2SO4 (b) the methanol/oil ratio and reaction period.
Fig. 8. The influence of the methanol/oil ratio and H2SO4 in the esterification process for minimizing the acid value (3D surface and contour plot).
Please cite this article in press as: Kings AJ et al. Cultivation, extraction and optimization of biodiesel production from potential microalgae Euglena san-
guinea using eco-friendly natural catalyst. Energy Convers Manage (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.018
8 A.J. Kings et al. / Energy Conversion and Management xxx (2016) xxxxxx
Table 4 such as food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetics and in fuel cells for
The predicted optimized process parameters value for minimizing the acid value. power generation [53,54].
Methanol/oil H2SO4 Stirring speed Time Acid value
(v/v) (vol.%) (rpm) (rpm) (mg KOH g1)
4.4.2.3. Effect of reaction temperature and time result. In general,
0.36 10 670 42 0.29
transesterification reaction is to be done at the lowest possible
temperature and time [55]. Temperature is a decisive factor in
the transesterification process, where low temperature increases
Table 5 the reaction time, which is not advisable for mass scale production
The designed process parameters of the transesterification process and the corre- [56]. Maintaining the process temperature just above its boiling
sponding ester yield. point (around 70 C) gives maximum yield (Fig. 10b). However, it
No. of Methanol/ Catalyst Speed Time Temperature Yield is important to maintain the rate of evaporation same as that of
run oil (v/v) (wt.%) (rpm) (min) (C) (%) reflux (condensation) to avoid methanol loss [56]. Moreover, the
1 0.35 6 600 80 45 27 refluxed methanol mixes more rapidly with oil enhancing the reac-
2 0.25 3 800 110 60 66.2 tion to yield maximum ester. Since transesterification is not a
3 0.45 3 800 50 60 56.8 reversible process, as the reaction time increases the yield of the
4 0.25 3 800 50 60 19.9
ester (biodiesel) increases. Fig. 8b also shows that the yield gets
5 0.25 3 800 50 80 37.5
6 0.25 9 400 110 60 73.3 maximum (98%) at around 80 min and further increases when
7 0.35 6 600 80 70 98.5 reaction time is redundant. Since the moisture content was
8 0.35 6 600 80 70 98.6 removed completely after the esterification process, increase of
9 0.25 3 400 110 80 73.2
reaction time has no effect on the ester yield, because soap forma-
10 0.45 9 800 50 80 78.5
11 0.25 9 400 50 60 36.7
tion does not take place in the absence of water in the transester-
12 0.35 6 600 80 70 98.4 ification process.
13 0.45 9 400 50 60 69.5
14 0.35 6 600 80 95 51.3
15 0.45 3 800 110 60 91.3 4.4.2.4. Effects of stirring speed. Stirring has a positive effect on the
16 0.45 9 400 110 80 95.8 yield of biodiesel even though it is not as pronounced as that of the
17 0.45 3 400 110 80 92.6
18 0.35 6 125 80 70 74.3
other factors. Proper mixing of oil with methanol is essential for
19 0.45 9 400 110 60 94.2 improving the biodiesel yield where the yield increases with the
20 0.45 3 400 50 80 66.5 speed of the stirrer up to 600 rpm. However, increasing the inten-
21 0.25 3 400 50 60 16.5 sity further affects the yield of biodiesel due to improper mixing
22 0.35 6 1075 80 70 77
[57,58].
23 0.35 6 600 80 70 98.5
24 0.45 9 400 50 80 79.6
25 0.35 6 600 80 70 98.6
26 0.25 9 400 50 80 54 4.5. Characterization of Euglena biodiesel
27 0.35 6 600 80 70 98.6
28 0.35 13 600 80 70 85.2 Basic characterization of biodiesel was done to ensure its
29 0.25 9 800 110 80 82.7 intended application in automobiles. The tested properties of
30 0.25 3 400 50 80 35.3
31 0.25 3 400 110 60 62.8
Euglena biodiesel were listed in Table 6 along with other reported
32 0.35 6 600 80 70 98.4 literature and standards. The density and viscosity were found to
33 0.25 3 800 110 80 75.5 be within the standard protocol of European and American norms
34 0.45 9 800 50 60 69.5 for biodiesel. Most of the properties such as cetane number, kine-
35 0.45 9 800 110 80 94.9
matic viscosity, oxidative stability and cold flow properties are
36 0.25 9 800 110 60 74.9
37 0.59 6 600 80 70 98.2 associated with the composition and structure of the fatty acid
38 0.25 9 400 110 80 82.2 profile of the biodiesel [5961].
39 0.11 6 600 80 70 37.7 GC-MS was done to identify and quantify the fatty acid com-
40 0.35 0 600 80 70 68.5 pounds present in the E. Sanguinea oil (Fig. 12). Most of the
41 0.45 3 800 110 80 93.3
42 0.35 6 600 150 70 98.4
microalgae have fatty acid compounds ranging from C11:0 to
43 0.25 9 800 50 80 54.5 C26:0 with the combination of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA),
44 0.45 9 800 110 60 94.2 monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) and saturated fatty acid
45 0.45 3 400 50 60 54.9 (SFA) in a balanced quantity to provide enhanced biodiesel proper-
46 0.35 6 600 9 70 22.9
ties [62]. The GC analysis result of the extracted algae biodiesel
47 0.25 9 800 50 60 38.3
48 0.45 3 800 50 80 67.2 was C16:0, C18:0, C22:0, C24:0, which represents SFAs, C18:1 rep-
49 0.35 6 600 80 70 98.6 resents MUFAs and C18:2 belongs to PUFAs profile. The presence of
50 0.45 3 400 110 60 89.4 high amount of MUFA (52.24%) is advantageous because of its bet-
ter oxidation stability, stable cold flow phenomenon and enhanced
combustion characteristics [63]. It was also stated that a high pro-
portion of SFA increases the cloud point [64].
this range will not further increase the conversion efficiency to SFAs have full hydrogen atom that the carbon atoms can hold,
provide higher yield, because excess catalyst results in soap forma- and hence they do not have any double bonds between the carbon
tion [37,49,51]. atoms, whereas MUFAs have one double bond [65,66]. PUFAs have
The photograph shows the separated layer of biodiesel, glycer- more than one double bond. Saturated, long straight chain of ester
ine and the catalyst (Fig. 11). The CaO settles at the bottom of the provides a high cetane number regardless of branching [67]. The
separating funnel after the process, which can be recovered and high cetane number of microalgae based biodiesel is due to the
reused [52]. They can also be used along with the esterified acid presence of high amount of saturated and MUFAs, which reduces
catalyst to form gypsum, which is used as a fertilizer. The glycerine the ignition delay period thereby enhancing the combustion qual-
separated in the middle layer is recovered and used in industries ity [68,69].
Please cite this article in press as: Kings AJ et al. Cultivation, extraction and optimization of biodiesel production from potential microalgae Euglena san-
guinea using eco-friendly natural catalyst. Energy Convers Manage (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.018
A.J. Kings et al. / Energy Conversion and Management xxx (2016) xxxxxx 9
Fig. 9. The perturbation plot of the transesterification process showing the influence of process parameters on biodiesel yield.
Fig. 10. The influence of the transesterification process parameters on biodiesel yield (a) the methanol/oil ratio and catalyst concentration (b) the processing time and
reaction temperature.
Please cite this article in press as: Kings AJ et al. Cultivation, extraction and optimization of biodiesel production from potential microalgae Euglena san-
guinea using eco-friendly natural catalyst. Energy Convers Manage (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.018
10 A.J. Kings et al. / Energy Conversion and Management xxx (2016) xxxxxx
4.7. Conclusion
Table 6
The physio-chemical properties of Euglena biodiesel in comparison with other algae based biodiesel and standards.
Biodiesel properties Protocol Euglena Auxenochorella protothecoides Chlorella protothecoides Spirulina platensis
biodiesel [70] [71] [72]
EN ASTM
14214 D6751
Density at 15 C (kg m3) 860900 875900 868 876.9 882 863.7
Viscosity at 40 C (mm2 s1) 3.55.0 1.96 4.545 4.354 4.43 12.4
Flash point (C) Min. 120 Min. 93 172 160 189
Total sulphur (mg kg1) Max. 10 Max. 15 <0.015 8.3 106 Nil
Cetane number Min. 51 Min. 47 65 52.6 70
Pour point (C) 15 to 10 13 9
Oxidation stability, 110 C (h) Min. 6 Min. 3 6.20 1.2 4.52
Acid value (mg KOH g1) Max. 0.5 Max. 0.80 0.29 0.2 0.29 0.75
Iodine value Max. 120 118 112.2 102
Phosphorus content Max. 4 Max. 10 Nil
(mg kg1)
Ash content (% mass) Max. Max 0.02 0.004 0.005 Nil
0.02
Cloud point (C) 3 to 12 15
Carbon residue (% mass) Max. 0.3 Max. 0.05 0.05 0.09 Nil
Please cite this article in press as: Kings AJ et al. Cultivation, extraction and optimization of biodiesel production from potential microalgae Euglena san-
guinea using eco-friendly natural catalyst. Energy Convers Manage (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.018
A.J. Kings et al. / Energy Conversion and Management xxx (2016) xxxxxx 11
600 rpm for first and second stage respectively. The natural CaO [28] Mandotra SK, Kumar P, Suseela MR, Ramteke PW. Fresh water green microalga
Scenedesmus abundans: a potential feedstock for high quality biodiesel
catalyst was recovered and reused for the subsequent processes.
production. Bioresour Technol 2014;156:427.
The physio-chemical properties of algal oil based biodiesel were [29] Karpagam R, Preeti R, Raj KJ, Saranya S, Ashokkumar B, Varalakshmi P. Fatty
within the biodiesel standards specified by EN and ASTM and com- acid biosynthesis from a new isolate Meyerella sp. N4: molecular
pared with other published results. The GC-MS result confirms the characterization, nutrient starvation, and fatty acid profiling for lipid
enhancement. Energy Fuels 2015;29(1):1439.
oxidation stability and better combustion characteristics. [30] Bas D, Boyacl IH. Modelling and optimization I: usability of response surface
methodology. J Food Eng 2007;78:83645.
[31] Durga MM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV. Euglena sp. as a suitable source of
lipids for potential use as biofuel and sustainable wastewater treatment. J Appl
References Phycol 2013;25:85565.
[32] Rosenberg A. A comparison of lipid patterns in photo synthesizing and
[1] Khan SA, Rashm R, Hussain Z, Prasad S, Banerjee UC. Prospects of biodiesel nonphoto synthesizing cells of Euglena gracilis. Biochemistry
production from microalgae in India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 1963;2:114854.
2009;13:236172. [33] Coleman LW, Rosen BH, Schwartzbach SD. Environment control of
[2] Amin S. Review on biofuel oil and gas production processes from microalgae. carbohydrate and lipid synthesis in Euglena. Plant Cell Physiol
Energy Convers Manage 2009;50:183440. 1988;29:42332.
[3] Daroch M, Geng S, Wang G. Recent advances in liquid biofuel production from [34] Terry KL, Raymond LP. System design for the autotrophic production of
algal feedstocks. Appl Energy 2013;102:137181. microalgae. Enzyme Microb Technol 1985;7:47487.
[4] Gouveia L, Oliveira AC. Microalgae as a raw material for biofuels production. J [35] Rittman BE. Opportunities for renewable bioenergy using microorganisms. J
Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2009;36:26974. Biotechnol Bioenergy 2008;100:20312.
[5] Brennan L, Owende P. Biofuels from microalgae a review of technologies for [36] Girish N, Niju SP, Begum KM, Anantharaman N. Utilization of a cost effective
production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renew solid catalyst derived from natural white bivalve clam shell for
Sustain Energy Rev 2010;14:55777. transesterification of waste frying oil. Fuel 2013;111:6538.
[6] Leung DYC, Wu X, Leung MKH. A review on biodiesel production using [37] Obadiah A, Swaroopa GA, Kumar SV, Jeganathan KR, Ramasubbu A. Biodiesel
catalyzed transesterification. Appl Energy 2010;87:108395. production from Palm oil using calcined waste animal bone as catalyst.
[7] Singh SP, Singh D. Biodiesel production through the use of different sources Bioresour Technol 2012;116:5126.
and characterization of oils and their esters as the substitute of diesel: a [38] Smith SM, Oopathum C, Weeramongkhonlert V, Smith CB, Chaveanghong S,
review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010;14:20016. Ketwong P. Transesterification of soybean oil using bovine bone waste as new
[8] Minowa T, Yokoyama A-Y, Kishimoto M, Okakurat T. Oil production from algal catalyst. Bioresour Technol 2013;143:68690.
cells of Dunaliella tertiolecta by direct thermochemical liquefaction. Fuel [39] Lavalley JC. Infrared spectrometric studies of the surface basicity of metal
1995;74(12):17358. oxides and zeolites using adsorbed probe molecules. Catal Today
[9] Mata TM, Martins AA, Caetano NS. Microalgae for biodiesel production and 1996;27:377401.
other applications: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010;14:21732. [40] Canakci M. The potential of restaurant waste lipids as biodiesel feedstocks.
[10] Helwani Z, Othman M, Aziz N, Kim J. Technologies for production of biodiesel Bioresour Technol 2007;98:18390.
focusing on green catalytic techniques: a review. Fuel Process Technol [41] Srivastava PK, Verma M. Methyl ester of Karanja oil as an alternative
2009;90:150214. renewable source energy. Fuel 2008;87:16737.
[11] Sharma Y, Singh B, Upadhyay S. Advancements in development and [42] Ma F, Hanna MA. Biodiesel production: a review. Bioresour Technol
characterization of biodiesel: a review. Fuel 2008;87:235573. 1999;70:115.
[12] Kawashima A, Matsubara K, Honda K. Acceleration of catalytic activity of [43] Meher L, Sagar DV, Naik S. Technical aspects of biodiesel production by
calcium oxide for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol 2009;100:696700. transesterifications a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2006;10:24868.
[13] Liu X, He H, Wang Y, Zhu S, Piao X. Transesterification of soybean oil to [44] Nakpong P, Wootthikanokkan S. High free fatty acid coconut oil as a potential
biodiesel using CaO as a solid base catalyst. Fuel 2008;87:21621. feed stock for biodiesel production in Thailand. Renewable Energy
[14] Refaat AA. Biodiesel production using solid metal oxide catalysts. Int J Environ 2010;35:16827.
Sci Technol 2010;8(1):20321. [45] Zhang Y, Dube MA, McLean DD, Kates M. Biodiesel production from waste
[15] Nurfitri I, Maniam GP, Hindryawati N, Yusoff MM, Ganesan S. Potential of cooking oil: 1. Process design and technological assessment. Bioresour Technol
feedstock and catalysts from waste in biodiesel preparation: a review. Energy 2003;89:116.
Convers Manage 2013;74:395402. [46] Tiwari AK, Kumar A, Raheman H. Biodiesel production from jatropha oil
[16] Lee DW, Park YM, Lee KY. Heterogeneous base catalysts for transesterification (Jatropha curcas) with high free fatty acids: an optimized process. Biomass
in biodiesel synthesis. Catal Surv Asia 2009;13:6377. Bioenergy 2007;31:56975.
[17] Joshi G, Rawat DS, Lamba BY, Bisht KK, Kumar P, Kumar N. Transesterification [47] Demirbas A. Recent developments in biodiesel fuels. Int J Green Energy
of Jatropha and Karanja oils by using waste egg shell derived calcium based 2007;4:1526.
mixed metal oxides. Energy Convers Manage 2015;96:25867. [48] Madras G, Kolluru C, Kumar R. Synthesis of biodiesel in supercritical fluids.
[18] Wei Z, Xu C, Li B. Application of waste eggshell as low-cost solid catalyst for Fuel 2004;83:202933.
biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol 2009;100(11):28835. [49] Yan S, Lu H, Liang B. Supported CaO catalysts used in the transesterification of
[19] Boro J, Deka D, Thakur AJ. A review on solid oxide derived from waste shells as rapeseed oil for the purpose of biodiesel production. Energy Fuels
catalyst for biodiesel production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012;16 2008;22:64651.
(1):90410. [50] Tapanes NCO, Aranda DAG, Carneiro JWM, Antunes OAC. Transesterification of
[20] Farooq M, Ramli A, Naeem A. Biodiesel production from low FFA waste cooking jatropha curcas oil glycerides: theoretical and experimental studies of
oil using heterogeneous catalyst derived from chicken bones. Renewable biodiesel reaction. Fuel 2008;87:228695.
Energy 2015;76:3628. [51] Leung DYC, Guo Y. Transesterification of neat and used frying oil: optimization
[21] Nakatani N, Takamori H, Takeda K, Sakugawa H. Transesterification of soybean for biodiesel production. Fuel Process Technol 2006;87:88390.
oil using combusted oyster shell waste as a catalyst. Bioresour Technol [52] Niju S, Meena KM, Begum S, Anantharaman N. Modification of egg shell and its
2009;100(3):15103. application in biodiesel production. J Saudi Chem Soc 2014;18(5):7026.
[22] Boey PL, Maniam GP, Hamid SA. Biodiesel production via transesterification of [53] Katryniok B, Paul S, Belliere-Beca V, Rey P, Dumeigni F. Glycerol dehydration to
palm olein using waste mud crab (Scylla serrata) shell as a heterogeneous acrolein in the context of new uses of glycerol. Green Chem
catalyst. Bioresour Technol 2009;100(24):63628. 2010;35:2493504.
[23] Borgwardt RH. Calcium oxide sintering in atmosphere containing water and [54] Fung Y, Yang Q, Wang X, Liu Y, Lee H, Ren N. Treatment of biodiesel production
carbon dioxide. Ind Eng Chem Res 1989;28(4):493500. wastes with simultaneous electricity generation using a single-chamber
[24] Miriam LRM, Raj RE, Kings AJ, Visvanathan MA. Identification and microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 2011;102:4115.
characterization of a novel biodiesel producing halophilic Aphanothece [55] Muniyappa PR, Brammer SC, Noureddini H. Improved conversion of plant oils
halophytica and its growth and lipid optimization in various media. Energy and animal fats into biodiesel and co-product. Bioresour Technol
Convers Manage 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.05.041. 1996;56:1924.
[25] Chojnacka K, Marquez-Rocha FJ. Kinetic and stoichiometric relationships of the [56] Sinha SA, Agarwal K, Garg S. Biodiesel development from rice bran oil:
energy and carbon metabolism in the culture of microalgae. Biotechnology transesterification process optimization and fuel characterization. Energy
2004;3(1):2134. Convers Manage 2008;49(5):124857.
[26] Ashokkumar V, Agila E, Sivakumar P, Salam Z, Rengasmy R, Ani FN. [57] Meher LC, Dharmagadda VSS, Naik SN. Optimization of alkali-catalyzed
Optimization and characterization of biodiesel production from microalgae transesterification of Pongamia pinnata oil for production of biodiesel.
Botryococcus grown at semicontinuous system. Energy Convers Manage Bioresour Technol 2006;97:13927.
2014;88:93646. [58] Veljkovic VB, Lakicevic SH, Stamenkovic OS, Todorovic ZB, Lazic ML. Biodiesel
[27] Nascimento IA, Marques SSI, Cabanelas ITD, Pereira SA, Druzian JI, De souza production from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) seed oil with a high content of
CO, et al. Screening microalgae strains for biodiesel production: lipid free fatty acids. Fuel 2006;85:26715.
productivity and estimation of fuel quality based on fatty acid profiles as [59] Mittelbach M, Remschmidt C. Biodiesel the comprehensive
selective criteria. Bioenergy Res 2013;6:113. handbook. Vienna: Boersedruck Ges, MBH; 2004.
Please cite this article in press as: Kings AJ et al. Cultivation, extraction and optimization of biodiesel production from potential microalgae Euglena san-
guinea using eco-friendly natural catalyst. Energy Convers Manage (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.018
12 A.J. Kings et al. / Energy Conversion and Management xxx (2016) xxxxxx
[60] Knothe G. Designer biodiesel: optimizing fatty ester composition to improve [68] Islam MA, Magnusson M, Brown RJ, Ayoko AG, Nabi NM, Heimann K.
fuel properties. Energy Fuels 2008;22(2):135864. Microalgal species selection for biodiesel production based on fuel
[61] Ramos MJ, Carmen MF, Abraham C, Lourdes R, Angel P. Influence of fatty acid properties derived from fatty acid profiles. Energies 2013;6(11):5676702.
composition of raw materials on biodiesel properties. Bioresour Technol [69] Knothe G. Dependence of biodiesel fuel properties on the structure of fatty
2009;100:2618. acid alkyl esters. Fuel Process Technol 2005;86(10):105970.
[62] Singh B, Guldhe A, Rawat I, Bux F. Towards a sustainable approach for [70] Xiao Y, Lu Y, Dai J, Wu Q. Industrial fermentation of Auxenochlorella
development of biodiesel from plant and microalgae. Renew Sustain Energy protothecoides for production of biodiesel and its application in vehicle diesel
Rev 2014;29:21645. engines. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2015;19(3):164. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/
[63] Knothe G. Improving biodiesel fuel properties by modifying fatty ester fbioe.2015. 00164.
composition. Energy Environ Sci 2009;2:75966. [71] Chen YH, Huang BY, Chiang TH, Tang TC. Fuel properties of microalgae
[64] Jeong GT, Park JH, Park SH, Park DH. Estimating and improving cold filter (Chlorella protothecoides) oil biodiesel and its blends with petroleum diesel.
plugging points by blending biodiesels with different fatty acid contents. Fuel 2012;94:2703.
Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 2008;13:50510. [72] Mostafa SSM, El-Gendy NS. Evaluation of fuel properties for microalgae
[65] Usta N. Use of tobacco seed oil methyl ester in a turbocharged IDI diesel Spirulina platensis bio-diesel and its blends with Egyptian petro-diesel Spirulina
engine. J Biomass Energy 2005;28:7786. platensis bio-diesel. Arab J Chem 2013;2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
[66] Nazar J, Ramesh A, Nagalingam B. Performance and emission characteristics of arabjc.. 07. 034.
a diesel engine using preheated karanji oil and its esters. In: ISTE national [73] Carvalho AP, Meireles LA, Malcata FX. Microalgal reactors: a review of enclosed
conference on alternative fuels for automobile IRTT. p. 116. system designs and performances. Biotechnol Prog 2006;22:1490506.
[67] Yoping GW, Yafen L. Trace formation from the tail pipe gas of a diesel engine
using biodiesel fuel. In: Proceedings of 7th APISCEU held at Hongkong SAR.
Please cite this article in press as: Kings AJ et al. Cultivation, extraction and optimization of biodiesel production from potential microalgae Euglena san-
guinea using eco-friendly natural catalyst. Energy Convers Manage (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.018